Sensitivity to tomato and peanut allergens in children monosensitized to grass pollen

Tomato Allergy: The Characterization of the Selected Allergens and Antioxidants of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)-A Review

Tomatoes are one of the most broadly produced and consumed crop plants. They are the source of health-promoting nutrients such as antioxidants, including ascorbic acid, polyphenols, or carotenoids. Despite the beneficial role of tomatoes in the daily diet, they have been confirmed as one of the most prevalent allergenic vegetables. Food allergies can cause many clinical symptoms, e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract, skin, and lungs, as well as anaphylactic shock. A huge amount of clinical research has been carried out to improve the understanding of the immunological mechanisms that lead to the lack of tolerance of food antigens, which can result in either immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reactions or non-IgE-mediated reactions. Lifestyle and diet play an important role in triggering food allergies. Allergy to tomatoes is also linked to other allergies, such as grass pollen and latex allergy. Numerous attempts have been made to identify and characterize tomato allergens; however, the data available on the subject are not sufficient.

Homemade Food Allergen Extracts for Use in Skin Prick Tests in the Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: A Good Alternative in the Absence of Commercially Available Extracts?

Introduction: The skin prick test (SPT) is the first step in the diagnosis of an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy. The availability of commercial food allergen extracts is very limited, resulting in a need for alternative extraction methods of food allergens. The objective of this study was to compare the SPT results of homemade food allergen extracts with commercially available extracts. Methods: Adult patients with a suspected food allergy were included. Food allergen-specific symptoms were scored using a questionnaire. SPTs were performed with homemade and commercially available extracts (ALK-Abelló, Kopenhagen, Denmark) from almond, apple, hazelnut, peach, peanut, and walnut. Serum-specific IgE was measured with ISAC or ImmunoCAP™. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) between the SPT results of both extract methods were calculated. The proportion of agreement with food allergen-specific symptoms was analyzed. Results: Fifty-four patients (mean age 36; range 19–69 years; female/male: 42/12) were included. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between the SPT results of both extract methods were strong for hazelnut 0.79 (n = 44) and walnut 0.78 (n = 31), moderate for apple 0.74 (n = 21) and peanut 0.66 (n = 28), and weak for almond 0.36 (n = 27) and peach 0.17 (n = 23). The proportion of agreement between SPT results and food allergen-specific symptoms was comparable for homemade and commercially available extracts, except for peach; 0.77 versus 0.36, respectively. Conclusion: In the diagnostic procedures to identify an IgE-mediated food allergy, homemade extracts from hazelnut and walnut appear to be a good alternative in the absence of commercially available food allergen extracts.

Update on pollen-food allergy syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Allergies affect 20-30% of the population and respiratory allergies are mostly due to pollen grains from anemophilous plants. One to 5% of people suffer from food allergies and clinicians report increasing numbers of pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS), such that the symptoms have broadened from respiratory to gastrointestinal, and even to anaphylactic shock in the presence of cofactors. Thirty to 60% of food allergies are associated with pollen allergy while the percentage of pollen allergies associated to food allergy varies according to local environment and dietary habits.

AREAS COVERED

Articles published in peer-reviewed journals, covered by PubMed databank, clinical data are discussed including symptoms, diagnosis, and management. A chapter emphasizes the role of six well-known allergen families involved in PFAS: PR10 proteins, profilins, lipid transfer proteins, thaumatin-like proteins, isoflavone reductases, and β-1,3 glucanases. The relevance in PFAS of three supplementary allergen families is presented: oleosins, polygalacturonases, and gibberellin-regulated proteins. To support the discussion a few original relevant results were added.

EXPERT OPINION

Both allergenic sources, pollen and food, are submitted to the same stressful environmental changes resulting in an increase of pathogenesis-related proteins in which numerous allergens are found. This might be responsible for the potential increase of PFAS.

In silico assessment data of allergenicity and cross-reactivity of NP24 epitopes from Solanum lycopersicum (Tomato) fruit

This paper describes data on allergies caused by food (vegetable) and their negative impact on the nutritional balance of the human body. Allergic responses to vegetables such as tomatoes, capsicum and spinach are next to fish, eggs and nuts. Epitopes such as NP24 (allergens) are one of the salt-induced allergenic proteins found in the thaumatin-like protein (TLP) family. The mechanism of allergenicity of TLP found in Solanum lycopersicum (Tomato) fruit is poorly studied. Here we demonstrated allergenicity conferred by the NP24 protein found in Tomato. The data on the cross-reactivity of NP24 protein was generated using Allergen Online and Allermatch tools. Tomato allergenic protein epitope shows a significant identity of with allergens reported in Capsicum, Olive, Kiwi, Tobacco and Banana allergens. Hence, the datasets of sequences, comparative analysis and homology epitope mapping over three dimensional (3D) structures revealed that NP24 has higher cross-reactivity to Capsicum and Tobacco proteins. Thus, this data probably act as limelight for planning wet lab experiments.

[Cross reactions between pollens and vegetable food allergens]

INTRODUCTION

The association of food allergies and pollinosis are numerous, implicating tree, grass and weed pollens on one hand and on the other, several plant foods which after ingestion can induce an oral syndrome or more severe reactions such as urticaria, Quincke's edema, asthma and even anaphylactic shock.

