Analysis of somatostatin receptors 2 and 5 polymorphisms in patients with acromegaly

SSTR2 expression in neoplastic and normal anterior pituitary is impacted by age, sex, and hormonal status

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are among the most common tumors encountered in neurooncology. While the majority of PitNETs demonstrate indolent behavior, a subset of tumors demonstrates aggressive behavior, including invasion into surrounding structures. As traditional imaging has limited capacity to distinguish tumor from post-operative changes, better methods of tumor delineation are needed to guide management. Somatotroph adenomas are known to express high levels of SSTR2, and SSTR2-targeting PET imaging has shown clinical utility in the management of neuroendocrine tumors and meningiomas. In this retrospective study of archival PitNETs (n = 271) and autopsy controls (AC) (n = 20), we show that although significant differences in SSTR2 immunostaining are appreciable between adenoma subtypes and ACs, high-staining cases are encountered in all subtypes. In ACs, females demonstrated significantly stronger SSTR2 staining than males. Weak age-related trends towards increasing labelling in females and decreasing labelling in males were noted but these did not reach statistical significance. Decreasing age-related trends were seen in gonadotrophs in both sexes; this was statistically significant in females. Our findings suggest that SSTR2-targeting imaging modalities may assist clinical management of a subset of PitNETs and that these results may need to be interpreted with consideration of patient age and sex.

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) expression is associated with better clinical outcome and prognosis in rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogues have recently been used as therapeutic targets for metastatic or surgically unresectable gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and associated somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression has been well demonstrated in most GEP NETs, with the exception of rectal NETs. SSTR2 immunohistochemical expressions were evaluated in 350 surgically or endoscopically resected rectal NETs and compared to clinicopathologic factors. SSTR2 expression was observed in 234 (66.9%) rectal NET cases and associated tumors with smaller size (p = 0.001), low pT classification (p = 0.030), low AJCC tumor stage (p = 0.012), and absence of chromogranin expression (p = 0.009). Patients with rectal NET and SSTR2 expression had significantly better overall survival than those without SSTR2 expression both by univariable (p = 0.006) and multivariable (p = 0.014) analyses. In summary, approximately two-thirds of rectal NETs expressed SSTR2. SSTR2 expression was significantly associated with favorable behavior and good overall survival in patients with rectal NETs. Furthermore, SSTR2 expression can be used as prognostic factors. When metastatic disease occurs, SSTR2 expression can be used a possible target for somatostatin analogues.

Short Stature due to Bioinactive Growth Hormone (Kowarski Syndrome)

OBJECTIVE

Bioinactive growth hormone (BGH) is a structurally abnormal, biologically inactive, but immunoreactive form of growth hormone encoded by pathogenic growth hormone 1 gene variants. The underlying cause of the defective physiology is decreased BGH binding affinity to both growth hormone binding proteins and growth hormone receptors (GHRs). GHR cannot dimerize when it is in a quiescent state because BGH cannot activate it. Nondimerized GHR is unable to activate intracytoplasmic signaling pathway molecules such as Janus kinase 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription, which initiate insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) transcription. IGF-1 cannot therefore be synthesized and IGF-1 levels in the circulation decrease. In contrast to children with growth hormone insensitivity, children with short stature due to BGH, known as Kowarski syndrome, exhibit an outstanding linear growth response to recombinant growth hormone therapy. For a number of reasons, differential diagnosis presents some difficulties. Similar diseases caused by genetic abnormalities that cause short stature range in severity from minor to severe clinical spectrum. Furthermore, some patients with Kowarski syndrome have previously been diagnosed with familial short stature, constitutional delayed puberty, and idiopathic short stature. This paper aims to review the particular clinical and laboratory findings of BGH.

METHODS

This study collected clinical and laboratory data from KS cases reported in the literature.

RESULTS

This review reports that KS cases have lower SDSs for height and IGF-1 compared to growth hormone deficiency.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of genetic defects underlying Kowarski syndrome (KS) will provide new insights into growth hormone insensitivity. As the availability of genetic analysis, including functional investigations expands, researchers will identify new underlying genetic pathways.

Differential Diagnosis of the Short IGF-I-Deficient Child with Apparently Normal Growth Hormone Secretion

The current differential diagnosis for a short child with low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and a normal growth hormone (GH) peak in a GH stimulation test (GHST), after exclusion of acquired causes, includes the following disorders: (1) a decreased spontaneous GH secretion in contrast to a normal stimulated GH peak ("GH neurosecretory dysfunction," GHND) and (2) genetic conditions with a normal GH sensitivity (e.g., pathogenic variants of GH1 or GHSR) and (3) GH insensitivity (GHI). We present a critical appraisal of the concept of GHND and the role of 12- or 24-h GH profiles in the selection of children for GH treatment. The mean 24-h GH concentration in healthy children overlaps with that in those with GH deficiency, indicating that the previously proposed cutoff limit (3.0-3.2 μg/L) is too high. The main advantage of performing a GH profile is that it prevents about 20% of false-positive test results of the GHST, while it also detects a low spontaneous GH secretion in children who would be considered GH sufficient based on a stimulation test. However, due to a considerable burden for patients and the health budget, GH profiles are only used in few centres. Regarding genetic causes, there is good evidence of the existence of Kowarski syndrome (due to GH1 variants) but less on the role of GHSR variants. Several genetic causes of (partial) GHI are known (GHR, STAT5B, STAT3, IGF1, IGFALS defects, and Noonan and 3M syndromes), some responding positively to GH therapy. In the final section, we speculate on hypothetical causes.

