Biologic therapies for refractory juvenile dermatomyositis: five years of experience of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance in North America

Achieving Medication-Free Remission in Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

Prognostic factors associated with medication discontinuation in children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) remain largely elusive. We aim to identify the predictors of medication-free remission (MFR) in children with JDM.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with JDM according to Peter & Bohan criteria and followed for ≥18 months at a tertiary care center from 2006 through 2022 were included. Data extracted included demographics, physical examination, laboratory results, and medications. MFR was defined as inactive JDM after discontinuation of all systemic immunosuppressives for ≥6 months, in line with international consensus guidelines for trials of therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients with JDM (63.6% female, age median [interquartile range (IQR)] 6 [3.5-12] years), 29 (52.7%) achieved MFR after a median (IQR) of 33 (22.5-55.2) months. MFR was more common in those who were younger at JDM diagnosis (median 5 vs 8 years, P = 0.008), had early resolution of disease activity (median 11 vs 18 months, P < 0.001), and presented with Gottron papules (χ2 = 5.25; P = 0.022) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (χ2 = 4.82, P = 0.028). Diagnosis of JDM before 5 years old (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-16.7) was the only predictor of MFR in our multivariate model (area under the curve 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Half of our patients with JDM achieved MFR. Age at JDM diagnosis may be an important predictor of achieving MFR.

Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Consensus Treatment Plans for Refractory Moderately Severe Juvenile Dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to develop consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for patients with refractory moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

The Biologics Workgroup of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance JDM Research Committee used case-based surveys, consensus framework, and nominal group technique to produce bDMARD CTPs for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM.

RESULTS

Four bDMARD CTPs were proposed: tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Each CTP has different options for dosing and/or route. Among 76 respondents, consensus was achieved for the proposed CTPs (93% [67 of 72]) as well as for patient characteristics, assessments, outcome measures, and follow-up. By weighted average, respondents indicated that they would most likely administer rituximab, followed by abatacept, TNFα inhibitor, and tocilizumab.

CONCLUSION

CTPs for the administration of bDMARDs in refractory moderately severe JDM were developed using consensus methodology. The implementation of the bDMARD CTPs will lay the groundwork for registry-based prospective comparative effectiveness studies.

Over Activation of IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in Juvenile Dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is characterized by persistent non-purulent inflammation in the muscle and skin. The underlying mechanisms still remain uncertain. This study aims to elucidate the mechanism of interleukin-6 (IL-6) activation of Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway (JAK/STAT3), contributing to the pathogenesis of JDM.

METHODS

Serum IL-6 levels were compared between 72 newly diagnosed patients with JDM and the same patient cohort in treatment remission. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was employed to identify differential signaling pathway expression in muscle biopsy samples from two patients with JDM and healthy controls. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine differences in STAT3 phosphorylation between JDM and control muscle tissues. In vitro, skeletal muscle cell lines were stimulated with IL-6, and the transcription levels of genes related to mitochondrial calcium channels were quantified via reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured in both IL-6 treated and untreated groups. ROS levels were then compared between IL-6 receptor antagonist pre-treated skeletal muscle cells and untreated cells.

RESULTS

IL-6 levels in newly onset patients with JDM were significantly higher compared to the same patient cohort in remission states (p < 0.0001). Serum IL-6 was significantly increased in patients with negative myositis specific antibody (MSA), positive melanoma differentiation associated protein 5 (MDA5) and positive nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2), yet not for JDM with positive transcriptional intermediary factor γ (TIF1γ), based on subgroup analysis. ScRNA-seq analysis of muscle biopsies from patients with MDA5-positive JDM and patients with MSA negative JDM revealed abnormal activation of the JAK/STAT3 pathway in skeletal myocytes, macrophages, and vascular endothelial cells. The phosphorylation levels of STAT3 were elevated in active JDM cases. Transcription of the calcium channel modulation gene sarcolipin (SLN) was significantly higher in JDM primary skeletal muscle cells compared to normal cells. In vitro, IL-6 enhanced SLN transcription and induced ROS production, and blocking the IL-6 receptor resulted in decreased ROS generation in skeletal muscle cells.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway was abnormally activated in patients with JDM. IL-6 may be involved in the pathogenesis of muscle damage by triggering the development of calcium overload and production of ROS. Blockade of the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway can be a potential treatment option for JDM, especially MDA5-positive patients and those who are negative for MSA.

