Lacidipine restores endothelium-dependent vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients

Lacidipine Ameliorates the Endothelial Senescence and Inflammatory Injury Through CXCR7/P38/C/EBP-β Signaling Pathway

Background: Lacidipine, a third-generation calcium channel blocker, exerts beneficial effects on the endothelium of hypertensive patients in addition to blood pressure lowering. However, the detailed mechanism underlying Lacidipine-related endothelial protection is still elusive.

Methods: Sixteen spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHRs) were randomly divided into two groups: Lacidipine-treated SHR group and saline-treated control group. Tail systolic blood pressure was monitored for four consecutive weeks. Endothelial cells (ECs) were pretreated with Lacidipine prior to being stimulated with H₂O₂, bleomycin, or Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in vitro. Then, cell activity, migration, and senescence were measured by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, transwell assay, and β-galactosidase staining, respectively. The fluorescent probe 2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) was used to assess the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Related protein expression was detected by Western blotting and immunofluorescence.

Results: Our data showed that Lacidipine treatment lowered the blood pressure of SHRs accompanied by the elevation of CXCR7 expression and suppression of P38 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBP-β) compared with the control group. In vitro experiments further demonstrated that Lacidipine increased the cell viability and function of ECs under oxidative stress, cell senescence, and inflammatory activation via the CXCR7/P38/signaling pathway.

Conclusions: Our results suggested that Lacidipine plays a protective role in EC senescence, oxidative stress, and inflammatory injury through the regulation of CXCR7/P38/C/EBP-β signaling pathway.

Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease, from Biology to Clinical Outcomes: A 2020 Update

The vascular endothelium is a dynamic, functionally complex organ, modulating multiple biological processes, including vascular tone and permeability, inflammatory responses, thrombosis, and angiogenesis. Endothelial dysfunction is a threat to the integrity of the vascular system, and it is pivotal in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability is a hallmark of chronic kidney disease (CKD), with this disturbance being almost universal in patients who reach the most advanced phase of CKD, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Low NO bioavailability in CKD depends on several mechanisms affecting the expression and the activity of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). Accumulation of endogenous inhibitors of eNOS, inflammation and oxidative stress, advanced glycosylation products (AGEs), bone mineral balance disorders encompassing hyperphosphatemia, high levels of the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and low levels of the active form of vitamin D (1,25 vitamin D) and the anti-ageing vasculoprotective factor Klotho all impinge upon NO bioavailability and are critical to endothelial dysfunction in CKD. Wide-ranging multivariate interventions are needed to counter endothelial dysfunction in CKD, an alteration triggering arterial disease and cardiovascular complications in this high-risk population.

Beneficial effects of combined therapy with lacidipine and candesartan in obese hypertensive patients

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is becoming one of the leading risk factors of coronary heart disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease. Despite the presence of a large number of antihypertensive agents and scientific substantiation of antihypertensive treatment principles it would be wrong to assume that the problem is completely solved. Development of endothelial dysfunction is one of the key pathogenic mechanisms in hypertension. This process is proven to have contributed by immune inflammation activation which is mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress.

AIMS

To investigate the additional benefits of the combined antihypertensive therapy with lacidipine and candesartan on the basis of studying their antioxidant properties, impact on endothelial function and pro-inflammatory cytokines activity in hypertensive patients with overweight and obesity.

METHODS

A combination of a calcium channel blocker and angiotensin receptor blocker (lacidipine 2 mg, 4 mg, and candesartan 4mg, 8mg, 16mg) was prescribed to 30 patients with essential hypertension of grades 1-3, 30 to 65 years old (mean age - 54.7 ± 5.8 years), who previously have not been receiving regular antihypertensive therapy.

RESULTS

During the course of combined antihypertensive therapy with lacidipine and candesartan, a significant reduction in i-NOS activity, TNF-α to its type I soluble receptor ratio (TNF- α/sTNF-αRI), and oxidative stress marker - 8-iso-PgF2α has been observed. Activity of e-NOS, levels of SOD and catalase, in contrast, have increased by the end of observation period.

CONCLUSION

The improvement of endothelial function due to lower level of oxidative stress and a significant decrease of immune activation has been observed in hypertensive patients with overweight and obesity under the influence of combined antihypertensive therapy with lacidipine and candesartan.

Hydrogen sulfide improves endothelial dysfunction in hypertension by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta/endothelial nitric oxide synthase signaling

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to elucidate the ameliorative effect of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on endothelium-dependent relaxation disturbances via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta/endothelial nitric oxide synthase (PPARδ/eNOS) pathway activation in hypertensive patients and rats.

METHODS

Renal arteries were collected from normotensive and hypertensive patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery. Renal arteries from 37 patients were cultured with or without sodium H2S (NaHS) 50 μmol/l. The rats were randomly divided into four groups: Sham; Sham + NaHS, two kidneys; one clipped (2K1C); and 2K1C + NaHS. Mean arterial pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography. A microvessel recording technique was used to observe the effect of NaHS on endothelium-dependent relaxation. Plasma H2S concentrations were detected using the monobromobimane method. Real-time PCR and western blotting were used to assess mRNA and protein levels of AT1, cystathionine γ-lyase, PPARδ, and phosphor-eNOS. Laser confocal scanning microscopy measured intracellular NO production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

RESULTS

NaHS improved endothelial function in hypertensive humans and rats. The 20-week administration of NaHS to 2K1C rats lowered the mean arterial pressure. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells, NaHS improved the AngII-induced production of NO. NaHS upregulated PPARδ expression, increased protein kinase B (Akt) or adenosine monophosphate kinase-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation, and enhanced eNOS phosphorylation. A PPARδ agonist could mimic the ameliorative effect of NaHS that was suppressed by PPARδ, AMPK, or Akt inhibition.

CONCLUSION

H2S plays a protective function in renal arterial endothelium in hypertension by activating the PPARδ/PI3K/Akt/eNOS or PPARδ/AMPK/eNOS pathway. H2S may serve as an effective strategy against hypertension.

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

Endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension

Although the endothelium has a number of important functions, the term endothelial dysfunction is commonly used to describe impairment in its vasodilatory capacity. It is increasingly recognized that this is related to hypertension, although whether it predates essential hypertension or is a consequence of it is still unknown. In this review, we explore the mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension, its prognostic significance and methods of pharmacological reversal.