BACKGROUND

The molecular basis of cross reactions between pollens and vegetable food allergens is increasingly understood. The principal allergens involved are those of the Bet v 1 family, and profilins found in all pollens as well as in many fruits and vegetables; these two groups of allergens are denatured by high temperatures and by gastric enzymes, in contrast to LTP, which is only found in weeds and some tree pollens. Other molecules can be involved in cross reactions such as Bet v 6 (an isoflavone reductase), 1 beta glucanases and thaumatine-like proteins. Inhibition experiments confirmed that the epitopes responsible for primary sensitization come mainly from pollen allergens; the cross-reactive molecular allergen is related to the geographic environment of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The practical aspects of managing these patients are underlined: explanations of co-sensitization, explanations for the lack of efficacy of some extracts, usefulness of a molecular diagnosis obtained either by CAP or microarray, prediction of severe clinical reactions induced by specific molecular allergens and the effectiveness of pollen immunotherapy on the cross-related food allergy.

Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects

BACKGROUND

Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) are consumed worldwide and their amount of consumption is associated with the prevalence of tomato allergy. Therefore, identification of tomato cultivars with reduced allergenicity would potentially increase the quality of life of affected subjects.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we examined the allergenic and biological activity of two different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects.

METHODS

Twenty-five subjects with tomato allergy were identified using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC). We applied skin prick test (SPT) and further DBPCFC to investigate the clinical differences between two tomato cultivars ('Reisetomate' and 'Matina'). To examine the molecular basis of allergenic activity, immunoblotting and basophil activation test (BAT) were performed.

RESULTS

The cultivar 'Reisetomate' induced significantly less positive skin reactions (P = 0.045) and elicited fewer symptoms after oral challenge compared with 'Matina' (P = 0.047). Molecular assessment revealed that IgE-binding profiles were variable on an interindividual basis, but no major differences between 'Reisetomate' and 'Matina' were detectable. In contrast, BAT underpinned the clinical differences evoked by the different tomato cultivars and showed a left-shift of the dose-response curve obtained for 'Matina' extract (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tomato cultivars promote a distinct clinical reactivity in tomato allergic subjects, demonstrated using SPT, DBPCFC and BAT. The molecular background for these differences could not be clarified, as the IgE-binding profiles did not reveal significant alterations. This might be due to instabilities of physicochemical sensitive proteins and/or different isoform expression of allergens.

Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Not all peanut-sensitized children develop allergic reactions on exposure.

OBJECTIVE

To establish by oral food challenge the proportion of children with clinical peanut allergy among those considered peanut-sensitized by using skin prick tests and/or IgE measurement, and to investigate whether component-resolved diagnostics using microarray could differentiate peanut allergy from tolerance.

METHODS

Within a population-based birth cohort, we ascertained peanut sensitization by skin tests and IgE measurement at age 8 years. Among sensitized children, we determined peanut allergy versus tolerance by oral food challenges. We used open challenge among children consuming peanuts (n = 45); others underwent double-blind placebo-controlled challenge (n = 34). We compared sensitization profiles between children with peanut allergy and peanut-tolerant children by using a microarray with 12 pure components (major peanut and potentially cross-reactive components, including grass allergens).

RESULTS

Of 933 children, 110 (11.8%) were peanut-sensitized. Nineteen were not challenged (17 no consent). Twelve with a convincing history of reactions on exposure, IgE > or =15 kUa/L and/or skin test > or =8mm were considered allergic without challenge. Of the remaining 79 children who underwent challenge, 7 had > or =2 objective signs and were designated as having peanut allergy. We estimated the prevalence of clinical peanut allergy among sensitized subjects as 22.4% (95% CI, 14.8% to 32.3%). By using component-resolved diagnostics, we detected marked differences in the pattern of component recognition between children with peanut allergy (n = 29; group enriched with 12 children with allergy) and peanut-tolerant children (n = 52). The peanut component Ara h 2 was the most important predictor of clinical allergy.

CONCLUSION

The majority of children considered peanut-sensitized on the basis of standard tests do not have peanut allergy. Component-resolved diagnostics may facilitate the diagnosis of peanut allergy.

Tomato allergy: detection of IgE-binding lipid transfer proteins in tomato derivatives and in fresh tomato peel, pulp, and seeds

There is an increasing consumption of tomatoes worldwide: fresh in salads, cooked in household sauces, or industrially processed. Although many tomato allergens have been identified, there is no information in the literature on the allergenic components found in commercial tomato products. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the allergenic profile of commercial tomato products by skin prick tests (SPTs) and IgE/immunoblotting in tomato-allergic subjects. The secondary end point was the study of the IgE-binding profile of tomato peel, pulp, and seeds. Forty tomato-allergic patients, reporting oral allergy syndrome (OAS) at different grades of severity for fresh and, in some cases, also for cooked tomato, were selected on the basis of positive tomato allergy history or open food challenge (OFC). They were evaluated by SPTs with different experimental tomato extracts. SDS-PAGE/immunoblotting was performed to detect tomato allergens, which were then identified by Edman degradation. Twenty-three patients (57.5%) presented first-grade OAS at the OFC, whereas 17 (42.5%) reported severe symptoms. Ten of these 17 patients (25%) reported allergic reactions to cooked tomatoes; in immunoblotting tests, their sera reacted only to lipid transfer protein (LTP). In commercial products, LTP was the only detectable allergen. In contrast to other LTP-containing fruits, in tomato, an IgE-binding LTP was identified not only in the peel but also in the pulp and seeds. This study demonstrates that, in fresh tomato, different LTP isoforms are present and allergenic. Industrial tomato derivatives still contain LTP, thus presenting a problem for LTP-allergic patients.

Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE-reactive legumin and vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation-mass spectrometry and in silico epitope modeling

Tomato fruit and seed allergens were detected by IgE-immunoblotting using sera from 18 adult tomato-sensitized patients selected based on a positive history skin prick test (SPT) and specific Immunglobulin (Ig) E-levels. Isolated tomato seed total protein showed high SPT activity comparable or even higher than tomato fruit protein. For the molecular characterization of tomato seed allergens, a multidimensional protein fractionation strategy and LC-MS/MS was used. Two legumin- and vicilin-proteins were purified and showed strong IgE-reactivity in immunoblots. Individual patient sera exhibited varying IgE-sensitivity against the purified proteins. In silico structural modeling indicates high homology between epitopes of known walnut allergens and the detected IgE-crossreactive tomato proteins.

