Effect of cardiologist care on 6-month outcomes in patients discharged with heart failure: results from an observational study based on administrative data

A STRONG call for intensive oral heart failure therapy in acute heart failure patients

Heart failure (HF), a chronic and progressive disease, is increasing in prevalence worldwide and is associated with increased hospitalizations and death. Despite notable improvements in medical therapy for HF, patients are still at risk of future negative outcomes. Current guidelines recommend four classes of medication for treating patients with HF, deemed guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The use and adherence of these GDMTs serve as a major predictor of outcomes in those with chronic HF; however, implementation of therapy remains poor, despite substantial evidence of benefit. The acute hospitalization for HF and the subsequent vulnerable period serve as important milestones for adequate disease modification, and implementing a strategy for aggressive medical therapy can improve HF outcomes. Current guidelines also recommend that follow-up with multidisciplinary chronic disease management specific to HF be provided to those living with heart failure, which is essential for improving readmissions and mortality. This follow-up, although important by itself, serves as an important avenue for disease modification through medication titration, and implementing such structured follow-up is essential for further population-wide improvements in HF mortality. In this context, the STRONG-HF trial investigators developed an implementation trial providing evidence for the rapid inpatient initiation and subsequent titration of HF GDMT, demonstrating the importance of implementation strategies in the care of HF patients. In this narrative review, we review the evidence base for treating patients with HF, highlight deficits in our current real-world experience, and provide support for trial evidence like STRONG-HF in the global fight to reduce the burden of HF.

The impact of specialist cardiology inpatient care on the long-term outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Specialist cardiac care has been shown to reduce inpatient mortality following non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but whether this benefit extends beyond index admission is unclear.

METHODS

Using the linked Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, and Office for National Statistics mortality recording, we included 425,205 NSTEMI patients admitted to UK hospitals, between January 2005 and March 2019 that survived to discharge. 217,964 (52 %) were admitted to a specialty cardiac ward. Multivariable Cox-regression models were applied to imputed data to estimate Hazard Ratios for mortality over our study period.

RESULTS

Patients admitted to specialty cardiology wards were younger (70 years vs. 75), less often female (32 % vs. 40 %) but more often received statins (86 % vs. 84 %) or beta-blockers (83 % vs. 77 %) (all P < 0.001). One-year (aHR:0.84, 95 % CI 0.83-0.86), and ten-year mortality (aHR: 0.88, 95 % CI 0.87-0.89) were lower in patients admitted to specialty cardiac wards, compared to admitted elsewhere (all P < 0.001). There was significant geographic variation in the proportion admitted to speciality cardiac wards (London 59 % vs. East of England 43 %), with over 1700 deaths potentially avoided if the MINAP target of 80 % was reached.

CONCLUSION

Patients admitted to a cardiac ward had significantly lower mortality compared to alternate wards persisting up to ten-years. There is wide regional variation in the proportion of patients who received specialist cardiology care during their admission and an opportunity exists for lives saved if the proportion of NSTEMI patients admitted to a cardiac ward were to reach the MINAP target of 80 %.

Sacubitril/valsartan in a wide spectrum of heart failure patients (from mechanisms of action to outcomes in specific populations)

Heart failure (HF) represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, decreased quality of life and a significant financial and economic burden. The prevalence of HF continues to rise, driven by an ageing population and an increasing burden of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and obesity. Understanding the complex pathophysiology and developing effective treatments are critical for improving patient outcomes, yet the range of effective, life-prolonging medication classes has remained mostly constant in the last few decades. The introduction of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) was a major breakthrough in HF management, for the first time targeting the natriuretic peptide system in addition to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway to potentiate the effects of older drug classes. ARNI shows superiority in clinical outcomes compared to previous guideline-directed therapies, especially in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). It has now been implemented into international guidelines, endorsing its use in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). This review summarises the mechanism of action of Sac/Val, presents key clinical trials in a range of patient populations and HF aetiologies and outlines gaps in knowledge and potential novel uses of Sac/Val.

