Contribution of the pancreas to circulating somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in the normal dog

Pharmacologic inhibition of somatostatin receptor 2 to restore glucagon counterregulation in diabetes

Glucose homeostasis is primarily maintained by pancreatic hormones, insulin and glucagon, with an emerging role for a third islet hormone, somatostatin, in regulating insulin and glucagon responses. Under healthy conditions, somatostatin secreted from pancreatic islet δ-cells inhibits both insulin and glucagon release through somatostatin receptor- induced cAMP-mediated downregulation and paracrine inhibition of β- and α-cells, respectively. Since glucagon is the body's most important anti-hypoglycemic hormone, and because glucagon counterregulation to hypoglycemia is lost in diabetes, the study of somatostatin biology has led to new investigational medications now in development that may help to restore glucagon counterregulation in type 1 diabetes. This review highlights the normal regulatory role of pancreatic somatostatin signaling in healthy islet function and how the inhibition of somatostatin receptor signaling in pancreatic α-cells may restore normal glucagon counterregulation in diabetes mellitus.

Islet cilia and glucose homeostasis

Diabetes is a growing pandemic affecting over ten percent of the U.S. population. Individuals with all types of diabetes exhibit glucose dysregulation due to altered function and coordination of pancreatic islets. Within the critical intercellular space in pancreatic islets, the primary cilium emerges as an important physical structure mediating cell-cell crosstalk and signal transduction. Many events leading to hormone secretion, including GPCR and second-messenger signaling, are spatiotemporally regulated at the level of the cilium. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of cilia action in islet hormone regulation and glucose homeostasis, focusing on newly implicated ciliary pathways that regulate insulin exocytosis and intercellular communication. We present evidence of key signaling proteins on islet cilia and discuss ways in which cilia might functionally connect islet endocrine cells with the non-endocrine compartments. These discussions aim to stimulate conversations regarding the extent of cilia-controlled glucose homeostasis in health and in metabolic diseases.

Gap junction coupling and islet delta-cell function in health and disease

The pancreatic islets contain beta-cells and alpha-cells, which are responsible for secreting two principal gluco-regulatory hormones; insulin and glucagon, respectively. However, they also contain delta-cells, a relatively sparse cell type that secretes somatostatin (SST). These cells have a complex morphology allowing them to establish an extensive communication network throughout the islet, despite their scarcity. Delta-cells are electrically excitable cells, and SST secretion is released in a glucose- and K_ATP-dependent manner. SST hyperpolarises the alpha-cell membrane and suppresses exocytosis. In this way, islet SST potently inhibits glucagon release. Recent studies investigating the activity of delta-cells have revealed they are electrically coupled to beta-cells via gap junctions, suggesting the delta-cell is more than just a paracrine inhibitor. In this Review, we summarize delta-cell morphology, function, and the role of SST signalling for regulating islet hormonal output. A distinguishing feature of this Review is that we attempt to use the discovery of this gap junction pathway, together with what is already known about delta-cells, to reframe the role of these cells in both health and disease. In particular, we argue that the discovery of gap junction communication between delta-cells and beta-cells provides new insights into the contribution of delta-cells to the islet hormonal defects observed in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This reappraisal of the delta-cell is important as it may offer novel insights into how the physiology of this cell can be utilised to restore islet function in diabetes.

KATP channel blockers control glucagon secretion by distinct mechanisms: A direct stimulation of α-cells involving a [Ca2+]c rise and an indirect inhibition mediated by somatostatin

Objective

Glucagon is secreted by pancreatic α-cells in response to hypoglycemia and its hyperglycemic effect helps to restore normal blood glucose. Insulin and somatostatin (SST) secretions from β- and δ-cells, respectively, are stimulated by glucose by mechanisms involving an inhibition of their ATP-sensitive K⁺ (K_ATP) channels, leading to an increase in [Ca²⁺]_c that triggers exocytosis. Drugs that close K_ATP channels, such as sulfonylureas, are used to stimulate insulin release in type 2 diabetic patients. α-cells also express K_ATP channels. However, the mechanisms by which sulfonylureas control glucagon secretion are still largely debated and were addressed in the present study. In particular, we studied the effects of K_ATP channel blockers on α-cell [Ca²⁺]_c and glucagon secretion in the presence of a low (1 mM) or a high (15 mM) glucose concentration and evaluated the role of SST in these effects.

Methods

Using a transgenic mouse model expressing the Ca²⁺-sensitive fluorescent protein, GCaMP6f, specifically in α-cells, we measured [Ca²⁺]_c in α-cells either dispersed or within whole islets (by confocal microscopy). By measuring [Ca²⁺]_c in α-cells within islets and glucagon secretion using the same perifusion protocols, we tested whether glucagon secretion correlated with changes in [Ca²⁺]_c in response to sulfonylureas. We studied the role of SST in the effects of sulfonylureas using multiple approaches including genetic ablation of SST, or application of SST-14 and SST receptor antagonists.

Results

Application of the sulfonylureas, tolbutamide, or gliclazide, to a medium containing 1 mM or 15 mM glucose increased [Ca²⁺]_c in α-cells by a direct effect as in β-cells. At low glucose, sulfonylureas inhibited glucagon secretion of islets despite the rise in α-cell [Ca²⁺]_c that they triggered. This glucagonostatic effect was indirect and attributed to SST because, in the islets of SST-knockout mice, sulfonylureas induced a stimulation of glucagon secretion which correlated with an increase in α-cell [Ca²⁺]_c. Experiments with exogenous SST-14 and SST receptor antagonists indicated that the glucagonostatic effect of sulfonylureas mainly resulted from an inhibition of the efficacy of cytosolic Ca²⁺ on exocytosis. Although SST-14 was also able to inhibit glucagon secretion by decreasing α-cell [Ca²⁺]_c, no decrease in [Ca²⁺]_c occurred during sulfonylurea application because it was largely counterbalanced by the direct stimulatory effect of these drugs on α-cell [Ca²⁺]_c. At high glucose, i.e., in conditions where glucagon release was already low, sulfonylureas stimulated glucagon secretion because their direct stimulatory effect on α-cells exceeded the indirect effect by SST. Our results also indicated that, unexpectedly, SST-14 poorly decreased the efficacy of Ca²⁺ on exocytosis in β-cells.

Conclusions

Sulfonylureas exert two opposite actions on α-cells: a direct stimulation as in β-cells and an indirect inhibition by SST. This suggests that any alteration of SST paracrine influence, as described in diabetes, will modify the effect of sulfonylureas on glucagon release. In addition, we suggest that δ-cells inhibit α-cells more efficiently than β-cells.

