The efficacy of oral and subcutaneous antigen-specific immunotherapy in murine cow's milk- and peanut allergy models

Microneedles Coated with Cow's Milk Proteins: Immunogenicity, Stability, and Safety Assessment

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most frequently occurring food allergies in children, especially in infants less than 3 years old. Mindful avoidance of CMA-triggering foods and prompt epinephrine injection to overcome anaphylaxis in the case of accidental ingestion are the only options currently available to allergic subjects. This study investigates the potential of coated microneedles for delivering CMA into the skin as a novel approach to allergen immunotherapy. Precise amounts of cow's milk proteins (CMP) were dip-coated onto stainless steel microneedle patches and reproducibly delivered to mice epidermis and dermis. Microneedle delivery did not cause bleeding or visible erythema and did not induce skin alarmins, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and IL-33. Dose-dependent elevations in cow's milk allergen-specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a levels were observed in Balb/c mice after three weekly microneedle immunizations. Microneedle immunizations proved to be as effective as subcutaneous immunizations without elevating undesired allergen-specific IgE. Moreover, microneedles could be stored at room temperature for at least three months without deterioration in coating integrity. Overall, these results suggest that coated microneedles are viable candidates for treating CMA, warranting further investigation.

Evaluation of peanut tolerance in sensitized mice through intradermal allergen delivery with adjuvants

Peanut allergy is a significant worldwide health issue and requires innovative approaches to provide safer and more effective treatments. This study explores the potential of intradermal immunotherapy using peanut formulations combined with adjuvants. Six groups of BALB/c mice previously sensitized to peanut received intradermal treatments every other week for three months comprising of: Group 1 (G1) = Peanut extract (PE) + epinephrine (EPN); G2 = PE + EPN + topical Aldara® pretreatment; G3 = PE + EPN + topical imiquimod (IMQ) micellar gel pretreatment; G4 = PE + EPN + monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) + IMQ; G5 = PE + EPN + IMQ; G6 = Peanut powder + EPN + hyaluronic acid (HA). Clinical scores of peanut allergy, serological levels of peanut-specific IgE (Pe-IgE), IgG1, IgG2a, and histamine were compared before and after treatment, alongside studies on IMQ permeation and the pharmacokinetics of major peanut allergen ara h 2. Clinical scores improved significantly in all groups except G2 (trend towards improvement without statistical significance). Pe-IgE level decreased in G1, G2, and G3, while Pe-IgG1 increased in G1, G3, and G4. G3 alone showed a significant rise in Pe-IgG2a. No group was statistically superior to G1 after adjusting for differences in cumulative allergen doses received and initial IgE levels. Ex vivo experiments revealed that IMQ micellar gel in G3 enhanced skin permeation compared to Aldara®. Additionally, ara h 2 absorption was significantly reduced in naive mice treated with PE and HA. Baseline treatment of PE and EPN effectively reduced markers of peanut allergy. However, addition of TLR-agonist adjuvants or HA did not yield statistically significant improvements compared to baseline (G1).

Dose and route of administration determine the efficacy of prophylactic immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a Brown Norway rat model

Introduction

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) is emerging as a viable option for treatment of peanut allergy. Yet, prophylactic IT remains unexplored despite early introduction of peanut in infancy was shown to prevent allergy. There is a need to understand how allergens interact with the immune system depending on the route of administration, and how different dosages of allergen may protect from sensitisation and a clinical active allergy. Here we compared peanut allergen delivery via the oral, sublingual (SL), intragastric (IG) and subcutaneous (SC) routes for the prevention of peanut allergy in Brown Norway (BN) rats.

Methods

BN rats were administered PBS or three different doses of peanut protein extract (PPE) via either oral IT (OIT), SLIT, IGIT or SCIT followed by intraperitoneal (IP) injections of PPE to assess the protection from peanut sensitisation. The development of IgE and IgG1 responses to PPE and the major peanut allergens were evaluated by ELISAs. The clinical response to PPE was assessed by an ear swelling test (EST) and proliferation was assessed by stimulating splenocytes with PPE.

