Pharmacokinetics of enalapril in normal subjects and patients with renal impairment

Strategies for Assessing Acceptable Intakes for Novel N-Nitrosamines Derived from Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

The detection of N-nitrosamines, derived from solvents and reagents and, on occasion, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) at higher than acceptable levels in drug products, has led regulators to request a detailed review for their presence in all medicinal products. In the absence of rodent carcinogenicity data for novel N-nitrosamines derived from amine-containing APIs, a conservative class limit of 18 ng/day (based on the most carcinogenic N-nitrosamines) or the derivation of acceptable intakes (AIs) using structurally related surrogates with robust rodent carcinogenicity data is recommended. The guidance has implications for the pharmaceutical industry given the vast number of marketed amine-containing drugs. In this perspective, the rate-limiting step in N-nitrosamine carcinogenicity, involving cytochrome P450-mediated α-carbon hydroxylation to yield DNA-reactive diazonium or carbonium ion intermediates, is discussed with reference to the selection of read-across analogs to derive AIs. Risk-mitigation strategies for managing putative N-nitrosamines in the preclinical discovery setting are also presented.

Pharmacology of enalapril in children: a review

Enalapril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that is used for the treatment of (paediatric) hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney diseases. Because its disposition, efficacy and safety differs across the paediatric continuum, data from adults cannot be automatically extrapolated to children. This review highlights paediatric enalapril pharmacokinetic data and demonstrates that these are inadequate to support with certainty an age-related effect on enalapril/enalaprilat pharmacokinetics. In addition, our review shows that evidence to support effective and safe prescribing of enalapril in children is limited, especially in young children and heart failure patients; studies in these groups are either absent or show conflicting results. We provide explanations for observed differences between age groups and indications, and describe areas for future research.

Safety of drug use in patients with a primary mitochondrial disease: An international Delphi-based consensus

Clinical guidance is often sought when prescribing drugs for patients with primary mitochondrial disease. Theoretical considerations concerning drug safety in patients with mitochondrial disease may lead to unnecessary withholding of a drug in a situation of clinical need. The aim of this study was to develop consensus on safe medication use in patients with a primary mitochondrial disease. A panel of 16 experts in mitochondrial medicine, pharmacology, and basic science from six different countries was established. A modified Delphi technique was used to allow the panellists to consider draft recommendations anonymously in two Delphi rounds with predetermined levels of agreement. This process was supported by a review of the available literature and a consensus conference that included the panellists and representatives of patient advocacy groups. A high level of consensus was reached regarding the safety of all 46 reviewed drugs, with the knowledge that the risk of adverse events is influenced both by individual patient risk factors and choice of drug or drug class. This paper details the consensus guidelines of an expert panel and provides an important update of previously established guidelines in safe medication use in patients with primary mitochondrial disease. Specific drugs, drug groups, and clinical or genetic conditions are described separately as they require special attention. It is important to emphasise that consensus-based information is useful to provide guidance, but that decisions related to drug prescribing should always be tailored to the specific needs and risks of each individual patient. We aim to present what is current knowledge and plan to update this regularly both to include new drugs and to review those currently included.

Acute Management of Hypertension Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is responsible for approximately 15% of strokes annually in the United States, with nearly 1 in 3 of these patients dying without ever leaving the hospital. Because this disproportionate mortality risk has been stagnant for nearly 3 decades, a main area of research has been focused on the optimal strategies to reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes. The acute hypertensive response following ICH has been shown to facilitate ICH expansion and is a strong predictor of mortality. Rapidly reducing blood pressure was once thought to induce cerebral ischemia, though has been found to be safe in certain patient populations. Clinicians must work quickly to determine whether specific patient populations may benefit from acute lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) following ICH. This review provides nurses with a summary of the available literature on blood pressure control following ICH. It focuses on intravenous and oral antihypertensive medications available in the United States that may be utilized to acutely lower SBP, as well as medications outside of the antihypertensive class used during the acute setting that may reduce SBP.

Tailored Assays for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Investigations of Aliskiren and Enalapril in Children: An Application in Serum, Urine, and Saliva

OBJECTIVES

Drugs that are effectively used to treat hypertension in adults (e.g., enalapril) have not been sufficiently investigated in children. Studies required for pediatric approval require special consideration regarding ethics, study design, and conduct and are also associated with special demands for the bioanalytic method. Pediatric-appropriate assays can overcome these burdens and enable systematic investigations of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic in all pediatric age groups.

METHODS

Tailored assays were developed for pharmacokinetic investigation of a drug in 100 μL of serum, saliva, and urine. All assays were applied in a proof-of-concept study to 22 healthy volunteers who had been given 300 mg aliskiren hemifumarate or 20 mg enalapril maleate and allowed for dense sampling. Changes in humoral parameters of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were also evaluated with 6 parameters in 2.1 mL blood per time point.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic results of aliskiren and enalapril obtained by low-volume assays in serum and urine were comparable to that noted in the literature. The dense sampling enabled very detailed concentration-time profiles that showed high intersubject variability and biphasic absorption behavior of aliskiren. The replacement of invasive sampling by saliva collection appears inappropriate for both drugs because the correlations of drug concentrations in both fluids were low. A low-volume assay was also used to determine values for in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and to compare those results with the published literature.

CONCLUSION

These results support both the use of low-volume assays in pediatric research and the systematic investigation of their use in neonates and infants. Use of this assay methodology will increase information about drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in this vulnerable population and might contribute to safe and effective use of pharmacotherapy.

Recognition of bio-relevant dicarboxylate anions by an azacalix[2]arene[2]triazine derivative decorated with urea moieties

The binding affinity of a dichlorocalix[2]arene[2]triazine based bis-urea azamacrocycle was investigated towards a wide range of bio-relevant dicarboxylate anions by a combination of ¹H NMR titrations in CDCl₃ and molecular dynamics simulations.

