1
|
Zwanenburg A, Price G, Löck S. Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:266-273. [PMID: 39212687 PMCID: PMC11839704 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02281-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems may personalise radiotherapy by assessing complex and multifaceted patient data and predicting tumour and normal tissue responses to radiotherapy. Here we describe three distinct generations of AI systems, namely personalised radiotherapy based on pretreatment data, response-driven radiotherapy and dynamically optimised radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main challenges in clinical translation of AI systems for radiotherapy personalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Germany:, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Gareth Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plummer JT, Vlachos IS, Martelotto LG. Introducing the Global Alliance for Spatial Technologies (GESTALT). Nat Genet 2025; 57:275-279. [PMID: 39901011 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-02066-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine T Plummer
- Center for Spatial Omics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
- Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
- Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Ioannis S Vlachos
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School Initiative for RNA Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Luciano G Martelotto
- Adelaide Centre for Epigenetics, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- South Australian immunoGENomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Mai Y, Zheng Y, Shi L. Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies. Genome Biol 2024; 25:254. [PMID: 39363244 PMCID: PMC11447944 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03401-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Batch effects in omics data are notoriously common technical variations unrelated to study objectives, and may result in misleading outcomes if uncorrected, or hinder biomedical discovery if over-corrected. Assessing and mitigating batch effects is crucial for ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of omics data and minimizing the impact of technical variations on biological interpretation. In this review, we highlight the profound negative impact of batch effects and the urgent need to address this challenging problem in large-scale omics studies. We summarize potential sources of batch effects, current progress in evaluating and correcting them, and consortium efforts aiming to tackle them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yuanbang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanting Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Leming Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Cancer Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- International Human Phenome Institutes (Shanghai), Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stetson D, Labrousse P, Russell H, Shera D, Abbosh C, Dougherty B, Barrett JC, Hodgson D, Hadfield J. Next-Generation Molecular Residual Disease Assays: Do We Have the Tools to Evaluate Them Properly? J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2736-2740. [PMID: 38754043 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Stetson
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA
| | - Paul Labrousse
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA
| | - Hugh Russell
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA
| | - David Shera
- Oncology Biometrics, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Chris Abbosh
- Cancer Biomarker Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Dougherty
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA
| | - J Carl Barrett
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA
| | - Darren Hodgson
- Cancer Biomarker Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - James Hadfield
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hung KL. Genetic Diagnosis in Children with Developmental Delay. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:669. [PMID: 38929248 PMCID: PMC11201514 DOI: 10.3390/children11060669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Developmental delay (DD) has a great impact on children at the developmental stage, and is often manifested by varying degrees of motor delays, intellectual disabilities, and other defects [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun-Long Hung
- Department of Pediatrics, Fu-Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City 243, Taiwan; or ; Tel.: +886-2-8512-8704; Fax: +886-2-2904-6422
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gong B, Lababidi S, Kusko R, Bouri K, Prezek S, Thovarai V, Prasanna A, Maier EJ, Golkaram M, Sun X, Kyriakidis K, Kitajima JP, Ebrahim Sahraeian SM, Guo Y, Johanson E, Jones W, Tong W, Xu J. Towards accurate indel calling for oncopanel sequencing through an international pipeline competition at precisionFDA. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8165. [PMID: 38589653 PMCID: PMC11001604 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58573-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurately calling indels with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is critical for clinical application. The precisionFDA team collaborated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) and successfully completed the NCTR Indel Calling from Oncopanel Sequencing Data Challenge, to evaluate the performance of indel calling pipelines. Top performers were selected based on precision, recall, and F1-score. The performance of many other pipelines was close to the top performers, which produced a top cluster of performers. The performance was significantly higher in high confidence regions and coding regions, and significantly lower in low complexity regions. Oncopanel capture and other issues may have occurred that affected the recall rate. Indels with higher variant allele frequency (VAF) may generally be called with higher confidence. Many of the indel calling pipelines had good performance. Some of them performed generally well across all three oncopanels, while others were better for a specific oncopanel. The performance of indel calling can further be improved by restricting the calls within high confidence intervals (HCIs) and coding regions, and by excluding low complexity regions (LCR) regions. Certain VAF cut-offs could be applied according to the applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binsheng Gong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Office of Research, National Center for Toxicological Research, Office of the Chief Scientist, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA
| | - Samir Lababidi
- Health Informatics Staff, Office of Data, Analytics, and Research, Office of Digital Transformation, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Rebecca Kusko
- Cellino Biotech, 750 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02143, USA
| | - Khaled Bouri
- Office of Regulatory Science and Innovation, Office of the Chief Scientist, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yunfei Guo
