The effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate on lung function and histamine responsiveness in recurrently wheezy infants

Ventilation inhomogeneity in infants with recurrent wheezing

BACKGROUND

The care of infants with recurrent wheezing relies largely on clinical assessment. The lung clearance index (LCI), a measure of ventilation inhomogeneity, is a sensitive marker of early airway disease in children with cystic fibrosis, but its utility has not been explored in infants with recurrent wheezing.

OBJECTIVE

To assess ventilation inhomogeneity using LCI among infants with a history of recurrent wheezing compared with healthy controls.

METHODS

This is a case-control study, including 37 infants with recurrent wheezing recruited from outpatient clinics, and 113 healthy infants from a longitudinal birth cohort, the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development study. All infants, at a time of clinical stability, underwent functional assessment including multiple breath washout, forced expiratory flows and body plethysmography.

RESULTS

LCI z-score values among infants with recurrent wheeze were 0.84 units (95% CI 0.41 to 1.26) higher than healthy infants (mean (95% CI): 0.26 (-0.11 to 0.63) vs -0.58 (-0.79 to 0.36), p<0.001)). Nineteen percent of recurrently wheezing infants had LCI values that were above the upper limit of normal (>1.64 z-scores). Elevated exhaled nitric oxide, but not symptoms, was associated with abnormal LCI values in infants with recurrent wheeze (p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation inhomogeneity is present in clinically stable infants with recurrent wheezing.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists in virus-induced wheezing : evidence to date

Virus-induced wheezing is a relatively benign entity that is usually transient in early childhood but is responsible for much health care utilization. The condition, seen traditionally as a subset of those children diagnosed as having frequent episodic asthma, is often treated with inhaled corticosteroids, despite their lack of efficacy. However, there remains some confusion differentiating atopic asthma from virus-induced wheezing in young children and their respective treatment strategies.The demonstration of cysteinyl leukotrienes in the nasopharyngeal secretions of infants and young children who wheeze prompted investigation of the role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of virus-induced wheezing for young children with bronchiolitis and virus-induced wheezing.Montelukast, the only leukotriene receptor antagonist studied in young children, has been proven useful in increasing the number of symptom-free days and delaying the recurrence of wheeze in the month following a diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus-induced wheezing in children aged 3-36 months. Subsequently, in children aged 2-5 years with frequent episodic asthma, primarily involving viral induced attacks in this age group, regular therapy with daily montelukast for 12 months reduced the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% over placebo, delayed the time to the first exacerbation by 2 months, and lowered the need to prescribe inhaled corticosteroids as preventative therapy. Additionally, montelukast has been demonstrated to be efficacious as an acute episode modifier in children aged 2-14 years (85% children <6 years) with virus-induced wheezing where it was prescribed at the onset of a viral infection in children with an established pattern of viral induced episodes of wheeze in the preceding year. In this study, emergency department visits were reduced by 45%, visits to all health care practitioners were reduced by 23%, and time of preschool/school and parental time off work was reduced by 33% for children who took montelukast for a median of 10 days.At present, there is good evidence to support the use of bronchodilators in the acute treatment of virus- induced wheezing, and increasing evidence to support the use of leukotriene receptor antagonists, in particular montelukast, in the management of children with virus-induced wheezing.

Asthma

Asthma has been recognized as a disease since the earliest times. In the Corpus Hippocraticum, Hippocrates used the term “ασθμα” to indicate any form of breathing difficulty manifesting itself by panting. Aretaeus of Cappadocia, a well-known Greek physician (second century A.D.), is credited with providing the first detailed description of an asthma attack [13], and to Celsus it was a disease with wheezing and noisy, violent breathing. In the history of Rome, we find many members of the Julio-Claudian family affected with probable atopic respiratory disorders: Caesar Augustus suffered from bronchoconstriction, seasonal rhinitis as well as a highly pruritic skin disease. Claudius suffered from rhinoconjunctivitis and Britannicus was allergic to horse dander [529]. Maimonides (1136–1204) warned that to neglect treatment of asthma could prove fatal, whereas until the 19th century, European scholars defined it as “nervous asthma,” a term that was given to mean a defect of conductivity of the ninth pair of cranial nerves.

