1
|
Kaur H, Lin LH, Kolin DL, Pinto A, Parra-Herran C, Catherwood M, Van de Vijver K, Buza N, McCluggage WG, Nucci MR. Primary Endometrial Gastric (Gastrointestinal)-type Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: A Detailed Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of 27 Cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2025; 49:564-577. [PMID: 40066786 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2025]
Abstract
Endometrial gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous adenocarcinoma (EmGA) is rare and was introduced as a new entity in the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of female genital tumors. Herein, we report a detailed clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 27 EmGA, the largest published series to date. The cohort consisted of 27 patients (median age 69 y; range 42 to 87 years). Histologically all cases showed gastric/gastrointestinal differentiation with foamy apical cytoplasm with distinct cell borders (n=21), goblet cells (n=9), signet ring cells (n=4), and Paneth cells (n=1). Using FIGO grading, 5 were grade 1, 14 grade 2, and 8 grade 3. Tumors were positive for MUC6 (10/21), CK7 (22/24), CK20 (16/24), CDX2 (24/26), and Claudin 18 (9/12). In all, 12/27 exhibited aberrant p53 expression and 3/26 showed MLH1 and PMS2 loss, including 2 with confirmed MLH1 gene promoter methylation. Next-generation sequencing showed pathogenic variants in TP53 (13/20), KRAS (7/20), PIK3CA (5/20), BRCA2 (4/20), SMAD4 (3/20), and POLE (1/20). Using TCGA classification (based on cases with available molecular results), 1/20 was POLE mutated, 2/20 were mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), 4/20 were no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and 13/20 were TP53 abnormal. FIGO stage (2009 staging system) ranged from IA to IVB. Outcome data (21 patients; follow-up of 2 to 77 mo) showed that 2 patients died of disease at 14 and 46 months after diagnosis, 1 patient died from other causes at 28 months, 8 were alive with disease, and 10 were alive with no evidence of disease. Like the cervical counterpart, primary EmGA has a distinctive morphologic appearance, harbors frequent TP53 mutations, and can be associated with adverse outcomes despite low-grade morphology and/or low-stage at presentation. They may be represented in all 4 TCGA molecular groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsimar Kaur
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lawrence Hsu Lin
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David L Kolin
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Andre Pinto
- Department of Pathology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Mark Catherwood
- Regional Molecular Diagnostics Service, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
| | | | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Marisa R Nucci
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta S, Ahuja S, Kalwaniya DS. Immunohistochemistry Markers in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms: a Comprehensive Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2024; 15:465-480. [PMID: 39328739 PMCID: PMC11422544 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-024-02049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has emerged as a crucial tool in diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, offering invaluable insights into tumor biology and guiding therapeutic decisions. The intricate histopathological landscape of ovarian cancer presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and classification. IHC offers a complementary approach, aiding in the characterization of tumor subtypes, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response. By targeting specific biomarkers, IHC enables the identification of diverse histological features and molecular alterations associated with ovarian malignancies. The integration of IHC into routine diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy, aids in the subclassification of ovarian tumors, and facilitates personalized treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on the judicious selection of antibody panels tailored to specific clinical scenarios, ensuring optimal utilization of resources and minimizing diagnostic pitfalls. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of IHC in refining the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of ovarian cancer, highlighting its significance in the era of precision medicine. By leveraging the molecular insights provided by IHC, clinicians and pathologists can optimize patient care and improve outcomes in ovarian cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedha Gupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sana Ahuja
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Dheer Singh Kalwaniya
- Department of Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ordulu Z, Watkins J, Ritterhouse LL. Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers. Clin Lab Med 2024; 44:199-219. [PMID: 38821641 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Ordulu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heinze K, Cairns ES, Thornton S, Harris B, Milne K, Grube M, Meyer C, Karnezis AN, Fereday S, Garsed DW, Leung SC, Chiu DS, Moubarak M, Harter P, Heitz F, McAlpine JN, DeFazio A, Bowtell DD, Goode EL, Pike M, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Staebler A, Köbel M, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Nelson BH, Anglesio MS. The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3471-3483. [PMID: 37339172 PMCID: PMC10472107 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. RESULTS Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Bronwyn Harris
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony N. Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - C. Leigh Pearce
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chui MH, Ellenson LH. Mixed Ovarian Neoplasms With Gastrointestinal-type Mucinous and Mullerian Epithelial Components: A Rare Group of Tumors Demonstrating the Phenotypic Plasticity of the Mullerian Epithelial Cell. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:756-765. [PMID: 37125505 PMCID: PMC10959257 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Primary mucinous ovarian neoplasms, gastrointestinal-type (GI-type), are composed of mucin-producing tumor cells resembling intestinal goblet cells or gastric foveolar epithelium. In contrast to seromucinous tumors, which exhibit endocervical-type mucinous differentiation and are thought to be derived from endometriosis, the cell/tissue-of-origin of most GI-type mucinous ovarian tumors is unknown. We identified 8 GI-type mucinous ovarian tumors (cystadenomas, n=4; borderline tumor/carcinoma, n=4) with spatially distinct areas that showed morphologic features of Mullerian-type epithelial differentiation (ciliated cells or endometrioid-type glands). Immunohistochemistry for cell lineage markers and Alcian blue (pH 2.5)/Periodic Acid-Schiff staining were performed. Morphologically distinct components were isolated by microdissection, from which extracted DNA was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing. In all cases, immunohistochemistry demonstrated mucin-producing cells to be positive for at least one GI marker (CK20 or CDX2), while areas with morphologic features of Mullerian differentiation were positive for PAX8, ER and/or PR, and lacked expression of CK20 and CDX2; CK7 was strongly and diffusely positive in all tumor cells. Tumor cells with a gastric-type phenotype produced neutral mucin, while acidic mucin was present within intestinal-type goblet cells. Targeted sequencing revealed ARID1A mutations in all mixed borderline tumors/carcinomas (n=4); other recurrent genetic alterations included KRAS (n=2) and TP53 mutations (n=2). Shared mutations were present in paired Mullerian and GI-type mucinous tumor components in 4 mixed borderline tumors/carcinomas, with more shared mutations between components than private mutations specific to each component. All mixed borderline tumors/carcinomas were associated with endometriosis (n=3) or Mullerian inclusion cysts (n=1); mutation or loss of ARID1A expression was seen in these putative precursor lesions in 2 cases. Hence, ovarian neoplasms composed of clonally related GI-type mucinous and Mullerian-type epithelial components harbor ARID1A mutations and are frequently associated with endometriosis. The existence of a Mullerian stem/progenitor cell with the capacity to differentiate toward cell lineages within the GI-tract may be involved in the pathogenesis of at least a subset of GI-type mucinous ovarian neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Köbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, et alKöbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PDP, Schildkraut JM, Sieh W, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Ramus SJ, Brenton JD. