Phase I trial of KN046, a novel bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Progress of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous cancer with substantial recurrence potential. Currently, surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatments for this disease. However, chemotherapy is often limited by several factors, including low bioavailability, significant systemic toxicity, inadequate targeting, and multidrug resistance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including those targeting programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), have been proven effective in the treatment of various tumours. In particular, in the treatment of TNBC with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, both monotherapy and combination chemotherapy, as well as targeted drugs and other therapeutic strategies, have broad therapeutic prospects. In addition, these inhibitors can participate in the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) through blocking PD-1/PD-L1 binding, which can improve immune efficacy. This article provides an overview of the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC and the progress of multiple therapeutic studies. To increase the survival of TNBC patients, relevant biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy have been explored to identify new strategies for the treatment of TNBC.

Application and future prospects of bispecific antibodies in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

As the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, lung cancer remains a noteworthy threat to human health. Although immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have significantly increased the efficacy of lung cancer treatment, a significant percentage of patients are not sensitive to immunotherapies and patients who initially respond to treatment can quickly develop acquired drug resistance. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) bind two different antigens or epitopes simultaneously and have been shown to enhance antitumor efficacy with suitable safety profiles, thus attracting increasing attention as novel antitumor therapies. At present, in addition to the approved bsAb, amivantamab, three novel bsAbs (KN046, AK112, and SHR-1701) are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials and many bsAbs are being evaluated in phase 1/2 clinical trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein we present the structure, classification, and mechanism of action underlying bsAbs in NSCLC and introduce related clinical trials. Finally, we discuss challenges, potential solutions, and future prospects in the context of cancer treatment with bsAbs.

Novel strategies in breast cancer management: From treatment to long-term remission

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although improvements in early detection and therapy have been made, metastatic breast cancer (mBC) continues to be an incurable disease. Although existing treatments can prolong survival and enhance quality of life, they do not provide a definitive cure. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes, particularly for subtypes such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+) BC. Key innovations include antibodydrug conjugates (ADCs) and next-generation endocrine therapies. ADCs combine monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic agents, allowing targeted delivery to tumor cells while minimizing systemic toxicity. Immunotherapy is emerging as a promising approach for aggressive subtypes, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Strategies under investigation include chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies, and natural killer (NK) cell treatments, all aimed at enhancing the ability of the immune system to target and eliminate resistant tumor cells. Tissue engineering, particularly hydrogel-based delivery systems, offers the potential for localized treatment. These systems enable the controlled release of therapeutic agents or immune cells directly to the tumor site, supporting tissue regeneration and enhancing immune surveillance to reduce recurrence. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including treatment resistance, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and high costs. Overcoming these barriers requires further innovation in drug delivery systems and a deeper understanding of tumor biology.

Efficacy and safety of KN026, a bispecific anti-HER2 antibody, in combination with KN046, an anti-CTLA4/PD-L1 antibody, in patients with advanced HER2-positive nonbreast cancer: a combined analysis of a phase Ib and a phase II study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of KN026, a novel bispecific HER2 (ECD2 and ECD4) antibody, plus KN046, a PD-L1, and CTLA4 bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced HER2-positive solid tumors. We conducted two sequentially designed phase Ib and II studies with similar target populations and evaluation schedules. The primary endpoints included safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for the phase Ib study, and the objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) for the phase II study. Hereby, we solely report the results from 113 nonbreast cancer patients. In phase Ib, MTD was not reached. Dose 3 was confirmed to be acceptable for the phase II study. An objective response has been exclusively observed in HER2-positive patients. Any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 108 (95.6%) patients. The most common TRAEs were infusion reactions (38.9%), anemia (37.2%), elevated AST (31.0%), and diarrhea (30.1%). Among the 108 patients evaluated for efficacy, the overall ORR was 55.6% (95%CI, 45.7%, 65.1%). In the HER2-positive GC subgroup, 38 patients received this regimen as the 1st-line treatment and 30 patients achieved an objective response, with an ORR of 78.9% (95%CI, 62.7%, 90.4%). Among 27 pretreated patients, the ORR was 44.4% (95%CI, 25.5%, 64.7%). In the other HER2-positive solid tumor subgroup (n = 34), the ORR was 52.9% (95%CI 35.1%,70.2%). Thus, KN026 plus KN04 exhibits promising efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in HER2-positive nonbreast cancer, as does the 1st-line treatment for GC.

