Effect of thromboxane A2 blockade on clinical outcome and restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty. Multi-Hospital Eastern Atlantic Restenosis Trial (M-HEART II)

High on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) and the subsequent risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with predominantly drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND

The association between HAPR and subsequent risk of restenosis after PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 4839 patients undergoing PCI (02/2007-12/2011) in the setting of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) registry. Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry using the multi-plate analyzer immediately before PCI and after intravenous administration of aspirin (500 mg). The primary outcome was clinical restenosis, defined as target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

The upper quintile cut-off of platelet reactivity measurements (191 AU × min) was used to categorize patients into a group with HAPR (platelet reactivity > 191 AU × min; n = 952) and a group without HAPR (platelet reactivity ≤ 191 AU × min; n = 3887). The primary outcome occurred in 94 patients in the HAPR group and 405 patients without HAPR (cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.4%; HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.77-1.19; P = 0.70). Follow-up angiography was performed in 73.2% of patients. There was no difference in binary restenosis (15.2% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.79) or late lumen loss (0.32 ± 0.57 vs. 0.32 ± 0.59 mm; P = 0.93) between patients with HAPR versus those without HAPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an association between HAPR, measured at the time of PCI, and clinical restenosis at 1 year after PCI.

Bioactive lipid regulation of platelet function, hemostasis, and thrombosis

Platelets are small, anucleate cells in the blood that play a crucial role in the hemostatic response but are also implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. It is widely appreciated that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) play an integral role in the function and regulation of platelets. PUFAs are substrates for oxygenase enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX) and 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX). These enzymes generate oxidized lipids (oxylipins) that exhibit either pro- or anti-thrombotic effects. Although the effects of certain oxylipins, such as thromboxanes and prostaglandins, have been studied for decades, only one oxylipin has been therapeutically targeted to treat cardiovascular disease. In addition to the well-known oxylipins, newer oxylipins that demonstrate activity in the platelet have been discovered, further highlighting the expansive list of bioactive lipids that can be used to develop novel therapeutics. This review outlines the known oxylipins, their activity in the platelet, and current therapeutics that target oxylipin signaling.

Vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, an update

Arterial occlusive disease is the leading cause of death in Western countries. Core contemporary therapies for this disease include angioplasties, stents, endarterectomies and bypass surgery. However, these treatments suffer from high failure rates due to re-occlusive vascular wall adaptations and restenosis. Restenosis following vascular surgery is largely due to intimal hyperplasia. Intimal hyperplasia develops in response to vessel injury, leading to inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cells dedifferentiation, migration, proliferation and secretion of extra-cellular matrix into the vessel's innermost layer or intima. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on the origin and mechanisms underlying the dysregulated proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, and we present the new avenues of research targeting VSMC phenotype and proliferation.

Targeting smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching in vascular disease

Objective

The phenotypic plasticity of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) is central to vessel growth and remodeling, but also contributes to cardiovascular pathologies. New technologies including fate mapping, single cell transcriptomics, and genetic and pharmacologic inhibitors have provided fundamental new insights into the biology of VSMC. The goal of this review is to summarize the mechanisms underlying VSMC phenotypic modulation and how these might be targeted for therapeutic benefit.

Methods

We summarize findings from extensive literature searches to highlight recent discoveries in the mechanisms underlying VSMC phenotypic switching with particular relevance to intimal hyperplasia. PubMed was searched for publications between January 2001 and December 2020. Search terms included VSMCs, restenosis, intimal hyperplasia, phenotypic switching or modulation, and drug-eluting stents. We sought to highlight druggable pathways as well as recent landmark studies in phenotypic modulation.

Results

Lineage tracing methods have determined that a small number of mature VSMCs dedifferentiate to give rise to oligoclonal lesions in intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. In atherosclerosis and aneurysm, single cell transcriptomics reveal a striking diversity of phenotypes that can arise from these VSMCs. Mechanistic studies continue to identify new pathways that influence VSMC phenotypic plasticity. We review the mechanisms by which the current drug-eluting stent agents prevent restenosis and note remaining challenges in peripheral and diabetic revascularization for which new approaches would be beneficial. We summarize findings on new epigenetic (DNA methylation/TET methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, histone deacetylation, bromodomain proteins), transcriptional (Hippo/Yes-associated protein, peroxisome proliferator-activity receptor-gamma, Notch), and β3-integrin-mediated mechanisms that influence VSMC phenotypic modulation. Pharmacologic and genetic targeting of these pathways with agents including ascorbic acid, histone deacetylase or bromodomain inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, and integrin inhibitors suggests potential therapeutic value in the setting of intimal hyperplasia.

Conclusions

Understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie the remarkable plasticity of VSMCs may lead to novel approaches to treat and prevent cardiovascular disease and restenosis.

The Effects of Preoperative Aspirin on Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Systematic Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives

Aspirin plays an important role in the maintenance of graft patency and the prevention of thrombotic event after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, the use of preoperative aspirin is still under debate due to the risk of bleeding.

Methods

From PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis using random effect model was performed.

Results

We performed a systemic meta-analysis of 17 studies (12 randomized controlled studies and 5 non-randomized registries) which compared clinical outcomes of 9,101 patients who underwent CABG with or without preoperative aspirin administration. Preoperative aspirin increased chest tube drainage (weighted mean difference 177.4 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI], 41.3–313.4; p=0.011). However, the risk of re-operation for bleeding was not different between the preoperative aspirin group and the control group (3.2% vs. 2.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.94–1.60; p=0.102). There was no difference in the rates of all-cause mortality (1.6% vs. 1.5%; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.64–1.49; p=0.920) and myocardial infarction (MI) (8.7% vs. 10.4%; OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66–1.04; p=0.102) between patients with and without preoperative aspirin administration.

Conclusions

Although aspirin increased the amount of chest tube drainage, it was not associated with increased risk of re-operation for bleeding. In addition, the risks of early postoperative all-cause mortality and MI were not reduced by using preoperative aspirin.

Effect of systemic long-term, low-dose aspirin on periodontal status and soluble CD14 in gingival crevicular fluid: a case-control study

AIM

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of systemic long-term, low-dose aspirin on the periodontal status and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) concentrations of aspirin-triggered lipoxins (ATL) and soluble CD14 (sCD14).

