Efficacy and safety of continuous 4-year telbivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

MDSC-targeted liposomal all-trans retinoic acid suppresses mMdscs and improves immunotherapy in HBV infection

BACKGROUND

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are evolving as a prominent determinant in cancer occurrence and development and are functionally found to suppress T cells in cancer. Not much research is done regarding its involvement in viral infections. This research was designed to investigate the role of MDSCs in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and how targeting these cells with our novel all-trans retinoic acid encapsulated liposomal formulation could improve immunotherapy in C57BL/6 mice.

METHODS

Ten micrograms (10 μg) of plasmid adeno-associated virus (pAAV/HBV 1.2, genotype A) was injected hydrodynamically via the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice. An all-trans retinoic acid encapsulated liposomal formulation (L-ATRA) with sustained release properties was used in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nRTI) to treat the HBV infection. The L-ATRA formulation was given at a dose of 5 mg/kg intravenously (IV) twice a week. The TDF was given orally at 30 mg/kg daily.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that L-ATRA suppresses MDSCs in HBV infected mice and enhanced T-cell proliferation in vitro. In vivo studies showed higher and improved immunotherapeutic effect in mice that received L-ATRA and TDF concurrently in comparison with the groups that received monotherapy. Lower HBV DNA copies, lower concentrations of HBsAg and HBeAg, lower levels of ALT and AST and less liver damage were seen in the mice that received the combination therapy of L-ATRA + TDF.

CONCLUSIONS

In effect, targeting MDSCs with the combination of L-ATRA and TDF effectively reduced mMDSC and improved immunotherapy in the HBV infected mice. Targeting MDSCs could provide a breakthrough in the fight against hepatitis B virus infection.

Evaluation of Clinical Neuropathy After Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Neurologic complications are more common in liver transplants than in other solid-organ transplants. One such neurologic complication, peripheral neuropathy, may cause functional limitations for recipients and have a negative effect on posttransplant quality of life. We aimed to examine the risk factors associated with the occurrence of clinical neuropathy after liver transplant and to investigate the frequency of sensory deficits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this case-control study, we analyzed factors from medical records of 63 recipients who underwent living donor liver transplant during the period from January 2010 to December 2016. A neuropathy symptom score was assigned to identify the patients who had clinical neuropathy (case group) and the patients without clinical neuropathy (control group). Quantitative sensory testing was performed to measure the warm and cold detection thresholds, and the difference between the 2 groups was examined.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, patients with clinical neuropathy were older (61.0 vs 55.4 years; P = .028), had higher rates of diabetes (46.2% vs 16.0%; P = .03), and were taking antiviral agents against hepatitis B (100% vs 62%; P = .006). Patients with neuropathic symptoms had significantly increased frequencies of impairment of warm and cold detection thresholds. In addition, the greater severity of symptoms showed higher detection thresholds of warm (control, 40.7℃; mild-to-moderate, 43.8 ℃; severe, 46.0 ℃; P = .007) and cold (control, 28.8℃ ; mild-to-moderate, 27.0 ℃; severe, 21.8 ℃ ; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that older age, diabetes, and treatment with oral antiviral agents against hepatitis B virus were more likely to be associated with the occurrence of clinical neuropathy after liver transplant. Early awareness and careful monitoring are warranted.

Nucleoside Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Improve Clinical Outcome in Transcriptional Active Human Parvovirus B19-Positive Patients

Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) is the predominant cardiotropic virus associated with dilated inflammatory cardiomyopathy (DCMi). Transcriptionally active cardiotropic B19V infection is clinically relevant and triggers adverse long-term mortality. During the study; we evaluated whether antiviral treatment with the nucleoside analogue telbivudine (LTD) is effective in suppressing transcriptional active B19V in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) of B19V positive patients and improving clinical outcomes. Seventeen B19V-positive patients (13 male; mean age 45.7 ± 13.9 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 37.7 ± 13.5%) with positive B19V DNA and transcriptional activity (B19V mRNA) in EMBs were treated with 600 mg/d LTD over a period of six months. Patients underwent EMBs before and after termination of the LTD treatment. B19V RNA copy numbers remained unchanged in 3/17 patients (non-responder) and declined or disappeared completely in the remaining 14/17 patients (responder) (p ≤ 0.0001). Notably; LVEF improvement was more significant in patients who reduced or lost B19V RNA (responder; p = 0.02) in contrast to non-responders (p = 0.7). In parallel; responder patients displayed statistically significant improvement in quality of life (QoL) questionnaires (p = 0.03) and dyspnea on exertion (p = 0.0006), reflecting an improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification (p = 0.001). Our findings demonstrated for the first time that suppression of B19V transcriptional activity by LTD treatment improved hemodynamic and clinical outcome significantly. Thus; the present study substantiates the clinical relevance of detecting B19V transcriptional activity of the myocardium.

Efficacy of telbivudine and entecavir against virus reactivation in HBeAg-patients undergoing chemotherapy

The renal protective effect of telbivudine (LdT) was verified by a previous meta-analysis. It was left unclear, however if this effect offsets the associated risk of virological breakthrough in hepatitis B e-antigen-negative (HBeAg-) patients receiving chemotherapy (C/T).Records of 260 HBeAg-, non-cirrhotic cancer patients undergoing systemic C/T with prophylactic LdT or entecavir (ETV) were retrospectively investigated. The investigation was conducted 6 months after completion of C/T, patient death from cancer, or antiviral modification. Treatment duration, outcome, change of renal function, and reason for antiviral modification were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of virological breakthrough during prophylaxis C/T and the change in renal function.Of the 126 HBeAg- patients treated with LdT, 3 (2.38%) experienced HBV virological breakthroughs, whereas none of the patients treated with ETV (P = .07) did. The estimated glomerular filtration rate for the patients treated with LdT was essentially unaltered, decreasing only slightly from 87.5 ± 23.1 to 87.3 ± 21.3 ml/minute/1.73 m (P = .55), while the rate for the ETV-treated patients was significantly lowered from 95.7 ± 32.2 to 85.5 ± 85.7 ml/minute/1.73 m (P = .0009).The absolute risk reduction ARR is 27.8% - 21.2% = 6.6%, comparing ETV with LdT for reduction of renal function impairment and the absolute risk increase for virological breakthrough during C/T, the absolute risk increase (ARI) is 2.38% - 0% = 2.38%. The overall likelihood of being helped over being harmed was 2.77. With careful selection of patients with the criteria of HBeAg-status and non-hematologic cancer, it is feasible that telbivudine raise lower probability of virological breakthroughs during prophylaxis treatment.

Development and validation of a model for hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in entecavir-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B

Achieving hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is a satisfactory endpoint during antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to develop and validate a novel scoring system to predict HBeAg seroconversion during entecavir (ETV) treatment. A total of 526 patients with HBeAg-positive CHB treated with ETV for at least 1 year were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts. Baseline parameters including hepatitis B virus DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), and alanine aminotransferase level were quantified. Patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion were compared with those without HBeAg seroconversion. A prediction model was established to predict HBeAg seroconversion during ETV treatment. After a median follow up of 2.67 years, 93 (36.0%) and 87 (32.5%) patients in the training and validation cohorts developed HBeAg seroconversion. A prediction score composed of age, HBsAg and HBcAb quantification was derived. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curve at 5 years of this prediction score were 0.70 and 0.72 in the training and validation cohorts. By using the dual cutoff values of 0.28 and 0.58, the model was endowed with high sensitivity and specificity to exclude or identify patients developing HBeAg seroconversion (90.3% sensitivity and 90.2% specificity in the training cohort as well as 92.8% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity in the validation cohort, respectively). A novel prediction score that uses baseline clinical variables was developed and validated. The score accurately estimates the probabilities of developing HBeAg seroconversion at 5-years ETV therapy in patients with CHB.

Ten-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety profiles of TDF treatment for up to 10 years in a well-described cohort of CHB patients.

