Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of bile duct injury in autoimmune hepatitis

Histopathology of Autoimmune Hepatitis: An Update

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare immune-mediated chronic liver disease that is diagnosed based on a combination of biochemical, immunologic, and histologic features and the exclusion of other causes of liver disease. According to the new consensus criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Pathology Group (IAIHPG), the likely histologic features include a chronic hepatitis pattern of injury with a lymphoplasmacytic portal infiltrate, interface activity, and portal-based fibrosis. More than mild lobular hepatitis with any of the above features can also be diagnosed as likely AIH in the absence of features of another liver disease. Centrilobular injury with prominent hepatocellular necrosis and mononuclear inflammation may represent an acute-onset disease and indicate possible AIH in the absence of concurrent liver disease. Kupffer cell hyaline bodies and portal lymphocyte apoptosis are significantly associated with AIH, whereas emperipolesis and hepatocellular rosette formation are nonspecific features indicative of disease severity. Liver histology is an integral part of the clinical diagnostic scoring system and is required to confirm or support AIH diagnosis. Substitution of the histologic component of the simplified AIH scoring system with the consensus IAIHPG criteria has been proposed to optimize clinical diagnosis. This review explores the significant role of histopathology in AIH by analyzing its main features and current histologic diagnostic criteria, different AIH presentations, differential diagnosis, assessment of concurrent liver disease, and identification of AIH variants with primary cholangiopathy.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

Prevalence and significance of antimitochondrial antibodies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH): Results from a large multicentre study of the International AIH Group

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are specific markers for the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) but can also be found occasionally in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The present large multicentre cohort study assessed the prevalence and significance of AMA in AIH-patients.

METHODS

123 AMA-positive AIH-patients were investigated and compared with 711 age-matched AMA-negative AIH-patients and 69 patients with AIH/PBC variant.

RESULTS

AMA prevalence in AIH-patients was 5.1% (range: 1.2%-11.8%). AMA-positivity was associated with female sex (p = 0.031) in AMA-positive AIH-patients but not with liver biochemistry, bile duct injury on liver biopsy, disease severity at baseline and response to treatment compared to AMA-negative AIH-patients. Comparing AMA-positive AIH-patients to those with AIH/PBC variant, there was no difference in disease severity. Regarding liver histology, AIH/PBC variant patients were characterized by the presence of at least one feature of bile duct damage (p<0.001). Response to immunosuppressive treatment was similar among groups. From AMA-positive AIH patients only those with evidence of non-specific bile duct injury had higher risk to progress to cirrhosis (HR=4.314, 95%CI: 2.348-7.928; p<0.001). During follow-up, AMA-positive AIH-patients had higher risk to develop histological bile duct injury (HR 4.654, 95%CI 1.829-11.840; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AMA presence is relatively common among AIH-patients, but their clinical significance seems important only when they co-exist with non-specific bile duct injury at the histological level. Therefore, a careful evaluation of liver biopsy seems of utmost importance in these patients.

The many faces and pathologic diagnostic challenges of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory liver disease, characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of specific autoantibodies, and typical abnormalities in liver histology. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are necessary for both chronic and acute onset AIH to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease or fatal liver failure. However, the diagnosis of AIH is challenging mainly because of its heterogeneous clinical, serological and pathological features. Although portal lymphoplasmacytosis and interface hepatitis are the most typical histological features of AIH, many other histological features can be observed in AIH, including emperipolesis, hepatocyte rosettes, and Kupffer cell hyaline globules. Recent studies have questioned emperipolesis and hepatocyte rosette formation as typical features of AIH, and atypical clinical and histological presentations have also been recognized. This led an international working group to propose the modified AIH diagnostic criteria. However, it is well recognized that there are no pathognomonic characteristics that can be used to diagnose AIH and careful clinicopathological correlation is required to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the histological features of AIH, its varied histopathologic spectrum, recent updates and major differential diagnoses in routine clinical practice.

A practical histological approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis: experience of an Italian tertiary referral center

Liver biopsy is crucial for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and new reproducible histological criteria would be highly desirable, especially in acute-on-chronic cases. The aims of the present study were (i) to evaluate the AIH histopathological criteria as a function of the time and modality of AIH onset, and (ii) to validate the count of apoptotic bodies in the portal tracts as a histopathological criterion for AIH diagnosis. Sixty-five patients were retrospectively enrolled: 20 underwent biopsy for the first diagnosis and 45 had a previous histological AIH diagnosis. Biopsies were revised, and all histological variables were collected, including the lymphocytic apoptotic bodies in the portal tracts. Clinical and serological data were revised as well. First-diagnosis patients showed a higher grade of inflammation (p = 0.001), but also worse portal fibrosis (p = 0.001). The apoptotic body count was higher in first-diagnosis patients than in follow-up patients (p = 0.002), and it was strongly correlated to inflammation. Using the apoptotic body count among the simplified AIH score variables, the first-biopsy patients in the "definite" category rose from 42 to 68%. Our results confirm the histopathological criteria proposed by the literature and introduce the count of portal apoptotic bodies for the diagnosis of active AIH, especially in first biopsies without other classic features, as well as in AIH diagnostic score, albeit future studies are required to find a definite cutoff.

The Spectrum of Autoimmune Liver Disorders, Clinical Presentation, and Autoantibodies in Patients From a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan

Background The autoimmune illnesses that affect the liver include autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and overlap syndrome. In our patients, we aimed to address the complete spectrum of autoimmune liver disorders, clinical presentation, and autoantibodies. Methods The study included all the patients diagnosed with autoimmune liver disorder irrespective of age, gender, and ethnic background presented at the liver clinic of the hospital in the last two years. The diagnosis was based on characteristic clinical and laboratory findings, the presence of one or more characteristic autoantibodies, and/or histological abnormalities. The diagnosis of AIH was further validated by revised International AIH Group criteria using a scoring calculator. The diagnostic criteria for PBC required the presence of chronic elevation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) with positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) or positive PBC-specific anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) (sp-100, gp-210) tests and/or compatible histology. The patients of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome fulfilled the criteria for AIH in the setting of PBC. Patients having liver involvement in other autoimmune disorders were included in the study. Results The total number of patients was 124; 83 (67%) were females; mean age ± standard error of mean (SEM) was 44.97 ± 1.47 years with a range of 09-84 years. Type-1 AIH was seen in 68 (54.8%) patients, type-2 AIH in 10 (8.1%) patients, PBC in 22 (17.7%) patients, overlap of PBC with AIH in 10 (8.1%) patients, IgG4 disease in four (3.2%) patients, psoriasis-specific immune hepatitis in four (3.2%) patients, celiac disease-related hepatitis in three (2.4%) patients, sarcoidosis in two (1.6%) patients, and ichthyosis-associated hepatitis in one (0.8%) patient. There was a high prevalence of cirrhosis (50%) at the time of presentation; 19% of patients had decompensated liver disease. ANA was positive in 52/68 cases of AIH type-1, but anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA) was reactive only in nine cases and anti-soluble liver antigen (SLA) in five cases. There was no female preponderance in type-2 AIH (M:F = 6:4). AMA was reactive in 25 (78%) cases of PBC and overlap syndrome. Antibodies prevalent in PBC (AMA-M2, AMA-M2-3E, sp-100, gp-210, anti-Ro52) were also seen in some cases of AIH, though they did not fulfill the criteria of the overlap syndrome. Conclusion There is an unmet need for the early diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases and the initiation of appropriate management to prevent complications.

Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare acute or chronic liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by large heterogeneity. Its distribution is global, covering all ages, both sexes and all ethnic groups. The aim of the present Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) of the Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver was to provide updated guidance and help to gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners for AIH diagnosis and management. AIH diagnosis is based on clinicopathological characteristics: namely, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, particularly of immunoglobulin G (IgG), circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on liver histology, absence of viral hepatitis, and a favorable response to immunosuppression. Clinical manifestations at disease onset are variable, ranging from asymptomatic to the acute/severe form. Aminotransferase and bilirubin levels vary, while the presence of hepatitis at the histological level is a prerequisite for diagnosis. Autoantibodies are the hallmark for AIH diagnosis; therefore, the CPG describe the appropriate serological algorithm for their detection. AIH therapy should aim to achieve complete biochemical (normalization of IgG and aminotransferases) and histological remission. All patients who have active disease, even those with cirrhosis, should be treated with individualized and response-guided induction therapy using prednisolone in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil as first-line therapy. Immunosuppression should be given for at least 3 years and for at least 2 years after the achievement of complete biochemical response, while a liver biopsy should be recommended before treatment discontinuation. Current CPG are also provided for several specific conditions and difficult-to-treat patients.

Global Disparities and Their Implications in the Occurrence and Outcome of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable occurrence, clinical phenotype, and outcome, and the factors contributing to this variability are uncertain. The goals of this review are to examine the global disparities in the occurrence and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis, suggest bases for these disparities, and encourage investigations that extend beyond single-center experiences. Disparities in the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis in different age groups, genders, ethnicities, and geographical regions suggest that factors other than genetic predisposition are involved. Age- and gender-related antigen exposures from the external (infections, toxins, and medications) and internal (intestinal microbiome) environment may affect the incidence of the disease, and the timeliness and nature of treatment may influence its prevalence. The increasing incidence of autoimmune hepatitis in Spain, Denmark, and the Netherlands suggests that a new etiological trigger has been introduced or that the susceptible population has changed. Variations in mortality between Western and Asian-Pacific countries may result from differences in disease detection or management, and variations in gender predilection, peak age of onset, frequency of concurrent immune diseases, and serological profile may reflect gender-biased and age-related antigen exposures and genetic predispositions. Global collaborations, population-based epidemiological studies that identify case clustering, and controlled interview-based surveys are mechanisms by which to understand these disparities and improve management. In conclusion, autoimmune hepatitis has a rising incidence in some countries and variable occurrence, phenotype, and outcome between countries and subgroups within countries. These disparities suggest that unrecognized population-based environmental, infectious, or socioeconomic factors are affecting its character.

Diagnostic approach to autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if left without treatment, can evolve into cirrhosis and possibly liver failure. The diagnosis of AIH is hampered by the lack of specific and reliable markers of the disease and a number of clinical, biochemical, immunological, histological and genetic factors should be considered to reach a confident diagnosis Areas covered: Clinical expression of AIH, histological features, serological and genetic profiles, differential diagnosis, overlap with other autoimmune liver diseases, assessed on the basis of personal experience and review of published literature in the last 10 years through a systematic Medline search (keywords: autoimmune hepatitis, diagnosis) Expert commentary: Notwithstanding numerous efforts to identify simple and reliable markers of the disease, the diagnosis of AIH is still based on the combination of histological, immunological and biochemical features and often can represent a real challenge for the hepatologist.

Clinical implications of antimitochondrial antibody seropositivity in autoimmune hepatitis: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) positivity is the serological marker of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but can also be sporadically detected in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Little is known about the clinical significance of AMA in AIH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 47 AMA-positive AIH cases from several centres and compared them with 264 well-characterized Italian AIH patients. Cases with any features of PBC were excluded.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, AMA-positive AIH patients were older (46 vs. 36, P=0.002) and more responsive to immunosuppression (74 vs. 59%, P=0.05), but no differences were observed between the two groups after logistic regression using AMA as a dependent variable. None of the AMA-positive AIH patients showed signs of evolving PBC features after a median follow-up of up 47 months. AMA was detected in combination with all serological AIH markers except antiliver kidney microsome type 1 and antiliver cytosol type 1. AMA was the only marker of autoimmunity in eight cases.

CONCLUSION

We found no differences between AIH with and without AMA. The groups had similar clinical, biochemical and histological features. AMA-positive AIH patients did not evolve towards PBC. In some cases, AMA was the only autoantibody.

Bile ductal injury and ductular reaction are frequent phenomena with different significance in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The significance of bile duct injury and ductular reaction in biopsies from autoimmune hepatitis patients is not clear. We aim to establish the prevalence and clinical relevance of both phenomena in autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

Cases of newly diagnosed, untreated autoimmune hepatitis without overlap syndrome were selected. Pretreatment and follow up biopsies were scored for inflammation, fibrosis, bile ductal injury and ductular reaction.

RESULTS

Thirty-five cases were studied of whom 14 cases had follow up biopsies. Bile duct injury was present in 29 cases (83%), mostly in a PBC-like pattern and was not correlated with demographical or laboratory findings. Ductular reaction, observed in 25 of 35 cases (71%) using conventional histology and in 30 of 32 cases (94%) using immunohistochemistry, was correlated with portal and lobular inflammation, interface hepatitis and centrilobular necrosis as well as bile duct injury and fibrosis. In 11 of 14 cases (79%) ductular reaction remained present on post-treatment biopsy whereas bile duct injury persisted in six of 14 (43%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Bile duct injury and ductular reaction are very common in newly diagnosed autoimmune hepatitis and cannot be predicted biochemically. Bile duct injury may subside in the majority of treated AIH cases while DR tends to persist during follow up. These findings show that the two phenomena are part of the spectrum of AIH with dissimilar responses to treatment and do not necessarily point towards an overlap syndrome. Persistence of ductular reaction after treatment supports the notion that it represents a regenerative response.

Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis: Current Status and Future Directions

Autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis on histological examination. The features lack diagnostic specificity, and other diseases that may resemble autoimmune hepatitis must be excluded. The clinical presentation may be acute, acute severe (fulminant), or asymptomatic; conventional autoantibodies may be absent; centrilobular necrosis and bile duct changes may be present; and the disease may occur after liver transplantation or with features that suggest overlapping disorders. The diagnostic criteria have been codified, and diagnostic scoring systems can support clinical judgment. Nonstandard autoantibodies, including antibodies to actin, α-actinin, soluble liver antigen, perinuclear antineutrophil antigen, asialoglycoprotein receptor, and liver cytosol type 1, are tools that can support the diagnosis, especially in patients with atypical features. Prednisone or prednisolone in combination with azathioprine is the preferred treatment, and strategies using these medications in various doses can ameliorate treatment failure, incomplete response, drug intolerance, and relapse after drug withdrawal. Budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors can be considered in selected patients as frontline or salvage therapies. Molecular (recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies), cellular (adoptive transfer and antigenic manipulation), and pharmacological (antioxidants, antifibrotics, and antiapoptotic agents) interventions constitute future directions in management. The evolving knowledge of the pathogenic pathways and the advances in technology promise new management algorithms.

Transitioning from Idiopathic to Explainable Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis lacks an identifiable cause, and its diagnosis requires the exclusion of etiologically defined diseases that resemble it. Insights into its pathogenesis are moving autoimmune hepatitis from an idiopathic to explainable disease, and the goal of this review is to describe the insights that are hastening this transition. Two types of autoimmune hepatitis are justified by serological markers, but they also have distinctive genetic associations (DRB1 and DQB1 genes) and autoantigens. DRB1 alleles are the principal susceptibility factors in white adults, and a six amino acid sequence encoded in the antigen-binding groove of class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex can influence the selection of autoantigens. Polymorphisms, including variants of SH2B3 and CARD10 genes, may affect immune reactivity and disease severity. The cytochrome mono-oxygenase, CYP2D6, is the autoantigen associated with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, and it shares homologies with multiple viruses that might promote self-intolerance by molecular mimicry. Chemokines, especially CXCL9 and CXCL10, orchestrate the migration of effector cells to sites of injury and are associated with disease severity. Cells of the innate and adaptive immune responses promote tissue damage, and possible deficiencies in the number and function of regulatory T cells may facilitate the injurious process. Receptor-mediated apoptosis is the principal mechanism of hepatocyte loss, and cell-mediated and antibody-dependent mechanisms of cytotoxicity also contribute. Insights that explain autoimmune hepatitis will allow triggering exogenous antigens to be characterized, risk management to be improved, prognostic indices to be refined, and site-specific therapeutic interventions to emerge.

Liver injury correlates with biomarkers of autoimmunity and disease activity and represents an organ system involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Liver disease (LD), defined as ≥ 2-fold elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), was examined in a longitudinal study of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Among 435 patients, 90 (20.7%) had LD with a greater prevalence in males (15/39; 38.5%) than females (75/396; 18.9%; p = 0.01). SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was greater in LD patients (7.8 ± 0.7) relative to those without (5.8 ± 0.3; p = 0.0025). Anti-smooth muscle antibodies, anti-DNA antibodies, hypocomplementemia, proteinuria, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anti-phospholipid syndrome were increased in LD. An absence of LD was noted in patients receiving rapamycin relative to azathioprine, cyclosporine A, or cyclophosphamide. An absence of LD was also noted in patients treated with N-acetylcysteine. LFTs were normalized and SLEDAI was diminished with increased prednisone use in 76/90 LD patients over 12.1 ± 2.6 months. Thus, LD is attributed to autoimmunity and disease activity, it responds to prednisone, and it is potentially preventable by rapamycin or N-acetylcysteine treatment.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by increased serum aminotransferase levels, autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis. Presentation can be acute, severe (fulminant), asymptomatic, or chronic. Diagnosis requires multiple findings and exclusion of similar diseases. Treatment with prednisone or prednisolone with azathioprine is recommended. Budesonide with azathioprine has normalized laboratory test with few side effects, but histologic resolution, durability of response, and target population are uncertain. Progressive worsening, incomplete improvement, drug intolerance, and relapse after drug withdrawal are suboptimal outcomes. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are salvage agents in small series and liver transplantation is effective for liver failure.

Autoimmune hepatitis, one disease with many faces: Etiopathogenetic, clinico-laboratory and histological characteristics

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an unresolving progressive liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, autoantibodies detection and interface hepatitis. Due to the absence of specific diagnostic markers and the large heterogeneity of its clinical, laboratory and histological features, AIH diagnosis may be potentially difficult. Therefore, in this in-depth review we summarize the substantial progress on etiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological phenotypes of AIH. AIH has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to severe or rarely fulminant hepatitis. Hypergammaglobulinemia with selective elevation of IgG is found in most cases. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry, and favored by the impaired control of T-regulatory cells. Histology (interface hepatitis, emperipolesis and hepatic rosette formation) and autoantibodies detection although not pathognomonic, are still the hallmark for a timely diagnosis. AIH remains a major diagnostic challenge. AIH should be considered in every case in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic etiology of chronic or acute hepatitis. Laboratory personnel, hepato-pathologists and clinicians need to become more familiar with disease expressions and the interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology to derive maximum benefit for the patient.

Unmet clinical need in autoimmune liver diseases

Despite recent advances in understanding and treatment, there remain significant areas of unmet clinical need in each of the autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs). The evolving research landscape and emerging large patient cohorts are creating unique opportunities to translate science into new therapies and care pathways, with the potential to significantly improve the lives of AILD patients. However, the areas of unmet need represent real challenges, which need to be addressed, if this vision is to be realised. This review describes the areas of unmet need in AILD in adults relating to diagnostic and prognostic assessment, primary therapy, symptom management, trial design and delivery, and structured care delivery, with the aim of focusing future research prioritisation.

