Responses of gut and pancreatic hormones, bile acids, and fibroblast growth factor-21 differ to glucose, protein, and fat ingestion after gastric bypass surgery

Effect of a 6-Week Carbohydrate-Reduced High-Protein Diet on Levels of FGF21 and GDF15 in People With Type 2 Diabetes

Context

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) are increased in type 2 diabetes and are potential regulators of metabolism. The effect of changes in caloric intake and macronutrient composition on their circulating levels in patients with type 2 diabetes are unknown.

Objective

To explore the effects of a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet with and without a clinically significant weight loss on circulating levels of FGF21 and GDF15 in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We measured circulating FGF21 and GDF15 in patients with type 2 diabetes who completed 2 previously published diet interventions. Study 1 randomized 28 subjects to an isocaloric diet in a 6 + 6-week crossover trial consisting of, in random order, a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein (CRHP) or a conventional diabetes (CD) diet. Study 2 randomized 72 subjects to a 6-week hypocaloric diet aiming at a ∼6% weight loss induced by either a CRHP or a CD diet. Fasting plasma FGF21 and GDF15 were measured before and after the interventions in a subset of samples (n = 24 in study 1, n = 66 in study 2).

Results

Plasma levels of FGF21 were reduced by 54% in the isocaloric study (P < .05) and 18% in the hypocaloric study (P < .05) in CRHP-treated individuals only. Circulating GDF15 levels increased by 18% (P < .05) following weight loss in combination with a CRHP diet but only in those treated with metformin.

Conclusion

The CRHP diet significantly reduced FGF21 in people with type 2 diabetes independent of weight loss, supporting the role of FGF21 as a "nutrient sensor." Combining metformin treatment with carbohydrate restriction and weight loss may provide additional metabolic improvements due to the rise in circulating GDF15.

GLP-1 enhances beta-cell response to protein ingestion and bariatric surgery amplifies it

OBJECTIVE

Protein ingestion stimulates β-cell secretion and alters glucose flux. Enhanced action of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and increased plasma glucose excursion contribute to prandial hyperinsulinemia after gastric bypass surgery (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We examined the contribution of endogenous GLP-1 to glucose kinetics and β-cell response to protein ingestion under basal glucose concentrations in humans, and whether these responses are affected by rerouted gut after GB or SG.

DESIGN

Glucose fluxes, insulin secretion rate (ISR), and incretin responses to a 50-gram oral protein load were compared between 10 non-diabetic individuals with GB, 9 matched subjects with SG and 7 non-operated controls (CN) with and without intravenous infusion of exendin-(9- 39) [Ex-9), a specific GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) antagonist.

RESULTS

Blocking GLP-1R increased the plasma glucose concentration before and after protein ingestion in all 3 groups (p<0.05) and decreased β-cell sensitivity to glucose in the first 30 minutes of protein ingestion (p<0.05). Reduction in the prandial ISR3h by Ex-9 infusion, however, only was observed in GB and SG (p<0.05 for interaction) and not in controls. Also, GLP-1R blockade increased post-protein insulin action in GB and SG, but not CN (p=0.09 for interaction). Endogenous glucose production (EGP) during the first 60 minutes after protein ingestion was increased in all 3 groups but EGP3h only was accentuated in GB by Ex-9 infusion (p<0.05 for interaction).

CONCLUSION

These findings are consistent with both a pancreatic and extrapancreatic role for GLP-1 during protein ingestion in humans, and GLP-1 actions are exaggerated by bariatric surgery.

Endogenous glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 as alternative for GLP-1 receptor agonists: Could this work and how?

In recent years, we have witnessed the many beneficial effects of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists, including the reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the reduction of body weight in those with obesity. Increasing evidence suggests that these agents differ considerably from endogenous GLP-1 when it comes to their routes of action, although their clinical effects appear to be the same. Given the limitations of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, could it be useful to develop agents which stimulate GLP-1 release? Here we will discuss the differences and similarities between GLP-1 receptor agonists and endogenous GLP-1, and will detail how endogenous GLP-1-when stimulated appropriately-could have clinically relevant effects.

