Observational study of the safety of buprenorphine+naloxone in pregnancy in a rural and remote population

A population-based time-series analysis of opioid agonist treatment dispensed during pregnancy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Identifying effective opioid treatment options during pregnancy is a high priority due to the growing prevalence of opioid use disorder across North America. We assessed the temporal impact of three population-level interventions on the use of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during pregnancy in Ontario, Canada.

DESIGN

This was a population-based time-series analysis to identify trends in the monthly prevalence of pregnant people dispensed methadone and buprenorphine. The impact of adding buprenorphine/naloxone to the public drug formulary, the release of pregnancy-specific guidance and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada between 1 July 2013 and 31 March 2022, comprising people who delivered a live or stillbirth in any Ontario hospital during the study period.

MEASUREMENTS

We identified any prescription for methadone or buprenorphine dispensed between the estimated conception date and delivery date and calculated the monthly prevalence of OAT-exposed pregnancies among all pregnant people in Ontario.

FINDINGS

Overall, rates of OAT during pregnancy have declined since mid-2018. Methadone-exposed pregnancies decreased from 0.46% of all pregnancies in Ontario in 2015 to a low of 0.16% in 2022. In the primary analysis, none of the interventions had a statistically significant impact on overall OAT rates; however, in the stratified analyses, there was a small increase in buprenorphine after the formulary change [0.006%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0032-0.0081, P < 0.0001] and a decrease in buprenorphine after the release of the 2017 guidelines (-0.005%, 95% CI = -0.0080 to -0.0020, P = 0.001) and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (-0.003%, 95% CI = -0.0054 to -0.0006, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Despite changes in guidance and funding, opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy has been declining in Ontario, Canada since 2018.

Safety and Efficacy of Buprenorphine-Naloxone in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The prevalence of opioid use among pregnant people has been increasing over the past few decades, with a parallel increase in the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) including methadone and buprenorphine is the recommended management method for opioid use disorders during pregnancy. Methadone has been extensively studied during pregnancy; however, buprenorphine was introduced in the early 2000s with limited data on the use of different preparations during pregnancy. Buprenorphine-naloxone has been incorporated into routine practice; however, only a few studies have investigated the use of this medication during pregnancy. To determine the safety and efficacy of this medication, we conducted a systematic review of maternal and neonatal outcomes among buprenorphine-naloxone-exposed pregnancies. The primary outcomes of interest were birth parameters, congenital anomalies, and severity of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Secondary maternal outcomes included the OAT dose and substance use at delivery. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Buprenorphine-naloxone doses ranged between 8 and 20 mg, and there was an associated reduction of opioid use during pregnancy. There were no significant differences in gestational age at delivery, birth parameters, or prevalence of congenital anomalies between buprenorphine-naloxone-exposed neonates and those exposed to methadone, buprenorphine monotherapy, illicit opioids, or no opioids. In studies comparing buprenorphine-naloxone to methadone, there were reduced rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome requiring pharmacotherapy. These studies demonstrate that buprenorphine-naloxone is a safe and effective opioid agonist treatment for pregnant people with OUD. Further large-scale, prospective data collection is required to confirm these findings. Patients and clinicians may be reassured about the use of buprenorphine-naloxone during pregnancy.

Successful Buprenorphine/Naloxone Low-dose Induction in Pregnancy: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) with methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone is recommended for pregnant women with OUD. Traditional buprenorphine/naloxone induction requires patients to be in moderate withdrawal before the first dose of medication to minimize the chances of precipitated withdrawal. The low-dose buprenorphine "microinduction" (Bernese) method was described in 2016 and involves giving small doses of buprenorphine to patients for whom opioid withdrawal was not desirable. This method is being used widely in Vancouver in the context of high rates of overdose due to fentanyl poisoning.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 24-year-old woman, in her first pregnancy, with severe opioid and stimulant use disorder successfully started on buprenorphine/naloxone through a low-dose-induction protocol. The dose was started at 0.5 mg sublingual daily and slowly increased to 18 mg over 17 days. She continued to use fentanyl/heroin during the induction. She did not experience precipitated withdrawal and was able to stop using nonprescribed opioids once at a therapeutic dose of buprenorphine/naloxone.