Cholestatic phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis can have cholestatic features that are outside the codified diagnostic criteria. These features have uncertain effects on the clinical presentation and progression of disease. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis can have antimitochondrial antibodies and coincidental bile duct injury or loss (2%-13% of patients), focal biliary strictures and dilations based on cholangiography (2%-11%), or histologic changes of bile duct injury or loss in the absence of other features (5%-11%). These findings probably represent atypical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis or variants of primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis, depending on the predominant findings. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and γ-glutamyl transferase, histologic features of bile duct injury, and findings from cholangiography are associated with responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy and individualized alternative treatments. Corticosteroid therapy, in combination with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid, has been promulgated by international societies, but these recommendations are not based on strong evidence. The frequency, variable outcomes, and uncertainties in diagnosis and management of the cholestatic phenotypes must be addressed by a collaborative investigational network. This network should define the genetic and pathologic features of these disorders, standardize their nomenclature, and establish a treatment algorithm. In this review, the different cholestatic phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis, mechanisms of pathogenesis, current management strategies and outcomes, and opportunities for improving understanding and therapy are presented.

Challenges in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis has diverse clinical phenotypes and outcomes that challenge current diagnostic criteria and management algorithms.

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the major difficulties in diagnosis and management, describe the efforts to ease them and encourage further progress in problem solving.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was reviewed for published experiences from 1984 to 2013.

RESULTS

Acute or acute severe (fulminant) hepatitis, asymptomatic mild disease, and histological findings of centrilobular necrosis or bile duct injury can confound diagnosis and treatment. Continuation of conventional therapy until normal liver test results and liver tissue reduces the frequency of relapse, but does not prevent its occurrence. Problematic patients can be identified using mathematical models, clinical phenotype, serological markers and the speed of improvement after treatment; however, their recognition and treatment are inconsistent. Mycophenolate mofetil can rescue patients with azathioprine intolerance but is less effective for refractory disease. Budesonide in combination with azathioprine can be used frontline, but is effective primarily in noncirrhotic, uncomplicated disease. Molecular and cellular interventions are feasible but largely unevaluated.

DISCUSSION

Resolution of the current challenges requires revision of diagnostic criteria, characterization of biological markers that reflect pathogenic pathways, development of dynamic indexes based on changes in disease behaviour, and introduction of new pharmacological, molecular and cellular interventions that have undergone rigorous evaluation.

CONCLUSION

These challenges reflect important remediable deficiencies in current management.

Sequential presentation of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)-autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) overlap syndrome is used to describe the coexistence of both diseases, with either a sequential or a simultaneous presentation in the same patient. Available studies have focused on the simultaneous form, whereas there is limited information on sequential PBC-AIH. We carried out a retrospective study of patients who sequentially developed PBC-AIH overlap syndrome.

METHODS

The medical data of 1065 patients diagnosed with PBC (n=483) and AIH (n=582) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A sequential development of PBC-AIH was observed in 19 (1.8%) patients after a mean of 6.5 (1-14) years of follow-up. AIH developed in 12 (2.5%) PBC patients, whereas PBC occurred in seven (1.2%) patients with AIH. The baseline serologic and histological findings of patients who developed PBC-AIH were similar to those of patients with typical PBC or AIH. Eighteen patients were treated with a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and immunosuppression after the diagnosis of PBC-AIH was established. One patient showed a spontaneous resolution of hepatitic flare under UDCA therapy. Biochemical remission was achieved in 16 patients, whereas three progressed to decompensated cirrhosis and required liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The sequential overlap of PBC-AIH can occur during the follow-up of patients with pure PBC or AIH. In our cohort, we could not identify any factors that predicted the development of this rare condition. The combination of UDCA and immunosuppression seems to be an appropriate therapy in the setting of PBC-AIH.

Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies and antibodies to a soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas in autoimmune hepatitis

Background

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA), smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) and antibodies to a soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) are useful markers that can help clinicians to diagnose and classify autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

Objectives

To determine whether ANA, SMA and anti-SLA/LP help to accurately diagnose patients with AIH.

Search strategy

The PubMed, CNKI, WANFANG, and SinoMed databases were accessed to retrieve studies published in English and Chinese. Studies published up to October 2013 were reviewed.

Selection criteria

Studies on the diagnostic value of ANA, SMA or anti-SLA/LP in the diagnosis of known or suspected AIH were included.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors evaluated studies independently and rated their methodological quality using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tools; relevant data were abstracted. The random-effects method was used to summarize sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) from all 29 studies.

Results

The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and DOR for ANA were 0.650 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.619 to 0.680), 0.751 (95%CI, 0.737 to 0.764), 3.030 (95%CI, 2.349 to 3.910), 0.464 (95%CI, 0.356 to 0.604), and 7.380 (95%CI, 4.344 to 12.539), respectively. For SMA, the values were 0.593 (95%CI, 0.564 to 0.621), 0.926 (95%CI, 0.917 to 0.934), 11.740 (95%CI, 7.379 to 18.678), 0.449 (95%CI, 0.367 to 0.549), and 31.553 (95%CI, 17.147 to 58.060), respectively. Finally, for anti-SLA/LP, the values were 0.194 (95%CI, 0.168 to 0.222), 0.989 (95%CI, 0.985 to 0.993), 11.089 (95%CI, 7.601 to 16.177), 0.839 (95%CI, 0.777 to 0.905), and 16.867 (95%CI, 10.956 to 25.967), respectively.

Authors’ conclusions

ANA provided moderate sensitivity and specificity, while SMA gave moderate sensitivity and high specificity, and anti-SLA/LP exhibited low sensitivity and high specificity. All three antibodies were limited by their unsatisfactory sensitivities and lack of consistency.

Diagnosis and management of the overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis may have cholestatic features that are outside the classical phenotype and that resemble findings in other immune-mediated liver diseases. These cholestatic phenotypes have been designated 'overlap syndromes'.

OBJECTIVES

To recognize the overlap syndromes in adults and manage them appropriately.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was reviewed for published experiences from 1984 to 2013.

RESULTS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis may exhibit features of primary biliary cirrhosis (7% to 13%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (6% to 11%) or a cholestatic syndrome without other diagnostic features (5% to 11%). These mixed phenotypes may represent classical autoimmune hepatitis with atypical features, transition states in the evolution of classical cholestatic syndromes, concurrent separate diseases or pathogenically distinct disorders. The 'Paris criteria' have been endorsed for the diagnosis of the overlap syndrome with primary biliary cirrhosis, and treatment with conventional immunosuppressive therapy alone or in combination with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid can be guided by the serum alkaline phosphatase level. The overlap syndrome with primary sclerosing cholangitis or with cholestasis without diagnostic features is commonly treated with immunosuppressive therapy and ursodeoxycholic acid. Responses are variable and commonly incomplete (20% to 100% improvement) depending on the degree of cholestasis.