Reducing the hospitalization epidemic of chronic heart failure by disease management programs

Chronic heart failure is the most common cause of hospitalization in Europe and rates are steadily increasing due to aging of the population. Hospitalization identifies a fundamental change in the natural history of heart failure (HF) increasing the risk of re-hospitalization and mortality. Heart failure management programs improve the quality of care for HF patients and reduce hospitalization burden. The goals of the heart failure management programs include optimization of drug therapy, patient education, early recognition of signs of decompensation, and management of comorbidities. Randomized clinical trials evidenced that system of care for heart failure patients improved adherence to treatment and reduced unplanned re-admissions to hospital. Multidisciplinary programs and home-visiting have shown improved efficacy with reductions in HF and all-cause hospitalizations and mortality. Community HF clinics should take care of the management of stable patients in strict contact with primary care, while hospital out-patients clinics should care of patients with severe disease or persistent clinical instability, candidates to advanced treatment options. In any case a holistic, patient-centered approach is suggested, to optimize care considering the needs of the individual patient. Telemonitoring is a new opportunity for HF patients, because it allows the continuity of care at home. All heart failure patients should require follow-up in a specific management program, but most of date come from clinical trials that included high-risk patients. While clinical trials have a specified duration (from months to some years), lifelong follow-up is recommended with differentiated approaches according to the patient's need.

The Effect of Home Care Support Clinics on Hospital Readmission in Heart Failure Patients in Japan

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is common and is associated with high rates of hospitalization. Home care support clinics/hospitals (HCSCs) and enhanced HCSCs were introduced in Japan in 2006 and 2012, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effect of post-discharge care by conventional or enhanced HCSCs on readmission, compared with general clinics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the Japanese nationwide health insurance claims database.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were ≥65 years of age, admitted for heart failure and discharged between July 2014 and August 2015 and received a home visit within a month following the discharge (n=12,393).

MAIN MEASURES

The exposure was the type of medical facility that provides post-discharge home healthcare: general clinics, conventional HCSCs, and enhanced HCSCs. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission for 6 months after the first visit; the incidence of emergency house calls was a secondary outcome. We used a competing risk regression using the Fine and Gray method, in which death was regarded as a competing event.

KEY RESULTS

At 6 months, readmissions were lower in conventional (38%) or enhanced HCSCs (38%) than general clinics (43%). The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of readmission was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) for conventional and 0.86 (0.78-0.96) for enhanced HCSCs. Emergency house calls increased with conventional (sHR: 1.77, 95% CI:1.57-2.00) and enhanced HCSCs (sHR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.71-2.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Older Japanese patients with heart failure receiving post-discharge home healthcare by conventional or enhanced HCSCs had lower readmission rates, possibly due to compensation with more emergency house calls. Conventional and enhanced HCSCs may be effective in reducing the risk of rehospitalization. Further studies are necessary to confirm the medical functions performed by HCSCs.

Integrated care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: protocol for the ESCAPE randomized trial and cohort study

ESCAPE

Evaluation of a patient-centred biopsychosocial blended collaborative care pathway for the treatment of multimorbid elderly patients.

THERAPEUTIC AREA

Healthcare interventions for the management of older patients with multiple morbidities.

AIMS

Multi-morbidity treatment is an increasing challenge for healthcare systems in ageing societies. This comprehensive cohort study with embedded randomized controlled trial tests an integrated biopsychosocial care model for multimorbid elderly patients.

HYPOTHESIS

A holistic, patient-centred pro-active 9-month intervention based on the blended collaborative care (BCC) approach and enhanced by information and communication technologies can improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease outcomes as compared with usual care at 9 months.

