ABBY: A phase 2 randomized trial of crenezumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease

Uncertainties in Anti-Amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, poses a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. After two decades of extensive efforts, we are still without significantly effective disease-modifying drugs for AD. Although brain amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation may predict cognitive decline, several drug candidates, including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and tested to reduce Aβ plaque burden effective, but without significant clinical success.

AREAS COVERED

The following review presents and discusses anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapeutics used to treat AD. The article considers both current approaches and alternatives. This article is multiple database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar) on all the available literature up to 1 February 2025.

EXPERT OPINION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anti-Aβ drugs in AD have not fully validated the Aβ cascade hypothesis. Nevertheless, eight anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies have, thus far, made it to Phase III RCTs. Moving forward, the use of the Apolipoprotein E genotype and tau protein as alternative biomarkers can assist clinicians in providing patients with even more individualized and efficacious anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies dosing regimens and reduce the risk of serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.

The neuroinflammatory role of microRNAs in Alzheimer's disease: pathological insights to therapeutic potential

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of dementia, contributing to around 60-80% of cases. The main pathophysiology of AD is characterized by an abnormal accumulation of protein aggregates extracellularly (beta-amyloid plaques) and intracellularly (neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau). However, an increasing number of studies have also suggested neuroinflammation may have a crucial role in precipitating the cascade reactions that result in the development of AD neuropathology. In particular, several studies indicate microRNAs (miRNAs) can act as regulatory factors for neuroinflammation in AD, with potential to affect the occurrence and/or progression of AD inflammation by targeting the expression of multiple genes. Therefore, miRNAs may have potential as therapeutic targets for AD, which requires more research. This article will review the existing studies on miRNAs that have been identified to regulate neuroinflammation, aiming to gain further insights into the specific regulatory processes of miRNAs, highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of miRNAs as biomarkers in AD, as well as current challenges, and suggest the further work to bridge the gap in knowledge to utilize miRNAs as therapeutic targets for AD.

Nanomaterials in targeting amyloid-β oligomers: current advances and future directions for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and therapy

The amyloid cascade hypothesis posits that amyloid-β oligomers (AβOs) are the most neurotoxic species in Alzheimer's disease (AD). These oligomers, characterized by their high β-sheet content, have been shown to significantly disrupt cell membranes, induce local inflammation, and impair autophagy processes, which collectively contribute to neuronal loss. As such, targeting AβOs specifically, rather than solely focusing on amyloid-β fibrils (AβFs), may offer a more effective therapeutic approach for AD. Recent advances in detection and diagnosis have emphasized the importance of accurately identifying AβOs in patient samples, enhancing the potential for timely intervention. In recent years, nanomaterials (NMs) have emerged as promising agents for addressing AβOs regarding their multivalent interactions, which can more effectively detect and inhibit AβO formation. This review provides an in-depth analysis of various nanochaperones developed to target AβOs, detailing their mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential via focusing on two main strategies, namely, disruption of AβOs through direct interaction and the inhibition of AβO nucleation by binding to intermediates of the oligomerization process. Evidence from in vivo studies indicate that NMs hold promise for ameliorating AD symptoms. Additionally, the review explores the different interaction mechanisms through which nanoparticles exhibit their inhibitory effects on AβOs, providing insights into their potential for clinical application. This comprehensive overview highlights the current advancements in NM-based therapies for AD and outlines future research directions aimed at optimizing these innovative treatments.

Drug delivery strategies with lipid-based nanoparticles for Alzheimer's disease treatment

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a distinctive form of dementia characterized by age-related cognitive decline and memory impairment. A key hallmark of AD is the irreversible overaccumulation of beta-amyloid (Aβ) in the brain, associated with neuroinflammation and neuronal death. Although Aβ clearance and immunoregulation have been the major therapeutic strategies for AD, highly selective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) negatively affects the delivery efficacy of the drugs without the ability to cross the BBB. In this review, we discuss the potential of lipid-based nanoparticles (LBNs) as promising vehicles for drug delivery in AD treatment. LBNs, composed of phospholipid mono- or bilayer, have attracted attention due to their exceptional cellular penetration capabilities and drug loading capabilities, which also facilitate cargo transcytosis across the BBB. Recent advances in the development and engineering of LBNs overcome the existing limitations of the current clinical approaches for AD treatment by addressing off-target effects and low therapeutic efficacy. Here, we review the transport pathways across the BBB, as well as various types of LBNs for AD therapy, including exosomes, liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), to elucidate their distinctive properties, preparation methodologies, and therapeutic efficacy, thereby offering innovative avenues for novel drug development for clinical translation in AD therapy.

Plasma Biomarkers for Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Implications for Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: A Comprehensive Review

Anti-amyloid therapies (AATs) are increasingly being recognized as promising treatment options for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs), small areas of edema and microbleeds in the brain presenting as abnormal signals in MRIs of the brain for patients with AD, are the most common side effects of AATs. While most ARIAs are asymptomatic, they can be associated with symptoms like nausea, headache, confusion, and gait instability and, less commonly, with more serious complications such as seizures and death. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been found to be a major risk for ARIA development. The identification of sensitive and reliable non-invasive biomarkers for CAA has been an area of AD research over the years, but with the approval of AATs, this area has taken on a new urgency. This comprehensive review highlights several potential biomarkers, such as Aβ40, Aβ40/42, phosphorylated-tau217, neurofilament light chain, glial fibrillary acidic protein, secreted phosphoprotein 1, placental growth factor, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, cluster of differentiation 163, proteomics, and microRNA. Identifying and staging CAA even before its consequences can be detected via neuroimaging are critical to allow clinicians to judiciously select appropriate candidates for AATs, stratify monitoring, properly manage therapeutic regimens for those experiencing symptomatic ARIAs, and optimize the treatment to achieve the best outcomes. Future studies can test potential plasma biomarkers in human beings and evaluate predictive values of individual markers for CAA severity.