Targeting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Immunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has revolutionized treatment, providing durable responses in a subset of patients. However, with fewer than 50% of patients achieving significant benefits, there is a critical need to expand therapeutic strategies. This review explores emerging targets in immune checkpoint inhibition beyond PD-1/PD-L1, including CTLA-4, TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM-3, NKG2A, and CD39/CD73. We highlight the biological basis of CD8 T cell exhaustion in shaping the antitumor immune response. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting additional inhibitory receptors (IR) are discussed, with a focus on their distinct mechanisms of action and combinatory potential with existing therapies. Despite significant advancements, challenges remain in overcoming resistance mechanisms and optimizing patient selection. This review underscores the importance of dual checkpoint blockade and innovative bispecific antibody engineering to maximize therapeutic outcomes for NSCLC patients.

Nanobodies targeting the tumor microenvironment and their formulation as nanomedicines

Among the emerging strategies for cancer theranostics, nanomedicines offer significant promise in advancing both patients' diagnosis and treatment. In combination with nanobodies, nanomedicines can potentially enhance the precision and efficiency of drug or imaging agent delivery, addressing key limitations of current approaches, such as off-target toxicities. The development of nanomedicines will be further accelerated by the creation of smart nanoparticles, and their integration with immunotherapy. Obviously, the success of nano-immunotherapy will depend on a comprehensive understanding of the tumor microenvironment, including the complex interplay of mechanisms that drive cancer-mediated immunosuppression and immune escape. Hence, effective therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironment requires modulation of immune cell function, overcoming resistance mechanisms associated with stromal components or the extracellular matrix, and/or direct elimination of cancer cells. Identifying key molecules involved in cancer progression and drug resistance is, therefore, essential for developing effective therapies and diagnostic tools that can predict patient responses to treatment and monitor therapeutic outcomes. Current nanomedicines are being designed with careful consideration of factors such as the choice of carrier (e.g., biocompatibility, controlled cargo release) and targeting moiety. The unique properties of nanobodies make them an effective engineering tool to target biological molecules with high affinity and specificity. In this review, we focus on the latest applications of nanobodies for targeting various components of the tumor microenvironment for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. We also explore the main types of nanoparticles used as a carrier for cancer immunotherapies, as well as the strategies for formulating nanoparticle-nanobody conjugates. Finally, we highlight how nanobody-nanoparticle formulations can enhance current nanomedicines.

Resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Unraveling causes, developing effective strategies, and exploring potential breakthroughs

Over the last two decades, advancements in deciphering the intricate interactions between oncology and immunity have fueled a meteoric rise in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, typified by an explosive growth of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, resistance to immunotherapy remains inevitable. Herein we unravel the labyrinthine mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy, characterized by their involvement of nearly all types of cells within the body, beyond the extrinsic cancer cells, and importantly, such cells are not only (inhibitory or excitatory, or both) signal recipients but also producers, acting in a context-dependent manner. At the molecular level, these mechanisms underlie genetic and epigenetic aberrations, which are regulated by or regulate various protein kinases, growth factors, and cytokines with inherently dynamic and spatially heterogeneous properties. Additionally, macroscopic factors such as nutrition, comorbidities, and the microbiome within and around organs or tumor cells are involved. Therefore, developing therapeutic strategies combined with distinct action informed by preclinical, clinical, and real-world evidence, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, oncolytic viruses, and cell-based therapies, may stand as a judicious reality, although the ideality is to overcome resistance point-by-point through a novel drug. Notably, we highlight a realignment of treatment aims, moving the primary focus from eliminating cancer cells -- such as through chemotherapy and radiotherapy -- to promoting immune modulation and underscore the value of regulating various components within the host macro- or micro-environment, as their effects, even if seemingly minimal, can cumulatively contribute to visible clinical benefit when applied in combination with ICIs. Lastly, this review also emphasizes the current hurdles scattered throughout preclinical and clinical studies, and explores evolving directions in the landscape of immunotherapy for NSCLC.