Post-prandial secretion of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) after carbohydrate-, fat- or protein enriched meals in healthy subjects

Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) is an important regulator of intestinal growth and function. In adherable mixed meals the macronutrient composition with the best potential for stimulating GLP-2 secretion is not known. We compared the effect of 3 iso-energetic meals, where approximately 60 % of the energy ratio was provided as either carbohydrate, fat, or protein, respectively, on the post-prandial endogenous GLP-2 secretion. The responses were compared to secretion profiles of peptide YY (PYY), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). Ten healthy subjects were admitted on three occasions, at least a week apart, after a night of fasting. In an open-label, crossover design, they were randomized to receive a high carbohydrate (HC), high fat (HF) or high protein (HP) meal. The meals were approximately ∼3.9 MJ. Venous blood was collected for 240 min, and plasma concentrations of GLP-2, GIP and PYY were measured with specific radioimmunoassays. Mean GLP-2 levels peaked already at 30 min for the HC meal, however the HP meal induced the highest mean GLP-2 peaking levels, resulting in significantly higher mean GLP-2 area under the curve (AUC) from baseline of 7279 pmol*min/L, 95 %-CI [6081;8477] compared to the HC meal: 4764 pmol*min/L, 95 %-CI [3498;6029], p = 0.020 and the HF meal: 4796 pmol*min/L, [3385;6207], p = 0.011. Findings were similar for the PYY. The HC meal provided a greater AUC for GIP compared to the HP- and HF meals. The HP meal was most effective with respect to stimulation of the postprandial GLP-2 and PYY secretion, whereas the HC meal was more effective for GIP.

Testing for Protein Leverage in Patients with Gastric Bypass: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Protein leverage (PL) is the phenomenon whereby a dominant appetite for protein drives overconsumption of energy with a decline in the ratio of protein to fat and carbohydrate in the diet. PL has been independently verified in several randomized control trials, and its predictions are supported by diet surveillance data. Our aim in the present study was to test whether surgical intervention through gastric bypass will ameliorate the PL effect.

METHODS

Ten patients with gastric bypass (2-5 years postsurgical time) were given ad libitum access to study food comprising 10%, 15%, or 25% protein and no access to other foods for 3 days while controlling food palatability and variety. Food intake was measured, and energy and nutrient intakes were calculated. Body weight, blood chemistry, lipid profile, hormones (insulin, leptin, and ghrelin), and creatinine were determined before and after each experimental period.

RESULTS

The gastric bypass patients in our study did not show evidence for protein intake regulation as predicted under PL but ate to constant total energy intake on the 10%, 15%, and 25% protein diets with protein intake varying significantly. Patients lost weight in the three study periods, but significant weight loss was observed only on the 15% protein diet.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that gastric bypass might disengage the PL mechanism, thus ameliorating an appetite-specific mechanism that drives energy overconsumption in modern food environments.

Postprandial secretion of follistatin after gastric bypass surgery and sleeve gastrectomy

Follistatin is secreted from the liver and may regulate muscle growth and insulin sensitivity. Protein intake stimulates follistatin secretion, which may be mediated by increased glucagon in the context of low insulin concentrations. We investigated circulating follistatin after mixed-meals in two cohorts of patients who were part of previously published studies and had undergone bariatric surgery with either simultaneous assessment of amino acid absorption or administration of the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin-(9-39), which increased glucagon concentrations and impaired insulin secretion. Study 1 comprised obese matched subjects with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery and unoperated controls who underwent 6-hour mixed-meal tests with intravenous and oral tracers including intrinsically labelled caseinate in the meal. Study 2 comprised obese subjects with previous RYGB who underwent two 5-hour mixed-meal tests with concomitant exendin-(9-39) or saline infusion. In study 1, the secretion of follistatin as well as the amino acid absorption was accelerated after RYGB compared with SG and controls, but the glucagon-to-C-peptide ratios did not differ between the groups. In study 2, exendin-(9-39) administration increased postprandial glucagon concentrations and lowered insulin secretion, whereas the concentration of follistatin was unchanged. In conclusion, postprandial follistatin secretion is accelerated in patients after RYGB which might be explained by an accelerated protein absorption rate rather than the glucagon-to-insulin ratio.

