Lesinurad in combination with allopurinol: results of a phase 2, randomised, double-blind study in patients with gout with an inadequate response to allopurinol

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-phenyl substituted pyridine derivatives as potential dual inhibitors of XOR and URAT1

Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) and uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) are two most widely studied targets involved in production and reabsorption of uric acid, respectively. Marketed drugs almost target XOR or URAT1, but sometimes, single agents might not achieve aim of lowering uric acid to ideal value in clinic. Thus, therapeutic strategies of combining XOR inhibitors with uricosuric drugs were proposed and implemented. Based on our initial work of virtual screening, A and B were potential hits for dual-targeted inhibitors on XOR/URAT1. By docking A/B with XOR/URAT1 respectively, compounds I1-7 were designed to get different degree of inhibition effect on XOR and URAT1, and I7 showed the best inhibitory effect on XOR (IC50 = 0.037 ± 0.001 μM) and URAT1 (IC50 = 546.70 ± 32.60 μM). Further docking research on I7 with XOR/URAT1 led to the design of compounds II with the significantly improved inhibitory activity on XOR and URAT1, such as II11 and II15. Especially, for II15, the IC50 of XOR is 0.006 ± 0.000 μM, superior to that of febuxostat (IC50 = 0.008 ± 0.000 μM), IC50 of URAT1 is 12.90 ± 2.30 μM, superior to that of benzbromarone (IC50 = 27.04 ± 2.55 μM). In acute hyperuricemia mouse model, II15 showed significant uric acid lowering effect. The results suggest that II15 had good inhibitory effect on XOR/URAT1, with the possibility for further investigation in in-vivo models of hyperuricemia.

Systematic review and model-based analysis to identify whether renal safety risks of URAT1 inhibitors are fully determined by uric acid-lowering efficacies

OBJECTIVE

Renal safety risk is currently an important factor that hinders the development of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors. This study aimed to compare the renal safety and uric acid-lowering efficacy of different URAT1 inhibitors and clarify the association between them.

METHODS

A systematic review of published randomized controlled trials on URAT1 inhibitors was conducted to investigate the incidence of renal safety events. A model-based analysis was performed to predict the uric acid-lowering efficacy of representative URAT1 inhibitors.

RESULTS

The overall renal safety event incidences of lesinurad, verinurad, dotinurad, SHR4640, and benzbromarone in patients with hyperuricemia were 11.2 % (142/1264), 12.0 % (34/284), 0.5 % (2/421), 2.3 % (5/213), and 1.3 % (5/393), respectively. A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was used to establish the dose-exposure-effect relationship of lesinurad, verinurad, dotinurad, and SHR4640 with or without the combination of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). The efficacy ranking of the intermediate dose of URAT1 inhibitors with once-daily dosing was 2 mg dotinurad > 10 mg verinurad > 5 mg SHR4640 > 400 mg lesinurad. The combination of 80 mg febuxostat and 600 mg allopurinol reduced the 24-h cumulative renal uric acid excretion by 48.4 % and 48.3 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Uric acid-lowering efficacy is not an independent factor for the renal safety risk of different URAT1 inhibitors, and structural differences could be responsible for the difference. The adverse renal effects of URAT1 inhibitors are dose-dependent, and the combination with high doses of XOIs can significantly reduce the renal safety risk by reducing uric acid excretion by the kidneys.

The Stiff Joint: Comparative Evaluation of Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With Urate Lowering Agents in Managing Acute Gout

Gout, an extremely painful form of arthritis, is triggered by the innate immune system's response to the accumulation of monosodium urate crystals in specific joints and surrounding tissues. This condition is characterized by recurring episodes of excruciating arthritis flares, interspersed with periods of disease quiescence. Over time, gout can result in disability, tophi formation, and severe pain. The treatment of gout is centered around two main objectives: alleviating inflammation and pain during acute gout attacks and long-term management to reduce serum urate levels and mitigate the risk of future attacks. Addressing inflammation and pain during acute attacks is often complicated by various factors, including underlying health conditions commonly associated with gout, such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. Moreover, gout patients are frequently older and have multiple coexisting health issues, necessitating complex medication regimens. Given the rising prevalence of gout and its associated comorbidities, there's a growing demand for improved treatment options. While existing treatments effectively manage gout in some patients, a significant portion, particularly those with comorbidities, face contraindications to these treatments and require alternative approaches. Innovative medications are required to enhance gout treatment, especially for individuals with concurrent health conditions. These considerations underscore the importance of reviewing both monotherapy and combination therapy approaches for acute gout treatment.

Outcome reporting in randomized trials in gout: A systematic scoping review from the OMERACT gout working group assessing the uptake of the core outcome set

OBJECTIVE

The selection and reporting of core outcome measures in clinical trials is essential for patients, researchers, and healthcare providers for clinical research to have an impact on healthcare. In this systematic scoping review, we aimed to quantify the extent to which gout clinical trials are collecting and reporting data in accordance with the core outcome domains from Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) published in 2009 applicable for both acute and chronic trials and evaluate the reporting according to the core domains before and after the 2009 OMERACT endorsement.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) allocating people with gout versus an active pharmacological gout treatment or a control comparator (no date limitation). We extracted the data in accordance with the core outcome sets, focusing individually on core outcome domains and the core outcome measurements for acute and chronic trials, respectively. In this study 'Acute trials' reflect studies that describe interventions for short term management of gout flares, and 'chronic trials' describe interventions for long-term urate lowering therapy in the management of gout.

RESULTS

From 8,522 records identified in the database search, 134 full text papers were reviewed, and 71 trials were included, of which 36 were acute and 35 were chronic. Only 3 of 36 (8%) acute trials reported all five core domains and none of the 35 included chronic trials reported all 7 core domains. In the acute trials, twenty-seven unique measurement instruments across the 5 core domains were identified. For chronic trials there were 31 unique measurement instruments used across the 7 core domains. Serum urate was reported in 100% of the chronic trials and gout flares in 80%. However, other core domains were reported in <30% of chronic trials. In particular the patient-important domains such as HR-QOL, patient global assessment and activity limitations were rarely reported. A broad variety of different measurement instruments were used to assess each endorsed core domain, a minority of trials used the OMERACT endorsed instruments. For acute trials, the number reporting on all core domains was consistently low and no change was detected before and after the endorsement of the core domains in 2009. None of the included chronic trials reported on all 7 endorsed core domains at any time.

