1
|
Thiruvengadam NR, Solaimani P, Shrestha M, Buller S, Carson R, Reyes-Garcia B, Gnass RD, Wang B, Albasha N, Leonor P, Saumoy M, Coimbra R, Tabuenca A, Srikureja W, Serrao S. The Efficacy of Real-time Computer-aided Detection of Colonic Neoplasia in Community Practice: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00225-8. [PMID: 38437999 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The use of computer-aided detection (CADe) has increased the adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but has not shown benefit in real-world implementation studies. We performed a single-center pragmatic RCT to evaluate the impact of real-time CADe on ADRs in colonoscopy performed by community gastroenterologists. METHODS We enrolled 1100 patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening, surveillance, positive fecal-immunohistochemical tests, and diagnostic indications at one community-based center from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to traditional colonoscopy or real-time CADe. Blinded pathologists analyzed histopathologic findings. The primary outcome was ADR (the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC), sessile-serrated lesion detection rate, and non-neoplastic resection rate. RESULTS The median age was 55.5 years (interquartile range, 50-62 years), 61% were female, 72.7% were of Hispanic ethnicity, and 9.1% had inadequate bowel preparation. The ADR for the CADe group was significantly higher than the traditional colonoscopy group (42.5% vs 34.4%; P = .005). The mean APC was significantly higher in the CADe group compared with the traditional colonoscopy group (0.89 ± 1.46 vs 0.60 ± 1.12; P < .001). The improvement in adenoma detection was driven by increased detection of <5 mm adenomas. CADe had a higher sessile-serrated lesion detection rate than traditional colonoscopy (4.7% vs 2.0%; P = .01). The improvement in ADR with CADe was significantly higher in the first half of the study (47.2% vs 33.7%; P = .002) compared with the second half (38.7% vs 34.9%; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS In a single-center pragmatic RCT, real-time CADe modestly improved ADR and APC in average-detector community endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05963724).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Thiruvengadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
| | - Pejman Solaimani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Manish Shrestha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Seth Buller
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Rachel Carson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Breanna Reyes-Garcia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Ronaldo D Gnass
- Department of Pathology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California
| | - Bing Wang
- Department of Pathology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Natalie Albasha
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California; Department of Medicine, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California
| | - Paul Leonor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California
| | - Arnold Tabuenca
- Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Department of Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Wichit Srikureja
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Steve Serrao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chawla T, Hurrell C, Keough V, Lindquist CM, Mohammed MF, Samson C, Sugrue G, Walsh C. Canadian Association of Radiologists Practice Guidelines for Computed Tomography Colonography. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:54-68. [PMID: 37411043 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231182975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer is the third most common malignancy in Canada. Computed tomography colonography (CTC) provides a creditable and validated option for colon screening and assessment of known pathology in patients for whom conventional colonoscopy is contraindicated or where patients self-select to use imaging as their primary modality for initial colonic assessment. This updated guideline aims to provide a toolkit for both experienced imagers (and technologists) and for those considering launching this examination in their practice. There is guidance for reporting, optimal exam preparation, tips for problem solving to attain high quality examinations in challenging scenarios as well as suggestions for ongoing maintenance of competence. We also provide insight into the role of artificial intelligence and the utility of CTC in tumour staging of colorectal cancer. The appendices provide more detailed guidance into bowel preparation and reporting templates as well as useful information on polyp stratification and management strategies. Reading this guideline should equip the reader with the knowledge base to perform colonography but also provide an unbiased overview of its role in colon screening compared with other screening options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Chawla
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Keough
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Chris M Lindquist
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Mohammed F Mohammed
- Abdominal Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Caroline Samson
- Département de Radiologie, Radio-oncologie et Médecine Nucléaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gavin Sugrue
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cynthia Walsh
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kashida H. Outline of Japanese Guidelines for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with a Short Reference to the Western Recommendations. J Anus Rectum Colon 2024; 8:1-8. [PMID: 38313746 PMCID: PMC10831978 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2023-043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society published the latest English versions of the guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal neoplastic lesions and colorectal cold polypectomy in 2020 and 2022, respectively. In this article, I present a comprehensive overview of these guidelines, including a comparison with the Western recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Kashida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim J, Choi JM, Lee J, Han YM, Jin EH, Lim JH, Bae JH, Seo JY. Boston bowel preparation scale score 6 has more missed lesions compared with 7-9. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1605. [PMID: 38238553 PMCID: PMC10796329 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52244-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Adequate bowel preparation is an important factor in high-quality colonoscopy. It is generally accepted that a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score ≥ 6 is adequate, but some reports suggest ≥ 7. Subjects who underwent colonoscopy at least twice within 3 years from August 2015 to December 2019 were included. Polyp detection rates (PDRs), adenoma detection rates (ADRs), and number of polyps including adenomas were compared stratified by baseline colonoscopy (C1) BBPS score. Among 2352 subjects, 529 had BBPS 6 (group 1) and 1823 had BBPS 7-9 (group 2) at C1. There was no significant difference in PDR or ADR at C1 and follow-up colonoscopy (C2) between the two groups. However, the numbers of polyps (1.84 vs. 1.56, P = 0.001) and adenomas (1.02 vs. 0.88, P = 0.034) at C2 were significantly higher in group 1 than group 2, respectively. Segmental BBPS score 2 in group 1 compared to group 2, especially, showed higher PDR (P = 0.001) and ADR (P = 0.007) at C2. BBPS 6 is associated with a higher number of polyps and adenomas in short-term follow-up colonoscopy than BBPS 7-9. To reduce the risk of missed polyps, a thorough examination is necessary for BBPS 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Min Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jooyoung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo Min Han
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Hyo Jin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ji Yeon Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pooler BD, Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Newton MA, Halberg RB, Grady WM, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ. Natural History of Colorectal Polyps Undergoing Longitudinal in Vivo CT Colonography Surveillance. Radiology 2024; 310:e232078. [PMID: 38289210 PMCID: PMC10831482 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Background The natural history of colorectal polyps is not well characterized due to clinical standards of care and other practical constraints limiting in vivo longitudinal surveillance. Established CT colonography (CTC) clinical screening protocols allow surveillance of small (6-9 mm) polyps. Purpose To assess the natural history of colorectal polyps followed with CTC in a clinical screening program, with histopathologic correlation for resected polyps. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CTC was used to longitudinally monitor small colorectal polyps in asymptomatic adult patients from April 1, 2004, to August 31, 2020. All patients underwent at least two CTC examinations. Polyp growth patterns across multiple time points were analyzed, with histopathologic context for resected polyps. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of advanced histopathology. Results In this study of 475 asymptomatic adult patients (mean age, 56.9 years ± 6.7 [SD]; 263 men), 639 unique polyps (mean initial diameter, 6.3 mm; volume, 50.2 mm3) were followed for a mean of 5.1 years ± 2.9. Of these 639 polyps, 398 (62.3%) underwent resection and histopathologic evaluation, and 41 (6.4%) proved to be histopathologically advanced (adenocarcinoma, high-grade dysplasia, or villous content), including two cancers and 38 tubulovillous adenomas. Advanced polyps showed mean volume growth of +178% per year (752% per year for adenocarcinomas) compared with +33% per year for nonadvanced polyps and -3% per year for unresected, unretrieved, or resolved polyps (P < .001). In addition, 90% of histologically advanced polyps achieved a volume of 100 mm3 and/or volume growth rate of 100% per year, compared with 29% of nonadvanced and 16% of unresected or resolved polyps (P < .001). Polyp volume-to-diameter ratio was also significantly greater for advanced polyps. For polyps observed at three or more time points, most advanced polyps demonstrated an initial slower growth interval, followed by a period of more rapid growth. Conclusion Small colorectal polyps ultimately proving to be histopathologically advanced neoplasms demonstrated substantially faster growth and attained greater overall size compared with nonadvanced polyps. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00204867 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dachman in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Dustin Pooler
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - David H. Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Kristina A. Matkowskyj
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Michael A. Newton
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Richard B. Halberg
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - William M. Grady
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Cesare Hassan
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Perry J. Pickhardt
- From the Departments of Radiology (B.D.P., D.H.K., P.J.P.), Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (K.A.M.), Biostatistics and Informatics (M.A.N.), Medicine (R.B.H.), and Oncology (R.B.H.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (K.A.M.); Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (M.A.N.); Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (W.M.G.); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (C.H.); and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yee J, Dachman A, Kim DH, Kobi M, Laghi A, McFarland E, Moreno C, Park SH, Pickhardt PJ, Plumb A, Pooler BD, Zalis M, Chang KJ. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): Version 2023 Update. Radiology 2024; 310:e232007. [PMID: 38289209 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
The CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS) has withstood the test of time and proven to be a robust classification scheme for CT colonography (CTC) findings. C-RADS version 2023 represents an update on the scheme used for colorectal and extracolonic findings at CTC. The update provides useful insights gained since the implementation of the original system in 2005. Increased experience has demonstrated confusion on how to classify the mass-like appearance of the colon consisting of soft tissue attenuation that occurs in segments with acute or chronic diverticulitis. Therefore, the update introduces a new subcategory, C2b, specifically for mass-like diverticular strictures, which are likely benign. Additionally, the update simplifies extracolonic classification by combining E1 and E2 categories into an updated extracolonic category of E1/E2 since, irrespective of whether a finding is considered a normal variant (category E1) or an otherwise clinically unimportant finding (category E2), no additional follow-up is required. This simplifies and streamlines the classification into one category, which results in the same management recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Yee
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Abraham Dachman
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - David H. Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Mariya Kobi
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Andrea Laghi
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Elizabeth McFarland
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Courtney Moreno
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Seong Ho Park
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Perry J. Pickhardt
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Andrew Plumb
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - B Dustin Pooler
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Michael Zalis
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| | - Kevin J Chang
- From the Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (J.Y.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (D.K., P.P., B.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (M.K.); Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (A.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (C.M.); Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Department of Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (K.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dachman AH. To Wait or to Act: How CT Colonography Can Improve Management of Colorectal Polyps. Radiology 2024; 310:e232975. [PMID: 38289208 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham H Dachman
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC2026, Chicago, IL 60637
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pooler BD, Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Newton MA, Halberg RB, Grady WM, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ. Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal. Gut 2023; 72:2321-2328. [PMID: 37507217 PMCID: PMC10822024 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The natural history of small polyps is not well established and rests on limited evidence from barium enema studies decades ago. Patients with one or two small polyps (6-9 mm) at screening CT colonography (CTC) are offered CTC surveillance at 3 years but may elect immediate colonoscopy. This practice allows direct observation of the growth of subcentimetre polyps, with histopathological correlation in patients undergoing subsequent polypectomy. DESIGN Of 11 165 asymptomatic patients screened by CTC over a period of 16.4 years, 1067 had one or two 6-9 mm polyps detected (with no polyps ≥10 mm). Of these, 314 (mean age, 57.4 years; M:F, 141:173; 375 total polyps) elected immediate colonoscopic polypectomy, and 382 (mean age 57.0 years; M:F, 217:165; 481 total polyps) elected CTC surveillance over a mean of 4.7 years. Volumetric polyp growth was analysed, with histopathological correlation for resected polyps. Polyp growth and regression were defined as volume change of ±20% per year, with rapid growth defined as +100% per year (annual volume doubling). Regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of advanced histology, defined as the presence of cancer, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous components. RESULTS Of the 314 patients who underwent immediate polypectomy, 67.8% (213/314) harboured adenomas, 2.2% (7/314) with advanced histology; no polyps contained cancer or HGD. Of 382 patients who underwent CTC surveillance, 24.9% (95/382) had polyps that grew, while 62.0% (237/382) remained stable and 13.1% (50/382) regressed in size. Of the 58.6% (224/382) CTC surveillance patients who ultimately underwent colonoscopic resection, 87.1% (195/224) harboured adenomas, 12.9% (29/224) with advanced histology. Of CTC surveillance patients with growing polyps who underwent resection, 23.2% (19/82) harboured advanced histology vs 7.0% (10/142) with stable or regressing polyps (OR: 4.0; p<0.001), with even greater risk of advanced histology in those with rapid growth (63.6%, 14/22, OR: 25.4; p<0.001). Polyp growth, but not patient age/sex or polyp morphology/location were significant predictors of advanced histology. CONCLUSION Small 6-9 mm polyps present overall low risk to patients, with polyp growth strongly associated with higher risk lesions. Most patients (75%) with small 6-9 mm polyps will see polyp stability or regression, with advanced histology seen in only 7%. The minority of patients (25%) with small polyps that do grow have a 3-fold increased risk of advanced histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Dustin Pooler
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - David H Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kristina A Matkowskyj
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Michael A Newton
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Richard B Halberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - William M Grady
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroentrology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Perry J Pickhardt
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Feng CH, Zhang Q, Chen J, Mao LQ, Sun Q, He Y, Yao LH. Factors influencing age at onset of colorectal polyps and benefit-finding after polypectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e35336. [PMID: 37773792 PMCID: PMC10545222 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Screening, followed by colonoscopic polypectomy, has been widely performed in China. However, factors influencing age at onset of colorectal polyps and benefit-finding after polypectomy have been insufficiently studied or ignored. A total of 152 patients with colorectal polyps first detected in First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University from July to September 2022 were enrolled in this study. We selected 11 factors associated with the risk of colorectal polyps, including gender, body mass index, occupational stress, education level, income satisfaction, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise frequency, diet, family history and polyp characteristics. Benefit-finding after polypectomy was obtained by follow-up for 142 of these patients. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that being overweight (i.e., body mass index ≥25 kg/m2), higher education level, lower exercise frequency, and refrigerated food preference were associated with early-onset colorectal polyps. Patients with a preference for pickled food and age ≥50 years at first colorectal polyp detection had lower benefit findings after colonoscopic polypectomy. Colorectal polyps may develop earlier in people who are overweight, well-educated, exercise less, and prefer refrigerated food. In addition, patients who prefer pickled food and age at onset ≥50 years have lower benefit-finding requiring more attention in future colonoscopy follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Hong Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Juan Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Li-Qi Mao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qian Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, People’s Hospital of Wuxing District, Wuxing Branch of the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ying He
- Central Laboratory, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lin-Hua Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thiruvengadam NR, Cote G, Gupta S, Rodrigues M, Schneider Y, Arain MA, Solaimani P, Serrao S, Kochman ML, Saumoy M. An Evaluation of Critical Factors for the Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection: Sensitivity and Threshold Analyses Using a Microsimulation Model. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:906-920. [PMID: 36736437 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of computer-aided detection (CAD) increases the adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the requirements for CAD to be cost-effective and the impact of CAD on adenoma detection by endoscopists with different ADRs. METHODS We developed a semi-Markov microsimulation model to compare the effectiveness of traditional colonoscopy (mean ADR, 26%) to colonoscopy with CAD (mean ADR, 37%). CAD was modeled as having a $75 per-procedure cost. Extensive 1-way sensitivity and threshold analysis were performed to vary cost and ADR of CAD. Multiple scenarios evaluated the potential effect of CAD on endoscopists' ADRs. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year. RESULTS When modeling CAD improved ADR for all endoscopists, the CAD cohort had 79 and 34 fewer lifetime CRC cases and deaths, respectively, per 10,000 persons. This scenario was dominant with a cost savings of $143 and incremental effectiveness of 0.01 quality-adjusted life years. Threshold analysis demonstrated that CAD would be cost-effective up to an additional cost of $579 per colonoscopy, or if it increases ADR from 26% to at least 30%. CAD reduced CRC incidence and mortality when limited to improving ADRs for low-ADR endoscopists (ADR <25%), with 67 fewer CRC cases and 28 CRC deaths per 10,000 persons compared with traditional colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS As CAD is implemented clinically, it needs to improve mean ADR from 26% to at least 30% or cost less than $579 per colonoscopy to be cost-effective when compared with traditional colonoscopy. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of CAD on community practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Thiruvengadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California.
| | - Gregory Cote
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shashank Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Medora Rodrigues
- Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | | | - Mustafa A Arain
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Pejman Solaimani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Steve Serrao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Michael L Kochman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Endoscopic Innovation, Research and Training, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gatenbee CD, Baker AM, Schenck RO, Strobl M, West J, Neves MP, Hasan SY, Lakatos E, Martinez P, Cross WCH, Jansen M, Rodriguez-Justo M, Whelan CJ, Sottoriva A, Leedham S, Robertson-Tessi M, Graham TA, Anderson ARA. Immunosuppressive niche engineering at the onset of human colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1798. [PMID: 35379804 PMCID: PMC8979971 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29027-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The evolutionary dynamics of tumor initiation remain undetermined, and the interplay between neoplastic cells and the immune system is hypothesized to be critical in transformation. Colorectal cancer (CRC) presents a unique opportunity to study the transition to malignancy as pre-cancers (adenomas) and early-stage cancers are frequently resected. Here, we examine tumor-immune eco-evolutionary dynamics from pre-cancer to carcinoma using a computational model, ecological analysis of digital pathology data, and neoantigen prediction in 62 patient samples. Modeling predicted recruitment of immunosuppressive cells would be the most common driver of transformation. As predicted, ecological analysis reveals that progressed adenomas co-localized with immunosuppressive cells and cytokines, while benign adenomas co-localized with a mixed immune response. Carcinomas converge to a common immune "cold" ecology, relaxing selection against immunogenicity and high neoantigen burdens, with little evidence for PD-L1 overexpression driving tumor initiation. These findings suggest re-engineering the immunosuppressive niche may prove an effective immunotherapy in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandler D Gatenbee
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA.
