Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Apatinib in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ramucirumab Beyond Progression Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Ramucirumab-Refractory Advanced Gastric Cancer: RINDBeRG Trial

PURPOSE

Continuous use of antiangiogenic agents has demonstrated survival benefits in various cancers. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan with irinotecan monotherapy as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (AGC) that has progressed on previous ramucirumab-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients age 20 years and older with AGC, who had experienced disease progression during ramucirumab-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either ramucirumab plus irinotecan or irinotecan monotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) expecting a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (a power of 80% and a significance level of one-sided 0.05). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and August 2022, 402 patients in Japan were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus irinotecan (n = 202) or irinotecan monotherapy (n = 200). The median OS was 9.4 months in the combination arm and 8.5 months in the monotherapy arm, with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12; P = .49). PFS was improved (median, 3.8 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89]; P = .002), while the DCR was significantly better (64.4% v 52.1%; P = .03) with the combination therapy. The adverse events of the combination therapy were manageable.

CONCLUSION

Adding ramucirumab to irinotecan does not provide a significant advantage in OS over irinotecan alone in patients with AGC who have progressed during ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy.

Cardiotoxicity of small-molecule kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recent advances in precision oncology have enabled many specific cancer patient populations to respond well and achieve longer survival with small-molecule kinase inhibitors, which have become a new therapeutic strategy for tumors. Since 2001, the Food and Drug Administration has approved 108 and 63 new anticancer drugs for treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies, respectively, 89 of which belong to the large group of small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). Compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-FU, SMKIs offer better efficacy with fewer toxic side effects. Nevertheless, with the development of more novel SMKIs and their wider clinical application to a larger population of cancer patients, variable degrees of cardiotoxic adverse events have emerged for some SMKIs during cancer therapy. This review comprehensively summarizes the most updated progress in the cardiotoxicity of SMKIs in cancer therapy and discusses the new findings and mechanisms, which will provide emerging strategies for the prevention of cardiotoxicity caused by small molecule targeted drugs and the design of the next generation of low cardiotoxicity targeted drugs.

First-Line Apatinib Combined with Tislelizumab and Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma with Poor Prognosis

In this prospective, open-label, exploratory study (RENMIN-213), patients with previously untreated, HER2-negative, advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell carcinoma or peritoneal metastasis were enrolled to receive eight cycles of apatinib, tislelizumab, and chemotherapy every 3 weeks, with a maintenance therapy with apatinib plus tislelizumab for a maximum of 1 year. Homogeneous patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy at the same time were deemed as the control group for efficacy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, biomarkers, health-related quality of life, and safety. A total of 33 patients [median (range) age, 60 (32-72) years; 21 (63.6%) male; 11 (33.3%) signet ring cell carcinoma; 30 (90.9%) peritoneal metastasis] were enrolled and deemed evaluable for efficacy analysis. Of these patients, 32 (97%) were without disease progression, of whom 1 (3.0%) patient had complete response and 18 (54.6%) had partial response. Six patients (18.2%) were able to undergo surgery after treatment. After propensity score matching, the median progression-free survival was 10.17 months (95% confidence interval, 7.13-13.21) in the apatinib combined with tislelizumab and chemotherapy group, as compared with 6.0 months in the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy group. The median duration of response increased from 4.5 to 8.7 months. The objective response rate increased from 33.3% to 54.6%, and the disease control rate increased from 87.9% to 97.0%. Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events for evaluable patients occurred in 11 patients (33.3%), and patients' health-related quality of life improved after treatment.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains a major health challenge worldwide, with nearly 1 million new cases annually contributing to more than 650 000 deaths. Epidemiologically, gastric cancer shows substantial geographical variation in incidence, with higher rates in Asia, South America, and eastern Europe, and a rapid increase in early-onset cases among people younger than 50 years. Key risk factors for gastric cancer include Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, obesity, smoking, and genetic predisposition. Early detection through comprehensive diagnostic procedures is crucial for optimising treatment outcomes. Standard treatment approaches for locally advanced gastric cancer include surgical resection, particularly D2 lymphadenectomy, complemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is increasing implementation of minimally invasive surgical techniques for operable disease and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for advanced stages. Emerging therapies, such as novel targeted treatments and next-generation immunotherapies, show promise in improving survival and quality of life. Future directions in the management of gastric cancer focus on precision medicine, continued advancement in immunotherapy, novel early detection methods, and a multidisciplinary approach to care. These strategies aim to enhance the overall effectiveness of treatment and prognosis worldwide.

Safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination treatment versus apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Background

Apatinib is a systemic therapeutic agent for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA). Its efficacy can be enhanced by applying it as a combination therapy, but the evidence supporting its combination application as a second-line treatment is not well documented. In the current study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of apatinib, both as a monotherapy and in combination regimens, for second-line treatment of GAC and GEJA in real-world settings.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort analysis, we analyzed clinical data from 96 patients with advanced GAC or GEJA who received second-line apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes of different treatment approaches (apatinib combination with other drugs).

Results

The results indicated that the overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for second-line apatinib therapy were 19.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.2m), while the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.9-12.4m). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified gender, liver metastasis, and peritoneal metastasis as independent predictors of inferior PFS and OS outcomes. In terms of safety, the primary adverse reactions included myelosuppression, elevated AST and ALT levels, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, hyperbilirubinemia, proteinuria, fatigue, and vomiting, with a low incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities.

Conclusions

Apatinib-based combination therapy significantly enhances both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer when compared to monotherapy, while also demonstrating a safe and reliable profile.

Oncolytic viruses: a promising therapy for malignant pleural effusion and solid tumors

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are natural or recombinant viruses that can directly lyse tumor cells without damaging normal cells. They enhance anti-tumor immunity by releasing antigens and activating inflammatory responses within the tumor microenvironment (TME). This offers a new therapeutic approach for MPE and solid tumors. This review discusses the progress of OVs administered via intrapleural and intratumoral routes, emphasizing their potential in MPE treatment and the challenges posed by the complex intrapleural environment, which affects the direct interaction between OVs, tumor cells, and immune cells. This review also discusses the regulatory barriers, safety concerns and accessibility of oncolytic virus therapy.

The current landscape of gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer diagnosis and treatment in China: a comprehensive nationwide cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer globally and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its alarming prevalence, limited comparative evidence exists on its treatment efficacy and prognosis across diverse China populations.