CONCLUSION

In this study we found a low adherence with the intended endorsed (i.e., core) outcome domains for acute and chronic gout studies which represents a poor uptake of the global OMERACT efforts for the minimum of what should be measured in clinical trials. In addition, there is a significant variation in how the OMERACT endorsed outcome domains have been measured. This systematic review demonstrates the need for continuous encouragement among gout researchers to adhere to OMERACT core domains as well as further guidance on outcome measurements reporting.

REGISTRATION

Prospero: CRD42019151316.

Transdermal delivery of allopurinol to acute hyperuricemic mice via polymer microneedles for the regulation of serum uric acid levels

Allopurinol (AP) is widely used to treat hyperuricemia which may cause severe side effects upon oral administration. Alternative means for the treatment of hyperuricemia are demanded to simultaneously facilitate drug absorption, patient compliance, and fewer side effects. In this study, a new polymer microneedle (MN) system was developed for the transdermal delivery of AP to acute hyperuricemic mice. This study aims to achieve the controllable regulation of serum uric acid (SUA) levels with fewer side effects compared with oral administration. The matrix of polymer MNs consisted of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and polycaprolactone (PCL), in which the rapid dissolution of PVP offers a rapid dissolution of AP into the blood and the biodegradability of PCL resulting in a sustainable drug release behavior. An in vivo study demonstrated that the AP-loaded MN system can effectively reduce the SUA levels as oral administration with lower side effects, which will be conducive to reducing the adverse reactions and improving the bioavailability of AP. This MN-mediated strategy can facilitate transcutaneous hyperuricemia treatment and provide a new alternative for the exploration of clinical treatment of hyperuricemia and improvement of patient compliance.

Comparative efficacy and safety of uricosuric agents in the treatment of gout or hyperuricemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The current world witnesses a greatly increased prevalence and incidence of hyperuricemia and gout with unfortunately the comparative efficacy and safety of present available uricosuric agents remaining uncertain. We herein aimed to investigate the most appropriate uricosuric agent for gout or hyperuricemia patients.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 2 July 2022 were searched to retrieve eligible studies assessing efficacy and safety of uricosuric drugs in hyperuricemia or gout patients. Network meta-analysis was carried out using the Stata 16.0 software.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials comprising 1851 patients were eventually included. Network meta-analysis showed that dotinurad 4 mg once daily, verinurad, dotinurad 2 mg once daily, dotinurad 1 mg once daily, and benzbromarone were the top 5 effective treatments to achieve target serum uric acid. Furthermore, dotinurad 4 mg once daily was more effective at achieving urate-lowering targets (RR of dotinurad 4 mg once daily vs. probenecid: 1.68, 95% CI [1.13; 2.50]) and safer (RR of probenecid vs. dotinurad 4 mg once daily: 1.77, 95% CI [0.69; 4.56]) than probenecid.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrated an important absolute benefit of dotinurad 4 mg once daily to achieve target serum uric acid and low risk of adverse events for drug treatment of gout or hyperuricemia patients. Additionally, verinurad might be used as an alternative uricosuric therapeutic option to dotinurad. These findings provided further comprehensive insight into the treatment value of current uricosuric agents for gout or hyperuricemia. Key Points 1. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis examining the efficacy and safety of currently available uricosuric agents in gout or hyperuricemia patients. 2. Recommended doses of dotinurad 4mg once daily used for the treatment of gout or hyperuricemia patients can significantly decrease serum uric acid levels. 3. The present findings will provide further comprehensive insight into the treatment value of certain uricosuric agents for gout or hyperuricemia.

Risk of Erectile Dysfunction in Male Patients with Gout Treated with Febuxostat or Allopurinol: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with the use of allopurinol and febuxostat in adult male gout patients.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using TriNetX (Cambridge, MA, USA), a global federated health research network that provides real-time electronic medical record datasets. We analyzed and compared the associated risk of ED in gout patients who started taking allopurinol or febuxostat within 12 months. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for demographic variables, comorbidities, and medication use. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of the outcome of interest. The hazard ratio (HR) and associated confidence intervals were calculated along with the proportionality test using R's Survival Package v3.2-3.

RESULTS

We identified 679,862 patients with gout among 107,517,445 patients in the database. Of these patients, 24,000 were treated with febuxostat and 299,726 with allopurinol. After propensity matching, 9075 patients receiving febuxostat without allopurinol (febuxostat group) and 9075 corresponding patients receiving allopurinol without febuxostat (allopurinol group) were analyzed for comparison. Among all male patients over 19 years of age, febuxostat was associated with a significantly higher risk of ED versus allopurinol (HR 1.354; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003-1.829; log rank test, p = 0.047). After subgroup analysis, in gout patients aged 19-64 years, a significantly higher incidence of ED was observed in the febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group (HR 2.002, 95% CI 1.282-3.126). The risk of ED did not differ significantly between the allopurinol and febuxostat groups in gout patients older than 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Febuxostat may be associated with a higher risk of ED than allopurinol in adult male patients with gout. Future large-scale prospective studies are warranted to confirm our results.

Effect modification by contextual factors of urate-lowering therapy on serum urate in people with gout: A systematic review with meta-regression analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize evidence of the effect of contextual factors (CFs) on efficacy of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on serum urate (SU) as outcome in gout patients.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from (updated) Cochrane reviews were the starting point. RCTs were included if they explored the role of any CF on efficacy of ULT on SU in gout patients. For CFs with sufficient data (i.e. ≥3 trials), a mixed-effects meta-regression analysis was performed with trial and comparison as random effects, whereas specific CFs were modelled as fixed factors.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included. Effect modification by CFs was explored for age, sex, race, renal function, cardiovascular comorbidity, tophi, thiazide-diuretic use, and previous ULT use. Crude data stratified by renal function were available for four trials (36 randomised comparisons), and suitable for meta-analysis. Pooled estimates revealed that gout patients with a normal, mildly-, or moderately impaired renal function were consistently more likely to achieve SU target with ULT compared to control. Among RCTs comparing ULT to placebo (30 comparisons), effects of ULT on achieving SU target were not statistically different for those with normal (OR:66.87;[11.39-392.75]) compared to mildly (OR:28.54;[5.11-159.46]) and moderately (OR:21.45;[3.20-143.64]) impaired renal function, but seemed lower in those with severely impaired (OR:9.13;[0.96-86.97]) renal function. Data were insufficient to draw conclusions on effect modification by other CFs.

