The use of intravenous versus subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of severe asthma: a review

Human monoclonal antibody F61 nasal spray effectively protected high-risk populations from SARS-CoV-2 variants during the COVID-19 pandemic from late 2022 to early 2023 in China

Following the national dynamic zero-COVID strategy adjustment, the utilization of broad-spectrum nasal neutralizing antibodies may offer an alternative approach to controlling the outbreak of Omicron variants between late 2022 and early 2023 in China. This study involved an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) to assess the pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy of the F61 nasal spray. A total of 2,008 participants were randomly assigned to receive F61 nasal spray (24 mg/0.8 mL/dose) or normal saline (0.8 mL/dose) and 1336 completed the follow-up in the IIT. Minimal absorption of F61 antibody into the bloodstream was detected in individuals receiving F61 nasal spray for seven consecutive days. No treatment-emergent adverse reactions of grade 3 severity or higher were reported. In the one-dose cohort, the 7-day cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was 79.0% in the F61 group and 82.6% in the placebo group, whereas, in the multiple-dose (once daily for 7 consecutive days) cohort, the rates were 6.55% in the F61 group and 23.83% in the placebo group. The laboratory-confirmed efficacy of F61 was 3.78% (-3.74%-10.75%) in the one-dose cohort and 72.19% (57.33%-81.87%) in the multiple-dose cohort. In the real-world study, 60,225 volunteers in four different regions were administered the F61 nasal spray based on the subject's wishes, over 90% efficacy rate was observed against different Omicron variants. The F61 nasal spray, with its favourable safety profile, could be a promising prophylactic monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.

NANOBODY® Molecule, a Giga Medical Tool in Nanodimensions

Although antibodies remain the most widely used tool for biomedical research, antibody technology is not flawless. Innovative alternatives, such as Nanobody® molecules, were developed to address the shortcomings of conventional antibodies. Nanobody® molecules are antigen-binding variable-domain fragments derived from the heavy-chain-only antibodies of camelids (VHH) and combine the advantageous properties of small molecules and monoclonal antibodies. Nanobody® molecules present a small size (~15 kDa, 4 nm long and 2.5 nm wide), high solubility, stability, specificity, and affinity, ease of cloning, and thermal and chemical resistance. Recombinant production in microorganisms is cost-effective, and VHH are also building blocks for multidomain constructs. These unique features led to numerous applications in fundamental research, diagnostics, and therapy. Nanobody® molecules are employed as biomarker probes and, when fused to radioisotopes or fluorophores, represent ideal non-invasive in vivo imaging agents. They can be used as neutralizing agents, receptor-ligand antagonists, or in targeted vehicle-based drug therapy. As early as 2018, the first Nanobody®, Cablivi (caplacizumab), a single-domain antibody (sdAb) drug developed by French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi for the treatment of adult patients with acquired thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP), was launched. Nanobody® compounds are ideal tools for further development in clinics for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Effect of nanoparticle size on their distribution and retention in chronic inflammation sites

Nanomedicines are increasingly researched and used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Herein, the effect of the size of nanoparticles on their distribution and retention in chronic inflammatory sites, as compared to healthy tissues, was studied in a mouse model with chronic inflammation in one of the hind footpads. Using PEGylated gold nanoparticles of 2, 10, 100, and 200 nm, we found that although the smaller nanoparticles of 2 and 10 nm showed greater distribution and slower clearance in the inflamed footpad than the relatively larger nanoparticles of 100 and 200 nm, the larger nanoparticles of 100 and 200 nm were more selectively distributed in the inflamed hind footpad than in the healthy hind footpad in the same mouse. Based on these findings, we prepared protein nanoparticles of 100-200 nm with albumin, IgG antibody, or anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody (mAb). The nanoparticles can release proteins in response to high redox activity and/or low pH, conditions seen in chronic inflammation sites. We then showed that upon intravenous injection, those stimuli-responsive protein nanoparticles distributed more selectively in the inflamed footpad than free proteins and remained longer in the inflamed footpad than similar protein nanoparticles that are not sensitive to high redox activity or low pH. These findings support the feasibility of increasing the selectivity of nanomedicines and protein therapeutics to chronic inflammation sites and prolonging their retention at the sites by innovative nanoparticle engineering.