Secondary prevention of asthma by the use of Inhaled Fluticasone propionate in Wheezy INfants (IFWIN): double-blind, randomised, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Wheezing and asthma often begins in early childhood, but it is difficult to predict whether or not a wheezy infant will develop asthma. Some researchers suggest that treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at the first signs of wheezing in childhood could prevent the development of asthma later in life. However, other investigators have reported that although such treatment could help control symptoms, the benefits can disappear within months of stopping treatment. We tested our hypothesis that to prevent loss of lung function and worsening asthma later in childhood, anti-inflammatory treatment needs to be started early in life.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, controlled study of inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 mug twice daily in young children who were followed prospectively and randomised after either one prolonged (>1 month) or two medically confirmed wheezy episodes. The dose of study drug was reduced every 3 months to the minimum needed. If the symptoms were not under control by 3 months, open-label fluticasone propionate 100 mug twice daily was added to the treatment. Children were followed-up to 5 years of age, at which point we gave their parents or guardians questionnaires, and measured the children's lung function (specific airways resistance [sR(aw)], forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1]) and airway reactivity (eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation [EVH] challenge). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN86717853.

FINDINGS

We followed 1073 children prospectively, of whom 333 were eligible, and 200 of these began treatment (130 male, median age 1.2 years [range 0.5-4.9]; 101 placebo, 99 treatment); 173 (85 treatment, 88 placebo) completed the follow-up at age five years. The groups did not differ significantly in the proportion of children with current wheeze, physician-diagnosed asthma or use of asthma medication, lung function, or airway reactivity (percentage change in FEV1, adjusted mean for placebo 5.5% [95% CI -2.5 to 13.4]) vs for treatment 5.0% [-2.2 to 12.2], p=0.87). There were no differences in the results after adjustment for open-label fluticasone propionate, nor between the two groups in the time before the open-label drug was added (estimated hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI 0.73-1.73], p=0.60), or the proportion needing the open-label drug (43 [42.57%] placebo, 41 [41.41%] treatment).

INTERPRETATION

The early use of inhaled fluticasone propionate for wheezing in preschool children had no effect on the natural history of asthma or wheeze later in childhood, and did not prevent lung function decline or reduce airway reactivity.

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report on recent studies on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on pulmonary function in young children with asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inhaled corticosteroids are considered the most effective treatment for persistent asthma in children. Appropriate control of childhood asthma may prevent more serious disease or irreversible obstruction in later years. While some authors have described an improvement with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in young children, others found no clinical or functional benefit. Various studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids ameliorate clinical outcomes, and recently a study demonstrated improvement in pulmonary function in young children with asthma. The use of different study designs may explain the lack of consistent results and disagreement regarding the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in these patients.

SUMMARY

Based on the preponderance of evidence, treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in infants and young children with recurrent wheeze and risk factors of developing asthma appears to allow better control of the illness and improve the pulmonary function.

Asthma therapy for children under 5 years of age

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evidence for effectiveness of currently used asthma medication for wheeze in young children is reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of the infant and preschool child with wheezing is complicated by the uncertainty with respect to the aetiology. Difficulties in defining phenotypes and objective outcome parameters combined with the transient nature of symptoms which often resolve spontaneously have confounded many therapeutic studies. Recent studies on the effect of pharmacotherapy in wheezing infants have tried to define a more homogeneous phenotype as well as make a selection of patients that are likely to respond to the studied drug. In addition, these studies have used lung function parameters and nitric oxide as one of the outcome measurements. Studies on the nature of inflammation and the development of airway remodelling in infants and young children are done to further define phenotypes.

SUMMARY

Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines and not even consensus statements on the right approach in pharmacological treatment of wheezing in infants and preschool children. The main issue still is the difficulty in coming to a correct diagnosis. Further studies are needed on the nature and the diagnostics of phenotypes and on the effect of early intervention.

Sodium cromoglycate therapy in wheezing infants: preliminary evidence of beneficial outcome at early school age

BACKGROUND

In order to affect the natural course of childhood wheezing and asthma, anti-inflammatory therapy is often prescribed for young wheezing children, but there is lack of long-term follow-up data.