Drug resistance in pituitary tumours: from cell membrane to intracellular signalling

The pharmacological treatment of pituitary tumours is based on the use of stable analogues of somatostatin and dopamine. The analogues bind to somatostatin receptor types 2 and 5 (SST2 and SST5) and dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2), respectively, and generate signal transduction cascades in cancerous pituitary cells that culminate in the inhibition of hormone secretion, cell growth and invasion. Drug resistance occurs in a subset of patients and can involve different steps at different stages, such as following receptor activation by the agonist or during the final biological responses. Although the expression of somatostatin and dopamine receptors in cancer cells is a prerequisite for these drugs to reach a biological effect, their presence does not guarantee the success of the therapy. Successful therapy also requires the proper functioning of the machinery of signal transduction and the finely tuned regulation of receptor desensitization, internalization and intracellular trafficking. The present Review provides an updated overview of the molecular factors underlying the pharmacological resistance of pituitary tumours. The Review discusses the experimental evidence that supports a role for receptors and intracellular proteins in the function of SSTs and DRD2 and their clinical importance.

Precision Therapy in Acromegaly Caused by Pituitary Tumors: How Close Is It to Reality?

Acromegaly presents with an enigmatic range of symptoms and comorbidities caused by chronic and progressive growth hormone elevations, commonly due to endocrinologic hypersecretion from a pituitary gland tumor. Comprehensive national acromegaly databases have been appearing over the years, allowing for international comparisons of data, although still presenting varying prevalence and incidence rates. Lack of large-scale analysis in geographical and ethnic differences in clinical presentation and management requires further research. Assessment of current and novel predictors of responsiveness to distinct therapy can lead to multilevel categorization of patients, allowing integration into new clinical guidelines and reduction of increased morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly. This review compares current data from epidemiological studies and assesses the present-day application of prognostic factors in medical practice, the reality of precision therapy, as well as its future prospects in acromegaly, with a special focus on its relevance to the South Korean population.

Multimodal therapy in aggressive pituitary tumors

The concept of aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) has been precisely defined in recent years. These tumors are characterized by morphological (radiological or histopathological) data of invasion, proliferative activity superior to that of typical adenomas and a clinical behavior characterized by resistance to standard therapies and frequent recurrences. The absence of cerebrospinal or distant metastases differentiates them from the pituitary carcinoma. APTs account for about 10% of all pituitary neoplasm. Proper diagnostic implies participation not only of radiological and hormonal investigation but also a thorough pathological assessment including proliferation markers and immunohistochemistry for hormones and transcription factors. Surgical resection, aiming gross total resection or tumor debulking, is the mainstay initial therapy in most patients. Most patients with APTs need more than one surgical intervention, pituitary radiation, sometimes on more than one occasion, and multiple sequential or combined medical treatments, to finally be doomed to unusual treatments, such as alkylating agents (temozolomide alone or in combination), molecular targeted therapies, or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Multimodal therapy, implemented by experts, preferably in specialized centers with high volume caseload, is the only way to improve the prognosis of patients with these uncommon tumors. The research needs in this area are multiple and include a greater knowledge of the molecular biology of these tumors, establishment of protocols for monitoring and sequencing of treatments, development of multicenter studies and international registries.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and serotonin pathway targets in neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms regarding their molecular biology, clinical behaviour, prognosis and response to therapy. Several attempts to establish robust predictive biomarkers have failed. Neither tissue markers nor blood borne ones have proven to be successful yet. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) as "liquid biopsies" could provide prognostic information at the time a therapeutic decision needs to be made and could be an attractive tool for tumour monitoring throughout the treatment period. However, "liquid biopsies" are far from becoming the standard biomarker in NETs. Promising results have been presented over the last few years using a novel biomarker candidate, a multianalyte algorithm analysis PCR-based test (NETest). New technologies will open the field to different ways of approaching the biomarker conundrum in NETs. However, the complications derived from being a heterogeneous group of malignancies will remain with us forever. In summary, there is an unmet need to incorporate new biomarker candidates into clinical research trials to obtain a robust prospective validation under the most demanding scenario.

