Severe weight loss after minimally invasive oesophagectomy is associated with poor survival in patients with oesophageal cancer at 5 years

Outcomes After Elective Versus Emergency Resection for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported similar complication rates, including anastomotic leakage, after elective and emergency surgery for right-sided colon cancer. This led to the consensus that emergency resection with primary anastomosis is safe. However, recent evidence suggests higher complication rates after emergency surgery, indicating that alternative strategies, such as a bridge to surgery, may be more suitable.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether complication rates, particularly anastomotic leakage, are higher after emergency resections compared to elective resections in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit from 2010 to 2019.

SETTINGS

Nationwide data from hospitals across the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent resection for right-sided colon cancer (n = 5056 emergency resections matched 1:1 to elective resections using propensity score matching).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of anastomotic leakage, 90-day complication rates, and mortality rates after elective versus emergency surgery for right-sided colon cancer.

RESULTS

After matching, no significant baseline differences remained. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage rates. However, the mortality rate was twice as high in the emergency group (9.4% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001), and the 90-day complication rate was also higher (41.7% vs 33.0%, p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Minimal missing data were handled with multiple imputation. Although propensity score matching was used, bias from unknown confounders may persist. The emergency group included more high-risk patients, potentially influencing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency resections for right-sided colon cancer are associated with higher complication and mortality rates compared to elective surgery. A bridge-to-surgery approach could reduce these risks by converting emergency cases to elective procedures. Further research is needed to validate these findings. See Video Abstract.

RESULTADOS TRAS LA RESECCIN ELECTIVA FRENTE A LA RESECCIN DE EMERGENCIA PARA CNCER DE COLON DEL LADO DERECHO UN ANLISIS DE PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN COINCIDENTE

ANTECEDENTES:Estudios previos informaron tasas de complicaciones similares, incluida la fuga anastomótica, después de una cirugía electiva y de emergencia para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho. Esto llevó al consenso de que la resección de emergencia con anastomosis primaria es segura. Sin embargo, evidencia reciente sugiere tasas de complicaciones más altas después de la cirugía de emergencia, lo que indica que las estrategias alternativas, como un puente a la cirugía, pueden ser más adecuadas.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si las tasas de complicaciones, en particular la fuga anastomótica, son más altas después de las resecciones de emergencia en comparación con las resecciones electivas en pacientes con cáncer de colon del lado derecho.DISEÑO:Un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utiliza datos de la Dutch ColoRectal Audit de 2010 a 2019.ESCENARIO:Datos a nivel nacional de hospitales de los Países Bajos.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a una resección por cáncer de colon del lado derecho (n = 5056 resecciones de emergencia emparejadas 1:1 con resecciones electivas mediante emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Incidencia de fuga anastomótica, tasas de complicaciones a los 90 días y tasas de mortalidad después de cirugía electiva versus cirugía de emergencia para cáncer de colon del lado derecho.RESULTADOS:Después del emparejamiento, no se mantuvieron diferencias significativas al inicio. No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de fuga anastomótica. Sin embargo, la tasa de mortalidad fue dos veces más alta en el grupo de emergencia (9,4% frente a 4,2%, p < 0,001) y la tasa de complicaciones a los 90 días también fue mayor (41,7% frente a 33,0%, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:Los datos faltantes mínimos se manejaron con imputación múltiple. Si bien se utilizó el emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, puede persistir el sesgo de factores de confusión desconocidos. El grupo de emergencia incluyó más pacientes de alto riesgo, lo que potencialmente influyó en los resultados.CONCLUSIONES:Las resecciones de emergencia para cáncer de colon del lado derecho se asocian con mayores tasas de complicaciones y mortalidad en comparación con la cirugía electiva. Un enfoque de puente a la cirugia podría reducir estos riesgos al convertir los casos de urgencia en procedimientos electivos. Se necesitan más investigaciones para validar estos hallazgos. (Traducción--Ingrid Melo).

Outcomes of jejunostomy-tube placement in surgical patients with esophageal cancer

Objective

Patients with esophageal cancer who undergo esophagectomy are at high risk for malnutrition. Jejunostomy tubes are often placed to provide enteral access for nutritional support. Traditionally, jejunostomy placement occurs at the time of esophagectomy. However, benefits have been described in patients with earlier jejunostomy placement. The purpose of this study is to determine outcomes of surgical patients with esophageal cancer on the basis of jejunostomy tube placement as well as to analyze the effect of placement timing on these factors.

