Comparisons of diabetic retinopathy events associated with glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis

An update on ocular effects of antidiabetic medications

The global increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes has led to the development and implementation of new classes of antidiabetic medications, introducing advanced therapeutic options for the management of the disease. These new medications, though primarily designed to regulate blood glucose levels, also have applications in weight management, potentially transforming the current approaches to diabetes treatment. Newer medications, however, have ophthalmic side effects with controversies in trials and real-life data. We comprehensively assessed the ocular benefits and adverse effects of traditional and newer-generation anti-diabetic drugs. Our primary focus is on how these newer medications affect the stage of diabetic retinopathy. Additionally, we explore the associations between these medications and other ocular conditions, including age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, orbital conditions, and diseases impacting the ocular surface. Furthermore, we provide contextual background by discussing the ocular effects of traditional anti-diabetic drugs.

The association between duration of metformin and sulfonylurea treatment and microvascular complications in patients with incident type 2 diabetes: a pooled cohort analysis

Objectives

The effect of the duration of medication with metformin and sulfonylurea (SUs) on microvascular complications based on the duration of type 2 diabetes (DM2) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of medication time with metformin and SUs and microvascular complications in newly diagnosed DM2 patients.

Methods

In this prospective multi-cohort study, data from 3,904 newly diagnosed DM from three cohorts of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 08 years were pooled. Metformin medication time alone, SUs alone, and a combination of both since drug initiation were defined as exposure. The incidence of microvascular complications (diabetic nephropathy or retinopathy) was defined as outcomes. The cumulative exposure to metformin, SUs, aspirin, statin, and anti-hypertensive medication was also determined using the same approach.

Results

Metformin alone, SUs alone, and the combination of both reduced the hazard of microvascular complications by 8%(HRAdj: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.96, P: 0.001), 6%(HRAdj: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.97, P: 0.004), and 9%(HRAdj: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.94, P: 0.001) for each year of use, respectively (p < 0.05). The protective effect of metformin and SUs, individually or in combination, on microvascular complications started approximately five years after the initial treatment and continued until approximately 15 years after the initial treatment and then reached a plato.

Conclusion

long-term use of metformin and SUs individually and in combination was associated with a decrease in the risk of microvascular outcomes in newly diagnosed DM for up to about one decade. These findings highlight the importance of choosing an appropriate treatment regimen for new patients with type 2 diabetes. Appropriate oral therapy can minimize microvascular complications and improve overall well-being.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-025-01577-w.

Semaglutide, central retinal thickness and continuous glucose monitoring in persons with type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis from a randomised trial

AIMS

Glycemic control is important for preventing diabetic retinopathy (DR), but rapid improvements could deteriorate the disease. In some, but not all studies, semaglutide is speculated to worsen DR, but the mechanism is unknown. Central retinal thickness (CRT) is an early marker of DR. Therefore, the objective was to investigate whether increased Time in Range (TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L)), was associated with reduced CRT in persons treated with semaglutide.

METHODS

Forty participants with type 2 diabetes were included in this post-hoc analysis of a 32-week randomised, placebo-controlled, partly open-label trial investigating the separate and combined effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin on target organ damage in 120 participants with type 2 diabetes. Individuals were randomised into four groups: i) semaglutide, ii) empagliflozin, iii) the combination or iv) placebo, n = 30 for each group). In the present study, 10 participants from each of the 4 arms participated. TIR was assessed using Continuous Glucose Measurement for 7-8 days and CRT was assessed using ocular coherence tomography.

RESULTS

In the 10 individuals treated with semaglutide, CRT increased ~1 % (3.76 μm, 95%CI [-0.32; 7.85], p = 0.065) compared to placebo. This was attenuated with adjustment for TIR (p = 0.21). Independently of the four interventions, increased TIR remained associated with increased CRT (0.07 μm, 95%CI[0.03; 0.12]μm, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide treatment did not impact CRT beyond what could be explained by changes in glycaemia. Across all interventions, increased TIR was associated with increases in CRT, thus supporting the link between rapid improved glycemia and DR.

Association of long-term use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with the risk of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a real-world evidence study

Background

In this study, we investigated the association of long-term use of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) with the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis based on the nationwide database from 2008 to 2022 in Taiwan. Patients with new-onset DM who were treated with either a DPP-4i or sulfonylurea from 2009 to 2017 were included in this study. Patients who received a DPP-4i were included in the case group and further divided on the basis of the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) as follows: ≤90, 91-180, 181-300, and >300 cDDD. Propensity score matching was performed to select patients who used a sulfonylurea, and these patients were assigned to the control group. With adjustment for sex, age, income, urbanization level, comorbidities, and other anti-diabetic agents, the Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the risk of DR associated with DPP-4i use over the 5-year follow-up.

Results

There were 83,503 patients with DPP-4i use and 167,006 patients with sulfonylurea use after matching. Compared with patients with sulfonylurea use, patients with DPP-4i use at ≤90 cDDD had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-1.49) for DR development, whereas those with DPP-4i use at 91-180, 181-300 or >300 cDDD had HRs of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.59-1.74), 1.82 (95% CI: 1.74-1.90), and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.91-2.82) for DR development, respectively. Of the different DPP-4is, linagliptin at ≤90 or 181-300 was associated with the highest risk of DR. Significant differences were discovered at ≤90, 91-181, and 181-300 cDDD in the risk of DR between patients using Saxagliptin versus sitagliptin. Vildagliptin at ≤90 or 91-180 cDDD was associated with an increased risk of DR, but not at 181-300 cDDD.

Conclusion

In patients with DM, DPP-4i at ≤90, 91-180, 181-300 and >300 cDDD was linked to an increased risk of DR over the 5-year follow-up. Sitagliptin at cDDD 181-300 was associated with the greatest DR risk. The potential for DPP-4i to accelerate DR progression should be considered.

Dose-Dependent Relationship Between Long-Term Metformin Use and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recent research has raised concerns about the association between metformin treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy. We sought to investigate this relationship, specifically examining if metformin use affects diabetic retinopathy risk in a dose-dependent manner.

METHODS

This study was a secondary data analysis based on a nationwide population database in Taiwan. Patients with new-onset DM, an age of 20 years or older, and a diagnosis of type 2 DM received at any time during 2002-2013 were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with new-onset type 2 DM between 2002 and 2013 were enrolled as the study population. We divided them into two groups: those treated with metformin and those treated with sulfonylureas. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to estimate the risk of diabetic retinopathy after 5 years of follow-up, including cumulative defined daily dose and intensity of metformin treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 241,231 patients received treatment with metformin, while 152,617 patients were treated with sulfonylureas. Compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas, patients who received metformin treatment, at a cumulative defined daily dose < 30, had a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.98). However, those with varying defined daily doses, especially at a higher metformin treatment level (> 25 defined daily dose), had a 2.43 times higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (95% confidence interval 1.37-4.30) compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DM treated with a lower cumulative dosage of metformin showed beneficial effects that were associated with a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy. In contrast, a higher intensity of metformin use had a greater risk of diabetic retinopathy.

Impact of duration of treatments with metformin and sulfonylureas, individually or in combination, on diabetic retinopathy among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: a pooled cohort's analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin and sulfonylurea (SUs) medication time on Diabetic retinopathy (DR) among newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) using a pooled analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of metformin and SUs' medication time on DR among newly diagnosed T2DM using a pooled analysis.

METHODS

The data of 4,068 newly diagnosed DM individuals(mean age, 60.2 ± 0.85 years) from three prospective cohorts of Tehran Sugar and Lipid Study (TLGS), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 08 years were pooled. The cumulative exposure to metformin, SUs, aspirin, statin, and anti-hypertensive medication was also determined using the same approach. The Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for the outcomes while adjusting for confounding factors such as fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), age, statin, aspirin, and anti-hypertensive medications.