METHODS

Across six European countries, ESCAPE is recruiting patients with heart failure, mental distress/disorder plus ≥2 medical co-morbidities into an observational cohort study. Within the cohort study, 300 patients will be included in a randomized controlled assessor-blinded two-arm parallel group interventional clinical trial (RCT). In the intervention, trained care managers (CMs) regularly support patients and informal carers in managing their multiple health problems. Supervised by a clinical specialist team, CMs remotely support patients in implementing the treatment plan-customized to the patients' individual needs and preferences-into their daily lives and liaise with patients' healthcare providers. An eHealth platform with an integrated patient registry guides the intervention and helps to empower patients and informal carers. HRQoL measured with the EQ-5D-5L as primary endpoint, and secondary outcomes, that is, medical and patient-reported outcomes, healthcare costs, cost-effectiveness, and informal carer burden, will be assessed at 9 and ≥18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

If proven effective, the ESCAPE BCC intervention can be implemented in routine care for older patients with multiple morbidities across the participating countries and beyond.

Association between patient volume to cardiologist, process of care, and clinical outcomes in heart failure

AIMS

The impact of hospital volume on clinical performance has been investigated by many researchers to date and thought that it is associated with quality of care and outcome for patients with heart failure (HF). This study sought to determine whether annual admissions of HF per cardiologist are associated with process of care, mortality, and readmission.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among the nationwide registry 'Japanese registry of all cardiac and vascular diseases - diagnostics procedure combination' data collected from 2012 to 2019, a total of 1 127 113 adult patients with HF and 1046 hospitals were included in the study. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcome was 30 day in-hospital mortality and readmission at 30 days and 6 months. Hospital and patient characteristics and process of care measures were also assessed. Mixed-effect logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards model was used for multivariable analysis, and adjusted odds ratio and hazard ratio were evaluated. Process of care measures had inverse trends for annual admissions of HF per cardiologist (P < 0.01 for all measures: prescription rate of beta-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation). Adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.08, P = 0.04) and 30 day in-hospital mortality was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01-1.09, P = 0.01) for interval of 50 annual admissions of HF per cardiologist. Adjusted hazard ratio for 30 day readmission was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01) and 6 month readmission was 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03-1.11, P < 0.01). Plots of the adjusted odds indicated 300 as the threshold of annual admissions of HF per cardiologist for substantial increase of in-hospital mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that annual admissions of HF per cardiologist are associated with worse process of care, mortality, and readmission with the threshold for mortality risk increased, emphasizing the optimal proportion of patients admitted with HF to cardiologist for better clinical performance.

Association of admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): insights from a national registry

AIM

Little is known about the association between admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 288 420 patients hospitalized with NSTEMI between 2010 and 2017 in the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project database. The cohort was dichotomized according to care under a non-cardiologist (n = 146 722) and care under a cardiologist (n = 141 698) within the first 24 h of admission to hospital. Patients admitted under a cardiologist were significantly younger (70 vs. 75 years, P < 0.001), and less likely to be female (32% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). Independent factors associated with admission under a cardiologist included prior history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07; P = 0.04], hypercholesterolaemia (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.20; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; P = 0.01), and admission to an interventional centre (OR 3.90, 95% CI 3.79-4.00; P < 0.001). Patients admitted under cardiology were more likely to receive optimal pharmacotherapy, undergo invasive coronary angiography (79% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), and receive revascularization in the form of PCI (52% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.85; P < 0.001), re-infarction (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.91; P = 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.84; P < 0.001) were lower in patients admitted under a cardiologist.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NSTEMI admitted under a cardiologist within 24 h of hospital admission were more likely to receive guideline-directed management and had better clinical outcomes.

Association of Patient and Primary Care Provider Factors with Outpatient COPD Care Quality

