Serological responses to revaccination with hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines among HIV-positive individuals whose anti-HAV antibody waned after primary vaccination

Efficacy and Durability of Immune Response After Receipt of Hepatitis A Vaccine in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is a serious health concern among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Coinfection with HAV and HIV is linked to increased hepatitis A viral load, elevated HIV RNA, and potential disruption of HIV treatment caused by liver dysfunction. Three vaccines for the prevention of HAV are currently approved for usage in the United States: 2 monovalent inactivated vaccines (hepatitis A vaccine, inactivated [GSK] and hepatitis A vaccine, inactivated [Merck]) and 1 hepatitis A (inactivated) and hepatitis B (recombinant) vaccine (GSK). Among people with HIV (PWH), seroconversion rates and antibody titers to HAV vaccines tend to be lower and less persistent than in immunocompetent individuals, with a notable difference among PWH with a lower CD4 cell count. We highlight in this review the potential need for serologic monitoring and revaccination strategies that would optimize lifelong protection against HAV in PWH.

Hepatitis a vaccine immunogenicity and boostability in adults receiving immunosuppressive therapy and adults living with HIV: a prospective single-centre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis A (hepA) vaccination is highly immunogenic in healthy individuals; however, there is uncertainty about the immunogenicity in immunocompromised populations (ICPs).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, people living with HIV (PLWH), patients on immunosuppressive mono- and combination therapy, and controls received two hepA vaccine doses at months 0 and 6-12, or three combined hepA/B vaccine doses at months 0, 1 and 6-12. Antibody levels were measured before and at different time-points post-vaccination (T2, 6, 8, 12 months). The primary endpoint was the seroconversion rate (SCR) at T8, defined as hepA antibodies ≥20 mIU/ml. To assess boostability, an additional vaccine dose was administered 1-5 years after T12 in those with antibodies < 50 mIU/ml, with antibody measurements before and seven days after the booster dose.

RESULTS

We included 150 participants. At T2 SCRs ranged between 35-58% in ICPs versus 94% in controls. Among PLWH, patients on monotherapy, combination therapy and controls SCRs at T8 were 33/34 (97%), 32/34 (94%), 25/30 (83%) and 28/28 (100%), respectively. The booster dose resulted in 71% additional seroconversion (17/24), with only patients using combination therapy not responding.

CONCLUSIONS

HepA vaccination is highly immunogenic in virologically suppressed PLWH and patients on immunosuppressive monotherapy, with SCRs after the complete hepA vaccination schedule similar to controls and adequate booster responses in case of waning immunity. However, patients using immunosuppressive combination therapy as well as all ICPs who did not receive the complete hepA vaccination schedule, are at risk of non-response to vaccination and post-vaccination antibody measurements are recommended.

Low rate of vaccination and risk of incident hepatitis A among HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Seville, Southern Spain

BACKGROUND

Periodic outbreaks of hepatitis A (HAV) infection in men who have sex with men (MSM) have been reported. Low vaccination uptake in HIV-infected individuals could drive new outbreaks. We aimed at evaluating the incidence of and risk factors for HAV infection in people living with HIV (PLWH) in our area. We also assessed the rates of HAV vaccination.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. 915 patients were included, 272 (30%) of them were anti-HAV seronegative at baseline.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (9.6%) susceptible individuals became infected. Incident cases peaked in 2009-2010 and 2017-2018. Incident HAV infection was independently associated with MSM [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence ratio): 4.39 (1.35-14.27), p=0.014]. One hundred and five (38.6%) HAV seronegative patients were vaccinated, 21 (20%) of them did not respond, and one (1%) patient lost immunity against HAV. Four (29%) non-responders to vaccination showed incident HAV 5-9 years afterwards.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of HAV infection in a cohort of well-controlled PLWH remains low and stable, with intermittent outbreaks involving mainly non-immunized MSM. A significant proportion of PLWH remain susceptible to HAV infection due to insufficient vaccine uptake and limited response to vaccination. Importantly, patients not responding to HAV vaccination continue at risk of infection.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of 1-Dose vs Accelerated 2-Dose Schedule for Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Revaccination Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Were Nonresponders or Had Seroreversion After Primary HAV Vaccination

BACKGROUND

For people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who have no serological responses to their primary hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination or have seroreversion after successful primary vaccination, the optimal revaccination strategy remains unclear.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized clinical trial, PWH who tested negative for anti-HAV antibodies after receiving a standard 2-dose series of primary HAV vaccination were enrolled and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1 dose (the 1-dose group) or 2 doses of HAV vaccine administered 4 weeks apart (the 2-dose group). Serological response rates and anti-HAV antibody titers were compared at weeks 24 and 48.