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: What Have We Learned From Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of cognitive impairment and dementia worldwide with rising prevalence, incidence and mortality. Despite many decades of research, there remains an unmet need for disease-modifying treatment that can significantly alter the progression of disease. Recently, with United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals, there have been tremendous advances in this area, with agents demonstrating effects on cognition and biomarkers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an instrumental role in these trials. This review article aims to outline how MRI is used for screening eligibility, monitoring safety and measuring efficacy in clinical trials, leaning on the landscape of past and recent AD clinical trials that have used MRI as examples; further, insight on promising MRI biomarkers for future trials is provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Alzheimer's disease and the immune system: A comprehensive overview with a focus on B cells, humoral immunity, and immunotherapy

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder and the major cause of dementia. Amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and microglial dysregulation are key contributors to AD pathogenesis. Impairments in the blood-brain barrier have unveiled the contribution of the immune system, particularly B cells, in AD pathology. B cells, a crucial component of adaptive immunity, exhibit diverse functions, including antigen presentation and antibody production. While their role in neuroinflammatory disorders has been well-documented, their specific function in AD lacks adequate data. This review examines the dual role of the B cells and humoral immunity in modulating brain inflammation in AD and explores recent advancements in passive and active immunotherapeutic strategies targeting AD pathobiology. We summarize preclinical and clinical studies investigating B cell frequency, altered antibody levels, and their implications in neuroinflammation and immunotherapy. Notably, B cells demonstrate protective and pathological roles in AD, influencing neurodegeneration through antibody-mediated clearance of toxic aggregates and inflammatory activation inflammation. Passive immunotherapies targeting Aβ have shown potential in reducing amyloid plaques, while active immunotherapies are emerging as promising strategies, requiring further validation. Understanding the interplay between B cells, humoral immunity, microglia, and mitochondrial dysfunction is critical to unraveling AD pathogenesis. Their dual nature in disease progression underscores the need for precise therapeutic interventions to optimize immunotherapy outcomes and mitigate neuroinflammation effectively.

Advancing Alzheimer's Disease Modelling by Developing a Refined Biomimetic Brain Microenvironment for Facilitating High-Throughput Screening of Pharmacological Treatment Strategies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant worldwide health challenge, requiring novel approaches for improved models and treatment development. This comprehensive review emphasises the systematic development and improvement of a biomimetic brain environment to address the shortcomings of existing AD models and enhance the efficiency of screening potential drug treatments. We identify drawbacks in traditional models and emphasise the necessity for more physiologically accurate systems through an in-depth analysis of current literature. This review aims to study the development of an advanced AD model that accurately replicates key AD pathophysiological aspects using cutting-edge biomaterials and microenvironment design. Incorporating biomolecular elements like Tau proteins and beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques improve the accuracy of illustrating disease mechanisms. The expected results involve creating a solid foundation for high-throughput screening with enhanced scalability, translational significance, and the possibility of speeding up drug discovery. Thus, this review fills the gaps in AD modelling and shows potential for creating precise and efficient drug treatments for AD.

Deep brain stimulation versus nonsurgical treatment for severe Alzheimer's disease: A long-term retrospective cohort study

Background

Severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by significant neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders, with limited effectiveness of conservative drug treatments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers a potential alternative.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of DBS versus conservative treatment in patients with severe AD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with severe AD diagnosed at the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from 2015 to 2022. Twenty patients received DBS, and twenty received conservative treatment. Treatment effects were assessed using standardized scales at three- and twelve-months post-treatment. Primary outcomes included changes in cognitive function [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale-Cognitive subscale, Clinical Dementia Rating). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, sleep quality, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and caregiver burden (Barthel Index, Functional Activity Questionnaire, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PDQI), Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)].

Results

DBS patients showed significantly greater improvements in MMSE, MoCA, FIM, and ZBI scores than controls, suggesting improved cognitive function and quality of life, and reduced caregiver burden (p < 0.05). Notably, DBS significantly reduced HAM-A, HAM-D, and PSQI scores, and improved NPI scores more than controls, indicating significant amelioration of neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

DBS is a safe and reversible treatment that potentially enhances cognitive function and quality of life in severe AD patients and alleviates caregiver burden. For the first time, we report that DBS also improves neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders, highlighting its clinical potential in AD.

Recent updates on immunotherapy in neurodegenerative diseases

Neurodegeneration is a progressive event leading to specific neuronal loss due to the accumulation of aberrant proteins. These pathologic forms of proteins further worsen and interfere with normal physiologic mechanisms, which can lead to abnormal proliferation of immune cells and subsequent inflammatory cascades and ultimately neuronal loss. Recently, immunotherapies targeting abnormal, pathologic forms of protein have shown a promising approach to modify the progression of neurodegeneration. Recent advances in immunotherapy have led to the development of novel antibodies against the proteinopathies which can eradicate aggregations of protein as evident from preclinical and clinical studies. Nonetheless, only a few of them have successfully received clinical approval, while others have been discontinued due to a lack of clinical efficacy endpoints. The current review discusses the status of investigational antibodies under clinical trials, their targets for therapeutic action, and evidence for failure or success.

Passive Anti-amyloid Beta Monoclonal Antibodies: Lessons Learned over Past 20 Years

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs cognitive and functional abilities, placing a substantial burden on both patients and caregivers. Current symptomatic treatments fail to halt the progression of AD, highlighting the urgent need for more effective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). DMTs under development are classified as either passive or active on the basis of their mechanisms of eliciting an immune response. While this review will touch on active immunotherapies, we primarily focus on anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a form of passive immunotherapy, discussing their multifaceted role in AD treatment and the critical factors influencing their therapeutic efficacy. With two mAbs now approved and prescribed in the clinical setting, it is crucial to reflect on the lessons learned from trials of earlier mAbs that have shaped their development and contributed to their current success. These insights can then guide the creation of even more effective mAbs, ultimately enhancing therapeutic outcomes for patients with AD while minimizing adverse events.

[Radiological Identification and Evaluation of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Alzheimer's Disease]

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), intracranial signal abnormalities observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), represent one of the main adverse events associated with treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) with anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) monoclonal antibodies. In severe cases, patients' lives may be threatened. As the first anti-Aβ antibody was approved for use in China, clinical departments are now confronted with an increased likelihood of encountering ARIA in real-world scenarios. Accurate pre-treatment risk assessment, timely identification during medication, and severity evaluation of ARIA are of great significance in guiding clinical decisions. The identification and assessment of ARIA can be conducted from two perspectives-imaging and clinical symptoms. This article focuses on imaging. We reviewed the pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiological and clinical characteristics, and imaging protocols and assessment of ARIA. We also stated at the end of the review that most current research data on ARIA came from clinical drug trials involving Caucasian populations, and that there was a lack of treatment experience in the real-world application of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in Chinese populations. Many issues concerning pre-treatment risk assessment still need to be explored. Additionally, whether there are other clinical factors and imaging indicators that can help predict drug risks, and whether using different imaging protocols can help make a difference in patient management in the real world all require further investigation.

