Psychophysiological reactivity and cardiac end-organ changes in white coat hypertension

White-coat hypertension, as defined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and subclinical cardiac organ damage: a meta-analysis

AIM

: The clinical and prognostic relevance of white-coat hypertension (WCH) has not been fully elucidated; in particular, the association of this blood pressure phenotype with suclinical organ damage remains unclear. We performed a systematic meta-analysis in order to provide a comprehensive information on cardiac structural and functional changes in WCH, as defined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

DESIGN

Studies were identified by the following search terms: 'white-coat hypertension', 'isolated clinic hypertension', 'cardiac organ damage', 'target organ damage', 'left ventricle', 'left ventricular hypertrophy', 'cardiac hypertrophy', 'ventricular dysfunction', and 'echocardiography'.

RESULTS

A total of 7382 untreated adult patients (2493 normotensive, 1705 WCH, and 3184 hypertensive individuals) included in 25 studies were considered. Left ventricular mass index was higher in WCH than in normotensive patients [standardized difference in mean (SDM) 0.50, P < 0.01]; mitral E/A ratio was lower (SDM -0.27, P < 0.01) and left atrium larger (SDM 0.29, P < 0.05) in WCH than in the normotensive counterparts. Hypertensive patients showed a greater left ventricular mass index (SDM 0.42, P < 0.01), reduced E/A (SDM -0.15, P < 0.01), and larger left atrium diameter (SDM 0.27, P < 0.01) than WCH patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that alterations in cardiac structure and function in WCH patients, as defined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, are intermediate between sustained hypertensive patients and normotensive controls. The study supports the view that WCH should not be further considered a fully benign entity.

Closer look at white-coat hypertension

This review aims to clarify novel concepts regarding the clinical and laboratory aspects of white-coat hypertension (WCHT). Recent studies on the clinical and biological implications of WCHT were compared with existing knowledge. Studies were included if the WCHT patients were defined according to the 2013 European Society of Hypertension guidelines, i.e., an office blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg, a home BP of ≤ 135/85 mmHg, and a mean 24-h ambulatory BP of ≤ 130/80 mmHg. WCHT studies published since 2000 were selected, although a few studies performed before 2000 were used for comparative purposes. True WCHT was defined as normal ABPM and home BP readings, and partial WCHT was defined as an abnormality in one of these two readings. The reported prevalence of WCHT was 15%-45%. The incidence of WCHT tended to be higher in females and in non-smokers. Compared with normotensive (NT) patients, WCHT was associated with a higher left ventricular mass index, higher lipid levels, impaired fasting glucose, and decreased arterial compliance. The circadian rhythm in WCHT patients was more variable than in NT patient’s, with a higher pulse pressure and non-dipping characteristics. Compared with sustained hypertension patients, WCHT patients have a better 10-year prognosis; compared with NT patients, WCHT patients have a similar stroke risk, but receive more frequent drug treatment. There are conflicting results regarding WCHT and markers of endothelial damage, oxidative stress and inflammation, and the data imply that WCHT patients may have a worse prognosis. Nitric oxide levels are lower, and oxidative stress parameters are higher in WCHT patients than in NT patients, whereas the antioxidant capacity is lower in WCHT patients than in NT patients. Clinicians should be aware of the risk factors associated with WCHT and patients should be closely monitored especially to identify target organ damage and metabolic syndrome.

Combination of Echocardiography and Pulse Wave Velocity Provides Clues for the Differentiation between White Coat Hypertension and Hypertension in Postmenopausal Women

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether or not noninvasive assessment of the cardiovascular system can discriminate white coat hypertension and hypertension in postmenopausal women. The major reason is the high prevalence of white coat hypertension in these subjects and the uncertain associations of white coat hypertension with cardiovascular risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Selected women were required to be naturally or surgically menopausal for at least 1 year but not more than 5 years past their menstrual period. White coat hypertension patients were defined as subjects who had office blood pressures >150/90 mm Hg but who had both systolic and diastolic ambulatory pressures <120/80 mm Hg. In total, 44 subjects with a mean age of 52 years were recruited from the outpatient clinic and examined. Office and home blood pressures were measured using the HEM 401C (Omron Life Science Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a semi-automatic device that operates on the cuff-oscillometric principle and generates a digital display of the systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure as well as the pulse rate. The pulse wave velocity (PWV) was recorded, and the left ventricular (LV) diameter, septal wall thickness, and left posterior wall thickness were assessed by M-mode echocardiography after selecting the measurement section by B-mode echocardiography.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were diagnosed as having white coat hypertension based on the criteria in the trial. Pulse wave patterns were different between subjects with white coat hypertension and those with hypertension. PWV of subjects with white coat hypertension was 1.32 ± 0.33 m/s and that of patients with hypertension was 1.46 ± 0.37 m/s (p < 0.01). In addition to these findings, there was a significant association between the values of home SBP and PWV and the LV mass index. However, this association was not seen for office SBP. When the data of the LV mass index and PWV were combined, white coat hypertension could be easily differentiated from hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of blood pressure self-monitoring, echocardiographic data, and PWV can be a powerful indicator for the treatment of hypertension in postmenopausal women.

Pulse Wave Velocity in Postmenopausal Women

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and osteoporosis are major causes of morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women. The relationship between atherosclerosis and osteoporosis has been established by studies of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and biochemical pathways that seem to overlap in many places. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is one of the known predictors of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Studies indicate that PWV in hypertensive postmenopausal women is increased, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) attenuates this increase. In addition, recently, many studies have suggested a role for arterial stiffness in the association between CVD and osteoporosis. From these findings, it appears that estrogen deficiency combined with production of inflammatory cytokines plays a role in increased PWV closely associated with CVD and osteoporosis, although the mechanisms of arterial stiffness in postmenopausal women may be more complex. Accordingly, a possible role for PWV as a surrogate marker of CVD as well as osteoporosis in postmenopausal women is discussed in this review. First, menopause leads to increased arterial stiffness with aging in females. Further, epidemiological data evaluating arterial stiffness assessed by PWV provided evidence that most of the established CVD risk factors are determinants of PWV, and these risk factors are increased in patients with CVD. In turn, contrary to expectation, HRT did not always contribute to a lower incidence of CVD in postmenopausal women. By reviewing the current data available, it becomes clear that, at present, the effects of menopause including HRT on PWV remain controversial, and further studies are needed to clarify these associations.

White-coat effect on systemic blood pressure in retired racing Greyhounds

BACKGROUND

Greyhounds are known to have a higher systemic arterial blood pressure (BP) than non-Greyhound dogs.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the high systemic BP was because of the white-coat effect.

ANIMALS

Twenty-two healthy retired racing Greyhounds (RRG) enrolled in a blood donation program.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We prospectively measured systemic BP in 3 environments: in the hospital by the investigator (Hosp), in the home by the investigator (H/I), and in the home by the owner (H/O). Five serial measurements of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (SAP, DAP, MAP) as well as heart rate (HR) were measured by an oscillometric method on the distal forelimb and distal hind limb in all 3 environments.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference for SAP, MAP, and HR between the Hosp and both H/I and H/O (P < .001); there were no significant differences for any of the parameters between the H/I and H/O environments. HR, but not SAP, MAP, or DAP (P < .05) decreased in RRG with multiple hospital visits for blood donation before this study. The hind limb SAP was significantly higher than the forelimb SAP (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

We conclude that the high SAP, MAP, and HR seen in the hospital setting are likely because of a white-coat effect. Furthermore, consideration should be given to defining the parameters of normal BP in RRG according to the environment in which they are obtained.

