Biased Agonism: Lessons from Studies of Opioid Receptor Agonists

Receptor dimers and biased ligands: Novel strategies for targeting G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest superfamily of membrane receptors. They regulate physiological and pathological processes such as metabolic homeostasis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and the immune response, and are one of the most important classes of drug targets, being targeted by 30-40 % of marketed drugs. A growing number of studies continue to reveal the complexity of GPCRs, especially their ability to interact with each other to form higher-order structures such as homodimers and heterodimers, which have different functions than monomers, and are involved in disease development and progression. The existence of GPCR homodimers and heterodimers is opening up new directions in drug discovery and development to harness their therapeutic potential. Particularly striking is the ability of GPCR dimers to trigger unique biased signalling pathways, which exquisitely balance the relationship between therapeutic effects and side effects. By suppressing adverse reactions and enhancing beneficial drug effects, GPCR dimers provide an unprecedented opportunity to minimise side effects, maximise therapeutic efficacy and enhance safety. This review aims to highlight the latest research advances in GPCR dimerization and GPCR-biased signalling, focusing on the development of dimer-targeting and biased ligands as innovative drugs that will likely provide new strategies for treating GPCR-related diseases as well as a better understanding of drug design for compounds that target GPCRs. GPCRs will play an increasingly important role in precision medicine and personalised therapy, leading us towards a safer, more efficient and smarter pharmaceutical future.

Biased agonism in peptide-GPCRs: A structural perspective

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are dynamic membrane receptors that transduce extracellular signals to the cell interior by forming a ligand-receptor-effector (ternary) complex that functions via allosterism. Peptides constitute an important class of ligands that interact with their cognate GPCRs (peptide-GPCRs) to form the ternary complex. "Biased agonism", a therapeutically relevant phenomenon exhibited by GPCRs owing to their allosteric nature, has also been observed in peptide-GPCRs, leading to the development of selective therapeutics with fewer side effects. In this review, we have focused on the structural basis of signalling bias at peptide-GPCRs of classes A and B, and reviewed the therapeutic relevance of bias at peptide-GPCRs, with the hope of contributing to the discovery of novel biased peptide drugs.

Functional dynamics of G protein-coupled receptors reveal new routes for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest human membrane protein family that transduce extracellular signals into cellular responses. They are major pharmacological targets, with approximately 26% of marketed drugs targeting GPCRs, primarily at their orthosteric binding site. Despite their prominence, predicting the pharmacological effects of novel GPCR-targeting drugs remains challenging due to the complex functional dynamics of these receptors. Recent advances in X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, spectroscopic techniques and molecular simulations have enhanced our understanding of receptor conformational dynamics and ligand interactions with GPCRs. These developments have revealed novel ligand-binding modes, mechanisms of action and druggable pockets. In this Review, we highlight such aspects for recently discovered small-molecule drugs and drug candidates targeting GPCRs, focusing on three categories: allosteric modulators, biased ligands, and bivalent and bitopic compounds. Although studies so far have largely been retrospective, integrating structural data on ligand-induced receptor functional dynamics into the drug discovery pipeline has the potential to guide the identification of drug candidates with specific abilities to modulate GPCR interactions with intracellular effector proteins such as G proteins and β-arrestins, enabling more tailored selectivity and efficacy profiles.

Buprenorphine: an old dog with new tricks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The survival rate of patients with a cancer or palliative care diagnosis has improved over the years although pain remains a debilitating symptom that many patients still require treatment with opioids. Compared to full mu-opioid receptor agonists such as morphine and oxycodone, buprenorphine continues to remain a second- or third-line choice in this group of patients.We have reviewed the pharmacology and clinical utility of buprenorphine to stimulate debate around the first-line use of buprenorphine in the management of pain in cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Buprenorphine has a pharmacological profile that is unique and unlike any other opioid. It is associated with many immediate and long-term benefits, with lower risks of adverse effects that make it an ideal first-line choice in the management of cancer pain.

SUMMARY

Buprenorphine appears to be a promising choice of opioid for cancer patients. Studies have found that buprenorphine is a safe and effective choice for many patients, making it a suitable first-line option for the management of cancer pain.

Biased signaling in GPCRs: Structural insights and implications for drug development

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors in humans, playing a crucial role in regulating diverse cellular processes and serving as primary drug targets. Traditional drug design has primarily focused on ligands that uniformly activate or inhibit GPCRs. However, the concept of biased agonism-where ligands selectively stabilize distinct receptor conformations, leading to unique signaling outcomes-has introduced a paradigm shift in therapeutic development. Despite the promise of biased agonists to enhance drug efficacy and minimize side effects, a comprehensive understanding of the structural and biophysical mechanisms underlying biased signaling is essential. Recent advancements in GPCR structural biology have provided unprecedented insights into ligand binding, conformational dynamics, and the molecular basis of biased signaling. These insights, combined with improved techniques for characterizing ligand efficacy, have driven the development of biased ligands for several GPCRs, including opioid, angiotensin, and adrenergic receptors. This review synthesizes these developments, from mechanisms to drug discovery in biased signaling, emphasizing the role of structural insights in the rational design of next-generation biased agonists with superior therapeutic profiles. Ultimately, these advances hold the potential to revolutionize GPCR-targeted drug discovery, paving the way for more precise and effective treatments.

