Acute pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease, with special reference to azathioprine-induced pancreatitis

Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid induced pancreatitis in a patient with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are well recognised to have the potential to cause drug-induced acute pancreatitis; however, there have only been infrequent case reports of rectal formulations causing acute pancreatitis. We describe a case of rectal Mesalazine (a 5-ASA) induced acute pancreatitis. The patient was commenced on rectal 5-ASA therapy 8 weeks prior to presentation following a diagnosis of Montreal classification E1 Ulcerative Colitis on colonoscopy. After the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was confirmed, 5-ASA was ceased and the patient made a clinical full recovery at 2 month follow-up. Despite its reduced systemic absorption, rectal 5-ASA like oral formations must be considered as a potential trigger for acute pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of pancreatitis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested an association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and pancreatitis, including acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). We aimed to examine the potential causal relationship between IBD and pancreatitis using the Mendelian randomization (MR) method.

METHODS

We obtained data from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in European individuals for IBD and its main subtypes, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (31,665 IBD cases, 13,768 UC cases, 17,897 CD cases and 33,977 controls). Four independent summary statistics of pancreatitis from the the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI, 10,630 AP cases and 844,679 controls, 1,424 CP cases and 476,104 controls) and FinnGen Consortium (8,446 AP cases, 4,820 CP cases and 437,418 controls) were used for bidirectional MR analyses and sensitivity analysis. Finally, further meta-analysis was conducted on the MR results.

RESULTS

Generally, IBD is associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis (IBD-AP, OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.020-1.080, P = 7.20 × 10-5; IBD-CP, OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.010-1.090, P = 0.019). In addition, UC increased the risk of pancreatitis (UC-AP, OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.020-1.070, P = 9.10 × 10-5; UC-CP, OR = 1.090, 95% CI 1.040-1.140, P = 1.44 × 10-4) and CD increased the risk of acute pancreatitis (OR = 1.040, 95% CI 1.020-1.060, P = 9.61 × 10-5). However, no causal association was found between CD and the risk of chronic pancreatitis (P > 0.05). The reverse MR results showed that AP may be associated with a reduced risk of IBD and CD (AP-IBD, OR = 0.880, 95% CI 0.810-0.960, P = 0.003; AP-CD, OR = 0.830, 95% CI 0.730-0.940, P = 0.003). However, there is no causal relationship between AP and the risk of UC, and there is no causal relationship between CP and the risk of IBD and its subtypes(P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, based on MR analysis and meta-analysis, our results showed a positive causal effect of IBD on pancreatitis, and subgroup analyses showed that UC and CD may promote the development of acute pancreatitis, whereas UC may promote the development of chronic pancreatitis. Reverse MR analysis suggests that AP may have a potential protective effect on IBD and CD.

Clinical Features of Thiopurine-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: Comparison Between Patients With and Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and Aims

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing acute pancreatitis (AP). Thiopurines (TP) are a well-known cause of AP. The aims of this study were to compare the incidence of AP and TP-induced AP (TIP) between patients with and without IBD under the use of TP and to assess for risk factors of TIP.

Methods

We examined a retrospective cohort of 664 patients treated with TP from 2016 to 2021 at our institution. AP was defined as pancreatitis confirmed by symptoms, serum tests, and radiology, and TIP as AP occurring shortly after starting TP and improving after withdrawal. We compared the incidence of AP and TIP between patients with and without IBD and reviewed the clinical features of TIP patients in detail.

Results

There were 366 IBD patients and 298 without IBD. IBD patients included 249 males (52.4%) with a median age of 39 years. Among them, 211 had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 155 had Crohn's disease (CD). Azathioprine was administered to 560 patients, and 6-mercaptopurine to 104. AP occurred in 13 IBD patients but in none without IBD, with a significantly higher incidence in IBD patients (1.9% vs. 0%, P = .009). Seven of 13 patients with AP satisfied the criteria for TIP. Furthermore, 5 of the 7 TIP patients had a prior history of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) intolerance.

Conclusions

TIP may be a condition specific to IBD. IBD patients with 5-ASA intolerance are prone to TIP.

Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.

Acute pancreatitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease: Risk factors, clinical course, and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the clinical course of acute pancreatitis (AP) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients compared to children with AP without IBD and to identify risk factors associated with AP among IBD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study compared clinical characteristics of children (<19 years) with AP with and without concomitant IBD who were hospitalized 2005-2019. We also conducted a risk factor analysis of AP development in pediatric IBD.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight (54% males) patients with 120 episodes of AP were admitted at a median age of 15.3 years. Thirteen patients (14 episodes) had a co-diagnosis of IBD, representing 4% of our IBD patient population. The AP-IBD patients presented with lower amylase levels compared to the non-IBD patients (160 [interquartile range, IQR: 83-231] vs. 418 [IQR: 176-874] U/L, p > 0.01), all had a mild pancreatitis, and none required invasive intervention. The presumed etiology for AP in all IBD patients was IBD-related: IBD flare-up in five, side effects of medications in two, and undetermined in seven. The only risk factor for AP development among IBD patients was IBD-associated arthritis (23% vs. 3% for IBD-non-AP, p = 0.04), while extracolonic Crohn's disease and induction therapy with nutrition were negative risk factors (15% vs. 51%, p = 0.05, and 8% vs. 44%, p = 0.04, respectively). Other parameters, including disease type and medications, were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

The clinical course of AP in pediatric IBD patients is mild. Only IBD-associated arthritis emerged as a risk factor for the development of AP, while, unexpectedly, IBD medication did not.

Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated.

AIMS

To assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP.

RESULTS

Thirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge-rechallenge-switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients.

The Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Mediating the Effect of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on nonmalignant Digestive System Diseases: A Multivariable Mendelian Randomized Study

Background

While observation studies have shown a positive correlation between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the risk of nonmalignant digestive system diseases, a definitive causal relationship has not yet been clearly established.

Methods

Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to investigate the potential causal association between genetic susceptibility to IBD and nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases. Genetic variants were extracted as instrumental variables (IVs) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis, which included 12,194 cases of Crohn's disease (CD) and 28,072 control cases of European ancestry. The GWAS for ulcerative colitis (UC) included 12,366 UC and 33,609 control cases of European ancestry. All IVs reached genome-wide significance (GWAS p value <5 × 10-8). Summary-level data for acute pancreatitis (AP), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease, cholelithiasis, and CeD (celiac disease) were obtained from the GWAS meta-analysis and the FinnGen dataset. Summary-level data on relevant inflammatory factors were provided by the International Genetic Consortium. Univariate MR analysis was conducted using inverse variance weighting as the primary method for estimating causal effects. Multivariate MR analyses were also performed to detect possible mediators.