•

K_ATP channel blockers control glucagon secretion by two mechanisms.

•

The first one is the direct stimulation of α-cell by a [Ca²⁺]_c rise, as in β-cells.

•

The second one is an indirect inhibition mediated by δ-cells releasing somatostatin.

•

Somatostatin mainly reduces the efficacy of Ca²⁺ on exocytosis in α-cells.

•

Somatostatin more potently inhibits glucagon than insulin secretion.

Paracrine regulation of insulin secretion

Pancreatic beta cells are the only cell type in our body capable of producing and secreting insulin to instruct the insulin-sensitive cells and tissues of our bodies to absorb nutrients after a meal. Accurate control of insulin release is of critical importance; too little insulin leads to diabetes, while an excess of insulin can cause potentially fatal hypoglycaemia. Yet, the pancreas of most people will control insulin secretion safely and effectively over decades and in response to glucose excursions driven by tens of thousands of meals. Because we only become aware of the important contributions of the pancreas when it fails to maintain glucose homeostasis, it is easy to forget just how well insulin release from a healthy pancreas is matched to insulin need to ensure stable blood glucose levels. Beta cells achieve this feat by extensive crosstalk with the rest of the endocrine cell types in the islet, notably the glucagon-producing alpha cells and somatostatin-producing delta cells. Here I will review the important paracrine contributions that each of these cells makes to the stimulation and subsequent inhibition of insulin release in response to a transient nutrient stimulation, and make the case that a breakdown of this local crosstalk contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes. Graphical abstract.

Intra-Pancreatic Insulin Nourishes Cancer Cells: Do Insulin-Receptor Antagonists such as PGG and EGCG Play a Role?

Harboring insulin-producing cells, the pancreas has more interstitial insulin than any other organ. In vitro, insulin activates both insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) to stimulate pancreatic cancer cells. Whether intra-pancreatic insulin nourishes pancreatic cancer cells in vivo remains uncertain. In the present studies, we transplanted human pancreatic cancer cells orthotopically in euglycemic athymic mice whose intra-pancreatic insulin was intact or was decreased following pretreatment with streptozotocin (STZ). In the next eight weeks, the tumor carriers were treated with one of the IR/IGF1R antagonists penta-O-galloyl-[Formula: see text]-D-glucose (PGG) and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) or treated with vehicle. When pancreatic tumors were examined, their fraction occupied with living cells was decreased following STZ pretreatment and/or IR/IGF1R antagonism. Using Western blot, we examined tumor grafts for IR/IGF1R expression and activity. We also determined proteins that were downstream to IR/IGF1R and responsible for signal transduction, glycolysis, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. We demonstrated that STZ-induced decrease in intra-pancreatic insulin reduced IR/IGF1R expression and activity, decreased the proteins that promoted cell survival, and increased the proteins that promoted apoptosis. These suggest that intra-pancreatic insulin supported local cancer cells. When tumor carriers were treated with PGG or EGCG, the results were similar to those seen following STZ pretreatment. Thus, the biggest changes in examined proteins were usually seen when STZ pretreatment and PGG/EGCG treatment concurred. This suggests that intra-pancreatic insulin normally combated pharmacologic effects of PGG and EGCG. In conclusion, intra-pancreatic insulin nourishes pancreatic cancer cells and helps the cells resist IR/IGF1R antagonism.

The Difference δ-Cells Make in Glucose Control

The role of beta and α-cells to glucose control are established, but the physiological role of δ-cells is poorly understood. Delta-cells are ideally positioned within pancreatic islets to modulate insulin and glucagon secretion at their source. We review the evidence for a negative feedback loop between delta and β-cells that determines the blood glucose set point and suggest that local δ-cell-mediated feedback stabilizes glycemic control.

Somatostatin Is Only Partly Required for the Glucagonostatic Effect of Glucose but Is Necessary for the Glucagonostatic Effect of KATP Channel Blockers

The mechanisms of control of glucagon secretion are largely debated. In particular, the paracrine role of somatostatin (SST) is unclear. We studied its role in the control of glucagon secretion by glucose and K_ATP channel blockers, using perifused islets and the in situ perfused pancreas. The involvement of SST was evaluated by comparing glucagon release of control tissue or tissue without paracrine influence of SST (pertussis toxin-treated islets, or islets or pancreas from Sst^-/- mice). We show that removal of the paracrine influence of SST suppresses the ability of K_ATP channel blockers or K_ATP channel ablation to inhibit glucagon release, suggesting that in control islets, the glucagonostatic effect of K_ATP channel blockers/ablation is fully mediated by SST. By contrast, the glucagonostatic effect of glucose in control islets is mainly independent of SST for low glucose concentrations (0-7 mmol/L) but starts to involve SST for high concentrations of the sugar (15-30 mmol/L). This demonstrates that the glucagonostatic effect of glucose only partially depends on SST. Real-time quantitative PCR and pharmacological experiments indicate that the glucagonostatic effect of SST is mediated by two types of SST receptors, SSTR2 and SSTR3. These results suggest that alterations of the paracrine influence of SST will affect glucagon release.

The somatostatin-secreting pancreatic δ-cell in health and disease

The somatostatin-secreting δ-cells comprise ~5% of the cells of the pancreatic islets. The δ-cells have complex morphology and might interact with many more islet cells than suggested by their low numbers. δ-Cells contain ATP-sensitive potassium channels, which open at low levels of glucose but close when glucose is elevated. This closure initiates membrane depolarization and electrical activity and increased somatostatin secretion. Factors released by neighbouring α-cells or β-cells amplify the glucose-induced effects on somatostatin secretion from δ-cells, which act locally within the islets as paracrine or autocrine inhibitors of insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion. The effects of somatostatin are mediated by activation of somatostatin receptors coupled to the inhibitory G protein, which culminates in suppression of the electrical activity and exocytosis in α-cells and β-cells. Somatostatin secretion is perturbed in animal models of diabetes mellitus, which might explain the loss of appropriate hypoglycaemia-induced glucagon secretion, a defect that could be mitigated by somatostatin receptor 2 antagonists. Somatostatin antagonists or agents that suppress somatostatin secretion have been proposed as an adjunct to insulin therapy. In this Review, we summarize the cell physiology of somatostatin secretion, what might go wrong in diabetes mellitus and the therapeutic potential of agents targeting somatostatin secretion or action.