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:208-222. [PMID: 36948887 PMCID: PMC10073933 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.311] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
- Pathology DepartmentCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences‐BugandoMwanzaTanzania
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Michelle Boisen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Kara L Cushing‐Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of HistopathologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Mona A El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College London, Hammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental PhysiotherapyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of UlmUlmGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | | | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow UniversityRzeszówPoland
| | | | - Jaime Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of PathologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Britta Ney
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Luis Paz‐Ares
- H12O‐CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | | | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health ServicesEdmontonABCanada
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraCOUSA
- Community Health Sciences, University of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of NorwayOsloNorway
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars‐Sinai Cancer, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBCCanada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlColumbiaSCUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer AgencyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPAUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterWest HollywoodCAUSA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical ScienceSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Talia KL, McCluggage WG. The diverse morphology and immunophenotype of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. Pathology 2023; 55:269-286. [PMID: 36759286 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Endometrioid carcinoma (EC) accounts for approximately 10-12% of ovarian epithelial malignancies but compared to its relative frequency, results in a disproportionate number of diagnostically difficult cases with potential for misdiagnosis. In this review the protean and diverse morphologies of ovarian EC are discussed, including 'metaplastic' changes, EC with spindle cell differentiation/corded and hyalinised features and EC with sex cord-like formations. The propensity for 'transdifferentiation' in ovarian ECs is also discussed, one example being the association with a somatically derived yolk sac tumour. Although immunohistochemistry may be extremely useful in diagnosing EC and in distinguishing between EC and other ovarian epithelial malignancies, metastatic neoplasms and sex cord-stromal tumours, this review also discusses the propensity for ovarian EC to exhibit an aberrant immunophenotype which may compound diagnostic uncertainty. The genomic characteristics of these tumours and the recent 'incorporation' of seromucinous carcinoma into the EC category are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Talia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Royal Women's Hospital and Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hollis RL. Molecular characteristics and clinical behaviour of epithelial ovarian cancers. Cancer Lett 2023; 555:216057. [PMID: 36627048 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is an umbrella term for multiple distinct diseases (histotypes), each with their own developmental origins, clinical behaviour and molecular profile. Accordingly, OC management is progressing away from a one-size-fits all approach, toward more molecularly-driven, histotype-specific management strategies. Our knowledge of driver events in high grade serous OC, the most common histotype, has led to major advances in treatments, including PARP inhibitor use. However, these agents are not suitable for all patients, most notably for many of those with rare OC histotypes. Identification of additional targeted therapeutic strategies will require a detailed understanding of the molecular landscape in each OC histotype. Until recently, tumour profiling studies in rare histotypes were sparse; however, significant advances have been made over the last decade. In particular, reports of genomic characterisation in endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous and low grade serous OC have significantly expanded our understanding of mutational events in these tumour types. Nonetheless, substantial knowledge gaps remain. This review summarises our current understanding of each histotype, highlighting recent advances in these unique diseases and outlining immediate research priorities for accelerating progress toward improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Unusual Ovarian Tumors With Endometrioid Proliferations Co-Expressing Estrogen Receptor and CDX-2 Arising in Cystadenofibromatous Background: Report of 3 Cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2023; 42:93-100. [PMID: 35149615 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This report describes 3 cases of ovarian tumors with unusual glandular proliferations co-expressing estrogen receptor and CDX-2 by immunohistochemistry set in cystadenofibromatous background. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on the cyst lining epithelium and glandular proliferations for all cases; CTNNB1 mutations were detected in the glandular proliferations of all neoplasms. The cyst lining of case 1 demonstrated a different CTNNB1 mutation from the matched glandular proliferation. No mutations were detected in the cyst lining from case 2. The cyst lining and glandular proliferation for case 3 harbored identical ATM and PIK3CA mutations with an additional CTNNB1 mutation in the glandular proliferation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported series of endometrioid proliferations with co-expression of estrogen receptor and CDX-2 in cystadenofibromatous background.