- Roche Sequencing Solutions, Santa Clara, CA, 95050, USA
| | - Elaine Johanson
- Health Informatics Staff, Office of Data, Analytics, and Research, Office of Digital Transformation, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Wendell Jones
- Q squared Solutions Genomics, 2400 Elis Road, Durham, NC, 27703, USA
| | - Weida Tong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Office of Research, National Center for Toxicological Research, Office of the Chief Scientist, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA
| | - Joshua Xu
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Office of Research, National Center for Toxicological Research, Office of the Chief Scientist, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bagger FO, Borgwardt L, Jespersen AS, Hansen AR, Bertelsen B, Kodama M, Nielsen FC. Whole genome sequencing in clinical practice. BMC Med Genomics 2024; 17:39. [PMID: 38287327 PMCID: PMC10823711 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-024-01795-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming the preferred method for molecular genetic diagnosis of rare and unknown diseases and for identification of actionable cancer drivers. Compared to other molecular genetic methods, WGS captures most genomic variation and eliminates the need for sequential genetic testing. Whereas, the laboratory requirements are similar to conventional molecular genetics, the amount of data is large and WGS requires a comprehensive computational and storage infrastructure in order to facilitate data processing within a clinically relevant timeframe. The output of a single WGS analyses is roughly 5 MIO variants and data interpretation involves specialized staff collaborating with the clinical specialists in order to provide standard of care reports. Although the field is continuously refining the standards for variant classification, there are still unresolved issues associated with the clinical application. The review provides an overview of WGS in clinical practice - describing the technology and current applications as well as challenges connected with data processing, interpretation and clinical reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Otzen Bagger
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Line Borgwardt
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Sand Jespersen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna Reimer Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Bertelsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Miyako Kodama
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Cilius Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jia P, Dong L, Yang X, Wang B, Bush SJ, Wang T, Lin J, Wang S, Zhao X, Xu T, Che Y, Dang N, Ren L, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liang F, Wang Y, Ruan J, Xia H, Zheng Y, Shi L, Lv Y, Wang J, Ye K. Haplotype-resolved assemblies and variant benchmark of a Chinese Quartet. Genome Biol 2023; 24:277. [PMID: 38049885 PMCID: PMC10694985 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03116-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent state-of-the-art sequencing technologies enable the investigation of challenging regions in the human genome and expand the scope of variant benchmarking datasets. Herein, we sequence a Chinese Quartet, comprising two monozygotic twin daughters and their biological parents, using four short and long sequencing platforms (Illumina, BGI, PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore Technology). RESULTS The long reads from the monozygotic twin daughters are phased into paternal and maternal haplotypes using the parent-child genetic map and for each haplotype. We also use long reads to generate haplotype-resolved whole-genome assemblies with completeness and continuity exceeding that of GRCh38. Using this Quartet, we comprehensively catalogue the human variant landscape, generating a dataset of 3,962,453 SNVs, 886,648 indels (< 50 bp), 9726 large deletions (≥ 50 bp), 15,600 large insertions (≥ 50 bp), 40 inversions, 31 complex structural variants, and 68 de novo mutations which are shared between the monozygotic twin daughters. Variants underrepresented in previous benchmarks owing to their complexity-including those located at long repeat regions, complex structural variants, and de novo mutations-are systematically examined in this study. CONCLUSIONS In summary, this study provides high-quality haplotype-resolved assemblies and a comprehensive set of benchmarking resources for two Chinese monozygotic twin samples which, relative to existing benchmarks, offers expanded genomic coverage and insight into complex variant categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Jia
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Center for Mathematical Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Lianhua Dong
- National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xiaofei Yang
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- Genome Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Bo Wang
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Stephen J Bush
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Tingjie Wang
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Center for Mathematical Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Jiadong Lin
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Songbo Wang
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Xixi Zhao
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Center for Mathematical Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Tun Xu
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Yizhuo Che
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Ningxin Dang
- Genome Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Luyao Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, School of Life Sciences and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China
| | - Yujing Zhang
- National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xia Wang
- National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Fan Liang
- GrandOmics Biosciences, Beijing, 100089, China
| | - Yang Wang
- GrandOmics Biosciences, Beijing, 100089, China
| | - Jue Ruan
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, China
| | - Han Xia
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
| | - Yuanting Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, School of Life Sciences and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China
| | - Leming Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute, School of Life Sciences and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China
| | - Yi Lv
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Center for Mathematical Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
| | - Jing Wang
- National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
| | - Kai Ye
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Center for Mathematical Medical, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
- School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
- MOE Key Lab for Intelligent Networks & Networks Security, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
- Genome Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.
- Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Leiden, 2311EZ, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Szapacs M, Jian W, Spellman D, Cunliffe J, Verburg E, Kaur S, Kellie J, Li W, Mehl J, Qian M, Qiu X, Sirtori FR, Rosenbaum AI, Sikorski T, Surapaneni S, Wang J, Wilson A, Zhang J, Xue Y, Post N, Huang Y, Goykhman D, Yuan L, Fang K, Casavant E, Chen L, Fu Y, Huang M, Ji A, Johnson J, Lassman M, Li J, Saad O, Sarvaiya H, Tao L, Wang Y, Zheng N, Dasgupta A, Abhari MR, Ishii-Watabe A, Saito Y, Mendes Fernandes DN, Bower J, Burns C, Carleton K, Cho SJ, Du X, Fjording M, Garofolo F, Kar S, Kavetska O, Kossary E, Lu Y, Mayer A, Palackal N, Salha D, Thomas E, Verhaeghe T, Vinter S, Wan K, Wang YM, Williams K, Woolf E, Yang L, Yang E, Bandukwala A, Hopper S, Maher K, Xu J, Brodsky E, Cludts I, Irwin C, Joseph J, Kirshner S, Manangeeswaran M, Maxfield K, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Solstad T, Thacker S, Tounekti O, Verthelyi D, Wadhwa M, Wagner L, Yamamoto T, Zhang L, Zhou L. 2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: ICH M10 BMV Guideline & Global Harmonization; Hybrid Assays; Oligonucleotides & ADC; Non-Liquid & Rare Matrices; Regulatory Inputs ( Part 1A - Recommendations on Mass Spectrometry, Chromatography and Sample Preparation, Novel Technologies, Novel Modalities, and Novel Challenges, ICH M10 BMV Guideline & Global Harmonization Part 1B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV, Biomarkers/CDx/BAV, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine). Bioanalysis 2023; 15:955-1016. [PMID: 37650500 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2023-0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (16th WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on the ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 15 and 14 (2023), respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Mehl
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yongjun Xue
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | - Yue Huang
- AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ola Saad
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Naiyu Zheng
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yang Lu
- US FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Li Yang
- US FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Eric Yang
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pan L, Mora J, Walravens K, Wagner L, Hopper S, Loo L, Bettoun D, Bond S, Dessy F, Downing S, Garofolo F, Gupta S, Henderson N, Irwin C, Ishii-Watabe A, Kar S, Jawa V, Joseph J, Malvaux L, Marshall JC, McDevitt J, Mohapatra S, Seitzer J, Smith J, Solstad T, Sugimoto H, Tounekti O, Wu B, Wu Y, Xu Y, Xu J, Yamamoto T, Yang L, Torri A, Kirshner S, Maxfield K, Vasconcelos JP, Abhari MR, Verthelyi D, Brodsky E, Carrasco-Triguero M, Kamerud J, Andisik M, Baltrukonis D, Bivi N, Cludts I, Coble K, Gorovits B, Gunn GR, Gupta S, Millner AH, Joyce A, Kubiak RJ, Kumar S, Liao K, Manangeeswaran M, Partridge M, Pine S, Poetzl J, Rajadhyaksha M, Rasamoelisolo M, Richards S, Song Y, Swanson S, Thacker S, Wadhwa M, Wolf A, Zhang L, Zhou L. 2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: FDA Draft Guidance on Immunogenicity Information in Prescription Drug Labeling, LNP & Viral Vectors Therapeutics/Vaccines Immunogenicity, Prolongation Effect, ADA Affinity, Risk-based Approaches, NGS, qPCR, ddPCR Assays ( Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment of Biotherapeutics and Novel Modalities; NAb Assays Integrated Approach). Bioanalysis 2023; 15:773-814. [PMID: 37526071 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2023-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2022 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 15 (2023), respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vibha Jawa
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuan Song
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boßelmann CM, Leu C, Lal D. Technological and computational approaches to detect somatic mosaicism in epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis 2023:106208. [PMID: 37343892 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Lesional epilepsy is a common and severe disease commonly associated with malformations of cortical development, including focal cortical dysplasia and hemimegalencephaly. Recent advances in sequencing and variant calling technologies have identified several genetic causes, including both short/single nucleotide and structural somatic variation. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodological advancements in this field while highlighting the unresolved technological and computational challenges that persist, including ultra-low variant allele fractions in bulk tissue, low availability of paired control samples, spatial variability of mutational burden within the lesion, and the issue of false-positive calls and validation procedures. Information from genetic testing in focal epilepsy may be integrated into clinical care to inform histopathological diagnosis, postoperative prognosis, and candidate precision therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian M Boßelmann
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Costin Leu
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Dennis Lal
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, USA; Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Genome-Wide Sequencing Modalities for Children with Unexplained Global Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disabilities—A Narrative Review. CHILDREN 2023; 10:children10030501. [PMID: 36980059 PMCID: PMC10047410 DOI: 10.3390/children10030501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Unexplained global developmental delay (GDD) and intellectual disabilities (ID) together affect nearly 2% of the pediatric population. Establishing an etiologic diagnosis is crucial for disease management, prognostic evaluation, and provision of physical and psychological support for both the patient and the family. Advancements in genome sequencing have allowed rapid accumulation of gene–disorder associations and have accelerated the search for an etiologic diagnosis for unexplained GDD/ID. We reviewed recent studies that utilized genome-wide analysis technologies, and we discussed their diagnostic yield, strengths, and limitations. Overall, exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) outperformed chromosomal microarrays and targeted panel sequencing. GS provides coverage for both ES and chromosomal microarray regions, providing the maximal diagnostic potential, and the cost of ES and reanalysis of ES-negative results is currently still lower than that of GS alone. Therefore, singleton or trio ES is the more cost-effective option for the initial investigation of individuals with GDD/ID in clinical practice compared to a staged approach or GS alone. Based on these updated evidence, we proposed an evaluation algorithm with ES as the first-tier evaluation for unexplained GDD/ID.
Collapse
|