Drug delivery breakthrough technologies - A perspective on clinical and societal impact

The way a drug molecule is administered has always had a profound impact on people requiring medical interventions - from vaccine development to cancer therapeutics. In the Controlled Release Society Fall Symposium 2022, a trans-institutional group of scientists from industry, academia, and non-governmental organizations discussed what a breakthrough in the field of drug delivery constitutes. On the basis of these discussions, we classified drug delivery breakthrough technologies into three categories. In category 1, drug delivery systems enable treatment for new molecular entities per se, for instance by overcoming biological barriers. In category 2, drug delivery systems optimize efficacy and/or safety of an existing drug, for instance by directing distribution to their target tissue, by replacing toxic excipients, or by changing the dosing reqimen. In category 3, drug delivery systems improve global access by fostering use in low-resource settings, for instance by facilitating drug administration outside of a controlled health care institutional setting. We recognize that certain breakthroughs can be classified in more than one category. It was concluded that in order to create a true breakthrough technology, multidisciplinary collaboration is mandated to move from pure technical inventions to true innovations addressing key current and emerging unmet health care needs.

WITHDRAWN: Prospective direct comparison of biological treatments on severe eosinophilic asthma: Findings from the PRISM study

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Pharmacogenetics of childhood uncontrolled asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a heterogeneous, multifactorial disease with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors playing a role in pathogenesis and therapeutic response. Understanding of pharmacogenetics can help with matching individualized treatments to specific genotypes of asthma to improve therapeutic outcomes especially in uncontrolled or severe asthma.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we outline novel information about biology, pathways, and mechanisms related to interindividual variability in drug response (corticosteroids, bronchodilators, leukotriene modifiers, and biologics) for childhood asthma. We discuss candidate gene, genome-wide association studies and newer omics studies including epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics as well as integrative genomics and systems biology methods related to childhood asthma. The articles were obtained after a series of searches, last updated November 2022, using database PubMed/CINAHL DB.

EXPERT OPINION

Implementation of pharmacogenetic algorithms can improve therapeutic targeting in children with asthma, particularly with severe or uncontrolled asthma who typically have challenges in clinical management and carry considerable financial burden. Future studies focusing on potential biomarkers both clinical and pharmacogenetic can help formulate a prognostic test for asthma treatment response that would represent true bench to bedside clinical implementation.

Monoclonal antibody and protein therapeutic formulations for subcutaneous delivery: high-concentration, low-volume vs. low-concentration, high-volume

Biologic drugs are used to treat a variety of cancers and chronic diseases. While most of these treatments are administered intravenously by trained healthcare professionals, a noticeable trend has emerged favoring subcutaneous (SC) administration. SC administration of biologics poses several challenges. Biologic drugs often require higher doses for optimal efficacy, surpassing the low volume capacity of traditional SC delivery methods like autoinjectors. Consequently, high concentrations of active ingredients are needed, creating time-consuming formulation obstacles. Alternatives to traditional SC delivery systems are therefore needed to support higher-volume biologic formulations and to reduce development time and other risks associated with high-concentration biologic formulations. Here, we outline key considerations for SC biologic drug formulations and delivery and explore a paradigm shift: the flexibility afforded by low-to-moderate-concentration drugs in high-volume formulations as an alternative to the traditionally difficult approach of high-concentration, low-volume SC formulation delivery.