DISCUSSION

This represents the first documented case of successful buprenorphine/naloxone low-dose induction in pregnancy. First-line recommendations still remain to use traditional buprenorphine/naloxone induction when patients present in withdrawal. Obtaining informed consent regarding the lack of research on low-dose induction in pregnancy as well as discussion of risks and benefits is essential.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose induction with buprenorphine/naloxone was successfully done in an outpatient setting. This represents a novel way of initiation of medication for OUD, which may enhance choice and collaboration between health care providers and women impacted by substance use in pregnancy.

A review of the safety of buprenorphine in special populations

Rates of opioid misuse and opioid use disorder have been increasing in recent years. Buprenorphine has emerged as an appealing medication for its use not only as treatment for opioid use disorder, but also as an opioid for chronic pain that has a ceiling effect on risks associated with opioid therapy. As other opioid prescribing decreases, buprenorphine prescribing continues to increase. As a result, it is imperative to understand the safety and efficacy of its use in special populations. This review article will explore the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine when used in subjects with hepatic and renal impairment, the elderly, and pregnant women. While manufacturer labeling for buprenorphine products may caution against their use in these populations, further examination of available data indicates that buprenorphine can be used safely and effectively for both chronic pain and/or opioid use disorder in all four of these populations.

Buprenorphine-naloxone versus Buprenorphine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

Data regarding treatment outcomes with the use of buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) in pregnancy are scarce. The objective of this study is to examine the outcomes in a cohort of pregnancies treated with BUP-NX versus buprenorphine (BUP).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined birthing person-infant dyads treated with BUP-NX versus BUP. The primary birthing person outcome was return to opioid use in pregnancy. The primary neonatal outcome was the need for pharmacologic treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).

RESULTS

The BUP-NX and the BUP treatment groups included 33 and 73 dyads, respectively. Except for psychiatric medication use, all demographics were similar between groups. In the final regression models, neither the birthing person nor the neonatal outcomes differed. The adjusted odds ratio for return to use during pregnancy for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-4.76). The adjusted odds ratio for pharmacologic treatment of NOWS for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.54). Among a subgroup of persons who transitioned from BUP to BUP-NX mid-pregnancy, there was no proximate return to use or need for dose increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BUP, the use of BUP-NX in pregnancy is not associated with a higher risk of return to opioid use or a higher need for pharmacological treatment for NOWS.

Opioid exposure during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformation: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Opioid exposure during pregnancy has increased alarmingly in recent decades. However, the association between prenatal opioid exposure and congenital malformation risk has still been controversial. We aim to assess the association between opioid exposure during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library of clinical trials were systematically searched to September 13th, 2021. Cohort studies reporting risk of congenital malformation after opioid exposure compared with non-exposure during pregnancy were included. Risk of studies was appraised with the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome based on indication, exposed period, whether adjusted data was used, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the relation of publication year.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen cohort studies with 7,077,709 patients were included. The results showed a significant increase in the risk of overall congenital malformation (RR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.11-1.53), major malformation (RR = 1.57, 95%CI:1.11-2.22), central nervous system malformation (RR = 1.36, 95% CI:1.19-1.55), and limb malformation (RR = 2.27, 95%CI:1.29-4.02) with opioid exposure during pregnancy. However, the predictive interval conveyed a different result on overall congenital malformation (95%PI: 0.82-2.09) and major malformation (95%PI: 0.82-2.09). No association between opioid exposure and overall congenital malformation in the first trimester (RR = 1.12, 95%CI:0.97-1.31) and prescribed for analgesic or antitussive treatment (RR = 1.03, 95%CI:0.94-1.13) were observed. In subgroups that study provided data adjusted for confounders (RR = 1.06, 95%CI:0.93-1.20) or identified moderate or serious risk of bias (RR = 1.00, 95%Cl: 0.85-1.16; RR = 1.21, 95%Cl: 1.60-2.68), no association was found.

CONCLUSION

Opioid exposed in the first trimester or prescribed for analgesic or antitussive treatment did not increase the risk of overall congenital malformation. The findings should be discussed in caution considering the situation of individual patients and weigh out its potential risk of congenital malformation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number: CRD42021279445 .

The Management of Substance Use Disorders: Synopsis of the 2021 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline

DESCRIPTION

In August 2021, leadership within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved a joint clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of substance use disorders (SUDs). This synopsis summarizes key recommendations.

METHODS

In March 2020, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group assembled a team to update the 2015 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Substance Use Disorders that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the National Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy CPGs. The guideline panel developed key questions, systematically searched and evaluated the literature, created two 1-page algorithms, and distilled 35 recommendations for care using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. This synopsis presents the recommendations that were believed to be the most clinically impactful.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The scope of the CPG is broad; however, this synopsis focuses on key recommendations for the management of alcohol use disorder, use of buprenorphine in opioid use disorder, contingency management, and use of technology and telehealth to manage patients remotely.