METHODS

Eighty-two of the original 100 children, hospitalized for wheezing under the age of 2 years in 1992-1993, were re-examined at school age in 1999. The children had participated in an open, randomized, parallel-group trial including a 4-month intervention with inhaled sodium cromoglycate (SCG) or budesonide (BUD). The baseline data, including data on atopy, eosinophilia and viral etiology, were prospectively collected on admission.

RESULTS

At early school age (median 7.2 years), asthma was present in 33 (40%) children. There was less asthma in the original SCG (21%) than in the control group (54%) (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07-0.77). The figure was 46% in the BUD group. When the analyses were performed separately for atopic and non-atopic infants, the difference was significant only among atopics. The lowered risk for asthma in the SCG group remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis when adjusted for age, sex and atopy, and further when adjusted for earlier episodes of wheezing and respiratory syncytial virus identification. However, after adjustment for blood eosinophilia, the significance was lost, albeit the risk for asthma remained low (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.04-1.12). A sensitivity analysis, which was done by including the six drop-outs of the SCG group as unfavorable and the 12 drop-outs of other groups as favorable outcomes in the model, did not change the direction of the result (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.26-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

An early SCG intervention in infants hospitalized for wheezing was associated with a lowered risk for early school-age asthma, especially in infants with evidence of atopy.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP has been reformulated using a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) propellant which is free from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: (1) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo with both CFC and HFA propellants in the treatment of chronic asthma. (2) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. (3) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches were current as of January 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group design trials for a minimum period of four weeks, in children and adults comparing CFC-BDP or HFA-BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. We analysed data with RevMan Analyses 1.0.2.

MAIN RESULTS

60 studies recruiting 6542 participants met the inclusion criteria. CFC-BDP (57 studies): In non-oral steroid treated patients, at doses of 400 mcg/day or less CFC-BDP produced significant improvements from baseline in a number of efficacy measures compared with placebo, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 360 ml (95% CI 260 to 460); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 12.41% (95% CI 8.18 to 16.64) and morning peak expiratory flow rate (am PEF) WMD 35.95 L/min (95% CI 27.85 to 44.04). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta-2 agonist use compared with placebo of -2.32 puffs/d (95% CI -2.55 to -2.09) and reduced the relative risk (RR) of trial withdrawal due to an asthma exacerbation 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.51). Subgroup analyses based on treatment duration provide support to the proposal that a treatment period of greater than four weeks is required to realise a fuller treatment effect. In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD -4.91 mg/d (95% CI -5.88 to -3.94 mg/d) and greater likelihood of withdrawing oral steroid treatment RR 8.02 (95% CI 3.23 to 19.92). HFA-BDP (3 studies): In non-oral steroid-treated patients, HFA-BDP was significantly more effective than placebo in improving FEV1, morning and evening PEF, FEF25 to 75%, reduced asthma symptoms and beta2-agonists daily consumption. Significant effects for such outcomes were apparent after six weeks of treatment. In oral steroid treated patients, HFA-BDP improved significantly FEV1 and am PEF. The summary estimates for these outcomes suggested a high level of heterogeneity, and divergent aims of the studies may contribute to the variation we observed. Limited data on adverse events were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of CFC-BDP and HFA-BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in people with severe asthma.

Respiratory infections and asthma: current treatment strategies

Infections such as lower respiratory illness potentially contribute to the initiation of asthma and are major factors in recurring acute exacerbations of the condition. Although typical bacterial respiratory pathogens such as Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Hemophilus influenzae do not initiate asthmatic exacerbations, data from a subgroup of adults suggest a potential role for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in the onset of asthma. Common cold viruses, predominantly respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in young children and rhinoviruses in older children and adults, are the major causes of acute exacerbations of asthma. These exacerbations are not prevented with maintenance therapies that are used for chronic asthma, but do respond to short courses of systemic corticosteroids. There are continued attempts to produce a successful vaccine and antiviral agents for the treatment of RSV that are more effective and more practical to use than ribavirin, which is currently the only available antiviral for RSV. The prevention and treatment of rhinovirus infections have focused on the major receptor for the virus, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which is located on respiratory epithelial cells. A multivalent, recombinant, antibody fusion protein identified as CFY196 has high avidity for ICAM-1 and has the potential to protect against rhinovirus infection. Another approach for preventing and treating rhinovirus infection uses a recombinant, soluble, truncated form of ICAM-1 in which the transmembrane and intracellular domains of the protein have been deleted. An initial clinical study on this agent demonstrated clinical efficacy in ameliorating the symptoms of experimental rhinovirus infection in volunteers, but did not significantly prevent infection.