Orally administered solasodine, a steroidal glycoalkaloid, suppresses ovalbumin-induced exaggerated Th2-immune response in rat model of bronchial asthma

Bronchial asthma is a chronic lung disorder, that affects an estimated 262 million people worldwide, thereby, causing a large socio-economic burden. Drug molecules from natural sources have exhibited a good promise in providing an alternative therapy in many chronic ailments. Solasodine, a glycoalkaloid has received an immense interest due to its large pharmacological and industrial value, however, its usefulness in asthma control has not been investigated till date. In this work, solasodine was tested for its ability to reverse several characteristics of bronchial asthma induced by intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin (OVA) and aluminium hydroxide in experimental rats. Treating asthmatic animals with solasodine (1 mg/kg b.w. or 10 mg/kg b.w.) or dexamethasone (2.5 mg/kg b.w.) reversed OVA-induced airway hyperresponsiveness, infiltration of inflammatory cells and histamine levels in the airways. Furthermore, as compared to OVA-control rats, allergen-induced elevated levels of IgE, nitrites, nitric oxide, and pro-inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-1β, LTD-4, and Th2-cytokines, particularly, IL-4, IL-5 were remarkably reduced in both bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and blood. These findings are supported by significant protection offered by various treatments against OVA-induced airway inflammation and mast cell degranulation in mesenteric tissues. Further, In-silico molecular docking studies performed to determine inhibitory potential of solasodine at IL-4 and IL-5, demonstrated strong affinity of phytocompound for these receptors than observed with antagonists previously reported. Results of current study imply that solasodine has therapeutic promise in allergic asthma, presumably due to its ability to prevent mast cell degranulation and consequent generation of histamine and Th2-associated cytokines in airways.

Alternative Routes of Administration for Therapeutic Antibodies—State of the Art

Background: For the past two decades, there has been a huge expansion in the development of therapeutic antibodies, with 6 to 10 novel entities approved each year. Around 70% of these Abs are delivered through IV injection, a mode of administration allowing rapid and systemic delivery of the drug. However, according to the evidence presented in the literature, beyond the reduction of invasiveness, a better efficacy can be achieved with local delivery. Consequently, efforts have been made toward the development of innovative methods of administration, and in the formulation and engineering of novel Abs to improve their therapeutic index. Objective: This review presents an overview of the routes of administration used to deliver Abs, different from the IV route, whether approved or in the clinical evaluation stage. We provide a description of the physical and biological fundamentals for each route of administration, highlighting their relevance with examples of clinically-relevant Abs, and discussing their strengths and limitations. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed the current literature, published as of the 1 April 2022 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as well as the FDA and EMA websites. Ongoing trials were identified using clinicaltrials.gov. Publications and data were identified using a list of general keywords. Conclusions: Apart from the most commonly used IV route, topical delivery of Abs has shown clinical successes, improving drug bioavailability and efficacy while reducing side-effects. However, additional research is necessary to understand the consequences of biological barriers associated with local delivery for Ab partitioning, in order to optimize delivery methods and devices, and to adapt Ab formulation to local delivery. Novel modes of administration for Abs might in fine allow a better support to patients, especially in the context of chronic diseases, as well as a reduction of the treatment cost.

Isoorientin ameliorates OVA-induced asthma in a murine model of asthma

Allergic asthma which is induced by ovalbumin (OVA) is a chronic airway inflammation disease. Isoorientin (Iso) is a natural C-glucosyl flavone with many biological properties. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Iso on OVA-induced allergic asthma. A total of 30 C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups: control group, OVA group, Dex (dexamethasone, 10 mg/kg) group, low-dose Iso group (Iso-L, 25 mg/kg), and high-dose Iso group (Iso-H, 50 mg/kg). The serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were collected for biochemical parameters, the lung tissue was collected for hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and western blot. The levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, malondialdehyde (MDA), NO, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Iso-L and Iso-H groups were significantly lower than that in model group (p < 0.05). Simultaneously, the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity were higher than that in model group (p < 0.05). Iso significantly ameliorated airway hyperresponsiveness. Meanwhile, H&E staining revealed that mice treated with Iso resulted in the ameliorated inflammatory cell infiltration and a reduction in interstitial thickening. The nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2 (Nrf2) and HO-1 protein expression in Iso-L and Iso-H groups were enhanced over that in model group, while p-NF-κB-p65 and p-IκB-α protein expression was decreased (p < 0.05). Our research indicated that Iso alleviated the OVA-induced allergic asthma, and this effect can be explained by the modulation of Nrf2/HO-1 and NF-κB signaling pathway; thus, the results providing a therapeutic rationale for the treatment of Iso on allergic asthma.