Advances in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment and Interstitial Lung Diseases-A Narrative Review

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (JIIM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by skeletal muscle weakness with or without a skin rash. Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common subtype of JIIM, accounting for 80% of JIIM. Recent studies identified several myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs). Each MSA or MAA is associated with distinct clinical features and outcomes, although there are several differences in the prevalence of MSA/MAA and autoantibody-phenotype relationships between age and ethnic groups. Histopathological studies have revealed critical roles of type I interferons and vasculopathy in the development of JDM. Serological classification mostly corresponds to clinicopathological classification. Novel therapeutic agents, such as biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), have been developed; however, to date, there is a lack of high-level evidence. As advances in treatment have reduced the mortality rate of JIIM, recent studies have focused on medium- and long-term outcomes. However, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) remains a major cause of death in anti-melanoma differentiation gene 5 autoantibody-positive JDM. Early diagnosis and intervention using a multi-drug regimen is critical for the treatment of RP-ILD. Rituximab and JAKi may reduce mortality in patients with JDM-associated RP-ILD refractory to conventional therapy.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factor in juvenile dermatomyositis: data of the Spanish registry

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common chronic idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. The diagnosis is clinical. Baseline laboratory and complementary studies trace the phenotype of these patients. The objective of this study was to describe epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics at diagnosis of JDM patients included in the Spanish JDM registry, as well as to identify prognostic factors on these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical features, laboratory tests, and complementary studies at diagnosis of JDM patients included on the Spanish JDM registry. These data were analyzed to assess whether there was a relationship with the development of complications and time to disease inactivity.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients from 17 Spanish paediatric rheumatology centres were included, 76 girls (65%). Median age at diagnosis was 7.3 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 4.5-10.2). All patients had pathognomonic skin lesions at the beginning of the disease. Muscle weakness was present in 86.2%. Median Childhood Muscle Assessment Scale was 34 (IQR 22-47). Twelve patients (34%) had dysphagia and 3,5% dysphonia. Anti-p155 was the most frequently detected myositis specific antibody, followed by anti-MDA5. Twenty-nine patients developed calcinosis and 4 presented with macrophage activation syndrome. 70% reached inactivity in a median time of 8.9 months (IQR 4.5-34.8). 41% relapsed after a median time of 14.4 months (IQR 8.6-22.8) of inactivity. Shorter time to treatment was associated with better prognosis (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95 per month of evolution, p = 0.02). Heliotrope rash at diagnosis correlates with higher risk of development complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe heliotrope rash as a risk factor for developing complications in our cohort of JDM patients, an easy-to-evaluate clinical sign that could help us to identify the group of patients we should monitor closely for this complication.

Treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors in juvenile dermatomyositis: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been increasingly used in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). This review aims to comprehensively analyze previous studies concerning the utilization of JAK inhibitors in JDM patients.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough review of MEDLINE and Scopus databases, spanning from their inception to September 1st, 2023, to identify articles involving JDM patients treated with JAK inhibitors.

RESULTS

Our literature search yielded 26 articles that encompassed 195 patients with JDM who received JAK inhibitors. The median (min-max) age of the patients was 4.9 (1-17) years (F/M:1.2). The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (57.4 %), and improvement was achieved in 89.7 % of patients treated with tofacitinib. The improvement rate for ruxolitinib, which was the second most frequently used JAK inhibitor (27.2 %), was 69.2 %. For baricitinib (15.4 %), the improvement rate was 92.7 %. The most prevalent indication for JAK inhibitor use was resistant/recurrent skin involvement (34.7 %) followed by resistant/recurrent muscle involvement (28.6 %). Adverse events were reported in 72.1 % of the patients; an increase in infections (especially upper respiratory tract infections) was the most common side effect.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that JAK inhibitors may be a good therapeutic option, particularly in the management of refractory JDM cases with an acceptable safety profile. However, further controlled studies are essential to establish a higher level of evidence for the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in JDM treatment.

Biologic drugs in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis: a literature review

There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the choice of biologic therapies and efficacy in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in JDM patients. We screened MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving JDM patients treated with biologic drugs. We identified 74 articles describing 495 JDM patients treated with biologic drugs (538 biologic treatments) during our literature search. The median (min-max) age of these patients was 9.8 (1-17) years (F/M:1.8). The most frequently used biologic drugs were rituximab (RTX, 50%) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (34.8%). In a few cases, abatacept (4.3%), anti-interleukin-1 agents (0.9%), tocilizumab (0.9%), bortezomib (0.4%), ustekinumab (0.2%), eculizumab (0.2%), and golimumab (0.2%) were used. RTX was most frequently preferred in patients with severe skin involvement (46.3%). Improvement with RTX was obtained in 60.1% of RTX treatments. Infliximab was most frequently preferred in calcinosis (43.3%), while adalimumab in skin involvement (50%) and etanercept in resistant/recurrent diseases (80%). Improvement was achieved in 44.4% of anti-TNF treatments. Adverse events were observed in 46.8% (58/124) of all treatments. Our results suggest that biologic agents may be a promising alternative for the treatment of particularly resistant JDM cases. Controlled studies are required to provide higher level of evidence for the timing of biologic use in JDM treatment. Key Points • There is no consensus on the choice and efficacy of biologic therapies in JDM. • RTX and TNF inhibitors are the most commonly used biologic drugs. • Biologics were especially preferred in severe skin involvement, calcinosis, and resistant diseases.