GRK5 regulates endocytosis of FPR2 independent of β-arrestins

The formyl-peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) is a G-protein-coupled receptor that responds to pathogen-derived peptides and regulates both proinflammatory and proresolution cellular processes. While ligand selectivity and G-protein signaling of FPR2 have been well characterized, molecular mechanisms controlling subsequent events such as endocytosis and recycling to the plasma membrane are less understood. Here, we show the key role of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5) in facilitating FPR2 endocytosis and postendocytic trafficking. We found, in response to activation by a synthetic peptide WKYMVm, the recruitment of β-arrestins to the receptor requires both putative phosphorylation sites in the C-terminal region of FPR2 and the presence of GRKs, predominantly GRK5. Furthermore, although GRKs are required for β-arrestin recruitment and endocytosis, the recruitment of β-arrestin is not itself essential for FPR2 endocytosis. Instead, β-arrestin determines postendocytic delivery of FPR2 to subcellular compartments and subsequent plasma membrane delivery and controls the magnitude of downstream signal transduction. Collectively, the newly characterized FPR2 molecular pharmacology will facilitate the design of more efficient therapeutics targeting chronic inflammation.

Effects of Biased Analogues of the Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonist, U50,488, in Preclinical Models of Pain and Side Effects

Kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists have well-established antinociceptive effects. However, many KOR agonists have negative side effects, which limit their therapeutic potential. Some researchers have suggested that the development of biased agonists that preferentially stimulate KOR G-protein pathways over β-arrestin pathways may yield drugs with fewer adverse side effects. This was investigated in the current study. We describe the synthesis and characterization of three U50,488 analogues, 1, 2, and 3. We evaluated the acute and chronic antinociceptive effects of these compounds in mice using the warm-water tail flick assay and in a paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain model. Side effects were investigated using open-field, passive wire hang, rotarod, elevated zero maze, conditioned place aversion, and whole-body plethysmography, with some tests being conducted in KOR or β-arrestin2 knock out mice. All compounds were highly potent, full agonists of the KOR, with varying signaling biases in vitro. In the warm-water tail withdrawal assay, these agonists were ~10 times more potent than U50,488, but not more efficacious. All KOR agonists reversed paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain, without tolerance. Compound 3 showed no significant side effects on any test. Signaling bias did not correlate with the antinociceptive or side effects of any compounds and knockout of β-arrestin2 had no effect on U50,488-induced sedation or motor incoordination. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of 3, with its lack of side effects typically associated with KOR agonists, and also suggest that G-protein signaling bias is a poor predictor of KOR agonist-induced side effects.

Signal profiles and spatial regulation of β-arrestin recruitment through Gβ5 and GRK3 at the μ-opioid receptor

The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that mediates both analgesic effects and adverse effects of opioid drugs. Despite extensive efforts to develop a signal-biased drug, drugs with sufficiently reduced side effects have not been established, in part owing to lack of comprehensive signal transducer profiles of MOR. In this study, by profiling the activity of signal transducers including G proteins and GPCR kinases (GRKs), we revealed an unprecedented mechanism of selective GRK3 activation by Gβ5, leading to β-arrestin recruitment. By utilizing multiple genome-edited cell lines and functional assays, we found that oliceridine, an FDA-approved G-protein-biased agonist, selectively activates Gαz- and GRK3-mediated signaling. Notably, among the five Gβ subtypes, only Gβ5 distinguishes GRK3 from GRK2. Using single-molecule imaging, we found that GRK3 is recruited to the plasma membrane upon MOR agonist stimulation by Gβ1 and Gβ5, yet their interaction dynamics with GRK3 and mechanisms of action are different. Furthermore, particle diffusion analysis suggests that Gβ5 is enriched in confined membrane domains, through which GRK3 is recruited to the plasma membrane in a freely diffusible state, thereby allowing GRK3 to efficiently interact with MOR. These findings provide a mechanism by which MOR agonists rely on a specific Gα-Gβ-GRK axis to induce β-arrestin recruitment.

Structure-Signal Relationships of the δ-Opioid-Receptor (DOR)-Selective Agonist KNT-127-Part I: Impact of the Morphinan Skeleton on the G-Protein-Biased DOR Agonism

The δ-opioid receptor (DOR) is a promising target for developing novel analgesics due to its lower risk of causing side effects compared to the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), which is commonly associated with dependence, respiratory depression, and other adverse effects. KNT-127, a DOR-selective agonist with a morphinan skeleton, offers analgesic and antidepressant benefits without inducing convulsions at therapeutic doses, unlike the conventional DOR agonist SNC80. While previous studies have suggested that KNT-127 exhibits reduced β-arrestin recruitment, a signaling pathway implicated in adverse opioid effects, the ligand structural basis for this biased signaling remains unclear. In this study, we explored the structure-signal relationships of KNT-127, focusing on its quinoline moiety, which is known to serve as an address domain responsible for DOR selectivity. Modifying the quinoline moiety by removing the aromatic rings reduced DOR selectivity and potency in relation to G-protein activation while diminishing both the potency and efficacy of β-arrestin recruitment. These results suggest that the morphinan skeleton is critical for reduced β-arrestin recruitment, while the quinoline moiety differentially modulates G-protein activation and β-arrestin recruitment. Together, our study expands the message-address concept, previously limited to receptor selectivity, by providing structural insights into the G-protein-biased agonism of DOR agonists, thereby guiding the design of safer DOR-targeting therapeutics.

