Risk Trajectories of Readmission and Death in the First Year after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine in treating risk window of AECOPD: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) significantly accelerate disease progression and substantially increase mortality risk. The risk window of AECOPD (AECOPDRW) represents a time between acute exacerbation and recovery to a stable stage. Chinese medicine (CM) has shown significant therapeutic efficacy in COPD but CM treatment for AECOPDRW has not been validated by high-quality clinical studies.

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical effect of CM syndrome differentiation treatment for patients with AECOPDRW.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial.

METHODS

336 eligible participants were included to the study. Both groups were based on the conventional treatment as the baseline therapy. The experimental group was administered Chinese herbal medicine granules based on CM syndrome differentiation, whereas the control group received a placebo in the form of Chinese herbal medicine granules. The intervention course lasted for 8-week, while the follow-up for 26-week. Primary outcomes were incidences of acute exacerbation and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores recorded during AECOPDRW. Secondary outcomes were the timing of the first acute exacerbation, incidence of exacerbations, acute exacerbation readmission rate, severity of exacerbation, and CAT scores during follow-up, pulmonary function, mMRC scale, clinical symptom scale, and the quality of life assessment tools.

RESULTS

At 8-week, the risk of acute exacerbations and CAT score were significantly reduced in the experimental group between-group analysis with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.375(95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.150 to 0.935; p = 0.027), and a mean difference (MD) of -2.476 score (95 % CI: -3.281 to -1.671; p < 0.001). At 26-week, experimental group showed statistically lower risk of acute exacerbation between-group analysis (RR: 0.519; 95 % CI: 0.282 to 0.953; p = 0.030). The first exacerbation time in the experimental group (97.63 ± 35.90) was statistically longer than in the control group (66.11 ± 25.25) (MD: 31.517 (95 % CI: 14.720 to 48.314; p < 0.001). The rates of acute exacerbation readmission were similar for both the groups during the risk window and follow-up period. After 26 weeks of follow-up, experimental group CAT score was reduced by 2.046 between-group analysis (p < 0.001). Furthermore, during the whole study, the experimental group showed significantly reduced in mMRC score, as well as FEV1 and FVC values (all p < 0.05). During study period, the experimental group had a significant reduce in clinical symptom scores, including cough, expectoration, and fatigue, than the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding to SGRQ, mCOPD-PRO and mESQ-COPD, our results demonstrated that CM had better advantages in many aspects.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of AECOPDRW with CM showed high efficacy and safety in significantly reducing further incidences of acute exacerbation, prolonging the interval to the initial acute exacerbation, alleviating the clinical symptoms, and improving the quality of life.

Improving Care for People with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Taking a Policy Lens

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) affect almost 470 million people worldwide, and this number is growing. CRDs take a significant toll on the capacity of health systems and economies, and their effect on people's lives can be devastating. Despite high rates of prevalence and mortality, CRDs are underprioritised by policymakers and governments. Tackling these conditions will require a holistic, multisectoral approach, including government-led strategies for prevention, diagnosis, management and investment in research. In this article, we provide a clear rationale for prioritising CRDs to advance population health. Proactive steps in countries of all income levels must be taken promptly to limit the growing prevalence and impact of CRDs both now and in the future.

Predictive modelling methods of hospital readmission risks for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant chronic respiratory condition characterised by persistent airway obstruction, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with COPD frequently experience hospital readmissions shortly after discharge, mainly due to acute exacerbations. This review aims to identify and synthesise the reported performance metrics and methodological limitations of different predictive modelling methods for hospital readmissions in COPD patients.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The review will include studies that develop or validate predictive models for hospital readmissions in COPD patients. A comprehensive search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science and Google Scholar using predefined keywords. Eligible studies will include those utilising any predictive modelling method, focusing on unplanned readmissions within specified timeframes (30, 60 or 90 days). Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts, selecting studies based on predefined inclusion criteria.Data extraction will be conducted based on the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS), and the methodological quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).The results will be synthesised narratively. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model will be conducted if at least five external validation studies are available for the same prediction model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research is based exclusively on published studies and does not involve the collection of primary data collection from patients. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024579524.

Recommendations for Improving Discharge-Related Care Following a COPD Exacerbation: An Expert Panel Consensus with Emphasis on Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to place a considerable disease and financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Therefore, preventing future exacerbations remains a key treatment goal. However, gaps remain in the standard of COPD care following exacerbations, despite the availability of evidence-based recommendations providing guidance on discharging patients from hospital or emergency department (ED) after a COPD exacerbation. To better understand these gaps in clinical practice, an advisory board meeting of 13 international pulmonologists was convened in September 2022, with the principal objective to formulate and recommend an evidence-based hospital discharge protocol following a COPD exacerbation, with a particular focus on LMICs. Based on identified gaps in COPD care, recommendations for alleviating the burden of exacerbations were proposed, which could be delivered as a discharge protocol for implementation in hospitals and/or ED. Following a review of the available clinical evidence, including an online survey of 11 pre-meeting questions and 5 additional questions discussed during the meeting, the key unmet needs identified by the experts included poor integration of standardized protocols in routine clinical practice, failure to ensure consistent delivery of post-discharge care, and lack of efficiently functioning healthcare systems. A protocol was formulated for delivery as part of a disease management program involving an interdisciplinary approach and a care bundle, aiming to address gaps in discharge-related care by determining the likelihood of readmission and optimizing maintenance treatment plans based on assessment of symptoms and future exacerbation risk. This can provide holistic care following hospital/ED discharge and personalized treatment plans by advocating referral to a specialist. To ensure wide-ranging uptake, implementation of a discharge protocol will need to be tailored to local healthcare settings by conducting feasibility studies, standardizing clinical pathways and healthcare policies, and engaging relevant stakeholders.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Exacerbations of COPD

Introduction

The role of eosinophilic inflammation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasingly recognised. Eosinophilic exacerbations have previously been associated with shorter hospital length of stay and lower inpatient mortality. The objective of this study was to examine clinical characteristics of hospitalised COPD exacerbations stratified by admission eosinophil count.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of exacerbations of COPD at an Australian tertiary health service between 1st October 2019 and 30th September 2020 that were identified using ICD-10 discharge codes. Patients were excluded if they received any systemic corticosteroids prior to hospitalisation. Admissions were stratified according to blood eosinophil count as high eosinophil (HE, ≥2% total white blood cell count), or low eosinophil (LE, <2%).

Results

Four hundred and six patients were analysed. HE patients were younger (74.7 vs 77.7 years, p=0.001) and had fewer co-morbidities (1 [1-2] vs 2 [1-3], p=0.044). Patients with HE were less likely to be taking inhaled corticosteroids (59% vs 71%, p=0.017). HE exacerbations had a higher blood eosinophil count (0.31 vs 0.06 × 109/L, p<0.0001), lower total white cell count (8.45 vs 10.6, p<0.001), lower CRP (10.4 vs 26.7, p<0.001), fewer infections (29.5% vs 52.1%, p<0.001) and less oxygen requirement (35.2% vs 46.8%, p=0.036). HE exacerbations had a shorter length of stay (3.56 vs 4.40 days, p=0.047) but similar inpatient mortality.

Discussion

Eosinophilic exacerbations of COPD were phenotypically different, affect a younger, less co-morbid population and were associated with shorter length of stay. This may be useful to help prognosticate clinical outcomes and guide clinical management.