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myositis: an update on pathophysiology and clinical care

The childhood-onset or juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs) are a heterogenous group of rare and serious autoimmune diseases of children and young people that predominantly affect the muscles and skin but can also involve other organs, including the lungs, gut, joints, heart and central nervous system. Different myositis-specific autoantibodies have been identified that are associated with different muscle biopsy features, as well as with different clinical characteristics, prognoses and treatment responses. Thus, myositis-specific autoantibodies can be used to subset JIIMs into sub-phenotypes; some of these sub-phenotypes parallel disease seen in adults, whereas others are distinct from adult-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Although treatments and management have much improved over the past decade, evidence is still lacking for many of the current treatments and few validated prognostic biomarkers are available with which to predict response to treatment, comorbidities (such as calcinosis) or outcome. Emerging data on the pathogenesis of the JIIMs are leading to proposals for new trials and tools for monitoring disease.

Adult and juvenile dermatomyositis treatment

INTRODUCTION

Dermatomyositis is a rare autoimmune inflammatory condition affecting skin and muscles. The disease can be seen in both adults and children. It can be associated with malignancy. Considering involvement of skin in the disease, many patients consult dermatologists for its treatment. Hence, knowledge about its presentation, complications, prognosis, and treatment is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review article is to provide comprehensive information about treatment of dermatomyositis.

METHODS

In this review article, we reviewed the published literature on adult and juvenile dermatomyositis to highlight the treatment. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals including reviews, clinical trials, case series, and case reports published in electronic database (MEDLINE/PubMed) through January 2021, cross references of respective articles and trials from clinicaltrials.gov were included for qualitative analysis of the literature.

RESULTS

Treatment options for dermatomyositis include traditional immunosuppressive agents and immunomodulatory therapy. High-dose corticosteroids represent the first line of treatment while other immunosuppressive agents are also used, either in combination with or as an alternative to corticosteroids, after initial treatment failure. Some biological agents have been used for the treatment of dermatomyositis with variable responses.

CONCLUSION

Although several treatment options are available, several questions remain unanswered about the optimal treatment of dermatomyositis.

Treatment escalation patterns to start biologics in refractory moderate juvenile dermatomyositis among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance

BACKGROUND

Despite new and better treatments for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), not all patients with moderate severity disease respond adequately to first-line therapy. Those with refractory disease remain at higher risk for disease and glucocorticoid-related complications. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become part of the arsenal of treatments for JDM. However, prospective comparative studies of commonly used biologics are lacking.

METHODS

The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM biologics workgroup met in 2019 and produced a survey assessing current treatment escalation practices for JDM, including preferences regarding use of biologic treatments. The cases and questions were developed using a consensus framework, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. The survey was completed online in 2020 by CARRA members interested in JDM. Survey results were analyzed among all respondents and according to years of experience. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the distribution of responses to each survey question.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one CARRA members responded to the survey (denominators vary for each question). Of the respondents, 88% were pediatric rheumatologists, 85% practiced in the United States, and 43% had over 10 years of experience. For a patient with moderately severe JDM refractory to methotrexate, glucocorticoids, and IVIG, approximately 80% of respondents indicated that they would initiate a biologic after failing 1-2 non-biologic DMARDs. Trials of methotrexate and mycophenolate were considered necessary by 96% and 60% of respondents, respectively, before initiating a biologic. By weighed average, rituximab was the preferred biologic over abatacept, tocilizumab, and infliximab. Over 50% of respondents would start a biologic by 4 months from diagnosis for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. There were no notable differences in treatment practices between respondents by years of experience.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents favored starting a biologic earlier in disease course after trialing up to two conventional DMARDs, specifically including methotrexate. There was a clear preference for rituximab. However, there remains a dearth of prospective data comparing biologics in refractory JDM. These findings underscore the need for biologic consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for refractory JDM, which will ultimately facilitate comparative effectiveness studies and inform treatment practices.

Calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: Updates on pathogenesis and treatment

Calcinosis, or the deposition of insoluble calcium salts in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, tendons, and muscles, is a feared complication of juvenile dermatomyositis. Calcinosis is estimated to affect up to 40% of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis and contributes to significant disease morbidity. Calcinosis can be challenging to treat, and the most effective treatment remains unknown because of a lack of comparative studies. We aim to review the literature published in the last 5 years to summarize updates on the pathogenesis and treatment of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis and describe future areas for research.