FGFR4 polymorphic alleles modulate mitochondrial respiration: A novel target for somatostatin analog action in pituitary tumors

We reported that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at codon 388 of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4-Gly388Arg) can result in distinct proteins that alter pituitary cell growth and function. Here, we examined the differential properties of the available therapeutic somatostatin analogs, octreotide and pasireotide, in pituitary tumor cells expressing the different FGFR4 isoforms. Consistent with their enhanced growth properties, FGFR4-R388-expressing cells show higher mitochondrial STAT3 serine phosphorylation driving basal and maximal oxygen consumption rate (OCR) than pituitary cells expressing the more common FGFR4-G388 isoform. While both somatostatin analogs reduce the OCR in FGFR4-G388 cells, pasireotide was more effective in decreasing OCR in cells expressing the variant FGFR4-R388 isoform. Down-regulation of somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) abrogated the effect of pasireotide, demonstrating its involvement in mediating this action. The effects on OCR were recapitulated by introducing a constitutively active serine STAT3 but not by a tyrosine-active mutant. Moreover, pharmacologic inhibition demonstrated the role for the phosphatase PP2A in mediating the dephosphorylation of STAT3-S727 by pasireotide. Our data indicate that FGFR4 polymorphic isoforms mediate signaling that yields mitochondrial therapeutic targets of relevance to the actions of different somatostatin analogs.

Cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling in the anterior pituitary gland in health and disease

The cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was the first among the so-called "second messengers" to be described. It is conserved in most organisms and functions as a signal transducer by mediating the intracellular effects of multiple hormones and neurotransmitters. In this review, we first delineate how different members of the cAMP pathway ensure its correct compartmentalization and activity, mediate the terminal intracellular effects, and allow the crosstalk with other signaling pathways. We then focus on the pituitary gland, where cAMP exerts a crucial function by controlling the responsiveness of the cells to hypothalamic hormones, neurotransmitters and peripheral factors. We discuss the most relevant physiological functions mediated by cAMP in the different pituitary cell types, and summarize the defects affecting this pathway that have been reported in the literature. We finally discuss how a deregulated cAMP pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of pituitary disorders and how it affects the response to therapy.

Somatostatin and dopamine receptor regulation of pituitary somatotroph adenomas

Somatostatin and dopamine receptors are expressed in normal and tumoral somatotroph cells. Upon receptor stimulation, somatostatin and the somatostatin receptor ligands octreotide, lanreotide, and pasireotide, and to a lesser extent, dopamine and the dopamine analogs bromocriptine and cabergoline, suppress growth hormone (GH) secretion from a GH-secreting pituitary somatotroph adenoma. Somatostatin and dopamine receptors are G_αi-protein coupled that inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and cAMP production and reduce intracellular calcium concentration and calcium flux oscillations. Although their main action on somatotroph cells is acute inhibition of GH secretion, they also may inhibit GH production and possibly somatotroph proliferation. These receptors have been reported to create complexes that exhibit functions distinct from that of receptor monomers. Somatostatin suppression of GH is mediated mainly by somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and to a lesser extent by SST5. Human somatostatin receptor subtype 5 has also been shown to harbor mutations associated with GH levels, somatotroph tumor behavior, and somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) responsiveness. Reviewing current knowledge of somatostatin and dopamine receptor expression and signaling in normal and tumoral somatotroph cells offers insights into mechanisms underlying SRL and dopamine agonist effectiveness in patients with acromegaly.

Truncated somatostatin receptor 5 may modulate therapy response to somatostatin analogues--Observations in two patients with acromegaly and severe headache

BACKGROUND

Somatotropinomas have unique "fingerprints" of somatostatin receptor (sst) expression, which are targets in treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). However, a significant expression of sst is not always related to the biochemical response to SSAs. Headache is a common complaint in acromegaly and considered a clinical marker of disease activity. SSAs are reported to have an own analgesic effect, but the sst involved are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated sst expression in two acromegalic patients with severe headache and no biochemical effects of octreotide, but a good response to pasireotide. We searched the literature for determinants of biochemical and analgesic effects of SSAs in somatotropinomas.

RESULTS

Case 1 had no biochemical or analgesic effects of octreotide, a semi-selective SSA, but a rapid and significant effect of pasireotide, a pan-SSA. Case 2 demonstrated discordance between analgesic and biochemical effects of octreotide, in that headache disappeared, but without biochemical improvement. In contrast, pasireotide normalized insulin-like growth factor 1. Both adenomas were sparsely granulated and had strong membranous expressions of sst2a in 50-75% and sst5 in 75-100% of tumor cells. The truncated sst5 variant TMD4 (sst5TMD4) showed expression in 20-57% of tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

A poor biochemical response to octreotide may be associated with tumor expression of a truncated sst5 variant, despite abundant sst2a expression, suggesting an influence from variant sst5 on common sst signaling pathways. Furthermore, unrelated analgesic and biochemical effects of SSAs supported a complex pathogenesis of acromegaly-associated headache. Finally, assessment of truncated sst5 in addition to full length sst could be important for a choice of postoperative SSA treatment in somatotropinomas.

Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Certain clinical conditions and markers have recently been demonstrated to modify the natural history of acromegaly in affected patients. Thus, some clinical, histological, radiological and molecular factors are associated with more aggressive pituitary tumors that have higher biochemical activity, higher tumor volumes and decreased tumoral and biochemical responses to current therapies. However, these factors do not seem to have an equal influence on the prognosis of patients with acromegaly. We present a review of the factors that influence the clinical course of patients with acromegaly and propose a risk value for each factor that will allow prognostic scoring for affected patients by considering a combination of these factors.

