Amifostine, cisplatin, and vinblastine in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a report of high response rates and prolonged survival

Overview of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity and ototoxicity, and the protective agents

Cisplatin has dramatically improved the survival rate of cancer patients, but it has also increased the prevalence of hearing and neurological deficits in this population. Cisplatin induces ototoxicity, peripheral (most prevalent) and central (rare) neurotoxicity. This review addresses the ototoxicity and the neurotoxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, providing an integrated view of the potential protective agents that have been evaluated in vitro, in vivo and in clinical trials, their targets and mechanisms of protection and their effects on the antitumor activity of cisplatin. So far, the findings are insufficient to support the use of any oto- or neuroprotective agent before, during or after cisplatin chemotherapy. Despite their promising effects in vitro and in animal studies, many agents have not been evaluated in clinical trials. Additionally, the clinical trials have limitations concerning the sample size, controls, measurement, heterogeneous groups, several arms of treatment, short follow-up or no blinding. Besides that, for most agents, the effects on the antitumor activity of cisplatin have not been evaluated in tumor-bearing animals, which discourages clinical trials. Further well-designed randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary to definitely demonstrate the effectiveness of the oto- or neuroprotective agents proposed by animal and in vitro studies.

The Neuroprotective Effect of Amitriptyline on Radiation-Induced Impairment of Hippocampal Neurogenesis

The radioprotective effect of amitriptyline, an inhibitor of acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase), on radiation-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis, loss of interneuron, and animal weight changes was investigated in BALB/c mice by immunostaining of biomarkers for cell division (Ki67), immature neurons (doublecortin or DCX), and interneurons (parvalbumin or PV) in the dentate gyrus (DG) of hippocampus. The results indicated that preirradiation (with 10 mg/kg, 2 times per day, for 7 consecutive days) or postirradiation (with 10 mg/kg, 2 times per day, for 14 consecutive days) treatment (pretreatment or posttreatment) with intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline prevented the loss of newly generated neurons, proliferating cells, and interneurons in the subgranular zone of the DG. At the molecular level, pretreatment or posttreatment inhibited the expression of sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1 (SMPD1) gene which codes for ASMase. The pretreatment for 7 days also prevented radiation-induced weight loss from 2 to 3 weeks, but not within 1 week after irradiation. On the other hand, the posttreatment with amitriptyline for 14 days could improve animal weight gain from 4 to 6 weeks after irradiation. The present study suggests that amitriptyline may be a promising candidate radio-neuroprotective drug to improve radiation-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis and relevant neurological and neuropsychological disorders.

Cytoprotective effects of amifostine in the treatment of childhood malignancies

BACKGROUND

Multi-systemic acute side effects occur, in response to intensive therapies that have been applied in childhood malignancies in recent years. Amifostine has rarely been used in the childhood cancers as a multisystemic protective agent for minimizing these side effects.

PROCEDURE

In this study, the effectiveness of amifostine in combination with chemotherapy for childhood cancer treatment has been researched. Of 11 subjects (2.5 months-17 years) 4 subjects had leukemia, 4 had solid tumor, and 3 had lymphoma. For these 11 subjects, 29 chemotherapy courses were given in combination with amifostine, and 20 without amifostine. Their hematological, gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicity were evaluated according to the WHO toxicity criteria. Amifostine was given intravenously in a dose of 740 mg/m(2), one to three consecutive days depending on the chemotherapy regimen.

RESULTS

The hemoglobin, leukocyte, and platelet levels of the two groups were not statistically different. However, when comparing the courses of the patients receiving the same medications at the same doses, in the group with amifostine, mean erythrocyte transfusion requirement was significantly reduced (P = 0.025). In 31% of the courses with amifostine and 50% of the courses without amifostine, febrile neutropenia developed. Gastrointestinal system and hepatic toxicity was significantly reduced in the courses with amifostine with respect to those without it (P = 0.001). Vomiting, hypotension and nausea were the only side effects related to amifostine.

CONCLUSION

Use of amifostine during the treatment of childhood cancers with intensive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy significantly reduced the erythrocyte transfusion requirements of the patients as well as gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicity.

A phase I study of extrapleural pneumonectomy and intracavitary intraoperative hyperthermic cisplatin with amifostine cytoprotection for malignant pleural mesothelioma

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of intraoperative intracavitary hyperthermic cisplatin perfusion with amifostine after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

Patients with mesothelioma were prospectively enrolled. Those with resectable disease received amifostine and 1-hour hyperthermic cisplatin perfusion of ipsilateral hemithorax and abdomen. Morbidity, recurrence, and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled; 29 underwent resection (operative mortality 7%, 2/29). Median age was 57 years. Eighteen were in pathologic stage I or II; 11 were in stage III. Median hospitalization was 15 days. Common complications were atrial fibrillation (66%, 19 patients), deep venous thrombosis (31%, 9 patients), and grade 3+ renal toxicity (31%, 9 patients). Feasibility was determined. Renal toxicity was unrelated to cisplatin dose, with no maximum tolerated dose determined. Overall median survival was 17 months (resected 20 months, unresected 10 months). Median survivals were 26 months for patients receiving higher cisplatin doses and 16 months for those receiving lower doses (P = .35). Survival was significantly longer with negative extrapleural nodes (31 vs 14 months, P = .0115) and early stage (all resected 35 months for stage I-II vs 14 months for stage III, P = .0022, epithelial 39 months for stage I-II vs 15 months for stage III, P = .0072).

CONCLUSION

Early stage and negative extrapleural lymph nodes were associated with prolonged survival. Single-dose amifostine did not protect adequately against cisplatin-induced renal toxicity. Additional cytoprotective strategies are needed to allow determination of cisplatin maximum tolerated dose.

Cytoprotective Agents Used in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review of the literature of commonly prescribed cytoprotective agents used in the treatment of patients with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles, research reports, review articles, and web sites.

