Trends in pharmacotherapy of Schizoaffective and bipolar affective disorders: a 5-year naturalistic study

International Trends in Lithium Use for Pharmacotherapy and Clinical Correlates in Bipolar Disorder: A Scoping Review

Lithium remains an effective option in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). Thus, we aim to characterize the pharmaco-epidemiological patterns of lithium use internationally over time and elucidate clinical correlates associated with BD using a scoping review, which was conducted using the methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). We searched several databases for studies that examined the prescriptions for lithium and clinical associations in BD from inception until December 2023. This review included 55 articles from 1967 to 2023, which collected data from North America (n = 24, 43.6%), Europe (n = 20, 36.4%), and Asia (n = 11, 20.0%). The overall prescription rates ranged from 3.3% to 84% (33.4% before and 30.6% after the median year cutoffs). Over time, there was a decline in lithium use in North America (27.7% before 2010 to 17.1% after 2010) and Europe (36.7% before 2003 to 35.7% after 2003), and a mild increase in Asia (25.0% before 2003 to 26.2% after 2003). Lithium use was associated with specific demographic (e.g., age, male gender) and clinical factors (e.g., lower suicide risk). Overall, we found a trend of declining lithium use internationally, particularly in the West. Specific clinical correlates can support clinical decision-making for continued lithium use.

Treatment pathways for bipolar disorder in the USA and Europe: convergence or divergence?

Mood stabilising therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for bipolar disorder, a disease that is commonly associated with disabling psychosocial morbidity [37,11]. A variety of drugs have been approved for use in bipolar disorder, thus providing a wide array of options for clinicians when deciding on a course of treatment [28]. In order to assist clinical decision-making, facilitate optimal quality of care and reduce unnecessary variation in clinical practice, several clinical practice guidelines and treatment algorithms have been developed [4,19,20,21]. As well as similarities, there are some differences between guidelines developed from an American perspective and those developed from a European perspective [4,19], and there is a pervasive view in the clinical community that treatment of patients with bipolar disorder differs substantially between the United States (US) and Europe. This article discusses what is known about the similarities and differences of treatment practices for bipolar disorder between the US and Europe.

Antipsychotic use in Northern Italian inter-episode bipolar disorder patients: considering both second- and first-generation agents

Evidence supports increasing antipsychotic use in bipolar disorder, especially second-generation antipsychotics. However, data regarding first-generation antipsychotic contemporary use are limited. We studied 380 Northern Italian bipolar disorder inter-episode patients, grouped according to current antipsychotic use, stratified by bipolar subtype (BDI vs. BDII). Furthermore, we compared first-generation antipsychotic users vs. non-users. In our sample (n = 357), 81.8% were taking antipsychotics (74% second-generation antipsychotics, 24.1% first-generation antipsychotics), with antipsychotic use in BDI significantly more prevalent than in BDII (85.2% vs. 72.0%). Overall, antipsychotic users vs. non-users had higher rates of hypo/manic last episode, lifetime psychiatric hospitalization, psychosis, and current psychotropic use, but lower rates of anxiety disorder main comorbidity and current antidepressant use. First-generation antipsychotic use rates (30.3% in BDI vs. 6.5% in BDII) were associated with more frequently being unpartnered, having elevated first/last episodes, higher lifetime hospitalization, involuntary commitment, psychosis, and psychosocial rehabilitation rates, and more current psychotropic use, but lower Global Assessment Functioning scores and less current antidepressant use. Bipolar disorder patients had robust antipsychotic (second-generation antipsychotic > first-generation antipsychotic) use, consistently with previous reports. FGAs were still prescribed for a substantial group of patients, likely suffering from severe bipolar disorder. Prescriptions need to be monitored to assess their appropriateness and adherence to evidence-based recommendations.

Psychotropic Medication of Acute Episodes of Mood Disorders: Current Prescription Attitude in Two Psychiatric Wards in Cagliari, Italy

Background:

Medication of acute episodes of mood disorders has changed over the last decades following the results of randomized clinical trials.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to analyze medication prescribed at discharge from two psychiatric wards. We focused on hospitalization as one of the best opportunities to start prophylaxis.