Analysis of IGF(CA)19 and IGFBP3-202A/C gene polymorphisms in patients with acromegaly: association with clinical presentation and response to treatments

OBJECTIVE

IGF1 and IGFBP3 gene polymorphisms have been recently described. However, their potential role in the setting of acromegaly and its outcome is unknown. In this study, we analyze these polymorphisms in patients with acromegaly and investigate their association with clinical presentation and response to treatments.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study was conducted in patients with acromegaly to analyze IGF1 and IGFBP3 gene polymorphisms.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients with acromegaly (57.3% women, mean age 44.9±13.1 years old) were followed up for a period of 11.4±8.0 years in eight tertiary referral hospitals in Spain. Clinical and analytical data were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. IGF1 and IGFBP3 gene polymorphisms were analyzed using PCR and specific primers.

RESULTS

Baseline laboratory test results were GH 19.3 (8.0-39.6) ng/ml, nadir GH 11.8 (4.1-21.5) ng/ml, and index IGF1 2.65±1.25 upper limit of normal. Regarding the IGF1 gene polymorphism, we did not find any association between the number of cyto-adenosine (CA) repeats and patients' baseline characteristics. Nevertheless, a trend for higher nadir GH values was observed in patients with <19 CA repeats. Regarding the IGFBP3 polymorphism, the absence of an A allele at the -202 position was associated with a higher baseline IGF1 and a higher prevalence of cancer and polyps. There were no differences in response to therapies according to the specific genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymorphisms in the IGF1 and IGFBP3 genes may not be invariably determinant of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients, but they may be associated with higher nadir GH levels or baseline IGF1, and determine a higher rate of colorectal polyps and cancer.

Dopamine and Somatostatin Analogues Resistance of Pituitary Tumors: Focus on Cytoskeleton Involvement

Pituitary tumors, that origin from excessive proliferation of a specific subtype of pituitary cell, are mostly benign tumors, but may cause significant morbidity in affected patients, including visual and neurologic manifestations from mass-effect, or endocrine syndromes caused by hormone hypersecretion. Dopamine (DA) receptor DRD2 and somatostatin (SS) receptors (SSTRs) represent the main targets of pharmacological treatment of pituitary tumors since they mediate inhibitory effects on both hormone secretion and cell proliferation, and their expression is retained by most of these tumors. Although long-acting DA and SS analogs are currently used in the treatment of prolactin (PRL)- and growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumors, respectively, clinical practice indicates a great variability in the frequency and entity of favorable responses. The molecular basis of the pharmacological resistance are still poorly understood, and several potential molecular mechanisms have been proposed, including defective expression or genetic alterations of DRD2 and SSTRs, or an impaired signal transduction. Recently, a role for cytoskeleton protein filamin A (FLNA) in DRD2 and SSTRs receptors expression and signaling in PRL- and GH-secreting tumors, respectively, has been demonstrated, first revealing a link between FLNA expression and responsiveness of pituitary tumors to pharmacological therapy. This review provides an overview of the known molecular events involved in SS and DA resistance, focusing on the role played by FLNA.

Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice

Somatostatin is a peptide with a potent and broad antisecretory action, which makes it an invaluable drug target for the pharmacological management of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1, 2A and B, 3, 4 and 5) belong to the G protein coupled receptor family and have a wide expression pattern in both normal tissues and solid tumors. Investigating the function of each SSTR in several tumor types has provided a wealth of information about the common but also distinct signaling cascades that suppress tumor cell proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. This provided the rationale for developing multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogs and combination therapies with signaling-targeted agents such as inhibitors of the mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR). The ability of SSTR to internalize and the development of rabiolabeled somatostatin analogs have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Novel pathway for somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with increased morbidity and mortality, where usually multiple treatment modalities are used. The somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the mainstay of medical therapy but, in many patients, including those with a germline mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene, disease activity cannot be controlled with these drugs. Previous data have suggested the involvement of the tumor-suppressor gene ZAC1 in the mechanism of action of SSAs, and more recent findings suggested that SSAs could regulate AIP, which in turn can stimulate ZAC1, therefore suggesting the existence of a SSA-AIP-ZAC1-somatostatin effect pathway. The current review discusses these novel observations, highlighting their significance in the treatment of sporadic and familial somatotroph adenomas.

