First-Line Treatment of Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Mantle-Cell Lymphoma With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus R-CHOP or R-CVP: Results of the BRIGHT 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Colonic lymphomatous polyposis mantle cell lymphoma: a case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract that may present as multiple lymphomatous polyposis. We report a case of lymphomatous polyposis with a review of the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old man of Black ethnicity and Ivorian nationality with no relevant past medical history, consulted for a sudden onset symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction, which evolved over 2 days. Macroscopic examination revealed the presence of multiple polyploid formations of the colonic mucosa. Histology showed diffuse lymphomatous proliferation of submucosa consisting off small lymphoid cells with a hyperchromatic crenelated nucleus, suggesting lymphomatous polyposis. Immunohistochemical examination showed expression by the tumor cells of antibodies to CD20, CD5, Bcl2, and cyclin D1. They did not express antibodies to CD10 and CD23. The Ki67 proliferation index was 25%. We have thus retained the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphomatous polyposis.

CONCLUSION

Multiple lymphomatous polyposis is a rare entity characterized by the presence of numerous gastrointestinal polyploid lesions sometimes involving several segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Typical lymphoma presenting as lymphomatous polyposis is mantle cell lymphoma; although, other tumors may have this aspect.

Front-line and second-line treatment for mantle cell lymphoma in clinical practice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

There are few reports of clinical practice treatment patterns and efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied a large, multicenter, cohort of patients with MCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 in eight institutions.

RESULTS

536 patients were registered (73% male, median of 70 years). Front-line treatment was based on high-dose cytarabine, bendamustine, and anthracyclines in 42%, 12%, and 15%, respectively. The median PFS for all patients was 45 months; 68, 34, and 30 months for those who received high-dose cytarabine-based, bendamustine-based and anthracycline-based therapy. 204 patients received second-line. Bendamustine-based treatment was the most common second-line regimen (36% of patients). The median second-line PFS (sPFS) for the entire cohort was 14 months; 19, 24, and 31 for bendamustine-, platinum-, and high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, with broad confidence intervals for these latter estimates. Patients treated with cytarabine-based therapies in the front-line and those with front-line PFS longer than 24 months had a substantially superior sPFS.

CONCLUSION

Front-line treatment in this cohort of MCL was as expected and with a median PFS of over 3.5 years. Second-line treatment strategies were heterogeneous and the median second-line PFS was little over 1 year.

Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of rituximab and chemotherapy is a first-line treatment for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has shown promising properties and activity in a variety of hematological malignancies. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide-based regimens in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published up to May 2022. Studies with patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, who were randomly assigned to a lenalidomide treatment group or a non-lenalidomide control group were considered for inclusion in this review and meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the time-to-event outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of dichotomous data were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 3593 patients from 10 studies were evaluated. The results of the pooled analysis indicated that the lenalidomide-based regimen was associated with prolonged overall survival (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97; P = 0.02) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.88; P = 0.002). Significant differences were found in the overall response rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.04-1.33; P = 0.01) and complete response rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.39; P = 0.05) between the treatment and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenalidomide appears to be a promising therapeutic agent that offers the possibility of a novel combination of chemotherapy free regimen for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Comparing R-Bendamustine vs. R-CHOP Plus Maintenance Therapy as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Follicular Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective GELTAMO Study

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and R-bendamustine (R-B) are the most common frontline treatment strategies for advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). After R-CHOP induction therapy, using rituximab for maintenance therapy notably improves outcomes; however, whether this can be achieved by using the same approach after R-B therapy is still being determined. This retrospective analysis compared 476 FL patients from 17 GELTAMO centers who received R-based regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy for untreated advanced-stage FL. The complete response rate at the end of induction was higher with R-B and relapses were more frequent with R-CHOP. During induction, cytopenias were significantly more frequent with R-CHOP and so was the use of colony-stimulating factors. During maintenance therapy, R-B showed more neutropenia and infectious toxicity. After a median follow-up of 81 months (95% CI: 77-86), the 6-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were 79% (95% CI: 72-86) for R-bendamustine vs. 67% (95% CI: 61-73) for R-CHOP (p = 0.046), and 6-year overall survival (OS) values were 91% (95% CI: 86-96) for R-B vs. 91% (95% CI: 87-94) for R-CHOP (p = 0.49). In conclusion, R-B followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated FL resulted in significantly longer PFS than R-CHOP, with older patients also benefiting from this treatment without further toxicity. Adverse events during maintenance were more frequent with R-B without impacting mortality.

End-of-treatment 18[F]-FDG PET can predict early progression in patients receiving bendamustine-rituximab for follicular lymphoma in first relapse: a prospective West Japan hematology Study Group (W-JHS) NHL01 trial

Response determined by 18[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT after induction therapy can predict progression-free survival (PFS) in follicular lymphoma (FL). However, little prospective research has examined the significance of PET after second-line therapy. We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II trial (W-JHS NHL01) of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) without rituximab maintenance for FL in first relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of end-of-treatment (EOT)-PET for predicting PFS in FL patients in first relapse. EOT-PET examinations were performed between 6 and 8 weeks from the start of the last BR cycle. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS. Key secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and 1-year overall survival (OS). Seventy-five patients were enrolled, and 8 were excluded from analysis. ORR was 86.6% and CRR was 59.7%. One-year PFS was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.7-94.3%) and 1-year OS in 75 patients was 97.3% (95% CI 89.6-99.3%). One-year PFS was significantly inferior in EOT-PET-positive patients (n = 9) compared with PET-negative patients (n = 58) (77.8% vs. 93.1%; p = 0.02). We confirmed that EOT-PET after second-line BR therapy could predict early progression in FL patients in first relapse.

Lenalidomide, rituximab (R2), and ixazomib for frontline treatment of high risk follicular and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) is an effective frontline treatment for patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). We investigated the safety and efficacy of addition of the proteasome inhibitor ixazomib to R2 for treatment of iNHL through a phase I/II clinical trial for high-risk patients. Twenty patients were enrolled, 18 were treated. The target dose of ixazomib 4 mg weekly was achieved during dose escalation. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were low grade gastrointestinal, rash, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia. There were 33% grade 2 and 17% grade 3 infections. With median follow-up of 5.2 years, four patients discontinued treatment due to lymphoma progression. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 61.2% [55.6% CR, 5.6% PR): 22.2% had stable disease and 16.7% had disease progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free and overall survival (OS) were 73% and 87% at 36 months, respectively. R2 can safely be combined with ixazomib for treatment-naïve iNHL patients.