RATIONALE

Large gaps exist between guideline-recommended outpatient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care and clinical practice. Seeking to design effective interventions, we identified patient and primary care provider (PCP) characteristics associated with receiving evidence-based COPD care.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of adults aged ≥ 40 years with clinically diagnosed COPD who received care at 2 University of Washington-affiliated primary care clinics between June 1, 2011, and June 1, 2013. Our primary outcome was the proportion of evidence-based outpatient COPD quality measures received through primary or pulmonary care. Among all patients, we assessed spirometry completion, respiratory symptom identification, smoking status ascertainment, oxygen saturation measurement, and guideline-concordant inhaled therapy prescription. We also determined confirmation of airflow obstruction, oxygen prescription, smoking cessation intervention, and pulmonary rehabilitation referral if eligible. We used multivariable mixed effects linear regression to estimate the association of patient and PCP characteristics with the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 641 patients, 382 were male (59.6%) with mean age 63.6 (standard deviation [SD] 10.6) years. Most patients currently smoked (N=386, 60.2%). Patients saw 150 unique PCPs during 5.3 (SD 3.2) PCP visits, with 107 completing pulmonary referrals (16.7%). Patients received 67.5% (SD 18.4%) of eligible (median 7 [interquartile range 6-7]) evidence-based quality measures. After adjustment, pulmonary referral was associated with a higher receipt of outpatient quality measures (ß₁17.7%, 95% confidence interval: 12.6%, 22.7%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and PCP identity/characteristics were not associated with outpatient care quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of outpatient COPD care was suboptimal. Future studies should investigate if engaging pulmonologists in COPD management improves care quality.

Cardiovascular implications of the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly emerged as one of the biggest public health concerns of the 21st century. Although it was initially reported as a cluster of pneumonia cases, it quickly became apparent that COVID-19 is not merely a respiratory tract infection. Its clinical course is often complicated by cardiovascular manifestations including venous and arterial thrombosis, electrical disturbances, and myocardial damage. In addition, the cardiovascular system is involved not only during infection but also preceding the contraction of the virus; having cardiovascular comorbidities indicates significant vulnerability to the pathogen. As longer-term data continue to accumulate, we now have concerns over its lasting cardiovascular effects after recovery. Moreover, there have been substantial collateral effects on the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases. Reports of adverse cardiovascular events from vaccination have emerged as new hurdles to our efforts to bring an end to the pandemic. As such, the association between COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system and cardiovascular practice in general is expansive. In this review, we provide an overview of the knowledge and considerations in this field, based on the evidence available at the time of this writing.

Stability over time of the "hospital effect" on 30-day unplanned readmissions: Evidence from administrative data

Past studies showed that hospital characteristics affect hospital performance in terms of 30-day unplanned readmissions, proving the existence of a "hospital effect". However, the stability over time of this effect has been under-investigated. This study offers new evidence about the stability over time of the hospital effect on 30-day unplanned readmissions. Using 78,907 heart failure (HF) records collected from 116 hospitals in the Lombardy Region (Northern Italy) over three years (2010-2012), this study analysed hospital performance in terms of 30-day unplanned readmissions. Hospitals with unusually high and low readmission rates were identified through multi-level regression that combined both patient and hospital covariates in each year. Our results confirm that although hospital covariates - and the connected managerial choices - affect the 30-day unplanned readmissions of a specific year, their effect is not stable in the short-term (3 years). This has important implications for pay-for-performance schemes and quality improvement initiatives.

Utilization of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: real-world data from the ARIADNE registry

Aims

To compare baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) initiated on sacubitril/valsartan compared with patients continued on conventional heart failure (HF)-treatment in a European out-patient setting.

Methods and results

Between July 2016 and July 2019, ARIADNE enrolled 8787 outpatients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF from 17 European countries. Choice of therapy was solely at the investigators’ discretion. In total, 4173 patients were on conventional HF-treatment (non-S/V group), while 4614 patients were on sacubitril/valsartan either at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). Of these, 2108 patients started sacubitril/valsartan treatment ±1 month around enrolment [restricted S/V (rS/V) group]. The average age of the patients was 68 years. Patients on S/V were more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms (50.3%, 44.6%, 32.1% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively) and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 32.3%, 32.7%, and 35.4% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively; P &lt; 0.0001). The most frequently received HF treatments were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; ∼84% in non-S/V), followed by β-blockers (∼80%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs; 53%). The use of triple HF therapy (ACEI/ARB/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with β-blockers and MRA) was higher in the S/V groups than non-S/V group (48.2%, 48.2%, and 40.2% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively).

Conclusion

In this large multinational HFrEF registry, patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan tended to be younger with lower LVEF and higher NYHA class. Fewer than half of the patients received triple HF therapy.