Somatotroph pituitary adenoma with acromegaly and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: SSTR5 polymorphism and PKD1 mutation

A 39-year-old woman with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) presented with acromegaly and a pituitary macroadenoma. There was a family history of this renal disorder. She had undergone surgery for pituitary adenoma 6 years prior. Physical examination disclosed bitemporal hemianopsia and elevation of both basal growth hormone (GH) 106 ng/mL (normal 0-5) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) 811 ng/mL (normal 48-255) blood levels. A magnetic resonance imaging scan disclosed a 3.0 cm sellar and suprasellar mass with both optic chiasm compression and left cavernous sinus invasion. Pathologic, cytogenetic, molecular and in silico analysis was undertaken. Histologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of the lesion disclosed a sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma. Standard chromosome analysis on the blood sample showed no abnormality. Sequence analysis of the coding regions of PKD1 and PKD2 employing DNA from both peripheral leukocytes and the tumor revealed the most common PKD1 mutation, 5014_5015delAG. Analysis of the entire SSTR5 gene disclosed the variant c.142C>A (p.L48M, rs4988483) in the heterozygous state in both blood and tumor, while no pathogenic mutations were noted in the MEN1, AIP, p27Kip1 and SSTR2 genes. To our knowledge, this is the fourth reported case of a GH-producing pituitary adenoma associated with ADPKD, but the first subjected to extensive morphological, ultrastructural, cytogenetic and molecular studies. The physical proximity of the PKD1 and SSTR5 genes on chromosome 16 suggests a causal relationship between ADPKD and somatotroph adenoma.

Identification of somatostatin receptor type 5 gene polymorphisms associated with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the genetic variance of somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) and investigate the possible correlation of such variants with acromegaly risk and different disease characteristics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The SSTR5 gene coding region and 2000 bp upstream region was sequenced in 48 patients with acromegaly and 96 control subjects. Further, three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed in the same group of acromegaly patients and in an additional group of 475 age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

In total, 19 SNPs were identified in the SSTR5 gene locus by direct sequencing. Three SNPs (rs34037914, rs169068, and rs642249) were significantly associated with the presence of acromegaly using the initial controls. The allele frequencies were significantly (P<0.01) different between the acromegaly patients and the additional large control group. rs34037914 and rs642249 remained significantly associated with acromegaly after Bonferroni correction and permutation tests (odds ratio (OR)=3.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.78-6.42; P=0.00016 and OR=2.41; 95% CI, 1.41-4.13; P=0.0014 respectively). Haplotype reconstruction revealed two possible risk haplotypes determined by rs34037914 (633T) and rs642249 (1044A) alleles. Both haplotypes were found in significantly higher frequency in acromegaly patients compared with controls (P<0.001). In addition, the 663T allele was significantly associated with a younger age of acromegaly diagnosis (unstandardized regression coefficient β=-10.4; P=0.002), increased body mass index (β=4.1; P=0.004), higher number of adenoma resection (P<0.001) and lack of observable tumor shrinkage after somatostatin analog treatment (P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a previously undetected strong association of two SSTR5 SNPs with acromegaly. The data also suggest a possible involvement of SSTR5 variants in decreased suppression of GH production and increased tumor proliferation.

Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

Somatostatin analogs (SA) are widely used in acromegaly, either as first-line or adjuvant treatment after surgery. First-line treatment with these drugs is generally used in the patients with macroadenomas or in those with clinical conditions so severe as to prevent unsafe reactions during anesthesia. Generally, the response to SA takes into account both control of GH and IGF-I excess, with consequent improvement of clinical symptoms directly related to GH and IGF-I excess, and tumor shrinkage. This latter effect is more prominent in the patients treated first-line and bearing large macroadenomas, but it is also observed in patients with microadenomas, even with little clinical implication. Predictors of response are patients' gender, age, initial GH and IGF-I levels, and tumor mass, as well as adequate expression of somatostatin receptor types 2 and 5, those with the highest affinity for octreotide and lanreotide. Only sporadic cases of somatostatin receptor gene mutation or impaired signaling pathways have been described in GH-secreting tumors so far. The response to SA also depends on treatment duration and dosage of the drug used, so that a definition of resistance based on short-term treatments using low doses of long-acting SA is limited. Current data suggest that response to these drugs is better analyzed taking together biochemical and tumoral effects because only the absence of both responses might be considered as a poor response or resistance. This latter evidence seems to occur in 25% of treated patients after 12 months of currently available long-acting SA.

Association between somatostatin receptor 5 gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk and survival

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin (SST) inhibited cell proliferation and negatively regulated the release of growth hormones by means of specific receptors (SSTR). Genetic variation in SSTR had been associated with risk of human cancers but had never been investigated in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study the SSTR5 gene in paired tumor and blood samples from 33 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients using the Sanger method were sequenced. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in samples from 863 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 876 healthy controls using the TaqMan method were analyzed. The associations between gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk and survival were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively.

RESULTS

No somatic mutations were identified, but 3 nonsynonymous SSTR5 SNPs (P109S, L48M, and P335L) in pancreatic tumors were identified. The SSTR5 P109S variant allele was associated with a 1.62-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.43, P = 0.019). Furthermore, the SSTR5 L48M AC variant and smoking had a joint effect on pancreatic cancer risk (p(interaction) = 0.035). The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 0.58 (0.34-0.97), 1.49 (1.18-1.89), and 2.27 (1.35-3.83) for the variant genotype alone, smoking alone, and both factors, respectively, compared with no factors. Finally, SSTR5 P335L CC and P109S CC combined were associated with lower overall survival durations in patients with resectable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that SSTR5 genetic variants play a role in pancreatic cancer development and progression.

