Sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis

Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation

BACKGROUND

Sulfasalazine-induced cytopenia, nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity is uncommon during long-term treatment. Some guidelines recommend 3 monthly monitoring blood tests indefinitely during long-term treatment while others recommend stopping monitoring after 1 year. To rationalise monitoring, we developed and validated a prognostic model for clinically significant blood, liver or kidney toxicity during established sulfasalazine treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

UK primary care. Data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold and Aurum formed independent development and validation cohorts.

PARTICIPANTS

Age ≥18 years, new diagnosis of an inflammatory condition and sulfasalazine prescription.

STUDY PERIOD

1 January 2007 to 31 December 2019.

OUTCOME

Sulfasalazine discontinuation with abnormal monitoring blood-test result.

ANALYSIS

Patients were followed up from 6 months after first primary care prescription to the earliest of outcome, drug discontinuation, death, 5 years or 31 December 2019. Penalised Cox regression was performed to develop the risk equation. Multiple imputation handled missing predictor data. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination.

RESULTS

8936 participants were included in the development cohort (473 events, 23 299 person-years) and 5203 participants were included in the validation cohort (280 events, 12 867 person-years). Nine candidate predictors were included. The optimism adjusted R2 D and Royston D statistic in the development data were 0.13 and 0.79, respectively. The calibration slope (95% CI) and Royston D statistic (95% CI) in validation cohort was 1.19 (0.96 to 1.43) and 0.87 (0.67 to 1.07), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This prognostic model for sulfasalazine toxicity uses readily available data and should be used to risk-stratify blood-test monitoring during established sulfasalazine treatment.

Drug Repositioning of Metformin Encapsulated in PLGA Combined with Photothermal Therapy Ameliorates Rheumatoid Arthritis

Purpose

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a highly prevalent form of autoimmune disease that affects nearly 1% of the global population by causing severe cartilage damage and inflammation. Despite its prevalence, previous efforts to prevent the perpetuation of RA have been hampered by therapeutics' cytotoxicity and poor delivery to target cells. The present study exploited drug repositioning and nanotechnology to convert metformin, a widely used antidiabetic agent, into an anti-rheumatoid arthritis drug by designing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based spheres. Moreover, this study also explored the thermal responsiveness of the IL-22 receptor, a key regulator of Th-17, to incorporate photothermal therapy (PTT) into the nanodrug treatment.

Materials and Methods

PLGA nanoparticles were synthesized using the solvent evaporation method, and metformin and indocyanine green (ICG) were encapsulated in PLGA in a dropwise manner. The nanodrug's in vitro anti-inflammatory properties were examined in J744 and FLS via real-time PCR. PTT was induced by an 808 nm near-infrared (NIR) laser, and the anti-RA effects of the nanodrug with PTT were evaluated in DBA/1 collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice models. Further evaluation of anti-RA properties was carried out using flow cytometry, immunofluorescence analysis, and immunohistochemical analysis.

Results

The encapsulation of metformin into PLGA allowed the nanodrug to enter the target cells via macropinocytosis and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Metformin-encapsulated PLGA (PLGA-MET) demonstrated promising anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), increasing the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4), and promoting the polarization of M1 to M2 macrophages in J774 cells. The treatment of the nanodrug with PTT exhibited more potent anti-inflammatory effects than free metformin or PLGA-MET in CIA mice models.

Conclusion

These results demonstrated that PLGA-encapsulated metformin treatment with PTT can effectively ameliorate inflammation in a spatiotemporal manner.

Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases

The past century has been characterized by intensive efforts, within both academia and the pharmaceutical industry, to introduce new treatments to individuals with rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases (RAIDs), often by 'borrowing' treatments already employed in one RAID or previously used in an entirely different disease, a concept known as drug repurposing. However, despite sharing some clinical manifestations and immune dysregulation, disease pathogenesis and phenotype vary greatly among RAIDs, and limited understanding of their aetiology has made repurposing drugs for RAIDs challenging. Nevertheless, the past century has been characterized by different 'waves' of repurposing. Early drug repurposing occurred in academia and was based on serendipitous observations or perceived disease similarity, often driven by the availability and popularity of drug classes. Since the 1990s, most biologic therapies have been developed for one or several RAIDs and then tested among the others, with varying levels of success. The past two decades have seen data-driven repurposing characterized by signature-based approaches that rely on molecular biology and genomics. Additionally, many data-driven strategies employ computational modelling and machine learning to integrate multiple sources of data. Together, these repurposing periods have led to advances in the treatment for many RAIDs.

Rheumatiod Arthritis: An Updated Overview of Latest Therapy and Drug Delivery

Rheumatoid arthritis is a severe autoimmune disorder, related to joints. It is associated with serious cartilage destruction. This causes disability and reduces the excellence of life. Numerous treatments are existed to combat this disease, however, they are not very efficient and possess severe side effects, higher doses, and frequent administration. Therefore, newer therapies are developed to overcome all these limitations. These include different monoclonal antibodies, immunoglobulins, small molecules used for immunotherapy and transgenes for gene therapy. One of the main goals of these new generation therapeutics is to address the underlying distressing biological processes by specifically targeting the causative agents with fewer systemic side effects and greater patient console. It is very fortuitous that loads of progressive investigations are going on in this field and many of them have entered into the successful clinical trial. But till date, a limited molecule has got FDA clearance and entered the market for treating this devastating disease. This review highlights the overview of conventional therapy and advancements in newer therapeutics including immunotherapy and gene therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Further, different novel techniques for the delivery of these therapeutics of active and passive targeting are also described.