Sensitization to tomato peel and pulp extracts in the Mediterranean Coast of Spain: prevalence and co-sensitization with aeroallergens

BACKGROUND

Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) are consumed world-wide. The prevalence of sensitization to tomatoes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of skin test reactivity to tomato and to describe the characteristics of tomato-sensitized subjects.

METHODS

Individuals attending for the first time during the period of the study to six Allergy centres, located along the Mediterranean coast of Spain, reporting respiratory and/or cutaneous symptoms, were included. All patients were skin prick tested with a battery of inhalant allergens and with peel and pulp of Canary tomato extracts.

RESULTS

The study included 1734 individuals (757 males, 977 females; 31.9+/-17.8 years old). The prevalence of sensitization to tomato was 6.52% (113 patients; 65 males, 48 females; 29.5+/-13 years old). The peel extract was positive in 110 patients and the pulp extract in 47 patients; three patients were positive exclusively to pulp. Only 1.8% of individuals reported symptoms with tomato; 44% of them had skin test negative to both extracts. Among tomato-sensitized subjects, 16% reported symptoms with tomato, 97% were sensitized to inhalant aeroallergens, including 84% to pollens (mainly Artemisia vulgaris and Platanus hybrida), with differences between Northern and Southern centres.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence found of skin test sensitivity to tomato is high. Peel extracts detected most of the sensitized subjects. Most of the sensitized subjects were asymptomatic and some patients reported symptoms without skin test sensitivity. Positive subjects were very frequently sensitized to pollens, suggesting allergen cross-reactivity. Regional differences may exist, possibly related to the pattern of sensitization to cross-reacting pollens.

Oral and nasal sensitization promote distinct immune responses and lung reactivity in a mouse model of peanut allergy

Despite structural and functional differences between the initial sites of contact with allergens in the gastrointestinal and nasal tracts, few animal models have examined the influence of the mucosal routes of sensitization on host reactivity to food or environmental antigens. We compared the oral and nasal routes of peanut sensitization for the development of a mouse model of allergy. Mice were sensitized by administration of peanut proteins in the presence of cholera toxin as adjuvant. Antibody and cytokine responses were characterized, as well as airway reactivity to nasal challenge with peanut or unrelated antigens. Oral sensitization promoted higher levels of IgE, but lower IgG responses, than nasal sensitization. Both orally and nasally sensitized mice experienced airway hyperreactivity on nasal peanut challenge. The peanut challenge also induced lung eosinophilia and type 2 helper T-cell-type cytokines in orally sensitized mice. In contrast, peanut challenge in nasally sensitized mice promoted neutrophilia and higher levels of lung MAC-1(+) I-A(b low) cells and inflammatory cytokines. In addition, nasal but not oral, sensitization promoted lung inflammatory responses to unrelated antigens. In summary, both oral and nasal peanut sensitization prime mice for airway hyperreactivity, but the initial mucosal route of sensitization influences the nature of lung inflammatory responses to peanut and unrelated allergens.

Kutane Symptome nach Genuss pollenassoziierter Nahrungsmittel

The molecular basis of pollen-related food allergy is the marked similarity in sequence and structure of allergenic proteins in pollens and food plants. In affected patients, specific IgE antibodies are primarily directed against pollen allergens but then recognize homologous allergens in plant food. In Central and Northern Europe up to 80% of birch pollen allergic subjects suffer from a food allergy, in particular to stone- and pip fruits, nuts and vegetables. The main clinical manifestation of pollen-related food allergy is the oral allergy syndrome (OAS), a contact urticaria of the oral mucosa. Other features include contact urticaria of the hands in those handling the foods, as well as generalized urticaria and angioedema following ingestion. The impact of pollen-related food allergy on the severity and course of atopic eczema remain to be elucidated.

Cross-reactivity among edible nuts: double immunodiffusion, crossed immunoelectrophoresis, and human specific igE serologic surveys

BACKGROUND

As many as one third of all food allergen anaphylactic events are related to tree nut ingestion. Although concurrent allergen sensitivity to tree nuts is common, cross-reactivity among nut antigens is less well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To survey serologic cross-reactivities among 7 tree nuts (walnut, pecan, hazelnut, cashew, Brazil nut, pistachio, and almond) and peanut.

METHODS

Human specific IgE enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition was used to identify nut allergen cross-reactivities. Single-nut rabbit antisera were used in double immunodiffusion, crossed-line immunoelectrophoresis, and crossed immunoelectrophoresis with intermediate gel studies of nut antigen cross-reactivity.

RESULTS

Nut specific IgE enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition demonstrated no cross-reactivities between peanut and tree nuts. Among tree nuts, 2 groups with allergen cross-reactivity were defined: (1) walnut, pecan, and hazelnut and (2) hazelnut, cashew, Brazil nut, pistachio, and almond. Double immunodiffusion, crossed-line immunoelectrophoresis, and crossed immunoelectrophoresis with intermediate gel results supported the same groupings of cross-reactive tree nuts and identified several less prominent nut-nut antigen cross-reactivities between groups and with peanut.

