The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study

'Balancing Challenges and Personal Resources': A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences of Arm Impairment After Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer

AIM

To explore how women previously treated for breast cancer experience living with arm impairment after axillary surgery.

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative study. The inductive starting point for the analysis was followed by a deductive approach as the categories were related to the components of the sense of coherence framework.

METHODS

Twenty-eight relapse-free Swedish-speaking females participated in six focus group discussions conducted between September and December 2022. All participants had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without completion axillary dissection 4 years earlier. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Three categories and an overall theme were identified. The categories 'Sense-making', 'Daily life' and 'Driving force' reflect actions to understand and prevent arm symptoms, adaptations made in daily life and the empowering resources adopted to meet challenges. The overall theme, 'Balancing challenges and personal resources', comprised a process that began at diagnosis and remained ongoing for some participants. Most participants considered their new life situations manageable. However, those with more pronounced arm impairment reported that they did not always receive adequate aid, and that their daily lives were negatively affected.

CONCLUSION

Returning to everyday life after axillary surgery for breast cancer is associated with varying degrees of challenges. Individuals with persistent arm impairment find returning to normal life more challenging. Therefore, further improvements in person-centred care are of utmost importance.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Members of the Swedish Breast Cancer Association were involved in the creation of the interview guide.

IMPACT

This study emphasises the requirement for providing further individualised support to those living with more severe arm impairment after axillary surgery.

REPORTING METHOD

This study was reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.

Safety and quality of life of CDK4/6 inhibitors therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in China

BACKGROUND

To investigate the treatment pattern, adverse events, and quality of life of Chinese patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) for hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional survey enrolled patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer currently treated with CDK4/6i. The patients reported adverse events and quality of life during CDK4/6i treatment with a questionnaire and EORTC QLQ-BR23. Meanwhile, the oncologists collected the treatment information, adverse events and patient characteristics from medical record.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1254 patients. Most patients received only one CDK4/6i, of which 38.92% received dalpiciclib, 35.81% received abemaciclib, 15.07% received palbociclib, and 0.47% received ribociclib, while 9.73% patients were treated with two CDK4/6i sequentially. The oncologists reported adverse events occurred in > 81.17% of patients, and most common AEs were leukopenia (63.30%) and neutropenia (58.73%). The most common symptomatic adverse events reported by the patients were fatigue (34.13%), alopecia (14.02%) and weakness (11.30%). The incidence of alopecia in patients receiving dalpiciclib was lower than in those receiving palbociclib (8.81% vs. 16.40%, P < 0.001) and abemaciclib (8.81% vs. 19.82%, P = 0.027). Regard to quality of life, breast symptom scores were lower in the palbociclib group than in the abemaciclib group (3.84 ± 8.57 vs. 5.70 ± 9.81, P = 0.047). Patient reported alopecia was associated with body image, systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset by hair loss (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of different CDK4/6i varies and has different impacts on patients' quality of life, which needs more attention in clinical practice.

Evaluating changes in the breast cancer-related quality of life of young women with breast cancer: long-term results from a multicenter prospective cohort

Background

Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) typically undergo intensive treatment that negatively impacts their quality of life (QoL). However, limited information is available on how their QoL changes, as most research has focused on older patients.

Objectives

To assess changes in QoL among YWBC, identify the most affected QoL domains, and identify the factors associated with these changes.

Design

Joven & Fuerte is a multicenter cohort of women aged ⩽40 in Mexico with newly diagnosed BC from 2014 to 2020.

Methods

Participants completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer module QLQ-BR23 questionnaire at five different time points from enrollment until year 5 postdiagnosis. Clinical and treatment data were also collected. Group-based multivariate trajectory modeling was used to analyze longitudinal changes across QoL domains and classify patients into appropriate groups. Logistic models were then employed to identify associations between variables and group classification.

Results

A total of 477 women (median age: 36 years; interquartile range 32-38) were included. Most had public health insurance (87%) and were diagnosed with stage II (49%) or III (39%) BC. Two trajectory groups, namely, "good" and "poor," were identified based on QLQ-BR23 scores. Most patients (n = 294, 62%) were in the poor group. In the good group, sexual enjoyment scores remained stable from baseline to year 5 (51.4), whereas those in the poor group decreased (51.0-37.3). Distress related to hair loss over time declined, with scores decreasing from 36.3 to 27.0 in the good trajectory group and from 43.4 to 31.2 in the poor trajectory group. For future perspective, the good group improved from 56.4 to 79.0, while the poor group increased from 39.3 to 57.2. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive BC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.94, p = 0.028) and those with public health insurance (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-0.90, p = 0.035) were less likely to belong to the poor trajectory group.

Conclusion

A high proportion of YWBC experience a poor QoL trajectory over time, particularly in areas related to sexual health, future perspective, and hair loss.

At-home Breast Oncology care Delivered with EHealth solutions (ABODE) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery for patients with breast cancer. eHealth solutions enable remote care and may improve patient activation, which is defined as having the knowledge, skills and confidence to manage one's health. Thus, we developed the Breast Cancer Treatment Application (app) for patients and practitioners to use throughout the cancer care continuum. The app facilitates virtual assistance, delivers educational resources, collects patient-reported outcome measures and provides individualised support via volunteer e-coaches. Among newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer, we will compare changes in patient activation, other patient-reported outcomes and health service outcomes over 1 year between those using the app and Fitbit, and those receiving standard care and Fitbit only.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled trial will include 200 patients with breast cancer seen at a tertiary care cancer centre in Ontario, Canada. The intervention group (n=100) will use the app in addition to standard care and Fitbit for 13 months following diagnosis. The control group (n=100) will receive standard care and Fitbit only. Patients will complete questionnaires at enrolment, 6 and 12 months post-diagnosis to measure patient activation (Patient Activation Measure-13 score), distress, anxiety, quality of life and experiences with their care and information received. All patients will also receive Fitbits to measure activity and heart rate. We will also measure wait times and number of visits to ambulatory care services to understand the impact of the app on the use of in-person services.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained on 6 January 2023. Protocol version 2.0 was approved on 6 January 2023. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. Study findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with participants, patient programmes and cancer awareness groups. The app has also been approved as a secure communication method at our trial institution, thus we are well-positioned to support future integration of the app into standard care through collaboration with our hospital network.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05989477.

Exercise Communication for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Scoping Review

Importance

Exercise may offer various clinical benefits to breast cancer survivors. However, exercise participation among survivors is low. Discussions about exercise can increase participation, but details regarding implementation of exercise communication for breast cancer survivors are unclear.

Objective

To examine the development and implementation of explicitly reported exercise communication for breast cancer survivors.

Evidence Review

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was used. Six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Communication and Mass Media Complete, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles describing exercise communication for female breast cancer survivors in any geographical location or setting published up to April 2024. Information about study and participant characteristics, exercise communication, and intervention components and effects were extracted.

Findings

Thirty-nine studies were included. Information consistent with exercise guidelines was communicated in 32 studies for aerobic exercise (82.1%) and 7 studies for muscle-strengthening exercise (17.9%). More studies communicated information about exercise benefits (20 [51.3%]) compared with exercise safety (3 [7.7%]). Studies included breast cancer survivors who were predominantly White (median [range], 85.5% [47.4%-98.7%]). Most included breast cancer survivors were educated (median percentage, 50.7% were college graduates) and had completed primary treatment (eg, median percentage, 66.7% had completed chemotherapy). Seventeen individualized (ie, tailored) information based on demographic or clinical characteristics (43.6%), and 5 considered contextual factors, such as the environment (12.8%). Most interventions reported an increase in exercise (19 of 21 [90.4%]). Heterogeneity in intervention design (eg, dietary advice or exercise trackers in addition to exercise information) and evaluation (eg, intervention length and outcomes) prevented quantitative synthesis of intervention effects.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic scoping review of exercise communication for breast cancer survivors, interventions including exercise communication appeared to show a favorable effect. However, data were limited about the development and implementation of these interventions among underrepresented breast cancer survivors. Interest in research involving exercise communication for breast cancer survivors in clinical settings remains strong.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor: Results from the NATALEE Trial

PURPOSE

The phase III NATALEE trial reported a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival benefit with ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) versus an NSAI alone in stage II/III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. In this study, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from NATALEE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone. Patient-reported outcome scores [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire global health status and physical, social, and emotional functioning domains; the supplementary European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific QOL questionnaire breast symptoms scale; health on a visual analog scale of the generic EuroQOL 5-level instrument; and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were assessed. The prespecified primary HRQOL endpoint was physical functioning. Mean scores and time-categorical and prespecified linear-time repeated-measure models were used to evaluate HRQOL changes during treatment.