COVID-19 Disease and Dermatomyositis: A Mini-Review

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 has caused a large number of deaths, and there is still no effective treatment. COVID-19 can induce a systemic inflammatory response, and its clinical manifestations are diverse. Recently, it has been reported that COVID-19 patients may develop myositis and interstitial pulmonary disease similar to dermatomyositis (DM). This condition is similar to the rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease associated with MDA5+ DM that has a poor prognosis and high mortality, and this poses a challenge for an early identification. Suppression of the immune system can protect COVID-19 patients by preventing the production of inflammatory cytokines. This article attempts to explore the possibility of a relationship between COVID-19 and DM in terms of the potential pathogenesis and clinical features and to analyze the therapeutic effect of the immunosuppressive drugs that are commonly used for the treatment of both DM and COVID-19.

Favorable outcomes with reduced steroid use in juvenile dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

High-intensity glucocorticoid regimens are commonly used to induce and maintain remission in Juvenile Dermatomyositis but are associated with several adverse side-effects. Evidence-based treatment guidelines from North American and European pediatric rheumatology research societies both advocate induction with intravenous pulse steroids followed by high dose oral steroids (2 mg/kg/day), which are then tapered. This study reports the time to disease control with reduced glucocorticoid dosing.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records at a single tertiary-care children's hospital of patients diagnosed with Juvenile Dermatomyositis between 2000 and 2014 who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was time to control of muscle and skin disease. Additional outcome measures included glucocorticoid dosing, effect of treatment on height, frequency of calcinosis, and complications from treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients followed during the study period, 31 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Median length of follow-up was 4.58 years, (IQR 3-7.5). Myositis control was achieved in a median of 7.1 months (IQR 0.9-63.4). Cutaneous disease control was achieved in a median of 16.7 months (IQR 4.3-89.5). The median starting dose of glucocorticoids was 0.85 mg/kg/day, (IQR 0.5-1.74). The median duration of steroid treatment was 9.1 months, (IQR 4.7-17.4), while the median duration of any pharmacotherapy was 29.2 months (IQR 10.4 to 121.3). Sustained disease control off medications was achieved in 21/31 (68%) patients by the end of review. Persistent calcinosis was identified in only one patient (3%).

CONCLUSION

Current accepted treatment paradigms for Juvenile Dermatomyositis include oral glucocorticoids beginning at 2 mg/kg/day and reduced over a prolonged time period. However, our results suggest that treatment using reduced doses and duration with early use of steroid-sparing agents is comparably effective in achieving favorable outcomes in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

Treatment of Calcinosis in Juvenile Dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle and skin involvement. Calcinosis is a debilitating complication of JDM which is difficult to treat and may cause long-term morbidity. The purpose of this review is to provide an update for the treatment of JDM-associated calcinosis based on previously published studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence-based studies are lacking for the management of calcinosis, and current treatment modalities have been largely based on case reports, case series, cohort studies, limited controlled studies and anecdotal clinical experience. The use of early aggressive therapy for resistant cases is strongly suggested to halt persistent disease activity which may help in reducing steroid use and their associated complications. Recent insights into disease pathogenesis, myositis-specific antibodies and genetic associations have led to identification of novel therapeutic targets such as Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2. Different treatment regimens with variable outcomes are in use for the treatment of refractory calcinosis; nevertheless, the level of evidence is not sufficient to propose specific guidelines. Recently, JAK 1/2 inhibitors have shown to be effective as an emerging therapeutic option highlighting that translational and clinical research is crucial to develop targeted treatment for JDM-associated calcinosis.

Autoimmune connective tissue diseases in the COVID-19 pandemic

Autoimmune connective tissue diseases are a heterogeneous group of clinical entities sharing a common feature-an impairment of structural components like collagen and elastin, arising by autoimmune mechanisms. Because most patients are on a long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which renders them vulnerable to infections, a new challenge appears in front of physicians in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. Immune mechanisms are substantial for the control and ceasing of viral infections, and their impairment may cause serious complications; however, data from immunosuppressed transplant patients do not reveal a higher frequency or diseases' severity in those infected by COVID-19. Several immunotherapies used to treat autoimmune connective tissue diseases favorably modulate the immune response of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients. The present review highlights the problems of susceptibility, severity, and therapeutic options in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between autoimmune connective tissue diseases and COVID-19 infection is explained with antiviral protection genes expression, hypercytokinemia, and lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation mechanisms. Recommendations concerning therapy for prevention during the pandemic period or in case of concomitant COVID-19 infection are also presented. Clinical trials are ongoing regarding COVID-19 therapy blocking the cytokine response. © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Clinical features, muscle biopsy scores, myositis specific antibody profiles and outcome in juvenile dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common inflammatory myopathy of childhood.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical features, paraclinical examinations, MSAs, treatment response and long-term outcome in a JDM cohort METHODS: 58 patients (35F, 23 M) from a tertiary referral center in the last two decades are included.