Support Models for Addiction Related Treatment (SMART) for pregnant women: Study protocol of a cluster randomized trial of two treatment models for opioid use disorder in prenatal clinics

Introduction

The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy increased nearly five-fold over the past decade. Despite this, obstetric providers are less likely to treat pregnant women with medication for OUD than non-obstetric providers (75% vs 91%). A major reason is many obstetricians feel unprepared to prescribe medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Education and support may increase prescribing and overall comfort in delivering care for pregnant women with OUD, but optimal models of education and support are yet to be determined.

Methods and analysis

We describe the rationale and conduct of a matched-pair cluster randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two models of support for reproductive health clinicians to provide care for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD. The primary outcomes of this trial are patient treatment engagement and retention in OUD treatment. This study compares two support models: 1) a collaborative care approach, based upon the Massachusetts Office-Based-Opioid Treatment Model, that provides practice-level training and support to providers and patients through the use of care managers, versus 2) a telesupport approach based on the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a remote education model that provides mentorship, guided practice, and participation in a learning community, via video conferencing.

Discussion

This clustered randomized clinical trial aims to test the effectiveness of two approaches to support practitioners who care for pregnant women with an OUD. The results of this trial will help determine the best model to improve the capacity of obstetrical providers to deliver treatment for OUD in prenatal clinics.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov trial registration number: NCT0424039.

Neurotoxic effect of nalufin on the histology, ultrastructure, cell cycle and apoptosis of the developing chick embryo and its amelioration by selenium

The use of opioids during pregnancy has recently dramatically increased presenting major health problems, especially on the developing neonatal nervous system development. Nalufin is considered one of the most used opioid analgesics for treatment of moderate to severe pain, especially during pregnancy. The aim of the present study was firstly to assess the possible neurotoxic effects of nalufin injection during the organogenesis period of chick embryos, and second to investigate the ameliorative effects of selenium as a supplement. Fertilized chicken eggs were in ovo injected with 0.2ml of either nalufin (20 mg/kg egg) or selenium (0.1 mg/kg egg) or both. Nalufin injection resulted in cerebral cortical layer disruption, increase of Caspase-3 immunoexpression and chromatolytic nuclei, degenerated organelles, rarefied cytoplasm and hemorrhage. On the molecular levels, nalufin induced DNA fragmentation, cell cycle arrest and increased the percentage of apoptosis of the neuronal cells. Selenium combined treatment restored the three-layered structure of the cerebral cortex, decreased caspase-3 immuno-expression, improved ultrastructure and recovered cell cycle arrest, decreased apoptosis, and DNA degradation. In conclusion, nalufin treatment during pregnancy imposes great concerns and should not be used during embryonic development, on the other hands, selenium appears to be a promising neuroprotective agent against nalufin-induced neurotoxicity.

The use of buprenorphine + naloxone sublingual tablet in the treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: Two case reports

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome occurs after exposure during pregnancies of mothers with an opioid use disorder. If non-pharmacological treatment is insufficient, pharmacological options are preferred, but a common treatment guideline has not yet been determined. Sublingual buprenorphine tablet is more prominent in the treatment. Since oral alternatives are not available in many clinics, as in our unit, parenteral morphine is still the drug of the first choice. In this paper, we reported that two babies with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome were successfully treated with a buprenorphine/naloxone combination, which was not previously shown in the literature.

CASES

We followed two babies whose mothers had an opioid use disorder during their pregnancies. The modified Finnegan scoring scale was used for the assessment of the babies. Both infants developed persistent seizures with resistant withdrawal signs. An effective parenteral route could not be provided due to hemodynamic instability. Thus, IV morphine could not be used. Due to the lack of oral treatment alternatives, first, we tried phenobarbital up to 40 mg/kg orally. Afterward, we used buprenorphine/naloxone combined tablet sublingually, which has not been used in children before. Detailed written consent was obtained from the parents for the emergency use of this drug in advance. Shortly after this treatment, the seizures and withdrawal signs were controlled. There were no adverse effects and babies were discharged fully recovered.