RESULTS

HRQOL was evaluated in all patients in the ribociclib plus NSAI (n = 2,549) and NSAI alone (n = 2,552) arms. Compliance was high in both arms (≈93%-97%). Mean scores did not differ meaningfully from baseline for any analyzed domain. Likewise, neither a meaningful change from baseline (in either treatment arm) nor a difference between arms was observed during treatment in the time-categorical, model-adjusted mean scores for any HRQOL domains-using published thresholds for interpreting longitudinal and between-group differences, with all values being within 0.5 SD of their baseline values. Linear-time regression analysis confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses of NATALEE show that adding adjuvant ribociclib to an NSAI does not negatively affect HRQOL in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Preferences for quality of life versus length of life in older women deciding about treatment for early breast cancer: A cross-sectional sub-analysis of the Bridging the Age Gap study

INTRODUCTION

Prioritising quality of life (QoL) or length of life is often necessary in the decision-making process for cancer care. This may be complicated in patients with limited life expectancy due to age and comorbidities. Older women with early breast cancer often receive non-standard care (primary endocrine therapy [PET] or omission of chemotherapy or radiotherapy) to reduce treatment morbidity and maintain QoL. We aimed to determine the perceived relative influence of QoL versus length of life in treatment decision making by older women with early (potentially curable) breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a sub-study of the Age Gap multi-centre, cohort study, which prospectively recruited women >70 yrs. with early breast cancer. Baseline demographics, health characteristics, and QoL scores were analysed alongside a bespoke questionnaire to assess QoL and length of life preferences, including a modified version of the validated quality/quantity questionnaire, in a subset of the main study.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 308 patients and 194 (63 %) were returned by participants with a median age of 75 years (range 70-93). Of these, 14 had PET and 180 had standard treatment (ST) (surgery +/- adjuvant therapy) including 37 who had chemotherapy. The PET group was older (median age 83.5 versus 76 years) and in poorer health (9/14; 64.3 % patients had one or more comorbidities versus 69/144; 47.9 %) with inferior baseline physical domain QoL scores. Patients who received PET valued QoL and length of life equally (Q score 0.87, L score 0.91), and patients who received chemotherapy favoured length of life over QoL (Q score 0.67, L score 0.86). Subgroup analysis showed a small correlation between increasing age and QoL preferences (Spearman's r = 0.2, P < 0.009). There was no correlation between co-morbidities, frailty, or global QoL and length of life/QoL preferences.

DISCUSSION

Older women with early breast cancer valued length of life and QoL highly, with an association between preference for QoL and less aggressive treatment choices. Relative QoL preference increased with advancing age. More research is needed to define QoL determinants and outcomes following treatment to help patients make decisions that reflect their priorities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN: 46099296.

Three-year patient-reported outcomes of the BOOG 2013-08 RCT evaluating omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery: Impact of personality traits on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

The non-inferiority randomized controlled trial BOOG 2013-08 investigates the oncological safety and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) omission in cT1-2 N0 breast cancer. The primary aim of the present study was to compare patient-reported arm function and HRQoL up to 3 years after study inclusion in cT1-2 N0 patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without SLNB. The secondary aim was to explore the association between personality traits 'trait anxiety' and 'neuroticism', and perceived arm function and HRQoL.

METHODS

A total of 1733 women with unilateral cT1-2 N0 invasive breast cancer treated with BCS with or without SLNB were included. The primary outcomes of arm function (assessed using the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire) and HRQoL (assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR-23 questionnaires) were analysed.

RESULTS

Analyses included 821 patients (383 with SLNB and 438 without SLNB). Those in the SLNB group experienced a slight, temporary decline in arm function (P < 0.025) and reported more HRQoL arm and breast symptoms (P < 0.049). High trait anxiety or neuroticism was associated with significant poorer arm function and lower HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

SLNB slightly reduced arm function, temporarily affecting HRQoL arm and breast symptoms. Neuroticism significantly negatively impacted arm function and HRQoL. Measuring and stratifying for personality traits is crucial for interpreting patient-reported outcomes and to identify patients needing additional support after surgery.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02271828 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Partial breast radiotherapy in low-risk breast cancer using a MRI-guided adaptive approach; results of the phase II PARLOB study

PURPOSE

The majority of breast cancer patients are treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative whole (WBI) or partial breast irradiation (PBI). Previous studies on PBI demonstrated similar ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) compared to WBI, however conflicting data on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were reported. This study investigates the feasibility of stereotactic MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) for PBI, with emphasis on toxicity and cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with low-risk breast cancer suitable for PBI as defined by ESTRO guidelines were included. SMART was delivered in supine position in a two-week course of 5 fractions of 6 Gy, or 6.5 Gy in case of high risk characteristics. Patient- and physician-reported toxicity and cosmetic outcomes were scored at 3, 9, 18 and 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Between 2017-2020, 50 patients were included and 45 patients were treated with SMART. Median age was 66 years, median tumor size was 1.2 cm. Most tumors were Bloom Richardson Grade 1 (55.6%) and estrogen receptor positive (95.6%). The majority did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy (80%). The highest grade acute toxicity was grade 2 in 20%, mostly fatigue. At 18 months, four patients (9%) reported grade 2 toxicity, consisting of fibrosis and fatigue. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was recorded. At 9 and 18 months, 86.4% of patients were (very) satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. The cosmetic outcome was good-excellent compared to the contralateral breast at 18 months in 90.9% and 73.8% as scored by patients and physicians, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic MRI-guided adaptive PBI for patients with low-risk breast cancer was feasible and resulted in low rates of toxicity. Good cosmetic outcomes were reported by patients after a follow-up of 18 months.

Effectiveness of an Innovative Mobile-Based Perioperative Care Program for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery (iCareBreast): Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers among women and significantly impacts psychological well-being and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) during the perioperative period. Mobile health interventions offer a promising approach to providing education and psychosocial support, yet their effectiveness in this context remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative, mobile-based, perioperative care program for women undergoing breast cancer surgery (iCareBreast). The assessment focused on perioperative self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, fatigue, HR-QoL, and perioperative care satisfaction.

METHODS

A two-group randomized control trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Singapore. The intervention group used the iCareBreast app, offering four main resources: perioperative care guidance, breast cancer and surgery education, psychological support, and social support. The control group received standard hospital care. Participants in the intervention group engaged with the fully automated app daily for 29 days (two weeks before surgery, on the day of surgery, and two weeks after surgery). Data were collected face-to-face or on the web at three time points: baseline, immediately after the intervention (T1; two weeks after surgery), and at a 2.5-month follow-up (T2; three months after surgery). The primary outcome was perioperative care self-efficacy, while secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, fatigue, HR-QoL, and perioperative care satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with early-stage breast cancer scheduled for breast surgery were enrolled in the study, with 62 patients assigned to the iCareBreast group and 61 patients to the control group. The results showed no significant differences between the groups in the primary outcome-perioperative self-efficacy-at any time point. Baseline scores were similar (P=.80), and while the iCareBreast group showed slightly lower scores at T1 (mean difference [MD] -1.63, 95% CI -3.43 to 0.18; P=.08) and T2 (MD -1.90, 95% CI -4.06 to 0.26; P=.09), the differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, secondary outcomes, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, HR-QoL, and perioperative care satisfaction, showed no significant changes between groups (all P>.05). However, the iCareBreast group reported higher perioperative care satisfaction during the postintervention assessment. Satisfaction scores were comparable at T1 (P=.68), while at T2, the iCareBreast group showed a slight increase compared to the control group (MD 0.35, 95% CI 0.04-0.73; P=.08), though the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The mobile-based psychosocial intervention, although satisfied by users, did not demonstrate significant benefits compared to standard care. This highlights the need to refine the iCareBreast app in future iterations to enhance its effectiveness in addressing the targeted health outcomes. Future mobile health research should prioritize optimizing user engagement strategies and incorporating personalized approaches to better address the perioperative care needs of patients with breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04172350; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04172350.

Patient-reported outcomes after immediate and delayed DIEP-flap breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy-results of the multicenter UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort

PURPOSE

Timing of Deep Inferior Epigastric artery Perforator (DIEP)-flap breast reconstruction in the context of post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients is topic of debate. We compared the impact of immediate (before radiotherapy) versus delayed (after radiotherapy) DIEP-flap breast reconstruction (IBR versus DBR) on short- and long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

Within the prospective, multicenter breast cancer cohort (UMBRELLA), we identified 88 women who underwent immediate or delayed DIEP-flap breast reconstruction and received PMRT. At 6 and 12 months post-mastectomy, as well as on long-term (≥ 12 months post-reconstruction) body image, breast symptoms, physical functioning, and pain were measured by EORTC-QLQ-30/BR23. Additionally, long-term evaluation included satisfaction with breast(s), physical well-being and self-reported adverse effects of radiation as measured by BREAST-Q, and late treatment toxicity. PROs were compared between groups using independent sample T-test.

RESULTS

IBR was performed in 56 patients (64%) and DBR in 32 patients (36%), with 15 months of median time to reconstruction. At 6 and 12 months post-mastectomy, better body image and physical functioning were observed after IBR. No statistically nor clinically relevant differences were observed in long-term EORTC and BREAST-Q outcomes (median follow-up 37-41 months for IBR vs. 42-46 months for DBR). Patients with IBR reported more fibrosis and movement restriction (median follow-up 29 vs. 61 months, resp.).

CONCLUSION

Long-term PROs were comparable for patients with IBR and DBR, despite more patient-reported fibrosis and movement restriction after IBR. Therefore, both treatment pathways can be considered when opting for autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of PMRT.