Serum phosphate in white-coat hypertensive patients: focus on dipping status and metabolic syndrome

Recent studies indicate an association between serum phosphate levels and blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A growing body of evidence suggests that white-coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome (MS) and a non-dipping pattern are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in patients with WCH according to their serum phosphate levels and number of MS components fulfilled. The study included 2600 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All patients underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Dipping pattern was defined as follows: 'dippers' had a nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall > or =10% but <20%; 'non-dippers' had an NSBP fall <10%; 'extreme dippers' had an NSBP fall > or =20% and 'reverse dippers' had an NSBP increase. There were 314 extreme dippers, 1337 dippers, 734 non-dippers and 116 reverse dippers. Reverse dippers presented with significantly lower levels of serum phosphate, whereas extreme dippers had significantly higher levels (3.39+/-3.29 vs. 3.58+/-3.52 mg per 100 ml, P<0.0001). The patients were classified according to the number of MS components and the main observation was the inverse relationship of serum phosphate with MS components (3.53+/-0.36, 3.50+/-0.38, 3.49+/-0.38, 3.44+/-0.36 and 3.35+/-0.31 mg per 100 ml, respectively, P=0.003). Patients with WCH and low serum phosphate levels appear to have a higher incidence of a non-dipping NSBP profile and an impaired metabolic profile. This observation may be important for the stratification of the cardiovascular risk in WCH patients.

Orienting-Defense Responses and Psychophysiological Reactivity in Isolated Clinic versus Sustained Hypertension

This study sought to determine whether patients with white-coat or isolated clinic hypertension (ICH) show, in comparison to patients with sustained hypertension (SH), a defense response pattern to novel stimuli and an enhanced psychophysiological reactivity to stress. Forty-three patients with essential hypertension were divided into two groups after 16 days of self-monitoring blood pressure (BP): ICH (24 men; self-measured BP < 135/85 mmHg) and SH (19 men; self-measured BP >or= 135/85 mmHg). Defense responses were measured as the cardiac changes to phasic non-aversive auditory stimuli. Psychophysiological reactivity (heart and breath rate, blood volume pulse, electromyography, and skin conductance) was measured during mental arithmetic and video game tasks. The standard deviation of self-measured BPs and the difference between mean BPs at work and at home were used as indicators of cardiovascular reactivity to daily stress. No significant differences were seen in defense responses or psychophysiological reactivity to laboratory or naturally occurring stressors. These results do not support the hypothesis that ICH can be explained in terms of a generalized hyperreactivity to novel or stressful stimuli.

Nocturnal blood pressure fall and metabolic syndrome score in patients with white coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Accumulating data report that white coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Metabolic syndrome (MS), and nondipping pattern is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in WCH patients according to their MS score.

METHODS

The study comprised 2300 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria and patients were classified into five groups: group I (hypertension), group II (hypertension and any one component), group III (hypertension and any two components), group IV (hypertension and any three components), and group V (all five components). Dipping pattern was defined as 'dippers' with nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall greater than or equal to 10% but less than 20%, 'nondippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 0% but less than 10%, 'extreme dippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 20%, and 'reverse dippers' with NSBP increase.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (n=522) and absence (n=1778) of MS. The overall prevalence of MS in the study population was 22.7%. Comparing the non-MS group with the MS we observed significant differences for nondippers (24.5% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001), dippers (54.4% vs. 43.5%, P<0.001), extreme dippers (17.8% vs. 11.3%, P<0.001), and reverse dippers (3.3% vs. 6.3%, P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Patients with WCH and increased number of MS components present with elevated nighttime SBP levels. This observation is of a great significance in the assessment of the cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Left ventricular mass index in children with white coat hypertension

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether children with white coat hypertension (WCH) have evidence of target-organ damage by comparing the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of subjects with WCH with that of matched normotensive and hypertensive controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Each subject in the WCH group was matched by body mass index (BMI; +/- 10%), age (+/- 1 year), and sex to a normotensive control and a hypertensive control. Echocardiograms were reviewed to determine the LVMI for each subject. These triple matches were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to detect differences in LVMI among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 27 matched triplets were established. The groups were comparable for sex, age, and BMI. Mean LVMI was 29.2 g/m(2.7) for the normotensive group, 32.3 g/m(2.7) for the WCH group, and 35.1 g/m(2.7) for the sustained hypertensive group (normotensive vs WCH, P = .028; WCH vs sustained hypertension, P = .07). Left ventricular hypertrophy was not present in any subject in the normotensive or WCH groups, but was found in 26% of the sustained hypertensive subjects (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling closely for BMI, the LVMI in the subjects with WCH was between that of the normotensives and sustained hypertensives, suggesting that WCH may be associated with hypertensive end-organ effects.

Blood pressure measurements taken by patients are similar to home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements

OBJECTIVE

To compare blood pressure measurements taken at home by physicians, nurses, and patients with office blood pressure measurement , ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure measurement.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients seen by a home care program were studied. Protocol 1 a) blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician and a nurse during a regular home visit (Home1); b) home blood pressure measurement was measured for 4 days (HBPM1); c) office blood pressure measurement was measured by a physician, a nurse, and the patient; and by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Protocol 2 blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician, and a nurse during a special home visit in the presence of a physician and a nurse only (Home2); and b) home blood pressure measurement was taken for the second time (HBPM2). Echocardiography, guided by a two-dimensional echocardiograph, was performed.

RESULTS

Protocol 1: a) office blood pressure measurement and Home1 were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, except for systolic and diastolic office blood pressure measurement taken by the patient or a family member, systolic blood pressure taken by a nurse, and diastolic blood pressure taken by a physician. b) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and HBPM1 were similar. Protocol 2: a) HBPM2 and Home2 were similar. b) Home2 was significantly lower than Home1, except for diastolic blood pressure taken by a nurse or the patient. There were significant relationships between: a) diastolic blood pressure measured by the patient and the thickness of the interventricular septum, posterior wall, and left ventricular mass; and b) ambulatory and HBPM2 diastolic and systolic blood pressure taken by a physician (home2) and left ventricular mass. Therefore, the data indicate that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic values relative to "office measurement."

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the measurement most similar to home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was blood pressure measured by the patient, and that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic value relative to "office measurements".