DISCUSSION

The overlap syndromes are clinical descriptions rather than pathological entities, and the dominant component of the disease determines its designation and therapy. Cholestatic findings in autoimmune hepatitis influence the response to immunosuppressive therapy.

CONCLUSION

The overlap syndromes must be considered in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and cholestatic findings, concurrent inflammatory bowel disease or steroid-refractory disease.

Review article: autoimmune hepatitis -- current management and challenges

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by interface hepatitis, hypergammaglobulinaemia, circulating autoantibodies and a favourable response to immunosuppression.

AIM

To review recent advancements in understanding aetiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological features, diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies of AIH.

METHODS

Published studies on AIH extracted mainly from PubMed during the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations are variable ranging from no symptoms to severe acute hepatitis and only seldom to fulminant hepatic failure. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry mechanisms, and favoured by the impaired control of regulatory T-cells. A typical laboratory finding is hypergammaglobulinaemia with selective elevation of IgG, although in 15-25% of patients - particularly children, elderly and acute cases - IgG levels are normal. Liver histology and autoantibodies, although not pathognomonic, still remain the hallmark for diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment is mandatory and life-saving; however, to meet strict response criteria, the conventional therapy with prednisolone with or without azathioprine is far from ideal.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune hepatitis remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinician, the hepato-pathologist and the laboratory personnel need to become more familiar with different expressions of the disease, interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology. According to the strict definition of treatment response issued by the 2010 AASLD guidelines, many patients are nonresponders to conventional treatment. Newer immunosuppressive agents targeting pathogenetic mechanisms can improve patient management, which needs to be tailored on a case-by-case basis.

Review article: the management of autoimmune hepatitis beyond consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines aid in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis, but they are frequently based on low-quality clinical evidence, conflicting experiences and divergent opinions. Recommendations may be weak, discrepant or non-existent at critical decision points.

AIMS

To identify the decision points where guidelines are weak or non-existent and review the evidence essential in the decision process.

METHODS

Full-text articles published in English using the keyword 'autoimmune hepatitis' were identified by PubMed from 1972 to 2013. Personal experience and investigations in autoimmune hepatitis also identified important contributions.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of the guidelines developed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and 48% of those proposed by the British Society of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence, conflicting experiences or divergent opinions. The key uncertainties in diagnosis relate to the timing of liver biopsy, recognising acute severe (fulminant) disease, interpreting coincidental nonclassical histological changes, accommodating atypical or deficient features in non-White patients, differentiating drug-induced from classical disease and identifying overlap syndromes. The key uncertainties in management relate to pre-treatment testing for thiopurine methyltransferase activity, treating asymptomatic mild disease, determining treatment end points, managing suboptimal responses, incorporating nonstandard medications as front-line and salvage agents, using azathioprine in pregnancy and instituting surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus guidelines are fraught with uncertainties in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Each decision point must counterbalance the current available evidence and tailor the application of this evidence to the individual patient.

Cholestatic liver disease overlap syndromes

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis share some clinical features with autoimmune hepatitis, but when features of autoimmune hepatitis are present, prognosis can be affected and immunosuppressive treatment warranted. The presence of severe interface hepatitis in primary biliary cirrhosis portends a worse prognosis and should prompt evaluation for possible autoimmune hepatitis overlap and treatment with immunosuppression. Specific models to identify which subjects benefit most from the addition of immunosuppression need to be developed. Drug-induced liver injury and IgG4 disease may masquerade as autoimmune hepatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis and are important to consider in the differential diagnosis of the overlap or variant syndromes.

The overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has two major variant phenotypes in which the features of classical disease are co-mingled with those of primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. These overlap syndromes lack codified diagnostic criteria, established pathogenic mechanisms, and confident management strategies. Their clinical importance relates mainly to the identification of patients who respond poorly to conventional corticosteroid treatment. Scoring systems that lack discriminative power have been used in their definition, and a clinical phenotype based on pre-defined laboratory and histological findings has not been promulgated. The frequency of overlap with primary biliary cirrhosis is 7-13 %, and the frequency of overlap with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 8-17 %. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis and features of cholestatic disease must be distinguished from patients with cholestatic disease and features of autoimmune hepatitis. Variants of the overlap syndromes include patients with small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis, antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis, and immunoglobulin G4-associated disease. Conventional corticosteroid therapy alone or in conjunction with ursodeoxycholic acid (13-15 mg/kg daily) has been variably effective, and cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and budesonide have been beneficial in selected patients. The key cholestatic features that influence the prognosis of autoimmune hepatitis must be defined and incorporated into the definition of the syndrome rather than rely on designations that imply the co-mingling of different diseases with manifestations of variable clinical relevance. The overlap syndromes in autoimmune hepatitis are imprecise, heterogeneous, and unfounded, but they constitute a clinical reality that must be accepted, diagnosed, refined, treated, and studied.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

Autoimmune hepatitis in special patient populations

Autoimmune hepatitis has diverse clinical phenotypes that challenge conventional diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. The goals of this review are to characterize these special populations and provide guidelines for their management. Patients with acute or acute severe (fulminant) presentations may have centrilobular zone 3 hepatic necrosis, but they can respond to conventional corticosteroid therapy. Asymptomatic mild disease warrants corticosteroid treatment because spontaneous resolution is uncertain and 10-year survival is less than expected. Male gender or the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude the diagnosis or need for treatment, and patients with cholestatic changes warrant cholangiography and possible combination therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. Different ethnic groups commonly have advanced hepatic fibrosis, rapidly progressive disease, or cholestatic features, and elderly patients typically respond well to corticosteroid therapy. Pregnancy is usually well-tolerated by mother and foetus but requires protection against postpartum exacerbation. Special populations must be recognized and treated with tailored regimens.