RESULTS

Mean age at onset was 8.1 ± 4.3, with a mean follow-up period of 5.66±3.59 years. Dermatological manifestations (91%) and muscle weakness (76%) were the key diagnostic elements. Elevated serum creatine kinase levels (86%), electromyography (23/25), muscle MRI (12/15), and muscle biopsy (n = 35) were compatible with the diagnosis. Out of 46 patients tested, 34 (76%) had autoantibodies, with NXP2 (21.7%), followed by TIF1g (17.4%), MDA5 (8.7%), and Mi-2 (8.7%). Presence of TIF1g and NXP2 indicated a severe course; and Ku a much severe course compared to previous studies. Corticosteroids (100%) combined with methotrexate (93%) was the initial treatment. Biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were used in 22% of the cohort. Calcinosis (36%) was the most common long-term complication, associated with disease onset ≤6 years, higher muscle biopsy scores and MDA5 positivity. Complete remission was achieved in 65.5% of the patients in a median 24 (IQR 11.8-42.5) months with a relapse rate of 26.3%. 43.9% of NXP2 and 33.3% of TIF-1 g positive patients had a relapse. Course was monophasic (31%), polyphasic (17.2%), chronic (51.8%) without mortality.

CONCLUSION

Integration of clinical features with laboratory and biopsy findings may help to predict prognosis and guide treatment in JDM. In our cohort calcinosis was associated with age, MDA5 autoantibodies, and muscle biopsy scores.

Tocilizumab and its usage for skin diseases

The monoclonal anti-IL6 receptor antibody called Tocilizumab is widely used by rheumatologists for joint diseases. Its application in dermatology has mainly concerned scleroderma and Systemic Sclerosis in the last years. The most varied skin diseases treated with tocilizumab, such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Behcet's Syndrome, Lupus, and the already mentioned scleroderma up to multi-organ syndromes with skin involvement will be discussed. At the same time, there have been several side reactions to the drug involving the skin forcing careful skin monitoring during treatment. Despite the evidence currently available in the appropriate literature, there is no formal recommendation for any of these diseases to use Tocilizumab for therapeutic purposes. The aim of this review was to collect all the main evidence on the use and involvement of the drug in dermatological practice in order to stimulate further research or hypothesize on possible therapeutic options.

Successful management with Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in refractory juvenile dermatomyositis: a pilot study and literature review

Objectives

JDM is a rare autoimmune inflammatory muscle disease with a pronounced IFN signature. Treatment for children with JDM has improved over the years with the use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents. However, there remains a subset of children who have refractory disease. Janus kinase and type I IFN signalling production are suspected to contribute to the pathogenesis of JDM. Our pilot study investigated the use of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in refractory JDM cases to provide new therapeutic options for better treatment.

Methods

Refractory JDM was defined as patients who failed two or more steroid sparing agents or high-dose steroids. Tofacitinib was given to three refractory JDM patients with a dose of 5 mg twice per day for at least 6 months. Core set measures defined by Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization were evaluated at month 0, 3 and 6 along with other systemic evaluations. A literature review was conducted to identify all the cases using Janus kinase inhibitors in JDM.

Results

All three subjects tolerated and responded well to tofacitinib with significant improvement in Child Myositis Assessment Scale, manual muscle testing-8, physician global disease activity and inflammatory indices without occurrence of severe adverse events.

Conclusion

This pilot study showed improvement of muscle strength, resolution of cutaneous lesions, increased daily quality of life and successful tapering of steroids when tofacitinib used in selected cases. Tofacitinib can be considered with caution when treating refractory JDM cases. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess its efficacy in JDM.

Retrospective analysis of infliximab and adalimumab treatment in a large cohort of juvenile dermatomyositis patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF treatment may be useful for the treatment of patients with refractory juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The aim of this study was to describe the use of infliximab and adalimumab therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis as an adjunctive treatment.

