The role of antitissue transglutaminase assay for the diagnosis and monitoring of coeliac disease: a French-Italian multicentre study

Do Serological Tests Eliminate the Need for Endoscopic Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Patients with Celiac Disease? A Retrospective Study with Review of Literature

Background: Celiac disease is one of the most common genetic allergies worldwide. The prevalence of celiac disease in Iran is similar to or even higher than the global prevalence. Celiac disease is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the small intestine. Affected patients are allergic to gluten protein that exists in some grains, such as wheat and barley. Methods: Serological endomysial IgA antibody (EMA-AB) and tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody (TTG-IgA) tests were performed on 114 patients aged the ages of 0-18 years with histopathological findings of celiac disease. The results of these tests were compared to the results of the histopathological study of the duodenal biopsy. Results: Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calculation of the TTG-IgA test's sensitivity and specificity, the best diagnostic limit for the TTG-IgA test is 144, which has the best sensitivity and specificity. At this value (cut-off), the test's sensitivity was 62%, and the specificity was 93.7%. For the endomysial test, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 80%, 93%, 90%, and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the endomysial test is better than that of the TTG-IgA test in general for diagnosing patients with celiac disease. In the TTG-IgA test, false-positive cases are high due to a cut-off of 20, reducing the test's specificity. In these false-positive cases, the endomysial test helps in better diagnosis.

Positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies with negative endomysial antibodies: Unresolved issues in diagnosing celiac disease

BACKGROUND

The serological screening for celiac disease (CD) is currently based on the detection of anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies, subsequently confirmed by positive endomysial antibodies (EMA). When an anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA IgA negative result occurs, it can be due either to the lower sensitivity of the EMA test or to the lower specificity of the anti-tTG test. This study aimed at verifying how variation in analytical specificity among different anti-tTG methods could account for this discrepancy.

METHODS

A total of 130 consecutive anti-tTG IgA positive/EMA negative samples were collected from the local screening routine and tested using five anti-tTG IgA commercial assays: two chemiluminescence methods, one fluoroimmunoenzymatic method, one immunoenzymatic method and one multiplex flow immunoassay method.

RESULTS

Twenty three/130 (17.7%) patients were diagnosed with CD. In the other 107 cases a diagnosis of CD was not confirmed. The overall agreement among the five anti-tTG methods ranged from 28.5% to 77.7%. CD condition was more likely linked to the positivity of more than one anti-tTG IgA assay (monopositive = 2.5%, positive with ≥ three methods = 29.5%; p = 0.0004), but it was not related to anti-tTG IgA antibody levels (either positive or borderline; p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with positive anti-tTG/negative EMA have a low probability of being affected by CD. Given the high variability among methods to measure anti-tTG IgA antibodies, anti-tTG-positive/EMA-negative result must be considered with extreme caution. It is advisable that the laboratory report comments on any discordant results, suggesting to consider the data in the proper clinical context and to refer the patient to a CD reference center for prolonged follow up.

Coeliac disease in childhood: An overview

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune condition, characterised by an immunological response to ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, affecting about 1% of the population in many regions of the world. Increased knowledge regarding the pathogenesis, improved diagnostic techniques and increased awareness over the years have transformed our understanding of CD such that it is no longer a rare enteropathy, but rather a common multisystem disorder which affects individuals of all ages and results in wide-ranging clinical manifestations. Only a minority of children now present with the classical clinical picture of profound diarrhoea and malnutrition. An increasing number of children with CD present with either mild, non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms or extra-intestinal manifestations or even be asymptomatic, as in many screening-detected children. Knowledge about these diverse manifestations and a high index of suspicion is essential so that appropriate investigations can be undertaken, diagnosis established and treatment initiated. Although traditionally small bowel biopsy is considered essential for the diagnosis, recent guidelines from various professional bodies have paved the way to a biopsy-free diagnosis in a subset of symptomatic children. Life long, strict gluten-free diet still remains the only effective treatment at present, although several novel therapeutic agents are in various phases of clinical trials.

Assessment of a Test for the Screening and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated intolerance to dietary gluten, affecting genetically predisposed individuals. ELISA-based serological tests help to decide if further duodenal biopsy is necessary, for this the diagnostic kits have to be accurate, specific, and sensible. In this study, we investigate the performance of an ELISA that uses the purified cross-linked complex of tissue transglutaminase and gliadin, referred as the "neoepitope" (AESKULISA® tTG New Generation), as antigen.

METHODS

We evaluated 41 newly diagnosed celiac patients, 18 celiac patients on gluten-free diet, and 169 controls, comprising healthy subjects, patients affected by other autoimmune diseases, and patients affected by several non-autoimmune diseases.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The assay has an excellent performance. Due to its high level of diagnostic accuracy, this assay constitutes a new approach for the screening of celiac patients not only for the diagnosis of CD, but also for monitoring patients on gluten-free diet and their compliance. Moreover, cases of neoepitope-positive subjects who were tested negative with "classical" serological markers could have a predictive value for this pathology. This aspect will require further studies of elaboration.

Overview of biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease

Among the adverse reactions caused by wheat, celiac disease (CD) is the longest studied and best-known pathology. The more recently defined non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) presents with symptoms which are often indistinguishable from CD. Diagnosis of CD is based on serologic, molecular, and bioptic testing. The IgA anti-transglutaminase (tTG) test is considered highly important, as it shows high sensitivity and specificity and its levels correlate to the degree of intestinal damage. Small bowel biopsy can be avoided in symptomatic patients with IgA anti-tTG levels above 10× the manufacturer's cut-off. Recently, tests of anti-deamidated peptides of gliadin (DGP) have replaced classic anti-native gliadin (AGA) tests. DGP assays have a considerably higher diagnostic accuracy than AGA assays, especially in the IgG class, and can replace anti-tTG tests in patients with selective IgA deficiency. The combination of IgG anti-DGP plus IgA anti-tTG assays show greater sensitivity than a single test, with very high specificity. EMA tests have great diagnostic accuracy but are not recommended by all the latest guidelines because they are observer dependent. Biopsy must still be considered the gold standard for CD diagnosis. HLA-DQ genotyping can be used to screen asymptomatic children and in cases of histology/serology disagreement. About half of NCGS patients are DQ2 positive and have IgG AGA. To diagnose NCGS, first CD and wheat allergy must be excluded; then the wheat dependence of symptoms must be verified by a gluten-free diet and subsequent gluten challenge.