Elucidating the harm potential of brorphine analogues as new synthetic opioids: Synthesis, in vitro, and in vivo characterization

The emergence of new synthetic opioids (NSOs) has added complexity to recreational opioid markets worldwide. While NSOs with diverse chemical structures have emerged, brorphine currently remains the only NSO with a piperidine benzimidazolone scaffold. However, the emergence of new generations of NSOs, including brorphine analogues, can be anticipated. This study explored the pharmaco-toxicological, opioid-like effect profile of brorphine alongside its non-brominated analogue (orphine) and three other halogenated analogues (fluorphine, chlorphine, iodorphine). In vitro, radioligand binding assays in rat brain tissue indicated that all analogues bind to the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) with nM affinity. While analogues with smaller-sized substituents showed the highest MOR affinity, further in vitro characterization via two cell-based (HEK 293T) MOR activation (β-arrestin 2 and mini-Gαi recruitment) assays indicated that chlorphine, brorphine, and iodorphine were generally the most active MOR agonists. None of the compounds showed significant in vitro biased agonism compared to hydromorphone. In vivo, we investigated the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) administration of the benzimidazolones (0.01-15 mg/kg) on mechanical and thermal antinociception in male CD-1 mice. Chlorphine and brorphine overall induced the highest levels of antinociception. Furthermore, the effects on respiratory changes induced by a fixed dose (15 mg/kg IP) of the compounds were investigated using non-invasive plethysmography. Fluorphine-, chlorphine-, and brorphine-induced respiratory depressant effects were the most pronounced. For some compounds, pretreatment with naloxone (6 mg/kg IP) could not reverse respiratory depression. Taken together, brorphine-like piperidine benzimidazolones are opioid agonists that have the potential to cause substantial harm to users should they emerge as NSOs. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Novel Synthetic Opioids (NSOs)".

Discovery of cyanoguanidine derivatives as biased μ-opioid receptor agonists

Opioid agonists, including morphine and its derivatives, have historically been utilized in conventional pain relief therapies. However, the morphine-like side effects associated with these compounds have constrained their broader application in clinical environments. Fortunately, novel compounds that selectively activate μ-opioid receptors (MOR) without activating the β-arrestin2 pathway, such as PZM21 and TRV130, demonstrate the potential to mitigate side effects while maintaining analgesic efficacy. In this study, we structurally modified PZM21 to get a series of compounds with a 2-cyanoguanidine scaffold, the majority of which display significant analgesic effects. Notably, Compound I-11 exhibited an analgesic effect comparable to that of morphine and selectively activates μ-opioid receptors while avoiding the activation of the β-arrestin2 pathway. Our work not only introduces a novel biased μ-opioid receptor agonist but also serves as a valuable reference for the further optimization of PZM21.

Multitarget ligands that comprise opioid/nonopioid pharmacophores for pain management: Current state of the science

Chronic pain, which affects more than one-third of the world's population, represents one of the greatest medical challenges of the 21st century, yet its effective management remains sub-optimal. The 'gold standard' for the treatment of moderate to severe pain consists of opioid ligands, such as morphine and fentanyl, that target the µ-opioid receptor (MOP). Paradoxically, these opioids also cause serious side effects, including constipation, respiratory depression, tolerance, and addiction. In addition, the development of opioid-use disorders, such as opioid diversion, misuse, and abuse, has led to the current opioid crisis, with dramatic increases in addiction, overdoses, and ultimately deaths. As pain is a complex, multidimensional experience involving a variety of pathways and mediators, dual or multitarget ligands that can bind to more than one receptor and exert complementary analgesic effects, represent a promising avenue for pain relief. Indeed, unlike monomodal therapeutic approaches, the modulation of several endogenous nociceptive systems can often result in an additive or even synergistic effect, thereby improving the analgesic-to-side-effect ratio. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of research efforts towards the development of dual- or multi-targeting opioid/nonopioid hybrid ligands for effective and safer pain management. We reflect on the underpinning discovery rationale by discussing the design, medicinal chemistry, and in vivo pharmacological effects of multitarget antinociceptive compounds.

Functional consequences of spatial, temporal and ligand bias of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate every aspect of kidney function by mediating the effects of various endogenous and exogenous substances. A key concept in GPCR function is biased signalling, whereby certain ligands may selectively activate specific pathways within the receptor's signalling repertoire. For example, different agonists may induce biased signalling by stabilizing distinct active receptor conformations - a concept that is supported by advances in structural biology. However, the processes underlying functional selectivity in receptor signalling are extremely complex, involving differences in subcellular compartmentalization and signalling dynamics. Importantly, the molecular mechanisms of spatiotemporal bias, particularly its connection to ligand binding kinetics, have been detailed for GPCRs critical to kidney function, such as the AT1 angiotensin receptor (AT1R), V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) and the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R). This expanding insight into the multifaceted nature of biased signalling paves the way for innovative strategies for targeting GPCR functions; the development of novel biased agonists may represent advanced pharmacotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of kidney diseases and related systemic conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes and heart failure.

Activation of μ receptors by SR-17018 through a distinctive mechanism

Agonists at μ opioid receptors relieve acute pain, however, their long-term use is limited by side effects, which may involve β-arrestin2. Agonists biased against β-arrestin2 recruitment may be advantageous. However, the classification of bias may be compromised by assays utilising overexpressed μ receptors which overestimate efficacy for G-protein activation. There is a need for re-evaluation with restricted receptor availability to determine accurate agonist efficacies. We depleted μ receptor availability in PathHunter CHO cells using the irreversible antagonist, β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA), and compared efficacies and apparent potencies of twelve agonists, including several previously reported as biased, in β-arrestin2 recruitment and cAMP assays. With full receptor availability all agonists had partial efficacy for stimulating β-arrestin2 recruitment relative to DAMGO, while only TRV130 and buprenorphine were partial agonists as inhibitors of cAMP accumulation. Limiting receptor availability by prior exposure to β-FNA (100 nM) revealed morphine, oxycodone, PZM21, herkinorin, U47700, tianeptine and U47931e are also partial agonists in the cAMP assay. The efficacies of all agonists, except SR-17018, correlated between β-arrestin2 recruitment and cAMP assays, with depleted receptor availability in the latter. Furthermore, naloxone and cyprodime exhibited non-competitive antagonism of SR-17018 in the β-arrestin2 recruitment assay. Limited antagonism by naloxone was also non-competitive in the cAMP assay, while cyprodime was competitive. Furthermore, SR-17018 only negligibly diminished β-arrestin2 recruitment stimulated by DAMGO (1 μM), whereas fentanyl, morphine and TRV130 all exhibited the anticipated competitive inhibition. The data suggest that SR-17018 achieves bias against β-arrestin2 recruitment through interactions with μ receptors outside the orthosteric agonist site. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Ligand Bias".