The Importance of Endogenously Secreted GLP-1 and GIP for Postprandial Glucose Tolerance and β-Cell Function After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery

Enhanced secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) seems to be essential for improved postprandial β-cell function after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) but is less studied after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Moreover, the role of the other major incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is relatively unexplored after bariatric surgery. We studied the effects of separate and combined GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and GIP receptor (GIPR) blockade during mixed-meal tests in unoperated (CON), SG-operated, and RYGB-operated people with no history of diabetes. Postprandial GLP-1 concentrations were highest after RYGB but also higher after SG compared with CON. In contrast, postprandial GIP concentrations were lowest after RYGB. The effect of GLP-1R versus GIPR blockade differed between groups. GLP-1R blockade reduced β-cell glucose sensitivity and increased or tended to increase postprandial glucose responses in the surgical groups but had no effect in CON. GIPR blockade reduced β-cell glucose sensitivity and increased or tended to increase postprandial glucose responses in the CON and SG groups but had no effect in the RYGB group. Our results support that GIP is the most important incretin hormone in unoperated people, whereas GLP-1 and GIP are equally important after SG, and GLP-1 is the most important incretin hormone after RYGB.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in people with versus without type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the study findings on whether GLP-1 secretion in response to a meal tolerance test is affected by the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The influence of putative moderators such as age, sex, meal type, meal form, and assay type were also explored.

METHODS

A literature search identified 32 relevant studies. The sample mean and SD for fasting GLP-1TOTAL and GLP-1TOTAL iAUC were extracted and used to calculate between-group standardised mean differences (SMD), which were meta-analysed using a random-effects model to derive pooled estimates of Hedges' g and 95 % prediction intervals (PI).

RESULTS

Pooled across 18 studies, the overall SMD in GLP-1TOTAL iAUC between individuals with T2D (n = 270, 1047 ± 930 pmol·L-1·min) and individuals without T2D (n = 402, 1204 ± 937 pmol·L-1·min) was very small, not statistically significant and heterogenous across studies (g = -0.15, p = 0.43, PI: -1.53, 1.23). Subgroup analyses demonstrated an effect of assay type whereby Hedges' g for GLP-1 iAUC was greater in individuals with, versus those without T2D when using ELISA or Mesoscale (g = 0.67 [moderate], p = 0.009), but not when using RIA (g = -0.30 [small], p = 0.10). Pooled across 30 studies, the SMD in fasting GLP-1TOTAL between individuals with T2D (n = 580, 16.2 ± 6.9 pmol·L-1) versus individuals without T2D (n = 1363, 12.4 ± 5.7 pmol·L-1) was small and heterogenous between studies (g = 0.24, p = 0.21, PI: -1.55, 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in fasting GLP-1TOTAL and GLP-1TOTAL iAUC between individuals with, versus those without T2D were generally small and inconsistent between studies. Factors influencing study heterogeneity such as small sample sizes and poor matching of groups may help to explain the wide prediction intervals observed. Considerations to improve comparisons of GLP-1 secretion in T2D and potential mediating factors more important than T2D diagnosis per se are outlined.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42020195612.

Weight loss by calorie restriction does not alter appetite-regulating gut hormone responses from perfused rat small intestine

AIM

Postprandial secretion of the appetite-inhibiting hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and peptide YY are reduced with obesity. It is unclear if the reduced secretion persists following weight loss (WL), if other appetite-inhibiting hormones are also reduced, and if so whether reduced secretion results from intrinsic changes in the gut.

METHODS

To address whether WL may restore secretion of GLP-1 and other appetite-inhibiting hormones, we performed a gut perfusion study of the small intestine in diet-induced obese (DIO) rats after WL. A 20% weight loss (means ± SEM (g): 916 ± 53 vs. 703 ± 35, p < 0.01, n = 7) was induced by calorie restriction, and maintained stable for ≥7 days prior to gut perfusion to allow for complete renewal of enteroendocrine cells. Age-matched DIO rats were used as comparator. Several gut hormones were analyzed from the venous effluent, and gene expression was performed on gut tissue along the entire length of the intestine.

RESULTS

Secretion of cholecystokinin, gastrin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, GLP-1, neurotensin, and somatostatin was not affected by WL during basal conditions (p ≥ 0.25) or in response to macronutrients and bile acids (p ≥ 0.14). Glucose absorption was indistinguishable following WL. The expression of genes encoding the studied peptides, macronutrient transporters (glucose, fructose, and di-/tripeptides) and bile acid receptors did also not differ between DIO and WL groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the attenuated postprandial responses of GLP-1, as well as reduced responses of other appetite-inhibiting gut hormones, in people living with obesity may persist after weight loss and may contribute to their susceptibility for weight regain.