METHODS

To address this, our study used a large-scale dataset from the National Cancer Information Database, including data from 220,304 patients from 53 leading hospitals across 27 provinces in China.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2023, early-stage (Stages I-II) gastric cancer diagnoses increased to 35.63% of all cancer cases. Our study evaluated the neoadjuvant treatment strategies, adjuvant post-operative therapy, first- and second-line management for progressive stages, alongside current gastric cancer treatment guidelines in China. Notably, immunotherapy accounted for 16.17% and 23.28% of first- and second-line treatments for late-stage gastric cancers, and 14.56% and 5.00% for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, respectively. Analysis of survival rates revealed that the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 74.07%, 54.89%, 44.21%, 37.97%, and 33.53%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates across stages I-IV were 85.07%, 49.34%, 35.56%, and 13.15%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer critical insights into the current state of gastric cancer treatment in China and can inform future initiatives to improve therapeutic outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.

The alkylglycerone phosphate synthase sustains the resistance of gastric cancer cells to ferroptosis induced by Apatinib

BACKGROUND

Apatinib is a targeted therapy used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, many gastric cancer patients develop resistance to Apatinib, and the mechanisms underlying this resistance remain unclear. Previous studies have shown that Apatinib can induce ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells. More recent research suggests that polyunsaturated ether phospholipids are closely associated with tumor cell sensitivity to ferroptosis, and may represent key molecules involved in the resistance of tumor cells to ferroptosis.

METHODS

We established Apatinib-resistant gastric cancer cell lines and assessed their tolerance to ferroptosis. We identified key enzymes responsible for the ferroptosis tolerance observed in drug-resistant cells using lipidomics and transcriptomics analysis. Molecular and biological experiments were conducted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying Apatinib resistance mediated by ferroptosis tolerance in gastric cancer cells.

RESULTS

Apatinib resistance is closely linked to ferroptosis resistance, which is driven by a reduction in the levels of polyunsaturated ether phospholipids-phospholipids that are particularly susceptible to oxidation and induce ferroptosis. The downregulation of key enzymes involved in polyunsaturated ether phospholipid synthesis, such as AGPS, mediates tolerance to both ferroptosis and Apatinib in gastric cancer cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, the expression of AGPS in tumor cells is regulated by the transcription factor ELK1. Drug-resistant cells acquire Apatinib tolerance by downregulating both ELK1 and AGPS expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib-resistant gastric cancer cells exhibit reduced expression of the transcription factor ELK1, which regulates the expression of AGPS. This reduction contributes to the resistance and malignancy of gastric cancer cells.

Apatinib-Induced Hypertension Correlates with Improved Prognosis in Solid Tumor Patients

This study evaluated the occurrence of apatinib-induced hypertension and its impact on the prognosis of patients with solid tumors. A retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up was conducted on 769 patients treated with apatinib from 2014 to 2021 across three hospitals. Patients were categorized into hypertension and non-hypertension groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary outcome. Apatinib-induced hypertension occurred in 33.3% of patients and was associated with significantly longer OS (HR 0.40, 95% CI [0.37-0.48], p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.41, 95% CI [0.35-0.49], p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis confirmed these findings in all cancer types, except for PFS in non-small cell lung cancer. Hypertension may serve as a predictive biomarker for improved anti-tumor efficacy.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in China

AIMS

Describe the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of Chinese patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic (UAM) gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GA/GEJA).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adults diagnosed with UAM GA/GEJA in China from 2017-2020.

RESULTS

Among 2,745 patients, 1,902, 729, and 284 received first-, second- and third-line (1 L, 2 L and 3 L) therapy-respectively. Most patients received chemotherapy alone in 1 L (84.1%) and 2 L (63.6%), and targeted-therapy-based treatment in 3 L (49.2%). Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 6.5, 4.2, and 3.2 months in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese patients with UAM GA/GEJA mainly received chemotherapy alone in 1 L/2 L and targeted therapy in 3 L. Median rwPFS was short in all lines, highlighting the need for more effective treatments.

Mismatch between evidence and related clinical recommendations about the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer patients with anticancer drugs: A critical historical review

PURPOSE

to analyze the most robust research and recommendations that have informed the potential superiority of treatments with anticancer drugs over any type of supportive care for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

We conducted a critical historical review. First, we identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from a previous scoping review conducted by our research group, ASTAC, updating the search strategy. Second, we searched for the most important and recognized international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in advanced EC. Finally, we performed a systematic document analysis to compare whether the recommendations proposed in the CPGs were supported by the previously identified relevant evidence.

RESULTS

We identified and assessed 15 RCTs and 11 CPGs from ESMO (eight), ASCO (two), and NICE (one) published over the last 40 years. There is a clear mismatch between these guidelines' recommendations and the available RCTs regarding the efficacy of anticancer drugs compared to best supportive care (BSC).

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistent evidence to support the treatment of advanced EC patients with anticancer drugs, and a notable mismatch exists between the available evidence and the recommendations made by relevant CPGs. As a result, these guidelines may be biased in favoring the use of anticancer drugs over supportive care and in consequence it is advisable to be very prudent when proposing systemic treatments to patients with advanced EC. Further rigorous and independent research is needed to better evaluate the true benefits of anticancer treatments in advanced EC and to update the CPGs accordingly.

Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of non-chemotherapy anticancer drugs (immunotherapy or targeted therapy) compared to best supportive care (BSC) or placebo for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) searching (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PROSPERO. Certainty of evidence was evaluated following GRADE.

RESULTS

Six RCTs included. Targeted therapies likely result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75, 0.93; moderate certainty) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43, 0.62; moderate certainty). Toxicity had a slightly increased risk (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95, 1.48; low certainty). Immunotherapy also showed a likely improvement in PFS (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49, 0.73; moderate certainty), while toxicity showed a likely higher risk (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.24, 5.94; moderate certainty). However, benefits in survival translated to time gains of slightly over a month for OS and less than a month for PFS. No data were reported on performance status (PS), hospital admissions, or quality of life (QoL).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests some survival benefits with low toxicity from these treatments, but gains are marginal. Uncertainties persist regarding their impact on QoL and outcomes for patients with poor PS. Caution is advised in treatment selection for advanced GC patients, who should actively participate in decision-making. Future research should include diverse patient populations and assess patient-centered outcomes with consistent comparator groups for BSC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6 ) on 2022-04-01.