Fluticasone improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

This study assessed the effects of treatment with fluticasone in children younger than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing and risk factors of developing asthma. This double-blind placebo-controlled study randomized children to receive fluticasone (125 mug; n = 14) or placebo (n = 12) twice daily for 6 months. Pulmonary function was assessed at the beginning and end, and parents filled out a daily diary recording respiratory symptoms, need for rescue medication, and emergency care. The SD score of maximum flow at functional residual capacity was -0.74 +/- 0.6 at the beginning and 0.44 +/- 1 at the end for the fluticasone group (p = 0.001), and -0.79 +/- 0.3 at the beginning and -0.78 +/- 1.4 at the end for the placebo group (p = 0.97). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) was observed between treatments. The percentage of symptom-free days was 91.3 +/- 7% for fluticasone and 83.9 +/- 10% for placebo (p = 0.05). The number of respiratory exacerbations was 2.1 +/- 1.7 and 4.1 +/- 3 (p = 0.04), and the percentage of days on albuterol was 8.6 +/- 6% and 16.3 +/- 9% (p = 0.028). Treatment with fluticasone twice daily for 6 months improves pulmonary function and clinical outcomes in children with asthma younger than 2 years.

Efficacy of fluticasone propionate on lung function and symptoms in wheezy infants

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of recurrent or persistent wheeze in infancy remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of 3 months of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate, 200 microg daily (FP200), on lung function and symptom scores in wheezy infants. Moreover, we evaluated whether infants with atopy and/or eczema respond better to FP200 as compared with non-atopic infants. Forced expiratory flow (Vmax(FRC)) was measured at baseline and after treatment. Sixty-five infants were randomized to receive FP200 or placebo, and 62 infants (mean age, 11.3 months) completed the study. Mean Vmax(FRC), expressed as a Z score, was significantly below normal at baseline and after treatment in both groups. The change from baseline of Vmax(FRC) was not different between the two treatment arms. After 6 weeks of treatment, and not after 13 weeks, the FP200 group had a significantly higher percentage of symptom-free days and a significant reduction in mean daily cough score compared with placebo. Separate analysis of treatment effect in infants with atopy or eczema showed no effect modification. We conclude that in wheezy infants, after 3 months of treatment with fluticasone, there was no improvement in lung function and no reduction in respiratory symptoms compared with placebo.

Inhaled fluticasone dipropionate decreases levels of nitric oxide in recurrenty wheezy infants

We examined the effect of inhaled fluticasone diproprionate (FDP) on symptoms, lung function (FEV(0.5)), and exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) in infants with recurrent wheeze and raised Fe(NO). Thirty-one infants aged 6-19 months (mean, 12.7 months; 12 girls) completed the study. All infants had a history of recurrent wheeze and a parental history of atopy. All children had raised Fe(NO), as determined by an offline tidal breathing technique prior to randomization. Lung function and Fe(NO) were assessed before and after 4 weeks of treatment with FDP or placebo. The parents recorded daily symptoms during the treatment period. Sixteen infants received FDP and 15 the placebo for 4 weeks. At completion of the study, infants treated with FDP had a significant reduction in Fe(NO) (35.0 ppb to 16.5 ppb) compared to those that received placebo (35.2 ppb to 30.2 ppb) (P = 0.05). Small increases in FEV(0.5) were observed in both groups, but these changes were not different between groups (P = 0.8). Symptom scores were not significantly different in either group following the intervention. We showed that a moderate dose of inhaled FDP reduces levels of Fe(NO), a potential marker of airway inflammation, even in the absence of significant changes in lung function and symptoms.