Effect of Meal Texture on Postprandial Glucose Excursions and Gut Hormones After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background and aims

The metabolic consequences after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are often studied using a liquid mixed meal. However, liquid meals may not be representative of the patients’ everyday diet. We therefore examined postprandial glucose and gut hormone responses using mixed meals differing only with respect to meal texture.

Methods

Twelve RYGB-operated, 12 SG-operated, and 12 unoperated individuals (controls) were enrolled in the study. Participants were matched on age, sex, and body mass index. In randomized order, each participant underwent a liquid and a solid 4-h mixed meal test on separate days. The meals were isocaloric (309 kcal), and with identical macronutrient composition (47 E% carbohydrate, 18 E% protein, 32 E% fat, and 3 E% dietary fibers). The liquid meal was blended to create a smooth liquid texture while the other meal retained its solid components.

Results

Postprandial glucose concentrations (peak and incremental area under curve, iAUC) did not differ between the two meal textures in any group. In the control group, peak C-peptide was higher after the liquid meal compared with the solid meal (p = 0.04), whereas iAUCs of C-peptide were similar between the two meals in all groups. Peak of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was higher after the liquid meal compared with the solid meal in RYGB- and SG-operated individuals (RYGB p = 0.02; SG p &lt; 0.01), but iAUC of GLP-1 did not differ between meal textures within any group. Peak of glucose-dependent insulin tropic polypeptide (GIP) was higher after the liquid meal in the SG and control groups (SG p = 0.02; controls p &lt; 0.01), but iAUCs of GIP were equal between meals. There were no differences in total AUC of ghrelin between the liquid and solid meals within any of the groups.

Conclusion

A liquid and a solid meal with identical macronutrient composition result in similar postprandial glucose responses, both in operated and unoperated individuals. Small differences were observed for the postprandial peaks of C-peptide, GLP-1, and GIP concentrations. Overall, a liquid meal is suitable for evaluating glucose tolerance, β-cell function, and gut hormones responses, both after RYGB and SG and in unoperated individuals.

Clinical Trial Registration

[www.clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT04082923].

Early effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on dietary fatty acid absorption and metabolism in people with obesity and normal glucose tolerance

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery markedly increases the rate of intestinal nutrient exposure after food intake, accelerates intestinal absorption of dietary glucose and protein, and alters the postprandial gut hormone response. However, our understanding of postprandial fat absorption and metabolism after RYGB is incomplete.

METHODS

Stable palmitate tracers were administered intravenously (K-[2,2-²H₂]palmitate) and orally with a mixed meal ([U-¹³C₁₆]palmitate) to study fatty acid absorption and metabolism before and 3 months after RYGB in 10 participants with obesity and normal glucose tolerance.

RESULTS

There was a tendency toward reduced fasting plasma nonesterified palmitate concentrations after RYGB, but neither fasting palmitate kinetics nor fasting triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations changed compared with before surgery. Postprandial TAG concentrations were numerically, but nonsignificantly, reduced 3-4 h after meal intake after compared with before RYGB. However, the postprandial appearance of the oral palmitate tracer in the plasma TAG pool and overflow into the nonesterified palmitate pool were initially faster but overall reduced after RYGB by 50% (median, IQR: [47;64], P = 0.004) and 46% (median, IQR: [33;70], P = 0.041), respectively. The maximal postprandial suppression of plasma nonesterified palmitate concentrations was slightly greater but shorter lasting after RYGB ('time × visit' interaction: P < 0.001), without detectable effects of surgery on the rate of appearance and disappearance of plasma palmitate.

CONCLUSION

RYGB resulted in an initially accelerated but overall ~50% reduced 4-h postprandial systemic appearance of dietary palmitate in participants with obesity and normal glucose tolerance. This is likely a result of faster but incomplete intestinal fat absorption combined with enhanced chylomicron-TAG clearance, but it needs further investigation in studies specifically designed to investigate these mechanisms.