CONCLUSION

Sublingual Buprenorphine 2 mg + Naloxone 0.5 mg (4:1) tablet could be used efficiently and without side effects to treat neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

On the path to reclaiming Indigenous midwifery: Co-creating the Maternal Infant Support Worker pilot program

Objective

The aim of the Maternal Infant Support Worker (MiSW) pilot program was to implement a virtual training program for lay maternal–infant health providers in remote First Nations communities in Northwestern Ontario, Canada.

Methods

The MiSW pilot program was administered jointly by a community college and a university and consisted of a 20‐week virtual course followed by a 9‐month mentored work placement in the community.

Results

The MiSW pilot program was delivered successfully; 11 of 13 participants received a certificate from a community college. MiSWs provided culturally and linguistically appropriate care to women, infants, and families in their respective communities. MiSWs provided doula support in their communities—a first for our region since the policy of forced evacuation for birth was implemented. MiSWs developed a community of practice for ongoing education, as well as to support each other in their work.

Conclusion

The MiSW pilot program demonstrated that it is possible to provide a virtual training program and then provide continued virtual mentorship as the participants work in their First Nations communities. By prioritizing Indigenous voices above those of the research team, we were able to gain the trust of the MiSWs and maintain engagement with communities.

The Maternal Infant Support Worker pilot program successfully implemented a virtual training program for lay maternal–infant workers living in remote communities.

Buprenorphine and Naloxone Versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and fetal outcomes among dyads prescribed buprenorphine and naloxone or buprenorphine during pregnancy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with opioid use disorder obtaining care in a comprehensive, perinatal program. Patients utilized medication for opioid use disorder: a buprenorphine and naloxone combination product or buprenorphine monotherapy. The primary outcome was neonatal abstinence syndrome requiring treatment. Maternal secondary outcomes included: negative urine drug screen at delivery, obstetrical care attendance, primary cesarean delivery, and preterm delivery. Neonatal secondary outcomes included neonatal biometry, admission to neonatal intensive care, appropriate findings on cord toxicology, and length of stay. Univariate analyses included Chi square, Fisher exact, t-, or Mann-Whitney tests, as appropriate. Multivariate binary logistic regressions examined the association of type of buprenorphine product with diagnosis of neonatal abstinence syndrome requiring treatment and adjusted for variables significantly different in between-group comparisons and correlates of treatments and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome was significantly higher (P = 0.007) among infants exposed in utero to buprenorphine versus buprenorphine and naloxone: 59/108 (54.6%) versus 30/85 (35.3%), respectively. The combined product, relative to the monoproduct, was associated with lower odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome: odds ratio (OR) = 0.453 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.253-0.813; P = 0.008). Adjusting for dose of buprenorphine product at delivery, year of expected delivery, type of prescriber, diagnosis of hepatitis C, and preterm delivery negated these results: adjusted OR = 0.627 (95% CI 0.309-1.275). Secondary outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

Compared with buprenorphine monotherapy, the combined buprenorphine and naloxone product was an acceptable alternative pharmacologic treatment for opioid use disorder during pregnancy.

Buprenorphine dosing for the treatment of opioid use disorder through pregnancy and postpartum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Opioid-related deaths are a leading cause of mortality during pregnancy through 12 months postpartum. Buprenorphine use during pregnancy is increasing, yet expert opinion on its dosing through the perinatal period is limited. We provide a review of the current clinical literature on buprenorphine dosing during pregnancy through 12 months postpartum. and present data from a retrospective chart review of patients at our institution describing trends in buprenorphine dosing during pregnancy and postpartum. Utilizing this information, we synthesize findings to provide clinical recommendations for providers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Existing literature during pregnancy reflects how many women increase and split total daily buprenorphine doses as gestational age advances.

SUMMARY

We present data from a retrospective chart review of patients at our institution describing trends in buprenorphine dosing during pregnancy and postpartum. Utilizing this information, we synthesize findings to provide clinical recommendations for providers. Changes in the total daily dose of buprenorphine used across pregnancy and through 12 months postpartum at the individual level do not follow consistent patterns, highlighting substantial individual variability. Altogether, buprenorphine dosing should be individualized through pregnancy and postpartum with frequent evaluations by providers and solicited input from patients.