IGF(CA)19 and IGFBP-3-202A/C gene polymorphism in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 gene polymorphisms in patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

We included 34 patients with acromegaly and 37 healthy subjects to study. At baseline examinations, antropometric measurements were done. Genomic DNA from the patients and controls were prepared. Serum, glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, growth hormone (GH), Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGFBP-3 levels of subjects were analyzed.

RESULTS

The frequency of genotype IGF-1(CA)19 and IGFBP3-202 A/C gene was significantly different between control and patients. In acromegalic patients, a significant difference in the serum IGF-1 levels and LDL cholesterol levels among the three IGF(CA)19 genotype. LDL levels were positively correlated with IGF-1. Subjects having >194 bp genotype had higher IGF-1 and LDL cholesterol levels. We observed that the patients with 194 bp genotype have more invasive and bigger tumors and they require adjunctive therapies. Clinical characteristics among the three IGFBP3-202 A/C genotype, AA, AC and CC, did not display any significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, 194 bp allele (20 CA repeats) of the IGF-I promoter have higher circulating IGF-I levels than others. We have found that the patients with 194 bp genotype are the resistant patients with active disease and they required high dose medication. We think this study may help to define the patients, who are resistant to drug therapy, and possible cardiovascular disease.

Eighteen insulin-like growth factor pathway genes, circulating levels of IGF-I and its binding protein, and risk of prostate and breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and its main binding protein, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), have been associated with risk of several types of cancer. Heritable factors explain up to 60% of the variation in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in studies of adult twins.

METHODS

We systematically examined common genetic variation in 18 genes in the IGF signaling pathway for associations with circulating levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. A total of 302 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were genotyped in >5,500 Caucasian men and 5,500 Caucasian women from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium.

RESULTS

After adjusting for multiple testing, SNPs in the IGF1 and SSTR5 genes were significantly associated with circulating IGF-I (P < 2.1 × 10(-4)); SNPs in the IGFBP3 and IGFALS genes were significantly associated with circulating IGFBP-3. Multi-SNP models explained R(2) = 0.62% of the variation in circulating IGF-I and 3.9% of the variation in circulating IGFBP-3. We saw no significant association between these multi-SNP predictors of circulating IGF-I or IGFBP-3 and risk of prostate or breast cancers.

CONCLUSION

Common genetic variation in the IGF1 and SSTR5 genes seems to influence circulating IGF-I levels, and variation in IGFBP3 and IGFALS seems to influence circulating IGFBP-3. However, these variants explain only a small percentage of the variation in circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in Caucasian men and women.

IMPACT

Further studies are needed to explore contributions from other genetic factors such as rare variants in these genes and variation outside of these genes.

The somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in neuroendocrine tumours

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

In recent years, scientific work has been intensified to unravel new (patho-) physiological insights, particularly regarding the functional role of somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype 5 (sst) and the development of novel sst(5)-targeted SRIF analogues, in order to broaden medical therapeutic opportunities in patients suffering from neuroendocrine diseases.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The scope of this review is primarily focused upon recent insights in sst(5)-receptor physiology, novel sst(5)-targeted treatment options predominantly directed towards pituitary adenomas, and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An understanding of the potential that novel sst(5)-targeted SRIF analogues might have in the medical treatment of Cushing's disease and acromegaly, as demonstrated by translational research, based on pathophysiological data combined with results from clinical trials.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The role of targeting sst(5) in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours remains to be established. The sst(5) subtype might function as sst(2) modulator in terms of receptor internalization and desensitization, and seems less important compared with sst(2)-preferring SRIF analogues in the regulation of human insulin secretion by the pancreas. Finally, absence of sst(5) in corticotroph adenomas could be related to tumour aggressiveness in Cushing's disease.

Pharmacogenetics of D2 dopamine receptor gene in prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Dopamine-agonists are the treatment of choice of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas (PRL-omas). Their actions on D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) and the clinical outcome may be affected by polymorphisms.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

PRL-omas are well-differentiated endocrine tumors expressing DRD2. The dopamine-agonist cabergoline (CB), normalizes prolactin and reduces tumor size in about 80 - 90% of patients. DRD2 polymorphisms correlate with neuropsychiatric disorders, in particular alcoholism and schizophrenia. This review describes the DRD2 polymorphisms, their functional effects, and their impact on susceptibility and response to dopamine-agonists treatment. Searching PubMed database for pertinent articles we found that some DRD2 polymorphisms, particularly TaqIA, TaqIB and NcoI, are associated with different receptor binding in brain areas. One study carried out in patients with PRL-omas found a correlation between NcoI and TaqIA and resistance to CB. In particular, resistant patients had higher prevalence of NcoI-T allele than the responsive patients, while the commonest haplotype (having TaqIA2 allele) was associated with better response.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review deals with the connection between DRD2 polymorphisms and PRL-oma treatment and suggests hypotheses for further studies.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Only one study was carried out to analyze the role of DRD2 polymorphisms in PRLomas response to CB. Further studies, including pituitary and hypothalamus in vivo determination of DRD2 binding according to DRD2 genotypes, investigation of possible post-receptorial mechanisms involved, as well as population studies in collaboration with psychiatrists and neurologists, are needed.