Inhibitory Effects of Jakyakgamcho-Tang (Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Paeonia lactiflora) on the Pacemaker Potential of the Interstitial Cells of Cajal in the Murine Small Intestine

Jakyakgamcho-tang (JYGCT) has been used to treat various diseases. The interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) regulate gastrointestinal (GI) motility as pacemaker cells. Here, we examined the effects of JYGCT on the pacemaker potential of the ICC in the small intestine. We observed that JYGCT inhibited the pacemaker potential in a dose-dependent manner. Glibenclamide did not affect the pacemaker potential and on these conditions, JYGCT also had no effect on the pacemaker potential. Pretreatment with capsazepine or SB452533 blocked the JYGCT-induced effects. In the presence of SQ-22536, JYGCT did not inhibit the pacemaker potential. Additionally, JYGCT inhibited spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and JYGCT-induced ITR increase was associated with TMEM16A, motilin and substance P activation. Moreover, JYGCT was effective in alleviating the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Our results suggest that JYGCT inhibited the pacemaker potential of the ICC via KATP, the TRPV1 or the cyclic AMP pathway, and intracellular Ca2+ regulation, indicating that JYGCT can affect ICC and thus have the function of regulating GI motility. Therefore, JYGCT may be used as a GI motility disorder regulator or disease prevention agent.

Nutrients handling after bariatric surgery, the role of gastrointestinal adaptation

Bariatric surgery determines a rearrangement of the gastrointestinal tract that influences nutrient handling and plays a role in the metabolic changes observed after surgery. Most of the changes depend on the accelerated gastric emptying observed in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and, to a lesser extent, in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The rapid delivery of meal into the jejunum, particularly after RYGB, contributes to the prompt appearance of glucose in peripheral circulation. Glucose increase is the principal determinant of GLP-1 increase with the consequent stimulation of insulin secretion, the latter balanced by a paradoxical glucagon increase that stimulates EGP to prevent hypoglycaemia. Protein digestion and amino acid absorption appear accelerated after RYGB but not after SG. After RYGB, the adaptation of the gut to the new condition participates to the metabolic change. The intestinal transit is delayed, the gut microbioma is changed, the epithelium becomes hypertrophic and increases the expression of glucose transporter and of the number of cell secreting hormones. These changes are not observed after SG. After RYGB-less after SG-bile acids (BA) increase, influencing glucose metabolism probably modulating FXR and TGR5 with an effect on insulin sensitivity. Muscle, hepatic and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity improve, and the gut reinforces the recovery of IS by enhancing glucose uptake and through the effect of the BA. The intestinal changes observed after RYGB result in a light malabsorption of lipid but not of carbohydrate and protein. In conclusion, functional and morphological adaptations of the gut after RYGB and SG activate inter-organs cross-talk that modulates the metabolic changes observed after surgery.Level of evidence Level V, narrative literature review.

Postprandial Dynamics of Proglucagon Cleavage Products and Their Relation to Metabolic Health

INTRODUCTION

While oral glucose ingestion typically leads to a decrease in circulating glucagon levels, a substantial number of persons display stable or rising glucagon concentrations when assessed by radioimmunoassay (RIA). However, these assays show cross-reactivity to other proglucagon cleavage products. Recently, more specific assays became available, therefore we systematically assessed glucagon and other proglucagon cleavage products and their relation to metabolic health.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used samples from 52 oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) that were randomly selected from persons with different categories of glucose tolerance in an extensively phenotyped study cohort.

RESULTS

Glucagon concentrations quantified with RIA were non-suppressed at 2 hours of the OGTT in 36% of the samples. Non-suppressors showed lower fasting glucagon levels compared to suppressors (p=0.011). Similar to RIA measurements, ELISA-derived fasting glucagon was lower in non-suppressors (p<0.001). Glucagon 1-61 as well as glicentin and GLP-1 kinetics were significantly different between suppressors and non-suppressors (p=0.004, p=0.002, p=0.008 respectively) with higher concentrations of all three hormones in non-suppressors. Levels of insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acids were comparable between groups. Non-suppressors were leaner and had lower plasma glucose concentrations (p=0.03 and p=0.047, respectively). Despite comparable liver fat content and insulin sensitivity (p≥0.3), they had lower 2-hour post-challenge glucose (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucagon 1-61, glicentin and GLP-1 partially account for RIA-derived glucagon measurements due to cross-reactivity of the assay. However, this contribution is small, since the investigated proglucagon cleavage products contribute less than 10% to the variation in RIA measured glucagon. Altered glucagon levels and higher post-challenge incretins are associated with a healthier metabolic phenotype.