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ok Atılgan A, Özen Ö, Haberal Reyhan A, Ayhan A. Clinicopathologic Features and the Loss of ARID1A Expression in Ovarian Seromucinous Borderline Tumors and Seromucinous Carcinomas. Int J Surg Pathol 2022; 31:398-408. [PMID: 36452965 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221134695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The current study highlighted the ARID1A and SALL4 expression and described histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of ovarian seromucinous tumors (SMTs) including borderline tumors (SMBTs) and seromucinous carcinomas (SMC; namely as endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation according to WHO 2020 classification). The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 38 SMTs were analyzed, including ARID1A, SALL4, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), TP53, keratin 7, keratin 20, CEA, CDX2, WT1, PAX2, and PAX8. SMCs and SMBTs comprised 68.4% (n = 26) and 31.6% (n = 12) of all SMTs, respectively, studied. The mean age of diagnosis was 47.4 years and 41.4 years, and the mean size was 9 cm and 7.45 cm for SMC and SMBT, respectively. There was endometriosis or endometriotic cyst in 61.5% of SMCs and 50% of SMBTs. Immunohistochemically, loss of ARID1A staining was observed in 15 (65.2%) of 26 SMCs, and 3 (33.3%) of the 12 SMBTs. Only one SMC showed focal SALL4 positivity. All SMTs were positive for ER, PR, PAX8, and keratin 7. SMTs were negative for WT1, keratin 20, CDX2, and CEA (negative in 66.7% to 92.3% of the cases). While all SMBTs and 24 (92.3%) of 26 SMCs exhibited “wild-type” TP53 staining, 2 (7.7%) SMCs, both were stage III, showed mutant type TP53 overexpression. We indicate there is a similarity between SMC and SMBT according to the immunohistochemical features. SMBTs are keratin 7, ER, PR positive tumors, and some of them have loss of ARID1A expression and are likely to develop in the background of endometriosis similar to SMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alev Ok Atılgan
- Department of Pathology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Özlem Özen
- Department of Pathology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Ali Ayhan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gilks CB, Selinger CI, Davidson B, Köbel M, Ledermann JA, Lim D, Malpica A, Mikami Y, Singh N, Srinivasan R, Vang R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S119-S142. [PMID: 36305537 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.
Collapse
|
12
|
Masciullo V, Susini T, Corrado G, Stepanova M, Baroni A, Renda I, Castiglione F, Minimo C, Bellacosa A, Chiofalo B, Vizza E, Scambia G. Nuclear Expression of β-Catenin Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12102401. [PMID: 36292090 PMCID: PMC9600744 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Beta-catenin is involved in intercellular adhesion and participates in the Wnt signaling pathway. This study evaluated the expression pattern and prognostic value of β-catenin in a series of endometrial carcinoma patients. Immunohistochemical analyses were used to assess the expression and subcellular localization of β-catenin from tissue sections of 74 patients with endometrial carcinoma. No correlation was found between beta-catenin expression and clinicopathological parameters. Patients expressing nuclear β-catenin (n = 13; 16%) showed a more favorable prognosis than patients expressing membranous β-catenin; the 5-year disease-related survival rate was 100% for cases expressing nuclear β-catenin, compared with 73.8% (SE 0.08) of cases expressing membranous β-catenin (p = 0.04). Although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.15), cases expressing nuclear β-catenin showed a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 90.9% (SE 0.08) compared with 67.4% (SE 0.08) of cases expressing membranous β-catenin. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that membranous β-catenin expression was found to be associated with a relative risk of death of 33.9 (p = 0.04). The stage of disease (p = 0.0006), histology (p = 0.003), and grading (p = 0.008) were also significantly correlated with disease-free survival according to univariate Cox analyses. Determining β-catenin expression and localization patterns may predict survival in patients with endometrial cancer and, therefore, should be considered a potential prognostic marker of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Masciullo
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Susini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marina Stepanova
- Cancer Signaling and Epigenetics Program and Cancer Epigenetics Institute, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Alessandro Baroni
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Renda
- Department of Pathology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Minimo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Alfonso Bellacosa
- Cancer Signaling and Epigenetics Program and Cancer Epigenetics Institute, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Benito Chiofalo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-5266-2433
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rajendran S, McCluggage WG. WT1 Positive Ovarian Endometrioid Tumors: Observations From Consult Cases and Strategies for Distinguishing From Serous Neoplasms. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:191-202. [PMID: 33782345 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, more than any other type of ovarian epithelial malignancy, demonstrates a varied morphology which can cause problems in diagnosis. In tubo-ovarian tumor pathology, WT1 is a commonly used marker as it is consistently expressed in low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and is often considered a specific marker of a serous phenotype. However, ovarian endometrioid neoplasms may also express WT1 which may contribute to misdiagnosis. We report our experience with 23 ovarian endometrioid neoplasms (4 borderline tumors, 19 carcinomas), mainly received in consultation, which were WT1 positive (diffuse in 11 cases) which often contributed to misdiagnosis. Endometriosis was identified in the same ovary in 6 cases and squamous elements in 7. We describe strategies for distinguishing such neoplasms, which may exhibit morphologic overlap with serous tumors, from low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and stress that a diagnosis of HGSC is unlikely with two grossly and histologically normal fallopian tubes. We also stress that a panel of markers should always be used rather than relying on a single marker and that when the morphology is classical of an endometrioid carcinoma, diagnostic immunohistochemistry is not needed given the potential for confusion in cases showing "aberrant" staining. We also discuss the phenomenon of "aberrant" immunohistochemical staining in endometrioid carcinomas which appears more common than in other ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Rajendran
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (S.R., W.G.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kamble PR, Breed AA, Pawar A, Kasle G, Pathak BR. Prognostic utility of the ovarian cancer secretome: a systematic investigation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:639-662. [PMID: 35083554 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06361-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is usually detected at an advanced stage with frequent recurrence. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival is influenced by the age at diagnosis, tumor stage and histological subtype. Nonetheless, quantifiable prognostic biomarkers are needed for early identification of the high-risk patients and for personalized medicine. Several studies link tumor-specific dysregulated expression of certain proteins with ovarian cancer prognosis. However, careful investigation of presence of these prognostically relevant proteins in ovarian cancer secretome is lacking. OBJECTIVE To critically analyze the recent published data on prognostically relevant proteins for ovarian cancer and to carefully search how many of them are reported in the published ovarian cancer secretome datasets. DESIGN A search for relevant studies in the past 2 years was conducted in PubMed and a comprehensive list of proteins associated with the ovarian cancer prognosis was prepared. These were cross-referred to the published ovarian cancer secretome profiles. The proteins identified in the secretome were further shortlisted based on a scoring strategy employing stringent criteria. RESULTS A panel of seven promising secretory biomarkers associated with ovarian cancer prognosis is proposed. CONCLUSION Scanning the ovarian cancer secretome datasets provides the opportunity to identify if tumor-specific biomarkers could be tested as secretory biomarkers. Detecting their levels in the body fluid would be more advantageous than evaluating the expression in the tissue, since it could be monitored multiple times over the course of the disease to have a better judgment of the prognosis and response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradnya R Kamble
