Antidrug Antibodies: B Cell Immunity Against Therapy

A High Threshold of Biotherapeutic Aggregate Numbers is Needed to Induce an Immunogenic Response In Vitro, In Vivo, and in the Clinic

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is concern that subvisible aggregates in biotherapeutic drug products pose a risk to patient safety. We investigated the threshold of biotherapeutic aggregates needed to induce immunogenic responses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Highly aggregated samples were tested in cell-based assays and induced cellular responses in a manner that depended on the number of particles. The threshold of immune activation varied by disease state (cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, allergy), concomitant therapies, and particle number. Compared to healthy donors, disease state patients showed an equal or lower response at the late phase (7 days), suggesting they may not have a higher risk of responding to aggregates. Xeno-het mice were used to assess the threshold of immune activation in vivo. Although highly aggregated samples (~ 1,600,000 particles/mL) induced a weak and transient immunogenic response in mice, a 100-fold dilution of this sample (~ 16,000 particles/mL) did not induce immunogenicity. To confirm this result, subvisible particles (up to ~ 18,000 particles/mL, containing aggregates and silicone oil droplets) produced under representative administration practices (created upon infusion of a drug product through an IV catheter) did not induce a response in cell-based assays or appear to increase the rate of adverse events or immunogenicity during phase 3 clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

The ability of biotherapeutic aggregates to elicit an immune response in vitro, in vivo, and in the clinic depends on high numbers of particles. This suggests that there is a high threshold for aggregates to induce an immunogenic response which is well beyond that seen in standard biotherapeutic drug products.

Fucosylation and Sialylation of Fc-Fragment of anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Antibodies do not Influence Their Immunogenicity in Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Antibodies targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha] are a mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, they fail to demonstrate efficacy in a considerable proportion of patients. On the other hand, glycosylation of antibodies might influence not only their immunogenicity but also their structure and function. We investigated whether specific glycosylation patterns of the Fc-fragment would affect the immunogenicity of anti-TNF-alpha antibody in monocyte-derived dendritic cells.

METHODS

The effect of a specific Fc-glycosylation pattern on antibody uptake by monocyte-derived dendritic cells [mo-DCs] and how this process shapes the immunologic profile of mo-DCs was investigated. Three N-glycoforms of the anti-TNF-alpha antibody adalimumab, that differed in the content of fucose or sialic acid, were tested: [1] mock treated Humira, abbreviated 'Fuc-G0', where the N-glycan mainly consist of fucose and N-acetylglucosamine [GlcNAc], without sialic acid; [2] 'Fuc-G2S1/G2S2' with fucose and alpha 2,6 linked sialic acid; and [3] 'G2S1/G2S2' with alpha 2,6 linked sialic acid, without fucose.

RESULTS

Our data demonstrated that neither fucosylation nor sialylation of anti-TNF-Abs [Fuc-G0, FucG2S1/G2S2, G2S1/G2S2] influence their uptake by mo-DCs. Additionally, none of the differentially glycosylated antibodies altered CD80, CD86, CD273, CD274 levels on mo-DCs stimulated in with lipopolysaccharide in the presence of antibodies. Next, we evaluated the levels of cytokines in the supernatant of mo-DCs stimulated with lipopolysaccharide in the presence of Fuc-G0, Fuc-G2S1/G2S2 or G2S1/G2S2-glycosylated anti-TNF antibodies. Only IL-2 and IL-17 levels were downregulated, and IL-5 production was upregulated by uptake of Fuc-G0 antibodies, as compared to control without antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The specific modification in the Fc-glycosylation pattern of anti-TNF-alpha Abs does not affect their immunogenicity under the tested conditions. As this study was limited to mo-DCs, further investigation is required to clarify whether Ab uptake into mo-DCs might change the immunological profile of T- and B-cells, in order to ultimately reduce the formation of anti-drug antibodies and to improve the patient care.

Controlled induction of immune tolerance by mesenchymal stem cells transferred by maternal microchimerism

Feto-maternal immune tolerance is established during pregnancy; however, its mechanism and maintenance remain underexplored. Here, we investigated whether mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) as non-inherited maternal antigens (NIMAs) transferred by maternal microchimerism could induce immune tolerance. We showed that MSCs had a potential equivalent to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to induce immune tolerance and that MSCs were essential to induce tolerance to MSC-specific antigens. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MSCs as NIMAs transferred by maternal microchimerism could induce robust immune tolerance that can be further enhanced using a drug. Our data shed light on induction of immune tolerance and serve as a foundation to develop new therapies using maternally derived cells for autoimmune or genetic diseases.