A history of the term "DMARD"

The article outlines a history of the concept of “disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs” or DMARDs—from the emergence in the 1970s of the idea of drugs with decisive long-term effects on bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), through the consolidation and popularisation in the term DMARD in 1980s and 1990s. It then examines the usage of the terms “remission-inducing drugs” (RIDs) and “slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs” (SAARDs), which for some years offered competition to the term DMARDs, thus underscoring the contingency of the establishment of DMARD as a word. Finally, it juxtaposes the apparently spontaneous emergence of the three terms DMARD, SAARD and RID, and the disappearance of the latter two, with a failed attempt in the early 1990s to replace these terms with the new term “disease-controlling antirheumatic treatment” (DC-ART). The analysis highlights the paradoxical qualities of the DMARD concept as robust albeit tension ridden, while playing down the role of identified individuals and overarching explanations of purpose.

Antibiotics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Antibiotic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commenced in the 1930s with the use of sulfasalazine. Later, tetracyclines were successfully used for the treatment of RA. In double-blind and randomized studies, levofloxacin and macrolide antibiotics (including clarithromycin and roxithromycin) were also shown to be effective in the treatment of RA. There have been several reports in the literature indicating that periodontal pathogens are a possible cause of RA. Oral bacteria are one possible cause of RA. In this review, we aimed to investigate the effects of different antibiotics in RA treatment.

Efficacy and safety of sulfasalazine in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding alternative treatments for antihistamine refractory chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). Patients with recalcitrant skin disease often cannot gain satisfactory symptom control with standard therapies and may require prolonged courses of oral corticosteroids. There is a lack of information describing the degree and duration of sulfasalazine's efficacy, the frequency and nature of adverse reactions, and the appropriate safety monitoring parameters.

OBJECTIVE

To present a case series detailing the efficacy and safety of sulfasalazine therapy in patients with CIU.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 39 patients with sulfasalazine-treated CIU evaluated at Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center from October 2007 to March 2012. Eight patients were excluded from the final analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (83.9%) showed an improvement in symptoms within the first 3 months, with 51.6% of patients (n = 16) becoming asymptomatic within the first 6 months of starting sulfasalazine. Eleven patients (35.4%) achieved complete relief of symptoms after tapering off sulfasalazine therapy. Five of the 31 patients (16.1%) failed treatment, defined as worsening symptoms and pursuit of an alternative therapy. Six of 31 patients (19.4%) had a modified course of sulfasalazine therapy owing to abnormal hematologic parameters. Serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 6.5% of patients (n = 2) and included a patient with drug-induced leukopenia and one with rhabdomyolysis.

CONCLUSION

Sulfasalazine is a highly effective treatment for patients with antihistamine resistant CIU. The frequency of adverse events leading to an alteration of sulfasalazine treatment supports the need for close monitoring of these patients.

Bone Marrow Examination for Unexplained Cytopenias Reveals Nonspecific Findings in Patients With Collagen Vascular Disease

Context.—Collagen vascular diseases are frequently included in the differential diagnosis for unexplained cytopenias and often prompt a bone marrow biopsy in this patient population to exclude malignancy. Few large-scale studies have characterized the bone marrow morphology in patients with collagen vascular disease, and most are limited to systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective.—To identify morphologic and immunohistochemical abnormalities specific to each of a wide range of collagen vascular disease cases.

Design.—We examined 102 cases of collagen vascular disease and 38 controls and evaluated the complete blood count, peripheral blood morphology, bone marrow morphology, as well as immunohistochemical staining, for numerous cell lineages.

Results.—Bone marrow findings, including abnormalities such as lymphoid aggregates, lipogranulomas, or abnormal localization of immature precursors, were not significantly different as compared to the control group.

Conclusions.—Bone marrow examination in patients with collagen vascular disease with cytopenias seldom provides new information. Caution should be exercised in interpreting morphologic findings suggestive of myelodysplasia since these are of a reactive nature in up to 27% of patients with collagen vascular disease. In a cost-effective diagnostic strategy, successful utilization may favor postponing a bone marrow biopsy while a more standardized autoimmune diagnostic panel is being performed.

Immunotherapies in rheumatologic disorders

Over the past several decades, rheumatology has directed its focus to understanding and countering the immune dysregulation underlying autoimmune diseases with rheumatologic manifestations. Older therapies, effective though poorly understood, are being scrutinized anew and are yielding the immune-modulating mechanisms behind their efficacy. New therapies, the "biologics," are drugs tailored to address specific immune defects and imbalances. This article discusses the current standard and biologic immunotherapies of the rheumatic diseases, correlating our current understanding of their mechanisms with dysfunctions believed to be present in the major autoimmune syndromes, especially rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use in the Elderly Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient

During the 10-year period since the last review was done by Gardner and Furst, studies have furthered the knowledge of the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. This article briefly reviews the clinical pharmacology of humans as they age, and details the effects of aging on the specific pharmacokinetics and responses to commonly used DMARDs. There has been some progress in understanding the elderly RA patient; however, data are insufficient to provide much confidence in DMARDs effects in the elderly.