- Cellular and Structural Biology Division, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR), Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Ananya A Breed
- Cellular and Structural Biology Division, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR), Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Apoorva Pawar
- Cellular and Structural Biology Division, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR), Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Grishma Kasle
- Cellular and Structural Biology Division, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR), Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
- Division of Biological Sciences, IISER, Kolkata, India
| | - Bhakti R Pathak
- Cellular and Structural Biology Division, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (ICMR), Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
16
|
Buza N. Immunohistochemistry in gynecologic carcinomas: Practical update with diagnostic and clinical considerations based on the 2020 WHO classification of tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 2021; 39:58-77. [PMID: 34750021 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This review provides an update on immunohistochemistry applications-diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive-in the pathology evaluation of gynecologic carcinomas. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors introduced important changes in the diagnostic classification of lower genital tract, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas, with major influence on the routine pathology practice. Lower genital tract carcinomas and their precursor lesions are now classified based on their human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent pathogenesis, reflecting the clinically significant prognostic differences and impacting the therapeutic decision-making. Immunohistochemical markers have an increasing role in the pathology evaluation of endometrial carcinomas: in addition to their traditional use in the differential diagnosis and histologic subtyping, they have also been recently advocated for prognostic classification as surrogates for the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) molecular groups. New entities - mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma and gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium - have also been added and often require immunostains for diagnostic confirmation. Ovarian carcinomas frequently show overlapping morphologic patterns and heterogeneous appearance within the same tumor, necessitating immunohistochemical work-up. Beyond diagnostic applications, there is increasing clinical demand for screening of inherited cancer syndromes, prediction of prognosis and guiding targeted therapy. Practical issues and pitfalls related to mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, HER2, and PD-L1 testing are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rodriguez M, Kang EY, Farrington K, Cook LS, Le ND, Karnezis AN, Lee CH, Nelson GS, Terzic T, Lee S, Köbel M. Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1452-1463. [PMID: 34534137 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Clinical factors and biomarker profiles associated with patient outcome in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma - Emphasis on tumor grade. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:187-194. [PMID: 34711431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of clinicopathological factors and molecular markers in prognostic classification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is not established. Tumor grade is used in risk assessment, but the role of current 3-tier grading system has been challenged. METHODS Clinicopathological factors and 12 immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR, ER, β-catenin, vimentin, ARID1A, HNF1-β, p53, p16, MIB-1, E-cadherin, c-erb-B2 and L1CAM) were analyzed as regards patient outcome in 215 contemporarily classified EnOCs. RESULTS Of clinical parameters, grade and stage appeared as strong independent prognostic factors both for disease-free and disease-specific overall survival. Grades 1-3 distinguished clearly from each other in the survival analysis, whereas stages I-II and stages III-IV clustered with each other. PR, ER, nuclear β-catenin and vimentin positivity were associated with favorable overall outcome and clinical parameters, whereas abnormal expression of p53, overexpression of p16 and L1CAM positivity were associated with aggressive disease characteristics and poor survival. The frequency of good-prognosis markers PR and β-catenin gradually decreased and poor-prognosis markers p53, p16 and L1CAM gradually increased from grade 1-3. However, vimentin and ER were expressed at similar frequencies across different grades and presented with independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS We found histological grade and disease stage, but not residual tumor, to be independent clinical prognostic factors in EnOC. A set of good-prognosis markers (PR, ER, β-catenin and vimentin) and poor-prognosis markers (p53, p16 and L1CAM) were identified. Our findings support continuation of the use of the 3-tier grading system for EnOC and provide clinically feasible IHC biomarkers for prognostic profiling.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ordulu Z, Watkins J, Ritterhouse LL. Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers. Surg Pathol Clin 2021; 14:415-428. [PMID: 34373093 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Ordulu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen S, Li Y, Qian L, Deng S, Liu L, Xiao W, Zhou Y. A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:668151. [PMID: 34150634 PMCID: PMC8210668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangfeng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuebo Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lili Qian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Sisi Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Luwen Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weihua Xiao
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, The CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.,Institute of Immunology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Karpathiou G, Papoudou-Bai A, Zarkavelis G, Picot T, Peoc'h M. Molecular Analysis of an Abdominal Wall Cesarean Section Endometrioid Carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol 2021; 30:68-71. [PMID: 33988473 DOI: 10.1177/10668969211018262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant transformation of endometriosis is rare, and most cases concern the ovaries, while extraovarian cases are mostly found in the rectovaginal septum. Incisional adenocarcinoma is extremely rare, with only few cases reported in the literature, while their molecular profile remains unknown. Thus, we report on an abdominal wall cesarean section scar endometrioid adenocarcinoma studied by next-generation sequencing and microsatellite instability analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - George Zarkavelis