CONCLUSION

Multiple agents have been theorized to have cytoprotective properties. Significant evidence exists supporting the use of some cytoprotective agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). More research is needed to determine the efficacy of new cytoprotective agents and expanded indications for those agents currently used.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Knowledge of the indications for and side effect profiles of cytoprotective agents is a necessary component of oncology nursing care. Familiarity with evidence-based research that supports or refutes the use of FDA-approved cytoprotective agents or alternative agents is helpful when suggesting, prescribing, or administering such agents.

Induction of apoptosis in human lung cancer cells following treatment with amifostine and an adenoviral vector containing wild-type p53

Adenoviral delivery of the p53 gene is a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of lung cancer. Furthermore, amifostine is a cytoprotective agent and recent reports have described its potentiation of chemotherapy's antitumor activity in lung cancer. Therefore, we wished to investigate the ability of amifostine both alone and in combination with p53-based therapy to induce apoptosis, and to understand the mechanisms by which this apoptosis occurs. Using p53 null and wild-type p53 human lung cancer cells and normal human bronchial epithelial cells, we evaluated the effects of amifostine on proliferation and apoptosis. We then analyzed Adp53 in combination with amifostine and performed isobologram analysis. Expression of p53, p21(WAF1), Bax, Bak, bcl-2, as well as total and phosphorylated Cdc2 in the absence and presence of olomoucine, a phosphorylated Cdc2 kinase inhibitor, was then determined. Amifostine-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells in a dose-dependent fashion. The combination of amifostine and Adp53 significantly enhanced, with a supra-additive effect, the inhibition of proliferation of lung cancer cells. This enhancement of apoptosis by amifostine was associated with activation of p53 and dephosphorylation of Cdc2 proteins. Notably, olomoucine effectively prevented amifostine and/or Adp53-induced Cdc2 kinase activation and subsequent apoptosis. Our data shows that amifostine alone can induce apoptosis of human lung cancer cells, and that the combination of Adp53 with amifostine resulted in significantly higher levels of apoptosis. In addition, it appears that Cdc2 kinase plays an important role in the induction of apoptosis by amifostine and Adp53.

Antimetastatic effect of a lipophilic ascorbic acid derivative with antioxidation through inhibition of tumor invasion

PURPOSE

Ascorbic acid (AA), the natural antioxidant, has been demonstrated to exert an antimetastatic action; however, AA is quite unstable in physiological condition. The aim of the present study is to investigate the stability, the antioxidation and the antimetastatic effects of three lipophilic AA derivatives in vitro as well as in vivo.

METHODS

The 95D cells were treated with ascorbic acid-2-O-phosphate-6-O-laureate (AA2P6L), ascorbic acid-2-O-phosphate-6-O-myristate (AA2P6M) and ascorbic acid-2-O-phosphate-6-O-stearate (AA2P6S). AA derivatives' stability in medium under cell culture condition, in the presence and in the absence of 95D cells, was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Cell viability and intracellular oxidative stress were measured by MTT assay and CDCFH assay, respectively. Wound healing assay and cell adhesion assay were used to investigate the antimetastatic activities against 95D cells in vitro, and the C57BL/6 mice model was used to evaluate the antimetastatic action in vivo.

RESULTS

All the three AA derivatives exhibited excellent stability, significantly different from AA. Results of MTT assay showed that IC(50) values of the cytotoxicity of those AA derivatives, namely AA2P6L, AA2P6M and AA2P6S, were 38.46, 28 and 22.97 microg/ml, while the CDCFH assay indicated that EC(50) values of antioxidant effects on 95D cells were 31.12, 33.51 and 38.31 microg/ml, respectively. Through the ratio of IC(50) vs EC(50) for AA derivatives, AA2P6L was demonstrated to be the most effective AA derivative, which retained the antioxidant ability as well as low cytotoxicity. AA2P6L dose-dependently inhibited 95D cells' migration and adhesion, by 50% at the concentration of 20 and 57 microg/ml, respectively. In the animal experiment, intraperitoneal administration of 75 mg/kg AA2P6L decreased the number of metastatic nodules by 62% and elevated the survival rate of C57BL/6 mice about onefold compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

AA2P6L, a lipophilic AA derivative with antioxidation, is shown to be a potent antimetastatic agent through the inhibition of tumor invasion. These results support future investigations on the feasibility of cancer chemotherapy with AA2P6L.

Amifostine for children with medulloblastoma treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy

In adult patients, amifostine appears to ameliorate cisplatin-related nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. We assessed the safety and efficacy of amifostine in 11 children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor treated with radiotherapy and vincristine, lomustine, and cisplatin. Amifostine was administered immediately prior to and 4 hr into the cisplatin infusion. Amifostine caused assymptomatic hypotension and hypocalcemia in 18 and 82% of patients, respectively. Despite amifostine use, 78% of patients developed significant ototoxicity. Although relatively well tolerated, amifostine does not appear to have a major impact on ameliorating the risk of developing significant nephro- and ototoxicity in children with medulloblastoma. Larger studies will help clarify these findings.

The cytoprotective aminothiol WR1065 activates p53 through a non-genotoxic signaling pathway involving c-Jun N-terminal kinase

WR1065 is an aminothiol with selective cytoprotective effects in normal cells compared with cancer cells. In a previous study (North, S., El-Ghissassi, F., Pluquet, O., Verhaegh, G., and Hainaut, P. (2000) Oncogene 19, 1206-1214), we have shown that WR1065 activates wild-type p53 in cultured cells. Here we show that WR1065 induces p53 to accumulate through escape from proteasome-dependent degradation. This accumulation is not prevented by inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases and is not accompanied by phosphorylation of Ser-15, -20, or -37, which are common targets of the kinases activated in response to DNA damage. Furthermore, WR1065 activates the JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase), decreases complex formation between p53 and inactive JNK, and phosphorylates p53 at Thr-81, a known site of phosphorylation by JNK. A dominant negative form of JNK (JNK-APF) reduces by 50% the activation of p53 by WR1065. Thus, WR1065 activates p53 through a JNK-dependent signaling pathway. This pathway may prove useful for pharmacological modulation of p53 activity through non-genotoxic mechanisms.