On measurements of glucagon secretion in healthy, obese, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operated individuals using sandwich ELISA

Glucagon is a key regulator of metabolism and is used in the diagnostic of neuroendocrine tumors. Accurate measurement of glucagon requires both extreme sensitivity and specificity since several peptides are derived from the same proglucagon precursor encoding part of the glucagon sequence and given that glucagon circulates in picomolar concentrations. A sandwich ELISA was recently developed and extensively evaluated; however, this method may not be accurate when measuring glucagon in patients with an enhanced production of proglucagon-derived peptides as seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). To overcome this, a modified version of the ELISA was developed. In this study, we evaluate an unmodified and a modified version of the ELISA in healthy individuals, individuals with obesity, and finally in two cohorts of patients following RYGB surgery using different nutrient stimuli to assess glucagon dynamics. Finally, in vitro spike-in recoveries using native glucagon and proglucagon-derived peptides were performed in buffer and in plasma. Our data support that both versions of the ELISA accurately capture endogenous and exogenous glucagon in healthy individuals and in individuals with obesity. However, the unmodified version of the assay may overestimate glucagon levels in patients following RYGB in line with minimal but consistent cross-reactivity to oxyntomodulin and glicentin that both are 50-fold increased after RYGB. Importantly, we did not find any changes between the two protocols at fasted conditions and therefore diagnostics of glucagonomas is not affected by the choice of assay procedure nor the surgical history of the patient (RYGB).

Pleurotus eryngii improves postprandial glycaemia, hunger and fullness perception, and enhances ghrelin suppression in people with metabolically unhealthy obesity

The aim of this study was to examine potential postprandial benefits of Pleurotus eryngii in nineteen volunteers with metabolically unhealthy obesity. An acute, randomized, crossover-designed trial comparing a meal with Pleurotus eryngii and a control meal was performed. The two meals matched in macronutrient and caloric content. Participants consumed both meals in random order after an overnight fast. Blood samples were drawn before and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after meal consumption (in total 266 samples) to determine glucose, insulin, ghrelin, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glicentin. Visual analog scales measuring the subjective perception of hunger and fullness were completed at the same time points. The test meal resulted in lower glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC). Additionally, the iAUC of the ghrelin response over time was substantially lower after the test meal (p = 0.033). Lower desire to eat and higher fullness was reflected by significantly lower hunger iAUC (p = 0.046) and higher fullness iAUC (p = 0.042) after the test meal. No differences in insulin, PYY, GLP-1 and glicentin were observed. Pleurotus eryngii can ameliorate postprandial glycaemia, appetite and regulate ghrelin levels at the postprandial state. This effect is attributed to the bioactive polysaccharides that inhibit the activity of enzymes catalysing carbohydrate hydrolysis, cause a delayed gastric emptying and glucose absorption.

Plasma GDF15 levels are similar between subjects after bariatric surgery and matched controls and are unaffected by meals

Growth differentiating factor 15 (GDF15) is expressed in the intestine and is one of the most recently identified satiety peptides. The mechanisms controlling its secretion are unclear. The present study investigated whether plasma GDF15 concentrations are meal-related and if potential responses depend on macronutrient type or are affected by previous bariatric surgery. The study included 1) volunteers ingesting rapidly vs. slowly digested carbohydrates (sucrose vs. isomaltose; n = 10), 2) volunteers who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery and unoperated matched controls ingesting a liquid mixed meal (n = 9-10 in each group), and 3) individuals with previous RYGB compared with unoperated controls ingesting isocaloric glucose, fat, or protein (n = 6 in each group). Plasma was collected after an overnight fast and up to 6 h after ingestion (≥12 time points). In cohort 1, fasting GDF15 concentrations were ∼480 pg/mL. Concentrations after sucrose or isomaltose intake did not differ from baseline (P = 0.26 to P > 0.99) and total area under the curves (tAUCs were similar between groups (P = 0.77). In cohort 2, fasting GDF15 concentrations were as follows (pg/mL): RYGB = 540 ± 41.4, SG = 477 ± 36.4, and controls = 590 ± 41.8, with no between-group differences (P = 0.73). Concentrations did not increase at any postprandial time point (over all time factor: P = 0.10) and tAUCs were similar between groups (P = 0.73). In cohort 3, fasting plasma GDF15 was similar among the groups (P > 0.99) and neither glucose, fat, nor protein intake consistently increased the concentrations. In conclusion, we find that plasma GDF15 was not stimulated by meal intake and that fasting concentrations did not differ between RYGB-, SG-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls when investigated during the weight stable phase after RYGB and SG.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our combined data show that GDF15 does not increase in response to a liquid meal. Moreover, we show for the first time that ingestion of sucrose, isomaltose, glucose, fat, or protein also does not increase plasma GDF15 concentrations, questioning the role of GDF15 in regulation of food source preference. Finally, we find that neither fasting nor postprandial plasma GDF15 concentrations are increased in individuals with previous bariatric surgery compared with unoperated body mass index (BMI)-matched controls.