Methods

This is a retrospective, multi-institutional study including 2 academic hospital systems. Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy were included. Patients who received a jejunostomy tube were compared with patients who did not receive a jejunostomy tube. Further analysis comparing early and routine jejunostomy placement timing was then performed.

Results

Of 327 included patients, 48.32% (158) had a jejunostomy tube and 51.68% (169) did not have any form of enteral access. For every day a patient had a jejunostomy tube in place, there was a reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit LOS (P ≤ .001 and < .001).

Conclusions

Jejunostomy tube placement in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy significantly enhances nutritional outcomes, particularly in malnourished patients, and reduces 90-day mortality and recurrence rates. Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and received an early jejunostomy tube had shorter hospital and intensive care unit LOS. Early placement of jejunostomy tubes should be considered to optimize nutritional support and improve overall patient resilience before surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and refine guidelines for jejunostomy tube placement in patients with esophageal cancer.

The course of physical fitness and nutritional status in patients following prehabilitation before esophageal cancer surgery: Results from the PRIOR study

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the course of physical fitness and nutritional status during curative therapy for esophageal cancer, after implementation of a prehabilitation program. Additionally, the impact of baseline physical fitness level and severe postoperative complications on the course of individual patients were explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, observational cohort study included patients with esophageal cancer following curative treatment. Prehabilitation, consisting of supervised exercise training and nutritional counseling was offered as standard care to patients after neoadjuvant therapy, prior to surgery. Primary outcome measures included change of exercise capacity, hand grip strength, self-reported physical functioning, Body Mass Index, and malnutrition risk from diagnosis to 2-6 months postoperatively. Analyses over time were performed using linear mixed models, and linear mixed regression models to investigate the impact of baseline level and severe postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Hundred sixty-eight patients were included (mean age 65.9 ± 8.6 years; 78.0 % male). All parameters (except for malnutrition risk) showed a decline during neoadjuvant therapy (p < .05), an improvement during prehabilitation (p < .005) and a decline postoperatively (p < .001), with a high heterogeneity between patients. Change in the outcomes from baseline to postoperatively was not different for patients with or without a severe complication. Better baseline physical fitness and nutritional status were significantly associated with a greater decline postoperatively (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a notable decline during neoadjuvant therapy, that fully recovers during prehabilitation, and a subsequent long lasting decline postoperatively. The heterogeneity in the course of physical fitness and nutritional status underlines the importance of individualized monitoring.

Evaluating the Impact of Post-Esophagectomy Exercise on 2- and 5-Yr Survival: Findings from the PERFECT Trial

PURPOSE

Despite recent treatment advances, esophageal cancer still has poor survival and a high morbidity. Exploratory evidence suggests that exercise can reduce cancer-related mortality and recurrence rates. Here, we investigated the effects of an exercise intervention in the first year after esophagectomy on survival in participants of the Physical ExeRcise Following Esophageal Cancer Treatment (PERFECT) trial.

METHODS

In the PERFECT trial, esophageal cancer patients who had undergone esophagectomy were randomized to a 12-wk exercise program (EX) or the control group (CG). We assessed 2- and 5-yr (progression-free) survival. (Un)adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for comparison between the trial arms. Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with events within the exercise intervention period, were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 120 participants (EX = 61; CG = 59) were included in the PERFECT trial. After 2-yr follow-up, no significant difference in the risk of death or progression between EX and CG was found (adjusted HR = 1.65 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-3.63) and 1.38 (95% CI, 0.76-2.50), respectively). After excluding patients with events during the intervention period (EX = 8; CG = 4), 2-yr HRs for death (1.03; 95% CI, 0.41-2.56) and progression (1.26; 95% CI, 0.64-2.48) both decreased and remained insignificant. No significant effects were found on 5-yr mortality (1.03; 95% CI, 0.57-1.84) and progression (1.21; 95% CI, 0.72-2.04) either. Sensitivity analysis resulted in attenuated 5-yr HRs for mortality (0.82; 95% CI, 0.42-1.58) and progression (1.08; 95% CI, 0.61-1.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate no benefit of a 12-wk exercise program in the first year post-esophagectomy on 2- and 5-yr (progression-free) survival in esophageal cancer patients. The absence of beneficial effects may be explained by the relatively short exercise program, which was performed after treatment completion.

Prognostic significance of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, platelet (HALP) score after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

Inflammatory, nutritional, and immune biomarkers are associated with the prognosis of patients with various tumors. Recently, a comprehensive predictive biomarker, the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, was introduced to predict clinical outcomes. We investigated the prognostic impact of preoperative HALP scores in patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHOD

The subjects of this study were 209 patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between February, 2005 and September, 2023. The HALP score was defined as (albumin [mg/dL] × hemoglobin [g/L] × lymphocyte [count/L]) / platelet [count/L]. The cutoff value was calculated according to the receiver operating characteristic curve based on 3-year survival.