METHODS

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and HBeAg-positive patients from two randomised, double-blind trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00117676 and NCT00116805) completed 48 weeks of randomised treatment with TDF or adefovir dipivoxil. A subset of these patients was then eligible to receive open-label TDF treatment for up to 10 years. At Year 10, patients were assessed for virological suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalisation, serological response, safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 641 randomised and treated patients, 585 (91%) entered the open-label extension phase with 203 (32%) patients completing Year 10 of the study. At Year 10, 118/118 (100%) of HBeAg-negative patients and 78/80 (98%) of HBeAg-positive patients with available data achieved hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 69 IU/mL, while 88/106 (83%) and 60/77 (78%) patients achieved ALT normalisation, respectively. Of the 23 patients with HBeAg status available at Year 10, 12 (52%) and six (27%) experienced HBeAg loss and seroconversion, respectively. No resistance to TDF was documented up to Year 10. In the period between Year 8 and Year 10, the safety profile of TDF was similar to previous reports, with few patients experiencing renal- or bone-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 10 years, TDF had a favourable safety profile, was well tolerated, and resulted in continued maintenance of virological suppression with no documented resistance.

Telbivudine can safely reduce mother-to-child transmission in chronic hepatitis B women after 12 weeks of gestation

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telbivudine in chronic hepatitis B women during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Methods

The week 12–34 of pregnant women were screened in this prospective non-intervention study, with HBV DNA > 10⁶ IU/mL and alanine aminotransferase > 50 IU/L. The patients were received telbivudine treatment as a treatment group or without antiviral treatment as a control group. All infants were received recombinant hepatitis B vaccine 10 μg within 12 h of birth, at week 4 and week 24, immunoglobulin G within 12 h of birth and were detected HBV markers at the range from 7 to 12 months after delivery.

Results

A total of 241 patients were finally enrolled, 139 patients in telbivudine group and 102 patients in control group. HBsAg negative rate of infants was 99.3% (135/136) in telbivudine group and was 91.9% (91/99) in control group after 7 months (P = 0.005), respectively. The incidence of undetectable HBV DNA levels (47.5%) was significantly lower in telbivudine-treated mothers than that in the controls (0%), and 75.5% patients alanine aminotransferase returned to normal in telbivudine group, and 51% in control group at delivery (P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

Telbivudine can safely reduce mother-to-child transmission in chronic hepatitis B women after 12 weeks of gestation.

Efficacy and safety of long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational study in 101 chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive) patients treated (≥3 years) with entecavir, tenofovir or telbivudine.

RESULTS

Treatment with entecavir and tenofovir was associated with high rate of virologic and biochemical response (&gt;95%) and HBeAg seroconversion (93% and 67%, respectively). Cumulative rate of virologic resistance was 0; 3.1% and 43.5% for tenofovir, entecavir and telbivudine, respectively. Long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment resulted in a regress of liver fibrosis (from 8.92 to 7.18 kPa, р&lt;0.0001) and reduction in the number of patients with advanced fibrosis (from 48.1% to 13.8%, р&lt;0.0001). Entecavir and tenofovir were safe and well tolerated, while treatment with telbivudine was associated with development of myopathy in 13% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Entecavir and tenofovir might be recommended for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B because of having potent antiviral effect, high genetic barriers against resistance and good safety.

Current state-of-the-art pharmacotherapy for the management of hepatitis B infection

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global challenge with several hundred million infected individuals. Disease activity can be controlled, and adverse outcomes prevented when treatment can be provided. Frequently life-long therapy is required instead of defined treatment periods such as with the case of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors provide an overview of current start of the art therapy for HBV and indicate where variation from the current guidelines could be considered. Certain patients may be eligible for treatment with suboptimal therapies when their baseline viral load is low. Identifying ideal candidates for interferon therapy will result in good sustained responses for some patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The biggest challenge remains linking patients to care and therapy. Patients can nowadays be sufficiently treated before the disease advances to a more progressed phase. However, future therapies must be extremely safe and ideally limit the required treatment period. Given Hepatitis D Virus's dependence on HBV and being a disease with an unmet clinical need, HDV may be the best target group for the development of a functional cure for hepatitis B.

Telbivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy improves renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A STROBE-compliant article

Few studies have addressed the impact of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-based combination therapy on the renal function of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study evaluated the effects of ADV combined with other antiviral nucleotide analogs (NAs) on renal function of patients with CHB, and analyzed the risk factors for more than 20% reduction of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).The data of 164 patients with CHB were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Of the 164 patients, 42 received entecavir (ETV) combined with ADV (ETV + ADV group), 68 lamivudine (LAM) combined with ADV (LAM + ADV group), and 54 telbivudine (LDT) combined with ADV (LDT + ADV group). Serum creatinine (SCr) level, eGFR, and proportion of patients with eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m were observed. Also, the independent risk factors for more than 20% reduction of baseline eGFR were analyzed.After 104-week combination therapy, compared with the baseline level, SCr levels were significantly increased in the ETV + ADV group (67 μmol/L vs 73 μmol/L, P = .012) and LAM + ADV group (68 μmol/L vs 79 μmol/L, P = .008), but it was significantly decreased in the LDT + ADV group (69 μmol/L vs 64 μmol/L, P = .023). Compared with the baseline level, eGFR was significantly decreased in the ETV + ADV group (107.8 mL/min/1.73 m vs 96.1 mL/min 1.73/m, P = .004), and LAM + ADV group (105.4 mL/min/1.73 m vs 87.3 mL/min/1.73 m, P = .000), but it was significantly increased in the LDT + ADV group (104.1 mL/min 1.73/m vs 116.2 mL/min/1.73 m,P = .005). The proportion of patients with normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m) was significantly higher in the LDT + ADV group than in the ETV + ADV group (P = .002) and LAM + ADV group (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (P = .035), male (P = .005), baseline eGFR (P < .001), LAM combined with ADV (P < .008), and ETV combined with ADV (P = .03) were independent risk factors for 20% reduction of baseline eGFR.As compared with ETV and ADV combination therapy as well as LAM and ADV combination therapy, LDT and ADV combination therapy can improve eGFR level, so LDT and ADV combination therapy is suitable for the patients with potential renal impairment.

Progression and status of antiviral monitoring in patients with chronic hepatitis B: From HBsAg to HBV RNA

As alternative indexes of hepatitis B virus (HBV), covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) transcriptional activity, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and peripheral blood RNA known as pgRNA, have been advocated as novel serum markers for prediction of prognosis and treatment response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Since the availability of commercial quantitative assays of HBsAg in 2011, HBsAg has been widely used for predicting treatment response of patients with CHB. Patients who received interferon therapy have shown a sharper reduction of HBsAg level than those who received nucleoside drug (NAs) therapy. Upon peginterferon treatment, sustained responders have presented a larger reduction of HBsAg level than the non-responders. An absence of HBsAg decline, together with < 2log reduction in HBV DNA at week 12, can serve as a stopping rule in HBsAg-negative patients infected with genotype D HBV. A sharp reduction of HBsAg titer in the NAs therapy is a predictor of HBsAg clearance in long-term treatment. HBcrAg, which consists of three species of related proteins sharing an identical 149 amino acid sequence, including HbcAg, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and a truncated 22-kDa precore protein, is still detectable in situations where serum HBV DNA levels become undetectable or HBsAg loss is achieved. Therefore, HBcrAg remains a measurable serum marker to correlate with cccDNA in this situation. The decline in HBcrAg has been observed with NAs therapy and the pattern of decline might provide prognostic information on the risk of HBV post-treatment reactivation. Peripheral blood RNA, which is known as pgRNA, directly derives from cccDNA and reflects intrahepatic cccDNA level. Quantitative pgRNA has been suggested to be helpful in CHB management. However, commercial quantitative assays are lacking. Additionally, the use of simultaneous and continuous clearance of HBV RNA and HBV DNA in serum has been suggested to be a safe stopping rule of NAs therapy for patients with CHB. However, clinical studies of large sample sizes are needed to prove the feasibility and significance of using serum HBV RNA as the assessment standard of antiviral therapy in CHB and the safety of the stopping rule in clinics.