Disparities in the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure admitted to internal medicine and cardiology departments: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study

Aims

Efforts are constantly made to decrease the rates of readmission after acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). ADHF admissions to internal medicine departments (IMD) were previously associated with higher risk for readmission compared with those admitted to cardiology departments (CD). It is unknown if the earlier still applies after recent advancement in care over the last decade. This contemporary cohort compares characteristics and outcomes of ADHF patients admitted to IMD with those admitted to CD.

Methods and results

The data for this single‐centre, retrospective study utilized a cohort of 8332 ADHF patients admitted between 2007 and 2017. We compared patients' baseline characteristics and clinical and laboratory indices of patients admitted to CD and IMD with the outcome defined as 30 day readmission rate. In comparison with those admitted to CD, patients admitted to IMD (89.5% of patients) were older (79 [70–86] vs. 69 [60–78] years; P < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of co‐morbidities and a higher ejection fraction. Readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in patients admitted to CD (15.9% vs. 19.6%; P = 0.01). Conflicting results of three statistical models failed to associate between the admitting department and 30 day readmission (odds ratio for 30 day readmission in CD: forced and backward stepwise logistic regression 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.97, P = 0.02; stabilized inverse probability weights model odds ratio 1.0, confidence interval 0.75–1.37, P = 0.96).

Conclusions

This contemporary analysis of ADHF patient cohort demonstrates significant differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to IMD and CD. Thus, focusing strategies for readmission prevention in patients admitted to IMD may be beneficial.

Hospitalization outcome of heart diseases between patients who received medical care by cardiologists and non-cardiologist physicians: A propensity-score matched study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effects of physician specialty on the outcome of heart disease remains incompletely understood because of inconsistent findings from some previous studies. Our purpose is to compare the admission outcomes of heart disease in patients receiving care by cardiologists and noncardiologist (NC) physicians.

METHODS

Using reimbursement claims data of Taiwan's National Health Insurance from 2008-2013, we conducted a matched study of 6264 patients aged ≥20 years who received a cardiologist's care during admission for heart disease. Using a propensity score matching procedure adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and type of heart disease, 6264 controls who received an NC physician's care were selected. Logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for complications and mortality during admission for heart disease associated with a cardiologist's care.

RESULTS

Patients who received a cardiologist's care had a lower risk of pneumonia (OR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.70), septicemia (OR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61), urinary tract infection (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.29-0.47) than did patients who received an NC physician's care. The association between a cardiologist's care and reduced adverse events following admission was significant in both sexes and in patients aged ≥40 years.

CONCLUSION

We raised the possibility that cardiologist care was associated with reduced infectious complications and mortality among patients who were admitted due to heart disease.

Outpatient healthcare utilization 30 days before and after hospitalization for heart failure in France: Contribution of the national healthcare database (Systèmenationaldesdonnéesdesanté)

BACKGROUND

Guidelines have been published concerning patient management after hospitalization for heart failure. The French national healthcare database (Systèmenationaldesdonnéesdesanté; SNDS) can be used to compare these guidelines with real-life practice.

AIMS

To study healthcare utilization 30 days before and after hospitalization for heart failure, and the variations induced by the exclusion of institutionalized patients, who are less exposed to outpatient healthcare utilization.

METHODS

We identified the first hospitalization for heart failure in 2015 of adult beneficiaries of the health insurance schemes covering 88% of the French population, who were alive 30 days after hospitalization. Outpatient healthcare utilization rates during the 30 days after hospitalization and the median times to outpatient care, together with their interquartile ranges, were described for all patients, and for a subgroup excluding institutionalized patients.