Results

Low and medium dose OIT (1 and 10 mg) and all doses of SCIT (1, 10, 100 µg) induced sensitisation to PPE, whereas high dose OIT (100 mg), SLIT (10, 100 or 1000 µg) or IGIT (1, 10 and 100 mg) did not. High dose OIT and SLIT as well as high and medium dose IGIT prevented sensitisation from the following IP injections of PPE and suppressed PPE-specific IgE levels in a dose-dependent manner. Hence, administration of peanut protein via different routes confers different risks for sensitisation and protection from peanut allergy development. Overall, the IgE levels toward the individual major peanut allergens followed the PPE-specific IgE levels.

Discussion

Collectively, this study showed that the preventive effect of allergen-specific IT is determined by the interplay between the specific site of PPE delivery for presentation to the immune system, and the allergen quantity, and that targeting and modulating tolerance mechanisms at specific mucosal sites may be a prophylactic strategy for prevention of peanut allergy.

An overview of the current state of food desensitization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the current evidence on food desensitization in children with food allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Food Allergen Specific Immunotherapy (FA-AIT) is currently recognised as a treatment option for treating children with allergy at least to the main common foods (i.e. milk, egg and peanut). The oral route of administration has been proven to be the most effective in achieving desensitisation. Efforts are devoted to overcome the current unmet needs mainly related to safety issues and long-term efficacy, as well as adherence to the treatment and improvement of health-related quality of life. In this perspective, alternative routes of administration and adjunctive treatments are under investigation.

SUMMARY

The future of food allergy management is a personalised approach based on a shared decision-making that takes into account the needs of patients and families. Health professionals will be able to offer multiple treatment options, including FA-AIT with adjunctive or alternative therapies. Thus, patients should be correctly identified, using validated predictive factors, in order to select appropriate candidates for these therapies.

Targeted allergen-specific immunotherapy within the skin improves allergen delivery to induce desensitization to peanut

Aim: Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) with peanut has been demonstrated to be safe but efficacy may be limited by allergen uptake through the skin barrier. To enhance allergen uptake into the skin, the authors used peanut-coated microneedles and compared them with EPIT in a peanut allergy mouse model. Methods: Sensitized mice were treated with peanut-coated microneedles or peanut-EPIT and then challenged with peanut to determine protection. Results: Treatment with peanut-coated microneedles was safe and showed enhanced desensitization to peanut compared with peanut-EPIT administered via a similar schedule. Protection was associated with reduced Th2 immune responses and mast cell accumulation in the intestine. Conclusion: Peanut-coated microneedles have the potential to present a safe method of improving allergen delivery for cutaneous immunotherapy.

Food Allergen Nitration Enhances Safety and Efficacy of Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy

(1) Background: Posttranslational protein modifications have been demonstrated to change protein allergenicity. Previously, it was reported that pretreatment with highly nitrated food proteins induced a tolerogenic immune response in an experimental mouse model and in human immune cells. Here, we investigated a possible therapeutic effect of modified proteins and evaluated the safety of oral exposure to highly nitrated proteins in an experimental food allergy model. (2) Methods: BALB/c mice were orally sensitized towards ovalbumin (OVA) under gastric acid suppression. Thereafter, treatment via intragastric gavage with maximally nitrated OVA (nOVAmax) and OVA as a control was performed six times every 2 weeks. On the last day of experiments, all the treated mice were orally challenged with OVA. Systemic anaphylactic reaction was determined by measuring the core body temperature. Moreover, antibody levels, regulatory T cell numbers, cytokine levels and histology of antrum tissues were analyzed. (3) Results: After oral immunotherapy, OVA-specific IgE titers were decreased while IgG1 titers were significantly elevated in the mice receiving OVA. After oral challenge with OVA, nOVAmax-treated allergic animals showed no drop of the core body temperature, which was observed for OVA-allergic and OVA-treated allergic animals. Significantly fewer eosinophils and mast cells were found in the gastric mucosa of the allergic mice after nOVAmax treatment. (4) Conclusions: Oral immunotherapy with nOVAmax reduced allergic reactions upon allergen exposure and the number of allergen effector cells in the gastric mucosa. Thus, maximally nitrated allergens enabled an efficient and safe treatment for food allergy in our experimental model.