Key Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress-Induced Ferroptosis in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Potential Therapeutic Approaches

The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing annually, particularly among patients with metabolic disorders such as hypertension and diabetes. However, there is currently no treatment capable of altering the natural course of HFpEF. Recently, the interplay between oxidative stress and ferroptosis in cardiovascular diseases has drawn extensive attention; however, minimal research has been published on the mechanisms of oxidative stress and ferroptosis in HFpEF. This paper reviews the relevant mechanisms through which oxidative stress is induced and promotes ferroptosis during the development of HFpEF. The review also explores more efficacious treatment approaches for HFpEF by inhibiting oxidative stress and ferroptosis, thereby offering a theoretical foundation for verifying the feasibility of these methods for further research. As tumor-targeted therapy progresses, the survival period of tumor patients is prolonged, and cardiovascular events have gradually emerged as one of the most crucial causes of death among tumor patients. Hence, inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway has become a major target in tumor treatment, significantly enhancing patient survival. Nevertheless, secondary cardiovascular complications and events, such as myocardial injury and subsequent heart failure, have severely impacted patient survival and quality of life. Therefore we have also explored the potential mechanism through which novel targeted anti-cancer drugs induce HFpEF via ferroptosis. Additionally, we reviewed the specific modes of action for preventing and treating HFpEF without influencing their anti-cancer therapeutic effect.

Noninvasive Assessment of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Through Radiomic Features

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with delayed diagnosis often limiting effective treatment options. This study introduces a novel, noninvasive radiomics-based approach using [18F] FDG PET/CT (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography) to predict vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) status and survival in patients with GC. The ability to noninvasively assess these parameters can significantly influence therapeutic decisions and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with GC, stratified into training, validation, and test groups. Each patient underwent a [18F] FDG PET/CT scan, and radiomic features were extracted using dedicated software. A Radiomics Score (RS) was calculated, serving as a predictor for VEGF status. Statistical analyses included logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the predictive power of RS on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The developed radiomics model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with the RS formula achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.861 in the training cohort and 0.857 in the validation cohort for predicting VEGF status. The model also identified RS as an independent prognostic factor for survival, where higher RS values correlated with poorer survival rates.

DISCUSSION

The findings underscore the potential of [18F] FDG PET/CT radiomics in transforming the management of GC by providing a noninvasive means to assess tumor aggressiveness and prognosis through VEGF status. This model could facilitate earlier and more tailored therapeutic interventions, potentially improving survival outcomes in a disease marked by typically late diagnosis and limited treatment success.

Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review

Esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be a significant global health concern, with two main subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prevention and changes in etiology, improvements in early detection, and refinements in the treatment have led to remarkable progress in the outcomes of EC patients in the past two decades. This seminar provides an in-depth analysis of advances in the epidemiology, disease biology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of esophageal cancer, focusing on the ongoing debate surrounding multimodality therapy. Despite significant advancements, EC remains a deadly disease, underscoring the need for continued research into early detection methods, understanding the molecular mechanisms, and developing effective treatments.

Clinical Progress of Fruquintinib in Colorectal Cancer: An Overview

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Conventional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have limited effects on advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC). Fruquintinib, a novel and highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, has shown significant efficacy and tolerance in treating mCRC. The FRESCO and FRESCO-2 trials demonstrated that fruquintinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival and the overall survival of refractory mCRC patients, establishing it as the standard third-line treatment strategy for mCRC. In addition, the combination of fruquintinib with other anticancer drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated potential for enhanced efficacy, which warrants further exploration. In this review, we aimed to systematically summarize the current knowledge about the pharmacological mechanisms, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse events, and corresponding treatment options of fruquintinib and provide an update on the clinical trials related to fruquintinib in CRC by conducting a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and consulting the relevant clinical trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and the ChiCTR website, aiming to offer new insights into the role of fruquintinib in the comprehensive treatment of CRC.

Early Evaluation of the Interaction and Gender Differences in Combination of Apatinib and Metoprolol Using Humanized CYP2D6 Model

Apatinib, a commonly used tyrosine kinase inhibitor in cancer treatment, can cause adverse reactions such as hypertension. Hypertension, in turn, can increase the risk of certain cancers. The coexistence of these diseases makes the use of combination drugs more common in clinical practice, but the potential interactions and regulatory mechanisms in these drug combinations are poorly understood. We used the humanized CYP2D6 mouse model to predict the effect of apatinib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol and investigated the interactional mechanism. The inhibitory effects and mechanisms of apatinib on metoprolol were investigated in vitro by using wild-type mouse liver microsomes (WT MLMs), humanized CYP2D6 mouse liver microsomes (hCYP2D6 MLMs), and human liver microsomes (HLMs). Molecular docking was utilized to explore the structural basis of the observed inhibitory mode. And in vivo interaction between apatinib and metoprolol was assessed by pharmacokinetics study using the humanized CYP2D6 mice. In vitro studies and molecular docking experiments indicated that apatinib competitively inhibited the metabolism of metoprolol. In vivo findings revealed that the administration of apatinib combined with metoprolol resulted in a significant increase in the AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞) and Cmax of metoprolol; additionally, there was a reduction in the CLz/F and heart rate, indicating that apatinib strongly inhibited metoprolol metabolism. And the homologous CYP2D6 protein in WT mice was more sensitive to apatinib compared to the hCYP2D6 mice. Gender analysis revealed that metoprolol accumulation was more pronounced in male mice when combined with apatinib, indicating a higher susceptibility to cardiotoxicity in males.

Targeted therapy and immunotherapy for gastric cancer: rational strategies, novel advancements, challenges, and future perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and its treatment has been a focus of medical research. Herein we systematically review the current status of and advancements in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for GC, which have emerged as important treatment strategies in recent years with great potential, and summarize the efficacy and safety of such treatments. Targeted therapies against key targets in GC, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR), have shown remarkable therapeutic efficacies by inhibiting tumor progression and/or blood supply. In particular, markable breakthroughs have been made in HER2-targeting drugs for HER2-positive GC patients. To address intrinsic and acquired resistances to HER2-targeting drugs, novel therapeutic agents including bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) targeting HER2 have been developed. Immunotherapy enhances the recognition and elimination of cancer cells by activating body anticancer immune system. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are the most commonly used immunotherapeutic agents and have been used with some success in GC treatment. Innovative immunotherapy modalities, including adoptive immune cell therapy, tumor vaccines, and non-specific immunomodulators therapy, and oncolytic viruses have shown promise in early-stage clinical trials for GC. Clinical trials have supported that targeted therapy and immunotherapy can significantly improve the survival and quality of life of GC patients. However, the effects of such therapies need to be further improved and more personalized, with advancement in researches on tumor immune microenvironment. Further studies remain needed to address the issues of drug resistance and adverse events pertaining to such therapies for GC. The combined application of such therapies and individualized treatment strategies should be further explored with novel drugs developed, to provide more effective treatments for GC patients.