Sulphasalazine inhibits human antigen-specific immune responses in vivo

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of the antirheumatic drug sulphasalazine (SASP) on the immune system by analysing systemic and gut-associated immune responses.

METHODS

A total of 23 healthy volunteers were treated with either SASP or placebo for 5 weeks in a double-blind fashion and immunised 2 weeks after the initiation of treatment. Specific immune responses were triggered by subcutaneous immunisation with tetanus toxoid and by peroral immunisation with inactivated influenza vaccine. The effects of treatment on specific immunity to tetanus and influenza were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunospot assay quantifying the number of circulating specific and total antibody-producing cells (spot-forming cells (SFC)) at 6, 8 and 10 days after immunisation.

RESULTS

An immunosuppressive effect of SASP on systemic immune response was observed with a decrease in the total number of IgG-SFC, IgG anti-tetanus SFC and IgG anti-tetanus antibody levels in serum. SASP also exerted an immunosuppressive effect on the mucosa-associated immune system as seen from its down-regulating effect on the total number of circulating IgA SFC.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show firstly that SASP exerts an immunosuppressive effect on defined immune responses to immunisation in vivo, and secondly that both mucosa-associated and systemic immunity are affected by SASP treatment.

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use in the elderly rheumatoid arthritis patient

During the 10-year period since the last review was done by Gardner and Furst, studies have furthered our knowledge of use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. This article will briefly review the clinical pharmacology of human as they age, and detail the effects of aging on the specific pharmacokinetics and responses to commonly used DMARDs. There has been some progress in understanding the elderly RA patient, however, there is insufficient data for much confidence in DMARDs effects in the elderly.

Pharmacological treatment of established rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory condition of unknown aetiology that affects about 1% of the general population. Although the optimal care of RA patients requires various modalities, pharmacotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for established RA. The current therapeutic model encourages a step-up approach that safely incorporates several currently available classes of agents: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and biological agents (tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and glucocorticoids, which offer a quick onset of symptom relief, are used mainly as adjunctive therapies. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biologicals have been successful in altering disease outcome and slowing radiographic progression. The indications, efficacy and safety of these agents in clinical trials and practice are reviewed in this chapter.

Ileum-targeted steroid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of controlled-release budesonide

In order to determine whether budesonide, which is believed to exert most of its anti-inflammatory effects in the intestinal tract, has a beneficial effect on disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we treated 26 patients with active RA in double-blind fashion with either controlled ileal-release budesonide (9 mg by mouth) ( n=14) or placebo ( n=12). All patients remained on their existing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Paracetamol was used for escape analgesia. Evaluations were performed at 0, 2, and 4 weeks and included tender and swollen joint counts, duration of morning stiffness, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) on a 100-mm horizontal scale, grip strength using a vigorimeter (lb/in(2)), haemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (Westergren method, mm/1st h), plasma viscosity (PV) in cP (normal range 1.5-1.72), C-reactive protein (CRP) (normal upper level 1 mg/dl), random plasma cortisol (nmol/l) drawn between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m., and blood pressure. Disease activity scores based on 28 joints (DAS 28) were also derived at all time points. Within-group comparisons revealed significant improvement in the budesonide-treated but not the placebo group with respect to numbers of tender and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, pain, ESR, PV, and DAS 28. Between-group comparisons showed significant differences for ESR, PV, pain, and random plasma cortisol (drawn between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.). There were no significant side effects in either group.

Safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

The definition of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has changed dramatically over the last decade. Current expectations of efficacy now include amelioration of signs and symptoms of disease activity as well as slowing, if not complete cessation, of disease progression as evidenced by Xray progression and significant improvement of patient function. Rheumatologists assess the safety profile of these agents more critically in an attempt to increase the risk:benefit profile. Traditional agents, such as methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine and leflunomide have provided patients with substantial relief of symptoms and some decrease of X-ray progression but have been hampered by the frequent occurrence of significant adverse events (AEs) and inability to maintain benefit for a prolonged period of time. With the increased understanding of the basic mechanism of the disease process, there has been the introduction of four biological disease-modifying agents introduced into clinical practice which have substantially increased the risk:benefit ratio for patients with various rheumatic diseases.

Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with enteric-coated sulfasalazine (Azulfidine EN tablets)

Abstract To investigate both the incidence and the dosage used to treat gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms associated with enteric-coated sulfasalazine (Azulfidine EN, AZL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we studied the clinical history of 153 RA patients, and any available data on GI symptoms that might have been associated with AZL. GI symptoms appeared in 64 (42.5%) of the 153 cases. There were 19 events of nausea, vomiting, or dyspepsia, 14 events each of epigastric discomfort and reduction or loss of appetite, 10 events of epigastric, stomach, or abdominal pain, 9 events of heartburn, 8 events of mouth ulcer, 3 events each of loss of taste and abdominal bloating or borborygmus, 2 events each of diarrhea or loose stools, hematemesis or melanemia, and gastric or esophageal ulcer, and 1 event of stomatitis. These results indicate that GI symptoms associated with AZL are usually mild and treatment can continue, with almost all cases responding to a reduction in dose or drug cessation. In some cases, a histamine receptor-2 blocker or proton pump inhibitor is also required.