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis and its changing guise in adults

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis is a disease that is unexplained by conventional clinical, laboratory and histological findings, and it can progress to cirrhosis, develop hepatocellular carcinoma, and require liver transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the changing phenotype of cryptogenic chronic hepatitis in adults, develop a diagnostic algorithm appropriate to current practice, and suggest treatment options. The frequency of cryptogenic hepatitis is estimated at 5.4%. Cryptogenic cirrhosis is diagnosed in 5-30% of patients with cirrhosis, and it is present in 3-14% of adults awaiting liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has been implicated in 21-63% of patients, and autoimmune hepatitis is a likely diagnosis in 10-54% of individuals. Viral infections, hereditary liver diseases, celiac disease, and unsuspected alcohol or drug-induced liver injury are recognized infrequently in the current cryptogenic population. Manifestations of the metabolic syndrome heighten the suspicion of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and the absence of hepatic steatosis does not discount this possibility. The diagnostic scoring system of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group can support the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in some patients. Certain genetic mutations may have disease-specificity, and they suggest that some patients may have an independent and uncharacterized disease. Corticosteroid therapy is effective in patients with autoimmune features, and life-style changes and specific therapies for manifestations of the metabolic syndrome are appropriate for all obese patients. The 1- and 5-year survivals after liver transplantation have ranged from 72-85% to 58-73%, respectively.

Autoimmune liver disease - are there spectra that we do not know?

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are common leading causes for liver cirrhosis and terminal stage of liver disease. They have variable prevalence among patients with liver disease and have two major clinical and biochemical presentations. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is the typical example of hepatocellular AILD, but it can also be presented under a cholestatic pattern. AIH has a scoring diagnostic system and respond in most cases to the treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is the second most common AILD, with a cholestatic presentation and characterized by positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA). It has an excellent response and long term outcome with the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Another AILD that is thought to be a variant of PBC is the autoimmune cholangitis, being a disease that has biochemical and histological features similar to PBC; but the AMA is negative. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare entity of AILD that has a cholestatic presentation and respond poorly to the treatment, with the ultimate progression to advance liver cirrhosis in most patients. Other forms of AILD include the overlap syndromes (OS), which are diseases with mixed immunological and histological patterns of two AILD; the most commonly recognized one is AIH-PBC overlap (AIH-PSC overlap is less common). The treatment of OS involves the trial of UDCA and different immunosuppressants. Here we present three case reports of unusual forms of chronic liver diseases that most likely represent AILD. The first two patients had a cholestatic picture, whereas the third one had a hepatocellular picture at presentation. We discussed their biochemical, immunological and histological features as well as their response to treatment and their outcomes. Then, we compared them with other forms of AILD.

Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis

The clinical phenotype of classical autoimmune hepatitis can be mimicked by idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, and differentiation can be difficult. The goals of this review are to enumerate the major agents of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis, describe the clinical findings and risk factors associated with it, detail the clinical tools by which to assess causality, discuss putative pathogenic mechanisms, and describe treatment and outcome. The frequency of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis among patients with classical features of autoimmune hepatitis is 9%. Minocycline and nitrofurantoin are implicated in 90% of cases. Female predominance, acute onset, and absence of cirrhosis at presentation are important clinical manifestations. Genetic factors affecting phase I and phase II transformations of the drug, polymorphisms that protect against cellular oxidative stress, and human leukocyte antigens that modulate the immune response may be important pathogenic components. Clinical judgment is the mainstay of diagnosis as structured diagnostic methods for drug-induced liver injury are imperfect. The covalent binding of a reactive drug metabolite to a hepatocyte surface protein (commonly a phase I or phase II enzyme), formation of a neoantigen, activation of CD8 T lymphocytes with nonselective antigen receptors, and deficient immune regulatory mechanisms are the main bases for a transient loss of self-tolerance. Discontinuation of the offending drug is the essential treatment. Spontaneous improvement usually ensues within 1 month. Corticosteroid therapy is warranted for symptomatic severe disease, and it is almost invariably effective. Relapse after corticosteroid withdrawal probably does not occur, and its absence distinguishes drug-induced disease from classical autoimmune hepatitis.

The concept of hepatic artery-bile duct parallelism in the diagnosis of ductopenia in liver biopsy samples

Absence of bile ducts (BDs) in >50% of portal tracts is currently the most widely accepted criterion for the diagnosis of ductopenia. In this study, we describe an alternative method for the quantitative assessment of BDs based on the percentage of portal tracts containing unpaired hepatic arteries (HAs). Diagnostic criteria for ductopenia were defined as follows: 1. presence of at least 1 unpaired HA in >10% of all portal tracts; 2. at least 2 unpaired HAs present in different portal tracts in a given sample. In liver biopsies from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and suspected chronic allograft rejection (n = 32), loss of BD was detected in 59.4% of patients using the unpaired HA method compared with 43.7% (P = 0.31), 21.9% (P = 0.005), and 12.5% (P = 0.001) by the traditional method, depending on specific adequacy criteria used (no adequacy criteria, >10 portal tracts, or >5 complete portal tracts per biopsy, respectively). The percentage of portal tracts containing BD(s) was significantly affected by the degree of portal inflammation, fibrosis stage, percentage of complete portal tracts, and biopsy width, whereas none of these factors influenced the prevalence of unpaired arteries. The unpaired HA method showed higher sensitivity for the detection of mild degrees of loss of BD compared with the traditional method, and was not influenced by factors that affected the percentage of portal tracts containing BDs.

Overlap syndromes: the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) position statement on a controversial issue

Some patients present with overlapping features between disorders within the spectrum of autoimmune liver diseases (i.e. autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)) and are commonly classified as having an "overlap syndrome". Standardized definitions of "overlap syndromes" are lacking. The aim of this report by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) is to evaluate if there are important reasons to classify conditions with overlapping features between autoimmune liver diseases as separate diagnostic entities. Definition of diagnostic criteria for overlap conditions can only be arbitrary. The IAIHG scoring system for diagnosis of AIH has been widely used to diagnose "overlap syndromes", but was not intended for such use and has not proven to be an efficient tool for this purpose. Some patients with overlapping features between a cholestatic and hepatitic disorder appear to benefit from treatment with a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and immunosuppressants, but this strategy is not evidence-based, and it seems unjustified to define new diagnostic groups in this regard. The IAIHG suggests that patients with autoimmune liver disease should be categorized according to the predominating feature(s) as AIH, PBC, and PSC/small duct PSC, respectively, and that those with overlapping features are not considered as being distinct diagnostic entities. The IAIHG scoring system should not be used to establish subgroups of patients. Patients with PBC and PSC with features of AIH should be considered for immunosuppressive treatment. Due to the low prevalence of such "overlap syndromes", prospective interventional therapeutic trials cannot be expected in the foreseeable future.

