1
|
Davidson B, Milosevic L, Kondrataviciute L, Kalia LV, Kalia SK. Neuroscience fundamentals relevant to neuromodulation: Neurobiology of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Neurotherapeutics 2024; 21:e00348. [PMID: 38579455 PMCID: PMC11000190 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has become a pivotal therapeutic approach for Parkinson's Disease (PD) and various neuropsychiatric conditions, impacting over 200,000 patients. Despite its widespread application, the intricate mechanisms behind DBS remain a subject of ongoing investigation. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge surrounding the local, circuit, and neurobiochemical effects of DBS, focusing on the subthalamic nucleus (STN) as a key target in PD management. The local effects of DBS, once thought to mimic a reversible lesion, now reveal a more nuanced interplay with myelinated axons, neurotransmitter release, and the surrounding microenvironment. Circuit effects illuminate the modulation of oscillatory activities within the basal ganglia and emphasize communication between the STN and the primary motor cortex. Neurobiochemical effects, encompassing changes in dopamine levels and epigenetic modifications, add further complexity to the DBS landscape. Finally, within the context of understanding the mechanisms of DBS in PD, the article highlights the controversial question of whether DBS exerts disease-modifying effects in PD. While preclinical evidence suggests neuroprotective potential, clinical trials such as EARLYSTIM face challenges in assessing long-term disease modification due to enrollment timing and methodology limitations. The discussion underscores the need for robust biomarkers and large-scale prospective trials to conclusively determine DBS's potential as a disease-modifying therapy in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Luka Milosevic
- KITE, Toronto, Canada; CRANIA, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Kondrataviciute
- CRANIA, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lorraine V Kalia
- CRANIA, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada; KITE, Toronto, Canada; CRANIA, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spooner RK, Hizli BJ, Bahners BH, Schnitzler A, Florin E. Modulation of DBS-induced cortical responses and movement by the directionality and magnitude of current administered. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2024; 10:53. [PMID: 38459031 PMCID: PMC10923868 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00663-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective therapy for alleviating motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PwP), although some may not receive optimal clinical benefits. One potential mechanism of STN-DBS involves antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway (HDP), thus suppressing cortical beta synchrony to improve motor function, albeit the precise mechanisms underlying optimal DBS parameters are not well understood. To address this, 18 PwP with STN-DBS completed a 2 Hz monopolar stimulation of the left STN during MEG. MEG data were imaged in the time-frequency domain using minimum norm estimation. Peak vertex time series data were extracted to interrogate the directional specificity and magnitude of DBS current on evoked and induced cortical responses and accelerometer metrics of finger tapping using linear mixed-effects models and mediation analyses. We observed increases in evoked responses (HDP ~ 3-10 ms) and synchronization of beta oscillatory power (14-30 Hz, 10-100 ms) following DBS pulse onset in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), supplementary motor area (SMA) and middle frontal gyrus (MFG) ipsilateral to the site of stimulation. DBS parameters significantly modulated neural and behavioral outcomes, with clinically effective contacts eliciting significant increases in medium-latency evoked responses, reductions in induced SM1 beta power, and better movement profiles compared to suboptimal contacts, often regardless of the magnitude of current applied. Finally, HDP-related improvements in motor function were mediated by the degree of SM1 beta suppression in a setting-dependent manner. Together, these data suggest that DBS-evoked brain-behavior dynamics are influenced by the level of beta power in key hubs of the basal ganglia-cortical loop, and this effect is exacerbated by the clinical efficacy of DBS parameters. Such data provides novel mechanistic and clinical insight, which may prove useful for characterizing DBS programming strategies to optimize motor symptom improvement in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Spooner
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Baccara J Hizli
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bahne H Bahners
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Esther Florin
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vinding MC, Waldthaler J, Eriksson A, Manting CL, Ferreira D, Ingvar M, Svenningsson P, Lundqvist D. Oscillatory and non-oscillatory features of the magnetoencephalic sensorimotor rhythm in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2024; 10:51. [PMID: 38443402 PMCID: PMC10915140 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with changes in neural activity in the sensorimotor alpha and beta bands. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated the role of spontaneous neuronal activity within the somatosensory cortex in a large cohort of early- to mid-stage PD patients (N = 78) on Parkinsonian medication and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (N = 60) using source reconstructed resting-state MEG. We quantified features of the time series data in terms of oscillatory alpha power and central alpha frequency, beta power and central beta frequency, and 1/f broadband characteristics using power spectral density. Furthermore, we characterised transient oscillatory burst events in the mu-beta band time-domain signals. We examined the relationship between these signal features and the patients' disease state, symptom severity, age, sex, and cortical thickness. PD patients and healthy controls differed on PSD broadband characteristics, with PD patients showing a steeper 1/f exponential slope and higher 1/f offset. PD patients further showed a steeper age-related decrease in the burst rate. Out of all the signal features of the sensorimotor activity, the burst rate was associated with increased severity of bradykinesia, whereas the burst duration was associated with axial symptoms. Our study shows that general non-oscillatory features (broadband 1/f exponent and offset) of the sensorimotor signals are related to disease state and oscillatory burst rate scales with symptom severity in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel C Vinding
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Josefine Waldthaler
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Allison Eriksson
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Cassia Low Manting
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Cognitive Neuroimaging Centre, Lee Kong Chien School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
- McGovern Institute of Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer's Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Fernando Pessoa Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran, Canaria, España
| | - Martin Ingvar
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Svenningsson
- Section of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel Lundqvist
- NatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson KA, Dosenbach NUF, Gordon EM, Welle CG, Wilkins KB, Bronte-Stewart HM, Voon V, Morishita T, Sakai Y, Merner AR, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Williamson T, Horn A, Gilron R, O'Keeffe J, Gittis AH, Neumann WJ, Little S, Provenza NR, Sheth SA, Fasano A, Holt-Becker AB, Raike RS, Moore L, Pathak YJ, Greene D, Marceglia S, Krinke L, Tan H, Bergman H, Pötter-Nerger M, Sun B, Cabrera LY, McIntyre CC, Harel N, Mayberg HS, Krystal AD, Pouratian N, Starr PA, Foote KD, Okun MS, Wong JK. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: pushing the forefront of neuromodulation with functional network mapping, biomarkers for adaptive DBS, bioethical dilemmas, AI-guided neuromodulation, and translational advancements. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1320806. [PMID: 38450221 PMCID: PMC10915873 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1320806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank XI was held on August 9-11, 2023 in Gainesville, Florida with the theme of "Pushing the Forefront of Neuromodulation". The keynote speaker was Dr. Nico Dosenbach from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. He presented his research recently published in Nature inn a collaboration with Dr. Evan Gordon to identify and characterize the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN), which has redefined the motor homunculus and has led to new hypotheses about the integrative networks underpinning therapeutic DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers, and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies, as well as logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The group estimated that globally more than 263,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: cutting-edge translational neuromodulation, cutting-edge physiology, advances in neuromodulation from Europe and Asia, neuroethical dilemmas, artificial intelligence and computational modeling, time scales in DBS for mood disorders, and advances in future neuromodulation devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara A. Johnson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Nico U. F. Dosenbach