Alliances of the gut and bone axis

Gut hormones secreted from enteroendocrine cells following nutrient ingestion modulate metabolic processes including glucose homeostasis and food intake, and several of these gut hormones are involved in the regulation of the energy demanding process of bone remodelling. Here, we review the gut hormones considered or known to be involved in the gut-bone crosstalk and their role in orchestrating adaptions of bone formation and resorption as demonstrated in cellular and physiological experiments and clinical trials. Understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of the gut-bone axis may identify adverse effects of investigational drugs aimed to treat metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and obesity and new therapeutic candidates for the treatment of bone diseases.

Follistatin secretion is enhanced by protein, but not glucose or fat ingestion, in obese persons independently of previous gastric bypass surgery

Follistatin is secreted from the liver and is involved in the regulation of muscle mass and insulin sensitivity via inhibition of activin A in humans. The secretion of follistatin seems to be stimulated by glucagon and inhibited by insulin, but only limited knowledge on the postprandial regulation of follistatin exists. Moreover, results on postoperative changes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are conflicting with reports of increased, unaltered, and lowered fasting concentrations of follistatin. In this study, we investigated postprandial follistatin and activin A concentrations after intake of isocaloric amounts of protein, fat, or glucose in subjects with obesity with and without previous RYGB to explore the regulation of follistatin by the individual macronutrients. Protein intake enhanced follistatin concentrations similarly in the two groups, whereas glucose and fat ingestion did not change postprandial follistatin concentrations. Concentrations of activin A were lower after protein intake compared with glucose intake in RYGB. Glucagon concentrations were also particularly enhanced by protein intake and tended to correlate with follistatin in RYGB. In conclusion, we demonstrated that protein intake, but not glucose or fat, is a strong stimulus for follistatin secretion in subjects with obesity and that this regulation is maintained after RYGB surgery.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Circulating follistatin and activin A were studied after intake of isocaloric protein, fat, or glucose drinks in subjects with obesity with and without previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Protein intake enhanced follistatin similarly in both groups, whereas glucose and fat ingestion did not change follistatin. Activin A was lower after protein compared with glucose in RYGB. The novel finding is that protein intake, but neither glucose nor fat, stimulates follistatin secretion independently of previous RYGB.

An overview of obesity mechanisms in humans: Endocrine regulation of food intake, eating behaviour and common determinants of body weight

Obesity is one of the biggest health challenges of the 21st century, already affecting close to 700 million people worldwide, debilitating and shortening lives and costing billions of pounds in healthcare costs and loss of workability. Body weight homeostasis relies on complex biological mechanisms and the development of obesity occurs on a background of genetic susceptibility and an environment promoting increased caloric intake and reduced physical activity. The pathophysiology of common obesity links neuro-endocrine and metabolic disturbances with behavioural changes, genetics, epigenetics and cultural habits. Also, specific causes of obesity exist, including monogenetic diseases and iatrogenic causes. In this review, we provide an overview of obesity mechanisms in humans with a focus on energy homeostasis, endocrine regulation of food intake and eating behavior, as well as the most common specific causes of obesity.

What Is an L-Cell and How Do We Study the Secretory Mechanisms of the L-Cell?