New and Emerging Concepts and Therapies for the Treatment of Food Allergy

Food allergy is an increasingly common disease that often starts in early childhood and lasts throughout life. Self-reported food allergy has risen at a rate of 1.2% per decade since 1988, and by 2018, the prevalence of food allergy in the United States was estimated to be 8% in children and 11% in adults.^- This prevalence has led to an economic burden of almost $25 billion annually. Despite these staggering statistics, as of the time of this writing, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has only approved one treatment for food allergy, which is limited to use in children with peanut allergy. Fortunately, a new horizon of therapeutic interventions, in all stages of development, lay ahead and hold promise for the near future.

Sublingual Immunotherapy: How Sublingual Allergen Administration Heals Allergic Diseases; Current Perspective about the Mode of Action

Owing to the successful application of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has become one of the leading treatments for allergic diseases. Similar to the case with other AITs, such as subcutaneous and oral immunotherapies, not only the alleviation of allergic symptoms, but also the curing of the diseases can be expected in patients undergoing SLIT. However, how and why such strong efficacy is obtained by SLIT, in which allergens are simply administered under the tongue, is not clearly known. Various potential mechanisms, including the induction of blocking antibodies, T cell tolerance, regulatory B and T cells, CD103^-CD11b⁺ classical dendritic cells, and CD206⁺ macrophages, and the reduction of innate lymphoid cells, mast cells, and basophils, have been suggested. Recently, through a comparative analysis between high- and non-responder patients of SLIT, we have successfully proposed several novel mechanisms. Here, we introduce our recent findings and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying the strong efficacy of SLIT.

Applications of Mouse Models to the Study of Food Allergy

Mouse models of allergic disease offer numerous advantages when compared to the models of other animals. However, selection of appropriate mouse models is critical to advance the field of food allergy by revealing mechanisms of allergy and for testing novel therapeutic approaches. All current mouse models for food allergy have weaknesses that may limit their applicability to human disease. Aspects such as the genetic predisposition to allergy or tolerance from the strain of mouse used, allergen dose, route of exposure (oral, intranasal, intraperitoneal, or epicutaneous), damage of the epithelial barrier, use of adjuvants, food matrix effects, or composition of the microbiota should be considered prior to the selection of a specific murine model and contemplated according to the intended purpose of the study. This chapter reviews our current knowledge on the application of mouse models to food allergy research and the variables that may influence the successful development of each type of model.

Induction of Hypersensitivity with Purified Beta-Lactoglobulin as a Mouse Model of Cow's Milk Allergy

Cow's milk allergy is one of the most prevalent food allergies in both children and adults. As dairy products are common dietary ingredients and the prevalence of chronic conditions is on the rise, milk allergy is a growing public health concern. To elucidate underlying mechanisms and develop therapeutic strategies, reliable animal models are essential research tools. Sensitization to a milk protein is the principal procedure for establishing animal models of cow's milk allergy. However, the methods of sensitization vary from laboratory to laboratory, using different milk proteins with different amounts, routes, and durations of allergen exposure during sensitization of varying sex and strains of mice, likely resulting in diverse immunological and physical responses. Furthermore, the sources and potential impurities of milk protein may also produce variable responses. Thus, standardization of sensitization protocol is important, particularly when results are compared across studies. Here, we describe a method to generate a mouse model of cow's milk allergy using purified β-lactoglobulin as the milk allergen with cholera toxin as an adjuvant in a 5-week oral sensitization protocol.

Decreased Histone Acetylation Levels at Th1 and Regulatory Loci after Induction of Food Allergy

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy against cow's milk protein fractions such as whey is one of the most common food-related allergic disorders of early childhood. Histone acetylation is an important epigenetic mechanism, shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of allergies. However, its role in food allergy remains unknown. IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy was successfully induced in a mouse model, as demonstrated by acute allergic symptoms, whey-specific IgE in serum, and the activation of mast cells upon a challenge with whey protein. The elicited allergic response coincided with reduced percentages of regulatory T (Treg) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells, matching decreased levels of H3 and/or H4 histone acetylation at pivotal Treg and Th17 loci, an epigenetic status favoring lower gene expression. In addition, histone acetylation levels at the crucial T helper 1 (Th1) loci were decreased, most probably preceding the expected reduction in Th1 cells after inducing an allergic response. No changes were observed for T helper 2 cells. However, increased histone acetylation levels, promoting gene expression, were observed at the signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (Stat6) gene, a proallergic B cell locus, which was in line with the presence of whey-specific IgE. In conclusion, the observed histone acetylation changes are pathobiologically in line with the successful induction of cow's milk allergy, to which they might have also contributed mechanistically.