Current topics in autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology characterized by interface hepatitis, hypergammaglobulinaemia and circulating autoantibodies. In the last decade a number of advancements have been made in the field of clinical and basic research: the simplified diagnostic criteria, the complete response defined as normalization of transaminase levels, the molecular identification of the antigenic targets of anti-liver cytosol antibody type 1 and anti-soluble liver antigen, the detection of anti-actin antibodies, the description of de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation for non-autoimmune liver diseases, the characterization of autoimmune hepatitis with overlapping features of primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis, the preliminary experience with novel treatment strategies based on cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and budesonide, the role played by "impaired" regulatory T cells and the development of novel animal models of autoimmune hepatitis.

Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in autoimmune liver disease

Certain autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease have prognostic implications that are under-utilized and under-developed. The goals of this review are to indicate progress in characterizing the autoantibodies with prognostic connotations and to indicate the feasibility and importance of discovering other markers. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through 2010. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, actin, liver cytosol type 1, asialoglycoprotein receptor, chromatin, cyclic citrullinated peptide, and uridine glucuronosyltransferases have been associated with the occurrence, severity, and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and antibodies to Sp100, gp210, and centromere have had similar implications in primary biliary cirrhosis. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen have shown the most promise in autoimmune hepatitis as they have been associated with severe histological changes, long durations of treatment, relapse after drug withdrawal, and high frequency of liver failure. Antibodies to the nuclear rim pore protein, gp210, have shown the most promise in primary biliary cirrhosis as they have been associated with severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, and progression to liver failure. The major limitations of the autoantibodies have been their lack of standardized assays, low negative predictabilities, and fluctuating levels. Performance parameters will improve as critical pathogenic pathways, comprehensive testing batteries, and standardized assays through international exchange workshops are developed. Progress has been made in identifying the serological markers of prognosis in autoimmune liver disease, and they promise to reflect critical disease mechanisms and enhance patient management.

Clinical characteristics of patients with autoimmune hepatitis seropositive for anticentromere antibody

AIM

Recent studies have revealed that primary biliary cirrhosis patients with anticentromere antibody (ACA) commonly develop portal hypertension. However, the clinical characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) remain uncertain. We investigated the clinical features of patients with AIH seropositive for ACA (ACA-AIH), comparing them with those of patients with AIH seropositive for other immunofluorescent patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (other-AIH).

METHODS

AIH was diagnosed on the basis of the scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Seropositivity for ACA was determined by a discrete speckled pattern on HEp-2 cells by an immunofluorescent technique. The severity of histological grading and staging was evaluated by the histological activity index (HAI) score.

RESULTS

Eight (17%) of 47 patients with AIH had ACA. No significant differences in age, sex, onset pattern of the disease, progression to hepatic failure and relapse rate were present between the ACA-AIH and other-AIH groups. The frequency of concurrent autoimmune diseases in ACA-AIH was significantly higher than that in other-AIH (75% vs 36%, P = 0.0406). Biochemical analysis revealed a significantly lower mean immunoglobulin G (IgG) level than that in other-AIH (2176 +/- 641 vs 3013 +/- 923 mg/dL, P = 0.0150). However, there were no differences in serum alanine aminotransferase levels, titers of ANA, HAI scores or the positive rate of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR4 between the groups.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the emergence of ACA is not a distinct entity of AIH, despite its clinical characteristics of a significantly higher frequency of concurrent autoimmune diseases and lower serum IgG levels.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

The role of autoantibodies as diagnostic markers of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoantibody testing is the first step towards the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and it is essential in the evaluation of acute and chronic hepatitis of undetermined cause and allograft dysfunction following liver transplantation. A standard diagnostic repertoire has been promulgated, and other autoantibodies are emerging that may have prognostic value. Supplemental autoantibodies may prove useful in assessing patients who lack the standard markers or who are distinctive among those with conventional markers. Serologic testing will improve as assays are standardized by serum exchange workshops, core diagnostic batteries are codified and promulgated, and markers emerge that are tightly associated with pathogenic mechanisms, and closely reflect disease activity and outcome.

Paris criteria are effective in diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) differ in clinical, laboratory, and histologic features as well as in response to therapy. A small subgroup of patients have an overlap syndrome with features of both diseases, although there is no consensus on its definition or diagnostic criteria. We evaluated the significance of the criteria used to diagnose PBC-AIH overlap syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included all patients diagnosed with PBC, AIH, or PBC-AIH overlap syndrome, based on the Paris criteria, since January 1990 (n = 134); patients were followed up for 9.7 +/- 3.7 years. The 3 groups were compared for their clinical, laboratory, and histologic features. Patients with overlap syndrome or PBC were graded by the revised and simplified AIH scoring systems to assess the ability of this system to identify AIH cases properly.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the Paris criteria for diagnosing the overlap syndrome were 92% and 97%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the AIH scoring systems were considerably lower. Among patients with the overlap syndrome, the 10-year, transplantation-free survival rate was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Paris diagnostic criteria detect overlap syndrome (PBC and AIH) with high levels of sensitivity and specificity. The clinical value of the revised and simplified AIH scoring system is not as reliable. Patients with PBC-AIH overlap syndrome have a 92% rate of 10-year, transplantation-free survival.

Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis

Treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis are complicated by the diversity of its clinical presentations, uncertainties about its natural history, evolving opinions regarding treatment end points, varied nature of refractory disease, and plethora of alternative immunosuppressive agents. The goals of this article are to review the difficult treatment decisions and to provide the bases for making sound therapeutic judgments. The English literature on the treatment problems in autoimmune hepatitis were identified by Medline search up to October 2009 and 32 years of personal experience. Autoimmune hepatitis may have an acute severe presentation, mild inflammatory activity, lack autoantibodies, exhibit atypical histological changes (centrilobular zone 3 necrosis or bile duct injury), or have variant features reminiscent of another disease (overlap syndrome). Corticosteroid therapy must be instituted early, applied despite the absence of symptoms, or modified in an individualized fashion. Pursuit of normal liver tests and tissue is the ideal treatment end point, but this objective must be tempered against the risk of side effects. Relapse after treatment withdrawal requires long-term maintenance therapy, preferably with azathioprine. Treatment failure or an incomplete response warrants salvage therapy that can include conventional medications in modified dose or empirical therapies with calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate mofetil. Liver transplantation supersedes empirical drug therapy in decompensated patients. Elderly and pregnant patients warrant treatment modifications. Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis can be simplified by recognizing its diverse manifestations and individualizing treatment, pursuing realistic goals, applying appropriate salvage regimens, and identifying problematic patients early.

Transitions between variant forms of primary biliary cirrhosis during long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Conditions exhibiting features of two different autoimmune liver diseases are designated overlap syndromes. Variant forms display some, but not all, characteristics of a distinct autoimmune liver disease. We describe transitions over time between variant forms of PBC, i.e. AMA-negative PBC, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)-PBC overlap and autoimmune cholangitis (AIC) in a large cohort of PBC patients in Sweden.