[Increasing social inequalities in quality of life after early breast cancer]

Using data from the French CANTO cohort (n=5,915), we assessed the socioeconomic inequalities in quality of life after breast cancer and their time trends over two years after diagnosis. Socioeconomic position was measured using self-reported financial difficulties. Quality of life was assessed with the QLQ-C30 summary score. Social inequalities were quantified using the slope index of inequality (SII). Social inequalities in QLQ-C30 summary score at baseline were observed after adjustment for age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, disease stage, and treatment. These inequalities significantly increased in year 1 and year 2 postdiagnosis.

An international Phase IV field study - psychometric properties of the updated module on assessing quality of life of patients with breast cancer EORTC QLQ-BR42

BACKGROUND

The EORTC QLQ-BR23, published in 1996, was one of the first disease-specific questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with breast cancer (BC). In the last decades, major changes in BC treatment have occurred, requiring an update of this module. The results of the Phase 1-3 of the study were published in 2019. The aim of study was to examine the psychometric properties of the provisional EORTC-QLQ-BR45.questionnaire.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of BC, age ≥18 years, and cognitive able to fill the questionnaire were included in the study and completed the provisional questionnaire during a visit at each participating centre. Psychometric analyses included the evaluation of the scale structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant, and clinical validity, and responsiveness to change.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and September 2021, 576 patients from 22 centers (17 countries, 16 languages) were enrolled in the study. The psychometric analyses resulted in a final questionnaire containing 42 items divided into 10 scales: Breast Symptoms, Body Image, Sexual Functioning, Arm Symptoms, Systemic Chemotherapy Side Effects, Hand/Feet Symptoms/Neuropathy, Skeletal Symptoms, Endocrine Symptoms, Breast Satisfaction, Vaginal Symptoms, and 3 single items: Weight Gain, Sexual Enjoyment and Future Perspective.

CONCLUSION

The revised EORTC QLQ-BR42 questionnaire incorporates the EORTC-QLQ-BR23 original items, combined with 19 new items that address the new therapies developed over the past 20 years. This comprehensive module is a valid instrument to assess the HRQoL of BC patients and can be used in place of the BR23 in future trials.

The effect of an interactive nurse support program developed with a mobile application on patient outcomes in breast cancer patients who received outpatient chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of the interactive nurse support program developed with a mobile application on patient outcomes (symptom management, quality of life, perception of social support, anxiety) in breast cancer patients who received outpatient chemotherapy.

METHODS

The randomized controlled study was conducted in the outpatient chemotherapy unit of a public hospital between 2021 and 2023. The study sample consisted of 100 breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophoshamide chemotherapy. Patients in the control group received standard care, and patients in the intervention group were applied an interactive nurse support program developed with a mobile application throughout four chemotherapy cycles. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23 Scales, Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MPSSS), Beck Anxiety Scale (BAS) were used in data collection. Data were collected five times, including before chemotherapy (t0) and at the end of the first week after each chemotherapy (t1, t2, t3, t4).

RESULTS

MSAS, BAS total scores, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 Scales "Symptom Dimension" scores of the patients in the intervention group were found to be significantly lower than the control group at t1, t2, t3, t4 (p˂0.05). EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale "General Well-Being", "Functional Status", EORTC QLQ-BR23 "Functional Status" scores, MPSSS total scores of the patients in the intervention group were found to be significantly higher than the control group at t1, t2, t3, t4 measurements (p˂0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The interactive nurse support program developed with the mobile application is effective on patient outcomes in breast cancer patients who received outpatient chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, NCT05739175.

Randomized Trial Assessing Prospective Surveillance and Exercise for Preventing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in High-Risk Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if combining a prospective surveillance model (PSM) with a supervised multimodal exercise program prevents breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) and its effect on the functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) of high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing treatment.

DESIGN

Two-arm parallel superiority randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Outpatient physical therapy service in a public hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

116 adult women (N=116; age ≥18y) diagnosed with stage I-III BC were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included recent surgery and indication for adjuvant chemotherapy. Exclusion criteria were significant arm volume difference, previous cancer, exercise contraindications, and extreme body mass index values.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized into experimental (n=61) or control groups (n=55) in a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group received PSM with a supervised multimodal exercise program for 12 weeks. The control group received PSM alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Arm volume, grip strength, 6-minute walk test, and QoL were blindly assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months.

RESULTS

The combination of PSM with a supervised multimodal exercise program significantly reduced arm volume and body weight and improved grip strength, functional capacity, and the QoL of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining PSM and physical exercise reduces arm volume, prevents BCRL, and improves physical performance and QoL in high-risk patients. The combination of PSM and STRONG-B was superior to PSM alone, validating the study's superiority design.

Sexual health in female and male cancer survivors - compared with age-matched cancer-free controls in Norway

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sexual dysfunction is a common late effect of cancer reducing quality of life. This study investigated sexual health in cancer survivors shortly after diagnosis and at long-term follow-up compared to the general population.

METHODS

A nationwide survey stratified by sex and age was distributed to a representative sample of the Norwegian population. Of the 5,135 respondents (33% response rate), 453 were cancer survivors, and 4,682 were cancer-free controls. Time since cancer diagnosis was divided into two categories: 2 years or less (short-term) and over 2 years (long-term). Sexual health was evaluated using the EORTC questionnaires SHQ-22 and the sexual domains of the QLQ-BR23/QLQ-BR45. Multivariable linear regression analyses compared sexual health between cancer survivors and cancer-free controls, and between short- and long-term cancer survivors.

RESULTS

Cancer survivors reported significantly poorer sexual health outcomes than cancer-free controls, except for the importance of maintaining a sexually active life, rated equally important. There were minimal differences in sexual health between short-term and long-term cancer survivors. Interestingly, male cancer survivors appeared to be more affected by sexual health challenges than females, when compared to their cancer-free controls.

INTERPRETATION

This study is the first to utilize the EORTC SHQ-22 questionnaire to assess sexual health in cancer survivors and controls. Sexual health was found to be significantly worse in cancer survivors compared to age-matched controls. It is imperative to address this overlooked health issue in the follow-up programs for cancer survivors.

Understanding quality of life in Danish women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing multiple treatments

BACKGROUND

Women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may experience several symptoms exacerbated by successive treatments. There is however, a lack of knowledge of the most important symptoms and how these may affect daily life function. This study aims to elucidate the quality of life (QoL), including both symptoms and daily life functions, among mBC women undergoing varied treatments.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a cross-sectional electronic questionnaire study enrolling mBC women (≥ stage III) receiving medical cancer treatment through September-December 2023. QoL, symptoms, and daily life function were measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer module (BR45). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), defined by the EORTC, covers the subjective perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of cancer patients' symptoms, including physical, emotional, social, and cognitive functions. We examined associations between QoL, treatment line and therapy types, and estimated odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of 359 eligible participants, 111 responded (30.9%). At study commencement, 90.9% of the participants received at least one type of systemic treatment, with 16.2% undergoing chemotherapy, 61.3% anti-hormonal treatment, and 66.6% targeted cancer treatment. QLQ-C30 sum scores were highest in women receiving anti-hormonal treatment (80.7, interquartile range [IQR]: 17.6), followed by targeted cancer treatment (78.8, IQR: 18.4), and lowest with chemotherapy (77.1, IQR: 24.8). Quality of life decreased with subsequent treatment lines (first line: 80.3, IQR: 20.7, fourth line: 67.4, IQR: 11.3). No significant differences were found in the functions or in the individual symptoms according to monotherapy type.

INTERPRETATION

Women with mBC experience a substantial symptom burden and reduced functioning, and their QoL differs with successive lines of treatment. This underlines that women living with mBC need support and effective symptom management to maintain QoL.

Translation and Linguistic Validation of BIS (Body Image Scale) for Breast Cancer Patients in India

A number of PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) have been developed and validated for English-speaking populations but with limited utility in non-English-speaking countries. Body image scale (BIS) is a type of PROM which assesses the changes in the body image of a patient diagnosed with cancer. The current study was carried out to translate the BIS in Hindi and Marathi. Out of the 10 questions in the BIS questionnaire, Hindi and Marathi translations were already available for 4 questions (Questions no. 2, 4, 5, and 9) from the EORTC BR23 questionnaire. Remaining questions were translated using the EORTC translation manual, which includes forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, proofreading, and pilot testing. Pilot testing done on 10 patients each for Hindi and Marathi showed at least 80% acceptability for all the questions for both Hindi and Marathi translations. Both the translated versions will be used for validation in a large cohort of breast cancer patients. The Hindi and Marathi versions of the BIS have very good acceptability and can be utilized for clinical trials once validated in cancer patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-02037-2.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Whole-Breast Plus Regional Irradiation and Whole-Breast Irradiation Only in pN1 Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial (KROG 17-01)

PURPOSE

The role of regional node irradiation (RNI) with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with pN1 breast cancer receiving taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy is not well defined. The KROG 1701 trial, a phase 3, multicenter, noninferiority study, aimed to compare the disease-free survival between WBI+RNI and WBI alone in this patient cohort. Comprehensive patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected at multiple timepoints are reported.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The trial (NCT03269981) enrolled patients with pN1 breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy, allocating them to receive either WBI+RNI or WBI only. PROs were assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaires Core 30and breast cancer-specific module 23 modules at baseline, during radiation therapy, and at subsequent follow-up intervals of 3 to 6 months, and annually up to 4 years.