METHODS

The study group consisted of 45 patients who were on long-term, low-dose aspirin therapy, and the control group included patients not on aspirin therapy. Mean bleeding index, plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were recorded. GCF samples were analyzed for concentrations of ATL, and sCD14 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.

RESULTS

The means of PI, PD, and CAL were higher for the control group compared to the study group. The mean concentration of ATL was significantly higher for the study group (49.13 ± 37.39 ng/mL). The mean concentration of sCD14 was higher in the control group (5.75 ± 3.91 μg/mL). There was a negative correlation in the study group between concentrations of ATL with PD (r = -0.54) and CAL (r = -0.123). There was a positive correlation between sCD14 and CAL (r = 0.047) in the study group. A negative correlation was also observed between concentrations of sCD14 and ATL (r = -0.134) in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate better periodontal status among long-term aspirin users compared to non-aspirin users.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for stable CAD or ACS : Redefining the optimal duration of treatment

The duration and combination of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation, consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is among the most intensely investigated therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular medicine. While initial studies have mainly focused on the efficacy and safety of individual antithrombotic agents, the increased need for a personalized, risk-based approach to define the optimal duration of antithrombotic treatment according to the estimated ischemic and bleeding risk was then recognized. Recent recommendations for the optimal duration of antithrombotic combination therapies following coronary stent implantation in various clinical scenarios have substantially changed. The aim of the present article is to discuss the recent evidence from randomized clinical trials and observational studies with respect to antithrombotic treatment regimens in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We will focus on optimal treatment duration and a personalized approach based on ischemic and bleeding risk assessment.

The role of Hippo/yes-associated protein signalling in vascular remodelling associated with cardiovascular disease

Vascular remodelling is a vital process of a wide range of cardiovascular diseases and represents the altered structure and arrangement of blood vessels. The Hippo pathway controls organ size by regulating cell survival, proliferation and apoptosis. Yes-associated protein (YAP), a transcription coactivator, is a downstream effector of the Hippo pathway. There is growing evidence for the importance of the Hippo/YAP pathway in vascular-remodelling and related cardiovascular diseases. The Hippo/YAP pathway alters extracellular matrix production or degradation and the growth, death and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, which contributes to vascular remodelling in cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary hypertension, atherosclerosis, restenosis, aortic aneurysms and angiogenesis. In this review, we summarize and discuss recent findings about the roles and mechanisms of Hippo/YAP signalling in vascular remodelling and related conditions.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Spotlight on Small Molecules in Cardiovascular Diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.8/issuetoc.

Contemporary Reflections on the Safety of Long-Term Aspirin Treatment for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Aspirin has been the cornerstone of therapy for the secondary prevention treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease since landmark trials were completed in the late 1970s and early 1980s that demonstrated the efficacy of aspirin for reducing the risk of ischemic events. Notwithstanding the consistent benefits demonstrated with aspirin for both acute and chronic cardiovascular disease, there are a number of toxicities associated with aspirin that have been showcased by recent long-term clinical trials that have included an aspirin monotherapy arm. As an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX), aspirin impairs gastric mucosal protective mechanisms. Previous trials have shown that up to 15-20 % of patients developed gastrointestinal symptoms with aspirin monotherapy, and approximately 1 % of patients per year had a clinically significant bleeding event, including 1 in 1000 patients who suffered an intracranial or fatal bleed. These risks have been shown to be compounded for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are also treated with other antithrombotic agents during the acute care/procedural period, as well as for an extended time period afterwards. Given observations of substantial increases in bleeding rates from many prior long-term clinical trials that have evaluated aspirin together with other oral platelet inhibitors or oral anticoagulants, the focus of contemporary research has pivoted towards tailored antithrombotic regimens that attempt to either shorten the duration of exposure to aspirin or replace aspirin with an alternative antithrombotic agent. While these shifts are occurring, the safety profile of aspirin when used for the secondary prevention treatment of patients with established cardiovascular disease deserves further consideration.

Optimal aspirin dose in acute coronary syndromes: an emerging consensus

Numerous clinical trials testing the efficacy of aspirin for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease have been published. We reviewed the literature pertaining to aspirin dose in acute coronary syndrome patients. Clinical trials assessing the comparative efficacy of different doses of aspirin are scarce. This complex antiplatelet therapy landscape makes it difficult to identify the best aspirin dose for optimizing efficacy and minimizing risk of adverse events, while complying with the various guidelines and recommendations. Despite this fact, current evidence suggests that aspirin doses of 75-100 mg/day may offer the optimal benefit:risk ratio in acute coronary syndrome patients.

A comparative study of restenosis rates in bare metal and drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Various studies have been performed throughout the world on the rate of restenosis using bare metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES). The prohibitive costs associated with DES generally dictate the type of stent used, especially in developing countries. Therefore, there was a need for a study to assess the effect of various risk factors on restenosis in BMS and DES in the Indian context. A study was performed in the premier institution of the Indian Armed Forces, the Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India, under the aegis of the Indian Council of Medical Research (New Delhi). The profile of patients in the armed forces is inherently diverse in terms of demography, ethnicity, genetics, etc, which reflects the diverse and varied nature of the population in India.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were included in the present study. Follow-up after stent implantation was scheduled for six to nine months following the procedure to assess symptoms, drug compliance, and treadmill test and coronary angiography results, and to ascertain the incidence of restenosis. However, only 80 patients returned for follow-up and, therefore, the final analysis was based on these patients. They were segregated into BMS (n=41) and DES (n=39) groups. Restenosis occurred in 29 patients (36.3%). Nine of 39 patients with DES (23.1%) and 20 of 41 patients with BMS (48.8%) developed restenosis. There was a statistically significant relationship between restenosis and female sex, clinical presentation before intervention and at the time of follow-up evaluation (unstable angina), hypertension, positive stress test and compliance with medical therapy (P<0.05). No statistically significant relationship was observed between restenosis and age, diabetes, smoking, obesity and diet (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DES appear to reduce the restenosis rate and clinical end points, and appear to be more cost effective than BMS. Patient-related factors (eg, sex, hypertension and unstable angina) are important variables that affect the restenosis rate. Noninvasive stress testing had high positive and negative predictive values. Therefore, based on the present study, noninvasive stress testing is suggested before routine angiography at follow-up, which will reduce the need for repeat coronary angiography.