Deletion of arrestin-3 does not reduce drug-seeking behavior in a longitudinal paradigm of oral morphine self-administration

Introduction

Opioid drugs are potent analgesics that mimic the endogenous opioid peptides, endorphins and enkephalins, by activating the µ-opioid receptor. Opioid use is limited by side effects, including significant risk of opioid use disorder. Improvement of the effect/side effect profile of opioid medications is a key pursuit of opioid research, yet there is no consensus on how to achieve this goal. One hypothesis is that the degree of arrestin-3 recruitment to the µ-opioid receptor impacts therapeutic utility. However, it is not clear whether increased or decreased interaction of the µ-opioid receptor with arrestin-3 would reduce compulsive drug-seeking.

Methods

We utilized three genotypes of mice with varying abilities to recruit arrestin-3 to the µ-opioid receptor in response to morphine in a novel longitudinal operant self-administration model. We also created a quantitative method to define compulsivity in drug-seeking based on a multi-variate analysis of several operant response variables.

Results

We demonstrate that arrestin-3 knockout and wild type mice have highly variable drug-seeking behavior with few genotype differences. In contrast, in mice where the µ-opioid receptor strongly recruits arrestin-3, drug-seeking behavior is much less varied. We found that mice lacking arrestin-3 were more likely to meet the criteria for compulsivity whereas mice with enhanced arrestin-3 recruitment did not develop a compulsive phenotype.

Conclusion

These experiments show that a lack of arrestin-3 is not protective against the abuse liability of morphine in an operant self-administration context. Our data also suggest that opioids that engage both G protein and arrestin-3, recapitulating the endogenous signaling pattern, will reduce abuse liability.

Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Characterization of Proteolytically-Stable Opioid-Neurotensin Hybrid Peptidomimetics

Linking an opioid to a nonopioid pharmacophore represents a promising approach for reducing opioid-induced side effects during pain management. Herein, we describe the optimization of the previously reported opioid-neurotensin hybrids (OPNT-hybrids), SBL-OPNT-05 & -10, containing the μ-/δ-opioid agonist H-Dmt-d-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NH2 and NT(8-13) analogs optimized for NTS2 affinity. In the present work, the constrained dipeptide Aba-β-Ala was modified to investigate the optimal linker length between the two pharmacophores, as well as the effect of expanding the aromatic moiety within constrained dipeptide analogs, via the inclusion of a naphthyl moiety. Additionally, the N-terminal Arg residue of the NT(8-13) pharmacophore was substituted with β3 hArg. For all analogs, affinity was determined at the MOP, DOP, NTS1, and NTS2 receptors. Several of the hybrid ligands showed a subnanomolar affinity for MOP, improved binding for DOP compared to SBL-OPNT-05 & -10, as well as an excellent NTS2-affinity with high selectivity over NTS1. Subsequently, the Gαi1 and β-arrestin-2 pathways were evaluated for all hybrids, along with their stability in rat plasma. Upon MOP activation, SBL-OPNT-13 and -18 were the least effective at recruiting β-arrestin-2 (E max = 17 and 12%, respectively), while both compounds were also found to be partial agonists at the Gαi1 pathway, despite improved potency compared to DAMGO. Importantly, these analogs also showed a half-life in rat plasma in excess of 48 h, making them valuable tools for future in vivo investigations.

Progress on the development of Class A GPCR-biased ligands

Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) continue to garner interest for their essential roles in cell signalling and their importance as drug targets. Although numerous drugs in the clinic target these receptors, over 60% GPCRs remain unexploited. Moreover, the adverse effects triggered by the available unbiased GPCR modulators, limit their use and therapeutic value. In this context, the elucidation of biased signalling has opened up new pharmacological avenues holding promise for safer therapeutics. Functionally selective ligands favour receptor conformations facilitating the recruitment of specific effectors and the modulation of the associated pathways. This review surveys the current drug discovery landscape of GPCR-biased modulators with a focus on recent advances. Understanding the biological effects of this preferential coupling is at different stages depending on the Class A GPCR family. Therefore, with a focus on individual GPCR families, we present a compilation of the functionally selective modulators reported over the past few years. In doing so, we dissect their therapeutic relevance, molecular determinants and potential clinical applications.

Transdermal Fentanyl in Patients with Cachexia-A Scoping Review

Cachectic patients frequently require transdermal fentanyl (TDF) for pain management, but data on its efficacy and safety are scarce and inconsistent. This scoping review aims to analyze the evidence concerning TDF administration in patients with cachexia irrespective of the underlying pathology. The primary objective is to assess the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of TDF in cachectic patients. The secondary objective is to identify cachexia characteristics that may influence fentanyl pharmacokinetics (PK). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to March 2024. The review included observational and clinical studies on cachectic patients with moderate to severe pain treated with TDF patches at any dosage or frequency. Phase 1 trials, animal studies, case reports, preclinical studies and conference abstracts were excluded. Nine studies were included: four studies reported that cachexia negatively impacted TDF efficacy, increasing required doses and lowering plasma concentrations; three studies found minimal or no impact of cachexia on TDF efficacy and PK; two studies suggested that cachexia might improve TDF outcomes. Study quality ranged from moderate to high, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool. The current evidence is insufficient to provide any definitive recommendations for TDF prescribing in cachectic patients.