Oxidative stress in human in sustained and white coat hypertension

Oxidative stress is thought to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Protein oxidation is defined here as the covalent modification of a protein induced either directly by reactive oxygen species or indirectly by reaction with secondary by-products of oxidative stress. The aim of our study was to evaluate the protein oxidation and to examine the function of the antioxidative system in sustained and white coat hypertensives (WCH) and compare with normotensives. This study was designed to investigate the protein oxidation parameters [protein carbonyls (PCOs)] in sustained hypertensives (17 males and 20 females) and WCH (18 males and 19 females). PCO and the endogenous antioxidant components protein thiol (P-SH), CuZn-superoxide dismutase (CuZn-SOD) and glutathione (GSH) were analysed using spectrophotometric and kinetic methods. Sustained hypertensive and WCH groups exhibited higher protein oxidation and lower P-SH, CuZn-SOD and GSH activities than normotensives. With regard to these parameters, there was no significant difference between sustained hypertensive and WCH groups. Blood pressure correlates positively with PCO groups and negatively with others. There exists an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in WCH because of the increase of oxidants associated with the decrease of antioxidant capacity. This may cause endothelial dysfunction just like in sustained hypertension. It may be necessary to add antioxidants to conventional antihypertensive therapy to balance the oxidative status in WCH.

Impaired arterial elasticity in young patients with white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Conflict still exists over whether patients with white-coat hypertension are at increased risk of developing target organ damage compared with normotensive individuals.

METHODS

We studied vascular distensibility in 117 young-to-middle age patients with white-coat hypertension, 174 patients with sustained hypertension, and 51 normotensive controls. To obtain a measure of compliance, a model was used that divides the total systemic compliance into large artery (C1) and small artery (C2) compliance. With this aim, radial arterial pulse waves were recorded with a tonometer sensor array by means of an HDI CR2000 device (Eagan, Minnesota, USA). Moreover, pulse wave velocity and the augmentation index were measured using the Specaway DAT system (St Pauls, Sydney, Australia).

RESULTS

Patients with sustained hypertension had a greater body mass index than patients with white-coat hypertension (P=0.04) or the normotensive individuals (P=0.01). C1 and C2 were decreased in the two hypertensive groups as compared with those in the normotensive group (P=0.0002 and 0.03, respectively, versus sustained hypertension; P=0.00007 and 0.0004, respectively, versus white-coat hypertension). Pulse wave velocity and aortic augmentation index were increased in the white-coat hypertension patients compared with the normotensive individuals (P=0.02 and 0.004, respectively). Aortic augmentation index (P=0.008) but not pulse wave velocity was increased in the sustained hypertensive patients compared with that in the normotensive individuals. All indexes of arterial distensibility were similar in the two hypertensive groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Indexes of arterial distensibility are impaired in the white-coat hypertensive group and similar to those in the sustained hypertensive group, indicating that early changes in the arterial wall can occur in white-coat hypertension. This may account for the higher risk of stroke that has been described in this condition.

Aortic elastic properties and left ventricular diastolic function in white-coat hypertensive individuals

OBJECTIVES

Although white-coat hypertension may be present in 25% or more of hypertensive individuals, its prognostic significance and predisposition to end organ damage is unknown. To evaluate whether white-coat hypertension is associated with end organ damage, we compared prognostically relevant measures of target-organ damage among 35 individuals with white-coat hypertension and age and sex-matched groups of sustained hypertension and normotensive individuals classified by clinical and 24-h ambulatory blood pressures.

METHODS

We evaluated left ventricular diastolic function and aortic elastic properties of 35 individuals with white-coat hypertension, 50 patients with sustained hypertension, and 35 normotensive healthy volunteers using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. None of the study participants with sustained hypertension and white-coat hypertension, who were newly diagnosed and never treated, had any systemic disease or coronary risk factor except hypertension.

RESULTS

Age, sex, and body mass indexes were similar among the three groups. Left ventricular diastolic function was more significantly impaired in the sustained hypertension and white-coat hypertension groups than in the control group, but it was not significantly different between the white-coat hypertension and sustained hypertension groups. Aortic distensibility was significantly lower, and aortic stiffness index was significantly higher in the sustained hypertension group than in the white-coat hypertension and control groups. Furthermore, aortic elastic properties were slightly impaired in the white-coat hypertension group compared with those in the control group. We also found a significant correlation between aortic elastic properties and left ventricular diastolic function.

CONCLUSIONS

White-coat hypertension may alter left ventricular diastolic function and aortic elastic properties. These alterations, however, might not be as remarkable as those caused by sustained hypertension. In this respect, individuals with white-coat hypertension are not at such a risk for end organ damage as patients with sustained hypertension.

White-coat hypertension in adults

White-coat hypertension is defined by the coexistence of persistently high office blood pressure (BP) with normal self-measured or ambulatory blood pressure. The prognostic impact of white-coat hypertension is a subject of debate. Cardiovascular morbidity seems to be lower in white-coat hypertension than in ambulatory hypertension, and, according to some but not all studies, is not dissimilar between white-coat hypertension and clinical normotension. In a large collaborative study including individual data from four prospective cohort studies, the incidence of stroke tended to increase in the white-coat hypertension group in the long run, crossing the hazard curve of the ambulatory hypertension by the ninth year of follow-up. These data raise the hypothesis, to be tested in future studies, that white-coat hypertension might not be a benign condition for stroke in the long term. Further studies are needed in order to: (1) test whether white-coat hypertension is really a benign condition for stroke in the long term; (2) compare, in patients with white-coat hypertension, a regimen based on life-style measures without drugs and a standard regimen consisting of life-style measures with the possible addition of drugs. On the basis of current evidence, it is reasonable to suggest a treatment based on life-style measures in the low-risk stratum of patients with white-coat hypertension under the conditions of correct definition, absence of comorbid conditions and target-organ damage, and adequate follow-up

Coronary flow reserve is preserved in white-coat hypertension

OBJECTIVES

To assess the possible influence of white-coat hypertension (WCH) on coronary flow reserve (CFR).

METHODS

CFR was measured by means of transthoracic second harmonic Doppler echocardiography in 29 patients with WCH, 32 patients with sustained hypertension and 35 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

CFR was significantly lower in the sustained hypertension group than in the WCH and the control groups, but it was not different between the WCH and the control groups (2.40 (SD 0.54), 2.77 (0.41) and 2.83 (0.60), respectively).

CONCLUSION

CFR is preserved in patients with WCH.

Increased circulating concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in white coat hypertension

Elevated plasma levels of the endogenous nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) contribute to endothelial dysfunction and seem to be a predictor for cardiovascular mortality. Elevated ADMA plasma concentrations have been demonstrated in patients with hypertension. However, the plasma concentrations of ADMA in white coat hypertension (WCH) has not been previously studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate ADMA in WCH and compare with normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) patients. We also evaluated the relation between ADMA and NO in these three groups. For this purpose, 34 NT, 34 white coat hypertensive (clinical hypertension and ambulatory daytime blood pressure <135/85 mmHg) and 34 HT patients were recruited in this study. The subjects were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and the patients with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were excluded. The ADMA levels were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Plasma ADMA levels were significantly higher in WCH group than in the NT group (3.21+/-0.49 micromol/l vs 2.84+/-0.58 micromol/l, P=0.046). It was significantly higher in the HT group than in the NTs (4.24+/-0.38 micromol/l, P<0.001). There was also a significant difference between the HT and WCH groups (P<0.001). The WCH subjects had significantly higher levels of NO than the HTs (41.68+/-2.23 vs 32.18+/-2.68 micromol/l; P<0.001) and significantly lower values than the NTs (48.24+/-4.29 micromol/l; P<0.001). In WCH and HT group, there was a negative correlation between ADMA and NO (r=-0.515, P=0.003 and r=-0.389, P=0.034, respectively). In NT subjects, there was no correlation between these two parameters (r=-0.287, P=0.124). The correlation between ADMA and NO was stronger in WCH group than in HT group. Although NO levels in HT patients were lower than WCHs and ADMA levels were higher in HT patients than WCHs, the negative correlation of these two parameters were more pronounced in WCH group. Decreased NO and increased ADMA levels in WCH may indicate endothelial dysfunction. Our data indicate also that WCH represent an intermediate group between NT and HT when endothelial dysfunction is concerned.