Rural Residence Associated with Receipt of Recommended Postdischarge Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Care among a Cohort of U.S. Veterans

Rationale: Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in rural areas experience inequitable access to care. Objectives: To assess whether rural residence is associated with receipt of recommended postdischarge COPD care. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of all U.S. veterans discharged from a Veterans Affairs medical center after COPD hospitalization from 2010 to 2019. Rural residence was defined by rural-urban commuting area classification. Our primary outcome was the proportion of recommended care received within 90 days of hospital discharge, including smoking cessation therapy, appropriate management of supplemental oxygen, appropriate prescription of inhaled therapy, and pulmonary rehabilitation. We conducted multivariable linear regression between rural residence and the proportion of recommended care received, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, and primary care facility type. We tested multivariable linear probability models for each of the recommended therapies. Results: Of 67,649 patients, 7,370 (10.8%) resided in rural areas and 2,000 (3.0%) in highly rural areas. Overall, the proportion of recommended COPD treatments received was low (mean, 15.0%; standard deviation, 21.0%). Compared with urban residence, patients with rural and highly rural residence received fewer recommended COPD care treatments (rural estimate [adjusted percentage difference (95% confidence interval)], -1.1 [-1.6, -0.6]; highly rural estimate, -1.2 [-2.1, -0.3]). Rural and highly rural residence were associated with lower likelihood of receiving appropriate inhaled therapy escalation (rural estimate, -4.0 [-5.1, -3.0]; highly rural estimate, -3.0 [-5.0, -1.1]) and pulmonary rehabilitation referral (rural estimate, -1.2 [-1.6, -0.9]; highly rural estimate, -2.1 [-2.7, -1.4]) but a higher likelihood of receiving smoking cessation therapy (rural estimate, 5.4 [3.3, 7.5]; highly rural estimate, 7.2 [3.3, 11.2]). There was no significant difference in appropriate oxygen management (rural estimate, -1.0 [-2.8, 0.9]; highly rural estimate, 3.1 [-0.7, 6.9]). Conclusions: Patients across the rural-urban spectrum received few recommended postdischarge COPD treatments. Health systems approaches are needed to address widespread underuse of evidence-based COPD care.

Initiation of home noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: when, where, and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to highlight the importance of timely initiation of home noninvasive ventilation (homeNIV) for patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As emerging evidence continues to show substantial benefits in reducing mortality and hospitalizations, it's crucial to identify which patients will benefit most and to provide clear guidance on implementing homeNIV effectively.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research supports the use of high intensity homeNIV for CHRF secondary to COPD, showing marked reductions in hospitalizations and mortality. However, despite its proven benefits, homeNIV is underutilized, often due to significant barriers related to payor policies and gaps in knowledge by those most likely to be evaluating and managing patients with advanced COPD. The literature also reveals ongoing debate about the optimal timing and setting for starting homeNIV, whether in outpatient clinics or directly after hospital discharge.

SUMMARY

The evidence suggests that homeNIV should be more widely used, with a focus on early initiation and careful titration to normalize PaCO 2 over time. By addressing the barriers to its broader use, we can improve outcomes for patients with CHRF due to COPD.

Resources and Readmission for COPD Exacerbation in Pneumology Units in Spain: The COPD Observatory Project

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents one of the most frequent causes of hospital readmissions and in-hospital mortality. One in five patients requires readmission within 30 days of discharge following an admission for exacerbation. These 'early readmissions' increase morbidity and mortality, as patients often do not recover their baseline lung function. The identification of factors associated with increased risk has been a major focus of research in recent years. Studies describe patient-related predictors, although some studies also suggest that better-resourced centres provide superior care. Objective: To describe resources, performance, and care provided in pneumology units in Spain, assessing their association with 30-day readmission for COPD and in-hospital mortality. Methods: This survey was conducted in 116 hospitals responsible for the COPD pathway in pneumology units/departments from November 2022 to March 2023. Results: Of the 116 participating hospitals, 56% had a pneumology department while 25.9% had a pneumology section. The vast majority were public and university hospitals. The number of beds allocated to pneumology/100,000 inhabitants was 6.6 (3.1-9.2) and pulmonologist staffing was 3.3 (2.6-4.1) per 100,000 inhabitants. There was an intermediate respiratory care unit (IMCU) dependent on the pneumology department in 31.9% of units and a respiratory team for 24 h emergency care in 30% of units, while only 9.5% had interventional pneumology units for bronchoscopic procedures. COPD rehabilitation programmes were offered in 58.6% of pneumology units. The average rate of patients on ventilatory support in acute failure was 13.8 (9.2-25) per 100 discharges, with a 30-day COPD readmission rate of 14.9%, with significant differences according to the level of complexity (p = 0.041), with a mean length of stay of 8.72 (1.26) days. The overall in-hospital mortality in pneumology units was 4.10 (1.18) per 100 admissions. In the adjusted model, having a discharge support programme and interventions performed during admission (number of patients with ventilatory support) were predictors of a favourable outcome. Hospital stay was also maintained as a predictor of an unfavourable outcome. Conclusions: There is significant variability in resources and the organisation of care in pneumology units in Spain. The availability of a discharge support programme and greater use of ventilatory support at discharge are factors associated with a lower 30-day COPD readmission rate in the pneumology unit. This information is relevant to improve the care of patients with COPD and as a future line of research.

Home high-flow therapy during recovery from severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation: a mixed-methods feasibility randomised control trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients recovering from severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) have a 30-day readmission rate of 20%. This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate clinical, patient-reported and physiological effects of home high-flow therapy (HFT) in addition to usual medical therapy, in eucapnic patients recovering from AECOPD to support the design of a phase 3 trial.

METHODS

A mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial (quantitative primacy, concurrently embedded qualitative evaluation) (ISRCTN15949009) recruiting consecutive non-obese patients hospitalised with AECOPD not requiring acute non-invasive ventilation. Participants were randomised to receive usual care or usual care and home HFT (37°C, 30 L/min) with weekly home-based follow-up for 4 weeks to collect data on: device usage, breathlessness (modified Borg scale, visual analogue scale, Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile), health-related quality of life (COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire), pulse oximetry, spirometry and inspiratory capacity, parasternal electromyography and actigraphy. Semistructured interviews were conducted in week 4. Trial progression criteria were: ≥40% of eligible patients randomised, ≤20% attrition, ≥70% complete data, and no device-related serious adverse events (SAE).

RESULTS

18 of 45 eligible patients were randomised (age 69±5 years, 44% female, body mass index 23±5 kg/m2, forced expiratory volume in 1 second 32±12%). One withdrew following non-respiratory hospitalisation. Complete outcome measures were collected in >90% of home assessments. There were no device-related SAE. Daily HFT usage was 2.7±2.2 hours in week 1, falling to 2.3±1.4 hours by week 4. Temperature and flow settings were modified for comfort in 6 cases. Higher HFT usage was associated with lower symptom burden (CAT p=0.01). Interviews highlighted ease of device use, reduced salbutamol usage, and improved sputum production and clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this feasibility study support the progression to a phase 3 randomised clinical trial investigating the effect of home (HFT) on admission-free survival in COPD patients recovering from a severe exacerbation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study received ethical approval (REC19/LO/0194) and was prospectively registered (ISRCTN15949009).