The somatostatin-secreting pancreatic δ-cell in health and disease

The somatostatin-secreting δ-cells comprise ~5% of the cells of the pancreatic islets. The δ-cells have complex morphology and might interact with many more islet cells than suggested by their low numbers. δ-Cells contain ATP-sensitive potassium channels, which open at low levels of glucose but close when glucose is elevated. This closure initiates membrane depolarization and electrical activity and increased somatostatin secretion. Factors released by neighbouring α-cells or β-cells amplify the glucose-induced effects on somatostatin secretion from δ-cells, which act locally within the islets as paracrine or autocrine inhibitors of insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion. The effects of somatostatin are mediated by activation of somatostatin receptors coupled to the inhibitory G protein, which culminates in suppression of the electrical activity and exocytosis in α-cells and β-cells. Somatostatin secretion is perturbed in animal models of diabetes mellitus, which might explain the loss of appropriate hypoglycaemia-induced glucagon secretion, a defect that could be mitigated by somatostatin receptor 2 antagonists. Somatostatin antagonists or agents that suppress somatostatin secretion have been proposed as an adjunct to insulin therapy. In this Review, we summarize the cell physiology of somatostatin secretion, what might go wrong in diabetes mellitus and the therapeutic potential of agents targeting somatostatin secretion or action.

Somatostatin: One of the Rare Multifunctional Inhibitors of Mammalian Species

This review article has for major main objectives to give an overlook of the major physiological effects of somatostatin on different organs. It will cover first the general aspect of the hormone, its cDNA and its protein maturation process, as well as its characterization in various organs. This aspect will be followed by the factors involved in the control of its secretion, its intracellular mode of action, and its general action on physiological processes. Secondly, the review will focus on the pancreas, looking at its in vivo and in vitro actions with special attention on its effects on normal pancreas growth and pancreatic tumors.

Function and expression of somatostatin receptors of the endocrine pancreas

Somatostatin (SST) regulates multiple biological processes via five genetically distinct, G-protein coupled receptors. Clinical interest in therapy for neuroendocrine and metabolic disorders has resulted in the development of new tools for exploring the function of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). The development of highly SSTR-selective agonists and antagonists, animal models with the deletion of individual SSTRs, as well as SSTR-specific antibodies have all been utilized in delineating SSTR functions. In the pancreas, SST is a potent regulator of insulin and glucagon secretion. Indeed, the inappropriate regulation of pancreatic A- and B-cell function in metabolic diseases provides an impetus to evaluate the SSTRs as therapeutic targets. By combining the results obtained from molecular biology, pharmacology and immunochemical studies the current review provides a summary of important recent developments which have extended our knowledge of SST actions in the endocrine pancreas.

Dose-response effect of a beta3-adrenergic receptor agonist, solabegron, on gastrointestinal transit, bowel function, and somatostatin levels in health

beta(3)-Adrenoceptors(beta(3)-AR) are expressed by cholinergic myenteric neurons and beta(3)-AR agonists are effective in experimental models of diarrhea. Our aim was to explore the effects of a beta(3)-AR agonist, solabegron, on gastrointestinal transit, safety, bowel function, plasma somatostatin, and solabegron pharmacokinetics (PK) following single and multiple doses. In a single-center, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 36 healthy volunteers were randomized to oral solabegron (50 or 200 mg twice daily) or placebo. Transit was measured by a validated method ((99m)Tc-labeled egg meal and (111)In charcoal delivered to the colon via delayed-release capsule). Stool frequency, form, and ease of passage were measured on a validated daily diary; plasma somatostatin by radioimmunoassay and plasma solabegron and its active metabolite by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy analysis followed by PK analysis using noncompartmental methods. There were no overall or dose-related effects of solabegron on gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit, plasma somatostatin levels, stool frequency, form, or ease of passage in healthy volunteers. Solabegron and active metabolite exposures (area under the curve and maximum serum concentration) at both dose levels were consistent with PK at similar doses in previous phase I studies. We concluded that 7 days of the beta(3)-AR agonist, solabegron, 50 or 200 mg twice daily, did not significantly alter gastrointestinal or colonic transit or bowel function. In this study, medication was generally well tolerated with few adverse events reported and no clinically significant changes in vital signs observed. Further studies on clinical efficacy, visceral sensitivity, and gastrointestinal transit are required in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Demonstration of functional neuronal beta3-adrenoceptors within the enteric nervous system

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although the beta(3)-adrenoceptor (AR) has been suggested to be involved in regulation of gut motility and visceral algesia, the precise mechanisms have been unknown. beta(3)-AR has been postulated to have a nonneuronal expression, being initially characterized in adipocytes and subsequently in the smooth muscle. We aimed to investigate the expression of beta(3)-AR in human enteric nervous system and its role in motility and visceral algesia.

METHODS

The expression of beta(3)-AR in human colon myenteric and submucosal plexus was investigated using immunohistochemistry. The effects of a beta(3)-AR agonist on nerve-evoked and carbachol-induced contractions as well as somatostatin release were investigated in strips of human colon. The effect of an agonist on diarrhea and visceral pain was investigated in vivo in rat models.

RESULTS

beta(3)-AR is expressed in cholinergic neurons in the myenteric plexus and submucosal plexus of human colon. Activation of beta(3)-AR causes the release of somatostatin from human isolated colon. In a rat model of visceral pain, beta(3)-AR agonist elicits somatostatin-dependent visceral analgesia. beta(3)-AR agonists inhibit cholinergically mediated muscle contraction of the human colon, as well as chemically induced diarrhea in vivo in a rat model.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first demonstration of expression of beta(3)-AR in the enteric nervous system. Activation of these receptors results in inhibition of cholinergic contractions and enhanced release of somatostatin, which may lead to visceral analgesia and inhibition of diarrhea. Therefore, beta(3)-AR could be a novel therapeutic target for functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Endotoxin injection increases growth hormone and somatostatin secretion in sheep

Endotoxin has been shown to stimulate GH secretion in human and sheep. However, changes in hypothalamic neurohormones involved in the GH regulation by endotoxin have never been studied in vivo. In sheep it is possible to collect hypophysial portal blood (HPB) and quantify GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIH) secretion under physiological conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an acute i.v. endotoxin administration on the secretion of these peptides in sheep. Endotoxin induced a sustained increase of GH (x6.2 +/- 1.3) in intact rams. This stimulation was delayed and less marked when compared with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Surprisingly, the GH increase was associated with an important rise of jugular (x10.6 +/- 2.4) and portal (x7.9 +/- 3) SRIH levels, without a significant GHRH increase. To determine if the portal SRIH increase was a consequence of an increased short feedback of GH, we studied GH response to endotoxin after a previous GHRH injection to deplete the pituitary pools of GH. In that case, despite the absence of increase of GH after endotoxin treatment, SRIH levels was markedly increased. For the first time we have observed an experimental situation in sheep with a simultaneous and closed amplitude increase in jugular and portal SRIH. The source of jugular SRIH is likely the gastrointestinal tract and the increased jugular SRIH release in systemic circulation might be in part responsible for the increase of hypophysial portal SRIH. Ultimately our results show that endotoxin induced a complex reaction at multiple levels with a specific increase in both portal and peripheral SRIH levels. The surprising association of a lack of change in GHRH release and an increased secretion of SRIH with the increase of GH suggests that the effect of endotoxin on GH axis is mainly a pituitary one. The selective blockade of somatostatin should be useful for a better knowledge of the role of SRIH stimulation in the physiopathology of septic shock.