Methods:

We examined retrospectively the clinical records of 357 patients hospitalized for mood episodes in two psychiatric wards in the Cagliari area (SPDC-1 and SPDC-2) between 1 January and 31 December 2016. We focused on the psychotropic medication prescribed at discharge from the hospital.

Results:

Most patients were discharged with antipsychotics (86%) and/or benzodiazepines (89%). Combined medication was frequent, including various co-administration of first-generation and/or second-generation antipsychotics (26% of patients), or antipsychotics combined with mood-stabilizers (51% of patients). There was a preferential prescription of first-generation antipsychotics in SPDC-1, and of second-generation antipsychotics in SPDC-2. Prescription of lithium was significantly more frequent in SPDC-1.

Conclusion:

Although the treatment was in line with randomized clinical trials, the choice of individual psychotropic agents differed significantly between the two wards. Different prescription attitudes can have consequences on the long-term outcome of patients discharged from the hospital after an acute mood episode.

Use and safety of antiepileptic drugs in psychiatric inpatients-data from the AMSP study

The psychiatric utilization patterns and risks of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were assessed by using data from the drug safety programme Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie over the time period 1993-2013. In a total of 432,215 patients, the main indications for AED use were acute mania, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenic and organic psychoses. Valproic acid (VPA) was the most common substance across all of those groups, reaching administration rates of up to 50% since 2005, at which time carbamazepine (CBZ) administration consistently dropped below a rate of 10%. Lamotrigine (LTG) and pregabalin (PGB) increased in relevance after 2005 and 2010, respectively (with administration rates of up to 9%), whereas oxcarbazepine (OXC) was least prevalent (<3%). The mean rates of severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ranged from 6 cases per 1000 patients treated (VPA) to 19/1000 (OXC) and were significantly lower with treatment with VPA compared to OXC and CBZ. Hyponatremia was the leading ADR during treatment with OXC; severe allergic skin reactions were most often observed during treatment with CBZ and LTG, and severe oedema was most common during treatment with PGB. Severe hyponatremia induced by OXC was observed significantly more often in female patients than in male patients.

Utilization of Psychopharmacological Treatment Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Bipolar Disorder From 2001 to 2010

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine utilization and patterns of psychopharmacological treatment during a 1-year follow-up period among patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder from 2001 to 2010.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder from 2001 to 2010 were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We assessed prescription records related to 4 kinds of psychopharmacological medication, including antipsychotics (APs), antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines, as well as health care utilization in a 1-year follow-up period among the study subjects. In addition, logistic regressions were applied to test the trends for utilization of psychopharmacological treatment during the 10-year study period.

RESULTS

A total of 2703 patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder were enrolled. The ratio of good adherence, defined as medications possession ratio greater than 0.8, for use of the examined psychopharmacological medication was relatively low during the study period. The use of first-generation APs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, lithium, carbamazepine, and benzodiazepines has declined; however, the use of second-generation APs, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, lamotrigine, and valproate has risen markedly during the 10-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents patterns of pharmacological treatment in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder in Taiwan for a 10-year study period. It would be of importance to further investigate causes and outcomes for polytherapy and nonadherence to psychotropic medications among patients with bipolar disorder.

Trends in pharmacotherapy in patients referred to a bipolar specialty clinic, 2000-2011

OBJECTIVE

To assess mood stabilizer (MS) and second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) prescribing trends in bipolar disorder (BD) outpatients referred to a bipolar disorder specialty clinic over the past 12 years.

METHOD

BD outpatients referred to the Stanford University Bipolar Disorder Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Prescription rates for MSs and SGAs were compared during the first (2000-2005) and second (2006-2011) six years.