Disease Modifying Monoclonal Antibodies and Symptomatic Pharmacological Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is an irreversible, progressive syndrome characterized by neurocognitive impairment. Two neuropathological features seen in AD are extracellular amyloid plaques consisting of amyloid beta1-40 and 1-42, and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). For decades, neuroscience research has heavily focused on seeking to understand the primary mechanism of AD and searching for pharmacological approaches for the treatment of dementia. Three monoclonal antibodies that act against amyloid beta-aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab-have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment and mild AD, in addition to medications for cognitive symptom management such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist. Further trials should focus on the combination of therapies targeting amyloid plaques and tau pathology.

The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanism to Biomaterials Therapy

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic, insidious, and progressive neurodegenerative disease that remains a clinical challenge for society. The fully approved drug lecanemab exhibits the prospect of therapy against the pathological processes, while debatable adverse events conflict with the drug concentration required for the anticipated therapeutic effects. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in the pathological progression of AD, as has been demonstrated in much research regarding oxidative stress (OS). The contradiction between anticipated dosage and adverse event may be resolved through targeted transport by biomaterials and get therapeutic effects through pathological progression via regulation of ROS. Besides, biomaterials fix delivery issues by promoting the penetration of drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), protecting the drug from peripheral degradation, and elevating bioavailability. The goal is to comprehensively understand the mechanisms of ROS in the progression of AD disease and the potential of ROS-related biomaterials in the treatment of AD. This review focuses on OS and its connection with AD and novel biomaterials in recent years against AD via OS to inspire novel biomaterial development. Revisiting these biomaterials and mechanisms associated with OS in AD via thorough investigations presents a considerable potential and bright future for improving effective interventions for AD.

Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease: Focusing on Microglia and Astrocytes in Neuroinflammation

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by its insidious onset and progressive development, making it the most common form of dementia. Despite its prevalence, the exact causes and mechanisms responsible for AD remain unclear. Recent studies have highlighted that inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS) plays a crucial role in both the initiation and progression of AD. Neuroinflammation, an immune response within the CNS triggered by glial cells in response to various stimuli, such as nerve injury, infection, toxins, or autoimmune reactions, has emerged as a significant factor alongside amyloid deposition and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) commonly associated with AD. This article aims to provide an overview of the most recent research regarding the involvement of neuroinflammation in AD, with a particular focus on elucidating the specific mechanisms involving microglia and astrocytes. By exploring these intricate processes, a new theoretical framework can be established to further probe the impact of neuroinflammation on the development and progression of AD. Through a deeper understanding of these underlying mechanisms, potential targets for therapeutic interventions and novel treatment strategies can be identified in the ongoing battle against AD.

Increases in amyloid-β42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease trials

Positive effects of new anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been attributed to brain amyloid reduction. However, most anti-Aβ antibodies also increase the CSF levels of the 42-amino acid isoform (Aβ42). We evaluated the associations of changes in CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ-PET with cognitive and clinical end points in randomized trials of anti-Aβ drugs that lowered (β- and γ-secretase inhibitors) or increased CSF Aβ42 levels (anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies) to test the hypothesis that post-treatment increases in CSF Aβ42 levels are independently associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes. From long-term (≥12 months) randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of anti-Aβ drugs published until November 2023, we calculated the post-treatment versus baseline difference in ADAS-Cog (cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) and CDR-SB (Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes) and z-standardized changes in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ-PET Centiloids (CL). We estimated the effect size [regression coefficients (RCs) and confidence intervals (CIs)] and the heterogeneity (I2) of the associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive and clinical end points using random-effects meta-regression models. We included 25 966 subjects with AD from 24 trials. In random-effects analysis, increases in CSF Aβ42 were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: -0.55; 95% CI: -0.89, -0.21, P = 0.003, I2 = 61.4%) and CDR-SB (RC: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.06, P = 0.002, I2 = 34.5%). Similarly, decreases in Aβ-PET were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and CDR-SB (RC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.33, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Higher CSF Aβ42 levels after exposure to anti-Aβ drugs are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aβ42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in AD.

Application of engineered antibodies (scFvs and nanobodies) targeting pathological protein aggregates in Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

The misfolding and aggregation of proteins are associated with various neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). The small-molecule engineered antibodies, such as single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies and nanobodies (Nbs), have gained attention in recent years due to their strong conformational specificity, ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), low immunogenicity, and enhanced proximity to active sites within aggregates.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed recent advances in therapies involving scFvs and Nbs that efficiently and specifically target pathological protein aggregates. Relevant publications were searched for in MEDLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, Elsevier ScienceDirect and Wiley Online Library.

EXPERT OPINION

We reviewed the recent and specific targeting of pathological protein aggregates by scFvs and Nbs. These engineered antibodies can inhibit the aggregation or promote the disassembly of misfolded proteins by recognizing antigenic epitopes or through conformational specificity. Additionally, we discuss strategies for improving the effective application of engineered antibodies in treating AD. These technological strategies will lay the foundation for the clinical application of small-molecule antibody drugs in developing effective treatments for neurological diseases. Through rational application strategies, small-molecule engineered antibodies are expected to have significant potential in targeted therapy for neurological disorders.

Insights into the use of biomarkers in clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

Biomarkers have been instrumental in population selection and disease monitoring in clinical trials of recently FDA-approved drugs targeting amyloid-β to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As new therapeutic strategies and biomarker techniques emerge, the importance of biomarkers in drug development is growing exponentially. In this emerging landscape, biomarkers are expected to serve a wide range of contexts of use in clinical trials focusing on AD and related dementias. The joint FDA-NIH BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) framework provides standardised terminology to facilitate communication among stakeholders in this increasingly complex field. This review explores various applications of biomarkers relevant to AD clinical trials, using the BEST resource as a reference. For simplicity, we predominantly provide contextual characterizations of biomarkers use from the perspective of drugs targeting amyloid-β and tau proteins. However, general definitions and concepts can be extrapolated to other targets.