| | - Ann-Marie Baker
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Ryan O Schenck
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX37BN, UK
| | - Maximilian Strobl
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA
| | - Jeffrey West
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA
| | - Margarida P Neves
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Sara Yakub Hasan
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Eszter Lakatos
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Pierre Martinez
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon, France
| | - William C H Cross
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Marnix Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher J Whelan
- Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA
| | - Andrea Sottoriva
- Center for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Simon Leedham
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX37BN, UK
| | - Mark Robertson-Tessi
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Alexander R A Anderson
- Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, SRB 4, Tampa, FL, 336122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dong H, Ren Y, Jiang B. Risk factors associated with missed colorectal lesions in colonoscopy and impact of colonoscopy with anesthesia on miss rate. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:484-491. [PMID: 33556255 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1879248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically determine the miss rate and risk factors for polyps, adenomas and advanced adenomas in the same population, and to further analyze the impact of colonoscopy with anesthesia on miss rate. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the information of the patients undergoing the second colonoscopy within 1 year after their first. The patient and lesion miss rate were calculated. The patient and lesion features of missed lesion were compared with non-missed lesion. Finally, the patients were divided into anesthesia group and without anesthesia group, and the impact of colonoscopy with anesthesia on missed lesions was further analyzed. RESULTS The patient miss rate of polyps, adenomas and advanced adenomas was 32.8, 25.6 and 10.4%, and the lesions miss rate was 19.6, 15.8 and 7.2%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion-related factors (large number of lesions, small lesion size, flat shape and location at the right colon) and patient-related factors (male, elder, abdominal symptoms, surgical history, diverticulum, colonoscopy without anesthesia and suboptimal bowel preparation) were found to be independently associated with missed polyps and adenomas (p < .05). Large number of lesions, flat shape and suboptimal bowel preparation were associated with missed advanced adenoma (p < .05). Colonoscopy with anesthesia can reduce the polyp miss rate (PMR) and male and elderly patients are more likely to be missed during colonoscopy without anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Many factors of patients and lesions can affect the lesions miss rate. Colonoscopy with anesthesia can reduce the PMR and male and elderly patients are more likely to be missed during colonoscopy without anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haibin Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China
| | - Yutang Ren
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China
| | - Bo Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chang JJ, Chien CH, Chen SW, Chen LW, Liu CJ, Yen CL. Long term outcomes of colon polyps with high grade dysplasia following endoscopic resection. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:376. [PMID: 33172387 PMCID: PMC7656717 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01499-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of recurrent colonic adenoma associated with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) colon polyps at baseline colonoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a clinical cohort study with patients who underwent polypectomy during screen colonoscopy to assess recurrent colonic adenoma risk factors. METHODS 11,565 patients at our facility underwent screen colonoscopy between September 1998 and August 2007. Data from patients with HGD colon polyps who had undergone follow-up colonoscopy were included for analysis. RESULTS Data from 211 patients was included. Rates of metachronous adenoma and advanced adenoma at follow-up were 58% and 20%, respectively. Mean follow-up period was 5.5 ± 1.8 (3-12) years. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an adenoma count of ≥ 3 at baseline colonoscopy was strongly associated with overall recurrence, multiple recurrence, advanced recurrence, proximal recurrence, and distal adenoma recurrence with odds ratios of 4.32 (2.06-9.04 95% CI), 3.47 (1.67-7.22 95% CI), 2.55 (1.11-5.89 95% CI), 2.46 (1.16-5.22 95% CI), 2.89 (1.44-5.78 95% CI), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed gender (male) [P = 0.010; OR 3.09(1.32-7.25 95% CI)] and adenoma count ≥ 3 [P = 0.002; OR 3.08(1.52-6.24 95% CI)] at index colonoscopy to be significantly associated with recurrence of advanced adenoma. CONCLUSION Recurrence of colonic adenoma at time of follow-up colonoscopy is common in patients who undergo polypectomy for HGD colon adenomas during baseline colonoscopy. Risk of further developing advanced adenomas is associated with gender and the number of colon adenomas present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Jang Chang
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan.,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hung Chien
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan.,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Shuo-Wei Chen
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan.,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wei Chen
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan.,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Jung Liu
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan.,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Cho-Li Yen
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 222, Mai Chin Road, Keelung, 204, Taiwan. .,Keelung Division, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burke JR, Brown P, Quyn A, Lambie H, Tolan D, Sagar P. Tumour growth rate of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: retrospective cohort study. BJS Open 2020; 4:1200-1207. [PMID: 32996713 PMCID: PMC8370463 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growth pattern of colorectal cancer is seldom investigated. This cohort study aimed to explore tumour growth rate in colorectal cancers managed non-surgically or deemed not resectable, and to determine its implication for prognosis. METHODS Consecutive patients with colonic or rectal adenocarcinoma were identified through the colorectal multidisciplinary team database at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust over a 2-year interval. Patients who received no treatment (surgery, stenting, colonic defunctioning procedures, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) and who underwent CT twice more than 5 weeks apart were included. Multidetector CT/three-dimensional image analysis was performed independently by three experienced radiologists. RESULTS Of 804 patients reviewed, 43 colorectal cancers were included in the final analysis. Median age at first CT was 80 (73-85) years and the median interval between scans was 150 (i.q.r. 72-471) days. An increase in T category was demonstrated in 31 of 43 tumours, with a median doubling time of 211 (112-404) days. The median percentage increase in tumour volume was 34·1 (13·3-53·9) per cent per 62 days. The all-cause 3-year mortality rate was 81 per cent (35 of 43) with a median survival time of 1·1 (0·4-2·2) years after the initial diagnostic scan. In those obstructed, the relative risk of death from subsequent perforation was 1·26 (95 per cent c.i. 1·07 to 1·49; P = 0·005). CONCLUSION This study documented a median doubling time of 211 days, with a concerning suggestion of tumour progression, which has implications for the current management standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. R. Burke
- John Golligher Colorectal Surgery UnitLeedsUK
- Leeds Institute of Biomedical and
Clinical SciencesSt James's University HospitalLeedsUK
| | - P. Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology,
St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - A. Quyn
- John Golligher Colorectal Surgery UnitLeedsUK
- Leeds Institute of Biomedical and
Clinical SciencesSt James's University HospitalLeedsUK
| | - H. Lambie
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology,
St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - D. Tolan
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology,
St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| | - P. Sagar
- John Golligher Colorectal Surgery UnitLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Saitoh Y, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Kusunoki M, Koike K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:219-239. [PMID: 31566804 DOI: 10.1111/den.13545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also several types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines wherein preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are appropriately outlined and to ensure that actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society compiled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines by using evidence-based methods in 2014. The first edition of these guidelines was published 5 years ago. Accordingly, we have published the second edition of these guidelines based on recent new knowledge and evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ko CW, Doria-Rose VP, Barrett MJ, Kamineni A, Enewold L, Weiss NS. Screening colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence: A case-control study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0226027. [PMID: 31805156 PMCID: PMC6894764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are both recommended colorectal cancer screening options, but their relative effectiveness needs clarification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. METHODS We conducted a case-control study within the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Cases were subjects age 70-85 years in the SEER-Medicare database diagnosed with CRC during 2004-2013. Up to 3 controls were matched to each case by birth year, sex, race, and SEER region. Receipt of screening colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy was ascertained from Medicare claims. Conditional logistic regression models were developed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for a history of screening in cases vs. controls. We conducted secondary analyses by sex, race, endoscopist characteristics, and with varying timing and duration of the look-back period. RESULTS Receipt of screening colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was associated with a 59% (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.39, 0.43) and 22% reduction (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.67, 0.92) in colorectal cancer incidence, respectively. Colonoscopy was associated with greater reduction in the distal colorectal cancer incidence (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.20, 0.24) than proximal colorectal cancer incidence (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.59, 0.66). Sigmoidoscopy was associated with a 52% reduction in distal colorectal cancer incidence (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.37, 0.63), but with no reduction in proximal colorectal cancer incidence. These associations were stronger in men than in women. No differences by race or endoscopist characteristics were observed. CONCLUSION Both screening colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were associated with reductions in overall colorectal cancer incidence, with a greater magnitude of reduction observed with colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia W. Ko
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - V. Paul Doria-Rose
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michael J. Barrett
- Information Management Services, Inc., Calverton, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Lindsey Enewold
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Noel S. Weiss
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Incidence of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Individuals With Untreated Diminutive Colorectal Adenomas Diagnosed by Magnifying Image-Enhanced Endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:964-973. [PMID: 31082873 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because of the increasing number of detected diminutive colorectal adenomas, the "diagnose-and-do-not-resect" approach has recently attracted attention as an alternative to resection. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in individuals with untreated diminutive adenomas and compared this incidence in individuals without adenomas. METHODS Data from 1,378 individuals who underwent first screening colonoscopy (CS) and at least one follow-up CS without polypectomy were analyzed. Patients with no adenomas or with only nonadvanced diminutive adenomas (<5 mm) diagnosed by magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy were scheduled to undergo a follow-up CS within 5 years after the initial CS without treatment. The participants were divided into 2 groups: those with untreated diminutive adenomas (group A) and those with no adenomas (group B). The cumulative incidence of ACN and the hazard ratio were assessed using Gray's test and the Fine and Gray model. RESULTS During the median follow-up period of 60.9 months, 21 ACNs were detected. The 5-year cumulative incidences of ACN in group A (n = 361) and group B (n = 1,017) were 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-3.4) and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.3-1.7), respectively, without a statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). No ACNs developed from unresected adenomas. The smoking status was significantly associated with the incidence of ACN, and the hazard ratio for ACN in group A vs group B adjusted for smoking status was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.52-3.90; P = 0.48). DISCUSSION The low 5-year cumulative incidence of ACN suggests the potential to adopt the "diagnose-and-do-not-resect" strategy as an alternative option for diminutive adenomas not requiring excessive surveillance.