Site-selective oral delivery of therapeutic antibodies to the inflamed colon via a folic acid-grafted organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposite system

This study aimed to develop a pH-responsive folic acid-grafted organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposite system for site-selective oral delivery of therapeutic antibodies. A folic acid-grafted aminoclay (FA-AC) was prepared via an in situ sol‒gel method. Then, a drug-loaded nanocomplex was prepared via the electrostatic interaction of FA-AC with infliximab (IFX), a model antibody, and coated with Eudragit® S100 (EFA-AC-IFX). FA-AC exhibited favorable profiles as a drug carrier including low cytotoxicity, good target selectivity, and capability to form a nanocomplex with negatively charged macromolecules. A pH-responsive FA-AC-based nanocomplex containing IFX (EFA-AC-IFX) was also obtained in a narrow size distribution with high entrapment efficiency (>87%). The conformational stability of IFX entrapped in EFA-AC-IFX was well maintained in the presence of proteolytic enzymes. EFA-AC-IFX exhibited pH-dependent drug release, minimizing premature drug release in gastric conditions and the upper intestine. Accordingly, oral administration of EFA-AC-IFX to colitis-induced mice was effective in alleviating the progression of ulcerative colitis, while oral IFX solution had no efficacy. These results suggest that a pH-responsive FA-AC-based nanocomposite system can be a new platform for the site-selective oral delivery of therapeutic antibodies.

Applications of choline-based ionic liquids in drug delivery

Ionic liquids (ILs) usually refer to kinds of salts with melting point below 100 °C and are composed of definite anions and cations. In recent years, in addition to the field of material engineering, the applications of ILs have been extended to biomedical application. As a solubilizer, skin penetration enhancer, antibacterial agent, and macromolecular stabilizer of poorly soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients, ILs have attracted great attention in the field of pharmaceutical research. Among them, choline-based ILs are very popular in the field of drug delivery due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity or non-toxicity and other characteristics. This article mainly reviews the applications of choline-based ILs formed by choline and organic acid and choline-based ionic liquids-pharmaceutical active ingredients in transdermal delivery, topical delivery and oral delivery.

Recent Advances in the Inhibition of the IL-4 Cytokine Pathway for the Treatment of Allergen-Induced Asthma

The IL-4 and IL-13 cytokine pathways play integral roles in stimulating IgE inflammation, with the IL-4 cytokine being a major cytokine in the etiology of thunderstorm asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. The increasing prevalence of thunderstorm asthma in the younger population and the lessening efficacy of corticosteroids and other anti-inflammatories has created a need for more effective pharmaceuticals. This review summarizes the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways while highlighting and discussing the current pathway inhibitors aimed at treating thunderstorm asthma and atopic dermatitis, as well as the potential efficacy of peptide therapeutics in this field.

Therapeutic antibodies - natural and pathological barriers and strategies to overcome them

Antibody-based therapeutics have become a major class of therapeutics with over 120 recombinant antibodies approved or under review in the EU or US. This therapeutic class has experienced a remarkable expansion with an expected acceleration in 2021-2022 due to the extraordinary global response to SARS-CoV2 pandemic and the public disclosure of over a hundred anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies. Mainly delivered intravenously, alternative delivery routes have emerged to improve antibody therapeutic index and patient comfort. A major hurdle for antibody delivery and efficacy as well as the development of alternative administration routes, is to understand the different natural and pathological barriers that antibodies face as soon as they enter the body up to the moment they bind to their target antigen. In this review, we discuss the well-known and more under-investigated extracellular and cellular barriers faced by antibodies. We also discuss some of the strategies developed in the recent years to overcome these barriers and increase antibody delivery to its site of action. A better understanding of the biological barriers that antibodies have to face will allow the optimization of antibody delivery near its target. This opens the way to the development of improved therapy with less systemic side effects and increased patients' adherence to the treatment.