Aspirin and platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: role in therapy and strategies to overcome resistance

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.

Thromboxane receptors antagonists and/or synthase inhibitors

Atherothrombosis is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in Western countries. Several clinical conditions are characterized by increased incidence of cardiovascular events and enhanced thromboxane (TX)-dependent platelet activation. Enhanced TX generation may be explained by mechanisms relatively insensitive to aspirin. More potent drugs possibly overcoming aspirin efficacy may be desirable. Thromboxane synthase inhibitors (TXSI) and thromboxane receptor antagonists (TXRA) have the potential to prove more effective than aspirin due to their different mechanism of action along the pathway of TXA(2). TXSI prevent the conversion of PGH(2) to TXA(2), reducing TXA(2) synthesis mainly in platelets, whereas TXRA block the downstream consequences of TXA(2) receptors (TP) activation.TXA(2) is a potent inducer of platelet activation through its interaction with TP on platelets. TP are activated not only by TXA(2), but also by prostaglandin (PG) D(2), PGE(2), PGF(2α), PGH(2), PG endoperoxides (i.e., 20-HETE), and isoprostanes, all representing aspirin-insensitive mechanisms of TP activation. Moreover, TP are also expressed on several cell types such as macrophages or monocytes, and vascular endothelial cells, and exert antiatherosclerotic, antivasoconstrictive, and antithrombotic effects, depending on the cellular target.Thus, targeting TP receptor, a common downstream pathway for both platelet and extraplatelet TXA(2) as well as for endoperoxides and isoprostanes, may be a useful antiatherosclerotic and a more powerful antithrombotic intervention in clinical settings, such as diabetes mellitus, characterized by persistently enhanced thromboxane (TX)-dependent platelet activation through isoprostane formation and low-grade inflammation, leading to extraplatelet sources of TXA(2). Among TXRA, terutroban is an orally active drug in clinical development for use in secondary prevention of thrombotic events in cardiovascular disease. Despite great expectations on this drug supported by a large body of preclinical and clinical evidence and pathophysiological rationale, the PERFORM trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of terutroban over aspirin in secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events among ~20,000 patients with stroke. However, the clinical setting and the design of the study in which the drug has been challenged may explain, at least in part, this unexpected finding.Drugs with dual action, such as dual TXS inhibitors/TP antagonist and dual COXIB/TP antagonists are currently in clinical development. The theoretical rationale for their benefit and the ongoing clinical studies are herein discussed.

Terutroban versus aspirin in patients with cerebral ischaemic events (PERFORM): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent stroke or other cardiovascular events. We compared the selective thromboxane-prostaglandin receptor antagonist terutroban with aspirin in the prevention of cerebral and cardiovascular ischaemic events in patients with a recent non-cardioembolic cerebral ischaemic event.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial was undertaken in 802 centres in 46 countries. Patients who had an ischaemic stroke in the previous 3 months or a TIA in the previous 8 days were randomly allocated with a central interactive response system to 30 mg per day terutroban or 100 mg per day aspirin. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of fatal or non-fatal ischaemic stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, or other vascular death (excluding haemorrhagic death). We planned a sequential statistical analysis of non-inferiority (margin 1·05) followed by analysis of superiority. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was stopped prematurely for futility on the basis of the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee. This study is registered, number ISRCTN66157730.

FINDINGS

9562 patients were assigned to terutroban (9556 analysed) and 9558 to aspirin (9544 analysed); mean follow-up was 28·3 months (SD 7·7). The primary endpoint occurred in 1091 (11%) patients receiving terutroban and 1062 (11%) receiving aspirin (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 95% CI 0·94-1·12). There was no evidence of a difference between terutroban and aspirin for the secondary or tertiary endpoints. We recorded some increase in minor bleedings with terutroban compared with aspirin (1147 [12%] vs 1045 [11%]; HR 1·11, 95% CI 1·02-1·21), but no significant differences in other safety endpoints.

INTERPRETATION

The trial did not meet the predefined criteria for non-inferiority, but showed similar rates of the primary endpoint with terutroban and aspirin, without safety advantages for terutroban. In a worldwide perspective, aspirin remains the gold standard antiplatelet drug for secondary stroke prevention in view of its efficacy, tolerance, and cost.

FUNDING

Servier, France.

Antiplatelet therapy and vascular disease: an update

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse, systemic disorder of the large and medium-sized arterial vessels, affecting the coronary, cerebral and peripheral circulation. Chronic inflammatory processes are the central pathophysiological mechanism largely driven by lipid accumulation, and provide the substrate for occlusive thrombus formation. The clinical sequelae of acute arterial thrombosis, heart attack and stroke, are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Such acute events are characterized by rupture or erosion of the atherosclerotic plaque leading to acute thrombosis. The atherosclerotic process and associated thrombotic complications are collectively termed atherothrombosis. The platelet is a pivotal mediator of various endothelial, immune, thrombotic and inflammatory responses and therefore a key player in the initiation and progression of atherothrombosis. A robust evidence base supports the clear clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents in the primary and secondary therapy of atherothrombotic disorders. Percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions have an established central role in the management of atherothrombotic disease and demand a greater understanding of platelet biology. In this article, we provide a clinically orientated overview of the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and the evidence supporting the use of the various established antiplatelet therapies, and discuss new and future agents.

Platelet response to clopidogrel and restenosis in patients treated predominantly with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies suggest a relationship between early thrombotic response after vascular injury and later development of restenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of platelet response to clopidogrel on the risk of restenosis after drug-eluting stenting (DES).