Drug Treatment of Hypertension: Focus on Vascular Health

Hypertension, the most common preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death, is a growing health burden. Serious cardiovascular complications result from target organ damage including cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and renal failure. While many systems contribute to blood pressure (BP) elevation, the vascular system is particularly important because vascular dysfunction is a cause and consequence of hypertension. Hypertension is characterised by a vascular phenotype of endothelial dysfunction, arterial remodelling, vascular inflammation and increased stiffness. Antihypertensive drugs that influence vascular changes associated with high BP have greater efficacy for reducing cardiovascular risk than drugs that reduce BP, but have little or no effect on the adverse vascular phenotype. Angiotensin converting enzyme ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) improve endothelial function and prevent vascular remodelling. Calcium channel blockers also improve endothelial function, although to a lesser extent than ACEIs and ARBs. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockers improve endothelial function and reduce arterial stiffness, and have recently become more established as antihypertensive drugs. Lifestyle factors are essential in preventing the adverse vascular changes associated with high BP and reducing associated cardiovascular risk. Clinicians and scientists should incorporate these factors into treatment decisions for patients with high BP, as well as in the development of new antihypertensive drugs that promote vascular health.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment with lercanidipine on endothelial progenitor cells and inflammation in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

It has been demonstrated that circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) number reflects the endogenous vascular repair ability, with the EPCs pool declining in presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Several drugs, including dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, have been reported to elicit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as to improve vascular remodeling and dysfunction. However, no data are available about the effects of lercanidipine on EPCs. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the effects of short-term treatment with lercanidipine on circulating EPCs, as well as on indices of inflammation and oxidative stress.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty essential hypertensive patients were included in the study and treated for 4 weeks with lercanidipine 20 mg per day orally. Investigations were performed in basal condition, after appropriate wash out of previous treatments, and after 4 weeks of lercanidipine treatment. Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers were assessed by ELISA technique. Lin-/7AAD-/CD34+/CD133+/VEGFR-2 + and Lin-/7AAD-/CD34+/VEGFR-2 + cells were identified by flow cytometry and considered as EPCs. EPCs cells were expressed as number of cells per million Lin-mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

Circulating EPCs were significantly increased after lercanidipine treatment (CD34+/CD133+/VEGFR-2 + cells: 78.3 ± 64.5 vs 46.6 ± 32.8; CD34+/VEGFR-2+: 87996 ± 165116 vs 1026 ± 1559, respectively, p < 0.05). A modest reduction in circulating indices of inflammation was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, lercanidipine is able to increase the number of circulating EPCs, possibly through a reduction of low-grade inflammation.

Inconsistent Correlation Between Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Peripheral Arterial Tonometry: Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

To estimate the association between 2 markers for atherosclerosis, measurements of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and of peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), and to evaluate the role of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in this association.We applied the 2 diagnostic tests to 588 participants from the ELSA-Brazil longitudinal study cohort. The PAT measurements, obtained with the EndoPAT2000, were the reactive hyperemia index (RHI), the Framingham RHI (F-RHI), and the mean basal pulse amplitude (BPA). We used the mean of the mean scores of carotid IMT of the distal layers of the left and right common carotids obtained by ultrasonography after 3 cardiac cycles. We used linear regression and the Spearman correlation coefficient to test the relationship between the 2 markers, and multiple linear regressions to exam the relationship between the RHI/F-RHI scores and the mean BPA and IMT scores after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.In the multivariate analysis, RHI (but not F-RHI) was positively correlated with the mean of the means of the IMT values after adjusting for sex and risk factors connected with both measures (β = 0.05, P = 0.02). Mean BPA did not remain significantly associated with IMT after adjusting for common risk factors.We found that the higher the IMT (or the worse the IMT), the higher the RHI (or the better the endothelial function). F-RHI was not associated with IMT. These 2 results are against the direction that one would expect and may imply that digital endothelial function (RHI and F-RHI) and IMT correspond to distinct and independent stages of the complex atherosclerosis process and represent different pathways in the disease's progression. Therefore, IMT and PAT measures may be considered complementary and not interchangeable.

Efficacy and safety of calcium channel blocker/diuretics combination therapy in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis

Although recent guidelines recommend the combination of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and thiazide (-like) diuretics, this combination is not widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination regarding the following endpoints: all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Four studies with a total of 30,791 of patients met the inclusion criteria. The combination CCB/thiazide (-like) diuretic was associated with a significant risk reduction for myocardial infarction (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.95) and stroke (RR, 0.77; CI, 0.64-0.92) compared with other combinations, whereas it was similarly effective compared with other combinations in reducing the risk of all-cause (RR, 0.89; CI, 0.75-1.06) and cardiovascular (RR, 0.89; CI 0.71-1.10) mortality. Elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension may particularly benefit from such a combination, since both drug classes have been shown to confer cerebrovascular protection.

Treating coronary disease and the impact of endothelial dysfunction

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Many clinical trials have suggested that lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions are effective in attenuating atherosclerotic disease progression and events development. However, an individualized approach with careful consideration to comprehensive vascular health is necessary to perform successful intervention strategies. Endothelial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in the early stage of atherosclerosis and is also associated with plaque progression and occurrence of atherosclerotic complications. The assessment of endothelial function provides us with important information about individual patient risk, progress and vulnerability of disease, and guidance of therapy. Thus, the application of endothelial function assessment might enable clinicians to innovate ideal individualized medicine. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the impact of pharmacological therapies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on endothelial dysfunction, and argue for the utility of non-invasive assessment of endothelial function aiming at individualized medicine.

Lacidipine improves endothelial repair capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a critical role in maintaining the integrity of vascular endothelium following arterial injury. Lacidipine has a beneficial effect on endothelium of hypertensive patients, but limited data are available on EPCs-mediated endothelial protection. This study tests the hypothesis that lacidipine treatment can improve endothelial repair capacity of EPCs from hypertensive patients through increasing CXC chemokine receptor four (CXCR4) signaling.

METHODS

In vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from hypertensive patients with or without in vitro lacidipine treatment was examined in a nude mouse model of carotid artery injury. Expression of CXCR4 and alteration in migration and adhesion functions of EPCs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Basal CXCR4 expression was markedly reduced in EPCs from hypertensive patients compared with normal subjects. In parallel, the phosphorylation of Janus kinase-2 (JAK-2) of EPCs, a CXCR4 downstream signaling, was also significantly decreased. Lacidipine promoted CXCR4/JAK-2 signaling expression of in vitro EPCs. Transplantation of EPCs pretreated with lacidipine significantly accelerated in vivo reendothelialization. The enhanced in vitro function and in vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs were inhibited by shRNA-mediated knockdown of CXCR4 expression or pretreatment with JAK-2 inhibitor AG490, respectively. In hypertensive patients, lacidipine treatment for 4 weeks also resulted in an upregulation of CXCR4/JAK-2 signaling of EPCs, which was associated with augmented EPCs-mediated reendothelialization and improved endothelial function.

CONCLUSION

Deterioration of CXCR4 signaling may lead to impaired EPCs-mediated reendothelialization of hypertensive patients. Lacidipine-modified EPCs via a partially CXCR4 signaling contribute to enhanced endothelial repair capacity in hypertension.