Lecanemab demonstrates highly selective binding to Aβ protofibrils isolated from Alzheimer's disease brains

Recent advances in immunotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have increased the importance of understanding the exact binding preference of each amyloid-beta (Aβ) antibody employed, since this determines both efficacy and risk for potentially serious adverse events known as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. Lecanemab is a humanized IgG1 antibody that was developed to target the soluble Aβ protofibril conformation. The present study prepared extracts of post mortem brain samples from AD patients and non-demented elderly controls, characterized the forms of Aβ present, and investigated their interactions with lecanemab. Brain tissue samples were homogenized and extracted using tris-buffered saline. Aβ levels and aggregation states in soluble and insoluble extracts, and in fractions prepared using size-exclusion chromatography or density gradient ultracentrifugation, were analyzed using combinations of immunoassay, immunoprecipitation (IP), and mass spectrometry. Lecanemab immunohistochemistry was also conducted in temporal cortex. The majority of temporal cortex Aβ (98 %) was in the insoluble extract. Aβ42 was the most abundant form present, particularly in AD subjects, and most soluble Aβ42 was in soluble aggregated protofibrillar structures. Aβ protofibril levels were much higher in AD subjects than in controls. Protofibrils captured by lecanemab-IP contained high levels of Aβ42 and lecanemab bound to large, medium, and small Aβ42 protofibrils in a concentration-dependent manner. Competitive IP showed that neither Aβ40 monomers nor Aβ40-enriched fibrils isolated from cerebral amyloid angiopathy reduced lecanemab's binding to Aβ42 protofibrils. Immunohistochemistry showed that lecanemab bound readily to Aβ plaques (diffuse and compact) and to intraneuronal Aβ in AD temporal cortex. Taken together, these findings indicate that while lecanemab binds to Aβ plaques, it preferentially targets soluble aggregated Aβ protofibrils. These are largely composed of Aβ42, and lecanemab binds less readily to the Aβ40-enriched fibrils found in the cerebral vasculature. This is a promising binding profile because Aβ42 protofibrils represent a key therapeutic target in AD, while a lack of binding to monomeric Aβ and cerebral amyloid deposits should reduce peripheral antibody sequestration and minimize risk for adverse events.

The role of IL-1 family of cytokines in the pathogenesis and therapy of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurological condition that occurs with age and poses a significant global public health concern, is distinguished by the degeneration of neurons and synapses in various regions of the brain. While the exact processes behind the neurodegeneration in AD are not completely known, it is now acknowledged that inflammation may have a significant impact on the beginning and advancement of AD neurodegeneration. The severity of many neurological illnesses can be influenced by the equilibrium between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. The IL-1 family of cytokines is linked to innate immune responses, which are present in both acute inflammation and chronic inflammatory diseases. Research on the role of the IL-1 family in chronic neurological disease has been concentrated on AD. In this context, there is indirect evidence suggesting its involvement in the development of the disease. This review aims to provide a summary of the contribution of every IL-1 family member in AD pathogenesis, current immunotherapies in AD disease, and present treatment possibilities for either targeting or boosting these cytokines.

Anti-amyloid Antibody Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, which is characterized by a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is extremely difficult to treat and severely reduces quality of life. Amyloid beta (Aβ) has been the primary target of experimental therapies owing to the neurotoxicity of Aβ and the brain Aβ load detected in humans by amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Recently completed phase 2 and 3 trials of third-generation anti-amyloid immunotherapies indicated clinical efficacy in significantly reducing brain Aβ load and inhibiting the progression of cognitive decline. Anti-amyloid immunotherapies are the first effective disease-modifying therapies for AD, and aducanumab and lecanemab were recently approved through the US Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval pathway. However, these therapies still exhibit insufficient clinical efficacy and are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. Further advances in the field of AD therapeutics are required to revolutionize clinical AD treatment, dementia care, and preventive cognitive healthcare.

Efficacy of anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibody therapy in early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies targeting amyloid-ß in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have conflicting results and early initiation of therapy may yield better outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized trials comparing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with placebo in MCI or mild dementia due to AD.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies comprising 15,275 patients were included. In patients with early AD, mAbs reduced the rate of decline, in both the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, the sum of boxes (CDR-SB; MD -0.30; 95% CI -0.42,-0.19; p < 0.01), and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscore (ADAS-cog; SMD -0.80; 95% CI -10.25,-0.35; p < 0.01). The results were similar between clinical stages for CDR-SB (MCI, MD -0.19; 95% CI -0.35,-0.03; p = 0.02; mild dementia, MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.65,-0.25; p < 0.01; subgroup differences, p = 0.13), as well as for ADAS-Cog (MCI, SMD -0.83; 95% CI -1.49,-0.17; p = 0.01; mild dementia, SMD -0.69; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.05; p = 0.03; subgroup differences, p = 0.47). The risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) was significantly higher in patients taking mAbs, including ARIA-edema (RR 7.7; 95% CI 4.60 to 13.00; p < 0.01), ARIA-hemorrhage (RR 1.8; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.59; p < 0.01), and symptomatic or serious ARIA (RR 14.1; 95% CI 7.30 to 27.14; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Anti-amyloid-ß mAbs attenuate cognitive and functional decline compared with placebo in early AD; whether the magnitude of this effect is clinically important remains uncertain, especially relative to the safety profile of these medications. Starting immunotherapy in patients with MCI was not significantly different than starting in the mild dementia stage.

PROSPERO REGISTRY

CRD42023430698.

Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer's Disease: Pitfalls and Challenges of Anti-Amyloid Therapies and Beyond

Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes a significant challenge to global healthcare systems, with limited effective treatments available. This review examines the landscape of novel therapeutic strategies for AD, focusing on the shortcomings of traditional therapies against amyloid-beta (Aβ) and exploring emerging alternatives. Despite decades of research emphasizing the role of Aβ accumulation in AD pathogenesis, clinical trials targeting Aβ have obtained disappointing results, highlighting the complexity of AD pathophysiology and the need for investigating other therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we first discuss the challenges associated with anti-Aβ therapies, including limited efficacy and potential adverse effects, underscoring the necessity of exploring alternative mechanisms and targets. Thereafter, we review promising non-Aβ-based strategies, such as tau-targeted therapies, neuroinflammation modulation, and gene and stem cell therapy. These approaches offer new avenues for AD treatment by addressing additional pathological hallmarks and downstream effects beyond Aβ deposition.

Passive Anti-Amyloid Beta Immunotherapies in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Impact

Alzheimer's disease, the most common type of dementia worldwide, lacks effective disease-modifying therapies despite significant research efforts. Passive anti-amyloid immunotherapies represent a promising avenue for Alzheimer's disease treatment by targeting the amyloid-beta peptide, a key pathological hallmark of the disease. This approach utilizes monoclonal antibodies designed to specifically bind amyloid beta, facilitating its clearance from the brain. This review offers an original and critical analysis of anti-amyloid immunotherapies by exploring several aspects. Firstly, the mechanisms of action of these therapies are reviewed, focusing on their ability to promote Aβ degradation and enhance its efflux from the central nervous system. Subsequently, the extensive history of clinical trials involving anti-amyloid antibodies is presented, from initial efforts using first-generation molecules leading to mixed results to recent clinically approved drugs. Along with undeniable progress, the authors also highlight the pitfalls of this approach to offer a balanced perspective on this topic. Finally, based on its potential and limitations, the future directions of this promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease are emphasized.