Collapse
|
18
|
The significance of the small adenoma: a longitudinal study of surveillance colonoscopy in an Australian population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31:563-569. [PMID: 30672827 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The international guidelines for surveillance following the finding of a small tubular adenoma vary between no surveillance or colonoscopy at 5 or 10 years, whereas surveillance after an advanced adenoma is 3 years. Optimization of surveillance reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) with efficient use of colonoscopy resources. We assessed the risks of advanced colorectal neoplasia following a baseline finding of a small adenoma compared with advanced adenoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective audit was undertaken of patients enrolled in a CRC surveillance program, wherein regular colonoscopies and screening with faecal immunochemical test (FIT) were provided. Patients diagnosed with either small or advanced adenoma followed by at least one surveillance colonoscopy were included. Advanced adenoma included adenomas with features of villous change, size of at least 10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, three or more small tubular adenomas and traditional and sessile serrated adenomas. Subdistribution hazard ratios were calculated for advanced neoplasia (CRC or advanced adenoma). RESULTS Overall, 378 patients (62.6±11.2 years, 57.9% male) were included, with 44.2% diagnosed with small adenoma and 55.5% with advanced adenoma at baseline. The crude cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia at first surveillance was 13.2 and 18.5% after small and advanced adenoma (P=0.16) (at 45.9 and 35.6 months, respectively), which became significant for advanced adenoma after adjustment (subdistribution hazard ratio=2.55, 95% confidence interval=1.49-4.35, P<001). A positive FIT was the only independent predictor of advanced neoplasia after a small adenoma at baseline colonoscopy (odds ratio=5.05, 95% confidence interval=1.27-20.02, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS The risk of advanced neoplasia following a small adenoma was lower than that following an advanced adenoma, but was strongly predicted by a positive FIT. Reducing frequency of colonoscopy while providing regular FIT might be a more efficient use of resources for this population.
Collapse
|
19
|
Moreno C, Kim DH, Bartel TB, Cash BD, Chang KJ, Feig BW, Fowler KJ, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Lambert DL, Levy AD, Marin D, Peterson CM, Scheirey CD, Smith MP, Weinstein S, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 15:S56-S68. [PMID: 29724427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the relevant literature regarding colorectal screening with imaging. For individuals at average or moderate risk for colorectal cancer, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening. After positive results on a fecal occult blood test or immunohistochemical test, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer detection. For individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer (eg, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn colitis), optical colonoscopy is preferred because of its ability to obtain biopsies to detect dysplasia. After incomplete colonoscopy, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average, moderate, or high risk. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David H Kim
- Co-author and Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Brooks D Cash
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - Barry W Feig
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | | | - Drew L Lambert
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Martin P Smith
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Iwai T, Imai K, Hotta K, Ito S, Yamaguchi Y, Kawata N, Tanaka M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Ono H. Endoscopic prediction of advanced histology in diminutive and small colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34:397-403. [PMID: 30070395 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Most polyps detected during colonoscopies are diminutive or small, and they rarely have advanced histology. Real-time prediction of advanced histology would help clinicians to assess the need for pathological evaluation. Here, we investigated endoscopic predictors of advanced histology in diminutive and small polyps. METHODS Consecutive patients with adenomatous polyps (<10 mm) removed endoscopically from January 2013 to December 2014 at a single tertiary cancer center were eligible for inclusion. Two endoscopists reviewed all endoscopic images to identify significant findings associated with advanced histology using multivariate models. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the identified endoscopic predictors for advanced histology were calculated. RESULTS Of 6170 polyps (4746 diminutive) removed from 2611 patients, 320 (5.2%) showed advanced histology, including five submucosal invasive cancers. In multivariate analysis, advanced histology was significantly associated with the following: loss of lobulation (odds ratio [OR] 61.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 19.1-199.0); heterogeneity in mucosal patterns (OR 29.0; 95% CI: 14.6-57.3); non-polypoid growth (OR 15.7; 95% CI: 4.4-55.5); white spots (OR 13.5; 95% CI: 7.8-23.5); and surface redness (OR 6.6; 95% CI: 3.0-14.5); and irregular capillary pattern (OR 4.8; 95% CI: 2.5-9.1). These significant predictors successfully predicted all submucosal invasive cancers as advanced histology. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were 37.2%, 97.8%, and 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS We identified six endoscopic predictors for advanced histology in diminutive or small colon polyps. Diminutive and small polyps lacking these predictors would not be considered to have advanced histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Iwai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masaki Tanaka
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Naomi Kakushima
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kohei Takizawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Ishiwatari
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kandel P, Wallace MB. Should We Resect and Discard Low Risk Diminutive Colon Polyps. Clin Endosc 2019; 52:239-246. [PMID: 30661337 PMCID: PMC6547333 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2018.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diminutive colorectal polyps <5 mm are very common and almost universally benign. The current strategy of resection with histological confirmation of all colorectal polyps is costly and may increase the risk of colonoscopy. Accurate, optical diagnosis without histology can be achieved with currently available endoscopic technologies. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations supports strategies for optical diagnosis of small non neoplastic polyps as long as two criteria are met. For hyperplastic appearing polyps <5 mm in recto-sigmoid colon, the negative predictive value should be at least 90%. For diminutive low grade adenomatous appearing polyps, a resect and discard strategy should be sufficiently accurate such that post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations based on the optical diagnosis, agree with a histologically diagnosis at least 90% of the time. Although the resect and discard as well as diagnose and leave behind approach has major benefits with regard to both safety and cost, it has yet to be used widely in practice. To fully implement such as strategy, there is a need for better-quality training, quality assurance, and patient acceptance. In the article, we will review the current state of the science on optical diagnose of colorectal polyps and its implications for colonoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pujan Kandel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Excision of premalignant polyps has a significant impact on reducing colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity. Colonoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis and affords an opportunity for treatment of colonic polyps. In recent years, serious debates have taken place because of the biological characteristics of diminutive polyps (DPs), polypectomy complications, and serious costs. There has not yet been a consensus on the management of DPs. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the real clinical importance of DPs smaller than 5 mm in diameter, which are frequently seen in geriatric patients by new endoscopic techniques, and to help in determining screening and surveillance programs. Methods: The patients who underwent colonoscopy and were found to have a diminutive colorectal polyp (<5 mm from September 1, 2016 through September 1, 2017), were classified into 3 groups according to the imaging method used: flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), narrow band imaging (NBI), or I-SCAN. In all groups, demographic data were compared according to Paris classification (morphologic) and Kudo classification (correlation between the prediction of endoscopic diagnosis and final pathological examination) in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values. Results: Two hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the study: 97 in the NBI group, 83 in the FICE group, and 87 in the I-SCAN group. There were no statistically significant differences between NBI, FICE, and I-SCAN in differentiating neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps, according to the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = .809). Conclusions: The estimated progression rates of DPs to advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer (CRC) are very low. Missing these polyps or not excising them may lead to failure to diagnose some cancers. There is a need for further comprehensive studies of removing all polyps to determine whether non–high-risk lesions require further pathologic examination and to re-examine routine surveillance programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Osman Kones
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training & Research Hospital University of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Al Bakir I, Curtius K, Graham TA. From Colitis to Cancer: An Evolutionary Trajectory That Merges Maths and Biology. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2368. [PMID: 30386335 PMCID: PMC6198656 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer, and this risk is related to disease duration, extent, and cumulative inflammation burden. Carcinogenesis follows the principles of Darwinian evolution, whereby somatic cells acquire genomic alterations that provide them with a survival and/or growth advantage. Colitis represents a unique situation whereby routine surveillance endoscopy provides a serendipitous opportunity to observe somatic evolution over space and time in vivo in a human organ. Moreover, somatic evolution in colitis is evolution in the ‘fast lane': the repeated rounds of inflammation and mucosal healing that are characteristic of the disease accelerate the evolutionary process and likely provide a strong selective pressure for inflammation-adapted phenotypic traits. In this review, we discuss the evolutionary dynamics of pre-neoplastic clones in colitis with a focus on how measuring their evolutionary trajectories could deliver a powerful way to predict future cancer occurrence. Measurements of somatic evolution require an interdisciplinary approach that combines quantitative measurement of the genotype, phenotype and the microenvironment of somatic cells–paying particular attention to spatial heterogeneity across the colon–together with mathematical modeling to interpret these data within an evolutionary framework. Here we take a practical approach in discussing how and why the different “evolutionary ingredients” can and should be measured, together with our viewpoint on subsequent translation into clinical practice. We highlight the open questions in the evolution of colitis-associated cancer as a stimulus for future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Al Bakir
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.,Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
| | - Kit Curtius
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Evolution and Cancer Laboratory, Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Kim DH, Hassan C, Matkowskyj KA, Halberg RB. The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:515-536. [PMID: 30115435 PMCID: PMC6100796 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