Antazoline increases insulin secretion and improves glucose tolerance in rats and dogs

In vivo effects of an imidazoline devoid of alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonistic properties, antazoline, on insulin secretion and glycemia were investigated both in fasted rats and dogs. In both species, antazoline (1.5 mg/kg i.v.) transiently increased insulinemia without affecting basal plasma glucose levels. In contrast, during an i.v. glucose tolerance test, antazoline markedly potentiated insulin release and thus increased the glucose disappearance rate. In rats, during an oral glucose tolerance test, the intragastric administration of antazoline (1.5 mg/kg) clearly enhanced insulin secretion and reduced hyperglycemia. In dogs provided with a venous pancreatico-duodenal bypass, antazoline (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) induced an immediate and transient increase in insulin and somatostatin but not in glucagon pancreatico-duodenal outputs. In conclusion, intravenously and orally administered, the imidazoline antazoline is able to stimulate insulin secretion in vivo and improve glucose tolerance. The imidazoline compounds could therefore have a potential therapeutic relevance as new antihyperglycemic insulinotropic agents.

Regulation of somatostatin-14 and -28 secretion by gastric acid in dogs: differential role of cholecystokinin

BACKGROUND

Prosomatostatin-derived peptides include two principle bioactive molecular forms, somatostatin 28 (S-28) and somatostatin 14 (S-14). This study examined whether there is a functional relationship between gastric acid secretion and the release of S-28 and S-14 into the circulation.

METHODS

In conscious dogs with gastric and duodenal cannulas, S-28 and S-14 responses, measured after extraction of acidified plasma and separation by gel chromatography, were evaluated by administration of nutrients and acid-inducing secretagogues without and with omeprazole.

RESULTS

Ingestion of a solid meal caused equivalent plasma elevations of S-28 and S-14, whereas infusions of histamine and gastrin selectively increased plasma S-14. Omeprazole decreased meal-stimulated S-28 (-67% +/- 8%; P < 0.01) and S-14 (-56 +/- 9%; P < 0.01) and abolished S-14 increases to histamine and gastrin. Intraduodenal perfusions of a liquid protein meal increased S-28 above S-14, comprising approximately 71% of total somatostatin-like immunoreactivity released, and omeprazole suppressed S-28 (-87% +/- 5%; P < 0.01) without influencing S-14. Similar responses occurred after exogenous cholecystokinin. Moreover, pretreatment of the intraduodenal protein meal with the cholecystokinin-A receptor antagonist MK-329 abolished increases of S-28 and S-14 and caused a further twofold increase of gastric acid (P < 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In the fed state, gastric acid causes direct release of S-14 from the stomach, but the acid-dependent component of S-28 secretion requires cholecystokinin as a cofactor. Negative feedback regulation between somatostatin and gastric acid secretory responses to nutrients may include S-28 modulated, in part, by cholecystokinin.

Effects of cholecystokinin (CCK)-8, CCK-33, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on basal and meal-stimulated pancreatic hormone secretion in man

Gastrointestinal hormones with insulinotropic effects, like cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) might tentatively be used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We therefore examined the effects of intravenous injection of pharmacological dose levels of CCK-8 (100 and 300 pmol/kg), CCK-33 (100 pmol/kg), GIP (100 pmol/kg), and CCK-8 plus GIP (100 pmol/kg of each) on plasma levels of glucose, insulin, somatostatin, glucagon, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) in healthy human volunteers. The peptides were given under basal conditions or in combination with a mixed meal. CCK-8, CCK-33, and GIP were all found to increase the basal plasma levels of insulin, somatostatin, and PP; the increases were observed already in samples taken at 2 min after the injection. In contrast, the plasma glucagon levels were unaffected by the peptides. CCK-8, CCK-33, and GIP (100 pmol/kg) all potentiated the meal-induced plasma responses of insulin and PP, whereas plasma levels of glucagon after the meal were not affected. Plasma somatostatin levels after the meal were increased by GIP but not affected by CCK-8 or CCK-33. CCK-8 and GIP together (100 pmol/kg for both) increased plasma levels of insulin, PP and somatostatin as much as each of the peptides given alone, both under basal conditions and after the meal intake. Plasma levels of glucagon were not affected by CCK-8 and GIP together. We conclude that in man, both CCK-8, CCK-33, and GIP moderately stimulate basal and meal related insulin release without any synergistic effects and that the peptides do not inhibit the secretion of glucagon.

Neural control of islet function by norepinephrine and sympathetic neuropeptides

It is clear that the sympathoadrenal system has a role in the regulation of endocrine pancreatic function and that the sympathetic nerves of the pancreas can change pancreatic hormone secretion to increase the availability of metabolic fuels. It seems likely that the classical sympathetic neurotransmitter, NE, acts in concert with peptide co-transmitters, such as galanin and NPY. Each is released during the stimulation of pancreatic sympathetic nerves and each is capable of influencing either islet function or pancreatic blood flow. There is considerable indirect evidence that the sympathetic innervation of the pancreas is activated during acute stress and influences the endocrine pancreas. However, proving such a physiologic role is difficult because of redundant mechanisms that influence the secretion of the metabolically-crucial hormones, insulin and glucagon. Such definitive proof therefore awaits the development of new techniques to dissect and dissociate these mechanisms.

Neuroendocrine mechanisms involved in regulation of body weight, food intake and metabolism

Body weight regulation is the result of food intake and energy expenditure. The central nervous system (CNS), and in particular, the hypothalamus, controls food intake as well as metabolism, the latter mainly by autonomic effects on the islet of Langerhans, hepatocytes and adipocytes. Body weight, more precisely body fat content, is probably controlled by a feedback mechanism in which insulin, released from the B cell of the islet of Langerhans, plays a key role. The islet of Langerhans is an intricate neuroendocrine unit in which the release of glucagon, insulin, and somatostatin from A, B, and D cells, respectively, is controlled by the CNS via a rich autonomic innervation. In addition, the endocrine cells of the pancreas influence each other by paracrine actions. The CNS control of the islets shapes the plasma insulin and blood glucose profiles during the circadian cycle and thereby regulates the nutrient flow to the different tissues in the body. Thus, the CNS structures involved in regulation of body weight and food intake control also metabolism. The mechanisms contributing to match food intake and the needs of metabolism are discussed.