Activation of p53 by the cytoprotective aminothiol WR1065: DNA-damage-independent pathway and redox-dependent modulation of p53 DNA-binding activity

WR1065 is an aminothiol with selective cytoprotective effects in normal compared to cancer cells, which is used to protect tissues against the damaging effect of radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs. WR1065 has been shown to induce wild-type p53 accumulation and activation in cultured cells, suggesting a role of p53 in cytoprotection. However, the molecular mechanisms by which WR1065 activates p53 remain unclear. Here, we demonstrated that p53 accumulation by WR1065 in MCF-7 cells did not result from the formation of DNA-damage as measured by DNA fragmentation and Comet assay, nor from oxidative stress as detected by measurement of glutathione levels, lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species production. p53 activation by WR1065 was not prevented by inhibition of PI-3 kinases, and was still detectable in MCF-7 cells stably transfected with the oncoprotein E6, which repressed p53 induction by DNA damage. These data provided evidence that WR1065 induces p53 by a pathway different than the one elicited by DNA-damage. Direct reduction by WR1065 of key cysteines in p53 may play an important role in this alternative pathway, as shown by the fact that WR1065 activated the redox-dependent, DNA-binding activity of p53 in vitro.

A pilot study on feasibility and efficacy of amifostine preceding high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support in myeloma patients

To evaluate feasibility and potential efficacy of amifostine (AMI) in the prevention of toxicities associated with high-dose melphalan (MEL), ten myeloma patients received AMI 910 mg/m2 in 15 min infusion preceding MEL 200 mg/m2 followed by stem cell infusion (AMI group). Hematologic and extra-hematologic toxicities as well as the need for supportive care observed in the AMI group were compared with ten myeloma patients treated in an identical protocol but without AMI. Hypotension was the most important adverse event of AMI infusion. No differences were observed in the time of engraftment between the AMI group and the control group neither was there any difference in the need for supportive care. Oral mucositis grade >2 was observed in 30% of the patients in both groups. Diarrhea grade >2 occurred only in two AMI patients but in five control patients. AMI preceding high-dose MEL is feasible, although adverse events are observed in some patients. Whether AMI could reduce the gastrointestinal toxicity associated with high-dose MEL can be reliably assessed only in prospective randomized trials.

Amifostine in clinical oncology: current use and future applications

Amifostine (Ethyol), an inorganic thiophosphate, is a selective broad-spectrum cytoprotector of normal tissues that provides cytoprotection against ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents, thus preserving the efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This review summarizes the preclinical data and clinical experience with amifostine, and provides insight into future clinical directions. Amifostine, an inactive pro-drug, is transformed to an active thiol after dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase found in the normal endothelium. The absence of alkaline phosphatase in the tumoral endothelium and stromal components, and the hypovascularity and acidity of the tumor environment, may explain its cytoprotective selectivity. The cytoprotective mechanism of amifostine is complicated, involving free radical scavenging, DNA protection and repair acceleration, and induction of cellular hypoxia. Intravenous administration of amifostine 740-900 mg/m(2) before chemotherapy and 250-350 mg/m(2) before each radiotherapy fraction are widely used regimens. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of amifostine as a cytoprotector for cisplatin chemotherapy and for radiation-induced xerostomia. Ongoing trials are being conducted to determine the efficacy of amifostine in reducing radiation-induced mucositis and other toxicities. Novel schedules and routes of administration are under investigation, and may further simplify the use of amifostine and considerably broaden its applications.

A Phase II trial of cisplatin plus WR-2721 (amifostine) for metastatic breast carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E8188)

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin has minimal antitumor activity when used as second- or third-line treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Older reports suggest an objective response rate of 8% when 60-120 mg/m2 of cisplatin is administered every 3-4 weeks. Although a dose-response effect has been observed with cisplatin, the dose-limiting toxicities associated with cisplatin (e.g., nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity) have limited its use as a treatment for breast carcinoma. WR-2721 or amifostine initially was developed to protect military personnel in the event of nuclear war. Amifostine subsequently was shown to protect normal tissues from the toxic effects of alkylating agents and cisplatin without decreasing the antitumor effect of the chemotherapy. Early trials of cisplatin and amifostine also suggested that the incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuropathy were reduced.

METHODS

A Phase II study of the combination of cisplatin plus amifostine was conducted in patients with progressive metastatic breast carcinoma who had received one, but not more than one, chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Patients received amifostine, 910 mg/m2 intravenously over 15 minutes. After completion of the amifostine infusion, cisplatin 120 mg/m2 was administered over 30 minutes. Intravenous hydration and mannitol was administered before and after cisplatin. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study of which 7 (16%) were ineligible. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered to the 37 eligible patients. Six partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 16%. Most patients (57%) stopped treatment because of disease progression. Neurologic toxicity was reported in 52% of patients. Seven different life-threatening toxicities were observed in patients while receiving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cisplatin and amifostine in this study resulted in an overall response rate of 16%. Neither a tumor-protective effect nor reduced toxicity to normal tissues was observed with the addition of amifostine to cisplatin in this trial.

Manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (MnSOD-PL) administration protects mice from esophagitis associated with fractionated radiation

Intraesophageal administration of manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (MnSOD-PL) prior to single fraction radiation has been shown to protect mice from lethal esophagitis. In our study, C3H/HeNsd mice received fractionated radiation in two protocols: (i) 18 Gy daily for four days with MnSOD-PL administration 24 hr prior to the first and third fraction, or (ii) 12 Gy daily for six days with MnSOD-PL 24 hr prior to the first, third, and fifth fraction. Control radiated mice received either no liposomes only or LacZ (bacterial beta-galactosidase gene)-plasmid/liposome (LacZ-PL) by the same schedules. We measured thiol depletion and lipid peroxidation (LP) in whole esophagus and tested the effectiveness of a new plasmid, hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged MnSOD (HA-MnSOD). In fractionation protocols, mice receiving MnSOD-PL, but not LacZ-PL (200 microl of plasmid/liposomes containing 200 microg of plasmid DNA), showed a significant reduction in morbidity, decreased weight loss, and improved survival. Four and seven days after 37 Gy single fraction radiation, the esophagus demonstrated a significant increase in peroxidized lipids and reduction in overall antioxidant levels, reduced thiols, and decreased glutathione (GSH). These reductions were modulated by MnSOD-PL administration. The HA-MnSOD plasmid product was detected in the basal layers of the esophageal epithelium 24 hr after administration and provided significant radiation protection compared to glutathione peroxidase-plasmid/liposome (GPX-PL), or liposomes containing MnSOD protein, vitamin E, co-enzyme Q10, or 21-aminosteroid. Thus, MnSOD-PL administration significantly improved tolerance to fractionated radiation and modulated radiation effects on levels of GSH and lipid peroxidation (LP). These studies provide further support for translation of MnSOD-PL treatment into human esophageal radiation protection.

Tolerability of the cytoprotective agent amifostine in elderly patients receiving chemotherapy: a comparative study

In order to determine if age and comorbidity influence the tolerability of the cytoprotective agent amifostine, we compared side effects related to amifostine in patients > or = 70 years (group I) with patients < 70 years (group II). We evaluated 268 consecutive administrations of amifostine (119 in group I and 149 in group II, respectively), given i.v. at a dose of 740 mg/m(2) just before platinum-, taxol- or cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Transient hypotension was the most common side effect occurring in association with amifostine. Decreases in systolic blood pressure > 20 mmHg were of similar frequency in both groups (27.1 versus 28.8% of amifostine infusions in group I and II, respectively). Hypotension did not result in medical sequelae in any of the patients. The amifostine infusion was interrupted 16 times in group I and 8 times in group II, respectively, mainly due to hypotension, but could be restarted after a few minutes in all patients except for three cases in group I. Patients in group II more often suffered from nausea/vomiting than in group II (20.8 versus 10.0% in group I). Other subjective symptoms (e.g. warmed, flushed sensation, sneezing, metallic taste, mouth dryness, dizziness and sleepiness) and hypocalcemia occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. Adverse effects associated with amifostine were not observed more frequently in elderly patients than in younger ones, although more elderly patients had a comorbidity than the younger ones.

Amifostine: chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic protective effects

Amifostine (Ethyoltrade mark, Alza Pharmaceuticals) is an inorganic thiophosphate cytoprotective agent known chemically as ethanethiol, 2-[3- aminopropyl)amino]dihydrogen phosphate. It is a prodrug of free thiol (WR-1065) that may act as a scavenger of free radicals generated in tissues exposed to cytotoxic drugs and binds to reactive metabolites of such drugs. Amifostine was originally developed as a radioprotective agent in a classified nuclear warfare project. Following declassification of the project it was evaluated as a cytoprotective agent against toxicity of the alkylating drugs and cisplatin. Differences in the alkaline phosphatase concentration of normal versus tumour tissues can result in greater conversion of amifostine in normal tissues. Inside the cell, WR-1065 provides an alternative target to DNA and RNA for the reactive molecules of alkylating or platinum agents and acts as a potent scavenger of the oxygen free radicals induced by ionizing radiation and some chemotherapy agents. Preclinical animal studies have demonstrated that the administration of amifostine protects against a variety of chemotherapy-related toxicities including cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity, cyclophosphamide- and bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity and the cytotoxicities (including cardiotoxicity) induced by doxorubicin and related chemotherapeutic agents. Amifostine has been shown to protect a variety of animal species from lethal doses of radiation. Amifostine gives haematological protection from cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, mitomycin C, fotemustine and radiotherapy; renal and peripheral nerve protection from cisplatin; mucosa, skin and salivary gland protection from radiotherapy. Multiple Phase I studies were carried out with amifostine in combination with chemotherapy for various neoplasms. Appropriate doses of amifostine were found to be 740 - 910 mg/m(2) in single-dose regimens and 340 mg/m(2) in multiple-dose regimens. In radioprotection, doses are generally 200 - 350 mg/m(2). For all these characteristics, amifostine has been recently approved and suggested in ASCO clinical practice guidelines as a radioprotector for head and neck cancer treatment and supportive agent during cisplatin-based chemotherapy, in lymphomas and solid tumours. Moreover, its spectrum of possible applications is enlarging. As data have been provided indicating that amifostine stimulates haematopoiesis, it has been employed with intriguing results in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Phase II trial of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Given the cisplatin-related myelotoxicity and nonhematologic toxicities, we were prompted to undertake a study of the noncisplatin combination of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and survival of this combination in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles.

RESULTS

Between December 1997 and June 1998, 89 untreated NSCLC patients were enrolled; 30 (34%) had stage IIIB disease (23 with malignant pleural effusion and seven without), and 59 (66%) had stage IV disease. Eighty-six percent of patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median number of cycles administered was four (range, one to eight cycles). The mean dose-intensity for both paclitaxel and gemcitabine was nearly 100%. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thirty-eight patients received second-line chemotherapy after completion of the study. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 32.2%, with a higher response rate for stage IIIB patients (43.3%) than for stage IV patients (26.3%). Overall median survival was 9.9 months, and 1-year survival was 38.8% (14.2 months for stage IIIB and 7.7 months for stage IV; P =.007). Median survival was 10.2 months for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and 4.8 months for patients with a performance status of 2 (P =.007).

CONCLUSION

A biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time, especially in patients with good performance status. It merits further exploration in future studies.