Results

Genetic susceptibility to UC was associated with an increased risk of AP (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.03-1.13; p=0.002) and IBS odds ratio (OR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI] = 1.03-1.11; (p < 0.001). In terms of potential mediators, interleukin 6 (IL-6) had a driving effect on the association between UC and AP. There was no apparent evidence of increased risk with CD. Meanwhile, genetic susceptibility to CD increases the risk of CeD (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.03-1.25; p=0.01).

Conclusions

The evidence suggests that UC is associated with an elevated risk of AP and IBS, and IL-6 may be responsible in AP. CD is associated with an increased risk of developing CeD. Implementing a proactive monitoring program for assessing the risk of gastrointestinal diseases in UC patients, particularly those with elevated IL-6 levels, may be of interest. In addition, the presence of AP and IBS may indicate the presence of UC. Preventing CeD is an essential consideration in the therapeutic management of patients with CD.

Evaluation of Genetic Variants Associated with the Risk of Thiopurine-Related Pancreatitis: A Case Control Study from ENEIDA Registry

INTRODUCTION

Risk factors for developing pancreatitis due to thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not clearly identified. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive pharmacogenetic risk of pancreatitis in IBD patients treated with thiopurines.

METHODS

We conducted an observational pharmacogenetic study of acute pancreatitis events in a cohort study of IBD patients treated with thiopurines from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry biobank of GETECCU. Samples were obtained and the CASR, CEL, CFTR, CDLN2, CTRC, SPINK1, CPA1, and PRSS1 genes, selected based on their known association with pancreatitis, were fully sequenced.

RESULTS

Ninety-five cases and 105 controls were enrolled; a total of 57% were women. Median age at pancreatitis diagnosis was 39 years. We identified 81 benign variants (50 in cases and 67 in controls) and a total of 35 distinct rare pathogenic and unknown significance variants (10 in CEL, 21 in CFTR, 1 in CDLN2, and 3 in CPA1). None of the cases or controls carried pancreatitis-predisposing variants within the CASR, CPA1, PRSS1, and SPINK1 genes, nor a pathogenic CFTR mutation. Four different variants of unknown significance were detected in the CDLN and CPA1 genes; one of them was in the CDLN gene in a single patient with pancreatitis and 3 in the CPA1 gene in 5 controls. After the analysis of the variants detected, no significant differences were observed between cases and controls.

CONCLUSION

In patients with IBD, genes known to cause pancreatitis seem not to be involved in thiopurine-related pancreatitis onset.

Temporal Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pancreatitis Co-Occurrence in Children and Adults in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease has been attributed to peripancreatic intestinal disease and/or drug-induced pancreatic toxicity. We used large cohort analyses to define inflammatory bowel disease and pancreatitis temporal co-occurrence with a detailed descriptive analysis to gain greater insight into the pathophysiological relationship between these 2 diseases.

METHODS

Truven Health MarketScan private insurance claims from 141,017,841 patients (younger than 65 years) and 7,457,709 patients from 4 academic hospitals were analyzed. We calculated the prevalence of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) with acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis (CP) and performed temporal and descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

Of 516,724 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 12,109 individuals (2.3%) had pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis (AP) was 2-6x more prevalent than CP. In adults, AP occurred equally among Crohn's disease and UC (1.8%-2.2% vs 1.6%-2.1%, respectively), whereas in children, AP was more frequent in UC (2.3%-3.4% vs 1.5%-1.8%, respectively). The highest proportion of pancreatitis (21.7%-44.7%) was at/near the time of inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. Of them, 22.1%-39.3% were on steroids during pancreatitis. Individuals with CP or recurrent pancreatitis hospitalizations had increased risk of a future inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis (odds ratio = 1.52 or 1.72, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease may not simply be a drug adverse event but may also involve local and/or systemic processes that negatively affect the pancreas. Our analysis of pancreatitis before, during, and after inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis suggests a bidirectional pathophysiologic relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and pancreatitis, with potentially more complexity than previously appreciated.

Acute idiopathic pancreatitis is associated with more aggressive disease course in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), whether Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. The prognostic value of diagnosing acute idiopathic pancreatitis in patients with IBD is not well understood.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 56 patients with IBD and acute pancreatitis was conducted in a tertiary center from 2011 to 2020. Aggressive disease course was defined as (i)biologic change, (ii)biologic dose escalation, or (iii)IBD-related surgeries occurring within 1 year of acute pancreatitis diagnosis. Logistic regression modelling identified associations between covariates and an aggressive disease course.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics between idiopathic pancreatitis and other causes of acute pancreatitis, in both CD and UC cohorts, were similar. Idiopathic pancreatitis was significantly associated with an aggressive disease course in CD (P = 0.04). No confounding factors were associated with an aggressive disease course in CD. Idiopathic pancreatitis, however, was not associated with an aggressive disease course in UC (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of acute idiopathic pancreatitis may provide a prognostic indicator of a more severe disease course in CD. No such association appears to exist with UC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that identifies an association and possible prognostic value between idiopathic pancreatitis and a more severe disease course in CD. More studies with a larger sample size are needed to validate these findings, further define idiopathic pancreatitis as an extraintestinal manifestation of IBD and elucidate a clinical strategy to optimize care in patients with aggressive CD and idiopathic pancreatitis.

A Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Intestinal and Systemic Diseases Associated with Pancreatic Disorders: Causality or Casualty?

The relationship between chronic intestinal disease, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and celiac disease (CelD), and pancreatic disorders has been little investigated. Although an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency with or without chronic pancreatitis, and chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia have been described in these patients, the pathogenetic link remains unclear. It may potentially involve drugs, altered microcirculation, gut permeability/motility with disruption of enteric-mediated hormone secretion, bacterial translocation, and activation of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue related to chronic inflammation. In addition, the risk of pancreatic cancer seems to be increased in both IBD and CelD patients with unknown pathogenesis. Finally, other systemic conditions (e.g., IgG4-related disease, sarcoidosis, vasculitides) might affect pancreatic gland and the intestinal tract with various clinical manifestations. This review includes the current understandings of this enigmatic association, reporting a clinical and pathophysiological overview about this topic.

Crohn's disease: review and standardization of nomenclature

Crohn's disease is an inflammatory bowel disease that can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract. It has a variable clinical course, with alternating periods of disease activity and remission. Because the incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease have been increasing, evaluation by imaging methods has become more important. The most widely used methods are computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography (as an elective examination), and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (in the context of emergency). Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography are useful for diagnosis, follow-up, evaluation of complications, and prognosis. Both can be used in order to evaluate the small bowel loops and the associated mesenteric findings, as well as to evaluate other abdominal organs. They both also can detect signs of disease activity, fibrosis, penetrating disease, and complications. The interpretation of such changes is essential to the multidisciplinary approach, as is the standardization of the nomenclature employed in the reports. In this paper, we review and illustrate the imaging findings of Crohn's disease, using the standardized nomenclature proposed in the multidisciplinary consensus statement issued by the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the Society of Pediatric Radiology, and the American Gastroenterology Association, with recommendations for descriptions, interpretations, and impressions related to those findings.