A multi-center assessment to compare residual allergenicity of partial hydrolyzed whey proteins in a murine model for cow's milk allergy - Comparison to the single parameter guinea pig model

INTRODUCTION

This 4-center study is part of a project to validate a food allergy murine model for safety testing of hydrolyzed infant formulas.

AIM

The aim of the current multi-center experiment was to evaluate the residual allergenicity of three partial hydrolyzed whey proteins (pWH) in a multiple-parameter cow's milk allergy murine model and to compare to the classically used guinea pig model. Previous work showed differences in the magnitude of the allergic response to whey between centers. To get a first insight in the effect of housing on the robustness of the mouse model, microbiota composition of non-sensitized mice was analyzed and compared between centers.

METHODS

Mice were sensitized intragastrically (i.g.) with whey, pWH or eWH using cholera toxin as an adjuvant. In mice, whey-IgE/IgG1, acute allergic symptoms were determined upon whey challenge. Guinea pigs were orally sensitized ad libitum via the drinking water (day 0-37) and challenged intravenously with whey on day 49. The microbial composition in fecal samples was determined in non-sensitized mice in all 4 research centers before and after conduct of the study.

RESULTS

Elevated levels of whey-IgG1 were detected in whey-sensitized mice in all centers. Except for pWH-A in center 4, we observed elevated levels of whey-IgE in whey-sensitized mice and mice sensitized with pWH-A, -B, -C. Center 2 was excluded from further analysis because of non-significant IgE levels in the positive control. In contrast to whey-mice, pWH-A treated mice showed no acute skin response, mMCP-1 release or change in body temperature upon whey challenge in all centers, which corresponds with the absence of anaphylactic shock symptoms in both the mouse and guinea pig model. pWH-B and -C induced anaphylactic shock symptoms in the guinea-pig and mice whereas results on the remaining allergic outcomes in mice were inconclusive. No differences in microbiota composition were measured in response to the challenge and Microbiota composition depended on the location of the centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both animal models showed comparable results on the residual allergenicity of partial hydrolyzed whey proteins, but none of the centers was able to differentiate between the residual sensitizing capacities of the pWH-B and -C based on a single elicitation parameter in the murine model. Differences in microbiota composition might contribute to the robustness of the food allergy murine model. For a well-balanced prediction on the potential allergenicity of hydrolyzed infant formulas a multiple murine parameter model is suggested to decrease the risk of false positive or false negative results. A future challenge is to develop an overall scoring system for proper risk assessment, taking all parameters into account.

Intranasal nanoemulsion vaccine confers long-lasting immunomodulation and sustained unresponsiveness in a murine model of milk allergy

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy for food allergy requires prolonged treatment protocols and, in most cases, does not lead to durable modulation of the allergic immune response. We have demonstrated an intranasal (IN) nanoemulsion adjuvant that redirects allergen-specific Th2 responses toward Th1 and Th17 immunity, and protects from allergen challenge after only 2-4 monthly administrations. Here, we investigate the ability of this technology to provide long-term modulation of allergy in a murine model of cow's milk allergy.

METHODS

Six weeks after sensitization to bovine casein, mice received four, monthly IN immunizations with nanoemulsion formulated with casein. Protection from casein challenge was assessed at 4 and 16 weeks after the final vaccine administration.

RESULTS

The NE vaccine significantly blunted the physiological responses to allergen challenge, and this effect persisted for at least 16 weeks. The protection from challenge was associated with the suppression of casein-specific Th2 immunity and induced Th1 and Th17 cytokines as well as induction of IL-10. Of interest, while immunized animals showed significantly decreased Th2 cytokine responses, cow's milk-specific IgE remained elevated in the serum at levels associated with reactivity in control sensitized animals. Protection was associated with suppressed mast cell activation and markedly reduced mast cell infiltration into the small intestine.