Effects of sulfasalazine treatment on serum immunoglobulin levels in children with juvenile chronic arthritis

This article describes the effects of sulfasalazine (SSZ) treatment on serum immunoglobulin (Ig) levels in 6 children with oligoarticular- or polyarticular onset juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). None of the children who developed dysimmunoglobulinemia during treatment showed clinical symptoms of this adverse event, in particular none developed severe infections. All patients regained normal immunoglobulin levels after discontinuing SSZ treatment. One patient with a partial IgA deficiency at the start of SSZ treatment showed a slow increase in the IgA level during treatment. During follow-up (4-6 years), one patient spontaneously developed a dysimmunoglobulinemia and one patient developed diabetes mellitus. Based on these case reports and review of the literature we advocate monitoring of serum immunoglobulin levels while on SSZ treatment.

Old and new drugs used in rheumatoid arthritis: a historical perspective. Part 1: the older drugs

Rheumatoid arthritis is the paradigmatic immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathy and may be of comparatively recent, New World origin. Apart from the symptom-relieving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, whose natural congeners have been in use since antiquity for musculoskeletal pain and inflammation, only a dozen drugs or drug classes--the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs--are currently in common use in rheumatoid arthritis. Development of these drugs has been a notable achievement of the 20th century. Some were developed serendipitously (glucocorticoids, antimalarials), some were the product of faulty reasoning (gold, D-penicillamine), and others were applied for plausible reasons but whose mechanism remains unproven (sulfasalazine, methotrexate, minocycline). A minority were originally applied on the basis of actions that remain germane to the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis as currently understood (azathioprine, cyclosporine, leflunomide, infliximab, etanercept). Among the latter are the more recently introduced and effective agents. The practical use of these drugs is determined by efficacy-toxicity considerations, which have also driven the recent development of the cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Sulfasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of sulfasalazine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group trials register, and Medline, up to July 1997, using the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Collaboration (Dickersin 1994). The search was complemented with bibliography searching of the reference list of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. Key experts in the area were contacted for further published and unpublished articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing sulfasalazine against placebo in patients with RA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers determined the studies to be included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (GW, MSA). Data were independently abstracted by two reviewers (EB, MSA), and checked by a third reviewer (BS) using a pre-developed form for the rheumatoid arthritis sub-group of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. The same two reviewers, using a validated scale (Jadad 1996) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs independently. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for joint counts, pain, and global and functional assessments. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios (OR) for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout and random effects for outcomes showing heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials, including 468 patients were included. A statistically significant benefit was observed for sulfasalazine when compared to placebo for tender and swollen joint scores, pain and ESR. The standardized weighted mean difference between treatment and placebo was -0.49 for tender and swollen joint scores, and -0.42 for pain. The difference for ESR was -17.6mm. Withdrawals from adverse reactions were significantly higher in the sulfasalazine group (OR=3.0). Patients receiving placebo were four times more likely to discontinue treatment because of lack of efficacy than patients receiving sulfasalazine.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Sulfasalazine appears to have a clinically and statistically significant benefit on the disease activity of patients with RA. Its effects on overall health status and radiological progression are not clear at this time, but would appear to be modest.

Is there a role for antibiotics in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Despite many advances in the understanding and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. An infectious aetiology of rheumatoid arthritis has long been postulated but, even though many continue to believe that there is a 'triggering agent for rheumatoid arthritis', none has been identified. Currently, both sulfasalazine and minocycline have been shown to be effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and are being used increasingly. In the case of minocycline, it appears that its ability to inhibit metalloproteases is an important characteristic that may account for some or part of its action against rheumatoid arthritis. Whether the antibacterial effects of these drugs or others are important in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis continues to be investigated.

Sulphasalazine in the treatment of children with chronic arthritis

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of sulphasalazine (SASP) in the treatment of children with chronic arthritis. The medical records of 36 children (25 boys, 11 girls) who received SASP for the treatment of chronic arthritis were reviewed. Twenty-one patients had juvenile spondyloarthropathies (JSA) (eight juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS), 13 undifferentiated JSA (uJSA) and 15 had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). The patients received SASP therapy for a mean of 2.5 years (range 3 weeks to 8.1 years). Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed retrospectively to determine the effects of treatment. A clinically significant response occurred in 23 (64%) children: remission in 14 (39%) (JRA 5, JSA 9) and improvement (25% reduction in joint count) in nine (25%) (JRA 4, JSA 5). There was no difference in response rate between JRA and JSA patients (p = 0.11), but the time to remission was shorter in JSA patients (mean 5 months) than in JRA patients (mean 25 months) (p = 0.024). Twelve of the 36 patients discontinued non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and six of eight patients discontinued prednisolone. A significant fall in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and rise in haemoglobin occurred in SASP-treated patients (p < 0.005) comparing most recent results with pretreatment levels. Side-effects occurred in four of 36 patients (11%); only one patient who had persisting severe diarrhoea required discontinuation of SASP. It was concluded that SASP appears to be effective and safe in the treatment of JRA and JSA patients. As a second-line agent, SASP is the drug of first choice for patients with JSA; for JRA patients SASP may be a useful, possibly less toxic alternative to methotrexate.

Sulfasalazine in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Dutch Juvenile Chronic Arthritis Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA).