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Cristin G. Welle
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Takashi Morishita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Sakai
- ATR Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Amanda R. Merner
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Neurosurgery and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Aryn H. Gittis
- Biological Sciences and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Division of Neurology, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network (UHN), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abbey B. Holt-Becker
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Lisa Moore
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika SPA, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Edmond and Lily Safar Center (ELSC) for Brain Research and Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Laura Y. Cabrera
- Neuroethics, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Philosophy, and Bioethics, and the Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Noam Harel
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andrew D. Krystal
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reese R, Kriesen T, Kersten M, Löhle M, Cantré D, Freiman TM, Storch A, Walter U. Combining ultrasound and microelectrode recordings for postoperative localization of subthalamic electrodes in Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 156:196-206. [PMID: 37972531 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess transcranial sonography (TCS) as stand-alone tool and in combination with microelectrode recordings (MER) as a method for the postoperative localization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). METHODS Individual dorsal and ventral boundaries of STN (n = 12) were determined on intraoperative MER. Postoperatively, a standardized TCS protocol was applied to measure medio-lateral, anterior-posterior and rostro-caudal electrode position using visualized reference structures (midline, substantia nigra). TCS and combined TCS-MER data were validated using fusion-imaging and clinical outcome data. RESULTS Test-retest reliability of standard TCS measures of electrode position was excellent. Computed tomography and TCS measures of distance between distal electrode contact and midline agreed well (Pearson correlation; r = 0.86; p < 0.001). Comparing our "gold standard" of rostro-caudal electrode localization relative to STN boundaries, i.e. combining MRI-based stereotaxy and MER data, with the combination of TCS and MER data, the measures differed by 0.32 ± 0.87 (range, -1.35 to 1.25) mm. Combined TCS-MER data identified the clinically preferred electrode contacts for STN-DBS with high accuracy (Coheńs kappa, 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Combined TCS-MER data allow for exact localization of STN-DBS electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE Our method provides a new option for monitoring of STN-DBS electrode location and guidance of DBS programming in Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Reese
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
| | - Thomas Kriesen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Maxi Kersten
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; Center for Transdisciplinary Neurosciences Rostock (CTNR), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Matthias Löhle
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock / Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Daniel Cantré
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Thomas M Freiman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; Center for Transdisciplinary Neurosciences Rostock (CTNR), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock / Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Uwe Walter
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; Center for Transdisciplinary Neurosciences Rostock (CTNR), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock / Greifswald, Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Hacker ML, Waters AC, Wang J, Provenza NR, de Hemptinne C, Johnson KA, Morrison MA, Cernera S. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. J Neurosci 2023; 43:7575-7586. [PMID: 37940596 PMCID: PMC10634582 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1427-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, involving chronic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions for electrical stimulation delivery. Despite its safety and efficacy, DBS remains an underutilized therapy. Advances in the field of DBS, including in technology, mechanistic understanding, and applications have the potential to expand access and use of DBS, while also improving clinical outcomes. Developments in DBS technology, such as MRI compatibility and bidirectional DBS systems capable of sensing neural activity while providing therapeutic stimulation, have enabled advances in our understanding of DBS mechanisms and its application. In this review, we summarize recent work exploring DBS modulation of target networks. We also cover current work focusing on improved programming and the development of novel stimulation paradigms that go beyond current standards of DBS, many of which are enabled by sensing-enabled DBS systems and have the potential to expand access to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neumann WJ, Steiner LA, Milosevic L. Neurophysiological mechanisms of deep brain stimulation across spatiotemporal resolutions. Brain 2023; 146:4456-4468. [PMID: 37450573 PMCID: PMC10629774 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a neuromodulatory treatment for managing the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other neurological and psychiatric disorders. Electrodes are chronically implanted in disease-relevant brain regions and pulsatile electrical stimulation delivery is intended to restore neurocircuit function. However, the widespread interest in the application and expansion of this clinical therapy has preceded an overarching understanding of the neurocircuit alterations invoked by deep brain stimulation. Over the years, various forms of neurophysiological evidence have emerged which demonstrate changes to brain activity across spatiotemporal resolutions; from single neuron, to local field potential, to brain-wide cortical network effects. Though fruitful, such studies have often led to debate about a singular putative mechanism. In this Update we aim to produce an integrative account of complementary instead of mutually exclusive neurophysiological effects to derive a generalizable concept of the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. In particular, we offer a critical review of the most common historical competing theories, an updated discussion on recent literature from animal and human neurophysiological studies, and a synthesis of synaptic and network effects of deep brain stimulation across scales of observation, including micro-, meso- and macroscale circuit alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Leon A Steiner
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
- Department of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto M5T 1M8, Canada
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Department of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto M5T 1M8, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Medical Sciences, and CRANIA Neuromodulation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3G9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avantaggiato F, Farokhniaee A, Bandini A, Palmisano C, Hanafi I, Pezzoli G, Mazzoni A, Isaias IU. Intelligibility of speech in Parkinson's disease relies on anatomically segregated subthalamic beta oscillations. Neurobiol Dis 2023; 185:106239. [PMID: 37499882 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Speech impairment is commonly reported in Parkinson's disease and is not consistently improved by available therapies - including deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS), which can worsen communication performance in some patients. Improving the outcome of STN-DBS on speech is difficult due to our incomplete understanding of the contribution of the STN to fluent speaking. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between subthalamic neural activity and speech production and intelligibility. METHODS We investigated bilateral STN local field potentials (LFPs) in nine parkinsonian patients chronically implanted with DBS during overt reading. LFP spectral features were correlated with clinical scores and measures of speech intelligibility. RESULTS Overt reading was associated with increased beta-low ([1220) Hz) power in the left STN, whereas speech intelligibility correlated positively with beta-high ([2030) Hz) power in the right STN. CONCLUSION We identified separate contributions from frequency and brain lateralization of the STN in the execution of an overt reading motor task and its intelligibility. This subcortical organization could be exploited for new adaptive stimulation strategies capable of identifying the occurrence of speaking behavior and facilitating its functional execution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Avantaggiato
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - AmirAli Farokhniaee
- Fondazione Grigioni per il Morbo di Parkinson, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 35, 20125 Milano, Italy.