Gastrin releasing peptide stimulates the secretion of insulin, but not that of glucagon or somatostatin, from the isolated perfused dog pancreas

Gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) is an intrapancreatic peptide, but its physiological function is unknown. Previously, the peptide has been shown to increase plasma levels of insulin and glucagon in vivo in dogs, but no studies on the possible direct actions on islet hormone secretion from the dog pancreas have been undertaken. Therefore, we examined the effects of a 10-min perfusion of synthetic porcine GRP at four different dose rates over a wide range (0.1-50 nmol l-1) on the islet hormone release from the isolated dog pancreas (n = 5-6 in each group) at 5.5 mM glucose. We found that, at all four concentrations tested, GRP rapidly and markedly stimulated insulin secretion. The stimulation was, however, transient: the increased insulin secretion returned to basal levels within 7-8 min despite the ongoing GRP perfusion for 10 min. In contrast, GRP did not affect the pancreatic secretion of glucagon or somatostatin. We conclude that GRP stimulates insulin secretion by a direct pancreatic action without affecting the secretion of glucagon or somatostatin.

Mechanism of sympathetic neural regulation of insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon secretion

The effects of electrical stimulation of the left splanchnic nerve on insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon secretion from the isolated perfused rat pancreas were investigated. Electrical splanchnic nerve stimulation (SNS), performed by square-wave impulses, produced a 25% decrease in effluent flow and a 10-fold increase in perfusate norepinephrine. Both insulin and somatostatin output in the presence of 16.7 mM glucose were inhibited during SNS by 85 and 56% of the basal value, respectively. Glucagon output in the presence of 5.5 mM glucose was stimulated 20-fold by SNS. Perfusion with 10(-6) M propranolol further decreased insulin and somatostatin output during SNS, when expressed as the total decrement beneath basal during stimulation. The glucagon response to SNS tended to be enhanced, although not significantly, by simultaneous infusion of 10(-6) M propranolol. However, 10(-6) M phentolamine (Phe) attenuated the SNS-induced inhibition of insulin and somatostatin output by 50 and 40%, respectively. However, insulin output remained decreased after SNS with Phe. The SNS-induced glucagon response was completely abolished by 10(-6) M Phe alone or by 10(-6) M Phe plus 10(-6) M propranolol. With 10(-6) M Phe plus 10(-6) M propranolol, insulin and somatostatin output remained decreased after SNS. These results suggest that insulin and somatostatin secretions induced by glucose are inhibited during SNS through the alpha-adrenergic mechanism and also that the beta-adrenergic mechanism exerts a stimulatory action. SNS-induced glucagon secretion occurs mainly through alpha-adrenergic activation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relationship between gastric acid and elevated plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity after a mixed meal

The aim of this study was to examine whether hydrochloric acid plays a role mediating the post-prandial increase in plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity in normal subjects. Intravenous infusion of cimetidine was found to reduce by 45% the postprandial increment in plasma somatostatin-like immunoreactivity. This effect was reversed by concomitant intragastric administration of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid, which in previous studies in fasted subjects had not affected plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity. The effects of cimetidine on postprandial plasma gastrin were the inverse of those observed on postprandial somatostatin. There was a greatly enhanced increment in postprandial plasma gastrin during cimetidine infusion, which was reduced significantly toward control levels by concomitant intragastric infusion of hydrochloric acid. To exclude direct inhibition by cimetidine of nutrient-stimulated plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity we studied the effect of cimetidine on plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity stimulated by an intraduodenal infusion of fat. Cimetidine did not alter the incremental response of somatostatinlike immunoreactivity to intraduodenal fat infusion. These data show that cimetidine does not invariably reduce nutrient-stimulated plasma somatostatinlike immunoreactivity and are consistent with the hypothesis that the action of cimetidine in reducing the plasma somatostatin response to ingestion of a meal is a consequence of reduction of postprandial acid secretion. These data suggest that the postprandial elevation in plasma somatostatin observed in humans is mediated in part through postprandial secretion of gastric acid, which in turn acts to elevate plasma somatostatin.

Circulating prosomatostatin-derived peptides. Differential responses to food ingestion

Prosomatostatin (pro-S) and its bioactive posttranslational products, somatostatin-14 (S-14), somatostatin-13 (S-13), and somatostatin-28 (S-28), were measured in human plasma by the use of immunoglobulins to the NH2-terminus of S-28 conjugated with agarose to separate them and, thereafter, by RIA with an antiserum recognizing the COOH-terminus of pro-S, and by specific RIA for the NH2-terminus of S-14 and pro-S. In healthy men, mean basal levels of pro-S were 4 pg equivalent S-14/ml; S-14/S-13 combined were 9 pg equivalent S-14/ml; and S-28 levels were 16 pg/ml. After a 700-kcal meal, pro-S, S-14, and S-14/S-13 did not change, whereas S-28 levels doubled by 120 min and remained elevated for 240 min. To evaluate the origins of these peptides, their levels were compared in peripheral, portal, gastric, and mesenteric veins of anesthetized patients and in patients with total resection of stomach and pancreas before and after nutrient intake. The stomach and small intestine were sources of both peptides; however, most S-28 originated in the small intestine. These findings suggest that, in contrast to S-14, S-28 is a hormone and may modulate postprandial nutrient absorption and use.

Biochemistry and physiology of gastrointestinal somatostatin

Somatostatin, a tetradecapeptide initially isolated from the ovine hypothalamus, is widely distributed throughout the gastrointestinal tract where it may act as a hormone, local chemical messenger, or neurotransmitter to elicit many physiological actions. Release of somatostatin from D cells in the gut is regulated by mechanisms that are both dependent on and independent of cAMP. In most cases somatostatin acts to inhibit the function of its target cells. It performs this action in part via pertussis-toxin-sensitive inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that regulate adenylate cyclase activity. Other mechanisms may involve sites of action distal to intracellular second messenger systems.

