Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad

The Stiff Joint: Comparative Evaluation of Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With Urate Lowering Agents in Managing Acute Gout

Gout, an extremely painful form of arthritis, is triggered by the innate immune system's response to the accumulation of monosodium urate crystals in specific joints and surrounding tissues. This condition is characterized by recurring episodes of excruciating arthritis flares, interspersed with periods of disease quiescence. Over time, gout can result in disability, tophi formation, and severe pain. The treatment of gout is centered around two main objectives: alleviating inflammation and pain during acute gout attacks and long-term management to reduce serum urate levels and mitigate the risk of future attacks. Addressing inflammation and pain during acute attacks is often complicated by various factors, including underlying health conditions commonly associated with gout, such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. Moreover, gout patients are frequently older and have multiple coexisting health issues, necessitating complex medication regimens. Given the rising prevalence of gout and its associated comorbidities, there's a growing demand for improved treatment options. While existing treatments effectively manage gout in some patients, a significant portion, particularly those with comorbidities, face contraindications to these treatments and require alternative approaches. Innovative medications are required to enhance gout treatment, especially for individuals with concurrent health conditions. These considerations underscore the importance of reviewing both monotherapy and combination therapy approaches for acute gout treatment.

The Chinese patent medicine Tongfengding capsule for gout in adults: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Gout is a common inflammatory arthritis caused by increased serum uric acid levels. Untreated or insufficiently treated gout can lead to deposition of monosodium urate crystals in joints, cartilage, and kidneys. Although Tongfengding capsules, a Chinese patent medicine, have long been used to treat gout, their effects and safety have not been reviewed systematically. This study evaluated its efficacy and safety for gout in adults.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials involving Tongfengding capsule for gout in adults were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBM, CNKI, and VIP databases, and analyzed using the Cochrane Handbook criteria. The primary outcome measures were the total effective rate. The secondary outcome measures including the blood uric acid (BUA), 24-h urinary total protein (24-h UTP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and adverse effects. The risk of bias was evaluated in all included studies. RevMan ver. 5.3.5 and GRADE profiler was used for data analysis and assessing the quality of evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

Six studies (n = 607 Chinese participants) were included. Tongfengding capsules plus conventional treatment significantly increased the total effective rate (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.33), while reducing the BUA (MD - 66.05 µmol/L, 95% CI - 81.26 to - 50.84), 24-h UTP (MD - 0.83 g/24 h, 95% CI - 0.96 to - 0.70), BUN (MD - 0.90 mmol/L, 95% CI - 1.60 to - 0.20), IL-6 (MD - 6.99 ng/L, 95% CI - 13.22 to - 0.75), IL-8 (MD - 12.17 ng/L, 95% CI - 18.07 to - 6.27), TNF-α (MD - 8.50 ng/L, 95% CI - 15.50 to - 1.51), and adverse effects (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Tongfengding capsules plus conventional treatment is safe and beneficial for adults with gout compared with conventional treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of uricosuric agents in the treatment of gout or hyperuricemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The current world witnesses a greatly increased prevalence and incidence of hyperuricemia and gout with unfortunately the comparative efficacy and safety of present available uricosuric agents remaining uncertain. We herein aimed to investigate the most appropriate uricosuric agent for gout or hyperuricemia patients.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 2 July 2022 were searched to retrieve eligible studies assessing efficacy and safety of uricosuric drugs in hyperuricemia or gout patients. Network meta-analysis was carried out using the Stata 16.0 software.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials comprising 1851 patients were eventually included. Network meta-analysis showed that dotinurad 4 mg once daily, verinurad, dotinurad 2 mg once daily, dotinurad 1 mg once daily, and benzbromarone were the top 5 effective treatments to achieve target serum uric acid. Furthermore, dotinurad 4 mg once daily was more effective at achieving urate-lowering targets (RR of dotinurad 4 mg once daily vs. probenecid: 1.68, 95% CI [1.13; 2.50]) and safer (RR of probenecid vs. dotinurad 4 mg once daily: 1.77, 95% CI [0.69; 4.56]) than probenecid.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrated an important absolute benefit of dotinurad 4 mg once daily to achieve target serum uric acid and low risk of adverse events for drug treatment of gout or hyperuricemia patients. Additionally, verinurad might be used as an alternative uricosuric therapeutic option to dotinurad. These findings provided further comprehensive insight into the treatment value of current uricosuric agents for gout or hyperuricemia. Key Points 1. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis examining the efficacy and safety of currently available uricosuric agents in gout or hyperuricemia patients. 2. Recommended doses of dotinurad 4mg once daily used for the treatment of gout or hyperuricemia patients can significantly decrease serum uric acid levels. 3. The present findings will provide further comprehensive insight into the treatment value of certain uricosuric agents for gout or hyperuricemia.