| | - Andrea Bandini
- The BioRobotics Institute, Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Viale Rinaldo Piaggo 34, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Health Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Viale Rinaldo Piaggo 34, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Chiara Palmisano
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; Parkinson Institute Milan, ASST G. Pini-CTO, via Bignami 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
| | - Ibrahem Hanafi
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Gianni Pezzoli
- Fondazione Grigioni per il Morbo di Parkinson, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 35, 20125 Milano, Italy; Parkinson Institute Milan, ASST G. Pini-CTO, via Bignami 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
| | - Alberto Mazzoni
- Health Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Viale Rinaldo Piaggo 34, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Ioannis U Isaias
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; Parkinson Institute Milan, ASST G. Pini-CTO, via Bignami 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Radcliffe EM, Baumgartner AJ, Kern DS, Al Borno M, Ojemann S, Kramer DR, Thompson JA. Oscillatory beta dynamics inform biomarker-driven treatment optimization for Parkinson's disease. J Neurophysiol 2023; 129:1492-1504. [PMID: 37198135 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00055.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons and dysregulation of the basal ganglia. Cardinal motor symptoms include bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of select subcortical nuclei is standard of care for medication-refractory PD. Conventional open-loop DBS delivers continuous stimulation with fixed parameters that do not account for a patient's dynamic activity state or medication cycle. In comparison, closed-loop DBS, or adaptive DBS (aDBS), adjusts stimulation based on biomarker feedback that correlates with clinical state. Recent work has identified several neurophysiological biomarkers in local field potential recordings from PD patients, the most promising of which are 1) elevated beta (∼13-30 Hz) power in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), 2) increased beta synchrony throughout basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits, notably observed as coupling between the STN beta phase and cortical broadband gamma (∼50-200 Hz) amplitude, and 3) prolonged beta bursts in the STN and cortex. In this review, we highlight relevant frequency and time domain features of STN beta measured in PD patients and summarize how spectral beta power, oscillatory beta synchrony, phase-amplitude coupling, and temporal beta bursting inform PD pathology, neurosurgical targeting, and DBS therapy. We then review how STN beta dynamics inform predictive, biomarker-driven aDBS approaches for optimizing PD treatment. We therefore provide clinically useful and actionable insight that can be applied toward aDBS implementation for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Radcliffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Alexander J Baumgartner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Drew S Kern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Mazen Al Borno
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States
| | - Steven Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cagle JN, Johnson KA, Almeida L, Wong JK, Ramirez-Zamora A, Okun MS, Foote KD, de Hemptinne C. Brain Recording Analysis and Visualization Online (BRAVO): An open-source visualization tool for deep brain stimulation data. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:793-797. [PMID: 37100201 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices with neural recording capabilities are commercially available and may potentially improve clinical care and advance research. However, tools, to visualize neural recording data have been limited. These tools in general, require custom-made software for processing and analysis. The development of new tools will be critical for clinicians and researchers to fully leverage the latest device capabilities. OBJECTIVE There is an urgent need for a user-friendly tool for in-depth visualization and analysis of brain signals and of DBS data. METHODS AND RESULTS The Brain Recording Analysis and Visualization Online (BRAVO) platform was developed to easily import, visualize, and analyze brain signals. This Python-based web interface has been designed and implemented on a Linux server. The tool processes the session files from DBS programming generated by a clinical 'programming' tablet. The platform is capable of parsing and organizing neural recordings for longitudinal analysis. We present the platform and cases exemplifying its application and use. CONCLUSION The BRAVO platform is an accessible easy-to-use, open-source web interface for clinicians and researchers to apply for analysis of longitudinal neural recording data. The tool can be used for both clinical and research applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson N Cagle
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neumann WJ, Horn A, Kühn AA. Insights and opportunities for deep brain stimulation as a brain circuit intervention. Trends Neurosci 2023; 46:472-487. [PMID: 37105806 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment and has provided unique insights into the dynamic circuit architecture of brain disorders. This Review illustrates our current understanding of the pathophysiology of movement disorders and their underlying brain circuits that are modulated with DBS. It proposes principles of pathological network synchronization patterns like beta activity (13-35 Hz) in Parkinson's disease. We describe alterations from microscale including local synaptic activity via modulation of mesoscale hypersynchronization to changes in whole-brain macroscale connectivity. Finally, an outlook on advances for clinical innovations in next-generation neurotechnology is provided: from preoperative connectomic targeting to feedback controlled closed-loop adaptive DBS as individualized network-specific brain circuit interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery at MGH Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure Clinical Research Centre, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Degenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
DBS-evoked cortical responses index optimal contact orientations and motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2023; 9:37. [PMID: 36906723 PMCID: PMC10008535 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Although subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly-effective treatment for alleviating motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), clinicians currently lack reliable neurophysiological correlates of clinical outcomes for optimizing DBS parameter settings, which may contribute to treatment inefficacies. One parameter that could aid DBS efficacy is the orientation of current administered, albeit the precise mechanisms underlying optimal contact orientations and associated clinical benefits are not well understood. Herein, 24 PD patients received monopolar stimulation of the left STN during magnetoencephalography and standardized movement protocols to interrogate the directional specificity of STN-DBS current administration on accelerometer metrics of fine hand movements. Our findings demonstrate that optimal contact orientations elicit larger DBS-evoked cortical responses in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex, and importantly, are differentially predictive of smoother movement profiles in a contact-dependent manner. Moreover, we summarize traditional evaluations of clinical efficacy (e.g., therapeutic windows, side effects) for a comprehensive review of optimal/non-optimal STN-DBS contact settings. Together, these data suggest that DBS-evoked cortical responses and quantitative movement outcomes may provide clinical insight for characterizing the optimal DBS parameters necessary for alleviating motor symptoms in patients with PD in the future.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lofredi R, Scheller U, Mindermann A, Feldmann LK, Krauss JK, Saryyeva A, Schneider GH, Kühn AA. Pallidal Beta Activity Is Linked to Stimulation-Induced Slowness in Dystonia. Mov Disord 2023. [PMID: 36807626 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) effectively alleviates symptoms in dystonia patients, but may induce movement slowness as a side-effect. In Parkinson's disease, hypokinetic symptoms have been associated with increased beta oscillations (13-30 Hz). We hypothesize that this pattern is symptom-specific, thus accompanying DBS-induced slowness in dystonia. METHODS In 6 dystonia patients, pallidal rest recordings with a sensing-enabled DBS device were performed and tapping speed was assessed using marker-less pose estimation over 5 time points following cessation of DBS. RESULTS After cessation of pallidal stimulation, movement speed increased over time (P < 0.01). A linear mixed-effects model revealed that pallidal beta activity explained 77% of the variance in movement speed across patients (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The association between beta oscillations and slowness across disease entities provides further evidence for symptom-specific oscillatory patterns in the motor circuit. Our findings might help DBS therapy improvements, as DBS-devices able to adapt to beta oscillations are already commercially available. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Lofredi
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Scheller
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Aurika Mindermann
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucia K Feldmann
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Assel Saryyeva