CONCLUSION

With few exceptions (notably limited peanut cross-reactivity with pistachio and walnut), peanut antigens did not serologically cross-react with tree nuts. Walnut, pecan, and hazelnut form a group of strongly cross-reactive tree nuts. Hazelnut, cashew, Brazil nut, pistachio, and almond form a group of moderately cross-reactive tree nuts. Cross-reactivities between these groups are less pronounced (notably limited cross-reactivity of walnut and pecan with Brazil nut). The strongest cross-reactivities among tree nuts follow botanical family associations: (1) walnut and pecan in the family Juglandaceae and (2) cashew and pistachio in the family Anacardiaceae.

The prevalence of peanut sensitization and the association to pollen sensitization in a cohort of unselected adolescents--The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS)

In the last decade an increased occurrence of peanut hypersensitivity and severe anaphylactic reactions to peanut have been reported. However, few prevalence studies have been performed in unselected populations. This study evaluated the point prevalence of peanut hypersensitivity in Danish adolescents. The point prevalence of peanut allergy confirmed by oral challenge was estimated to 0.5%. The number of adolescents sensitized to peanut by specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) (CAP FEIA) and skin prick test (SPT) were higher (5.8% resp. 3.4%). In adolescents without clinically relevant peanut sensitization most cases were sensitized to grass pollen and the IgE class for grass was higher than for peanut. A correlation between peanut and pollen (grass) sensitization is therefore plausible. Before a positive SPT or specific IgE measurement to peanut is considered clinically relevant in a patient, the case history should be evaluated together with examination for pollen sensitization.

The clinical relevance of sensitization to pollen-related fruits and vegetables in unselected pollen-sensitized adults

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have described cross-reactivity between fresh fruits, vegetables and pollen. However, no data demonstrates the clinical relevance of sensitization to pollen-related fruits and vegetables in unselected pollen-sensitized adults with and without symptoms in the pollen season.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical relevance of sensitization to pollen-related fruits and vegetables in unselected pollen-sensitized adults and to examine the diagnostic value of skin-prick test (SPT), histamine release and specific IgE compared with the outcome of oral challenge.

METHODS

In total, 936 unselected adults (female : male 479 : 457, median age 33.7 years) were examined for pollen sensitization and clinical cross-reactivity with pollen-related fruits and vegetables by questionnaire, SPT, histamine release, specific IgE and oral challenge.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pollen sensitization was 23.8% (n = 223). The probability of a clinical reaction to pollen-related foods in the respective pollen-sensitized groups was: 24% (birch), 4% (grass), 10% (mugwort), 35% (birch + grass), 8% (grass + mugwort) and 52% (birch + grass + mugwort). The odds ratio of a clinical reaction to pollen-related fruits and vegetables in symptomatic pollen-sensitized adults was as high as four times (birch + grass) the odds ratio of a clinical reaction in asymptomatic pollen-sensitized adults.

CONCLUSION

This study not only demonstrates a high prevalence of clinical reactions to fruits and vegetables in pollen-sensitized adults, but also a discrepancy between the prevalence of sensitization to fruits and vegetables and the clinical relevance in different pollen-sensitized groups with symptoms in the pollen season as a significant factor.

Tomato profilin Lyc e 1: IgE cross-reactivity and allergenic potency

BACKGROUND

To date, very little data are available about the nature of tomato allergens. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-reactive profilins have been suggested to account for allergic symptoms in patients suffering from tomato allergy.

METHODS

The cDNA of tomato profilin was amplified by reversely transcribed polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from total RNA extracted from ripe tomato fruit. The gene was cloned into the pET101D expression plasmid and the protein was produced in Escherichia coli BL21. Purification was performed via poly-l-proline (PLP) affinity chromatography. IgE reactivity of recombinant tomato profilin was investigated by immunoblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IgE-inhibition studies were performed to analyse cross-reactivity with other profilins. To determine the allergenic activity of the recombinant protein, basophil histamine release assays using sera of patients with adverse reactions to tomato were performed.

RESULTS

Profilin was identified as a new minor allergen in tomato fruits. The recombinant tomato profilin comprises 131 amino acids and high sequence identity to other allergenic food and pollen profilins. It was shown to be IgE-reactive with a prevalence of 22% (11/50) in tomato-allergic patients. In patients with tomato allergy and multiple sensitization to other foods and birch pollen, IgE directed against tomato profilin showed a strong cross-reactivity with profilins from plant food sources and birch pollen. The tomato profilin was able to induce mediator release from human basophils.

CONCLUSION

The tomato profilin is a minor allergen in tomato fruit. Thus, it shows biological activity, as confirmed by in vitro histamine release assays with human basophils and thereby has the potential to account for clinical symptoms in tomato-allergic patients.

Detection of clinical markers of sensitization to profilin in patients allergic to plant-derived foods

BACKGROUND

A proper classification of patients allergic to plant-derived foods is of pivotal importance because the clinical features of allergic reactions to fruits and vegetables depend on the nature and characteristics of proteins responsible for sensitization. However, in normal clinical settings this is presently impossible.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to detect clinical markers of sensitization to profilin.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients allergic to fruits and vegetables but not sensitized to lipid transfer protein or natural rubber latex were studied. Food allergy was ascertained on the basis of clinical history and positive skin prick test responses with fresh foods, commercial extracts, or both. Allergies to foods that had caused less than 2 adverse reactions were confirmed by means of open oral challenge. IgE reactivity to rBet v 1/rBet v 2 and to natural Phleum species profilin were detected. Moreover, IgE to the 30- to 40-kd and 60- to 90-kd birch pollen-enriched fractions, which also can be involved in cross-reactivity phenomena, were measured in sera from 52 patients by means of ELISA.