Serum markers in the clinical management of celiac disease

The advent of highly reliable noninvasive celiac diagnostic tests has transformed the field of celiac disease, from diagnosis, to evaluation of epidemiology, to clinical and translational research. Serologic tests in their modern forms are highly sensitive and specific for diagnosis, allowing for consideration of avoidance of diagnostic intestinal biopsy in some settings. On the other hand, as predictors of intestinal damage and for use in monitoring disease activity, currently available noninvasive tests have been disappointing. Serologic tests, while a measure of disease activity, do not correlate well with histology or symptomatology, and it is unclear if they predict long-term risk. Additionally, while the many clinically available tests have improved accessibility, they can have widely different cutoff levels and overall performance, making the comparison of levels in individual patients over time and across populations quite difficult. In the future, we can expect to see improvement in the currently available serologic tests including tissue transglutaminase and deamidated gliadin peptide with expansion of the dynamic range of the tests, and the celiac care community should push for a standardization of assays that would simplify research and patient care. Additionally, current serologic tests are measures of the adaptive immune response in celiac disease but do not directly measure intestinal inflammation. Promising work on intestinal fatty acid-binding protein and other assays which directly measure intestinal damage may complement traditional serologic tests and further improve our ability to noninvasively diagnose and monitor celiac disease. The coming years hold promise for the continuing evolution of serum-based tests in celiac disease with the possibility of substantial improvement of patient care and clinical research.

Investigation into celiac disease in Indian patients with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on celiac disease in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis or idiopathic noncirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension (NCIPH). Our objective was to evaluate for celiac disease in patients with portal hypertension in India.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with portal hypertension having cryptogenic chronic liver disease (cases) and hepatitis B- or C-related cirrhosis (controls) were prospectively enrolled. We studied tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody and duodenal histology in study patients.

RESULT

Sixty-one cases (including 14 NCIPH patients) and 59 controls were enrolled. Celiac disease was noted in six cases (including two NCIPH patients) as compared to none in controls. In a significant proportion of the remaining study subjects, duodenal biopsy showed villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and lamina propria inflammation, not accompanied by raised intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs); this was seen more commonly in cases as compared to controls. An unexpectedly high rate of tTG antibody positivity was seen in study subjects (66 %) of cases as compared to 29 % in controls (p-value < 0.001), which could indicate false-positive test result.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 10 % of patients with unexplained portal hypertension (cryptogenic chronic liver disease) had associated celiac disease. In addition, an unexplained enteropathy was seen in a significant proportion of study patients, more so in patients with cryptogenic chronic liver disease. This finding warrants further investigation.

Effect of gluten free diet on immune response to gliadin in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity is a syndrome characterized by gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms occurring in a few hours/days after gluten and/or other wheat protein ingestion and rapidly improving after exclusion of potential dietary triggers. There are no established laboratory markers for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, although a high prevalence of first generation anti-gliadin antibodies of IgG class has been reported in this condition. This study was designed to characterize the effect of the gluten-free diet on anti-gliadin antibodies of IgG class in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

METHODS

Anti-gliadin antibodies of both IgG and IgA classes were assayed by ELISA in 44 non-celiac gluten sensitivity and 40 celiac disease patients after 6 months of gluten-free diet.

RESULTS

The majority of non-celiac gluten sensitivity patients (93.2%) showed the disappearance of anti-gliadin antibodies of IgG class after 6 months of gluten-free diet; in contrast, 16/40 (40%) of celiac patients displayed the persistence of these antibodies after gluten withdrawal. In non-celiac gluten sensitivity patients anti-gliadin antibodies IgG persistence after gluten withdrawal was significantly correlated with the low compliance to gluten-free diet and a mild clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-gliadin antibodies of the IgG class disappear in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity reflecting a strict compliance to the gluten-free diet and a good clinical response to gluten withdrawal.

Utility of tissue transglutaminase immunohistochemistry in pediatric duodenal biopsies: patterns of expression and role in celiac disease-a clinicopathologic review

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) is a ubiquitous multifunctional protein. It has roles in various cellular processes. tTG is a major target of autoantibodies in celiac disease, and its expression by immunohistochemistry in pediatric celiac disease has not been fully examined. We studied tTG expression in 78 pediatric duodenal biopsies by utilizing an antibody to transglutaminase 2. Serum tTG was positive in all celiac cases evaluated. Serum antiserum endomysial antibody (EMA) and tTG were negative in all control subjects and in inflammatory bowel disease and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. There was a statistically significant difference between cases of celiac disease and normal controls in terms of tTG immunohistochemical staining in duodenal biopsies surface epithelium (P value = 0.0012). There was no significant statistical difference in terms of staining of the villous surface or crypt between the cases of celiac disease and cases with IBD (P value = 0.5970 and 0.5227, resp.). There was no detected correlation between serum tTG values and immunohistochemical positivity on duodenal biopsy in cases of celiac disease (P value = 1). There was no relationship between Marsh classification and positivity of villous surface for tTG (P value = 0.4955). We conclude that tTG has limited utility in diagnosis of celiac disease in pediatric duodenal biopsies.

Diagnosis of coeliac disease in children younger than 2 years

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To diagnose coeliac disease (CD) in children younger than 2 years, the old ESPGHAN criteria based on 3 small bowel biopsies were recommended until recently. The aim of the present study was to investigate the applicability of only 1 small intestinal biopsy plus positive serology for the diagnosis of CD in children younger than 2 years.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study included 81 patients younger than 2 years with symptoms suggestive of CD, who all completed the diagnostic procedure based on 3 small bowel biopsies. According to the finding of the third biopsy, patients were divided into group A-CD confirmed (N = 44), and group B-CD not confirmed, after the gluten challenge (N = 37).

RESULTS

At the time of the first biopsy, total villous atrophy (Marsh IIIc) was found more often in group A than in group B (77% vs 27%, P < 0.01). Also, all of the studied antibodies were more frequently positive in group A than in group B (P < 0.01 for all of the tested antibodies). Positive anti-endomysial antibodies and Marsh IIIc finding were the best discriminators between the group A and the group B and considerably contributed to the prediction of CD.

CONCLUSIONS

The second and the third biopsies (before and after the gluten challenge) may also be avoided when diagnosing CD in children younger than 2 years provided that the child, at the time of presentation, has positive anti-endomysial antibodies and Marsh IIIc on the small bowel biopsy. A gluten challenge should be still considered in all other children younger than 2 years.

Determination of IgG and IgA antibodies against native gliadin is not helpful for the diagnosis of coeliac disease in children up to 2 years old

OBJECTIVE

Assays for antibodies against native gliadin (anti-nGli) are still often assumed to perform better in the diagnosis of coeliac disease in young children than tests for antibodies to deamidated gliadin (anti-dGli), tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), and endomysium (EmA). We compared the performance of assays for anti-nGli, anti-dGli, anti-tTG, and EmA in this age group.