Impact of Disease States on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) in elderly patients and patients with renal and hepatic impairment were examined, and a role for an AUC/EC50 ratio to guide dosing was evaluated. A Medline and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts search was used to identify human studies and abstracts. Relevant data were evaluated and summarized. Dosing regimens were compared using an AUC/EC50 ratio. Most studies evaluating ACE inhibitors in renal impairment report a strong linear correlation between creatine clearance and drug elimination. AUC and EC50 values for these drugs in elderly subjects appear similar to younger and hypertensive patients. There is increased AUC in some patients with hepatic impairment. Pharmacodynamic data are conflicting. Prolonged ACE inhibition is evident in renal impairment but not necessarily other disease states. ACE inhibitor dosing for hypertension is reasonable based on pharmacokinetics and EC50 values. Further individualization of therapy may improve outcomes, and using the threshold AUC/EC50 ratio may help guide appropriate dosing.

The pharmacokinetics of enalapril in children and infants with hypertension

Forty children with hypertension between the age of 2 months and 15 years received 0.07 to 0.14 mg/kg of enalapril as a single daily dose. Enalapril was administered orally as a novel extemporaneous suspension in children younger than 6 years of age and as tablets in older children. First-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics were estimated in children ages 1 to 24 months, 25 months to < 6 years, 6 to < 12 years, and 12 to < 16 years. Maximum serum concentrations for enalapril occurred approximately 1 hour after administration. Serum concentrations of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, peaked between 4 and 6 hours after the first dose and 3 and 4 hours after multiple doses. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), adjusted for body surface area, did not differ between age groups. Based on comparison of first-dose and steady-state AUCs, the accumulation of enalaprilat in children ranged from 1.13- to 1.45-fold. For children ages 2 to 15 years, mean urinary recovery of total enalaprilat ranged from 58.3% in children ages 6 to < 12 years to 71.4% in children ages 12 to < 16 years. Urinary recovery for children ages 2 to < 6 years was 66.8%. The mean percentage conversion of enalapril to enalaprilat ranged from 64.7% for children ages 1 to 24 months to 74.6% for children ages 6 to < 12 years. The median effective half-life for accumulation ranged from 14.6 hours in children ages 12 to < 16 years to 16.3 hours in children ages 6 to < 12 years. There were two serious adverse events, neither of which was attributed to enalapril or resulted in discontinuation of the study drug. The extemporaneous suspension used in this study was tolerated well. The pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat in hypertensive children ages 2 months to 15 years with normal renal function appears to be similar to that previously observed in healthy adults.

A simple HPLC method for quantitation of enalaprilat

A reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with UV-detection has been developed for the determination of enalaprilat. The method produced linear response over the wide concentration range of 1-200 microg/ml, with an average accuracy of 97.35 +/- 4.93%, as well as average intra- and iter-day variations of 3.72 and 5.18%, respectively. The limits of detection and quantitation of the method were 0.125 and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. The method was selective with respect to resolution of the peaks of enalaprilat and enalapril maleate.

Risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in end-stage renal disease

The effective treatment of hypertension is an extremely important consideration in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Virtually any drug class--with the possible exception of diuretics--can be used to treat hypertension in the patient with ESRD. Despite there being such a wide range of treatment options, drugs which interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis are generally suggested as agents of choice in this population, even though the evidence in support of their preferential use is quite scanty. ACE inhibitors, and more recently angiotensin antagonists, are the 2 drug classes most commonly employed to alter renin-angiotensin axis activity and therefore produce blood pressure control. ACE inhibitor use in patients with ESRD can sometimes prove an exacting proposition. ACE inhibitors are variably dialysed, with compounds such as catopril, enalapril, lisinopril and perindopril undergoing substantial cross-dialyser clearance during a standard dialysis session. This phenomenon makes the selection of a dose and the timing of administration for an ACE inhibitor a complex issue in patients with ESRD. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease thirst drive and to decrease erythropoiesis. In addition, ACE inhibitors have a unique adverse effect profile. As is the case with their use in patients without renal failure, use of ACE inhibitors in patients with ESRD can be accompanied by cough and less frequently by angioneurotic oedema. In the ESRD population, ACE inhibitor use is also accompanied by so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions. Angiotensin antagonists are similar to ACE inhibitors in their mechanism of blood pressure lowering. Angiotensin antagonists are not dialysable and therefore can be distinguished from a number of the ACE inhibitors. In addition, the adverse effect profile for angiotensin antagonists is remarkably bland, with cough and angioneurotic oedema rarely, if ever, occurring. In patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists are also not associated with the anaphylactoid dialyser reactions which occur with ACE inhibitors. The nonpressor effects of angiotensin antagonists--such as an influence on thirst drive and erythropoiesis--have not been explored in nearly the depth, as they have been with ACE inhibitors. Although ACE inhibitors have not been compared directly to angiotensin antagonists in patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists possess a number of pharmacokinetic and adverse effect characteristics, which would favour their use in this population.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic renal insufficiency

AIMS

To compare the serum pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril after 1 and 10 days of dosing with fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril.

METHODS

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF, NYHA Class II-IV) and chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance </=30 ml min-1 ) were randomized to receive fosinopril, enalapril or lisinopril in two parallel-group studies. In the first study 24 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n=12 patients) or 2.5 mg enalapril (n=12) every morning for 10 consecutive days. In the second study 31 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n=16 patients) or 5 mg lisinopril (n=15) every morning for 10 consecutive days. Samples of blood were collected for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) between the first and last days of treatment and the accumulation index (AI) were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

All three angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exhibited a significant increase in AUC between the first and last days of treatment in both studies. The difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.41) and enalaprilat (1.96) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.05, 1.84). Similarly, the difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.21) and lisinopril (2.76) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.85, 2.69). All three ACE inhibitors completely inhibited serum ACE for 24 h. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinoprilat exhibits significantly less accumulation than enalaprilat or lisinopril in patients with CHF and renal insufficiency, most probably because fosinoprilat is eliminated by both the kidney and liver, and increased hepatic elimination can compensate for reduced renal clearance in patients with kidney dysfunction.