Characterization of intracellular signaling mediated by human somatostatin receptor 5: role of the DRY motif and the third intracellular loop

Somatostatin (SST) exerts inhibitory effects on hormone secretion and cell proliferation by interacting with five different receptors (SST1-SST5) linked to multiple cellular effectors. The receptor structural domains involved in these effects have been only partially elucidated. The aim of the study was to investigate the molecular determinants mediating the interaction of the human SST5 with intracellular signaling in the pituitary cell line GH3, focusing on the BBXXB domain in the third intracellular loop and the DRY motif in the second intracellular loop. We analyzed the effects of the SST5 agonist BIM23206 on cAMP accumulation, intracellular calcium, GH secretion, cell proliferation, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cells expressing either wild-type SST5 or mutant receptors, in particular the naturally occurring mutant R240W in the BBXXB domain and the D136A and R137A mutants in the DRY motif. We found that residues D136 and R137 were critical for SST5 signaling because their substitutions abolished all the intracellular responses. Conversely, third intracellular loop mutations resulted in receptor that inhibited intracellular cAMP levels similar to the wild-type (50 +/- 9 vs. 53 +/- 12% inhibition) but failed to mediate the other responses elicited by wild-type SST5, i.e. reduction of intracellular calcium levels as well as inhibition of ERK1/2. These events resulted in an absent inhibition of GH release and an impaired reduction of cell proliferation (38 +/- 7 vs. 76 +/- 6% inhibition in wild type, P < 0.05). These data indicate that different regions of SST5 are required for the activation of different signaling pathways.

Genetic abnormalities of somatostatin receptors in pituitary tumors

Somatostatin exerts antisecretive and antiproliferative effects on different endocrine cells by acting through a family of G protein-coupled receptors that includes five subtypes (SST1-5). Normal human pituitary and pituitary adenomas have been shown to express almost all SST subtypes, with the exception of SST4. Consistent with the observation that octreotide and other somatostatin analogs bind to SST2 and SST5 with high affinity, these genes have been screened for quantitative/qualitative abnormalities in tumors removed from patients with poor responsiveness to somatostatin analogs treatment. Data obtained in GH-secreting adenomas suggested that resistance to octreotide was frequently associated with low expression of SST2 mRNA, although other authors failed to confirm this finding. To date, the only mutational change involving SST2 and SST5 is the Arg to Trp substitution in codon 240 of the SST5 gene that was found in one acromegalic patient resistant to octreotide. Similarly, loss of heterozygosis at SST5 gene locus in pituitary adenomas has been described in individual tumors. In recent years, molecular studies investigated the possible association of gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to diseases and/or resistance to drugs. As far as polymorphic variants of SST genes are concerned, a possible role of SST5 C1004T and T-461C alleles in influencing GH and IGF-I levels in patients with acromegaly has been proposed. Nevertheless, polymorphic variants in SST2 and SST5 genes seem to have a minor, if any, role in determining the different responsiveness to somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly.

Efficacy of a slow-release formulation of lanreotide (Autogel) 120 mg) in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide long acting release (LAR): an open, multicentre longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg (ATG120; Ipsen S.p.A, Milan, Italy) is a high-dose, sustained-release aqueous gel formulation, supplied in a prefilled syringe and given by deep subcutaneous injection. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of ATG120 given every 4-8 weeks with those of octreotide LAR (o-LAR) given every 4 weeks. DESIGN PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A phase III multicentre Italian open clinical study of 23 acromegalic patients (15 female, 8 male). All patients had received o-LAR for 6-18 months and, after 3 months wash out, ATG120 was given every 6 weeks for a total of four injections (Period 1). Then the interval between ATG120 injections was adjusted according to three different schemes: every 4, 6 or 8 weeks depending on GH levels (GH > 2.5 microg/l; 1 < GH <or= 2.5 microg/l; GH <or= 1 microg/l, respectively). ATG120 was given for a further two to three doses, with a final assessment (Period 2) at Week 34, 36 or 42.

MEASUREMENTS

Hormonal (GH and IGF-I) and clinical efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

ATG120 induced a significant GH decrease from 9.9 +/- 11.3 at baseline (Visit 1) to 3.5 +/- 5.7 at the end of Period 1 (P < 0.01) and to 3.8 +/- 5.7 microg/l at the final visit (P < 0.01). IGF-I also decreased from 544 +/- 312 at baseline (Visit 1) to 318 +/- 181 at Period 1 and to 356 +/- 187 microg/l at the final visit (both P < 0.05 vs. baseline). The frequency of ATG120 administrations was adjusted to every 4 weeks in 12 patients, every 6 weeks in 4 patients and every 8 weeks in 6 patients; 1 patient withdrew before the dose adjustment. Serum GH and IGF-I achieved at the end of Period 1 and Period 2 were similar to those reached with o-LAR. The number of patients who achieved GH < 2.5 microg/l was comparable between o-LAR (43%) and ATG120 at Period 1 (48%) and at Period 2 (62%). Normal IGF-I levels were recorded in 8 patients during o-LAR (35%), 11 during ATG Period 1 (48%) and 10 at the final visit (43%). Last, 4 patients showed a better response to ATG120 and 2 to o-LAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for acromegaly. In approximately half of patients ATG120 may be administered every 6-8 weeks, instead of every 4 weeks, without lost of efficacy.