R-CHOP treatment for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: Over 15-year follow-up of JCOG0203

Anti-CD20 antibody in combination with chemotherapy extends overall survival (OS) in untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL), yet the optimal associated therapy is unclear. Data on the cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies postrelapse after conventional immunochemotherapy are scarce. A long-term analysis of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment was conducted in a randomised clinical trial. A six-cycle R-CHOP regimen was administered every 2 or 3 weeks without rituximab maintenance. A prespecified evaluation was conducted 15 years after the completion of enrolment, following initial analysis results that showed no significant differences in outcomes at the 3-year mark. In-depth analyses were performed on the cohort of 248 patients with FL who were allocated to the two treatment arms. With a median follow-up period of 15.9 years, the 15-year OS was 76.2%. There were no protocol treatment-related deaths, nor were there any fatal infections attributable to subsequent lymphoma treatment. At 15 years, the cumulative incidence of non-haematological and haematological malignancies was 12.8% and 3.7% respectively. Histological transformation appeared after a median of 8 years. R-CHOP maintains safety and efficacy in patients with advanced FL over extended follow-up, making it a viable first-line option for patients with advanced-stage FL.

Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: A roadmap to do better than Pola-RCHP in DLBCL

In treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), oncologists have traditionally relied on the chemotherapy backbone of R-CHOP as standard of care. The two dangers that the hematologist must navigate between are the aggressive disease (Charybdis that in the absence of therapy systematically destroys all the ships) and the toxicity of the therapies (Scylla with its six monstrous heads that devours six crew members at a time), and hematologists have to navigate very carefully between both. Therefore, three different strategies were employed with the goal of improving cure rates: de-escalating regimens, escalating regimens, and replacement strategies. With a replacement strategy, a breakthrough in treatment was identified with polatuzumab vedotin (anti-CD79B antibody/drug conjugate) plus R-CHP. However, this regimen still did not achieve the elusive universal cure rate. Fortunately, advances in genomic and molecular technologies have allowed for an improved understanding of the heterogenous molecular nature of the disease to help develop and guide more targeted, precise, and individualized therapies. Additionally, new pharmaceutical technologies have led to the development of novel cellular therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, that could be more effective, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Thus, we aim to highlight the challenges of DLBCL therapy as well as the need to address therapeutic regimens eventually no longer tethered to a chemotherapy backbone. In the intersection of artificial intelligence and multi-omics (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics), we propose the need to analyze multidimensional biologic datato launch a decisive attack against DLBCL in a targeted and individualized fashion.

Cutaneous malignancies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common lymphoid malignancy that is associated with an increased risk of developing cutaneous malignancies. Clinical outcomes for these malignancies, including melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (KC), are worse for patients with CLL. Individuals with CLL develop an immunodeficiency of both the adaptive and innate immune system, which plays a role in the increased prevalence of skin cancers. This review focuses on the complex interplay between genetics, immunity, and pathogens that influence the cellular composition and biology of skin tumors and their microenvironment in CLL patients, and in comparison with other chronic hematological malignancies. It is paramount for dermatologists to be aware of the association between CLL (and chronic hematological malignancies more broadly) and cutaneous malignancies. This is a high-risk population who require regular and vigorous dermatologic follow-up.

Phase I study of bendamustine, rituximab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax in relapsed, refractory mantle cell lymphoma

This dose-finding study evaluated safety of venetoclax plus Bendamustine-Rituximab-Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory MCL. Six 28-day cycles were administered in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Dose level 1 (DL1) included Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on day 1-2, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, and Ibrutinib 560 mg daily. Venetoclax was dosed with ramp-up and at 400 mg starting in Cycle 2 for 5 days. The most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (80%), constipation (60%), and fatigue (60%). Rare hematologic grade 3-4 AEs, 1 dose-limiting toxicity at DL1 (prolonged grade 3 thrombocytopenia), and delayed hematologic toxicity were observed. DL-1 with Bendamustine dose-reduced to 70 mg/m2 (n = 3) revealed no significant toxicity. The overall and complete response rates were both 80% (8/10). This study underscored that venetoclax combined with chemoimmunotherapy is complicated by hematologic toxicity, limiting future development. Although a maximum tolerated dose was not formally established given early study closure, this study demonstrated preliminary tolerability and efficacy of Bendamustine-Rituximab-Ibrutinib-Venetoclax at DL-1.

Survival Outcomes of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective, 15-Year, Real-Life Study

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) prognosis has significantly improved in recent years; however, the possible survival benefit of new treatment options should be evaluated outside of clinical trials. We investigated 73 consecutive MCL patients managed from 2006 to 2020. For younger patients <65 years old, the median PFS was 72 months and we reported a 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year PFS of 73%, 62%, and 41%; median OS was not reached and we reported a 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 88%, 82%, and 66%. For patients aged 75 years or older, the median PFS was 36 months and we reported a 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year PFS of 52%, 37%, and 37%; median OS was not reached and we reported a 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 72%, 55%, and 55%. The median PFS was significantly reduced for patients treated between 2006 and 2010 compared to patients treated between 2011 and 2015 (p = 0.04). Interestingly, there was a trend towards improved OS for patients treated between 2016 and 2020 compared to between 2006 and 2010 and between 2011 and 2015 (5-year OS was 91%, 44%, and 33%). These findings could be due to the introduction of BR as a first-line regimen for elderly patients and to the introduction of ibrutinib as a second-line regimen.

Recent Bendamustine Treatment Before Apheresis Has a Negative Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

PURPOSE

Approximately 30%-40% of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) infused with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve durable responses. Consensus guidelines suggest avoiding bendamustine before apheresis, but specific data in this setting are lacking. We report distinct outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy according to previous bendamustine exposure.

METHODS

The study included CAR T-cell recipients from seven European sites. Safety, efficacy, and CAR T-cell expansion kinetics were analyzed according to preapheresis bendamustine exposure. Additional studies on the impact of the washout period and bendamustine dose were performed. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were carried out for all efficacy comparisons between bendamustine-exposed and bendamustine-naïve patients.