METHODS

We investigated retrospectively 184 children (42 with coeliac disease under normal diet and 142 controls) up to 2 years of age. Immunoglobulin (Ig) A- and IgG-anti-dGli, IgA- and IgG-anti-nGli, IgA- and IgG-anti-tTG, and IgA-EmA were measured in serum. Areas under receiver operating characteristics curves, sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

From all of the tests investigated, only assays for IgG-anti-dGli, IgA-anti-tTG, and IgA-EmA had high specificity (≥ 0.96) connected with high sensitivity (≥ 0.86), with high positive predictive values (≥ 0.52 and ≥ 0.69 at pretest probabilities of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively) and negative predictive values (≥ 0.99 and ≥ 0.98 at pretest probabilities of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively). These assays also showed high positive likelihood ratio (≥ 24) at low negative likelihood ratio (≤ 0.15) and high diagnostic odds ratios (≥ 136).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the use of assays of anti-nGli to diagnose coeliac disease in young children. IgA-anti-tTG, IgA-EmA, and IgG-anti-dGli perform better than anti-nGli.

Celiac disease screening assays for children younger than 3 years of age: the performance of three serological tests

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimum serological test for celiac disease (CD) in young children is not known. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of three serological tests (IgA + IgG DGP, IgA TTG, and IgA + IgG EMA) for children younger than 3 years of age.

METHODS

We identified all subjects younger than 3 years of age (n = 6,074) that were tested for CD serology and included those with biopsy data. Patients were classified as group 1 (n = 47): patients with confirmed CD or group 2 (n = 12): patients with normal biopsy findings.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 with regard to number of patients with positive IgA TTG (97.87% vs. 50%, P < 0.001), IgA + IgG DGP (100% vs. 77.78%, P = 0.007), and IgA + IgG EMA (95.65% vs. 9.09%, P < 0.001). There was a significantly positive correlation between Marsh-Oberhuber score on the small duodenal biopsies and all tests. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity showed that manufacturer's levels had high sensitivity for all tests (IgA TTG 97%, IgA + IgG DGP 100%, IgA + IgG EMA 96%), however specificity was low for IgA + IgG DGP (44%) and IgA TTG (50%) but not for IgA + IgG EMA (91%).

CONCLUSIONS

For children younger than 3 years of age, IgA + IgG EMA is highly sensitive and specific. Use of IgA + IgG DGP or IgA TTG as a single serological marker is insufficient for definite diagnosis of CD in this age group. Based on our results, it might be reasonable to postpone the biopsy for asymptomatic children with negative EMA.

Assessment of a combination screening assay for celiac disease

PURPOSE

A serological screening assay for celiac disease (CD), designed to simultaneously detect IgA and IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase (a-tTG) and IgA and IgG deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (a-DGP), was recently developed. In this study, we establish the performance of this assay.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 CD patients and 18 CD patients on gluten-free diets. The diagnosis of CD was based on histological and serological criteria, including concomitant positive serology tests (a-tTG, IgA anti-endomysial antibodies). As control population, we enrolled 169 subjects: 145 disease controls and 24 blood donors. In all cases, serum samples were tested for: IgA a-tTG, IgG a-tTG, IgA a-DGP, IgG a-DGP, IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA), IgA and IgG for a-tTG and a-DGP in a single assay.

RESULTS

The new test, QUANTA Lite (™) h-tTG/DGP Screen, detects all IgA and IgG antibodies against atTG and a-DGP present in a sample. In our study, the test showed 100% sensitivity and 91.12% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed additional value of the new h-tTG/DGP Screen assay, which proved superior to more conventional assays and can be considered the best initial test for CD. Further studies are necessary to determine whether combination of h-tTG/DGP Screen with IgA a-tTG or IgA a-DGP can be used to obviate the need for duodenal biopsy in high- and low-risk populations.

The old and new tests for celiac disease: which is the best test combination to diagnose celiac disease in pediatric patients?

BACKGROUND

In the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD), serum assays for anti-endomysium (EMA) and anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies have excellent diagnostic accuracy. However, these assays are less sensitive in young pediatric patients. Recently, a new ELISA test using deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) as antigen has proved to be very sensitive and specific even in pediatric patients. In addition, anti-actin IgA antibodies (AAA) is another test that can be used in CD patients because antibody concentrations correlate with the degree of villous atrophy. This study evaluated the clinical accuracy of anti-tTG, EMA, AGA, anti-DGP and AAA and the effectiveness of these in different combinations for diagnosing CD in a large cohort of pediatric patients.

METHODS

Sera of 150 children under 6 years of age were tested: 95 patients had a diagnosis of CD, while 55 patients who did not suffer from CD were used as controls. Anti-DGP IgA/IgG and AAA were assayed with ELISA kits, while anti-tTG IgA/IgG and AGA IgG/IgA were assayed using a quantitative fluoroimmunoassay. The EMA test was conducted by indirect immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Seventy-six of 95 (80%) CD patients were positive for DGP IgA and/or tTG IgA. Eighty of 95 (84.2%) patients were positive for DGP IgG and/or tTG IgA. None of the controls were positive for these antibodies. Eighty-four of 95 (88.4%) patients and 8/55 (14.5%) controls were positive for AAA and/or anti-tTG IgA.

CONCLUSIONS

In very young children, association of anti-tTG IgA with anti-DGP IgG is the best test combination for diagnosing CD, yielding a cumulative sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 100%.

Testing for gluten-related disorders in clinical practice: the role of serology in managing the spectrum of gluten sensitivity

Immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase is the single most efficient serological test for the diagnosis of celiac disease. It is well known that immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase levels correlate with the degree of intestinal damage, and that values can fluctuate in patients over time. Serological testing can be used to identify symptomatic individuals that need a confirmatory biopsy, to screen at-risk populations or to monitor diet compliance in patients previously diagnosed with celiac disease. Thus, interpretation of serological testing requires consideration of the full clinical scenario. Antigliadin tests are no longer recommended for the diagnosis of classical celiac disease. However, our understanding of the pathogenesis and spectrum of gluten sensitivity has improved, and gluten-sensitive irritable bowel syndrome patients are increasingly being recognized. Studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of antigliadin serology in the diagnosis of gluten sensitivity.

Clinical accuracy of anti-tissue transglutaminase as screening test for celiac disease under 2 years

AIM

To investigate, in patients with suspected celiac disease (CD) younger than 2 years, the clinical value of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) in diagnostic work-up of CD.

METHODS

Between June 2005 and June 2009, 169 patients aged <2 years, with symptoms suggestive of CD, were submitted to biopsy. CD diagnosis was based on the revised criteria of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

RESULTS

Of the 169 patients enrolled, 155 were included: 108 of them showed mucosal atrophy and 47 negative histology. Sensitivity and specificity of tTG, at the cut-off of 8 AU/mL, were 0.96 (CI 0.91-0.99) and 0.91 (CI 0.80-0.98), respectively, with likelihood ratio (LR) of 11.31; at the cut-off of 16 AU/mL, they were 0.79 (CI 0.70-0.86) and 1.00, respectively (CI 0.92-1.00), with LR 4.50.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients younger than 2 years, suspected for CD, tTG is very valuable in selecting for small intestinal biopsy.

Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies as a routine test for celiac disease: a prospective analysis

GOALS

This study was designed to establish whether deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (DGP-AGA) could improve the serologic workup for celiac disease (CD).

BACKGROUND

The best serologic approach for CD screening is currently based on the combined detection of tissue transglutaminase (tTGA), endomysial (EmA), and gliadin antibodies (AGA).

STUDY

One hundred forty-four consecutive patients with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal signs suggestive for CD were investigated using serologic tests, that is, IgG and IgA DGP-AGA, IgA tTGA, IgA EmA, and duodenal biopsy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight out of 144 patients (33%) had CD with different severity of villous atrophy. IgA tTGA showed 93.7% sensitivity compared with 91.6% for IgA EmA, 84.3% for IgA DGP-AGA, and 82.3% for IgG DGP-AGA. Of the 3 cases negative for IgA tTGA, IgA EmA, and IgA DGP-AGA, 2 had total IgA deficiency, although both were positive for IgG DGP-AGA. IgG DGP-AGA showed a very high specificity for CD (98.9%), not only superior to IgA DGP-AGA (79.8%), but also to IgA tTGA (96.6%) and very close to IgA EmA (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective study shows that the combined search for IgA tTGA and IgG DGP-AGA provides the best diagnostic accuracy for CD, allowing the identification of all CD cases---except one---with a very high specificity. The serologic workup for CD screening could be significantly improved by the routine introduction of IgG DGP-AGA together with IgA tTGA, thus reducing the number of tests and with an obvious advantage in terms of cost-efficacy.

Old and new serological tests for celiac disease screening

Evaluation of: Lewis NR, Scott BB. Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody compared as screening test for celiac disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 31(1), 73-81 (2010). In celiac disease (CD), deamidation of gliadin peptides, induced by tissue transglutaminase (tTG), generates novel antigenic epitopes evoking a specific immune response. Serological tests based on the detection of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) have been developed with very promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity for CD screening. In the present study, a meta-analysis of studies published from 1998 to 2008 was designed to compare the performance of DGP antibodies with that of tTG antibodies, the validated and routinely employed test for CD screening. The authors have limited their analysis to IgA class antibodies underlining that most of the considered studies had methodological imperfections, especially ascertainment bias. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that the pooled sensitivities for DGP and tTG antibodies were 87.8% (95% CI: 85.6-89.9) and 93% (95% CI: 91.2-94.5), respectively, and the pooled specificities were 94.1% (95%CI: 92.5-95.5) and 96.5% (95% CI: 95.2-97.5), respectively. In summary, although both tests represent a very good tool for identifying celiac patients, tTG antibodies display a higher predictive value than DGP antibodies, and must still be considered the best serological test for CD screening.

Diagnostic efficacy of the ELISA test for the detection of deamidated anti-gliadin peptide antibodies in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of an ELISA test for anti-gliadin IgA and IgG antibodies, which uses synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-gliadin antibodies, AGAs) as coating; the results were compared with a test that uses extracted gliadin (AGAe).

METHODS

The study was conducted on the sera of 144 patients suffering from celiac disease (CD), including 20 patients with IgA deficiency and 9 who were following a gluten-free diet (GFD), and 129 controls.

RESULTS

In the 115 CD patients (without IgA deficiency), the sensitivity of AGAe IgA and IgG was 32.2 and 60.9%, whereas that of AGAs IgA and IgG was 59.1 and 72.2%. The specificity for AGAe IgA and IgG, and AGAs IgA and IgG was 93.8 and 89.9%, and 96.9% and 99.2%, respectively. Of the 20 patients with CD and IgA deficiency, 7 tested positive for AGAe IgG and 14 for AGAs IgG. The test using deamidated gliadin peptides performed better in terms of sensitivity and specificity than the AGA tests with extracted antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

The very high specificity of the AGAs IgG test (99.2%) also suggests that patients who test positive with this assay require a thorough followup, even if the anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) and anti-endomysial autoantibodies (EMA) assays are negative.

Use of serum biomarkers in a diagnostic test for irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Currently, no single serum biomarker can reliably differentiate irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) from other functional gastrointestinal disorders or organic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

To develop and validate a diagnostic test using serum biomarkers to detect IBS.

METHODS

Ten serum biomarkers were selected from a potential panel of 140 for their ability to differentiate IBS from non-IBS disease in blood samples from patients with IBS, other gastrointestinal disorders and healthy volunteers. A predictive modelling tool was developed to assess patterns and relationships among the 10 serum biomarkers that best differentiated IBS patients from healthy controls and patients with non-IBS gastrointestinal disease. This model was tested in a different cohort of patients and healthy controls (n = 516) to determine the predictive accuracy of differentiating IBS from non-IBS.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the 10-biomarker algorithm for differentiating IBS from non-IBS was 50% and 88% respectively. The positive predictive value was 81%, and the negative predictive value was 64% at 50% IBS prevalence in the validation cohort. Overall accuracy was 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing serum biomarker patterns can differentiate IBS from non-IBS with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Assessing serum biomarkers in an overall diagnostic strategy may allow earlier diagnosis and treatment for patients with IBS.

Prevalence of celiac disease among first degree relatives of Brazilian celiac patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that celiac disease, an autoimmune disorder that occurs in genetically susceptible individuals, is highly prevalent among relatives of celiac patients.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of celiac disease in a group of first degree relatives of Brazilian celiac patients.

METHODS

First degree relatives of celiac patients attending the Brasilia University Hospital Pediatric Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic or the Celiac Disease Investigation Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil, between March 2001 and November 2004 were invited to undergo serological screening for celiac disease applying the IgA anti-endomysium antibody test (IgA-EMA). All positive IgA-EMA sera underwent a second screening using the IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies test. Duodenal or small intestinal biopsies were performed in all subjects positive to serological testing. Biopsy samples were classified as type (O) normal, (I) infiltrative, (II) infiltrative hyperplastic, (III) flat destructive, and (IV) atrophic hypoplastic. The final diagnosis was ascertained in subjects showing positive serological tests and a grade I to III small intestinal lesion.

RESULTS

Nine new cases of celiac disease were found among the 188 first degree relatives tested (4.8%).

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms the high prevalence of celiac disease among first degree celiac patients relatives and reinforces the need of extensive diagnostic screening in this specific group.