Characteristics of rehabilitation programs for chronic respiratory diseases in Asia: A scoping review

The rates of chronic respiratory disease (CRD) is rising in Asia. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to be a highly efficacious intervention for people with CRD. While PR models are well established in Western countries, environmental, cultural and societal factors may influence how rehabilitation programs for people with CRD are conducted in Asia. This review aims to identify the characteristics of rehabilitation programs for people with CRD within Asia and identify differences between these rehabilitation programs to the recently updated American Thoracic Society (ATS) PR guidelines. Utilising the PRISMA scoping review guidelines, five databases- CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Health and Medical Collection were searched from inception until 13th December 2023. A total of 137 studies (n = 19,128) were included in the review. As many as 113 studies (83 %) included aerobic exercises as part of rehabilitation, only 90 studies (66 %) included resistance training. Thirty-nine studies included interventions such as Tai Chi, Qigong and Yoga. Comparing to the 2023 ATS PR guidelines, only 22 % of the included studies evaluated a rehabilitation program that was consistent with the guidelines. Improvement in exercise capacity (76 %) and quality of life (QOL) (73 %) were the most frequent outcomes used to evaluate program efficacy. The results suggest that models of rehabilitation varied greatly within the Asia region, with some more heavily adapted to suit the local context as compared to others. Further consideration on how to balance adaptation of PR with fidelity of the intervention needs to be taken.

The effect of telemedicine employing telemonitoring instruments on readmissions of patients with heart failure and/or COPD: a systematic review

Background

Hospital readmissions pose a challenge for modern healthcare systems. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring of patients' vital signs in decreasing readmissions with a focus on a specific patient population particularly prone to rehospitalization: patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a comparative effectiveness systematic review.

Methods

Three major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest's ABI/INFORM, were searched for English-language articles published between 2012 and 2023. The studies included in the review employed telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring technologies and quantified the effect on hospital readmissions in the HF and/or COPD populations.

Results

Thirty scientific articles referencing twenty-nine clinical studies were identified (total of 4,326 patients) and were assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 (nine moderate risk, six serious risk) and ROBINS-I tools (two moderate risk, two serious risk), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (three good-quality, four fair-quality, two poor-quality). Regarding the primary outcome of our study which was readmissions: the readmission-related outcome most studied was all-cause readmissions followed by HF and acute exacerbation of COPD readmissions. Fourteen studies suggested that telemedicine using telemonitoring decreases the readmission-related burden, while most of the remaining studies suggested that it had a neutral effect on hospital readmissions. Examination of prospective studies focusing on all-cause readmission resulted in the observation of a clearer association in the reduction of all-cause readmissions in patients with COPD compared to patients with HF (100% vs. 8%).

Conclusions

This systematic review suggests that current telemedicine interventions employing telemonitoring instruments can decrease the readmission rates of patients with COPD, but most likely do not impact the readmission-related burden of the HF population. Implementation of novel telemonitoring technologies and conduct of more high-quality studies as well as studies of populations with ≥2 chronic disease are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Systematic Review Registration

This study is registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY), identifier (INPLASY202460097).

An Italian Delphi Consensus on the Triple inhalation Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

The management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lacks standardization due to the diverse clinical presentation, comorbidities, and limited acceptance of recommended approaches by physicians. To address this, a multicenter study was conducted among Italian respiratory physicians to assess consensus on COPD management and pharmacological treatment.

METHODS

The study employed the Delphi process using the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method, involving a scientific board and expert panel. During a 6-month period, the scientific board conducted the first Delphi round and identified 11 broad areas of COPD management to be evaluated while the second Delphi round translated all 11 items into statements. The statements were subsequently presented to the expert panel for independent rating on a nine-point scale. Consensus was considered achieved if the median score was 7 or higher. Consistently high levels of consensus were observed in the first rating, allowing the scientific board to finalize the statements without requiring further rounds.

RESULTS

Topics generating substantial discussion included the pre-COPD phase, patient-reported outcomes, direct escalation from a single bronchodilator to triple therapy, and the role of adverse events, particularly pneumonia, in guiding triple therapy prescriptions. Notably, these topics exhibited higher standard deviations, indicating greater variation in expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study emphasized the significance that Italian pulmonologists attribute to managing mortality, tailoring treatments, and addressing cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD patients. While unanimous consensus was not achieved for all statements, the results provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making among physicians and contribute to a better understanding of COPD management practices in Italy.

Review of the Evidence for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD: Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness

COPD is a common and lethal chronic condition, recognized as a leading cause of death worldwide. COPD is associated with significant morbidity and disability, particularly among older adults. The disease course is marked by periods of stability and disease exacerbations defined by worsening respiratory status resulting in a high burden of health care utilization and an increased risk of mortality. Treatment is focused on pharmacologic therapies, but these are not completely effective. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) represents a key medical intervention for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including COPD. PR provides individualized and progressive exercise training, education, and self-management strategies through a comprehensive and multidisciplinary program. PR has been associated with improvement in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and dyspnea in patients living with COPD. Moreover, PR has been associated with improvements in hospital readmission and 1-y survival. In addition to the clinical benefits, PR is estimated to be a cost-effective medical intervention. Despite these benefits, participation in PR remains low. We will review the evidence for PR in each of these benefit domains among patients with stable COPD and in those recovering from a COPD exacerbation.

Mortality prevention as the centre of COPD management

COPD is a major healthcare problem and cause of mortality worldwide. COPD patients at increased mortality risk are those who are more symptomatic, have lower lung function and lower diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, decreased exercise capacity, belong to the emphysematous phenotype and those who have concomitant bronchiectasis. Mortality risk seems to be greater in patients who experience COPD exacerbations and in those who suffer from concomitant cardiovascular and/or metabolic diseases. To predict the risk of death in COPD patients, several composite scores have been created using different parameters. In previous years, large studies (also called mega-trials) have evaluated the efficacy of different therapies on COPD mortality, but until recently only nonpharmaceutical interventions have proven to be effective. However, recent studies on fixed combinations of triple therapy (long-acting β-agonists, long-acting muscarinic antagonists and inhaled corticosteroids) have provided encouraging results, showing for the first time a reduction in mortality compared to dual therapies. The aim of the present review is to summarise available data regarding mortality risk in COPD patients and to describe pharmacological therapies that have shown effectiveness in reducing mortality.

Predicting Hospital Readmission in Medicaid Patients With COPD Using Administrative and Claims Data

BACKGROUND

The goals of this study were to develop a model that predicts the risk of 30-d all-cause readmission in hospitalized Medicaid patients diagnosed with COPD and to create a predictive model in a retrospective study of a population cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed 2016-2019 Medicaid claims data from 7 United States states. A COPD admission was one in which either the admission diagnosis or the first or second clinical (discharge) diagnosis bore an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for COPD. A readmission was an admission for any condition (not necessarily COPD) that occurred within 30 d of a COPD discharge. We estimated a mixed-effects logistic model to predict 30-d readmission from patient demographic data, comorbidities, past health care utilization, and features of the index hospitalization. We evaluated model fit graphically and measured predictive accuracy by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Among 12,283 COPD hospitalizations contributed by 9,437 subjects, 2,534 (20.6%) were 30-d readmissions. The final model included demographics, comorbidities, claims history, admission and discharge variables, length of stay, and seasons of admission and discharge. The observed versus predicted plot showed reasonable fit, and the estimated area under the ROC curve of 0.702 was robust in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model identified with acceptable accuracy hospitalized Medicaid patients with a diagnosis of COPD who are at high risk of readmission. One can use the model to develop post-discharge management interventions for reducing readmissions, for adjusting comparisons of readmission rates between sites/providers or over time, and to guide a patient-centered approach to patient care.