Amyloid-beta antibody binding to cerebral amyloid angiopathy fibrils and risk for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities

Therapeutic antibodies have been developed to target amyloid-beta (Aβ), and some of these slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, they can also cause adverse events known as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema (ARIA-E). We investigated therapeutic Aβ antibody binding to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) fibrils isolated from human leptomeningeal tissue to study whether this related to the ARIA-E frequencies previously reported by clinical trials. The binding of Aβ antibodies to CAA Aβ fibrils was evaluated in vitro using immunoprecipitation, surface plasmon resonance, and direct binding assay. Marked differences in Aβ antibody binding to CAA fibrils were observed. Solanezumab and crenezumab showed negligible CAA fibril binding and these antibodies have no reported ARIA-E cases. Lecanemab showed a low binding to CAA fibrils, consistent with its relatively low ARIA-E frequency of 12.6%, while aducanumab, bapineuzumab, and gantenerumab all showed higher binding to CAA fibrils and substantially higher ARIA-E frequencies (25-35%). An ARIA-E frequency of 24% was reported for donanemab, and its binding to CAA fibrils correlated with the amount of pyroglutamate-modified Aβ present. The findings of this study support the proposal that Aβ antibody-CAA interactions may relate to the ARIA-E frequency observed in patients treated with Aβ-based immunotherapies.

Spatiotemporal development of the neuronal accumulation of amyloid precursor protein and the amyloid plaque formation in the brain of 3xTg-AD mice

The amyloid plaque is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. The accumulation of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) in the neuronal structure is assumed to lead to amyloid plaque formation through the excessive production of β-amyloid protein. To study the relationship between the neuronal accumulation of APP and amyloid plaque formation, we histologically analyzed their development in the different brain regions in 3xTg-AD mice, which express Swedish mutated APP (APPSWE) in the neurons. Observation throughout the brain revealed APPSWE-positive somata in the broad regions. Quantitative model analysis showed that the somatic accumulation of APPSWE developed firstly in the hippocampus from a very early age (<1 month) and proceeded slower in the isocortex. In line with this, the hippocampus was the first region to form amyloid plaques at the age of 9-12 months, while amyloid plaques were rarely observed in the isocortex. Females had more APPSWE-positive somata and plaques than males. Furthermore, amyloid plaques were observed in the lateral septum and pontine grey, which did not contain APPSWE-positive somata but only the APPSWE-positive fibers. These results suggested that neuronal accumulation of APPSWE, both in somatodendritic and axonal domains, is closely related to the formation of amyloid plaques.

Pathological and physiological functional cross-talks of α-synuclein and tau in the central nervous system

α-Synuclein and tau are abundant multifunctional brain proteins that are mainly expressed in the presynaptic and axonal compartments of neurons, respectively. Previous works have revealed that intracellular deposition of α-synuclein and/or tau causes many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Despite intense investigation, the normal physiological functions and roles of α-synuclein and tau are still unclear, owing to the fact that mice with knockout of either of these proteins do not present apparent phenotypes. Interestingly, the co-occurrence of α-synuclein and tau aggregates was found in post-mortem brains with synucleinopathies and tauopathies, some of which share similarities in clinical manifestations. Furthermore, the direct interaction of α-synuclein with tau is considered to promote the fibrillization of each of the proteins in vitro and in vivo. On the other hand, our recent findings have revealed that α-synuclein and tau are cooperatively involved in brain development in a stage-dependent manner. These findings indicate strong cross-talk between the two proteins in physiology and pathology. In this review, we provide a summary of the recent findings on the functional roles of α-synuclein and tau in the physiological conditions and pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. A deep understanding of the interplay between α-synuclein and tau in physiological and pathological conditions might provide novel targets for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic strategies to treat neurodegenerative diseases.

Monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease focusing on intracerebral targets

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases. Due to the complexity of the disorder and the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), its drug discovery and development are facing enormous challenges, especially after several failures of monoclonal antibody (mAb) trials. Nevertheless, the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the mAb aducanumab has ushered in a new day. As we better understand the disease's pathogenesis and identify novel intracerebral therapeutic targets, antibody-based therapies have advanced over the past few years. The mAb drugs targeting β-amyloid or hyperphosphorylated tau protein are the focus of the current research. Massive neuronal loss and glial cell-mediated inflammation are also the vital pathological hallmarks of AD, signaling a new direction for research on mAb drugs. We have elucidated the mechanisms by which AD-specific mAbs cross the BBB to bind to targets. In order to investigate therapeutic approaches to treat AD, this review focuses on the promising mAbs targeting intracerebral dysfunction and related strategies to cross the BBB.

Pathophysiological aspects of transferrin-A potential nano-based drug delivery signaling molecule in therapeutic target for varied diseases

Transferrin (Tf), widely known for its role as an iron-binding protein, exemplifies multitasking in biological processes. The role of Tf in iron metabolism involves both the uptake of iron from Tf by various cells, as well as the endocytosis mediated by the complex of Tf and the transferrin receptor (TfR). The direct conjugation of the therapeutic compound and immunotoxin studies using Tf peptide or anti-Tf receptor antibodies as targeting moieties aims to prolong drug circulation time and augment efficient cellular drug uptake, diminish systemic toxicity, traverse the blood-brain barrier, restrict systemic exposure, overcome multidrug resistance, and enhance therapeutic efficacy with disease specificity. This review primarily discusses the various biological actions of Tf, as well as the development of Tf-targeted nano-based drug delivery systems. The goal is to establish the use of Tf as a disease-targeting component, accentuating the potential therapeutic applications of this protein.