Thiopurines impair the apical plasma membrane expression of CFTR in pancreatic ductal cells via RAC1 inhibition

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurine-induced acute pancreatitis (TIP) is one of the most common adverse events among inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with azathioprine (AZA), representing a significant clinical burden. Previous studies focused on immune-mediated processes, however, the exact pathomechanism of TIP is essentially unclear.

METHODS

To model TIP in vivo, we triggered cerulein-induced experimental pancreatitis in mice receiving a daily oral dose of 1.5 mg/kg AZA. Also, freshly isolated mouse pancreatic cells were exposed to AZA ex vivo, and acinar cell viability, ductal and acinar Ca²⁺ signaling, ductal Cl^- and HCO₃^- secretion, as well as cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) expression were assessed using microscopy techniques. Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate (RAC1) activity was measured with a G-LISA assay. Super-resolution microscopy was used to determine protein colocalization.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that AZA treatment increases tissue damage in the early phase of cerulein-induced pancreatitis in vivo. Also, both per os and ex vivo AZA exposure impaired pancreatic fluid and ductal HCO₃^- and Cl^- secretion, but did not affect acinar cells. Furthermore, ex vivo AZA exposure also inhibited RAC1 activity in ductal cells leading to decreased co-localization of CFTR and the anchor protein ezrin, resulting in impaired plasma membrane localization of CFTR.

CONCLUSIONS

AZA impaired the ductal HCO₃^- and Cl^- secretion through the inhibition of RAC1 activity leading to diminished ezrin-CFTR interaction and disturbed apical plasma membrane expression of CFTR. We report a novel direct toxic effect of AZA on pancreatic ductal cells and suggest that the restoration of ductal function might help to prevent TIP in the future.

Severity of acute pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biologics: A propensity-score-matched analysis using a nationwide database in Japan

Background and Aim

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several studies from Western countries have reported that the severity of AP in patients with IBD is similar to that in the general population; however, its severity in patients from Eastern countries in the era of biologics remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the severity of AP in patients with IBD and the effect of biologics on the severity of AP using a nationwide database.

Methods

We divided 1138 eligible AP admissions from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database system into IBD and non-IBD groups after propensity score matching, and compared the severity of AP. We divided the IBD group into ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) subgroups and compared each with the non-IBD group. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the clinical factors affecting acute pancreatitis.

Results

IBD and UC groups had lower rate of severe AP compared to the non-IBD group (13.7% vs 28.3%, P < 0.0001 and 11.0% vs 28.3%, P < 0.0001, respectively). There were no differences in the rates of severe AP between the CD and non-IBD groups. Multivariate analysis showed that biologics did not affect the severity of AP.

Conclusion

The severity of AP in patients with IBD may be lower than that in the general population; biologics for IBD may not worsen its severity. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the severity of AP in patients with IBD.

Inflammatory bowel disease does not alter the clinical features and the management of acute pancreatitis: A prospective, multicentre, exact-matched cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE AND AIMS

Acute pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease occurs mainly as an extraintestinal manifestation or a side effect of medications. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and severity indicators of acute pancreatitis and the treatment of patients with both diseases.

DESIGN

We performed a matched case-control registry analysis of a multicentre, prospective, international acute pancreatitis registry. Patients with both diseases were matched to patients with acute pancreatitis only in a 1:3 ratio by age and gender. Subgroup analyses were also carried out based on disease type, activity, and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

No difference in prognostic factors (laboratory parameters, bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis, imaging results) and outcomes of acute pancreatitis (length of hospitalization, severity, and local or systemic complications) were detected between groups. Significantly lower analgesic use was observed in the inflammatory bowel disease population. Antibiotic use during acute pancreatitis was significantly more common in the immunosuppressed group than in the non-immunosuppressed group (p = 0.017). However, none of the prognostic parameters or the severity indicators showed a significant difference between any subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in the prognosis and severity of acute pancreatitis could be detected between patients with both diseases and with pancreatitis only. The need for different acute pancreatitis management is not justified in the coexistence of inflammatory bowel disease, and antibiotic overuse should be avoided.

Clinical insights into drug-associated pancreatic injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-induced pancreatitis is one of the top three causes of acute pancreatitis. A drug exposure is traditionally determined to be the cause of pancreatitis only after other possible and common causes of pancreatitis have been excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we challenge this traditional notion of drug-induced pancreatitis as a diagnosis of exclusion. Instead, we propose to shift the paradigm of conceptualizing what we term drug-associated pancreatic injury (DAPI); as a continuum of pancreatic injury that can be concomitant with other risk factors. The aims of this targeted review are to harness recent literature to build a foundation for conceptualizing DAPI, to highlight specific drugs associated with DAPI, and to describe a framework for future studies of DAPI.

SUMMARY

Our hope is that probing and characterizing the mechanisms underlying the various types of DAPI will lead to safer use of the DAPI-inducing drugs by minimizing the adverse event of pancreatitis.

Systematic review-pancreatic involvement in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disorder of the gut with frequent extra-intestinal complications. Pancreatic involvement in IBD is not uncommon and comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions, including acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI); however, data on such an association remain sparse and heterogeneous.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating pancreatic involvement in patients with IBD.

RESULTS

Four thousand one hundred and twenty-one records were identified and 547 screened; finally, 124 studies were included in the review. AP is the most frequent pancreatic manifestation in IBD; the majority of AP cases in IBD are due to gallstones and drugs but cases of idiopathic AP are increasingly reported. AIP is a rare disease, but a strong association with IBD has been demonstrated, especially for type 2 and ulcerative colitis. The pathogenetic link between IBD and AIP remains unclear, but an immune-mediated pathway seems plausible. An association between CP and PEI with IBD has also been suggested, but data are to date scarce and conflicting.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the association between IBD and pancreatic diseases. Gallstones and drugs should be considered the most probable causes of AP in IBD, with type 2 AIP also being possible.

Finding Predictors of Azathioprine-Induced Pancreatitis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OBJECTIVES

Azathioprine (AZA)-induced pancreatitis (AIP) is a common, idiosyncratic adverse effect whose incidence and risk factors data in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are not fully clarified. We aimed to establish the incidence, clinical course and identify risk factors for AIP.

METHODS

A retrospective study including all IBD patients on AZA between January 2013 and July 2020 was conducted. Patients with AIP were considered.