RESULTS

Of the 153 participants (77 in the 1-dose group and 76 in the 2-dose group), the overall serological response rates at week 48 after revaccination were similar between the 2 groups (2- vs 1-dose, 80.2% vs 71.4%, P = .20). However, anti-HAV antibody titers were consistently higher in the 2-dose group than in the 1-dose group. In subgroup analysis, PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination were significantly more likely to mount a serological response after 2-dose HAV revaccination (68.4% vs 44.1%, P = .038). No severe adverse events were reported throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-dose HAV revaccination administered 4 weeks apart yielded similar serological responses as 1-dose revaccination among PWH who were nonresponders or had seroreversion after primary HAV vaccination. The 2-dose revaccination schedule generated significantly higher anti-HAV antibody titers and was more likely to elicit serological responses at week 48 among PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03855176.

Durability of serologic responses to inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccination among people living with HIV following acute hepatitis A outbreak: a 5-year follow-up study

Serologic responses to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination may wane among immunocompromised populations. To evaluate the long-term seroresponses to 2-dose HAV vaccination, we retrospectively included people living with HIV (PLWH) who had achieved seroconversion within 12 months after vaccination at a university hospital during an outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017. PLWH included in the study received either Havrix or Vaqta. The seroresponses were evaluated 60 months after the second dose of vaccination and estimated by the intention-to-treat (ITT) with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Overall, 986 PLWH (median age, 34 years and CD4 count, 587 cells/µL) were included. The rates of PLWH with persistent seroprotection at month 60 of vaccination were 90.7% (894/986) and 97.4% (748/768) in the ITT with LOCF and PP analyses, respectively. PLWH with persistent seroprotection had achieved higher peak anti-HAV IgG titers after vaccination and had a slower decline in antibody levels compared with those with seroreversion. In the multivariable analysis, seroreversion at month 60 was associated with body-mass index (per 1-kg/m² increase, AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17), lowest-ever CD4 count (per 10-cell/µL increase, AOR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/ml at vaccination (AOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59), and having received Vaqta as the first dose of HAV vaccination (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.70). The seroprotection against HAV remained high in the long-term follow-up among PLWH on antiretroviral therapy after 2-dose HAV vaccination. Regular monitoring of seroresponses and timely administration of HAV vaccines are warranted to maintain seroprotection.

Living with HIV and Getting Vaccinated: A Narrative Review

After 40 years of its appearance, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a leading public health challenge worldwide. Since the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART), HIV infection has become a chronic condition, and people living with HIV could have life expectancies close to those of the general population. People with HIV often have an increased risk of infection or experience more severe morbidity following exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases. Nowadays, several vaccines are available against bacteria and viruses. However, national and international vaccination guidelines for people with HIV are heterogeneous, and not every vaccine is included. For these reasons, we aimed to perform a narrative review about the vaccinations available for adults living with HIV, reporting the most updated studies performed for each vaccine among this population. We performed a comprehensive literature search through electronic databases (Pubmed-MEDLINE and Embase) and search engines (Google Scholar). We included English peer-reviewed publications (articles and reviews) on HIV and vaccination. Despite widespread use and guideline recommendations, few vaccine trials have been conducted in people with HIV. In addition, not all vaccines are recommended for people with HIV, especially for those with low CD4 cells count. Clinicians should carefully collect the history of vaccinations and patients' acceptance and preferences and regularly check the presence of antibodies for vaccine-preventable pathogens.

Acute Hepatitis A Viral Infection in People With HIV With Previously Documented Hepatitis A Immunity or Appropriate Vaccination: A Case Series

We describe 4 people with HIV (PWH) who acquired acute hepatitis A (HAV) infection during recent King County, Washington, outbreaks despite documented immunity and/or vaccination. HAV revaccination may be needed in PWH with risk factors for HAV infection regardless of preexisting immunity.

Hepatitis A vaccination and its immunological and epidemiological long-term effects - a review of the evidence

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections continue to represent a significant disease burden causing approximately 200 million infections, 30 million symptomatic illnesses and 30,000 deaths each year. Effective and safe hepatitis A vaccines have been available since the early 1990s. Initially developed for individual prophylaxis, HAV vaccines are now increasingly used to control hepatitis A in endemic areas. The human enteral HAV is eradicable in principle, however, HAV eradication is currently not being pursued. Inactivated HAV vaccines are safe and, after two doses, elicit seroprotection in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults for an estimated 30-40 years, if not lifelong, with no need for a later second booster. The long-term effects of the single-dose live-attenuated HAV vaccines are less well documented but available data suggest they are safe and provide long-lasting immunity and protection. A universal mass vaccination strategy (UMV) based on two doses of inactivated vaccine is commonly implemented in endemic countries and eliminates clinical hepatitis A disease in toddlers within a few years. Consequently, older age groups also benefit due to the herd protection effects. Single-dose UMV programs have shown promising outcomes but need to be monitored for many more years in order to document an effective immune memory persistence. In non-endemic countries, prevention efforts need to focus on 'new' risk groups, such as men having sex with men, prisoners, the homeless, and families visiting friends and relatives in endemic countries. This narrative review presents the current evidence regarding the immunological and epidemiological long-term effects of the hepatitis A vaccination and finally discusses emerging issues and areas for research.