Alzheimer's Disease-Related Epigenetic Changes: Novel Therapeutic Targets

Aging is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), although the precise mechanism and molecular basis of AD are not yet fully understood. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, mitochondrial DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), play a role in regulating gene expression related to neuron plasticity and integrity, which are closely associated with learning and memory development. This review describes the impact of dynamic and reversible epigenetic modifications and factors on memory and plasticity throughout life, emphasizing their potential as target for therapeutic intervention in AD. Additionally, we present insight from postmortem and animal studies on abnormal epigenetics regulation in AD, as well as current strategies aiming at targeting these factors in the context of AD therapy.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies for Cognitive Decline in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) have produced encouraging cognitive and clinical results. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare and rank mAb drugs according to their efficacy and safety.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials testing various mAbs for the treatment of cognitive decline in patients with AD, up to March 31, 2023. R software (version 4.2.3) along with JAGS and STATA software (version 15.0) were used for statistical analysis. Odds ratio (OR) for binary variables, mean difference (MD) for continuous variables, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized to estimate treatment effects and rank probabilities for each mAb in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes. We calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) to evaluate each mAb, with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or lower likelihood of adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-three randomized controlled trials with a total of 21,087 patients were included in the current NMA, involving eight different mAbs. SUCRA values showed that aducanumab (87.01% and 99.37%, respectively) was the most likely to achieve the best therapeutic effect based on the changes of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores. Donanemab (88.50% and 99.00%, respectively) performed better than other therapies for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Positron Emission Tomography-Standardized Uptake Value ratio (PET-SUVr). Lecanemab (87.24%) may be the most promising way to slow down the decrease of Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score. In the analysis of the incidence of adverse events (subjects with any treatment-emergent adverse event), gantenerumab (89.12%) had the least potential for adverse events, while lecanemab (0.79%) may cause more adverse events. Solanezumab (95.75% and 80.38%, respectively) had the lowest incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities characterized by edema and effusion (ARIA-E) and by cerebral microhemorrhages (ARIA-H) of the included immunotherapies. While SUCRA values provided a comprehensive measure of treatment efficacy, the inherent statistical uncertainty required careful analysis in clinical application.

CONCLUSION

Despite immunotherapies significantly increasing the risks of adverse events and ARIA, the data suggest that mAbs can effectively improve the cognitive function of patients with mild and moderate AD. According to the NMA, aducanumab was the most likely to achieve significant improvements in different cognitive and clinical assessments (statistically improved MMSE and CDR-SB), followed by donanemab (statistically improved ADAS-Cog, and PET-SUVr) and lecanemab (statistically improved ADCS-ADL).

Proteomics revealed an association between ribosome-associated proteins and amyloid beta deposition in Alzheimer's disease

Most scholars believe that amyloid-beta (Aβ) has the potential to induce apoptosis, stimulate an inflammatory cascade, promote oxidative stress and exacerbate the pathological progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the deposition of Aβ in AD. At approximately 6 months of age, APP/PS1 double transgenic mice gradually exhibit the development of plaques, as well as spatial and learning impairment. Notably, the hippocampus is specifically affected in the course of AD. Herein, 6-month-old APP/PS1 double transgenic mice were utilized, and the differentially expressed (DE) proteins in the hippocampus were identified and analyzed using 4D label-free quantitative proteomics technology and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). Compared to wild-type mice, 29 proteins were upregulated and 25 proteins were downregulated in the AD group. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological processes (BP) indicated that the DE proteins were mainly involved in 'ribosomal large subunit biogenesis'. Molecular function (MF) analysis results were primarily associated with '5.8S rRNA binding' and 'structural constituent of ribosome'. In terms of cellular components (CC), the DE proteins were mainly found in 'polysomal ribosome', 'cytosolic large ribosomal subunit', 'cytosolic ribosome', and 'large ribosomal subunit', among others. Furthermore, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis demonstrated that the results were mainly enriched in the 'Ribosome signaling pathway'. The key target proteins identified were ribosomal protein (Rp)l18, Rpl17, Rpl19, Rpl24, Rpl35, and Rpl6. The PRM verification results were consistent with the findings of the 4D label-free quantitative proteomics analysis. Overall, these findings suggest that Rpl18, Rpl17, Rpl19, Rpl24, Rpl35, and Rpl6 may have potential therapeutic value for the treatment of AD by targeting Aβ.

Identification of selective dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) inhibitors and their effects on tau and microtubule

The overexpression of dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A), commonly observed in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS), can induce the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and amyloid plaques. Hence, designing a selective DYRK1A inhibitor would result in a promising small molecule for treating neurodegenerative diseases. Developing selective inhibitors for DYRK1A has been a difficult challenge due to the highly preserved ATP-binding site of protein kinases. In this study, we employed a structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) campaign targeting DYRK1A from a database containing 1.6 million compounds. Enzymatic assays were utilized to verify inhibitory properties, confirming that Y020-3945 and Y020-3957 showed inhibitory activity towards DYRK1A. In particular, the compounds exhibited high selectivity for DYRK1A over a panel of 120 kinases, reduced the phosphorylation of tau, and reversed the tubulin polymerization for microtubule stability. Additionally, treatment with the compounds significantly reduced the secretion of inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α activated by DYRK1A-assisted NFTs and Aβ oligomers. These identified inhibitors possess promising therapeutic potential for conditions associated with DYRK1A in neurodegenerative diseases. The results showed that Y020-3945 and Y020-3957 demonstrated structural novelty compared to known DYRK1A inhibitors, making them a valuable addition to developing potential treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.

Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), aducanumab and lecanemab, have received accelerated approval from the US FDA for initiation of treatment in early Alzheimer's disease patients who have proven β-amyloid pathology (Aβ). One of these, lecanemab, has subsequently received full approval and other monoclonal antibodies are poised for positive review and approval. Anti-amyloid mAbs share the feature of producing a marked reduction in total brain Aβ revealed by amyloid positron emission tomography. Trials associated with slowing of cognitive decline have achieved a reduction in measurable plaque Aβ in the range of 15-25 centiloids; trials of agents that did not reach this threshold were not associated with cognitive benefit. mAbs have differences in terms of titration schedules, MRI monitoring schedules for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and continuing versus interrupted therapy. The approximate 30% slowing of decline observed with mAbs is clinically meaningful in terms of extended cognitive integrity and delay of onset of the more severe dementia phases of Alzheimer's disease. Approval of these agents initiates a new era in Alzheimer's disease therapeutics with disease-modifying properties. Further advances are needed, i.e. greater efficacy, improved safety, enhanced convenience, and better understanding of ill-understood observations such as brain volume loss.