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure values.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 3303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive treatment in Japan. Information on the characteristics of the patients was collected by a physician's self-administrated questionnaire. The office blood pressure value was calculated as the average of the four readings in two visits. All patients were asked to measure their blood pressure once every morning and once every evening. In the study, we included patients with at least three measurements in the morning and in the evening, respectively. The average of all home blood pressure values was taken as the home blood pressure value.

RESULTS

The mean value of home systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 136.8/79.3 mmHg, and the mean value of office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8/80.6 mmHg. Of the 3303 patients, 758 (23.0%) had controlled hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 628 (19.0%) had masked uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 640 (19.4%) had treated white-coat hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg), and 1277 (38.7%) had uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Treated white-coat hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were often observed in clinical settings. Physicians need to understand the prevalence of such patients to prevent inadequate diagnosis and treatment in them.

Transiently elevated diastolic blood pressure is associated with a gender-dependent effect on cardiovascular risk

We assessed the morbidity and mortality of subjects with transiently elevated diastolic pressure in the General Practice Hypertension Study Group (GPHSG) population. A total of 23 578 patients (aged 18-65 years) from seven UK general practices were screened in 1974 for a diastolic blood pressure (DBP4) of > or = 90 mmHg. Two further readings of DBP4 determined hypertensive (either DBP4 > or = 90 mmHg) or transient hypertensive (both DBP4 < 90 mmHg) status. Transients (n = 850) were matched with normotensive controls (n = 824) and risk ratios calculated over a mean follow-up of 18.7 years. Rescreening was conducted in six of the practices (n = 20 942) after 7.7 years. Male transients had a higher relative hazard for cardiovascular mortality than controls (11.8%, 8.6%, adjusted relative hazard 1.59, P = 0.056). Female transients had a lower relative hazard for cardiovascular mortality than controls (3.6%, 5.4%, adjusted relative hazard 0.39, P = 0.018). In all, 422 patients with transient hypertension were rescreened along with 367 matched controls. Significantly more transients were on antihypertensive treatment compared with their controls (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI]) for both male (4.2 [1.6-11.1]) and female patients (2.4 [1.0-5.56]) and more untreated female transients developed hypertension. Male transients had a higher rates of diabetes mellitus (adj OR = 5.1, P = 0.04) and stroke (adj OR 15.9, P = 0.03). This study has shown that transiently elevated DBP in GPHSG is associated with a significantly higher risk of later hypertension in men and women and of diabetes, stroke and cardiovascular mortality in men. Women with this condition have a significantly lower cardiovascular mortality.

Hyperhomocysteinemia: an additional risk factor in white coat hypertension

The association between homocysteine and sustained hypertension (HT) has been studied. The aim of this study was to assess homocysteine levels in white coat hypertension (WCH) as an indicator of increased risk in the development of cardiovascular diseases. WCH was defined as clinical hypertension and a daytime ambulatory blood pressure of < 135/85 mmHg. Plasma levels of homocysteine were determined in patients with WCH, hypertension, and normotension (NT). The study group included 100 subjects, 33 with WCH (16 males, 17 females) aged 49.1 +/- 1.9; 35 sustained hypertensives (17 males,18 females) aged 48.5 +/- 1.7 and 32 normotensive control subjects (15 males, 17 females) aged 48.8 +/- 2.2. The subjects were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. Patients with a smoking habit, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus were not included in the study. Homocysteine levels were analyzed by ELISA. Plasma homocysteine levels were significantly higher in the WCH group compared to the controls (12.32 +/- 1.07 versus 5.35 +/- 1.38 micromol/L; P < 0.001) and the WCH group had significantly lower homocysteine values than the hypertensives (19.03 +/- 0.76 micromol/L P < 0.001). Total cholesterol and tri-glycerides were not different among the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary albumin excretion (UAE) or creatinine clearance between the three groups. Hypertensive retinopathy was observed in the WCH group, but was less severe and less frequent compared to HTs. LVMI was greater in the WCH group compared to the NTs, but significantly less than HTs. The data demonstrate that WCH is associated with high levels of homocysteine. The increase in homocysteine level in WCH is not as high as in SHT. Since an elevated plasma homocysteine level is a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease and there was target organ damage in our WCH group, we conclude that WCH should not be considered to be an innocent trait.

Endothelium and angiogenesis in white coat hypertension

Hypertensive patients are at particular risk of cardiovascular complications, possibly related to endothelial damage or dysfunction, or to abnormal angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to compare the risk conferred by white coat hypertension (WCH) vs sustained hypertension in the development of the endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis by evaluating nitric oxide (NO=NO2+NO3), endothelin-1 (ET-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and E-selectin levels in plasma. The study group included 102 subjects, 34 with WCH (17 male and 17 female patients) aged 49+/-11 years, 34 sustained hypertensives (HT) (15 male and 19 female patients) aged 47+/-11 years and 34 normotensive control subjects (NT) (16 male and 18 female patients) aged 48+/-10 years. WCH was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure less than 135/85 mmHg. The subjects were matched for age, gender, body mass index and the patients with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. The NO, ET-1, VEGF and E-selectin levels were analysed by ELISA technique. The WCH subjects had significantly higher levels of NO than the HT (41.68+/-2.23 vs 32.18+/-2.68 micromol/l; P<0.001) and significantly lower values than the NT (48.24+/-4.29 micromol/l; P<0.001). ET-1 levels of the WCH group were significantly higher than the NT (8.10+/-0.92 vs 5.95+/-0.26 ng/ml; P<0.001) and significantly lower than the HT (11.46+/-0.59 ng/ml; P<0.001). Considering with VEGF, the WCH group had significantly higher levels than the NT (195.88+/-11.84 vs 146.26+/-18.67 pg/ml; P<0.001), but the difference from the HT group was not significant (203.35+/-7.48 pg/ml; P=0.062). E-selectin in the WCH group was significantly lower than the HT (4.77+/-0.52 vs 8.49+/-2.85; P<0.001), but the difference from the NT group was not significant (3.86+/-0.67; P=0.077). Our data demonstrate that WCH is associated with endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis. The degree of these changes is not as severe as observed in hypertensive population.