The anti-PD-L1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody KN046 plus lenvatinib in advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II trial

This open-label phase II trial (NCT04542837) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KN046 combined with lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore the potential response biomarkers. Participants received KN046 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and lenvatinib 12 or 8 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. A total of fifty-five participants were enrolled. The results meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. No DLT was observed in the safety run-in period. The incidence of serious adverse events and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 30.9% and 47.3%, respectively. Grade ≥3 immunotherapy-related adverse events occurred in 3 (5.5%) participants. Five (9.1%) participants discontinued treatment due to TRAEs, all of which were grade 1-2. The ORR was 45.5% (95% CI, 31.97-59.45). The median progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI, 8.21-15.24) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 (95% CI, 11.20-not estimable) months, and 12-month OS rate was 60.0% (95% CI, 45.87-71.55). Circulating tumor DNA status before the third cycle of treatment was associated with prognosis. In conclusion, First-line KN046 plus lenvatinib shows promising efficacy for advanced unresectable or metastatic HCC.

Broad-Spectrum Engineered Multivalent Nanobodies Against SARS-CoV-1/2

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages escape most preclinical/clinical neutralizing antibodies in development, suggesting that previously employed antibody screening strategies are not well suited to counteract the rapid mutation of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, there is an urgent need to screen better broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody. In this study, a comprehensive approach to design broad-spectrum inhibitors against both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 by leveraging the structural diversity of nanobodies is proposed. This includes the de novo design of a fully human nanobody library and the camel immunization-based nanobody library, both targeting conserved epitopes, as well as the development of multivalent nanobodies that bind nonoverlapping epitopes. The results show that trivale B11-E8-F3, three nanobodies joined tandemly in trivalent form, have the broadest spectrum and efficient neutralization activity, which spans from SARS-CoV-1 to SARS-CoV-2 variants. It is also demonstrated that B11-E8-F3 has a very prominent preventive and some therapeutic effect in animal models of three authentic viruses. Therefore, B11-E8-F3 has an outstanding advantage in preventing SARS-CoV-1/SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially in immunocompromised populations or elderly people with high-risk comorbidities.

Next-generation combination approaches for immune checkpoint therapy

Immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, leading to dramatic clinical outcomes for a subset of patients. However, many patients do not experience durable responses following immune checkpoint therapy owing to multiple resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for effective combination strategies that target these resistance pathways and improve clinical responses. The development of combination strategies based on an understanding of the complex biology that regulates human antitumor immune responses has been a major challenge. In this Review, we describe the current landscape of combination therapies. We also discuss how the development of effective combination strategies will require the integration of small, tissue-rich clinical trials, to determine how therapy-driven perturbation of the human immune system affects downstream biological responses and eventual clinical outcomes, reverse translation of clinical observations to immunocompetent preclinical models, to interrogate specific biological pathways and their impact on antitumor immune responses, and novel computational methods and machine learning, to integrate multiple datasets across clinical and preclinical studies for the identification of the most relevant pathways that need to be targeted for successful combination strategies.

The first-in-class bispecific antibody IBI318 (LY3434172) targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 in patients with advanced tumors: a phase Ia/Ib study

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet clinical need to enhance the response rate and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based cancer immunotherapy (IO). Herein, we presented the clinical study of IBI318 (LY3434172), a first-in-class bispecific antibody (bsAb) targeting PD-1 and PD-L1, in patients with advanced tumors.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter Phase Ia/Ib study of IBI318, the Phase Ia involved dose escalation and a safety dose expansion, while the Phase Ib focused on preliminary safety and efficacy evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In Phase Ia, patients with advanced tumors received IBI318 doses ranging from 0.3 to 1200 mg every two weeks (Q2W) to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). In Phase Ib, NSCLC or NPC patients from five cohorts with varying treatment histories received IBI318 at the RP2D. The primary endpoint was safety and the secondary endpoints included efficacy assessed by investigators according to RECIST v1.1, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics.