Antibodies against synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides for celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up in children

BACKGROUND

AGA IgA II and AGA IgG II have recently been suggested as reliable tools for celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. We compared their utility for diagnosis and monitoring CD in children with that of tTG IgA, an established CD marker.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 161 CD and 129 control children in whom CD was histologically confirmed or ruled out. We followed 37 children with CD on a gluten-free diet for 12-84 months. In fasting sera, we measured AGA IgA II, AGA IgG II, and tTG IgA using ELISAs.

RESULTS

The best sensitivity (92.5%), specificity (97.6%), positive predictive value (98%), and negative predictive value (91.2%) were obtained using tTG IgA. AGA IgG II correctly identified 3 of 3 children with CD with total IgA deficiency who had negative AGA IgA II and tTG IgA results. In children <2 years old without total IgA deficiency, AGA IgG II and tTG IgA performed equally well (sensitivity 96.4% and specificity 100%). AGA IgA II, AGA IgG II, and tTG IgA concentrations diminished significantly (P < 0.0001) after 1 year of a gluten-free diet, reaching values below the cutoff in 87%, 70%, and 51% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The best available index for diagnosing CD in children was tTG IgA. In infants <2 years old, AGA IgG II performed as well as tTG IgA in cases without total IgA deficiency and allowed detection of CD when total IgA was <0.06 g/L. Gluten-free diet monitoring can be achieved using any of the studied serum markers.

Prevalence of celiac disease in Shiraz, southern Iran

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in Shiraz, southern Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum samples were collected from 1440 persons (age range = 20-83 years, mean age = 45.4 years) in 2004 and screened for endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibodies. A questionnaire was completed for all subjects in relation to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and cases with positive serology were requested to undergo small-bowel biopsy.

RESULTS

Seven cases (0.5%) were positive for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), and only two (0.14%) were positive for IgA anti-endomysial antibody (anti-EMA), both of whom had highly positive anti-tTg levels (40.4 and 48.0 IU/l). The major clinical symptoms of CD, such as recurrent abdominal pain and change in bowel habits were present in all patients with positive anti-tTG assays. Only five subjects with positive serology agreed to undergo upper GI endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. Three of these cases were reported with Marsh I histologic findings, while in the two cases with positive serologic anti-EMA, more advanced forms of CD were present.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CD in apparently healthy adults was lower than the reported series from northern parts of the country; therefore, we suggest a more long-term follow-up study in high-risk groups, especially in the apparently healthy subjects in our region.

Usefulness of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides in celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up

The prevalence of the recently described deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies was compared with that of the routinely used antigliadin, antiendomysial, and tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the sera of 128 untreated celiac patients and 134 controls. Sensitivity and specificity for celiac disease were 83.6 and 90.3% for IgA and 84.4 and 98.5% for IgG antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides. The new test displayed higher diagnostic accuracy than antigliadin antibodies and, although less sensitive than antiendomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibodies, showed significantly higher specificity than tissue transglutaminase antibodies (P < 0.001). Persistence of peptide antibodies after gluten withdrawal was an expression of low compliance with the diet and of the lack of improvement of the intestinal mucosa. The combined use of tissue transglutaminase and deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies seems to be a very useful tool for celiac disease diagnosis. Moreover, antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides can be helpful in disease follow-up.

What is the role of serologic testing in celiac disease? A prospective, biopsy-confirmed study with economic analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal serologic tests for the detection of celiac disease and follow-up assessment remains controversial. Our aim was to evaluate all current immunologic assays for diagnosing celiac disease using the gold standard of duodenal biopsy. We also assessed whether tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody is a quantitative marker for histologic severity.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients referred for gastroscopy without a previous known diagnosis of celiac disease were recruited (group 1). Concurrently, patients with a known diagnosis of celiac disease on a gluten-free diet for more than 1 year undergoing repeat duodenal biopsy were identified (group 2). All patients had duodenal biopsies and serologic analysis performed for immunoglobulin(Ig) A and antibodies to human immunoglobulin (Ig)A-tTG, IgA-gliadin, IgG-gliadin, and IgA-endomysial antibody.

RESULTS

Two thousand patients were recruited in the first group. Seventy-seven (3.9%) patients were diagnosed with new celiac disease. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for IgA tTG were 90.9%, 90.9%, 28.6%, and 99.6%. When adopting a 2-step approach using tTG first and then EMA the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 85.7%, 98.6%, 71.7%, and 99.7%, respectively. The use of nondeamidated IgA/IgG gliadin antibodies conferred no additional diagnostic benefit when considering the detection of adult celiac disease. In the second group 48 patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet were identified. Sixteen of 48 of these patients had persisting villous atrophy, but 7 of 16 (44%) had a normal tTG level.

CONCLUSIONS

IgA tTG alone is a sensitive marker for celiac disease. A normal tTG level does not predict recovery of villous atrophy in patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet.

Is tissue transglutaminase autoantibody the best for diagnosing celiac disease in children of developing countries?

AIM

To prospectively evaluate the role of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody in detecting celiac disease (CD) in Indian children.

METHODS

Over a period of 3 years, 333 children (<or=14 y of age) with suspected CD were evaluated. CD was diagnosed on the basis of modified ESPGHAN criteria. Antibody to tTG (guinea-pig) was detected by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Children with a suspicion of CD but found to have normal villous architecture were taken as controls. Antiendomysial antibody (EMA) and IgA-antigliadin antibody were done in 80 cases and 40 controls.

RESULTS

The mean age of 180 children with CD was 6.5+/-3 years with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1. Their presenting complaints were diarrhea in 84% and failure to thrive in 87%. Wasting, stunting, and anemia were seen in 87%, 59%, and 83% of cases, respectively. The best sensitivity and specificity of tTG antibody we have got at a cut-off value of 10 U/mL and were 94% and 97%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 98% and negative predictive value of 92.4%. The mean tTG antibody titer was 106+/-76 U/mL in cases and 2+/-1.6 U/mL in controls (P<0.001). The concordance of tTG antibody with EMA was 95% in cases and 97.5% in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

tTG antibody is a highly sensitive and specific serologic marker. Being technically simpler and due to its high concordance with EMA, it can be used as an alternative to EMA in developing countries like India.

Elevated B cell-activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family in coeliac disease

OBJECTIVE

The B cell-activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) family (BAFF) was recently described as a critical survival factor for B cells, and its expression is increased in several autoimmune diseases. Abnormal production of BAFF disturbs immune tolerance allowing the survival of autoreactive B cells and participates in the progression of B-cell lymphomas. Coeliac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder induced by gluten intake in genetically predisposed individuals, associated with autoantibody production and with an increased risk of lymphoma at follow-up. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible implications of BAFF in CD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with small-bowel biopsies and laboratory-proven diagnosis of CD were included in the study. All serum samples were analysed before the start of a gluten-free diet (GFD). In 12 cases, one or more samples were analysed during follow-up of the GFD. Seventy-seven blood donors were taken as controls. Serum BAFF levels and anti-transglutaminase (a-tTG) antibodies were assessed by ELISA and endomysial antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Serum BAFF levels appeared to be significantly more elevated in CD patients than in controls (p<0.0001) and, compared with other autoimmune diseases where BAFF is increased, a much larger percentage (80.8%) of CD patients presented BAFF levels above the normal range. In addition, serum BAFF levels were found to correlate with a-tTG antibody levels (p =0.0007) and there was a significant reduction of BAFF after introduction of a GFD.