For decades, colorectal screening strategies have been largely driven by static features, particularly polyp size. Although cross-sectional features of polyp size, morphology, and location are important determinants of clinical relevance before histology, they lack any dynamic information on polyp growth rates. Computed tomography colonography allows for in vivo surveillance of colorectal polyps, providing volumetric growth rates that are providing new insights into tumorigenesis. In this article, existing cross-sectional and longitudinal data on colorectal polyps are reviewed, with an emphasis on how these features may affect clinical relevance and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Silva-Illanes N, Espinoza M. Critical Analysis of Markov Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:858-873. [PMID: 30005759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening is challenging because of the need to model the underlying unobservable natural history of the disease. OBJECTIVES To describe the available Markov models and to critically analyze their main structural assumptions. METHODS A systematic search was performed in eight relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Econlit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Economic Evaluations Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Cost-Effective Analysis Registry, and European Network of Health Economics Evaluation Databases), identifying 34 models that met the inclusion criteria. A comparative analysis of model structure and parameterization was conducted using two checklists and guidelines for cost-effectiveness screening models. RESULTS Two modeling techniques were identified. One strategy used a Markov model to reproduce the natural history of the disease and an overlaying model that reproduced the screening process, whereas the other used a single model to represent a screening program. Most of the studies included only adenoma-carcinoma sequences, a few included de novo cancer, and none included the serrated pathway. Parameterization of adenoma dwell time, sojourn time, and surveillance differed between studies, and there was a lack of validation and statistical calibration against local epidemiological data. Most of the studies analyzed failed to perform an adequate literature review and synthesis of diagnostic accuracy properties of the screening tests modeled. CONCLUSIONS Several strategies to model colorectal cancer screening have been developed, but many challenges remain to adequately represent the natural history of the disease and the screening process. Structural uncertainty analysis could be a useful strategy for understanding the impact of the assumptions of different models on cost-effectiveness results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manuel Espinoza
- HTA Unit, Centre for Clinical Research UC, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kluge MA, Williams JL, Wu CK, Jacobson BC, Schroy PC, Lieberman DA, Calderwood AH. Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87. [PMID: 28648575 PMCID: PMC5742069 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The risks of missed findings after inadequate bowel preparation are not fully characterized in a diverse cohort. We aimed to evaluate the likelihood of missed polyps after an inadequate preparation as assessed by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). METHODS In this observational study of prospectively collected data within a large, national, endoscopic consortium, we identified patients aged 50 to 75 years who underwent average-risk screening colonoscopy (C1) followed by a second colonoscopy for any indication within 3 years (C2). We determined the polyp detection rates (PDRs) and advanced PDRs during C2 stratified by C1 BBPS scores. RESULTS Among segment pairs without polyps at C1 (N = 601), those with inadequate C1 BBPS segment scores had a higher PDR at C2 (10%) compared with those with adequate bowel preparation at C1 (5%; P = .04). Among segment pairs with polyps at C1 (N = 154), segments with inadequate bowel preparation scores at C1 had higher advanced PDRs at C2 (20%) compared with those with adequate bowel preparation scores at C1 (4%; P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of advanced polyps at C1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.1-10.8) but not inadequate BBPS scores at C1 (adjusted OR 1.8; 95% CI, 0.6-5.1) was associated with a significantly increased risk of advanced polyps at C2. CONCLUSIONS Inadequate BBPS segment scores generally are associated with higher rates of polyps and advanced polyps at subsequent colonoscopy within a short timeframe. The presence of advanced polyps as well as inadequate BBPS segment scores can inform the risk of missed polyps and help triage which patients warrant a timely repeat colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Kluge
- Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Connie K. Wu
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Brian C. Jacobson
- Section of Gastroenterology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Paul C. Schroy
- Section of Gastroenterology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - David A. Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sollazzo M, Genchi C, Paglia S, Di Giacomo S, Pession A, de Biase D, Grifoni D. High MYC Levels Favour Multifocal Carcinogenesis. Front Genet 2018; 9:612. [PMID: 30619451 PMCID: PMC6297171 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The term "field cancerisation" describes the formation of tissue sub-areas highly susceptible to multifocal tumourigenesis. In the earlier stages of cancer, cells may indeed display a series of molecular alterations that allow them to proliferate faster, eventually occupying discrete tissue regions with irrelevant morphological anomalies. This behaviour recalls cell competition, a process based on a reciprocal fitness comparison: when cells with a growth advantage arise in a tissue, they are able to commit wild-type neighbours to death and to proliferate at their expense. It is known that cells expressing high MYC levels behave as super-competitors, able to kill and replace less performant adjacent cells; given MYC upregulation in most human cancers, MYC-mediated cell competition is likely to pioneer field cancerisation. Here we show that MYC overexpression in a sub-territory of the larval wing epithelium of Drosophila is sufficient to trigger a number of cellular responses specific to mammalian pre-malignant tissues. Moreover, following induction of different second mutations, high MYC-expressing epithelia were found to be susceptible to multifocal growth, a hallmark of mammalian pre-cancerous fields. In summary, our study identified an early molecular alteration implicated in field cancerisation and established a genetically amenable model which may help study the molecular basis of early carcinogenesis.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Where does cancer come from? Although the cell-of-origin is difficult to pinpoint, cancer clones harbor information about their clonal ancestries. In an effort to find cells before they evolve into a life-threatening cancer, physicians currently diagnose premalignant diseases at frequencies that substantially exceed those of clinical cancers. Cancer risk prediction relies on our ability to distinguish between which premalignant features will lead to cancer mortality and which are characteristic of inconsequential disease. Here, we review the evolution of cancer from premalignant disease, and discuss the concept that even phenotypically normal cell progenies inherently gain more malignant potential with age. We describe the hurdles of prognosticating cancer risk in premalignant disease by making reference to the underlying continuous and multivariate natures of genotypes and phenotypes and the particular challenge inherent in defining a cell lineage as "cancerized."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Curtius
- Centre for Tumor Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, EC1M 6BQ London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas A Wright
- Centre for Tumor Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, EC1M 6BQ London, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Centre for Tumor Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, EC1M 6BQ London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Von Renteln D, Bouin M, Barkun AN. Current standards and new developments of colorectal polyp management and resection techniques. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:835-842. [PMID: 28319429 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1309279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colonoscopy and endoscopic removal of precancerous polyps play an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. Improved endoscopes and quality standards have led to an increasing polyp and adenoma detection rate. Optimal polyp resection techniques and management strategies are key for an effective colonoscopy practice. Areas covered: Strategies for how to improve diminutive polyp (polyps up to 5 mm in size) management are discussed because of their high prevalence. Systematic removal of diminutive polyps leads to increasing costs of colonoscopy practice, while the effect on colorectal cancer prevention might be negligible. Furthermore, polypectomy recommendations for mid-size and large polyps are provided. For all larger polyps larger, complete and safe resection is mandatory to avoid post colonoscopy cancers. The focus for managing such larger polyps is to use new techniques (i.e. cold snares) and to attempt complete removal and to reduce post-polypectomy complications. Expert commentary: The resect-and-discard strategy is a promising management strategy for diminutive polyps. However, modification of this approach might be required in order to make widespread adoption feasible. Cold snare polypectomy is a promising new approach for small polyp resection. For resection of large polyps adequate treatment recommendations with regard to endoscopic mucosal resection and complication prevention are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Von Renteln
- a Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) , Montreal , Canada
| | - Mickael Bouin
- a Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) , Montreal , Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- b Division of Gastroenterology , McGill University Health Center, McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Prakash MK, Lang B, Heinrich H, Valli PV, Bauerfeind P, Sonnenberg A, Beerenwinkel N, Misselwitz B. CMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:80. [PMID: 28583127 PMCID: PMC5460500 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0458-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. CRC incidence and mortality can be reduced by several screening strategies, including colonoscopy, but randomized CRC prevention trials face significant obstacles such as the need for large study populations with long follow-up. Therefore, CRC screening strategies will likely be designed and optimized based on computer simulations. Several computational microsimulation tools have been reported for estimating efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CRC prevention. However, none of these tools is publicly available. There is a need for an open source framework to answer practical questions including testing of new screening interventions and adapting findings to local conditions. METHODS We developed and implemented a new microsimulation model, Colon Modeling Open Source Tool (CMOST), for modeling the natural history of CRC, simulating the effects of CRC screening interventions, and calculating the resulting costs. CMOST facilitates automated parameter calibration against epidemiological adenoma prevalence and CRC incidence data. RESULTS Predictions of CMOST were highly similar compared to a large endoscopic CRC prevention study as well as predictions of existing microsimulation models. We applied CMOST to calculate the optimal timing of a screening colonoscopy. CRC incidence and mortality are reduced most efficiently by a colonoscopy between the ages of 56 and 59; while discounted life years gained (LYG) is maximal at 49-50 years. With a dwell time of 13 years, the most cost-effective screening is at 59 years, at $17,211 discounted USD per LYG. While cost-efficiency varied according to dwell time it did not influence the optimal time point of screening interventions within the tested range. CONCLUSIONS Predictions of CMOST are highly similar compared to a randomized CRC prevention trial as well as those of other microsimulation tools. This open source tool will enable health-economics analyses in for various countries, health-care scenarios and CRC prevention strategies. CMOST is freely available under the GNU General Public License at https://gitlab.com/misselwb/CMOST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meher K Prakash