RESULTS

Azathioprine-induced pancreatitis occurred in 33 patients (7.5%; 442 patients on AZA). The mean time receiving AZA until AIP was 25 days, with a mean dose of 88 mg. All patients had a mild course of disease, which resolved with suspension of AZA and with no complications. Smoking (P = 0.02), single daily dose of AZA (P < 0.001), and concomitant budesonide (P = 0.001) were risk factors for AIP. In multivariate analysis, concomitant treatment with budesonide (odds ratio, 5.3; P = 0.002) and single daily dose of AZA (odds ratio, 3.8; P = 0.002) were the only predictors of AIP.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AIP was a relatively common adverse effect, it presented a mild course in all patients. Smoking, concomitant use of budesonide, and single-dose regimen of AZA should be avoided in IBD patients treated with AZA.

HLA-variants associated with azathioprine-induced pancreatitis in patients with Crohn's disease

The immunosuppressant drug azathioprine is associated with a 4% risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Studies have demonstrated an increased risk in carriers of HLA‐DQA1*02:01 and HLA‐DRB1*07:01. We investigated whether these human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types were associated with azathioprine‐induced pancreatitis also in Swedish patients with IBD, and whether the type of disease affected the association. Nineteen individuals with IBD who developed acute pancreatitis after initiation of azathioprine were genotyped and compared with a population control cohort (n = 4891) and a control group matched for disease (n = 81). HLA‐DQA1*02:01 and HLA‐DRB1*07:01 were in full linkage disequilibrium, and were significantly associated with acute pancreatitis both when cases were compared with population controls (OR 3.97 [95% CI 1.57–9.97], p = 0.0035) and matched controls (OR 3.55 [95% CI 1.23–10.98], p = 0.0275). In a disease‐specific analysis, the correlation was positive in patients with Crohn's disease versus matched controls (OR 9.27 [95% CI 1.86–46.19], p = 0.0066), but not in those with ulcerative colitis versus matched controls (OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.07–6.74], p = 0.749). In patients with Crohn's disease, we estimated the conditional risk of carriers of HLA‐DQA1*02:01‐HLA‐DRB1*07:01 to 7.3%, and the conditional risk of a non‐carrier to 2.2%. We conclude that HLA‐DQA1*02:01‐HLA‐DRB1*07:01 is a marker for increased risk of acute pancreatitis in individuals of Swedish genetic origin, treated with azathioprine for Crohn's disease.

Characteristics and Frequency of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Pancreatitis: A Japanese Nationwide Survey

Acute pancreatitis (AP) develops in approximately 2% of patients with the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the characteristics and frequency of childhood-onset IBD-associated AP in Japan have not been studied. The present study aimed to clarify the characteristics of IBD-associated AP in Japan.

Methods

A nationwide survey of pediatric patients with IBD (age, <17 years) was conducted from December 2012 to March 2013 at 683 hospitals and medical centers in Japan. A secondary survey was also sent to the centers with the target patients to evaluate their characteristics.

Results

The response rate to the first part of the survey was 61.2% (n = 418). In total, 871 patients with Crohn disease and 1671 patients with ulcerative colitis were enrolled. The second part of the survey found that 11 (1.3%) patients with Crohn disease and 23 (1.4%) patients with ulcerative colitis experienced IBD-associated AP caused by medication (n = 18, 53%), a primary disease (n = 11, 32%), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 1, 3%), or an anatomical abnormality (n = 1, 3%). All the patients had only mild AP.

Conclusions

IBD-associated AP was not very frequent and was generally mild. The major cause of the pancreatitis was the medication used to treat the IBD.

Pancreatic Disorders in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can involve multiple organ systems, and pancreatic manifestations of IBD are not uncommon. The incidence of several pancreatic diseases is more frequent in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis than in the general population. Pancreatic manifestations in IBD include a heterogeneous group of disorders and abnormalities ranging from mild, self-limited disorders to severe diseases. Asymptomatic elevation of amylase and/or lipase is common. The risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with IBD is increased due to the higher incidence of cholelithiasis and drug-induced pancreatitis in this population. Patients with IBD commonly have altered pancreatic histology and chronic pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. Diagnosing acute pancreatitis in patients with IBD is challenging. In this review, we discuss the manifestations and possible causes of pancreatic abnormalities in patients with IBD.

The unfolded protein response: An emerging therapeutic target for pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatitis is a debilitating disease involving inflammation and fibrosis of the exocrine pancreas. Recurrent or chronic forms of pancreatitis are a significant risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. While genetic factors have been identified for both pathologies, environmental stresses play a large role in their etiology. All cells have adapted mechanisms to handle acute environmental stress that alters energy demands. A common pathway involved in the stress response involves endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR). While rapidly activated by many external stressors, in the pancreas the UPR plays a fundamental biological role, likely due to the high protein demands in acinar cells. Despite this, increased UPR activity is observed in response to acute injury or following exposure to risk factors associated with pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Studies in animal and cell cultures models show the importance of affecting the UPR in the context of both diseases, and inhibitors have been developed for several specific mediators of the UPR. Given the importance of the UPR to normal acinar cell function, efforts to affect the UPR in the context of disease must be able to specifically target pathology vs. physiology. In this review, we highlight the importance of the UPR to normal and pathological conditions of the exocrine pancreas. We discuss recent studies suggesting the UPR may be involved in the initiation and progression of pancreatitis and PDAC, as well as contributing to chemoresistance that occurs in pancreatic cancer. Finally, we discuss the potential of targeting the UPR for treatment.

Frequency, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Outcome of Azathioprine-Induced Pancreatitis Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From a Tertiary Referral Center

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify the frequency of azathioprine-induced acute pancreatitis (AZA-AP) and related factors.

METHODS

Seven hundred eighty-seven inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients on AZA therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Azathioprine-induced AP was diagnosed with positive imaging and/or an at least 3-fold increased amylase level, in presence of typical abdominal pain. The AZA-AP group was compared with patients on AZA therapy with no history of pancreatitis and 4 numerical adjacent cases with the same diagnosis were selected (group B).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients developed gastrointestinal symptoms (6.9%); however, only half of them (26 of 54) had pancreatitis, except 1, all within the first 2 months under AZA. When the AZA-AP group was compared with group B, only budesonide usage and active smoking were significantly more common in group A (46.2% vs 25%, P = 0.034, and 77% vs 51%, P = 0.017, respectively). Active smoking was the only independent risk factor for AZA-AP development (odds ratio, 3.208 [95% confidence interval, 1.192-8.632]).

CONCLUSIONS

All IBD patients developed AZA-AP nearly all within the first 2 months. Azathioprine intolerance may be a hidden diagnosis in at least half of the patients with AZA-AP symptoms. All smoker IBD patients should be monitored closely for AZA-AP development.

Use of thiopurines is not a risk factor for post-ERC pancreatitis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Risk of post-ERC pancreatitis (PEP) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is 1-7.8%. PSC is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis, which are usually treated with thiopurines. The role of thiopurines in PEP risk is still unclear.