RESULTS

From February 11, 2019, to January 25, 2022, a total of 103 eligible patients were enrolled (Phase Ia, n = 55; Phase Ib, n = 48). The median follow-up was 10.1 months (range 0.7-28.6). The RP2D was determined to be 300 mg Q2W. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grades occurred in 88 patients (85.4%), while 10 patients (9.7%) experienced grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.5% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 49.5% in all patients. In Phase Ib, the confirmed ORR was 45.5% in treatment-naïve NSCLC patients and 30.0% in IO-naïve NPC patients who had failed or were intolerant to platinum-based treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

IBI318 demonstrated a favorable safety profile and preliminary efficacy in treatment-naïve NSCLC and IO-naïve NPC patients. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the full therapeutic potential of PD-1/PD-L1 dual inhibition with bsAbs.

Bispecific antibodies: advancing precision oncology

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are engineered molecules designed to target two different epitopes or antigens. The mechanism of action is determined by the bsAb molecular targets and structure (or format), which can be manipulated to create variable and novel functionalities, including linking immune cells with tumor cells, or dual signaling pathway blockade. Several bsAbs have already changed the treatment landscape of hematological malignancies and select solid cancers. However, the mechanisms of resistance to these agents are understudied and the management of toxicities remains challenging. Herein, we review the principles in bsAb engineering, current understanding of mechanisms of action and resistance, data for clinical application, and provide a perspective on ongoing challenges and future developments in this field.

Enhancing cancer immunotherapy: Nanotechnology-mediated immunotherapy overcoming immunosuppression

Immunotherapy is an important cancer treatment method that offers hope for curing cancer patients. While immunotherapy has achieved initial success, a major obstacle to its widespread adoption is the inability to benefit the majority of patients. The success or failure of immunotherapy is closely linked to the tumor's immune microenvironment. Recently, there has been significant attention on strategies to regulate the tumor immune microenvironment in order to stimulate anti-tumor immune responses in cancer immunotherapy. The distinctive physical properties and design flexibility of nanomedicines have been extensively utilized to target immune cells (including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs)), offering promising advancements in cancer immunotherapy. In this article, we have reviewed treatment strategies aimed at targeting various immune cells to regulate the tumor immune microenvironment. The focus is on cancer immunotherapy models that are based on nanomedicines, with the goal of inducing or enhancing anti-tumor immune responses to improve immunotherapy. It is worth noting that combining cancer immunotherapy with other treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and photodynamic therapy, can maximize the therapeutic effects. Finally, we have identified the challenges that nanotechnology-mediated immunotherapy needs to overcome in order to design more effective nanosystems.

Dual blockade immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in lung cancer

Cancer immunotherapies, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have reshaped the treatment paradigm for both advanced non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Programmed death receptor-1/programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) are some of the most common and promising targets in ICIs. Compared to ICI monotherapy, which occasionally demonstrates treatment resistance and limited efficacy, the dual blockade immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 operates at different stages of T cell activation with synergistically enhancing immune responses against cancer cells. This emerging dual therapy heralds a new direction for cancer immunotherapy, which, however, may increase the risk of drug-related adverse reactions while improving efficacy. Previous clinical trials have explored combination therapy strategy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents in lung cancer, yet its efficacy remains to be unclear with the inevitable incidence of immune-related adverse events. The recent advent of bispecific antibodies has made this sort of dual targeting more feasible, aiming to alleviate toxicity without compromising efficacy. Thus, this review highlights the role of dual blockade immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in treating lung cancer, and further elucidates its pre-clinical mechanisms and current advancements in clinical trials. Besides, we also provide novel insights into the potential combinations of dual blockade therapies with other strategies to optimize the future treatment mode for lung cancer.