Racial Differences in 1-Year Mortality after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States

Rationale: One quarter of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) die within 1 year. Although overall mortality rates are higher among White patients with COPD, racial and ethnic differences in the vulnerable period following hospitalization are unknown.Objectives: To determine the association between race and ethnicity and mortality following COPD hospitalization and to evaluate the extent to which differences are explained by clinical, geographic, socioeconomic, and post-acute care factors among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD exacerbation, we constructed Cox regression models for 1-year mortality accounting for hospital-level clustering; sequentially adjusting for clinical, geographic, neighborhood socioeconomic, and post-acute care characteristics; and stratifying by sex and individual socioeconomic status.Results: Among 244,624 hospitalizations, Medicare beneficiaries of racial and ethnic minority groups had a lower risk of dying within 1 year of hospitalization than those of White race (hazard ratios, 0.78 [95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.80] for Black patients, 0.79 [0.76-0.82] for Hispanic patients, and 0.82 [0.77-0.86] for others). Differences in visits to physicians, attendance of pulmonary rehabilitation, and discharge disposition explained some of the mortality gap among dual-eligible beneficiaries but not among non-dual-eligible beneficiaries.Conclusions: Medicare beneficiaries of White race are at greater risk of mortality following COPD hospitalization compared with beneficiaries of minority race and ethnicity groups. Our findings should be interpreted in the context of the selection of a hospitalized population and a potentially incomplete assessment of illness severity in administrative data, and warrant further investigation.

Impact of COPD on mortality: An 8-year observational retrospective healthcare claims database cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Here we present a large observational study on the association of COPD and exacerbations with mortality (AvoidEx Mortality).

METHODS

A real-world, observational cohort study with longitudinal analyses of German healthcare claims data in patients ≥40 years of age with a COPD diagnosis from 2011 to 2018 (n = 250,723) was conducted. Patients entered the cohort (index date) upon the first COPD diagnosis. To assess the impact of COPD on all-cause death, a propensity score-matched control group of non-COPD patients was constructed. The number and severity of exacerbations during a 12-month pre-index period were used to form subgroups. For each exacerbation subgroup the exacerbations during 12 months prior to death were analysed.

RESULTS

COPD increases the all-cause mortality risk by almost 60% (HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.55-1.59)) in comparison to matched non-COPD controls, when controlling for other baseline covariates. The cumulative risk of death after 8 years was highest in patients with a history of more than one moderate or severe exacerbation. Among all deceased COPD patients, 17.2% had experienced a severe, and 34.8% a moderate exacerbation, within 3 months preceding death. Despite increasing exacerbation rates towards death, more than the half of patients were not receiving any recommended pharmacological COPD therapy in the year before death.

CONCLUSION

Our study illustrates the impact of COPD on mortality risk and highlights the need for consequent COPD management comprising exacerbation assessment and treatment.

Use of infection control measures in people with chronic lung disease: mixed methods study

Background

The introduction of community infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduction in acute exacerbations of lung disease. We aimed to understand the acceptability of continued use of infection control measures among people with chronic lung disease and to understand the barriers and facilitators of use.

Methods

Australian adults with chronic lung disease were invited to an online survey (last quarter of 2021) to specify infection control measures they would continue themselves post-pandemic and those they perceived should be adopted by the community. A subset of survey participants were interviewed (first quarter of 2022) with coded transcripts deductively mapped to the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results

193 people (COPD 84, bronchiectasis 41, interstitial lung disease 35, asthma 33) completed the survey. Physical distancing indoors (83%), handwashing (77%), and avoidance of busy places (71%) or unwell family and friends (77%) were measures most likely to be continued. Policies for the wider community that received most support were those during the influenza season including hand sanitiser being widely available (84%), wearing of face coverings by healthcare professionals (67%) and wearing of face coverings by the general population on public transport (66%). Barriers to use of infection control measures were related to physical skills, knowledge, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion, beliefs about capabilities and beliefs about consequences.

Conclusions

Adults with chronic lung diseases in Australia are supportive of physical distancing indoors, hand hygiene, and avoidance of busy places or unwell family and friends as long-term infection control measures.

Predictors of Readmission, for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - A Systematic Review

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third-leading cause of death globally and is responsible for over 3 million deaths annually. One of the factors contributing to the significant healthcare burden for these patients is readmission. The aim of this review is to describe significant predictors and prediction scores for all-cause and COPD-related readmission among patients with COPD.

Methods

A search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from database inception to June 7, 2022. Studies were included if they reported on patients at least 40 years old with COPD, readmission data within 1 year, and predictors of readmission. Study quality was assessed. Significant predictors of readmission and the degree of significance, as noted by the p-value, were extracted for each study. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022337035).

Results

In total, 242 articles reporting on 16,471,096 patients were included. There was a low risk of bias across the literature. Of these, 153 studies were observational, reporting on predictors; 57 studies were observational studies reporting on interventions; and 32 were randomized controlled trials of interventions. Sixty-four significant predictors for all-cause readmission and 23 for COPD-related readmission were reported across the literature. Significant predictors included 1) pre-admission patient characteristics, such as male sex, prior hospitalization, poor performance status, number and type of comorbidities, and use of long-term oxygen; 2) hospitalization details, such as length of stay, use of corticosteroids, and use of ventilatory support; 3) results of investigations, including anemia, lower FEV1, and higher eosinophil count; and 4) discharge characteristics, including use of home oxygen and discharge to long-term care or a skilled nursing facility.

Conclusion

The findings from this review may enable better predictive modeling and can be used by clinicians to better inform their clinical gestalt of readmission risk.

Phenotypes, Etiotypes, and Endotypes of Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major health problem with a high prevalence, a rising incidence, and substantial morbidity and mortality. Its course is punctuated by acute episodes of increased respiratory symptoms, termed exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD). ECOPD are important events in the natural history of the disease, as they are associated with lung function decline and prolonged negative effects on quality of life. The present-day therapy for ECOPD with short courses of antibiotics and steroids and escalation of bronchodilators has resulted in only modest improvements in outcomes. Recent data indicate that ECOPD are heterogeneous, raising the need to identify distinct etioendophenotypes, incorporating traits of the acute event and of patients who experience recurrent events, to develop novel and targeted therapies. These characterizations can provide a complete clinical picture, the severity of which will dictate acute pharmacological treatment, and may also indicate whether a change in maintenance therapy is needed to reduce the risk of future exacerbations. In this review we discuss the latest knowledge of ECOPD types on the basis of clinical presentation, etiology, natural history, frequency, severity, and biomarkers in an attempt to characterize these events.

Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Discharged from Coronavirus 2019 Hospitalization

Rationale

There is concern that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at greater risk of increased healthcare utilization (HCU) following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) infection.

Objective

To assess whether COPD is an independent risk factor for increased post-discharge HCU.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD discharged home from a hospitalization due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021, using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM). COVID-19 was identified by an International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis code of U07.1. The primary outcome was HCU (ie, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, rehabilitation/skilled nursing facility (SNF) visits, outpatient office visits, and telemedicine visits) nine months post-discharge after COVID-19 hospitalization (from here on "post-discharge") in patients with COPD compared to HCU of patients without COPD. Poisson regression modeling was used to calculate relative risk (RR) and confidence interval (CI) for COPD, adjusted for the other covariates.