METHODS

A total of 1,608 consecutive patients were previously enrolled in a study on the relation between platelet reactivity and outcomes after DES. All patients received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood samples for the assessment of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry were drawn directly before percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel low response was defined as upper quintile of multiple electrode platelet aggregometry measurements. Accordingly, 323 patients (20%) were considered as low and 1,285 (80%) as normal responders. Primary end point of the present study was target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

Target lesion revascularization rates were comparable in both groups (10.9% vs 9.5%, hazard rate [HR] 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.7, P = .441). Follow-up angiography revealed no difference in binary angiographic restenosis (13.9% vs 15.9%, P = .445) and late lumen loss (0.32 +/- 0.64 vs 0.35 +/- 0.63 mm, P = .477). Low responders had significantly more stent thromboses (2.5% vs 0.5%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.6, P = .002), Q wave myocardial infarctions (2.5% vs 0.6%, HR 4.0, 95% CI 1.5-10.7, P = .005), and ischemic strokes (1.3% vs 0.2%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2-24.0, P = .028) at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Low platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel, a known predictor of thrombotic complications, does not have a significant impact on restenosis after DES.

Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical review of the 2007 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines and beyond

Antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the 2007 PCI treatment guidelines were published by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, new clinical evidence has emerged, expanding our understanding of antiplatelet use and potentially affecting the treatment guidelines. For example, clinical trial results prompted a Science Advisory to recommend that dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel be used for longer periods-up to 1 year in patients who receive bare metal stents and at least 1 year in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. New trial results have also emerged regarding the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. This article reviews the current recommendations for antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients, recent trial results, newly developed agents, ongoing clinical trials, and the future direction of antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergo PCI.

Platelet dense-granule secretion plays a critical role in thrombosis and subsequent vascular remodeling in atherosclerotic mice

BACKGROUND

Platelet aggregation plays a critical role in myocardial infarction and stroke; however, the role of platelet secretion in atherosclerotic vascular disease is poorly understood. Therefore, we examined the hypothesis that platelet dense-granule secretion modulates thrombosis, inflammation, and atherosclerotic vascular remodeling after injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Functional deletion of the Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 3 gene (HPS3(-/-)) markedly reduces platelet dense-granule secretion. HPS3(-/-) mice have normal platelet counts, platelet morphology, and alpha-granule number, as well as maximal secretion of the alpha-granule marker P-selectin; however, their capacity to form platelet-leukocyte aggregates is significantly reduced (P<0.05). To examine the role of platelet dense-granule secretion in these processes, atherosclerosis-prone mice with combined genetic deficiency of apolipoprotein E and HPS3 (ApoE(-/-), HPS3(-/-)) were compared with congenic, atherosclerosis-prone mice with normal platelet secretion (ApoE(-/-), HPS3(+/+)). After 16 to 18 weeks on a high-fat diet, both groups of mice had similar fasting cholesterol levels and body weight. Carotid arteries of ApoE(-/-), HPS3(+/+) mice thrombosed rapidly after FeCl(3) injury, but ApoE(-/-), HPS3(-/-) mice were completely resistant to thrombotic arterial occlusion (P<0.01). Three weeks after injury, neointimal hyperplasia (from alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells) was significantly less (P<0.001) in arteries from ApoE(-/-), HPS3(-/-) mice. In ApoE(-/-), HPS3(-/-) mice, there were also pronounced reductions in arterial inflammation, as indicated by a 74% decrease in CD45-positive leukocytes (P<0.01) and a 73% decrease in Mac-3-positive macrophages (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In atherosclerotic mice, reduced platelet dense-granule secretion is associated with marked protection against the development of arterial thrombosis, inflammation, and neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury.

Optimizing platelet P2Y12 inhibition for patients undergoing PCI

Guidelines recommend that dual antiplatelet therapy using aspirin and clopidogrel should be administered to the majority of patients with acute coronary syndromes, including those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the results of a large randomized, placebo-controlled study suggest that a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel must be administered at least 15 h prior to PCI in order to achieve a significant reduction in peri-PCI thrombotic events. Other data suggest that 2 h of pretreatment may be sufficient if a 600-mg loading dose is used. Since it is often difficult to achieve an adequate pretreatment goal with clopidogrel in clinical practice, more rapid achievement of platelet P2Y(12) inhibition may improve patient outcomes. Prasugrel, [6-[2-(3,4-diflurophenyl) cyclopropyl1-1-y1] amino-2-propylthio-9-D-ribofuranosyl-9H-purine (AZD6140), and cangrelor are platelet P2Y(12) receptor antagonists currently in development that offer faster acting inhibition of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)--induced platelet aggregation. These agents act upon the same platelet receptor as clopidogrel, but are distinguished by their routes of administration, reversibility, and pharmacodynamic properties. Prasugrel is an orally administered agent that provides faster, higher, and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. The results of Phase II testing suggest that the risk of bleeding is similar in prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients. AZD6140 is another orally administered platelet inhibitor with rapid and reversible action. Again, Phase II testing suggests similar bleeding risk for clopidogrel. Preliminary evidence suggests that clinical outcomes may be better in prasugrel- and AZD6140-treated patients than in clopidogrel-treated patients. Cangrelor is an intravenously administered, reversible, short-acting agent with a rapid onset of activity. Bleeding risk and clinical outcomes data are similar in cangrelor- and abciximab-treated patients. The results of ongoing Phase III clinical trials involving more than 40,000 patients will demonstrate whether these agents fulfill their potential to improve outcomes in PCI-treated patients by providing faster, higher, and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation.

Anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic approaches in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Over the past three decades, there has been a tremendous increase in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. However, PCI causes disruption of atherosclerotic plaque and denudation of the endothelium, leading to stimulation of platelet aggregation and activation of the coagulation cascade. Therefore, anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic agents have a pivotal role as adjuncts before, during and after PCI, in order to minimize the risk of procedural ischemic complications, such as myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and various degrees of myonecrosis. The current article presents a comprehensive review of the evolution of current anti-platelet and anticoagulation regimens used in the setting of PCI. It starts with a summary of the current perspective of the coagulation process along with platelet activation and aggregation. The review then focuses specifically on individual anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic drugs including their mechanism of action and the scientific evidence which led to their use in PCI. Finally, we present summary recommendations from the AHA/ACC guidelines for individual anticoagulant and anti-platelet regimens given peri-PCI.