RESULTS

From April 2017 to December 2021, 840 patients were enrolled; 777 received intervention as assigned, and 750 completed baseline PRO questionnaires (387 in WBI+RNI, 363 in WBI only). All PRO domains showed improvements over time (P < .001). During radiation therapy, the WBI+RNI group reported greater fatigue and nausea. Higher arm symptom scores were observed in the WBI+RNI group 3 months post-treatment (P = .030). No other significant PRO domain differences, including arm/breast symptoms, were observed between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pN1 breast cancer treated with taxane-based chemotherapy, adding RNI to WBI resulted in minor, temporary declines in specific PRO domains, but these differences were not clinically significant. This indicates that overall patient experience between WBI+RNI and WBI is comparable, supporting the safety and patient tolerability of both treatments.

Assessing the Relationship of Different Levels of Pain to the Health Status of Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between different pain levels in the affected arm and health status in long-term breast cancer survivors (LTBCSs) and identified predictors of pain at this stage of long-term survivorship. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 80 participants categorized LTBCSs by pain levels in the affected arm into three groups: no pain (0-0.99), mild pain (1-3.99), and moderate to severe pain (4-10). Variables assessed at least 5 years since diagnosis include pain in the non-affected arm, pain interference, cancer-related fatigue (CRF), physical activity (PA) level, fitness condition, mood state, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: A total of 36.25% of LTBCSs have no pain, 30% have mild pain, and 33.75% have moderate to severe pain. Furthermore, pain presence was associated with increased pain in the non-affected arm, pain interference, CRF, mood disturbances, and physical inactivity, as well as a decreased HRQoL (all p < 0.05). Regression analysis found "upset by hair loss", CRF "affective domain", "dyspnea", and "alcohol consumption" as significant predictors of higher levels of pain in the affected arm (r2 adjusted = 0.646). Conclusions: A total of 63.75% of LTBCSs continue to experience mild to moderate to severe pain in the affected arm, negatively impacting their physical, mental, and emotional health status, with increased pain severity ≥5 years beyond cancer diagnosis. "Upset by hair loss", CRF "affective domain", "dyspnea", and alcohol consumption collectively explain 64.6% of the affected-arm pain level in LTBCSs.

Evaluating Treatment Preferences and the Efficacy of Capsaicin 179 mg Patch vs. Pregabalin in a Randomized Trial for Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain in Breast Cancer: CAPTRANE

Background/Objectives: CAPTRANE evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) vs. oral pregabalin for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) following breast cancer surgery. The study was designed with the aim of demonstrating noninferiority of one HCCP against daily pregabalin. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, open-label study conducted across nine centers in France. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score after 2 months. Results: Recruitment challenges resulted in the randomization of 140 patients (versus 644 planned); the per-protocol population comprised 107 patients (HCCP: n = 65; pregabalin: n = 42). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (standard deviation) change versus baseline in NPRS score was -1.926 (2.554) with HCCP and -1.634 (2.498) with pregabalin. The prespecified analysis showed that HCCP was not inferior to pregabalin: the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the between-arm difference was -0.889 and the upper bound was +0.260 (i.e., below the predefined clinical threshold of +0.4). Patient-reported outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between treatments. The painful area size decreased significantly more with HCCP. Tolerability profiles differed, with HCCP mostly causing application-site reactions. While >50% of patients switched from pregabalin to HCCP, none switched from HCCP to pregabalin. Conclusions: This comparative study in PSNP post breast cancer surgery, evaluating a single treatment of HCCP, shows a noninferior reduction in pain intensity, a superior reduction in painful area size, and a patient preference for HCCP compared with pregabalin. Despite limitations, it contributes valuable initial data for PSNP management in breast cancer care.

Quality of life in early breast cancer patients after adjuvant accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) in randomized trial

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a valid option for adjuvant therapy of selected early breast cancer (BC). This single-institution prospective randomized study compares the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between women treated with the highly conformal-external beam APBI technique and those with the more commonly used moderately hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (hypo-WBI). Eligible patients were women over 50 years with early BC (G1/2 DCIS ≤ 25 mm or G1/2 invasive non-lobular luminal-like HER2 negative carcinoma ≤ 20 mm) after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins. APBI arm consisted of 30 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions and WBI arm of 40 Gy in 15 fractions plus 10 Gy in 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed. Patients were requested to complete the official Czech translation of the EORTC QoL questionnaires, including QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR45, before radiation (baseline), at the end of radiation (M0) and 1 (M1), 3 (M3), 6 (M6), 12 (M12), and 24 (M24) months after radiation. Linear regression models were used to analyze differences in HRQoL between the arms. The 85 enrolled patients exhibited no differences in HRQoL scores between the two arms at baseline. Patients in the APBI arm reported more favorable global health status at M6 (p = 0.055). Other functional scales showed a decrease in the WBI arm at M0 (p = 0.027 for physical functioning). During radiation, symptoms scores increased. Significant between-group differences were observed for the pain (p = 0.002), systemic therapy side effects (p = 0.004), and breast symptoms (p < 0.001) scales at M0, with higher scores in the WBI arm. During follow-up, scores on symptoms scales returned to at least the baseline values. Early BC patients treated with APBI showed non-inferior short-term and late HRQoL outcomes compared to hypo-WBI. In addition to previous findings regarding toxicity, promising pain and breast symptoms results, suggest that APBI should be strongly considered as a treatment option for selected low-risk patients.Trial registration NCT06007118, August 23, 2023 (retrospectively registered).

Quality of life of women with a screen-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) screening enables early detection of BC, which may lead to improved quality of life (QoL). We aim to compare QoL between women with a screen-detected and clinically detected BC in the Netherlands.

METHODS

We used data from the 'Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation' (UMBRELLA) between October 2013 and March 2022. Patients were categorized as screen-detected or clinically detected. We analysed three questionnaires, namely EORTC QLQ C-30, BR23, and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by BC patients shortly after diagnosis (T1) and one-year after treatment (T2). Independent t-tests were performed to compare QoL average differences between the two groups. Bonferroni-corrected p-value significance threshold of 0.00057 was used. The magnitude of differences was calculated using Cohen's d. The clinical relevance of QLQ-C30 differences was assessed based on interpretation guideline of EORTC-QLQ-C30 results.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 691 women with screen-detected BC and 480 with clinically detected BC. Generally, screen-detected BC patients reported a better QoL. At T1, their average QLQ-C30 summary score was higher (86.1) than clinically detected BC patients (83.0) (p < 0.0001). Cohen's d for all items ranged between 0.00 and 0.39. A few QLQ-C30 score differences were clinically relevant, indicating better outcomes in emotional functioning, general health, constipation, and fatigue for women with screen-detected BC.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Netherlands, women with screen-detected BC reported statistically significant and better QoL than women with clinically detected BC. However, clinical relevance of the differences is limited.

Digital Rehabilitation Program for Breast Cancer Survivors on Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy: A Feasibility Study

Background: Breast cancer survivors often face physical and psychological challenges, including weight gain, metabolic syndrome, and reduced quality of life. To address these concerns, a mobile app-based rehabilitation program called "THRIVE" was developed to improve physical activity, medication adherence, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population. Methods: This prospective, single-arm study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of the "THRIVE" app among breast cancer survivors undergoing hormonal therapy. Participants were recruited from Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong between December 2022 and June 2023. Eligible survivors had completed treatment within the last five years or had stable advanced disease on hormonal therapy. Participants monitored their exercise, medication adherence, and self-care via the app and a Fitbit activity tracker for 16 weeks. Primary outcomes included recruitment, dropout, adherence rates, and safety. Secondary outcomes, measured at baseline and week 16, included physical activity intensity, HRQoL, psychological stress, body composition, and app satisfaction. Results: A total of 50 participants, with a median age of 53 years, completed the study. The recruitment rate was 70.4% with no dropouts. The adherence rate, measured by completing exercises recommended in the mobile app at least three times per week, was 74%. No severe adverse events were reported. While physical activity intensity showed no significant changes from baseline to week 16 (p = 0.24), cognitive function (p = 0.021), future perspective (p = 0.044), arm symptoms (p = 0.042), depression (p = 0.01), and anxiety (p = 0.004) improved. All participants reported perfect medication compliance (100%). Satisfaction with the app was high. Conclusions: This mobile app-based rehabilitation program demonstrated good feasibility, with satisfactory recruitment, adherence, and safety, providing valuable insights into future definitive studies.

The EORTC QLQ breast modules and the FACT-B for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients - an updated literature review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Two commonly used quality of life questionnaires in breast cancer are EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B, and the extended FACT-B + 4. More recently, the EORTC EORTC QLQ-BR42 was developed. This systematic review compares the various versions of the EORTC QLQ and FACT tools for breast cancer in terms of their content, validity, and psychometric properties.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. All questionnaires have been proven to be valid, reliable and responsive. The provisional EORTC QLQ-BR45 transitioned to the EORTC QLQ-BR42 in Phase IV of its development, which encompasses the side effects associated with the latest breast cancer treatments. Both the EORTC and FACT measures assess physical and mental dimensions of quality of life, with the EORTC measure placing relatively more emphasis on physical content and FACT placing relatively more emphasis on mental (social and emotional) content. The four additional items in the FACT-B + 4 were developed to address arm lymphoedema following axillary surgery.