Anticancer drug-induced kidney disorders

Nephrotoxicity is an inherent adverse effect of certain anticancer drugs. Renal dysfunction can be categorised as prerenal uraemia, intrinsic damage or postrenal uraemia according to the underlying pathophysiological process. Renal hypoperfusion promulgates prerenal uraemia. Intrinsic renal damage results from prolonged hypoperfusion, exposure to exogenous or endogenous nephrotoxins, renotubular precipitation of xenobiotics or endogenous compounds, renovascular obstruction, glomerular disease, renal microvascular damage or disease, and tubulointerstitial damage or disease. Postrenal uraemia is a consequence of clinically significant urinary tract obstruction. Clinical signs of nephrotoxicity and methods used to assess renal function are discussed. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced renal dysfunction generally include damage to vasculature or structures of the kidneys, haemolytic uraemic syndrome and prerenal perfusion deficits. Patients with cancer are frequently at risk of renal impairment secondary to disease-related and iatrogenic causes. This article reviews the incidence, presentation, prevention and management of anticancer drug-induced renal dysfunction. Dose-related nephrotoxicity subsequent to administration of certain chloroethylnitrosourea compounds (carmustine, semustine and streptozocin) is commonly heralded by increased serum creatinine levels, uraemia and proteinuria. Additional signs of streptozocin-induced nephrotoxicity include hypophosphataemia, hypokalaemia, hypouricaemia, renal tubular acidosis, glucosuria, aceturia and aminoaciduria. Cisplatin and carboplatin cause dose-related renal dysfunction. In addition to increased serum creatinine levels and uraemia, electrolyte abnormalities, such as hypomagnesaemia and hypokalaemia, are commonly reported adverse effects. Rarely, cisplatin has been implicated as the underlying cause of haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Pharmaceutical antidotes to cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity include amifostine, sodium thiosulfate and diethyldithiocarbamate. Dose- and age-related proximal tubular damage is an adverse effect of ifosfamide. In addition to renal wasting of electrolytes, glucose and amino acids, Fanconi syndrome, rickets and osteomalacia have occurred with ifosfamide treatment. High dose azacitidine causes renal dysfunction manifested by tubular acidosis, polyuria and increased urinary excretion of electrolytes, glucose and amino acids. Haemolytic uraemia is a rare adverse effect of gemcitabine. Methotrexate can cause increased serum creatinine levels, uraemia and haematuria. Acute renal failure is reported following administration of high dose methotrexate. Urinary alkalisation and hydration confer protection against methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction. Dose-related nephrotoxicity, including acute renal failure, are reported subsequent to treatment with pentostatin and diaziquone. Acute renal failure is a rare adverse effect of treatment with interferon-alpha. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome occurs with mitomycin administration. A mortality rate of 50 to 100% is reported in patients developing mitomycin-induced haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Capillary leak syndrome occurring with aldesleukin therapy can cause renal dysfunction. Infusion-related hypotension during infusion of high dose carmustine can precipitate renal dysfunction.

Pilot trial of cytoprotection with amifostine given with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

In an attempt to limit toxicities associated with dose-intensive therapy used for transplant regimens, we performed a pilot study using amifostine with high-dose busulfan (12 mg/kg), melphalan (100 mg/m2), and thiotepa (500 mg/m2) in 21 patients with a variety of malignancies. After 3 days of oral busulfan, amifostine was given at 910 mg/m2 IV for 10 minutes, preceding the infusion of each of 2 doses of melphalan and thiotepa given for 4 days. Antiemetic premedication for amifostine was given to all patients. The median patient age was 50 years (range: 32-65 years). Twenty-one patients received 82 separate amifostine infusions. One patient discontinued amifostine after the second dose because of severe nausea and emesis, and two infusions were temporarily held secondary to hypotension. Of these 82 cycles, there was a total of 37 episodes of nausea/vomiting, 28 episodes of sneezing, 11 episodes of flushing, and 1 episode of oral paresthesia. Systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure decreased by a mean of 8.4 mm Hg and 5.0 mm Hg, respectively. In general, the infusion was well tolerated. Patients were observed until discharge home (N = 15), until initiation of an additional tandem transplant procedure (N = 4), or until death (N = 2). All twenty-one patients experienced nonhematologic toxicities grade II or greater. Grade II toxicities included mucositis (N = 21), gastrointestinal (N = 3), skin (N = 1), and liver (N = 1), and grade III toxicities included liver (N = 1). Mucositis was also scored according to a detailed toxicity assessment. Mucositis did not appear to be improved with amifostine when compared with a control group of patients not receiving amifostine. Renal dysfunction after transplantation was decreased in the amifostine group, whereas there was no significant effect on posttransplant hepatic dysfunction. Although these data demonstrate the feasibility of delivering parenteral amifostine in conjunction with dose-intensive chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, there was no evidence of a significant reduction in nonmarrow toxicities.

A randomized trial comparing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with solid tumors

This study evaluates the degree of kidney damage during cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy and its possible prevention by amifostine. Thirty-one patients with solid tumors stratified according to pretreatment were randomized to receive VIP- or TIP-chemotherapy with or without amifostine (910 mg/m2) given as a short infusion prior to cisplatin. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4 g/m2) and either etoposide (500 mg/m2) (= VIP) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) (= TIP) repeated at 3 weekly intervals. For all patients the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by creatinine-clearance, serum creatinine, electrolytes and differential urinary protein/enzyme excretion were determined prior to, during and after each cycle. A total of 62 cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable. In the amifostine-group GFR was fully maintained after application of two cycles of chemotherapy, whereas in the control group a > 30%-reduction of median GFR (108 to 80 ml/min) was observed (p < 0.001). Patients receiving amifostine had a lower degree of high molecular weight proteins excretion indicating less glomerular damage. In both groups significant increases of tubular marker profiles peaking at day 3 after chemotherapy were observed with a nearly complete reversibility of these changes prior to the next chemotherapy cycle. The number of patients with low magnesium serum levels during treatment was 17% after amifostine application versus 69% in control patients. The results seem to indicate that treatment with amifostine can preserve GFR after application of two cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy cycles. This may be advantageous if repetitive cycles of chemotherapy or subsequent administration of high dose chemotherapy is planned.