CONCLUSIONS

BAFF may represent a possible pathogenic factor in CD. Its implications for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of CD should also be assessed.

Interpretative comments on autoantibody tests

Immunology laboratories perform diagnostic tests to identify the autoantibody markers needed to classify disorders which are complex, often rare, and hard to define. The recent introduction of new markers and the use of increasingly complicated assay procedures can cause difficulty in interpreting test results. Moreover, during the performance of some tests, some autoantibodies which were not requested, and consequently not expected, may be identified by chance. It is advisable for these positive results to be reported only when they have a high predictive value and suggest the possible presence of an autoimmune disease. An interpretative comment on autoantibody test results is crucial in a number of cases: when autoantibodies with a significant clinical correlation (high specificity) are found; when two or more methods are used to determine the same autoantibody and the results disagree; when unexpected autoantibody positivity is found and in case of results generated by further diagnostic tests conducted by the laboratory on its own initiative. The interpretative comment should be based on the patient's personal characteristics (sex, age) and the other laboratory parameters available; it should specify the diagnostic accuracy of the assay methods used, the clinical and diagnostic correlations of the antibodies which tested positive, and any further tests needed to complete the diagnostic process.

Low specificity of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

The association between celiac disease (CD) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is well documented in medical literature; however, a high frequency of false positive results of the anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) test has been reported in patients with PBC. To verify if the positive results for anti-tTG autoantibody are false positives due to cross reactivity with mitochondrial antigens, we studied 105 adult patients affected with PBC, positive for anti-mitochondrial M2 antibodies. Anti-tTG IgA antibodies were studied by using six different immunoenzymatic assays that employ the tTG antigen obtained from different sources (human recombinant, placenta, red blood cells, and guinea pig liver). On the whole, 28 out of 105 PBC subjects tested positive for anti-tTG IgA antibodies, but only two were eventually found to be affected by CD; the other 26 were shown to be false positive. The specificity of the various antigenic substrates ranged from 88.5% of the human erythrocytes tTG to 97.1% of the human recombinant tTG. The results of this study showed that a true association between PBC and CD was present in only 2% of the patients and that, in most cases, the false positive results were attributable to the type of substrate utilized in the assay.

Population screening for coeliac disease in a low prevalence area in Italy

OBJECTIVE

A screening program was proposed for the village of Carcare (population 5700), located in a region of Italy with an apparently low prevalence of coeliac disease (CD): only 1 patient diagnosed out of 2557 inhabitants. The study group comprised 1002 individuals (568 F, 434 M, age range 13-90 years) recruited from blood donors, secondary school pupils and people referred to the local outpatient facilities for routine blood chemistry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Total IgA, IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (ELISA, recombinant human antigen) and IgA antiendomysium (EMA) (IFI, umbilical cord substrate) antibodies were measured in the serum of all participants. All patients with IgA deficiency were investigated for IgG tTG antibodies, and in the case of disagreement between tTG and EMA, they were typed for HLA DQ2-DQ8 haplotypes.

RESULTS

Thirteen subjects were positive and 988 negative for autoantibodies (3/988 had IgA deficiency). One serum sample was positive for tTG antibodies but negative for EMA. Ten out of 13 positive subjects consented to undergo duodenal biopsy, which invariably produced evidence of CD despite the absence of clinical signs/symptoms. A post-diagnostic clinical investigation provided evidence showing mild iron deficiency (4 subjects) and osteoporosis (2 subjects). After counselling, all subjects accepted a gluten-free diet.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CD in the study group was 1:100 (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.5-1.8%): this indicates that CD is largely underdiagnosed in Carcare. Our results suggest that the low prevalence of CD observed in some regions is likely to be due to underdiagnosis.

A new indirect chemiluminescent immunoassay to measure anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies

OBJECTIVES

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (anti-tTG) determination using second-generation (human antigen) enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) is a very accurate test to diagnose celiac disease (CD). In this study, we compared 2 second-generation ELISAs (Celikey tTG; Pharmacia Diagnostics GmbH & Co, Freiburg, Germany, and QuantaLite; Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA) and antiendomysial antibodies (EMAs) with a new indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON tTG; DiaSorin S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) in diagnosing and monitoring CD in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Antiendomysial antibodies, anti-tTGs and total immunoglobulin A were measured in the sera of 103 control children, 101 children with histologically proven CD and 31 CD children on gluten-free diet (GFD).

RESULTS

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody mean levels were significantly higher in CD with respect to control or GFD children. The sensitivity value of EMAs, LIAISON tTG, Celikey tTG and QuantaLite in diagnosing CD was 97.7%, 97.0%, 94.1% and 98.0%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity values were 91.1%, 98.1%, 97.1% and 96.1%, respectively. The degree of mucosal destruction (Marsh criteria) was correlated with EMA semiquantification (P < 0.01) and with the circulating levels of anti-tTGs measured using LIAISON (P < 0.05) or QuantaLite (P < 0.01). Twenty-six CD children were followed up from 5 to 25 months after GFD. The circulating levels of anti-tTGs measured with any of the 3 assays significantly dropped after GFD.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody determination with second-generation ELISAs is as effective as EMAs for CD diagnosis. The novel chemiluminescent method described in the present paper for the detection of anti-tTGs in the diagnosis of CD had the highest sensitivity and specificity values. The anti-tTG test correlates with the degree of mucosal destruction and is suitable for verifying patient compliance to dietary treatment.