Metabolic effects of manidipine

The calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) were originally introduced as vasodilators for the treatment of coronary heart disease, but are now also noted for their clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension. Data from large clinical studies have shown that CCAs are not associated with the undesirable metabolic effects (e.g. worsening of dyslipidemia and reduction of insulin sensitivity) seen with older agents such as thiazide diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) that are used to treat hypertension. Indeed, reductions in cardiovascular risk and rates of onset of new cases of diabetes mellitus have been reported in trials in patients with hypertension treated with CCAs. These beneficial effects extend beyond those expected to accompany reductions in BP. Until recently, the biochemical effects underlying these metabolic changes were only poorly understood, but pharmacologic studies have now started to shed more light on these issues. Of particular interest are studies with manidipine, some of which suggest that this agent may be associated with greater improvements in insulin sensitivity and may have better renal protective properties than other CCAs. Confirmation of potential differences among CCAs in terms of the relative magnitude of any beneficial metabolic effects requires further study. Ongoing research is expected to clarify further the action of these agents at the cellular level and to assist with the optimization of antihypertensive therapy, particularly in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk profiles.

Current therapeutic strategies to mitigate the eNOS dysfunction in ischaemic stroke

Impairment of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity is implicated in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in many diseases including ischaemic stroke. The modulation of eNOS during and/or following ischaemic injury often represents a futile compensatory mechanism due to a significant decrease in nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability coupled with dramatic increases in the levels of reactive oxygen species that further neutralise NO. However, applications of a number of therapeutic agents alone or in combination have been shown to augment eNOS activity under a variety of pathological conditions by potentiating the expression and/or activity of Akt/eNOS/NO pathway components. The list of these therapeutic agents include NO donors, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors, aspirin, dipyridamole and ellagic acid. While most of these compounds exhibit anti-platelet properties and are able to up-regulate eNOS expression in endothelial cells and platelets, others suppress eNOS uncoupling and tetrahydrobiopterin (an eNOS stabiliser) oxidation. As the number of therapeutic molecules that modulate the expression and activity of eNOS increases, further detailed research is required to reveal their mode of action in preventing and/or reversing the endothelial dysfunction.

Effects of antihypertensive treatment on endothelial function

Essential hypertension is characterized by endothelial dysfunction due to reduced availability of nitric oxide (NO) secondary to increased generation of oxygen-free radicals. Some antihypertensive drugs may improve or restore endothelial function independently of their blood pressure lowering effect. The newer generation of β-blockers, such as nebivolol and carvedilol, which provide antioxidant activity, can improve endothelial function in patients with hypertension. Dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists reverse impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in different vascular districts, through a mechanism related to an antioxidant effect. However, conflicting results are found in the brachial artery. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve endothelial function in subcutaneous, epicardial, brachial, and renal circulation, but they are ineffective in potentiating the impaired response to acetylcholine in the forearm of hypertensive patients. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists can restore endothelium-dependent vasodilatation to acetylcholine in subcutaneous microcirculation but not in that of the forearm muscle. They also improve basal NO release and decrease the vasoconstrictor effect of endogenous endothelin-1. Large-scale clinical trials are required to definitively demonstrate that treatment of endothelial dysfunction can improve the prognosis of patients with essential hypertension.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with mild essential hypertension

It has been reported that the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) reflects the endogenous vascular repair ability, with the EPCs pool declining in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. However, their relationship with hypertension and the effects of anti-hypertensive treatment remain unclear. We randomized 29 patients with mild essential hypertension to receive barnidipine up to 20 mg or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) up to 25 mg. Circulating EPCs were isolated from peripheral blood at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Mononuclear cells were cultured with endothelial basal medium supplemented with EGM SingleQuots. EPCs were identified by positive double staining for both FITC-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin I and Dil-labeled acethylated low-density lipoprotein. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were significantly reduced. No difference was observed between drugs. An increase in the number of EPCs was observed after 3 and 6 months of anti-hypertensive treatment (p < 0.05). Barnidipine significantly increased EPCs after 3 and 6 months of treatment, whereas no effect was observed with HCT. No statistically significant correlation was observed between EPCs and clinical BP values. Our data suggest that antihypertensive treatment may increase the number of EPCs. However, we observed a different effect of barnidipine and HCT on EPCs, suggesting that, beyond its BP lowering effect, barnidipine may elicit additional beneficial properties, related to a healthier vasculature.

[Isolated systolic hypertension. An independent disease]

Hypertension can be classified based on certain criteria, such as severity, existence of specific end-organ damage, or the dominant blood pressure subphenotype so that isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), mixed systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDH), and isolated systolic hypertensive (ISH) states can be defined. The FRAMINGHAM study was the first to demonstrate a continuous increase of systolic blood pressure with age and a peak of diastolic pressure between 55 and 65 years of age. This results not only in a high prevalence of hypertension of approximately 50-80% beyond the age of 60 but also in a disproportionately high increase in isolated systolic hypertension. ISH develops either as a new condition mostly from the group of primary high-normal blood pressure or secondly through burnout of existing systolic-diastolic hypertension with highly progressive vascular ageing.The pathophysiological background lies in remodeling processes in the macrovascular and microvascular compartments with stiffening of conduit and peripheral arterial vessels. In clinical practice these processes are easy to measure by determining pulse wave velocity (PWV), the augmentation index, and pulse pressure. These parameters are closely related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality ISH is not only a hypertension subphenotype but often indicates significant organ damage or may even be considered to be a secondary form of hypertension characterized by remodeled and stiffened arterial vessel walls and this condition is difficult to treat. It appears therefore that ISH warrants special therapeutic strategies with a focus on antiproliferative, antistiffening, anti-atherosclerotic, and vasodilating actions. As a result of the available data from the results of treatment studies it appears that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are the preferred drugs for treatment of this condition.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs on alcohol-induced functional responses of cultured human endothelial cells

Alcohol-induced endothelial changes might contribute to an increase in blood pressure in regular alcohol consumers. Some antihypertensive drugs affect oxidative stress and endothelial function and might counteract the effects of alcohol at the cellular level. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the effects of three different types of antihypertensive agents on alcohol-induced endothelial responses and oxidative stress. Cultured human endothelial cells were exposed to increasing concentrations (1, 10, 60 micromol/L) of zofenoprilat, carvedilol, and lacidipine in the absence and in the presence of ethanol (140 mmol/L). Concentrations of endothelin (ET) and nitric oxide (NO) were measured in the culture media as markers of endothelial function, and malondialdehyde (MDA) and intracellular glutathione (GSHi) were measured as markers of oxidative stress. Exposure to alcohol increased the levels of ET, NO, and MDA, and decreased GSHi. Carvedilol and zofenoprilat were more effective than lacidipine in counteracting the effects of alcohol on ET production. Alcohol-induced NO production was enhanced by carvedilol, whereas zofenoprilat and lacidipine did not have a significant effect. The alcohol-induced increase in MDA concentrations was blunted by all three drugs, but only carvedilol restored a normal response. All three drugs increased GSHi levels, with the effect being greater for carvedilol and lacidipine than zofenoprilat. Carvedilol is more effective than zofenoprilat and lacidipine in counteracting alcohol-induced endothelial responses in vitro and in decreasing oxidative stress. These effects might be particularly beneficial in patients with alcohol-related hypertension.