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brian Lang
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.,SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Henriette Heinrich
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Piero V Valli
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Bauerfeind
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Amnon Sonnenberg
- The Portland VA Medical Center, P3-GI, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Niko Beerenwinkel
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.,SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vleugels JLA, Hazewinkel Y, Fockens P, Dekker E. Natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a systematic literature review. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:1169-1176.e1. [PMID: 28024986 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Diminutive (1-5 mm) and small (6-9 mm) polyps comprise 90% of detected lesions during colonoscopy and rarely contain advanced histology or colorectal cancer (CRC). Routine removal of these lesions results in a significant burden to colonoscopy programs. At the same time, the risk for progression of these polyps to CRC is unclear. We performed a systematic review to explore the natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies investigating the natural history of colorectal polyps. Studies were considered eligible when they assessed patients with 1- to 9-mm polyps that were not treated with polypectomy and that underwent follow-up. We excluded studies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, polyposis syndromes, and previously diagnosed CRC. We independently extracted study characteristics and evaluated CRC and advanced adenoma (size ≥ 10 mm, containing high-grade dysplasia or villous features) as outcome parameters. RESULTS Of 8775 retrieved studies, 9 studies with 721 patients were included that prospectively evaluated the evolution of 1- to 9-mm polyps. In 7 studies the average duration of observation was 2 to 3 years. There was only 1 study in which 1 small polyp might have progressed to cancer. Of 1034 adenomas sized 1 to 9 mm in those studies, 6% progressed to advanced adenomas over time. CONCLUSIONS Based on this systematic review, it appears that some 1- to 9-mm adenomas progress to advanced adenomas within 2 to 3 years. No information on long-term CRC transition rates was found. Defining the biologic significance of these polyps is needed to balance between benefits and harm of polypectomy. (PROSPERO database registration number: CRD42016036577.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper L A Vleugels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yark Hazewinkel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Park SK, Song YS, Jung YS, Kim WH, Soo Eun C, Ko BM, Seo GS, Cha JM, Park JJ, Mo Moon C, Jung Y, Jeon SR, Park DI. Do surveillance intervals in patients with more than five adenomas at index colonoscopy be shorter than those in patients with three to four adenomas? A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:1026-1031. [PMID: 27862272 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM There is controversy about the surveillance interval after colonoscopy when 5-10 adenomas have been found on index colonoscopy. This study aimed to investigate the risk of colorectal neoplasm (CRN) according to the number of adenomas at index colonoscopy. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at 10 university hospitals in Korea. We included 1394 patients with ≥ 3 adenomas at index colonoscopy. The risk of advanced CRN was compared according to the number of adenomas (intermediate risk group, 3-4 small adenomas or at least one ≥ 10 mm, and high risk group, ≥ 5 small adenomas or ≥ 3 at least one ≥ 10 mm). RESULTS Overall, 164 (11.8%) developed an advanced CRN after a mean of 4.0 years from baseline colonoscopy. The 3-year and 5-year risk of advanced CRN was 2.1% (95% CI 2.09-2.11) and 14.4% (95% CI 14.36-14.44) in intermediate risk group and 3.2% (95% CI 3.19-3.21) and 23.3% (95% CI 19.15-19.25) in high risk group (P = 0.01). Having ≥ 5 adenomas (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.23, P = 0.01) detected at index colonoscopy was a significant risk factor for developing advanced CRN. CONCLUSIONS Although risk of advanced CRN in patients with 5-10 adenomas was significantly higher than that in patients with 3-4 adenomas, the cumulative risk at 3 years was low at 3.2%. Thus, we suggest that a 3-year surveillance interval might be appropriate for the patients with 5-10 adenomas, and further prospective studies are needed to investigate whether more intensive surveillance is needed in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Kyung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Seok Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Suk Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Hee Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Soo Eun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Bong Min Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center and Research institute, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Geom Seog Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Mo Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Seong Ran Jeon
- Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Il Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prieto SP, Lai KK, Laryea JA, Mizell JS, Mustain WC, Muldoon TJ. Fluorescein as a topical fluorescent contrast agent for quantitative microendoscopic inspection of colorectal epithelium. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS 2017; 8:2324-2338. [PMID: 28736674 PMCID: PMC5516830 DOI: 10.1364/boe.8.002324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Fiber bundle microendoscopic imaging of colorectal tissue has shown promising results, for both qualitative and quantitative analysis. A quantitative image quality control and image feature extraction algorithm was previously designed for quantitative image feature analysis of proflavine-stained ex vivo colorectal tissue. We investigated fluorescein as an alternative topical stain. Images of ex vivo porcine, caprine, and human colorectal tissue were used to compare microendoscopic images of tissue topically stained with fluorescein and proflavine solutions. Fluorescein was shown to be comparable for automated crypt detection, with an average crypt detection sensitivity exceeding 90% using a combination of three contrast limit pairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra P. Prieto
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, 1 University Blvd., Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
| | - Keith K. Lai
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, L-25, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jonathan A. Laryea
- Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Jason S. Mizell
- Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - William C. Mustain
- Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Timothy J. Muldoon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, 1 University Blvd., Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
von Renteln D, Pohl H. Polyp Resection - Controversial Practices and Unanswered Questions. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2017; 8:e76. [PMID: 28277492 PMCID: PMC5387755 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2017.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Detection and complete removal of precancerous neoplastic polyps are central to effective colorectal cancer screening. The prevalence of neoplastic polyps in the screening population in the United States is likely >50%. However, most persons with neoplastic polyps are never destined to develop cancer, and do not benefit for finding and removing polyps, and may only be harmed by the procedure. Further 70-80% of polyps are diminutive (≤5 mm) and such polyps almost never contain cancer. Given the questionable benefit, the high-cost and the potential risk changing our approach to the management of diminutive polyps is currently debated. Deemphasizing diminutive polyps and shifting our efforts to detection and complete removal of larger and higher-risk polyps deserves discussion and study. This article explores three controversies, and emerging concepts related to endoscopic polyp resection. First, we discuss challenges of optical resect-and-discard strategy and possible alternatives. Second, we review recent studies that support the use of cold snare resection for ≥5 mm polyps. Thirdly, we examine current evidence for prophylactic clipping after resection of large polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel von Renteln
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM), and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CR-CHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and Geisel School of Medicine and The Dartmouth Institute, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pottegård A, Hallas J. New use of prescription drugs prior to a cancer diagnosis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 26:223-227. [PMID: 27889931 PMCID: PMC5299521 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Revised: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Cancers often have considerable induction periods. This confers a risk of reverse causation bias in studies of cancer risk associated with drug use, as early symptoms of a yet undiagnosed cancer might lead to drug treatment in the period leading up to the diagnosis. This bias can be alleviated by disregarding exposure for some time before the cancer diagnosis (lag time). We aimed at assessing the duration of lag time needed to avoid reverse causation bias. Methods We identified all Danish patients with incident cancer between 2000 and 2012 (n = 353 087). Incident use of prescription drugs was assessed prior to their cancer diagnosis as well as among population controls (n = 1 402 400). Analyses were conducted for all cancers and for breast, lung, colon and prostate cancer individually. Further, analyses were performed for a composite measure of all incident drug use as well as for nine pre‐specified individual drug classes, representing drug treatment likely to be prescribed for symptoms of the given cancers. Results The incidence rate for new drug treatment among cancer cases was stable around 130 per 1000 persons per month until 6 months prior to cancer diagnosis where it increased gradually and peaked at 434 in the month immediately preceding the cancer diagnosis. Considerable variation was observed among cancers, for example, breast cancer showed almost no such effect. The pre‐selected drug classes showed a stronger increase prior to cancer diagnoses than drugs overall. Conclusions Incident use of drugs increases in the months prior to a cancer diagnosis. To avoid reverse causation, 6 months' lag time would be sufficient for most drug‐cancer associations. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Pottegård
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Hallas
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cross WC, Graham TA, Wright NA. New paradigms in clonal evolution: punctuated equilibrium in cancer. J Pathol 2016; 240:126-36. [PMID: 27282810 DOI: 10.1002/path.4757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Evolutionary theories are themselves subject to evolution. Clonal evolution - the model that describes the initiation and progression of cancer - is entering a period of profound change, brought about largely by technological developments in genome analysis. A flurry of recent publications, using modern mathematical and bioinformatics techniques, have revealed both punctuated and neutral evolution phenomena that are poorly explained by the conventional graduated perspectives. In this review, we propose that a hybrid model, inspired by the evolutionary model of punctuated equilibrium, could better explain these recent observations. We also discuss the conceptual changes and clinical implications of variable evolutionary tempos. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Ch Cross
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, EC1 2 AD, UK.