METHODS

We conducted a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study of patients with active JCA of both oligoarticular and polyarticular onset. Patients were treated with a dosage of 50 mg/kg/day of SSZ (maximum 2,000 mg/day) or placebo. The efficacy variables were joint scores, physician's, parents', and patient's overall assessments, and laboratory parameters of inflammation.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients enrolled, 52 (75%) completed the trial. Six patients (18%) withdrew from the placebo group, and 11 (31%) withdrew from the SSZ group (P = 0.18). In the intention-to-treat analysis of end point efficacy, between-group differences were significant for the overall articular severity score (P = 0.02), all global assessments (P = 0.01), and the laboratory parameters (P < 0.001). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SSZ group and were the main reason for withdrawal (P < 0.001), but in all instances, these events were transient or reversible upon cessation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this first placebo-controlled study show that SSZ is effective and safe in the treatment of children with oligoarticular- and polyarticular-onset JCA, although it was not well tolerated in one-third of the patients.

Hematologic complications of rheumatic disease therapies

Hematologic side effects of rheumatic disease therapies are generally mild and reversible; however, the clinician must be alert for potential profound and life-threatening toxicities. A knowledge of the toxicity patterns for the individual drugs is necessary to anticipate potential complications. Management of acute leukemias and lymphomas arising in patients with connective tissue disorders is particularly challenging. Further data are needed to define the best treatment options and thus enrollment in clinical trials is encouraged for these patients.

Mechanistic studies on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of salicylazosulfapyridine an anti-inflammatory medicine

Salicylazosulfapyridine (SASP), which has been in clinical use for over 50 years, was reported by the National Toxicology Program to increase rat (F344 strain) urinary bladder and mouse (B6C3F1 hybrid) liver tumours under ad libitum (AL) feeding conditions, while under a feed restriction (FR) regimen, these tumours were not increased. The present investigations were undertaken to assess the implications of these results for the safety of SASP in humans. SASP and its 2 major metabolites, 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) and sulfapyridine (SP) were tested for in vivo induction of micronuclei in mouse bone marrow cells with or without prefolic treatment and for in vivo formation of DNA adducts in rat and mouse liver and urinary bladder. None exhibited mutagenicity or DNA reactivity. SASP and SP have induced sister chromatid exchanges and micronuclei (MN) in cultured human lymphocytes in the absence of liver activation enzymes and in B6C3F1 mice (but not in rats) MN in bone marrow and peripheral RBC. Treatment with folate reduces the frequency of MN. Perhaps the short (28 days) RBC lifespan in mouse underlies the sensitivity of this species. Thus, SASP without folate supplementation is an aneuploidogen. In a 2-year study in AL fed SASP-treated (high dose 337.5 mg/kg) rats, urinary pH was increased and urinary specific gravity was reduced at 60 weeks. At the end, this SASP group showed urothelial hyperplasia and papillomas in the urinary bladders of male rats primarily. In the FR high dose SASP group, the hyperplasia was reduced from 82% to 14%. At the end of 2 years, the incidence of multi-organ leukemia was reduced in both AL and FR high dose SASP groups. Thus, SASP caused intraluminal bladder changes in the rat (especially males) consisting of chronic urothelial stimulation, concretions, hyperplasia which resulted in neoplasia. In the mouse, because of species differences in liver ratios (mouse > rat) and, increasing (3 times higher) liver perfusion in the mouse, compared to the rat, there was hepatocellular toxicity and resulting preneoplasia and neoplasia within 2 years. These findings occurred in all AL SASP groups (flat curve without dose response); but were reduced under FR conditions. In this species, the multiorgan lymphoma incidence was reduced in both AL and FR high dose SASP groups. Thus, SASP and its major metabolites are not genotoxic. Folate deficiency associated with SASP administration is probably responsible for aneuploidy in lymphocytes and erythrocytes. SASP does not induce neoplasia directly in either livers, urinary bladders or other organs. Accordingly, SASP is judged to pose no carcinogenic risk to humans.

Limited effect of sulphasalazine treatment in reactive arthritis. A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of sulphasalazine in reactive arthritis.

METHODS

Double blind placebo controlled trial of six months duration comparing sulphasalazine 2-3 g per day (n = 37) with matching placebo (n = 42) in adults with active reactive arthritis (age 19-57 years, median 34). Treatment response was evaluated once a month by changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), pain, peripheral arthritis, tender iliosacral joints, entesopathy, extra-articular manifestations, and working ability.

RESULTS

15 patients in the sulphasalazine group and eight in the placebo group withdrew from the study prematurely. Adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, were the main reason for withdrawal in the actively treated group. Intention-to-treat analyses showed significant improvements over time in both groups in ESR, pain, and number of swollen joints (P < 0.01). Number of days on sick leave decreased significantly in the sulphasalazine group only (P < 0.01). No significant differences between the two groups were present after six months. Among the patients completing the trial according to protocol, persistent complete remission had occurred within two months in five (23%) of the actively treated, but in no placebo treated patients (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Sulphasalazine seemed to improve only the very short term outcome of reactive arthritis. The possible beneficial effect of the drug should also be weighed against the risk of adverse events. Although these were mainly mild, almost 25% of the patients in the actively treated group gave up treatment for this reason.