Results

We identified a cohort of 160,913 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, with 57,756 discharged home and 14,622 (25.3%) diagnosed with COPD. Patients with COPD had a mean age of 75.48 years (±9.49); 55.5% were female and 70.9% were White. Patients with COPD had an increased risk of HCU in the nine months post-discharge after adjusting for the other covariates. Risk of ED visits, readmissions, length of stay during readmission, rehabilitation/SNF visits, outpatient office visits, and telemedicine visits were increased by 57% (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.53-1.60), 50% (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.46-1.54), 55% (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.53-1.56), 18% (RR 1.18; 95% CI 1.14-1.22), 16% (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.16-1.17), and 28% (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.24-1.31), respectively. Younger patients (ages 18 to 65 years), women, and Hispanic patients with COPD showed an increased risk for post-discharge HCU.

Conclusion

Patients with COPD hospitalized with COVID-19 experienced increased HCU post-discharge compared to patients without COPD.

Association of rural living with COPD-related hospitalizations and deaths in US veterans

It is unclear whether the high burden of COPD in rural areas is related to worse outcomes in patients with COPD or is because the prevalence of COPD is higher in rural areas. We assessed the association of rural living with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs)-related hospitalization and mortality. We retrospectively analyzed Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare data of a nationwide cohort of veterans with COPD aged ≥ 65 years with COPD diagnosis between 2011 and 2014 that had follow-up data until 2017. Patients were categorized based on residential location into urban, rural, and isolated rural. We used generalized linear and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of residential location with AECOPD-related hospitalizations and long-term mortality. Of 152,065 patients, 80,162 (52.7%) experienced at least one AECOPD-related hospitalization. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, rural living was associated with fewer hospitalizations (relative risk-RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89-0.91; P < 0.001) but isolated rural living was not associated with hospitalizations. Only after accounting for travel time to the closest VA medical center, neighborhood disadvantage, and air quality, isolated rural living was associated with more AECOPD-related hospitalizations (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05-1.09; P < 0.001). Mortality did not vary between rural and urban living patients. Our findings suggest that other aspects than hospital care may be responsible for the excess of hospitalizations in isolated rural patients like poor access to appropriate outpatient care.

Strategies to Improve Enrollment and Participation in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Following a Hospitalization for COPD: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY

PURPOSE

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, very few patients attend. We sought to describe strategies used to promote participation in PR after a hospitalization for COPD.

METHODS

A random sample of 323 United States based PR programs was surveyed. Using a positive deviance approach, a 39-item survey was developed based on interviews with clinicians at hospitals demonstrating high rates of participation in PR. Items focused on strategies used to promote participation as well as relevant contextual factors.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 209 programs (65%), of which 88% (n = 184) were hospital-based outpatient facilities. Most (91%, n = 190) programs described enrolling patients continuously, and 80% (n = 167) reported a wait time from referral to the initial PR visit of <4 wk. Organization-level strategies to increase referral to PR included active surveillance (48%, n = 100) and COPD-focused staff (49%, n = 102). Provider-level strategies included clinician education (45%, n = 94), provider outreach (43%, n = 89), order sets (45%, n = 93), and automated referrals (23%, n = 48). Patient-level strategies included bedside education (53%, n = 111), flyers (49%, n = 103), motivational interviewing (33%, n = 69), financial counseling (64%, n = 134), and transportation assistance (35%, n = 73). Fewer than one-quarter (18%, n = 38) of PR programs reported using both bedside education and automatic referral, and 42% (n = 88) programs did not use either strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes current practices in the United States, and highlights opportunities for improvement at the organization, provider, and patient level. Future research needs to demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies, alone or in combination.

Long-term Telerehabilitation or Unsupervised Training at Home for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Despite the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), many patients do not access or complete pulmonary rehabilitation, and long-term maintenance of exercise is difficult. Objectives: To compare long-term telerehabilitation or unsupervised treadmill training at home with standard care. Methods: In an international randomized controlled trial, patients with COPD were assigned to three groups (telerehabilitation, unsupervised training, or control) and followed up for 2 years. Telerehabilitation consisted of individualized treadmill training at home supervised by a physiotherapist and self-management. The unsupervised training group performed unsupervised treadmill exercise at home. The control group received standard care. The primary outcome was the combined number of hospitalizations and emergency department presentations. Secondary outcomes included time free from the first event; exercise capacity; dyspnea; health status; quality of life; anxiety; depression; self-efficacy; and subjective impression of change. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 120 participants were randomized. The incidence rate of hospitalizations and emergency department presentations was lower in telerehabilitation (1.18 events per person-year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.46) and unsupervised training group (1.14; 95% CI, 0.92-1.41) than in the control group (1.88; 95% CI, 1.58-2.21; P < 0.001 compared with intervention groups). Telerehabilitation and unsupervised training groups experienced better health status for 1 year. Intervention participants reached and maintained clinically significant improvements in exercise capacity. Conclusions: Long-term telerehabilitation and unsupervised training at home in COPD are both successful in reducing hospital readmissions and can broaden the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation and maintenance strategies.

High versus Medium Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) combined with bronchodilators have been identified to improve outcomes in COPD but also to be associated with certain adverse effects.

Objective

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and summarize data on the efficacy and safety of dosing levels (high versus medium/low) of ICS alongside ancillary bronchodilators following PRISMA guidelines.

Data Sources

Medline and Embase were systematically searched until December 2021. Randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) that met predefined inclusion criteria were included.

Data Extraction

Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Any acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) risk was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome, mortality rate as the primary safety outcome, moderate/severe AECOPD risk as the secondary efficacy outcome and pneumonia risk as the secondary safety outcome. Subgroup analyses of individual ICS agents, of patients with baseline moderate/severe/very severe COPD and of patients with recent COPD exacerbation history were also performed. A random-effects model was used.

Results

We included 13 RCTs in our study. No data on low doses were included in the analysis. High dose ICS was not associated with a statistically significant difference in any AECOPD risk (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91-1.05, I²: 41.3%), mortality rate (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, I²: 0.0%), moderate/severe AECOPD risk (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06, I²: 0.0%) or pneumonia risk (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86 -1.33, I²: 9.3%) compared to medium dose ICS. The same trend was identified with the several subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

Our study collected RCTs investigating the optimal dosing level of ICS prescribed alongside ancillary bronchodilators to patients with COPD. We identified that the high ICS dose neither reduces AECOPD risk and mortality rates nor increases pneumonia risk relative to the medium dose.

Invasive Nocardiosis Versus Colonization at a Tertiary Care Center: Clinical and Radiological Characteristics

Objective

To describe the clinical and radiographic findings in a large cohort of patients with positive cultures for Nocardia emphasizing the differences between invasive disease and colonization.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 133 patients with a positive Nocardia isolate between August 1, 1998, and November 30, 2018, and a computed tomography (CT) of the chest within 30 days before or after the bacteria isolation date.

Results

Patients with colonization were older (71 vs 65 years; P=.004), frequently with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (56.8% vs 16.9%; P<.001) and coronary artery disease (47.7% vs 27%, P=.021), and had Nocardia isolated exclusively from lung specimens (100% vs 83.1%; P=.003). On CT of the chest, they had frequent airway disease (84.1% vs 51.7%; P<.001). Patients with invasive nocardiosis had significantly (P<.05) more diabetes, chronic kidney disease, solid organ transplant, use of corticosteroids, antirejection drugs, and prophylactic sulfa. They had more fever (25.8% vs 2.3%; P<.001), cutaneous lesions (14.6% vs 0%; P=.005), fatigue (18% vs 0%; P=.001), pulmonary nodules (52.8% vs 27.3%; P=.006), and free-flowing pleural fluid (63.6% vs 29.4%; P=.024). The patterns of nodule distribution were different-diffuse for invasive nocardiosis and peribronchiolar for Nocardia colonization.