Effectiveness of telbivudine antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated glomerulonephritis: A 104-week pilot study

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of telbivudine in treatment of hepatitis B virus-associated glomerulonephritis (HBV-GN).A total of 43 HBV-GN patients combined with chronic hepatitis B were treated with telbivudine for 104 weeks. Serum levels of HBV DNA viral load, HBeAg, HBeAb, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine (Cr), and 24-hour urinary protein were evaluated after telbivudine treatment of 12, 24, 52, 76, and 104 weeks. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated at baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks, and 104 weeks of treatment, respectively. Complete remission (CR) was defined as urinary protein <0.3 g/day, with normal ALT, AST, Cr, and eGFR. Criteria for partial remission include: 24-hour urinary protein excretion decreased by >50% compared with baseline level, and ALT and AST decreased >50%.Proteinuria level gradually decreased in patients with HBV-GN after telbivudine treatment. The percentages of PR + CR were 90.7% and 95.3%, respectively, at 52 and 104 weeks. Compared to baseline, eGFR were significantly increased from 69.2 ± 23.1 mL/min/1.73 m to 116.2 ± 26.3 mL/min/1.73 m at 104 weeks of treatment. Multivariate analysis indicated that baseline HBV DNA viral load (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.19, P = .02) and baseline urinary protein (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-2.44, P = .03) were independent risk factors associated with CR after telbivudine treatment among patients with HBV-GN.Our study demonstrates that telbivudine can be used to treat HBV-GN and effectively improve eGFR in these patients.

Real World Experience of Telbivudine Versus Entecavir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B, Including Long-Term Outcomes after Treatment Modification

PURPOSE

To estimate long-term outcomes after treatment modification in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with entecavir (ETV) and telbivudine (LdT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 131 nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve CHB patients treated with ETV or LdT. During the 3-year study, NA treatment history including the incidence, the type of treatment modification, reasons for the modification, and overall complete virologic response (CVR) rate were retrospectively evaluated using the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

Among the 131 patients, 84 and 47 were initially treated with ETV and LdT, respectively. During the course of 3-year study, 82 patients in the ETV group (97.6%) maintained initial treatment whereas only 19 in the LdT group (40.4%). In the LdT group, 26 patients (92.9%) switched to another NA and another NA was added in 2 (7.1%) patients. An assessment of the CVR rate at 3 years, including treatment modification, showed that 89.3% and 95.7% of patients in the ETV and LdT groups, respectively, had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels (p=0.329). Among LdT patients with treatment modification, the cumulative incidence rate of a CVR for rescue therapy was significantly higher in the tenofovir than in the ETV group (p=0.009).

CONCLUSION

During the 3-year study, there were no significant differences in the CVR between the ETV and LdT groups if appropriate rescue therapy was considered.

Upgrade Combination Response Is Limited by Prolonged Nucelos(t)ide Analogue Therapy in HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real-life Study

Background and Aims: Few previous studies have reported on a combination response (hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA undetected, alanine aminotransferase normalization and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion) following nucleos(t)ide analogue (NAs) long-term therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to investigate the combination response on long-term NAs therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB and to determine whether prolonged therapy is beneficial for combination response, particularly in optimal patients (baseline alanine aminotransferase level ≥5 upper limit of normal and HBV DNA level <10⁹ copies/mL). Methods: In total, 280 HBeAg-positive CHB patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 190 were treated with entecavir and 90 were treated with telbivudine. Results: The cumulative rates of combination response in the total number of patients were 8.6% at 1 year, 13.2% at 2 years, 19.1% at 3 years, 24.2% at 4 years and 26.0% at 5 years. In optimal patients, the cumulative rate of combination response was significantly higher than that in the non-optimal patients at 3 years (p = 0.043); the trend of the cumulative rate was not strong at the later time. Interestingly, in optimal patients, combination response mainly occurred in the first 3 years. Multivariate analysis identified HBeAg/anti-HBe seroconversion at 1 year as the only factor for combination response in optimal patients (hazard ratio: 16.321; p = 0.000). During the 3 years, the proportion with aspartate aminotransaminase to platelet ratio index ≤0.5 increased from 15.6% at baseline to 71.3% at year 3. Conclusions: Upgrading the rate of combination response is limited by prolonging the treatment duration of NAs from 3 years to 5 years in HBeAg-positive CHB patients; a new switch treatment strategy modification should be considered, particularly in optimal patients.

Negative HBcAg in immunohistochemistry assay of liver biopsy is a predictive factor for the treatment of patients with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

The hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) is an important target for antiviral response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, the correlation between HBcAg in the hepatocyte nucleus and nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapeutic response is unclear. We sought to evaluate the role of HBcAg by analysing liver biopsies for viral response in NA-naïve hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive (+) CHB patients via immunohistochemistry (IHC). A total of 48 HBcAg-negative (-) patients and 48 HBcAg (+) patients with matching baseline characteristics were retrospectively analysed for up to 288 weeks. Virological response (VR) rates of patients in the HBcAg (-) group were significantly higher at week 48 and 96 than the HBcAg (+) group (77.1% versus 45.8% at week 48, respectively, P = 0.002 and 95.3% versus 83.3% at week 96, respectively, P = 0.045). The serological negative conversion rate of HBeAg was significantly higher in the HBcAg (-) than in the HBcAg (+) group from week 96 to 288 (35.4 % versus 14.6% at week 96, respectively, P = 0.018; 60.4% versus 14.6%, respectively, P < 0.001 at week 144; 72.9% versus 35.4%, respectively, P < 0.001 at week 288). The cumulative frequencies of VR and lack of HBeAg were higher in the HBcAg (-) group (both P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that HBcAg (-) was the predictor for the lack of HBeAg (OR 4.482, 95% CI: 1.58-12.68). In summary, the absence of HBcAg in the hepatocyte nucleus could be an independent predictor for HBeAg seroconversion rates during NA-naïve treatment in HBeAg (+) CHB patients.

Review article: long-term safety of oral anti-viral treatment for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Safety profile of nucleos(t)ide analogues is an important issue in view of its widespread use for decades in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

AIM

To review and evaluate the latest evidence on the safety profiles of the six approved nucleoside analogues.

METHODS

Relevant articles related to nucleoside analogue safety were selected for review following extensive language- and date-unrestricted, electronic searches of the literature.

RESULTS

Nephrotoxicity has been well reported in patients receiving older generations of nucleotide analogues, namely adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Yet risks of renal failure and renal replacement therapy were similar in patients treated with nucleoside analogues versus nucleotide analogues in real-life setting. Bone toxicity is closely related to nucleoside analogue effect on renal proximal tubular and phosphaturia. Real-life data demonstrated increased risk of hip fracture in patients receiving adefovir but not TDF. The newly approved tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has improved renal and bone safety profiles compared to TDF. Long-term use of nucleoside analogues eg entecavir does not increase the risk of other cancers. Muscular toxicity may be seen in telbivudine-treated patients so regular monitoring is advised. Peripheral neuropathy and lactic acidosis are rare adverse events. Latest international guidelines support the use of TDF, telbivudine and lamivudine during pregnancy; breastfeeding is not contraindicated during TDF therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term safety profile of nucleoside analogues is now better defined with more data from large real-life cohorts and clinical trials with long-term follow-up. The new nucleotide analogue, TAF is now available with favourable renal and bone safety profiles.