CONCLUSION

Few RCTs report stratified analyses exploring the role of CFs. ULT seemed effective in reaching the SU target in all levels of renal function, though severely impaired renal function appeared to render a slight disadvantage.

2021 Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology clinical practice guideline for treatment of gout

BACKGROUND

Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. This clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to provide recommendations based on systematically obtained evidence and values and preferences tailored to the unique needs of patients with gout and hyperuricemia in Asia, Australasia, and the Middle East. The target users of these guidelines are general practitioners and specialists, including rheumatologists, in these regions.

METHODS

Relevant clinical questions were formulated by the Steering Committee. Systematic reviews of evidence were done, and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. A multi-sectoral consensus panel formulated the final recommendations.

RESULTS

The Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology Task Force developed this CPG for treatment of gout with 3 overarching principles and 22 recommendation statements that covered the treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia (2 statements), treatment of acute gout (4 statements), prophylaxis against gout flare when initiating urate-lowering therapy (3 statements), urate-lowering therapy (3 statements), treatment of chronic tophaceous gout (2 statements), treatment of complicated gout and non-responders (2 statements), treatment of gout with moderate to severe renal impairment (1 statement), and non-pharmacologic interventions (5 statements).

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for clinically relevant scenarios in the management of gout were formulated to guide physicians in administering individualized care.

Inequalities in enrollment of women and racial minorities in trials testing uric acid lowering drugs

AIMS

We investigated sex and racial inequalities in clinical trials testing serum uric acid (SUA) lowering drugs and analyzed the temporal trends of participation among the pre-specified demographic groups. Data were collected from publications of clinical trials testing SUA-lowering drugs. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relation between drug approval year and proportion of women and minorities enrolled in clinical studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The mean percentage enrollment of women in clinical trials significantly decreased over the time (r = -0.43, P-value = 0.02). Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in mean percentage enrollment of women among trials testing different SUA-lowering drugs, with the highest representation in rasburicase (71.1%) and the lowest representation of women in dotinurad (0.8%). Over the time, also the mean percentage enrollment of racial minorities decreased, passing from 8.7% to 2.2% in a 10-year period. Women were proportionally underrepresented compared with their share of the population with asymptomatic hyperuricemia, overall (participation-to-prevalence ratio (PPR) = 0.34), in trials testing xanthine oxiase inhibitors (PPR = 0.38) and uricosurics (PPR = 0.29), and in trials with febuxostat, allopurinol, pegloticase, halofenate/arhalofenate, verinurad, lesinurad and dotinurad. Women were proportionally underreppresented also compared with their share of the population with gout, overall (PPR = 0.69) and in trials testing XOIs (PPR = 0.69), uricosurics (PPR = 0.68), and all SUA-lowering drugs excepted for rasburicase, pegloticase and topiroxostat.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that women and racial and ethnical minorities are underrepresented in controlled clinical trials testing SUA-lowering drugs, with similar pattern across drug classes.

The association between urate-lowering therapies and treatment-related adverse events, liver damage, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): A network meta-analysis of randomized trials

PURPOSE

Hyperuricemia is a common disease that may lead to gout, renal damage, and cardiovascular events. Oral medication is the main treatment for hyperuricemia patients when lifestyle intervention fails. An evaluation of the safety of various urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) is integral to clinical decision-making. We constructed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the safety of oral ULTs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to April 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials that examined the safety of ULTs. The language restriction was English. The three outcomes used to assess the safety of uric acid lowering medications were treatment-related adverse events, liver damage, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

Thirty-two trials enrolling 23,868 individuals were included in the study. In terms of treatment-related adverse events, there were no statistically significant differences between five uric acid lowering medications and placebo: allopurinol (risk ratio (RR): 1.08; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.91, 1.29), febuxostat (RR: 1.05; 95% CrI: 0.89, 1.25), lesinurad (RR: 1.19; 95% CrI: 0.85, 1.67), lesinurad combined with xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI, RR: 1.05; 95% CrI: 0.83, 1.32), and topiroxostat (RR: 1.01; 95% CrI: 0.83, 1.23). Topiroxostat likely increases risk of liver damage (RR: 2.65; 95%CI: 1.24, 5.70; NNH: 33.40) as compared with placebo. With regard to MACE, there were no statistically significant differences between three uric acid lowering medications and placebo: allopurinol (RR: 0.63; 95% CrI: 0.36, 1.34), febuxostat (RR: 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.38, 1.66), and lesinurad combined with XOI (RR: 0.56; 95% CrI: 0.23, 1.85). The rankings of different interventions were depicted by cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

CONCLUSIONS

Through NMA, we provide some evidence for the safety of ULTs. We found no statistically significant differences in their effects on treatment-related adverse events and MACE. However, topiroxostat likely increases the risk of liver damage.

Creation of an adequate animal model of hyperuricemia (acute and chronic hyperuricemia); study of its reversibility and its maintenance

AIM

Hyperuricemia is defined by the European Rheumatology Society as a uric acid level greater than 6 mg/dl (60 mg/l or 360 μmol/l). Our goal was to evaluate the hypouricemic effect of nettle. For this reason, we have first of all try to create an hyperuricemic animal model which is very suitable because at the level of literature there is not an exact model, there are many models and our objective is to set an adequate model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An attempt has been made to test acute and chronic hyperuricemia by varying the duration and method of induction of potassium oxonate. Similarly, attempts have been made to induce chronic hyperuricemia through an animal and vegetable diet. The reversibility of hyperuricemia was tested with a maintenance protocol.

KEY FINDINGS

For the creation of the hyperuricemia model, it has been shown that acute hyperuricemia cannot be induced by short administration of potassium oxonate and persistent chronic hyperuricemia can be induced only after daily administration of oxonate of potassium by intraperitoneal injection for 15 days. Indeed, hyperuricemia was reversible after stopping the administration of potassium oxonate. The high-purine diet is also capable of inducing chronic hyperuricemia but to a less extent.

SIGNIFICANCE

After creating an adequate model of hyperuricemia while setting the dose of potassium oxonate, route of administration and duration. A maintenance protocol was followed which subsequently made it possible to deduce that the daily administration of potassium oxonate must be continued to maintain the hyperuricemia.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapies for hyperuricemic patients with gout: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of the commonly used urate-lowering therapies (ULTs): febuxostat, allopurinol, and lesinurad in hyperuricemic patients with gout.