Buprenorphine-naloxone use in pregnancy: a systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this systematic review and metaanalysis is to compare pregnancy outcomes between pregnant women undergoing treatment for opioid use disorder with buprenorphine-naloxone and those undergoing treatment for opioid use disorder with other forms of medication-assisted treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Clinical Trials, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies assessing the relationship between maternal buprenorphine-naloxone use and pregnancy outcomes. Outcomes assessed included neonatal abstinence syndrome diagnosis and treatment, neonatal intensive care unit admission, length of neonatal hospital stay, delivery complications, mode of delivery, labor analgesia, illicit drug use, medication-assisted treatment dosage, gestational age at delivery, breastfeeding status, miscarriage, congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal demise, birthweight, head circumference, length, and Apgar scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 studies comprising 6 study groups met the inclusion criteria. Of the 1875 mother-baby dyads available for analysis, medications prescribed as part of the medication-assisted treatment included buprenorphine-naloxone, buprenorphine alone, methadone, or long-acting opioids. There were no serious adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes associated with maternal buprenorphine-naloxone use reported among any of the studies. Women prescribed with buprenorphine-naloxone for delivered neonates who were less likely to require treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome were compared with pregnant women prescribed with other opioid agonist medications. Of the remaining outcomes assessed, metaanalysis did not detect any statistically significant differences when comparing the groups of women using buprenorphine-naloxone with the groups of women prescribed with other medications as part of the medication-assisted treatment.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women undergoing treatment for opioid use disorder with buprenorphine-naloxone do not experience significantly different pregnancy outcomes than women undergoing treatment with other forms of opioid agonist medication-assisted therapy.

Medication treatment for opioid use disorder in expectant mothers (MOMs): Design considerations for a pragmatic randomized trial comparing extended-release and daily buprenorphine formulations

Opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant women has increased significantly in recent years. Maintaining these women on sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is an evidence-based practice but BUP-SL is associated with several disadvantages that an extended-release (XR) BUP formulation could eliminate. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) is conducting an intent-to-treat, two-arm, open-label, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, Medication treatment for Opioid-dependent expectant Mothers (MOMs), to compare mother and infant outcomes of pregnant women with OUD treated with BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL. A second aim is to determine the relative economic value of utilizing BUP-XR. Approximately 300 pregnant women with an estimated gestational age (EGA) of 6-30 weeks, recruited from 12 sites, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to BUP-XR or BUP-SL, balancing on site, EGA, and BUP-SL status (taking/not taking) at the time of randomization. Participants will be provided with study medication and attend weekly medication visits through 12 months postpartum. Participants will be invited to participate in two sub-studies to evaluate the: 1) mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve mother and infant outcomes; and 2) effects of prenatal exposure to BUP-XR versus BUP-SL on infant neurodevelopment. This paper describes the key design decisions for the main trial made during protocol development. This Investigational New Drug (IND) trial uniquely uses pragmatic features where feasible in order to maximize external validity, hence increasing the potential to inform clinical practice guidelines and address multiple knowledge gaps for treatment of this patient population.

Medication safety challenges in Aboriginal Health Care services

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine the challenges faced by the Aboriginal Health Practitioners in the community assisting their clients to manage medicines.

DESIGN

Qualitative, in depth interviews with eight Aboriginal Health Practitioners employed at various Aboriginal Community Controlled Health services in Victoria were undertaken.

SETTING

Rural Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service.

PARTICIPANTS

Aboriginal Health Practitioners who are registered with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Practice Board of Australia as an Aboriginal Health Practitioner and who have experience in the planning, provision, management and evaluation of health services within their scope of practice.

RESULTS

This study revealed multiples challenges faced by Aboriginal Health Practitioners assisting clients with medication management. These were mainly divided into the attitudes and the culture of the workplace and barriers with medications use faced by the clients. The following subthemes were identified within the attitudes and workplace culture theme. These were reporting of errors, pamphlets not culturally appropriate, lack of education of Aboriginal Health Practitioner role and doctors' understanding of Aboriginal culture. The subthemes identified by the Aboriginal Health Practitioners that were specific to the clients included language barriers, immediacy, sharing medications by family members, medications disposal, self-diagnosis, traditional medicine, not feeling comfortable with doctors, literacy and alcohol use.

CONCLUSION

This study has identified many barriers to medication safety in the Aboriginal community, and strategies to improve some of the challenges identified.

Long-term treatment retention in West Virginia's comprehensive opioid addiction treatment (COAT) program

BACKGROUND

The United States continues to experience an opioid epidemic of unprecedented proportions despite FDA approval of life saving medications, such as buprenorphine. This paper describes a novel group-based buprenorphine treatment model and summarizes patient characteristics and treatment retention. This model, known as the Comprehensive Opioid Addiction Treatment (COAT) program, was developed in West Virginia, the epicenter of the opioid epidemic.