Selective regulation of somatostatin receptor subtype signaling: evidence for constitutive receptor activation

Anterior pituitary hormone secretion is under tonic suppression by hypothalamic somatostatin signaling through somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTs). Because some hormonal axes are known to be abnormally regulated by ligand-independent constitutively active G protein-coupled receptors, we tested pituitary SSTs for selective constitutive signaling. We therefore differentially silenced endogenous SST2, SST3, and SST5 in somatostatin-sensitive ACTH-secreting mouse AtT-20 pituitary corticotroph cells using small inhibitory RNA (siRNA) and analyzed downstream SSTs-regulated pathways. Transfection with siRNA reduced specific receptor subtype mRNA expression up to 82%. Specificity of receptor silencing was validated against negative controls with different gene-selective siRNAs, concordance of mRNA and cAMP changes, reduced potency of receptor-selective agonists, and phenotype rescue by overexpression of the silenced receptor. Mouse SST3 > SST5 > SST2 knockdown increased basal cAMP accumulation (up to 200%) and ACTH secretion (up to 60%). SST2- and SST5-selective agonist potencies were reduced by SST3- and SST5-silencing, respectively. SST5 > SST2 = SST3 silencing also increased basal levels of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. SST3- and SST5-knockdown increased cAMP was only partially blocked by pertussis toxin. The results show that SST2, SST3, and SST5 exhibit constitutive activity in mouse pituitary corticotroph cells, restraining adenylate cyclase and MAPK activation and ACTH secretion. SST3 mainly inhibits cAMP accumulation and ACTH secretion, whereas SST5 predominantly suppresses MAPK pathway activation. Therefore, SST receptor subtypes control pituitary cell function not only through somatostatin binding to variably expressed cell membrane receptor subtypes, but also by differential ligand-independent receptor-selective constitutive action.

Germline mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein gene in familial somatotropinoma

CONTEXT

Acromegaly is usually sporadic, but familial cases occur in association with several familial pituitary tumor syndromes. Recently mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene were associated with familial pituitary adenoma predisposition.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate the status of AIP in a pituitary tumor predisposition family.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a nonprofit academic center and medical centers.

PATIENTS

Eighteen members of a Brazilian family with acromegaly were studied.

RESULTS

A novel germline mutation in the AIP gene, Y268X, predicted to generate a protein lacking two conserved domains, was identified in four members of this family: two siblings with early-onset acromegaly; a third, 41-yr-old sibling with a microadenoma but no clinical features of disease, and his 3-yr-old son. No changes were found in 14 unaffected at-risk relatives or 92 healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm the role of the AIP gene in familial acromegaly. This finding increases the spectrum of molecular defects that can give rise to pituitary adenoma susceptibility. Establishment of genotype-phenotype correlations in AIP mutant tumors will determine whether AIP screening can be used as a tool for clinical surveillance and genetic counseling of families with pituitary tumor predisposition. The underlying basis for the phenotypic variation within AIP-mutant families and the mechanism of AIP-mediated tumorigenesis remain to be defined.

Hormonal signaling and pituitary adenomas

In recent years the demonstration that human pituitary adenomas are monoclonal in origin provides further evidence that pituitary neoplasia arise from the replication of a single mutated cell in which growth advantage results from either activation of proto-oncogenes or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Mutations in common oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are only exceptionally involved in pituitary tumors. Since pituicytes may proliferate in response to hypothalamic neurohormones, locally produced growth factors and peripheral hormones, it has been speculated that dysregulation of the signaling molecules that constitute these pathways may confer growth advantage to the target cell, finally resulting in tumor formation. The only mutational change so far recognized to be unequivocally associated with pituitary tumors occur in the Gs alpha gene (GNAS1) and cause constitutive activation of the cAMP-dependent pathway. However, other components of pituitary-specific pathways are frequently altered in their expression and activity. This review will focus on the possible impact of G proteins and other components of hormone signaling on pituitary tumorigenesis.

The GH1/IGF-1 axis polymorphisms and their impact on breast cancer development

The growth hormone 1/insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH1/IGF-1) axis plays an essential role in the development of the breast by regulating cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Imbalances within this axis lead to an aberrant signalling and recent research has focussed on the overexpression of these growth factors and their involvement in breast cancer development. The increased understanding of the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways connected to the GH1/IGF-1 axis has provided important insights into aetiology, prevention and therapy for breast cancer. However, to identify the contribution of the GH1/IGF-1 signalling pathway to cancer risk still remains a challenge since the results of various studies are controversial. Here, we discuss the influence of low-penetrance polymorphisms in the genes along the GH1/IGF-1 axis and their impact on hormone levels and cancer risk, especially breast cancer. We point out what is known about the effects of the variants and show how the interaction of genetic variants affects breast cancer risk.