SUMMARY

The development and uptake of quality of life tools are essential in the evaluation of breast cancer treatments. The EORTC QLQ-BR42 and FACT-B are both valid, reliable, and responsive QoL questionnaires.

Effects of a motor and cognitive training program on executive function and different biomarkers related to muscle-brain crosstalk in breast cancer survivors: 3-arm randomised controlled BRAINonFIT study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant but often neglected issue for breast cancer survivors that reduces their quality of life. Physical exercise and cognitive training have emerged as promising strategies for CRCI; however, evidence regarding its effectiveness is still unknown. A recently developed motor-cognitive training (dual-tasks) is proposed to examine its efficacy on executive function, physical fitness, emotional symptomatology, and important muscle-brain crosstalk biomarkers.

METHODS

The BRAINonFIT study is a randomised, controlled, longitudinal (20 weeks), three-arm, parallel study with a follow-up phase (12 weeks). Breast cancer survivors (stage I-IIIA) with completed chemotherapy are recruited from QuirónSalud Hospital in Seville. Principal outcomes are executive functions, measured by the Trail Making Test, Stroop and Digit Span Backwards; physical fitness, assessed by muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition; and several muscle-brain biomarkers analysed by immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA). Secondary endpoints are memory function, intelligence, learning ability, self-reported cognitive function, and emotional symptomatology. Assessments take place after the enrolment (baseline; T1), after completing the interventions (5 months after baseline; T2), and after completing the follow-up period (8 months after baseline; T3).

DISCUSSION

Given the importance of improving care for breast cancer survivors, this study will provide preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive-motor training (dual task) as a therapeutic strategy to improve CRCI. Moreover, addressing muscle-brain crosstalk by representative biomarkers will help to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which this intervention may beneficially impact CRCI.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT06073717.

Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how

As the treatment for cancer improves and advances are made, the clinical focus is often on treatment response and survival. However, these are not the only factors which are important to patients. More patients are living longer after cancer treatment and therefore it is important that we can describe not only the treatment to patients but also what their life will be like during and after treatment. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) allow us to describe these. Although there are a range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to the clinician to assess these, the use of them in many areas of brachytherapy lags behind ideal levels. Brachytherapy has many features that differ to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) yet the assessment of quality of life during and after treatment is much more scarce than EBRT. Brachytherapy is often used in the setting of organ preservation or in place of radical surgery, yet there is a paucity of quality of life data comparing the different treatment modalities. This review article will aim to elaborate on the evidence that exists in the use of specific PROMs within prostate, breast and gynaecologic cancers and describe the development of a novel PROMs approach in rectal brachytherapy which aims to identify and resolve symptoms at an early stage.

Model of Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Using Cross-Sectional Data: The Role of Resilience

Purpose

Resilience has been suggested as an important predictor of both physical and mental health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. However, it is unclear why resilient women handle their diagnosis better, not only mentally, but also physically. The aim of this study was to investigate paths between resilience, physical activity, and mental, physical, and global health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Structural equation modeling was conducted to evaluate the proposed structural paths using a sample of 638 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from Sweden.

Results

Resilience was directly associated with physical activity and mental health-related quality of life. It was indirectly associated with physical functioning, through mental health-related quality of life and physical activity. Resilience was also indirectly associated with global quality of life, through mental health-related quality of life.

Conclusion

Mental health support and encouraging physical activity may be especially relevant to enhance all aspects of health-related quality of life early in the breast cancer process. Results should be replicated longitudinally.

Immediate Psychological Implications of Risk-Reducing Mastectomies in Women With Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Risk-reducing mastectomy is recommended for high-risk patients but may have significant psychological consequences. This study aimed to determine the differences in anxiety, depressive symptomatology, body image and quality of life in women with an increased risk of breast cancer immediately before and after undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy.

METHODS

Eighty-eight women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to BRCA1/2 mutations or a previous cancer diagnosis participated in this study. Instruments used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Body Image Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast 23, administered 15-30 days before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Following surgery, there was an immediate and significant worsening in anxiety, depressive symptomatology and body image. There was a significant deterioration in global, physical, role, and social functioning, as well as in body image and sexual enjoyment scales. Additionally, there were increases in fatigue, nausea and vomiting, constipation, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, perceived financial difficulties, pain, systemic therapy side effects, and breast and arm symptoms. However, there was an improvement in future perspective. These changes occurred independently of whether participants had a cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation.

CONCLUSION

Risk-reducing mastectomies have immediate psychological consequences. While these procedures improve future health perspective, they increase anxiety and depressive symptomatology and decrease body image and quality of life, regardless of cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation. These findings highlight the psychological consequences of such surgical procedures, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological interventions both before and after surgery.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®) in breast cancer patients: The prospective observational multicenter VIP study

Patients' self-reporting is increasingly considered essential to measure quality-of-life and treatment-related side-effects. However, if multiple patient-reported instruments are used, redundancy may represent an overload for patients. Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) are a tool allowing direct patients' reporting of side-effects. We tested psychometric properties of a selected list of PRO-CTCAE items, in a cohort of 303 breast cancer patients, using validated instruments for quality of life assessment as anchors. The analysis of convergent validity with HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and EORTC BR-23 sub-scales, and the analysis of responsiveness with the PGIC (Patients Global Impression of Change) score supported that a selected list of PRO-CTCAE symptoms might represent a standardized, agile tool for both research and practice settings to reduce patient burden without missing relevant information on patient perceptions. Among patients using digital devices, those with a higher education levels required shorter time to fulfil questionnaires. In conclusion, a selected list of PRO-CTCAE items can be considered as a standardized, agile tool for capturing crucial domains of side-effects and quality of life in patients with breast cancer. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04416672).

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study

BACKGROUND

In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and then adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-522.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks, plus 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and then 4 cycles of doxorubicin (or epirubicin) plus cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 9 cycles. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) were prespecified secondary objectives. Between-group differences in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline (day 1 of cycle 1 in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) to the prespecified latest time point with at least 60% completion and at least 80% compliance were assessed using a longitudinal model (no alpha error assigned).

RESULTS

Week 21 (neoadjuvant phase) and week 24 (adjuvant phase) were the latest time points at which completion/compliance rates were ≥60%/80%. In the neoadjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [n = 762] vs placebo plus chemotherapy [n = 383]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 21 in QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), emotional functioning, and physical functioning were -1.04 (95% confidence interval = -3.46 to 1.38), -0.69 (95% CI = -3.13 to 1.75), and -2.85 (95% CI = -5.11 to -0.60), respectively. In the adjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab [n = 539] vs placebo [n = 308]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 24 were -0.41 (95% CI = -2.60 to 1.77), -0.60 (95% CI = -2.99 to 1.79), and -1.57 (95% CI = -3.36 to 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

No substantial differences in PRO assessments were observed between neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488.

Assessing the Impact of Mastectomy on the Quality of Life among Cancer Survivors: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study in Mysuru

Introduction

While mastectomy a crucial procedure in preventing and treating breast cancer is essential, it significantly impacts the emotional well-being, dignity, and overall quality of life (QoL) of survivors. Dealing with the physical challenges of mastectomy is emotionally demanding as it requires adapting to the changes in one's body following breast cancer.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of mastectomy on the QoL among cancer survivors.

Subjects and Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the outpatient departments of oncology at two tertiary care hospitals in Mysuru. Women diagnosed with breast cancer in the year 2021-2022 and who have undergone mastectomy of at least one breast were chosen for the study. The QoL was measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - C-30 and BR (breast specific) - 23 modules.

Results

Emotional, physical, social, and cognitive functioning scores assigned a maximum number of participants in the average to good QoL category. The survivors scored lower in sexual enjoyment (10.758 ± 29.73), sexual functioning (32.024 ± 45.35), future perspective (57.419 ± 38.773), and body image (57.309 ± 32.51) and reported lower QoL which was also related to their menstruation status and age. However, a small group of participants had a positive body image despite their transformed bodies. Symptoms such as fatigue (80.43 ± 24.84), nausea/vomiting (116.39 ± 64.7), insomnia (73.43 ± 38.85), and financial difficulties (65.28 ± 45.46) negatively affected the QoL. The study also highlighted that poor QoL was associated with hair loss (85.48 ± 34.60), side effects of systemic therapy (42.08 ± 22.28), arm symptoms (83.16 ± 23.67), and breast symptoms (20.71 ± 30.45).

Conclusion

Survivors face physical and psychological changes that significantly impact their QoL. QoL assessments offer insights into the impact of the disease during and after treatment.