METHODS

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ULTs with placebo or head to head. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving the target serum urate (SU) level at month 6. Safety outcomes included total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, withdrawals due to AEs, and AEs per organ system. A Bayesian network model was used to compare all ULTs with placebo and among themselves.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs were included for the analysis, in which 7968 patients were randomly assigned to take either placebo or one of 11 ULTs: allopurinol, febuxostat 40/80/120/240 mg/day, lesinurad 400 mg/day, lesinurad 200/400/600 mg/day plus allopurinol, and lesinurad 200/400 mg/day plus febuxostat. All ULTs were effective in achieving the target SU level at month 6 compared with placebo (ORs between 26.81 and 1928). Febuxostat 80/120/240 mg/day was superior to allopurinol and well tolerated for urate reduction. And as febuxostat dosage increased, more patients achieved the target SU level. Furthermore, the lesinurad combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) groups had a higher proportion of patients achieving the target SU level than the febuxostat 40 mg/day group (ORs between 2.89 and 9.17), the allopurinol group (ORs between 3.56 and 11.27), or the lesinurad 400 mg/day monotherapy group (ORs between 12.30 and 39.17) but might have a high risk of AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

All ULTs are effective in achieving the target SU level compared with placebo in hyperuricemic patients with gout. Lesinurad in combination with febuxostat or allopurinol is effective in urate lowering, especially for patients with inadequate response to XOI monotherapy. Key Points • All urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) were effective in achieving the target serum urate (SU) level at month 6 compared with placebo in hyperuricemic patients with gout. • Febuxostat 80/120/240 mg/day was superior to allopurinol and well tolerated for urate reduction. And as febuxostat dosage increased, more patients achieved the target SU level. • Lesinurad in combination with febuxostat or allopurinol was effective in urate lowering, especially for patients with inadequate response to xanthine oxidase inhibitor monotherapy, but might have a high risk of AEs.

Refractory gout - does it exist?

Refractory gout (RG) has been increasingly recognized to be a major problem in clinical care. Patients diagnosed with RG have been assumed to be non-adherent, or under-dosed, to the greater part. In a minority, pathophysiological mechanisms have been discussed. During the last two decades, however, none of the studies differentiated non-adherence from impaired response to drug treatment. A definition of adherence has been proposed in the case of allopurinol treatment (oxipurinol in serum, >20 µmol/l), which would seem to confirm a dose of about 50 mg/d being taken by the patients. Guidelines for treating gout published by national or international rheumatology societies do provide very little, if any, information on how to evaluate patients with RG. Coinciding with the development of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor, febuxostat, a moderate increase in the number of publications on RG was observed, with a sharp rise following after its approval for clinical use. It was demonstrated recently that intensive training and supervision of patients with gout resulted in very low numbers of patients not reaching treatment targets. It should be remembered that allopurinol, is an ideal instrument for differentiating non-adherence from true impaired response. We conclude that, apart from very rare patients, needing confirmation of such a diagnosis by metabolic ward studies, RG does not exist, and with close to hundred percent, treatment failure is due to patient and physician behavior.

Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Disease

Purine metabolism in the circulatory system yields uric acid as its final oxidation product, which is believed to be linked to the development of gout and kidney stones. Hyperuricemia is closely correlated with cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and chronic kidney disease, as attested by the epidemiological and empirical research. In this review, we summarize the recent knowledge about hyperuricemia, with a special focus on its physiology, epidemiology, and correlation with cardiovascular disease. This review also discusses the possible positive effects of treatment to reduce urate levels in patients with cardiovascular disease and hyperuricemia, which may lead to an improved clinical treatment plan.

Impact of Lesinurad and allopurinol on experimental Hyperuricemia in mice: biochemical, molecular and Immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

Hyperuricemia is an abnormal increase in uric acid levels in the blood. It is the cause of gout that manifested by inflammatory arthritis and painful disable. Therefore, current study evaluated the potential ameliorative impact of Lesinurad and Allopurinol on the kidneys of hyperuricemic mice at the biochemical, molecular and cellular levels.

METHODS

Lesinurad and allopurinol alone or in combination were orally administered to hyperuricemic and control mice for seven consecutive days. Levels of uric acid and blood urea nitrogen, along with antioxidants and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) were measured in the serum. The mRNA expression of mouse urate anion transporter-1, glucose transporter 9, organic anion transporters, in renal tissues were examined using quantitative real time PCR. Simultaneously, the immunoreactivity of transforming growth factor-beta 1 was examined immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

Lesinurad and allopurinol administration resulted in significant decrease in serum levels of uric acid, blood urea nitrogen, xanthine oxidase activity, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) reported in hyperuricemic mice. Both partially reversed oxonate-induced alterations in renal mURAT-1, mGLUT-9, mOAT-1 and mOAT-3 expressions, as well as alterations in the immunoreactivity of TGF- β1, resulting in the increase of renal uric acid secretion and excretion. The combined administration of lesinurad and ALP restored all altered parameters in a synergistic manner, improving renal function in the hyperuricemic mouse model employed.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed synergistic ameliorative hypouricemic impact of both lesinurad and allopurinol in the treatment of hyperuricemia in mice at the biochemical, molecular and cellular levels.

Hypouricemia: what the practicing rheumatologist should know about this condition

We presented an update in the field of hypouricemia, which is defined as a serum urate concentration of < 2 mg/dL (119 μmol/L), for the practicing rheumatologist, who usually is the consulting physician in cases of disorders of urate metabolism. We performed a narrative review through a literature search for original and review articles in the field of human hypouricemia published between January 1950 and July 2018. We divided the etiology of hypouricemia into two main categories: those associated with a decrease in urate production and those promoting the elimination of urate via the kidneys. The most common conditions associated with these categories are discussed. Furthermore, the etiology of hypouricemia may be associated with certain medications prescribed by the practicing rheumatologists, such as the following: urate-lowering drugs (allopurinol and febuxostat); recombinant uricase (pegloticase); uricosuric agents (probenecid, benzbromarone); urate transporter URAT1 inhibitor (lesinurad); angiotensin II receptor blocker (losartan); fenofibrate; high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; some NSAID; and high-dose salicylate therapy. The rheumatologist is considered an expert in the metabolism of urate and its associated pathological conditions. Therefore, specialists must recognize hypouricemia as a biomarker of various pathological and potentially harmful conditions, highlighting the importance of conducting a deeper clinical investigation to reach a more accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Gout: state of the art after a decade of developments