VASCULAR INFLAMMATION AND ATHEROGENESIS ARE ACTIVATED VIA RECEPTORS FOR PAMPs AND SUPPRESSED BY REGULATORY T CELLS

Despite significant advances in identifying the risk factors and elucidating atherosclerotic pathology, atherosclerosis remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized society. These risk factors independently or synergistically lead to chronic vascular inflammation, which is an essential requirement for the progression of atherosclerosis in patients. However, the mechanisms underlying the pathogenic link between the risk factors and atherosclerotic inflammation remain poorly defined. Significant progress has been made in two major areas, which are determination of the roles of the receptors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in initiation of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis, and characterization of the roles of regulatory T cells in suppression of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. In this review, we focus on three related issues: (1) examining the recent progress in endothelial cell pathology, inflammation and their roles in atherosclerosis; (2) analyzing the roles of the receptors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in initiation of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis; and (3) analyzing the advances in our understanding of suppression of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis by regulatory T cells. Continuous improvement of our understanding of the risk factors involved in initiation and promotion of artherogenesis, will lead to the development of novel therapeutics for ischemic stroke and cardiovascular diseases.

Cilnidipine, a slow-acting Ca2+ channel blocker, induces relaxation in porcine coronary artery: role of endothelial nitric oxide and [Ca2+]i

Cilnidipine is a dual blocker of L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels in vascular smooth muscle and N-type Ca(2+) channels in sympathetic nerve terminals that supply blood vessels. However, the clinical benefits of cilnidipine and underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. This study was designed to compare the time course of relaxant responses to cilnidipine and nifedipine, and to examine the role of endothelial NO and [Ca(2+)](i) in the vasorelaxation. Porcine left circumflex coronary arteries were isolated and isometric tension was measured with Grass force transducers. Endothelial [Ca(2+)](i) in intact arteries was determined by a calcium fluorescence imaging technique. The free radical scavenging capacity was also assayed. Cilnidipine and nifedipine induced concentration-dependent relaxations in high KCl-precontracted artery rings, while the former-induced relaxation was slower as compared to the latter. Treatment with L-NAME or ODQ reduced relaxations to cilnidipine or nifedipine to the same extent as in rings without endothelium. Indomethacin or omega-conotoxin had no effects. L-Arginine antagonized the effect of L-NAME on cilnidipine-induced relaxations. Cilnidipine did not affect sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation in rings with and without endothelium. Cilnidipine and nifedipine caused extracellular Ca(2+)-dependent increases in endothelial [Ca(2+)](i) in intact arteries and cilnidipine's action had a slower onset, similar to that of cilnidipine-induced relaxation. Neither cilnidipine nor nifedipine exhibited a free radical scavenging property. The present results demonstrate that cilnidipine can produce endothelium-dependent relaxation in porcine coronary arteries in vitro in addition to blocking Ca(2+) channels. Like short-acting nifedipine, cilnidipine-dependent relaxation, albeit to a slower onset, is partly mediated by endothelial NO but not by prostacyclin. The increased release or bioavailability of NO may causally result from elevated endothelial [Ca(2+)](i) in arteries. The Ca(2+) channel-independent effect suggests the usefulness of cilnidipine in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases associated with diminished NO release, such as atherosclerosis.

The vascular endothelium in hypertension

The vascular endothelium plays a fundamental role in the basal and dynamic regulation of the circulation. Thus, it has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. A spectrum of vasoactive substances is synthesised in the endothelium; of these, nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (PGI2) and endothelin (ET)-1 are the most important. There is a continuous basal release of NO determining the tone of peripheral blood vessels. Systemic inhibition of NO synthesis or scavenging of NO through oxidative stress causes an increase in arterial blood pressure. Also, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has a major role in hypertension as it has a direct vasoconstrictor effect and important interactions with oxygen free radicals and NO. Prostacyclin, in contrast to NO, does not contribute to the maintenance of basal vascular tone of conduit arteries, but its effect on platelets is most important. ET acts as the natural counterpart to endothelium-derived NO and has an arterial blood pressure-raising effect in man. Anti-hypertensive therapy lowers blood pressure and may influence these different mediators, thus influencing endothelial function. In summary, due to its position between the blood pressure and smooth muscle cells responsible for peripheral resistance, the endothelium is thought to be both victim and offender in arterial hypertension. The delicate balance of endothelium-derived factors is disturbed in hypertension. Specific anti-hypertensive and anti-oxidant treatment is able to restore this balance.

Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture)

Endothelial cells synthesize and release various factors that regulate angiogenesis, inflammatory responses, hemostasis, as well as vascular tone and permeability. Endothelial dysfunction has been associated with a number of pathophysiological processes. Oxidative stress appears to be a common denominator underlying endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases. However, depending on the pathology, the vascular bed studied, the stimulant, and additional factors such as age, sex, salt intake, cholesterolemia, glycemia, and hyperhomocysteinemia, the mechanisms underlying the endothelial dysfunction can be markedly different. A reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), an alteration in the production of prostanoids, including prostacyclin, thromboxane A2, and/or isoprostanes, an impairment of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization, as well as an increased release of endothelin-1, can individually or in association contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Therapeutic interventions do not necessarily restore a proper endothelial function and, when they do, may improve only part of these variables.

Protection of endothelial function: targets for nutritional and pharmacological interventions

The vascular endothelium synthesizes and releases a spectrum of vasoactive substances and therefore plays a fundamental role in the basal and dynamic regulation of the circulation. Nitric oxide (NO)-originally described as endothelium-derived relaxing factor-is released from endothelial cells in response to shear stress produced by blood flow, and in response to activation of a variety of receptors. After diffusion from endothelial to vascular smooth muscle cells, NO increases intracellular cyclic guanosine-monophosphate concentrations by activation of the enzyme guanylate cyclase leading to relaxation of the smooth muscle cells. NO has also antithrombogenic, antiproliferative, leukocyte-adhesion inhibiting effects, and influences myocardial contractility. Endothelium-derived NO-mediated vascular relaxation is impaired in spontaneously hypertensive animals. NO decomposition by free oxygen radicals is a major mechanism of impaired NO bioavailability. The resulting imbalance of endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting substances disturbs the normal function of the vascular endothelium. Endothelin acts as the natural counterpart to endothelium-derived NO. Besides its arterial blood pressure rising effect in humans, endothelin-1 induces vascular and myocardial hypertrophy, which are independent risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Current therapeutic strategies concentrate mainly on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and an impressive reduction in the risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been achieved. Inflammatory mechanisms play an important role in vascular disease and inflammatory plasma markers correlate with prognosis. The production of reactive oxygen species under pathological conditions may represent an important inflammatory trigger. Novel therapeutic strategies specifically targeting inflammation thus bear great potential for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this context, the vascular actions of flavanol-rich cocoa, particularly with regard to enhanced NO synthesis and endothelial function observed in humans following consumption, warrants further attention. This review discusses pharmacological and dietary intervention.