Diagnosis of celiac disease

Celiac disease is an immune mediated enteropathy initiated by ingestion of gluten, in genetically susceptible individuals. With changing epidemiology, celiac disease initially thought to affect only Europeans, has been increasingly reported from other parts of the world including India. However, its true prevalence in India is still not known, as the diagnosis is being missed. The gold standards for diagnosis have been characteristic small intestinal mucosal changes on gluten and a full clinical remission on its removal from the diet. Presence of serological antibodies, which disappear on gluten free diet further confirms the diagnosis. The understanding of the histopathology of celiac disease has changed over the years. The small bowel mucosal lesion of celiac disease is an evolutionary process with normal mucosal architecture and an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes at one end of the spectrum and classical flat mucosa at the other. In the Indian subcontinent celiac disease has a heterogeneous histological presentation and the diagnosis may be missed if it is based only on severe mucosal changes or the serology is not considered when moderate or mild mucosal changes are present. The last two decades have shown that antiendomysical (Anti EMA) and anti tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTGA) have a sensitivity and specificity of more than 95% to diagnose celiac disease. Anti EMA tests being operator dependent are more liable to errors and anti- tTGA may be preferred for large scale screening. However, the different source of tTGA antigen, varied techniques of production and the use of arbitrary units by different commercial kits can influence the diagnostic accuracy of the anti-tTGA assay. There is a strong genetic association of celiac disease with HLA-DQ2 or DQ8. The presence of HLA-DQ2 hetrodimer in more than 97% of a group of North Indian patients with celiac disease indicates that this population has a similar genetic risk for the disease. HLA DQ2 typing can be used for ruling out celiac disease where the diagnosis is equivocal as it has a negative predictive value of greater than 95%. Given the protean clinical manifestation and the heterogeneous histology a standard algorithm for diagnosis of celiac disease is important.

Nutritional management of the gluten-free diet in young people with celiac disease in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

For young people with celiac disease, adherence to the gluten-free diet may be difficult to achieve and gluten restriction may lead to insufficient nutrient intake and unbalanced food intake resulting in overweight. In The Netherlands, no nutritional information is available. Therefore, we evaluated the nutritional management and nutritional state in young celiac patients.

METHODS

The Dutch Celiac Society invited all its members aged 12 to 25 years to complete a food record and a questionnaire. Nutrient intakes were compared with the recommendations and the intake in the general population. Total immunoglobin A, endomysial antibody, tissue transglutaminase and IgA gliadin were determined, and height and weight were assessed.

RESULTS

Strict dietary compliance was reported by 75%. The fiber and iron intakes were significantly lower, and the saturated fat intake significantly higher than recommended but comparable with the general population. Most of the patients (61%) found the diet easy to follow. Regular medical controls were reported by 86% but regular dietary controls by only 7% of the patients. Mean and SD scores for height and body mass index were -0.3 +/- 1.1 and -0.3 +/- 0.8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The dietary compliance in this group is high, the nutritional state is adequate, but the nutrient intake is not. Better medical and dietary support is necessary to prevent long-term complications and to achieve an ongoing satisfying management in this group of young patients with a chronic disorder.

Systematic review: the use of serology to exclude or diagnose coeliac disease (a comparison of the endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests)

BACKGROUND

With the appreciation of the high prevalence of coeliac disease there is increasing use of serology in screening asymptomatic people and testing those with suggestive features.

AIM

To compare the sensitivities and specificities of the endomysial antibody and the tissue transglutaminase antibody tests.

METHODS

Using electronic databases a search was made for relevant papers using the terms tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibody.

RESULTS

Both the endomysial antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody have very high sensitivities (93% for both) and specificities (>99% and >98% respectively) for the diagnosis of typical coeliac disease with villous atrophy. Human recombinant tissue transglutaminase performs much better than guinea pig tissue transglutaminase. Review of studies comparing endomysial antibody with human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody shows that endomysial antibody more often has a higher specificity and human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody more often has a higher sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody is the preferred test for screening asymptomatic people and for excluding coeliac disease in symptomatic individuals with a low pretest probability (i.e. <25%) for coeliac disease. Furthermore, it has a number of practical and financial advantages. If the pretest probability is >25%, biopsy is preferred as the post-test probability of coeliac disease with a negative test is still >2%.

Utilidad de los anticuerpos antitransglutaminasa en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad celíaca

BACKGROUND

Anti-transglutaminase antibodies have been proposed as a useful tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of celiac disease.

AIM

To compare anti-transglutaminase antibodies with the classical antibodies used to diagnose celiac disease.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Patients who underwent duodenal biopsy for suspected celiac disease were selected if they had the following serum antibody samples: antiendomysial IgA, anti-transglutaminase IgA, antigliadin IgG, and antigliadin IgA. A diagnostic value of each of these antibodies was established according to the final diagnosis, taking the duodenal biopsy as the reference.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients with duodenal biopsy and serologic markers for celiac disease were selected. Thirty-six patients were children (< 14 years-old) and 86 were adults. A diagnosis of celiac disease was made in 41 patients (26 children and 15 adults). Of the 15 adults, only 2 (13%) presented typical malabsorption syndrome. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-transglutaminase antibodies was 100% and 98% respectively compared with values of 97% and 98% for antiendomysial IgA, 85% and 97% for antigliadin IgA, and 97% and 92% for antigliadin IgG antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of anti-transglutaminase antibodies is high in celiac disease. These antibodies may be useful as a screening test to select candidates for duodenal biopsy.

Celiac sprue presenting as advanced liver disease

This case report describes the complexity of diagnosing celiac sprue in a patient who presented with features predominantly resembling that of advanced liver disease in the absence of diarrhea.

Clinical Utility of Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Coeliac Disease in Children and Adolescents

Identification of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as a major target antigen of IgA anti-endomysial antibodies and detection of auto-antibodies against tTG in the serum pointed out a new direction in the serologic diagnosis of coeliac disease. Clinical utility of determination of anti-tTGIgA antibodies, with recombinant human tTG used as antigen, was evaluated for the diagnosis of coeliac disease and monitoring the adherence to the diet in children and adolescents.

PATIENTS

The study was performed in 169 patients aged 2-24 years, including 42 children (26 girls, 16 boys, mean age 8.01 ± 5.69, range 2-18) with newly diagnosed coeliac disease (CD) (group I), 60 patients (39 females, 21 males, mean age 15.68 ± 4.74, range 5-24) with CD recognized at least 3 years before entering the study, non-compliants with gluten-free diet (group II) and 67 children (34 girls, 33 boys, mean age 6,28± 4.48, range 2-16) suspected of malabsorption, in whom diagnosis of CD had been excluded.

METHODS

Serum samples were taken from all patients and tested for total IgA, anti-endomysial IgA (IgAEmA) or IgG autoantibodies (IgGEmA), only in cases with IgA deficiency, by indirect immunofluorescence method and anti-tTGIgA antibodies by ELISA.