Recent advances in immunotherapy and its combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a review

The incidence of melanoma is increasing year by year and is highly malignant, with a poor prognosis. Its treatment has always attracted much attention. Among the more clinically applied immunotherapies are immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and oncolytic virotherapy. With the continuous development of technology and trials, in addition to immune monotherapy, combinations of immunotherapy and radiotherapy have shown surprising efficacy. In this article, we review the research progress of immune monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced melanoma, with the aim of providing new ideas for the treatment strategy for advanced melanoma.

A systematic review of antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Charting the course of future therapies

INTRODUCTION

There is a need to improve the outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), especially in recurrent unresectable and metastatic (R/M) setting. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) may deliver promising results.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to identify ADC and BsAb clinical trials, involving patients with HNSCC and NPC, from database creation to December 2023. We reported trial characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (trAEs).

RESULTS

23 trials (65 % phase I) were found, involving 540 R/M patients (355 [20trials] HNSCC and 185 [5trials] NPC). There were 13 ADC (n = 343) and 10 BsAb (n = 197) trials. 96 % patients were refractory to standard of care treatments. ORR ranged from 0 to 100 %, with the highest ORR for GEN1042 plus chemoimmunotherapy. ORRs for monotherapies were 47 % for ADC, and 0-37 % for BsAb. MRG003 reached in HNSCC 43 % and NPC 47 %. BL-B01D1 54 % in NPC. Longest median OS was seen with MRG003 and KN046. Grade ≥ 3 trAEs were 28-60 % in ADC trials, and 3-33 % BsAb. Grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive trAEs were typically seen in 8 ADC trials, while 4 BsAb showed infusion-related reactions (IRR). Four treatment-related deaths were reported (1 pneumonitis), all ADC trials.

CONCLUSION

ADC and BsAb antibodies show promise in R/M HNSCC and NPC. Results are premature by small sample sizes and lack of control arm. ADC mainly caused myelosuppression and a pneumonitis case, and BsAb IRR. Further research is warranted in this setting.

Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors aimed at nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

During the first stage of the study, using 40 patients with stage III/IVa NPC treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy as a first-line treatment (observation group) and 70 patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). In the second stage of the study, 88 patients with NPC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were grouped according to the number of lines of immunotherapy, the number of times, and the types of application.

RESULTS

Observation of the short-term effects in the first stage indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) of the observation group and the control group against primary foci of NPC was 75.0% versus 40.0%; the mortality rate of the observation group was much lower than that of the control group. The overall first-line treatment evaluation of the observation vs. control groups were as follows: ORR (67.5% vs. 38.6%); median PFS (17.52 vs. 17.21 months); and median OS (18.68 vs. 18.14 months), respectively (p < 0.05). The second stage of the study had an ORR of 53.4%, and the efficacy of immunotherapy was related to staging, timing, and frequency.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy as the first-line treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma may improve patient outcomes significantly. Timing, frequency, and the type of immunotherapy exerted an effect on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Adverse effects that occurred during treatment were tolerable and controllable.

Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab in previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma(COMPASSION-06): A phase II multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab monotherapy, a first-in-class, bi-specific PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody, in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M-NPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with R/M-NPC who had failed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and second-line single agent or combined chemotherapy, and immunotherapy-naive. Patients received cadonilimab for 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (Q2W). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in full analysis set (FAS) assessed by investigators according to RECIST v.1.1. The secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were assessed. The median time from first dose to data cutoff was 16.56 (range, 0.8-25.2) months. ORR was 26.1 % (95 %CI:10.2-48.4). The ORR were 44.4 % (95 %CI: 13.7-78.8) and 14.3 % (95 %CI:1.8-42.8) in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥50 % and <50 %, respectively. ORR was achieved in 40.0 % (95 %CI:12.2-73.8) of patients with EBV-DNA level <4000 IU/ml (n = 10) and 15.4 % (95 %CI:1.9-45.4) of those with ≥4000 IU/ml. The median PFS was 3.71 months (95 %CI: 1.84-9.30). respectively. Median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 79.7 % (95 % CI:54.5-91.9). Only two patients (8.3 %) experienced Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with hypothyroidism (30.4 %), rash (21.7 %) and pruritus (21.7 %) being the most prevalent TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

Cadonilimab monotherapy demonstrated a promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with previously treated R-M/NPC and provide an efficacious salvage treatment option.