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gerd-Helge Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Exzellenzcluster - NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong JK, Mayberg HS, Wang DD, Richardson RM, Halpern CH, Krinke L, Arlotti M, Rossi L, Priori A, Marceglia S, Gilron R, Cavanagh JF, Judy JW, Miocinovic S, Devergnas AD, Sillitoe RV, Cernera S, Oehrn CR, Gunduz A, Goodman WK, Petersen EA, Bronte-Stewart H, Raike RS, Malekmohammadi M, Greene D, Heiden P, Tan H, Volkmann J, Voon V, Li L, Sah P, Coyne T, Silburn PA, Kubu CS, Wexler A, Chandler J, Provenza NR, Heilbronner SR, Luciano MS, Rozell CJ, Fox MD, de Hemptinne C, Henderson JM, Sheth SA, Okun MS. Proceedings of the 10th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in cutting edge technologies, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, and women in neuromodulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 16:1084782. [PMID: 36819295 PMCID: PMC9933515 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1084782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The deep brain stimulation (DBS) Think Tank X was held on August 17-19, 2022 in Orlando FL. The session organizers and moderators were all women with the theme women in neuromodulation. Dr. Helen Mayberg from Mt. Sinai, NY was the keynote speaker. She discussed milestones and her experiences in developing depression DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank X speakers was that DBS has continued to expand in scope however several indications have reached the "trough of disillusionment." DBS for depression was considered as "re-emerging" and approaching a slope of enlightenment. DBS for depression will soon re-enter clinical trials. The group estimated that globally more than 244,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia, and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, closed loop DBS, DBS tele-health, neuroethics, lesion therapy, interventional psychiatry, and adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Doris D. Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - R. Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casey H. Halpern
- Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika, Goose Creek, SC, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James F. Cavanagh
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Svjetlana Miocinovic
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Annaelle D. Devergnas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Roy V. Sillitoe
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Carina R. Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Erika A. Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Petra Heiden
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Pankaj Sah
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Terry Coyne
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Cynthia S. Kubu
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer Chandler
- Centre for Health Law, Policy, and Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sarah R. Heilbronner
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Marta San Luciano
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael D. Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Subthalamic beta bursts correlate with dopamine-dependent motor symptoms in 106 Parkinson's patients. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2023; 9:2. [PMID: 36611027 PMCID: PMC9825387 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathologically increased beta power has been described as a biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD) and related to prolonged bursts of subthalamic beta synchronization. Here, we investigate the association between subthalamic beta dynamics and motor impairment in a cohort of 106 Parkinson's patients in the ON- and OFF-medication state, using two different methods of beta burst determination. We report a frequency-specific correlation of low beta power and burst duration with motor impairment OFF dopaminergic medication. Furthermore, reduction of power and burst duration correlated significantly with symptom alleviation through dopaminergic medication. Importantly, qualitatively similar results were yielded with two different methods of beta burst definition. Our findings validate the robustness of previous results on pathological changes in subcortical oscillations both in the frequency- as well as in the time-domain in the largest cohort of PD patients to date with important implications for next-generation adaptive deep brain stimulation control algorithms.
Collapse
|
16
|
Verma AK, Yu Y, Acosta-Lenis SF, Havel T, Sanabria DE, Molnar GF, MacKinnon CD, Howell MJ, Vitek JL, Johnson LA. Parkinsonian daytime sleep-wake classification using deep brain stimulation lead recordings. Neurobiol Dis 2023; 176:105963. [PMID: 36521781 PMCID: PMC9869648 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Excessive daytime sleepiness is a recognized non-motor symptom that adversely impacts the quality of life of people with Parkinson's disease (PD), yet effective treatment options remain limited. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for PD motor signs. Reliable daytime sleep-wake classification using local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from DBS leads implanted in STN can inform the development of closed-loop DBS approaches for prompt detection and disruption of sleep-related neural oscillations. We performed STN DBS lead recordings in three nonhuman primates rendered parkinsonian by administrating neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Reference sleep-wake states were determined on a second-by-second basis by video monitoring of eyes (eyes-open, wake and eyes-closed, sleep). The spectral power in delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), low-beta (8-20 Hz), high-beta (20-35 Hz), gamma (35-90 Hz), and high-frequency (200-400 Hz) bands were extracted from each wake and sleep epochs for training (70% data) and testing (30% data) a support vector machines classifier for each subject independently. The spectral features yielded reasonable daytime sleep-wake classification (sensitivity: 90.68 ± 1.28; specificity: 88.16 ± 1.08; accuracy: 89.42 ± 0.68; positive predictive value; 88.70 ± 0.89, n = 3). Our findings support the plausibility of monitoring daytime sleep-wake states using DBS lead recordings. These results could have future clinical implications in informing the development of closed-loop DBS approaches for automatic detection and disruption of sleep-related neural oscillations in people with PD to promote wakefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay K Verma
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Ying Yu
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Sergio F Acosta-Lenis
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Tyler Havel
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | | | - Gregory F Molnar
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Colum D MacKinnon
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Michael J Howell
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Jerrold L Vitek
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Luke A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Rheede JJ, Feldmann LK, Busch JL, Fleming JE, Mathiopoulou V, Denison T, Sharott A, Kühn AA. Diurnal modulation of subthalamic beta oscillatory power in Parkinson’s disease patients during deep brain stimulation. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2022; 8:88. [PMID: 35804160 PMCID: PMC9270436 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00350-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Beta-band activity in the subthalamic local field potential (LFP) is correlated with Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptom severity and is the therapeutic target of deep brain stimulation (DBS). While beta fluctuations in PD patients are well characterized on shorter timescales, it is not known how beta activity evolves around the diurnal cycle, outside a clinical setting. Here, we obtained chronic recordings (34 ± 13 days) of subthalamic beta power in PD patients implanted with the Percept DBS device during high-frequency DBS and analysed their diurnal properties as well as sensitivity to artifacts. Time of day explained 41 ± 9% of the variance in beta power (p < 0.001 in all patients), with increased beta during the day and reduced beta at night. Certain movements affected LFP quality, which may have contributed to diurnal patterns in some patients. Future DBS algorithms may benefit from taking such diurnal and artifactual fluctuations in beta power into account.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vissani M, Nanda P, Bush A, Neudorfer C, Dougherty D, Richardson RM. Toward Closed-Loop Intracranial Neurostimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 93:e43-e46. [PMID: 36123196 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Vissani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pranav Nanda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan Bush
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Darin Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen R, Berardelli A, Bhattacharya A, Bologna M, Chen KHS, Fasano A, Helmich RC, Hutchison WD, Kamble N, Kühn AA, Macerollo A, Neumann WJ, Pal PK, Paparella G, Suppa A, Udupa K. Clinical neurophysiology of Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2022; 7:201-227. [PMID: 35899019 PMCID: PMC9309229 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This review is part of the series on the clinical neurophysiology of movement disorders and focuses on Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism. The pathophysiology of cardinal parkinsonian motor symptoms and myoclonus are reviewed. The recordings from microelectrode and deep brain stimulation electrodes are reported in detail.