Conclusion

The isolation of Nocardia in sputum from a patient with respiratory symptoms does not equal active infection. Only by combining clinical and chest CT findings, one could better differentiate between invasive nocardiosis and Nocardia colonization.

The Association of Frailty With Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Treated With Noninvasive Ventilation

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and impact of frailty on mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV). This was a single-center, prospective study of patients who developed ARF (irrespective of etiology) and were treated with NIV support. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We modeled the relationship of CFS with one-year mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for other clinical and demographic characteristics. Of the 166 patients enrolled, 48% had moderate to severe frailty. These patients were more likely to be female (67% versus 33%) and on oxygen therapy at home (46% versus 28%). The median CFS score was 5 (interquartile range (IQR): 5-6). Moderate to severe frailty was associated with a 60% higher risk of one-year mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-2.31). Frailty assessment may identify patients in need of ventilatory support who are at increased risk of mortality and may be an important factor to consider when discussing goals of care in this vulnerable population.

Real-World Treatment of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective German Claims Data Analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to describe the real-world treatment of German incident COPD patients, compare that treatment with clinical guidelines, and provide insight into disease development after incident diagnosis. In addition, the economic burden of the disease by assessing COPD-related healthcare costs was described.

Patients and Methods

Based on a German claims dataset, continuously insured individuals (04/2014-03/2019) aged 40 years or older with at least two incident pulmonologist's diagnoses or one inpatient diagnosis of COPD (ICD-10-GM code J44.-; no respective diagnosis in a 12-month baseline period) were selected. Treatment patterns after incident diagnosis considering inhaled maintenance therapies identified by ATC codes (outpatient prescriptions) were analyzed. Prescription patterns were compared with recommendations of German COPD treatment guidelines. Severe exacerbations were assessed as hospitalizations with main diagnosis ICD-10-GM code J44.1. COPD-associated costs from the perspective of the health insurance fund AOK PLUS were calculated per patient-year (PY).

Results

The sample comprised 17,464 incident COPD patients with a mean age of 71.5 years. 58.9% were male and the mean Charlson-Comorbidity-Index was 5.3. During follow-up (median: 2.0 years), 57.1% of the patients received at least one prescription of an inhaled maintenance therapy, whereas 42.9% did not. Among treated patients, 35.2% started their treatment with LABA/LAMA, 25.3% with LAMA monotherapy, 16.2% with LABA/ICS, and 7.8% with LABA/LAMA/ICS therapy. Within four weeks after initial diagnosis, ICS-containing therapies were prescribed in 14.1% of patients. Of all patients with a prescribed triple therapy, 68.9% had no corresponding exacerbation history documented. On average, 0.16 severe exacerbations and 0.19 COPD-related hospitalizations were observed per PY during available follow-up. Direct COPD-related costs were 3,693 €/PY, with COPD-related hospitalizations being responsible for about 79.2% of these costs.

Conclusion

Long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of incident COPD patients in Germany, in line with guideline recommendations. Yet, a considerable proportion of incident COPD patients did not receive any inhaled maintenance therapy.

Predictors of short-term COPD readmission

COPD readmissions have a great impact on patients' quality of life and mortality. Our goal was to identify factors related to 60-day readmission. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study with a nested case-control study, with 60 days of follow-up after the index admission. Patients readmitted were matched, by age, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s and month at admission, with patients admitted in the same period but not readmitted at 2 months. Data were collected on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life data at the index admission and events from discharge to readmission within 60 days. Conditional logistic (60-day readmission) and Cox (days to readmission) regression models were constructed. Both multivariable analyses identified the following as predictors: any admission in the preceding 2 months (OR: 2.366; HR: 1.918), hematocrit at ED arrival ≤ 35% (OR: 2.949; HR: 1.570), pre-existing cardiovascular disease (valvular disease or myocardial infarction) (OR: 1.878; HR: 1.490); NIMV at discharge (OR: 0.547; HR: 0.70); no appointment with a specialist after discharge (OR: 5.785; HR: 3.373) and patient-reported need for help at home (OR: 2.978; HR: 2.061). The AUC for the logistic model was 0.845 and the c-index for the Cox model was 0.707. EuroQol EQ-5D score before the admission was correlated with a lower risk of readmission (OR: 0.383; HR: 0.670). As conclusions, we have identified factors related to 60-day readmission and summarized the findings in easy-to-use scoring scales that could be incorporated into the daily clinical routine and may help establish preventive measures to reduce future readmissions.Registration: Clinical Trial Registration NCT03227211.

Early Initiation of non-invasive ventilation at home improves survival and reduces healthcare costs in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

While non-invasive ventilation at home (NIVH) is gaining wider acceptance as a treatment option for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with chronic respiratory failure (COPD-CRF), uncertainty remains about the optimal time to begin NIVH, whether a specific phenotype of COPD-CRF predicts improved outcomes, and how NIVH affects healthcare costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 100% research identifiable fee-for-service Medicare claims from 2016 through 2020, we designed an observational, retrospective, cohort study to determine how NIVH use in COPD-CRF patients stratified by CRF phenotype and by timing of initiation affected mortality, healthcare utilization, and total healthcare costs compared to a matched control group.

RESULTS

In hypercapnic COPD-CRF patients starting NIVH within the first week following diagnosis, risk of death was reduced by 43% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.51-0.63, p < .0001), those starting 8-15 days following diagnosis had mortality reduction of 31% (HR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.62-0.77, p < .0001), and those starting 16-30 days following diagnosis showed mortality reduction of 16% (HR 0.84, CI 0.073-0.096, p < .01) compared to controls. Medicare spending was also associated with timing of NIVH initiation in hypercapnic COPD-CRF. Those beginning treatment 0-7 days and 0-15 days following diagnosis had a $5484 and a $3412 reduction in Medicare expenditures respectively the next year. NIVH was not associated with improved clinical outcomes or decreased Medicare spending in COPD-CRF patients who were not hypercapnic.

CONCLUSION

In this study, early initiation of NIVH for hypercapnic COPD-CRF patients was associated with reductions in the risk of death and in total Medicare spending.

Exploring the Patient Experience with Noninvasive Ventilation: A Human-Centered Design Analysis to Inform Planning for Better Tolerance

BACKGROUND

This study brings a human-centered design (HCD) perspective to understanding the patient experience when using noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with the goal of creating better strategies to improve NIV comfort and tolerance.

METHODS

Using an HCD motivational approach, we created a semi-structured interview to uncover the patients' journey while being treated with NIV. We interviewed 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with NIV while hospitalized. Patients' experiences were captured in a stepwise narrative creating a journey map as a framework describing the overall experience and highlighting the key processes, tensions, and flows. We broke the journey into phases, steps, emotions, and themes to get a clear picture of the overall experience levers for patients.

RESULTS

The following themes promoted NIV tolerance: trust in the providers, the favorable impression of the facility and staff, understanding why the mask was needed, how NIV works and how long it will be needed, immediate relief of the threatening suffocating sensation, familiarity with similar treatments, use of meditation and mindfulness, and the realization that treatment was useful. The following themes deterred NIV tolerance: physical and psychological discomfort with the mask, impaired control, feeling of loss of control, and being misinformed.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the reality of patients with COPD treated with NIV will help refine strategies that can improve their experience and tolerance with NIV. Future research should test ideas with the best potential and generate prototypes and design iterations to be tested with patients.