METHODS

Data on 454 patients actively enrolled in the COAT program were extracted from an administrative clinical data set and electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive and quantitative analysis to determine long-term retention in treatment using frequencies and means.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the 454 patients are as follows: average age of 39, 53% female, predominantly white (94%) and Medicaid was the primary insurance provider (68%). Analysis of retention showed 37.8% of patents were retained less than one year and 14.7% were retained 10 or more years. Initiating treatment at a younger age was associated with long-term retention.

CONCLUSION

Opioid use disorder is a chronic relapsing disease and treatment models that retain patients long-term have the greatest benefit. The COAT model has been successful in retaining patients long-term in a rural setting where barriers to treatment are many.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Treating perinatal opioid use disorder in rural settings: Challenges and opportunities

Perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) is a life-threatening condition that significantly impacts women in rural areas. Medication assisted treatment (MAT) is the recommended treatment but can be difficult to access. Pregnant women may initially present for treatment of OUD in the emergency department, on labor and delivery units, or in an office setting, each of which presents unique challenges. Initiation of MAT in the appropriate setting, based on accurate assessment of gestational age, is a centrally important component of care for perinatal OUD. However, initiating treatment may present challenges to providers who lack experience treating this disorder. Vermont and New Hampshire are predominantly rural states which have focused on expanding MAT access for pregnant women using two different approaches to integrating treatment with maternity care.

Analgesia, Opioids, and Other Drug Use During Pregnancy and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

When opioid misuse rises in the United States, pregnant women and their neonates are affected. This article summarizes the use of Food and Drug Administration-approved products, including methadone, buprenorphine, and the combination formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone to treat adult opioid use disorder during the perinatal period. All labels include pregnancy, neonatal, and lactation information and note the accepted use of these medications during the perinatal period if the benefits outweigh the risks. A summary of the neonatal abstinence syndrome definition, its assessment tools, treatment approaches, and future genetic directions are provided.

West Virginia's model of buprenorphine expansion: Preliminary results

West Virginia (WV) is situated at the epicenter of the opioid epidemic with the highest rates of overdose deaths and some of the lowest rates of access to life saving evidence-based medication assisted treatment (MAT) for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). WV used a modified hub-and-spoke model to build organizational capacity for facilities to use buprenorphine to treat patients with OUD and to provide ongoing case consultation. The purpose of this study is to 1) describe the group-base model of buprenorphine treatment and the model used to build organizational capacity, 2) to describe the preliminary results of buprenorphine expansion in WV and 3) to report preliminary data describing and comparing the characteristics of the patients served across five hubs. A single Coordinating Center uses video conferencing to train hubs and provide ongoing case consultation, as well as clinical support. Hubs were trained to deliver a buprenorphine treatment model that is multi-disciplinary and includes group-based medication management and psychosocial therapy. Five regional hubs independently treat patients and are leading MAT expansion in their local areas by training and mentoring spokes (n = 13). As a result of the WV STR funding, 14 health care facilities have started to use buprenorphine, 56 health professionals were trained and 196 patients with OUD have been treated. There were few sociodemographic characteristic differences across patients treated at the five hubs, while there were differences in self-reported alcohol and drug use in the 30 days prior to intake. Additional research is needed to determine whether the WV modified hub-and-spoke model resulted in statistically significant improvements in buprenorphine treatment capacity; there is a need to address MAT stigma and regulatory barriers in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of the buprenorphine expansion.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome

Neonatal abstinence syndrome refers to the signs and symptoms attributed to the cessation of prenatal exposure (via placental transfer) to various substances. This Primer focuses on neonatal abstinence syndrome caused by opioid use during pregnancy - neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). As the global prevalence of opioid use has alarmingly increased, so has the incidence of NOWS. NOWS can manifest with varying severity or not at all, for unknown reasons, but is likely to be associated with multiple factors, both maternal (for example, smoking and additional substance exposures) and neonatal (gestational age, sex and genetics). Care for the infant with NOWS begins with addressing the issues experienced by pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Co-occurring mental illness, economic hardship, intimate partner violence, infectious diseases and limited access to care are common in these women and can result in poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although there is no consensus regarding optimal NOWS management, non-pharmacological interventions (such as breastfeeding and rooming-in of the mother and the baby) have become a priority, as they can ameliorate symptoms without the need for further opioid exposure. Untreated NOWS can be associated with morbidity in early infancy, and the long-term consequences of fetal opioid exposure are only beginning to be understood.