Effect of inhaled steroids on lung function in young children: a cohort study

The objectives of the present study were to determine the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treating recurrent bronchial obstruction (rBO) in young children up to 2 yrs of age and to assess possible modifying effects of ICS on lung function in young children with rBO. From an observational, noninterventional birth cohort of 3,754 newborn children (3,697 with complete questionnaire data by 2 yrs of age), 306 children with documented rBO by age 2 yrs (cases) were identified along with 306 matched controls. Two tidal flow/volume measurements were taken, one at presentation of disease (children were steroid naive) and one at 2 yrs of age (mean age 11.2 and 25.6 months, respectively), from: 21 cases who subsequently received ICS (ICS+); 33 who did not (ICS-); and in 15 controls. The mean +/- SD duration of ICS treatment was 10.3 +/- 6.5 months. The main outcomes were treatment with ICS and baseline ratio of time to peak expiratory flow/total expiratory time (tPTEF/tE). From the entire cohort, 77 children (2.1%) and 21% of children with rBO had received ICS by 2 yrs of age. Baseline tPTEF/tE was significantly lower at the first visit only in ICS+ as compared to ICS- subjects, as well as in ICS+ and ICS- as compared to controls. The mean difference in baseline tPTEF/tE from first to second visit was borderline statistically significant in the ICS+ group only and correlated significantly with duration of ICS treatment. The present observational cohort study demonstrated that one-fifth of young children with recurrent bronchial obstruction had received inhaled corticosteroids. Early inhaled corticosteroid treatment improved lung function by age 2 yrs, mostly in those with the longest duration of treatment.

Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in children less than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) in young children with recurrent wheezing and risk factors for asthma. Our study design was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of inhaled FP 50 mcg twice daily (FP 100) and 125 mcg twice daily (FP 250), for 6 months. Outcome measures included number of wheezing episodes, days on albuterol, height standard deviation score (height SDS), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase fraction (AKP), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and serum levels of cortisol (SC). Our subjects were 30 patients, aged 7-24 months. Mean wheezing episodes were 6.0 +/- 1.9, 1.9 +/- 1.9, and 2.8 +/- 1.2; mean days of albuterol use were 24.3 +/- 1.3, 6.5 +/- 0.8, and 9.1 +/- 0.8, per patient for placebo, FP100, and FP250 groups, respectively. There was a significant reduction in clinical outcome in the two FP groups compared to placebo (P < 0.01). No significant correlations were found between FP dosage and height SDS, OC, AKP, IGFBP-3, and SC. In conclusion, in young children with asthmatic symptoms, FP at 50 and 125 mcg b.i.d. for 6 months significantly improved respiratory symptoms without causing significant side effects on growth and bone metabolism.

Efficacy of steroid treatments in the asthmatic preschool child

Asthma represents the most common chronic disease in preschool children. Hospital admission for wheezy disorders is the most common paediatric chronic disease causing hospital admission and more common in young children than later in life.

Beclomethasone dipropionate and salbutamol by metered dose inhaler in infants and small children with recurrent wheezing

The efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) to control respiratory symptoms was evaluated in 31 children under age 2 years with recurrent wheezing. The study was conducted in a double-blind, parallel, and placebo-controlled fashion. The two study groups received either salbutamol plus BDP 200 microg bid by metered dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer, or salbutamol MDI plus a placebo. Inhaled corticosteroid (IC) and placebo were administered for 8 weeks. Patients were seen every 2 weeks as outpatients, and their progress was evaluated by clinical examination and a daily symptom score card. At the end of the study, patients in both groups had significantly decreased symptoms. No significant difference was found between BDP and placebo groups regarding clinical score, number of salbutamol doses, sleep disturbances, number of symptom-free days, feelings of insecurity of mothers regarding the infants' life due to wheezing, and mothers' perceptions of progress in their infants' respiratory symptoms. We conclude that salbutamol plus 200 microg bid of BDP inhaled from an MDI with a spacer for 8 weeks is no better than salbutamol alone for decreasing recurrent wheezing in small children under age 24 months.

Outcome of asthma in children and adolescents at a specialty-based care program

BACKGROUND

Asthma remains a major cause of morbidity for children despite national guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcome from a structured specialty-based care program.