Clinically Important Benefits and Harms of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Amyloid for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate clinically meaningful benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid in patients with Alzheimer dementia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and 5 trial registries, as well as the reference lists of identified studies. We included randomized controlled trials comparing a monoclonal antibody with placebo at a dose consistent with that used in phase 3 trials or for Food and Drug Administration approval. Studies had to report at least 1 clinically relevant benefit or harm. Data were extracted independently by at least 2 researchers for random effects meta-analysis. Changes in cognitive and functional scales were compared between groups, and each difference was assessed to determine if it met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

We identified 19 publications with 23,202 total participants that evaluated 8 anti-amyloid antibodies. There were small improvements over placebo in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-Cog-11 to -14 score (standardized mean difference = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04), Mini Mental State Examination score (0.32 points; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50), and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score (mean difference =-0.18 points; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), and the combined functional scores (standardized mean difference = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the changes, including those for lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab, exceeded the MCID. Harms included significantly increased risks of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-edema (relative risk [RR] = 10.29; number needed to harm [NNH] = 9), ARIA-hemorrhage (RR = 1.74; NNH = 13), and symptomatic ARIA-edema (RR = 24.3; NNH = 86).

CONCLUSIONS

Although monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid provide small benefits on cognitive and functional scales in patients with Alzheimer dementia, these improvements are far below the MCID for each outcome and are accompanied by clinically meaningful harms.

Advances in Understanding and Managing Alzheimer's Disease: From Pathophysiology to Innovative Therapeutic Strategies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the presence of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles, leading to cognitive and physical decline. Representing the majority of dementia cases, AD poses a significant burden on healthcare systems globally, with onset typically occurring after the age of 65. While most cases are sporadic, about 10% exhibit autosomal forms associated with specific gene mutations. Neurofibrillary tangles and Aβ plaques formed by misfolded tau proteins and Aβ peptides contribute to neuronal damage and cognitive impairment. Currently, approved drugs, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl D-aspartate receptor agonists, offer only partial symptomatic relief without altering disease progression. A promising development is using lecanemab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, as an immune therapeutic approach. Lecanemab demonstrates selectivity for polymorphic Aβ variants and binds to large soluble Aβ aggregates, providing a potential avenue for targeted treatment. This shift in understanding the role of the adaptive immune response in AD pathogenesis opens new possibilities for therapeutic interventions aiming to address the disease's intricate mechanisms. This review aims to summarize recent advancements in understanding Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology and innovative therapeutic approaches, providing valuable insights for both researchers and clinicians.

Consistency between Treatment Effects on Clinical and Brain Atrophy Outcomes in Alzheimer's Disease Trials

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal changes in volumetric MRI outcome measures have been shown to correlate well with longitudinal changes in clinical instruments and have been widely used as biomarker outcomes in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). While instances of discordant findings have been noted in some trials, especially the recent amyloid-removing therapies, the overall relationship between treatment effects on brain atrophy and clinical outcomes, and how it might depend on treatment target or mechanism, clinical instrument or imaging variable is not yet clear.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the consistency and therapeutic class-dependence of treatment effects on clinical outcomes and on brain atrophy in published reports of clinical trials conducted in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or AD.

DESIGN

Quantitative review of the published literature. The consistency of treatment effects on clinical and brain atrophy outcomes was assessed in terms of statistical agreement with hypothesized equal magnitude effects (e.g., 30% slowing of both) and nominal directional concordance, as a function of therapeutic class.

SETTING

Interventional randomized clinical trials.

PARTICIPANTS

MCI or AD trial participants.

INTERVENTION

Treatments included were those that involved ingestion or injection of a putatively active substance into the body, encompassing both pharmacological and controlled dietary interventions.

MEASUREMENTS

Each trial included in the analysis reported at least one of the required clinical outcomes (ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB or MMSE) and at least one of the required imaging outcomes (whole brain, ventricular or hippocampal volume).

RESULTS

Data from 35 trials, comprising 185 pairwise comparisons, were included. Overall, the 95% confidence bounds overlapped with the line of identity for 150/185 (81%) of the imaging-clinical variable pairs. The greatest proportion of outliers was found in trials of anti-amyloid antibodies that have been shown to dramatically reduce the level of PET-detectable amyloid plaques, for which only 13/33 (39%) of observations overlapped the identity line. A Deming regression calculated using all data points yielded a slope of 0.54, whereas if data points from the amyloid remover class were excluded, the Deming regression line had a slope of 0.92. Directional discordance of treatment effects was also most pronounced for the amyloid-removing class, and for comparisons involving ventricular volume.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a frame of reference for the interpretation of clinical and brain atrophy results from future clinical trials and highlight the importance of mechanism of action in the interpretation of imaging results.

Amyloid-Directed Antibodies: Past, Present, and Future

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder in patient demographics over 65 years old causing debilitating cognitive impairment. Most commonly, AD is diagnosed clinically as "probable AD", and definitive diagnosis is confirmed through postmortem brain autopsies to detect extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intraneuronal hyperphosphorylated tau tangles. The exact mechanism causing AD is still unknown, but treatments for AD have been actively investigated. Currently, immunotherapies have shown substantial promise in reducing the pathologic and clinical signs of AD.

Objective

This review aims to evaluate passive immunotherapies deemed to have promise for further development and use in the treatment of AD.

Methods

Immunotherapies were selected via a narrative review of medications that have potential clinical effectiveness with a status of FDA accepted, FDA fast-track, FDA status pending, or emerging therapies poised to pursue FDA approval.

Results

This review has yielded two anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that are currently fully FDA approved, one mAb granted FDA fast-track status, two therapies on hold, three discontinued medications, and three promising emerging therapies.

Conclusions

We conclude that, in the near future, passive immunotherapies will be the preferred and evidence-based method of treatment for AD with the presence of brain Aβ deposits for both symptom management and potential slowing of disease progression. Specifically, lecanemab and donanemab will require further clinical studies to optimize patient selection based on safety profiles. Despite some key limitations, these two drugs are paving the way for disease-modifying treatments in patients displaying early signs of amyloid pathology.