Effect of hydrochlorothiazide on the pharmacokinetics of enalapril in hypertensive patients with varying renal function

An open, randomised, cross-over study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of enalaprilat, administered as 20 mg enalapril both as monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ 12.5 mg). Three groups of 6 hypertensive patients were enrolled [untreated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-115 mm Hg]; normal renal function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 81 ml min-1 1.73 m-2], mild renal impairment (GFR 51-80 ml min-1 1.73 m-2), and moderate renal impairment (GFR 31-50 ml min-1 1.73 m-2). The pharmacokinetics of enalaprilat and enalaprilat plus HCTZ correlated predictably with renal impairment with increased plasma concentrations and decreased urinary elimination at lower values of GFR. The coadministration of HCTZ had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of enalaprilat in any group. We conclude that although the pharmacokinetics of both enalaprilat and HCTZ are related to renal function, HCTZ has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of enalaprilat and that dosage adjustment for both regimens should be based on renal function.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in renal failure

Arterial hypertension occurs frequently in patients with chronic renal failure. Antihypertensive treatment of arterial hypertension with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been shown to be effective with a low incidence of adverse effects compared with other drug classes. Furthermore, treatment with ACE inhibitors may slow the progression of renal function impairment in certain groups of patients, such as those with diabetes. Most ACE inhibitors are prodrugs which are converted by hepatic esterolysis to an active diacid metabolite. Only captopril and lisinopril have sufficient oral bioavailability and are given as active drugs. ACE inhibitors can be subdivided into 3 classes with regard to the active group: the majority of ACE inhibitors are carboxyl-containing drugs, a new class of ACE inhibitors possess a phosphoryl-group and captopril and related compounds are sulfhydryl-containing drugs. The predominant elimination pathway of ACE inhibitors is excretion via the kidneys. Therefore, renal insufficiency is associated with reduced elimination of most ACE inhibitors and, thus, altered pharmacokinetic properties. This is most evident in chronic renal failure when glomerular filtration rates (GFR) are < 30 to 40 ml/min (1.8 to 2.4 L/h). As renal clearance decreases, the peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the active drugs or diacids are increased and time to peak concentrations and half-life are prolonged. However, there are large between-drug differences in the changes in pharmacokinetic parameters, resulting in different degrees of drug accumulation after consecutive administration. This leads, for example, to high accumulation rates for drugs such as lisinopril, or cilazaprilat. In contrast, fosinopril, which is also excreted to a large extent by the hepatobiliary pathway, does not seem to accumulate in renal failure. In general, pharmacokinetics and conversion of prodrugs seem to be slightly affected in chronic renal failure; however, these changes do not appear to be clinically relevant. Efficiency of clearance for prodrugs or active drugs and their respective metabolites by haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis varies considerably. For some ACE inhibitors, such as captopril or enalapril, the high elimination fraction by haemodialysis necessitates a supplemental dose after dialysis. Other ACE inhibitors, such as quinapril or cilazapril, are only poorly eliminated by haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Dosage recommendations for treatment with ACE inhibitors in chronic renal failure depend on the specific pharmacokinetic properties of the various agents. For most ACE inhibitors, dosage adjustment is recommended in moderate and severe impairment of renal function, with resultant dosages being 25 to 50% of those recommended for patients with normal renal function.

Effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of trandolapril

1. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of trandolapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with an active metabolite, trandolaprilat, which is in part further metabolised prior to renal elimination, were evaluated in 31 subjects with a wide range of renal function (creatinine clearance 4-112 ml min-1 1.73 m-2). 2. The pharmacokinetics of trandolapril were unaffected by differences in renal function. 3. In contrast, there was a close correlation between the renal clearance (0-96 h) of trandolaprilat and creatinine clearance (r = 0.95, P = 0.0001). The maximum plasma concentration of trandolaprilat, and the area under the concentration curve (0-96 h) correlated inversely with creatinine clearance (r = -0.59, P < 0.001; and r = -0.61, P < 0.001 respectively). 4. Significant changes in plasma trandolaprilat concentrations were seen only in patients with creatinine clearances of 30 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 or less, suggesting that a dose reduction in trandolapril might be advisable in severe renal impairment. 5. However, the majority of parameters of ACE inhibition were unrelated to creatinine clearance, although area under the curve for ACE inhibition (0-336 h) showed a weak negative correlation (r = -0.49, P < 0.01). Similarly, weighted mean changes in blood pressure were not influenced by renal function. 6. Therefore, while the pharmacokinetic parameters of trandolaprilat correlated with creatinine clearance, pharmacodynamic measurements (ACE inhibition and blood pressure changes) in general showed no such relationship, indicating that dose adjustment of ACE inhibitors in renal impairment should be based on pharmacokinetic results only in conjunction with pharmacodynamic data.

Study on pharmacokinetics of a new biliary excreted oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, temocapril (CS-622) in humans

Despite the usefulness of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE; EC 3.4.15.1) inhibitors for patients with renal insufficiency, some hesitation has been exercised in applying ACE inhibitors to the treatment of such patients because most ACE inhibitors are excreted mainly into the urine. In this context, development of an ACE inhibitor which is excreted into the bile has been sought. The pharmacokinetic properties of the novel ACE inhibitor, temocapril hydrochloride (temocapril HCl; CS-622), were investigated in six healthy volunteers. This drug is excreted mainly into the bile in animal studies. Temocapril HCl was given in a single dose of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg, and 36, 44, and 38 per cent of the administered drug was excreted in the feces and 17, 19, and 24 per cent in the urine as the de-esterified active diacid form (the diacid metabolite) within 48 h, respectively. The plasma ACE activity was markedly inhibited. No abnormal clinical findings suggestive of side-effects were observed. Thus, from the pharmacokinetic standpoint, temocapril HCl is expected to be a useful drug for patients with renal dysfunction.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of captopril, enalapril, and quinapril

This review compares the metabolism and pharmacokinetic profiles of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and 2 newer ACE inhibitors, enalapril and quinapril. Captopril differs from both enalapril and quinapril in that its chemical structure contains a sulfhydryl group, the presence of which may be important in the development of adverse reactions. Captopril also differs from enalapril and quinapril in its ability to be metabolized in plasma. Enalapril and quinapril are both de-esterified, most likely in the liver, to their active metabolites, enalaprilat and quinaprilat. All 3 ACE inhibitors are eliminated primarily via renal excretion, and renal dysfunction markedly increases the area under the time versus plasma concentration curves. Hepatic dysfunction also slows the conversion of enalapril and quinapril to their active metabolites. There is evidence that both captopril and enalapril, but not quinapril, may accumulate with repeated dosing. The pharmacokinetics of these agents are not significantly modified by co-administration of other drugs. However, captopril does cause marked increases in trough plasma levels of digoxin. Overall, the pharmacokinetic profiles of captopril, enalapril, and quinapril make them suitable for a wide range of patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure.

The pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite, quinaprilat, in patients with various degrees of renal function

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite, quinaprilat, were determined after oral administration of 20 mg quinapril HCl on day 1 and days 4 through 10 in 17 normotensive subjects with various degrees of renal function. Blood and urine samples were collected over 72- and 24-hour periods, respectively, after the first single dose and last multiple dose for measurement of quinapril and quinaprilat concentrations. The renal clearance of quinapril and quinaprilat decreased with increasing renal insufficiency but did not result in significant changes in quinapril pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. In contrast, quinaprilat maximum plasma concentration, trough and peak steady-state plasma concentrations, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and half-life increased significantly with increasing renal insufficiency. The disposition of quinapril and quinaprilat was unchanged from single to multiple doses. Small changes in the pharmacokinetic disposition of quinapril, together with a decreased rate of quinaprilat elimination, resulted in increased quinaprilat plasma concentrations following administration of both single and multiple quinapril doses to normotensive patients with renal impairment. Thus, quinapril dosage adjustment may be required in some patients with renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of perindopril and its effects on serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure

1. Perindopril, an orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, was given to 23 hypertensive patients with stable chronic renal failure for 15 days. The dose of perindopril was 2 or 4 mg once a day according to the degree of renal failure. The creatinine clearance of the patients ranged from 6 to 67 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. The pharmacokinetics of perindopril and perindoprilat, its active metabolite, were studied after acute and chronic administration of perindopril. 2. The drug was well tolerated and creatinine clearance was unaltered by treatment. 3. In both groups, steady-state was reached within 3 days of chronic treatment. 4. After both acute and chronic drug administration renal impairment had no effect on perindopril pharmacokinetics but the pharmacokinetics of perindoprilat were altered significantly. After chronic administration the serum accumulation ratio was 1.81 in patients with mild renal failure and 5.35 in patients with severe renal failure. Chronic administration did not modify the renal clearance of perindoprilat nor its elimination half-life. 5. A significant correlation between the renal clearance of perindoprilat and creatinine clearance was observed (r = 0.87 first dose, r = 0.83 last chronic dose). 6. A non-linear relationship between serum perindoprilat concentration and inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme was described by a modified Hill equation. Values of IC50 were 1.11 +/- 0.07 micrograms I-1 (mean +/- s.d.) in patients with severe renal failure and 1.81 +/- 0.20 micrograms l-1 in patients with moderate renal failure. Chronic administration increased maximal inhibition and decreased the time to maximal inhibition only in patients with severe renal failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Metabolites of antihypertensive drugs. An updated review of their clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications

Many antihypertensive drugs are extensively metabolised in humans. Since some metabolites are active and may therefore contribute to the pharmacological activity of the parent drugs, knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of active metabolites is important for understanding the overall effects of drugs. Four categories of antihypertensive drugs with active metabolites are dealt with, with selected examples described in some detail. First, drugs with effects relying totally on active metabolites include agents such as methyldopa, cadralazine and many angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Secondly, those with effects primarily due to active metabolites include drugs such as triamterene and spironolactone. Thirdly, agents with effects primarily due to the parent drug, but with active metabolites providing significant contributions to the overall pharmacological effect, include drugs such as indoramin, alprenolol, acebutolol, diltiazem and verapamil. Lastly, agents with pharmacological effects with only minor (if any) contributions from active metabolites include drugs such as propranolol, metoprolol, carteolol and others.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of a combination tablet of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide with enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide tablets administered together and separately

Enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) are established single agent treatments for mild hypertension and cardiac failure and are a potent combination in more severe or resistant cases. We have compared the pharmacokinetics of enalaprilat (the active metabolite of enalapril) and HCT in a four-way comparison of a combination tablet of enalapril (10 mg)/HCT (25 mg) with a single dose of an enalapril tablet (10 mg), a single dose of a HCT tablet (25 mg) and simultaneous administration of separate tablets of enalapril (10 mg) and HCT (25 mg) in normotensive volunteers (n = 12, 21-26 years). Each subject received all four treatments and the study was conducted as a randomized, latin square, open design with at least 1 week washout between studies. Overall, HCT was bioequivalent under all conditions and enalaprilat was bioequivalent when given in combination with HCT either as one tablet or as two separate tablets. However, when given with HCT, the mean AUC and Cmax of enalaprilat were reduced up to 20 per cent compared with enalapril administered alone. This is unlikely to be of clinical significance as the differences did not reach statistical significance and the total enalaprilat excreted in the urine over 96 h was similar after all treatments.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of perindopril and its metabolites in hypertensive patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency

1 Perindopril is a prodrug which is hydrolysed in vivo to the active metabolite perindoprilat, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Perindoprilat glucuronide is also found in plasma. 2 The pharmacokinetics of perindopril and its metabolites were studied after administration of a single 4 mg dose to hypertensive patients with various degrees of renal failure. 3 The absorption and elimination of perindopril were not influenced by the degree of renal failure. 4 The mean area under the serum concentration-time curve of the active metabolite perindoprilat increased from 93 ng ml-1 h in subjects with normal renal function to 1106 ng ml-1 in patients with severe renal failure, whereas its half-life varied from 5.0 to 27.4 h. 5 In the same subjects, the mean area under the curve of perindoprilat glucuronide increased from 78 to 513 ng ml-1 h, while its half-life varied from 1.8 h to 7.7 h. 6 Perindopril, perindoprilat, and perindoprilat glucuronide were dialysable. 7 The extent and duration of serum angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition was augmented in renal failure. The mean area under the inhibition time curve (extrapolated to infinity) increased from 2490%.h in subjects with normal renal function to 42241 %.h in patients with severe renal impairment. The half-life of inhibition varied from 12.1 h to 100.4 h. This effect of renal failure on the pharmacodynamics of perindoprilat was more pronounced than its influence on perindoprilat kinetics. 8 In view of the important influence of renal impairment on the elimination and action of the active substance perindoprilat, a dosage reduction of perindopril is proposed in in patients with renal failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pharmacokinetics of benazepril relative to other ACE inhibitors