A brief review of urate transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout: Current therapeutic options and potential applications

Hyperuricemia is a common metabolic condition, cause by increased levels of serum urate (SUA). Reduced excretion of uric acid is reported as the key factor of primary hyperuricemia, accounting for approximately 90% of the cases. Urate transporter 1 (URAT1) is a major protein involved in uric acid reabsorption (about 90%). Therefore, URAT1 inhibitors are considered to be a highly effective and promising class of uricosuric agents for treating hyperuricemia. This review summarizes the development of URAT1 inhibitors for the treatment of hyperuricemia, including approved URAT1 inhibitors, URAT1 inhibitors under development in clinical trials, substances with URAT1 inhibitory effects from derivatives and natural products, and conventional drugs with new uses. This review provides new ideas regarding research on URAT1 inhibitors by introducing the structure, properties, and side effects of chemical drugs, as well as the sources and categories of natural drugs. We also discuss new mechanisms of classic drugs, which may provide guidance to many practicing clinicians. The research and discovery of new inhibitors remain in full swing, and tremendous developments are expected in the field.

Multiple-Purpose Connectivity Map Analysis Reveals the Benefits of Esculetin to Hyperuricemia and Renal Fibrosis

Hyperuricemia (HUA) is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Serum uric acid (SUA) levels in CKD stage 3–4 patients closely correlate with hyperuricemic nephropathy (HN) morbidity. New uric acid (UA)-lowering strategies are required to prevent CKD. The multiple-purpose connectivity map (CMAP) was used to discover potential molecules against HUA and renal fibrosis. We used HUA and unilateral ureteral occlusion (UUO) model mice to verify renoprotective effects of molecules and explore related mechanisms. In vitro experiments were performed in HepG2 and NRK-52E cells induced by UA. Esculetin was the top scoring compound and lowered serum uric acid (SUA) levels with dual functions on UA excretion. Esculetin exerted these effects by inhibiting expression and activity of xanthine oxidase (XO) in liver, and modulating UA transporters in kidney. The mechanism by which esculetin suppressed XO was related to inhibiting the nuclear translocation of hexokinase 2 (HK2). Esculetin was anti-fibrotic in HUA and UUO mice through inhibiting TGF-β1-activated profibrotic signals. The renoprotection effects of esculetin in HUA mice were associated with lower SUA, alleviation of oxidative stress, and inhibition of fibrosis. Esculetin is a candidate urate-lowering drug with renoprotective activity and the ability to inhibit XO, promote excretion of UA, protect oxidative stress injury, and reduce renal fibrosis.

Comparative Study of Real-Life Management Strategies in Gout: Data From Two Protocolized Gout Clinics

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of 2 gout clinics that implemented different treatment strategies.

METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with gout and a follow-up of 9-15 months were included. Co-primary outcomes were the proportion of patients reaching a serum uric acid (UA) ≤0.36 mmoles/liter and free of flares. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients requiring treatment intensification and experiencing adverse events. One clinic adopted a strict serum UA (≤0.30 mmoles/liter target) strategy, with early addition of a uricosuric to allopurinol, and the other clinic adopted a patient-centered (PC) strategy emphasizing a shared decision based on serum UA and patient satisfaction with gout control. Independent t-tests or chi-square tests were used to test differences in outcomes, and logistic regressions were used to adjust the effect of the treatment center on outcomes for confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 126 and 86 patients had a follow-up mean ± SD of 11.3 ± 1.8 versus 11.1 ± 1.9 months. In the UA strategy, 105 of 126 patients (83%) compared to 63 of 86 (74%) in the PC strategy (P = 0.10) reached the threshold of ≤0.36 mmoles/liter; and 58 of 126 (46%) versus 31 of 86 (36%) were free of flares (P = 0.15). In the UA strategy, 76 of 126 patients (60%) were on allopurinol monotherapy compared to 63 of 86 (73%) in the PC strategy (P = 0.05), yet the number of adverse events was not different (n = 25 [20%] versus n = 20 [23%]; P = 0.55). Adjusting for confounders did not substantially change these associations.

CONCLUSION

A strict UA strategy resulted in a nonsignificantly higher proportion of patients reaching a serum UA ≤0.36 mmoles/liter and being free of flares. This result was accomplished with significantly more therapy intensification. The small sample size plays a role in the significance of results.

Efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in gout

The aim of this review is to present current evidence about the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) in the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. Gout is the most common inflammatory form of arthritis. It is caused by an elevated concentration of serum uric acid (UA) that leads to the formation of monosodium urate crystals in joints and different tissues. The goal of therapy is to maintain serum UA levels at <6 mg/dL (0.36 mmol/L), to prevent the formation and deposition of monosodium urate crystals, and to dissolve existing crystals. Lesinurad, a new uricosuric, increases renal urate excretion by selectively inhibiting the renal uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Lesinurad is indicated in adults, in combination with a XOI, for the adjunctive treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout (with or without tophi) who have not achieved target serum UA levels with an adequate dose of a XOI alone. With the combination strategy, serum UA targets could be reached with the consequence of inhibiting formation of new crystals and promoting dissolution of existing crystals and, therefore, inducing improvement of outcomes such as flares and tophi. The approval of lesinurad was based on data from three pivotal phase III studies (CLEAR 1, CLEAR 2, and CRYSTAL). These clinical studies assessed lesinurad 200 and 400 mg doses. As only lesinurad 200 mg/day dose was finally approved and commercialized, it will be the focus of this paper. In the pivotal clinical trials, the target serum UA level was achieved by significantly more patients in lesinurad 200 mg plus allopurinol group (CLEAR 1 and CLEAR 2 trials) or lesinurad 200 mg plus febuxostat group (CRYSTAL study) compared with patients who received either XOI alone. In these trials, the safety profile of lesinurad 200 mg plus a XOI was comparable to allopurinol or febuxostat alone. Lesinurad, in combination with a XOI, is an effective and safe treatment that covers unmet needs in adults with gout who have not achieved target serum UA levels with a XOI alone.

Prescribing patterns of allopurinol and febuxostat according to directives on the reimbursement criteria and clinical guidelines: analysis of a primary care database

OBJECTIVE

According to American clinical guidelines, allopurinol and febuxostat may be prescribed as first-line therapy to treat hyperuricemia. However, the Italian Medicines Agency directive, called Nota 91, allows the reimbursement of second-line febuxostat in the case of failure and/or intolerance of a previous allopurinol therapy, so partially embracing European League Against Rheumatism recommendations and the British Society for Rheumatology Guideline. Such inconsistency might lead to heterogeneity among General Practitioners (GPs) in treatment of hyperuricemia. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the prescribing behavior of GPs in terms of compliance with Nota 91 and/or official guidelines.