METHODS

Sixty children recruited to the UK JDM Cohort and Biomarker Study that had received at least 3 months of anti-TNF treatment (infliximab or adalimumab) were studied. Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT8) and physician's global assessment (PGA) were recorded. Skin disease was assessed using the modified skin disease activity score (DAS). Data were analysed using Friedman's test for repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, there were improvements at 6 and 12 months in skin disease (χ2(2) = 15.52, p = 0.00043), global disease (χ2(2) = 8.14, p = 0.017) and muscle disease (CMAS χ2(2) = 17.02, p = 0.0002 and MMT χ2(2) = 10.56, p = 0.005) in infliximab patients. For patients who switched from infliximab to adalimumab, there was improvement in global disease activity (χ2(2) = 6.73, p = 0.03), and trends towards improvement in CMAS, MMT8 and modified DAS. The median initial prednisolone dose was 6 [0-10] mg, and final was 2.5 [0-7.5] mg (p < 0.0001). Fifty-four per cent of patients had a reduction in the number and/or size of calcinosis lesions. Twenty-five per cent switched their anti-TNF treatment from infliximab to adalimumab. 66.7%of the switches were to improve disease control, 26.7% due to adverse events and 6.6% due to patient preference. A total of 13.9 adverse reactions occurred in 100 patient-years, of which 5.7 were considered serious.

CONCLUSION

Reductions in muscle and skin disease, including calcinosis, were seen following treatment with infliximab and adalimumab.

Dermatomyositis: Diagnosis and treatment

The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the initial evaluation of patients with suspected dermatomyositis (DM), the relevant work-up for malignancy and interstitial lung disease once a diagnosis of DM is made, and treatment recommendations for patients with DM based on disease severity, the presence of systemic symptoms, and myositis-specific antibody (MSA) profiles. This review emphasizes the emerging role of MSAs in the diagnosis of DM and highlights how MSAs can be used to guide the appropriate work-up for malignancy and interstitial lung disease. The treatment approach proposed by this continuing medical education series discusses both established and novel therapies for DM and highlights the importance of considering lesion type, degree of muscle involvement, presence of systemic symptoms, presence of MSAs, and patient age when determining the best treatment approach for a patient with DM.

Research priorities in childhood-onset lupus: results of a multidisciplinary prioritization exercise

BACKGROUND

Childhood-onset systemic erythematosus lupus (cSLE) is characterized by more severe disease, widespread organ involvement and higher mortality compared to adult-onset SLE. However, cSLE is largely underfunded to carry out necessary research to advance the field. Few commonly used SLE medications have been studied in children, and important knowledge gaps exist concerning epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology and optimal treatments for cSLE.

METHODS

In order to assess highest cSLE research priority areas, the Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) and Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) administered a cSLE research prioritization survey to pediatric rheumatologists, dermatologists and nephrologists with expertise in lupus. Members of LFA and CARRA's SLE Committee identified a list of cSLE research domains and developed a 17-item tiered, web-based survey asking respondents to categorize the research domains into high, medium, or low priority areas. For domains identified as high priority, respondents ranked research topics within that category. For example, for the domain of nephritis, respondents ranked importance of: epidemiology, biomarkers, long-term outcomes, quality improvement, etc. The survey was distributed to members of CARRA, Midwestern Pediatric Nephrology Consortium (MWPNC) and Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) Connective Tissue Disease group.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 256/752 (34%). The highest prioritized research domains were: nephritis, clinical trials, biomarkers, neuropsychiatric disease and refractory skin disease. Notably, nephritis, clinical trials and biomarkers were ranked in the top five by all groups. Within each research domain, all groups showed agreement in identifying the following as important focus areas: determining best treatments, biomarkers/pathophysiology, drug discovery/novel treatments, understanding long term outcomes, and refining provider reported quality measures.

CONCLUSION

This survey identified the highest cSLE research priorities among leading rheumatology, dermatology and nephrology clinicians and investigators engaged in care of children with lupus. There is a strong need for multidisciplinary collaboration moving forward, which was indicated as highly important among stakeholders involved in the survey. These survey results should be used as a roadmap to guide funding and specific research programs in cSLE to address urgent, unmet needs among this population.

Erythematous scaling lesions of the face, dorsal fingers, elbows, and knees together with symmetrical muscle weakness in a child

Juvenile dermatomyositis shows characteristic skin lesions. However, this does not rule out co-occurring other autoimmune diseases, which may be more prominent regarding skin manifestations. Co-occurring other skin autoimmune diseases should not be regarded as a preclusion for dermatomyositis. Here, we present an impressing case of juvenile dermatomyositis with co-occurring psoriasis.

The PRINTO evidence-based proposal for glucocorticoids tapering/discontinuation in new onset juvenile dermatomyositis patients

BACKGROUND

Prednisone (PDN) in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), alone or in association with other immunosuppressive drugs, namely methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CSA), represents the first-line treatment option for new onset JDM patients. No clear evidence based guidelines are actually available to standardize the tapering and discontinuation of glucocorticoids (GC) in JDM. Aim of our study was to provide an evidence-based proposal for GC tapering/discontinuation in new onset juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), and to identify predictors of clinical remission and GC discontinuation.