RESULTS

Among the 104,984 patients included (mean age 79 years; 52% women), 74% were non-institutionalized (mean age 78 years; 47% women). The frequencies of at least one consultation after hospitalization and the median times to consultation were 69% (total sample) vs. 78% (subgroup excluding institutionalized patients) and 8 days (interquartile range 3; 16) vs. 7 days (3; 15) for general practitioners, 20% vs. 21% and 14 days (7; 23) vs. 16 days (9; 24) for cardiologists and 58% vs. 69% and 3 days (1; 9) vs. 2 days (1; 7) for nurses, with reimbursement of diuretics in 77% vs. 86%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in 48% vs. 55% and beta-blockers in 55% vs. 63%. Departmental variations, excluding institutionalized patients, were large: general practice consultations (interquartile range 74%; 83%), cardiology consultations (11%; 23%) and nursing care (68%; 77%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low outpatient healthcare utilization rates, long intervals to first healthcare utilization and departmental variations indicate a mismatch between guidelines and real-life practice, which is accentuated when including institutionalized patients.

Heart failure in the Veneto region of Italy: analysis of therapeutic pathways and the utilization of healthcare resources

Objectives: Aim of the study was to describe the use and pharmacoutilization profiles of recommended drugs for HF patients, hospital re-admission rates, mortality rates and determine healthcare resource consumption and related costs for HF patients in an Italian region. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the administrative database and included adult patients who were discharged alive with a primary or secondary HF diagnosis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. We assessed data on HF-related drug prescriptions at discharge and during a 12-month follow-up period, as well as treatment adherence and treatment modification. All-cause mortality, hospital HF re-admission, and mean direct cost per patient were also analyzed during the follow-up period. Results: A total of 69,164 patients were included. One in ten patients had discontinued all treatment initially prescribed by the end of follow-up. In total, 25.9% of patients were re-hospitalized with an HF diagnosis during the follow-up period; the mortality rate at 12 months was 24.3%. The mean annual cost per patient was €6,303.7, with nearly three-fourths attributable to hospitalizations. Conclusions: In our study, we observed an under-prescription of recommended drugs for the treatment of HF. Moreover, one out of four HF patients were re-hospitalized for HF-related causes and the healthcare costs related to hospitalization accounted for the great majority of the total healthcare resource costs.

Are degree of urbanisation and travel times to healthcare services associated with the processes of care and outcomes of heart failure? A retrospective cohort study based on administrative data

A few studies have found that patients with heart failure (HF) living in less densely populated areas have reduced use of services and poorer outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding transport accessibility measured as the actual distance between the patient's home and the healthcare facility. The aim of this study was to investigate if different urbanisation levels and travel times to healthcare services are associated with the processes of care and the outcomes of HF. This retrospective cohort study included patients residing in the Local Healthcare Authority of Bologna (2915 square kilometres) who were discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of HF between 1 January and 31 December 2017. Six-month study outcomes included both process (cardiology follow-up visits) and outcome measures (all-cause readmissions, emergency room visits, all-cause mortality). Of the 2022 study patients, 963 (47.6%) lived in urban areas, 639 (31.6%) in intermediate density areas, and 420 (20.8%) in rural communities. Most patients lived ≤30 minutes away from the nearest healthcare facility, either inpatient or outpatient. After controlling for a number of individual factors, no significant association between travel times and outcomes was present. However, rural patients as opposed to urban patients were more likely to see a cardiologist during follow-up (OR 1.42, 99% CI 1.03-1.96). These follow-up visits were associated with reduced mortality within 6 months of discharge (OR 0.53, 99% CI 0.32-0.87). We also found that multidisciplinary interventions for HF were more common in rural than in urban settings (18.8% vs. 4.0%). In conclusion, travel times had no impact on the quality of care for patients with HF. Differences between urban and rural patients were possibly mediated by more proximal factors, some of which are potential targets for intervention such as the availability and utilisation of follow-up cardiology services and multidisciplinary models of care.