Sustained fentanyl exposure inhibits neuronal activity in dissociated striatal neuronal-glial cocultures through actions independent of opioid receptors

Besides having high potency and efficacy at the µ-opioid (MOR) and other opioid receptor types, fentanyl has some affinity for some adrenergic receptor types, which may underlie its unique pathophysiological differences from typical opioids. To better understand the unique actions of fentanyl, we assessed the extent to which fentanyl alters striatal medium spiny neuron (MSN) activity via opioid receptors or α1-adrenoceptors in dopamine type 1 or type 2 receptor (D1 or D2)-expressing MSNs. In neuronal and mixed-glial cocultures from the striatum, acute fentanyl (100 nM) exposure decreased the frequency of spontaneous action potentials. Overnight exposure of cocultures to 100 nM fentanyl severely reduced the proportion of MSNs with spontaneous action potentials, which was unaffected by coexposure to the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (10 µM) but fully negated by coadministering the pan-α1-adrenoceptor inverse agonist prazosin (100 nM) and partially reversed by the selective α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist RS 100329 (300 nM). Acute fentanyl (100 nM) exposure modestly reduced the frequency of action potentials and caused firing rate adaptations in D2, but not D1, MSNs. Prolonged (2-5 h) fentanyl (100 nM) application dramatically attenuated firing rates in both D1 and D2 MSNs. To identify possible cellular sites of α1-adrenoceptor action, α1-adrenoceptors were localized in subpopulations of striatal astroglia and neurons by immunocytochemistry and Adra1a mRNA by in situ hybridization in astrocytes. Thus, sustained fentanyl exposure can inhibit striatal MSN activity via a nonopioid receptor-dependent pathway, which may be modulated via complex actions in α1-adrenoceptor-expressing striatal neurons and/or glia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Acute fentanyl exposure attenuated the activity of striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in vitro and in dopamine D2, but not D1, receptor-expressing MSNs in ex vivo slices. By contrast, sustained fentanyl exposure suppressed the spontaneous activity of MSNs cocultured with glia through a nonopioid receptor-dependent mechanism modulated, in part, by α1-adrenoceptors. Fentanyl exposure can affect striatal function via a nonopioid receptor mechanism of action that appears mediated by α1-adrenoreceptor-expressing striatal neurons and/or astroglia.

Strategies for developing μ opioid receptor agonists with reduced adverse effects

Opioids are currently the most effective and widely used painkillers in the world. Unfortunately, the clinical use of opioid analgesics is limited by serious adverse effects. Many researchers have been working on designing and optimizing structures in search of novel μ opioid receptor(MOR) agonists with improved analgesic activity and reduced incidence of adverse effects. There are many strategies to develop MOR drugs, mainly focusing on new low efficacy agonists (potentially G protein biased agonists), MOR agonists acting on different Gα subtype, targeting opioid receptors in the periphery, acting on multiple opioid receptor, and targeting allosteric sites of opioid receptors, and others. This review summarizes the design methods, clinical applications, and structure-activity relationships of small-molecule agonists for MOR based on these different design strategies, providing ideas for the development of safer novel opioid ligands with therapeutic potential.

Biased signalling in analgesic research and development

Ligand bias offers a novel means to improve the therapeutic profile of drugs. With regard to G protein-coupled receptors involved in analgesia, it could be advantageous to develop such drugs if the analgesic effect is mediated by a different cellular signalling pathway than the adverse effects associated with the drug. Whilst this has been explored over a number of years for the μ receptor, it remains unclear whether this approach offers significant benefit for the treatment of pain. Nevertheless, the development of biased ligands at other G protein-coupled receptors in the CNS does offer some promise for the development of novel analgesic drugs in the future. Here we summarise and discuss the recent evidence to support this.

The role of orphan G protein-coupled receptors in pain

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which form the largest family of membrane protein receptors in humans, are highly complex signaling systems with intricate structures and dynamic conformations and locations. Among these receptors, a specific subset is referred to as orphan GPCRs (oGPCRs) and has garnered significant interest in pain research due to their role in both central and peripheral nervous system function. The diversity of GPCR functions is attributed to multiple factors, including allosteric modulators, signaling bias, oligomerization, constitutive signaling, and compartmentalized signaling. This review primarily focuses on the recent advances in oGPCR research on pain mechanisms, discussing the role of specific oGPCRs including GPR34, GPR37, GPR65, GPR83, GPR84, GPR85, GPR132, GPR151, GPR160, GPR171, GPR177, and GPR183. The orphan receptors among these receptors associated with central nervous system diseases are also briefly described. Understanding the functions of these oGPCRs can contribute not only to a deeper understanding of pain mechanisms but also offer a reference for discovering new targets for pain treatment.

Morphinan Evolution: The Impact of Advances in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Morphinan-based opioids, derived from natural alkaloids like morphine, codeine and thebaine, have long been pivotal in managing severe pain. However, their clinical utility is marred by significant side effects and high addiction potential. This review traces the evolution of the morphinan scaffold in light of advancements in biochemistry and molecular biology, which have expanded our understanding of opioid receptor pharmacology. We explore the development of semi-synthetic and synthetic morphinans, their receptor selectivity and the emergence of biased agonism as a strategy to dissociate analgesic properties from undesirable effects. By examining the molecular intricacies of opioid receptors and their signaling pathways, we highlight how receptor-type selectivity and signaling bias have informed the design of novel analgesics. This synthesis of historical and contemporary perspectives provides an overview of the morphinan landscape, underscoring the ongoing efforts to mitigate the problems facing opioids through smarter drug design. We also highlight that most morphinan derivatives show a preference for the G protein pathway, although detailed experimental comparisons are still necessary. This fact underscores the utility of the morphinan skeleton in future opioid drug discovery.