Inhaled antibodies: Quality and performance considerations

The use of antibodies in the treatment of lung diseases is of increasing interest especially as the search for COVID-19 therapies has unfolded. Historically, the use of antibody therapy was based on multiple targets including receptors involved in local hyper-reactivity in asthma, viruses and micro-organisms involved in a variety of pulmonary infectious disease. Generally, protein therapeutics pose challenges with respect to formulation and delivery to retain activity and assure therapy. The specificity of antibodies amplifies the need for attention to molecular integrity not only in formulation but also during aerosol delivery for pulmonary administration. Drug product development can be viewed from considerations of route of administration, dosage form, quality, and performance measures. Nebulizers and dry powder inhalers have been used to deliver protein therapeutics and each has its advantages that should be matched to the needs of the drug and the disease. This review offers insight into quality and performance barriers and the opportunities that arise from meeting them effectively.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous CT-P13 in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized phase I/III trial

Objective

To assess non-inferiority of s.c. to i.v. CT-P13 in RA.

Methods

Patients with active RA and inadequate response to MTX participated in this phase I/III double-blind study at 76 sites. Patients received CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg [week (W) 0 and W2] before randomization (1:1) at W6 to CT-P13 s.c. via pre-filled syringe (PFS) 120 mg biweekly until W28, or CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks until W22. Randomization was stratified by country, W2 serum CRP and W6 body weight. From W30, all patients received CT-P13 s.c. In a usability sub-study, patients received CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector (W46–54) then PFS (W56–64). The primary endpoint was change (decrease) from baseline in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-CRP at W22 (non-inferiority margin: −0.6).

Results

Of 357 patients enrolled, 343 were randomized to CT-P13 s.c. (n = 167) or CT-P13 i.v. (n = 176) at W6. The least-squares mean change (decrease) from baseline (standard error) in DAS28-CRP at W22 was 2.21 (0.22) for CT-P13 s.c. (n = 162) and 1.94 (0.21) for CT-P13 i.v. [n = 168; difference 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.52)], establishing non-inferiority. Efficacy findings were similar between arms at W54. Safety was similar between arms throughout: 92 (54.8%; CT-P13 s.c.) and 117 (66.9%; CT-P13 i.v.) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (from W6). There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings. Usability was similar for CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector or PFS.

Conclusion

CT-P13 s.c. was non-inferior to CT-P13 i.v. in active RA. The convenience of s.c. administration could benefit patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147248.

Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices

PURPOSE

The objective of this work was to systematically evaluate the effects of formulation composition on subcutaneous injection site pain (ISP) using matrices comprising of common pharmaceutical excipients.

METHODS

Two randomized, blinded, crossover studies in healthy subjects were conducted at a single site, where subjects received 1 mL SC injections of the buffer matrices. ISP intensity was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), which was then analyzed via heatmap, categorical grouping, subgroup analysis, and paired delta analysis.

RESULTS

Buffer type, buffer concentration and tonicity agent showed a substantial impact on ISP. Citrate buffer demonstrated a higher ISP than acetate buffer or saline). The 20 mM citrate buffer was more painful than 10 or 5 mM citrate buffers. NaCl and propylene glycol were significantly more painful than sugar alcohols (mannitol, sucrose, trehalose or glycerol). Histidine buffers exhibited ISP in the descending order of 150 mM > 75 mM > 25 mM > 0 mM NaCl, while histidine buffers containing Arginine-HCl at 0, 50, or 150 mM all showed very low ISP. Histidine buffer at pH 6.5 showed a lower ISP than pH 5.7.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic study via orthogonal analyses demonstrated that subcutaneous ISP is significantly influenced by solution composition.

Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis: How Similar Are They in Pathogenesis and Treatment Responses?