Evaluating the effect of upper-body morbidity on quality of life following primary breast cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Improvements in breast cancer management continue to increase survival and life expectancy after treatment. Yet the adverse effects of treatment may persist long term, threatening physical, psychological, and social wellbeing, leading to impaired quality of life (QOL). Upper-body morbidity (UBM) such as pain, lymphoedema, restricted shoulder range of motion (ROM), and impaired function are widely reported after breast cancer treatment, but evidence demonstrating its impact on QOL is inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of UBM on QOL following primary breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

The study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020203445). CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for studies reporting QOL in individuals with and without UBM following primary breast cancer treatment. Primary analysis determined the standardised mean difference (SMD) in physical, psychological, and social wellbeing scores between UBM + /UBM - groups. Secondary analyses identified differences in QOL scores between groups, according to questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies were included, with 39 conducive to meta-analysis. Types of UBM included pain, lymphoedema, restricted shoulder ROM, impaired upper-body function, and upper-body symptoms. UBM + groups reported poorer physical (SMD =  - 0.99; 95%CI =  - 1.26, - 0.71; p < 0.00001), psychological (SMD =  - 0.43; 95%CI =  - 0.60, - 0.27; p < 0.00001), and social wellbeing (SMD =  - 0.62; 95%CI =  - 0.83, - 0.40; p < 0.00001) than UBM - groups. Secondary analyses according to questionnaire showed that UBM + groups rated their QOL poorer or at equal to, UBM - groups across all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate the significant, negative impact of UBM on QOL, pervading physical, psychological, and social domains.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Efforts to assess and minimise the multidimensional impact of UBM are warranted to mitigate impaired QOL after breast cancer.

Is it really over when it is over? physical, mental and emotional health status of long-term breast cancer survivors compared to healthy matched controls

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess pain, fitness condition, physical activity (PA) level, comorbidities, cancer-related fatigue (CRF), mood state and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in long-term breast cancer survivors (LTBCS) compared to women without cancer history, matched by age, weight, height, and educational level.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study conducted in Granada between April 2018 and July 2023 involved 80 LTBCS and 80 matched controls. Pain, fitness condition, PA level, comorbidities, CRF, mood state, and HRQoL were evaluated ≥ 5 years post-diagnosis using validated instruments.

RESULTS

LTBCS, compared to the controls, reported significantly higher levels of "pain intensity and interference", CRF (in all domains and > 40% exhibited moderate-to-severe fatigue levels), "sadness-depression", "anxiety", "anger/hostility", and "symptom scales" (All: P = .000 to .027). Moreover, 66.25% of LTBCS not only did not reach recommended PA levels (P = .035), but also presented significantly lower levels of "general physical fitness", "muscular strength", "happiness", "functioning scales" (except "emotional functioning"), and "global health status" (All: P = .000 to .048).

CONCLUSION

LTBCS still suffer from physical (pain, fitness condition, and CRF), both mental and emotional (sadness-depression, anxiety and anger/hostility) long-term side effects as well as multiple HRQoL issues (including lower levels of physical functioning and higher levels of symptoms). These findings highlight the chronic nature of this disease and the importance of continuing long- term follow-up care for survivors many years after the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Efficacy and patient-reported outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving aumolertinib as first-line therapy: a real-world study

Background

Aumolertinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and a well-tolerated toxicity profile compared to gefitinib in front-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the AENEAS trial. However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of aumolertinib have not been published.

Methods

In this real-world study, the efficacy was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. PROs were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Quality of Life lung cancer-specific module (QLQ-LC13) in advanced NSCLC patients receiving aumolertinib as initial therapy. Pre-specified key symptoms were cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, sore mouth or tongue, dysphagia, hair loss, tingling in hands or feet, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain, and pain at other sites.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included, 23 of whom had efficacy information up to January 2024. The median follow-up time was 264 days (interval: 36-491 days). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 65.2% and 91.3%, respectively. The EORTC QLQ-LC30 general health status scale showed that functional scales increased and symptom scales decreased during aumolertinib treatment. Symptom scales assessed by the EORTC QLQ-LC13 showed that improvements in cough, sore mouth or tongue, tingling in hands or feet, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain, and other pain sites were both clinically and statistically significant after 6 months of aumolertinib treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

In this real-world study, aumolertinib showed comparable disease control and objective response rates as reported in the AENEAS trial for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Aumolertinib treatment improved PROs, further supporting it in first-line clinical practice.

Using intervention mapping to facilitate and sustain return-to work after breast cancer: protocol for the FASTRACS multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Women with breast cancer face many barriers to return to work (RTW) after their cancer. The main objective of the FASTRACS-RCT is to evaluate the impact of the FASTRACS (Facilitate and Sustain Return to Work after Breast Cancer) intervention on the sustainable RTW of breast cancer patients, 12 months after the end of active treatment.

METHODS

FASTRACS-RCT is a prospective, national, multicentre, randomized, controlled and open-label study. A total of 420 patients with early breast cancer scheduled for surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to: (i) the intervention arm comprising four steps over 6 months : Handing over the intervention tools; transitional medical consultation with the general practitioner (GP); pre-RTW visit with the company's occupational physician (OP); catch-up visit with a hospital-based RTW expert (if sick leave > 10 months) (ii) the control arm to receive usual care. The design of the FASTRACS intervention was informed by intervention mapping for complex interventions in health promotion planning, and involved patients and representatives of relevant stakeholders. Specific tools were developed to bridge the gap between the hospital, the GP, the OP and the workplace: a toolkit for breast cancer patients comprising a theory-based guide; specific checklists for the GP and the OP, respectively; and a theory-based guide for workplace actors (employer, manager, colleagues). The primary endpoint will associate sustainable RTW (full-time or part-time work at 50% or more of working time, for at least 28 consecutive days) and days off work. It will be assessed at 4, 8 and 12 months after the end of active oncological treatment. Secondary endpoints will include quality of life, anxiety, depression, RTW self-efficacy, physical activity, social support, job accommodations, work productivity, job status, and the usefulness and acceptability of the intervention's tools.

DISCUSSION

FASTRACS-RCT will be supplemented by a realist evaluation approach aimed at understanding the influence of context in activating the intervention's mechanisms and effects. If the expected impact of the intervention is confirmed, the intervention will be adapted and scaled-up for other cancers and chronic diseases to better integrate healthcare and work disability prevention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04846972 ; April 15, 2021.

Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Comprehensive Nodal Irradiation in the RadComp Trial

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used in the ongoing RadComp pragmatic randomized clinical trial (PRCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The deidentified and blinded data set included 774 English-speaking female participants who completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment. Eleven PRO measures were evaluated, including the Trial Outcome Index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes, the BREAST-Q, and selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. PROs were measured at 3 timepoints: baseline, completion of radiation therapy (RT), and 6 months post-RT. Ten variables were used as validity anchors. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated between PROs and convergent validity indicators. Mean PRO differences between clinically distinct categories were compared with analysis of variance methods (known-groups validity). PRO change scores were mapped to change in other variables (sensitivity to change).

RESULTS

Most correlations between PROs and validity indicators were large (≥0.5). Mean score for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes was higher (better) for those with a lumpectomy compared with those with a mastectomy (P < .001). Mean scores for the FACT-B Trial Outcome Index and for PROMIS Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were better for those with good baseline performance status compared with those with poorer baseline performance status (P < .05). At completion of RT and post-RT, mean scores for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes and BREAST-Q Radiation were significantly different (P < .001) across categories for all Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -Treatment Satisfaction - General items. There were medium-sized correlations between change scores for FACT-B Trial Outcome Index, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and change scores in the Visual Analog Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving radiation in the RadComp PRCT, our findings demonstrate high reliability and validity for important PRO measures, supporting their psychometric strength and usefulness to reflect the effect of RT on health-related quality of life.

Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (CAPItello-291): patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

CAPItello-291 is an ongoing phase 3 trial in which capivasertib-fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo-fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after aromatase inhibitor treatment, in both the overall population and in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. This study further explored patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, symptoms, and symptom tolerability in CAPItello-291.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which was conducted across 193 hospitals and cancer centres in 19 countries, enrolled women with any menopausal status or men, aged ≥18 years (≥20 years in Japan), with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 or 6 inhibitor therapy. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/WHO performance score of 0 or 1 and could have received up to two previous lines of endocrine therapy and up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (stratified according to the presence or absence of liver metastases, previous use of a CDK4/6 inhibitor [yes vs no], and geographical region) to receive oral capivasertib 400 mg (twice daily for 4 days, followed by 3 days off) plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (every 14 days for the first three injections, then every 28 days) or placebo with matching fulvestrant dosing. The dual primary endpoint of the trial was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN-altered tumours. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module (QLQ-C30) and breast module (QLQ-BR23), Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and Patient Global Impression of Treatment Tolerability (PGI-TT) questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Evaluation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 were secondary endpoints and evaluation of PRO-CTCAE and PGI-TT were pre-defined exploratory endpoints, and these endpoints are the subject of analysis in this Article. Data were collected at baseline and prespecified timepoints. Patient-reported outcomes were analysed in all randomly assigned patients with an evaluable baseline assessment and at least one evaluable post-baseline assessment. Change from baseline was assessed using mixed model with repeated measures for EORTC QLQ-C30 and summarised for QLQ-BR23. Time to deterioration was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. PGI-TT and PRO-CTCAE responses were summarised at each treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were not prospectively powered for statistical comparison. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04305496.