RESULTS

[Table: see text] Strong significant associations between anti-tTGIgA present in the serum and IgAEmA (Kendall τ 0.7748, p<0.0001) and good correlation between the levels of anti-tTGIgA and IgAEmA (r=0,488, p=0.001) were found in group I. We have not shown the relationship between the presence of both types of antibodies in patients of group II (Kendall τ 0.2102, p=0.0937). However, a good significant correlation between the levels of these parameters was observed (r=0,813, p<0,0001). Anti-tTGIgA concentration was nificantly higher in patients of group I compared to group II (38.35 U/ml v. 23.13 U/ml, p=0,0356). The sensitivity of anti- tTGIgA test in group I was 88.1%, in group II - 91.7% while specificity reached 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of anti-tTGIgA shows high sensitivity (88.1%) and specificity (97%) for the detection of coeliac disease. This test can be used alternatively with the immunofluorescent IgAEmA in diagnosis of coeliac disease, and also as a marker of compliance with gluten-free diet. However, both IgAEmA and anti-tTGIgA tests do not reach 100% sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis and nitoring of celiac disease. Therefore small intestinal biopsy is still recommended as a ? gold standard?.

Anti-human versus anti-guinea pig tissue transglutaminase antibodies as the first-level serological screening test for coeliac disease in the general population

BACKGROUND

So far the reliability of the anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase antibodies for the coeliac disease diagnosis has been evaluated in selected groups of patients.

AIM

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of anti-human versus anti-guinea pig tissue transglutaminase in the coeliac disease screening of the general population.

SUBJECTS

Two healthy Italian populations living in Marche region and in Western Sardinia.

METHODS

Both anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based commercially available kit (Eu-tTG, Eurospital, Trieste, Italy).

RESULTS

During the period 1999-2001, 3541 subjects (1500 from "continental" Italy and 2041 from Sardinia) were screened for coeliac disease using both anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase as first-level tests. Both these tests were negative in 3439/3541 sera, while 29 resulted positive for both of them and 73 showed discordant results. Overall, 50 intestinal biopsies were performed in 22, 21 and 7 subjects with positivity to both screening tests, to anti-guinea pig and to anti-human tissue transglutaminase alone, respectively. A coeliac disease diagnosis was made in 25 subjects giving an overall prevalence of 1:126 individuals. The anti-tissue transglutaminase specificity and sensitivity were 98 and 92% for guinea pig and 99.6 and 96% for human tissue transglutaminase, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-human tissue transglutaminase test should definitely replace the anti-guinea pig-derived one as first-level screening tool for identifying all subjects who need the second-level investigations (small intestinal biopsy).

Prevalence of coeliac disease in patients with sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVE

Susceptibility to sarcoidosis and coeliac disease has been linked to the class II haplotype HLA-DR3, DQ2, and an association between the two disorders has been suggested. As a pilot study, we have sought to determine the prevalence of coeliac disease in a cohort of Irish patients with sarcoidosis.

DESIGN

Prospective, case-controlled study.

METHODS

One hundred and two sarcoid patients (47 males, 55 females) from the west of Ireland and 105 (52 males, 53 females) healthy, ethnically matched, controls underwent interview and screening for coeliac disease and human leucocyte antigen typing by serology. Those with elevated anti-gliadin IgA (AGA) and/or positive endomysial antibody (EMA) were offered small intestinal biopsy.

RESULTS

Three (3%) sarcoid patients had a prior diagnosis of coeliac disease. A further 12 (12%) patients and four (4%) controls had elevated AGA (P = 0.047), of whom three and one, respectively, had positive EMA. Small intestinal biopsy in 11 patients and three controls confirmed coeliac disease in one individual each, giving a prevalence of coeliac disease in patients compared with controls of 4/102 (4%) versus 1/105 (1%) (P = 0.21). Sensitivity and specificity of EMA and elevated AGA in sarcoid patients was 100% and 50%, and 50% and 9%, respectively. Of the four affected sarcoid patients, three carried HLA-DR3, DQ2 and one carried DR5 (12), DR7, DQ2.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated a moderately increased prevalence of coeliac disease in Irish patients with sarcoidosis, which we feel justifies future screening of our sarcoid population. Estimation of EMA is recommended and should be restricted to those with susceptible haplotypes.

IgA and IgG tissue transglutaminase antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and coeliac disease (CD) are diseases of an autoimmune origin that share the human leukocyte HLA-B8 and HLA-DR3 histocompatibility antigens, yet the co-association of CD with SLE is mainly based on case reports. Thus, the real prevalence of CD in SLE is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of antitissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) in SLE and the relation between SLE and CD. In this case-control study, 100 patients with SLE, and 120 healthy subjects were studied. Sera from all participants were analysed for the presence of IgA and IgG anti-tTG antibodies using a human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immuno-enzymatic assay. Anti-tTG positive patients and controls were further tested for antiendomysial (EMA) antibodies by an indirect immunofluorescence and HLA typing (DQalpha1*0501-DQbeta1*0201 allele determination). Subjects who had EMA or the mentioned allele, underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm a possible diagnosis of CD. Anti-tTG antibodies (IgA or IgG isotypes) were found in three of the 100 SLE patients (overall prevalence of 3%): one had the IgA and two the IgG isotypes. Only 1 of 120 healthy subjects (0.8%) had a low positive reaction for IgA anti-tTG. Only the IgA anti-tTG positive SLE patient was diagnosed as having CD based on a positive IgA-EMA and small bowel biopsy findings. The two IgG anti-tTG positive SLE patients and the IgA anti-tTG positive healthy subject were classified as false positives (EMA negative and HLA DQalpha1*0501-DQbeta1*0201 allele negative). In conclusion, anti-tTG antibodies were found at a low rate in SLE patients and mostly did not indicate the presence of CD. Thus, serological screening for CD is not recommended in SLE, unless a clinical suspicion of CD is present.

IgA and IgG tissue transglutaminase antibody prevalence and clinical significance in connective tissue diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and primary biliary cirrhosis

An association between celiac disease (CD) and other autoimmune diseases such as connective tissue diseases (CTD), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has been reported in several studies. However, a high rate of false positives in autoantibody testing was noted, especially when tissue transglutaminase (tTG) from guinea pig liver was used. Thus, the real prevalence of CD in CTD, IBD, and PBC is unclear. In a case-control study, 400 patients with CTD, 170 with IBD, 48 with PBC, and 120 healthy subjects were investigated for CD by the analysis of IgA and IgG tTG antibodies using the more specific human recombinant tTG immunoenzymatic assay. Patients and controls with positive findings were further tested for antiendomysial antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and HLA typing, and those found positive by either of these tests underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm a possible diagnosis of CD. Twelve patients were positive for IgA or IgG tTG antibodies, showing an overall prevalence of 1.9%. Only 1 healthy subject (0.8%) had a low level positive reaction for IgA anti-tTG. Among the 12 patients and the healthy subject, only 2 (1 SLE and 1 ulcerative colitis patient) were subsequently confirmed to be affected with CD by positive EMA, HLA, and small bowel biopsy findings. The highest rate of false positives was found in PBC patients (10.4%). For these reasons, serological screening testing for CD is not recommended in CTD patients or in subjects affected with IBD or PBC, unless there is a relevant clinical suspicion of CD.