RESULTS

During follow-up, DR occurred in 519 DM. Metformin alone, SUs alone, and the combination of both reduced the hazard of DR by 10%, 7%, and 11% for each year of use, respectively (p < 0.05). The protective effect of metformin and SUs, individually or in combination, on DR started approximately five years after the initial treatment and continued until approximately 15 years after the initial treatment and then reached a plato.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with metformin and SUs, individually and in combination, was associated with a reduced risk of DR in people with newly diagnosed diabetes for up to a decade compared with no treatment. These findings highlight the protective role of metformin and sulfonylureas as inexpensive and readily available drugs to prevent DR in people with newly diagnosed diabetes.

Incretin-based therapy: a new horizon in diabetes management

Diabetes mellitus, a metabolic syndrome characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin dysfunction, often leads to serious complications such as neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease. Incretins, gut peptide hormones released post-nutrient intake, have shown promising therapeutic effects on these complications due to their wide-ranging biological impacts on various body systems. This review focuses on the role of incretin-based therapies, particularly Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, in managing diabetes and its complications. We also discuss the potential of novel agents like semaglutide, a recently approved oral compound, and dual/triple agonists targeting GLP-1/GIP, GLP-1/glucagon, and GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptors, which are currently under investigation. The review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the beneficial impacts of natural incretins and the therapeutic potential of incretin-based therapies in diabetes management.

Drug Exposure As a Predictor in Diabetic Retinopathy Risk Prediction Models-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to assess drug exposure handling in diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk prediction models, a network-meta-analysis to identify drugs associated with DR and a meta-analysis to determine which drugs contributed to enhanced model performance.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We included studies presenting DR models incorporating drug exposure as a predictor. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023. We evaluated the quality of studies using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and certainty using GRADE. We conducted network meta-analysis and meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and pooled C-statistic, respectively, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) (PROSPERO: CRD42022349764).

RESULTS

Of 5,653 records identified, we included 28 studies of 678,837 type 1 or 2 diabetes participants, of which 38,579 (5.7%) had DR. A total of 19, 3, and 7 studies were at high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. Drugs included in models as predictors were: insulin (n = 24), antihypertensives (n = 5), oral antidiabetics (n = 12), lipid-lowering drugs (n = 7), antiplatelets (n = 2). Drug exposure was modelled primarily as a categorical variable (n = 23 studies). Two studies handled drug exposure as time-varying covariates, and one as a time-dependent covariate. Insulin was associated with an increased risk of DR (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.61-3.86). Models that included insulin (n = 9) had a higher pooled C-statistic (C-statistic = 0.84, CI: 0.80-0.88), compared to models (n = 9) that incorporated a combination of drugs alongside insulin (C-statistic = 0.79, CI: 0.74-0.84), as well as models (n = 3) not including insulin (C-statistic = 0.70, CI: 0.64-0.75). Limitations include the high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity in reviewed studies.

CONCLUSION

This is the first review assessing drug exposure handling in DR prediction models. Drug exposure was primarily modelled as a categorical variable, with insulin associated with improved model performance. However, due to suboptimal drug handling, associations between other drugs and model performance may have been overlooked. This review proposes the following for future DR prediction models: (1) evaluation of drug exposure as a variable, (2) use of time-varying methodologies, and (3) consideration of drug regimen details. Improving drug exposure handling could potentially unveil novel variables capable of significantly enhancing the predictive capability of prediction models.

Ocular and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Sitagliptin Eye Drops: Preclinical Data

Background/Objectives: Early stages of diabetic retinopathy are currently considered an unmet medical need due to the lack of effective treatments beyond proper monitoring and control of glycemia and blood pressure. Sitagliptin eye drops have emerged as a new therapeutic approach against early stages of the disease, as they can prevent its main hallmarks, including both neurodegeneration and microvascular impairment. Interestingly, all of these effects occur without any glycemic systemic improvement. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and distribution of the drug within the eye and plasma. Methods: A total of 48 male New Zealand rabbits were treated with topical administration (eye drops) of sitagliptin at two concentrations: 5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL. Blood, iris/ciliary body, retina/choroid, aqueous humor, and vitreous humor samples were collected at specific intervals post-administration (10 and 30 min and 1, 3, 6, 15, and 24 h), processed, and analyzed using an LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin were then calculated, and statistical comparisons were performed. Results: Our findings indicate that sitagliptin reaches the retina prior to the aqueous and vitreous humors, suggesting that its absorption follows the transscleral route. Additionally, systemic absorption was minimal and below pharmacologically active concentrations. Conclusions: These results support the use of an eye drop formulation for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and other retinal diseases.

Evaluation of systemic medications associated with diabetic retinopathy: a nested case-control study from the UK Biobank

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the associations between commonly used systemic medications and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

Individuals with linked primary care prescription data from the UK Biobank were included. Cases were defined as individuals with a Hospital Episode Statistics-coded or primary care recorded diagnosis of DR or self-reported DR. Controls were matched for age, sex, glycosylated haemoglobin, duration of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension status and cardiovascular disease status. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using conditional univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 3377 case subjects with DR were included in the study and matched with 3377 control subjects. In multivariable logistic regression, increased odds of incident DR were observed for exposure to short-acting insulins (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.18), medium-acting insulins (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.60 to 2.75), sulfonylureas (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.46). Instead, the use of fibrates (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94) and Cox-2 inhibitors (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79) was associated with decreased odds of incident DR. Dose-response relationships were observed for all five drug categories (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study comprehensively investigated the associations between systemic medication use and DR and found significant associations between the use of short-acting insulins, medium-acting insulins and sulfonylureas with increased odds of incident DR. In contrast, fibrates and Cox-2 inhibitors were associated with decreased odds of incident DR. These findings may provide valuable insights into DM medication management and serve as a reference for the prevention of DR in patients with DM.

Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the choice of glucose-lowering agent for type 2 diabetes (T2D) impacts a patient's risk of developing sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational database study emulating an idealized target trial.

SUBJECTS

Adult (≥21 years) enrollees in United States commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, with T2D and moderate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk who had no baseline history of advanced diabetic retinal complications, initiating treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and sulfonylureas.

METHODS

We used inverse propensity scoring weights in time-to-event Cox proportional hazards models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment for either diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

RESULTS

The final study population included 371 698 patients, of whom 42 265 initiated GLP-1 RA, 53 476 initiated SGLT2i, 78 444 initiated DPP-4i, and 197 513 initiated sulfonylurea agents. The probability of treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy within 2 and 5 years was 0.3% and 0.7% for patients initiating SGLT2i (median follow-up 830 [interquartile range (IQR), 343-1401] days), 0.4% and 1.0% for GLP-1 RA (669 [IQR, 256-1167] days), 0.4% and 0.9% for DPP-4i (1263 [IQR, 688-1938] days), and 0.5% and 1.2% for sulfonylurea (1223 [IQR, 662-1879] days). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors use was associated with a lower risk of treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy compared with all other medication classes, including GLP-1 RA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.97), DPP-4i (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97), and sulfonylurea (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use was associated with a similar risk of sight-threatening retinopathy as DPP-4i (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85-1.35) and sulfonylurea (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors use was associated with a lower risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy among adults with T2D and moderate CVD risk compared with other glucose-lowering therapies. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists do not confer increased retinal risk, relative to DPP-4i and sulfonylurea medications.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist use and the effect on diabetic retinopathy: An uncertain relationship

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a group of relatively novel medications for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. These medications can mimic the naturally occurring incretins of the body, which promote the release of insulin in response to hyperglycaemia. The anti-glycaemic effects of these medications can be profound and carry other metabolic benefits such as promoting weight loss. Clinical trials have shown GLP-1 RAs are safe to use from a cardiovascular perspective. However, some trials have suggested a link between GLP-1 RA use and worsening diabetic retinopathy. The conclusions surrounding this link are poorly established as data is drawn primarily from cardiovascular outcome trials. If an association does exist, a possible explanation might be the observed phenomenon of early worsening diabetic retinopathy with rapid correction of hyperglycaemic states. Trials which look at diabetic retinopathy as a primary outcome in relation to use of GLP-1 RAs are sparse and warrant investigation given the growing use of this group of medications. Therefore currently, it is uncertain what effect, beneficial or adverse, GLP-1 RA use has on diabetic retinopathy. This article provides an overview of GLP-1 RA use as a treatment for diabetes mellitus and the current understanding of their relationship with diabetic retinopathy.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of sight-threatening retinopathy in Taiwanese population: A propensity based cohort study

AIMS

To compare the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) use and no use in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using propensity score matching, we identified 27,506 pairs of GLP-1 RA users and non-users, 3904 pairs of GLP-1 RA and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) users, 10,985 pairs of GLP-1 RA and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) users, 2542 pairs of GLP-1 RA and sulfonylurea, respectively, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy between GLP-1 RA use and other matched groups.