Association of post-discharge specialty outpatient visits with readmissions and mortality in high-risk heart failure patients

Heart failure (HF) outcomes are especially poor in high-risk patients with certain comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether early specialty or primary care provider (PCP) follow-up after HF discharge affects outcomes in high-risk patients is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed patients discharged from a Get With The Guidelines HF-participating hospital from 2007-2012 with linked Medicare claims to investigate the association of medical specialist visit within 14 days of discharge stratified by comorbidity with the primary outcome of 90-day HF readmission. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 1-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 33,243 patients, 39.4% had DM, 19.8% had CKD, 30.0% had COPD, and 36.3% had no key comorbidity. Nephrologist visit in patients with CKD was associated with a 35% reduction in 90-day HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.85). Pulmonologist visit in patients with COPD was associated with a 29% reduction in 90-day HF readmission (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.91). In patients with no key comorbidity, PCP and Cardiologist visits were associated with decreased 90-day mortality (HR for PCP 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94; HR for Cardiologist 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.96). In patients with DM, Endocrinologist visit was associated with a 42% reduction of 90-day mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist and PCP visit in the immediate post-discharge period may improve 90-day HF readmission and mortality in certain high-risk groups of patients with HF.

Higher Diuretic Requirements in Acute Heart Failure With Admission Hyponatraemia Versus Normonatraemia

BACKGROUND

Diuretic requirements in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and hyponatraemia versus normonatraemia on admission has not been previously explored.

METHODS

The Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial dataset was utilised to examine the characteristics and diuretic requirements of patients with ADHF with hyponatraemia or normonatraemia on admission.

RESULTS

Patients with ADHF and admission hyponatraemia (n = 103, average Na 130.2 meq/L) had a higher degree of congestion evident in higher frequency of jugular venous distension (JVD) >12 cmH₂O (p = 0.007), 2+ lower extremity oedema (p = 0.001), and higher right atrial pressure (p = 0.007), compared with normonatraemic patients (n = 327, average Na 138.6 meq/L). Despite a similar baseline furosemide dose in both groups (median 200 mg), the hyponatraemia group received higher in-hospital furosemide (280 vs. 200 mg, in both groups, respectively, p < 0.001) which represented a higher percentage of furosemide utilisation relative to baseline, compared with the normonatraemia group (33% vs 0%, in both groups respectively, p = 0.007). With in-hospital diuresis, the Na level of hyponatraemic subjects started significantly increasing at discharge and up to 6 months after randomisation-all relative to baseline. Hyponatraemic patients had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) longitudinally at multiple time points compared with normonataremic patients, but it did not further decrease despite the higher furosemide dose in the former group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ADHF and hyponatraemia on admission had a higher degree of congestion and required higher doses of furosemide, compared with normonatraemic subjects. The lower Na and SBP in this instance should not lead to withholding or minimising diuretic dosage which should rather be dictated by volume status.

Putting veterans with heart failure FIRST improves follow-up and reduces readmissions

Background

Despite improvements in length of stay and mortality, congestive heart failure (CHF) remains the most common cause of 30-day readmissions to the hospital. Though multiple studies have found that early follow-up after discharge (eg, within 7 days) is critical to improving 30-day readmissions, implementation strategies are challenging in resource-limited settings. Here we present a quality improvement initiative aimed at improving early follow-up while maximising available resources.

Methods

This was a medical resident-driven initiative. A process map of the discharge and follow-up appointment process was created that identified multiple areas for improvement. Based on these findings, a two-part intervention was implemented. First, heart failure discharge education with focus on early follow-up was disseminated to providers throughout the internal medicine department. Subsequently, improved identification of high-risk patients (Failure Intervention Risk StratificationTool) and innovative use of the existing electronic medical record (EMR) were employed to sustain and improve on gains from the first set of interventions.

Results

We increased our 7-day follow-up rate from 47% to 57% (p=0.429) and decreased the average time to follow-up from 17.6 days to 8.7 days (p=0.016) following the first intervention. The percentage of patients readmitted within 30 days after discharge at baseline (2012–2013) and following the first intervention (education and standardisation of follow-up scheduling) and second intervention (risk stratification, intensive follow-up and EMR change) was 25% and 21%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate decreased from 10% in 2011 to 7.16% in December 2015.

Conclusion

Close hospital discharge follow-up and identification of high-risk patients with CHF are useful approaches to reduce readmissions. Using the existing EMR tool for identifying high-risk patients and improving adherence to best practices is an effective intervention. In patients with CHF these strategies improved time to follow-up and 30-day readmissions while decreasing mortality.