FINDINGS

Between June 2, 2020, and Oct 13, 2021, 901 patients were enrolled, of whom 708 patients were randomly assigned to receive capivasertib-fulvestrant (n=355) or placebo-fulvestrant (n=353). The median age of the patients was 59 years (IQR 51-67) in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group and 58 years (IQR 49-66) in the placebo-fulvestrant group. At data cutoff (Aug 15, 2022), the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival in censored patients was 13·0 months (IQR 9·1-16·7) for capivasertib-fulvestrant and 12·7 months (IQR 2·0-16·4) for placebo-fulvestrant in the overall population. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL) scores were maintained from baseline and were similar between treatment groups throughout the study period (difference in mean change from baseline of -2·5 [95% CI -4·5 to -0·6] with capivasertib-fulvestrant vs -5·6 [-7·9 to -3·4] with placebo-fulvestrant; treatment difference 3·1 [95% CI 0·2 to 6·0]). Median time to deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL was 24·9 months (95% CI 13·8 to not reached) in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group and 12·0 months (10·2 to 15·7) in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·53 to 0·92). Time to deterioration HRs for all EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 subscale scores showed little difference between the treatment groups, except for diarrhoea, which was worse in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group than in the placebo-fulvestrant group (HR 2·75, 95% CI 2·01-3·81). In PRO-CTCAE symptom assessment, the proportion of patients reporting loose and watery stools "frequently" or "almost constantly" was 29% higher at cycle 1, day 15 in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group than in the placebo-fulvestrant group, decreasing at subsequent cycles. Other PRO-CTCAE-reported symptoms (rash, mouth or throat sores, itchy skin, and numbness or tingling in hands or feet) were absent or mild in most patients in both groups throughout treatment. According to the PGI-TT, most patients in both groups reported "not at all" or "a little bit" of bother from treatment side-effects.

INTERPRETATION

Patient-reported outcomes from CAPItello-291 demonstrated that capivasertib-fulvestrant delayed time to deterioration of GHS/QOL and maintained other dimensions of HRQOL (except symptoms of diarrhoea) similarly to fulvestrant. With the clinical efficacy and manageable safety profile, these exploratory results further support the positive benefit-risk profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in this population.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Magnitude and Temporal Variations of Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Quality of Life After Early Breast Cancer: Results From the Multicentric French CANTO Cohort

PURPOSE

Socioeconomic status (SES) influences the survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, limited research investigates social inequalities in their quality of life (QoL). This study examines the socioeconomic inequalities in QoL after an EBC diagnosis and their time trends.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used data from the French prospective multicentric CANTO cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993498), including women with EBC enrolled between 2012 and 2018. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30). summary score at diagnosis and 1 and 2 years postdiagnosis. We considered three indicators of SES separately: self-reported financial difficulties, household income, and educational level. We first analyzed the trajectories of the QLQ-C30 summary score by SES group. Then, social inequalities in QLQ-C30 summary score and their time trends were quantified using the regression-based slope index of inequality (SII), representing the absolute change in the outcome along socioeconomic gradient extremes. The analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, disease stage, and type of local and systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 5,915 included patients with data on QoL at diagnosis and at the 2-year follow-up, social inequalities in QLQ-C30 summary score at baseline were statistically significant for all SES indicators (SIIfinancial difficulties = -7.6 [-8.9; -6.2], SIIincome = -4.0 [-5.2; -2.8]), SIIeducation = -1.9 [-3.1; -0.7]). These inequalities significantly increased (interaction P < .05) in year 1 and year 2 postdiagnosis, irrespective of prediagnosis health, tumor characteristics, and treatment. Similar results were observed in subgroups defined by menopausal status and type of adjuvant systemic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of preexisting inequalities in QoL increased over time after EBC diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of considering social determinants of health during comprehensive cancer care planning.

Effect of a multimodal intervention in breast Cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: A study protocol of the multimodal project

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To determine the effect of a multimodal intervention (nutritional behavior change and physical exercise) on quality of life, chemotherapy response rate and tolerance, histopathological level of the tumor, body composition, and biochemical parameters, in patients diagnosed with breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment, and to compare them with the control group.

METHODS

Anticipated 80 patients diagnosed with breast cancer aged 18-70 years will be recruited for this randomized, unblinded clinical trial based on a nutritional behavior change and physical exercise in patients during the approximately 6 months in which the patient receives neoadjuvant treatment. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two groups (intervention or control). Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed before the beginning and after the neoadjuvant treatment (before surgery). The primary outcome is quality of life, whereas secondary outcomes include chemotherapy response rate and tolerance, histopathological level of the tumor and body composition (i.e., visceral adipose tissue activity, bone, lean and fat masses). We will analyze blood parameters (i.e., biochemical, inflammatory, and tumor markers) as exploratory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study will address the influence of a practical and viable multimodal intervention (i.e., nutritional behavior change and physical exercise) on breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Given the practical viability of the intervention in real-world settings, our study holds promise for significant scientific and clinical implications.

The impact of age on physical functioning after treatment for breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to explore the impact of age on physical functioning post-treatment for early-stage, locally advanced, or locally recurrent breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), identify PROMs used and variations in physical functioning terms/labels.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EmBase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED were searched, along with relevant key journals and reference lists. Risk of bias (quality) assessment was conducted using a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data was synthesised through tables and narrative.

RESULTS

28,207 titles were extracted from electronic databases, resulting in 44 studies with age sub-groups, and 120 without age sub-groups. Of those with findings on the impact of age, there was variability in the way findings were reported and 21 % found that age did not have a significant impact. However, 66 % of the studies found that with older age, physical functioning declined post-treatment. Comorbidities were associated with physical functioning declines. However, findings from sub-groups (breast cancer stage, treatment type and time post-treatment) lacked concordance. Twenty-eight types of PROM were used: the EORTC QLQ-C30 was most common (50.6 %), followed by the SF-36 (32.3 %). There were 145 terms/labels for physical functioning: 'physical functioning/function' was used most often (82.3 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings point towards an older age and comorbidities being associated with more physical functioning declines. However, it was not possible to determine if stage, treatment type and time since treatment had any influence. More consistent use of the terminology 'physical functioning/function' would aid future comparisons of study results.

A Clinical Analysis of Prognosis and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Approximately 25-30% of patients suffer from breast deformity and/or asymmetry after conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS). Generally, it is thought that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) results in an improved cosmetic result; however, studies comparing the prognosis and aesthetic outcomes of CBCS and OBCS in early breast cancer (EBC) are inadequate.

METHODS

A total of 143 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study; 53 underwent OBCS and 90 underwent CBCS. The resected weight, complications, esthetic results, patient satisfaction, and recurrence rate were compared between the groups. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed by the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients in OBCS group was 43.8 years. This was younger than that in CBCS group (49.1 years, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications (11.3% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.64) and re-excision (5.7% vs. 6.7%, p > 0.99) rates were similar. The OBCS group had higher breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being than the CBCS group (75 vs. 63, p < 0.001 and 84 vs. 77, p = 0.05); however, sexual well-being (56 vs. 66, p = 0.05) and physical well-being (65 vs. 76, p < 0.001) were worse in OBCS. After 42.3 (range: 12.6-69.2)-month median follow-up, no difference in event-free survival (EFS) was demonstrated between the groups (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Although OBCS has the better aesthetic outcomes and identical oncological safety in comparison with CBCS, the sexual and physical well-being in OBCS are not improved for Asian patients. Hence, choosing an appropriate procedure may be more important for the typically small to moderate-sized breasts characteristic of Asian females unlike Westerners.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A bibliometric worldview of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer from 2013 to 2023

Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of analytical and descriptive investigations on the trajectory, essential research directions, current research scenario, pivotal investigative focuses, and forthcoming perspectives. The objective of this research is to provide a thorough update on the progress made in BCS for breast cancer over the preceding decade. Retrieved from the Web of Science database, the data span from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2023. Utilizing a set of advanced analytical instruments, we conducted comprehensive bibliometric and visual analyses. The findings underscore the predominant influence of the USA, representing 35.77% of the overall publications and playing a pivotal role in shaping research within this field. Notable productivity was evident at various institutions, including the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the University of Toronto. Annals of Surgical Oncology contributed the most publications in this field. An examination of keywords indicated a change in the concentration of research attention, transitioning from molecular subtype, ultrasonography, and intraoperative aspects to SEER, male breast cancer, and adjuvant measures. By offering a comprehensive bibliometric assessment, this study enhances our understanding of BCS for breast cancer. Consequently, this benefits both experienced researchers and newcomers alike, providing prompt access to essential information and fostering the extraction of innovative concepts within this specific field.

Quality of Life Outcomes Associated With Optimization of Treatment by Omitting Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Improved prognosis of early breast cancer (EBC) has created opportunities for treatment optimization but reducing morbidity should not inadvertently compromise quality of life (QoL). PROSPECT1 used pre-operative MRI and pathology findings to identify women suitable for radiotherapy (RT) omission following breast conserving surgery. We retrospectively explored the association between de-escalation by omission of RT and QoL in women with EBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three groups were recruited: PROSPECT participants who omitted RT following preoperative MRI (A); participants who received RT following preoperative MRI (B); and women who received usual care - No MRI, received RT (C). Measures included the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23, BCTOS, DASS-21 and a measure of decision regret. Between group differences were assessed using ANOVA or nonparametric equivalents. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed with qualitative description (n = 44).