Screening and Management of Substance Use in Pregnancy: A Review

Substance use during pregnancy has important implications for health care providers, policy makers, and can negatively impact a woman's health and the health of her children. Understanding trends, patterns of use and outcomes are critical to prevention campaigns, building awareness, and providing effective care. This review will discuss the current therapeutic approaches and recommendations for screening and patient management for substance use in pregnancy and during the postpartum period, and it is geared towards any care providers who care for patients or those who may care for patients who may be at risk for substance use during pregnancy.

Treating women with opioid use disorder during pregnancy in Appalachia: Initial neonatal outcomes following buprenorphine + naloxone exposure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rising concerns regarding diversion and misuse of mono-buprenorphine for treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorders have sparked interest in the use of buprenorphine + naloxone to reduce misuse and diversion rates. Examined the relationship of prenatal buprenorphine + naloxone exposure to neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of 26 mother infant dyads in comprehensive medication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine + naloxone during pregnancy.

RESULTS

All neonatal birth outcome parameters were within normal ranges, albeit on the lower side of normal for gestational age and birth weight. Only 19% of neonates required morphine pharmacology for NAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of buprenorphine + naloxone shows relative safety in pregnancy.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

These findings can help better guide prescribing practices for pregnant patients at risk for misuse or diversion of buprenorphine. (Am J Addict 2018;27:92-96).

Opioid use in pregnancy and parenting: An Indigenous-based, collaborative framework for Northwestern Ontario

Opioid use affects up to 30% of pregnancies in Northwestern Ontario. Health care providers in Northwestern Ontario have varying comfort levels providing care to substance-involved pregnant women. Furthermore, health care practitioners, social service agencies and community groups in Northwestern Ontario often work in isolation with little multidisciplinary communication and collaboration. This article describes two workshops that brought together health and social service providers, community organizations, as well as academic institutions and professional organizations involved in the care of substance-involved pregnant and parenting women. The initial workshop presented best practices and local experience in the management of opioid dependence in pregnancy while the second workshop asked participants to apply a local Indigenous worldview to the implementation of clinical, research and program priorities that were identified in the first workshop. Consensus statements developed by workshop participants identified improved transitions in care, facilitated access to buprenorphine treatment, stable funding models for addiction programs and a focus on Indigenous-led programming. Participants identified a critical need for a national strategy to address the effects of opioid use in pregnancy from a culturally safe, trauma-informed perspective that takes into account the health and well-being of the woman, her infant, her family and her community.

First Nations hepatitis C virus infections: Six-year retrospective study of on-reserve rates of newly reported infections in northwestern Ontario

OBJECTIVE

To document rates of newly reported hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases from 2010 to 2015 in remote First Nations communities.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of aggregate data of newly reported HCV antibody-positive (Ab+) cases.

SETTING

Northwestern Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 31 First Nations communities (an on-reserve population of 20 901) supported in health care by the Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The aggregate characteristic data included year of notification, age range, and sex for a 6-year period (2010 to 2015).

RESULTS

There were 267 HCV Ab+ cases in the 6-year study period. The incidence in 2015 was 324.2 per 100 000 population. This is 11 times the rate for all of Ontario. The most common associated risk factor was sharing of intravenous drug use equipment. Women made up 52% of patients with newly reported HCV Ab+ cases. More than 45% of cases were in patients between 20 and 29 years of age.

CONCLUSION

This high burden of newly reported HCV Ab+ cases in geographically remote First Nations communities is concerning, and prevention and treatment resources are needed. This burden of disease might pose more urgent health and social challenges than can be generalized from the experience of the rest of Canada.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Birth Outcomes in Neonates Exposed to Naltrexone in Utero: A Comparison with Methadone-, Buprenorphine- and Non-opioid-Exposed Neonates

BACKGROUND

Naltrexone may provide a suitable alternative to methadone and buprenorphine in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent women; however, little is known about its effects on neonatal morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the health of neonates exposed to naltrexone in utero, and compare it with outcomes in neonates exposed to methadone or buprenorphine and a non-exposed control group.

METHODS

Sequential cohorts of Western Australian (WA) opioid-dependent women treated with implant naltrexone, oral methadone or sublingual buprenorphine were identified via records from a drug and alcohol clinic (Subiaco, WA) for naltrexone and state prescribing records for methadone and buprenorphine. A control cohort of non-opioid-dependent women was obtained from the WA electoral roll. Identifying information and treatment records for these women were linked against the Midwife Notification System records to identify exposed offspring born between 2001 and 2011. Birth characteristics, congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality for all neonates were extracted from state records.