Benazepril is a prodrug that, following rapid conversion to benazeprilat, is a potent nonsulfhydryl inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. The absorption, bioactivation, distribution, and elimination of benazepril and benazeprilat have been evaluated in healthy subjects, hypertensive patients, and patients with characteristics known to alter the pharmacokinetic disposition of ACE inhibitors, such as renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and advanced age. Following oral administration, benazepril is absorbed and transformed into benazeprilat in the liver. Coadministration of benazepril with food delays absorption slightly but does not affect the ultimate bioavailability of benazeprilat. Severe hepatic impairment slows conversion of benazepril to benazeprilat but does not affect the overall bioavailability of benazeprilat; thus dosage adjustment is not necessary in the hepatically impaired population. Mild-to-moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance greater than 30 ml/min) slightly increases benazeprilat concentrations; severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min) reduces benazeprilat elimination and requires dosage reduction. In elderly patients, benazepril disposition is the same as in younger patients, although benazeprilat clearance is slightly reduced. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions occur with benazepril and many other medications commonly prescribed to elderly hypertensive patients. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of benazepril are stable over a wide range of conditions, and dosage adjustments for pharmacokinetic reasons are required infrequently.

Pharmacokinetics of newer drugs in patients with renal impairment (Part II)

Cardiovascular diseases occur frequently in patients with renal failure. Any pharmacokinetic impairment in these diseases should be considered when individualizing drug therapy. The pharmacokinetics of new cardiovascular drugs in uraemic patients are reviewed: alpha- and beta-blocking agents, ACE inhibitors, centrally acting antihypertensive agents, calcium antagonists, antiarrhythmic agents and inotropic agents. Guidelines are proposed for adjustment of dosage regimens as a function of renal impairment. Renal or extrarenal elimination of drugs and their metabolites, and the activity of the latter, are taken into account. The disposition of new drugs such as flestolol, alacepril, delapril, propafenone, milrinone or enoximone, is not well documented in patients with renal failure. Further characterizations of the elimination of these compounds are needed and the potential therapeutic or toxic effects of the metabolites require evaluation to determine whether the dosage needs to be adjusted. Until such investigations are performed, those drugs should not be used in uraemic patients; if no therapeutic alternative is available, clinical controls are necessary at regular intervals. Relationships between pharmacological or therapeutic effects and drug plasma concentrations should be evaluated for such long term use drugs. The knowledge of a plasma concentration therapeutic window is important to provide information which will be useful in determining appropriate drug dosage in renal failure.

Comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of fosinopril, lisinopril and enalapril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

The phosphinyl ester prodrug fosinopril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is fully hydrolysed after oral administration to the pharmacologically active diacid, fosinoprilat. This metabolite is cleared by both hepatic and renal routes, while most other ACE inhibitors are cleared exclusively by the kidney. In the present study, after administration of multiple fixed oral doses the accumulation of the active moieties of fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril was compared in patients with renal insufficiency. 29 patients with creatinine clearances (CLCR) less than 30 ml/min received either fosinopril 10mg (n = 9), enalapril 2.5mg (n = 10) or lisinopril 5mg (n = 10) once daily for 10 days in a nonblind (open-label) parallel study. Pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), peak serum concentration (Cmax) and time to peak concentration (tmax), as well as renal function, blood pressure, and plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone levels, were determined on the first and last days of the study. The percentage (+/- SEM) increases in AUC from day 1 to day 10 for fosinoprilat, enalaprilat and lisinopril were 26.8 +/- 9.9 (nonsignificant), 76.6 +/- 16.6 (p less than 0.001) and 161.7 +/- 31.8% (p less than 0.001), respectively. These results indicate that there was significantly less accumulation of fosinoprilat, based on accumulation indices, relative to either enalaprilat (p less than 0.05) or lisinopril (p less than 0.001) during the study. The Cmax of fosinopril increased significantly less than that of lisinopril (21.1 vs 123.6%; p less than 0.01). Renal function was not altered in any group, and blood pressure changed modestly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite, quinaprilat, in patients on chronic hemodialysis

The pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite, quinaprilat, were evaluated in 12 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on chronic hemodialysis. Each subject received a single 20-mg oral dose of quinapril 4 hours before a 4-hour hemodialysis treatment. Serial dialysate and blood samples were obtained over 4 and 96 hours, respectively. Samples were analyzed for quinapril and quinaprilat concentrations by gas chromatography. Mean tmax and Cmax values for quinapril were 1.2 hours and 129 ng/mL, respectively. Only one patient had detectable quinapril dialysate concentrations which accounted for 2.8% of the quinapril dose. Mean apparent plasma clearance for quinapril was 1275 mL/min with a mean half-life of 1.7 hours. Quinapril was extensively de-esterified to its diacid metabolite, quinaprilat. Mean tmax and Cmax for quinaprilat were 4.5 hours and 671 ng/mL, respectively. Mean apparent plasma clearance for quinaprilat was 24.0 mL/min with a mean half-life of 17.5 hours. As with quinapril, quinaprilat was not readily dialyzable. Only 5.4% of the administered quinapril dose was recovered as quinaprilat during a single hemodialysis treatment. In view of these results, supplemental quinapril doses need not be routinely given to patients following hemodialysis. Overall, quinapril and quinaprilat pharmacokinetics in patients with ESRD on chronic hemodialysis were not markedly different from those previously observed in patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction (CLcr less than 29 mL/min) not yet requiring hemodialysis (RDND).