This review is part of the series on the clinical neurophysiology of movement disorders. It focuses on Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism. The topics covered include the pathophysiology of tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia, balance and gait disturbance and myoclonus in Parkinson’s disease. The use of electroencephalography, electromyography, long latency reflexes, cutaneous silent period, studies of cortical excitability with single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation, studies of plasticity, intraoperative microelectrode recordings and recording of local field potentials from deep brain stimulation, and electrocorticography are also reviewed. In addition to advancing knowledge of pathophysiology, neurophysiological studies can be useful in refining the diagnosis, localization of surgical targets, and help to develop novel therapies for Parkinson’s disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| | - Amitabh Bhattacharya
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - Matteo Bologna
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| | - Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rick C Helmich
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology and Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - William D Hutchison
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Departments of Surgery and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nitish Kamble
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonella Macerollo
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.,The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Pramod Kumar Pal
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | | | - Antonio Suppa
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| | - Kaviraja Udupa
- Department of Neurophysiology National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Merk T, Peterson V, Lipski WJ, Blankertz B, Turner RS, Li N, Horn A, Richardson RM, Neumann WJ. Electrocorticography is superior to subthalamic local field potentials for movement decoding in Parkinson's disease. eLife 2022; 11:75126. [PMID: 35621994 PMCID: PMC9142148 DOI: 10.7554/elife.75126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain signal decoding promises significant advances in the development of clinical brain computer interfaces (BCI). In Parkinson's disease (PD), first bidirectional BCI implants for adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) are now available. Brain signal decoding can extend the clinical utility of adaptive DBS but the impact of neural source, computational methods and PD pathophysiology on decoding performance are unknown. This represents an unmet need for the development of future neurotechnology. To address this, we developed an invasive brain-signal decoding approach based on intraoperative sensorimotor electrocorticography (ECoG) and subthalamic LFP to predict grip-force, a representative movement decoding application, in 11 PD patients undergoing DBS. We demonstrate that ECoG is superior to subthalamic LFP for accurate grip-force decoding. Gradient boosted decision trees (XGBOOST) outperformed other model architectures. ECoG based decoding performance negatively correlated with motor impairment, which could be attributed to subthalamic beta bursts in the motor preparation and movement period. This highlights the impact of PD pathophysiology on the neural capacity to encode movement vigor. Finally, we developed a connectomic analysis that could predict grip-force decoding performance of individual ECoG channels across patients by using their connectomic fingerprints. Our study provides a neurophysiological and computational framework for invasive brain signal decoding to aid the development of an individualized precision-medicine approach to intelligent adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timon Merk
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Victoria Peterson
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Witold J Lipski
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Benjamin Blankertz
- Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Berln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert S Turner
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neumann WJ, Köhler RM, Kühn AA. A practical guide to invasive neurophysiology in patients with deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 140:171-180. [PMID: 35659821 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers the unique opportunity to record human neural population activity as multiunit activity and local field potentials (LFP) directly from the target area in the depth of the brain. This has led to important discoveries through characterization of pathological activity patterns and identification of motor and cognitive correlates of basal ganglia function in patients with movement disorders. These findings have been covered extensively in a large body of literature, but the technical aspects of microelectrode and LFP recordings in DBS patients are rarely reported. This review summarizes the experience from invasive neurophysiology experiments in over 500 DBS cases in the last 20 years in a single centre. It introduces the basics of intraoperative microelectrode recordings, discusses the neurophysiological and technical aspects of LFP signals and gives and outlook on current and next-generation developments - from sensing enabled implantable devices to combined electrocorticography and LFP recordings during adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard M Köhler
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sarica C, Nankoo JF, Fomenko A, Grippe TC, Yamamoto K, Samuel N, Milano V, Vetkas A, Darmani G, Cizmeci MN, Lozano AM, Chen R. Human Studies of Transcranial Ultrasound neuromodulation: A systematic review of effectiveness and safety. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:737-746. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
|
23
|
França C, Carra RB, Diniz JM, Munhoz RP, Cury RG. Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: state of the art and future perspectives. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:105-115. [PMID: 35976323 PMCID: PMC9491408 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2022-s133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
For more than 30 years, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been a therapeutic option for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. However, this therapy is still underutilized mainly due to misinformation regarding risks and clinical outcomes. DBS can ameliorate several motor and non-motor symptoms, improving patients' quality of life. Furthermore, most of the improvement after DBS is long-lasting and present even in advanced PD. Adequate patient selection, precise electric leads placement, and correct DBS programming are paramount for good surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, DBS still has many limitations: axial symptoms and signs, such as speech, balance and gait, do not improve to the same extent as appendicular symptoms and can even be worsened as a direct or indirect consequence of surgery and stimulation. In addition, there are still unanswered questions regarding patient's selection, surgical planning and programming techniques, such as the role of surgicogenomics, more precise imaging-based lead placement, new brain targets, advanced programming strategies and hardware features. The net effect of these innovations should not only be to refine the beneficial effect we currently observe on selected symptoms and signs but also to improve treatment resistant facets of PD, such as axial and non-motor features. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art regarding DBS selection, implant, and programming, and explore new advances in the DBS field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina França
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Centro de Distúrbios do Movimento, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rafael Bernhart Carra
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Centro de Distúrbios do Movimento, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Juliete Melo Diniz
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia Funcional, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Renato Puppi Munhoz
- University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Movement Disorders Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rubens Gisbert Cury
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Centro de Distúrbios do Movimento, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Toward therapeutic electrophysiology: beta-band suppression as a biomarker in chronic local field potential recordings. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2022; 8:44. [PMID: 35440571 PMCID: PMC9018912 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00301-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising concept for feedback-based neurostimulation, with the potential of clinical implementation with the sensing-enabled Percept neurostimulator. We aim to characterize chronic electrophysiological activity during stimulation and to validate beta-band activity as a biomarker for bradykinesia. Subthalamic activity was recorded during stepwise stimulation amplitude increase OFF medication in 10 Parkinson's patients during rest and finger tapping. Offline analysis of wavelet-transformed beta-band activity and assessment of inter-variable relationships in linear mixed effects models were implemented. There was a stepwise suppression of low-beta activity with increasing stimulation intensity (p = 0.002). Low-beta power was negatively correlated with movement speed and predictive for velocity improvements (p < 0.001), stimulation amplitude for beta suppression (p < 0.001). Here, we characterize beta-band modulation as a chronic biomarker for motor performance. Our investigations support the use of electrophysiology in therapy optimization, providing evidence for the use of biomarker analysis for clinical aDBS.