RESULTS

The birth characteristics of naltrexone-exposed neonates (n = 68) were superior to methadone-exposed neonates (n = 199) in terms of birth size (birth weight, head circumference and length), hospital length of stay (5.5 vs. 11.3 days), and rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) (7.5 vs. 51.5%). Naltrexone-exposed neonates were generally not significantly different to buprenorphine-exposed neonates (n = 124), with the exception of significantly lower rates of NAS (7.5 vs. 41.8%) and shorter hospital length of stay (5.5 vs. 8.0 days) in naltrexone-exposed neonates. Compared with the control group of neonates (n = 569), naltrexone-exposed neonates were not significantly different in terms of overall rates of congenital anomalies, stillbirths and neonatal mortality; however, they were significantly smaller (3137.1 vs. 3378.0 g), spent more time in hospital following birth (5.5 vs. 4.3 days) and had higher rates of NAS (7.5 vs. 0.2%). Exposure of neonates to prenatal methadone was associated with a high incidence of neonatal mortality (2.0 vs. 0.2 per 100 live births) and congenital anomalies (10.6 vs. 4.4 per 100 births) compared with the control group. Rates of neonatal mortality and congenital abnormalities in buprenorphine-exposed neonates were not significantly different to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of implant naltrexone during pregnancy was not associated with higher rates of negative birth outcomes compared with methadone- and buprenorphine-exposed neonates. Significantly, naltrexone and buprenorphine were not associated with the high rates of neonatal mortality or congenital anomalies seen in methadone-exposed neonates.

Opioid Use in Pregnancy, Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, and Childhood Outcomes: Executive Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the March of Dimes Foundation

In April 2016, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development invited experts to a workshop to address numerous knowledge gaps and to review the evidence for the screening and management of opioid use in pregnancy and neonatal abstinence syndrome. The rising prevalence of opioid use in pregnancy has led to a concomitant dramatic fivefold increase in neonatal abstinence syndrome over the past decade. Experts from diverse disciplines addressed research gaps in the following areas: 1) optimal screening for opioid use in pregnancy; 2) complications of pregnancy associated with opioid use; 3) appropriate treatments for pregnant women with opioid use disorders; 4) the best approaches for detecting, treating, and managing newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome; and 5) the long-term effects of prenatal opioid exposure on children. Workshop participants identified key scientific opportunities to advance the understanding of opioid use disorders in pregnancy and to improve outcomes for affected women, their children, and their families. This article provides a summary of the workshop presentations and discussions.

Maternal-Fetal Monitoring of Opioid-Exposed Pregnancies: Analysis of a Pilot Community-Based Protocol and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

To describe/analyse a novel, community-based prenatal monitoring protocol for opioid-exposed pregnancies developed by our centre in 2014 to optimize prenatal care for this population. A literature review of published monitoring protocols for this population is also presented.

METHODS

Retrospective comparison of pre-protocol (n = 215) and post-protocol (n = 251) cohorts. Medline and Embase were searched between 2000-2016 using MeSH terms: [fetal monitoring OR prenatal care] AND [opioid-related disorders OR substance-related disorders] in Medline and [fetal monitoring OR prenatal care] AND [opiate addiction OR substance abuse] in Embase, producing 518 results. Thirteen studies included protocols for monitoring opioid-exposed pregnancies. No comprehensive monitoring protocols with high-quality supporting evidence were found.

RESULTS

We evaluated 466 opioid-exposed pregnancies, 215 before and 251 after introduction of the protocol. Since implementation, there was a significant increase in the number of opioid-exposed patients who have underwent urine drug screening (72.6% to 89.2%, P < 0.0001); a significant reduction in the number of urine drug screenings positive for illicit opioids (50.2% to 29.1%, P < 0.0001); and a significant increase in the number of patients who discontinued illicit opioid use by the time of delivery (24.7% to 39.4%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the CS rate (27.4% vs. 26.3%, P > 0.05). There were no observed differences in the rate of preterm birth, birth weight <2500 g, or Apgar score <7 (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Care of women with increased opioid use during pregnancy is an important but under-studied health issue. A novel protocol for focused antenatal care provision for women with opioid-exposed pregnancies improves standard of care and maternal/fetal outcomes.