METHODS

Using the Health Search Database, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the patterns of use of allopurinol and febuxostat between 2011 and 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 44,257 and 5837 patients were prescribed with allopurinol and febuxostat, respectively. Among febuxostat users, 4321 (74%) had a previous allopurinol treatment; 92% of switches to febuxostat were related to hyperuricemia, whereas 9% of switchers presented intolerance to allopurinol; 26% of patients were prescribed with febuxostat as first-line therapy. The presence of diabetes and/or moderate/severe renal disease were statistically significant determinants of febuxostat use as first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prescriptions of febuxostat were highly compliant to Nota 91. Only a sub-group of frontline prescriptions of febuxostat were mainly driven by the presence of renal dysfunction, which is able to increase the risk of allopurinol intolerance and/or inefficacy. These findings indicate that GPs' prescribing behavior for hyperuricemia is highly compliant with both regulatory directives and clinical guidelines.

Effects of febuxostat on serum cytokines IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and COX-2

Effects of febuxostat on serum cytokines interleukin (IL)-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in patients with gout were investigated. A total of 80 patients with gout admitted and treated in the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from January 2015 to September 2017 were selected and divided into two groups by virtue of a random number table, with 40 patients in each group. All the enrolled patients received strict gout diet adjustment and took colchicine at the same time. Patients in the control group were additionally treated with allopurinol, while those in the the observation group were administered with febuxostat. The serum uric acid levels were compared between the two groups. The number of gout attacks and adverse reactions were recorded, and the variations in COX-2 positive value integral were clarified. At different time-points of observation, the serum uric acid levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p<0.05). Moreover, at 3 months after treatment, the levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum in the observation group were decreased compared with those in the control group (p<0.05). The IL-1 and TNF-α levels were lower in the observation group at 1 week, 1 and 3 months after treatment compared with those in the control group (p<0.05). Furthermore, it was discovered that at 3 months after treatment, the COX-2 positive value integral in the observation group was superior to that in the control group (p<0.05). During follow-up, the number of gout attacks that needed medical intervention in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group (p<0.05). Compared with allopurinol therapy, febuxostat therapy can remarkably inhibit inflammatory responses in the body, relieve clinical symptoms and reduce relapse of the patients with gout.

Emodin-induced hepatotoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid through inhibiting UGTs and MRP2

Aggravating effect of probenecid (a traditional anti-gout agent) on emodin-induced hepatotoxicity was evaluated in this study. 33.3% rats died in combination group, while no death was observed in rats treated with emodin alone or probenecid alone, indicating that emodin-induced (150 mg/kg) hepatotoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid (100 mg/kg). In toxicokinetics-toxicodynamics (TK-TD) study, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and systemic exposure (area under the serum concentration-time curve, AUC) of emodin and its glucuronide were significantly increased in rats after co-administrated with emodin and probenecid for 28 consecutive days. Results showed that the increased AUC (increased by 85.9%) of emodin was mainly caused by the decreased enzyme activity of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs, decreased by 11.8%-58.1%). In addition, AUC of emodin glucuronide was increased 5-fold, which was attributed to the decrease of multidrug-resistant-protein 2 (MRP2) protein levels (decreased by 54.4%). Similarly, in vitro experiments proved that probenecid reduced the cell viability of emodin-treated HepG2 cells through inhibiting UGT1A9, UGT2B7 and MRP2. Our findings demonstrated that emodin-induced hepatoxicity was exacerbated by probenecid through inhibition of UGTs and MRP2 in vivo and in vitro, indicating that gout patients should avoid taking emodin-containing preparations in combination with probenecid for a long time.

Urate transporter inhibitor lesinurad is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator (sPPARγM) in vitro

Gout is the most common arthritic disease in human but was long neglected and therapeutic options are not satisfying. However, with the recent approval of the urate transporter inhibitor lesinurad, gout treatment has experienced a major innovation. Here we show that lesinurad possesses considerable modulatory potency on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). Since gout has a strong association with metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, this side-activity appears as very valuable contributing factor to the clinical efficacy profile of lesinurad. Importantly, despite robustly activating PPARγ in vitro, lesinurad lacked adipogenic activity, which seems due to differential coactivator recruitment and is characterized as selective PPARγ modulator (sPPARγM).