COPD - do the right thing

A gap exists between guidelines and real-world clinical practice for the management and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although this has narrowed in the last decade, there is room for improvement in detection rates, treatment choices and disease monitoring. In practical terms, primary care practitioners need to become aware of the huge impact of COPD on patients, have non-judgemental views of smoking and of COPD as a chronic disease, use a holistic consultation approach and actively motivate patients to adhere to treatment.This article is based on discussions at a virtual meeting of leading Nordic experts in COPD (the authors) who were developing an educational programme for COPD primary care in the Nordic region. The article aims to describe the diagnosis and lifelong management cycle of COPD, with a strong focus on providing a hands-on, practical approach for medical professionals to optimise patient outcomes in COPD primary care.

Hospital Variation in Non-Invasive Ventilation Use for Acute Respiratory Failure Due to COPD Exacerbation

Background

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) use in patients admitted with acute respiratory failure due to COPD exacerbations (AECOPDs) varies significantly between hospitals. However, previous literature did not account for patients’ illness severity. Our objective was to examine the variation in risk-standardized NIV use after adjusting for illness severity.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed AECOPD hospitalizations from 2011 to 2017 at 106 acute-care Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals in the USA. We stratified hospitals based on the percentage of NIV use among patients who received ventilation support within the first 24 hours of admission into quartiles, and compared patient characteristics. We calculated the risk-standardized NIV % using hierarchical models adjusting for comorbidities and severity of illness. We then stratified the hospitals by risk-standardized NIV % into quartiles and compared hospital characteristics between quartiles. We also compared the risk-standardized NIV % between rural and urban hospitals.

Results

In 42,048 admissions for AECOPD over 6 years, the median risk-standardized initial NIV % was 57.3% (interquartile interval [IQI]=41.9–64.4%). Hospitals in the highest risk-standardized NIV % quartiles cared for more rural patients, used invasive ventilators less frequently, and had longer length of hospital stay, but had no difference in mortality relative to the hospitals in the lowest quartiles. The risk-standardized NIV % was 65.3% (IQI=34.2–84.2%) in rural and 55.1% (IQI=10.8–86.6%) in urban hospitals (p=0.047), but hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

NIV use varied significantly across hospitals, with rural hospitals having higher risk-standardized NIV % rates than urban hospitals. Further research should investigate the exact mechanism of variation in NIV use between rural and urban hospitals.

Association between Initiation of Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Rehospitalizations in Patients Hospitalized with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Although clinical trials have found that pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can reduce the risk of readmissions after hospitalization for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, less is known about PR's impact in routine clinical practice. Objectives: To evaluate the association between initiation of PR within 90 days of discharge and rehospitalization(s). Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries (66 years of age or older) hospitalized for COPD in 2014 who survived at least 30 days after discharge. Measurements and Main Results: We used propensity score matching and estimated the risk of recurrent all-cause rehospitalizations at 1 year using a multistate model to account for the competing risk of death. Of 197,376 total patients hospitalized in 4,446 hospitals, 2,721 patients (1.5%) initiated PR within 90 days of discharge. Overall, 1,534 (56.4%) patients who initiated PR and 125,720 (64.6%) who did not were rehospitalized one or more times within 1 year of discharge. In the propensity-score-matched analysis, PR initiation was associated with a lower risk of readmission in the year after PR initiation (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.90). The mean cumulative number of rehospitalizations at 1 year was 0.95 for those who initiated PR within 90 days and 1.15 for those who did not (P < 0.001). Conclusions: After hospitalization for COPD, Medicare beneficiaries who initiated PR within 90 days of discharge experienced fewer rehospitalizations over 1 year. These results support findings from randomized controlled clinical trials and highlight the need to identify effective strategies to increase PR participation.

Outcomes of Patients with COPD Hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019

RATIONALE

There is controversy concerning the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesize that patients with COPD hospitalized for COVID-19 have increased mortality risk.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether COPD increased the risk of mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with COVID-19 between February 10, 2020, and November 10, 2020, and hospitalized within 14 days of diagnosis. Electronic health records from U.S. facilities (Optum COVID-19 data) were used.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 31,526 patients, 3030 (9.6%) died during hospitalization. Mortality in patients with COPD was higher than that of patients without COPD, 14.02% and 8.8%, respectively. Univariate (odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 1.84) and multivariate (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.50) analysis showed that patients with COPD had greater odds of death due to COVID-19 than patients without COPD. We found significant interactions between COPD and sex and COPD and age. Specifically, the increased mortality risk associated with COPD was observed among female (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.95) but not male patients (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.34); and in patients aged 40 to 64 (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.90) and 65 to 79 (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.78) years.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD is an independent risk factor for death in adults aged 40 to 79 years hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

30-day Readmission After an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is Associated with Cardiovascular Comorbidity

OBJECTIVE

Readmission after hospitalization for a chronic disease is a major concern of interest for health care quality. Our aim was to investigate the predictors and rates of early readmission after an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in a tertiary care hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a 3-year period, patients hospitalized in our pulmonary disease clinic with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and who had an index hospitalization for AECOPD were included. Readmission was defined as rehospitalization within 30 days of AECOPD discharge. Demographics, comorbidities, exacerbations, prior intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), blood eosinophil count, and antibiotic and/or steroid treatment at the index AECOPD admission were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (17.3%) readmissions occurred in 300 patients. Readmissions were due to AECOPD in 46.2%, pneumonia in 19.2%, and cardiovascular disease in 15.4% patients. Twenty-one (40%) of the readmitted patients were frequent exacerbators. After adjusting for individual and clinical predictors, the odds ratio for readmission was 2.11 (95% CI, 1.07-4.15, P = .03) for those with congestive heart failure, 3.30 (95% CI, 1.05-9.75, P = .04) for those with arrhythmia, and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.04-3.81, P = .04) for LTOT users prior to AECOPD.

CONCLUSION

A significant majority of patients readmitted after an AECOPD mainly suffered from recurrent AECOPD. Associated congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, and prior LTOT were risk factors identified for early AECOPD readmissions in our study. Better recognition of readmission risk factors might help to reduce readmission rates of AECOPD.

Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a prevalent condition in the UK, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Hospital physicians manage a significant portion of acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admissions to hospital and readmissions after discharge. Optimal management of exacerbations requires controlled oxygen therapy and ventilatory support where necessary, and careful administration of bronchodilators, steroids and antibiotics. Holistic care for these patients includes nutritional supplementation and palliative support for those with advanced disease. To reduce the chance of readmission, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care bundles can be used, along with a review of inhaled and oral therapies. Where available, hospital-at-home discharge schemes can safely facilitate early discharge. Most importantly, high quality evidence-based smoking cessation support must be offered to smokers. Exercise improves the physiological and psychological condition of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and should be encouraged, with referral to a pulmonary rehabilitation service if available.

The Association with COPD Readmission Rate and Access to Medical Institutions in Elderly Patients

Purpose

Up to 20% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require re-admission within 30 days of discharge after hospitalization for acute exacerbations of the disease. These re-admissions can increase morbidity and the economic burden of COPD. Reducing re-admissions has become a policy target in many developed countries. We investigated the risk factors for COPD re-admissions among older adults with COPD.