RESULTS

In the matched cohorts, the time-varying exposure analysis showed that GLP-1 RA use was not associated with an increased risk of vision-threatening retinopathy compared to GLP-1 RA non-use (aHR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.89-1.03). New-user and active-comparator analyses showed that GLP-1 RA was associated with a significantly lower risk of vision-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i (aHR 0.8, 95 % CI 0.66-0.97) but had no significant association with this risk compared to SGLT2i (aHR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.96-1.24) or sulfonylureas (aHR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.49-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide cohort study showed that GLP-1 RA use was not associated with an increased risk of vision-threatening retinopathy compared to non- GLP-1 RA use, and GLP-1 RA could significantly lower the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i.

Risk of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: a real-world data study from a global federated database

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

A protective role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-ra) in the development of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema has been described in some recent studies, which may extend beyond glycaemic control. We aimed to review the clinical impact of SGLT2i and GLP1-ra therapy on the risk of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in individuals with type 2 diabetes taking insulin.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of approximately two million people with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin across 97 healthcare organisations using a global federated health research network (TriNetX, Cambridge, USA). Two intervention cohorts (SGLT2i + insulin, n=176,409; GLP1-ra + insulin, n=207,034) were compared against a control cohort (insulin with no SGLT2i/GLP1-ra, n=1,922,312). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and estimated HRs were reported for each outcome. Propensity score was used to 1:1 match for age, sex, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, microvascular complications, chronic kidney disease, HbA1c, BMI and use of pioglitazone, lipid modifying agents, antilipemic agents, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II inhibitors and metformin. A sub-analysis comparing the two intervention cohorts was also performed.

RESULTS

SGLT2i with insulin was associated with a reduced HR (95% CI) for diabetic macular oedema compared with the control cohort (0.835; 0.780, 0.893), while GLP1-ra with insulin demonstrated a lack of signal with no statistical significance to the HR (1.013; 0.960, 1.069). SGLT2i with insulin was not associated with a clinically significant increase in the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (1.076; 1.027, 1.127), while GLP1-ra with insulin increased diabetic retinopathy risk (1.308; 1.261, 1.357). Compared with SGLT2i with insulin, GLP1-ra with insulin was associated with higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (1.205; 1.153, 1.259) and diabetic macular oedema (1.130; 1.056, 1.208).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our study suggests that the combination of SGLT2i and insulin is associated with lower risk of developing diabetic macular oedema. However, the use of GLP1-ra was associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes also taking insulin. A comparative analysis showed favourable outcomes with SGLT2i and insulin in the development of diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy. RCTs using dedicated  retinal imaging are required to determine the causal relationship with these therapies.

Role of Systemic Factors in Improving the Prognosis of Diabetic Retinal Disease and Predicting Response to Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment

Topic

To review clinical evidence on systemic factors that might be relevant to update diabetic retinal disease (DRD) staging systems, including prediction of DRD onset, progression, and response to treatment.

Clinical relevance

Systemic factors may improve new staging systems for DRD to better assess risk of disease worsening and predict response to therapy.

Methods

The Systemic Health Working Group of the Mary Tyler Moore Vision Initiative reviewed systemic factors individually and in multivariate models for prediction of DRD onset or progression (i.e., prognosis) or response to treatments (prediction).

Results

There was consistent evidence for associations of longer diabetes duration, higher glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and male sex with DRD onset and progression. There is strong trial evidence for the effect of reducing HbA1c and reducing DRD progression. There is strong evidence that higher blood pressure (BP) is a risk factor for DRD incidence and for progression. Pregnancy has been consistently reported to be associated with worsening of DRD but recent studies reflecting modern care standards are lacking. In studies examining multivariate prognostic models of DRD onset, HbA1c and diabetes duration were consistently retained as significant predictors of DRD onset. There was evidence of associations of BP and sex with DRD onset. In multivariate prognostic models examining DRD progression, retinal measures were consistently found to be a significant predictor of DRD with little evidence of any useful marginal increment in prognostic information with the inclusion of systemic risk factor data apart from retinal image data in multivariate models. For predicting the impact of treatment, although there are small studies that quantify prognostic information based on imaging data alone or systemic factors alone, there are currently no large studies that quantify marginal prognostic information within a multivariate model, including both imaging and systemic factors.

Conclusion

With standard imaging techniques and ways of processing images rapidly evolving, an international network of centers is needed to routinely capture systemic health factors simultaneously to retinal images so that gains in prediction increment may be precisely quantified to determine the usefulness of various health factors in the prognosis of DRD and prediction of response to treatment.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review was to examine if dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use affects the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

Cohort studies published up to 20th July 2023 in the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. The adjusted effect size was pooled to calculate the odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the use of DPP4i was not associated with any significant change in the risk of DR (OR: 0.86 95% CI: 0.70, 1.06 I2 = 78%). The pooled analysis also found that DPP4i use was not associated with any significant risk of progression of DR (OR: 0.87 95% CI: 0.47, 1.59 I2 = 86%). The results did not change during sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Present evidence from a limited number of real-world studies shows that DPP4i may not affect the incidence and progression of DR. There is a need for further studies from different countries using accurate definitions of DR and its progression to validate the current results.

Effects of newer-generation anti-diabetics on diabetic retinopathy: a critical review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading etiology of blindness in the working population of the USA. Its long-term management relies on effective glycemic control. Seven anti-diabetic classes have been introduced for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the past two decades, with different glucose-lowering and cardiovascular benefits. Yet, their effects specifically on DR have not been studied in detail. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to investigate this topic, focusing on the available clinical data for T2D. Published studies were evaluated based on their level of statistical evidence, as long as they incorporated at least one endpoint or adverse event pertaining to retinal health. Fifty nine articles met our inclusion criteria and were grouped per anti-diabetic class as follows: alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists (8), amylin analogs (1), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (28), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (9), and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (9), plus one retrospective study and two meta-analyses evaluating more than one of the aforementioned anti-diabetic categories. We also reviewed publicly-announced results of trials for the recently-introduced class of twincretins. The available data indicates that most drugs in the newer anti-diabetic classes are neutral to DR progression; however, there are subclasses differences in specific drugs and T2D populations. In particular, there is evidence suggesting there may be worse diabetic macular edema with PPAR-gamma agonists, potential slight DR worsening with semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist), and potential slight increase in the incidence of retinal vein occlusion in elderly and patients with advanced kidney disease receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors. All these warrant further investigation. Longer follow-up and systematic assessment of at least one DR-related endpoint are highly recommended for all future trials in the T2D field, to ultimately address this topic.

Incretin-based drugs and the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

AIM

The results from the SUSTAIN-6 trial generated some uncertainty regarding the association between incretin-based drugs [dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)] and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Our objective was to synthesize the available evidence from observational studies regarding the use of incretin-based drugs and the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systemically searched Cochrane Library, Embase and Medline to identify observational studies of interest. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Data from included studies were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model with the Hartung-Knapp extension.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies in the systematic review, with 10 examining DPP-4 inhibitors and seven examining GLP-1 RAs. Nine studies investigated incident diabetic retinopathy, six investigated diabetic retinopathy progression and two investigated both outcomes. Seven studies were at moderate risk of bias, four at serious risk of bias and three at critical risk of bias. Data pooled across studies showed no association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors (risk ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 1.17) or GLP-1 RAs (risk ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.56, 1.34) and the risk of diabetic retinopathy.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of incretin-based drugs is not associated with the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution considering the limited quality of some of the available evidence.