METHODS

Comparison of previous and subsequent years for children ranging from infancy to adolescence who entered a specialty clinic program at a university hospital serving a widely dispersed patient population. One hundred fifty-seven patients previously receiving primary care for their respiratory symptoms were seen during the study period; 23 were lost to followup, 15 were excluded because of other serious concurrent medical problems, and 119 were available for outcome analysis. Evaluation included historical data base from a structured interview, evaluation of pulmonary physiology, and allergy skin testing. Treatment decisions were evidence-based. Patient and/or family education was targeted at decision-making. Toll-free telephone access to the specialty service was provided around the clock. Frequency of unscheduled medical care, hospitalizations, sleep disturbance, activity interference, attainment of defined criteria for control, and medication use were quantified.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-five acute care visits were reduced to 47, and 99 hospitalizations were decreased to 10 (P < 0.001 for both). Nocturnal symptoms and exercise limitation decreased significantly (P < 0.001 for both). All criteria for control of asthma were met in 89% of 75 without tobacco smoke exposure and 50% of 44 with exposure (P < 0.0001 for the difference in outcome). Frequent antibiotic use for respiratory symptoms were eliminated after entering the program. Maintenance medications were not used in 72 with an intermittent pattern of viral respiratory infection-induced asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid use increased from 38 to 68% among 47 subjects with a chronic pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity from asthma is largely prevented with often less, but better selected, medication than had been occurring in previous primary care. These data have implications for revised guidelines directed at primary care physicians.

Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone

BACKGROUND

The role of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of wheeze in infancy remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of inhaled fluticasone on symptoms in a group of wheezy infants who had a high risk of progressing to childhood asthma.

METHODS

A total of 52 infants, under 1 year of age, with a history of wheeze or cough and a history (personal or first degree relative) of atopy were prescribed either 150 microg fluticasone twice daily (group F) or placebo (group P), via metered dose inhaler, for 12 weeks following a two week run in period. Symptoms were scored in a parent held diary and the mean daily symptom score (MDS) and symptom free days (SFD) calculated for each two week period.

RESULTS

Thirty seven infants completed the study. Both MDS and SFD improved significantly between the run in and final two week period in group F, but not group P, with a mean difference in change (95% CI) between groups of 1.12 (0.05 to 2.18) for MDS and median difference of 3.0 (0.002 to 8.0) for SFD.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of clinical symptoms in response to fluticasone can be shown in this high risk group of infants. In the absence of effective alternatives inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in this patient group.

Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in infancy

The inability to accurately predict the outcome of infants with recurrent wheezy bronchitis makes the early use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) controversial. Data from bronchoalveolar lavages and epidemiological surveys suggest a persistent inflammation of the airways in the more severe cases. Prospective studies, mostly with nebulized corticosteroids, have demonstrated clinical efficacy on daytime and nightime symptoms, reduced requirements for rescue bronchodilators and a real steroid sparing effect. In infants with episodic viral-associated wheeze with or without interval symptoms, ICS use carries the risk of overtreatment and of adverse effects. Long-term prospective studies are urgently required to assess the efficacy and safety of ICS and their possible effects on the natural history of infantile asthma.

The effect of inhaled budesonide on symptoms, lung function, and cold air and methacholine responsiveness in 2- to 5-year-old asthmatic children

We hypothesized that measurement of lung function (LF) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) could serve as supplemental tools in evaluating the efficacy of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic children aged 2 to 5 yr. We studied 38 children (mean age: 53 mo; range: 35 to 71 mo) with moderately severe asthma in a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study involving 8 wk of treatment. Budesonide (BUD) 400 microgram twice daily was administered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler and metal spacer device. Symptom scores (SSc) and use of short-acting beta(2)-agonist were monitored with diary cards. LF in awake children was measured as the specific airway resistance (sRaw), using whole-body plethysmography; as resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint); and as resistance and reactance at 5 Hz (Rrs5, Xrs5) by the impulse oscillation technique. Cold air challenge (CACh) and methacholine challenge (MCh) were used to assess BHR. Children in the BUD group experienced significantly fewer night- and daytime symptoms (p < 0.05) and more symptom-free days (p < 0.05), but not nights (p = 0.07), than children in the placebo group. Daytime (p < 0.05) but not nighttime (p = 0.09) use of rescue medication and asthma exacerbation rates (3.7 versus 9.3 exacerbations/yr) (p = 0.006) were both in favor of BUD. LF measured with the Rint technique, Rrs5, and Xrs5 were significantly improved by BUD. BHR as measured by CACh improved significantly with BUD, whereas no improvement was found on MCh. In conclusion, inhaled BUD at a total dose of 800 microgram daily significantly improved SSc, asthma exacerbation rates, lung function, and BHR as assessed by CACh in asthmatic children aged 2 to 5 yr.