RESULTS

Among 597 BD patients (mean±SD age 35.4±8.6 years; 58.1% female; 40.7% Type I, 43.6% Type II, and 15.7% Type Not Otherwise Specified; taking 2.6±1.7 prescription psychotropic medications), lamotrigine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole usage more than doubled, from 14.7% to 37.2% (p<0.0001), 7.2% to 19.7% (p<0.0001), and 3.1% to 10.9% (p=0.0003), respectively, while olanzapine and risperidone use decreased by more than half from 15.0% to 6.6% (p=0.0043), and from 8.7% to 3.8% (p=0.039), respectively. SGA use increased from 34.1% to 44.8% (p=0.013), although MS use continued to be more common (in 65.2% for 2006-2011). Use of other individual MSs and SGAs and MSs as a class did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 12 years, in patients referred to a BD specialty clinic, lamotrigine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole use more than doubled, and olanzapine and risperidone use decreased by more than half. Tolerability (for lamotrigine, aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone) more than efficacy (for quetiapine) differences may have driven these findings. Additional studies are needed to explore the relative influences of enhanced tolerability versus efficacy upon prescribing practices in BD patients.

Interactions between valproic acid and quetiapine/olanzapine in the treatment of bipolar disorder and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVES

The anticonvulsant valproic acid and the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and quetiapine provide synergistic mood-stabilising, antidepressant and antipsychotic activities in the treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective disorders. Existing literature shows that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics drug-drug interactions (DDIs) possibly occur with the use of such a combination. Clinical reports of a possible interaction between the drugs leading to an increased risk of adverse drug reactions have also emerged. The main objective of this paper is to review the incidence of DDIs between the anticonvulsant and the antipsychotics, to postulate the possible mechanisms of the interaction and to establish whether certain target populations are at an increased susceptibility to such interactions. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the antipsychotics to monitor for an interaction was also assessed. A systematic database search was carried out using the search engine provided by PubMed using the following key words: olanzapine, quetiapine, valproic acid, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction, bipolar disorder, therapeutic drug monitoring.

KEY FINDINGS

Evidence of a possible clinically relevant DDI between valproic acid and both antipsychotics has been uncovered. A possible mechanism for the interactions has been postulated, and the importance of TDM has been discussed.

SUMMARY

Further research is required to determine whether DDIs occur with the concurrent use of valproic acid and olanzapine or quetiapine, and to investigate the potential of TDM as a clinical tool in improving pharmacotherapy and preventing toxicity.

Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry

The current statement is a systematic review of the available data concerning the efficacy of medication treatment of bipolar disorder (BP). A systematic MEDLINE search was made concerning the treatment of BP (RCTs) with the names of treatment options as keywords. The search was updated on 10 March 2012. The literature suggests that lithium, first and second generation antipsychotics and valproate and carbamazepine are efficacious in the treatment of acute mania. Quetiapine and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are also efficacious for treating bipolar depression. Antidepressants should only be used in combination with an antimanic agent, because they can induce switching to mania/hypomania/mixed states/rapid cycling when utilized as monotherapy. Lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole are efficacious during the maintenance phase. Lamotrigine is efficacious in the prevention of depression, and it remains to be clarified whether it is also efficacious for mania. There is some evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions as an adjunctive treatment to medication. Electroconvulsive therapy is an option for refractory patients. In acute manic patients who are partial responders to lithium/valproate/carbamazepine, adding an antipsychotic is a reasonable choice. The combination with best data in acute bipolar depression is lithium plus lamotrigine. Patients stabilized on combination treatment might do worse if shifted to monotherapy during maintenance, and patients could benefit with add-on treatment with olanzapine, valproate, an antidepressant, or lamotrigine, depending on the index acute phase. A variety of treatment options for BP are available today, but still unmet needs are huge. Combination therapy may improve the treatment outcome but it also carries more side-effect burden. Further research is necessary as well as the development of better guidelines and algorithms for the step-by-step rational treatment.

Prescribing trends in bipolar disorder: cohort study in the United Kingdom THIN primary care database 1995-2009

OBJECTIVES

To determine changes in prescribing patterns in primary care of antipsychotic and mood stabiliser medication in a representative sample of patients with bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom over a fifteen year period and association with socio-demographic factors.

METHODS

We identified 4700 patients in the Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database, who had received treatment for bipolar disorder between 1995 and 2009. The proportion of time for which each individual was prescribed a particular medication was studied, along with variation by sex, age and social depravation status (quintiles of Townsend scores). The number of drugs an individual was taking within a particular year was also examined.