Associations of antidiabetic drugs with diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most frequent complication of type 2 diabetes and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness. Current clinical decisions regarding the administration of antidiabetic drugs do not sufficiently incorporate the risk of DR due to the inconclusive evidence from preceding meta-analyses. This umbrella review aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of antidiabetic drugs on DR in people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

A systematic literature search was undertaken in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from inception till 17th May 2022) without language restrictions to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials or longitudinal studies that examined the association between antidiabetic drugs and DR in people with type 2 diabetes. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist, and evidence assessment was performed using the GRADE (Grading of recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Random-effects models were applied to calculate relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022332052).

Results

With trial evidence from 11 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we found that the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) was not statistically associated with the risk of DR, compared to either placebo (RR: GLP-1 RA, 0.98, 0.89-1.08; SGLT-2i, 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.27; DPP-4i, 1.17, 0.99-1.39) or other antidiabetic drugs. Compared to other antidiabetic drugs, meglitinides (0.34, 0.01-8.25), SGLT-2i (0.73, 0.10-5.16), thiazolidinediones (0.92, 0.67-1.26), metformin (1.15, 0.81-1.63), sulphonylureas (1.24, 0.93-1.65), and acarbose (4.21, 0.44-40.43) were not statistically associated with the risk of DR. With evidence from longitudinal studies only, insulin was found to have a higher risk of DR than other antidiabetic drugs (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 2.04-2.99).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that antidiabetic drugs are generally safe to prescribe regarding the risk of DR among people with type 2 diabetes. Further robust and large-scale trials investigating the effects of insulin, meglitinides, and acarbose on DR are warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=332052, identifier CRD42022332052.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) exhibit glucose-lowering, weight-reducing, and blood pressure-lowering effects. Nevertheless, a debate exists concerning the association between GLP-1RA treatment and the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the risk of DR in patients with T2DM undergoing GLP-1RA treatment, we conducted a meta-analysis utilizing data derived from randomized placebo-controlled studies (RCTs).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We focused on RCTs involving the use of GLP-1RAs in patients with T2DM. Utilizing R software, we compared the risk of DR among T2DM patients undergoing GLP-1RA treatment. The Cochrane risk of bias method was employed to assess the research quality.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis incorporated data from 20 RCTs, encompassing a total of 24,832 T2DM patients. Across all included trials, randomization to GLP-1 RA treatment did not demonstrate an increased risk of DR (odds ratio = 1.17; 95% CI 0.98-1.39). Furthermore, no significant heterogeneity or publication bias was detected in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that the administration of GLP-1 RA is not associated with an increased risk of DR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION IDENTIFIER: CRD42023413199.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Risk of Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

IMPORTANCE

Diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy share many similarities in pathophysiological processes. Preclinical studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have a protective role in the risk of diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of sight-threatening retinopathy associated with SGLT2is and other second-line glucose-lowering medications (including pioglitazone, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP-4is]) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study in Taiwan applied a new-user and active-comparator design. Patient demographic and clinical data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients with newly diagnosed T2D from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, were recruited and followed up until December 31, 2020. Propensity score matching was used to identify pairs of patients treated with SGLT2i vs DPP-4i, SGLT2i vs pioglitazone, and SGLT2i vs sulfonylurea from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed between August 18, 2022, and May 5, 2023.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with SGLT2i, DPP-4i, pioglitazone, and sulfonylureas starting on January 1, 2016.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was sight-threatening retinopathy in participants. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess relative hazards of sight-threatening retinopathy between the matched case and control groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3 544 383 patients with newly diagnosed T2D were identified. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 65 930 pairs of patients treated with SGLT2i vs DPP-4i, 93 760 pairs treated with SGLT2i vs pioglitazone, and 42 121 pairs treated with SGLT2i vs sulfonylurea were identified. These matched patients included 236 574 males (58.6%), with a mean (SD) age of 56.9 (11.8) years. In the matched cohorts, SGLT2i had a significantly lower risk of sight-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63), pioglitazone (AHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), and sulfonylureas (AHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.71). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that SGLT2i was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i (3.52 vs 6.13; P < .001), pioglitazone (4.32 vs 5.76; P < .001), and sulfonylureas (2.94 vs 4.67; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of sight-threatening retinopathy compared with DPP-4i, pioglitazone, and sulfonylureas. This finding suggests that SGLT2i may play a role not only in reduced risk of diabetic nephropathy but also in the slow progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with T2D.

Cost-Effectiveness of Glucose-Lowering Therapies as Add-on to Standard Care for People With Type 2 Diabetes in Malaysia

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various glucose-lowering therapies as add-on to standard care for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Malaysia.

METHODS

A state-transition microsimulation model was developed to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of 4 treatments: standard care, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from a healthcare provider's perspective over a lifetime horizon with 3% discount rate in a hypothetical cohort of people with T2D. Data input were informed from literature and local data when available. Outcome measures include costs, quality-adjusted life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and net monetary benefits. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainties.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, the costs to treat a person with T2D ranged from RM 12 494 to RM 41 250, whereas the QALYs gains ranged from 6.155 to 6.731, depending on the treatment. Based upon a willingness-to-pay threshold of RM 29 080 per QALY, we identified SGLT2i as the most cost-effective glucose-lowering treatment, as add-on to standard care over patient's lifetime, with the net monetary benefit of RM 176 173 and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of RM 12 279 per QALY gained. The intervention also added 0.577 QALYs and 0.809 LYs compared with standard care. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that SGLT2i had the highest probability of being cost-effective in Malaysia across varying willingness-to-pay threshold. The results were robust to various sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i was found to be the most cost-effective intervention to mitigate diabetes-related complications.

Incretins and microvascular complications of diabetes: neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy and microangiopathy

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs, incretin mimetics) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is, incretin enhancers) are glucose-lowering therapies with proven cardiovascular safety, but their effect on microvascular disease is not fully understood. Both therapies increase GLP-1 receptor agonism, which is associated with attenuation of numerous pathological processes that may lead to microvascular benefits, including decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, decreased inflammation and improved vascular function. DPP-4is also increase stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), which is associated with neovascularisation and tissue repair. Rodent studies demonstrate several benefits of these agents in the prevention or reversal of nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy, but evidence from human populations is less clear. For nephropathy risk in human clinical trials, meta-analyses demonstrate that GLP-1RAs reduce the risk of a composite renal outcome (doubling of serum creatinine, eGFR reduction of 30%, end-stage renal disease or renal death), whereas the benefits of DPP-4is appear to be limited to reductions in the risk of albuminuria. The relationship between GLP-1RAs and retinopathy is less clear. Many large trials and meta-analyses show no effect, but an observed increase in the risk of retinopathy complications with semaglutide therapy (a GLP-1RA) in the SUSTAIN-6 trial warrants caution, particularly in individuals with baseline retinopathy. Similarly, DPP-4is are associated with increased retinopathy risk in both trials and meta-analysis. The association between GLP-1RAs and peripheral neuropathy is unclear due to little trial evidence. For DPP-4is, one trial and several observational studies show a reduced risk of peripheral neuropathy, with others reporting no effect. Evidence in other less-established microvascular outcomes, such as microvascular angina, cerebral small vessel disease, skeletal muscle microvascular disease and autonomic neuropathies (e.g. cardiac autonomic neuropathy, gastroparesis, erectile dysfunction), is sparse. In conclusion, GLP-1RAs are protective against nephropathy, whereas DPP-4is are protective against albuminuria and potentially peripheral neuropathy. Caution is advised with DPP-4is and semaglutide, particularly for patients with background retinopathy, due to increased risk of retinopathy. Well-designed trials powered for microvascular outcomes are needed to clarify associations of incretin therapies and microvascular diseases.

Rapid Reduction of HbA1c and Early Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Real-world Population-Based Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy (EWDR) due to the rapid decrease of blood glucose levels is a concern in diabetes treatment. The aim of the current study is to evaluate whether this is an important issue in subjects with type 2 diabetes with mild or moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR), who represent the vast majority of subjects with DR attended in primary care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a retrospective nested case-control study of subjects with type 2 diabetes and previous mild or moderate NPDR. Using the SIDIAP ("Sistema d'informació pel Desenvolupament de la Recerca a Atenció Primària") database, we selected 1,150 individuals with EWDR and 1,150 matched control subjects (DR without EWDR). The main variable analyzed was the magnitude of the reduction of HbA1c in the previous 12 months. The reduction of HbA1c was categorized as rapid (>1.5% reduction in <12 months) or very rapid (>2% in <6 months).