The potential role of amifostine in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer

Amifostine protects healthy tissues but not tumor cells from the damage induced by cytotoxic treatments, particularly ionizing radiations, alkylating and platinating agents. The clinical effectiveness of amifostine has been demonstrated by randomized trials in ovarian and head-and-neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. The available pharmacoeconomic data confirm a favorable cost/utility ratio. The majority of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive radio and/or chemotherapy. A role for amifostine in these patients has been hypothesized, and some experiences performed. The aim of this paper is to outline the present role of amifostine in the treatment of NSCLC.

Amifostine plus cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

a two-stage Simon design was applied. To proceed after the first stage, responses from seven of 19 patients were needed. Overall, 17 responses from 40 treated patients were required to comply with the design parameter. Inclusion criteria were cyto-histologically proven stage IIIB-IV NSCLC; age of 70 years or less; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; normal cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions; and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were staged by physical examination, biochemistry, chest radiograph, brain, thoracic and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans, and bone scan. All patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (iv) day 1, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) iv days 1-8-15-22, amifostine 740 mg/m(2) iv day 1 every 4 weeks up to six cycles. Eleven of 40 enrolled patients were stage IIIB and 29 stage IV, with a median age of 57 years (range, 38-70 years).

RESULTS

all patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat analysis). We observed 20 (50%) objective responses, with four (10%) complete responses. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and median survival was 45 weeks. The toxicity was manageable. The reported main toxicities were neutropenia grade 4 in 10% of patients, grade 1 and grade 3 nephrotoxicity both in 5% of patients and grade 1 amifostine-related hypotension in 15% of patients.

CONCLUSION

these data show that cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine is an active and feaseable regimen in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. A phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced NSCLC is warranted.

The cytoprotective aminothiol WR1065 activates p21waf-1 and down regulates cell cycle progression through a p53-dependent pathway

The phosphoaminothiol WR1065, the active metabolite of the pro-drug amifostine (WR2721), protects cultured cells and tissues against cytotoxic exposure to radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. We show here that WR1065 and the pro-drug WR2721 activate the p53 tumor suppressor protein and induce the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21waf-1 in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7, and in the mouse fibroblast cell line balb/c 3T3. Using two MCF-7 derived cell lines, MN1 and MDD2, we show that induction of p21waf-1 is detectable in MN1 (expressing a functional p53) but not in MDD2 (p53 disabled). These effects are observed at concentrations of WR1065 (0.5 to 1 mM) identical to those required to protect against cytotoxicity by hydrogen peroxide. Induction of p53 is not prevented by addition of aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of Cu-dependent amine-oxidases which blocks the extra-cellular degradation of WR1065 into toxic metabolites. Moreover, spermidine, a natural polyamine structurally related to amifostine, does not activate p53. Induction of p53 by WR1065 results in a delay in the G1/S transition in MCF-7 and MN-1 cells, but not in the p53 disabled cells MDD2. These data indicate that WR1065, a polyamine analog with thiol anti-oxidant properties, activates a cell cycle check-point involving p53.

The use of reduced doses of amifostine to ameliorate nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors

This study evaluates the degree of kidney damage during cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy and its possible prevention by amifostine. Thirty-one patients with solid tumors stratified according to pretreatment were randomized to receive cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy with or without amifostine (1000 mg absolute) given as a short infusion prior to cisplatin. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4 g/m2) and either etoposide (500 mg/m2) (VIP regimen) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) (TIP regimen) repeated at 3 weekly intervals. For all patients the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, electrolytes and differential urinary protein excretion were determined prior to, during and after each treatment cycle. A total of 62 cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable. In the amifostine arm the GFR was almost completely maintained after application of two cycles of chemotherapy (121 to 108 ml/min), whereas in the control group a 30% reduction of the GFR (105 to 80 ml/min) was observed. In both groups marked increases of glomerular and tubular marker profiles peaking at day 3 after chemotherapy were found with a nearly complete reversibility of these changes prior to the next chemotherapy cycle. Patients receiving amifostine had a lower degree of hypomagnesemia, as well as a lower urinary excretion of N-acetyl-glucosaminidase and albumin, indicating less tubular damage compared to the control patients. Treatment with 1000 mg amifostine resulted in an almost complete preservation of GFR. This corresponded to a slightly reduced excretion of tubular marker proteins and a lower incidence of hypomagnesemia during chemotherapy in amifostine patients compared to controls. This dose of amifostine may be sufficient for nephroprotection in patients without pre-existing risk factors for renal damage who undergo a restricted number of chemotherapy cycles.

Amifostine Inhibits Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Apoptosis by Activating NF-κB/Rel Transcription Factors

We investigated the involvement of NF-κB/Rel transcription factors that reportedly can inhibit apoptosis in various cell types in the antiapoptotic mechanism of the cytoprotectant amifostine. In the nontumorigenic murine myeloid progenitor 32D cells incubated with amifostine, we detected a reduction of the IκB cytoplasmic levels by Western blotting and a raising of nuclear NF-κB/Rel complexes by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Amifostine inhibited by more than 30% the growth factor deprivation-induced apoptosis, whereas its effect failed when we blocked the NF-κB/Rel activity with an NF-κB/Rel-binding phosphorothioate decoy oligodeoxynucleotide. In human cord blood CD34+ cells, the NF-κB/Rel p65 subunit was detectable (using immunofluorescence analysis) mainly in the cytoplasm in the absence of amifostine, whereas its presence was appreciable in the nuclei of cells incubated with the cytoprotectant. In 4 CD34+ samples incubated for 3 days in cytokine-deficient conditions, cell apoptosis was reduced by more than 30% in the presence of amifostine (or amifostine plus a control oligo); the effect of amifostine was abolished in cultures with the decoy oligo. These findings indicate that the inhibition of hematopoietic progenitor cell apoptosis by amifostine requires the induction of NF-κB/Rel factors and that the latter can therefore exert an antiapoptotic activity in the hematopoietic progenitor cell compartment. Furthermore, the identification of this specific mechanism underlying the survival-promoting activity of amifostine lends support to the possible use of this agent in apoptosis-related pathologies, such as myelodysplasias.