Oral antiplatelet therapy for percutaneous coronary revascularization

Great strides in interventional pharmacotherapy have been made over the past few decades, virtually all focused on optimizing peri-PCI antithrombotic therapy in order to reduce thrombotic complications. Our understanding of the role of platelets and of antiplatelet therapies in this process continues to evolve. Today, dual or even triple antiplatelet therapy has become standard of care at the time of PCI followed by dual therapy long-term in the majority of patients. However, currently available oral regimens are hampered by limitations including the need to initiate treatment at least a few hours before the procedure to achieve maximum benefit and the safety issues surrounding irreversible platelet inhibition in the uncommon, but not rare situations when a patient requires surgical revascularization. These limitations have led to the suboptimal "real-world" utilization of these proven agents and have fostered the development of a wide variety of alternative platelet inhibitors with theoretical, but still unproven clinical benefits. There are ample clinical data that strongly support the use of aspirin and clopidogrel in virtually all patients undergoing a PCI today. This review will highlight these data as well as emphasize the gaps in our understanding. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Impact of aspirin treatment on long-term outcome (over 10 years) after percutaneous coronary intervention

Aspirin has been shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effects on long-term (over 10 years) mortality have not been fully elucidated. This retrospective study recorded the patient characteristics and admission medication for all patients undergoing PCI over an 8-year period from 1984 to 1992. Follow-up information was available for 748 patients (100%) for a mean of 143.6 +/- 43.4 months. A propensity analysis was performed to adjust for presumed selection biases in the administration of aspirin. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the group that received aspirin and the group that did not, except for the administration of statins and PCI procedural success rate. Of the 748 patients, 535 (71.5%) received aspirin treatment at the time of PCI. During the 12-year follow-up, 54 patients died from any cause and 20 patients from cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that aspirin treatment led to a significant reduction in all cause mortality (10% versus 16.4%; P = 0.01) and cardiac death (3.7% versus 8.0%; P = 0.02) compared to other antiplatelet drugs. The hazard ratio (HR) for the total mortality and cardiac mortality rates was adjusted using the Cox-proportional hazard model for confounding variables and propensity score. The all cause (HR, 0.49; 95%CI [0.29-0.80], P = 0.005) and cardiac mortality rates (HR, 0.32; 95%CI [0.14-0.72], P = 0.006) for patients receiving aspirin remained lower than for those not receiving aspirin. Aspirin treatment at the time of PCI significantly reduced the risk of death from any cause and cardiac death. The administration of aspirin had a positive impact on the over 10-year long-term outcomes of patients who underwent PCI.

Percutaneous coronary interventions for coronary artery disease: the long and short of optimizing medical therapy

Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and timely introduction of pharmacological treatment can have a significant bearing on the patient's health and outcome. In addition to treating the culprit lesion mechanically, admission for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) gives an opportunity for the interventional cardiologist to optimize medical therapy. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current medical literature pertaining to cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction and vascular event prevention in the setting of PCI, with emphasis on antiplatelet therapies, beta-blockers, HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors (statins) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with regard to therapy optimization during PCI and for chronic CAD. We discuss the effects of these oral therapies in reducing ischaemic events, thus augmenting the benefits of PCI, as well as preventing recurrent CV events after the procedure.

Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

In patients with stable CAD, PCI can be considered a valuable initial mode of revascularization in all patients with objective large ischaemia in the presence of almost every lesion subset, with only one exception: chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed. In early studies, there was a small survival advantage with CABG surgery compared with PCI without stenting. The addition of stents and newer adjunctive medications improved the outcome for PCI. The decision to recommend PCI or CABG surgery will be guided by technical improvements in cardiology or surgery, local expertise, and patients' preference. However, until proved otherwise, PCI should be used only with reservation in diabetics with multi-vessel disease and in patients with unprotected left main stenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents might change this situation. Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS (UA or NSTEMI) have to be stratified first for their risk of acute thrombotic complications. A clear benefit from early angiography (<48 h) and, when needed, PCI or CABG surgery has been reported only in the high-risk groups. Deferral of intervention does not improve outcome. Routine stenting is recommended on the basis of the predictability of the result and its immediate safety. In patients with STEMI, primary PCI should be the treatment of choice in patients presenting in a hospital with PCI facility and an experienced team. Patients with contra-indications to thrombolysis should be immediately transferred for primary PCI, because this might be their only chance for quickly opening the coronary artery. In cardiogenic shock, emergency PCI for complete revascularization may be life-saving and should be considered at an early stage. Compared with thrombolysis, randomized trials that transferred the patients for primary PCI to a 'heart attack centre' observed a better clinical outcome, despite transport times leading to a significantly longer delay between randomization and start of the treatment. The superiority of primary PCI over thrombolysis seems to be especially clinically relevant for the time interval between 3 and 12 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms on the basis of its superior preservation of myocardium. Furthermore, with increasing time to presentation, major-adverse-cardiac-event rates increase after thrombolysis, but appear to remain relatively stable after primary PCI. Within the first 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms, both reperfusion strategies seem equally effective in reducing infarct size and mortality. Therefore, thrombolysis is still a viable alternative to primary PCI, if it can be delivered within 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms. Primary PCI compared with thrombolysis significantly reduced stroke. Overall, we prefer primary PCI over thrombolysis in the first 3 h of chest pain to prevent stroke, and in patients presenting 3-12 h after the onset of chest pain, to salvage myocardium and also to prevent stroke. At the moment, there is no evidence to recommend facilitated PCI. Rescue PCI is recommended, if thrombolysis failed within 45-60 min after starting the administration. After successful thrombolysis, the use of routine coronary angiography within 24 h and PCI, if applicable, is recommended even in asymptomatic patients without demonstrable ischaemia to improve patients' outcome. If a PCI centre is not available within 24 h, patients who have received successful thrombolysis with evidence of spontaneous or inducible ischaemia before discharge should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularized accordingly--independent of 'maximal' medical therapy.

Antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: how many and how much?