RESULTS

The study included 439 patients with R/R LBCL infused with CD19-targeted commercial CAR T cells, of whom 80 had received bendamustine before apheresis. Exposed patients had significantly lower CD3+ cells and platelets at apheresis. These patients had a lower overall response rate (ORR, 53% v 72%; P < .01), a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 3.1 v 6.2 months; P = .04), and overall survival (OS, 10.3 v 23.5 months; P = .01) in comparison with the bendamustine-naïve group. Following adjustment methods for baseline variables, these differences were mitigated. Focusing on the impact of bendamustine washout before apheresis, those with recent (<9 months) exposure (N = 42) displayed a lower ORR (40% v 72%; P < .01), shorter PFS (1.3 v 6.2 months; P < .01), and OS (4.6 v 23.5 months; P < .01) in comparison with bendamustine-naïve patients. These differences remained significant after IPTW and PSM analysis. Conversely, the cumulative dose of bendamustine before apheresis did not affect CAR-T efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Recent bendamustine exposure before apheresis was associated with negative treatment outcomes after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy and should be therefore avoided in CAR T-cell candidates.

Novel treatment for mantle cell lymphoma - impact of BTK inhibitors and beyond

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) primarily affects older adults, accounting for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in western countries. The disease course of MCL is heterogenous; driven by clinical, cytogenetics, and molecular features that shape differences in outcomes, including proliferation index, MIPI scores, and mutational profile such as TP53 aberration. The advent of novel agents has fundamentally evolved the treatment landscape for MCL with treatment strategies that can now be more effectively tailored based on both patient- and disease-specific factors. In this review, we discuss the major classes of novel agents used for the treatment of MCL, focusing on efficacy and notable toxicities of BTK inhibitors. We further examine effective novel combination regimens and, lastly, discuss future directions for the evolution of targeted approaches for the treatment of MCL.

Phase 1b dose-finding study of rituximab, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib (R2I) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that frequently becomes chemoresistant over time. The distinct mechanisms of ibrutinib and lenalidomide provided a judicious rationale to explore the combination with anti-CD20 immunotherapy. In this phase 1b study (NCT02446236), patients (n = 25) with relapsed/refractory MCL received rituximab with escalating doses of lenalidomide (days 1-21) and ibrutinib 560 mg (days 1-28) of 28-day cycles. The MTD for lenalidomide was 20 mg; most common grade ≥3 adverse events were skin rashes (32%) and neutropenic fever (24%). The best ORR was 88%, CR rate was 83%, and median duration of response (DOR) was 36.92 months (95% CI 33.77, 51.37). Responses were seen even in refractory patients or with high-risk features (e.g. blastoid variant, TP53 mutation, Ki-67 > 30%). R2I was safe and tolerable in patients with R/R MCL.

Nine-year follow-up of lenalidomide plus rituximab as initial treatment for mantle cell lymphoma

Although chemoimmunotherapy is the current standard of care for initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), newer data suggest that there may be a role for a chemotherapy-free approach. We report the 9-year follow-up results of a multicenter, phase 2 study of lenalidomide plus rituximab (LR) as the initial treatment of MCL. The LR doublet is used as induction and maintenance until progression, with optional discontinuation after 3 years. We previously reported an overall response rate of 92% in evaluable patients, with 64% achieving a complete response. At a median follow-up of 103 months, 17 of 36 evaluable patients (47%) remain in remission. The 9-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 51% and 66%, respectively. During maintenance, hematologic adverse events included asymptomatic grade 3 or 4 cytopenia (42% neutropenia, 5% thrombocytopenia, and 3% anemia) and mostly grade 1 to 2 infections managed in the outpatient setting (50% upper respiratory infections, 21% urinary tract infections, 16% sinusitis, 16% cellulitis, and 13% pneumonia, with 5% requiring hospitalization). More patients developed grade 1 and 2 neuropathy during maintenance therapy (29%) than during induction therapy (8%). Twenty-one percent of patients developed secondary malignancies, including 5% with invasive malignancies, whereas the remainder were noninvasive skin cancers treated with local skin-directed therapy. Two patients permanently discontinued therapy because of concerns of immunosuppression during the COVID-19 pandemic. With long-term follow-up, LR continues to demonstrate prolonged, durable responses with manageable safety as initial induction therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01472562.

Current approach to Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a unique CD20+, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the bone marrow and circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M. The clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients are highly variable. High-level evidence supports integration of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the chemotherapy backbone to treat WM. However, its contemporary management has become more nuanced, with deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and incorporation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors to the treatment paradigm. Prior knowledge of the patients' MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutation status may aid in the treatment decision-making. Currently, the two frequently utilized approaches include fixed-duration chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitor-based continuous treatment until progression. Randomized trials comparing these two vastly divergent approaches are lacking. Recent studies demonstrating efficacy of B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) inhibitors and non-covalent BTK inhibitors in patients, previously exposed to a covalent BTK inhibitor, are a testament to the rapidly expanding options against WM.

BR vs. R‑miniCHOP in unfit patients with B‑cell non‑Hodgkin lymphoma: A randomized, two‑center, cohort study

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety between the bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen and rituximab combined with low-dose doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-miniCHOP) in the treatment of 'unfit' patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma grade 3B (FL3B). Patients, >70 years of age with DLBCL or FL3B, defined as unfit according to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, were included in the present study. All patients received 4-6 cycles of a BR or R-miniCHOP regimen at a three-week interval. The objective remission rate (ORR) and adverse reactions were evaluated between the two groups. A total of 35 patients, recruited between January 2020 and December 2021, were included in this prospective study. The median age was 74 years (range, 70-82 years). The ORR in the BR group was similar to that in the R-miniCHOP group (73.3 vs. 75.0%; P=0.606). However, the BR group exhibited a lower incidence of leukopenia than the R-miniCHOP group (20.0 vs. 60.0%; P=0.037). The univariate analysis revealed that the ORR was influenced by the serum β2 microglobulin level. The BR regimen showed equivalent efficacy but more improved safety compared with R-miniCHOP in unfit patients with DLBCL and FL3B. The BR regimen may be considered as an alternative treatment in these subgroups of patients.