AIMS AND METHODS

We evaluated the thiopurine use in PEP. The data of 354 PSC patients who underwent 985 ERCs between 2009 and 2018 were collected. 177 patients treated with thiopurines (study group, SG) and 177 controls (CG) were matched with a propensity score (PSM). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and generalized linear mixed model were performed. The P-value <0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

In matched data, 472 ERCs were performed in SG and 513 in CG. Thiopurines were used in 373/472 (79.0%) ERCs in SG. The PEP rate was 5.3% in SG and 5.7% in CG (p = 0.889). Unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.07-1.51, p = 0.004), and periampullary diverticulum (OR 4.87, 95%CI 1.72-11.98, p = 0.001) increased the risk of PEP.

CONCLUSION

Prior or present thiopurine use did not increase the risk of PEP.

Pancreatic Disorders in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition and mainly affects the intestines, however, the involvement of the other organs of the gastrointestinal tract (upper part, pancreas, and liver) have been observed. The coexistence of IBD with pancreatic pathology is rare, however, it has been diagnosed more frequently during recent years in the pediatric population. This article reviews the current literature on the most common pancreatic diseases associated with IBD in the pediatric population and their relationship with IBD activity and treatment. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review of data from published studies on pancreatic disorders, also reported as extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), among children with IBD. We searched PubMed and Web of Science to identify eligible studies published prior to 25 April 2020. Results: Forty-four papers were chosen for analysis after a detailed inspection, which aimed to keep only the research studies (case control studies and cohort studies) or case reports on children and only those which were written in English. The manifestations of IBD-associated pancreatic disorders range from asymptomatic increase in pancreatic enzymes activity to severe disease such as acute pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis (AP) induced by drugs, mainly thiopurine, seems to be the most- often-reported pancreatic disease associated with IBD in children. AP associated with other than drug etiologies, and chronic pancreatitis (CP), are rarely observed in the course of pediatric IBD. The pancreatic involvement can be strictly related to the activity of IBD and can also precede the diagnosis of IBD in some pediatric patients. The course of AP is mild in most cases and may occasionally lead to the development of CP, mainly in cases with a genetic predisposition. Conclusions: The involvement of the pancreas in the course of IBD may be considered as an EIM or a separate co-morbid disease, but it can also be a side effect of IBD therapy, therefore a differential diagnosis should always be performed. As the number of IBD incidences with concomitant pancreatic diseases is constantly increasing in the pediatric population, it is important to include pancreatic enzymes level measurement in the workup of IBD.

Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis following Colonoscopic Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis

A 37-year-old man with corticosteroid-dependent ulcerative pancolitis was taken up for colonoscopic fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Preparation for colonoscopy was done with 118 g polyethylene glycol (PEG) in 2 L water ingested over 2 hours, followed by clear fluids. 200 g of screened donor stool, blended with water was instilled into terminal ileum; cecum; and ascending, transverse, and descending colon. Eighteen hours following ingestion of PEG and 2 hours following FMT, he complained of severe epigastric pain with radiation to back. Serum lipase was 6,756 U/L. He was managed with intravenous (IV) fluids and symptomatic treatment with discontinuation of corticosteroids and 6-MP. Ultrasound did not reveal gall bladder stones or sludge. There was no history of alcohol intake. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan at 48 hours showed bulky pancreas with peripancreatic stranding. He recovered over a week with normalization of lipase. Three weeks later he again reported severe epigastric pain 14 hours following ingestion of PEG, this time prior to colonoscopic FMT. Serum lipase was 1,140 U/L; the procedure was deferred and he recovered with symptomatic treatment over 3 days. Maintenance colonoscopic FMT was performed 4 times over the following 2 years with sodium phosphate preparation with no recurrence of pain. MRCP showed no evidence of chronic pancreatitis. He remains in clinical and endoscopic steroid-free, thiopurine-free remission. PEG is a rare cause of acute pancreatitis and merits consideration in appropriate clinical setting.

Presymptomatic Crohn's Disease in a Young Patient Diagnosed Just After the Onset of Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is an extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease. There have been few reports describing acute pancreatitis preceding a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. We herein report a rare case of a 16-year-old boy with presymptomatic Crohn's disease that was newly diagnosed just after the onset of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Crohn's disease of any stage, much less in the presymptomatic stage, is rarely diagnosed just after the development of acute pancreatitis. The present case suggests that acute pancreatitis without an apparent cause in young or pediatric population can precede a diagnosis of presymptomatic Crohn's disease.

Polyphenols from food by-products: An alternative or complementary therapy to IBD conventional treatments

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are illnesses characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation and microbial dysbiosis that have emerged as a public health challenge worldwide. It comprises two main conditions: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Currently, conventional therapy to treat IBD are not free from side effects, such as liver and kidney toxicity, drug resistance, and allergic reactions. In view of this, there is growing research for alternative and complementary therapies that, in addition to acting in the prevention or the control of the disease, do not compromise the quality of life and health of individuals. In this sense, a growing body of evidence has confirmed the benefits of natural phenolic compounds in intestinal health. Phenolic compounds or polyphenols are molecules widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom (flowers, vegetables, leaves, and fruits), including plant materials remaining of the handling and food industrial processing, referred to in the scientific literature as by-products, food waste, or bagasse. Since by-products are low-cost, abundant, easily accessible, safe, and rich in bioactive compounds, it becomes an exciting option to extract, concentrate or isolate phenolic compounds to be posteriorly applied in the therapeutic approach of IBD. In this article, we have reviewed the main phenolic compounds present in various plants and by-products that have shown beneficial and/or promising effects in experimental pre-clinical, clinical, and in vitro research with IBD. In addition, we have mentioned and suggested several plants and by-products originated and produced in Latin America that could be part of future research as good sources of specific phenolic compounds to be applied in the prevention and development of alternative treatments for IBD. This review may offer a valuable reference for studies related to IBD administering phenolic compounds from natural, cheap, and easily accessible raw and undervalued materials.

Outcomes of drug-induced acute pancreatitis: a ten-year experience of an academic center

BACKGROUND

drug-induced pancreatitis is an unexplored entity.

METHODS

a retrospective cohort study was performed at a referral center. Patients with drug-induced acute pancreatitis between 2008 and 2018 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, involved drugs, clinical course and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

drug-induced pancreatitis represented 2.8 % of acute pancreatitis (47/1,665) and 18 different drugs were involved (thiopurines 61.8 %). The latency period was less than one month in 87.2 % of cases. Pancreatitis was mild in 89.3 % and recurrence risk was 2.3 %.

CONCLUSION

drugs are a rare cause of pancreatitis, which mostly occurs within the first month of treatment, is usually mild and is associated with a low risk of recurrence.