Telbivudine therapy for gravidas with chronic hepatitis B infection and patients at risk of renal impairment

Hepatitis B virus infection is currently the most important cause of chronic viral hepatitis worldwide and is one of the most frequent causes of end-stage liver disease. With the international implementation of the hepatitis B vaccine and combined prophylaxis for infants born to HBsAg(+) mothers, the prevalence of hepatitis B has decreased remarkably. However, intra-uterine transmission has become a critical bottleneck for eliminating hepatitis B infection. The efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogs on inhibiting hepatitis B replication has been widely confirmed, and the quality of life and the survival of individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have improved to a great degree. However, with the availability of long-term antiviral treatment and the ever increasing ageing population, renal disorders should be considered when choosing antiviral medicines. The antiviral efficacy and safety of telbivudine (LdT) have been shown in patients with CHB infection, and LdT is approved as a class B drug for pregnancy. Furthermore, the renal protective function of LdT has been demonstrated recently. In this review, we will focus on the efficacy and safety of LdT in gravidas with CHB infection, as well as the renal protective function of LdT in CHB patients. LdT might provide physicians with a solid option for effectively treating patients with CHB, especially gravidas or those either with or at risk of renal impairment.

Improvement of telbivudine on renal function and massive proteinuria: A case report

The quality of life and extended survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), especially those with decompensated liver cirrhosis, has been improved markedly with nucleos(t)ide analogs treatment. In such conditions, the influence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and antiviral agents on renal function becomes a consideration with long-term use and ageing. Membranous glomerulonephritis has been confirmed as the most common histological renal lesion. In this study, we reported a CHB patient with decompensated cirrhosis showing a significant improvement in massive proteinuria along with elevation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after 1 year treatment with telbivudine. However, a well-designed study should be performed to confirm the causal association, and the molecular mechanism needs further investigation.

The Ca2+/CaMKK2 axis mediates the telbivudine induced upregulation of creatine kinase: Implications for mechanism of antiviral nucleoside analogs' side effect

Telbivudine (LdT), a widely prescribed anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) drug for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis B (CHB), causes adverse reactions ranging from creatine kinase (CK) elevation to myopathy. The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanism(s) of LdT induced CK elevation. The effects of LdT on mitochondrial morphology and proteins (TK2 and β-actin), oxidative stress, intracellular Ca²⁺ levels, Ca²⁺-related signaling pathway (CaMKK2/AMPK), and Ca²⁺-related biomarkers such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were assessed in human skeletal muscle cells (HSKMCs). The results showed that LdT induced a dose-dependent increase in CK activity in HSKMCs, without affecting mitochondrial morphology, and TK2 and β-actin protein levels, following 72 h of treatment. In addition, LdT increased Ca²⁺ production, ROS generation, MDA and lipid peroxide (LPO) levels, and activated the CaMKK2/AMPK signaling pathway. Moreover, these effects were attenuated by the BAPIA-AM (the calcium chelator). We also confirmed the presence of relevant markers (MDA, LPO, and SOD) in serum from CHB patients after LdT treatment, and found that CK was positively correlated with MDA and LPO, and negatively associated with SOD. These findings indicate that LdT induces CK elevation and oxidative stress associated with imbalance of intracellular Ca²⁺ in HSKMCs, suggesting that Ca²⁺/CaMKK2 axis imbalance may underlie human LdT-induced CK elevation. The present findings provide a solid basis for assessing the mechanism of drug-induced CK elevation, which can help develop new tools for the prevention and treatment of diseases associated with drug-induced CK elevation.

Renal Function Improvement by Telbivudine in Liver Transplant Recipients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic renal failure is a frequent complication in liver transplantation. Telbivudine, anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleoside, can improve renal function. It is interesting if using telbivudine for prophylaxis of HBV recurrence has additional value on renal function improvement. 120 liver transplant recipients with lamivudine prophylaxis for HBV recurrence were 1 : 1 randomized into lamivudine-continuous (n = 60) and telbivudine-replacement (n = 60) groups. Fifty-eight patients in lamivudine-continuous group and 54 in telbivudine-replacement group completed the study. In telbivudine-replacement group, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGRF) was improved from 63.0 ± 16.3 ml/min to 72.8 ± 21.1 ml/min at 12 months after telbivudine administration (p = 0.003). Stratifying the patients according to renal function staging, the eGRF was improved from 74.7 ± 6.9 ml/min to 84.2 ± 16.6 ml/min (p = 0.002) in 32 stage II patients and from 48.2 ± 7.3 ml/min to 59.7 ± 11.8 ml/min in 20 stage III patients after 12 months of telbivudine administration (p < 0.001). Eleven (18.3%) patients with telbivudine developed polyneuritis during the trial and post hoc following-up. In conclusion, renal function was improved by telbivudine in liver transplant recipients with long-term chronic kidney disease. However, the high incidence of polyneuritis induced by telbivudine has to be closely monitored. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials NCT02447705.

Factors Related to Significant Improvement of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Telbivudine Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The improvement of estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving telbivudine therapy is well known. The aim of this study was to clarify the kinetics of eGFRs and to identify the significant factors related to the improvement of eGFRs in telbivudine-treated CHB patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Serial eGFRs were calculated every 3 months using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. The patients were classified as CKD-1, -2, or -3 according to a baseline eGFR of ≥90, 60-89, or <60 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. A significant improvement of eGFR was defined as a more than 10% increase from the baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were enrolled, of whom 36% had significantly improved eGFRs. According to a multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.028) and CKD-3 (p = 0.043) were both significantly related to such improvement. The rates of significant improvement of eGFR were about 73% and 77% in patients with DM and CKD-3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Telbivudine is an alternative drug of choice for the treatment of hepatitis B patients for whom renal safety is a concern, especially patients with DM and CKD-3.

Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between the Response-Guided Therapies and Monotherapies of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) monotherapies are typically used as the primary treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, including lamivudine (LAM), telbivudine (TBV), adefovir (ADV), entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF). For high-resistance NAs (LAM, TBV, ADV), they can generate excellent clinical outcomes by using response-guided therapy; however, their pharmacoeconomic profiles remain unclear in China. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness between response-guided therapies and monotherapies of NAs for Chinese hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative CHB patients.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov model to simulate CHB progression associated with 12 treatment strategies using effectiveness and cost data from the published literature. We measured the lifetime costs, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity (especially to extend the range of the TDF price) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore the uncertainties of the model.

RESULTS

For both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, no treatment strategy generated the lowest lifetime costs (US$31,185-US$31,338) and QALYs (7.54-7.58). ETV and TDF monotherapies were not dominated by other treatments, whereas, the ICER of ETV monotherapy was the lowest (US$6112/QALY-US$8533/QALY). For each high-resistance NA, compared with its monotherapy, the ICERs of its response-guided therapies were below the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$22,833/QALY. Additionally, TDF monotherapy was the preferred treatment when its price dropped to US$1820/year or lower.

CONCLUSION

Among 12 treatment strategies evaluated, ETV monotherapy is the most cost-effective treatment for treatment-naive CHB patients in China. The response-guided therapies of high-resistance NAs are more cost-effective than their monotherapies.

Chronic hepatitis B: a critical discussion

Telbivudine (LdT) is an antiviral agent currently used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus, which was first approved by the US FDA in 2006. The safety of LdT is of great importance for patients that receive long-term treatment for this condition. It has been confirmed that patients treated with LdT have significantly elevated creatine kinase levels. However, the mechanism responsible for this adverse reaction is unclear. This review summarizes the current literature of the adverse reactions of LdT and the possible mechanisms that are involved in chronic hepatitis B infection. Thus, we aim to provide guidance on best practices in using LdT and to provide evidence of the possible mechanisms of LdT-associated adverse reactions.

Comparison of telbivudine and entecavir on the change of off- treatment eGFR after 3 years of treatment in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B patients

Background

The change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with off-treatment nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) in chronic hepatitis B patients (CHB) is unclear. This study is aimed to evaluate the off-treatment eGFR after 3 years of therapy with telbivudine (LdT) or entecavir (ETV) and to assess predictive factors for eGFR improvement.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2011, we identified NA-naïve patients who were at least 20 years of age diagnosed with compensated CHB. All patients received a 3-year NA treatment and 1 year off-treatment follow-up; the initial selection of patients for LdT or ETV treatment was at the physicians’ discretion. An increase of more than 10% in eGFR from the baseline was identified as an improvement. The change of chronic kidney disease stages were recorded and compared with baseline at year 3 and year 4, respectively.