Deletion of arrestin-3 does not improve compulsive drug-seeking behavior in a longitudinal paradigm of oral morphine self-administration

Opioid drugs are potent analgesics that mimic the endogenous opioid peptides, endorphins and enkephalins, by activating the μ-opioid receptor. Opioid use is limited by side effects, including significant risk of opioid use disorder. Improvement of the effect/side effect profile of opioid medications is a key pursuit of opioid research, yet there is no consensus on how to achieve this goal. One hypothesis is that the degree of arrestin-3 recruitment to the μ-opioid receptor impacts therapeutic utility. However, it is not clear whether increased or decreased interaction of the μ-opioid receptor with arrestin-3 would reduce compulsive drug-seeking. To examine this question, we utilized three genotypes of mice with varying abilities to recruit arrestin-3 to the μ-opioid receptor in response to morphine in a novel longitudinal operant self-administration model. We demonstrate that arrestin-3 knockout and wild type mice have highly variable drug-seeking behavior with few genotype differences. In contrast, in mice where the μ-opioid receptor strongly recruits arrestin-3, drug-seeking behavior is much less varied. We created a quantitative method to define compulsivity in drug-seeking and found that mice lacking arrestin-3 were more likely to meet the criteria for compulsivity whereas mice with enhanced arrestin-3 recruitment did not develop a compulsive phenotype. Our data suggest that opioids that engage both G protein and arrestin-3, recapitulating the endogenous signaling pattern, will reduce abuse liability.

A Balancing Act: Learning from the Past to Build a Future-Focused Opioid Strategy

The harmful side effects of opioid drugs such as respiratory depression, tolerance, dependence, and abuse potential have limited the therapeutic utility of opioids for their entire clinical history. However, no previous attempt to develop effective pain drugs that substantially ameliorate these effects has succeeded, and the current opioid epidemic affirms that they are a greater hindrance to the field of pain management than ever. Recent attempts at new opioid development have sought to reduce these side effects by minimizing engagement of the regulatory protein arrestin-3 at the mu-opioid receptor, but there is significant controversy around this approach. Here, we discuss the ongoing effort to develop safer opioids and its relevant historical context. We propose a new model that reconciles results previously assumed to be in direct conflict to explain how different signaling profiles at the mu-opioid receptor contribute to opioid tolerance and dependence. Our goal is for this framework to inform the search for a new generation of lower liability opioid analgesics.

Current strategic trends in drug discovery: the present as prologue

INTRODUCTION

Escalating costs and inherent uncertainties associated with drug discovery invite initiatives to improve its efficiency and de-risk campaigns for inventing better therapeutics. One such initiative involves recognizing and exploiting current approaches in therapeutics invention with molecular mechanisms of action that hold promise for designing and targeting new chemical entities as drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective considers the current contextual framework around three drug-discovery approaches and evaluates their potential to help identify new targets/modalities in small-molecule molecular pharmacology: diversifying ligand-directed phenotypes for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pharmacotherapeutic signaling; developing therapeutic-protein degraders and stabilizers for proximity-inducing pharmacology; and mining organelle biology for druggable therapeutic targets.

EXPERT OPINION

The contemporary drug-discovery approaches examined appear generalizable and versatile to have applications in therapeutics invention beyond those case studies discussed herein. Accordingly, they may be considered strategic trends worthy of note in advancing the field toward novel ways of addressing pharmacotherapeutically unmet medical needs.

Alleviating effect of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and its major components on postherpetic pain: a randomized blinded controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) causes severe pain which can lead to decreased quality-of-life. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of inhalation of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) oil and its major components (linalool and linalyl acetate) on the pain in patients with PHN.

METHODS

This study was performed at an outpatient clinic. Sixty-four patients with postherpetic neuralgia were randomly allocated to a control group (almond oil) or one of three experimental groups (lavender oil, linalool, or linalyl acetate diluted in almond oil at concentration of 1% v/v), and the participants inhaled the aroma by natural breathing. Quality, severity, and intensity of pain were measured before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Six patients discontinued the intervention for personal reasons; hence, data from 58 patients were analyzed (control group, n = 14; 1% lavender oil group, n = 15; 1% linalool, n = 15; 1% linalyl acetate, n = 14). Reduction in sensory pain was greater in the 1% lavender oil group, 1% linalool group, and 1% linalyl acetate group than in the control group (all P < 0.001). Reduction in affective pain was greater in the 1% lavender group (P < 0.001) and the 1% linalool group (P = 0.007) than in the control group. Decreases in pain severity and intensity were significantly greater in all three intervention groups than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhalation of lavender oil and its major volatile components effectively reduced the quality, severity, and intensity of postherpetic pain, suggesting that lavender oil, linalool, and linalyl acetate may each be an effective intervention for reducing pain in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered on the Clinical Research Information Service.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

KCT0007772, first registration 06/10/2022.