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer ACE inhibitors. A review

The orally active angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) such as captopril and enalapril represent a significant therapeutic advance in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril differs from captopril in several respects. It is a prodrug converted by hepatic esterolysis to the active (but more poorly absorbed) diacid, enalaprilat. Enalaprilat is more potent than captopril, more slowly eliminated and does not possess a sulfhydryl (SH) group. Enalapril was rapidly followed by a number of newer ACE inhibitors, the majority of which are similar to enalapril in that they are prodrugs, converted by hepatic esterolysis to a major active but poorly absorbed diacid metabolite. In one case (delapril) there are 2 active metabolites; in another (alacepril) the prodrug is converted in vivo to captopril. Lisinopril is an exception in that it is an enalaprilat-like diacid but with acceptable oral bioavailability, so that the prodrug route is not employed. The newer ACE inhibitors are at widely different stages of development, and it is not yet clear how many will reach regular clinical use. Of these newer drugs, lisinopril is the longest established and is the subject of the widest published literature. For a number there is as yet little published pharmacokinetic information. A variety of assay methods have been employed to characterise the pharmacokinetics of the ACE inhibitors, including enzymatic techniques, radioimmunoassay and chromatography. The peak plasma concentrations of the prodrugs are generally observed at around 1 hour and those of the diacid metabolites at about 2 to 4 hours. However, there is considerable variation within and between drugs, with benazepril and benazeprilat reaching peak concentrations early and enalapril and enalaprilat typical of later times to peak. Absorption of the active diacids is generally poor, and moderate (typically 30 to 70%) for the prodrugs. The bioavailability of lisinopril is about 25%. It is difficult to talk meaningfully about half-lives of the active drugs. The declines in their plasma concentrations are polyphasic and, if analytical sensitivity allows, active drug may be found at 48 hours or more following administration. This may reflect binding to ACE in plasma. Half-lives of accumulation are of the order of 12 hours; protein binding varies from little (lisinopril) to 90% (benazeprilat). Elimination is mostly renal but there may be biliary elimination for some, such as benazeprilat and fosinopril. The half-lives of the prodrugs are short. Impaired renal function decreases the elimination rate of the diacids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The pharmacokinetics of enalapril in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis

The possibility of an impaired hepatic de-esterification of enalapril to enalaprilat due to hepatic dysfunction was assessed in seven patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and 10 normal control subjects. The peak serum concentration and time to the peak serum concentration of enalaprilat, as well as the suppression of serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity, following a single oral dose of enalapril maleate (10 mg) were not different in the two groups. The elimination half-life of enalaprilat was related to renal function. The results suggest that hepatic biotransformation of the drug may not be disturbed in a clinically significant manner in patients with moderate hepatic dysfunction due to compensated liver cirrhosis.

Preferential biliary elimination of FPL 63547, a novel inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme, in the rat

1. The route of elimination of FPL 63547, a novel inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), has been investigated in the anaesthetized rat. Comparisons have been made with other ACE inhibitors. 2. Bile and urine samples were collected over a 5 hour period following a single i.v. dose of ACE inhibitor (2 mumol kg-1). Samples were bioassayed for ACE inhibitory activity using affinity-purified rabbit lung ACE and the amounts of the active form of inhibitor present in each sample were calculated by comparison with a standard curve. 3. FPL 63547 was rapidly and extensively excreted as the diacid in the bile but appeared in the urine in negligible amounts. The bile:urine ratio was 21.4:1 indicating a marked preference for the biliary route. A similar elimination profile was observed when the compound was dosed in its active form (FPL 63547 diacid), 87.9% of which was found in the bile over the 5 h collection period, with a bile: urine ratio of 14.6:1. 4. The marked preference of FPL 63547 for biliary elimination was not shared by the other ACE inhibitors tested in this study. Lisinopril demonstrated the opposite pattern, being excreted almost exclusively by the kidney (bile:urine ratio 0.06:1). Enalapril was eliminated in approximately equal amounts in bile and urine (ratio 0.7:1) while spirapril diacid showed a slight preference for the bile (ratio 2.6:1). 5. The physical chemical properties of FPL 63547 diacid may be responsible for its unusual preference for biliary elimination. In particular, the amphipathic character and strong acid functionality of the compound are thought to favour transport into the bile. 6. Elimination by the biliary route will be preferred in patients whose renal function is impaired as a result of disease or age. In such patients the elimination of renally-excreted ACE inhibitors is known to be compromised, resulting in compound accumulation and the need for closer monitoring. Therefore, the elimination profile of FPL 63547, if confirmed in man, may prove to be clinically advantageous.

Effects of cardiovascular disease on pharmacokinetics

The pathophysiologic changes occurring in cardiovascular disease can affect the kinetics of drugs in several different ways. The present review examines these modifications and the underlying mechanisms. The kinetics of specific agents, such as antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive, cardiotonic, and other drugs are considered, and the clinical implications are outlined. The clinician should be aware of these modifications, because they require an adjustment of the dosage regimen. A rational basis for a correct therapeutic choice can be provided by adequate knowledge of these modifications.

Local inhibition of converting enzyme and vascular responses to angiotensin and bradykinin in the human forearm

1. The function of angiotensin converting enzyme was investigated in twenty-four healthy men. Forearm blood flow was measured under basal conditions and during administration of enalaprilat (a converting enzyme inhibitor) and/or peptide substrates of converting enzyme into the left brachial artery. Blood flow was compared in the two arms. 2. Enalaprilat had no effect on basal blood flow. The concentration of enalaprilat in venous blood from the control arm was low, and plasma renin activity was not increased, indicating that systemic inhibition of converting enzyme did not occur. 3. Effects of angiotensin and of bradykinin, administered intra-arterially, were limited to the infused arm. Enalaprilat (13 nmol min-1) inhibited converting enzyme in the infused arm, in which it caused approximately a 100-fold reduction in sensitivity to angiotensin I, while having no effect on the vasoconstriction caused by angiotensin II. Enalaprilat increased vasodilatation caused by bradykinin. 4. Aspirin, an inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase, did not inhibit vasodilatation caused by bradykinin whether infused alone or with enalaprilat, indicating that these responses are not mediated by prostaglandins. 5. We conclude that under basal conditions neither conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II nor degradation of bradykinin determines resistance vessel tone in the human forearm. Converting enzyme may affect vascular tone in situations in which intravascular concentrations of peptides are increased over those present under basal conditions.

Enalapril. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in congestive heart failure

Enalapril provides significant haemodynamic, symptomatic and clinical improvement when added to maintenance therapy with digitalis and diuretics in patients with congestive heart failure [NYHA (New York Heart Association) classes II to IV]. These effects are not attenuated during long term therapy. More significantly, a clinical study demonstrated that enalapril reduces mortality when added to established therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class IV) refractory to digitalis, diuretics and other vasodilators. Thus, ACE inhibitors such as enalapril offer a significant advance in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Because these drugs improve symptoms in patients with classes II to IV failure, and reduce mortality in patients with severe heart failure, they should be considered as first choice adjuvant therapy when a vasodilator is needed in addition to conventional treatment with digitalis and diuretics.