Severe asthma and rhinosinusitis represent frequent comorbidities, complicating the overall management of the disease. Both asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can be differentiated into endotypes: those with type 2 eosinophilic inflammation and those with a non-type 2 inflammation. A correct definition of phenotype/endotype for these diseases is crucial, taking into account the availability of novel biological therapies. Even though patients suffering from type 2 severe asthma-with or without CRS with nasal polyps-significantly benefit from treatment with biologics, the existence of different levels of patient response has been clearly demonstrated. In fact, in clinical practice, it is a common experience that patients reach a good clinical response for asthma symptoms, but not for CRS. At first glance, a reason for this could be that although asthma and CRS can coexist in the same patient, they can manifest with different degrees of severity; therefore, efficacy may not be equally achieved. Many questions regarding responders and nonresponders, predictors of response, and residual disease after blocking type 2 pathways are still unanswered. In this review, we discuss whether treatment with biological agents is equally effective in controlling both asthma and sinonasal symptoms in patients in which asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps coexist.

Immunogenicity Challenges Associated with Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins

The subcutaneous route of administration has provided convenient and non-inferior delivery of therapeutic proteins compared to intravenous infusion, but there is potential for enhanced immunogenicity toward subcutaneously administered proteins in a subset of patients. Unwanted anti-drug antibody response toward proteins or monoclonal antibodies upon repeated administration is shown to impact the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of multiple biologics. Unique immunogenicity challenges of the subcutaneous route have been realized through various preclinical and clinical examples, although subcutaneous delivery has often demonstrated comparable immunogenicity to intravenous administration. Beyond route of administration as a treatment-related factor of immunogenicity, certain product-related risk factors are particularly relevant to subcutaneously administered proteins. This review attempts to provide an overview of the mechanism of immune response toward proteins administered subcutaneously (subcutaneous proteins) and comments on product-related risk factors related to protein structure and stability, dosage form, and aggregation. A two-wave mechanism of antigen presentation in the immune response toward subcutaneous proteins is described, and interaction with dynamic antigen-presenting cells possessing high antigen processing efficiency and migratory activity may drive immunogenicity. Mitigation strategies for immunogenicity are discussed, including those in general use clinically and those currently in development. Mechanistic insights along with consideration of risk factors involved inspire theoretical strategies to provide antigen-specific, long-lasting effects for maintaining the safety and efficacy of therapeutic proteins.

From cell line development to the formulated drug product: The art of manufacturing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and related products have steadily grown to become the dominant product class within the biopharmaceutical market. Production of antibodies requires special precautions to ensure safety and efficacy of the product. In particular, minimizing antibody product heterogeneity is crucial as drug substance variants may impair the activity, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties of an antibody, consequently resulting in the failure of a product in pre-clinical and clinical development. This review will cover the manufacturing and formulation challenges and advances of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, focusing on improved processes to minimize variants and ensure batch-to-batch consistency. Processes put in place by regulatory agencies, such as Quality-by-Design (QbD) and current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP), and how their implementation has aided drug development in pharmaceutical companies will be reviewed. Advances in formulation and considerations on the intended use of a therapeutic antibody, including the route of administration and patient compliance, will be discussed.

Predicting bioavailability of monoclonal antibodies after subcutaneous administration: Open innovation challenge

Despite the increasing trend towards subcutaneous delivery of monoclonal antibodies, factors influencing the subcutaneous bioavailability of these molecules remain poorly understood. To address critical knowledge gaps and issues during development of subcutaneous dosage forms for monoclonal antibodies, the Subcutaneous Drug Delivery and Development Consortium was convened in 2018 as a pre-competitive collaboration of recognized industry experts. One of the Consortium's eight problem statements highlights the challenges of predicting human bioavailability of subcutaneously administered monoclonal antibodies due to a lack of reliable in vitro and preclinical in vivo predictive models. In this paper, we assess the current landscape in subcutaneous bioavailability prediction for monoclonal antibodies and discuss the gaps and opportunities associated with bioavailability models for biotherapeutics. We also issue an open challenge to industry and academia, encouraging the development of reliable models to enable subcutaneous bioavailability prediction of therapeutic large molecules in humans and improve translation from preclinical species.