RESULTS

On the basis of in vitro tests, 24, 18, and 25 patients turned out to be sensitized to Bet v 1, Bet v 2, or both, respectively. Four patients had negative test results for both allergens. Hypersensitivity to Bet v 2 was strongly associated with clinical allergy to citrus fruits (39% in patients monosensitized to Bet v 2 vs 4% in patients monosensitized to Bet v 1, P <.025), melon or watermelon (67% vs 0%, P <.001), banana (66% vs 8%, P <.001), and tomato (33% vs 0%, P <.05), whereas Bet v 1 sensitivity was associated with clinical allergy to apple (100% vs 39%, P <.001) and hazelnut (56% vs 0%, P <.001). The sensitivity of a history of allergy to gourd fruits, citrus fruits, tomato, banana, or a combination thereof as a means to detect profilin-hypersensitive patients was 85% (41/48). The specificity of an allergy to any of these fruits exceeded 85%, with positive predictive values ranging between 68% and 91%.

CONCLUSION

In clinical settings in which laboratory investigations are not easily accessible, allergy to melon, watermelon, citrus fruits, tomato, and banana can be used as a marker of profilin hypersensitivity once a sensitization to natural rubber latex and lipid transfer protein is ruled out.

Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato

Until now, only a small amount of information is available about tomato allergens. In the present study, a glycosylated allergen of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Lyc e 2, was purified from tomato extract by a two-step FPLC method. The cDNA of two different isoforms of the protein, Lyc e 2.01 and Lyc e 2.02, was cloned into the bacterial expression vector pET100D. The recombinant proteins were purified by electroelution and refolded. The IgE reactivity of both the recombinant and the natural proteins was investigated with sera of patients with adverse reactions to tomato. IgE-binding to natural Lyc e 2 was completely inhibited by the pineapple stem bromelain glycopeptide MUXF (Man alpha 1-6(Xyl beta 1-2)Man beta 1-4GlcNAc beta 1-4(Fuc alpha 1-3)GlcNAc). Accordingly, the nonglycosylated recombinant protein isoforms did not bind IgE of tomato allergic patients. Hence, we concluded that the IgE reactivity of the natural protein mainly depends on the glycan structure. The amino acid sequences of both isoforms of the allergen contain four possible N-glycosylation sites. By application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry the predominant glycan structure of the natural allergen was identified as MMXF (Man alpha 1-6(Man alpha 1-3)(Xyl beta 1-2)Man beta 1-4GlcNAc beta 1-4(Fuc alpha 1-3) GlcNAc). Natural Lyc e 2, but not the recombinant protein was able to trigger histamine release from passively sensitized basophils of patients with IgE to carbohydrate determinants, demonstrating that glycan structures can be important for the biological activity of allergens.

[The allergenic significance of legumes]

Leguminous are a cheap source of protein that are cultivated practically throughout the world. They are the main source of food in developing countries. In the Mediterranean area and Middle East, the most commonly consumed legumes are lentils and chickpea. In the United States, United Kingdom and south-east Asia, the major legumes involved in food allergy are considered to be peanut and soy bean, respectively. The clinical manifestations of the allergy to legumes are similar for all legumes and range from oral allergy syndrome, urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis and asthmatic crises to anaphylaxis and even death. Legumes have a high degree of immunological cross-reactivity. Severals authors have described cross-reactivity among different legumes and between legumes and various vegetables. The allergenicity of legumes is mainly is mainly related to allergens from the storage proteins of seeds. Vicilins from this group of proteins could be an important common allergen in clinical allergy to legumes. Profilins are considered to be a cause of cross-reactivity among fruits, vegetables and some pollens and are believed to be a panallergen. Other panallergens of increasing importance are lipid transfer proteins. Few studies have assessed the long-term clinical course of allergy to legumes. Novel therapeutic agents are being investigated for the treatment of peanut allergy and these could be applied to other legumes.

Tomato allergy in children and young adults: cross-reactivity with latex and potato

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that allergy to natural rubber latex is associated with cross-reactivity to certain foods such as tomato and potato. The objective was to investigate the clinical and immunologic differences between a group of patients with clinical allergy to tomato and latex and another which had only clinical allergy to tomato. We also aimed to assess, in vitro, the relationship of tomato and latex allergens, which could explain the cross-reactivity.

METHODS

Forty patients with histories of adverse reactions to tomato and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity were enrolled in the study. Tomato, latex, and potato components were analyzed by SDS-PAGE immunoblotting. CAP and immunoblot inhibition were used to study allergen cross-reactivity.

RESULTS

Patients from group A had a mean age of 13.2 years, and in group B the mean age was 21.7 years. In group B, 9/10 patients belonged to the latex-fruits syndrome. All patients of both groups tolerated potato. Immunoblotting patterns obtained with patients' sera from pool A showed IgE-binding bands to tomato ranging from 44 to 46 kDa and a triple band at 67 kDa. For latex, there was a strong binding at 44 kDa, and potato showed a strong band of 44 kDa and a 67-kDa triple band. In pool B, the binding to the band of 44 kDa in latex and tomato was more intense than in pool A. In pool A, immunoblot inhibition with potato allergen showed an intense inhibition of the three allergens (potato, latex, and tomato); with latex, inhibition was partial and with tomato, a complete inhibition of tomato and latex was observed, and a partial inhibition of potato. In pool B, the inhibition pattern followed a similar tendency to pool A. The CAP inhibition confirmed the high rate of cross-reactivity between tomato, potato, and latex.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, tomato, potato, and latex showed a common band of 44-46 kDa probably corresponding to patatin. This protein could be implicated in the high cross-reactivity between tomato, latex, and potato observed in the immunoblot and CAP inhibition.

Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) induced by Rosaceae or nuts are positive on skin prick tests with commercial food extracts. This suggests reactivity against distinct stable allergens.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To define the prevalence of subjects positive on skin prick tests with commercial extracts among patients with OAS caused by Rosaceae and/or nuts and (2) To investigate whether commercial extracts-positive subjects show some peculiar clinical feature and may represent a specific subset with food allergy.