Results

This study included two groups consisting of 46 patients each (each with3 years of treatment with LdT or ETV). In LdT-treated patients, the mean eGFR increased from 94.3 ± 28.3 to 104.0 ± 31.2 mL/min/1.73 m² in year 3 (p = 0.01) and from 104.0 ± 31.2 to 104.0 ± 28.8 mL/min/1.73 m² in year 4 (p = 0.99). However, in ETV-treated patients, the mean eGFR decreased from 93.1 ± 26.1 to 85.5 ± 25.1 mL/min/1.73 m² in year 3 (p = 0.0009) and from 85.5 ± 25.1 to 87.7 ± 24.8 mL/min/1.73 m² in year 4 (p = 0.2). After a multivariate analysis, the predictors for the off-treatment eGFR improvement were the LdT treatment (odds ratio [OR], 3.97 (1.37–11.5), p = 0.01) and pre-treated eGFR (OR, 0.98 (0.95–1.00), p = 0.04).

Conclusions

At year 4, 48.8 and 21.3% patients had an improved eGFR from baseline in LdT and ETV patients, respectively. Telbivudine may have a protective renal effect that can last for one year after treatment in non-cirrhotic CHB patients without a virological breakthrough.

HBeAg Seroconversion in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analog Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

HBeAg seroconversion is an important intermediate outcome in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. This study aimed to compare the effect of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) on HBeAg seroconversion in treating CHB with lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir.

METHODS

Network meta-analysis of NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 1-2 years of treatment was performed. In addition, NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 3-5 years of treatment was systematically evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles were included in this study. Nine and five studies respectively reporting on 1- and 2-year treatment were included in our network meta-analysis. In addition, 6, 5, and 5 studies, respectively reporting on 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatment were included in our systematic evaluation. Telbivudine showed a significantly higher HBeAg seroconversion rate after a 1 year treatment period compared to the other NAs (odds ratio (OR) = 3.99, 95% CI 0.68-23.6). This was followed by tenofovir (OR = 3.36, 95% CI 0.70-16.75). Telbivudine also showed a higher seroconversion rate compared to the other NAs after a 2 year treatment period, (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 0.92-2.22). This was followed by entecavir (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.72-1.72). No significant difference was observed between spontaneous induction and long-term telbivudine treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion. However, entecavir and tenofovir treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversions were significantly lower than spontaneous seroconversion.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with potent anti-HBV drugs, especially tenofovir and entecavir, may reduce HBeAg seroconversion compared with spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion rate. Telbivudine treatment, whether short term or long term, is associated with higher HBeAg seroconversion compared with the other NAs. However, the high rates of drug resistance likely limit the application of telbivudine.

Use of telbivudine in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A preliminary experience

Telbivudine is a relatively novel oral nucleoside analogue with favourable efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but its data in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was lacking. The efficacy and tolerability of telbivudine in four treatment-naïve HBsAg-positive KTRs were reviewed (treatment duration 54 (36-72) months) HBV DNA declined from 2.6 × 10(5) (7.8 × 10(3) -1.5 × 10(7) ) copies/mL at baseline to 170 (0.0-3.2 × 10(4) ) copies/mL at 12 months, and became undetectable at 24 and 36 months (P = 0.060, 0.118 and 0.005 compared with baseline). Alanine aminotransferase levels dropped from 46.5 (30-48) IU/mL at baseline to 28 (13-45) IU/mL, 34.5 (15-71) IU/mL and 26 (12-41) IU/mL at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively (P = 0.109, 0.715 and 0.068 compared with baseline). Serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable after 36 months of treatment (P all > 0.05 compared with baseline). No virological breakthrough, cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma occurred. Our pilot data suggests that telbivudine has favourable efficacy and renal safety profiles in HBsAg-positive KTRs.

Telbivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B: A journey to identify super-responders and to optimize treatment using the roadmap model

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most serious health problems worldwide with a high risk for cirrhosis and liver cancer. Several antiviral agents have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, leading to a rapid reduction in HBV DNA and normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Telbivudine, a potent inhibitor of HBV replication, has been shown to be well tolerated. Because of the emergence of drug resistance, optimization strategies for telbivudine therapy have been shown to improve patient responses. Optimal baseline characteristics in so-called super-responders have been used to predict the virological response. Baseline HBV DNA levels < 9 log₁₀ copies/mL (2 × 10⁸  IU/mL) or alanine aminotransferase levels of more than or equal to twofold the upper limit of normal in HBeAg-positive patients and HBV DNA < 7 log₁₀ copies/mL (2 × 10⁶  IU/mL) in HBeAg-negative patients were strong predictors for virological response. In addition, the roadmap model, based on early virological response at week 24 of therapy, is considered as a powerful tool to identify patients at risk of treatment failure (HBV DNA ≥ 300 copies/mL, i.e. 60 IU/mL) and to reduce the risk of antiviral resistance. When considering pre-treatment characteristics and on-treatment responses, telbivudine may provide physicians with a wide choice of options to effectively treat patients with chronic hepatitis B, especially those with or at risk of renal impairment, or women of childbearing age.

Telbivudine vs tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients: OPTIMA roadmap study

AIM

To make efficacy and safety comparison of telbivudine-raodmap and tenofovir-roadmap in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

This was the first prospective, randomised, two-arm, open-label, non-inferiority study in HBeAg-negative CHB patients that compared telbivudine and tenofovir administered as per roadmap concept. Patients were treated up to 24 wk and, depending on virologic response, continued the same therapy or received add-on therapy up to 104 wk. Eligible patients received an additional 52 wk of treatment in the extension period (i.e., up to 156 wk). Patients who developed virologic breakthrough (VB) while on monotherapy also received add-on therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of patients achieving hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 300 copies/mL at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the rates of HBV DNA < 300 and < 169 copies/mL, HBV DNA change from baseline, alanine aminotransferase normalisation, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, HBsAg seroconversion, VB, and emergence of resistance at various timepoints throughout the study. Safety and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were randomised. Non-inferiority of telbivudine arm to tenofovir arm was demonstrated at week 52 (± 7 d window), with over 91% of patients in each treatment arm achieving HBV DNA level < 300 copies/mL. Both arms were similar in terms of key secondary efficacy variables at weeks 104 and 156. The percentage of patients achieving HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL remained high and was similar in the telbivudine and tenofovir arms at both weeks 104 and 156. Over 82% of patients in both arms achieved alanine aminotransferase normalisation at week 52, and this percentage remained high at weeks 104 and 156. Telbivudine treatment progressively reduced serum HBsAg levels from baseline while no change was reported in quantitative HBsAg during therapy with tenofovir. Both treaments showed acceptable safety profiles. The telbivudine arm showed eGFR improvement unlike the tenofovir arm.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy was shown for both telbivudine-roadmap and tenofovir-roadmap regimens in HBeAg-negative CHB patients over 156 wk. Telbivudine arm was associated with renal improvement.

Comparison of the Efficacies and Safety of Combined Therapy between Telbivudine Plus Adefovir and Lamivudine Plus Adefovir in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Real-World Practice

Background and Aim

Chronic hepatitis B infection remains a significant health issue worldwide. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined therapy using lamivudine plus adefovir (LAM+ADV) versus telbivudine plus adefovir (LdT+ADV) and the corresponding renal function change and safety.

Methods

This study enrolled a total of 171 patients (110 patients received LAM+ADV and 60 patients received LdT+ADV). We analyzed the changes in renal function using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The DNA undetectable rate, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization rate were analyzed. We checked the serum uric acid, phosphate and creatine kinase, and lactic acid levels to analyze safety. We observed these patients for 48 to 240 weeks and checked their serum profile every 6 months.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) efficacy in terms of DNA undetectable rate, ALT normalization rate, and HBeAg seroconversion rate. Both the LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV groups had stable or improved renal function. However, a higher eGFR was found in the LdT+ADV group with continuous serum fluctuation during 3 years of combined therapy as well as a higher serum creatine kinase level.