White-coat hypertension: a clinical review

White-coat hypertension (WCHT), also called 'isolated office or clinic hypertension', is defined as the occurrence of blood pressure (BP) values higher than normal when measured in the medical environment, but within the normal range during daily life, usually defined as average daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) or home BP values (<135 mm Hg systolic and <85 mm Hg diastolic). The prevalence of WCHT varies from 15% to over 50% of all patients with mildly elevated office BP (OBP) values. In untreated hypertensive patients, the probability of WCHT especially increases with female gender and a mildly elevated OBP level. The value of other possible determinants such as (non) smoking status, duration of hypertension, left ventricular mass, number of OBP measurements, educational level, etc. is less consistently shown. Although, for various reasons, studies evaluating the long-term effects of WCHT are not always easy to interpret, most data indicate that persons with WCHT have a worse or equal cardiovascular prognosis than normotensives, but a better one than those with sustained hypertension. WCHT is sometimes considered a prehypertensive state, but data on the long-term evolution of subjects with WCHT are scarce. Patients with WCHT and a high cardiovascular risk or proven target organ damage should be pharmacologically treated. Subjects with uncomplicated WCHT should probably not receive medical therapy, but a close follow-up, including regular assessment of other risk factors and measurement of OBP (every 6 months) and ABP (every 1 or 2 years), is warranted.

Oxidative stress in white coat hypertension; role of paraoxonase

Oxidative stress in sustained hypertension was shown with several biochemical parameters. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) plays an important role during the atherosclerosis process and paraoxonase (PON1) can significantly inhibit lipid peroxidation. Serum PON1 activity, oxLDL and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations and their relationship with serum lipid parameters and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were determined in subjects with white coat hypertension (WCH), sustained hypertension (HT) and normotension (NT). The study group consisted of a total of 86 subjects, 30 with WCH (14 male, 16 female subjects), 30 with HT (13 male, 17 female subjects) and 26 with NT (12 male, 14 female subjects). Both white coat hypertensive and hypertensive subjects had significantly higher levels of MDA than normotensives (P<0.026 and P<0.001, respectively). The oxLDL level of the HT group was significantly higher than the NT group (P<0.023). The WCH group had an oxLDL level similar to both hypertensive and normotensive groups. HT and WCH groups had significantly lower PON1 levels than the normotensive group (P<0.001). oxLDL correlated with MDA positively (P=0.008), and PON1 negatively (P=0.008). A negative correlation between MDA and PON1 (P=0.014) was detected. MDA correlated positively with both SBP and DBP (P=0.001), while PON1 correlated with both of them negatively (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively). OxLDL correlated with diastolic blood pressure positively (P=0.008). Our data demonstrate that oxidative stress increase in WCH is associated with a decrease in PON1 activity. The reduction in PON1 activity may be one of the factors leading to an increase in oxidative status in WCH.

Target organ damage and changes in arterial compliance in white coat hypertension. Is white coat innocent?

The aim of this study was to perform an extensive evaluation of target organ status, metabolic abnormalities and hemodynamic alterations in white coat hypertension (WCH). Fifty normotensive (NT), 90 WCH (ambulatory daytime blood pressure < 135/85 mmHg) and 101 hypertensive (HT) subjects underwent extensive biochemical, echocardiographic, fundoscopic examination. In a subgroup study, arterial compliance and intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured by Doppler ultrasound in left common carotid artery. WCH subjects were found to have higher body mass index (BMI) than the NTs (p = 0.042). Left ventricle mass index (LVMI) was greater in the WCHs than the NTs (p < 0.001), but significantly less than the HTs (p < 0.001). Hypertensive retinopathy was observed in the WCHs, but was less severe and rare compared to the HTs (13% vs 27%). Both WCHs and HTs had high levels of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (p = not significant). Total cholesterol was higher in WCHs than in the NTs (p = 0.04) The distensibility coefficient (DC) of the WCHs was significantly greater than the HTs (p < 0.01), while significantly smaller than the NTs (p < 0.01). The compliance coefficient (CC) of the WCHs was significantly higher than the HTs (p < 0.01), and significantly less than the NTs (p < 0.01). The IMT in the HTs was significantly higher than the WCHs (0.81 +/- 0.05 vs 0.70 +/- 0.04 mm; p < 0.001) and the NTs (p < 0.001). The difference between the NTs and the WCHs was not significant. Our data indicate that patients with WCH represent an intermediate group between NTs and sustained HTs where target organ damage and cardiovascular risk is concerned.

White-Coat Hypertension Contributes to the Presence of Carotid Arteriosclerosis

It remains unclear whether white-coat hypertension is associated with vascular organ damage (e.g., carotid arteriosclerosis) in the same way sustained hypertension is. We therefore compared the progression of carotid arteriosclerosis among Japanese individuals showing normal blood pressures, sustained hypertension or white-coat hypertension. A total of 30 subjects (mean age, 58 years) with white-coat hypertension, 30 (mean age, 54 years) with untreated sustained hypertension who had no plaque formation in the carotid arteries, and 30 normotensive subjects (mean age, 58 years) were enrolled in this study. The white-coat and sustained hypertensive subjects were matched with respect to their clinical blood pressures, but their ambulatory blood pressures differed. Conversely, white-coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects were matched with respect to ambulatory blood pressures, but their clinical blood pressures differed. Carotid intimal-medial thickness was measured by B-mode ultrasonography, and the cross-sectional area of the common carotid artery was calculated. The three groups were similar with respect to age, sex ratio, height, laboratory data and the incidence of smoking. Body weights and body mass indexes were significantly higher among patients with sustained hypertension than among either normotensive or white-coat hypertensive patients. Intimal-medial thicknesses and carotid cross-sectional areas were similar in patients with white-coat and sustained hypertension and significantly higher than in normotensive subjects. Collectively, these findings suggest that white-coat hypertension contributed to the presence of carotid arteriosclerosis in our subjects in a manner similar to sustained hypertension. Thus, clinical evaluation of white-coat hypertension should be conducted with the potential for target organ damage in mind.

Relevance of blood pressure variation in the circadian onset of cardiovascular events

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a highly useful diagnostic tool as it can detect non-dipping and can distinguish masked hypertension, white-coat hypertension and sustained hypertension. Furthermore, measurement of blood pressure using ABPM has greater prognostic strength than single clinic blood pressure measurements. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe study, for example, found that elevation of ambulatory systolic blood pressure, but not conventional single cuff systolic blood pressure, by 10 mmHg was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Blood pressure follows a circadian rhythm, with peak levels during the morning hours. The morning period has also been associated with a greater risk for cardiovascular events compared with the rest of the 24 h. The morning surge in blood pressure, along with haemostatic changes that promote thrombosis, is believed to contribute to this heightened risk. Long-acting antihypertensive agents that provide blood pressure control throughout the 24-h dosing interval, including the morning hours, are the most appropriate therapeutic approach to hypertension. Direct comparative studies with telmisartan and other angiotensin-II receptor blockers and with amlodipine have shown that telmisartan has a long duration of action and controls blood pressure over the 24-h dosing period.

The white-coat effect is unrelated to the difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure and is associated with greater reactivity to public speaking

OBJECTIVE

To compare the blood pressure (BP) response to doctor's visit with the BP reaction to a psycho-social challenge and with the difference between clinic and daytime BP (DeltaC-D).