METHODS

Skin prick tests were carried out with a large panel of commercial extracts of airborne allergens (Allergopharma) and of vegetable foods (Dome/Hollister-Stier) in 298 adults with OAS caused by Rosaceae (n = 237) and or nuts (n = 161), positive on skin prick tests with fresh offending foods.

RESULTS

25/237 (11%) patients were positive on prick tests with commercial plum extract. This subgroup showed a higher incidence of systemic symptoms (64% versus 6%; P < .001) and a lower incidence of birch pollen allergy (12% versus 99%; P < .001) than commercial extract-negative patients; moreover, 36% versus 0%, respectively, did not have respiratory allergy (P < .001). Apple and peach were the main offending foods among commercial extract-negative and commercial extract-positive patients, respectively (87% versus 44% for apple, P < .001; and 52% versus 88% for peach, P < .005). Eight of one hundred sixty-one (5%) nuts-sensitive patients were positive on prick test with commercial walnut extract. This subgroup showed a higher proportion of patients who experienced systemic symptoms (63% versus 6%, P < .001), a lower prevalence of birch pollen allergy (13% versus 97%, P < .001), and a higher prevalence of grass pollen allergy (88% versus 41%, P < .05) than commercial extract-negative subjects. Further, reactivity against commercial walnut extract was associated with skin reactivity against commercial extracts of peanut (88% versus 37%, P < .005), tomato (75% versus 5%, P < .001), and plum (63% versus 8%, P < .001), and inversely related with skin reactivity against fresh apple (P < .001). In most cases, high levels of IgE specific for peach, apple, and hazelnut were associated with peanut reactivity rather than with clinical sensitivity to specific foods. In a preliminary investigation, most commercial extract-positive patients reacted against a 10-kDa protein characterized as a lipid transfer protein (LTP).

CONCLUSIONS

Skin prick tests with commercial extracts of plum and walnut may be usefully employed to detect patients with OAS reacting against stable allergens. The high prevalence of systemic symptoms in these patients suggests that allergens' stability is associated with a higher resistance to the gastrointestinal environment and strongly influences the clinical expression of vegetable food allergy. At least some stable allergens, namely lipid transfer protein might be shared by botanically unrelated fruits such as nuts, peanuts, legumes, tomato, and Prunoideae.

Specific IgE antibodies to aeroallergens and food among Israelis

BACKGROUND

There are no data about specific IgE antibodies to food and aeroallergens in the Israeli population.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the relationship between selected demographic parameters and rate of sensitivity to various allergens throughout all ages.

METHODS

Analysis was carried out on 776 positive specific IgE from 655 patients (347 to food, 429 to aeroallergens, and 121 to both). The studied parameters were age and gender.

RESULTS

Age-related analysis showed the highest positivity to food (eggs, legumes, and milk) and the lowest to pollens during infancy. High sensitivity to house mites prevailed at all ages. Sensitivity to pollens and epidermals increased with age while sensitivity to eggs, legumes, and milk decreased. Above the age of 30 years, the rate of sensitivity to all tested aeroallergens and food was similar and close to the average value. Our data showed a significant cross-sensitivity between various foods and aeroallergens and also confirmed cross-sensitivity results reported earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Age is a dominant factor affecting type I hypersensitivity. House mite is the most common allergen throughout life. (2) The age distribution and nature of sensitivity to allergens in Israel has some similarities to Spain but differ from other countries. (3) Cross-sensitivity between food and aeroallergens was found.

Molecular characterization of Dau c 1, the Bet v 1 homologous protein from carrot and its cross-reactivity with Bet v 1 and Api g 1

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients with birch pollen allergy exhibit the so-called oral allergy syndrome, an IgE-mediated food allergy. The most frequent and therefore best characterized pollen-fruit syndrome is apple allergy in patients suffering from tree pollen-induced pollinosis. The occurrence of adverse reactions to proteins present in vegetables such as celery and carrots in patients suffering from pollen allergy has also been reported. cDNAs for Bet v 1 homologous proteins have been cloned from celery, apple and cherry. Objective The aim of the study was to identify Bet v 1 homologues from carrot (Daucus carota), to isolate the respective cDNA, to compare the IgE-binding capacity of the natural protein to the recombinant allergen and determine the cross-reactivity to Api g 1 and Bet v 1.

METHODS

Molecular characterization of the carrot allergen was performed using IgE-immunoblotting, cross-inhibition assays, N-terminal sequencing, PCR-based cDNA cloning and expression of the recombinant protein in Escherichia coli.

RESULTS

A 16-kDa protein from carrot was identified as a major IgE-binding component and designated Dau c 1. Sequencing corresponding cDNAs revealed three extremely similar sequences (Dau c 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3) with an open reading frame of 462 bp coding for 154 amino acid residues.

CONCLUSIONS

Purified recombinant Dau c 1.2 was tested in immunoblots displaying IgE-binding capacity comparable to its natural counterpart. Cross-inhibition assays verified the existence of common B-cell epitopes present on Dau c 1, Api g 1 as well as on Bet v 1.

Identification of HLA-DR and -DQ alleles conferring susceptibility to pollen allergy and pollen associated food allergy

BACKGROUND

Allergenic crossreactivity of pollen and foods due to the antigeneic similarity of oligopeptides is a well established clinical phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the immunopathological relevance of antigen presentation, we analysed the HLA class-II genotype of patients with either pollen allergy or pollen associated food allergy.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with pollen allergy and 80 patients with pollen associated food allergy were evaluated by skin- prick tests, RAST, and HLA class-II genotyping. The control population comprised 4251 healthy blood and bone marrow donors.