RESULTS

The cutoff value of the HALP score was 35, and a low HALP score was confirmed in 107 patients (51%). Multivariate analysis of disease-free survival identified lymph node metastasis (HR 1.53, p = 0.03), extrahepatic lesions (HR 2.48, p < 0.01), and a low HALP score (HR 2.0, p < 0.01) as independently poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified extrahepatic lesions (HR 2.98, p < 0.01), a high CEA (HR 1.78, p = 0.02), and a low HALP score (HR 1.92, p = 0.02) as independently poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The HALP score is a useful prognostic factor for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM.

Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.

Impact of early enteral feed composition on the rate of chyle leak post-esophagectomy

Patients undergoing esophagectomy are at risk of malnutrition and benefit from perioperative enteral feeding. Esophagectomy carries a risk of chyle leak, and this risk may be influenced by early enteral feed composition. We evaluated the impact of early enteral medium-chain triglyceride-rich feed on the prevalence and severity of chyle leak post-esophagectomy, length of stay, and postoperative weight change. This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy at a single center between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients received enteral feed on postoperative days 1-5 with Nutrison Energy or Protein Plus Energy ('standard') (January 2015- June 2021) or Nutrison Peptisorb Plus High Energy High Protein ('HEHP') enteral feed (June 2021 to December 2022). All patients transitioned to 'standard' supplemental jejunal feeding on postoperative day 6 onwards and were discharged on oral IDDSI level 4 diet. Patients who did not commence early enteral feeding were excluded from analysis. A total of 329 patients were included. Patients who received early HEHP feed had fewer chyle leaks (5/52; 9.6%) compared with patients who received standard feed (68/277; 24.5%, P = 0.017). The HEHP group had a shorter total length of hospital stay (P = 0.011). Weight change from preoperative baseline was equivalent in both groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.066) and 3 months (P = 0.400). In the context of routine jejunostomy use and early enteral feeding post-esophagectomy, HEHP feed on postoperative days 1-5 was associated with significantly fewer chyle leaks and shorter length of stay compared with standard feed. No difference was noted in postoperative weight change between groups.

Nutritional status and body mass index before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and associated outcomes: a rapid review

PURPOSE

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients experience several post-HSCT complications affecting nutritional status, body mass index (BMI), and mortality that can potentially be mitigated by nutritional management. This rapid review examines the relationship between pre-HSCT nutritional status and BMI and post-HSCT survival.

METHODS

Articles were identified from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two researchers independently completed the title, abstract, and full-text review. Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) randomized clinical trials or observational studies; (2) human subjects diagnosed with cancer and undergoing HSCT; (3) reported pre-HSCT nutritional status (e.g., diet recall, nutritional survey, dietitian session) or BMI; and (4) reported treatment related mortality and/or survival.

RESULTS

The initial search found 3036 articles, 28 were included in full-text review, and 18 met inclusion criteria. Articles had quasi-experimental (n = 2) and observational (n = 16) study designs. Of the studies, n = 5 reported nutritional intake decreased post-HSCT, and n = 2 reported nutrition intervention (i.e., controlled feeding) post-HSCT improved survival. Four studies reported having a BMI classified as underweight improved survival, while n = 5 reported having a BMI classified as overweight or obese improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Current research exploring the relationship between nutritional status and BMI with HSCT survival is mixed. Further research is needed to determine how nutritional status and BMI are associated withsurvival post-HSCT to inform future intervention work.

Nutritional care in patients undergoing laparoscopic/minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours

The introduction of minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours has been associated with many favourable postoperative outcomes and a reduced impact on nutritional status. The literature review begins by discussing the impact of minimally invasive procedures on the nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal tumours, followed by indications for enteral nutrition (EN) in this population, including preoperative nutritional support and postoperative nutritional support. The review then examines the evidence that favours the use of EN in this population, including studies demonstrating improved outcomes with preoperative EN and reduced postoperative complications with postoperative EN. It also discusses potential strategies for improving outcomes with EN, such as early initiation of feeding and individualized nutrition plans. Overall, current evidence shows that EN improves outcomes, reduces complications, and enhances the quality of life. However, the optimal timing, composition of EN, and long-term outcomes are still unclear, indicating the need for future investigations.