The effects of epinephrine on islet hormone secretion in the dog

We investigated the direct effects of physiological levels of epinephrine on the basal and arginine-stimulated secretion of insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin from the in situ pancreas in halothane-anaesthetized dogs. An IV infusion of 20 ng/kg/min of epinephrine increased plasma epinephrine levels to 918 +/- 103 pg/ml (P less than 0.001), and increased the baseline pancreatic output of insulin (P less than 0.05), glucagon (P less than 0.05) and somatostatin (P less than 0.05). The acute insulin response (AIR) to 2.5 g of arginine during this infusion of epinephrine was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than in controls as were the acute glucagon response (AGR) (P less than 0.05) and the acute somatostatin response (ASLIR) (P less than 0.05). Plasma glucose levels increased slightly and transiently during infusion of epinephrine from 99 +/- 2 mg/dl to a maximum of 110 +/- 3 mg/dl (P less than 0.05). An IV infusion of 80 ng/kg/min of epinephrine produced plasma epinephrine levels of 2,948 +/- 281 pg/ml, and increased the baseline pancreatic output of insulin (P less than 0.05) and glucagon (P less than 0.05). In contrast, baseline somatostatin output decreased transiently during this high dose infusion of epinephrine. The AIR and ASLIR to arginine were both significantly lower (P less than 0.05) than those during the infusion of epinephrine at the low dose. The AGR to arginine remained potentiated (P less than 0.05). Plasma glucose levels increased from 99 +/- 3 mg/dl to 119 +/- 4 mg/dl (P less than 0.01). We conclude that the effect of epinephrine on islet hormone secretion is dependent on the plasma level of epinephrine. At stress levels of 900-1000 pg/ml, both insulin and somatostatin secretion are stimulated; only at near pharmacologic, or extreme stress levels, does epinephrine produce net inhibition.

Somatostatin response to glucose before and after prolonged fasting in lean and obese non-diabetic subjects

Insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin concentrations were measured in 7 lean and 7 obese non-diabetic subjects over 7 days of fasting. In addition each subject was given a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test after fasts of 12 h and 7 days. In lean subjects complete food deprivation induced a significant decrease in the circulating levels of both insulin and somatostatin, while glucagon nearly doubled by 48 h and then remained constant for the duration of starvation. Refeeding with oral glucose suppressed the increased plasma glucagon, but insulin and somatostatin responses were enhanced in comparison with the prefast values, as assessed by the integrated areas of change. In obese subjects peripheral insulin and somatostatin levels were significantly lowered, but plasma glucagon level was unchanged at the end of the starvation period. In the same group glucose-induced insulin and somatostatin release were greater than in the fed state. Suppression of plasma glucagon by glucose appeared less complete in obese than in lean subjects. It is concluded that prolonged starvation enhances D-cell responsiveness to glucose in lean and obese subjects.

Effect of vagotomy and atropine on plasma somatostatin response to a meal in conscious dogs

In 4 conscious dogs with gastric fistulas the somatostatin responses to a meal were measured and compared to the responses seen after i.v. infusion of atropine sulfate (20 and 50 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) or cimetidine (8 mg.kg-1.h-1). The experiments were repeated after truncal vagotomy. The somatostatin responses to bombesin (0.5 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) were also measured before and after vagotomy. Vagotomy decreased basal and postprandial somatostatin levels and reduced the somatostatin responses to feeding during the first 30-min period following the ingestion of the meal but not during subsequent periods. Bombesin-induced somatostatin release was increased after vagotomy. Atropine decreased the somatostatin responses to the meal before and after vagotomy. Cimetidine had no significant effect. These studies suggest that, in conscious dogs, somatostatin released into the circulation is partly under vagal control and that, as for gastrin release, vagal pathways for stimulation and inhibition are present. Our studies also suggest that cholinergic mechanisms are involved in the control of postprandial somatostatin release.

The presence and actions of NPY in the canine endocrine pancreas

Immunofluorescent staining for neuropeptide Y (NPY) in canine pancreatic tissue was performed together with an evaluation of the effects of synthetic NPY on the release of insulin (IRI), glucagon (IRG) and somatostatin (SLI) from the duodenal lobe of the canine pancreas in situ. NPY-like immunoreactivity was localized in perivascular nerve fibers throughout the acinar tissue. NPY-immunoreactive fibers were also demonstrated in the islets, usually surrounding blood vessels but also occasionally in fibers associated with endocrine cells, primarily at the periphery of islets. In addition, the ganglia dispersed in the pancreatic parenchyma were densely innervated by NPY-immunoreactive fibers, and these ganglia regularly contained cell bodies staining for NPY. Direct infusion of NPY into the pancreatic artery (p.a.) produced a dose-dependent decrease of pancreatic SLI output and of pancreatic venous blood flow. Low-dose p.a. infusion of NPY (50 pmol/min) had no effect on basal IRI or IRG output or on the islet response to glucose (5-g bolus, i.v.). High-dose p.a. infusion of NPY (500 pmol/min) transiently stimulated IRI output and modestly increased IRG output. However, the comparatively sparse innervation of canine islets with NPY-like immunoreactive fibers and the relatively minor effects of large doses of synthetic NPY on pancreatic hormone release lead us to conclude that this peptide is not an important neuromodulator of islet function in the dog.

Role of pancreatic somatostatin in determining glucagon response to arginine and morphine

It has been proposed that pancreatic somatostatin (SS) tonically inhibits pancreatic glucagon secretion. In keeping with this hypothesis, we have previously shown that infusion of a nonimmunoreactive analogue of SS, [D-Ala5,D-Trp8]somatostatin (SSa), which in low doses inhibits SS secretion without inhibiting glucagon or insulin secretion, is associated with a large increase in glucagon and small increase in insulin secretion. Although direct stimulation of the alpha- and beta-cells by the analogue could not be excluded, high doses of the analogue appeared to inhibit insulin and glucagon secretion. These data therefore suggested that the effect of the analogue on insulin and glucagon secretion was indirect and due to reduction of tonic inhibition on the alpha- and beta-cells by SS. If pancreatic SS is an important regulator of glucagon secretion, then alterations in pancreatic SS should influence the glucagon response to secretagogues. Therefore, in the present study, we have examined the glucagon response to two different stimuli, arginine and morphine, either before or during suppression of pancreatic SS secretion. Intravenous injection of arginine produced a rapid increase of pancreatic glucagon output from the in vivo dog pancreas. When basal pancreatic SS output was suppressed by infusion of SSa, arginine injection produced a twofold larger glucagon response. Infusion of morphine directly into the pancreatic artery of the dog decreased pancreatic SS output and increased pancreatic glucagon output. When SS was suppressed by SSa infusion, morphine did not further suppress pancreatic SS secretion and the glucagon response to morphine was abolished.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) on islet hormone secretion in the pig