CONCLUSION

The sustained unresponsiveness of at least 16 weeks after vaccination suggests that the nanoemulsion vaccine alters the allergic phenotype in a persistent manner different from traditional desensitization, and this leads to long-term suppressive effects on allergic disease without eliminating serum IgE.

A Solid-in-Oil Nanodispersion System for Transcutaneous Immunotherapy of Cow's Milk Allergies

An allergy to cow’s milk proteins is the most common food allergy in infants and toddlers. Conventional oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergies requires hospital admission due to the risk of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Therefore, a simpler and safer immunotherapeutic method is desirable. We examined transcutaneous immunotherapy with a solid-in-oil (S/O) system. In the S/O system, nano-sized particles of proteins are dispersed in an oil-vehicle with the assistance of nonionic surfactants. In the present study, the S/O system enhanced the skin permeation of the allergen molecule β-lactoglobulin (BLG), as compared with a control PBS solution. The patches containing BLG in the S/O nanodispersion skewed the immune response in the allergy model mice toward T helper type 1 immunity, indicating the amelioration of allergic symptoms. This effect was more pronounced when the immunomodulator resiquimod (R-848) was included in the S/O system.

Microneedles coated with peanut allergen enable desensitization of peanut sensitized mice

The prevalence of peanut allergies has escalated over the last 20 years, yet there are no FDA approved treatments for peanut allergies. In this study we evaluated the potential of microneedles to deliver peanut protein extract (PE) into skin and assessed if the ensuing immune responses could desensitize mice that were sensitized to peanuts. Peanut sensitized mice were either treated through cutaneous immunotherapy using PE-coated microneedles or not treated, and then orally challenged with PE. After oral challenge, the clinical symptoms of peanut-induced anaphylaxis were significantly lower in the microneedle treated mice as compared to untreated mice, and this was accompanied by down-regulation of systemic anaphylaxis mediators such as histamine and mast cell protease-1 (MCPT-1) in the microneedles treated group. Overall, there was an up-regulation of Th1 cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ) as compared to Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5) in splenocyte culture supernatants of the microneedle treated group as compared to untreated group, suggesting that microneedles promoted immune modulation towards the Th1 pathway. Furthermore, mice treated with PE-coated microneedles were observed to retain integrity of their small intestine villi and had reduced eosinophilic infiltration as compared to the untreated but peanut sensitized mice, which further confirmed the desensitization capability of peanut cutaneous immunotherapy using coated microneedles. Thus, our current study represents a novel minimally invasive microneedle based cutaneous immunotherapy, which may provide a novel route of desensitization for the treatment of peanut allergies.

A network-based approach for identifying suitable biomarkers for oral immunotherapy of food allergy

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising therapeutic approach to treat food allergic patients. However, concerns with regards to safety and long-term efficacy of OIT remain. There is a need to identify biomarkers that predict, monitor and/or evaluate the effects of OIT. Here we present a method to select candidate biomarkers for efficacy and safety assessment of OIT using the computational approaches Bayesian networks (BN) and Topological Data Analysis (TDA).

RESULTS

Data were used from fructo-oligosaccharide diet-supported OIT experiments performed in 3 independent cow's milk allergy (CMA) and 2 independent peanut allergy (PNA) experiments in mice. Bioinformatical approaches were used to understand the data structure. The BN predicted the efficacy of OIT in the CMA with 86% and indicated a clear effect of scFOS/lcFOS on allergy parameters. For the PNA model, this BN (trained on CMA data) predicted an efficacy of OIT with 76% accuracy and shows similar effects of the allergen, treatment and diet as compared to the CMA model. The TDA identified clusters of biomarkers closely linked to biologically relevant clinical symptoms and also unrelated and redundant parameters within the network.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we provide a promising application of computational approaches to a) compare mechanistic features of two different food allergies during OIT b) determine the biological relevance of candidate biomarkers c) generate new hypotheses to explain why CMA has a different disease pattern than PNA and d) select relevant biomarkers for future studies.