RESULTS

In 1995, 40.6% of patients with bipolar disorder were prescribed a psychotropic medication at least twice. By 2009 this had increased to 78.5% of patients. Valproate registered with the greatest increase in use (22.7%) followed by olanzapine (15.7%) and quetiapine (9.9%). There were differences by age and sex; with young (18-30 year old) women having the biggest increase in proportion of time on medication. There were no differences by social deprivation status. By 2009, 34.2% of women of childbearing age were treated with valproate.

CONCLUSIONS

Lithium use overall remained relatively constant, whilst second generation antipsychotic and valproate use increased dramatically. Changes in prescribing practice preceded published trial evidence, especially with the use of second generation antipsychotics, perhaps with inferences being made from treatment of schizophrenia and use of first generation antipsychotics. Women of childbearing age were prescribed valproate frequently, against best advice.

Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Lithium carbonate and valproate semisodium are both recommended as monotherapy for prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder, but are not individually fully effective in many patients. If combination therapy with both agents is better than monotherapy, many relapses and consequent disability could be avoided. We aimed to establish whether lithium plus valproate was better than monotherapy with either drug alone for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder.

METHODS

330 patients aged 16 years and older with bipolar I disorder from 41 sites in the UK, France, USA, and Italy were randomly allocated to open-label lithium monotherapy (plasma concentration 0.4-1.0 mmol/L, n=110), valproate monotherapy (750-1250 mg, n=110), or both agents in combination (n=110), after an active run-in of 4-8 weeks on the combination. Randomisation was by computer program, and investigators and participants were informed of treatment allocation. All outcome events were considered by the trial management team, who were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were followed up for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was initiation of new intervention for an emergent mood episode, which was compared between groups by Cox regression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 55261332.

FINDINGS

59 (54%) of 110 people in the combination therapy group, 65 (59%) of 110 in the lithium group, and 76 (69%) of 110 in the valproate group had a primary outcome event during follow-up. Hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83, p=0.0023) for combination therapy versus valproate, 0.82 (0.58-1.17, p=0.27) for combination therapy versus lithium, and 0.71 (0.51-1.00, p=0.0472) for lithium versus valproate. 16 participants had serious adverse events after randomisation: seven receiving valproate monotherapy (three deaths); five lithium monotherapy (two deaths); and four combination therapy (one death).

INTERPRETATION

For people with bipolar I disorder, for whom long-term therapy is clinically indicated, both combination therapy with lithium plus valproate and lithium monotherapy are more likely to prevent relapse than is valproate monotherapy. This benefit seems to be irrespective of baseline severity of illness and is maintained for up to 2 years. BALANCE could neither reliably confirm nor refute a benefit of combination therapy compared with lithium monotherapy.

FUNDING

Stanley Medical Research Institute; Sanofi-Aventis.

Changes in outpatient lithium treatment in the Netherlands during 1996-2005

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the present study were to investigate in outpatients in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2005, changes in 1) the incidence and prevalence of lithium use and 2) lithium use patterns (discontinuation, add-on, and switch).

METHODS

Incidence and prevalence of lithium use were determined for each year between 1996 and 2005. In addition, we determined cumulative changes in lithium use (discontinuation, add-on, and switching) at three, six, 12 and 24 months for three separate time-cohorts (1998-1999, 2000-2001 and 2002-2003). Lastly, concomitant use of other drugs used in the treatment of bipolar disorders next to lithium during the 24 months after the first lithium prescription was determined for the three time-cohorts.

RESULTS

Incidence of lithium use was constant at approximately 0.2 per 1000 person-years, prevalence increased with 26% from 0.95 to 1.2 per 1000 persons. The percentage of patients receiving an add-on drug used in the treatment of bipolar disorders was constant over the three time-cohorts, with a significant decrease in use of tricyclic antidepressants. Within the patient group that stopped using lithium, more patients switched from lithium to another agent used in the treatment of bipolar disorders over calendar time, and fewer patients discontinued lithium. There was a significant increase in the use of atypical antipsychotics and valproic acid next to lithium.