Conclusions

Long-term LdT+ADV combined therapy and LAM+ADV combined therapy were both associated with stable or improved renal function. The clinical efficacy was similar between the two groups, but the LdT group had a higher serum creatine kinase level. We need to monitor the data regularly in clinical practice.

Telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in HBeAg-positive patients in China: a health economic analysis

BACKGROUND

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) are the standard of care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The present analysis aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of NUCs in Chinese healthcare settings.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to simulate two therapeutic strategies for a hypothetical patient cohort diagnosed with hepatitis B e antigen-positive CHB, unwilling or unable to receive interferon therapy, and about to start treatment with any NUC. The first strategy included NUC monotherapy without sequencing (telbivudine [LDT], entecavir [ETV], tenofovir [TDF], lamivudine [LAM], adefovir dipivoxil [ADV], and combination therapies of either LDT and ADV or LDT and TDF, followed by best supportive care [BSC]). The second strategy included sequential therapies of individual NUCs: LAM → ADV, ADV → LAM, LDT → ADV, and ETV → ADV, followed by BSC. The analysis included two scenarios: with and without costs due to nephrotoxicity. Renal impact was quantified as costs alone, without consideration for quality of life decrements.

RESULTS

When renal impact was not considered, without treatment sequencing, LDT was cost effective compared with other NUCs. Amongst the strategies with sequencing, LDT → ADV was cost effective. The results were similar when renal impact was considered. However, LDT strategy demonstrated better cost effectiveness. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, in both scenarios, LDT → ADV sequence was cost effective with 51 % probability even at willingness to pay of $20,000.

CONCLUSION

Use of LDT, as compared with other NUCs, is cost effective in CHB treatment in Chinese healthcare settings. Considering the detrimental renal impact, overall costs for all treatment options were increased. However, the increase for LDT was comparatively small.

Renal Function in Nucleos(t)ide Analog-Treated Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Renal safety is an important factor in selecting the most appropriate nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This systematic literature review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess renal function associated with telbivudine treatment compared to other NAs in patients with CHB.

METHODS

A systematic literature search via Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane library for publications of randomized controlled trials and observational studies was conducted. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare renal function with telbivudine treatment versus other NAs after 1 year of therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 (six randomized controlled and 34 observational) studies were included for review. Telbivudine consistently showed an improvement in renal function as measured by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over various time points regardless of the method of measurement. Changes in eGFR (mL/min) from baseline and corresponding 95% credible intervals with various NAs were as follows: monotherapies (telbivudine: 7.78 [6.91, 8.65], entecavir: -1.07 [-4.80, 2.62], lamivudine: -6.08 [-13.35, 1.15], tenofovir: -9.53 [-14.31, -4.89]) and combination therapies (telbivudine + adefovir: 8.37 [-34.00, 50.34], telbivudine + tenofovir: 8.29 [-0.05, 16.64], entecavir + adefovir: 4.15 [-38.55, 46.37], telbivudine + lamivudine: 0.51 [-11.77, 12.96], and lamivudine + adefovir: -0.39 [-42.48, 41.21]). At 1 year, the change in eGFR from baseline was significantly higher with telbivudine compared to other NAs.

CONCLUSION

The systematic literature review and network meta-analysis provide evidence that telbivudine is associated with significant improvement in renal function in patients with CHB, either alone or in combination with other NAs.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma AG.

Comparison of clinical efficacy and renal safety of telbivudine and entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Limited data is available on the clinical outcomes of telbivudine (LdT) and entecavir (ETV) in pre-emptive antiviral chemoprophylaxis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and renal safety of LdT and ETV in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who received cytotoxic chemotherapy.

METHODS

Altogether 290 treatment-naïve CHB patients undergoing intense chemotherapy were enrolled to receive daily 600 mg of LdT or 0.5 mg of ETV as pre-emptive antiviral chemoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

The ETV group had significantly higher proportion of patients with undetectable hepatitis B viral (HBV) DNA load compared with LdT at week 24 (73.0% vs 50.3%, P = 0.000). The cumulative rates of virological breakthrough in the LdT and ETV groups were 9.15% and 3.65% at the second year of therapy, respectively (P = 0.059), which was associated with detectable HBV DNA at week 24 (P = 0.000). The MELD score of the LdT group was significantly lower than that of the ETV group after the first year (4.53 vs 7.53, P = 0.002) and the second year (1.96 vs 7.09, P = 0.000) of antiviral therapy. Moreover, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly improved in the LdT group than in the ETV group after two years of antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSION

LdT has a lower clinical efficacy in viral suppression than ETV, but LdT is associated with greater extent of improvement in liver and renal functions of patients in pre-emptive prophylaxis for cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Efficacy of telbivudine with conditional tenofovir intensification in patients with chronic hepatitis B: results from the 2-year roadmap strategy

Background:

A 2-year roadmap study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir intensification at Week 24 in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving telbivudine.

Scope:

A prospective multicenter study was conducted in treatment-naive patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB. All patients received telbivudine (600 mg/day) until Week 24. Thereafter, patients with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (≥300 copies/mL) were administered tenofovir (300 mg/day) plus telbivudine, and patients with undetectable HBV DNA continued telbivudine monotherapy until Week 104. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA (<300 copies/mL) at Weeks 52 and 104.

Findings:

A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the trial, of which 100 were eligible for efficacy analysis. Undetectable HBV DNA levels were observed at Week 24 in 55 patients who continued on with telbivudine monotherapy. The remaining 45 patients with detectable HBV DNA received tenofovir add-on therapy. With monotherapy, 100% (55/55) and 94.5% (52/55) of patients achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/mL at Weeks 52 and 104, respectively; the corresponding values for patients with add-on therapy were 84.4% (38/45) and 93.3% (42/45). Overall, undetectable HBV DNA (<300 copies/mL) was found in 93% (93/100) and 94% (94/100) of patients at Weeks 52 and 104, respectively. HBeAg seroconversion rate was 44.4% (44/99) at Week 104 for the overall patient population. One patient in the monotherapy group and six in the intensification group demonstrated HBsAg clearance at Week 104. HBsAg seroconversion was observed in four patients at Week 104, all belonged to the tenofovir intensification group. Eight patients sustained HBsAg loss during a posttreatment follow-up period of 16 weeks. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization was constant in the telbivudine monotherapy group, whereas a progressive improvement was observed in the tenofovir intensification group. Two patients in the monotherapy and none in the intensification group experienced viral breakthrough by Week 104. There were no reports of myopathy in either group. The mean changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, from baseline to Week 104 were +6.145 mL/min/1.73 m² (p=0.0230) and +7.954 mL/min/1.73 m² (p=0.0154) in the telbivudine monotherapy and tenofovir intensification groups, respectively. The incidence of serious AEs was four in the telbivudine monotherapy and two in the tenofovir intensification group. The main limitation of this study was limited sample size, which made the power of the observation low, and the absence of a comparative subgroup to assess the progression of patients with detectable HBV DNA without treatment intensification.

Conclusions:

Data from this 2-year roadmap study confirmed that telbivudine with add-on tenofovir was effective and well tolerated in patients with CHB. Telbivudine was associated with an improvement in eGFR from baseline in both the groups.

Comprehensive analysis of hospital-based prospective cohort reveals the unique effectiveness and safety for nucleos(t)ide analogues in HBV patients

BACKGROUND

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) including lamivudine (LAM), telbivudine (LDT), adefovir dipivoxil(ADV), and entecavir (ETV) have been widely used as anti-HBV drugs. We aimed to study the effectiveness and safety of various NAs.