- University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.,Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Karnezis AN, Chen SY, Chow C, Yang W, Hendricks WPD, Ramos P, Briones N, Mes-Masson AM, Bosse T, Gilks CB, Trent JM, Weissman B, Huntsman DG, Wang Y. Re-assigning the histologic identities of COV434 and TOV-112D ovarian cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 160:568-578. [PMID: 33328126 PMCID: PMC10039450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of effective cancer treatments depends on the availability of cell lines that faithfully recapitulate the cancer in question. This study definitively re-assigns the histologic identities of two ovarian cancer cell lines, COV434 (originally described as a granulosa cell tumour) and TOV-112D (originally described as grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma), both of which were recently suggested to represent small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), based on their shared gene expression profiles and sensitivity to EZH2 inhibitors. METHODS For COV434 and TOV-112D, we re-reviewed the original pathology slides and obtained clinical follow-up on the patients, when available, and performed immunohistochemistry for SMARCA4, SMARCA2 and additional diagnostic markers on the original formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clinical material, when available. For COV434, we further performed whole exome sequencing and validated SMARCA4 mutations by Sanger sequencing. We studied the growth of the cell lines at baseline and upon re-expression of SMARCA4 in vitro for both cell lines and evaluated the serum calcium levels in vivo upon injection into immunodeficient mice for COV434 cells. RESULTS The available morphological, immunohistochemical, genetic, and clinical features indicate COV434 is derived from SCCOHT, and TOV-112D is a dedifferentiated carcinoma. Transplantation of COV434 into mice leads to increased serum calcium level. Re-expression of SMARCA4 in either COV434 and TOV-112D cells suppressed their growth dramatically. CONCLUSIONS COV434 represents a bona fide SCCOHT cell line. TOV-112D is a dedifferentiated ovarian carcinoma cell line.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology
- Carcinoma, Small Cell/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Small Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology
- Cell Dedifferentiation/genetics
- Cell Line, Tumor/drug effects
- Cell Line, Tumor/pathology
- DNA Helicases/analysis
- DNA Helicases/deficiency
- DNA Helicases/genetics
- Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors
- Female
- Gene Expression Profiling
- Humans
- Mice
- Nuclear Proteins/analysis
- Nuclear Proteins/deficiency
- Nuclear Proteins/genetics
- Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Transcription Factors/analysis
- Transcription Factors/deficiency
- Transcription Factors/genetics
- Exome Sequencing
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Shary Yuting Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christine Chow
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Winnie Yang
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William P D Hendricks
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pilar Ramos
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Natalia Briones
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jeffrey M Trent
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Bernard Weissman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Yemin Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zyla RE, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Amemiya Y, Bassiouny D, Seth A, Djordjevic B, Nofech-Mozes S, Parra-Herran C. CTNNB1 Mutations and Aberrant β-Catenin Expression in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Correlation With Patient Outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:68-76. [PMID: 32769429 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CTNNB1 mutations and aberrant β-catenin expression have adverse prognosis in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, and recent evidence suggests a prognostic role of β-catenin in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. Thus, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of the CTNNB1 mutational status, and its correlation with β-catenin expression, in a well-annotated cohort of 51 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. We performed immunohistochemistry for β-catenin and developed an 11-gene next-generation sequencing panel that included whole exome sequencing of CTNNB1 and TP53. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic variables including disease-free and disease-specific survival. Tumor recurrence was documented in 14 patients (27%), and cancer-related death in 8 patients (16%). CTNNB1 mutations were found in 22 cases (43%), and nuclear β-catenin in 26 cases (51%). CTNNB1 mutation highly correlated with nuclear β-catenin (P<0.05). Mutated CTNNB1 status was statistically associated with better disease-free survival (P=0.04, log-rank test) and approached significance for better disease-specific survival (P=0.07). It also correlated with earlier International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P<0.05). Nuclear β-catenin, TP53 mutations, age, ProMisE group, surface involvement, tumor grade and stage also correlated with disease-free survival. There was no association between membranous β-catenin expression and disease-free or disease-specific survival. CTNNB1 mutations and nuclear β-catenin expression are associated with better progression-free survival in patients with OEC. This relationship may be in part due to a trend of CTNNB1-mutated tumors to present at early stage. β-catenin immunohistochemistry may serve as a prognostic biomarker and a surrogate for CTNN1B mutations in the evaluation of patients with ovarian endometrioid neoplasia, particularly those in reproductive-age or found incidentally without upfront staging surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman E Zyla
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Yutaka Amemiya
- Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dina Bassiouny
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.,Department of Pathology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Arun Seth
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.,Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Santandrea G, Piana S, Valli R, Zanelli M, Gasparini E, De Leo A, Mandato VD, Palicelli A. Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:199. [PMID: 33572888 PMCID: PMC7911119 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The term "ovarian carcinoma" encompasses at least five different malignant neoplasms: high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These five histotypes demonstrated distinctive histological, molecular, and clinical features. The rise of novel target therapies and of a tailored oncological approach has demanded an integrated multidisciplinary approach in the setting of ovarian carcinoma. The need to implement a molecular-based classification in the worldwide diagnostic and therapeutic setting of ovarian cancer demanded a search for easy-to-use and cost-effective molecular-surrogate biomarkers, relying particularly on immunohistochemical analysis. The present review focuses on the role of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of molecular analysis in the everyday diagnostic approach to ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Santandrea