This review article summarizes the relevant English literature on gout from 2010 through April 2017. It emphasizes that the current epidemiology of gout indicates a rising prevalence worldwide, not only in Western countries but also in Southeast Asia, in close relationship with the obesity and metabolic syndrome epidemics. New pathogenic mechanisms of chronic hyperuricaemia focus on the gut (microbiota, ABCG2 expression) after the kidney. Cardiovascular and renal comorbidities are the key points to consider in terms of management. New imaging tools are available, including US with key features and dual-energy CT rendering it able to reveal deposits of urate crystals. These deposits are now included in new diagnostic and classification criteria. Overall, half of the patients with gout are readily treated with allopurinol, the recommended xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), with prophylaxis for flares with low-dose daily colchicine. The main management issues are related to patient adherence, because gout patients have the lowest rate of medication possession ratio at 1 year, but they also include clinical inertia by physicians, meaning XOI dosage is not titrated according to regular serum uric acid level measurements for targeting serum uric acid levels for uncomplicated (6.0 mg/dl) and complicated gout, or the British Society for Rheumatology recommended target (5.0 mg/dl). Difficult-to-treat gout encompasses polyarticular flares, and mostly patients with comorbidities, renal or heart failure, leading to contraindications or side effects of standard-of-care drugs (colchicine, NSAIDs, oral steroids) for flares; and tophaceous and/or destructive arthropathies, leading to switching between XOIs (febuxostat) or to combining XOI and uricosurics.

Target genes, variants, tissues and transcriptional pathways influencing human serum urate levels

Elevated serum urate levels cause gout and correlate with cardiometabolic diseases via poorly understood mechanisms. We performed a trans-ancestry genome-wide association study of serum urate in 457,690 individuals, identifying 183 loci (147 previously unknown) that improve the prediction of gout in an independent cohort of 334,880 individuals. Serum urate showed significant genetic correlations with many cardiometabolic traits, with genetic causality analyses supporting a substantial role for pleiotropy. Enrichment analysis, fine-mapping of urate-associated loci and colocalization with gene expression in 47 tissues implicated the kidney and liver as the main target organs and prioritized potentially causal genes and variants, including the transcriptional master regulators in the liver and kidney, HNF1A and HNF4A. Experimental validation showed that HNF4A transactivated the promoter of ABCG2, encoding a major urate transporter, in kidney cells, and that HNF4A p.Thr139Ile is a functional variant. Transcriptional coregulation within and across organs may be a general mechanism underlying the observed pleiotropy between urate and cardiometabolic traits.

Efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in gout

The aim of this review is to present current evidence about the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) in the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Gout is the most common inflammatory form of arthritis. It is caused by an elevated concentration of serum uric acid (UA) that leads to the formation of monosodium urate crystals in joints and different tissues. The goal of therapy is to maintain serum UA levels at <6 mg/dL (0.36 mmol/L), to prevent the formation and deposition of monosodium urate crystals, and to dissolve existing crystals. Lesinurad, a new uricosuric, increases renal urate excretion by selectively inhibiting the renal uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Lesinurad is indicated in adults, in combination with a XOI, for the adjunctive treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout (with or without tophi) who have not achieved target serum UA levels with an adequate dose of a XOI alone. With the combination strategy, serum UA targets could be reached with the consequence of inhibiting formation of new crystals and promoting dissolution of existing crystals and, therefore, inducing improvement of outcomes such as flares and tophi. The approval of lesinurad was based on data from three pivotal phase III studies (CLEAR 1, CLEAR 2, and CRYSTAL). These clinical studies assessed lesinurad 200 and 400 mg doses. As only lesinurad 200 mg/day dose was finally approved and commercialized, it will be the focus of this paper. In the pivotal clinical trials, the target serum UA level was achieved by significantly more patients in lesinurad 200 mg plus allopurinol group (CLEAR 1 and CLEAR 2 trials) or lesinurad 200 mg plus febuxostat group (CRYSTAL study) compared with patients who received either XOI alone. In these trials, the safety profile of lesinurad 200 mg plus a XOI was comparable to allopurinol or febuxostat alone. Lesinurad, in combination with a XOI, is an effective and safe treatment that covers unmet needs in adults with gout who have not achieved target serum UA levels with a XOI alone.

Pharmacological urate-lowering approaches in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a global public health issue and uric acid (UA) remains a major risk factor of CKD. As the main organ for the elimination of UA, kidney owned a group of urate transporters in tubular epithelium. Kidney disease hampered the UA excretion, and the accumulation of serum UA in return harmed the renal function. Commercially, there are three kinds of agents targeting at urate-lowering, xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor which prevents the production of UA, uricosuric which increases the concentration of UA in urine thus decreasing serum UA level, and uricase which converts UA to allantoin resulting in the dramatic decrement of serum UA. Of note, in patients with CKD, administration of above-mentioned agents, alone or combined, needs special attention. New evidence is emerging for the efficacy of several urate-lowering drugs for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with CKD. Besides, loads of novel and promising drug candidates and phytochemicals are in the different phases of research and development. As of today, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the widespread use of UA-lowering therapy to prevent or slow down the progression of CKD. The review summarized the evidence and perspectives about the treatment of hyperuricemia with CKD for medicinal chemist and nephrologist.

Efficacy and safety during extended treatment of lesinurad in combination with febuxostat in patients with tophaceous gout: CRYSTAL extension study

Background

In gout, long-term urate-lowering therapy (ULT) promotes dissolution of tissue urate crystal deposits. However, no studies using combined xanthine oxidase inhibition and uricosuric ULT have focused on clinical outcomes or adverse events (AEs) beyond 12 months of therapy. Our objective in the present study was to examine efficacy and long-term safety in patients with tophaceous gout receiving febuxostat plus lesinurad as combination therapy.