Inhaled steroids for episodic viral wheeze of childhood

BACKGROUND

Recurrent episodic wheeze in association with viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a specific clinical illness distinct from persistent atopic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to identify whether corticosteroid treatment, given episodically or daily, is beneficial to children with viral episodic wheeze.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroid treatment versus placebo in children under 17 years of age who suffer from 'episodic viral wheeze', which is defined by wheeze in association with coryzal symptoms with minimal or no intercurrent lower respiratory tract symptoms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for missing information. Studies were categorised according to whether treatment was given episodically or daily (maintenance). The primary outcome was episodes requiring oral corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes addressed episode severity, frequency and duration and parental treatment preference.

MAIN RESULTS

Five randomised controlled trials in children with a history of mild episodic viral wheeze were identified. Most of the children had previously required no or infrequent oral corticosteroids and had very infrequent hospital admissions. There were three studies of preschool children given episodic high dose inhaled corticosteroid (1.6 - 2.25 mg per day), two using a crossover and one a parallel design. The two studies of maintenance corticosteroid (400 micrograms per day) were parallel in design, one of pre-school children the other of children aged 7 -9 years. Results from the two cross-over studies of episodic high dose inhaled corticosteroids showed a reduced requirement for oral corticosteroids (Relative risk (RR)=0.53, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.04). In these 2 double blind studies, this treatment was preferred by the children's parents over placebo (RR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.48,0.87). Maintenance low dose inhaled corticosteroids did not show any clear reduction over placebo in the proportion of episodes requiring oral corticosteroids (N=2 trials, RR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.23,2.90) or in those requiring hospital admission (N=1 trial, RR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.01,4.11).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Episodic high dose inhaled corticosteroids provide a partially effective strategy for the treatment of mild episodic viral wheeze of childhood. There is no current evidence to favour maintenance low dose inhaled corticosteroids in the prevention and management of episodic mild viral induced wheeze.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP is now frequently used as the reference treatment against which these newer agents are being compared.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: a) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. b) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. c) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register (1999) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and Glaxo Wellcome for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing BDP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager (Revman) 4.0.3 with Metaview 3.1.

MAIN RESULTS

52 studies were selected for inclusion (3459 subjects). The studies were generally of high methodological quality. In non-oral steroid treated patients, BDP produced significant improvements in a number of efficacy measures compared to placebo including FEV1 weighted mean difference (WMD) 340ml (95% CI 190-500ml); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 6% (95% CI 0.4 to 11.5%) and morning PEFR WMD 50 L/min (95% CI 8 to 92 L/min). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to placebo WMD 1.75 puffs/d (95% CI 1.4 to 2.4 puffs/d) and reduced the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation relative risk (RR) 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.43). In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD 5 mg/d (95% CI 4 to 6 mg/d) and a higher likelihood of discontinuing oral prednisolone RR 0.54 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.67). There was little evidence for a clincially worthwhile dose response effect, but few studies recruited patients with more severe asthma.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in patients with severe disease.

Early nebulized budesonide in the treatment of bronchiolitis and the prevention of postbronchiolitic wheezing

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis and in the prevention of postbronchiolitic wheezing.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed.

PATIENTS

Forty infants with bronchiolitis (83% RSV), mean age 13.5 weeks (range 4 to 41 weeks), were admitted to the Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, Brighton, UK.

METHODS

Twenty-one infants received nebulized budesonide 1 mg every 12 hours for 5 days, then 500 micrograms every 12 hours continuing to a total of 6 weeks. Nineteen received nebulized placebo (0.9% saline) for 6 weeks. A clinical scoring system was used to rate acute symptoms, and diary cards were used to assess persistent respiratory symptoms over a 6-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the budesonide and placebo groups in change in clinical score 48 hours after trial entry, mean oxygen requirements, or length of hospital stay during the acute illness. At 6-month follow-up, the two groups did not differ significantly in prevalence of wheeze, respiratory symptom scores, or proportion requiring bronchodilators or steroids.

CONCLUSION

This study did not demonstrate that a 6-week course of nebulized budesonide reduced the symptoms of acute bronchiolitis or prevented postbronchiolitic wheezing.