Folate and homocysteine status and haemolysis in patients treated with sulphasalazine for arthritis

In an attempt to estimate the frequency of folate deficiency and haemolysis in a group of 25 outpatients with arthritis treated with sulphasalazine (SASP), haematological measurements, including plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) which is a sensitive marker of folate deficiency, serum folate (S-folate), erythrocyte (RBC) folate, S-cobalamin and routine indices of haemolysis were performed. No patient had been taking folate-containing vitamins for at least 8 weeks prior to the study. Compared to a group of 72 healthy hospital staff, the median plasma tHcy was significantly higher in the patient group (8.8 mumol 1(-1) vs. 6.8 mumol 1(-1); p = 0.003). Five patients (20%) had plasma tHcy levels that exceeded the upper normal limit of plasma tHcy (median+2 SD of the reference group). Median S-folate was significantly lower in the patient group (6.0 nmol 1(-1) vs. 8.5 nmol 1(-1); p < 0.001), and 11 (44%) patients had depressed S-folate. Only three (12%) patients had RBC folate values below the reference interval. There was no difference in the levels of RBC folate between the two groups. A comparison of S-cobalamin levels in the two groups disclosed a significantly lower level in the patient group. However, no patient had cobalamin deficiency as assessed by S-cobalamin and S-methylmalonate measurements. Thus, it is unlikely that any patient had increased plasma tHcy due to cobalamin deficiency. Of 24 patients having a HbA1c measurement performed, 12 (50%) had decreased levels indicating chronic haemolysis. Only seven (28%) patients had reticulocytosis. HbA1c was positively correlated to haptoglobin levels (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated to the percentage of reticulocytes (r = -0.50; p = 0.02). The percentage of reticulocytes was negatively correlated to haptoglobin levels (r = -0.42; p = 0.04). The chronic haemolysis of the patients' blood due to SASP might explain the similar RBC folate values in the two groups because of a relatively higher folate content of young erythrocytes. In conclusion, our results support previous findings of folate deficiency and haemolysis occurring in a considerable fraction of patients receiving treatment with SASP. Measurements of plasma tHcy suggest that a substantial number of patients may have folate deficiency at the tissue level.

Sulfasalazine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Sulfasalazine was first used for rheumatic polyarthritis in the 1940s and in the past 2 decades has become firmly established as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The drug is split by the action of bacterial azoreductases in the large intestine into sulfapyridine and mesalazine (mesalamine, 5-aminosalicylic acid), although whether the parent molecule or the sulfapyridine moiety, or both, is the active principle remains uncertain. Sulfasalazine is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), producing improvements in disease parameters similar to those seen with penicillamine, hydroxychloroquine or oral or parenteral gold in comparative clinical trials. However, there are no direct comparisons of the drug with methotrexate. Most adverse events associated with sulfasalazine are minor and tend to occur within 3 months of starting therapy. A meta-analysis of studies investigating DMARD therapy, which included almost 5000 evaluable patients, concluded that sulfasalazine was close to methotrexate in terms of efficacy but was slightly less well tolerated. However, unlike sulfasalazine, many DMARDs may be unsuitable for women who are, or may become, pregnant because of their potential to cause teratogenic effects. Sulfasalazine may also offer a more rapid onset of action than other DMARDs and may slow down the radiological progression of RA. Combination therapy with other DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, appears more effective than single DMARD therapy. If the safety of these regimens is shown in large numbers of patients they are likely to become more widely used in the future. Sulfasalazine is a therapy of first choice in patients with RA and may be the DMARD of choice in women who are, or may become, pregnant.

Outcome of second line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To study the functional outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who tolerate second line drug therapy for five years.

METHODS

We enrolled into prospective controlled trials, 190 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who tolerated 'disease modifying' antirheumatic drug therapy for five years. Demographic data were recorded. Disease activity was measured every six months for two years and annually thereafter, using clinical and laboratory variables. Patient function was measured using the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire. The change in each variable was analysed using paired Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Patient function improved significantly compared with baseline. The improvement was maximal after one to two years, and thereafter function started to decline slowly. After five years of treatment the patients' function was still significantly better than before treatment had started. There were highly significant improvements in all variables measured to assess disease activity, which remained well controlled throughout the five year period.

CONCLUSION

Good control of disease activity and improved function can be achieved long term in approximately 30% of RA patients treated with injectable gold, sulphasalazine or penicillamine.

Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphadenopathy associated with sulphasalazine

We report a 19-year-old woman with psoriasis who developed a severe allergic reaction within 1 week of commencement of sulphasalazine; her skin becoming erythrodermic with associated lymphadenopathy, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Clinical signs and haematological abnormalities rapidly returned to normal on discontinuation of sulphasalazine. It is important to monitor carefully haematological indices in the early stages of treatment with this drug.