Methods

Patients receiving combined lesinurad and febuxostat in the 12-month core CRYSTAL study continued at the same doses in the extension study (“200CONT”, “400CONT”), whereas those receiving only febuxostat 80 mg were randomized to lesinurad 200 or 400 mg with febuxostat (“200CROSS”, “400CROSS”). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing complete resolution (CR) of at least one target tophus by extension month (EM) 12. The key secondary endpoint was mean rate of gout flares requiring treatment from the end of EM 2 to the end of EM 12. Secondary endpoints included reduction in the sum of areas for all target tophi. Safety assessments included AEs and laboratory data for the entire extension study (median length of lesinurad exposure, 800 days).

Results

Of 235 patients completing the core study, 196 (83.4%) enrolled in the extension: 200CONT (n = 64), 200CROSS (n = 33), 400CONT (n = 65), and 400CROSS (n = 34). At EM 12, 59.6%, 43.5%, 66.7%, and 50.0% of patients, respectively, had CR of at least one target tophus. The sum of areas for all target tophi was reduced by 76.4%, 58.1%, 77.5%, and 62.8%, respectively. The adjusted mean (SE) rates of gout flares requiring treatment from the end of EM 2 to the end of EM 12 were 0.6 (0.19), 1.3 (0.48), 0.2 (0.08), and 1.9 (0.93), respectively. Target sUA < 5.0 mg/dl was achieved by 77.1%, 79.2%, 88.5%, and 71.4% of patients, respectively. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and renal-related TEAEs in the core study were not increased with prolonged lesinurad exposure in the extension study.

Conclusions

Patients receiving lesinurad plus febuxostat therapy for 2 years continued to be at sUA target. Patients exhibited a progressive increase in CR of at least one target tophus, progressive reduction in tophus size, and reduction of gout flares requiring treatment over the second year, with AEs consistent with those observed in the core study.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01510769. Registered on 13 January 2012.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1788-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy and Safety of Lesinurad in Patients with Hyperuricemia Associated with Gout: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Five RCTs, which included 1959 patients, compared the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in patients with hyperuricemia associated with gout.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size by using a random-effect model. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving target serum uric acid (sUA) levels by month 6 and the mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12. Gout-related outcomes were also assessed. The secondary outcome was the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Compared with xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) monotherapy, lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with allopurinol or febuxostat exhibited a higher proportion of patients achieving target sUA levels of < 6.0 mg/dl or < 5.0 mg/dl, respectively, by month 6. Lesinurad-plus-XOI groups also significantly sustained lower mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12 compared to XOI alone group. In gout-related outcomes, no significant treatment group differences favored lesinurad. The number of TEAEs was comparable between the lesinurad 200 mg-plus-XOI group and the XOI-monotherapy group. Although lesinurad 400 mg monotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo, significantly more TEAEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the combination of lesinurad 200 mg and XOI is effective and well tolerated for treating patients with gout who have not achieved an adequate response to XOI monotherapy, clinical gout-related outcomes were not improved. Therefore, additional studies investigating the long-term clinical implication of lesinurad are warranted.

Large-scale whole-exome sequencing association studies identify rare functional variants influencing serum urate levels

Elevated serum urate levels can cause gout, an excruciating disease with suboptimal treatment. Previous GWAS identified common variants with modest effects on serum urate. Here we report large-scale whole-exome sequencing association studies of serum urate and kidney function among ≤19,517 European ancestry and African-American individuals. We identify aggregate associations of low-frequency damaging variants in the urate transporters SLC22A12 (URAT1; p = 1.3 × 10⁻⁵⁶) and SLC2A9 (p = 4.5 × 10⁻⁷). Gout risk in rare SLC22A12 variant carriers is halved (OR = 0.5, p = 4.9 × 10⁻³). Selected rare variants in SLC22A12 are validated in transport studies, confirming three as loss-of-function (R325W, R405C, and T467M) and illustrating the therapeutic potential of the new URAT1-blocker lesinurad. In SLC2A9, mapping of rare variants of large effects onto the predicted protein structure reveals new residues that may affect urate binding. These findings provide new insights into the genetic architecture of serum urate, and highlight molecular targets in SLC22A12 and SLC2A9 for lowering serum urate and preventing gout.

Elevated serum urate levels are a risk factor for gout. Here, Tin et al. perform whole-exome sequencing in 19,517 individuals and detect low-frequency genetic variants in urate transporter genes, SLC22A12 and SLC2A9, associated with serum urate levels and confirm their damaging nature in vitro and in silico.

Predicting Response or Non-response to Urate-Lowering Therapy in Patients with Gout

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the extent of treatment success or failure with the xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitors allopurinol and febuxostat and indicate how the dosage of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) may be modified to increase the response in the majority of patients with gout.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gout flares are associated with serum concentrations of urate above 0.42 mmol/L (7 mg/dL). Achieving and maintaining serum urate below 0.36 mmol/L is considered an effective response to ULT. On an intention to treat basis, clinical trials indicate that allopurinol at daily doses of 100 to 300 mg decreases serum urate adequately in only about 40% of gout patients while febuxostat 80 mg daily reduces serum urate adequately in approximately 70% of gout patients. Higher doses of ULT may be required in patients receiving concomitant diuretics. The addition of a uricosuric agent to allopurinol and febuxostat therapy significantly increases the proportion of patients achieving adequate lowering of serum urate. Finally, carriers of a genetic variant of the transporter, ABCG2 (BCRP), have a decreased response to allopurinol. Careful examination of medication adherence, titration of doses, and the addition of uricosuric agents increase the percentage of patients responding to allopurinol and febuxostat.

Physiology of Hyperuricemia and Urate-Lowering Treatments

Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and is a multifactorial disease typically characterized by hyperuricemia and monosodium urate crystal deposition predominantly in, but not limited to, the joints and the urinary tract. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia has increased in developed countries over the past two decades and research into the area has become progressively more active. We review the current field of knowledge with emphasis on active areas of hyperuricemia research including the underlying physiology, genetics and epidemiology, with a focus on studies which suggest association of hyperuricemia with common comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Finally, we discuss current therapies and emerging drug discovery efforts aimed at delivering an optimized clinical treatment strategy.