RESULTS

Monovalent pollen allergy was observed in 57% (n=68) of patients with pollinosis (57x grass pollen, 11x birch pollen), but only in 15% (n=12) of patients with food allergy (9x grass pollen, 3x birch pollen). Hazelnut (71%), almond (65%), walnut (44%) and apple (41%) were the most common food allergens and frequently associated with birch pollen allergy. Grass pollen allergy was associated with an increased frequency of HLA-DQB1*0301 (RR=2.3; EF=0.4; P=0.0016) when compared with the control population. HLA-DRB *08 conferred a sixfold higher risk for peanut allergy (EF=0.3; P=0.0013) and -DRB1*12 a 13-fold higher risk for carrot allergy (EF=0.3; P<0.000001). The differences on allele frequencies detected among patients with food allergies diminished or turned statistically insignificant when their genotypes were directly compared to those of patients with the corresponding pollen allergies. This was found in the case of birch pollen associated hazel nut allergy for the extended haplotype HLA-DRB1*01, -DQA1*0101, -DQB1*0501 as well as in grass pollen associated peanut allergy for HLA-DRB1*08 (from RR=6, P=0.0013 to insignificant) and in birch pollen associated carrot allergy for HLA-DRB1*12 (from RR=13, P < 0.000001 to insignificant).

CONCLUSION

We were able to identify HLA class-II alleles associated with some allergies thus indicating that these alleles might confer susceptibility to the respective allergens. Similarities at the level of the HLA class-II genotype parallel the empirical finding of distinct cross-reactivity patterns thus complementing investigations of IgE specificities. Our observations provide evidence for the major importance of antigen presentation on the manifestation of distinct crossreactivity patterns.

Allergenic cross-reactivity, food allergy and pollen

Pollen-allergic patients frequently present oral allergy-like symptoms after ingestion of several kinds of plant foods. The majority of these reactions are due to three distinct cross-reactive structures that are present in birch pollen. Proteins that share common epitopes with Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, occur in other kinds of tree pollen, apples, stone fruits, celery, carrots and nuts. Approximately 70% of patients who are allergic to birch pollen may experience symptoms after consumption of foods from these groups. In contrast to Bet v 1, two minor allergenic structures which sensitise ≈10-20% of all pollen-allergic patients are also present in grass and weed pollen, namely profilin and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. Profilins can induce symptoms to almost all kinds of plant foods, whereas the clinical relevance of IgE binding to ubiquitous carbohydrates of N-glycans from plants remains in doubt. The paper summarises the knowledge pertaining to the molecular features of these cross-reactive structures and the characteristics of the cross-reactivity patterns and discusses aspects of diagnosis, management and routes of sensitisation.

Anaphylaxis induced by lentils

BACKGROUND

The legume food family is large and includes peanut and soybean, two of the most frequent causes of food allergy. Literature on type I hypersensitivity to lentils, also a legume, is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a child with repeated anaphylactic reactions related to lentils.

METHODS

Skin prick tests with both commercial and cooked extracts and serum-specific IgE measured by CAP-RIA were used to identify specific IgE antibodies to various legumes.

RESULTS

An 8-year-old girl suffered four episodes of anaphylaxis related to lentils from ages 3 to 7 years. The first three involved ingestion of cooked lentils and each time smaller amounts induced symptoms. The fourth episode occurred with inhalation exposure to cooking lentil soup. Subsequently, she presented with contact urticaria from raw chickpeas and an anaphylactic reaction after ingestion of cooked chickpeas. Prick tests showed strongly positive reactions to lentil and chickpea and weaker positive reactions to peanut, pea, soybean, and white bean. CAP-RIA was class 6 to lentil; class 5 to peanut, pea, and soybean; class 4 to white bean, and class 0 to green bean.

CONCLUSION

Severe type I hypersensitivity to lentils occurred in this patient and was associated with clinically relevant hypersensitivity to chickpeas. Prick tests and CAP-RIA demonstrated multiple positive reactions to other legumes.

Inhalative occupational and ingestive immediate-type allergy caused by chicory (Cichorium intybus)

We report a first case of occupational allergy to chicory (Cichorium intybus) in a vegetable wholesaler. Symptoms occurred after oral, cutaneous or inhalatory exposure. The patient also reported reactions after ingestion of botanically related endive (Cichorium endivia) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa). We identified the responsible allergen by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot to be a 48-kDa protein, confined to the non-illuminated parts of the plants. No cross-reactivity was found with mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris), ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen, which suggests that the vegetable is the primary allergenic material.

Relationship between pollinosis and fruit or vegetable sensitization

The prevalence of vegetable sensitization in children with pollinosis (Group A; n = 48) and the prevalence of pollen sensitization in children with fruit or vegetable allergy (Group B; n = 42) were studied by means of prick-test and determination of serum specific IgE to several pollens, fruits and vegetables. Fifteen patients from Group A (31%) showed sensitivity to fruits and/or vegetables, but only three of them had any symptoms after ingestions. Twenty nine patients from Group B (69%) showed pollen sensitization, mainly to grass and Compositae pollen. An association was found between sensitivity to Compositae pollen and sensitivity to several fruits and vegetables (Compositae, Fagaceae, Brassica, Betulaceae and Leguminoseae).

Kiwi fruit allergy: a new birch pollen-associated food allergy

BACKGROUND

To determine the cross-reacting antigens of kiwi fruit and other foods and pollen, we investigated 22 patients allergic to kiwi fruit: 10 with severe systemic reactions and 12 with localized symptoms confined to oral and pharyngeal mucosa (oral allergy syndrome). Seven patients with birch pollen allergy who tolerated kiwi fruit were included as a control group.