A risk-benefit assessment of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

There is no ideal slow-acting antirheumatic drug. Therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is currently being modified, with strong recommendations to abandon the traditional pyramidal approach. The call is for a more aggressive, earlier approach to suppress inflammation. Combination therapy rather than the use of a single agent is advocated by some. Improved methods for assessing disease activity as well as measurement of outcome have been developed. Markers of poor prognosis have helped to define patients for earlier treatment. Comparison of toxicity among such a diverse group of drugs is probably best achieved with a toxicity index measuring the number of episodes expressed in terms of patient-years of exposure. Toxicity remains the commonest reason for discontinuing an agent, while remission beyond 36 months on therapy is uncommon, except with methotrexate. The profile of toxicity is clearly defined for individual agents, but combination therapy may reveal an entirely different set of toxic manifestations. There is an urgent need to develop a set of risk factors to predict toxicity in an individual patient. Juvenile chronic arthritis behaves differently from adult RA. Drug toxicity profiles are similar, but less common. Outcome is more difficult to measure, with the major impact of disease and therapy being on growth retardation.

Sulfasalazine in early rheumatoid arthritis. A 48-week double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Eighty patients (symptomatic disease < 12 months) were randomly assigned to treatment with SSZ or placebo for 48 weeks. Clinical, laboratory, and scintigraphic data were used to determine the effects of treatment.

RESULTS

SSZ was superior to placebo in reducing the laboratory features of inflammation, the clinical parameters of disease activity, as well as the scintigraphic activity in the joints. Furthermore, fewer erosive changes developed in the joints of patients receiving active treatment, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

SSZ is effective in the treatment of RA, and its onset of action is rapid. The results support the view that SSZ retards the development of joint erosions. However, like other conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, its remission-inducing ability is insufficient.

Evaluation of sulphasalazine in the treatment of spondyloarthropathies

Sulphasalazine has been shown to have an effect in patients with spondyloarthropathies, but the clinical indication for its use is controversial and its long term effect has not yet been evaluated. Treatment with sulphasalazine was analysed retrospectively in a group of 372 patients with a wide range of spondyloarthropathies to determine subsets of patients showing differential effects of the drug. One hundred and one patients received sulphasalazine at a mean daily dose of 2 g (ankylosing spondylitis, 54 patients; psoriatic arthritis, 21 patients; reactive arthritis, four patients; arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease, six patients; undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, 16 patients). A comparison between treated and untreated patients suggests that only patients with active and severe disease were treated whatever the precise diagnosis or the amount of axial disease in the spondyloarthropathy. After six months of treatment improvement was noted in 59 patients unrelated to their subgroup or amount of axial disease. After a mean follow up of 20 months, 37 patients were still receiving treatment, 33 had discontinued the drug because of inefficacy, 14 because of side effects, six because of remission of the disease, and 11 for other reasons. Comparison between the beginning and end of treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and daily dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It is concluded that: (a) a low percentage of patients with spondyloarthropathy have active disease requiring treatment with sulphasalazine despite the use of NSAIDs (27% in this study); (b) in this subgroup of patients sulphasalazine seems to be of clinically relevant benefit in 59%; and (c) this benefit does not seem to be correlated with either the precise diagnosis of spondyloarthropathy or the amount of axial disease.

Ankylosing spondylitis. Current drug treatment

The administration of drugs constitutes an important component of the therapeutic programme in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The main objective of initiating such therapy is to reduce pain, stiffness and discomfort. There are at present 3 groups of drugs available for the management of AS. The first group is represented by drugs thought to influence the disease process itself. In this group, sulfasalazine is the only drug which is controlled trials has been shown to suppress disease activity in AS. We recommend the use of sulfasalazine in patients with high disease activity, with peripheral arthritis and in those with AS of short duration. The second group of drugs includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which suppress inflammation without influencing the disease process. These drugs should be administered selectively during periods of high disease activity. Moreover, 1 drug should be used in appropriate dosage before it is assumed to be inefficient. High doses of NSAIDs may be prescribed before bedtime in patients suffering from severe pain and stiffness during the night. The toxicity profile of NSAIDs includes gastrointestinal and renal side effects. The third group comprises analgesics and muscle relaxants. Such drugs should be used rather frequently in patients with longstanding AS refractory to treatment with NSAIDs. Peripheral arthritis and enthesopathy are generally managed by local injections of corticosteroids, while AS complicated by psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease is treated as primary AS. AS occurring in juveniles is best treated with aspirin and an NSAID, although careful observation is necessary for the development of Reye's syndrome (with aspirin) and gastric irritation (with NSAIDs). When patients with AS undergo surgery, the possibility of silent gastrointestinal bleeding due to the use of NSAIDs and salicylates should not be ignored. Patients treated with oral corticosteroids should receive a bolus injection of soluble corticosteroid prior to surgical intervention. NSAIDs may be administered pre- and postoperatively to relieve stiffness induced by immobility. Rapid treatment of intervening infections and use of NSAIDs is recommended in AS complicated by renal amyloidosis. During pregnancy and lactation, ibuprofen may be the preferred drug in AS.

Prospective trial comparing the use of sulphasalazine and auranofin as second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Two hundred patients with rheumatoid arthritis were studied in a prospective open trial comparing treatment with sulphasalazine and auranofin in patients with active disease over 12 months. The two drugs improved many parameters of disease activity at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. At 12 weeks, the group treated with sulphasalazine had a lower platelet count (Mann-Whitney U test), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and articular index, with a greater decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (Students t test) and C reactive protein between 0 and 12 weeks. There were no significant differences between sulphasalazine and auranofin treatment after 24 and 48 weeks. Life table analysis showed no significant differences in the rate of side effects which caused treatment to be stopped. Sulphasalazine works more rapidly, may be a more effective disease modifying antirheumatic drug, and is as well tolerated as auranofin.