Impact of immunochemotherapy with R-bendamustine or R-CHOP for treatment naïve advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: A subset analysis of the FOLL12 trial by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the FOLL12 trial to determine the impact of different initial immunochemotherapy (ICT) regimens on patient outcomes. Patients were selected from the FOLL12 trial, which included adults with stage II-IV follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-3a and high tumor burden. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard ICT followed by rituximab maintenance (RM) or the same ICT followed by a response-adapted approach. ICT consisted of rituximab-bendamustine (RB) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP), per physician's decision. A total of 786 patients were included in this analysis, 341 of whom received RB and 445 R-CHOP. RB was more frequently prescribed to older subjects, females, patients without bulky disease, and those with grade 1-2 FL. After a median of 56 months of follow-up, R-CHOP and RB had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard Ratio for RB 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.42, p = 0.392). Standard RM was associated with improved PFS compared to response-adapted management both after R-CHOP and RB. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events were more frequent with R-CHOP during induction treatment and more frequent with RB during RM. Grade 3-4 infections were more frequent with RB. RB was also associated with a higher incidence of transformed FL. R-CHOP and RB showed similar activity and efficacy, but with different safety profiles and long-term events, suggesting that the treating physician should carefully select the most appropriate chemotherapy regimen for each patient based on patient's individual characteristics, choices, and risk profile.

Mosunetuzumab and the emerging role of T-cell-engaging therapy in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. Since the advent of rituximab, FL has seen a progressive improvement in patient prognosis. While chemotherapy combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody remains standard first-line therapy, most patients will relapse and require subsequent therapy. T-cell-redirecting therapies can be very potent and are transforming the therapeutic landscape in the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. T-cell-dependent bispecific antibodies, of which mosunetuzumab is the first to be approved for R/R FL, are proving to be a highly effective, 'off-the-shelf' option with manageable toxicities. This review covers approved treatments for R/R FL and focuses on preclinical and clinical data available for mosunetuzumab (Lunsumio™), with the goal of determining its role in the treatment of R/R FL.

The prognostic role of gene polymorphisms in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas and mantle-cell lymphoma receiving bendamustine and rituximab: results of the 5-year follow-up study

The variability in disease outcome for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) could be related to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes that affect immune and inflammatory response. We investigated SNPs that could have a prognostic role for patients receiving bendamustine and rituximab (BR). All samples were genotyped for the IL-2 (rs2069762), IL-10 (rs1800890, rs10494879), VEGFA (rs3025039), IL-8 (rs4073), CFH (rs1065489) and MTHFR (rs1801131) SNPs by allelic discrimination assays using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays. We report a long-term follow-up analysis of 79 iNHL and MCL patients that received BR. Overall response rate was 97.5% (CR rate 70.9%). After a median follow-up of 63 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. We report a significant association between SNP in IL-2 (rs2069762) and reduced PFS and OS (p<.0001). We suggest a role for cytokine SNPs in disease outcome, while SNPs seem not related to long-term toxicity or secondary malignancies.

Efficacy and safety of front-line treatment regimens for Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rituximab-based chemo-immunotherapy is currently the standard first-line treatment for Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia (WM), while ibrutinib has emerged as an alternative. In the absence of randomised trials (RCTs) comparing these regimens, the optimal first-line treatment for WM remains uncertain. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment regimens for WM. We searched key databases from January 2007 to March 2023, including phase II and III trials, including treatment-naïve WM patients treated with rituximab-based regimens or ibrutinib. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were evaluated. Four phase III and seven phase II trials were included among 736 unique records. Pooled response rates from all comparative and non-comparative trials were 46%, 33% and 26% for bendamustine rituximab (BR), bortezomib-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (BDRC) and ibrutinib rituximab (IR), respectively. Two-year pooled PFS was 89%, 81% and 82% with BR, BDRC and IR, respectively. Neuropathy was more frequent with bortezomib, while haematologic and cardiac toxicities were more common with chemo-immunotherapy and ibrutinib-based regimens respectively. Our findings suggest that BR yields higher response rates than bortezomib or ibrutinib-based combinations. RCTs comparing BR against emerging therapies, including novel Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, are warranted.

Outcomes of patients with indolent lymphoma treated with bendamustine plus rituximab compared to rituximab plus CVP or CHOP chemoimmunotherapy in Ontario

Bendamustine (B) with rituximab (R) has become the preferred regimen for patients with indolent lymphoma in Ontario, Canada, compared to R with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP). We conducted a propensity-matched retrospective cohort population-based study of patients treated with R-CVP/CHOP from 2005 to 2012 and patients treated with BR from 2013 to 2018. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included toxicities and healthcare utilization. The 5-year OS for patients treated with BR (n = 2023) and R-CVP/CHOP (n = 2023) was 80% and 75% respectively. Treatment with BR was associated with improved OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91). During the first 9 months, patients treated with BR versus R-CVP/CHOP had a higher number of admissions for infection (22% compared to 17%, p < 0.01) and a higher number of mean ED visits (mean 1.01 ± 1.68 visits vs. 0.85 ± 1.51 visits, p < 0.01). This trend persisted for 3 years. The adjusted 5-year OS for patients 75 years and older did not differ based on treatment regimen (55.5% for BR vs. 55.4% for R-CVP/CHOP). Our study supports the use of BR for patients with indolent lymphoma requiring treatment but suggests increased risk of certain toxicities warranting careful patient selection.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Tailoring Upfront Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

In this article, we will review current strategies for the front-line management of mantle cell lymphoma, an uncommon and biologically and clinically heterogeneous subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable with current therapies. Patients invariably relapse with time, and as a result, treatment strategies involve persistent therapy over the course of months to years, including induction, consolidation, and maintenance. Topics discussed include the historical development of various chemoimmunotherapy backbones with continued modifications to maintain and improve efficacy while limiting off-target, off-tumor effects. Chemotherapy-free induction regimens were developed initially for elderly or less fit patients though are now being utilized for younger, transplant-eligible patients due to deeper, more prolonged remission durations with fewer toxicities. The historic paradigm of recommending autologous hematopoietic cell transplant for fit patients in complete or partial remission is now being challenged based in part on ongoing clinical trials in which minimal residual disease directed approaches influence the consolidation strategy for any particular individual. The addition of novel agents, namely first and second generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunomodulatory drugs, BH3 mimetics, and type II glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been tested in various combinations with or without immunochemotherapy. We will attempt to help the reader by systematically explaining and simplifying the various approaches for treating this complicated group of disorders.

Treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the era of novel agents

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a highly heterogeneous presentation that ranges from an indolent disease to an extremely aggressive one. Several clinical and biological prognostic markers can assist in determining the aggressiveness of the disease. Such as MIPI, Ki-67, and TP53, NOTCH1, and CDKN2A mutations. While aggressive chemoimmunotherapy regimens combining rituximab and cytarabine, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation yield the most promising results, this treatment is too toxic for older patients. Several lower-intensity regimens have shown efficacy in older patients with reduced toxicity profiles. However, older relapsed/refractory patients have an extremely poor outcome. In the last several years, there is a major trend toward chemotherapy-free regimens, targeted therapies such as BTK, BCL-2 and PI3K inhibitors, and immunotherapies such as lenalidomide and CAR-T, which can provide a promising strategy for older patients. Herein we review the current therapies for older MCL patients, chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies.

Time to progression of disease and outcomes with second-line BTK inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Time to progression of disease (POD) after first-line (1L) therapy is prognostic in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), although studies have included a broad range of 1L, second-line (2L), and subsequent lines of therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors predicting outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL exclusively initiating 2L Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) after 1L rituximab-containing therapy. Patients were accrued from 8 international centers (7 main, 1 validation cohort). Multivariable models evaluating the association between time to POD and clinical/pathologic factors were constructed and converted into nomograms and prognostic indexes predicting outcomes in this population. A total of 360 patients were included, including 160 in the main cohort and 200 in the validation cohort. Time to POD, Ki67 ≥ 30%, and MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) were associated with progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) from the start of 2L BTKis. C-indexes were consistently ≥0.68 in both cohorts. Web/application-based calculators based on nomograms and prognostic indexes to estimate PFS2 and OS2 were constructed. The 2L BTKi MIPI identifies 3 groups with distinct 2-year PFS2, including high risk (14%), intermediate risk (50%), and low risk (64%). Time to POD, Ki67, and MIPI are associated with survival outcomes in patients with R/R MCL receiving 2L BTKis. Simple clinical models incorporating these variables may assist in planning for alternative therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, or novel agents with alternative mechanisms of action.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

Long-term follow-up of rituximab plus bendamustine and cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed MCL

The combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low-dose cytarabine (R-BAC) has been studied in a phase 2 prospective multicenter study from Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (RBAC500). In 57 previously untreated elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), R-BAC was associated with a complete remission rate of 91% and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68-89). Here, we report the long-term survival outcomes, late toxicities, and results of minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation. After a median follow-up of 86 months (range, 57-107 months), the median overall survival (OS) and PFS were not reached. The 7-year PFS and OS rates were 55% (95% CI, 41-67), and 63% (95% CI, 49-74), respectively. Patients who responded (n = 53) had a 7-year PFS of 59% (95% CI, 44-71), with no relapse or progression registered after the sixth year. In the multivariate analysis, blastoid/pleomorphic morphology was the strongest adverse predictive factor for PFS (P = .04). Patients with an end of treatment negative MRD had better, but not significant, outcomes for both PFS and OS than patients with MRD-positive (P = 0.148 and P = 0.162, respectively). There was no signal of late toxicity or an increase in secondary malignancies during the prolonged follow-up. In conclusion, R-BAC, which was not followed by maintenance therapy, showed sustained efficacy over time in older patients with MCL. Survival outcomes compare favorably with those of other immunochemotherapy regimens (with or without maintenance), including combinations of BTK inhibitors upfront. This study was registered with EudraCT as 2011-005739-23 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01662050.

Risk of a second cancer and infection in patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma exposed to first-line bendamustine plus rituximab: A retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database

Bendamustine has a potent immunosuppressive effect because it causes T-cell lymphopenia, which might lead to a second primary malignancy (SPM) and would increase the risk of infection. Using the Medical Data Vision administrative claims database, we compared the cumulative incidence of SPM, infections within 6 months, and overall survival (OS) among untreated patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas (iBCL) who received rituximab-based chemotherapy between 2009 and 2020. Patients with grade 3b follicular lymphoma or a previous history of malignancy were excluded. Eligible 5234 patients were assigned to three cohorts: rituximab monotherapy (N = 780), RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (doxorubicin replaced with pirarubicin) (N = 2298), or bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (N = 2156). There were 589 recorded SPMs, of which myelodysplastic syndromes were the most common (1.7%). The cumulative incidence of SPM was significantly higher in patients treated with BR than in those treated with rituximab monotherapy (p < 0.01) or RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (p < 0.0001): the 5-year cumulative incidence function was 18.1%, 12.5%, and 12.9%, respectively. In the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model, BR showed a significantly higher cumulative incidence of SPM than RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (subhazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.61). Furthermore, in sensitivity analysis, a nested case-control study using an entire cohort showed consistent results: the SPM odds ratios (95% CI) of first-line bendamustine, bendamustine after first-line, and any-line bendamustine were 1.43 (1.14-1.78), 1.26 (0.96-1.64), and 1.33 (1.09-1.62), respectively. Regarding infections, adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of BR compared to RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP were as follows: cytomegalovirus infection, 13.7 (4.88-38.4); bacterial pneumonia, 0.63 (0.50-0.78); and pneumocystis pneumonia, 0.24 (0.11-0.53). There was no significant difference in OS between RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP and BR in patients with follicular, mantle cell, marginal zone, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas. In conclusion, treatment strategies that consider the risk of SPM and infections after chemotherapy are warranted in patients with iBCL.

Personalised therapy in follicular lymphoma - is the dial turning?

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent lymphoma accounting for approximately 20%-25% of all new non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses in western countries. Whilst outcomes are mostly favorable, the spectrum of clinical phenotypes includes high-risk groups with significantly inferior outcomes. This review discusses recent updates in risk stratification and treatment approaches from upfront treatment for limited and advanced stage follicular lymphoma to the growing options for relapsed, refractory disease with perspectives on how to approach this from a personalized lens. Notable gaps remain on how one can precisely and prospectively select optimal treatment for patients based on varying risks, with an anticipation that an increased understanding of the biology of these different phenotypes and increasing refinement of imaging- and biomarker-based tools will, in time, allow these gaps to be closed.