Pharmacokinetics of ramipril in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency

In an open trial, the pharmacokinetics of ramipril and its active metabolite ramiprilat were studied in 25 hypertensive patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency given 5 mg ramipril p.o. for 14 days. Ramipril was rapidly absorbed and reached a peak concentration after 1-2 h. Cmax was greater in patients with severe renal insufficiency, which might indicate a reduced renal elimination rate, although, the rapid decline of the concentration-time curve for ramipril was almost independent of renal function. The mean initial apparent half-lives on Days 1 and 12, respectively, were 2.8 and 3.4 h (Group I: creatinine clearance 5-15 ml/min), 1.8 and 2.3 h (Group II: creatinine clearance 15-40 ml/min), and 1.9 and 1.9 h (Group III: creatinine clearance 40-80 ml/min). No accumulation was observed after multiple dosing. In contrast, the kinetics of its active acid metabolite ramiprilat was significantly influenced by renal function. The mean times to the peak plasma concentration were 5.7 h in Group I, 4.4 h in Group II and 3.8 h in Group III. The initial decline in plasma ramiprilat was dependent upon renal function; the mean initial apparent half-lives (Days 1 and 12, respectively) were 16.0 and 14.8 h (Group I), 10.1 and 9.5 h (Group II) and 10.6 and 8.0 h (Group III). Mean trough concentrations and absolute accumulation also increased with worsening renal function, and the renal clearance of ramiprilat was significantly correlated with the creatinine clearance. The subsequent long terminal phase at low plasma ramiprilat concentrations represented slow dissociation of the ACE-inhibitor complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of cilazapril in patients with renal failure

1. The pharmacokinetics of a single 1 mg dose of cilazapril were determined in six subjects with normal renal function and in 19 uraemic patients with various degrees of renal impairment. 2. Significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were noted in all groups of subjects between 2 and 8 h after administration of 1 mg cilazapril. 3. There was a significant correlation between ACE inhibition at 24 h and creatinine clearance (CrCL). 4. For cilazapril, Cmax and tmax were independent of creatinine clearance. AUC(24) was inversely related to CrCL and apparent plasma clearance (CL/F) was directly related to CrCL. 5. For cilazaprilat, Cmax and tmax were related to creatinine clearance. AUC(24) was inversely related to CrCl and apparent plasma clearance (CL/F) was directly related to CrCL. 6. Dialysis clearance was approximately 2 l h-1 for cilazapril and for cilazaprilat. 7. The effects of renal impairment on cilazapril and cilazaprilat kinetics were similar to those observed for other inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme such as captopril, enalapril and lisinopril. 8. It may be necessary to modify doses of cilazapril for the treatment of essential hypertension in uraemic patients. When creatinine clearance was below 15 ml min-1 cilazaprilat concentrations were increased, half-lives were prolonged and ACE inhibition remained above 90% for at least 24 h. A reduced dosage is indicated for these patients. 9. In patients requiring haemodialysis, maintenance doses of 0.5 mg given after each haemodialysis session are sufficient.

Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, enalapril and enalaprilat in renal failure: effects of haemodialysis

1. Lisinopril and enalapril were administered as 2.5 mg single doses and as eight single daily 2.5 mg doses to separate groups of six patients with chronic renal failure. Patients were receiving regular haemodialysis. 2. In the absence of haemodialysis, the decline in plasma concentrations of lisinopril and enalaprilat was extremely slow and plasma concentrations were generally high. 3. Haemodialysis had large effects on plasma concentrations of lisinopril and enalaprilat. A 4 h period reduced plasma concentrations of both drugs by around one-half and often by significantly more than this. Even 1 or 2 h of haemodialysis had significant effects. 4. Haemodialysis plasma clearance was similar for both drugs with mean values of the order of 40 ml min-1. Clearance did not markedly differ when measured after 1, 2 or 4 h of haemodialysis or after single or multiple doses of lisinopril or enalapril. 5. The design of dosage regimens of both lisinopril and enalapril for patients with severe renal impairment or chronic renal failure should take into consideration the use and effects of haemodialysis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Relationship between pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

The inter-relationship between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of ACE inhibitors is reviewed. First, some of the methods which have been used to assess the pharmacodynamics of ACE inhibitors in humans are presented. They include humoral assays (e.g. ACE activity in plasma, renin activity, etc.), haemodynamic changes (blood pressure, total peripheral resistance, etc.) and agonist challenges (angiotensin I infusions). Subsequently a pharmacokinetic-dynamic model is described, based on biochemical processes obtained after ACE inhibition, which seems to be useful for the interpretation of the complex processes. The various correlations between plasma drug concentration on the one hand and plasma ACE activity, angiotensin II concentration in plasma or blood pressure on the other, are discussed on the basis of this model. From the model obtained it becomes obvious that under many circumstances the release of the inhibitor from ACE binding is the step which in fact determines the pharmacodynamically relevant elimination rate of the drug at low concentrations, whereas at high concentrations the elimination of the drug is mainly dependent on kidney (and/or liver) elimination rate. The dynamic-kinetic correlations are then presented for some ACE inhibitors in various disease states: arterial hypertension, heart failure, old age, renal failure, liver disease. In a final section the kinetic and dynamic relevance of interactions of ACE inhibitors with food and other drugs is described (e.g. prostaglandin inhibitors, diuretics, digoxin and cimetidine). Despite the great body of literature which deals with the kinetic and/or dynamic properties of ACE inhibitors, precise knowledge of the relationship between their kinetic and dynamic behaviour is rather limited and there is a clear need for further studies to elucidate this complex topic, thereby improving therapeutic possibilities with these useful new compounds.