RESULTS

We did not find any significant difference in HbA1c reduction between case and control subjects (0.13 ± 1.21 vs. 0.21 ± 1.18; P = 0.12). HbA1c reduction did not show significant association with worsening of DR, neither in the unadjusted analyses nor in adjusted statistical models that included the main confounding variables: duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1c, presence of hypertension, and antidiabetic drugs. In addition, when stratification by baseline HbA1c was performed, we did not find that those patients with higher levels of HbA1c presented a higher risk to EWDR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the rapid reduction of HbA1c is not associated with progression of mild or moderate NPDR.

Cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in older adults: a combined protocol for an individual participant data analysis for risk prediction and a network meta-analysis of novel anti-diabetic drugs

Introduction

Older and multimorbid adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Estimating risk and preventing CVD is a challenge in this population notably because it is underrepresented in clinical trials. Our study aims to (1) assess if T2D and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with the risk of CVD events and mortality in older adults, (2) develop a risk score for CVD events and mortality for older adults with T2D, (3) evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of novel antidiabetics.

Methods and analysis

For Aim 1, we will analyse individual participant data on individuals aged ≥65 years from five cohort studies: the Optimising Therapy to Prevent Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Multimorbid Older People study; the Cohorte Lausannoise study; the Health, Aging and Body Composition study; the Health and Retirement Study; and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. We will fit flexible parametric survival models (FPSM) to assess the association of T2D and HbA1c with CVD events and mortality. For Aim 2, we will use data on individuals aged ≥65 years with T2D from the same cohorts to develop risk prediction models for CVD events and mortality using FPSM. We will assess model performance, perform internal-external cross validation, and derive a point-based risk score. For Aim 3, we will systematically search randomized controlled trials of novel antidiabetics. Network meta-analysis will be used to determine comparative efficacy in terms of CVD, CKD, and retinopathy outcomes, and safety of these drugs. Confidence in results will be judged using the CINeMA tool.

Ethics and dissemination

Aims 1 and 2 were approved by the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern); no approval is required for Aim 3. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented in scientific conferences.

A medication-wide association study to identify medications associated with incident clinically significant diabetic retinopathy

Background

Diabetic retinopathy, a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, is one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. Although some oral drugs have been suggested to affect the risk of diabetic retinopathy, systematic evaluation about the associations between medications and diabetic retinopathy is still absent.

Objective

To comprehensively investigate associations of systemic medications with incident clinically significant diabetic retinopathy (CSDR).

Design

Population-based cohort study.

Methods

From 2006 to 2009, more than 26 000 participants residing in New South Wales were enrolled in the 45 and Up study. Diabetic participants with self-reported physician diagnosis or records of anti-diabetic medication prescriptions were finally included in the current analysis. CSDR was defined as diabetic retinopathy cases requiring retinal photocoagulation recorded in the Medicare Benefits Schedule database from 2006 to 2016. Prescriptions of systemic medication from 5 years to 30 days prior to CSDR were retrieved from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. The study participants were equally split into training and testing datasets. Logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between each of systemic medication and CSDR in the training dataset. After controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), significant associations were further validated in the testing dataset.

Results

The 10-year incidence of CSDR was 3.9% (n = 404). A total of 26 systemic medications were found to be positively associated with CSDR, among which 15 were validated by the testing dataset. Additional adjustments for pertinent comorbidities suggested that isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) (OR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.00-3.48), calcitriol (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.02-8.24), three insulins and analogues (e.g., intermediate-acting human insulin, OR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.69-10.8), five anti-hypertensive medications (e.g., furosemide, OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.77-3.61), fenofibrate (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.36-2.82) and clopidogrel (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.15-2.58) were independently associated with CSDR.

Conclusion

This study investigated the association of a full spectrum of systemic medications with incident CSDR. ISMN, calcitriol, clopidogrel, a few subtypes of insulin, anti-hypertensive and cholesterol-lowering medications were found to be associated with incident CSDR.

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Attenuates Oxidative Stress-Induced Injury in Diabetic Retinopathy Rats

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) on oxidative stress-induced injury of diabetic retinopathy (DR) rats.

METHODS

DR rat model was constructed treated with Ad-CFTR. Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining was applied for testing the thickness of each layer of retinal tissues. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine levels of serum inflammatory cytokines and contents of oxidative stress related genes in rats. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining was used to detect retinal cell apoptosis, and western blotting to measure the expression of MAPK/NF-κB pathway-related proteins in retinal tissues.

RESULTS

Our experiment revealed the remarkable decrease of CFTR protein in retinal tissues of DR rats. DR rats had decreased body weight and increased blood glucose level, with decreased thickness of total retinal thickness (TRT), outer nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer (ONL + OPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL). Besides, DR rats were apparently up-regulated in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, with increased malondial dehyde (MDA), p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 and p-JNK1/2/JNK1/2 expressions, decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in retinal tissues, as well as up-regulated p65 protein in nucleus and down-regulated p65 protein in cytoplasm. DR rats treated with Ad-CFTR were effectively improved regarding the above parameters except body weight and blood glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

CFTR can inhibit MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway to ameliorate inflammatory response and oxidative stress-induced injury of DR rats, thereby reducing retinal cell apoptosis and playing a protective role in retina.

Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals That Retinal Neuromodulation Is a Relevant Mechanism in the Neuroprotective Effect of Sitagliptin in an Experimental Model of Diabetic Retinopathy

Synaptic dysfunction and neuronal damage have been extensively associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Our group evidenced that chronic hyperglycemia reduces the retinal expression of presynaptic proteins, which are crucial for proper synaptic function. The aim of the study was to explore the effect of topically administered sitagliptin, an inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4, on the retinal expression patterns of an experimental model of DR. Transcriptome analysis was performed, comparing the retinas of 10 diabetic (db/db) mice randomly treated with sitagliptin eye drops (10 mg/mL) twice daily and the retinas of 10 additional db/db mice that received vehicle eye drops. Ten non-diabetic mice (db/+) were used as a control group. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Reactome databases were used to perform the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) in order to explore the most enriched biological pathways among the groups. The most differentiated genes of these pathways were validated through quantitative RT-PCR. Transcriptome analysis revealed that sitagliptin eye drops have a significant effect on retinal expression patterns and that neurotransmission is the most enriched biological process. Our study evidenced enriched pathways that contain genes involved in membrane trafficking, transmission across chemical synapses, vesicle-mediated transport, neurotransmitter receptors and postsynaptic signal transmission with negative regulation of signaling as a consequence of neuroprotector treatment with sitagliptin. This improves the modulation of the macromolecule biosynthetic process with positive regulation of cell communication, which provides beneficial effects for the neuronal metabolism. This study suggests that topical administration of sitagliptin ameliorates the abnormalities on presynaptic and postsynaptic signal transmission during experimental DR and that this improvement is one of the main mechanisms behind the previously demonstrated beneficial effects.

Part Six: Antidiabetic Medication Benefits Beyond Glucose Lowering in Older People

Older people with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk for macrovascular (damage to arteries that can lead to myocardial infarction or stroke) and microvascular (damage to small blood vessels including retinopathy and nephropathy) disease. Since 2008, newly approved antidiabetic medications have been required to show cardiovascular safety as part of the US Food and Drug Administration approval process. Since this time, new data have emerged regarding the differences between agents in terms of reducing diabetes-related complications. Older people often are at risk for or currently have one or more diabetes-related complication. When managing antidiabetic medication in older people, it is imperative to consider the risk versus benefit of each medication and to use agents that have proven benefits.

Progression of retinopathy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The effect of Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains controversial. Previous reviews combined data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with or without cardiovascular (CV) benefits and did not address confounders, therefore may have generated misleading results. The study aimed to examine the effect of GLP1RA on DR in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in RCTs with or without CV benefits and distinguish the effect by major confounders.