LIMITATIONS

We did not know the specific diagnosis for which lithium treatment was instituted.

CONCLUSION

The changes were in line with the increase in alternatives during the last decade and in line with Dutch guidelines.

Divalproex, lithium and suicide among Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Suicide completion and attempted suicide are major concerns for people with bipolar disorder. Studies in the private sector have suggested that lithium treatment may be superior to divalproex therapy with regard to minimizing suicidal behavior among individuals with bipolar disorder. However, few data are available regarding Medicaid patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Subjects were 12,662 Oregon Medicaid patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder and treated with medication between 1998 and 2003. Outcomes measures were completed suicide and emergency department visits for suicide attempts (including non-fatal poisoning). Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for demographics, co-morbidity, and concurrent psychotropic medication use.

RESULTS

Divalproex was the most common mood stabilizer (used by 33% of subjects) followed by gabapentin (32%), lithium (25%), and carbamazepine (3%). There were 11 suicide deaths and 79 attempts. Adjusted hazard ratios (versus lithium users) for suicide attempts were 2.7 for divalproex users (p<0.001), 1.6 for gabapentin users (not significant) and 2.8 for carbamazepine users (not significant). For suicide deaths, the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.5 for divalproex users (not significant), 2.6 for gabapentin users (p<0.001), and not available for carbamazepine users.

LIMITATIONS

It should be noted that subjects were not assigned at random to medication use, data on prior suicide attempts were not available, medication use was measured by automated pharmacy records, and duration of mood stabilizer utilization may have been brief.

CONCLUSIONS

Lithium may have a protective effect with regard to suicide attempts among Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder. It remains unclear whether or not lithium protects these patients against completed suicide.

Lithium in mood disorders: increasing evidence base, declining use?

Use of lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder may be declining even as knowledge of the efficacy and side-effects of lithium has increased. Recent meta-analyses confirm the benefits of maintenance lithium treatment and show that it reduces suicide and suicidality. Psychiatrists should continue to utilise this efficacious treatment for bipolar disorder.

Pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole and concomitant carbamazepine

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole when coadministered with carbamazepine using an open-label sequential treatment design in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Nine male patients were enrolled and received aripiprazole monotherapy (30 mg once daily) for 14 days, after which aripiprazole steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed. Subjects were then administered carbamazepine together with aripiprazole for 4 to 6 weeks. The dose of carbamazepine was titrated to produce a trough serum concentration within the range of 8 to 12 mg/L. Aripiprazole pharmacokinetics were then assessed in the presence of carbamazepine. Six patients completed the study as designed. Coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of aripiprazole by 66% and 71%, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Similarly, coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval of the major active metabolite of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, by 68% and 69%, respectively (P < 0.001). Both aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole are substrates for the cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme which is known to be induced by carbamazepine dosed to steady state. Thus, therapeutic doses of carbamazepine had significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. When carbamazepine is added to aripiprazole therapy, aripiprazole dose should be doubled (to 20-30 mg/d). Additional dose increases should be based on clinical evaluation. When carbamazepine is withdrawn from combination therapy, aripiprazole dose should then be reduced.

Sodium valproate at therapeutic concentrations changes Ca2+ response accompanied with its weak inhibition of protein kinase C in human astrocytoma cells