METHODS

All patients were evaluated by skin testing and RAST; three patients were evaluated by RAST inhibition assays.

RESULTS

Prick tests showed positive reactions to kiwi fruit in all patients, whereas specific IgE to kiwi fruit could be demonstrated only in patients with generalized severe symptoms. Surprisingly, all 22 patients with clinical kiwi allergy showed positive prick test results and elevated IgE to birch pollen. Clinically, all complained of rhinitis during birch pollen season. Many patients showed sensitization to grass and mugwort pollen. Also, food allergy was found to be associated with kiwi allergy: we found strong reactions to apple and hazelnut; moderate reactions to carrot, potato, and avocado; and weak reactions to wheat and rye flour, pineapple and papaya, and their enzymes bromelain and papain. RAST inhibition studies revealed cross-reacting antigens between birch pollen and kiwi fruit. Interestingly, patients with birch pollen allergy without clinical signs of kiwi allergy had positive prick test reactions to kiwi. Patients with kiwi allergy showed higher concentrations to birch pollen IgE compared with patients with isolated birch pollen allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that kiwi allergy is a new manifestation of birch pollen-associated food allergy and is mediated by cross-reacting antigens in the kiwi fruit. Kiwi allergy can be expected in patients with birch pollen allergy exhibiting high levels of IgE to birch pollen.

Pistachio nut hypersensitivity: identification of pistachio nut allergens

Type I hypersensitivity to pistachio nut antigens was demonstrated in three patients by means of immediate skin-test reactivity, specific IgE determination by a fluoroimmunoassay (CAP), CAP-inhibition and leucocyte histamine release. Sensitization to other dried fruits and pollens was observed in the patients. The CAP-inhibition studies revealed significant crossreactivity between pistachio and cashew nut belonging to the Anacardiaceae family, and between pistachio nut and other dried fruits belonging to taxonomically unrelated botanical families. No relevant crossallergenicity was observed between pistachio nut and Lolium and Olea pollens. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of a pistachio nut extract followed by immunoblotting analysis identified four IgE-binding bands with molecular weights of 34, 41, 52 and 60 kD.

Bronchial asthma induced by chick pea and lentil

Allergic reactions to legumes through inhalation have rarely been described. We report the case of a 20-year-old man who experienced asthmatic attacks when exposed to the steam from cooking either chick pea or lentil. Type I hypersensitivity to the antigens in these legumes was demonstrated by means of immediate skin reactivity, histamine release tests, RAST and RAST inhibition. Specific bronchial challenges with the heated (75 degrees for 30 min) extracts of chick pea and lentil elicited isolated immediate responses.

Relationship between IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies to foods and the development of IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens. II. Increased levels of IgG antibodies to foods in children who subsequently develop IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens

In the present investigation we have tested the hypothesis that children with a high IgG antibody response to foods have an increased risk of developing IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens. Sera from 106 children with an increased risk of developing IgE-mediated allergy were analysed. During the follow-up, in 54 of these children IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens appeared. A positive/negative IgG1 and IgG4 anti-food score was determined as described previously: sera from age-clustered unselected children were tested for the levels of IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies to common foods. For each IgG RAST and each age group, the 75-percentile was chosen as cut-off value. Each antibody level was thus converted into a positive (higher than the 75-percentile of the age group) or negative value. The number of positive tests was used as the score. High-risk children with a high IgG1 anti-food score more often developed inhalant-specific IgE antibodies than high-risk children with low IgG1 titres: 50% of the children with a high IgG1 anti-food score developed IgE antibodies to grass pollen. Fifty per cent of the children with a high and 14% of the children with a low IgG1 anti-food score developed IgE antibodies to cat dander. For the prediction of the development of IgE anti-mite (house dust mite), the IgG4 anti-food scores appeared less useful than the IgG1 anti-food scores; 46% of the IgG4 high responders versus 22% of the IgG4 low responders acquired IgE anti-mite, whereas for IgG1 these percentages were 73 and 19, respectively.

Allergy to different fish species in cod-allergic children: in vivo and in vitro studies

The presence of a positive clinical history and skin test (ST) results for 17 fish species (anchovy, bass, carp, dogfish, eel, gilthead, mackerel, mullet, perch, red mullet, salmon, sardine, sole, tench, toothed gilthead, trout, and tuna) were investigated in 20 children with cod-positive clinical history, ST, and RAST, and in 40 children positive to one or more foods different from cod (cow's milk, chicken egg white, peanut, and tomato). In cod-positive children, positive clinical history (60%) and ST (85%) to fish species were more frequent than in cod-negative children (7.5% and 10% respectively). In cod-positive children, a high frequency of positive STs to eel (85%) and to bass, dentex, sole, and tuna (55%) was observed. Positivity to dogfish (10%) was the least frequent. RAST-inhibition experiments suggested the presence of cross-reacting antigen(s) in cod, bass, dentex, eel, sole, and tuna. Results of this study demonstrate that cod allergy might be, on the whole, a reliable index of fish allergy, but cod-positive children may perhaps tolerate some other species, which will have to be tested for possible inclusion in their diet.

Symptoms of respiratory allergies are worse in subjects with coexisting food sensitization

Food sensitization was evaluated in 78 subjects with respiratory allergies, both by skin tests with commercial and fresh allergens, and by specific IgE determination. On the basis of the presence or absence of the latter the population was divided into two groups. The group with food-specific IgE showed more severe features of respiratory allergy, including a greater number of positive skin tests and specific IgE determinations, more class 3 and 4 reactions, and more symptoms. The hypothesis that early food sensitization can predispose to severe inhalant allergy is discussed.