METHODS

We conducted electronic searches of multiple databases and a manual search using references lists. We included 13 RCTs examining the effect of GLP1 RA on health outcomes/adverse events including DR or DR complications in T2DM. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

GLP1RA was associated with an elevated risk of rapidly worsening DR in four major RCTs with CV benefits in T2DM (OR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.05-1.44). The association between GLP1 RA and DR was significant in subgroups of RCTs with length over 52 weeks (1.2, 1.00-1.43), using placebo as a comparator (1.22, 1.05-1.42). In subgroups with patients who had T2DM ≥10 years (1.19, 0.99-1.42) or with subjects enrolled from multiple countries (1.2, 0.99-1.46), the association appeared to be evident but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP1 RA including liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide are associated with an increased risk of rapidly worsening DR in RCTs with CV benefits. Further data from clinical studies with longer follow-up purposefully designed for DR risk assessment, particularly including patients of established DR are warranted.

The association between the use of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and the risk of diabetic retinopathy and other eye disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and the incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Pubmed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrial.gov were searched from inception to October 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with reports of incidence of DR and other eye disorders between SGLT2i users and non-SGLT2i users with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included.

RESULTS

In general, the incidences of DR were comparable between SGLT2i users and non-SGLT2i users (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.61 to 1.06, P=0.12). However, compared with non-SGLT2i users, the incidence of DR was significantly reduced in SGLT2i users with diabetes duration less than 10 years (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.76, P=0.01). Weight reduction in SGLT2i users was associated with the decreased risk of retinal detachment. Moreover, longer study duration was associated with lower incidence of cataract and retinal vasculopathy in SGLT2i users.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the use of SGLT2i was not associated with the incidence of DR. However, a reduced risk of DR was observed in SGLT2i users with diabetes duration less than 10 years. An early initiation of SGLT2i might be more likely to provide with ocular benefits.

Beyond the Glycaemic Control of Dapagliflozin: Microangiopathy and Non-classical Complications

Dapagliflozin is a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In monotherapy or as an additive therapy, dapagliflozin aids glycaemic control, is associated with reductions in blood pressure and weight, and promotes a favourable lipid profile. In this review, we address the impact of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular risk factors and common microangiopathic complications such as kidney disease and retinopathy in patients with T2DM. Furthermore, we evaluate its potential beneficial effects on other less frequent complications of diabetes, such as macular oedema, cognitive impairment, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and respiratory disorders during sleep. Moreover, the underuse of SGLT2i in clinical practice is discussed. Our goal is to help translate this evidence into clinical practice.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists – Potential Game Changers in the Treatment of Glaucoma?

Glaucoma is a common ocular neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells and their axons. It is the most common cause of irreversible blindness. With an increasing number of glaucoma patients and disease progression despite treatment, it is paramount to develop new and effective therapeutics. Emerging new candidates are the receptor agonists of the incretin hormone glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1), originally used for the treatment of diabetes. GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have shown neuroprotective effects in preclinical and clinical studies on neurodegenerative diseases in both the brain (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, stroke and diabetic neuropathy) and the eye (e.g., diabetic retinopathy and AMD). However, there are currently very few studies investigating the protective effects of GLP-1R agonists in the treatment of specifically glaucoma. Based on a literature search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, this review aims to summarize current clinical literature on GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases to elucidate their potential in future anti-glaucomatous treatment strategies.

Minimum Effective Dose of DPP-4 Inhibitors for Treating Early Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy in an Experimental Model

The neurovascular unit (NVU) plays an essential role in the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR). We previously reported that the topical administration (eye drops) of sitagliptin and saxagliptin, two dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), prevents retinal neurodegeneration and vascular leakage in db/db mice. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the minimum effective dose of the topical administration of these DPP-4i. For this purpose, sitagliptin and saxagliptin were tested at different concentrations (sitagliptin: 1 mg/mL, 5 and 10 mg/mL, twice per day; saxagliptin: 1 and 10 mg/mL, once or twice per day) in db/db mice. As end points of efficacy, the hallmarks of NVU impairment were evaluated: reactive gliosis, neural apoptosis, and vascular leakage. These parameters were assessed by immunohistochemistry, cell counting, and the Evans blue method, respectively. Our results demonstrated that the minimum effective dose is 5 mg/mL twice per day for sitagliptin, and 10 mg/mL twice per day for saxagliptin. In conclusion, this study provides useful results for the design of future preclinical regulatory studies and for planning clinical trials.

Association between Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors and Incident Glaucoma in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study in Taiwan

PURPOSE

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an important risk factor for glaucoma, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to protect the optic nerves. We therefore aimed to evaluate the association between SGLT2 inhibitors and incident glaucoma.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the largest multi-institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan, containing data of over a million individuals. We included T2D patients newly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) from 2016 to 2018. Our primary outcome was incident glaucoma diagnosis between initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs, and 31st March 2021. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to increase homogeneity between the two treatment groups, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of glaucoma, based on Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

We included 9,927 and 1,065 T2D patients who had been newly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs, respectively. Lower risk of incident glaucoma was observed in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (7.9 events per 1,000 person-years), compared to those receiving GLP-1 RAs (10.0 events per 1,000 person-years), with an HR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69-0.95). Multiple sensitivity analyses and a negative control outcome analysis confirmed the robustness of our main findings.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that T2D patients newly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors have a reduced risk of incident glaucoma, compared to those prescribed GLP-1 RAs, in clinical practice. Future prospective studies are suggested to confirm this association.

Liraglutide Treatment Does Not Induce Changes in the Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose: Liraglutide treatment has shown promising anti-inflammatory and nerve regenerative results in preclinical and clinical trials. We sought to assess if liraglutide treatment would induce nerve regeneration through its anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic mechanisms by increasing peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in individuals with long-term type 1 diabetes. Methods: Secondary analyses were performed on a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on adults with type 1 diabetes, distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN), and confirmed diabetic retinopathy, who were randomized 1:1 to either 26 weeks placebo or liraglutide treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in peripapillary RNFL thickness between treatments, assessed by optical coherence tomography. Results: Thirty-seven participants were included in the secondary analysis. No differences in mean peripapillary RNFL thickness (overall ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -1 (±8) μm (-1%) vs. placebo -1 (±5) μm (-1%), P = 0.78, n = 37) or any of the quadrants. Peripapillary RNFL thicknesses were shown between treatments in either nonproliferative (ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -1 (±5) μm (-1%) vs. placebo 0 (±4) μm (0%), P = 0.80, N = 26) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy subgroup (ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -2 (±14) μm (-3%) vs. placebo -1 (±6) μm (-2%), P = 0.88, N = 11). Conclusions: In this study, 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment did not induce measurable changes in the assessed optic nerve thickness. Thus, this methodology does not support the induction of substantial nerve regeneration in this cohort with established retinopathy and DSPN. The trial was approved by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. TODINELI study: EUDRA CT: 2013-004375-12, Ethics Ref: N-20130077 Clinical trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02138045.

Reappraisal of the efficacy of intensive glycaemic control on microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomised control-trials

OBJECTIVE

To re-assess the effect of tight glycaemic control on diabetic microvascular complications.

METHOD

Meta-analysis and trial sequential analyses of randomised trials included in Hemmingsen et al that specifically assessed glycaemic control with a specific HbA_1c level targeted in the intervention group, and compared intensive glycaemic control versus standard glycaemic control.

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials that randomised 28,614 participants with type 2 diabetes (15,269 to intensive control and 13,345 to conventional control), including 3 sub-studies, were included. Strict control of blood glucose levels is associated with a reduction of retinopathy progression (RR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89, I²=33%), incidence or progression of macular oedema (RR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.40-0.99, I²=0%), number of photocoagulations (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, I²=0%), risk of microalbuminuria (RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.9, I²=76%) and risk of "macroalbuminuria or proteinuria" (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.55-0.85, I²=36%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has shown that a tight control of blood glucose levels is associated with a decrease of specific microvascular complication of diabetes: photocoagulation, progression of diabetic retinopathy, incidence or progression of macular oedema, risk of microalbuminuria and risk of macroalbuminuria or proteinuria. Regarding all the other outcomes (vision loss, surgery of cataract, proliferative or non-proliferative retinopathy, death related to kidney disease, development of kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, neuropathy), no significant result was found.