IUPHAR themed review: Opioid efficacy, bias, and selectivity

Drugs acting at the opioid receptor family are clinically used to treat chronic and acute pain, though they represent the second line of treatment behind GABA analogs, antidepressants and SSRI's. Within the opioid family mu and kappa opioid receptor are commonly targeted. However, activation of the mu opioid receptor has side effects of constipation, tolerance, dependence, euphoria, and respiratory depression; activation of the kappa opioid receptor leads to dysphoria and sedation. The side effects of mu opioid receptor activation have led to mu receptor drugs being widely abused with great overdose risk. For these reasons, newer safer opioid analgesics are in high demand. For many years a focus within the opioid field was finding drugs that activated the G protein pathway at mu opioid receptor, without activating the β-arrestin pathway, known as biased agonism. Recent advances have shown that this may not be the way forward to develop safer analgesics at mu opioid receptor, though there is still some promise at the kappa opioid receptor. Here we discuss recent novel approaches to develop safer opioid drugs including efficacy vs bias and fine-tuning receptor activation by targeting sub-pockets in the orthosteric site, we explore recent works on the structural basis of bias, and we put forward the suggestion that Gα subtype selectivity may be an exciting new area of interest.

IUPHAR Review - Bivalent and bifunctional opioid receptor ligands as novel analgesics

Though efficacious in managing chronic, severe pain, opioid analgesics are accompanied by significant adverse effects including constipation, tolerance, dependence, and respiratory depression. The life-threatening risks associated with µ opioid receptor agonist-based analgesics challenges their use in clinic. A rational approach to combatting these adverse effects is to develop agents that incorporate activity at a second pharmacologic target in addition to µ opioid receptor activation. The promise of such bivalent or bifunctional ligands is the development of an analgesic with an improved side effect profile. In this review, we highlight ongoing efforts in the development of bivalent and bifunctional analgesics that combine µ agonism with efficacy at κ and δ opioid receptors, the nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor, σ receptors, and cannabinoid receptors. Several examples of bifunctional analgesics in preclinical and clinical development are highlighted, as are strategies being employed toward the rational design of novel agents.

Reanalysis of a μ opioid receptor crystal structure reveals a covalent adduct with BU72

BACKGROUND

The first crystal structure of the active μ opioid receptor (μOR) exhibited several unexplained features. The ligand BU72 exhibited many extreme deviations from ideal geometry, along with unexplained electron density. I previously showed that inverting the benzylic configuration resolved these problems, establishing revised stereochemistry of BU72 and its analog BU74. However, another problem remains unresolved: additional unexplained electron density contacts both BU72 and a histidine residue in the N-terminus, revealing the presence of an as-yet unidentified atom.

RESULTS

These short contacts and uninterrupted density are inconsistent with non-covalent interactions. Therefore, BU72 and μOR form a covalent adduct, rather than representing two separate entities as in the original model. A subsequently proposed magnesium complex is inconsistent with multiple lines of evidence. However, oxygen fits the unexplained density well. While the structure I propose is tentative, similar adducts have been reported previously in the presence of reactive oxygen species. Moreover, known sources of reactive oxygen species were present: HEPES buffer, nickel ions, and a sequence motif that forms redox-active nickel complexes. This motif contacts the unexplained density. The adduct exhibits severe strain, and the tethered N-terminus forms contacts with adjacent residues. These forces, along with the nanobody used as a G protein substitute, would be expected to influence the receptor conformation. Consistent with this, the intracellular end of the structure differs markedly from subsequent structures of active μOR bound to Gi protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Later Gi-bound structures are likely to be more accurate templates for ligand docking and modelling of active G protein-bound μOR. The possibility of reactions like this should be considered in the choice of protein truncation sites and purification conditions, and in the interpretation of excess or unexplained density.

A stepwise activation model for the insulin receptor

The binding of insulin to the insulin receptor (IR) triggers a cascade of receptor conformational changes and autophosphorylation, leading to the activation of metabolic and mitogenic pathways. Recent advances in the structural and functional analyses of IR have revealed the conformations of the extracellular domains of the IR in inactive and fully activated states. However, the early activation mechanisms of this receptor remain poorly understood. The structures of partially activated IR in complex with aptamers provide clues for understanding the initial activation mechanism. In this review, we discuss the structural and functional features of IR complexed with various ligands and propose a model to explain the sequential activation mechanism. Moreover, we discuss the structures of IR complexed with biased agonists that selectively activate metabolic pathways and provide insights into the design of selective agonists and their clinical implications.

Carfentanil is a β-arrestin-biased agonist at the μ opioid receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The illicit use of fentanyl-like drugs (fentanyls), which are μ opioid receptor agonists, and the many overdose deaths that result, has become a major problem. Fentanyls are very potent in vivo, leading to respiratory depression and death. However, the efficacy and possible signalling bias of different fentanyls is not clearly known. Here, we compared the relative efficacy and bias of a series of fentanyls.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

For agonist signalling bias and efficacy measurements, Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer experiments were undertaken in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with μ opioid receptors, to assess Gi protein activation and β-arrestin 2 recruitment. Agonist-induced cell surface receptor loss was assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, whilst agonist-induced G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel current activation was measured electrophysiologically from rat locus coeruleus slices. Ligand poses in the μ opioid receptor were determined in silico using molecular dynamics simulations.

KEY RESULTS

Relative to the reference ligand DAMGO, carfentanil was β-arrestin-biased, whereas fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil did not display bias. Carfentanil induced potent and extensive cell surface receptor loss, whilst the marked desensitisation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel currents in the continued presence of carfentanil in neurones was prevented by a GRK2/3 inhibitor. Molecular dynamics simulations suggested unique interactions of carfentanil with the orthosteric site of the receptor that could underlie the bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Carfentanil is a β-arrestin-biased opioid drug at the μ receptor. It is uncertain how such bias influences in vivo effects of carfentanil relative to other fentanyls.