Hepatitis A vaccination

Hepatitis A is an important public health issue worldwide. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) was first licensed in 1992. Both inactivated HepA (HepA-I) and live attenuated HepA (HepA-L) are highly immunogenic and well tolerated, and immune protection postvaccination can persist for at least 20 y. HepA is effective for both preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis, especially among children and young adults. The strategy of HepA vaccination varies in different countries and mainly includes vaccination among high-risk populations, regional childhood vaccination and universal childhood vaccination. The incidence of hepatitis A has decreased greatly in many countries in the last 30 y, but hepatitis A outbreaks frequently occur among high-risk populations and those who have not been covered by universal child vaccination programs in recent years. Disease surveillance and serosurveys are suggested to clarify the shift in the epidemiology of hepatitis A. The long-term persistence of immune protection after one dose of HepA should be further studied, as well as the cost-effective evaluation of different strategies of HepA vaccination. Based on this evidence, the recommendation on HepA vaccination should be put forward scientifically and updated in a timely and well-implemented manner.

Effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination among people living with HIV in Taiwan: Is one dose enough?

BACKGROUND

Single dose hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine had been proven its efficacy in immunocompetent but not immunocompromised hosts. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of one dose versus 2 doses HAV vaccine among people living with HIV (PLHIV).

METHOD

We conducted a 1:1 single center retrospective case-control study for PLHIV in Northern Taiwan. Case patients were those who received single dose HAV vaccine and controls were those who completed standard 2 doses HAV vaccine. Nationwide campaign of single dose HAV vaccine had been practiced for high risk population including PLHIV and those who had newly diagnosed sexually transmitted diseases.

RESULTS

During February 2016 and December 2017, 90 cases received single dose HAV vaccine provided while the other 90 age-matched controls received 2 doses vaccine were enrolled. We found more injection drug users (22.22% vs. 1.11%, p < 0.0001), more co-infection with viral hepatitis C (28.89% vs. 5.56%, p < 0.0001), and history of syphilis infection (56.67% VS 30%, p = 0.0003) in single dose group than 2 doses group. Seroconversion rate at one year was significantly higher in 2 doses group (97.78% vs 56.67%, p < 0.0001). Among single dose group, people with hepatitis B or C virus co-infection (HBV: p = 0.02, aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.002-0.55; HCV: p = 0.002, aOR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58) were less likely to achieve seropositivity, while those who had higher CD4 count at baseline and one year, had better response to vaccine.

CONCLUSION

Two doses HAV vaccine is necessary among PLHIV to achieve sustained seroresponse rather than single dose.

Early Seroreversion After 2 Doses of Hepatitis A Vaccination in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients: Incidence and Associated Factors

Serological responses (Seroresponse) and durability of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination are reduced among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Incidence of and associated factors with early seroreversion (loss of seroresponse) among HIV-positive patients who have achieved seroresponses after two doses of HAV vaccination remain unclear. In this multicenter study, we followed HIV-positive adults who had mounted seroresponses after completing two doses of HAV vaccination during a recent outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017, a 1:4 case-control study was conducted to identify factors associated with seroreversion. Case patients were those with seroreversion, and controls were those with similar follow-up durations who were able to maintain seroresponses. During the study period, 49 of the 1,256 patients (3.9%) seroreverted after a median follow-up of 611 days. In a case-control study, seroreversion was more likely to occur in patients with a higher weight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.703; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.292-2.323, per 10-kg increment) and HIV viremia at the time of vaccination (aOR, 2.922; 95% CI, 1.067-7.924), whereas positive seroresponse at 6 months of HAV vaccination and higher CD4 lymphocyte counts at vaccination were inversely associated with early seroreversion with an aOR of 0.059 (95% CI, 0.020-0.154) and 0.837 (95% CI, 0.704-0.979, per 100-cell/mm³ increment), respectively, in multivariable analyses. Conclusion: During an outbreak setting, early seroreversion following two-dose HAV vaccination occurred in 3.9% of HIV-positive patients. Lower and delayed seroresponses to HAV vaccination, a higher weight, and HIV viremia and lower CD4 lymphocyte counts at the time of HAV vaccination were associated with early seroreversion. Regular monitoring of seroresponse and booster vaccination might be warranted, especially in HIV-positive adults with predictors of early seroreversion.