METHODS

New onset JDM children were randomized to receive either PDN alone or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or cyclosporine (CSA). In order to derive steroid tapering indications, PRINTO/ACR/EULAR JDM core set measures (CSM) and their median absolute and relative percent changes over time were compared in 3 groups. Group 1 included those in clinical remission who discontinued PDN, with no major therapeutic changes (MTC) (reference group) and was compared with those who did not achieve clinical remission, without or with MTC (Group 2 and 3, respectively). A logistic regression model identified predictors of clinical remission with PDN discontinuation.

RESULTS

Based on the median change in the CSM of 30/139 children in Group 1, after 3 pulses of methyl-prednisolone, GC could be tapered from 2 to 1 mg/kg/day in the first two months from onset if any of the CSM decreased by 50-94%, and from 1 to 0.2 mg/kg/day in the following 4 months if any CSM further decreased by 8-68%, followed by discontinuation in the ensuing 18 months. The achievement of PRINTO JDM 50-70-90 response after 2 months of treatment (ORs range 4.5-6.9), an age at onset > 9 years (OR 4.6) and the combination therapy PDN + MTX (OR 3.6) increase the probability of achieving clinical remission (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence-based proposal for glucocorticoid tapering/discontinuation based on the change in JDM CSM of disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial full title: Five-Year Single-Blind, Phase III Effectiveness Randomized Actively Controlled Clinical Trial in New Onset Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Prednisone versus Prednisone plus Cyclosporine A versus Prednisone plus Methotrexate. EUDRACT registration number: 2005-003956-37 .

CLINICAL TRIAL

gov is NCT00323960 . Registered on 17 August 2005.

Creating a Pharmacotherapy Collaborative Practice Network to Manage Medications for Children and Youth: A Population Health Perspective

Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) use relatively high quantities of healthcare resources and have overall higher morbidity than the general pediatric population. Embedding clinical pharmacists into the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) to provide comprehensive medication management (CMM) through collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) for children, especially for CSHCN, can improve outcomes, enhance the experience of care for families, and reduce the cost of care. Potential network infrastructures for collaborative practice focused on CSHCN populations, common language and terminology for CMM, and clinical pharmacist workforce estimates are provided. Applying the results from the CMM in Primary Care grant, this paper outlines the following: (1) setting up collaborative practices for CMM between clinical pharmacists and pediatricians (primary care pediatricians and sub-specialties, such as pediatric clinical pharmacology); (2) proposing various models, organizational structures, design requirements, and shared electronic health record (EHR) needs; and (3) outlining consistent documentation of CMM by clinical pharmacists in CSHCN populations.

Targeting Tregs in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Juvenile Dermatomyositis-Insights From Other Diseases

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are believed to be dysfunctional in autoimmunity. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) result from a loss of normal immune regulation in specific tissues such as joints or muscle and skin, respectively. Here, we discuss recent findings in regard to Treg biology in oligo-/polyarticular JIA and JDM, as well as what we can learn about Treg-related disease mechanism, treatment and biomarkers in JIA/JDM from studies of other diseases. We explore the potential use of Treg immunoregulatory markers and gene signatures as biomarkers for disease course and/or treatment success. Further, we discuss how Tregs are affected by several treatment strategies already employed in the therapy of JIA and JDM and by alternative immunotherapies such as anti-cytokine or co-receptor targeting. Finally, we review recent successes in using Tregs as a treatment target with low-dose IL-2 or cellular immunotherapy. Thus, this mini review will highlight our current understanding and identify open questions in regard to Treg biology, and how recent findings may advance biomarkers and new therapies for JIA and JDM.

Serum biomarkers of glucocorticoid response and safety in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and juvenile dermatomyositis

Glucocorticoids are standard of care for many chronic inflammatory conditions, including juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). We sought to define pharmacodynamic biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy and safety concerns of glucocorticoid treatment for these two disorders. Previous proteomic profiling of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with glucocorticoids identified candidate biomarkers for efficacy and safety concerns of glucocorticoids. Serial serum samples from patients with AAV (n = 30) and JDM (n = 12) were obtained during active disease, and after treatment with glucocorticoids. For AAV, 8 of 11 biomarkers of the anti-inflammatory response to glucocorticoids were validated (P-value ≤0.05; CD23, macrophage-derived cytokine, interleukin-22 binding protein, matrix metalloproteinase-12, T lymphocyte surface antigen Ly9, fibrinogen gamma chain, angiopoietin-2 [all decreased], and protein C [increased]), as were 5 of 7 safety biomarkers (P-value ≤0.05; afamin, matrix metalloproteinase-3, insulin growth factor binding protein-5, angiotensinogen, leptin [all increased]). For JDM, 10 of 11 efficacy biomarkers were validated (P-value ≤0.05; all proteins except fibrinogen gamma chain) and 6 of 7 safety biomarkers (P-value ≤0.05; AAV proteins plus growth hormone binding protein). The identified efficacy biomarkers may be useful as objective outcome measures for early phase proof-of-concept studies when assessing novel anti-inflammatory drugs in JDM and AAV, and likely in other inflammatory disorders. Similarly, safety biomarkers may also be helpful assessing toxicity of alternatives to glucocorticoids.