A registry-based randomised trial comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor and metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST): Rationale, design and protocol

AIM

SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular and renal complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients at high cardiovascular risk. Metformin is currently widely used as initial monotherapy in T2D but lacks convincing data to show that it reduces risk of complications. We aim to compare the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin and metformin as first-line T2D medication with regard to development of complications in a registry-based randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

The SGLT2 inhibitor or metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST) trial will enrol 4300 subjects at 30-40 study sites in Sweden who will be randomised 1:1 to either metformin or dapagliflozin. Participants must have T2D duration <4 years, no prior cardiovascular disease, and be either drug-naïve or on monotherapy for T2D.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events and occurrence or progression of microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, diabetic foot lesions). Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary endpoint, start of insulin therapy, risk factor biomarkers, patient-reported outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will primarily be assessed using nationwide healthcare registries.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMARTEST trial will investigate whether dapagliflozin is superior to metformin in preventing complications in early stage T2D. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03982381, EudraCT 2019-001046-17).

Fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem cells in people with diabetic retinopathy: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

In two large RCTs, fenofibrate reduced the progression of diabetic retinopathy. We investigated whether fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), which have vascular properties and have been shown to protect from retinopathy.

METHODS

We conducted a 12 week parallel-group RCT comparing fenofibrate vs placebo. Patients with diabetic retinopathy and without other conditions that would affect HSPCs were enrolled at a tertiary diabetes outpatient clinic and randomised to receive fenofibrate or placebo based on a computer-generated sequence. Patients and study staff assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in the levels of circulating HSPCs, defined by expression of the stem cell markers CD34 and/or CD133. Secondary endpoints were the changes in endothelial progenitor cells, lipids, soluble mediators and gene expression. We used historical data on the association between HSPCs and retinopathy outcomes to estimate the effect of fenofibrate on retinopathy progression.

RESULTS

Forty-two participants with diabetic retinopathy were randomised and 41 completed treatment and were analysed (20 in the placebo group and 21 in the fenofibrate group). Mean age was 57.4 years, diabetes duration was 18.2 years and baseline HbA_1c was 60 mmol/mol (7.6%). When compared with placebo, fenofibrate significantly increased levels of HSPCs expressing CD34 and/or CD133. CD34⁺ HSPCs non-significantly declined in the placebo group (mean ± SD -44.2 ± 31.6 cells/10⁶) and significantly increased in the fenofibrate group (53.8 ± 31.1 cells/10⁶). The placebo-subtracted increase in CD34⁺ HSPCs from baseline was 30% (99.3 ± 43.3 cells/10⁶; p = 0.027) which, projected onto the relationship between HSPC levels and retinopathy outcomes, yielded an OR of retinopathy progression of 0.67 for fenofibrate vs placebo. Endothelial differentiation of CD34⁺ cells, estimated by the %KDR (kinase insert domain receptor) expression, was significantly reduced by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate decreased serum triacylglycerols, but the change in triacylglycerols was unrelated to the change in HSPCs. No effect was observed for endothelial progenitor cells, cytokines/chemokines (stromal-cell derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Fenofibrate increased HSPC levels in participants with diabetic retinopathy and this mechanism may explain why fenofibrate reduced retinopathy progression in previous studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927315.

Risk of diabetic macular oedema with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients: A multi-institutional cohort study in Taiwan

AIMS

To investigate the risk of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) associated with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study by analysing a large multi-institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan. We included adult patients with T2DM without DMO newly receiving either SGLT2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) during the period 2016 to 2018. We used propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting to generate comparable groups. The study outcome was incident DMO, determined by clinical diagnosis during outpatient visits or admissions. We followed patients from the index date to either DMO occurrence, last clinical visit, patient death, or December 31, 2020. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of DMO.

RESULTS

We included 9986 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors (mean [SD] age 59.6 (12.1) years, median [interquartile range {IQR}] glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 70 (61-81)mmol/mol, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 89.1 [71.4-108.7] mL/min/1.73 m² and urine albumin-creatinine ratio [UACR] 26.1 [9.7-117.6] mg/g) and 1067 new users of GLP-1RAs (mean [SD] age 58.4 (41.5) years, median [IQR] HbA1c 73 [64-84] mmol/mol, eGFR 91.6 [68.6-114.0] mL/min/1.73 m² and UACR 37.6 [11.1-153.2] mg/g) with similar baseline characteristics. Lower DMO risks were observed among patients newly receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (7.9/1000 person-years), compared to those receiving GLP-1RAs (10.7/1000 person-years) with an HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower risk of DMO in T2DM patients in clinical practice, compared to use of GLP-1RAs. Future studies are necessary to confirm this observation.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy: insights into preservation of sight and looking beyond

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) were initially developed as therapeutic options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, randomized clinical trials have investigated their effects in cardiorenal protection through major adverse cardiovascular event reduction and reductions in diabetic nephropathy. While multiple mechanisms are proposed for this protection, microvascular protection is the primary component of their efficacy. While not primarily emphasized in clinical trials, evidence in other studies suggests that SGLT2i may confer retinoprotective effects via some of the same mechanisms in the aforementioned cardiorenal trials. Diabetic patients are susceptible to vision loss with chronic hyperglycemia promoting inflammation, edema, and retinal pathological changes. Targeting these pathways via SGLT2i may represent opportunities for providers to decrease retinopathy in high-risk T2DM patients, reduce disease progression, and lower drug burden in diabetic retinopathy patients. Further comprehensive clinical trials investigating these associations are needed to establish the potential retinoprotective effects of SGLT2i.

The Safety of Pharmacological and Surgical Treatment of Diabetes in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy-A Review

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a non-infectious pandemic of the modern world; it is estimated that in 2045 it will affect 10% of the world's population. As the prevalence of diabetes increases, the problem of its complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), grows. DR is a highly specific neurovascular complication of diabetes that occurs in more than one third of DM patients and accounts for 80% of complete vision loss cases in the diabetic population. We are currently witnessing many groundbreaking studies on new pharmacological and surgical methods of treating diabetes.

AIM

The aim of the study is to assess the safety of pharmacological and surgical treatment of DM in patients with DR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An analysis of the data on diabetes treatment methods currently available in the world literature and their impact on the occurrence and progression of DR.

RESULTS

A rapid decrease in glycaemia leads to an increased occurrence and progression of DR. Its greatest risk accompanies insulin therapy and sulfonylurea therapy. The lowest risk of DR occurs with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors; the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues is also safe. Patients undergoing pancreatic islet transplants or bariatric surgeries require intensive monitoring of the state of the eye, both in the perioperative and postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

It is of utmost importance to individualize therapy in diabetic patients, in order to gradually achieve treatment goals with the use of safe methods and minimize the risk of development and progression of DR.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibition and ocular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective for the treatment of macrovascular complications and nephropathy in type 2 diabetes, but effects on microvascular eye outcomes are unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on total ocular events and retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for the period from database inception date to October 11, 2019. Two reviewers working independently extracted relevant data. Random-effects models with inverse variance weighting were selected to estimate summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included nine studies, involving 39 982 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. There were 1414 total ocular events, of which 624 were retinopathy events. SGLT2 inhibition was not associated with a change in the risk of total ocular events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85, 1.11) or retinopathy (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84, 1.16), with consistent effects across studies (P for heterogeneity = 0.35 and 0.45, respectively). The effects of SGLT2 inhibition on eye disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes are probably null, although the available data cannot exclude small to moderate benefits or harms.

Subpopulation Differences in the Cardiovascular Efficacy of Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The cardiovascular efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are well documented; however, the differences in cardiovascular efficacy among subpopulations remain unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the differences in cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs among subpopulations of patients with T2DM and to assess the drug safety.

METHODS

Relevant studies up to March 31, 2020 were searched for in six electronic databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Clinical Trials, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke). Subpopulations were defined using ten selected influential factors, and the differences in cardiovascular efficacy in subpopulations stratified by different influential factors were accessed by synthesizing studies with random-effects models one by one.