Amifostine Inhibits Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Apoptosis by Activating NF-κB/Rel Transcription Factors

We investigated the involvement of NF-κB/Rel transcription factors that reportedly can inhibit apoptosis in various cell types in the antiapoptotic mechanism of the cytoprotectant amifostine. In the nontumorigenic murine myeloid progenitor 32D cells incubated with amifostine, we detected a reduction of the IκB cytoplasmic levels by Western blotting and a raising of nuclear NF-κB/Rel complexes by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Amifostine inhibited by more than 30% the growth factor deprivation-induced apoptosis, whereas its effect failed when we blocked the NF-κB/Rel activity with an NF-κB/Rel-binding phosphorothioate decoy oligodeoxynucleotide. In human cord blood CD34+ cells, the NF-κB/Rel p65 subunit was detectable (using immunofluorescence analysis) mainly in the cytoplasm in the absence of amifostine, whereas its presence was appreciable in the nuclei of cells incubated with the cytoprotectant. In 4 CD34+ samples incubated for 3 days in cytokine-deficient conditions, cell apoptosis was reduced by more than 30% in the presence of amifostine (or amifostine plus a control oligo); the effect of amifostine was abolished in cultures with the decoy oligo. These findings indicate that the inhibition of hematopoietic progenitor cell apoptosis by amifostine requires the induction of NF-κB/Rel factors and that the latter can therefore exert an antiapoptotic activity in the hematopoietic progenitor cell compartment. Furthermore, the identification of this specific mechanism underlying the survival-promoting activity of amifostine lends support to the possible use of this agent in apoptosis-related pathologies, such as myelodysplasias.

The sulfhydryl containing compounds WR-2721 and glutathione as radio- and chemoprotective agents. A review, indications for use and prospects

Radio- and chemotherapy for the treatment of malignancies are often associated with significant toxicity. One approach to reduce the toxicity is the concomitant treatment with chemoprotective agents. This article reviews two sulfhydryl compounds, namely the agent WR-2721 (amifostine), a compound recently registered for use in human in many countries, and the natural occurring compound glutathione (GSH). GSH is not registered as a chemoprotective agent. WR-2721 is an aminothiol prodrug and has to be converted to the active compound WR-1065 by membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase. WR-1065 and GSH both act as naturally occurring thiols. No protective effect on the tumour has been found when these compounds are administered intravenously. There is even in vitro evidence for an increased anti-tumour effect with mafosfamide after pretreatment with WR-2721, and in vivo after treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Randomized clinical studies have shown that WR-2721 and GSH decrease cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and that WR-2721 reduces radiation radiotherapy-induced toxicity. Side-effects associated with WR-2721 are nausea, vomiting and hypotension, GSH has no side-effects. An exact role of WR-2721 and GSH as chemoprotectors is not yet completely clear. Future studies should examine the protective effect of these drugs on mucositis, cardiac toxicity, neuro- and ototoxicity, the development of secondary neoplasms and their effect on quality of life.

Cytoprotection in the treatment of pediatric cancer: review of current strategies in adults and their application to children

BACKGROUND

The protection of patients from the acute and/or chronic toxicity of antineoplastic therapy has become a major concern of oncology centers around the world. However, most of the effort has been directed toward the adult population, and limited studies have been performed in the group that may gain the most from such strategies, namely, children.

PROCEDURES

The MedLine and CancerLit databases were surveyed, and the relevant biomedical literature on cytoprotection during antineoplastic treatment was analyzed.

RESULTS

Cytotoxicity from antineoplastic therapy customarily is addressed by altering dosing schedules, a technique that can seriously impact the efficacy of the therapy. Colony stimulating factors have been used posttherapy to stimulate recovery from neutropenia, and various agents have been proposed as pretherapy cytoprotectors. Trials in adults have produced mixed results, and, to date, only amifostine and dexrazoxane have been approved as cytoprotectors for very narrow indications. Few trials have been performed in children, although these patients often can look forward to long-term remission.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent permanent toxicities from antineoplastic therapies that impact long-term pediatric survivors, the experience gained in adults should be extended more aggressively to children, and formal, randomized trials should be performed to determine the type of protection most suitable for the pediatric population.

Review of the comparative pharmacology and clinical activity of cisplatin and carboplatin

PURPOSE

To review the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and relative clinical activities of cisplatin and carboplatin. Through a search of the MEDLINE database, we identified phase III clinical trials and pharmacologic studies comparing cisplatin and carboplatin published in the English language medical literature from January 1966 to December 1997.

RESULTS

Prospective randomized trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin were identified for ovarian (n = 12), germ cell (n = 4), non-small-cell lung (n = 1), small-cell lung (n = 3), and head and neck (n = 4) cancers. Carboplatin and cisplatin were equally effective in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer and extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. One study each showed a trend toward better survival in favor of cisplatin for patients with optimally debulked ovarian and limited-stage small-cell lung cancers. These results were, however, based on subset analyses. In germ cell tumors, carboplatin was inferior because of lower relapse-free survival rates. Cisplatin produced superior response rates and survival in head and neck cancers. There are no published randomized phase III studies of bladder, cervical, endometrial, and esophageal cancers.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin does not possess equivalent activity to cisplatin in all platinum-sensitive tumors. Carboplatin can replace cisplatin in chemotherapy regimens for suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer. Two ongoing studies will address the same question in optimally debulked disease. Carboplatin can also be substituted for cisplatin in the treatment of non-small-cell and extensive-stage small-cell lung cancers. Its role in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer needs to be investigated further. Carboplatin is inferior to cisplatin in germ cell, head and neck, and esophageal cancers. Randomized studies are needed to determine whether carboplatin has equivalent efficacy to cisplatin in bladder, cervical, and endometrial cancers.