What was First, Obesity or Inflammatory Bowel Disease? What Does the Gut Microbiota Have to Do with It?

A sedentary lifestyle and inadequate nutrition often leads to disturbances in intestinal homeostasis, which may predispose people to excess body weight and metabolic syndrome. Obesity is frequently observed in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), similar to the general population. Obesity may exert a negative effect on the course of IBD as well as reduce the response to treatment. Moreover, it may also be an additional risk factor for vein thromboembolism during the flare. In both obesity and IBD, it is of great importance to implement proper dietary ingredients that exert desirable effect on gut microbiota. The key to reducing body mass index (BMI) and alleviating the course of IBD is preserving healthy intestinal microflora.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Elevate the Risk of Developing Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Increasing data suggest that acute pancreatitis (AP) occurs more frequently among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) than in the non-IBD population; however, currently no comprehensive meta-analysis is available.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was conducted in 4 major databases. We included observational studies sampling from the general population. Basic study characteristics and crude incidences of AP were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroups were set up by Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. Heterogeneity was tested with I statistics.

RESULTS

Eight studies were eligible for the analysis. The odds of AP were 3 times higher in IBD (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.93-3.30; I, 0.0%), significantly higher in Crohn disease than in ulcerative colitis (P < 0.001; OR, 4.12 vs OR, 2.61; I, 0.0%). The pooled annual incidence of AP in IBD was 210/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 84-392/100,000 person-years; I, 98.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that IBD elevates the risk of AP and of 100,000 IBD patients 210 AP cases are to be expected annually. Therefore, it is important to include pancreatic enzyme level measurements and radiological investigations in the workup of IBD patients with acute abdominal pain.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: Prevalence, Causative agents, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We sought to study the causative drugs, prevalence and outcomes of drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP).

METHODS

Retrospective study of DIAP patients at a tertiary teaching hospital. The diagnosis and severity of pancreatitis were determined based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. The cases were further subclassified using the Badalov et al., 2008 classification, and Naranjo score to evaluate and determine the odds of drug-related adverse reaction as a causative factor for AP.

RESULTS

Out of 841 AP patients, a total of 31 patients (3.6%) with DIAP were included. The mean age was 52.9 years, 51.6% were male. The most common causative drugs are listed in Table 3. Most cases were mild in severity (87%), moderate AP occurred in 2 patients (6.5%) and severe AP in 2 patients (6.5%). 19.3% had systemic inflammatory response syndrome at presentation, but it persisted beyond 48 h in only 9.6%. 9.6% developed acute kidney injury. One patient with valproate induced DIAP had pancreatic necrosis, splenic vein thrombus, and sub occlusive superior mesenteric vein thrombus on abdominal imaging. Three patients had recurrent AP, and two (6.5%) of them eventually developed chronic pancreatitis. Notably, none of our patients developed complications such as shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacteremia, or death. 1 patient had an acute peripancreatic fluid collection on initial imaging and another patient developed a pseudocyst on follow up imaging. None of them required drainage.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a prevalence of DIAP of (3.6%) and hydrochlorothiazide, azathioprine, and doxycycline were the most common culprit drugs.

Inflammatory bowel disease and pancreatic cancer: a Scandinavian register-based cohort study 1969-2017

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of cancer.

AIM

To assess the risk of pancreatic cancer in IBD compared to the general population.

METHODS

Patients with incident IBD 1969-2017 were identified in Danish and Swedish National Patient Registers and through biopsy data, and were matched to IBD-free reference individuals by sex, age, place of residence and year of IBD diagnosis. We linked data to Cancer and Causes of Death Registers and examined the absolute and relative risks of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic cancer death.

RESULTS

Among 161 926 patients followed for 2 000 951 person years, 442 (0.27%) were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer compared to 3386 (0.21%) of the 1 599 024 reference individuals. The 20-year cumulative incidence was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.30-0.38) vs 0.29% (0.28-0.30). The incidence rate was 22.1 (20.1-24.2)/100 000 person years in the patients (excluding the first year of follow-up: 20.8 [18.8-23.0]), and 16.6 (16.0-17.2) in the reference individuals. The hazard ratio (HR) for pancreatic cancer was increased overall: 1.43 (1.30-1.58), in subtypes (Crohn's disease: 1.44 [1.18-1.74]; ulcerative colitis: 1.35 [1.19-1.53]; IBD unclassified: 1.99 [1.50-2.64]) and especially in IBD patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: 7.55 (4.94-11.5). Patients and reference individuals with pancreatic cancer did not differ in cancer stage (P = 0.17) or pancreatic cancer mortality (HR 1.07 [0.95-1.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD had an excess risk of pancreatic cancer, in particular patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, the cumulative incidence difference after 20 years was small: 0.05%, that is, one extra pancreatic cancer per 2000 IBD patients.

Idiopathic acute pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well characterized. Our purpose was to better understand this condition and its natural history.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study conducted at nine Spanish IBD referral centers. Patients with IBD and a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) between 1998 and 2018 were included. Patients with a previous episode of AP or a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis were excluded. IAP and non-IAP were compared by multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 185 patients with IBD (68.7% Crohn's disease) and a first episode of AP. Thirty-eight of those 185 (20.6%) fulfilled criteria for IAP. There were no severe cases of IAP. On multivariate analysis, AP before IBD diagnosis (21.1% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.04) and ulcerative colitis (52.6% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.002) were significantly more common in IAP. Further work-up was performed in 16/38 (42%) IAP patients, and a cause was identified in 6/16 (37.5%). Median time from AP to the end of follow-up was 6.3 years (3.1-10). Five-year risk of AP recurrence was significantly higher in IAP group (28% vs. 5.1%, log-rank p = 0.001), with a median time to first recurrence of 4.4 months (2.9-12.2).

CONCLUSIONS

IAP represents the second cause of AP in patients with IBD. It is more frequent in ulcerative colitis, and presents a high risk of recurrence. Additional imaging work-up after a first episode of IAP in IBD patients is highly advisable, as it identifies a cause in more than one-third of cases.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

According to the European evidence-based consensus, published by European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO), diseases of the pancreas are included as extra-intestinal manifestations in IBD in the forms of acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), pancreatic duct abnormalities and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). Presence of pancreatic autoantibodies directed against the exocrine of the pancreas has been reported in about one-third of CD. However, association between CD and PEI is not fully elucidated.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of CD were recruited at the Department for Digestive Diseases at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) measurements were performed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients included in the study, 13 (65%) males and 7 (35%) females, mean age 48.3±1.4 years (range 29-67 years). Mean duration of CD was 15.7±2.1 years (range 1-40 years). There were 11 (55%) patients without history of bowel surgery and 9 (45%) patients after ileocecal resection. FE-1 test was normal in all patients, among them 15 (75%) patients with the values of FE-1>500.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal elastase-1 level was normal in all patients with CD strongly indicated absence of PEI in this group of patients.