| | - Trevor A Graham
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, EC1 2 AD, UK
| | - Nicholas A Wright
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, EC1 2 AD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yee J, Chang KJ, Dachman AH, Kim DH, McFarland EG, Pickhardt PJ, Cash BD, Bruining DH, Zalis ME. The Added Value of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13:931-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
38
|
Scarpa M, Scarpa M, Castagliuolo I, Erroi F, Basato S, Brun P, Angriman I, Castoro C. CD80 down-regulation is associated to aberrant DNA methylation in non-inflammatory colon carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:388. [PMID: 27377375 PMCID: PMC4932699 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2405-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The lack of positive costimulatory molecules represents one of the mechanisms by which tumor cells evade immune surveillance. Promoter hypermethylation plays a major role in cancer development through transcriptional silencing of critical genes. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of the costimulatory molecule CD80 in relationship with genomic methylation in non-inflammatory colon carcinogenesis. Methods Colonic mucosal samples were collected from healthy subjects (n = 30) and from dysplastic adenoma (n = 14), and colon adenocarcinoma (n = 10). DNA methyltransferases-1, −3a, −3b and CD80 mRNA expression were quantified by real time qRT-PCR. The methylation status of CDH13, APC, MLH1, MGMT1 and RUNX3 gene promoters was assessed by methylation-specific PCR. CD80 expression was assessed in HT29, HCT-15 and LoVo cell lines after treatment with the DNA-methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Results CD80 mRNA levels were significantly lower in the non-inflammatory dysplastic colonic mucosa of patients with one or more methylated genes and inversely correlated with patients’ methylation scores (τ = −0.41, p = 0.05 and τ = −0.37, p = 0.05, respectively). Treatment with 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine significantly increased CD80 expression both in terms of the level of CD80 mRNA (p = 0.007) and of CD80+ cells (p = 0.003). Conclusions These results indicate that the failure of immune surveillance mechanisms in non-inflammatory colon carcinogenesis may be linked to genomic methylation directly or indirectly affecting CD80 expression. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2405-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Scarpa
- Esophageal and Digestive Tract Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
| | - Melania Scarpa
- Esophageal and Digestive Tract Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Erroi
- Esophageal and Digestive Tract Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Silvia Basato
- Esophageal and Digestive Tract Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Paola Brun
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Imerio Angriman
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DISCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carlo Castoro
- Esophageal and Digestive Tract Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
von Renteln D, Barkun AN. Increasing detection rates for diminutive adenomas: are we on the right track? Gut 2016; 65:1056-7. [PMID: 26896457 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Greuter MJE, Berkhof J, Fijneman RJA, Demirel E, Lew JB, Meijer GA, Stoker J, Coupé VMH. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150910. [PMID: 27194458 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Imaging may be promising for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, since it has test characteristics comparable with colonoscopy but is less invasive. We aimed to assess the potential of CT colonography (CTC) and MR colonography (MRC) in terms of (cost-effectiveness) using the Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model. METHODS We compared several CTC and MRC strategies with 5- or 10-yearly screening intervals with no screening, 10-yearly colonoscopy screening and biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening. We assumed trial-based participation rates in the base-case analyses and varied the rates in sensitivity analyses. Incremental lifetime costs and health effects were estimated from a healthcare perspective. RESULTS The health gain of CTC and MRC was similar and ranged from 0.031 to 0.048 life-year gained compared with no screening, for 2-5 screening rounds. Lifetime costs per person for MRC strategies were €60-110 higher than those for CTC strategies with an equal number of screening rounds. All imaging-based strategies were cost-effective compared with no screening. FIT screening was the dominant screening strategy, leading to most LYG and highest cost-savings. Compared with three rounds of colonoscopy screening, CTC with five rounds was found to be cost-effective in an incremental analysis of imaging strategies. Assumptions on screening participation have a major influence on the ordering of strategies in terms of costs and effects. CONCLUSION CTC and MRC have potential for CRC screening, compared with no screening and compared with three rounds of 10-yearly colonoscopy screening. When taking FIT screening as the reference, imaging is not cost-effective. Participation is an important driver of effectiveness and cost estimates. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first study to assess the cost-effectiveness of MRC screening for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein J E Greuter
- 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- 2 Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erhan Demirel
- 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- 3 Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, NSW, Australia
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- 2 Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- 4 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Berger BM, Schroy PC, Dinh TA. Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using a Multitarget Stool DNA Test: Modeling the Effect of the Intertest Interval on Clinical Effectiveness. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015; 15:e65-74. [PMID: 26792032 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Revised: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test was recently approved for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for men and women, aged ≥ 50 years, at average risk of CRC. The guidelines currently recommend a 3-year interval for mt-sDNA testing in the absence of empirical data. We used clinical effectiveness modeling to project decreases in CRC incidence and related mortality associated with mt-sDNA screening to help inform interval setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Archimedes model (Archimedes Inc., San Francisco, CA) was used to conduct a 5-arm, virtual, clinical screening study of a population of 200,000 virtual individuals to compare the clinical effectiveness of mt-sDNA screening at 1-, 3-, and 5-year intervals compared with colonoscopy at 10-year intervals and no screening for a 30-year period. The study endpoints were the decrease in CRC incidence and related mortality of each strategy versus no screening. Cost-effectiveness ratios (US dollars per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) of mt-sDNA intervals were calculated versus no screening. RESULTS Compared with 10-year colonoscopy, annual mt-sDNA testing produced similar reductions in CRC incidence (65% vs. 63%) and related mortality (73% vs. 72%). mt-sDNA testing at 3-year intervals reduced the CRC incidence by 57% and CRC mortality by 67%, and mt-sDNA testing at 5-year intervals reduced the CRC incidence by 52% and CRC mortality by 62%. At an average price of $600 per test, the annual, 3-year, and 5-year mt-sDNA screening costs would be $20,178, $11,313, and $7388 per QALY, respectively, compared with no screening. CONCLUSION These data suggest that screening every 3 years using a multitarget mt-sDNA test provides reasonable performance at acceptable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul C Schroy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:1682-90. [PMID: 26482858 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 08/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Volumetric growth assessment has been proposed for predicting advanced histology at surveillance computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC). We examined whether is it possible to predict which small (6-9 mm) polyps are likely to become advanced adenomas at surveillance by assessing volumetric growth. METHODS In an invitational population-based CTC screening trial, 93 participants were diagnosed with one or two 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s). They were offered a 3-year surveillance CTC. Participants in whom surveillance CTC showed lesion(s) of ≥6 mm were offered colonoscopy. Volumetric measurements were performed on index and surveillance CTC, and polyps were classified into growth categories according to ±30% volumetric change (>30% growth as progression, 30% growth to 30% decrease as stable, and >30% decrease as regression). Polyp growth was related to histopathology. RESULTS Between July 2012 and May 2014, 70 patients underwent surveillance CTC after a mean surveillance interval of 3.3 years (s.d. 0.3; range 3.0-4.6 years). In all, 33 (35%) of 95 polyps progressed, 36 (38%) remained stable, and 26 (27%) regressed, including an apparent resolution in 13 (14%) polyps. In 68 (83%) of the 82 polyps at surveillance, histopathology was obtained; 15 (47%) of 32 progressing polyps were advanced adenomas, 6 (21%) of 28 stable polyps, and none of the regressing polyps. CONCLUSIONS The majority of 6-9 mm polyps will not progress to advanced neoplasia within 3 years. Those that do progress to advanced status can in particular be found among the lesions that increased in size on surveillance CTC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cash BD, Pickhardt PJ. Defining the Risk of Small Polyps: Potential Value of CTC. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:1691-3. [PMID: 26673497 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Although the clinical importance of large colorectal polyps and the benign nature of diminutive polyps are generally accepted, elucidating the clinical significance of small polyps (6-9 mm) could have an enormous impact on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Serial volumetric measurement via CTC may be a valuable method for assessing changes in polyp size. With the recognition of alternative CRC pathways, a more precise understanding of the natural history of small colorectal polyps is needed and data such as those reported by Nolthenius contribute to that knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooks D Cash
- Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Perry J Pickhardt
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer MGJ, Bipat S, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J. Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial. Eur Radiol 2015; 26:2762-70. [PMID: 26560732 PMCID: PMC4927597 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4081-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is a viable option for 6-9 mm polyps at CTC screening for colorectal cancer. We established participation and diagnostic yield of surveillance and determined overall yield of CTC screening. Material and methods In an invitational CTC screening trial 82 of 982 participants harboured 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s) for which surveillance CTC was advised. Only participants with one or more lesion(s) ≥6 mm at surveillance CTC were offered colonoscopy (OC); 13 had undergone preliminary OC. The surveillance CTC yield was defined as the number of participants with advanced neoplasia in the 82 surveillance participants, and was added to the primary screening yield. Results Sixty-five of 82 participants were eligible for surveillance CTC of which 56 (86.2 %) participated. Advanced neoplasia was diagnosed in 15/56 participants (26.8 %) and 9/13 (69.2 %) with preliminary OC. Total surveillance yield was 24/82 (29.3 %). No carcinomas were detected. Adding surveillance results to initial screening CTC yield significantly increased the advanced neoplasia yield per 100 CTC participants (6.1 to 8.6; p < 0.001) and per 100 invitees (2.1 to 2.9; p < 0.001). Conclusion Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps has a substantial yield of advanced adenomas and significantly increased the CTC yield in population screening. Key Points • The participation rate in surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is 86 %. • Advanced adenoma prevalence in a 6-9 mm CTC surveillance population is high. • Surveillance CTC significantly increases the yield of population screening by CTC. • Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps is a safe strategy. • Surveillance CTC is unlikely to yield new important extracolonic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, PO Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, G1-215, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet C de Haan
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten G J Thomeer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shandra Bipat
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina Biermann
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: when to resect and discard? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29:639-49. [PMID: 26381308 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to be effective in reducing incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The increase in use of colonoscopy in national bowel cancer screening programmes combined with improved technology has resulted in a large increase in detection of polyps. Most polyps detected at screening colonoscopy are small (<10 mm) or diminutive (<6 mm) and, in particular the latter, have a very small chance of containing advanced features or cancer. The main reason for resecting small adenomas and sending them to histopathology serves to inform on the future surveillance intervals. Being able to diagnose adenomas in vivo would allow for them to be resected and discarded, saving the costs associated with histopathology. Diagnosing distal hyperplastic polyps in vivo would allow for these to be left in situ reducing the risks associated with polypectomy. There are now a number of new technologies that could potentially make optical diagnosis a reality. Resect and discard policy is an attractive concept for patients, gastroenterologists and health service providers and would present an enticing change to current clinical practice.
Collapse
|
46
|
Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:331-45. [PMID: 25278245 PMCID: PMC4291518 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3435-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
47
|
Hoff G. Gastrointestinal cancer screening: screening may release new research funding to improve health service also in routine clinics. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50:718-26. [PMID: 25857737 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1011225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We are far from having seen the ideal method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and the downsides of screening have not been fully addressed. Funding of adequately sized screening trials with a 10-15-year perspective for endpoints CRC mortality and incidence is difficult to get. Also, with such time horizons, there will always be an ongoing study to be awaited before feeling obliged to invest in the next. New, promising screening methods may, however, emerge far more often than every 10th year, and the knowledge gap may easily widen unless research is made a key responsibility for any ongoing cancer screening program. Previous lost battles on screening research may be won if accepting that scientific evidence may be obtained within the framework of screening programs - provided that they are designed as platforms for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER). Accepting that CER-based screening programs should be preferred to non-CER programs and seriously compete for their funding sources, then CER screening programs may not be considered so much as contenders for ordinary clinical research funds. Also, CER within a screening framework may benefit patients in routine clinics as shown by screening research in Nordic countries. The Nordic countries have been early contributors to research on CRC screening, but slow in implementing screening programs.
Collapse
|
48
|
Bernstein C, Bernstein H. Epigenetic reduction of DNA repair in progression to gastrointestinal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7:30-46. [PMID: 25987950 PMCID: PMC4434036 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i5.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2014] [Revised: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Deficiencies in DNA repair due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA repair genes cause increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. In sporadic GI cancers, mutations in DNA repair genes are relatively rare. However, epigenetic alterations that reduce expression of DNA repair genes are frequent in sporadic GI cancers. These epigenetic reductions are also found in field defects that give rise to cancers. Reduced DNA repair likely allows excessive DNA damages to accumulate in somatic cells. Then either inaccurate translesion synthesis past the un-repaired DNA damages or error-prone DNA repair can cause mutations. Erroneous DNA repair can also cause epigenetic alterations (i.e., epimutations, transmitted through multiple replication cycles). Some of these mutations and epimutations may cause progression to cancer. Thus, deficient or absent DNA repair is likely an important underlying cause of cancer. Whole genome sequencing of GI cancers show that between thousands to hundreds of thousands of mutations occur in these cancers. Epimutations that reduce DNA repair gene expression and occur early in progression to GI cancers are a likely source of this high genomic instability. Cancer cells deficient in DNA repair are more vulnerable than normal cells to inactivation by DNA damaging agents. Thus, some of the most clinically effective chemotherapeutic agents in cancer treatment are DNA damaging agents, and their effectiveness often depends on deficient DNA repair in cancer cells. Recently, at least 18 DNA repair proteins, each active in one of six DNA repair pathways, were found to be subject to epigenetic reduction of expression in GI cancers. Different DNA repair pathways repair different types of DNA damage. Evaluation of which DNA repair pathway(s) are deficient in particular types of GI cancer and/or particular patients may prove useful in guiding choice of therapeutic agents in cancer therapy.
Collapse
|
49
|
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27:417-434. [PMID: 25652022 DOI: 10.1111/den.12456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 384] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become common in recent years. Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also many types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines in which the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and the selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are properly outlined, and to ensure that the actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with the guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has recently compiled a set of colorectal ESD/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) guidelines using evidence-based methods. The guidelines focus on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and caveat before, during, and after ESD/EMR and, in this regard, exclude the specific procedures, types and proper use of instruments, devices, and drugs. Although eight areas, ranging from indication to pathology, were originally planned for inclusion in these guidelines, evidence was scarce in each area. Therefore, grades of recommendation were determined largely through expert consensus in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masao Ichinose
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Matsui
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Sugita
- Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
IJspeert JEG, Medema JP, Dekker E. Colorectal neoplasia pathways: state of the art. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25:169-82. [PMID: 25839680 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease and each CRC possesses a unique molecular tumor profile. The main pathways of oncogenesis are the chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability and serrated neoplasia pathway. Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) may be the precursor lesions of CRC arising via the serrated neoplasia pathway. This has led to a paradigm shift because all SSA/Ps should be detected and resected during colonoscopy. The ability to accurately detect and resect only those polyps with a malignant potential could result in safer and cost-effective practice. Optimization of the endoscopic classification systems is however needed to implement targeted prevention methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joep Evert Godfried IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Room C2-231, Amsterdam 1105 AZ The Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul Medema
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, Room G2-131, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Room C2-115, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|