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Simonetta Piana
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Riccardo Valli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Elisa Gasparini
- Oncology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, AUSL Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo Dario Mandato
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ji R, Li Y, He C, Zhu X, He A, Lu Y. Detection and analysis of multiple biomarkers in ovarian cancer: clinical significance in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation. Gland Surg 2020; 9:2175-2186. [PMID: 33447568 PMCID: PMC7804549 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical significance of CA125, CK7, CK20, ER, PR, C-erbb2, and P-gp in ovarian cancer. METHODS Ovarian cancer patients were recruited from Nantong Cancer Hospital between March 2006 and July 2011. The expressions of CA125, CK7, CK20, ER, PR, C-erbb2, and P-gp were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC).The chi-square test (χ2) was used to analyze the correlation between each index and the clinical characteristics of the patients. The patients were followed up to record the cancer recurrence time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to map the cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and COX regression analysis was established for multivariate analysis. RESULTS The results of IHC showed that the positive expression rates of CA125, CK7, ER, C-erbb2, and P-gp in malignant ovarian cancer tissues were significantly higher than those in benign ovarian cancer tissues. CA125 expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age of patients and the Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. CK7 expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age, tissue differentiation, and number of residual lesions. CK20 expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age and tissue differentiation of the patients. ER expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age of patients and FIGO stage. PR expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age of the patients. C-erbb2 expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the age of the patients. P-gp expression in malignant ovarian cancer was significantly correlated with the patient age, pathological type, and tissue differentiation. The expression of CA125, CK7, CK20, C-erbb2, and P-gp had significant effects on the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer. The COX regression analysis showed that P-gp was an independent risk factor for ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS In malignant ovarian cancer tissues, CA125, CK7, CK20, ER, PR, C-erbb2, and P-gp are over-expressed. The expression of P-gp is an independent risk factor for ovarian cancer, and it can be an important target for the treatment of malignant ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Ji
- Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Chenyun He
- Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xinghua Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Aiqin He
- Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yunyan Lu
- Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McCluggage WG. Endometriosis-related pathology: a discussion of selected uncommon benign, premalignant and malignant lesions. Histopathology 2020; 76:76-92. [PMID: 31846535 DOI: 10.1111/his.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is an extremely common condition and, in most cases, establishing a histological diagnosis is straightforward, although a variety of benign alterations may result in problems with interpretation. In this review, I discuss selected uncommon variants of endometriosis or benign alterations that may result in diagnostic problems. The topics covered include the contentious issue of so-called atypical endometriosis, stromal endometriosis, polypoid endometriosis, and the association of endometriosis with florid mesothelial hyperplasia. The propensity of endometriosis to undergo neoplastic transformation (especially to endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma) is well known. Selected issues relating to the various neoplasms that can arise in endometriosis are discussed, with a particular concentration on unusual variants of endometrioid carcinoma that result in a disproportionately high number of issues in referral practice. The propensity of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas to show an unexpected ('aberrant') immunophenotype with positive staining with 'intestinal' markers and negative staining with Mullerian markers is also discussed. Uncommon tumour types that may arise in endometriosis, namely seromucinous neoplasms, mesonephric-like carcinomas, and somatically derived yolk sac tumours, are also covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Endometrial Gastric (Gastrointestinal)-type Mucinous Lesions: Report of a Series Illustrating the Spectrum of Benign and Malignant Lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44:406-419. [PMID: 31567280 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the recent elucidation of gastric-type lesions in the female genital tract (especially in the cervix), occasional cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma displaying gastric (gastrointestinal) differentiation have been reported, but they are currently not recognized as a distinct pathologic entity. We report 9 cases of endometrial mucinous lesions which exhibit gastric (gastrointestinal)-type features by morphology and immunohistochemistry, including 4 adenocarcinomas and 5 benign mucinous lesions, in patients aged 32 to 85. The adenocarcinomas showed gastric-type morphology in all 4 cases and goblet cells in 1, with a component of benign gastric-type mucinous glands in 1 case. Immunohistochemically, the adenocarcinomas were positive for CK7 (4/4), CEA (4/4), MUC6 (3/3), PAX8 (3/4), CK20 (2/4), CDX2 (2/4), and estrogen receptor (1/4). They were negative for Napsin A (0/3), with mutation-type p53 staining in 2/4 cases, block-type p16 positivity in 1/4, and scattered chromogranin-positive cells in 1/2. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed nonsense mutation in RB1 gene for the case with block-positive p16. Follow-up was available in all adenocarcinoma cases and indicated aggressive behavior; 2 patients were dead of disease at follow-up of 7 months to 3 years, 1 was alive with progression at 9 months, and 1 was alive without disease at 7 months. The benign mucinous lesions (including the benign component in 1 adenocarcinoma) exhibited gastric-type morphologic features in 5/6 cases, goblet cells in 5/6, and Paneth-like neuroendocrine cells in 1/6. These benign mucinous lesions were associated with an endometrial polyp in 5/6 cases. Cytologic atypia was present in 2/6 cases and a lobular architecture resembling cervical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia in 4/6. Immunohistochemically, the benign mucinous lesions were positive for CK7 (5/5), CDX2 (5/6), estrogen receptor (4/5), MUC6 (4/5), CK20 (3/5), PAX8 (3/5), and CEA (2/4), with scattered chromogranin-positive cells in 4/4 cases; in all cases tested Napsin A was negative, p53 was wild-type and p16 was negative. We propose the term "endometrial gastric (gastrointestinal)-type adenocarcinoma" for this distinctive group of rare aggressive endometrial carcinomas. We believe that benign or atypical gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous lesions are putative precursors for these adenocarcinomas, comparable to recognized premalignant gastric-type lesions in the cervix and the vagina. Future recognition and reporting of these gastric-type endometrial mucinous lesions will help delineate their pathogenesis and clinical significance.