Side Effects and Interactions of the Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor Febuxostat

The paper addresses the safety of febuxostat and summarizes reports on side effects and interactions of febuxostat published by the cut-off date (last day of literature search) of 20 March 2018. Publications on side effects and the interactions of febuxostat were considered. Information concerning the occurrence of side effects and interactions in association with the treatment with febuxostat was collected and summarized in the review. The incidence of severe side effects was much less frequent than mild side effects (1.2–3.8% to 20.1–38.7%). The rate and range of febuxostat side effects are low at doses of up to 120 mg and only increase with a daily dose of over 120 mg. The publications reveal no age-dependent increase in side effects for febuxostat. In patients with impaired renal function, no increase in adverse events is described with a dose of up to 120 mg of febuxostat per day. Patients with impaired liver function had no elevated risk for severe side effects. A known allopurinol intolerance increases the risk of skin reactions during treatment with febuxostat by a factor of 3.6. No correlation between treatment with febuxostat and agranulocytosis has been confirmed. Possible interactions with very few medications (principally azathioprine) are known for febuxostat. Febuxostat is well tolerated and a modern and safe alternative to allopurinol therapy.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Concomitant Multiple Dose Administration of Verinurad (RDEA3170) and Allopurinol in Adult Male Subjects With Gout

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. This phase 1b, multiple‐dose, drug‐drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of verinurad in combination with allopurinol. Adult males with gout were randomized to receive once‐daily oral doses of allopurinol 300 mg or verinurad 10 mg alone for 7 days, allopurinol 300 mg + verinurad 10 mg on days 8 to 14, and the alternative single agent on days 15 to 21. Colchicine 0.6 mg was taken prophylactically for gout flares. Plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad, allopurinol, oxypurinol (allopurinol active metabolite), colchicine (plasma only), and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Verinurad plasma exposure was unaffected by allopurinol. Verinurad increased the maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) for allopurinol by 33%; the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) was unaffected. Oxypurinol C_max and AUC were reduced 32% and 38%, respectively, by verinurad. Colchicine plasma exposure was unaltered by verinurad. The maximum decrease in serum urate was greater with verinurad + allopurinol (65%) than with verinurad (51%) or allopurinol (43%) alone. Compared with the baseline rate, the maximum rate of uric acid excreted in urine was +56% with verinurad, −46% with allopurinol, and unchanged with verinurad + allopurinol. No serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were noted. Despite decreased systemic exposure of allopurinol and oxypurinol in the presence of verinurad, the combination resulted in greater serum urate reduction compared with either drug alone and was well tolerated at the studied doses.

Individualized treatment strategies for hyperuricemia informed by a semi-mechanistic exposure-response model of uric acid dynamics

To provide insight into pharmacological treatment of hyperuricemia we developed a semi-mechanistic, dynamical model of uric acid (UA) disposition in human. Our model represents the hyperuricemic state in terms of production of UA (rate, PUA), its renal filtration (glomerular filtration rate, GFR) and proximal tubular reabsorption (fractional excretion coefficient, FE). Model parameters were estimated using data from 9 Phase I studies of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI) allopurinol and febuxostat and a novel uricosuric, the selective UA reabsorption inhibitor lesinurad, approved for use in combination with a XOI. The model was qualified for prediction of the effect of patients' GFR and FE on concentration of UA in serum (sUA) and UA excretion in urine and their response to drug treatment, using data from 2 Phase I and 4 Phase III studies of lesinurad. Percent reduction in sUA from baseline by a XOI is predicted to be independent of GFR, FE or PUA. Uricosurics are more effective in underexcreters of UA or patients with normal GFR. Co-administration of a XOI and an uricosuric agent should be considered for patients with high sUA first in the treatment algorithm of gout before uptitration of XOI. The XOI dose in combination with a uricosuric can be reduced compared to XOI alone for the same target sUA to the degree dependent on patient's GFR and FE. This exposure-response model of UA can be used to rationally select the best drug treatment option to lower elevated sUA in gout patients under differing pathophysiological situations.

Metabolism and Disposition of Verinurad, a Uric Acid Reabsorption Inhibitor, in Humans

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a second generation selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor for the treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Following a single oral solution of 10-mg dose of [¹⁴C]verinurad (500 μCi), verinurad was rapidly absorbed with a median time to occurrence of maximum observed concentration (T_max) of 0.5 hours and terminal half-life of 15 hours. In plasma, verinurad constituted 21% of total radioactivity. Recovery of radioactivity in urine and feces was 97.1%. Unchanged verinurad was the predominant component in the feces (29.9%), whereas levels were low in the urine (1.2% excreted). Acylglucuronide metabolites M1 (direct glucuronidation) and M8 (glucuronidation of N-oxide) were formed rapidly after absorption of verinurad with terminal half-life values of approximately 13 and 18 hours, respectively. M1 and M8 constituted 32% and 31% of total radioactivity in plasma and were equimolar to verinurad on the basis of AUC ratios. M1 and M8 formed in the liver were biliary cleared with complete hydrolysis in the GI tract, as metabolites were not detected in the feces and/or efflux across the sinusoidal membrane; M1 and M8 accounted for 29.2% and 32.5% of the radioactive dose in urine, respectively. In vitro studies demonstrated that CYP3A4 mediated the formation of the N-oxide metabolite (M4), which was further metabolized by glucuronyl transferases (UGTs) to form M8, as M4 was absent in plasma and only trace levels were present in the urine. Several UGTs mediated the formation of M1, which could also be further metabolized by CYP2C8. Overall, the major clearance route of verinurad is metabolism via UGTs and CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.

Lesinurad: A Novel Agent for Management of Chronic Gout

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of lesinurad and determine its role relative to other agents in the management of chronic gout.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search (1946 to February 2018) using the terms lesinurad and RDEA594 was conducted to identify relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

In vitro or in vivo evaluations of lesinurad published in the English language were eligible for inclusion. Phase II and III trials were selected for review of efficacy and safety.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Five clinical trials were evaluated. In 4 trials in which lesinurad was used in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), a greater percentage of patients receiving lesinurad 200 mg (54.0%-63.0%) compared with placebo (23.3%-46.8%) achieved a serum uric acid (sUA) level of <6 mg/dL at 1 to 6 months. In one trial involving lesinurad used as monotherapy, a sUA level of <6 mg/dL was achieved by a significantly greater percentage of patients receiving lesinurad 400 mg (29.9%) compared with placebo (1.9%) at 6 months. When used as combination therapy, the drug had an acceptable safety profile, with upper-respiratory-tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and hypertension occurring most commonly and transient renal-related events detected less frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesinurad has a novel mechanism of action and is safe and effective for the treatment of chronic gout. At this time, lesinurad may be considered as an add-on therapy for patients who have an inadequate response to maximum tolerated doses of a XOI.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects and safety of verinurad in combination with allopurinol in adults with gout: a phase IIa, open-label study

Objectives

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high affinity, selective uric acid transporter (URAT1) inhibitor indevelopment for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. This phase IIa study evaluated the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of verinurad combined with allopurinol versus allopurinol alone in adults with gout.