[Pancreatic diseases and inflammatory bowel diseases: a random or regular combination?]

Pathology of the pancreas in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is more common than in the general population and includes a wide range of manifestations from asymptomatic to severe disorders. Acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, increased pancreatic enzymes and structural duct anomalies are often associated with IBD. They can be either a manifestation of IBD itself or develop independently.

Can We Predict the Toxicity and Response to Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?

Thiopurines are a cheap, effective treatment option in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with the growing choice of targeted therapies available, as well as the well-documented toxicities of thiopurines, the role of thiopurines has been questioned. Nevertheless, given their inexpense in an era of spiraling healthcare costs, thiopurines remain an attractive option in the right patients. In the age of personalized medicine, being able to predict patients who will respond as well as those that will develop toxicity to a treatment is vital to tailoring therapy. This review will summarize the available literature with respect to predictors of response and toxicity to thiopurines in order to guide management in IBD. Specifically, toxicities addressed will include myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, alopecia, gastrointestinal and flu-like symptoms, and complications associated with Epstein-Barr virus. While more work needs to be done to further our ability to predict both response to and side effects from therapies, pharmacogenomic research shows significant promise in its ability to personalize our use of thiopurines.

The Etiology of Pancreatic Manifestations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic chronic and recurrent condition that comprises Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. A pancreatic lesion is one of the extraintestinal lesions in patients with IBD. Acute pancreatitis is the representative manifestation, and various causes of pancreatitis have been reported, including those involving adverse effects of drug therapies such as 5-aminosalicylic acid and thiopurines, gall stones, gastrointestinal lesions on the duodenum, iatrogenic harm accompanying endoscopic procedures such as balloon endoscopy, and autoimmunity. Of these potential causes, autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a relatively newly recognized disease and is being increasingly diagnosed in IBD. AIP cases can be divided into type 1 cases involving lymphocytes and IgG4-positive plasma cells, and type 2 cases primarily involving neutrophils; the majority of AIP cases complicating IBD are type 2. The association between IBD and chronic pancreatitis, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, pancreatic cancer, etc. has also been suggested; however, studies with high-quality level evidence are limited, and much remains unknown. In this review, we provide an overview of the etiology of pancreatic manifestation in patients with IBD.

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases: a referral center study

Background

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic manifestations have been reported in patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of hepatobiliary and pancreatic manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease and their association with the disease itself and the medications used.

Methods

Data were retrospectively extracted from the clinical records of patients followed up at our tertiary IBD referral Center.

Results

Our study included 602 IBD patients, with liver function tests at regular intervals. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (Std. Dev.: 6.72). Abdominal imaging examinations were present in 220 patients and revealed findings from the liver, biliary tract and pancreas in 55% of examined patients (120/220). The most frequent findings or manifestations from the liver, biliary tract and pancreas were fatty liver (20%, 44/220), cholelithiasis (14.5%, 32/220) and acute pancreatitis (0.6%, 4/602), respectively. There were 7 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Regarding hepatitis viruses, one-third of the patients had been tested for hepatitis B and C. 5% (12/225) of them had positive hepatitis B surface antigen and 13.4% had past infection with hepatitis B virus (positive anti-HBcore). In addition, most of the patients were not immune against hepatitis B (negative anti-HBs), while 3% of patients were anti-HCV positive and only one patient had active hepatitis C. Furthermore, 24 patients had drug-related side effects from the liver and pancreas. The side effects included 21 cases of hepatotoxicity and 3 cases of acute pancreatitis. Moreover, there were two cases of HBV reactivation and one case of chronic hepatitis C, which were successfully treated.

Conclusion

In our study, approximately one out of four patients had some kind by a hepatobiliary or pancreatic manifestation. Therefore, it is essential to monitor liver function at regular intervals and differential diagnosis should range from benign diseases and various drug related side effects to severe disorders, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Usefulness of Thiopurine Monotherapy for Crohn's Disease in the Era of Biologics: A Long-Term Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are classically used in Crohn's disease (CD). Treatment fails in a proportion of patients either due to adverse events (AE) or lack of efficacy. Increasing use of anti-TNFα biologic drugs may have had impact on thiopurines usage.

AIM

To evaluate the evolving use of azathioprine (AZA) monotherapy in the era of biologics.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed clinical records of all CD patients who started treatment with AZA monotherapy at our center since 1990. Dates of starting AZA and treatment failure (TF) were collected. We defined AZA TF if it was withdrawn due to lack of efficacy or AE, or biologics were added.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included: 46.5% were males and mean age was 31 (range 17-84) years. Median follow-up was 43 (range 0.2-289) months. Overall, 147 patients (38%) experienced TF. Median cumulative survival time of AZA was 126 (95% CI 105-147) months. Proportion of patients with AZA TF increased along time: 7 patients in 1990-1995 (4.7% of all TF); 8 in 1996-2000 (5.4%); 22 in 2001-2005(15%); 41 in 2006-2010 (28%); 69 in 2011-2014 (47%) (p = 0.04). 7%, 21%, 4%, 45%, and 33.3% of patients moved to biologics in each period, respectively (χ² = 13.07; p < 0.05). Seventy-four patients (18.4%) stopped AZA due to AE, and 73(19%) due to lack of efficacy. Regarding AZA indication, prevention of postoperative recurrence obtained better results than steroid dependency (p = 0.001); perianal fistulizing CD predicted poorer outcomes (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

An important proportion of CD patients under AZA monotherapy experienced TF in our experience. Although AZA monotherapy remains useful for CD in the era of biologics, current clinical practice is shifting to anti-TNFα biologic drugs in an increasing proportion of patients.

Association between use of azathioprine and risk of acute pancreatitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease: a Swedish-Danish nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown an association between use of azathioprine and increased risk of acute pancreatitis in adult inflammatory bowel disease. However, whether an association exists among paediatric patients is not known. We aimed to investigate whether use of azathioprine is associated with the risk of acute pancreatitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

We did a nationwide register-based cohort study in Sweden (2006-16) and Denmark (2000-16). All paediatric patients (<18 years of age) with inflammatory bowel disease during the study period were identified through hospital records. Episodes of incident azathioprine use and no use of any thiopurine were matched (1:1) using propensity scores, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, previous treatment, indicators of disease severity, and health care use. Incident acute pancreatitis (physician-assigned diagnosis with ICD-10 code K85) occurring in the 90 days following treatment initiation were identified through outpatient and inpatient hospital records.