Analysis of the correlation between the dose exposure intensity and apatinib in advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Apatinib is a small molecule anti-angiogenesis targeted drug that has demonstrated significant efficacy as a late-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer in phase 3 clinical trials. This study amid to evaluate the correlation between dose exposure intensity and efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

We conducted an observational, retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced gastric cancer who received apatinib targeted therapy in Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University between June 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021. Dose exposure intensity (DEI) was defined as the product of dose and continuous medication time. Patients were assigned to high-dose exposure intensity (HDEI) and low-dose exposure intensity (LDEI) cohorts. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. The relationship between HDEI and LDEI and clinical outcomes was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier curve and χ2 test.

Results

61 patients were enrolled and assigned into two retrospective cohorts. The median PFS (mPFS) were 6.50 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [4.80-9.20]) and 4.10 months (95% CI [3.70-5.20]), and the median OS (mOS) were 10.70 months (95% CI [9.20-18.50]) and 7.50 months (95% CI [6.80-9.30]) for the HDEI and LDEI cohorts, respectively. The mPFS were 5.85 months (95% CI [5.00-7.00]) and 4.60 months (95% CI [4.10-5.90]), and mOS were 9.60 months (95% CI [9.10-12.40]) and 7.60 months (95% CI [7.20-10.20]) the for the 250 mg cohort and 500 mg cohorts. The mPFS were 6.65 months (95% CI [5.90-9.20]) and 4.10 months (95% CI [3.90-5.20]), and the mOS were 11.20 months (95% CI [9.20-18.50]) and 7.60 months (95% CI [7.20-9.60])for the long medication time and short medication time cohorts, respectively. The most common TRAEs of any grade were hypertension, proteinuria, and neutrophil count decreased. The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions in the 500 mg cohort was higher than the 250 mg cohort (P=0.0016).

Conclusion

The efficacy of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer was significantly positively correlated with dose exposure intensity, and HDEI can prolong PFS and OS. Early application of low-dose apatinib (250 mg/d) can improve patients' tolerability, and the adverse reactions are controllable.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer: a real - world retrospective cohort study

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic drugs have demonstrated effectiveness in treating advanced gastric cancer (GC), their role in neoadjuvant or conversion therapy remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anti-angiogenesis and ICIs in patients with locally advanced GC (LAGC).

Methods

In this cohort study, we reviewed our prospectively maintained GC database and included individuals diagnosed with clinical stage II-III GC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery between January 2022 and August 2023. The treatment protocol combined ICIs, anti-angiogenic therapy (specifically apatinib), and chemotherapy (S-1 with oxaliplatin). A systematic approach was used to document patients' clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological findings, and survival outcomes, which were subsequently analyzed in detail.

Results

A total of 38 individuals met the study's inclusion criteria, with the majority (32 patients, 84.2%) having clinical stage III GC. All participants underwent surgery, resulting in a notable R0 resection rate of 97.4%. The rates of major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) were 47.4% and 23.7%, respectively. Post-surgery, 36 patients (92.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 22 months, ten patients experienced disease recurrence, including three who died from tumor relapse. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate stood at 100%, and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 94.7%, with median OS and DFS yet to be reached. The neoadjuvant therapy regimen was generally well-tolerated, with no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported. Only one patient experienced a grade 4 TRAE (immune-related hepatitis), while the most common grade 3 TRAEs included thrombocytopenia, elevated aminotransferase levels, and neutropenia.

Conclusions

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and ICIs has proven effective in treating LAGC patients, achieving high pCR rates and favorable survival outcomes while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

INTEGRATE IIa Phase III Study: Regorafenib for Refractory Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment options for refractory advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer (AGOC) are limited. Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in the INTEGRATE I phase II trial. INTEGRATE IIa was designed to examine whether regorafenib improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial compared regorafenib and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo and BSC for participants with confirmed evaluable metastatic/advanced AGOC who failed ≥two prior therapies on a 2:1 random assignment, stratified by tumor location, geographic region (Asia v rest of world), and prior vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. The primary end point was OS. Treatment efficacy on OS was first tested in the pooled INTEGRATE I + INTEGRATE IIa cohort and, if significant, then in the INTEGRATE IIa cohort. Secondary end points were PFS, objective response rate, safety, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

INTEGRATE IIa enrolled 251 participants: 157 from Asia and 94 from rest of world and 169 received regorafenib and 82 received placebo. No significant heterogeneity was observed between INTEGRATE I and INTEGRATE IIa studies on OS. Pooled OS analysis hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.87; P = .001; 361 events). INTEGRATE IIa alone OS HR was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P = .006; 238 events), the median OS was 4.5 months versus 4.0 months, and 12-month survival rates were 19% and 6%, for regorafenib versus placebo, respectively. After a preplanned adjustment for multiplicity, there were no statistically significant differences across regions or other prespecified subgroups. Regorafenib improved PFS (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70]; P < .0001) and delayed deterioration in global QoL (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]; P = .0043). The toxicity profile was consistent with that of previous reports.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib improves survival compared with placebo in refractory AGOC.

Comprehensive review of signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal cancers

Targeted therapy, the milestone in the development of human medicine, originated in 2004 when the FDA approved the first targeted agent bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, and several trials have popped up in the last two decades with an unprecedented speed. Specifically, EGF/EGFR, VEGF/VEGFR, HGF/c-MET, and Claudin 18.2 therapeutic targets have been developed in recent years. Some targets previously thought to be undruggable are now being newly explored, such as the RAS site. However, the efficacy of targeted therapy is extremely variable, especially with the emergence of new drugs and the innovative use of traditional targets for other tumors in recent years. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of the major signaling pathway mechanisms and recent advances in targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers, as well as future perspectives.