Synthetic glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues are effective anti-obesity and anti-diabetes drugs. The beneficial actions of GLP-1 go far beyond insulin secretion and appetite, and include cardiovascular benefits and possibly also beneficial effects in neurodegenerative diseases. Considerable reserves of GLP-1 are stored in intestinal endocrine cells that potentially might be mobilized by pharmacological means to improve the body's metabolic state. In recognition of this, the interest in understanding basic L-cell physiology and the mechanisms controlling GLP-1 secretion, has increased considerably. With a view to home in on what an L-cell is, we here present an overview of available data on L-cell development, L-cell peptide expression profiles, peptide production and secretory patterns of L-cells from different parts of the gut. We conclude that L-cells differ markedly depending on their anatomical location, and that the traditional definition of L-cells as a homogeneous population of cells that only produce GLP-1, GLP-2, glicentin and oxyntomodulin is no longer tenable. We suggest to sub-classify L-cells based on their differential peptide contents as well as their differential expression of nutrient sensors, which ultimately determine the secretory responses to different stimuli. A second purpose of this review is to describe and discuss the most frequently used experimental models for functional L-cell studies, highlighting their benefits and limitations. We conclude that no experimental model is perfect and that a comprehensive understanding must be built on results from a combination of models.

Enteroendocrine Hormone Secretion and Metabolic Control: Importance of the Region of the Gut Stimulation

It is now widely appreciated that gastrointestinal function is central to the regulation of metabolic homeostasis. Following meal ingestion, the delivery of nutrients from the stomach into the small intestine (i.e., gastric emptying) is tightly controlled to optimise their subsequent digestion and absorption. The complex interaction of intraluminal nutrients (and other bioactive compounds, such as bile acids) with the small and large intestine induces the release of an array of gastrointestinal hormones from specialised enteroendocrine cells (EECs) distributed in various regions of the gut, which in turn to regulate gastric emptying, appetite and postprandial glucose metabolism. Stimulation of gastrointestinal hormone secretion, therefore, represents a promising strategy for the management of metabolic disorders, particularly obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). That EECs are distributed distinctively between the proximal and distal gut suggests that the region of the gut exposed to intraluminal stimuli is of major relevance to the secretion profile of gastrointestinal hormones and associated metabolic responses. This review discusses the process of intestinal digestion and absorption and their impacts on the release of gastrointestinal hormones and the regulation of postprandial metabolism, with an emphasis on the differences between the proximal and distal gut, and implications for the management of obesity and T2DM.

The effect of acute dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibition on incretin release and glucose metabolism after gastric bypass surgery

Enhanced meal-related enteroendocrine secretion, particularly of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), contributes to weight-loss and improved glycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Dietary glucose drives GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion postoperatively. Understanding how glucose triggers incretin secretion following RYGB could lead to new treatments of diabetes and obesity. In vitro, incretin release depends on glucose absorption via sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1). We investigated the importance of SGLT1/SGLT2 for enteropancreatic hormone concentrations and glucose metabolism after RYGB in a randomized, controlled, crossover study. Ten RYGB-operated patients ingested 50 g of oral glucose with and without acute pretreatment with 600 mg of the SGLT1/SGLT2-inhibitor canagliflozin. Paracetamol and 3-O-methyl-d-glucopyranose (3-OMG) were added to the glucose drink to evaluate rates of intestinal entry and absorption of glucose, respectively. Blood samples were collected for 4 h. The primary outcome was 4-h plasma GLP-1 (incremental area-under the curve, iAUC). Secondary outcomes included glucose, GIP, insulin, and glucagon. Canagliflozin delayed glucose absorption (time-to-peak 3-OMG: 50 vs. 132 min, P < 0.01) but did not reduce iAUC GLP-1 (6,067 vs. 7,273·min·pmol^-1·L^-1, P = 0.23), although peak GLP-1 concentrations were lowered (-28%, P = 0.03). Canagliflozin reduced GIP (iAUC -28%, P = 0.01; peak concentrations -57%, P < 0.01), insulin, and glucose excursions, whereas plasma glucagon (AUC 3,216 vs. 4,160 min·pmol·L^-1, P = 0.02) and amino acids were increased. In conclusion, acute SGLT1/SGLT2-inhibition during glucose ingestion did not reduce 4-h plasma GLP-1 responses in RYGB-patients but attenuated the early rise in GLP-1, GIP, and insulin, whereas late glucagon concentrations were increased. The results suggest that SGLT1-mediated glucose absorption contributes to incretin hormone secretion after RYGB.