Antihypertensive and renal effects of lisinopril in older patients with hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril were assessed in 60 older patients with a mean age of 75 years (range, 65 to 85 years) in a 12-week open study. Mean ( +/- SEM) blood pressure while sitting was reduced from 190/106 +/- 3.3/1.8 mm Hg at entry to 162/89 +/- 3.2/1.6 mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment (p less than 0.001). There was no significant alteration in heart rate, and postural hypotension did not occur. Mean glomerular filtration rate at entry was 61.6 +/- 3.4 ml/minute and was unchanged after 12 weeks of therapy at 62.2 +/- 3.0 ml/minute. Fourteen patients continued to receive lisinopril for a period of one year. Blood pressure remained controlled throughout and heart rate remained unchanged. There was a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 128.8 +/- 1.9 mm Hg to 105.1 +/- 1.5 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Biochemical parameters remained unaltered. There was a significant increase in renal blood flow (p less than 0.025) and a corresponding reduction in renovascular resistance (p less than 0.001) following long-term therapy with lisinopril. Thus, lisinopril was generally well-tolerated and highly effective in lowering blood pressure in older hypertensive patients, whereas at the same time renal function was not adversely changed.

A randomized cross-over study of enalapril in congestive heart failure: haemodynamic and hormonal effects during rest and exercise

We performed a randomized double-blind placebo controlled cross-over study of enalapril in 16 patients with chronic congestive heart failure, to assess haemodynamic and hormonal effects at rest and on exercise. Acute effects were measured 4 h after enalapril 10 mg, and chronic effects after 6 weeks treatment with enalapril 10-20 mg per day. Exercise tolerance, assessed by the duration of a maximal bicycle ergometer test, was not altered by enalapril. Mean blood pressure was reduced after enalapril, at rest and on exercise, acutely by 7% and 8% respectively, and chronically by 14% and 16%. Systemic vascular resistance was reduced by 16% at rest both acutely (NS) and chronically (p less than 0.05). The resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was reduced by 28% with chronic treatment. In the acute study, total body oxygen consumption on exercise was 26% higher after enalapril. Chronically, resting oxygen consumption was reduced by 13% after enalapril, with mixed venous oxygen saturation increasing by 16%. In the acute study enalapril increased plasma renin activity at rest and on exercise by 181% and by 189%, and reduced aldosterone by 49% (NS) and 39% (p less than 0.05), and these effects were sustained after 6 weeks. Enalapril increased antidiuretic hormone concentrations at rest acutely by 73% (NS) and chronically by 34% (p less than 0.05) but not on exercise; the increase in the acute study correlated with plasma enalaprilat levels (r = 0.66, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of ramipril (HOE 498)

The pharmacokinetics of ramipril (HOE 498) were studied after oral administration of a single 10 mg dose to 24 hypertensive patients with different degrees of renal function. The creatinine clearance ranged between 4.1 and 126 ml/min/1.73 m2 and was below 35 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 16 patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme activity and the concentrations of ramipril and its active diacid metabolite ramiprilat were measured in plasma up to 10 days after drug intake. Urine levels of ramipril, ramiprilat, their glucuronides and 2 major metabolites (a diketopiperazine and a diketopiperazine acid) were measured up to 4 days after medication. The plasma concentration-time curve of ramiprilat was polyphasic with an initial steep decline after the peak level and a subsequent very long terminal phase at low concentrations. Impaired renal function resulted in higher peak levels of ramiprilat, longer times to peak and a markedly slower decline of plasma ramiprilat levels. Hence, the duration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition was considerably prolonged in renal failure and depended on the severity of renal impairment. The urinary excretion of ramipril and its metabolites decreased with decreasing renal function and was linearly related to the creatinine clearance, suggesting an alternative pathway of elimination. The pattern of excretion rates of ramipril and its various metabolites was not affected by renal failure. In contrast to the marked changes in the renal elimination, no relevant differences were observed in the absorption of ramipril from the gastrointestinal tract. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in all groups. The single 10 mg dose of ramipril was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ramipril in renal failure

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril were studied in 6 patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. A single oral dose of 5 mg was given and serum concentrations of the compound and its diacid, the active metabolite (ramiprilat), as well as ACE activity, blood pressure and pulse rate were monitored for 28 days. The original compound reached peak serum concentrations of 42.8 +/- 26.5 ng/ml about 1 hour after dosing and was completely eliminated from the serum after 24 hours. Ramiprilat reached peak values of 14.4 +/- 11.6 ng/ml after about 6 hours. In contrast with the parent compound, low concentrations of ramiprilat were still detected in the serum after 28 days. ACE activity decreased to approximately 5% of baseline values, remained low for the next 48 hours, then increased slowly thereafter but reached only 84.5% of initial values after 28 days. Blood pressure decreased significantly and remained low for 24 hours after dosing. The drug was well tolerated in all patients. It is concluded that a single 5 mg dose of ramipril was effective in inhibiting plasma ACE activity and lowering blood pressure in patients with renal failure. There was a slower decline in ramiprilat concentrations compared with subjects with normal renal function.

Lisinopril in hypertensive patients with and without renal failure

Lisinopril (MK521), a lysine analogue of enalaprilic acid, the bioactive metabolite of enalapril, has a longer half-life than enalaprilic acid, and is excreted unchanged in the urine. Its kinetic profile and antihypertensive and hormonal effects have been investigated in an open study in 3 groups each of 6 hypertensive patients, with normal, moderate and severe impairment of renal function. Serum drug level, blood pressure, converting enzyme activity (CEA), plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentration (PAC), and serum potassium and creatinine were measured during 1 week following a single oral dose and subsequently following 8 daily doses of 5 mg lisinopril. Accumulation of lisinopril was found in the severe renal failure group. CEA was suppressed to less than 10% of its initial value from 4 to 24 h after the initial dose in all three groups, and the suppression was more marked and lasted longer in patients with severe renal failure. An inverse correlation was found in all patients between log serum lisinopril concentration and log CEA. Lisinopril lowered blood pressure in all three groups over 24 h. PRA rose and PAC fell similarly in the groups. Serum potassium increased in the renal failure groups and creatinine remained unchanged in all groups. Thus, when lisinopril 5 mg is given daily to patients with severe renal failure it may accumulate. The high serum lisinopril concentration does not cause an excessive antihypertensive effect. In patients with severe renal failure, adjustment of the dose or the dosing frequency to the degree of renal failure is recommended to avoid administration of doses in excess of those required to achieve adequate inhibition of converting enzyme.