SUBJECTS

We studied 64 young stage-1 hypertensive subjects and 33 normotensive controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relationship between direct and surrogate measure of white-coat effect (WCE) and assessment of BP response to public speaking in subjects with normal or increased reaction to BP measurement.

METHODS

The responses to BP measurement by a doctor and to public speaking were assessed with beat-to-beat Finapres recording. DeltaC-D was calculated on the basis of two BP monitorings and used as a surrogate measure of WCE.

RESULTS

BP and heart rate changes elicited by the visit were unrelated to DeltaC-D and were correlated to the changes caused by the speech test [P <0.001 for systolic BP (SBP), P = 0.01 for diastolic BP (DBP), and P <0.001 for heart rate]. Hypertensive subjects with SBP response to doctor's visit above the median (hyper-reactive) showed increased reactivity also to public speaking (61 +/- 15 mmHg), while those with BP response below the median (normo-reactive) had a response to the psycho-social challenge (40 +/- 21 mmHg, 0.001 versus hyper-reactive) similar to that of the normotensive controls (38 +/- 17 mmHg). Epinephrine urinary output was greater in the hyper-reactive than the normo-reactive subjects (23 versus 12 microg/24 h, = 0.01). The SBP response to public speaking was greater in the hypertensive subjects with higher systolic daytime BP than in those with lower daytime BP (55.3 +/- 20.9 versus 45.1 +/- 20.6 mmHg, = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with increased WCE have an exaggerated response also to psycho-social stimuli. Average daytime BP, which incorporates the BP reactions to many psycho-social triggers can, thus, not be taken as the basal BP of an individual. This helps explain why DeltaC-D does not reflect the true WCE.

Circulating homocysteine levels in sustained and white coat hypertension

Although white coat hypertension has been widely studied in the last years, its risk profile is not yet completely clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating homocysteine levels, an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, in subjects with white coat and sustained hypertension. We selected 31 sustained hypertensive subjects, 31 white coat hypertensive subjects and 31 normotensive subjects matched for age, gender, body mass index and occupation. Women were also matched for menopausal status. Subjects with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. White coat hypertension was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/85 mmHg. Blood samples were drawn after a fasting period of 12 h for routine laboratory tests and homocysteine determination. Homocysteine levels were evaluated by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Creatinine, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides were not different among the groups. White coat hypertensive subjects had significantly lower homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients (8.2+/-2.0 vs 12.6+/-3.9 micromol/l, P=0.0003). No significant difference was observed between white coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects regarding this parameter (8.2+/-2.0 vs 7.6+/-1.9 micromol/l, P=0.9). In conclusion, our data show that middle-aged white coat hypertensive subjects without other cardiovascular risk factors have lower circulating homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients suggesting that they are at lower cardiovascular risk.

What is the white-coat effect and how should it be measured?

The white coat effect is conceived as a measure of the blood pressure response to a clinic visit, but there is no agreement as to exactly how it should be defined. The most widely used definition is the difference between the average clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressures, but other methods that have been used include the difference between clinic and home pressures, measurements using ambulatory blood pressures only, clinic measurements only, and laboratory (reactivity) testing. Few studies have compared the different methods, but the reactivity method has reported bigger changes of blood pressure and heart rate than the others. The effect tends to be greater in older than younger patients, in women than in men, but is present to a greater or lesser degree in almost all hypertensive patients. It is diminished but not obliterated by drug treatment. It is not closely related to overall blood pressure variability, and does not predict cardiovascular risk. The white coat effect appears to be idiosyncratic to the clinic setting.

The white-coat effect is associated with increased blood pressure reactivity to physical activity

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that blood pressure (BP) reactivity to the stress of a clinic visit, the so-called white-coat effect, is associated with increased BP reactivity to physical activity.

DESIGN

Patients referred to our clinic for assessment of hypertension prospectively underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring and simultaneous actigraphy.

METHODS

The difference between mean clinic BP and mean daytime ambulatory BP was considered to be a measure of the white-coat effect. Presence or absence of a white-coat effect (clinic-daytime difference > 0 mmHg) was added to a mixed model regression of BP on mean activity score for the 10-min interval preceding BP measurement.

RESULTS

The group (n = 421) was heterogeneous in age, gender, mean 24-h BP and use of antihypertensive medications. A total of 259 patients had a systolic white-coat effect; for diastolic BP there were 264. Female patients exhibited a significantly larger white-coat effect. Coefficients for the regressions of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure on physical activity levels were significantly higher in those who had a white-coat effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest increased BP reactivity to activity in those with a white-coat effect. Patients with a prominent white-coat effect may experience greater BP load during normal daily activities as a consequence of increased BP reactivity. In patients with white-coat hypertension, this may contribute to target-organ damage.

[Medical stress and blood pressure]

BP measurement by a physician may trigger a blood pressure and heart rate increase often referred to as the white coat effect. This pressure response may occur both in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. The identification of such individuals is usually not possible on a clinical basis. This identification is however important because white coat effect and permanent hypertension do not share the same prognosis, the white coat effect being associated with a low rate of cardiovascular complications. To avoid an important overestimation of the real blood pressure level due to this white coat effect, it is possible to increase the delay before blood pressure measurements (beyond 15 minutes) or to take into account measurements made by nurses. Reading may also have a favorable consequence. However, a blood pressure recording outside the office, that is an ambulatory or a home blood pressure measurement, is the only way to confirm the presence of a white coat effect. The decision to treat is based on this measurement.

Clinic and ambulatory heart rate in sustained and white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sustained and white-coat hypertensives show hypertension in the office setting but different blood pressure values outside the clinical environment. So far, only a few incomplete data on heart rate are available inside and outside the clinical setting in these groups of patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinic and ambulatory heart in sustained hypertensives, white-coat hypertensives and normotensives.

METHODS

We selected 236 sustained hypertensives, 236 white-coat hypertensives and 236 normotensives matched for age, gender and body mass index, and with a similar occupation. The subjects had been submitted to clinic evaluation and the non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate. White-coat hypertension was defined as clinic hypertension and a daytime blood pressure of less than 135/85 mmHg.

RESULTS

The clinic heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives and white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives (76 +/- 11 versus 75.5 +/- 10 versus 70 +/- 9 beats/min [bpm], respectively, P < 0.05). The daytime heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives than in white-coat hypertensives and normotensives (79.4 +/- 10 versus 74.6 +/- 8.5 versus 74.5 +/- 8.5 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05), as were the night-time heart rate (67 +/- 8.5 versus 63 +/- 8 versus 63 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05) and 24 h heart rate (76.3 +/- 9 versus 72 +/- 7.8 versus 72 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05). When men and women were analyzed separately, the same trend was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinic heart rate is similar in sustained and white-coat hypertensives, but the ambulatory heart rate is lower in white-coat hypertensives. As ambulatory heart rate is more representative of 24 h heart rate load and may be a better indicator of the detrimental effect of heart rate, our findings suggest that white-coat hypertensives are at lower cardiovascular risk than sustained hypertensives.

Ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has emerged as a valuable clinical and research tool in the assessment of pediatric hypertension. Large databases of 24-hour blood pressure monitorings in healthy children are under development for establishing normal reference values analogous to the Task Force data for casual blood pressure. In the clinical setting, pediatric studies using ABPM to evaluate elevated blood pressure have shown that the prevalence of white coat hypertension in children is similar to that reported in adults. Furthermore, 24-hour blood pressure parameters are correlated with hypertensive end-organ injury such as left ventricular hypertrophy. ABPM has allowed detailed assessment of circadian blood pressure patterns that show early subtle abnormalities in some high-risk groups and normal patterns in other groups previously thought to be at high risk. These studies will assist in the practice of evidence-based medicine regarding pediatric hypertension that will improve the long-term care that pediatricians provide to their patients.

Isolated office hypertension: are there any markers of future blood pressure status?

BACKGROUND

The introduction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring into clinical practice has defined a clinical condition called 'isolated office hypertension'.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes in patients with isolated office hypertension and to identify the presence of markers capable of identifying which patients will develop sustained hypertension.

METHODS

All the 407 patients enrolled had a random office systolic or/and diastolic blood pressure of over 140/90mmHg and a mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure of 130/84mmHg or less. At enrollment, each patient underwent a 'baseline examination' made up of a physical evaluation, a 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and a mental arithmetic test performed at the end of the 24h ambulatory monitoring.

RESULTS

Of the 173 patients finally studied, 102 (58.9%) developed sustained hypertension with an increase in both ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At the time of the baseline examination, the patients were divided into two groups. Group A included patients with mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the first hour of 130/84mmHg or less; group B included patients with mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic pressures in the first hour of greater than 130/84mmHg. During the mental arithmetic test, the systolic and heart rate values increased significantly only in group B patients. Of the 102 patients who had become hypertensive by the time of the follow-up examination, 84 (82%) belonged to group B.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that isolated office hypertension may indeed be a transitional state towards the development of sustained hypertension. Moreover, the mean ambulatory blood pressure value during the first hour can be considered to be a marker of a higher risk of developing sustained hypertension.

White coat hypertension in children with elevated casual blood pressure

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed our experience using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in children referred to a hypertension clinic to determine the frequency of pediatric white coat hypertension (WCH).

STUDY DESIGN

WCH was defined by 3 different diagnostic criteria: (1) mean 24-hour blood pressure (BP) less than Task Force-defined 95th percentile, (2) mean 24-hour BP less than 95th percentile from pediatric normative ABPM data, and (3) mean 24-hour BP less than ABPM 95th percentile and BP load (percentage of BP readings during 24-hour period exceeding the 95th percentile) less than 25%.

RESULTS

Clinic BP values were available in 67 otherwise healthy children who underwent ABPM; 51 had confirmed clinic hypertension by Task Force criteria. WCH frequency in these 51 patients with the stated criteria was 53%, 45%, and 22%, respectively. Elevated BP load was found in 52% (12/23) of patients with normal mean BP.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that many children referred for casual BP elevation have WCH even by strict diagnostic criteria. ABPM may help differentiate WCH from persistent hypertension, thereby avoiding unnecessary diagnostic evaluation and identifying children most likely to benefit from early intervention.

White coat hypertension in children

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become more widely used in the assessment of elevated blood pressure in children. The accurate diagnosis of white coat hypertension (WCH) is particularly important in children because detection of elevated blood pressure often results in expensive and invasive diagnostic procedures to detect underlying disease. Recent normative pediatric data have both enhanced our ability to interpret ABPM results in pediatric patients and increased awareness that children suffer from WCH as has already been reported in adults. The few studies of WCH in children report a prevalence ranging from 44-88%, depending on the choice of threshold values for normalcy. When persistent hypertension is confirmed by three blood pressure measurements on three different occasions, ABPM should be performed as part of the initial evaluation. If hypertension is confirmed by ABPM, further evaluation should be tailored to the individual patient depending on the age, severity of hypertension, associated risk factors, and presence of end-organ injury.

Treatment of white coat hypertension

White coat hypertension has been defined as the persistent elevation of blood pressure at the clinic or office only. It usually implies that daily ambulatory blood pressure is normal. The accepted cutoff for normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure is 135/85 mm Hg. The prevalence of white coat hypertension is high and varies from 20% to 45%. It appears to be more frequent in women, older patients, and persons with mild hypertension. White coat hypertension should not be confused with the white coat effect. The white coat effect signifies the difference in blood pressure between the office and daytime ambulatory blood pressure and occurs in patients with white coat hypertension as well as in patients with sustained hypertension that is treated or untreated. White coat hypertension is a benign condition, and the incidence of target-organ damage or cardiovascular morbidity and death is not significantly different from that in normotensive persons. Pharmacologic treatment should be withheld; instead, treatment should consist of lifestyle modification, moderate salt restriction, weight reduction, regular exercise, smoking cessation, and correction of glucose and lipid abnormalities. In addition, semiannual or annual follow-up with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is advised.

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications

This article is a critical review of the available evidence on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Several event-based cohort studies have shown that ABP improves cardiovascular risk stratification over and beyond traditional risk factors, including office BP. Most of these studies have been conducted in subjects with essential hypertension who were untreated at the time of execution of ABP monitoring; other studies have been conducted in subjects who were poorly controlled with treatment or in the general population. In these studies, ABP was examined as a continuous variable or with operational risk categories. Cardiovascular risk showed a direct and independent association with the observed ABP (systolic, diastolic, and pulse) and an inverse association with the degree of BP reduction from day to night. Cardiovascular risk was also directly associated with the difference between the observed value of ABP and that predicted from the office BP. White-coat hypertension versus ambulatory hypertension and dippers versus nondippers are 2 classifications based on arbitrary operational risk categories. A blunted or absent BP reduction from day to night, defined with ABP as a continuous variable or with operational thresholds, was also associated with a worse outcome regardless of the average value of ABP during the 24 hours. Overall, these studies indicate that ABP monitoring is particularly valuable to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in untreated subjects with office hypertension and in those with resistant hypertension. Intervention studies targeted at ABP are now needed.

"White coat hypertension" in adolescents: increased values of urinary cortisol and endothelin

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether "white coat hypertension" (WCH) in adolescents is an innocent phenomenon or is associated with early changes of the vascular system and/or increased stress response, reflected in the urinary endothelin and cortisol values, respectively.

STUDY DESIGN

The study group included 36 subjects, 14 with WCH (8 males and 6 females) aged 12.9 +/- 3 years and 22 normotensive control subjects (12 males and 10 females) aged 13 +/- 3.5 years. WCH was defined as systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or =95th percentile for age, sex, and height and with reported normal BP measurements at home. Urinary endothelin (UET1), urinary free cortisol (UFC), and plasma renin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay; and urinary albumin levels were determined by nephelometry. For statistical analysis, the Mann Whitney U test, Spearman correlation coefficient, and multivariate analysis of variance/multivariate analysis of covariance were used, as applicable.

RESULTS

The 24-hour values of UET1 and UFC were greater in male subjects with WCH than in male control subjects (P =.02), whereas no such difference was found in female subjects. The difference in UFC values in male subjects was accounted for by the day values. In subjects with WCH, and not in control subjects, a positive correlation of UET1 to UFC (r = 0.59, P =.027), diastolic BP (r = 0.55, P =.04), and mean BP (r = 0.65, P =.012) was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that WCH in adolescence may not be an innocent phenomenon and may represent a prelude to permanent idiopathic hypertension of adulthood.

Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension.

METHODS

Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF.

RESULTS

In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives.

CONCLUSION

This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect.

Diagnosis of white coat hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

White coat hypertension (WCH) is common in referred hypertensive patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is not free from the white coat syndrome. We examined the use of the elevation of the first and last measurements of ABPM for diagnosis of WCH in a hypertensive population that had been referred to a hospital-based hypertension unit. Data were obtained on 1350 patients for clinic and ABPM parameters. WCH, as diagnosed by conventional clinic blood pressure (BP) measurement, was compared with a variety of alternative methods determined from ABPM. In all cases, mean daytime pressure was <135 mm Hg/85 mm Hg with an elevation of clinic BP >/=140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic. The definitions tested for this elevation were first hour mean pressure, first reading, maximum reading in first hour, last hour mean pressure, last reading, maximum reading in the last hour and maximum reading in first or last hour. Elevation of the maximum pressure in the first hour or last hour above 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic showed a high level of agreement (kappa=0.91) with classical WCH for diagnosis of the white coat syndrome. Termed ambulatory white coat hypertension, patients with this finding were older than classic white coat patients and had higher daytime (127+/-6/78+/-5 mm Hg versus 121+/-5.5/74+/-6 mm Hg, P<0.005 for systolic and diastolic) and nighttime (114+/-11/67+/-8 mm Hg versus 106+/-9/61+/-6 mm Hg, P<0.005 for systolic and diastolic) pressures. They also had a significantly greater Sokolow-Lyon index (leads V(1)+V(5), 21+/-7 mV versus 18+/-6 mV). Elevation of BP above 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic in the first or last hour of monitoring diagnoses patients with a white coat response in whom there is a higher BP profile than in patients with classic white coat response alone. We suggest, therefore, that this is a better measure of the white coat phenomenon.

Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has now become an established clinical tool. It is appropriate to take stock and assess the situation of this technique. UPDATE ON EQUIPMENT: Important improvements in equipment have occurred, with reductions in weight, in awkwardness and in noisiness of the machines, better acceptability and tolerance by the patients, and better reliability. Validation programmes have been proposed and should be referred to. Limitations of the technique persist with intermittent recording in current practice. The reproducibility is limited in the short-term while recording over 24 h is acceptable. DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS: White-coat effect (WCE) is manifested as a transient elevation in blood pressure during the medical visit The frequency of this phenomenon, the size of the effect, age, sex and level of blood pressure (BP) or the situation of occurrence (general practitioner, specialist or nurse) have been interpreted differently. It does not seem that WCE predicts cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. White-coat hypertension (WCH) is diagnosed on the evidence of abnormal clinical measures of BP and normal ABPM. The latest upper limits of normality by ABPM recommended by the JNCVI are < 135/85 mmHg while patients are awake and < 120/75 mmHg while patients are asleep. If we accept these upper limits of normality in ABPM, WCH does not appear to be a real problem as regards risk factors or end-organ effects. In terms of prognosis, data are limited. Cardiovascular morbidity seems low in WCH but identical to that of hypertensive subjects in these studies. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results. WCH does not appear to benefit from anti-hypertensive treatment. It is obvious that the lower the BP regarded as the limit of normality, the less likely the occurrence of secondary effects of metabolism, or end-organ effects or complications in those classified as hypertensive. 24 HOUR CYCLE: One of the most specific characteristics of ABPM is the possibility of being able to discover modification or alteration of the 24 h cycle of BP. Non-dippers are classically defined as those who show a reduction in BP of less than 10/5 mmHg or 10% between the day (06.00-22.00 h) and the night, or an elevation in BP. In contrast, extreme dippers are those in whom the BP reduction is greater than 20%. CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM: The data remain inconclusive with regard to the existence of a consistent relationship between the lack of a nocturnal dip in blood pressure and target organ damage. As regards prognosis, it seems that an inversion of the day-night cycle is of pejorative significance. CEREBROVASCULAR SYSTEM: Almost all studies have shown that non-dippers had a significantly higher frequency of stroke than dippers. In contrast, too great a fall in nocturnal BP may be responsible for more marked cerebral ischaemia. RENAL SYSTEM: Non-dippers have a significantly elevated median urinary excretion of albumin. There is a significant correlation between the systolic BP and nocturnal diastolic BP, and urinary excretion of albumin. Various studies have confirmed the increased frequency of change in the 24 h cycle in hypertensive subjects at the stage of renal failure.

DIABETES

BP abnormalities should be considered as markers of an elevated risk in diabetic subjects but cannot be considered at present as predictive of the appearance of micro-albuminuria or other abnormalities. ABPM is thus of interest in type I or type II diabetes both in the initial assessment and in the follow-up and adaptation of treatment. PHARMACO-THERAPEUTIC USES: The introduction of ABPM has truly changed the means and possibilities of approach to the study of the effects of anti-hypertensive medications, with new possibilities of analysis such as trough-peak ratio smoothness index, etc.

"White coat effect" induced by therapist's presence during speech therapy for stroke rehabilitation: a single case study

The excessive pressor response triggered in patients by an alerting reaction to a doctor's presence has been termed the "white coat effect." A 68-year-old man with verbal apraxia after multiple lacunar infarctions was referred to the hospital for speech rehabilitation. He experienced difficulty in talking with the speech therapist during therapy sessions but not when talking with his friends or family. Because the therapist's presence was stressful to the patient, it was considered that his anxiety might produce an excessive increase in blood pressure. Blood pressure monitoring was performed during 2 separate days of speech therapies consisting of two sessions each. In one session, therapy was directed by the therapist; in the other, therapy was self-directed. The therapist-directed approach substantially increased both systolic and diastolic blood pressures, whereas the self-directed therapy slightly increased only systolic pressure. It was concluded that the excessive pressor response seen in this patient during therapist-directed speech therapy resulted from the white coat effect induced by the therapist's presence.

Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension: a 10-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the risk conferred by white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension for the development of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n=479) who underwent 24-hour intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the basis of a persistently elevated clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg were followed up for the development of subsequent cardiovascular events during a 9.1+/-4. 2-year period. White-coat hypertension, defined as a clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg associated with a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, was present in 126 patients, and the remainder had sustained mild hypertension. A subgroup of patients without complications underwent follow-up echocardiography and carotid ultrasound. White-coat hypertensives were younger (44+/-12 versus 52+/-10 years, respectively; P<0.001) and had a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular events (1.32 versus 2.56 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; P<0.001) than sustained hypertensives. Multivariate analysis revealed age (P=0.002), sex (P=0.007), race (P=0.001), smoking (P=0.005), and the presence of white-coat hypertension (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.90; P=0.04) to be independent predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events. Subgroup analysis in patients without complications revealed a lower incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and lesser degrees of carotid hypertrophy in the white-coat group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate a relatively benign outcome in white-coat hypertension compared with sustained mild hypertension.