[Efficacy and safety of bendamustine-rituximab combination therapy for newly diagnosed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and elderly mantle cell lymphoma: a multi-center prospective phase II clinical trial in China]

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bendamustine in combination with rituximab (BR regimen) for the treatment of newly diagnosed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-iNHL) and elderly mantle cell lymphoma (eMCL) . Methods: From December 1, 2020 to September 10, 2022, a multi-center prospective study was conducted across ten Grade A tertiary hospitals in Shandong Province, China. The BR regimen was administered to evaluate its efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed B-iNHL and eMCL patients, and all completed at least four cycles of induction therapy. Results: The 72 enrolled patients with B-iNHL or MCL were aged 24-74 years, with a median age of 55 years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores of 0-1 were observed in 76.4% of patients, while 23.6% had scores of 2. Disease distribution included follicular lymphoma (FL) (51.4% ), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (33.3% ), eMCL (11.1% ), and the unknown subtype (4.2% ). According to the Ann Arbor staging system, 16.7% and 65.3% of patients were diagnosed with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ lymphomas, respectively. Following four cycles of BR induction therapy, the overall response rate was 98.6%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 83.3% and a partial response (PR) rate of 15.3%. Only one eMCL patient experienced disease progression during treatment, and only one FL patient experienced a relapse. Even when evaluated using CT alone, the CR rate was 63.9%, considering the differences between PET/CT and CT assessments. The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range: 4-22), with a PFS rate of 96.8% and an OS rate of 100.0%. The main hematologic adverse reactions included grade 3-4 leukopenia (27.8%, with febrile neutropenia observed in 8.3% of patients), grade 3-4 lymphopenia (23.6% ), grade 3-4 anemia (5.6% ), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (4.2% ). The main non-hematologic adverse reactions such as fatigue, nausea/vomiting, rash, and infections occurred in less than 20.0% of patients. Conclusion: Within the scope of this clinical trial conducted in China, the BR regimen demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating newly diagnosed B-iNHL and eMCL patients.

Efficacy of front-line immunochemotherapy for transplant-ineligible mantle cell lymphoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is no standard first-line immunochemotherapy regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) currently, and the efficacy of various treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of all eligible randomized controlled trials. Pairwise comparisons and ranking of different first-line treatment options were performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the NMA, involving a total of 2897 MCL patients. The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen showed the best progression-free survival (PFS), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.89 and probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 69%. The VR-CAP regimen was the most potential intervention to improve overall survival (OS), with a SUCRA of 0.89 and PbBT of 63%. Compared with the R-CHOP regimen, the BR regimen achieved a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [95% credible interval 0.2-0.96]). The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen (HR 0.14 [0.02-0.99]), BR+R regimen (HR 0.19 [0.034-0.99]), and BR regimen (HR 0.3 [0.08-1.03]) were superior to CHOP regimen with better PFS. The R-FC regimen (HR 2.27 [1.01-5.21]) or FC regimen (HR 3.17 [1.15-8.71]) was inferior to the VR-CAP regimen with a worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents the most promising first-line treatment strategy for transplant-ineligible MCL patients in terms of PFS and OS, which provides innovative treatment strategy for MCL treatment.

Ki67 proliferation index in follicular lymphoma is associated with favorable outcome in patients treated with R-CHOP

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a common, indolent small B-cell lymphoma. While the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index is widely used, reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed. A recent study suggested that architectural patterns of CD10, BCL6, and Ki67 expression may correlate with progression-free survival (PFS) in FL patients treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. We examined the prognostic and predictive utility of architectural patterns of CD10, BCL6, Ki67, and FOXP1 in 90 patients treated with immunochemotherapy (bendamustine-rituximab [BR] and R-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [CHOP]). We found that high follicular Ki67 (≥30%) was associated with longer PFS in the subgroup of patients treated with R-CHOP but not among those treated with BR. Validation of this biomarker may support routine use of Ki67 as a predictive marker in FL.

Tisagenlecleucel: CAR-T cell therapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an anti CD19 CAR-T therapy that has demonstrated clinical activity in R/R large B-cell lymphoma and R/R B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It showed particularly high efficacy in R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) with a manageable toxicity profile. The pivotal ELARA study in R/R FL confirmed these findings and led to the FDA approval of tisa-cel in R/R FL after two lines of systemic therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We start with an introduction of FL and the current treatment landscape with emphasis on the R/R setting. We review the role of CAR-T in R/R FL with focus on currently available products. We describe the ELARA study at a high level to give a perspective of the patient population that was treated. Finally, we discuss aspects related to product selection and whether bispecific antibodies will challenge the role of CAR-T in FL given their similar efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

Tisa-cel is a highly effective therapy for heavily pretreated R/R FL with a toxicity profile that is low grade and manageable. Durable remissions (including high-risk patients) are seen in the pivotal ELARA study. Clinicians should consider early referral of R/R FL patients for assessment and discussion.

Pretreatment CT Texture Parameters as Predictive Biomarkers of Progression-Free Survival in Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Immunochemotherapy and Rituximab Maintenance

The purpose of this study was to determine whether texture analysis features present on pretreatment unenhanced computed tomography (CT) images, derived from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography (18-FDG PET/CT), can predict progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free survival at 24 months (PFS 24), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival in patients with high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance. Seventy-two patients with follicular lymphoma were retrospectively included. Texture analysis was performed on unenhanced CT images extracted from 18-FDG PET/CT examinations that were obtained within one month before treatment. Skewness at a fine texture scale (SSF = 2) was an independent predictor of PFS (hazard ratio = 3.72 (95% CI: 1.15, 12.11), p = 0.028), PFS 24 (hazard ratio = 13.38; 95% CI: 1.29, 138.13; p = 0.029), and TTNT (hazard ratio = 5.11; 95% CI: 1.18, 22.13; p = 0.029). Skewness values above -0.015 at SSF = 2 were significantly associated with lower PFS, PFS 24, and TTNT. Kurtosis without filtration was an independent predictor of PFS (SSF = 0; HR = 1.22 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.44), p = 0.013), and TTNT (SSF = 0; hazard ratio = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.46; p = 0.013). This study shows that pretreatment unenhanced CT texture analysis-derived tumor skewness and kurtosis may be used as predictive biomarkers of PFS and TTNT in patients with high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance.