Short-term effects of antirheumatic drugs

Antirheumatic drugs fall into four categories: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs), corticosteroids, and cytotoxic drugs. NSAIDs are useful in controlling the symptoms and signs of inflammation. They work within a few days but patients' response varies widely and is unpredictable. Hence there is a wide choice of agent. Anxiety about the side-effects of NSAIDs, particularly on the stomach and kidney, is growing and their use is likely to decline, especially in the elderly. SAARDs are being used increasingly early in the disease. It is realized that there is only a small window of opportunity (2 years) in which to get the disease into remission before irreversible damage is done to the joints. Thus, there is a growing tendency to use combinations of SAARDs together with steroids early in the disease. The most appropriate treatment for established RA (of more than 2 years duration) is less easy to discern. It is important to define realistic treatment goals on an individual basis and to tailor the medication accordingly. Cytotoxic drugs are still reserved for severe aggressive joint disease or for systemic manifestations. Once we are able to predict outcome more accurately, the stage will be set for a trial of combination chemotherapy in severe early RA.

The use of sulphasalazine as a disease modifying antirheumatic drug

SASP is a useful DMARD in RA and is probably useful in early ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthropathy and reactive arthritis. It shares many of the characteristics of other DMARDs such as gold and penicillamine. It produces improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity, with a slow onset of action--8-12 weeks elapse before beneficial effect is noted. SASP probably slows radiological progression of RA but definitive proof is difficult to obtain. Although side-effects are common, these are often managed by a reduction in dose, and serious adverse events requiring cessation of therapy are uncommon. Serious side-effects do occur however, and regular monitoring with full blood counts is recommended. The mechanism of action of SASP is unknown and this remains one of the principal areas of research interest.

Comparison of the single dose pharmacokinetics of sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease

The pharmacokinetics of sulphasalazine and its principal metabolites in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were compared. Patients with RA had a significantly greater concentration of plasma sulphapyridine than patients with IBD (medians 14.0 micrograms/ml and 7.4 micrograms/ml respectively). Patients with RA also tended to maintain a higher plasma sulphapyridine concentration with time, as determined by the area under the curve (AUC), but a lower plasma sulphasalazine AUC than patients with IBD. It is suggested that more sulphasalazine may be presented to the lower bowel for cleavage to sulphapyridine and 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with RA than in IBD. Patients with RA may also have impaired metabolism of sulphapyridine as a consequence of their disease. Together these factors may contribute to higher peak circulating sulphapyridine concentrations and may be responsible for the higher incidence of side effects of sulphasalazine treatment in patients with RA than in patients with IBD.

Treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced enteropathy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced small intestinal inflammation may have an adverse effect on the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We therefore assessed small intestinal and joint inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis before and after three to nine months' treatment with sulphasalazine (n = 40) and other second line drugs (n = 20), while keeping the dosage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at the same level. Sulphasalazine significantly decreased the mean (SD) faecal excretion of 111indium labelled leucocytes from 2.39 (2.22)% to 1.33 (1.13)% (normal less than 1%, p less than 0.01) and improved the joint inflammation as assessed by a variety of parameters. There was no significant correlation between the effects of sulphasalazine treatment on the intestine and the joints. Treatment with other second line drugs had no significant effect on the faecal excretion of 111indium (1.58 (1.04)% and 1.86 (1.51)%, respectively) but improved joint inflammation significantly. The lack of correlation between the intestinal and joint inflammation and their response to treatment suggests that the two are not causally related.

Effect of sulphasalazine and sulphapyridine on neutrophil superoxide production: role of cytosolic free calcium

As the neutrophil granulocyte plays an important part in rheumatoid inflammation the effect of sulphasalazine on neutrophil function was studied. The results show that sulphasalazine, and its metabolite sulphapyridine, inhibit neutrophil superoxide production elicited by the receptor mediated stimulus N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenyl-alanine (fMLP) and by the calcium ionophore A23187. This effect seems to be dependent on inhibition of intracellular Ca++ increase as both substances reduce this increase upon cell activation with fMLP and A23187. Sulphasalazine and sulphapyridine do not inhibit superoxide production after stimulation with the ester phorbol myristate acetate, a stimulus response coupling which is independent of intracellular Ca++ increase. The reported inhibition of superoxide generation may explain, at least partly, the antirheumatic property of sulphasalazine.

The effect of folic acid supplementation on the toxicity of low-dose methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Thirty-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis completed a 24-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of folic acid (FA) supplementation during low-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy. Administration of the daily FA supplement significantly lowered toxicity scores without affecting efficacy, as measured by joint counts, joint indices, and patient and physician evaluation of disease activity. Fifteen patients experienced some sort of toxicity; 67% were in the placebo group, and 33% were in the FA supplement group. Four patients in the placebo group had toxicity levels serious enough to require discontinuation of the MTX, while no patients in the FA supplement group discontinued MTX because of toxicity. Low-normal initial plasma and red blood cell folate levels were predictive of future toxicity with MTX therapy. We conclude that a daily supplement of 1 mg of FA during low-dose MTX therapy (median dose 7.5 mg/week [16.4 mumoles]) is usefull in lessening toxicity without altering efficacy during the first 6 months of treatment.