Collapse
|
28
|
Krämer P, Talhouk A, Brett MA, Chiu DS, Cairns ES, Scheunhage DA, Hammond RFL, Farnell D, Nazeran TM, Grube M, Xia Z, Senz J, Leung S, Feil L, Pasternak J, Dixon K, Hartkopf A, Krämer B, Brucker S, Heitz F, du Bois A, Harter P, Kommoss FKF, Sinn HP, Heublein S, Kommoss F, Vollert HW, Manchanda R, de Kroon CD, Nijman HW, de Bruyn M, Thompson EF, Bashashati A, McAlpine JN, Singh N, Tinker AV, Staebler A, Bosse T, Kommoss S, Köbel M, Anglesio MS. Endometrial Cancer Molecular Risk Stratification is Equally Prognostic for Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5400-5410. [PMID: 32737030 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is generally associated with a more favorable prognosis compared with other ovarian carcinomas. Nonetheless, current patient treatment continues to follow a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Even though tumor staging offers stratification, personalized treatments remain elusive. As ENOC shares many clinical and molecular features with its endometrial counterpart, we sought to investigate The Cancer Genome Atlas-inspired endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular subtyping in a cohort of ENOC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IHC and mutation biomarkers were used to segregate 511 ENOC tumors into four EC-inspired molecular subtypes: low-risk POLE mutant (POLEmut), moderate-risk mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), high-risk p53 abnormal (p53abn), and moderate-risk with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Survival analysis with established clinicopathologic and subtype-specific features was performed. RESULTS A total of 3.5% of cases were POLEmut, 13.7% MMRd, 9.6% p53abn, and 73.2% NSMP, each showing distinct outcomes (P < 0.001) and survival similar to observations in EC. Median OS was 18.1 years in NSMP, 12.3 years in MMRd, 4.7 years in p53abn, and not reached for POLEmut cases. Subtypes were independent of stage, grade, and residual disease in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS EC-inspired molecular classification provides independent prognostic information in ENOC. Our findings support investigating molecular subtype-specific management recommendations for patients with ENOC; for example, subtypes may provide guidance when fertility-sparing treatment is desired. Similarities between ENOC and EC suggest that patients with ENOC may benefit from management strategies applied to EC and the opportunity to study those in umbrella trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Krämer
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mary Anne Brett
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek S Chiu
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daniëlla A Scheunhage
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rory F L Hammond
- Barts Health National Health Service Trust, Department of Pathology, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Farnell
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tayyebeh M Nazeran
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Zhouchunyang Xia
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janine Senz
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lukas Feil
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jana Pasternak
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katherine Dixon
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Krämer
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Felix K F Kommoss
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Institute of Pathology, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Hans-Walter Vollert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medizin Campus Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Wolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cornelis D de Kroon
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marco de Bruyn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emily F Thompson
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ali Bashashati
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Naveena Singh
- Barts Health National Health Service Trust, Department of Pathology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna V Tinker
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Annette Staebler
- University Hospital Tuebingen, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Meagher NS, Wang L, Rambau PF, Intermaggio MP, Huntsman DG, Wilkens LR, El-Bahrawy MA, Ness RB, Odunsi K, Steed H, Herpel E, Anglesio MS, Zhang B, Lambie N, Swerdlow AJ, Lubiński J, Vierkant RA, Goode EL, Menon U, Toloczko-Grabarek A, Oszurek O, Bilic S, Talhouk A, García-Closas M, Wang Q, Tan A, Farrell R, Kennedy CJ, Jimenez-Linan M, Sundfeldt K, Etter JL, Menkiszak J, Goodman MT, Klonowski P, Leung Y, Winham SJ, Moysich KB, Behrens S, Kluz T, Edwards RP, Gronwald J, Modugno F, Hernandez BY, Chow C, Kelemen LE, Keeney GL, Carney ME, Natanzon Y, Robertson G, Sharma R, Gayther SA, Alsop J, Luk H, Karpinskyj C, Campbell I, Sinn P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Coulson P, Chang-Claude J, Shah M, Widschwendter M, Tang K, Schoemaker MJ, Koziak JM, Cook LS, Brenton JD, Daley F, Kristjansdottir B, Mateoiu C, Larson MC, Harnett PR, Jung A, deFazio A, Gorringe KL, Pharoah PDP, Minoo P, Stewart C, Bathe OF, Gui X, Cohen P, Ramus SJ, Köbel M. A combination of the immunohistochemical markers CK7 and SATB2 is highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from colorectal and appendiceal metastases. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1834-1846. [PMID: 31239549 PMCID: PMC8207534 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0302-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Primary ovarian mucinous tumors can be difficult to distinguish from metastatic gastrointestinal neoplasms by histology alone. The expected immunoprofile of a suspected metastatic lower gastrointestinal tumor is CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+/PAX8-. This study assesses the addition of a novel marker SATB2, to improve the diagnostic algorithm. A test cohort included 155 ovarian mucinous tumors (105 carcinomas and 50 borderline tumors) and 230 primary lower gastrointestinal neoplasms (123 colorectal adenocarcinomas and 107 appendiceal neoplasms). All cases were assessed for SATB2, PAX8 CK7, CK20, and CDX2 expression on tissue microarrays. Expression was scored in a 3-tier system as absent, focal (1-50% of tumor cells) and diffuse ( >50% of tumor cells) and then categorized