Frontline Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia with Chemoimmunotherapy

Despite the introduction of effective novel agents, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), with its widespread use, retains relevance and is one of the 2 vastly disparate strategies to treat Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), the alternative being the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based approach. Considerable evidence over the past decades supports the integration of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the CIT backbone in WM, a CD20+ malignancy. Besides substantial efficacy, the finite duration of the treatment, coupled with lower rates of cumulative and long-term, clinically significant adverse effects and greater affordability, make CIT appealing, notwithstanding the lack of quality-of-life data with such an approach in WM. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial reported substantially higher efficacy and a more favorable safety profile of the bendamustine-rituximab (BR) doublet compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) among patients with WM. Subsequent studies reaffirmed its high efficacy and tolerability, making BR the mainstay of managing treatment-naïve patients with WM. High-quality evidence supporting the use of BR over Dexamethasone, Rituximab, and Cyclophosphamide (DRC), another commonly used regimen, is lacking, as is its comparison with the continuous BTKi-based approach. However, DRC appeared less potent than BR in cross-trial comparisons and retrospective series involving treatment-naïve patients with WM. Additionally, a recent retrospective, international study demonstrated comparable outcomes with fixed-duration BR and continuous ibrutinib monotherapy among previously untreated, age-matched patients exhibiting MYD88^L265P mutation. However, unlike ibrutinib, BR appears effective irrespective of the MYD88 mutation status. CIT, preferably BR, is well suited to serve as the control arm (comparator) regimen against which novel targeted agents may be evaluated as frontline therapies for WM in high-quality trials. Purine analog-based CIT has been extensively evaluated in WM, although its use has waned, even in the multiply relapsed patient population, as effective and safer alternatives emerge.

Clinical features and prognosis of double primary malignant neoplasms in patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma

To investigate the clinical features, survival, and prognostic factors of patients with double primary malignant neoplasms (DPMNs) comprising non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and malignant solid tumors. Of the 2352 patients diagnosed with NHL, 105 (4.46%) patients were diagnosed with DPMNs, 42 (40.0%) had NHL first (the NHL-first group) and 63 (60.0%) had solid tumor first (the ST-first group). Females were more frequent in the ST-first group, and the interval time between the two tumors was longer. More NHLs in early stages and originating from extranodal sites were observed in the NHL-first group. Male, age ≥ 55 years at diagnosis of the first tumor, interval time <60 months, NHL diagnosed first, NHL arising from an extranodal site, DPMNs without breast cancer, and no surgery for the first primary tumor were associated with poorer overall survival (OS). Interval time <60 months and NHL diagnosed first were independent risk factors that affected the prognosis of patients with DPMNs. Therefore, careful monitoring and follow-up are especially important for these patients. 50.5% (53/105) of patients with DPMNs did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to the diagnosis of the second tumor. We further compared the baseline characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL) patients with and without solid tumors, the former had a higher proportion of extranodal DLBCL, suggesting that extranodal DLBCL is more likely to develop solid tumors than nodal DLBCL.

Enhancing prognostication and personalizing treatment of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue is an indolent lymphoma originating from marginal zone B-cells and associated with chronic inflammation. EMZL demonstrates distinct genomic alterations according to the primary extranodal site of disease but commonly affects signaling pathways including NF-ĸB, B-cell receptor, and NOTCH. Treatment with radiation therapy is commonly implemented in localized diseases, and multiple agents are available for patients with advanced-stage diseases in need of therapy. Bendamustine with rituximab is a frontline platform associated with high efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical features, diagnosis, genomics, models enabling risk stratification, treatment options, and future directions.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of consistent genotyping profile in EMZL precludes the development of tissue and circulatory biomarkers for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, the biological heterogeneity observed in extranodal sites associated with overall limited genomic data prevents the testing of druggable pathways aiming for a personalized treatment approach. Future clinical trials should focus on EMZL considering the unique clinical characteristics in the eligibility criteria and response assessment to better inform efficacy of novel agents and delineate sequences of therapies.

Estimating the Burden of Illness of Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Many patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) relapse after first-line chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To examine healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost, treatment patterns, progression, and survival of patients with FL and MZL who relapse after first-line treatment, in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective, administrative data study identified patients with relapsed FL and MZL (1 January 2005-31 December 2018). Patients were followed for up to three years post relapse to assess HCRU, healthcare costs, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS), stratified by first- and second-line treatment.

RESULTS

The study identified 285 FL and 68 MZL cases who relapsed after first-line treatment. Average duration of first-line treatment was 12.4 and 13.4 months for FL and MZL patients, respectively. Drug (35.9%) and cancer clinic costs (28.1%) were major contributors to higher costs in year 1. Three-year OS was 83.9% after FL and 74.2% after MZL relapse. No statistically significant differences were observed in TTNT and OS between patients with FL who received R-CHOP/R-CVP/BR in the first line only versus both the first- and second- line. A total of 31% of FL and 34% of MZL patients progressed to third-line treatment within three years of initial relapse.

CONCLUSION

Relapsing and remitting nature of FL and MZL in a subset of patients results in substantial burden to patients and the healthcare system.

How I manage mantle cell lymphoma: indolent versus aggressive disease

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma with a variable clinical course and historically poor prognosis. Management is challenging in part due to the heterogeneity of the disease course, with indolent and aggressive subtypes now well recognised. Indolent MCL is often characterised by a leukaemic presentation, SOX11 negativity and low proliferation index (Ki-67). Aggressive MCL is characterised by rapid onset widespread lymphadenopathy, extra-nodal involvement, blastoid or pleomorphic histology and high Ki-67. Tumour protein p53 (TP53) aberrations in aggressive MCL are recognised with clear negative impact on survival. Until recently, trials have not addressed these specific subtypes separately. With the increasing availability of targeted novel agents and cellular therapies, the treatment landscape is constantly evolving. In this review, we describe the clinical presentation, biological factors, and specific management considerations of both indolent and aggressive MCL and discuss current and potential future evidence which may help move to a more personalised approach.