Effects of Treatment with the Hypomethylating Agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in Murine Type II Collagen-Induced Arthritis

The emerging role of epigenetics in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases has recently attracted much interest on the possible use of epigenetic modulators for the prevention and treatment of these diseases. In particular, we and others have shown that drugs that inhibit DNA methylation, such as azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC), already used for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, exert powerful beneficial effects in rodent models of type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barrè syndrome. Along this line of research, we have presently studied the effects of DAC in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis induced by type II collagen and have demonstrated that DAC administration was associated with a significant amelioration of the clinical condition, along with in vivo and ex vivo modification of the immunological profile of the so-treated mice, that exhibited a diminished production of Th1 and Th17 pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduction of anti-type II collagen autoantibodies.

Transferon™, a peptide mixture with immunomodulatory properties is not immunogenic when administered with various adjuvants

Transferon, a human dialyzable leukocyte extract (hDLE), is a biotherapeutic that comprises a complex mixture of low-molecular-weight peptides (< 10 kDa) and is used to treat diseases with an inflammatory component. Some biotherapeutics, including those composed of peptides, can induce anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that block or diminish their therapeutic effect. Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated peptide-derived drug immunogenicity. In this study, the immunogenicity of Transferon was examined in a murine model during an immunization scheme using the following adjuvants: Al(OH)₃, incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA), or Titermax Gold. The inoculation scheme entailed three routes of administration (intraperitoneal, Day 1; subcutaneous, Day 7; and intramuscular, Day 14) using 200 μg Transferon/inoculation. Serum samples were collected on Day 21. Total IgG levels were quantitated by affinity chromatography, and specific antibodies against components of Transferon were analyzed by dot-blot and ELISA. Ovalbumin (OVA, 44 kDa) and peptides from hydrolyzed collagen (PFHC, < 17 kDa) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, in the same inoculation scheme and analyses for Transferon. OVA, PFHC, and Transferon increased total IgG concentrations in mice. However, only IgG antibodies against OVA were detected. Based on the results, it is concluded that Transferon does not induce generation of specific antibodies against its components in this model, regardless of adjuvant and route of administration. These results support the safety of Transferon by confirming its inability to induce ADA in this animal model.

Immunogenicity to Biotherapeutics - The Role of Anti-drug Immune Complexes

Biological molecules are increasingly becoming a part of the therapeutics portfolio that has been either recently approved for marketing or those that are in the pipeline of several biotech and pharmaceutical companies. This is largely based on their ability to be highly specific relative to small molecules. However, by virtue of being a large protein, and having a complex structure with structural variability arising from production using recombinant gene technology in cell lines, such therapeutics run the risk of being recognized as foreign by a host immune system. In the context of immune-mediated adverse effects that have been documented to biological drugs thus far, including infusion reactions, and the evolving therapeutic platforms in the pipeline that engineer different functional modules in a biotherapeutic, it is critical to understand the interplay of the adaptive and innate immune responses, the pathophysiology of immunogenicity to biological drugs in instances where there have been immune-mediated adverse clinical sequelae and address technical approaches for their laboratory evaluation. The current paradigm in immunogenicity evaluation has a tiered approach to the detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) elicited in vivo to a biotherapeutic; alongside with the structural, biophysical, and molecular information of the therapeutic, these analytical assessments form the core of the immunogenicity risk assessment. However, many of the immune-mediated adverse effects attributed to ADAs require the formation of a drug/ADA immune complex (IC) intermediate that can have a variety of downstream effects. This review will focus on the activation of potential immunopathological pathways arising as a consequence of circulating as well as cell surface bound drug bearing ICs, risk factors that are intrinsic either to the therapeutic molecule or to the host that might predispose to IC-mediated effects, and review the recent literature on prevalence and intensity of established examples of type II and III hypersensitivity reactions that follow the administration of a biotherapeutic. Additionally, we propose methods for the study of immune parameters specific to the biology of ICs that could be of use in conjunction with the detection of ADAs in circulation.