Endothelial function and its assessment

Endothelial dysfunction is a characteristic aspect of most of the conditions associated with atherosclerosis and is commonly found as an early feature in atherothrombotic vascular disease. An appreciation of the underlying mechanisms of endothelial function, as well as dysfunction, is essential as this has critical influence on the different methods in the assessment of endothelial function and effects of various treatments on its quantification. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction is recognised as a type of 'target organ damage' in common cardiovascular conditions (e.g., hypertension) and the area is of increasing interest for new drug development, as therapies that modulate the endothelium will have added advantages; thus, for the development of new/experimental drugs, an awareness of ways to assess the endothelium is necessary. In this review, an overview of different methods including biochemical markers, and invasive and non-invasive tools, to determine endothelial function is presented as well as their clinical relevance. Furthermore, the effects of various treatments on endothelial dysfunction and their underlying mechanisms are elucidated.

Targeting endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive subjects

The endothelium is a favourite early target of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases like hypertension. This key role of the endothelium results from its capacity to respond to numerous autocrine and paracrine stimuli and to mechanical factors like shear stress but also from the pathophysiological consequences of endothelial dysfunction on vasomotor tone, arterial stiffness, arterial remodelling, and inflammation, all of which are factors that play a critical role in atherosclerosis and target-organ damage. In hypertension, endothelial dysfunction has been shown at the level of both resistance and conduit arteries and mainly results from an increase in nitric oxide (NO) degradation by interaction between NO and superoxide anions, while in experimental models of hypertension a decrease in NO production can also be observed. The fact that forearm endothelial dysfunction is a marker of future cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension stresses the importance of the clinical evaluation of endothelial function and of the evaluation of the effects of the different antihypertensive drug classes on this parameter. In this context, many studies have demonstrated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, the perindopril-indapamide combination, and angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1) blockers improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation partly independently of arterial pressure. Both their antioxidant effects and the stimulation of the release of NO are involved in their beneficial effects. For calcium antagonists, only the recent drugs have been shown to improve endothelial function with a simultaneous improvement in several markers of oxidative stress. Finally, beta-blockers classically do not affect endothelial function. Only nebivolol, a beta-blocker with NO donor properties, has been shown to improve endothelial function, but this effect results from the increase in NO and not from the beta-blocking properties of the drug.

Effects of lacidipine on vascular responses in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effects of the calcium channel blocker lacidipine on vascular responses, such as endothelial function and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and on levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Endothelial function was assessed by measuring the flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery and IMT was measured in the common, bifurcating, and in the internal carotid artery by using high-resolution ultrasound. The study population consisted of 96 consecutive patients [mean age 60 years, male (n) = 70] who showed at least one coronary artery narrowed by more than 50% (coronary angiography). These patients were randomly assigned to lacidipine treatment (4 mg/day, n = 48) or to a placebo (n = 48). We measured FMD, IMT, and hs-CRP prior to and after 6 months of treatment and following coronary angiography in all patients.

RESULTS

Clinical and medical history revealed no significant differences between the groups. IMT of the common carotid artery was significantly diminished from 0.92 +/- 0.15 to 0.87 +/- 0.15 mm 6 months after treatment with lacidipine (p < 0.005). However, IMT of any region in the carotid artery did not show any significant changes in the placebo group. Endothelial function and hs-CRP levels were slightly improved (insignificant) in the lacidipine group. In the placebo group, there were no significant changes.

CONCLUSION

Lacidipine leads to a significant reduction of the common carotid artery IMT as well as to a decrease in markers of inflammation in patients with CAD during a relatively short period (6 months).

Effects of nilvadipine and amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a double blind, prospective, randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This double blind, prospective, randomised, parallel group clinical trial was aimed at investigating the effects of nilvadipine or amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertensive patients over a 3-month treatment period.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eligible outpatients (supine DBP > or = 90 mmHg and < or = 110 mmHg and supine SBP < or = 180 mmHg) entered a maximum 15-day placebo run-in period and were randomised to receive once daily nilvadipine 8 mg or amlodipine 5 mg (to be doubled in the case of lack of response at day 30). Follow-up visits with measurement of supine and orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate were performed after 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment. Standard laboratory tests and 12-lead ECG were performed at study entry and at the end of treatment; adverse events were collected at any time.

RESULTS

A total number of 168 patients, 83 in the nilvadipine and 85 in the amlodipine group, took part in the study: 15 and 14 in the two groups, respectively, were prematurely withdrawn. Supine DBP at endpoint similarly decreases in the two groups (-11.0 +/- 7.1 mmHg in the nilvadipine group and -12.7 +/- 8.2 mmHg in the amlodipine group), with no significant differences between groups at any time point. Measurements in the orthostatic position also did not show between-groups differences. Blood pressure was normalised in 61.8% of patients in the nilvadipine group and in 63.0% in the amlodipine group; responders to therapy were 64.5% and 69.1% in the two groups, respectively. Results of SBP also did not show differences between groups at any time point, except a more marked decrease in the amlodipine group compared to nilvadipine in the supine measurements at endpoint. A total number of 30 patients (36.6%) in the nilvadipine group and 23 (27.1%) in the amlodipine group reported adverse events (p = 0.24 between groups), which mainly consisted of vasodilatory effects (e.g. oedema, flushing and headache). A favourable lipid profile, i.e. a significant (p = 0.002 between groups) decrease of triglycerides levels and an increase of HDL-C, was observed in the nilvadipine group, compared with an increase of triglycerides in the amlodipine group. No effects on haematology, liver and renal function were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Nilvadipine or amlodipine produced comparable effects on DBP and shared a similar adverse effect profile. A favourable effect on lipid profile was observed following nilvadipine treatment.