RESULTS

A total of six cardiovascular outcome trials of long-acting GLP-1RAs, comprising 49,936 participants, were included. Among stratified subpopulations, no significant differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs were observed across the ten characteristics of subjects (all P for interaction > 0.05). Favorable trends were observed in the subpopulation with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to that without (P = 0.171). With regards to safety, long-acting GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the risk of retinopathy (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92-1.29; P = 0.316), but increase the risk of serious gastrointestinal events (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02-1.83; P = 0.037). Long-acting GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the risk of serious adverse events (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-1.00; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggested no subpopulation differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs among stratified subpopulations, and favorable trends were only observed in the subpopulation with established CVD. These findings may have implications for the management of long-acting GLP-1RAs across subpopulations of patients with T2DM.

Comparative Effectiveness of Glucose-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several pharmacologic options for type 2 diabetes are available.

PURPOSE

To compare benefits and harms of glucose-lowering drugs in adults with type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

Several databases from inception through 18 December 2019 and ClinicalTrials.gov on 10 April 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language randomized trials that had at least 24 weeks of intervention and assessed the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on mortality, glycemic, and vascular outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pairs of reviewers extracted data and appraised risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

453 trials assessing 21 antidiabetic interventions from 9 drug classes were included. Interventions included monotherapies (134 trials), add-on to metformin-based therapies (296 trials), and monotherapies versus add-on to metformin therapies (23 trials). There were no differences between treatments in drug-naive patients at low cardiovascular risk. Insulin regimens and specific glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) added to metformin-based background therapy produced the greatest reductions in hemoglobin A_1c level. In patients at low cardiovascular risk receiving metformin-based background treatment (298 trials), there were no clinically meaningful differences between treatments for mortality and vascular outcomes. In patients at increased cardiovascular risk receiving metformin-based background treatment (21 trials), oral semaglutide, empagliflozin, liraglutide, extended-release exenatide, and dapagliflozin reduced all-cause mortality. Oral semaglutide, empagliflozin, and liraglutide also reduced cardiovascular death. Odds of stroke were lower with subcutaneous semaglutide and dulaglutide. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduced heart failure hospitalization and end-stage renal disease. Subcutaneous semaglutide and canagliflozin increased diabetic retinopathy and amputation, respectively.

LIMITATION

Inconsistent definitions of cardiovascular risk and low-level confidence in some estimates for patients at low cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSION

In diabetic patients at low cardiovascular risk, no treatment differs from placebo for vascular outcomes. In patients at increased cardiovascular risk receiving metformin-based background therapy, specific GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors have a favorable effect on certain cardiovascular outcomes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes, supported by an unrestricted educational grant from AstraZeneca. (PROSPERO: CRD42019122043).

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists, Diabetic Retinopathy and Angiogenesis: The AngioSafe Type 2 Diabetes Study

AIMS

Recent trials provide conflicting results on the association between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). The aim of the AngioSafe type 2 diabetes (T2D) study was to determine the role of GLP-1RA in angiogenesis using clinical and preclinical models.

METHODS

We performed two studies in humans. In study 1, we investigated the effect of GLP-1RA exposure from T2D diagnosis on the severity of DR, as diagnosed with retinal imaging (fundus photography). In study 2, a randomized 4-week trial, we assessed the effect of liraglutide on circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), and angio-miRNAs.We then studied the experimental effect of Exendin-4, on key steps of angiogenesis: in vitro on human endothelial cell proliferation, survival and three-dimensional vascular morphogenesis; and in vivo on ischemia-induced neovascularization of the retina in mice.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 3154 T2D patients, 10% displayed severe DR. In multivariate analysis, sex, disease duration, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), micro- and macroangiopathy, insulin therapy and hypertension remained strongly associated with severe DR, while no association was found with GLP-1RA exposure (o 1.139 [0.800-1.622], P = .47). We further showed no effect of liraglutide on HPCs, and angio-miRNAs. In vitro, we demonstrated that exendin-4 had no effect on proliferation and survival of human endothelial cells, no effect on total length and number of capillaries. Finally, in vivo, we showed that exendin-4 did not exert any negative effect on retinal neovascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

The AngioSafe T2D studies provide experimental and clinical data confirming no effect of GLP-1RA on angiogenesis and no association between GLP-1 exposure and severe DR.

Adjuvant Therapies in Diabetic Retinopathy as an Early Approach to Delay Its Progression: The Importance of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a progressive disease induced by a sustained state of chronic hyperglycemia that can lead to several complications targeting highly metabolic cells. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a multifactorial microvascular complication of DM, with high prevalence, which can ultimately lead to visual impairment. The genesis of DR involves a complex variety of pathways such as oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, neurodegeneration, angiogenesis, lipid peroxidation, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, each possessing potential therapeutic biomarkers. A specific treatment has yet to be developed for early stages of DR since no management is given other than glycemic control until the proliferative stage develops, offering a poor visual prognosis to the patient. In this narrative review article, we evaluate different dietary regimens, such as the Mediterranean diet, Dietary Pattern to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and their functional foods, and low-calorie diets (LCDs). Nutraceuticals have also been assessed in DR on account of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiangiogenic properties, which may have an important impact on the physiopathology of DR. These nutraceuticals have shown to lower reactive oxygen species (ROS), important inflammatory factors, cytokines, and endothelial damage biomarkers either as monotherapies or combined therapies or concomitantly with established diabetes management or nonconventional adjuvant drugs like topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Metformin Treatment Is Associated with a Decreased Risk of Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between metformin use and the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to investigate the effect of metformin dosage on reducing the incidence of DR.

METHODS

The study population included patients with newly diagnosed T2DM, who were aged ≥20 years and prescribed with antidiabetic drug therapy lasting ≥90 days, as identified using the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2000 and 2012. We matched metformin users and nonusers by a propensity score. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to compute and compare the risk of developing nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in metformin users and nonusers.

RESULTS

Overall, 10,044 T2DM patients were enrolled. Metformin treatment was associated with a lower risk of NPDR (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.87) and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR, aHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.45); however, the reduction in risk was borderline significant for STDR progression among NPDR patients (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-1.01). Combination therapy of metformin and DPP-4i exhibited a stronger but inverse relationship with NPDR development (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.41), especially at early (<3 months) stages of metformin prescription. These inverse relationships were also evident at different metformin doses and in adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index scores (aDCSI). Moreover, combination therapy of metformin with sulfonylureas was associated with an increased risk of NPDR.

CONCLUSION

Metformin treatment in patients with T2DM was associated with a reduced risk of NPDR, and a potential trend was found for a reduced STDR risk in patients who had previously been diagnosed with NPDR. Combining metformin with DPP-4i seemingly had a significantly beneficial effect against NPDR risk, particularly when aDCSI scores were low, and when metformin was prescribed early after T2DM diagnosis. These results may recommend metformin for early treatment of T2DM.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy and its progression: A real-world Korean study

The sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications of diabetes, while their effect on diabetic retinopathy has not been clarified. We compared the effects of SGLT2is with those of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) on the risk of diabetic retinopathy and its progression in people with type 2 diabetes. We performed a retrospective cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes who started on a SGLT2i or DPP4i from 2014 to 2016 according to the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Subjects initiated on a SGLT2i or DPP4i were matched on a 1:1 basis according to their propensity scores, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios for the risk of diabetic retinopathy and its progression. After propensity score-matching, 41,430 patients without a history of diabetic retinopathy were identified as new users of a SGLT2i (n = 20,175) or DPP4i (n = 20,175). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for diabetic retinopathy was 0.89 (0.83–0.97) for SGLT2i initiators compared with DPP4i initiators. In patients with a history of diabetic retinopathy (n = 4,663 pairs), there was no significant difference in diabetic retinopathy progression between SGLT2i initiators and DPP4i initiators (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.78–1.13). This real-world cohort study showed that SGLT2is might be associated with lower risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with DPP4is. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the long-term effect of SGLT2is in diabetic retinopathy in people with diabetes.