Sodium valproate (VPA) has been used clinically for treatment of not only epilepsy but also mood disorder. Although VPA is effective for treatment of epilepsy via inhibition of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase, it remains unknown why VPA is effective for the treatment of mood disorder. The authors examined the effect of VPA at therapeutic concentrations (300 and 600 microM) on the elevation of intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) induced by carbachol, a muscarinic receptor agonist, in 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells. Treatment of the cells with 300 and 600 microM VPA for 2 min did not change the carbachol-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevation. Treatment with 300 and 600 microM VPA for 48 h, however, reduced the elevation. Since we have shown that Li(+) reduced carbachol-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevation in protein kinase C (PKC)-downregulated 1321N1 cells [Kurita, M., Mashiko, H., Rai, M., Kumasaka, T., Kouno, S., Niwa, S., Nakahata, N., 2002. Lithium chloride at a therapeutic concentration reduces Ca(2+)response in protein kinase C down-regulated human astrocytoma cells, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 442, 17-22.], the activity of PKC was examined. Treatment with VPA at the same concentrations for 24 or 48 h weakly reduced protein kinase C activity in membrane and cytosol fractions from the cells. On the other hand, the treatment of the cells with 600 microM VPA for 24 or 48 h slightly increased the B(max) value, but not the K(d) value, in the binding of [(3)H]quinuclidinyl benzylate, a muscarinic receptor ligand, to the membranes, suggesting that the number or affinity of muscarinic receptor did not decrease after VPA treatment. These results indicate that VPA at therapeutic concentrations slightly decreases the PKC activity and inhibits muscarinic receptor-mediated [Ca(2+)](i) elevation probably through change in the intracellular signaling pathway. VPA-induced reduction of PKC activity and [Ca(2+)](i) elevation may play a role in the treatment of mood disorder.

A systematic chart review of the naturalistic course and treatment of early-onset bipolar disorder in a child and adolescent psychiatry center

Studies on the naturalistic course of early-onset bipolar disorder are few and studies evaluating the efficacy of pharmacotherapy consist largely of open trials of thymoleptics and neuroleptics on small samples. The current study was undertaken to map the course of the disorder and the prevailing prescribing practice in early-onset bipolar disorder at a child and adolescent psychiatry center in India. A chart review of 139 children and adolescents (<16 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder-mania was performed and the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, episode characteristics, and treatment and follow-up details were collected and the data analyzed. The index episode remitted in all 133 (96%) subjects for whom the information was available. One hundred twenty-five (90%) subjects received thymoleptics for the index episode, of which lithium was used in 85%. Valproate was the next most commonly used thymoleptic (18%). Eighteen (13%) subjects received combination thymoleptics. Sixty-eight percent received neuroleptics either alone or as adjuncts in the acute phase. During the follow-up period, which ranged from 3 to 56 months (mean +/- SD, 15 +/- 14), 35% of subjects relapsed, 89% within the first 2 years. Twenty-eight percent of subjects relapsed despite being on apparently adequate doses of lithium. The limitations of the study are that it is retrospective in nature, and that structured diagnostic tools and rating scales were not used. We conclude that lithium is the most commonly used thymoleptic in early-onset bipolar disorder. Lithium alone or in combination with neuroleptics appears to have good efficacy in the acute phase of the disorder. The majority of relapses occurred in the first 2 years and the efficacy of currently used thymoleptics in prophylaxis is uncertain.

The pharmacological treatment of bipolar affective disorder: practice is improving but could still be better

Pharmacological treatment of bipolar affective disorder was examined by case note review of 120 subjects under the care of four hospitals in the North-East of England and compared with that recommended in published consensus opinions and also with the findings of previous surveys. Although the only comparison available is with other geographical regions, it appears that lithium use has remained relatively constant in recent years (53% in this sample). The use of anticonvulsants (62%) was greater than in previous studies, as was use of mood stabilizers in combination (37% overall, 53% in rapid cycling subjects). Antidepressant use was found in 23% of subjects. Eleven percent of subjects taking antidepressants were not prescribed a mood stabilizer and 43% of antidepressants prescribed were tricyclics, possibly increasing the risk of switching to mania. Fifteen percent had no mood stabilizer and antipsychotic use was almost equally split between typical and atypical drugs. Practice in the population studied is nearer than treatment described in previous work to that suggested in the literature. This may result from either, or most probably a combination of, the local availability of a specialist mood disorder service and evolution of overall prescribing practice. However, it still falls short in a number of respects of such recommendations as exist and this requires further examination and monitoring.

Naturalistic evaluation of inpatient treatment of mania in a private Brazilian psychiatric hospital

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical practices on the treatment of mania in a Brazilian hospital, and to compare them to other international similar reports and practice guidelines.