Antiplatelet agents play a major role in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Stent thrombosis and the demand for improved clinical outcomes have driven the need for aggressive antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens and newer, more efficacious, therapies. The benefits of intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists and clopidogrel in high-risk patients undergoing PCI appear complementary. In low- to intermediate-risk patients, clopidogrel pre-treatment and a maintenance dose of aspirin + clopidogrel for at least 1 year after PCI are supported by the data, although the optimal duration of clopidogrel treatment beyond 1 year remains hotly contested. The next generation of clinical trials will examine the benefits of antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents as adjunctive therapy with drug-eluting stents. A better understanding of our patients' overall risk will add to procedural success and more durable outcomes.

Pharmacological evaluation of both enantiomers of (R,S)-BM-591 as thromboxane A2 receptor antagonists and thromboxane synthase inhibitors

The aim of this work is to evaluate the anti-thromboxane activity of two pure enantiomers of (R,S)-BM-591, a nitrobenzene sulfonylurea chemically related to torasemide, a loop diuretic. The drug affinity for thromboxane A2 receptor (TP) of human washed platelets has been determined. In these experiments, (R)-BM-591 (IC50 = 2.4+/-0.1 nM) exhibited a significant higher affinity than (S)-BM-591 (IC50 = 4.2+/-0.15 nM) for human washed platelets TP receptors. Both enantiomers were stronger ligands than SQ-29548 (IC50 = 21.0+/-1.0 nM) and sulotroban (IC50 = 930+/-42 nM), two reference TXA2 receptor antagonists. Pharmacological characterisations of (S)-BM-591 and (R)-BM-591 were compared in several models. Thus, (R)-BM-591 strongly prevented platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA) (600 microM) and U-46619 (1 microM) while (S)-BM-591 showed a lower activity. On isolated tissues pre-contracted by U-46619, a stable TXA2 agonist, (S)-BM-591 was more potent in relaxing guinea-pig trachea (EC50 = 0.272+/-0.054 microM) and rat aorta (EC50 = 0.190+/-0.002 microM) than (R)-BM-591 (EC50 of 9.60+/-0.63 microM and 0.390+/-0.052 microM, respectively). Moreover, at 1 microM, (R)-BM-591 totally inhibited TXA2 synthase activity, expressed as TXB2 production from human platelets, while at the same concentration, (S)-BM-591 poorly reduced the TXB2 synthesis (22%). Finally, in rats, both enantiomers lost the diuretic activity of torasemide. In conclusion, (R)-BM-591 exhibits a higher affinity and antagonism on human platelet TP receptors than (S)-BM-591 as well as a better thromboxane synthase inhibitory potency. In contrast, (S)-BM-591 is more active than the (R)-enantiomer in relaxing smooth muscle contraction of rat aorta and trachea guinea pig. Consequently, (R)-BM-591 represents the best candidate for further development in the field of thrombosis disorders.

Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes including one-year survival: results from the Do Tirofiban and ReoProGive Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET)

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine if clopidogrel treatment initiated before coronary stenting improved clinical outcomes among patients receiving aspirin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor.

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy plays a pivotal role in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

METHODS

Outcomes among 4,809 patients randomized to tirofiban or abciximab during PCI with stent placement were compared according to whether they received 300 mg of clopidogrel before PCI (93.1%) versus immediately after the procedure.

RESULTS

The 30-day primary composite end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or urgent target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was lower among clopidogrel-pretreated patients (6.6% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.009), mainly because of reduction of MI (6.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.012). The benefit of clopidogrel pretreatment was sustained at six months (death, MI, any TVR: 14.6% vs. 19.8%, HR = 0.71, p = 0.010), and this was due mainly to lowering of death and MI (7.8% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.001). At one year, clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.011). Because clopidogrel pretreatment was not randomized, multivariable and propensity analyses were performed. After adjusting for baseline heterogeneity, clopidogrel pretreatment was an independent predictor for death or MI at 30 days (HR = 0.63, p = 0.012) and at six months (HR = 0.61, p = 0.003), and survival at one year (HR = 0.53, p = 0.044). No excess in 30-day bleeding events was noted with clopidogrel pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing coronary stent placement with aspirin and a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, clopidogrel pretreatment is associated with a reduction of death and MI irrespective of the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used.

Saratin, an inhibitor of collagen-platelet interaction, decreases venous anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in a canine dialysis access model

Prosthetic dialysis access thrombosis and/or stenosis is the most common cause of graft impairment or loss and is primarily attributed to venous outflow stenosis due to intimal hyperplasia. Intimal hyperplasia is thought to result from interactions between areas of exposed subendothelial collagen in an injured vessel and platelets, resulting in platelet adhesion. Saratin, an inhibitor of the vWF-dependent binding of platelet to collagen interaction, has been shown in vitro to reduce the adhesion of platelets to collagen. In the current study, the authors investigated the effects of topical saratin administration in a canine dialysis access model in regard to intimal hyperplasia development at the venous anastomosis. Fourteen female mongrel dogs underwent placement of a femoral polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) dialysis access graft and were placed into 1 of 2 groups: 1) control or 2) experimental with topical saratin application. The experimental group had 600 microg of saratin (1 microg/microL) applied for 5 minutes directly onto the venous anastomosis before restoration of blood flow;control groups received vehicle control. At 4 weeks postoperative, a portion of the graft was removed along with a segment of the outflow vein. Veins were subsequently processed, sectioned, and analyzed along the length of the excised segment and divided into blocks that included the area of the graft toe, midanastomotic region and heel, and blocks A-E. Intimal hyperplasia was assessed by a computer-assisted morphometric analysis. Platelet counts and bleeding times were also measured. Vein segments in the control group (n=7) showed pronounced intimal hyperplasia in blocks B, C, and D as compared to the saratin group (n=6). Distribution of intimal hyperplasia by blocks between control and saratin groups were as follows: block [A] 8.6 +/- 1.9 vs 9.7 +/- 3.0% (p=NS), [B] 32.7 +/- 6.3 vs 10.7 +/- 3.5% (p=0.01), [C] 44.8 +/- 6.2% vs 10.3 +/- 1.5% (p=0.0004), [D] 40.8 +/- 11.0 vs 9.1 +/- 4.2% (p=0.02), [E] 7.5 +/- 5.5 vs 2.7 +/- 0.4% (p=NS). Intimal hyperplasia normalized to vein wall thickness also showed a significant reduction with saratin application. Bleeding times and platelet counts obtained at different time points during the experiment showed no difference between control and saratin groups. In a canine dialysis access model using PTFE grafts, topical application of saratin at the venous anastomosis decreased intimal hyperplasia development by as much as 77% when compared with control animals. Saratin provides for a method of substantially reducing intimal hyperplasia by direct local application without systemic side effects.