METHODS

Two thousand three hundred and eighty patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were enrolled. The rate of virologic response, optimization therapy, and serologic responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

HBV DNA inhibitory capacity was shown to be LAM+ADV≈ETV>LDT>LAM>ADV. Virologic breakthrough rate and proportion of optimized treatment were LAM>ADV>LDT>LAM+ADV>ETV. However, virological response rate showed the opposite trend. The selection of anti-virals, HBeAg-negative, and lower HBV DNA levels after one year of anti-viral treatment, are favorable factors for the maintenance of virologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study's results were consistent with the major clinical guidelines to recommend ETV and TDF as the preferred treatment for CHB patients. LAM could be used for patients with lower HBV DNA load; ADV may be more applicable to non-cirrhotic patients with HBeAg-negative and lower HBV DNA load. LDT can be used to treat patients with HBeAg-positive, low HBV DNA load, and higher ALT levels due to higher HBeAg conversion rate in a baseline optimized population. The effectiveness of LAM+ADV is similar to and sometimes better than ETV treatment in a CHB population.

Comprehensive review of telbivudine in pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To achieve an evidence-based conclusion regarding the safety and efficacy of telbivudine during pregnancy.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of data from a literature search reported 1739 pregnancy outcomes (1673 live births) from 1725 non-overlapping pregnant women treated with telbivudine. The prevalence of live birth defects (3.6/1000) was similar to that of the non-antiviral controls (3.0/1000) and not increased as compared with overall prevalence (14.5 to 60/1000). No target organ toxicity was identified. The prevalence of spontaneous abortion in pregnant women treated with telbivudine (4.2/1000) was not increased compared with the overall prevalence (16/1000). The mother-to-child transmission rate was significantly reduced in pregnant women treated with telbivudine (0.70%) compared to those treated with the non-antiviral controls (11.9%; P < 0.0001) or compared to the historical rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected population without antiviral treatment (10%-15%).

RESULTS

Cumulatively 489 pregnancy cases have been reported in the telbivudine pharmacovigilance database (with a cut-off date 31 August 2014), of those, 308 had known pregnancy outcomes with 249 cases of live births (239 cases of live birth without congenital anomaly and 10 cases of live birth with congenital anomaly). In the latest antiretroviral pregnancy registry report (1 January 1989 through 31 January 2015) of 27 patients exposed to telbivudine during pregnancy (18, 6 and 3 during first, second and third trimester, respectively) 19 live births were reported and there were no cases of birth defects reported.

CONCLUSION

Telbivudine treatment during pregnancy presents a favorable safety profile without increased rates of live birth defects, spontaneous abortion or elective termination, or fetal/neonatal toxicity. Exposure to telbivudine in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of HBV transmission from mother to child on the basis of standard immune prophylaxis procedure.

Telbivudine protects against renal impairment in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

It has been reported that treatment with telbivudine might be associated with a significant improvement of renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B. To confirm this finding, a systematic literature review was conducted. Four online databases (PubMed, CNKI/FMJS, Ovid and SpringerLink) were searched. Serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate changes from baseline to the end of the treatment were analyzed. A total of seven full-text articles and 13 abstracts with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 689 patients fulfilled the selection criteria for review. The results showed that long-term treatment with telbivudine, either as monotherapy or combined with other nucleos(t)ide analogs, can significantly improve renal function in chronic hepatitis B patients, particularly those at high risk of renal impairment.

A comparison of telbivudine and entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients: a prospective cohort study in China

There are few studies directly comparing the efficacy and safety of telbivudine and entecavir. The present prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of these compounds in 196 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B for a median follow-up period of 172 weeks; 97 were treated with telbivudine and 99 were treated with entecavir. Patients showing suboptimal responses could also take adefovir at 24-48 weeks and all patients with viral breakthrough were started on adefovir. The 240-week cumulative proportions of patients showing undetectable hepatitis B DNA levels and serum alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization were similar in the two study groups. Viral breakthrough developed in 14% of the telbivudine group and in 2% of the entecavir group (p 0.002). Interestingly, the cumulative proportions of patients treated with entecavir and telbivudine showing HBeAg seroconversion were 12% versus 21% at 48 weeks (p 0.041), 15% versus 38% at 96 weeks (p 0.001), 24% versus 50% at 144 weeks (p 0.001), 33% versus 53% at 192 weeks (p 0.004) and 36% versus 53% at 240 weeks (p 0.005), respectively. Patients treated with telbivudine were therefore significantly more likely to show HBeAg seroconversion than those receiving entecavir and similar results were observed in study sub-groups matched for age, serum ALT, and HBV DNA levels. A safety analysis identified no differences between grade 3/4 creatine kinase elevations in the study groups and only telbivudine was associated with improved kidney function.

DNA polymerase inhibitors for treating hepatitis B: a safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Oral nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues (NAs) are currently the mainstay of treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. They are generally safe to use. However, since their approval in the last decade and a half, the literature has reported adverse effects associated with the use of NA in HBV patients. A comprehensive review on the drug safety is lacking.

AREAS COVERED

Significant adverse effects associated with NA use in HBV patients including muscle toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, nephrotoxicity and lactic acidosis are discussed. The reported prevalence of each adverse effect, as well as their predictive factors, reversibility and their use in pregnancy and lactating mothers are covered in this review. Novel data regarding reno-protective effect of telbivudine are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Use of NA in HBV is generally safe. Uncommon adverse effects can be minimized or detected early if clinicians exercise adequate precautions when using NA for at-risk populations with regular monitoring.

Comparison of efficacy and renal safety of telbivudine and entecavir in treatment-naive elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Data comparing the clinical outcomes of telbivudine (LdT) and entecavir (ETV) in elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B are limited.

GOALS

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and renal safety of LdT and ETV in treatment-naive elderly (≥ 60 years) patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients treated with LdT were consecutively enrolled in the study. Each patient was matched on the basis of age, sex, and baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels with three to four randomly selected controls treated with ETV.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Higher cumulative HBeAg-seroconversion rates were observed in the LdT group than in the ETV group after 2 years (50 vs. 20%) and 3 years (50 vs. 26.67%) of treatment (all P<0.0001). Virological response rate at week 24 was significantly lower in the LdT group than it was in the ETV group (54.55 vs. 70.87%, P<0.0001), but no significant difference was noted in long-term cumulative rates of undetectable HBV DNA levels between the two groups (P=0.562). Virological breakthrough occurred in six (18.18%) LdT patients, with no such cases reported in the ETV group (P<0.0001). Antiviral resistance was strongly associated with LdT use and the absence of undetectable HBV DNA at weeks 12 and 24 (P<0.0001). During the study, significant improvement was observed in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and model for end-stage liver disease score in LdT versus ETV group.

CONCLUSION

LdT has a lower clinical efficacy for viral suppression and a higher risk of antiviral resistance than does ETV. However, LdT resulted in higher HBeAg-seroconversion rates and better renoprotective effects than did ETV.

Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update

Worldwide, some 240 million people have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), with the highest rates of infection in Africa and Asia. Our understanding of the natural history of HBV infection and the potential for therapy of the resultant disease is continuously improving. New data have become available since the previous APASL guidelines for management of HBV infection were published in 2012. The objective of this manuscript is to update the recommendations for the optimal management of chronic HBV infection. The 2015 guidelines were developed by a panel of Asian experts chosen by the APASL. The clinical practice guidelines are based on evidence from existing publications or, if evidence was unavailable, on the experts' personal experience and opinion after deliberations. Manuscripts and abstracts of important meetings published through January 2015 have been evaluated. This guideline covers the full spectrum of care of patients infected with hepatitis B, including new terminology, natural history, screening, vaccination, counseling, diagnosis, assessment of the stage of liver disease, the indications, timing, choice and duration of single or combination of antiviral drugs, screening for HCC, management in special situations like childhood, pregnancy, coinfections, renal impairment and pre- and post-liver transplant, and policy guidelines. However, areas of uncertainty still exist, and clinicians, patients, and public health authorities must therefore continue to make choices on the basis of the evolving evidence. The final clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are presented here, along with the relevant background information.