METHODS

Chart revision of 425 consecutive admissions (269 patients) for the treatment of manic or mixed episodes (ICD-10 criteria) in a private psychiatric hospital of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 1996 to 2000. The rates of utilization of each antimanic medication and ECT were compared to those reported in similar international observational studies (X2, bicaudate, alpha =0.05).

RESULTS

The observed frequencies of use of each treatment modality were: lithium (71.5%); carbamazepine (34.8%); valproate (9.4%); antipsychotics (83.3%); benzodiazepines (62.4%); antidepressants (7.5%) and ECT (33.2%). The differences detected between local practice and international guidelines were: lower rate of valproate and higher rate of carbamazepine prescription; the use of sine wave devices for ECT; frequent concomitant use of ECT with lithium (72.3%), benzodiazepines (46.8%) and/or carbamazepine (31.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the need to develop national practice guidelines for the treatment of mania and for the use of ECT, and to promote their propagation through specific medical educational programs, aiming at the standardization of practices based on the available scientific evidence.

Treatment of bipolar affective disorder in clinical practice

A case note survey of 100 outpatients with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder in a UK inner city teaching hospital revealed monotherapy with a mood stabilizer in only 23% of patients, mostly lithium (15%). Overall, 51% of patients were prescribed lithium, 19% carbamazepine and 5% valproate with only 8% receiving a combination of two mood stabilizers. Treatment appeared to be inadequate in 13/51 of patients on lithium, 9/19 of those on carbamazepine and 1/5 of those on valproate. Antipsychotics were used as monotherapy in 20% of patients and combined with a mood stabilizer in 43% of patients. Only 6% of patients were on atypical antipsychotics. These findings suggest that the treatment for many patients does not match recommendations. Clearer evidence on the place of combination mood stabilizers and adjunctive antipsychotics, particularly atypicals is needed in the treatment of bipolar affective disorder.

Apparent autoinduction of valproate beta-oxidation in humans

AIMS

The study aimed to show whether autoinduction of valproate (VPA) along its beta-oxidation pathway occurred upon chronic dosing in humans.

METHODS

Twelve young volunteers without active illness took sodium valproate (NaVPA) 200 mg orally 12 hourly for 3 weeks. On days 7 and 21, serial blood samples and all urine passed over an interdosing interval from 08.00 to 20.00 h were collected for analysis of VPA and certain metabolites.

RESULTS

Plasma AUC(0,12 h) of VPA was significantly lower on day 21 than on day 7 (2.40 vs 2.84 micromol ml-1 h, 95% CI for the difference 0.13-0.81 micromol ml-1 h). Significant differences in plasma AUC(0,12 h) of the beta-oxidation metabolites E-2-en-VPA and 3-oxo-VPA were not found. However, formation clearances of plasma VPA to urinary E-2-en-VPA and 3-oxo-VPA were significantly increased from day 7 to day 21 (0. 010 vs 0.024 and 2.57 vs 3.60 ml kg-1 h-1, respectively, 95% CI for the differences -0.025 to -0.004 and -1.72 to -0.34 ml kg-1 h-1, respectively). Formation clearances to VPA-glucuronide (0.534 vs 0. 505 ml kg-1 h-1) and 4-OH-VPA (0.112 vs 0.110 ml kg-1 h-1) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular low dose VPA intake in humans over a period of 3 weeks appears to be associated with a small induction of its metabolism by the beta-oxidation pathway, but not by glucuronidation or 4-hydroxylation.

Weight gain associated with valproate in childhood

Weight gain is a common side effect of valproate treatment. Several mechanisms have been suggested for its pathophysiology; of these, impairment of beta-oxidation of fatty acids and increased insulin secretion have been supported by clinical studies. To investigate whether changes in carnitine and insulin levels had a role in the weight gain occurring with valproate treatment in children, 20 patients with epilepsy were randomly assigned to receive either carnitine or placebo supplementation in addition to valproate. After a follow-up period of 3 months, weight gain was observed in both groups. The mean insulin concentration and insulin/glucose ratios increased. Weight gain did not correlate with carnitine levels. These results suggest that weight gain during valproate treatment is not related to a decrease in carnitine levels. However, an increase in insulin levels together with a decrease in glucose levels may cause weight gain, possibly by stimulating appetite.