Calcitonin gene-related peptide occurs in intrapancreatic nerves and endocrine cells. The peptide is therefore a candidate for being of physiological importance for pancreatic function. We examined the direct effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on islet hormone secretion in the pig by infusing the peptide into the superior pancreatic artery. We found that 15 min intrapancreatic infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (22 pmol/min) decreased baseline pancreatic insulin output from 48 +/- 10 microU/min to 8 +/- 7 microU/min (p less than 0.01). Moreover, calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibited glucose-induced insulin secretion by 45% compared to controls (p less than 0.01), yet left terbutaline (beta 2-adrenoceptor)-stimulated insulin secretion unaffected. Furthermore, while being without effect on baseline glucagon output, calcitonin gene-related peptide potentiated terbutaline-induced glucagon secretion more than seven-fold (p less than 0.001). In contrast, the peptide did not affect baseline or stimulated pancreatic somatostatin output. We conclude that in pigs calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibits insulin secretion and potentiates glucagon secretion by direct effects on the pancreas that are not mediated by primary alterations in pancreatic somatostatin secretion. We suggest that the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide might be of importance for the intrapancreatic regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion in pigs.

Halothane anesthesia does not suppress sympathetic activation produced by neuroglucopenia

To determine the suitability of halothane anesthesia for studies of sympathetic control of the endocrine pancreas in dogs, we assessed the effect of halothane anesthesia (0.8% inspired concentration) on the sympathetic response to central neuroglucopenia. In dogs anesthetized with halothane, intravenous administration of the neuroglucopenic agent, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG; 100 mg/kg), produced increases of both systemic plasma epinephrine (EPI; delta = 269 +/- 86 pg/ml, P less than 0.025) and norepinephrine (NE; delta = 157 +/- 55 pg/ml, P less than 0.025) equivalent to those previously observed in conscious dogs. Measurement of plasma NE kinetics revealed that the plasma NE response to 2-DG during halothane was due to an increase in the rate of NE appearance that was identical to that of conscious dogs, rather than to an impairment of NE clearance. In contrast, 2-DG at this dose did not increase plasma EPI or NE levels in dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg). Plasma glucose increased modestly after 2-DG (100 mg/kg) in both conscious and halothane-anesthetized dogs but not in the pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Although 2-DG at a threefold higher dose (300 mg/kg) caused plasma EPI, NE, and glucose (delta = 12 +/- 3 mg/dl, P less than 0.001) to increase in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs, the responses to this higher dose of 2-DG were all significantly larger in halothane-anesthetized dogs (delta of plasma glucose = 30 +/- 8 mg/dl, P less than 0.005; P less than 0.0025 vs. pentobarbital).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma somatostatin and plasma glucagon in long-term IDDM without residual B-cell function. No effect of different long-term metabolic control

To further study the elevated plasma somatostatin (SRIF)--and reduced plasma glucagon concentrations found in IDDM patients without residual B-cell function compared to normal controls, we investigated 39 such patients, randomly assigned to three different insulin treatment regimens; conventional therapy with two injections a day (CTh), insulin pump (CSII) and multiple injections (MI), for 1 year. They were given an arginine infusion (0.5 g/kg/20 min). The mean basal plasma SRIF values in the CTh, CSII and MI groups were 20.8 +/- 3.3, 18.6 +/- 1.8 and 20.6 +/- 2.8 pmol/l and the mean basal plasma glucagon values were 30 +/- 5.7, 19 +/- 2.3 and 27 +/- 4.7 pmol/l, respectively. Both SRIF and glucagon increased in all groups in relation to arginine infusion. For both hormones, the mean values were highest in the CTh group, lowest in the CSII group, although the differences were not significant. The mean HbA1 values for the last 3 months within the test were 10.0 +/- 0.5, 8.8 +/- 0.3 and 9.1 +/- 0.5%, respectively, in the same order as above. The CTh group had significantly higher HbA1 values than the CSII group (p less than 0.02). We conclude that small differences in long-term blood glucose control are of inconsiderable importance for the islet hormonal response to arginine found in IDDM without B-cell function.

Effect of CCK-8 on basal and meal-stimulated somatostatin in the baboon

We measured the ability of CCK-8 alone, a test meal alone, or a combination of the two, to increase peripheral plasma somatostatin levels in the baboon. Baboons received a five-minute intravenous infusion of either CCK-8 (1, 2, or 4 micrograms/kg) or saline prior to a 30-minute meal. CCK-8 administration at all doses resulted in a significant rise of plasma somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI). In addition, ingestion of a meal following a control saline infusion resulted in a significant rise of plasma SLI. However, the meal-related rise in SLI was blunted by prior administration of CCK-8 at all doses, including a dose which did not significantly decrease meal size. CCK-8 administration at all doses also blunted the meal-related rise of plasma insulin and glucose. We conclude that the known ability of CCK-8 to inhibit gastric emptying, as well as to decrease meal size, may account for its suppression of the meal-related SLI release.

Galanin: a novel pancreatic neuropeptide

Immunofluorescent staining for galanin in canine pancreatic tissue was performed together with an evaluation of the effects of synthetic galanin on pancreatic output of glucagon, somatostatin, and insulin in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. A dense network of galaninlike immunoreactive nerve fibers was visualized in association with the islets of Langerhans and occasional galanin immunoreactive fibers were seen to course through the exocrine parenchyma of dog pancreas. During intravenous infusion of synthetic porcine galanin (25 pmol X kg-1 X min-1) pancreatic glucagon output rapidly doubled, and the output of both somatostatin and insulin decreased by 70%. Because arterial and pancreatic venous catecholamine levels remained unchanged, the effects on hormone secretion were not secondary to activation of the sympathetic nervous system. The direct pancreatic action of galanin was confirmed by infusing a peripherally ineffective dose of galanin (0.25 pmol X kg-1 X min-1) into the pancreatic artery, which also stimulated glucagon (+90%) and suppressed somatostatin (-50%) and insulin (-70%) release. The presence of galaninlike immunoreactive neurons in dog islets, together with the direct action of galanin on pancreatic hormone release, suggest that this recently discovered peptide could serve as an important neuromodulator of endocrine pancreatic function.