FINDINGS

We identified 3574 azathioprine episodes and 18 700 no-use episodes, which resulted in 3374 pairs after propensity score matching; baseline characteristics in the matched cohort were well balanced. Among the matched azathioprine episodes, mean age was 14·3 years (SD 3·1), 1854 (54·9%) were male, 1923 (57·0%) had Crohn's disease, and 1451 (43·0%) had ulcerative colitis or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease. Within the first 90 days following initiation of azathioprine, 40 acute pancreatitis events occurred (incidence rate 49·1 events per 1000 person-years) compared with six events in the no-use group (8·4 events per 1000 person-years). Azathioprine use was associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (incidence rate ratio 5·82 [95% CI 2·47-13·72]; absolute difference 1·0 [95% CI 0·3-2·6] events per 100 patients) during the 90-day risk period.

INTERPRETATION

Use of azathioprine was associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease during the first 90 days following treatment initiation, suggesting the need for regular and rigorous monitoring. The risk of acute pancreatitis needs to be considered when deciding on optimal treatment strategies.

FUNDING

Swedish Research Council, Frimurare Barnhuset Foundation, and the Åke Wiberg Foundation.

Adverse events in IBD therapy: the 2018 update

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis affect an increasing number of patients, and utilization of immune suppressant and biologic therapies is also increasing. These agents are linked to adverse events ranging from mild nuisance symptoms to potentially life-threatening complications including infections and malignancies. Areas covered: This review provides an updated discussion on adverse events associated with immunomodulator, anti-TNF-α, anti-integrin, and anti-IL 12/IL-23 antibody therapies. In addition, we review the risk profile of the currently widely available infliximab biosimilar medication. Expert commentary: Providers should engage in risk-benefit discussion with information specific to each medication discussed, and consider individualized risk factors when selecting therapeutic agents. Drug monitoring and shared decision-making results in more personalized medical management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Pancreatic Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multisystemic disease, and pancreatic manifestations of IBD are not uncommon. The incidence of several pancreatic diseases in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis is more frequent compared to the general population. Pancreatic manifestations in IBD include a wide heterogenic group of disorders and abnormalities of the pancreas and range from mild self-limited diseases to severe disorders. Acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, pancreatic autoantibodies, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and asymptomatic imaging and laboratory abnormalities are included in related-IBD pancreatic manifestations. Involvement of the pancreas in IBD may be the result of IBD itself or of medications used.

Prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations in Korean inflammatory bowel disease patients

Background

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in South Korea is increasing. Although extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are an important factor in the clinical outcomes of IBD patients, EIMs have not yet been investigated in Korea. Thus, we conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of EIMs in Korean IBD patients.

Methods

The 2014 claims data from the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) of Korea were used. IBD patients were identified by codes for Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the NHIS registration system for rare or intractable diseases. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition codes were used to identify EIM cases. To estimate the prevalence of EIMs in the general population of Korea, we used national sample data. Standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) were calculated to compare the prevalence rates of EIMs among IBD patients to those among the general population of Korea.

Results

A total of 13,925 CD patients and 29,356 UC patients were identified. CD and UC patients were different in terms of demographics and utilization of medication. Among the 17 EIMs investigated, pyoderma gangrenosum, osteomalacia, Sweet syndrome, and scleritis were observed in very few patients. The SPRs were greater than 1 for all EIMs. Aphthous stomatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis were highly prevalent in both CD and UC patients, but the SPRs of the EIMs were not high.

Conclusion

The study confirmed that EIMs are more prevalent among IBD patients than among the general population of Korea. The prevalence of EIMs in IBD patients suggests the need for greater attention and effort in clinical practice.

Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are widely used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In this paper, we review the main indications for their use, as well as practical aspects on efficacy, safety and method of administration. They are mainly used to maintain remission in steroid-dependent disease or with ciclosporin to control a severe ulcerative colitis flare-up, as well as to prevent postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence, and also in combination therapy with biologics. About 30-40% of patients will not respond to treatment and 10-20% will not tolerate it due to adverse effects. Before they are prescribed, immunisation status against certain infections should be checked. Determination of thiopurine methyltransferase activity (TPMT) is not mandatory but it increases initial safety. The appropriate dose is 2.5mg/kg/day for azathioprine and 1.5mg/kg/day for mercaptopurine. Some adverse effects are idiosyncratic (digestive intolerance, pancreatitis, fever, arthromyalgia, rash and some forms of hepatotoxicity). Others are dose-dependent (myelotoxicity and other types of hepatotoxicity), and their surveillance should never be interrupted during treatment. If therapy fails or adverse effects develop, management can include switching from one thiopurine to the other, reducing the dose, combining low doses of azathioprine with allopurinol and assessing metabolites, before their use is ruled out. Non-melanoma skin cancer, lymphomas and urinary tract tumours have been linked to thiopurine therapy. Thiopurine use is safe during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Personalizing protein nourishment

Proteins are not equally digestible-their proteolytic susceptibility varies by their source and processing method. Incomplete digestion increases colonic microbial protein fermentation (putrefaction), which produces toxic metabolites that can induce inflammation in vitro and have been associated with inflammation in vivo. Individual humans differ in protein digestive capacity based on phenotypes, particularly disease states. To avoid putrefaction-induced intestinal inflammation, protein sources, and processing methods must be tailored to the consumer's digestive capacity. This review explores how food processing techniques alter protein digestibility and examines how physiological conditions alter digestive capacity. Possible solutions to improving digestive function or matching low digestive capacity with more digestible protein sources are explored. Beyond the ileal digestibility measurements of protein digestibility, less invasive, quicker and cheaper techniques for monitoring the extent of protein digestion and fermentation are needed to personalize protein nourishment. Biomarkers of protein digestive capacity and efficiency can be identified with the toolsets of peptidomics, metabolomics, microbial sequencing and multiplexed protein analysis of fecal and urine samples. By monitoring individual protein digestive function, the protein component of diets can be tailored via protein source and processing selection to match individual needs to minimize colonic putrefaction and, thus, optimize gut health.

Understanding the Cautions and Contraindications of Immunomodulator and Biologic Therapies for Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases for which there are no cures. These diseases are immunopathogenic, and medical treatment is centered on the temperance of a dysregulated immune response to allow mucosal healing and prevent the sequelae of fistulation and stenosis. Accordingly, the armamentarium of medications, which has expanded immensely in recent history, is not without significant infectious and neoplastic risks. Many of these untoward effects can be mitigated by screening and avoidance of contraindicated medications. This review seeks to highlight the cautions for use of immunomodulators, anticytokine, and α4-integrin antagonists. The potential adverse events are further complicated by substantial heterogeneity in disease phenotype in the inflammatory bowel disease population. Large patient registries and databases provide considerable experience and knowledge to calculate the incidence of safety outcomes. To identify rarer outcomes after prolonged therapy, more prospective studies and continued adverse event reporting will aid safe application and minimize potential harms.