Valproate treatment and the risk of hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries

Long-term administration of valproate to women with epilepsy has been suggested to result in increased risk of hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries. In preliminary reports involving patients treated for several years, the reported rates were as high as 43% for polycystic ovaries and 17% for hyperandrogenism. In particular, when therapy started before the age of 20 years, the rates of either one of these complications were as high as 80%. Surprisingly, these reports have been relatively ignored in the psychiatric literature to date. As increasing numbers of bipolar patients are in long-term treatment with valproate, there is an important need for further research that clarifies the relationship between long-term administration of valproate and other mood stabilizers and the potential development of reproductive endocrinologic abnormalities, and for increased awareness among clinicians and patients of the unknown potential for these worrisome side-effects.

The increasing use of anticonvulsants in prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder

The medical records of patents with bipolar disorders who received prophylactic drug treatments during three time periods from January 1983 to December 1984, January 1988 to December 1989, and from January 1993 to December 1994, were reviewed retrospectively. The percentage of lithium monotherapy sharply decreased from 96% (51/53) in the first study period to 51.9% (83/160) in the third study period. Carbamazepine monotherapy and combination of lithium and carbamazepine increased from 3.8% in the first study period to 45.6% in the third study period. These results suggest that anticonvulsants may become one of the major drug treatment strategies for bipolar disorder in the future.

Lithium plus valproate as maintenance polypharmacy for patients with bipolar I disorder: a review

Standard pharmacotherapy for the maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder consists of lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. However, many patients fail to respond to monotherapy with any of these agents, and as a result, psychiatrists often resort to polypharmacy. Findings from some open-label trials and retrospective chart reviews suggest this approach may be useful, but in the few controlled trials that have been conducted, the results have been negative. One drug combination that warrants further study as maintenance therapy is lithium plus valproate. Each is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of acute mania, and lithium has demonstrated efficacy for maintenance treatment as well. Some preliminary evidence suggests that the combination can be effective for patients who do not respond to monotherapy, and it seems to be no more dangerous than monotherapy. Concomitant administration of lithium plus valproate does not significantly alter lithium pharmacokinetics, and statistically significant changes that arise in valproate pharmacokinetics are not clinically significant. Although it is not known whether the drugs interact to augment response, many of their effects in the central nervous system do differ, and there is no indication of pharmacodynamic interactions that oppose each other. Finally, some evidence suggests that lithium and valproate may differ with regard to clinical variables that predict response to treatment.

Valproate-induced limb malformations in mice associated with reduction of intracellular pH

Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly used antiepileptic agent that recently has been found useful in the treatment of affective disorders and prophylaxis of migraine. VPA induces congenital malformations, especially spina bifida, in the offspring of women treated with this agent during early pregnancy. The mechanism by which VPA induces abnormal development remains unknown despite many studies in experimental animals in which VPA causes malformations similar to those seen in human infants. Because of its chemical structure as a weak organic acid and its capability to induce postaxial forelimb ectrodactyly in C57BL/6 mice, we postulated that VPA acts to perturb limb morphogenesis by reducing embryonic intracellular pH (pHi). We administered VPA, 200 to 400 mg/kg, to C57BL/6 mice on day 9 of gestation. A dose-dependent incidence of postaxial forelimb ectrodactyly was observed. Forelimb bud pHi was estimated by computer-assisted image analysis from the transplacental distribution of 14C-DMO. At the highest doses, 300 and 400 mg/kg, a decrease of pHi of 0.2 to 0.3 pH units was observed uniformly throughout the limb bud 1 h after VPA treatment. None of these changes were seen after treatment with 2-en VPA, a nonteratogenic analog of VPA. Furthermore, the capability of VPA to induce postaxial forelimb ectrodactyly was greatly enhanced by coadministration of agents that inhibit pHi regulatory processes. These data support the hypothesis that VPA-induced postaxial ectrodactyly in murine fetuses can be attributed to reduction in limb bud pHi.