Collapse
|
25
|
Frey J, Cagle J, Johnson KA, Wong JK, Hilliard JD, Butson CR, Okun MS, de Hemptinne C. Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches. Front Neurol 2022; 13:825178. [PMID: 35356461 PMCID: PMC8959612 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.825178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has advanced treatment options for a variety of neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. As the technology for DBS continues to progress, treatment efficacy will continue to improve and disease indications will expand. Hardware advances such as longer-lasting batteries will reduce the frequency of battery replacement and segmented leads will facilitate improvements in the effectiveness of stimulation and have the potential to minimize stimulation side effects. Targeting advances such as specialized imaging sequences and “connectomics” will facilitate improved accuracy for lead positioning and trajectory planning. Software advances such as closed-loop stimulation and remote programming will enable DBS to be a more personalized and accessible technology. The future of DBS continues to be promising and holds the potential to further improve quality of life. In this review we will address the past, present and future of DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Frey
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jackson Cagle
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kara A. Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Justin D. Hilliard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Christopher R. Butson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- *Correspondence: Coralie de Hemptinne
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wong JK, Deuschl G, Wolke R, Bergman H, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Sheth SA, Bronte-Stewart HM, Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Lambert E, Kehnemouyi Y, Starr PA, Little S, Anso J, Gilron R, Poree L, Kalamangalam GP, Worrell GA, Miller KJ, Schiff ND, Butson CR, Henderson JM, Judy JW, Ramirez-Zamora A, Foote KD, Silburn PA, Li L, Oyama G, Kamo H, Sekimoto S, Hattori N, Giordano JJ, DiEuliis D, Shook JR, Doughtery DD, Widge AS, Mayberg HS, Cha J, Choi K, Heisig S, Obatusin M, Opri E, Kaufman SB, Shirvalkar P, Rozell CJ, Alagapan S, Raike RS, Bokil H, Green D, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Cutting Edge Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Neuromodulation, Neuroethics, Pain, Interventional Psychiatry, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:813387. [PMID: 35308605 PMCID: PMC8931265 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.813387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
DBS Think Tank IX was held on August 25-27, 2021 in Orlando FL with US based participants largely in person and overseas participants joining by video conferencing technology. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging deep brain stimulation (DBS) technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank IX speakers was that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. After collectively sharing our experiences, it was estimated that globally more than 230,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. As such, this year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, adaptive DBS, neuromodulation for pain, network neuromodulation for epilepsy and neuromodulation for traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Robin Wolke
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N. Petrucci
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Emilia Lambert
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yasmine Kehnemouyi
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ro’ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lawrence Poree
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Giridhar P. Kalamangalam
- Department of Neurology, Wilder Center for Epilepsy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | | | - Kai J. Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Nicholas D. Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christopher R. Butson
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland and Saint Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Genko Oyama
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikaru Kamo
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoko Sekimoto
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Hattori
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James J. Giordano
- Neuroethics Studies Program, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Diane DiEuliis
- US Department of Defense Fort Lesley J. McNair, National Defense University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - John R. Shook
- Department of Philosophy and Science Education, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Darin D. Doughtery
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alik S. Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jungho Cha
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kisueng Choi
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Stephen Heisig
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mosadolu Obatusin
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Scott B. Kaufman
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Hemant Bokil
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | - David Green
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ansó J, Benjaber M, Parks B, Parker S, Oehrn CR, Petrucci M, Gilron R, Little S, Wilt R, Bronte-Stewart H, Gunduz A, Borton D, Starr PA, Denison TJ. Concurrent stimulation and sensing in bi-directional brain interfaces: a multi-site translational experience. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35234664 PMCID: PMC9095704 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac59a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a design analysis and guidance framework for the implementation of concurrent stimulation and sensing during adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) with particular emphasis on artifact mitigations. APPROACH We defined a general architecture of feedback-enabled devices, identified key components in the signal chain which might result in unwanted artifacts and proposed methods that might ultimately enable improved aDBS therapies. We gathered data from research subjects chronically-implanted with an investigational aDBS system, Summit RC+S, to characterize and explore artifact mitigations arising from concurrent stimulation and sensing. We then used a prototype investigational implantable device, DyNeuMo, and a bench-setup that accounts for tissue-electrode properties, to confirm our observations and verify mitigations. The strategies to reduce transient stimulation artifacts and improve performance during aDBS were confirmed in a chronic implant using updated configuration settings. MAIN RESULTS We derived and validated a "checklist" of configuration settings to improve system performance and areas for future device improvement. Key considerations for the configuration include 1) active instead of passive recharge, 2) sense-channel blanking in the amplifier, 3) high-pass filter settings, 4) tissue-electrode impedance mismatch management, 5) time-frequency trade-offs in the classifier, 6) algorithm blanking and transition rate limits. Without proper channel configuration, the aDBS algorithm was susceptible to limit-cycles of oscillating stimulation independent of physiological state. By applying the checklist, we could optimize each block's performance characteristics within the overall system. With system-level optimization, a 'fast' aDBS prototype algorithm was demonstrated to be feasible without reentrant loops, and with noise performance suitable for subcortical brain circuits. SIGNIFICANCE We present a framework to study sources and propose mitigations of artifacts in devices that provide chronic aDBS. This work highlights the trade-offs in performance as novel sensing devices translate to the clinic. Finding the appropriate balance of constraints is imperative for successful translation of aDBS therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ansó
- Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94117, UNITED STATES
| | - Moaad Benjaber
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3TH, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Brandon Parks
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, 968 Center Dr, Gainesville, FL, Gainesville, 32603, UNITED STATES
| | - Samuel Parker
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute, Brown University, 164 Angell St 4th floor, Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, UNITED STATES
| | - Carina Renate Oehrn
- Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94117, UNITED STATES
| | - Matthew Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, Stanford, California, 94304, UNITED STATES
| | - Roee Gilron
- Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, UCSF, 513 Parnassus, UCSF, 513 Parnassus, San Francisco, California, 94122, UNITED STATES