Methods

Forty-one subjects were randomised into two cohorts of verinurad (2.5-20 mg) plus allopurinol (300 mg once daily) versus allopurinol 300 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily or 300 mg twice daily alone. Each treatment period was 7 days. Serial plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad, allopurinol, oxypurinol and uric acid.

Results

Serum pharmacodynamic data pooled across cohorts demonstrated maximum per cent decreases in serum urate (sUA) from baseline (E_max) at 7-12 hours after verinurad plus allopurinol treatment. Combination treatment decreased sUA in dose-dependent manner: least-squares means E_max was 47%, 59%, 60%, 67%, 68% and 74% for verinurad doses 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 and 20 mg plus allopurinol 300 mg once daily, versus 40%, 54% and 54% for allopurinol 300 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily and 300 mg twice daily. Verinurad had no effect on allopurinol plasma pharmacokinetics, but decreased oxypurinol C_max by 19.0%-32.4% and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point by 20.8%-39.2%. Verinurad plus allopurinol was well tolerated with no serious adverse events (AEs), AE-related withdrawals or renal-related events. Laboratory values showed no clinically meaningful changes.

Conclusion

Verinurad coadministered with allopurinol produced dose-dependent decreases in sUA. All dose combinations of verinurad and allopurinol were generally well tolerated. These data support continued investigation of oral verinurad in patients with gout.

Trial registration number

NCT02498652.

New urate-lowing therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent studies of lesinurad and arhalofenate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lesinurad acts by blocking urate reabsorption channels URAT-1 and OAT-4. It has urate-lowering effect when used alone and in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). Its uricosuric activity depends on glomerular filtration, and its' efficacy is impaired at eGFR less than 30 ml/min. Lesinurad monotherapy (400 mg/day) associates with serum creatinine elevations. However, this risk is substantially attenuated with coprescription of a XOI and when prescribed at a dose of 200 mg/day. Given its' modest urate-lowering effect, and the risk of serum creatinine elevation when used alone, it is licenced for use in combination with XOI for people unable to achieve target serum uric acid with XOI alone. Lesinurad does not have the drug interactions associated with probenecid, however, it is metabolized by CYP2C9, and should be used with caution if CYP2C9 inhibitors are coprescribed. Arhalofenate also acts by blocking URAT-1; however, it also blocks the NALP-3 inflammasome providing gout-specific anti-inflammatory effect. Arhalofenate has a weaker urate-lowering effect than lesinurad and further phase III evaluation is planned.

SUMMARY

Lesinurad provides an additional option for people with gout unable to achieve target serum uric acid with XOI alone.

Determination of lesinurad in rat plasma by a UHPLC-MS/MS assay

Lesinurad is an oral inhibitor of urate-anion exchanger transporter 1 and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for combination therapy with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor for the treatment of hyperuricemia associated with refractory gout. In the present study, a sensitive and specific ultra high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay was established and verified for the determination of lesinurad in rat plasma and was described in details for the first time. Chromatographic separation of lesinurad and diazepam (internal standard, IS) was performed on a Rapid Resolution HT C18 column (3.0 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm) using methanol–water (70:30, v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Lesinurad and IS were extracted from plasma by liquid–liquid extraction using ethyl acetate. The mass spectrometric detection was carried out using an electrospray ionization source in positive mode. Multiple reaction monitoring was used for quantification of the precursor to product ion at m/z 405.6 → 220.9 for lesinurad and m/z 285.1 → 192.8 for IS. The assay was well validated for selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, linearity, matrix effects, and stability. The verified method was applied to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters and concentration–time profiles for lesinurad after oral/intravenous administration in rats. The study might provide an important reference and a necessary complement for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of lesinurad.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Febuxostat

Febuxostat is a xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor that has been developed to treat chronic gout. In healthy subjects, the pharmacokinetic parameters of febuxostat after multiple oral dose administration include an oral availability of about 85 %, an apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of 10.5 ± 3.4 L/h and an apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V _ss/F) of 48 ± 23 L. The time course of plasma concentrations follows a two-compartment model. The initial half-life (t _½) is approximately 2 h and the terminal t _½ determined at daily doses of 40 mg or more is 9.4 ± 4.9 h. Febuxostat is administered once daily. The maximum (peak) plasma concentrations are approximately 100-fold greater than the trough concentrations. Consequently, there is no significant accumulation of the drug during multiple dose administration. There are few data on the pharmacokinetics of febuxostat in patients with gout. While the pharmacokinetic parameters are not affected by mild to moderate hepatic impairment, there is no consensus on whether renal impairment has any effect on the pharmacokinetics of febuxostat. Febuxostat is extensively metabolised by oxidation (approximately 35 %) and acyl glucuronidation (up to 40 %); febuxostat acyl glucuronides are cleared by the kidney. In healthy subjects treated with multiple doses of febuxostat 10-240 mg, the concentrations of serum urate are reduced by a maximum of about 80 %. The percentage reduction in the concentrations of serum urate is slightly less in gouty patients than in healthy subjects.

Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad

The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for combination therapy to achieve serum urate (SUA) target levels in gout. Within this overarching aim, a second aim was to evaluate the evidence for a new uricosuric agent lesinurad, which inhibits urate transport in the kidney. In summary, this review indicates that there are a number of ways to approach patients who do not achieve a target serum urate with allopurinol (APL) monotherapy. These include higher doses of APL up to 600–800 mg/d, switching to febuxostat, or adding in a uricosuric. For the latter option, controlled supporting evidence is available for benzbromarone, probenecid, and lesinurad. All options appear similar in terms of success rates, so the choice of option comes down to physician and patient choice, cost, experience, and strength of the evidence base. Increasing the dose of APL is the cheapest option, while febuxostat is consistently superior to standard doses of APL. The strongest evidence for the uricosuric option is available for lesinurad as trials of other agents are either nonexistent or based on small single-centre trials. It is suggested that guidelines should be expanded to consider all of these evidence-based options in the not-uncommon occurrence of APL inadequate response.