Effect of Manidipine as Compared to Atenolol on Platelet Aggregation in Elderly Patients with Isolated Systolic Hypertension and Type II Diabetes Mellitus

This study was done to evaluate the effect of treatment with manidipine as compared with atenolol on thrombin-mediated platelet aggregation in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus. After a 2-week washout placebo period, 60 elderly patients (aged 65-80 years) with isolated systolic hypertension (SBP > 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to manidipine 10 mg or atenolol 50 mg 6-week treatment according to a double-blind, crossover design. Thirty patients had a concomitant well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c < or = 6.5%). At the end of the washout and of each treatment period, blood pressure (BP) (by mercury sphygmomanometer) and platelet aggregation (by Born-type aggregometer) were evaluated. Blood samples were collected using sodium citrate as anticoagulant, and platelet aggregation was induced by 2 different concentrations of ADP and collagen. Manidipine and atenolol produced a significant BP reduction in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, with no difference between treatments. Despite the similar BP effect, in diabetic patients manidipine produced a significant reduction in platelet aggregation induced by both doses of either ADP or collagen. In nondiabetic hypertensives, manidipine inhibited platelet aggregation only at the highest doses of both inducers. The difference in the platelet inhibitory effect of manidipine between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects was statistically significant (P < 0.05) at both inducer concentrations. No changes in platelet aggregation were observed in the atenolol group. These data indicate that, unlike atenolol, manidipine inhibits platelet aggregation in elderly hypertensive patients, expecially in those with associated type II diabetes mellitus. The clinical impact of this positive effect in terms of prevention of cardiovascular complications in these high-risk patients remains to be clarified.

Protection of endothelial function

The vascular endothelium synthesizes and releases a spectrum of vasoactive substances and therefore plays a fundamental role in the basal and dynamic regulation of the circulation. Nitric oxide (NO)--originally described as endothelium-derived relaxing factor--is released from endothelial cells in response to shear stress produced by blood flow, and in response to activation of a variety of receptors. After diffusion from endothelial to vascular smooth muscle cells, NO increases intracellular cyclic guanosine-monophosphat concentrations by activation of the enzyme guanylate cyclase leading to relaxation of the smooth muscle cells. NO has also antithrombogenic, antiproliferative, leukocyte-adhesion inhibiting effects, and influences myocardial contractility. Endothelium-derived NO-mediated vascular relaxation is impaired in spontaneously hypertensive animals. NO decomposition by free oxygen radicals is a major mechanism of impaired NO bioavailability. The resulting imbalance of endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting substances disturbs the nor- mal function of the vascular endothelium. Endothelin acts as the natural counterpart to endothelium-derived NO. In man, besides its effect of increasing arterial blood pressure, ET-1 induces vascular and myocardial hypertrophy, which are independent risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Current therapeutic strategies concentrate mainly on lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and an impressive reduction in the risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been achieved. Inflammatory mechanisms play an important role in vascular disease and inflammatory plasma markers correlate with prognosis. Novel therapeutic strategies specifically targeting inflammation thus bear great potential for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly: Pushing the Frontiers of Therapy—A Suggested New Approach

In elderly patients with systolic hypertension resistant to treatment with conventional therapy, increased aortic pulse wave reflection and a high augmentation index are often present. These findings are indicative of endothelial dysfunction and deficient generation of nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator in the arterial tree. In such patients, treatment with the nitric oxide donor extended-release isosorbide mononitrate characteristically produces prompt and sustained falls in both pulse wave reflection and systolic blood pressure. The adjunct use of this nitrate produces useful additional decreases in systolic blood pressure ranging from 10 to 45 mm Hg, often achieving target blood pressure goals in isolated systolic hypertension. By combining this endothelium-independent nitric oxide donor with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, the potential exists to address both the nitric oxide deficiency and endothelial dysfunction of the vascular endothelium in these patients. Other possibilities for synergism with this combination include complementary hemodynamic, circadian, and metabolic actions together with prevention of nitrate tolerance. Isosorbide mononitrate may also be used successfully with calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, and diuretics.

Platelet morphology and plasma indices of platelet activation in essential hypertension: effects of amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Platelet abnormalities have been described in hypertension, especially in the presence of target organ damage. Our aim was to study the differences in morphology and indices of platelet activation in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension as compared to normotensive controls and secondly, to study the effects of amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy on these indices.

METHODS

We recruited 42 previously untreated, newly diagnosed hypertensive patients (25 men; mean age 53 years) for the cross-sectional study, where data were compared with those from 30 normotensive controls (20 men; mean age 57 years). Of the 42 untreated hypertensive patients who were recruited, 27 patients successfully completed, the six-month treatment phase with amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy. Platelet morphology (volume and mass) was quantified, and plasma markers of platelet activation (betaTG and sPsel) measured in citrated plasma. The mass of P-selectin in each platelet (pPsel) was determined by lysing a fixed number of platelets and then determining the levels of P-selectin in the lysate.

RESULTS

Hypertensive patients had significantly higher platelet volume (P = 0.01) and mass (P = 0.003), plasma betaTG and sPsel, and pPsel levels (all P < 0.001) compared to the controls. After a mean treatment time of 6 months, there was a decrease in platelet volume (P < 0.001) and mass (P = 0.02), with lower pPsel, sPsel and BTG levels (all P < 0.001) compared to the untreated state.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertension using amlodipine-based anti-hypertensive therapy results in a reversal of the platelet morphology abnormalities and indices of platelet activation. This may contribute to a reduction in thrombosis-related complications seen in those whose blood pressure lowering is effective.

The Use of Calcium Antagonists in the Therapy of Hypertension in the Elderly

Calcium antagonists (calcium channel blockers) are widely used in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. The results of a large number of clinical trials have demonstrated that calcium antagonists are as efficacious as other classes of antihypertensive agents in decreasing blood pressure in the elderly patients. Large clinical trials have shown the effectiveness of calcium antagonists (with long duration of action) in reducing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in elderly hypertensive patients. The calcium antagonists are a chemically, pharmacologically and therapeutically heterogeneous group of agents. Among themselves, they differ in vasoselectivity, effect on cardiac conduction, sympathetic activation, adverse effect profile, ability to protect against target organ damage, suitability for patients with co-morbid conditions, and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The calcium antagonists can be used as single agents or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. These drugs should not be used as first-line drugs in treating high blood pressure in patients with heart failure, since drugs in other classes provide more benefits. The dihydropyridine calcium antagonists should not be used in post-myocardial infarction patients or in patients with unstable angina; however, non-dihydropyridines may be used in such patients. The adverse effects of dihydropyridines include peripheral and ankle edema, flushing and headache. The short-acting preparations of the older calcium antagonists are no longer used, because of the potential for adverse cardiovascular outcome.

Effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action

Essential hypertension is associated with impairment of both endothelial function and insulin action, and this has provided rationale for the use of antihypertensive agents that are at least neutral, if not beneficial, in these areas. This study examines the effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action. Sixteen patients with essential hypertension were recruited with 13 (3 men/10 women; median age, 55 years; range, 38 to 65 years) completing the study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study design was used. After a 6-week placebo run-in, there were two 12-week treatment periods of either placebo or doxazosin, separated by a 6-week wash out period. Subjects were studied at the end of each treatment period with endothelial function assessed by forearm plethysmography and insulin action by the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Blood pressure was significantly lowered by doxazosin (doxazosin 144 +/-3/86 +/- 2 mm Hg; placebo 159 +/- 3/96 +/- 1 mm Hg, P <.005 for both systolic and diastolic pressure; mean +/- SEM). Baseline forearm blood flow (FBF) was unchanged (doxazosin 4.9 +/- 0.9; placebo 4.0 +/- 0.7 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1), P >.05), however, FBF responses (area under dose response curve, percentage change in infused:control arm ratio) to acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) were improved by doxazosin (doxazosin 58.6 +/- 11.7 standard units [SU]; placebo 22.1 +/- 7.0 SU, P =.03) with responses to sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation) unchanged (doxazosin 40.3 +/- 5.5 SU; placebo 46.3 +/- 8.1 SU, P >.05). Exogenous glucose infusion rates to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia were not significantly different (doxazosin 30.4 +/- 0.9; placebo 32.3 +/- 1.0 micromol x kg(-1) min(-1), P >.05). Suppression of postabsorptive endogenous glucose production by insulin was also unchanged by treatment (doxazosin 65.6% +/- 7.5% suppression; placebo 68.3% +/- 11.2% suppression, P >.05). Doxazosin has a neutral effect on both peripheral and hepatic insulin action, but improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation. These results indicate that doxazosin can be used safely in patients with insulin resistance, while its positive effect on endothelial function may lessen the subsequent incidence of atherosclerosis.

Amlodipine improves vascular function in patients with moderate to severe hypertension

The long-term effects of amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, were examined in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Eighteen never-treated patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension (49 +/- 8 years) were studied. In all patients, forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by plethysmography before and 6 months after amlodipine treatment. Endothelium-nondependent and endothelium-dependent vasodilations were assessed by intrabrachial infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and acetylcholine (ACh), respectively. FBF modification by vitamin C, an oxygen radical scavenger, was also assessed under ACh infusion. The results were compared with those of 13 normal subjects. Blood pressure was significantly lowered (from 176 +/- 17/97 +/- 13 to 144 +/- 12/82 +/- 10 mm Hg) after treatment (P < 0.01). Forearm vascular resistance was increased in the hypertensive patients before treatment; however, it was normalized after treatment during SNP infusion and was improved during ACh infusion. Since vitamin C improved FBF under ACh infusion both before and after the amlodipine treatment, it is suggested that the production of free radicals was not canceled by amlodipine. The analysis of heart rate variability showed that amlodipine does not activate sympathetic nerve function. Therefore, amlodipine is effective in lowering blood pressure associated with the improvement of vascular function, and is suggested to be an effective antihypertensive agent for patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

The influence of one-year treatment by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on baroreflex sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in essential hypertension--comparison with calcium channel blockers

BACKGROUND

Both baroreflex sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilator function have been recognized to have prognostic significance in cardiovascular diseases. Long-term antihypertensive treatment effects on these parameters, however, remain unclear.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We examined the effects of long-term treatment by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) orcalcium channel blockers (CCB) on baroreflex and flow-mediated vasodilator function in patients with essential hypertension (EH). We recruited 36 patients aged 56 +/- 11 years, with systolic blood pressure > or = 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mmHg. Patients were assigned either to treatment by long-acting ACEI (n = 12) or CCB (n = 24). All patients were followed for 12 months. Optimal BP was achieved by two optional increases in treatment: dose-doubling of the primary drug during the first three months and the addition of diuretics or beta-blockers thereafter. Target blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg or a fall > or = 20/10 mmHg. Baroreflex sensitivity was examined by spectral analysis of blood pressure and RR interval variabilities before treatment and after 3 and 12 months of treatment. The flow-mediated vasodilator function was determined before and 12 months after treatment by measuring the change in brachial artery diameter during increases in flow induced by reactive hyperemia.

RESULTS

Baseline blood pressures were similar between the ACEI and CCB groups (172 +/- 5/103 +/- 2 vs. 172 +/- 4/101 +/- 3 mmHg). Blood pressures after 3 and 12 months of treatment also did not differ between the ACEI and CCB groups (149 +/- 4/91 +/- 2 vs. 145 +/- 2/85 +/- 2 mmHg, and 133 +/- 5/84 +/- 2 vs. 133 +/- 2/81 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively). Baseline baroreflex sensitivity was similar between the groups (6.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.9 +/- 0.6 msec/mmHg). This parameter remained unchanged at three months but increased after 12 months of treatment in both the ACEI (9.5 +/- 1.6 msec/mmHg, p = 0.05) and CCB (9.1 +/- 1.2 msec/mmHg, p = 0.006) groups. Percent increases in brachial arterial diameter and flow during reactive hyperemia increased in the group treated with ACEI (12.4 +/- 3.5 vs. 25.8 +/- 6.3% and 618 +/- 72 vs. 953 +/- 166, p < 0.05 for both) but both parameters remained unchanged in the group treated with CCB.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that long-term blood pressure control with modem antihypertensive drugs improves baroreflex function. Treatment with ACEI may be more favorable for flow-mediated vasodilator function than treatment with CCB.

Lacidipine

Lacidipine (Caldine, Lacimen, Lacipil, Midotens, Motens) is a once-daily, orally-administered, lipophilic dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with an intrinsically slow onset of activity, resulting in a lack of reflex tachycardia. It has a long duration of action and a high degree of vascular selectivity. In addition to calcium channel-modulated vasodilation, lacidipine displays antioxidant activity greater than that of other dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. In randomised, well-controlled trials, lacidipine 2-6 mg orally once daily had antihypertensive efficacy similar to that of other long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, thiazide diuretics, atenolol (a beta-blocker) and enalapril (an ACE inhibitor). Lacidipine was effective in elderly patients (including those with isolated systolic hypertension), African Nigerian patients and patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes mellitus. During long-term treatment for 4 or 5 years in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or essential hypertension, the incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality with lacidipine was similar to that with chlorthalidone or atenolol. The European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), in which 2334 patients with hypertension were randomised to 4 years of therapy with lacidipine 4-6 mg/day or the beta-blocker atenolol 50-100 mg/day, demonstrated significantly lower atherosclerotic progression and plaque formation with lacidipine compared with atenolol in patients completing the full 4 years of the study. Between-group differences in favour of lacidipine for the primary efficacy variable (mean change in carotid artery intima-media thickness) did not reach statistical significance in the intent-to-treat population. The tolerability profile of lacidipine (headache, flushing, pedal oedema, dizziness and palpitations) is similar to that of other dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, but with a lower incidence of peripheral oedema. Data from the ELSA study suggest that the incidence of serious adverse events during long-term lacidipine therapy is similar to that with atenolol.

CONCLUSION

Lacidipine is an effective, well tolerated, once-daily, oral antihypertensive agent that can be used in a wide variety of patients. As with other members of its class, lacidipine has shown potentially beneficial antiatherosclerotic effects, although definitive data with respect to possible superiority over other drug classes are still required. Therefore, lacidipine is an attractive therapy for the long-term management of essential hypertension.