Update on the clinical management of juvenile dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare, chronic autoimmune illness with primary features of symmetric, proximal muscle weakness and involvement of the skin with a number of identifiable rashes. Evidence to support treatment decisions is limited, given the paucity of clinical trials. Consensus based methods, informed by available data, play an important role in treatment recommendations. Areas covered: This review focuses on evidence and consensus opinion regarding therapeutic options in JDM and identifies gaps where future research is needed. Expert commentary: The combination of trial evidence (as limited as it is) and consensus opinion support standard initial management for children with JDM to consist of high-dose corticosteroids, either intravenous or oral, and methotrexate. Several other agents have preliminary support, either through clinical trials or case series for their use in patients who either fail to respond adequately, have severe disease or have contraindications to standard initial therapy. One of the important goals of management in JDM will be to reduce the corticosteroid exposure experienced by patients. To meet this goal, progress in a number of key areas is needed: increased international collaboration, advances in study design and increased translational research.

Development of practice and consensus-based strategies including a treat-to-target approach for the management of moderate and severe juvenile dermatomyositis in Germany and Austria

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common inflammatory myopathy in childhood and a major cause of morbidity among children with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The management of JDM is very heterogeneous. The JDM working group of the Society for Pediatric Rheumatology (GKJR) aims to define consensus- and practice-based strategies in order to harmonize diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of JDM.

METHODS

The JDM working group was established in 2015 consisting of 23 pediatric rheumatologists, pediatric neurologists and dermatologists with expertise in the management of JDM. Current practice patterns of management in JDM had previously been identified via an online survey among pediatric rheumatologists and neurologists. Using a consensus process consisting of online surveys and a face-to-face consensus conference statements were defined regarding the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of JDM. During the conference consensus was achieved via nominal group technique. Voting took place using an electronic audience response system, and at least 80% consensus was required for individual statements.

RESULTS

Overall 10 individual statements were developed, finally reaching a consensus of 92 to 100% regarding (1) establishing a diagnosis, (2) case definitions for the application of the strategies (moderate and severe JDM), (3) initial diagnostic testing, (4) monitoring and documentation, (5) treatment targets within the context of a treat-to-target strategy, (6) supportive therapies, (7) explicit definition of a treat-to-target strategy, (8) various glucocorticoid regimens, including intermittent intravenous methylprednisolone pulse and high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapies with tapering, (9) initial glucocorticoid-sparing therapy and (10) management of refractory disease.

CONCLUSION

Using a consensus process among JDM experts, statements regarding the management of JDM were defined. These statements and the strategies aid in the management of patients with moderate and severe JDM.

Current management of juvenile dermatomyositis in Germany and Austria: an online survey of pediatric rheumatologists and pediatric neurologists

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare pediatric autoimmune disease with broad variations of the individual course. Data on the optimal management are mostly lacking. Currently treatment decisions are often based on experts' opinions. In order to develop consensus-based treatment strategies for JDM in Germany a survey was pursued to analyze the current clinical practice.

METHODS

An online survey addressing all members of the Society for Pediatric Rheumatology (GKJR) in Germany and Austria and pediatric neurologists with expertise in JDM was performed in February/March of 2016. The questionnaire consisted of 5 case scenarios including diagnostic criteria, treatment of moderate, severe and refractory JDM, using either multiple choice or a 5-point Likert scale. Basic descriptive statistics were used to analyze the findings.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 60 pediatric rheumatologists and 7 pediatric neurologists experienced in the management of JDM. Typical findings allowing a diagnosis were considered to be: typical skin changes, proximal muscle weakness, MRI findings, elevated muscle enzymes, nailfold capillary changes, presence of calcinosis and muscle biopsy. Regarding induction treatment of moderate/severe JDM: 59%/74% opted for intermittent intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse therapy, and 21%/40% for conventional high-dose oral glucocorticoids. Methotrexate (MTX) was the preferred disease-modifying conventional anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARD) for moderate and severe JDM. Regarding the management of refractory moderate or severe JDM, intravenous immune globulins, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab were preferred treatment options.

CONCLUSION

There is consensus about the diagnosis of JDM strongly supported by classic clinical and MRI findings. There is great variety in the treatment of JDM in Germany regarding both induction and maintenance therapy. The development of consensus-based treatment strategies for JDM based on harmonization of current clinical practice is essential in order to allow comparative effectiveness research in the future.