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, San Francisco, 94143, UNITED STATES
| | - Robert Wilt
- Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94117, UNITED STATES
| | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, Standford, California, 94304, UNITED STATES
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Biomedical Sciences Building JG56 P.O. Box 116131, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-6131, UNITED STATES
| | - David Borton
- School of Engineering, Brown University, 182 Hope Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, UNITED STATES
| | - Philip A Starr
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, 94143, UNITED STATES
| | - Timothy J Denison
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Combining Multimodal Biomarkers to Guide Deep Brain Stimulation Programming in Parkinson Disease. Neuromodulation 2022; 26:320-332. [PMID: 35219571 PMCID: PMC7614142 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming of multicontact DBS leads relies on a very time-consuming manual screening procedure, and strategies to speed up this process are needed. Beta activity in subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFP) has been suggested as a promising marker to index optimal stimulation contacts in patients with Parkinson disease. OBJECTIVE In this study, we investigate the advantage of algorithmic selection and combination of multiple resting and movement state features from STN LFPs and imaging markers to predict three relevant clinical DBS parameters (clinical efficacy, therapeutic window, side-effect threshold). MATERIALS AND METHODS STN LFPs were recorded at rest and during voluntary movements from multicontact DBS leads in 27 hemispheres. Resting- and movement-state features from multiple frequency bands (alpha, low beta, high beta, gamma, fast gamma, high frequency oscillations [HFO]) were used to predict the clinical outcome parameters. Subanalyses included an anatomical stimulation sweet spot as an additional feature. RESULTS Both resting- and movement-state features contributed to the prediction, with resting (fast) gamma activity, resting/movement-modulated beta activity, and movement-modulated HFO being most predictive. With the proposed algorithm, the best stimulation contact for the three clinical outcome parameters can be identified with a probability of almost 90% after considering half of the DBS lead contacts, and it outperforms the use of beta activity as single marker. The combination of electrophysiological and imaging markers can further improve the prediction. CONCLUSION LFP-guided DBS programming based on algorithmic selection and combination of multiple electrophysiological and imaging markers can be an efficient approach to improve the clinical routine and outcome of DBS patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Pozzi NG, Isaias IU. Adaptive deep brain stimulation: Retuning Parkinson's disease. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2022; 184:273-284. [PMID: 35034741 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819410-2.00015-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A brain-machine interface represents a promising therapeutic avenue for the treatment of many neurologic conditions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive, neuro-modulatory tool that can improve different neurologic disorders by delivering electric stimulation to selected brain areas. DBS is particularly successful in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), where it allows sustained improvement of motor symptoms. However, this approach is still poorly standardized, with variable clinical outcomes. To achieve an optimal therapeutic effect, novel adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems are being developed. These devices operate by adapting stimulation parameters in response to an input signal that can represent symptoms, motor activity, or other behavioral features. Emerging evidence suggests greater efficacy with fewer adverse effects during aDBS compared with conventional DBS. We address this topic by discussing the basics principles of aDBS, reviewing current evidence, and tackling the many challenges posed by aDBS for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoló G Pozzi
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ioannis U Isaias
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg and Julius Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mizrahi-Kliger AD, Feldmann LK, Kühn AA, Bergman H. Etiologies of insomnia in Parkinson's disease - Lessons from human studies and animal models. Exp Neurol 2022; 350:113976. [PMID: 35026228 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Sleep disorders are integral to Parkinson's disease (PD). Insomnia, an inability to maintain stable sleep, affects most patients and is widely rated as one of the most debilitating facets of this disease. PD insomnia is often perceived as a multifactorial entity - a consequence of several of the disease symptoms, comorbidities and therapeutic strategies. Yet, this view evolved against a backdrop of a relative scarcity of works trying to directly dissect the underlying neural correlates and mechanisms in animal models. The last years have seen the emergence of a wealth of new evidence regarding the neural underpinnings of insomnia in PD. Here, we review early and recent reports from patients and animal models evaluating the etiology of PD insomnia. We start by outlining the phenomenology of PD insomnia and continue to analyze the evidence supporting insomnia as emanating from four distinct subdivisions of etiologies - the symptoms and comorbidities of the disease, the medical therapy, the degeneration of non-dopaminergic cell groups and subsequent alterations in circadian rhythms, and the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brainstem and its resulting effect on the basal ganglia. Finally, we review emerging neuromodulation-based therapeutic avenues for PD insomnia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviv D Mizrahi-Kliger
- Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
| | - Lucia K Feldmann
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany; NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel; Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gilron R, Little S, Wilt R, Perrone R, Anso J, Starr PA. Sleep-Aware Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Control: Chronic Use at Home With Dual Independent Linear Discriminate Detectors. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:732499. [PMID: 34733132 PMCID: PMC8558614 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.732499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising new technology with increasing use in experimental trials to treat a diverse array of indications such as movement disorders (Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor), psychiatric disorders (depression, OCD), chronic pain and epilepsy. In many aDBS trials, a neural biomarker of interest is compared with a predefined threshold and stimulation amplitude is adjusted accordingly. Across indications and implant locations, potential biomarkers are greatly influenced by sleep. Successful chronic embedded adaptive detectors must incorporate a strategy to account for sleep, to avoid unwanted or unexpected algorithm behavior. Here, we show a dual algorithm design with two independent detectors, one used to track sleep state (wake/sleep) and the other used to track parkinsonian motor state (medication-induced fluctuations). Across six hemispheres (four patients) and 47 days, our detector successfully transitioned to sleep mode while patients were sleeping, and resumed motor state tracking when patients were awake. Designing “sleep aware” aDBS algorithms may prove crucial for deployment of clinically effective fully embedded aDBS algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ro'ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Robert Wilt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Randy Perrone
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cagle JN, Wong JK, Johnson KA, Foote KD, Okun MS, de Hemptinne C. Suppression and Rebound of Pallidal Beta Power: Observation Using a Chronic Sensing DBS Device. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:749567. [PMID: 34566612 PMCID: PMC8458625 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.749567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly used therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Here, we study the effect of DBS on pallidal oscillatory activity as well as on symptom severity in an individual with PD implanted with a new pulse generator (Medtronic Percept system) which facilitates chronic recording of local field potentials (LFP) through implanted DBS lead. Pallidal LFPs were recorded while delivering stimulation in a monopolar configuration using stepwise increments (0.5 mA, every 20 s). At each stimulation amplitude, the power spectral density (PSD) was computed, and beta power (13–30 Hz) was calculated and correlated with the degree of bradykinesia. Pallidal beta power was reduced when therapeutic stimulation was delivered. Beta power correlated to the severity of bradykinesia. Worsening of parkinsonism when excessive stimulation was applied was associated with a rebound in the beta band power. These preliminary results suggest that pallidal beta power might be used as an objective marker of the disease state in PD. The use of brain sensing from implanted neural interfaces may in the future facilitate clinical programming. Detection of rebound could help to optimize benefits and minimize worsening from overstimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson N Cagle