Regulation of endothelial-type NO synthase expression in pathophysiology and in response to drugs

In many types of cardiovascular pathophysiology such as hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis, diabetes, cigarette smoking, or hypertension (with its sequelae stroke and heart failure) the expression of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) is altered. Both up- and downregulation of eNOS have been observed, depending on the underlying disease. When eNOS is upregulated, the upregulation is often futile and goes along with a reduction in bioactive NO. This is due to an increased production of superoxide generated by NAD(P)H oxidase and by an uncoupled eNOS. A number of drugs with favorable effects on cardiovascular disease upregulate eNOS expression. The resulting increase in vascular NO production may contribute to their beneficial effects. These compounds include statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists, calcium channel blockers, and some antioxidants. Other drugs such as glucocorticoids, whose administration is associated with cardiovascular side effects, downregulate eNOS expression. Stills others such as the immunosuppressants cyclosporine A and FK506/tacrolimus or erythropoietin have inconsistent effects on eNOS. Thus regulation of eNOS expression and activity contributes to the overall action of several classes of drugs, and the development of compounds that specifically upregulate this protective enzyme appears as a desirable target for drug development.

Improvement of endothelial function by amlodipine and vitamin C in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

The effects of antihypertensive agents on endothelial function have not been fully evaluated in human hypertension and data on the forearm circulation of humans are controversial. The aim of this study was (1) to evaluate the endothelial function in hypertensive patients (2) to investigate whether vitamin C administration has any benefit on the endothelial function and (3) to determine whether treatment with calcium antagonist improves endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

The endothelial function was estimated using venous occlusion plethysmography (VOP) in 8 hypertensive patients and 8 healthy volunteers. The patients in the hypertension group were treated with amlodipine, then examined again. The change of forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with acetylcholine infusion through brachial artery and also with intra-arterial vitamin C.

RESULTS

Forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine was significantly enhanced with intra-arterial infusion of vitamin C in hypertensive group before antihypertensive treatment. Co-infusion of L-NMMA, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, blunted forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine. After treatment with amlodipine for 2 months in hypertensive group, endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation to acetylcholine was significantly improved compared to pretreatment, and vitamin C did not affect the improved endothelial function by amlodipine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin C (acutely) and amlodipine (chronically) improved endothelial function in hypertensive patients. These results suggest that increased oxidative stress, at least in part, may be involved in the decreased endothelial function in hypertension.

Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and calcium antagonist on endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension

The endothelium plays an important role in maintaining vascular tone and function. Essential hypertension is associated with alterations in endothelial function. The effects of antihypertensive agents on endothelial function have not been fully evaluated in human hypertension and data on the forearm circulation of humans are controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or a calcium antagonist improves endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients and whether the mechanism involved could be related to antioxidant activity. Endothelial function was estimated using venous occlusion plethysmography in 18 hypertensive patients and 11 healthy volunteers. The patients in the hypertension group were treated with enalapril or amlodipine. The change of forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured during acetylcholine infusion through the brachial artery and also during intra-arterial vitamin C infusion to explore the effects of vitamin C on responses to acetylcholine. FBF response to acetylcholine was significantly enhanced by intra-arterial infusion of vitamin C in the hypertensive group before antihypertensive treatment. Co-infusion of L-NMMA(N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, blunted forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine. After antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or amlodipine for 2 months in the hypertensive group, endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation (vasodilatory response to acetylcholine) was significantly improved. Even though the mechanisms leading to depressed endothelial function in essential hypertension remain to be elucidated, our study shows that treatment with an ACE inhibitor or a calcium antagonist resulted in demonstrable improvement by a mechanism that is probably related to antioxidant activity.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs on endothelial dysfunction: clinical implications

Essential hypertension is associated with endothelial dysfunction, which is caused mainly by the production of oxygen-free radicals that can destroy nitric oxide (NO), and impair its beneficial and protective effects on the vessel wall. In prospective studies, endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Antihypertensive drugs show contrasting effects in terms of improvement or restoration of endothelial function. Little evidence is available with beta-blockers. Whereas treatment with atenolol has a negative effect in peripheral subcutaneous and muscle microcirculation, insufficient evidence is available to establish whether new compounds such as nebivolol, which activates the L-Arginine--NO pathway, and carvedilol, which has strong antioxidant activity, can improve endothelial function in patients with hypertension. Calcium channel antagonists, particularly the dihydropyridines, can reverse impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in different vascular districts, including the subcutaneous, epicardial, renal and forearm circulation. However, conflicting results are found in the brachial artery. In the forearm circulation, nifedipine and lacidipine can improve endothelial dysfunction by restoring NO availability through a mechanism probably related to an antioxidant effect. ACE inhibitors, on the other hand, seem to improve endothelial function in subcutaneous, epicardial, brachial and renal circulation, whereas they are ineffective in potentiating the blunted response to acetylcholine in the forearm of patients with essential hypertension. They can also selectively improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation to bradykinin, an effect not mediated by restoring NO availability but probably related to hyperpolarisation. Recent evidence suggests angiotensin II AT(1)-receptor antagonists can restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine in subcutaneous microcirculation but not in that of the forearm muscle. Evidence concerning the effect of these drugs on the brachial artery in patients with atherosclerosis is positive. However, treatment with an AT(1)-receptor antagonist can improve basal NO release and decrease the vasoconstrictor effect of endogenous endothelin-1. In conclusion, despite the considerable evidence that impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation can be improved by appropriate antihypertensive treatment, no clinical data exist demonstrating that the reversal of endothelial dysfunction is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events. In the near future, large scale clinical trials are required to demonstrate that treatment of endothelial dysfunction can lead to better prognosis in patients with essential hypertension.

Oxygen species in the microvascular environment: regulation of vascular tone and the development of hypertension

Derangements of the three endothelium-related vasodilator systems (prostaglandins, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor(s) and nitric oxide) cause the endothelial dysfunction observed in hypertension. Free radical-induced nitric oxide degradation plays a crucial role in hypertension. An increase in superoxide producing enzymes such as NAD(P)H oxidase and xanthine oxidase has been demonstrated. Superoxide dismutase may correct endothelial dysfunction in vitro and superoxide dismutase mimetics can lower blood pressure in experimental animals. Antioxidant agents and xanthine oxidase-inhibiting compounds have been used in humans. In addition, the synthesis of vasoconstrictor peroxides derived from the activity of cyclooxygenase in the endothelium and the vascular smooth muscle is stimulated by the OH. radical. Hydrogen peroxide levels are augmented in hypertension, but its role is unclear because recent investigations have shown that this substance may act as a hyperpolarizing factor. It is thought that the therapeutic benefit of anti-hypertensive drugs, such as calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, could be in part due to an inhibition of free radical production. A role of superoxide in the endothelial dysfunction and hypertension of chronic renal failure has also been suggested by recent animal experiments.