Post-operative weight loss affects 3-year survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma are at high risk of malnutrition. Some patients benefit from total gastrectomy associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without cytoreduction surgery (CR) as a curative strategy. The aim of this study was to describe pre- and post-operative nutritional assessments and their impact on survival in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with gastrectomy and HIPEC with or without CR at Lyon University Hospital were retrospectively included from April 2012 to August 2017. Carcinologic data, history of weight, anthropometric measures, nutritional biological markers and CT-scan body composition were collected.

RESULTS

54 patients were included. Malnutrition affected 48.1% before and 64.8% after surgery, and severe malnutrition respectively 11.1% and 20.3%. Pre-operative sarcopenia diagnosed by CT scan was found in 40.7% of the patients while 81.1% of the sarcopenic patients had a normal or high body mass index. A loss of ⩾ 20% of usual weight on discharge was a pejorative factor of survival at 3 years of follow-up (p = 0.0470). Only 14.8% of the patients continued artificial nutrition following discharge but artificial nutrition was resumed in 30.4% of the patients within 4 months after discharge owing to weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing gastrectomy and HIPEC with or without CR are at high risk of malnutrition. Post-operative weight loss has a pejorative impact on outcome. These patients should be systematically screened for malnutrition with early interventionist nutritional care and close nutritional follow-up.

Risk stratification of anastomotic stricture using early postoperative endoscopic and computed tomography findings in patients undergoing esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is one of the major complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. We have previously reported that severe mucosal degeneration (MD) of the anastomotic site was associated with the incidence of AS. Meanwhile, there are few reports to correlate anastomotic internal circumference (AIC) with computed tomography (CT) with the incidence of AS. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify the correlation of early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings with the incidence of AS. We assessed 205 patients who underwent esophagectomy. We then divided them into the non-AS group (n = 164) and the AS group (n = 41) and compared their background data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. We also evaluated the risk factors for AS using logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis revealed small AIC (P = 0.003; OR = 4.400; 95% CI = 1.650-11.700) and severe MD (P < 0.001; OR = 7.200; 95% CI = 2.650-19.600) as the independent risk factors for AS development. We also stratified the patients into the following four groups according to the incidence of AS: low-risk (normal AIC and intact or mild MD, 6.2%), intermediate-risk (small AIC and intact or mild MD, 29.4%), high-risk (normal AIC and severe MD, 42.9%), and very high-risk (small AIC and severe MD, 61.1%). Early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings were useful in predicting the development of AS after esophagectomy.

Early postoperative weight loss is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery for esophageal cancer (EC) causes morphological and functional changes in the upper gastrointestinal tract, resulting in postoperative weight loss (PWL). PWL has been shown to lead to poor nutritional status and immunocompetence, which may worsen the prognosis for several types of cancer. However, few reports have examined the relationship between weight loss (WL) in the early postoperative period and cancer prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 421 esophageal cancer patients underwent curative esophagectomy at Osaka University Hospital from 2010 to 2016. Based on the patients' body weight 1.5 months after surgery, they were classified into severe WL (n = 50) and slight-moderate WL (n = 371) groups.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the severe WL group than the slight-moderate WL group (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0004, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, tumor invasion depth (pT3, 4), lymph node metastasis (pN2, 3), preoperative Prognostic Nutrition Index (< 45), postoperative complications (≥ G3), and severe WL were independent prognostic factors for CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-3.7; HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8; HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; and HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.2, respectively). In a multivariate analysis of risk factors leading to severe WL, thoracotomy (VATS) and postoperative MAX CRP (high) were independent risk factors (odds ratio [OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97; OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.5).

CONCLUSION

Early PWL would be a useful marker of poor cancer prognosis in EC patients. Highly inflammatory conditions due to surgical invasion and postoperative complications may contribute to early PWL.

Postoperative Nutrition Management: Who Needs What?

Background

Early oral feeding after major abdominal surgery has been clearly shown to be safe and not a risk factor for anastomotic dehiscence. Within the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol, it is the nutritional plan A. Nonetheless, one must consider that postoperative protein and energy requirements will often be not covered by oral food intake alone. Because nutritional status has been shown to be a prognostic factor in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, the preoperative identification of patients at risk may be mandatory. Malnutrition may be underestimated in an overweight society. With special regard to patients with cancer and those with preexisting malnutrition, an accumulating caloric gap may be harmful in the early and late postoperative periods. Furthermore, complications requiring reoperation and intensive care treatment may occur.

Summary

Therefore, a plan B for postoperative nutrition therapy is needed, using preferentially the enteral route. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism recently addressed perioperative nutritional management and the indications for enteral and even parenteral supplementation to achieve caloric requirements in the postoperative course. In the first months after surgery, persisting weight loss is common in patients with upper gastrointestinal resections, even in those with an uncomplicated course. This may delay the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, increase toxicity, and worsen long-term outcomes.