Current Landscape of Molecular Biomarkers in Gastroesophageal Tumors and Potential Strategies for Co-Expression Patterns

The treatment of metastasized gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma largely depends on molecular profiling based on immunohistochemical procedures. Therefore, the examination of HER2, PD-L1, and dMMR/MSI is recommended by the majority of clinical practice guidelines, as positive expression leads to different treatment approaches. Data from large phase-III trials and consequent approvals in various countries enable physicians to offer their patients several therapy options including immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or both combined with chemotherapy. The introduction of novel therapeutic targets such as CLDN18.2 leads to a more complex decision-making process as a significant number of patients show positive results for the co-expression of other biomarkers besides CLDN18.2. The aim of this review is to summarize the current biomarker landscape of patients with metastatic gastroesophageal tumors, its direct clinical impact on daily decision-making, and to evaluate current findings on biomarker co-expression. Furthermore, possible treatment strategies with multiple biomarker expression are discussed.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery for Gastric Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a significant global health burden, ranking as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite recent advancements in GC treatment, the five-year survival rate for advanced-stage GC patients remains low. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify novel drug targets and develop effective therapies. However, traditional drug discovery approaches are associated with high costs, time-consuming processes, and a high failure rate, posing challenges in meeting this critical need. In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and big data in drug discovery, particularly in cancer research. AI has the potential to improve the drug discovery process by analyzing vast and complex datasets from multiple sources, enabling the prediction of compound efficacy and toxicity, as well as the optimization of drug candidates. This review provides an overview of the latest AI algorithms and big data employed in drug discovery for GC. Additionally, we examine the various applications of AI in this field, with a specific focus on therapeutic discovery. Moreover, we discuss the challenges, limitations, and prospects of emerging AI methods, which hold significant promise for advancing GC research in the future.

A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines: 2024 Update

Differences in demographics, medical expertise, and patient healthcare resources across countries have led to significant variations in guidelines. In light of these differences, in this review, we aimed to explore and compare the most recent updates to gastric cancer treatment from five guidelines that are available in English. These English-version guidelines, which have been recently published and updated for journal publication, include those published in South Korea in 2024, Japan in 2021, China in 2023, the United States in 2024, and Europe in 2024. The South Korean and Japanese guidelines provide a higher proportion of content to endoscopic and surgical treatments, reflecting their focus on minimally invasive techniques, function-preserving surgeries, and systemic therapy. The Chinese guidelines provide recommendations addressing not only surgical approaches but also perioperative chemotherapy and palliative systemic therapy. Meanwhile, in the United States and European guidelines, a higher proportion of the content is dedicated to perioperative and palliative systemic therapy, aligning with their approaches to advanced-stage disease management. All guidelines address surgical and systemic chemotherapy treatments; however, the proportion and emphasis of content vary based on the patient distribution and treatment approaches specific to each country. With emerging research findings on gastric cancer treatment worldwide, the national guidelines are being progressively revised and updated. Understanding the commonalities and differences among national guidelines, along with the underlying evidence, can provide valuable insights into the treatment of gastric cancer.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with apatinib and camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a protocol for a single-arm phase II trial

Gastric cancer, as the fifth most diagnosed malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death globally, remains a significant health concern. The potential effect of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, when used alongside chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, has yet to be explored in the published literature. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen when combined with apatinib and camrelizumab (SOXAC) as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. A single-arm, open-label, single-center phase II clinical trial has been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SOXAC regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT2-3N + M0 or T4NxM0). Eligible patients are to receive 2 cycles of SOXAC and 1 cycle of SOX regimen with camrelizumab (SOXC) as neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical surgery, and 3 cycles of SOXC as postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is major pathological remission (MPR), while secondary endpoints include pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), operation-related outcomes, and safety. The SOX regimen remains a leading choice for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern countries. Recent studies suggest that combining chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors can enhance the antitumor immune response. This phase II clinical trial seeks to assess the safety and efficacy of the SOXAC regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, while also exploring the correlation between biomarkers and efficacy.Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR2200062285 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ).

Efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective real-world study

We aimed to explore the efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to analyze the factors affecting prognosis based on clinical characteristics. Eighty-five AGC patients who underwent rechallenged after the failure of first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were retrospectively collected from July 2019 to December 2022 in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. Potential factors affecting prognosis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test. Stratified factors included human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS). The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.3%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 74.1%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months. Results showed that patients in the I + C group had the best response. The ORR was 20.0% VS 8.7% in the I + C group and I + C + AAD group. The DCR was 78.0% VS 65.2%, and the median PFS was 6.7 VS 4.7 months [hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-1.00, p = .022]. The ORR was 20.0% VS 8.3% in the I + C group and I + C + ADC group. The DCR was 78.0% VS 75.0%, and the median PFS was 6.7 VS 4.4 months (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.26-1.30, p = .112). The median PFS was 4.7 VS 4.4 months in the I + C + AAD group and I + C + ADC group (HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 0.60-2.47, p = .580). Adverse events (AEs) were found in 34 patients, mainly including leukopenia 9 (10.6%), and neutropenia 8 (9.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs was 8.2%. There were no drug-related deaths and all AEs were manageable. Rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy showed good survival benefit and acceptable safety in the therapy of AGC. Especially for patients with HER-2-positive and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1%, rechallenge may be an effective treatment modality.

NSUN5 promotes tumorigenic phenotypes through the WNT signaling pathway and immunosuppression of CD8+ T cells in gastric cancer

NSUN5, a key member of the M5C methylation family, plays a significant role in fundamental biological processes like cell proliferation and differentiation. However, its specific function and mechanisms in gastric cancer remain insufficiently understood. Initially, we examined NSUN5's differential expression in gastric cancer versus normal tissues, along with survival trends, associated signaling pathways, and immune infiltration using the TCGA database. Subsequently, we conducted immunohistochemistry experiments to assess NSUN5 expression in gastric cancer tissues. Gain-and loss-of-function experiments were carried out to investigate NSUN5's impact on the proliferation, stemness, and migratory capabilities of gastric cancer cells, as well as the expression of vital proteins in pertinent signaling pathways. Our findings demonstrate that NSUN5 is not only overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues, but also positively associated with tumor stage and inversely linked with patient prognosis. NSUN5 promotes the in vitro proliferation, stemness, and migration of gastric cancer cells, and the in vivo growth of these cells, chiefly through the activation of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Additionally, NSUN5 appears to diminish the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in gastric cancer, contributing to immune evasion. In conclusion, NSUN5 functions as a proto-oncogene in the progression of gastric cancer and may serve as a potential therapeutic target.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Second-line Therapies for Patients With Advanced Thymic Carcinoma

AIMS

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare form of highly invasive tumors. Currently, the standard first-line therapy involves paclitaxel plus carboplatin treatment, while the recommended regimen for second-line therapy remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to explore the second-line mode of TC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the outcome of subjects with advanced TC between 2009 and 2023 in three medical centers, retrospectively. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-Meier was used for calculating Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The factors affecting survival in the real world were evaluated by Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 136 patients were included in this study, the median PFS (mPFS) for all subjects was 5.97 months, and the median OS (mOS) was 25.03 months. According to patient's treatment modes, they are divided into monotherapy (n = 95) and combination therapy (n = 41), PFS manifested the difference between two groups (5.17 vs. 9.00 months, P = 0.043). OS also indicated a significant distinction (22.50 vs. 38.00 months, P = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in PFS between patients using immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and those with antivascular therapy (8.57 vs. 13.10 months, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