Biologics for Severe Asthma: Treatment-Specific Effects Are Important in Choosing a Specific Agent

Patients with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma have greater morbidity, greater use of health care resources, and more impairment in health-related quality of life when compared with their peers with well-controlled disease. Fortunately, since the introduction of biological therapeutics, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma now have beneficial treatment options that they did not have just a few years ago. In addition to anti-IgE therapy for allergic asthma, 3 new biological therapeutics targeting IL-5 and 1 targeting IL-4 and IL-13 signaling have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma, and approval of more biological therapeutics is on the horizon. These medications decrease the frequency of asthma exacerbations, improve lung function, reduce corticosteroid usage, and improve health-related quality of life. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, specific indications, benefits, and side effects of each of the approved biological therapies for asthma. Furthermore, this article reviews how a clinician could use specific patient characteristics to decide which biologic treatment may be optimal for a given patient.

Influence of physiochemical properties on the subcutaneous absorption and bioavailability of monoclonal antibodies

Many therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were initially developed for intravenous (IV) administration. As a means to improve mAb drug-ability and the patient experience, subcutaneous (SC) administration is an increasingly important delivery route for mAbs. Unlike IV administration, bioavailability limitations for antibodies have been reported following SC injection and can dictate whether a mAb is administered via this parenteral route. The SC bioavailability of antibodies has been difficult to predict, and it can be variable and partial, with values ranging from ~50% to 100%. The mechanisms leading to the incomplete bioavailability of some mAbs relative to others are not well understood. There are some limited data that suggest the physiochemical properties inherent to a mAb can contribute to its SC absorption, bioavailability, and in vivo fate. In this study, we evaluated the integrated influence of multiple mAb physiochemical factors on the SC absorption and bioavailability of six humanized mAbs in both rats and cynomolgus monkeys. We demonstrate the physiochemical properties of mAbs are critical to their rate and extent of SC absorption. The combination of high positive charge and hydrophobic interaction significantly reduced the rate of the evaluated mAb’s SC absorption and bioavailability. Reduction or balancing of both these attributes via re-engineering the mAbs restored desirable properties of the molecules assessed. This included reduced association with SC tissue, improvements in mAb absorption from the SC space and overall SC bioavailability. Our findings point to the importance of evaluating the relative balance between various physiochemical factors, including charge, hydrophobicity, and stability, to improve the SC drug-ability of mAbs for selecting or engineering mAbs with enhanced in vivo absorption and bioavailability following SC administration.

The first-in-human study of CNTO 7160, an anti-interleukin-33 receptor monoclonal antibody, in healthy subjects and patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis

AIMS

To assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and immunogenicity of CNTO 7160, an anti-interleukin-33 receptor (IL-33R) monoclonal antibody, in healthy subjects and patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

In Part 1 of this Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy subjects (n = 68) received single ascending intravenous (IV) CNTO 7160 dose (0.001 to 10 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part 2, patients with mild asthma (n = 24) or mild AD (n = 15) received 3 biweekly IV CNTO 7160 doses (3 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo.

RESULTS

CNTO 7160 was generally well tolerated, with 1 serious adverse event of severe cellulitis reported (AD, CNTO 7160, 3 mg/kg). CNTO 7160 exhibited nonlinear PK (0.01-10 mg/kg). Mean clearance decreased with increasing dose (2.43 to 18.03 mL/d/kg). CNTO 7160 PK was similar between healthy subjects and patients with asthma or AD (3 or 10 mg/kg). Free sIL-33R suppression was rapid and dose dependent. Ex vivo inhibition of p38 phosphorylation of basophils was dose-dependent (1-10 mg/kg) and sustained inhibition (≥75%) was observed at higher doses (3 or 10 mg/kg). PK/PD modelling and simulation suggests that 1 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks provides adequate systemic drug exposure for sustained inhibition of p38 phosphorylation of basophils. Despite confirmation of target engagement, no apparent CNTO 7160 clinical activity was observed in patients (asthma or AD).

CONCLUSION

This first-in-human study provides PK, PD and safety data, supporting further clinical investigation of CNTO 7160 in patients with asthma and AD.

Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors

Biologic-device combination products using prefilled syringes (PFSs) and autoinjectors (AIs) are popular for biological products administered subcutaneously. Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability studies commonly provide the scientific data to support introduction of AI presentations via bridging with PFS. A survey of biological products approved by FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research identified 17 biologics license applications (BLAs) with both PFS and AI presentations for subcutaneous (SC) administration, including 16 approved on February 1, 2018, and one with AI presentation under review. A systematic review on the device parameters and the PK comparability studies bridging the two presentations was conducted. Subsequently, whether device parameters or the PK study design may have influenced the PK comparability study results was evaluated. The reported device parameters for AI and PFS are generally consistent across BLAs, whereas the approach to assess PK comparability varied, including the study design. Most PK comparability studies met bioequivalence (BE) criteria. Upon inspection of the studies that did not meet BE criteria, injection depth of AI and the injection site for either AI or PFS were identified as potential influencing factors to the outcome of PK comparability study. This study represents an initial attempt to identify the potential influencing factors on device bridging, including the characteristics of the device and the clinical pharmacology study. These findings may inform the combination product development strategy, specifically design considerations for device and PK comparability studies.

Reslizumab and mepolizumab for moderate-to-severe poorly controlled asthma: an indirect comparison meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg and mepolizumab 100 mg. Materials & methods: Eligible studies evaluated reslizumab and mepolizumab in patients with inadequately-controlled severe eosinophilic asthma. Using a Bayesian network meta-analysis, 95% credible intervals and posterior probabilities were reported. Results: Of 19 indirect efficacy comparisons performed in base-case (Global Initiative for Asthma 4/5 patients with ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year) and overall populations, significant differences favoring reslizumab were observed for severe exacerbations, FEV₁ at 4 weeks and eosinophil counts at 4, 16 and 24 weeks, with no other significant differences including risk of adverse events. Conclusion: Indirect comparison of reslizumab and mepolizumab largely showed no significant differences in efficacy or safety.

Pharmacogenetic Factors Affecting Asthma Treatment Response. Potential Implications for Drug Therapy

Asthma is a frequent disease, mainly characterized by airway inflammation, in which drug therapy is crucial in its management. The potential of pharmacogenomics testing in asthma therapy has been, to date, little explored. In this review, we discuss pharmacogenetic factors affecting asthma treatment, both related to drugs used as controller medications for regular maintenance, such as inhaled corticosteroids, anti-leukotriene agents, long-acting beta-agonists, and the new biologic agents used to treat severe persistent asthma. In addition, we discuss current pharmacogenomics knowledge for rescue medications provided to all patients for as-needed relief, such as short-acting beta-agonists. Evidence for genetic variations as a factor related to drugs response has been provided for the following genes and groups of drugs: Inhaled corticosteroids: FCER2; anti-leukotriene agents: ABCC1, and LTC4S; beta-agonists: ADRB2. However, the following genes require further studies confirming or rejecting association with the response to asthma therapy: ADCY9, ALOX5, ARG1, ARG2, CRHR1, CRHR2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYSLTR1, CYSLTR2, GLCCI1, IL4RA, LTA4H, ORMDL3, SLCO2B1, SPATS2L, STIP1, T, TBX21, THRA, THRB, and VEGFA. Although only a minority of these genes are, at present, listed as associated with drugs used in asthma therapy, in the Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium gene-drug pair list, this review reveals that sufficient evidence to start testing the potential of clinical pharmacogenomics in asthma therapy already exists. This evidence supports the inclusion in pilot pharmacogenetics tests of at least four genes. Hopefully these tests, if proven useful, will increase the efficiency and the safety of asthma therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies for asthma treatment

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease. It occurs in a 'severe' form in about 8-10% of asthmatic patients. In the last decade, the development of biological drugs (e.g. monoclonal antibodies) allowed to efficiently approach severe asthma. The current therapeutic targets available are mainly those related to TH2 inflammation. Areas covered: The main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the monoclonal antibodies against IL-5, IL-5Ra, IL4-IL13, and IgE, that are currently marketed or understood for severe asthma are discussed in this paper. Expert opinion: The currently available biological drugs represent an excellent therapeutic add-on to traditional drugs, especially in replacing systemic corticosteroid therapies. The different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the drugs, despite sometime sharing the same target, would allow a better personalization of the therapy, tailoring the treatment to the characteristics of the patient.