RESULTS

Data from 400 women were analyzed (125A, 102B, 173C). Group A had fewer symptoms and better body image (breast symptoms: A-B P = .003, A-C P = <.001; arm symptoms: A-B P = .004, A-C P = .011; body image: A-C P = .041) and fewer differences between the treated and untreated breasts (cosmetic: A-B P < .001, A-C P < .001; functional: A-C P = .011; breast specific pain: A-B P < .001, A-C P < .001). Two qualitative themes were found: Treatment with the biggest impact on QoL, and Specific impact of RT on QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Omission of RT was associated with better QoL and functional and cosmetic outcomes. It was highly acceptable to patients. Clinicians should consider the potential for preserved QoL associated with treatment optimization via omission of RT in treatment planning for patients with EBC.

Health utility values of breast cancer treatments and the impact of varying quality of life assumptions on cost-effectiveness

In breast cancer research, utility assumptions are outdated and inconsistent which may affect the results of quality adjusted life year (QALY) calculations and thereby cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Four hundred sixty four female patients with breast cancer treated at Erasmus MC, the Netherlands, completed EQ-5D-5L questionnaires from diagnosis throughout their treatment. Average utilities were calculated stratified by age and treatment. These utilities were applied in CEAs analysing 920 breast cancer screening policies differing in eligible ages and screening interval simulated by the MISCAN-Breast microsimulation model, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000. The CEAs included varying sets on normative, breast cancer treatment and screening and follow-up utilities. Efficiency frontiers were compared to assess the impact of the utility sets. The calculated average patient utilities were reduced at breast cancer diagnosis and 6 months after surgery and increased toward normative utilities 12 months after surgery. When using normative utility values of 1 in CEAs, QALYs were overestimated compared to using average gender and age-specific values. Only small differences in QALYs gained were seen when varying treatment utilities in CEAs. The CEAs varying screening and follow-up utilities showed only small changes in QALYs gained and the efficiency frontier. Throughout all variations in utility sets, the optimal strategy remained robust; biennial for ages 40-76 years and occasionally biennial 40-74 years. In sum, we recommend to use gender and age stratified normative utilities in CEAs, and patient-based breast cancer utilities stratified by age and treatment or disease stage. Furthermore, despite varying utilities, the optimal screening scenario seems very robust.

Empowerment, Pain Control, and Quality of Life Improvement in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients through Pain Neuroscience Education: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study Protocol (EMPOWER Trial)

The treatment of early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) has improved patients' prognosis but often leads to adverse events and sequelae affecting quality of life (QoL). Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is a promising non-pharmacological intervention in this field. Preliminary data have shown the beneficial effect of PNE in BC survivors. However, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding its optimal use in eTNBC. To address this issue, a prospective pilot study will enroll 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with eTNBC at IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital. The PNE program will consist of 10 weekly sessions to be started within 4 weeks of the onset or worsening of a pain syndrome (PS). QoL, pain, and disability will be assessed before, during, at the end of, and 6 months after PNE using validated questionnaires. Peripheral venous blood samples will be taken before and at the end of PNE to evaluate inflammatory serum biomarker levels. The primary objective is to evaluate whether PNE leads to clinical improvement in QoL and pain. If successful, it will be validated in a larger multi-centric cohort, potentially leading to its widespread implementation as a standard pain management tool for eTNBC patients.

Addressing the unmet needs of women with breast cancer in Mexico: a non-randomised pilot study of the digital ePRO intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the acceptability, feasibility, usability, and preliminary effect of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) intervention for patients with breast cancer in Mexico.

DESIGN

We conducted a multimethod non-randomised pilot study. We used a pre-test/post-test design for quantitative assessment of the intervention's effect on patients' supportive care needs and quality of life. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with participants and healthcare workers to explore the intervention's benefits and barriers and understand its feasibility.

PARTICIPANTS

50 women aged 20-75 diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer were enrolled within 2 weeks of starting neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. We excluded illiterate women and those with visual impairment, cognitive disability or severe depression. IDIs were conducted with 18 participants and 10 healthcare providers.

SETTING

Oncology services in three public hospitals of the Mexican Social Security Institute.

INTERVENTION

The ePRO intervention consisted of a responsive web application for weekly symptom reporting combined with proactive follow-up by nurses guided by predefined clinical algorithms for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

50 women were enrolled out of 66 eligible patients approached (75.8%). All 50 completed the 4-week follow-up assessment (100% retention). Completion of the symptom registry declined from 100% in week 1 to 66% in week 6. Participants experienced decreases in supportive care needs and increased quality of life. The ePRO application was rated highly usable. Participants and health professionals both perceived intervention benefits. Drawbacks included poor fit for women receiving radiotherapy and challenges using the application for women with low digital literacy or experiencing severe symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study provided evidence of the high usability and potential efficacy of a web-based ePRO intervention. We revised recruitment during the pilot to include multiple facilities, and we will further revise for the randomised trial to address barriers to successful ePRO implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05925257.

Patient and nursing staff perspectives on automated scalp cooling (ASC) for chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Automated scalp cooling (ASC) is available to patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer to decrease chemotherapy-induced alopecia. This study sought to elucidate patient and chemotherapy nursing perspectives on the ASC experience.

METHODS

This is a survey-based study of chemotherapy nursing staff and patients with breast cancer regarding perceived efficacy, side effects, administration, support, and overall opinions of ASC. Chemotherapy nurses across a large, multi-regional tertiary healthcare system completed a one-time survey regarding their experiences in administering ASC. Breast cancer patients who utilized ASC were surveyed along with a control group who underwent alopecia-inducing chemotherapy without ASC use for comparison.

RESULTS

The majority of nursing responses reported inadequate technical support, an increased burden of administering ASC compared to other clinical duties, and that they would not recommend ASC to a family member or friend. Patients who underwent ASC reported significantly less hair loss and were significantly less likely to shave their heads or wear a wig, but this did not translate into significant differences in body image or psychosocial wellbeing responses. Time investment was the most significant burden related to ASC.

CONCLUSION

Patients using ASC reported significantly less hair loss compared to those not using ASC during alopecia-inducing breast cancer chemotherapy, but this did not translate to improved body image. The majority of chemotherapy nurses reported they lacked adequate support in administering ASC and would not recommend it. Enhanced nursing support may provide a means for improving the ASC experience for both nursing staff and patients.

Effects of a Physical Exercise Program on Quality of Life and Physical Fitness of Breast Cancer Survivors: the MAMA_MOVE Gaia After Treatment Trial

To assess the effects of a group class physical exercise program on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), physical fitness and activity, and safety in early breast cancer women after treatment, a double-phase trial [16-week control phase (CP) followed by a 16-week intervention phase (IP)] was designed. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T1), 8 (T2) and 16 (T3) weeks (CP), and 24 (T4) and 32 (T5) weeks (IP). The primary endpoint was global health status. Out of 82 enrolled patients, 37 completed the IP. Global health status decreased (-10,1; 95% CI -19.8 to -0.4; p = 0.040) during the CP and stabilized during the IP. Physical and sexual functioning increased during the IP (p = 0.008; p = 0.017), while cardiorespiratory fitness increased in the CP (p = 0.004). Upper limb strength and lower limb functionality increased during both phases [CP: p < 0.0001, p = 0.001 (surgical and nonsurgical arm), p = 0.028; IP: p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, p = 0.009]. Body mass index decreased in the IP (p = 0.026). Waist circumference increased in the CP (p = 0.001) and decreased in the IP (p = 0.010); sedentary behaviours and moderate and vigorous physical activity did not change. Adherence to 70% of the sessions was reported in 54% of patients. No serious adverse events related to the intervention were reported. In conclusion, the physical exercise program was able to prevent the decline in global health status and to improve other domains of HRQOL and physical fitness. As physical exercise is not the standard of care in many countries, the implementation of group class programs might be an option.

Oncologic treatment support via a dedicated mobile app: a prospective feasibility evaluation (OPTIMISE-1)

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mhealth) is gaining interest, with mobile devices and apps being ever more available among medical facilities and patients. However, in the field of radiation oncology, the medical benefits of mhealth apps are still underexplored. As an additional approach to patient care during radiotherapy, we designed a mobile treatment surveillance app based on patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the feasibility of app-based treatment surveillance in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Alongside technical practicability and acceptance, we assessed patient satisfaction and quality of life during treatment.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study was performed at Heidelberg University Hospital between August 2018 and January 2020. During RT we measured patients' quality of life, symptoms, and treatment satisfaction. Respective questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 with diagnosis-specific modules, RAND PSQ-18) were presented to patients via a mobile app running on a designated tablet device. The primary endpoint was determined by the fraction of patients who completed at least 80% of the items. Secondary endpoints were disease-related quality of life and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 49 cancer patients (14 breast, 13 pelvic, 12 lung, 10 prostate) were eligible for analysis. 79.6% (95% confidence interval: 66.4-88.5%; n = 39) of all patients completed at least 80% of the items received by the mobile app. A mean of 227.5 ± 48.25 questions were answered per patient. Breast cancer patients showed the highest rate of answered questions, with 92.9% (n = 13) completing at least 80% of the items.

CONCLUSION

Patients showed high acceptance, with 79.6% (n = 39) completing at least 80% of the given items. The use of a mobile app for reporting symptoms and quality of life during RT is feasible and well accepted by patients. It may allow for resource-efficient, detailed feedback to the medical staff and assist in the assessment of side effects over time.