METHODS

We retrieved all patients with variant forms of PBC in six university hospitals in Sweden, covering 60% of the Swedish population. The diagnosis of PBC and its variants was based on laboratory findings and compatible histological features. The revised autoimmune hepatitis scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group was used to establish the diagnosis of AIH.

RESULTS

In a population of 800 patients with PBC, we identified 35 (5%) variant forms; 25 patients with AIH-PBC overlap, 8 with AIC and 2 with AMA-negative PBC at the time of our study. The initial diagnoses were PBC (3 patients), AIH (3), AIH-PBC overlap (16), AIC (8) and AMA-negative PBC with (1) or without (4) concomitant AIH. The median follow-up was 125 (41-360) months. Immunosuppression and ursodeoxycholic acid induced a complete or good regression of increased aminotransferases in about half of the patients who were given one or both of these treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Variant forms of PBC are seen in approximately 5% of PBC patients in Sweden. Transition between different forms may occur, emphasizing the value of repeat biopsies, but established overlapping AIH-PBC seems to be stable over time.

The serological profile of the autoimmune hepatitis/primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome

OBJECTIVES

During the last decade patients with concomitant clinical, biochemical, immunoserological, and histological features of both autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) were sporadically described, but definite diagnostic criteria and specific serological markers to support the diagnosis of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome (AIH/PBC OS) are still lacking.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, and histological features, autoantibody profile, and treatment response of 15 patients with coexistent hepatitic and cholestatic liver damage, all fulfilling strict diagnostic criteria for both AIH and PBC, were compared with those of 120 patients with pure PBC and 120 patients with pure AIH.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, the AIH/PBC OS patients' median age was 51 years, similar to that of the PBC patients (52 years, P=NS), but significantly higher than that of the AIH patients (40 years, P=0.04). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 60% of AIH/PBC OS patients, but only in 4% of PBC patients and 26% of AIH patients (P<0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Double positivity for antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and anti-dsDNA was present in 47% of those with AIH/PBC OS, but only in 2% of the pathological controls (P<0.0001; specificity: 98; 95% confidence interval (CI): 97-99.2; positive likelihood ratio: 28; 95% CI: 9.8-79.4). Combined therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) plus steroids) achieved biochemical response in 77% of AIH/PBC OS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant AMA/anti-dsDNA seropositivity can be considered the serological profile of AIH/PBC OS. The combination of UDCA and steroids is effective in achieving persistent biochemical amelioration in most AIH/PBC OS patients.

Non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis and advances in diagnosis and treatment

Non-classical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis can delay diagnosis and treatment. Our aims were to describe the clinical phenotypes that can confound the diagnosis, detail scoring systems that can ensure their recognition, and outline advances in treatment that can improve their outcome. Prime source and review articles in English were selected through Medline from 1970-2008 and assimilated into personal libraries spanning 32 years. Acute severe or asymptomatic presentations and atypical histological findings, including centrilobular zone 3 necrosis and concurrent bile duct changes, are compatible with the diagnosis. Cholangiographic abnormalities may be present in children and adults with the disease, and autoimmune hepatitis must be considered in patients without autoantibodies or with antimitochondrial antibodies and no other cholestatic features. Asymptomatic patients frequently become symptomatic; mild disease can progress; and there are no confident indices that justify withholding treatment. Two diagnostic scoring systems with complementary virtues have been developed to evaluate patients with confusing features. Normal liver tests and tissue constitute the optimal end point of treatment, and the first relapse is an indication for long-term azathioprine therapy. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are promising salvage therapies, and budesonide with azathioprine may be a superior frontline treatment. We conclude that the non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis can be recognized promptly, diagnosed accurately, and treated effectively.

High prevalence of small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis among patients with overlapping autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Overlap syndrome is a term used for overlapping features of autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis or primary biliary cirrhosis and for autoimmune cholangitis. We describe a high prevalence of small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis among patients with overlapping autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.

METHODS

We sought to retrieve all patients with overlap syndrome between primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis in six university hospitals in Sweden. The revised autoimmune hepatitis scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group was used to establish the diagnosis autoimmune hepatitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or magnetic resonance cholangiography were used to separate the primary sclerosing cholangitis cases diagnosed through liver biopsy into small and large primary sclerosing cholangitis. A histological diagnosis compatible with both autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis was required for inclusion.

RESULTS

26 patients fulfilled our criteria for histological overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, 7 (27%) of which had small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis. The reliability of the diagnosis small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis was supported by a very close similarity between small and large duct primary sclerosing cholangitis patients in clinical and laboratory data, and by a poor response to immunosuppressive therapy in the small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis patients. Patients with large duct overlap syndrome had a good response to immunosuppressive therapy. In both groups, our limited experience from ursodeoxycholic acid was largely poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis is prevalent in the overlap syndrome between autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Effects of serum aspartate aminotransferase levels in patients with autoimmune hepatitis influence disease course and outcome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Untreated patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who present with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels that are more than 5-fold greater than the upper limit of normal (UPLN) have a mortality rate of up to 80%. This study evaluated whether serum AST levels of patients, determined at presentation, are associated with disease course or outcome.

METHODS

The records of 235 patients (median age, 46 y; range, 5-80 y) who presented with AIH, based on International AIH Group score (median, 22; range, 16-28), between 1970 and 2005, were examined. AST levels at presentation were available for 213 patients, who were assigned to 3 groups: group 1, AST less than 2x the UPLN, n = 26 (median, 62 IU; range, 23-97 IU); group 2, AST 2 to 10x the UPLN, n = 71 (median, 241 IU; range, 107-500 IU); and group 3, AST greater than 10x the UPLN, n = 116 (median, 1073 IU; range, 563-4603 IU).

RESULTS

Patients in groups 1 and 2 had a significantly worse outcome (risk of liver transplantation or death) compared with those in group 3 (60% survival vs 82%; P = .01; odds ratio, 2.1). These patients were more likely to present with ascites (P < .001), hematemesis (P = .009), and cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis based on an index biopsy (P < .001). Patients in groups 1 and 2 also had lower bilirubin levels at presentation (P < .001) and were less likely to be symptomatic (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AIH, AST levels greater than 10x the UPLN at presentation were associated with a lower risk of cirrhosis and a better long-term outcome than those with AST levels that were less than 10x the UPLN.