Peritumor tertiary lymphoid structures are associated with infiltrating neutrophils and inferior prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The positive prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy within tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) in cancerous tissue has been well demonstrated, including liver cancer. However, the relationship between TLS and prognosis in the peritumoral region of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has received less attention. Few studies on whether TLS, as a typical representative of acquired immune cell groups, is associated with innate immune cells. The aim of this paper was to identify the prognostic role of peritumor TLS in HCC and to simply explore the relationship with neutrophils infiltration.

METHODS

This study included cancerous and paracancerous tissue from 170 patients after surgical resection of HCC. TLS was examined and identified by pathological H&E examination, and the impact on prognosis was further classified by determination of total TLS area. Immunohistochemical staining of CD15+ neutrophils was also performed on half of the cases. The obtained results were validated by external public database, as TLS has been widely shown to be tagged with 12 chemokines.

RESULTS

In peritumoral tissue, the TLS- group had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes compared with the TLS+ group. On the contrary, the intratumor TLS+ group showed better DFS outcomes. When further investigating the relationship between TLS area distribution and DFS, progressively worse prognosis was only found in the peritumor region with increasing TLS density (TLS- vs. TLS_L vs. TLS_H ). In addition, neutrophil infiltration increased in parallel with TLS density in the peritumoral region, which was not observed in the intratumoral region.

CONCLUSIONS

TLS might have a dual prognostic role in different regions of HCC. The abundance of peritumoral TLS is an independent influence of DFS. The inconsistent correlation between neutrophils and corresponding TLS in different regions may indicate different pathways of immune aggregation and may serve as an explanation for the different prognosis of TLS, which needs to be specifically explored.

Perioperative Nutritional Support: A Review of Current Literature

Since the beginning of the practice of surgery, the reduction of postoperative complications and early recovery have been two of the fundamental pillars that have driven the improvement of surgical techniques and perioperative management. Despite great advances in these fields, the rationalization of antibiotic prophylaxis, and other important innovations, postoperative recovery (especially in elderly patients, oncological pathology or digestive or head and neck surgery) is tortuous. This can be explained by several reasons, among which, malnutrition has a major role. Perioperative nutritional support, included within the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol, has proven to be a main element and a critical step to achieve better surgical results. Starting with the preoperative nutritional assessment and treatment in elective surgery, we can improve nutritional status using oral supplements and immunomodulatory formulas. If we add early nutritional support in the postoperative scenario, we are able to significantly reduce infectious complications, need for intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, costs, and mortality. Throughout this review, we will review the latest developments and the available literature.

Is it necessary to routinely perform feeding jejunostomy at the time of esophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is a routine procedure at the time of esophagectomy in some centers. With the widespread popularization of enhanced recovery after surgery, the necessity of FJ has been increasingly questioned. This study aims to analyze the differences in safety and effectiveness between with (FJ group) or without (no-FJ group) performing FJ at the time of esophagectomy. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were overall postoperative complications, postoperative pneumonia, intestinal obstruction, and weight loss at 3 and 6 months after esophagectomy. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated for statistical analysis. About 12 studies comprising 2,173 patients were included. The FJ group had a longer LOS (WMD = 2.05, P = 0.01) and a higher incidence of intestinal obstruction (OR = 11.67, P < 0.001) than the no-FJ group. The incidence of overall postoperative complications (OR = 1.24, P = 0.31) and postoperative pneumonia (OR = 1.43, P = 0.13) were not significantly different, nor the weight loss at 3 months (WMD = 0.58, P = 0.24) and 6 months (P > 0.05) after esophagectomy. Current evidence suggests that routinely performing FJ at the time of esophagectomy appears not to generate better postoperative outcomes. FJ may need to be performed selectively rather than routinely. More studies are required to further verify.

Oral Nutritional Supplements and Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Gastrointestinal Surgery

Nowadays, patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery are following perioperative treatment in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Although oral feeding is supposed not to be stopped perioperatively with respect to ERAS, malnourished patients and inadequate calorie intake are common. Malnutrition, even in overweight or obese patients, is often underestimated. Patients at metabolic risk have to be identified early to confirm the indication for nutritional therapy. The monitoring of nutritional status postoperatively has to be considered in the hospital and after discharge, especially after surgery in the upper gastrointestinal tract, as normal oral food intake is decreased for several months. The article gives an overview of the current concepts of perioperative enteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.