Non-digestible oligosaccharides scFOS/lcFOS facilitate safe subcutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy

BACKGROUND

Improving the safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for food allergy is necessary to reduce side effects and achieve long-term tolerance. We determined the effect of dietary supplementation with 1% non-digestible short- and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (scFOS/lcFOS) on safety and efficacy of SCIT using a peanut allergy mouse model.

METHODS

After sensitization, mice received a scFOS/lcFOS or control diet for the rest of the study. To study safety of SCIT, mice were dosed with a single subcutaneous injection of peanut extract (PE) or PBS. To study efficacy, mice were dosed subcutaneously (SCIT, 3 times/week) with PE or PBS for 3 weeks. Hereafter, acute allergic skin responses, anaphylactic shock symptoms and body temperature were assessed. To study the mechanism in vitro, the human IgE receptor (FcεRI)-transfected rat mast cell (RBL) line was sensitized with an oligoclonal pool of chimeric human (chu)IgE antibodies against bovine β-lactoglobulin (BLG) and incubated with the oligosaccharides before exposure to BLG to assess direct the effect on degranulation.

RESULTS

scFOS/lcFOS reduced anaphylaxis caused by a single PE SCIT dose. scFOS/lcFOS alone also reduced the acute allergic skin response. Moreover, scFOS/lcFOS supplementation resulted in lower MMCP-1 levels in serum after PE SCIT dose compared to control diet, while antibody levels were not affected by the diet. In vitro incubation with scFOS/lcFOS at 0.5% suppressed the degranulation of IgE-sensitized RBL cells. However, dietary supplementation with scFOS/lcFOS did not improve the efficacy of SCIT.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that scFOS/lcFOS diet improves the safety of SCIT, as evidenced by lower anaphylactic responses without compromising the efficacy in a mouse model for peanut allergy. This effect is likely to result from the suppression of mast cell effector function.

Mouse strain differences in response to oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy

BACKGROUND

Promising therapies for food allergy are emerging, mostly based on animal experimentation. However, different mouse strains are used, which may make it hard to compare experiments. The current study investigated whether the immunological differences between C3H/HeOuJ (C3H) and BALB/c mice lead to differences in efficacy of peanut-specific immunotherapy.

METHODS

After sensitization using peanut extract (PE), C3H and BALB/c mice received oral immunotherapy (OIT) by intragastric dosing for three weeks. Hereafter, mice were exposed to PE via the intradermal, intragastric and intraperitoneal route, to determine allergic outcomes. Furthermore, PE-specific antibody and cytokine production were determined and the number of various immune cells at different time points during the study were measured.

RESULTS

OIT protected C3H mice against anaphylaxis, whereas no anaphylaxis was seen in BALB/c mice. In contrast, OIT induced an increase in MMCP-1 levels in BALB/c mice but not in C3H mice. No effect of OIT on the acute allergic skin response was observed in either strain. Specific antibody responses showed similar patterns in both strains for IgA and IgG1. IgE levels were a tenfold higher in BALB/c mice and after the intragastric challenge (day 70) OIT-treated BALB/c mice showed induced IgE levels. Moreover, in C3H mice IgG2a levels were higher and increased in response to OIT and challenges. After the final challenge, but not at other timepoints MLN-derived lymphocytes from OIT-treated BALB/c mice produced less IL-13 and IL-5 compared to control-treated mice, whereas no differences were seen in case of C3H mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results show that the C3H strain is more suitable to study clinical outcomes of OIT, whereas the BALB/c strain is more optimal to study T cell responses.

Butyrate Enhances Desensitization Induced by Oral Immunotherapy in Cow's Milk Allergic Mice

Background

In previous studies, we showed that a fructo-oligosaccharide- (FOS-) supplemented diet enhanced oral immunotherapy (OIT) efficacy in a mouse model for cow's milk allergy. Fermentation of FOS by intestinal bacteria leads to production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) including butyrate.

Aim

To investigate the contribution of butyrate in the enhanced efficacy of OIT + FOS.