Follicular lymphoma: an update on biology and optimal therapy

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a mature B-cell neoplasm with a mostly indolent course. Genetic hallmark characteristics are Bcl-2 overexpression based on a t(14;18) translocation and additional secondary genetic and epigenetic aberrations. Standard treatment for early-stage patients has curative intent and usually consists of radiotherapy with or without rituximab. In the advanced stage, the main therapeutic focus is on prolonged remissions. Therefore, treatment in asymptomatic patients is usually deferred. Symptomatic patients are subject to immunochemotherapy induction followed by antibody maintenance. Importantly, about one in five patients subsequently experiences a more rapid clinical course, achieving only short remissions with multiple relapses (POD24). In those patients, there is still an urgent need for improved therapeutic options. Accordingly, a plethora of targeted and immunotherapeutic options, including immunomodulatory drugs, small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies as well as bispecific T-cell engager antibodies and CAR-T cell products have been recently evaluated in such relapsed high-risk patients.

Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of orally-administered bendamustine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The optimal dosing schedule, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects were also evaluated. A multicenter, open-label trial with a standard 3 + 3 design and dose escalation by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was conducted. The treatment schedules were once daily for 7, 14, and 21 days every 3 weeks as one cycle. The total dose per cycle was increased from 175 to 840 mg/m². Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days, and one of three patients at 37.5 mg/m²/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m²/day × 21 days. However, the delayed recovery from a decrease in neutrophil or platelet count hampered the start of subsequent treatment cycles, and the trend was more prominent at 37.5 mg/m²/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m²/day × 21 days than in 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days. MTD was determined as 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days to allow acceptable hematologic recovery. The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered bendamustine were generally dose-dependent; however, the inter-individual variability is relatively large. The major adverse events were hematologic toxicities; gastrointestinal disorders were generally mild. Adverse drug reactions did not lead to the discontinuation of the drug. A partial response was observed in two of six patients (prostatic small cell carcinoma and thymic carcinoma) at 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days. The RD and optimal dosing schedule of orally-administered bendamustine was 75 mg/m² once daily for 7 days every 3 weeks for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03604679. Registration date July 27, 2018).

Management of Marginal Zone Lymphoma: A Canadian Perspective

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are a rare, heterogenous group of lymphomas, accounting for 5-17% of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the western world. They can be further divided into three subtypes: extranodal MZL, splenic MZL, and nodal MZL. These subtypes differ in clinical presentation and behavior, which influences how they are managed. There is currently no standard of care for the treatment of MZL, owing to the difficulty in conducting phase 3 randomized trials in MZL, and the fact that there are limited data on the efficacy of therapy in individual subtypes. Treatment practices are thus largely borrowed from other indolent lymphomas and are based on patient and disease characteristics, as well as access to therapy. This review summarizes the Canadian treatment landscape for MZL and how these therapies may be sequenced in practice.

Second primary malignancies in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: epidemiology and risk factors

With the advancements in therapeutics for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), the long-term survival of patients with NHL has markedly increased. Second primary malignancies (SPMs) have become an increasingly relevant long-term concern for NHL survivors. The etiology of SPMs is multifactorial and involves multiple steps. Germline alterations, immune dysregulation, and clonal hematopoiesis contribute to the accumulation of intrinsic adverse factors, and external factors such as lifestyle; exposure to infectious factors; and late effects of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, high-dose therapy, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation further increase SPM risk. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) are a devastating complication of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. However, as targeted therapies begin to replace cytotoxic chemotherapy, the incidence of t-MNs is likely to decline, particularly for indolent B-cell NHL.

Personalized approaches for treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can have diverse disease presentations, which vary in aggressiveness and prognosis, and can occur in patients with varying ability to tolerate therapy. Additionally, the options for treatment of MCL have expanded rapidly in the last decade, translating to improved outcome for patients.

AREAS COVERED

We review the initial evaluation of patients with MCL, identifying disease- and patient-specific prognostic factors, along with personalized therapies for patients with MCL. Specific scenarios include indolent and limited-stage MCL, advanced-stage disease in transplant-eligible and ineligible patients, and high-risk TP53 mutant disease. Ongoing trials and future directions in MCL treatment are also highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the wide array of disease and patient presentations with MCL, a personalized therapeutic approach is needed to optimize outcomes. The best therapeutic strategy should incorporate disease prognostic factors, patient status and comorbidities, goals of care, and response to treatment.

Combined Reverse-Transcriptase Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification and Next-Generation Sequencing Analyses to Assign Unclassified BCL2-/BCL6- Nonrearranged Small B-Cell Lymphoid Neoplasms as Follicular or Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Distinguishing between follicular lymphoma (FL) and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) can be difficult when morphologic and phenotypic features are unusual and characteristic cytogenetic rearrangements are absent. We evaluated the diagnostic contribution of ancillary techniques-including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-detected 1p36 deletion; reverse-transcriptase, multiplex, ligation-dependent probe amplification (RT-MLPA); and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-for tumors that remain unclassified according to standard criteria. After review, 50 CD5-negative small B-cell lymphoid neoplasms without BCL2 and BCL6 FISH rearrangements were diagnosed as FLs (n = 27), NMZLs (n = 5), or unclassified (n = 18) based on the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. FISH helped identify the 1p36 deletion in 3 FLs and 1 unclassified tumor. Most classified FLs had an RT-MLPA germinal center B-cell (GCB) signature (93%) or were noncontributive (7%). Classified NMZLs had an RT-MLPA activated B-cell signature (20%), had an unassigned signature (40%), or were noncontributive (40%). Among unclassified tumors, the RT-MLPA GCB signature was associated with mutations most commonly found in FLs (CREBBP, EZH2, STAT6, and/or TNFRSF14) (90%). An RT-MLPA-detected GCB signature and/or NGS-detected gene mutations were considered as FL identifiers for 13 tumors. An activated B-cell signature or NOTCH2 mutation supported NMZL diagnosis in 3 tumors. Combining the RT-MLPA and NGS findings successfully discriminated 89% of unclassified tumors in favor of one or the other diagnosis. NGS-detected mutations may be of therapeutic interest. Herein, we detected 3 EZH2 and 8 CREBBP mutations that might be eligible for targeted therapies.