Enhancing anti-CD274 (PD-L1) targeting through combinatorial immunotherapy with bispecific antibodies and fusion proteins: from preclinical to phase II clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved great success in the treatment of many different types of cancer. Programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1, CD274) is a major immunosuppressive immune checkpoint and a target for several already approved monoclonal antibodies. Despite this, novel strategies are under development, as the overall response remains low.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, an overview of the current biomarkers for response to PD-L1 inhibitor treatment is given, followed by a discussion of potential novel biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden and circulating tumor DNA. Combinatorial immunotherapy is a potential novel strategy to increase the response to PD-L1 inhibitor treatment and currently, several interesting bispecific antibodies as well as bispecific fusion proteins are undergoing early clinical investigation. We focus on substances targeting PD-L1 and a secondary target, and a secondary immunomodulatory target like CTLA-4, TIGIT, or CD47.

EXPERT OPINION

Overall, the presented studies show anti-tumor activity of these combinatorial immunotherapeutic approaches. However, still relatively low response rates suggest a need for better biomarkers.

The Application of Emodin Treatment on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Therapy

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy prevailing in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Southern China, Southeast Asia, and North Africa. Although early-stage NPC responds well to the primary treatment of radio-chemotherapy, the mortality rate of advanced NPC remains high. Therefore, developing new therapies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an urgent task. Emodin is an anthraquinone derivative mainly found in Rheum palmatum. Emodin has been found to possess many anti-cancer functions against various types of cancers, but they are less discussed in the treatment of NPC. This review organized the different studies about the anti-NPC activity of emodin and discussed the potential and challenges of emodin treatment in NPC therapy.

Anti-PD-L1-Based Bispecific Antibodies Targeting Co-Inhibitory and Co-Stimulatory Molecules for Cancer Immunotherapy

Targeting PD-L1 via monospecific antibodies has shown durable clinical benefits and long-term remissions where patients exhibit no clinical cancer signs for many years after treatment. However, the durable clinical benefits and long-term remissions by anti-PD-L1 monotherapy have been limited to a small fraction of patients with certain cancer types. Targeting PD-L1 via bispecific antibodies (referred to as anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs) which can simultaneously bind to both co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory molecules may increase the durable antitumor responses in patients who would not benefit from PD-L1 monotherapy. A growing number of anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs have been developed to fight against this deadly disease. This review summarizes recent advances of anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs for cancer immunotherapy in patents and literatures, and discusses their anti-tumor efficacies in vitro and in vivo. Over 50 anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs targeting both co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory molecules have been investigated in biological testing or in clinical trials since 2017. At least eleven proteins, such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, PD-1, PD-L2, TIM-3, TIGIT, CD28, CD27, OX40, CD137, and ICOS, are involved in these investigations. Twenty-two anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs are being evaluated to treat various advanced cancers in clinical trials, wherein the indications include NSCLC, SNSCLC, SCLC, PDA, MBNHL, SCCHN, UC, EC, TNBC, CC, and some other malignancies. The released data from clinical trials indicated that most of the anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs were well-tolerated and showed promising antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. However, since the approved and investigational bsAbs have shown much more significant adverse reactions compared to PD-L1 monospecific antibodies, anti-PD-L1-based bsAbs may be further optimized via molecular structure modification to avoid or reduce these adverse reactions.

Applications and challenges in designing VHH-based bispecific antibodies: leveraging machine learning solutions

The development of bispecific antibodies that bind at least two different targets relies on bringing together multiple binding domains with different binding properties and biophysical characteristics to produce a drug-like therapeutic. These building blocks play an important role in the overall quality of the molecule and can influence many important aspects from potency and specificity to stability and half-life. Single-domain antibodies, particularly camelid-derived variable heavy domain of heavy chain (VHH) antibodies, are becoming an increasingly popular choice for bispecific construction due to their single-domain modularity, favorable biophysical properties, and potential to work in multiple antibody formats. Here, we review the use of VHH domains as building blocks in the construction of multispecific antibodies and the challenges in creating optimized molecules. In addition to exploring traditional approaches to VHH development, we review the integration of machine learning techniques at various stages of the process. Specifically, the utilization of machine learning for structural prediction, lead identification, lead optimization, and humanization of VHH antibodies.