Methods

C3H/HeOuJ mice were sensitized and received OIT with or without FOS or butyrate supplementation. After treatment, whole blood was collected to conduct a basophil activation test (BAT) and allergen challenges were performed to measure acute allergic symptoms. CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells (Tregs) were isolated from treated mice or differentiated in vitro and used in a bone marrow-derived mast cell (BMMC) suppression assay. Cecum content was collected to analyze SCFA concentrations.

Results

Allergen-induced basophil activation was reduced in OIT + butyrate samples compared to OIT. Accordingly, the acute allergic skin response and mast cell degranulation upon challenge were reduced in OIT + butyrate and OIT + FOS mice compared to sensitized controls. Butyrate was increased in the cecum content of OIT + FOS mice compared to OIT mice and sensitized controls. Treg-mediated BMMC suppression was enhanced after in vivo butyrate and FOS exposure in combination with OIT but with a more pronounced effect for butyrate.

Conclusion

Butyrate supplementation enhanced OIT-induced desensitization of basophils and mast cells and Treg functionality. Only OIT + FOS treatment induced potential microbial alterations, shown by increased butyrate levels in cecum content. Both butyrate and FOS are promising candidates to improve OIT efficacy in human studies to treat food allergies.

Basophil Activation Test: Old and New Applications in Allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The basophil activation test (BAT) using flow cytometry has supplanted traditional methods of measuring basophil degranulation using histamine and other mediator release, and can be used for clinical applications as well as to explore the immune mechanisms of effector cell response to allergen. This review discusses the advancements made in clinical, diagnostic and laboratory research of allergy utilizing an ever-evolving BAT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Being an in vitro surrogate of the allergic reaction that happens in vivo in the sick patient, the BAT can be used to support the diagnosis of various allergic conditions, such as food, drug, respiratory and insect venom allergies, and the assessment of clinical response to allergen-specific immunotherapy and other immunomodulatory treatments. The BAT can also be used for research purposes to explore the mechanisms of allergy and tolerance at the level of the basophil, for instance by manipulating IgE and IgG and their receptors and by studying intracellular signalling cascade in response to allergen. This review covers the applications of the BAT to the clinical management of allergic patients and the increased understanding of the mechanisms of immune response to allergens as well as technological advancements made in recent years.

The Multifaceted B Cell Response in Allergen Immunotherapy

While allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for IgE-mediated diseases holds curative potential, the considerable heterogeneity in clinical outcomes may relate to the complex mechanisms of tolerance. The regulation of humoral immunity by AIT contributes to the suppression of allergic responses. Recent findings have revealed novel roles for IgA and IgG antibodies in the induction of tolerance. These mechanisms synergize with their ability to block allergen-IgE binding and mediate inhibitory signaling of effector cells of the allergic response. In addition, the regulatory activity of B cells in AIT extends beyond IL-10 secretion and induction of IgG₄. Here, we review the evolution of the B cell response during AIT with special emphasis on the novel protective mechanisms entailing humoral immunity.

Dietary Supplementation with Nondigestible Oligosaccharides Reduces Allergic Symptoms and Supports Low Dose Oral Immunotherapy in a Peanut Allergy Mouse Model

SCOPE

A major downside of oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy is the risk of severe side effects. Non-digestible short- and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (scFOS/lcFOS) reduce allergy development in murine models. Therefore, it is hypothesized that scFOS/lcFOS can also support the efficacy of OIT in a peanut allergy model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After sensitization to peanut extract (PE) using cholera toxin, C3H/HeOuJ mice are fed a 1% scFOS/lcFOS or control diet and receive OIT (1.5 or 15 mg PE). Hereafter, mice are exposed to PE via different routes to determine the safety and efficacy of treatment in clinical outcomes, PE-specific antibody production, and numbers of various immune cells. scFOS/lcFOS increases short-chain fatty acid levels in the caecum and reduce the acute allergic skin response and drop in body temperature after PE exposure. Interestingly, 15 mg and 1.5 mg OIT with scFOS/lcFOS induce protection against anaphylaxis, whereas 1.5 mg OIT alone does not. OIT, with or without scFOS/lcFOS, induces PE-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) IgG and IgA levels and increases CD103+ dendritic cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

scFOS/lcFOS and scFOS/lcFOS combined with low dose OIT are able to protect against a peanut-allergic anaphylactic response.