Lipoxins in chronic inflammation

The discovery of endogenous molecules involved in counterregulation of inflammatory responses that may lead to tissue injury provides an opportunity to explore new therapeutic approaches based on manipulation of new pathways. Natural counterregulatory pathways may reduce the possibility of unwanted toxic side-effects. Lipoxins are trihydroxytetraene-containing eicosanoids that are generated within the vascular lumen during platelet-leukocyte interactions and at mucosal surfaces via leukocyte-epithelial cell interactions. During cell-cell interactions, transcellular biosynthetic pathways are the major lipoxin biosynthetic routes, and thus, in humans, lipoxins are formed in vivo during multicellular responses, such as inflammation and asthma. This branch of the eicosanoid cascade generates specific tetraene-containing products that serve as "stop signals" for neutrophils that regulate key steps in leukocyte trafficking and prevent neutrophil-mediated tissue injury. These novel anti-inflammatory lipid mediators also appear to facilitate the resolution of the acute inflammatory response. In this review, recent findings and new concepts pertaining to the generation of lipoxins and their impact on the resolution of acute inflammation, and organ protection from leukocyte-mediated injury, are presented. The parallels and possible associations with periodontal diseases are discussed.

What is the role for improved long-term antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention?

BACKGROUND

Coronary stent placement has replaced balloon angioplasty as the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) method of choice, primarily because of its lower restenosis rate. Compared with aspirin (ASA) monotherapy or ASA plus warfarin, the ticlopidine and ASA combination is superior in reducing thrombotic events after stenting. Clopidogrel plus ASA appears to be at least as effective as ticlopidine and ASA. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors effectively prevent periprocedural thrombotic complications, but their short duration of action and parenteral dosing don't allow for long-term protection. This review aimed to answer how long after PCI with a stent patients are at risk for recurrent thrombotic events and what the optimal way to prevent them is.

RESULTS

Classically, ASA has been prescribed indefinitely, whereas adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists have been discontinued after 2 to 4 weeks. However, the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial found that long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and ASA was more effective than ASA alone in preventing major cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome, including those treated with PCI.

CONCLUSION

Results from additional ongoing studies are needed to clarify the role of long-term dual oral antiplatelet therapy in preventing ischemic events in patients who have undergone PCI.

Ramatroban, a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, prevents macrophage accumulation and neointimal formation after balloon arterial injury in cholesterol-fed rabbits

Macrophage infiltration appears to play an important role in restenosis after arterial intervention. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a major chemotactic factor for macrophages. We have previously shown that ramatroban, a thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) receptor antagonist, diminished the expression of MCP-1 in human vascular endothelial cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after balloon angioplasty of atherosclerotic arteries, ramatroban would reduce MCP-1 expression, macrophage accumulation, and neointimal formation. New Zealand white rabbits were fed a cholesterol-rich diet for 4 weeks, and the abdominal aorta of the rabbits were injured by a 2-French Fogarty catheter. They were randomized to receive 1 or 5 mg/kg daily of ramatroban (n = 7 or n = 8) or saline (n = 6). At 4 weeks after balloon angioplasty, the intimal hyperplasia and the macrophage-positive area in the intima by the ramatroban treatment was significantly reduced. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression in injured aortas of the ramatroban-treated group was significantly less evident than in the vehicle-treated group. Thromboxane A(2) receptor blockade by ramatroban for 4 weeks after balloon angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbits prevented macrophage infiltration through MCP-1 downregulation and neointimal formation.

Periprocedural routines of coronary angioplasty--extreme diversity with unrevealed consequences

Our objective was to evaluate the current trends of coronary angioplasty periprocedural care in the state of Israel. PTCA technology has undergone through some major developments and refinements, which have yielded new algorithms and routines. With this shift of paradigms, some of the periprocedural routines (these include medications and dosing before, during and after the procedure, as well as the handling of anti-coagulation, femoral sheath removal and the extent of patient monitoring post-PTCA) have been partially re-established. In order to assess trends in periprocedural care, we elected to analyze the current state of practice in the state of Israel. A questionnaire was sent to every cardiac catheterization laboratory in Israel that performs PTCA. An authorized senior cardiologist representing the laboratory submitted the information required for our survey. A nurse-to-nurse telephone questionnaire was conducted simultaneously to cross-examine the validity of the data. All centers submitted results. The average heparin dose for PTCA varied between 5000 and 15 000 units, ACT was monitored routinely by some and not at all by others, post-PTCA heparin administration was routinely administered by some institutions and not by others, and the mean femoral sheath dwell time ranged from 4 to 18 h. Post-PTCA cardiac monitoring varied from 6 to more than 24 h. Some institutions prescribed to all patients nitrates, calcium channel blockers and low-molecular-weight heparin, while others did not. We conclude that there is profound variability in the periprocedural routines that may translate into a significant cost increase, patient discomfort, a prolonged monitoring and hospital stay, and potential patient morbidity. We suggest that these routines should be critically evaluated, and that if they do not contribute to the procedural success and patient well-being they should be abandoned.

Short- and long-term oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention

Platelets play a central role in both the short- and long-term manifestations of atherothrombosis. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), there is a steep rise in cardiovascular events early, followed by an incremental rise in cardiovascular events over the long term. This long-term event rate is related to persistent platelet activation and thrombin generation. There is therefore a need to optimize both short- and long-term oral antiplatelet and antithrombotic strategies. The benefits of aspirin therapy, when administered early and continued over the long term, were demonstrated in several early randomized trials. The Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration found a 46% reduction in vascular events with antiplatelet therapy (mostly aspirin). However, despite treatment with aspirin and proven therapies, recurrent events remain high. The adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists, ticlopidine and clopidogrel, inhibit the early steps of platelet activation, degranulation, and release of prothrombotic and inflammatory mediators, while also preventing activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial demonstrated the benefits of aspirin plus clopidogrel in reducing major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke reduced by 20%, p = 0.00009) in a broad range of patients with ACS when administered early and continued over the long term. The benefits emerge very rapidly after a 300 mg loading dose. For the large number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the CURE trial, there was a substantial risk reduction with clopidogrel pretreatment followed by long-term therapy (p < 0.002). This benefit was present, regardless of whether intervention was performed early or late. The significant benefits of aspirin and clopidogrel persist for the combined efficacy-safety end point of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or life-threatening bleeding when clopidogrel is started early, combined with aspirin and other standard therapies, and continued for up to one year.