β-Arrestins: Structure, Function, Physiology, and Pharmacological Perspectives

The two β-arrestins, β-arrestin-1 and -2 (systematic names: arrestin-2 and -3, respectively), are multifunctional intracellular proteins that regulate the activity of a very large number of cellular signaling pathways and physiologic functions. The two proteins were discovered for their ability to disrupt signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via binding to the activated receptors. However, it is now well recognized that both β-arrestins can also act as direct modulators of numerous cellular processes via either GPCR-dependent or -independent mechanisms. Recent structural, biophysical, and biochemical studies have provided novel insights into how β-arrestins bind to activated GPCRs and downstream effector proteins. Studies with β-arrestin mutant mice have identified numerous physiologic and pathophysiological processes regulated by β-arrestin-1 and/or -2. Following a short summary of recent structural studies, this review primarily focuses on β-arrestin-regulated physiologic functions, with particular focus on the central nervous system and the roles of β-arrestins in carcinogenesis and key metabolic processes including the maintenance of glucose and energy homeostasis. This review also highlights potential therapeutic implications of these studies and discusses strategies that could prove useful for targeting specific β-arrestin-regulated signaling pathways for therapeutic purposes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The two β-arrestins, structurally closely related intracellular proteins that are evolutionarily highly conserved, have emerged as multifunctional proteins able to regulate a vast array of cellular and physiological functions. The outcome of studies with β-arrestin mutant mice and cultured cells, complemented by novel insights into β-arrestin structure and function, should pave the way for the development of novel classes of therapeutically useful drugs capable of regulating specific β-arrestin functions.

Involvement of the Opioid Peptide Family in Cancer Progression

Peptides mediate cancer progression favoring the mitogenesis, migration, and invasion of tumor cells, promoting metastasis and anti-apoptotic mechanisms, and facilitating angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis. Tumor cells overexpress peptide receptors, crucial targets for developing specific treatments against cancer cells using peptide receptor antagonists and promoting apoptosis in tumor cells. Opioids exert an antitumoral effect, whereas others promote tumor growth and metastasis. This review updates the findings regarding the involvement of opioid peptides (enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins) in cancer development. Anticancer therapeutic strategies targeting the opioid peptidergic system and the main research lines to be developed regarding the topic reviewed are suggested. There is much to investigate about opioid peptides and cancer: basic information is scarce, incomplete, or absent in many tumors. This knowledge is crucial since promising anticancer strategies could be developed alone or in combination therapies with chemotherapy/radiotherapy.

A MOR Antagonist with High Potency and Antagonist Efficacy among Diastereomeric C9-Alkyl-Substituted N-Phenethyl-5-(3-hydroxy)phenylmorphans

The 5-(3-hydroxy)phenylmorphan structural class of compounds are unlike the classical morphinans, 4,5-epoxymorphinans, and 6,7-benzomorphans, in that they have an equatorially oriented aromatic ring rather than the axial orientation of that ring found in the classical opioids. This modified and simplified opioid-like structure has been shown to retain antinociceptive activity, depending on its stereochemistry and substituents, and some of them have been found to be much more potent than morphine. A simple C9-hydroxy-5-(3-hydroxy)phenylmorphan enantiomer was found to be about 500 times more potent than morphine in vivo. We have previously examined C9-alkenyl and hydroxyalkyl substituents in the N-phenethyl-5-(3-hydroxy)phenylmorphan class of compounds. Comparable C9-alkyl (methyl through butyl) substituents, with their sets of diastereomers, have not been explored. All these compounds have now been synthesized to determine the effect chain-length and stereochemistry at the C9 position in the molecule might have on their interaction with opioid receptors. We now report the synthesis and in vitro activity of 16 compounds, the C9-methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl diastereomers, using the inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation assay. Several potent (sub-nanomolar and nanomolar) MOR compounds were found to be selective agonists with varying efficacy. Of greatest interest, a selective MOR antagonist was discovered; it did not display any DOR or KOR agonist activity in vitro, was three times more potent than naltrexone, and was found to antagonize the EC90 of fentanyl at MOR to a greater extent than naltrexone.

β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and debilitating complication, especially amongst high risk procedures, such as orthopedic surgery. This kind of neurocognitive disorder negatively affects cognitive domains, such as memory, awareness, attention, and concentration after surgery; however, its pathophysiology remains unknown. Multiple lines of evidence supporting the occurrence of inflammatory events have come forward from studies in human patients' brain and bio-fluids (CSF and serum), as well as in animal models for POD. β-arrestins are downstream molecules of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs). As versatile proteins, they regulate numerous pathophysiological processes of inflammatory diseases by scaffolding with inflammation-linked partners. Here we report that β-arrestin1, one type of β-arrestins, decreases significantly in the reactive astrocytes of a mouse model for POD. Using β-arrestin1 knockout (KO) mice, we find aggravating effect of β-arrestin1 deficiency on the cognitive dysfunctions and inflammatory phenotype of astrocytes in POD model mice. We conduct the in vitro experiments to investigate the regulatory roles of β-arrestin1 and demonstrate that β-arrestin1 in astrocytes interacts with the dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) to regulate mitochondrial fusion/fission process. β-arrestin1 deletion cancels the combination of β-arrestin1 and cellular Drp1, thus promoting the translocation of Drp1 to mitochondrial membrane to provoke the mitochondrial fragments and the subsequent mitochondrial malfunctions. Using β-arrestin1-biased agonist, cognitive dysfunctions of POD mice and pathogenic activation of astrocytes in the POD-linked brain region are reduced. We, therefore, conclude that β-arrestin1 is a promising target for the understanding of POD pathology and development of POD therapeutics.