Effect and mechanism of vagal nerve stimulation on somatostatin secretion in dogs

To investigate the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on the release of pancreatic somatostatin, we electrically stimulated (10 Hz, 5 ms, 13.5 mA, and 10 min) the thoracic vagi just below the heart in halothane anesthetized dogs (n = 15). The stimulation increased the pancreatic output of somatostatinlike immunoreactivity (SLI) (delta = +248 +/- 81 fmol/min, P less than 0.005; base-line levels = 455 +/- 150 fmol/min). min). Arterial plasma SLI levels increased as well (delta = +16 +/- 3 fmol/ml, P less than 0.001; base-line levels = 65 +/- 3 fmol/ml), reflecting stimulation of extrapancreatic SLI secretion. Significant vagal activation was verified by a fivefold increase of pancreatic output of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) (delta = +31.4 +/- 5.9 ng/min, P less than 0.001; base-line levels = 7.8 +/- 0.9 ng/min). Atropine pretreatment (n = 6) inhibited partially both the PP response (delta = +7.9 +/- 3.8 ng/min after atropine) and the pancreatic SLI response (delta = +92 +/- 29 fmol/min) to vagal nerve stimulation. However, atropine pretreatment did not modify the arterial SLI response (delta = +20 +/- 7 fmol/ml). Hexamethonium pretreatment (n = 9) completely abolished all three responses. We conclude that 1) electrical stimulation of the vagus stimulates pancreatic SLI, extrapancreatic SLI, and PP release in vivo in the dog; 2) both muscarinic and nonmuscarinic mechanisms mediate the PP and pancreatic SLI responses; 3) a nonmuscarinic mechanism mediates the extrapancreatic SLI response; and 4) all three responses are mediated via ganglionic nicotinic receptors.

Endogenous opioid modulation of pancreatic hormone secretion: studies in dogs

The role of endogenous opioid peptides in the modulation of secretion of hormones from the endocrine pancreas was studied in dogs. In response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, plasma glucagon secretion significantly increased, followed by an increase in plasma somatostatin immunoreactivity. Pretreatment with the opiate antagonist, naloxone, prevented the somatostatin response but had no effect on the augmented glucagon secretion. Neither the degree of hypoglycemia nor recovery from the induced glucose nadir were affected by naloxone. Arginine Hcl administration resulted in prompt increases in immunoreactive glucagon and insulin secretion, as well as a rise in serum glucose. Pretreatment with naloxone failed to affect any of these responses. Our results suggest that endogenous opioid peptides mediate the somatostatin response following hypoglycemia-induced glucagon secretion.

Caerulein and secretin induced pancreatic growth: a possible control by endogenous pancreatic somatostatin

Pancreatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia following chronic joint (CA + SE), or separate, caerulein (CA: 1 microgram . kg-1) and secretin (SE: 75 micrograms . kg-1) administration were studied in parallel with pancreatic somatostatin (SRIF) contents following 2, 4, 7 and 10 days of treatment. Parameters indicative of pancreatic growth (tissue weight, DNA and protein contents, cellular protein concentrations) increased significantly after 2 days of CA or CA + SE and reached a plateau between days 4 and 10. SE merely induced a mild hypertrophy after 4 days. Endogenous pancreatic SRIF contents varied upon treatment, differently so with each peptide regimen. Indeed, CA and CA + SE treatments decreased total SRIF contents after 2 days with no effect thereafter. SE also decreased the latter after 2 days while significant increases were observed after 7 and 10 days. The inverse relationship seemingly existing between SRIF contents and the amplitude of hormonally-induced pancreatic growth supports the hypothesis that endogenous pancreatic SRIF, operating as an 'antigrowth' factor, may participate in the exogenous CA, SE and CA + SE stimulated pancreatic growth phenomena.

Regulation of somatostatin secretion in man: study of the role of free fatty acids and ketone bodies

We have investigated in normal subjects the possible role of plasma free fatty acids (FFA) and blood ketone bodies (KB) in the regulation of human somatostatin secretion. Heparin injected during the intravenous infusion of a fat emulsion raised FFA levels acutely from 0.4 +/- 0.1 to near 3 mmol/L. Plasma somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) rose from a mean (+/- SEM) basal value of 9.2 +/- 1.0 ng Eq S14/L to 20.0 +/- 6.0 ng Eq S14/L (P less than 0.05). Plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) level was unchanged and glucagon (IRG) concentration decreased from 156 +/- 20 to 107 +/- 2 ng/L (P less than 0.05). During this test, there was a rise not only in FFA but also in plasma triglycerides (TG) and in blood glycerol and KB levels. The infusion of a fat emulsion alone increased triglyceride and glycerol levels to a similar extent but induced also a mild rise of FFA (0.37 +/- 0.05 to 1.13 +/- 0.5 mmol/L, P less than 0.01), KB (78 +/- 12 to 360 +/- 45 mumol/L, P less than 0.01), and SLI (14.8 +/- 4.6 to 23.8 +/- 7.1 ng Eq S14/L, P less than 0.05). The induction by DL-Na-3-hydroxybutyrate infusion of a rise of KB was associated with a decrease of FFA (P less than 0.05) and SLI (P less than 0.05) without modification of IRI or IRG levels. Phentolamine infusion did not modify the SLI or glucagon response to acute elevations of FFA, whereas propranolol suppressed the increase of SLI without preventing the concomitant decrease of IRG.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Somatostatin in epithelial cells of intestinal mucosa is present primarily as somatostatin 28

Region-specific antisera to [Tyr14]-SS28(1-14) were used to identify cells containing immunoreactivity to the SS28(1-14) fragment of somatostatin 28 (SS28) in gastric and intestinal mucosal epithelium and in pancreatic islets by immunoperoxidase staining. Radioimmunoassay with iodinated [Tyr14]-SS28(1-14) identified one antiserum (F4) to SS28(1-14) that cross-reacted equally with SS28(1-12), SS28(1-14) and SS28. Two other antisera (F3 and F8) to SS28(1-14) did not cross-react with SS28(1-12) and showed insignificant cross-reactivity to SS28. Immunostaining results showed that F4 stained the same cells that reacted with antiserum AS-10, which is specific for the cyclic tetradecapeptide somatostatin, SS28(15-28). Antisera F3, F4, and F8 all reacted with islet D cells and with somatostatin cells in the antral mucosa. However, only antiserum F4 detected immunoreactivity in mucosal epithelial cells; F3 and F8 did not bind to these cells. After sections of intestine were exposed to trypsin, however, epithelial cells containing immunoreactivity to SS28(1-14) were detected in intestinal mucosa with antisera F3 and F8. These results were obtained for duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon, but most of the epithelial cells with immunoreactivity to SS28(1-14) were in the duodenum. Both radioimmunoassay and immunostaining results suggest that F3 and F8 bind to a region of SS28(1-14) that is unavailable to antibodies in the intact SS28 molecule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)