Reducing the toxicity of anticancer therapy: new strategies

Cytoprotective agents offer opportunities to reduce the treatment-related toxicity of anticancer therapy and perhaps to increase the dose and dose intensity of radiation and chemotherapy. One such agent is amifostine, an organic thiophosphate. Amifostine selectively protects normal tissues and provides broad-spectrum protection for a variety of organs while remaining minimally toxic. Clinical studies have demonstrated that amifostine protects against myelotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, mucositis and esophagitis in patients treated with alkylating and platinum agents, paclitaxel and radiation therapy. In addition, preclinical studies suggest the possibility of protection against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mutagenicity. Preclinical and clinical studies have not demonstrated any diminution of antitumor efficacy. Amifostine is well tolerated in doses of 740 or 910 mg/m2. The most common side effects requiring treatment are transient hypotension, which responds to intravenous fluids, and nausea and vomiting, effectively treated with 5-HT3 antagonists and dexamethasone.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, etoposide combination chemotherapy: a multifractionated bolus dose schedule for non-small cell lung cancer

In this phase II study, paclitaxel was added to the combination of cisplatin and etoposide (TPE regimen), in 37 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, using a multifractionated dosing schedule. The total dose of paclitaxel (175-200 mg/m2); cisplatin (75 mg/m2); and etoposide (175-200 mg/m2) was divided into five daily doses administered over 3 h with cycles repeated at 21-28 days. 15 patients had stage III A or B disease and 22 stage IV disease. 32 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 37 for response. Neutropenia was the most prominent toxicity. Grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 12 (38%) and 9 (25%) of the patients, respectively and 11 patients required hospitalisation. 3 patients died secondary to chemotherapy related sepsis. Diarrhoea (grade 3, 3 patients; grade 4, 2 patients) was the only other significant non-haematological acute toxicity. The optimal dose rate for this multifractionated regimen was paclitaxel 35 or 40 mg/m2/fraction; cisplatin 15 mg/m2/fraction; etoposide 35 or 40 mg/m2/fraction. Responses were observed in 28 of 37 evaluable patients (3 complete response; 25 partial responses [76%]. 22 patients are alive; 8 with stage III B disease received radiation or surgery (3 had minimal or no tumour in the pathology specimen). TPE is a highly active regimen for non-small cell lung cancer and multifractionated dose scheduling is a feasible and well tolerated system.

Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and WR2721 for refractory metastatic breast cancer

Cisplatin, as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), has at best shown only modest response rates. At high doses, the toxicity profile of this drug may outweigh any potential benefits for MBC patients. We performed a phase II study to determine whether the investigational agent WR2721 would mitigate the toxicity of cisplatin in patients with MBC and to assess the antitumor response of cisplatin as salvage therapy. Thirteen women were enrolled in the study. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 120 mg/m2 together with WR2721 at a dose of 910 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days. Response was assessed at the end of two cycles, and toxicity was evaluated after each treatment cycle. No objective antitumor responses were noted. Three patients exhibited toxicity from cisplatin in the form of ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, myelotoxicity, and persistent delayed nausea and vomiting necessitating discontinuation from the study. There was one death from renal failure. WR2721 itself caused significant but transient hypotension in 46% of the patients. In our experience, salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin in pretreated patients with MBC produced no objective responses. WR2721 did not prevent the occurrence of organ toxicity.

Bone marrow protection with amifostine in the treatment of high-risk malignant lymphoma

Based on preclinical and clinical studies which suggested that amifostine can protect against haematological toxicity of cyclophosphamide, we conducted a clinical trial of amifostine and intermediate doses of cyclophosphamide in patients with high-risk malignant lymphoma. 40 patients were enrolled to receive amifostine (910 mg/m2) before cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2) for two cycles (10 patients); 20 patients were allocated to receive amifostine/cyclophosphamide only on one cycle (patients were their own control) and 10 patients received cyclophosphamide alone without amifostine protection. Patients who received amifostine had fewer days of severe granulocytopenia (grade III or IV) and infectious episodes, and delay on treatment was minimal. Amifostine was well tolerated; only 2 patients developed transient and mild hypotension. The complete response rate was 72% (29/40). We conclude that amifostine is a good protector against haematological toxicity of cyclophosphamide and did not interfere with tumour response. Clinical trials with increasing doses of cytotoxic drugs or combination chemotherapy are needed to define the role of this myeloprotector agent in the treatment of patients with malignant lymphoma.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most lethal cancer in both men and women. Given that chemotherapy for advanced disease is marginally beneficial and noncurative, its use must be governed judiciously, with each decision being evaluated individually for each patient. Chemotherapy for lung cancer has progressed over the past decade, and with the advent of new agents, its future looks promising.

Influence of single and multiple doses of amifostine on the efficacy and the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in mice

We have previously reported that amifostine potentiates the anti-tumour activity of carboplatin in mice. The present study was carried out in well-established human ovarian cancer xenografts OVCAR-3, A2780 and FMa grown subcutaneously in the nude mouse. It was found that a single dose of amifostine resulted in a higher increase in the anti-tumour activity of carboplatin than three doses of amifostine. A single dose of amifostine increased the AUC (area under the curve) values of total platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate (30.1 vs 18.2 microM x h), liver (307.7 vs 236.4 nmol g(-1) x h), kidney (500.8 vs 368.3 nmol g(-1) x h) and OVCAR-3 tumour tissue (184.0 vs 146.8 nmol g(-1) x h). Despite this increase in total platinum, a decrease in platinum (Pt)-DNA adduct levels was observed in liver, kidney and bone marrow, which was significant in liver. In tumour tissue an insignificant increase in Pt-DNA adduct levels, specifically the Pt-GG adduct, was observed after treatment with a single dose of amifostine, which may explain the increase in anti-tumour activity. The increase in the AUC of total platinum was probably caused by a reduction in body temperature, which was most severe after three doses of amifostine. The extreme hypothermia may be the reason that three doses of amifostine resulted in less potentiation of the efficacy of carboplatin.