Patients and Methods

Data obtained from the National Health Insurance Service-Senior Cohort (NHIS-SC) in Korea were analyzed. The subjects included 558,147 patients aged ≥70 who had been admitted for COPD between 2013 and 2015. Re-admission was defined as being re-hospitalized within 30 days after discharge. The key variables selected from the database included income-based insurance contributions, demographical variables, information on inpatient medical services, types of healthcare facilities, and emergency time relevance index (TRI). The TRI is a regional medical-use analysis index that evaluates whether the capacity of the medical services available is appropriate for the medical needs of the target residents.

Results

In 814 COPD re-admission cases among 4867 total admissions due to COPD in elderly subjects, higher re-admission rates were associated with male sex, admission to district hospitals, medical aid recipients, and a longer hospital stay. When additionally adjusting the TRI to identify the difference in re-admission rates due to medical service accessibility, the same results were found, except for the areas of residence. The TRI was lower in re-admission cases (odds ratio 0.991 [95% CI, 0.984‒0.998], P = 0.013).

Conclusion

In this study, COPD re-admission rates among older adults were significantly associated with sex, length of hospital stay, and the type of hospital. The capacity of the medical services provided was also related to the COPD re-admission rate. Better access to appropriate emergency services is associated with reduction of COPD re-admission rates.

Home parasternal electromyography tracks patient-reported and physiological measures of recovery from severe COPD exacerbation

Exacerbations of COPD remain a leading cause of emergency hospitalisations worldwide, and up to 28% of patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge [1]. Recent analyses of more than 2.3 million COPD hospitalisations highlight the dynamic and time-dependent nature of readmission risk, which peaks within the first 72 h of discharge [2, 3]. Effective readmission prevention strategies remain elusive and recognition of re-exacerbations beyond daily symptom variability is challenging for both patients and clinicians. Promotion of transitional care services and 30-day readmission penalties implemented by policymakers worldwide have had limited impact [4]. Telemonitoring strategies incorporating symptom and vital observation monitoring (peripheral oxygen saturation (S_pO2), heart rate, respiratory frequency) have consistently failed to demonstrate beneficial effects on hospitalisation risk [5]. Objective physiological monitoring has been explored using the forced oscillation technique. However, this also failed to prolong time to first hospitalisation [6].

Physiological phenotyping using daily home-based assessments reveals early improvement in load–capacity–drive imbalance following #AECOPD and feasibility of home parasternal electromyography measurement, which tracks symptoms, health status and spirometryhttps://bit.ly/3o6I0Ty

High Blood Eosinophil and YKL-40 Levels, as Well as Low CXCL9 Levels, are Associated with Increased Readmission in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background

Readmission after hospital discharge is common among patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Predictive biomarkers of readmission would facilitate stratification strategies and individualized prognosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the utility of type 2 biomarkers (eosinophils, periostin, and YKL-40) and a type 1 biomarker (CXCL9) in predicting readmission events in patients with AECOPD.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study design. Blood levels of eosinophils, periostin, YKL-40, and CXCL9 were measured at admission. The clinical outcomes were 12-month COPD-related readmission, time to COPD-related readmission, and number of 12-month COPD-related readmissions. These outcomes were analyzed using logistic and Cox regression models and Spearman's rank test.

Results

A total of 123 patients were included, of whom 51 had experienced at least one readmission for AECOPD. High levels of eosinophils (≥200 cells/μL or 2% of the total white blood cell count, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] =3.138, P=0.009) and YKL-40 (≥14.5 ng/mL, aOR =2.840, P=0.015), as well as low CXCL9 levels (≤30.1 ng/mL, aOR =2.551, P=0.028), were associated with an increased COPD-related readmission. The highest relative readmission rate was observed in patients with both high eosinophil and YKL-40 levels. Moreover, high eosinophil and YKL-40 levels were associated with a shorter time to first COPD-related readmission and an increased number of 12-month COPD-related readmissions.

Conclusion

High blood eosinophil and YKL-40 levels, as well as low CXCL9 levels, have predictive utility for the 12-month COPD-related readmission rate. Using eosinophils and YKL-40 together allows more precise identification of patients at high risk of COPD-related readmission.

Readmissions Reduction Program: Mortality and Readmissions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) following discharge of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has led to a reduction in 30-day readmissions with unknown effects on postdischarge mortality.Objectives: To examine the association of HRRP with 30-day hospital readmission and 30-day postdischarge mortality rate in patients after discharge from COPD hospitalization.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of readmission and mortality rates in a national cohort (N = 4,587,542) of admissions of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older with COPD from 2006 to 2017.Measurements and Main Results: Data were analyzed for three nonoverlapping periods based on implementation of the HRRP specific to COPD: 1) preannouncement (December 2006 to March 2010), 2) announcement (April 2010 to August 2014), and 3) implementation (October 2014 to November 2017). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 20.54% in the preannouncement period (December 2006 to July 2008) to 18.74% in the implementation period (May 2016 to November 2017). The 30-day risk-standardized postdischarge mortality rates were 6.91%, 6.59%, and 7.30% for the preannouncement, announcement, and implementation periods, respectively. Generalized estimating equations analyses estimated an additional 1,196 deaths (October 2014 to April 2016) and 3,858 deaths (May 2016 to November 2017) during the HRRP implementation period.Conclusions: We found a reduction in 30-day all-cause readmission rate during the implementation period compared with the preannouncement phase. HRRP implementation was also associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality after discharge from COPD hospitalization. Additional research is necessary to confirm our findings and understand the factors contributing to increased mortality in patients with COPD in the HRRP implementation period.

Predicting Re-Exacerbation Timing and Understanding Prolonged Exacerbations: An Analysis of Patients with COPD in the ECLIPSE Cohort

PURPOSE

Understanding risk factors for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is important for optimizing patient care. We re-analyzed data from the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) study (NCT00292552) to identify factors predictive of re-exacerbations and associated with prolonged AECOPDs.

METHODS

Patients with COPD from ECLIPSE with moderate/severe AECOPDs were included. The end of the first exacerbation was the index date. Timing of re-exacerbation risk was assessed in patients with 180 days' post-index-date follow-up data. Factors predictive of early (1-90 days) vs late (91-180 days) vs no re-exacerbation were identified using a multivariable partial-proportional-odds-predictive model. Explanatory logistic-regression modeling identified factors associated with prolonged AECOPDs.

RESULTS

Of the 1,554 eligible patients from ECLIPSE, 1,420 had 180 days' follow-up data: more patients experienced early (30.9%) than late (18.7%) re-exacerbations; 50.4% had no re-exacerbation within 180 days. Lower post-bronchodilator FEV1 (P=0.0019), a higher number of moderate/severe exacerbations on/before index date (P<0.0001), higher St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (P=0.0036), and season of index exacerbation (autumn vs winter, P=0.00164) were identified as predictors of early (vs late/none) re-exacerbation risk within 180 days. Similarly, these were all predictors of any (vs none) re-exacerbation risk within 180 days. Median moderate/severe AECOPD duration was 12 days; 22.7% of patients experienced a prolonged AECOPD. The odds of experiencing a prolonged AECOPD were greater for severe vs moderate AECOPDs (adjusted odds ratio=1.917, P=0.002) and lower for spring vs winter AECOPDs (adjusted odds ratio=0.578, P=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Prior exacerbation history, reduced lung function, poorer respiratory-related quality-of-life (greater disease burden), and season may help identify patients who will re-exacerbate within 90 days of an AECOPD. Severe AECOPDs and winter AECOPDs are likely to be prolonged and may require close monitoring.