In the second-line therapy for advanced TC, the efficacy of combination therapy was better than monotherapy, especially for immunotherapy combined with antivascular therapy.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CAP 02 Re-challenge): A single-arm, phase II study

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparisons Involving Ramucirumab

PURPOSE

With relatively few direct comparisons among treatment options for previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, network meta-analysis (NMA) may inform evidence-based decision-making. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM + PTX) is a preferred regimen in guideline recommendations. NMA of key outcomes may further characterize the relative clinical value of RAM + PTX.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials of adult patients with previously treated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer informed a NMA which compared overall survival, progression-free survival, and discontinuations due to adverse events. Comparisons were reported relative to placebo/best supportive care (BSC) when possible, otherwise relative to RAM + PTX.

RESULTS

The base-case NMA focused on second-line treatment only, from 19 of 28 studies identified. For overall survival, seven of 16 regimens were favorable relative to placebo/BSC, with RAM + PTX as the most favorable. For progression-free survival, five of 14 regimens were unfavorable relative to RAM + PTX. For discontinuations due to adverse events, two of 13 regimens were similar to placebo/BSC: ramucirumab monotherapy and fluorouracil; relative to RAM-PTX, all regimens were similar except ramucirumab monotherapy which was favorable and irinotecan + cisplatin which was unfavorable.

CONCLUSION

This NMA of trials of previously treated gastric/GEJ cancer suggests that RAM + PTX has one of the more favorable clinical profiles.

Disitamab vedotin combined with apatinib in gastric cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

In patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing gastric cancer (GC), the combination of HER2 targeting and a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen has been demonstrated to significantly improve their prognosis. However, in a proportion of patients, cancer progresses within a short period of time, and there is currently no standard treatment after disease progression.

CASE SUMMARY

This study presents a case of a 51-year-old male with advanced GC who underwent radical resection (Billroth type II subtotal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy) and resection of liver metastases. Immunohistochemical staining revealed a HER2 score of 2+, a dMMR status, and a Ki67 proliferation index of 30% to 40%. The gene test results indicated the presence of ERBB2 amplification and a PD-L1 expression level of less than 5%. Since December 2021, the patient has experienced disease progression during both first-line (two cycles of KN026 combined with KN046) and second-line (five cycles of nivolumab combined with trastuzumab and SOX chemotherapy) treatment regimens. The patient's prognosis following the first and second lines of treatment was unfavorable, with progression occurring in a relatively short time. For third-line therapy, disitamab vedotin (RC48) plus apatinib was used. At the time of this report, the patient had achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of 25.8 months, which exceeded the median survival time for patients with advanced GC.

CONCLUSION

Despite the unfavorable prognosis associated with advanced GC, the implementation of personalized treatment approaches may still prove beneficial for select patients. In patients with HER2-positive GC with extensive metastatic involvement, the use of the HER2-targeted combination with apatinib has demonstrated the potential to prolong both PFS and overall survival.

Nivolumab plus anlotinib hydrochloride in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the phase II OASIS trial

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), possess immunomodulatory properties and have shown promising outcomes when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies. The OASIS phase II trial (NCT04503967) is designed to determine the clinical activity and safety of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and anlotinib hydrochloride (a multi-targets TKI) as second-line or above therapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). From December 2020 to September 2022, 45 patients with GAC and 3 with ESCC were enrolled in this study. The pre-specified endpoints were reached, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate achieving 29.2%. For secondary objectives, disease control rate was 64.6%; median progression-free survival was 4.0 months; and median overall survival was 11.1 months with a manageable toxicity profile. The exploratory analyses unveiled that the balance of gut bacteria and the presence of a pre-existing immune signature characterized by a high percentage of CD68+PD-L1+ PD-1+ macrophages and low pretreatment variant allele frequencies (VAF), as well as low expression of certain cytokines were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with GAC.

Apatinib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: phase II trial

Most patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ultimately experience tumor progression after first-line systemic therapies. Systemic therapy is generally recommended as second-line treatment for advanced HCC in the major guidelines. Combining apatinib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) likely drives synergistic activity on advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. This phase II trial (ChiCTR2000029082) aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with HCC with extrahepatic metastasis who have progressed after first-line systemic therapies. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progress-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), 6- and 12-month survival rates, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Thirty-nine patients received oral treatment with apatinib, and hepatic artery infusion oxaliplatinplus raltitrexed. Per RECIST v1.1, the ORR and DCR was 53.8% and 89.7% in the patients population, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 6.2 months and 11.3 months, respectively. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 81.7% and 44.1%, respectively. All AEs were manageable by medication or dose modifications. Apatinib plus HAIC for second-line therapy in advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis shows promising efficacy and manageable toxicities.

Progress in the clinical development of investigational systemic agents for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains an endemic disease in certain parts of the world, with many patients presenting with advanced disease on diagnosis. Chemotherapy had remained the standard of care with minimal progress made until recent years. This review aims to provide an overview of recent significant breakthroughs and up-and-coming novel strategies in treating this deadly disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the latest clinical development of promising investigational agents in the treatment of advanced NPC. These include anti-vascular agents, signaling pathways inhibitors and immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The addition of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) to platinum-based chemotherapy has undoubtedly changed the therapeutic landscape of R/M NPC in the first-line setting. This leaves much room for further research on the optimal treatment strategy in subsequent-line settings, likely including the addition of CPI to anti-vascular agents or novel CPI combinations, with or without chemotherapy as a backbone. Other potential approaches include optimal CPI maintenance therapy after first-line CPI-chemotherapy combination. Potential novel agents on the horizons are antibody-drug conjugates, bi-specific antibodies and signaling inhibitors, with several phase II/III studies currently underway.

Identification of angiogenesis-related subtypes and risk models for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and is characterized by significant heterogeneity, highlighting the need for further studies aimed at personalized treatment strategies. Tumor angiogenesis is critical for tumor development and metastasis, yet its role in molecular subtyping and prognosis prediction remains underexplored. This study aims to identify angiogenesis-related subtypes and develop a prognostic model for GC patients. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we performed consensus cluster analysis on differentially expressed angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs), identifying two patient subtypes with distinct survival outcomes. Differentially expressed genes between the subtypes were analyzed via Cox and LASSO regression, leading to the establishment of a subtype-based prognostic model using a machine learning algorithm. Patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups based on the risk score. Validation was performed using independent datasets (ICGC and GSE15459). We utilized a deconvolution algorithm to investigate the tumor immune microenvironment in different risk groups and conducted analyses on genetic profiling, sensitivity and combination of anti-tumor drug. Our study identified ten prognostic signature genes, enabling the calculation of a risk score to predict prognosis and overall survival. This provides critical data for stratified diagnosis and treatment upon patient admission, monitoring disease progression throughout the entire course, evaluating immunotherapy efficacy, and selecting personalized medications for GC patients.