Revolutionizing cancer immunotherapy: unleashing the potential of bispecific antibodies for targeted treatment

Recent progressions in immunotherapy have transformed cancer treatment, providing a promising strategy that activates the immune system of the patient to find and eliminate cancerous cells. Bispecific antibodies, which engage two separate antigens or one antigen with two distinct epitopes, are of tremendous concern in immunotherapy. The bi-targeting idea enabled by bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) is especially attractive from a medical standpoint since most diseases are complex, involving several receptors, ligands, and signaling pathways. Several research look into the processes in which BsAbs identify different cancer targets such angiogenesis, reproduction, metastasis, and immune regulation. By rerouting cells or altering other pathways, the bispecific proteins perform effector activities in addition to those of natural antibodies. This opens up a wide range of clinical applications and helps patients with resistant tumors respond better to medication. Yet, further study is necessary to identify the best conditions where to use these medications for treating tumor, their appropriate combination partners, and methods to reduce toxicity. In this review, we provide insights into the BsAb format classification based on their composition and symmetry, as well as the delivery mode, focus on the action mechanism of the molecule, and discuss the challenges and future perspectives in BsAb development.

Immune checkpoints in rheumatoid arthritis: progress and promise

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most prevalent autoimmune inflammatory conditions, and while the mechanisms driving pathogenesis are yet to be completely elucidated, self-reactive T cells and immune checkpoint pathways have a clear role. In this review, we provide an overview of the importance of checkpoint pathways in the T cell response and describe the involvement of these in RA development and progression. We discuss the relationship between immune checkpoint therapy in cancer and autoimmune adverse events, draw parallels with the involvement of immune checkpoints in RA pathobiology, summarise emerging research into some of the lesser-known pathways, and the potential of targeting checkpoint-related pathways in future treatment approaches to RA management.

The cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells as a target for cancer treatment

Macrophages represent an important component of the innate immune system. Under physiological conditions, macrophages, which are essential phagocytes, maintain a proinflammatory response and repair damaged tissue. However, these processes are often impaired upon tumorigenesis, in which tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) protect and support the growth, proliferation, and invasion of tumor cells and promote suppression of antitumor immunity. TAM abundance is closely associated with poor outcome of cancer, with impediment of chemotherapy effectiveness and ultimately a dismal therapy response and inferior overall survival. Thus, cross-talk between cancer cells and TAMs is an important target for immune checkpoint therapies and metabolic interventions, spurring interest in it as a therapeutic vulnerability for both hematological cancers and solid tumors. Furthermore, targeting of this cross-talk has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment with the antibody against CD47 protein, a critical macrophage checkpoint recognized as the "don't eat me" signal, as well as other metabolism-focused strategies. Therapies targeting CD47 constitute an important milestone in the advancement of anticancer research and have had promising effects on not only phagocytosis activation but also innate and adaptive immune system activation, effectively counteracting tumor cells' evasion of therapy as shown in the context of myeloid cancers. Targeting of CD47 signaling is only one of several possibilities to reverse the immunosuppressive and tumor-protective tumor environment with the aim of enhancing the antitumor response. Several preclinical studies identified signaling pathways that regulate the recruitment, polarization, or metabolism of TAMs. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the role of macrophages in cancer progression and the mechanisms by which they communicate with tumor cells. Additionally, we dissect various therapeutic strategies developed to target macrophage-tumor cell cross-talk, including modulation of macrophage polarization, blockade of signaling pathways, and disruption of physical interactions between leukemia cells and macrophages. Finally, we highlight the challenges associated with tumor hypoxia and acidosis as barriers to effective cancer therapy and discuss opportunities for future research in this field.