Risk Factors for Renal Functional Decline in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Oral Antiviral Agents

Renal functional decline that is frequently seen during chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment can exert adverse effects on overall prognosis. It, however, is difficult to distinguish vulnerable patients who may experience renal dysfunction because most previous CHB studies were conducted in relatively healthy individuals. In this retrospective observational study, renal functional decline in CHB patients receiving oral antiviral agents for more than 6 months was analyzed and risk factors of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression were determined. Renal functional decline was defined when the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased by more than 25% from baseline and rapid CKD progression was defined as eGFR decreased by more than 5 mL/min/1.73 m2/y among patients who experienced renal functional decline. A total of 4178 patients were followed up for a median 23 months. Antiviral agents included lamivudine (17.0%), adefovir (3.7%), entecavir (70.4%), telbivudine (0.6%), tenofovir (4.0%), or clevudine (4.3%). Renal functional decline occurred in 706 (16.9%) patients. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, hypertension, diabetes, history of liver or kidney transplantation, underlying underlying CKD, and simultaneous administration of diuretics increased the hazard ratio for renal functional decline; however, clevudine reduced risk. The eGFR significantly increased over time in patients receiving telbivudine or clevudine compared with lamivudine. Among the 3175 patients followed up for more than 1 year, 407 (12.8%) patients experienced rapid CKD progression. Patients with rapid CKD progression showed lower serum albumin, higher total bilirubin, and prolonged prothrombin time compared with patients with stable renal function, but hepatitis B envelope antigen positivity and hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid level did not differ between the control and rapid CKD progression groups. Age, diabetes, kidney transplantation, underlying CKD, and simultaneous administration of diuretics were identified as risk factors for rapid CKD progression, and clevudine showed a beneficial effect. Age, hypertension, diabetes, liver or kidney transplantation, underlying CKD, and diuretics were identified as risk factors for renal functional decline. This study suggests that close monitoring of renal function and adequate management are required for CHB patients receiving antiviral agents with these risk factors.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors of creatine kinase elevation associated with telbivudine

PURPOSE

An increasing number of studies are reporting a high frequency of creatine kinase (CK) elevation during telbivudine therapy; however, few reports have focused on the cumulative incidence and risk factors of CK elevation. This study was performed to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors of CK elevation in Chinese patients treated with telbivudine.

METHODS

In this observational study, patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving telbivudine therapy between July 2008 and December 2013 were enrolled. The cumulative incidence of CK elevation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method combined with the log rank test. Risk factors were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 207 eligible patients were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of CK elevation at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months was 51.2 %, 68.9 %, 75.1 %, 78.1 %, 78.1 %, and 78.1 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significant risk factors for CK elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative incidence of CK elevation after long-term telbivudine use is quite high, and gender and baseline eGFR may be useful predictors. However, when combined with regular monitoring of CK levels, especially for patients with lower eGFR, telbivudine is a relatively safe nucleoside analog treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

Current Management of Chronic Hepatitis B and C in Chronic Kidney Disease

The landscape of therapeutic options for hepatitis B and C has changed drastically over the course of 2 decades. There are now novel, effective, well-tolerated, oral antiviral agents being used to successfully control chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections and cure chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infections. However, patients with CKD were rarely included in the Phase II and III randomized trials for these medications. This paucity of data and the high prevalence of comorbidities associated with CKD pose distinct challenges to physicians treating chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections in the setting of kidney insufficiency/failure. Thus, this review will attempt to summarize the current data regarding novel antiviral therapies for HBV and HCV in the CKD population.

Telbivudine in liver transplant recipients: Renal protection does not overcome the risk of polyneuropathy and myopathy

The recently reported benefit of telbivudine for renal function has not been systematically studied in long-term liver transplantation (LT) recipients who are at high risk for renal impairment. We aimed to examine whether switching lamivudine therapy to telbivudine could improve renal function in LT recipients who have impaired renal function. This single-center, prospective cohort study enrolled LT recipients who were on lamivudine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis and who had renal impairment for at least 1 year. Lamivudine was switched to telbivudine. The primary outcome was to evaluate the change in renal function at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. The secondary outcomes were to assess the efficacy of telbivudine for HBV prophylaxis and the safety profile of telbivudine in the posttransplant setting. After 45 patients were enrolled, the study was terminated early because of increased rates of polyneuropathy/myopathy. During telbivudine treatment (median, 64 weeks), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased in 34 patients (76%). The improvement in renal function was prominent after 24 weeks of telbivudine treatment. Telbivudine was effective as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence. Twenty-six patients (58%) developed polyneuropathy and/or myopathy. The 1-year estimated incidence of polyneuropathy/myopathy was 28%. Diabetes was the strongest predictor of polyneuropathy/myopathy (hazard ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-11.50; P = 0.007). In conclusion, although it seems to have a favorable effect in the improvement of renal function and seems to be effective in the prevention of HBV recurrence, the high risk of polyneuropathy and myopathy hampers the use of telbivudine in LT recipients.

Telbivudine is associated with improvement of renal function in patients transplanted for HBV liver disease

Recent studies showed that telbivudine in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection improved their glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but data regarding its impact on renal function in liver transplant (LT) recipients are very limited. We evaluated 17 consecutive recipients who received at baseline nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) (NAs) other than telbivudine for 12 months, and then they were switched to telbivudine prophylaxis for another 12 months. In each patient, laboratory data including evaluation of GFR (using MDRD and CKD-EPI) were prospectively recorded. The changes in GFR (ΔGFR) between baseline and after 12 months (1st period) and between telbivudine initiation and 24 months (2nd period) were evaluated. All patients remained serum HBsAg and HBV-DNA negative. GFR-MDRD at baseline, 12 months and 24 months were 72 ± 18, 67.8 ± 16 and 70.3 ± 12 mL/min, respectively, (P = 0.025 for comparison between 12 months and 24 months). ΔGFR at the 1st period was significantly lower, compared with ΔGFR at the 2nd period [mean ΔGFR-MDRD: -4.2 (range: -24-9) vs 2.5 (range: -7-22) mL/min, P = 0.013; mean ΔGFR-CKD-EPI: -4.2 (range: -19-10) vs 4.0 (range: -7-23) mL/min, P = 0.004], although the serum levels of calcineurin inhibitors were similar between the two periods. A second group of recipients (n = 17) who remained under the same nontelbivudine NA(s) for 24 months had a decline in the mean eGFR during the total follow-up period. In conclusion, we showed that telbivudine administration in LT recipients for HBV cirrhosis was effective and it was associated with significant improvement in renal function, but this remains to be confirmed in larger well-designed studies.

Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogue combination therapy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Monotherapy with telbivudine or adefovir can affect estimated the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, only a few studies have assessed changes in eGFR in patients who have chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and are receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination therapy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of long-term NA combination therapy on eGFR in Chinese CHB patients. This retrospective study included 195 CHB patients. Patient subgroups included those treated with lamivudine plus adefovir (n = 73), telbivudine plus adefovir (n = 51), and entecavir plus adefovir (n = 35); untreated patients (n = 36) served as a control group. After an average follow-up duration of 24 months with combination therapy, analysis of changes in eGFR from baseline values, calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas, showed decrease by 11.08 and 18.34 mL/min (P < .001), respectively, in the lamivudine plus adefovir group; decrease by 3.73 and 10.04 mL/min (P = .012), respectively, in the entecavir plus adefovir group; and increase by 0.91 and 2.12 mL/min (P = .46), respectively, in the telbivudine plus adefovir group. The eGFR in the telbivudine plus adefovir group was similar to that for the untreated group. The eGFR decreases due to adefovir therapy could be rescued by adding telbivudine, and the eGFR increase due to telbivudine could be compromised by adding adefovir. Adefovir in combination with lamivudine or entecavir therapy was significantly associated with decreased eGFR, but telbivudine could rescue the eGFR decrease that results from adefovir treatment.