Unveiling promising targets in gastric cancer therapy: A comprehensive review

Gastric cancer (GC) poses a significant global health challenge, ranking fifth in incidence and third in mortality among all malignancies worldwide. Its insidious onset, aggressive growth, proclivity for metastasis, and limited treatment options have contributed to its high fatality rate. Traditional approaches for GC treatment primarily involve surgery and chemotherapy. However, there is growing interest in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This comprehensive review highlights recent advancements in GC targeted therapy and immunotherapy. It delves into the mechanisms of various strategies, underscoring their potential in GC treatment. Additionally, the review evaluates the efficacy and safety of relevant clinical trials. Despite the benefits observed in numerous advanced GC patients with targeted therapies and immunotherapies, challenges persist. We discuss pertinent strategies to overcome these challenges, thereby providing a solid foundation for enhancing the clinical effectiveness of targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

SAFFRON-104: a phase Ib/II study of sitravatinib alone or with tislelizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Sitravatinib is a spectrum-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MER), VEGFR-2, KIT, and MET. SAFFRON-104 (NCT03941873) was a multicohort phase Ib/II study investigating sitravatinib with/without tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced HCC or GC/GEJC. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of sitravatinib with/without tislelizumab. Phase II evaluated sitravatinib monotherapy in patients with pretreated HCC, and sitravatinib plus tislelizumab in anti-PD-(L)1-naïve or -treated HCC and anti-PD-(L)1-naïve GC/GEJC. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability (phase I) and objective response rate (ORR) (phase II).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (March 31, 2023), 111 patients were enrolled; 102 were efficacy-evaluable (median study follow-up 9.1 months [range: 0.7-36.9]). The RP2D of sitravatinib was determined as 120 mg orally once daily. In patients receiving sitravatinib monotherapy and sitravatinib in combination with tislelizumab, grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (51.9%) and 42 (50.0%) patients, respectively. The ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.7-49.1) in patients with pretreated HCC receiving sitravatinib monotherapy. In patients receiving sitravatinib with tislelizumab, the ORR was 11.5% (95% CI 2.4-30.2) with anti-PD-(L)1-naïve HCC, 9.5% (95% CI 1.2-30.4) with anti-PD-(L)1-treated HCC, and 16.1% (95% CI 5.5-33.7) in patients with anti-PD-(L)1-naïve GC/GEJC.

CONCLUSIONS

Sitravatinib with/without tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced HCC and GC/GEJC.

Thymic epithelial tumor medical treatment: A narrative review

Thymic epithelial tumors, a malignancy originating in the thymus, are the commonest primary neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum; however, among thoracic tumors, they have a relatively low incidence rare. Thymic epithelial tumors can be broadly classified into thymic carcinoma and thymoma. As the cornerstone of thymic tumor treatment, surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage patients, whereas, for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, the treatment is chemoradiotherapy. Targeted therapy is less effective for thymic tumors. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as another effective treatment option for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, particularly thymomas, is limited owing to immune-related adverse effects. Here, we have summarized all pertinent information regarding chemotherapy, especially preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy in combination with other treatments, and reviewed the effectiveness of these procedures and recent advances in targeted therapy. In addition, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in thymic epithelial tumors, to provide a holistic treatment view.

Characteristics and patient-reported outcomes of long-term cancer survivors after apatinib-based therapy: an online survey

BACKGROUND

Data on long-term cancer survivors treated with apatinib are lacking. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of long-term cancer survivors after apatinib-based therapy, and to know about their satisfaction degree with apatinib and severity of depression and insomnia.

METHODS

Patients with solid tumors who had received apatinib-based therapy for at least 5 years were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Characteristics of patients and treatment, knowledge of apatinib, satisfaction degree, and severity of depression and insomnia assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Insomnia Severity Index were collected.

RESULTS

Between December 8, 2023 and March 1, 2024, a total of 436 patients completed the online questionnaire. Most patients were satisfied with the efficacy (96.6%) and safety (93.1%) of apatinib, were willing to continue apatinib treatment (99.5%), and would recommend apatinib to other patients (93.3%). Continuous apatinib treatment resulted in significant negative impact on daily life, work, or study in only two (0.5%) patients. Almost all patients currently had no or mild depression (97.0%) and insomnia (97.9%) problems. The most common patient-reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (21.3%) and hypertension (18.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey showed a high satisfaction degree with apatinib in long-term cancer survivors. Long-term apatinib treatment resulted in almost no negative impact on patient's quality of life.

Preparation of Radiolabeled Zolbetuximab Targeting CLDN18.2 and Its Preliminary Evaluation for Potential Clinical Applications

Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2), due to its high expression in various gastric cancer tissues, is considered an optimal target for antitumor drug molecules. In this study, we obtained the labeled compounds of [125I]I-zolbetuximab using the Iodogen method. Under the optimum labeling conditions, the molar activity of [125I]I-zolbetuximab was 1.75 × 102 GBq/μmol, and the labeling efficiency was more than 99%. The labeled compounds exhibited excellent in vitro stability in both phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) and fetal bovine serum systems (FBS) (radiochemical purity >90% at 72 h). The uptake percentage of [125I]I-zolbetuximab in MKN45-CLDN18.2 cells is 24.69 ± 0.84% after 6 h. The saturation binding assay and specificity assay further demonstrated the high specificity of [125I]I-zolbetuximab for CLDN18.2. The long retention at the tumor site and rapid metabolic clearance at other organ sites of [125I]I-zolbetuximab were observed in small-animal SPECT-CT imaging. The same trend was also observed in the biodistribution study. Due to the excellent targeting ability of zolbetuximab for CLDN18.2, [125I]I-zolbetuximab exhibits strong specific binding and retention with cells and tumors highly expressing CLDN18.2. However, the balance between mAb's longer cycle time in vivo and targeting binding and retention ability should be intensively considered for using this kind of radiopharmaceutical in the diagnosis and treatment of CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer.

Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial

The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376 .

Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial final results

Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) is highly expressed with the development of various malignant tumors, especially gastrointestinal cancers, and is emerging as a new target for cancer treatment. Satricabtagene autoleucel (satri-cel)/CT041 is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell targeting CLDN18.2, and the interim results of the CT041-CG4006 trial were reported in June 2022. Here we present the final results of this single-arm, open-label, phase 1 trial, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of satri-cel in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastrointestinal cancers. This trial included a dose-escalation stage (n = 15) and a dose-expansion stage in four different cohorts (total n = 83): cohort 1, satri-cel monotherapy in 61 patients with standard chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers; cohort 2, satri-cel plus anti-PD-1 therapy in 15 patients with standard chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers; cohort 3, satri-cel as sequential treatment after first-line therapy in five patients with gastrointestinal cancers; and cohort 4, satri-cel monotherapy in two patients with anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody-refractory gastric cancer. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. A total of 98 patients received satri-cel infusion, among whom 89 were dosed with 2.5 × 108, six with 3.75 × 108 and three with 5.0 × 108 CAR T cells. Median follow-up was 32.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3, 36.5) since apheresis. No dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related deaths or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were reported. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 96.9% of patients, all classified as grade 1-2. Gastric mucosal injuries were identified in eight (8.2%) patients. The overall response rate and disease control rate in all 98 patients were 38.8% and 91.8%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.7, 6.6) and 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.1, 10.2), respectively. Satri-cel demonstrates therapeutic potential with a manageable safety profile in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastrointestinal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03874897 .

Effect and Safety of Apatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Phase 2 Trial

Context

Presently, there is a paucity of prospective clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced thyroid cancer.

Objective

This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of apatinib as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with local advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Methods

Patients were treated with preoperative apatinib over a course of 2 to 4 cycles, culminating in surgical resection. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR); the secondary endpoints were the rate of R0 surgery, alterations in serum thyroglobulin levels, disease-free survival, and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 14 patients who met the inclusion criteria were administered neoadjuvant apatinib. Among these, 13 patients underwent surgical procedures following apatinib treatment and were enrolled in the ITT population. The ORR was 53.8% and the DCR was 100%. Of the patients, 84.6% received R0 surgery, while the remaining 15.4% underwent R1 resection. Predominant among the observed AEs were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, proteinuria, and hypothyroidism, with no instances of grade 4 or 5 AEs reported. Subsequent to surgery, patients were followed up for a median period of 34 months, during which disease progression occurred in 5 individuals (35.7%), encompassing 3 cases of locoregional recurrences and 2 cases of distant metastases.

Conclusion

Apatinib may be an effective agent in the use of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced DTC. Patients may therefore benefit from surgical outcomes and their long-term prognosis.

Utilising systematic reviews to assess potential overtreatment and claim for better evidence-based research: an analysis of anticancer drugs versus supportive care in advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Highlighting the identified gaps in evidence-based research concerning advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment and care, this review evaluates the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs compared to supportive care for advanced EC patients, aiming to assess the appropriateness of usual treatments and identify the gaps that need to be filled with primary research.

METHODS

We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarised using GRADE summary of finding tables.

RESULTS

We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies.

CONCLUSION

RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of supportive care in advanced EC is low or very low, and this information should be actively shared with affected patients. More and better RCTs should be conducted to assess whether any old or new proposed treatment for advanced EC patients provides a better balance of benefits and harms than the supportive care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6 ) on 2022-03-29.

Exploring treatment options in cancer: Tumor treatment strategies

Traditional therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy have burdened cancer patients with onerous physical and psychological challenges. Encouragingly, the landscape of tumor treatment has undergone a comprehensive and remarkable transformation. Emerging as fervently pursued modalities are small molecule targeted agents, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), cell-based therapies, and gene therapy. These cutting-edge treatment modalities not only afford personalized and precise tumor targeting, but also provide patients with enhanced therapeutic comfort and the potential to impede disease progression. Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that these therapeutic strategies still harbour untapped potential for further advancement. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the merits and limitations of these treatment modalities holds the promise of offering novel perspectives for clinical practice and foundational research endeavours. In this review, we discussed the different treatment modalities, including small molecule targeted drugs, peptide drugs, antibody drugs, cell therapy, and gene therapy. It will provide a detailed explanation of each method, addressing their status of development, clinical challenges, and potential solutions. The aim is to assist clinicians and researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of these diverse treatment options, enabling them to carry out effective treatment and advance their research more efficiently.

Antitumor Effects of Resveratrol Opposing Mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is an aggressive and multifactorial disease. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is identified as a significant etiological factor in gastric cancer. Although only a fraction of patients infected with H. pylori progresses to gastric cancer, bacterial infection is critical in the pathology and development of this malignancy. The pathogenic mechanisms of this bacterium involve the disruption of the gastric epithelial barrier and the induction of chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, angiogenesis and metastasis. Adherence molecules, virulence (CagA and VacA) and colonization (urease) factors are important in its pathogenicity. On the other hand, resveratrol is a natural polyphenol with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Resveratrol also inhibits cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis, suggesting a role as a potential therapeutic agent against cancer. This review explores resveratrol as an alternative cancer treatment, particularly against H. pylori-induced gastric cancer, due to its ability to mitigate the pathogenic effects induced by bacterial infection. Resveratrol has shown efficacy in reducing the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the synergistic effects of resveratrol with chemotherapy and radiotherapy underline its therapeutic potential. However, further research is needed to fully describe its efficacy and safety in treating gastric cancer.

Phase 1/2a Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the results from an early-phase study of rivoceranib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating, multicenter three-part phase 1/2a trial, patients had advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Part 1 evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of five ascending once-daily doses of rivoceranib from 81 mg to 685 mg. Part 2 evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of once-daily rivoceranib 685 mg. Part 3 was conducted later, due to lack of maximum tolerated dose determination in part 1, to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of once-daily rivoceranib 805 mg in patients with unresectable or advanced gastric cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were enrolled in parts 1 (n=25), 2 (n=30), and 3 (n=6). In parts 1 and 2, patients were white (45.5%) or Asian (54.5%), and 65.6% were male. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hypertension (32.7%), hyponatremia (10.9%), and hypophosphatemia (10.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.2%. In part 3, dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two out of six patients: grade 3 febrile neutropenia decreased appetite, and fatigue. The ORR was 33%.

CONCLUSION

The recommended phase 2 dose of rivoceranib was determined to be 685 mg once daily, which showed adequate efficacy with a manageable safety profile (NCT01497704 and NCT02711969).