Resolution of inflammation: a new paradigm for the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases

The periodontal diseases are infectious diseases caused by predominantly Gram-negative bacteria. However, as our understanding of the pathogenesis of the periodontal diseases grows, it is becoming clear that most of the tissue damage that characterizes periodontal disease is caused by the host response to infection, not by the infectious agent directly. Investigation into the mechanism of action of host-mediated tissue injury has revealed that the neutrophil plays an important role in destruction of host tissues. In this paper, we review the biochemical pathways and molecular mediators that are responsible for regulation of the inflammatory response in diseases such as periodontitis, with a focus on lipid mediators of inflammation. Pro-inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes, are balanced by counter-regulatory signals provided by a class of molecules called lipoxins. The role of lipoxins in the control and resolution of inflammation is discussed, as is the possibility of the development of new therapeutic strategies for the control and prevention of neutrophil-mediated tissue injury in inflammatory diseases like periodontitis.

Lipoxins and aspirin-triggered 15-epi-lipoxin biosynthesis: an update and role in anti-inflammation and pro-resolution

Lipoxins (LX) are trihydroxytetraene-containing eicosanoids that are generated within the vascular lumen during platelet-leukocyte interactions and at mucosal surfaces via leukocyte-epithelial cell interactions. Recent findings have given several new concepts that are reviewed here regarding the generation of LX and 15 epi-LX and their impact in the resolution of acute inflammation and organ protection from leukocyte-mediated injury. During cell-cell interactions, transcellular biosynthetic pathways are used as major LX biosynthetic routes, and thus, in humans, LX are formed in vivo during multicellular responses such as inflammation, and asthma. This branch of the eicosanoid cascade generates specific tetraene-containing products that serve as neutrophil "stop signals," in that they regulate key steps in leukocyte trafficking and prevent neutrophil-mediated acute tissue injury. In addition, aspirin's mechanism of action also involves the triggering of carbon 15 epimers of lipoxins or 15-epi-lipoxins that mimic the bioactions of native LX. An overview of these recent developments is presented with a focus on the cellular and molecular interactions of these novel anti-inflammatory lipid mediators that also appear to facilitate the resolution of acute inflammatory responses.

Role of prostacyclin in the cardiovascular response to thromboxane A2

Thromboxane (Tx) A2 is a vasoconstrictor and platelet agonist. Aspirin affords cardioprotection through inhibition of TxA2 formation by platelet cyclooxygenase (COX-1). Prostacyclin (PGI2) is a vasodilator that inhibits platelet function. Here we show that injury-induced vascular proliferation and platelet activation are enhanced in mice that are genetically deficient in the PGI2 receptor (IP) but are depressed in mice genetically deficient in the TxA2 receptor (TP) or treated with a TP antagonist. The augmented response to vascular injury was abolished in mice deficient in both receptors. Thus, PGI2 modulates platelet-vascular interactions in vivo and specifically limits the response to TxA2. This interplay may help explain the adverse cardiovascular effects associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors, which, unlike aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), inhibit PGI2 but not TxA2.

Heparin and coumadin versus acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether postprocedural antithrombotic therapy with prolonged heparin infusion followed by 6 months of oral anticoagulation in addition to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reduces the incidence of angiographic restenosis after successful PTCA. One hundred ninety-one patients with uncomplicated PTCA were randomized into two groups: one group was discharged with ASA 100 mg only (G1) and the other group was additionally treated with 12-24 hr of heparin infusion and overlapping oral anticoagulation with coumadin for 6 months (G2). The two groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, coronary risk profile, clinical presentation, and angiographic lesion characteristics. Stents were implanted in 33% and 36% of the G1 and G2 patients, respectively. In-hospital myocardial infarction occurred in 4% of the G1 and 3% of the G2 patients. One patient in G1 died of subacute stent thrombosis (day 3). Six-month angiographic follow-up was obtained in 90% of G1 patients and 94% of G2 patients. Restenosis occurred in 30% and 33% of the patients and mean diameter stenoses at follow-up were 40% +/- 28% and 39% +/- 24%, respectively. Thrombin inhibition with heparin infusion followed by 6 months of oral anticoagulation did not reduce angiographic restenosis among patients undergoing PTCA with or without stent implantation. The occurrence of acute ischemic complications was also comparable in the two groups.

Overview of therapies for prevention of restenosis after coronary interventions

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and across the world. The economic impact of coronary artery disease is staggering and on the rise. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is widely used to treat severe, symptomatic coronary stenosis. The Achilles heel of angioplasty is restenosis of those treated arteries. As a result, numerous therapies, including mechanical and pharmacological approaches, to prevent restenosis have been studied. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of restenosis has enhanced the success of these therapeutic approaches. To date, the most important and successful approach to limit restenosis has been the use of coronary stents. Stents have reduced the rate of restenosis from approximately 50% down to 20-30%. However, in-stent restenosis presents a new and an even more challenging dilemma. The success of adjunctive drug therapy has been promising, but, as of yet, very limited. Antithrombotic agents have reduced acute thrombosis and many of the acute complications of angioplasty. New approaches and therapies are very encouraging, and provide great hope in the treatment of restenosis. Brachytherapy has shown success in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, and recently has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Drug-eluting stents using antiproliferative drugs are the most exciting new advance in preventing restenosis, currently in Phase III trials. Gene therapy, targeted drug delivery, and newer antithrombotic agents are also under investigation. We will review the pathophysiology of restenosis, animal models, pharmacological therapies, and mechanical approaches for the treatment of restenosis.