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Magnusson JL, Leventhal DK. Revisiting the "Paradox of Stereotaxic Surgery": Insights Into Basal Ganglia-Thalamic Interactions. Front Syst Neurosci 2021; 15:725876. [PMID: 34512279 PMCID: PMC8429495 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.725876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Basal ganglia dysfunction is implicated in movement disorders including Parkinson Disease, dystonia, and choreiform disorders. Contradicting standard "rate models" of basal ganglia-thalamic interactions, internal pallidotomy improves both hypo- and hyper-kinetic movement disorders. This "paradox of stereotaxic surgery" was recognized shortly after rate models were developed, and is underscored by the outcomes of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders. Despite strong evidence that DBS activates local axons, the clinical effects of lesions and DBS are nearly identical. These observations argue against standard models in which GABAergic basal ganglia output gates thalamic activity, and raise the question of how lesions and stimulation can have similar effects. These paradoxes may be resolved by considering thalamocortical loops as primary drivers of motor output. Rather than suppressing or releasing cortex via motor thalamus, the basal ganglia may modulate the timing of thalamic perturbations to cortical activity. Motor cortex exhibits rotational dynamics during movement, allowing the same thalamocortical perturbation to affect motor output differently depending on its timing with respect to the rotational cycle. We review classic and recent studies of basal ganglia, thalamic, and cortical physiology to propose a revised model of basal ganglia-thalamocortical function with implications for basic physiology and neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel K Leventhal
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Parkinson Disease Foundation Research Center of Excellence, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Neurology, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fasano A, Gorodetsky C, Paul D, Germann J, Loh A, Yan H, Carlen PL, Breitbart S, Lozano AM, Ibrahim GM, Kalia SK. Local Field Potential-Based Programming: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:271-275. [PMID: 34406680 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Programming deep brain stimulation (DBS) is still based on a trial-and-error approach, often becoming a time-consuming process for both treating physicians and patients. Several strategies have been proposed to streamline DBS programming, most of which are preliminary and mainly address Parkinson's disease, a condition readily responsive to DBS adjustments. In the present proof-of-principle pilot study, we successfully demonstrate that local field potentials (LFP)-based programming can be an effective approach when used for DBS indications that have a delayed temporal onset of benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS A recently commercialized implantable pulse generator (IPG) with the capability to non-invasively and chronically stream live and/or record LFPs from DBS electrode after implantation was used to program one pediatric patient with generalized dystonia and an adult with seizures refractory to multiple medications and vagal nerve stimulation. RESULTS The IPG survey function detected a peak in the delta range (1.95 Hz) in the left globus pallidus of first patient. This LFP was detected when recording in the brain area adjacent to contacts 9 and 10 and absent when recording from other areas. The chronic recording of the 1.95 Hz LFP with two sets of stimulation showed a greater power increase with the settings associated with a worsening of dystonia. Broadband LFP home recording of "absence seizure" and "focal/partial seizure" was used in the second patient and reviewer with the IPG "timeline" and "event" functions. The chronic recording of the 2.93 Hz and 8.79 Hz (spit sensing) showed a reduced power with the stimulation setting associated with seizure control. CONCLUSIONS The approach presented in this pilot proof-of-concept study may inform and streamline the DBS programming for conditions requiring clinicians and patients to wait weeks before appreciating any clinical benefit. Prospective studies on larger samples of patients are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada.,KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolina Gorodetsky
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darcia Paul
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jürgen Germann
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron Loh
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Han Yan
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter L Carlen
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Epilepsy Program, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Breitbart
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada.,KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cummins DD, Kochanski RB, Gilron R, Swann NC, Little S, Hammer LH, Starr PA. Chronic Sensing of Subthalamic Local Field Potentials: Comparison of First and Second Generation Implantable Bidirectional Systems Within a Single Subject. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:725797. [PMID: 34447294 PMCID: PMC8382799 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available. OBJECTIVE To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient. METHODS A 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized. RESULTS In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude. CONCLUSION This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D. Cummins
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ryan B. Kochanski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Roee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicole C. Swann
- Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lauren H. Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yin Z, Zhu G, Zhao B, Bai Y, Jiang Y, Neumann WJ, Kühn AA, Zhang J. Local field potentials in Parkinson's disease: A frequency-based review. Neurobiol Dis 2021; 155:105372. [PMID: 33932557 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery offers a unique opportunity to record local field potentials (LFPs), the electrophysiological population activity of neurons surrounding the depth electrode in the target area. With direct access to the subcortical activity, LFP research has provided valuable insight into disease mechanisms and cognitive processes and inspired the advent of adaptive DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). A frequency-based framework is usually employed to interpret the implications of LFP signatures in LFP studies on PD. This approach standardizes the methodology, simplifies the interpretation of LFP patterns, and makes the results comparable across studies. Importantly, previous works have found that activity patterns do not represent disease-specific activity but rather symptom-specific or task-specific neuronal signatures that relate to the current motor, cognitive or emotional state of the patient and the underlying disease. In the present review, we aim to highlight distinguishing features of frequency-specific activities, mainly within the motor domain, recorded from DBS electrodes in patients with PD. Associations of the commonly reported frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and high-frequency oscillations) to motor signs are discussed with respect to band-related phenomena such as individual tremor and high/low beta frequency activity, as well as dynamic transients of beta bursts. We provide an overview on how electrophysiology research in DBS patients has revealed and will continuously reveal new information about pathophysiology, symptoms, and behavior, e.g., when combining deep LFP and surface electrocorticography recordings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zixiao Yin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Guanyu Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Baotian Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Yutong Bai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Jiang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charite´ Campus Mitte, Charite´ - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charite´ Campus Mitte, Charite´ - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|