into either absent/present or nondiffuse/diffuse. SATB2 and PAX8 expression was further evaluated in ovarian tumors from an international cohort of 2876 patients (expansion cohort, including 159 mucinous carcinomas and 46 borderline mucinous tumors). The highest accuracy of an individual marker in distinguishing lower gastrointestinal from ovarian mucinous tumors was CK7 (91.7%, nondiffuse/diffuse cut-off) followed by SATB2 (88.8%, present/absent cut-off). The most effective combination was CK7 and SATB2 with accuracy of 95.3% using the 3-tier interpretation, absent/focal/diffuse. This combination outperformed the standard clinical set of CK7, CK20 and CDX2 (87.5%). Re-evaluation of outlier cases confirmed ovarian origin for all but one case. The accuracy of SATB2 was confirmed in the expansion cohort (91.5%). SATB2 expression was also detected in 15% of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma but less than 5% of other ovarian histotypes. A simple two marker combination of CK7 and SATB2 can distinguish lower gastrointestinal from ovarian primary mucinous tumors with greater than 95% accuracy. PAX8 and CDX2 have value as second-line markers. The utility of CK20 in this setting is low and this warrants replacement of this marker with SATB2 in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola S Meagher
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School. UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Linyuan Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Pathology Department, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - David G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver General Hospital, BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Department of Histopathology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Roberta B Ness
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology. Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Esther Herpel
- Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bonnie Zhang
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Neil Lambie
- NSW Health Pathology. Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Oleg Oszurek
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sanela Bilic
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver General Hospital, BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Western Women's Pathology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, Wembley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rhonda Farrell
- Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Inst Clinical Scienses, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - John L Etter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul Klonowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yee Leung
- Histopathology Department, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No 1, Faculty of Medicine, Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Christine Chow
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Yanina Natanzon
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gregory Robertson
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hugh Luk
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH). University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katrina Tang
- NSW Health Pathology. Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Linda S Cook
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Frances Daley
- Division of Breast Cancer Research. Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Bioscience, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Inst Clinical Scienses, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network. Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Parham Minoo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Colin Stewart
- Histopathology Department, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Oliver F Bathe
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Xianyong Gui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Paul Cohen
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Le Page C, Köbel M, Meunier L, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM, Rahimi K. A COEUR cohort study of SATB2 expression and its prognostic value in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH 2019; 5:177-188. [PMID: 30924313 PMCID: PMC6648975 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the expression of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). SATB2 is a nuclear matrix-associated transcription factor that is associated with abnormal expression in certain cancers but has not been reported for ovarian carcinoma. SATB2 mRNA and protein expression was first assessed in a pilot cohort of 26 samples by Affymetrix microarray and by routine immunohistochemistry on a small tissue microarray. A large multicenter validation cohort representing the well-characterized cases of 235 ovarian EC from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) was then used to validate this result and to assess the prognostic impact of SATB2 expression. SATB2 staining was scored as negative, weak, moderate, and strong intensity, and by percentage of stained cells. No SATB2 expression was observed in clear cell carcinomas but 10% (n = 3) of the ECs in the pilot cohort showed SATB2 expression. In the validation cohort, strong expression was observed in 11% of ECs, while weak or moderate expression levels were detected in 12% of cases. Evaluation of SATB2 expression with clinicopathological parameters revealed an association with patient age and Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade but not with disease stage or postoperative residual disease. Any expression of SATB2, independent of intensity, was also associated with longer survival and improved progression-free survival with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.56) and HR = 0.16 (95% CI 0.02-1.24) respectively. A greater beneficial effect was observed in patients with stage III/IV disease compared to patients with stage I/II disease. Furthermore, direct comparison of SATB2 with other reported prognostic biomarkers such as progesterone receptor, CDX2 and β-catenin within this cohort showed that SATB2 had the strongest association with survival. Given the current lack of accurate prognostic factors for these patients, SATB2 has promising clinical utility and warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Le Page
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic-Oncology, CHUM, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|