In Silico Prediction of Quercetin Analogs for Targeting Death-Associated Protein Kinase 1 (DAPK1) Against Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that greatly affects the health and life quality of the elderly population. Existing drugs mainly alleviate symptoms but fail to halt disease progression, underscoring the urgent need for the development of novel drugs. Based on the neuroprotective effects of flavonoid quercetin in AD, this study was designed to identify potential AD-related targets for quercetin and perform in silico prediction of promising analogs for the treatment of AD. Database mining suggested death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) as the most promising AD-related target for quercetin among seven protein candidates. To achieve better biological effects for the treatment of AD, we devised a series of quercetin analogs as ligands for DAPK1, and molecular docking analyses, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) predictions, as well as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. The energy for drug-protein interaction was predicted and ranked. As a result, quercetin-A1a and quercetin-A1a1 out of 19 quercetin analogs exhibited the lowest interaction energy for binding to DAPK1 than quercetin, and they had similar dynamics performance with quercetin. In addition, quercetin-A1a and quercetin-A1a1 were predicted to have better water solubility. Thus, quercetin-A1a and quercetin-A1a1 could be promising agents for the treatment of AD. Our findings paved the way for further experimental studies and the development of novel drugs.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative condition marked by the progressive deterioration of cognitive abilities, memory impairment, and the accumulation of abnormal proteins, specifically beta-amyloid plaques and tau tangles, within the brain. Despite extensive research efforts, Alzheimer's disease remains without a cure, presenting a significant global healthcare challenge. Recently, there has been an increased focus on antibody-based treatments as a potentially effective method for dealing with Alzheimer's disease. This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the current status of research on antibody-based molecules as therapies for Alzheimer's disease. We will briefly mention their mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and safety profiles while addressing the challenges and limitations encountered during their development. We also highlight some crucial considerations in antibody-based treatment development, including patient selection criteria, dosing regimens, or safety concerns. In conclusion, antibody-based therapies present a hopeful outlook for addressing Alzheimer's disease. While challenges remain, the accumulating evidence suggests that these therapies may offer substantial promise in ameliorating or preventing the progression of this debilitating condition, thus potentially enhancing the quality of life for the millions of individuals and families affected by Alzheimer's disease worldwide.

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA): radiological, biological and clinical characteristics

Excess accumulation and aggregation of toxic soluble and insoluble amyloid-β species in the brain are a major hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Randomized clinical trials show reduced brain amyloid-β deposits using monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid-β and have identified MRI signal abnormalities called amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) as possible spontaneous or treatment-related adverse events. This review provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art conceptual review of radiological features, clinical detection and classification challenges, pathophysiology, underlying biological mechanism(s) and risk factors/predictors associated with ARIA. We summarize the existing literature and current lines of evidence with ARIA-oedema/effusion (ARIA-E) and ARIA-haemosiderosis/microhaemorrhages (ARIA-H) seen across anti-amyloid clinical trials and therapeutic development. Both forms of ARIA may occur, often early, during anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibody treatment. Across randomized controlled trials, most ARIA cases were asymptomatic. Symptomatic ARIA-E cases often occurred at higher doses and resolved within 3-4 months or upon treatment cessation. Apolipoprotein E haplotype and treatment dosage are major risk factors for ARIA-E and ARIA-H. Presence of any microhaemorrhage on baseline MRI increases the risk of ARIA. ARIA shares many clinical, biological and pathophysiological features with Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. There is a great need to conceptually link the evident synergistic interplay associated with such underlying conditions to allow clinicians and researchers to further understand, deliberate and investigate on the combined effects of these multiple pathophysiological processes. Moreover, this review article aims to better assist clinicians in detection (either observed via symptoms or visually on MRI), management based on appropriate use recommendations, and general preparedness and awareness when ARIA are observed as well as researchers in the fundamental understanding of the various antibodies in development and their associated risks of ARIA. To facilitate ARIA detection in clinical trials and clinical practice, we recommend the implementation of standardized MRI protocols and rigorous reporting standards. With the availability of approved amyloid-β therapies in the clinic, standardized and rigorous clinical and radiological monitoring and management protocols are required to effectively detect, monitor, and manage ARIA in real-world clinical settings.

Anti-Amyloid Therapy, AD, and ARIA: Untangling the Role of CAA

Anti-amyloid therapies (AATs), such as anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, are emerging treatments for people with early Alzheimer's disease (AD). AATs target amyloid β plaques in the brain. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), abnormal signals seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain in patients with AD, may occur spontaneously but occur more frequently as side effects of AATs. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a major risk factor for ARIA. Amyloid β plays a key role in the pathogenesis of AD and of CAA. Amyloid β accumulation in the brain parenchyma as plaques is a pathological hallmark of AD, whereas amyloid β accumulation in cerebral vessels leads to CAA. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of ARIA is necessary for early detection of those at highest risk. This could lead to improved risk stratification and the ultimate reduction of symptomatic ARIA. Histopathological confirmation of CAA by brain biopsy or autopsy is the gold standard but is not clinically feasible. MRI is an available in vivo tool for detecting CAA. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid β level testing and amyloid PET imaging are available but do not offer specificity for CAA vs amyloid plaques in AD. Thus, developing and testing biomarkers as reliable and sensitive screening tools for the presence and severity of CAA is a priority to minimize ARIA complications.

Accelerating Alzheimer's therapeutic development: The past and future of clinical trials

Alzheimer's disease (AD) research has entered a new era with the recent positive phase 3 clinical trials of the anti-Aβ antibodies lecanemab and donanemab. Why did it take 30 years to achieve these successes? Developing potent therapies for reducing fibrillar amyloid was key, as was selection of patients at relatively early stages of disease. Biomarkers of the target pathologies, including amyloid and tau PET, and insights from past trials were also critical to the recent successes. Moving forward, the challenge will be to develop more efficacious therapies with greater efficiency. Novel trial designs, including combination therapies and umbrella and basket protocols, will accelerate clinical development. Better diversity and inclusivity of trial participants are needed, and blood-based biomarkers may help to improve access for medically underserved groups. Incentivizing innovation in both academia and industry through public-private partnerships, collaborative mechanisms, and the creation of new career paths will be critical to build momentum in these exciting times.

Beta Amyloid Oligomers with Higher Cytotoxicity have Higher Sidechain Dynamics

The underlying biophysical principle governing the cytotoxicity of the oligomeric aggregates of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides has long been an enigma. Here we show that the size of Aβ40 oligomers can be actively controlled by incubating the peptides in reverse micelles. Our approach allowed for the first time a detailed comparison of the structures and dynamics of two Aβ40 oligomers of different sizes, viz., 10 and 23 nm, by solid-state NMR. From the chemical shift data, we infer that the conformation and/or the chemical environments of the residues from K16 to K28 are different between the 10-nm and 23-nm oligomers. We find that the 10-nm oligomers are more cytotoxic, and the molecular motion of the sidechain of its charged residue K16 is more dynamic. Interestingly, the residue A21 exhibits unusually high structural rigidity. Our data raise an interesting possibility that the cytotoxicity of Aβ40 oligomers could also be correlated to the motional dynamics of the sidechains.

Failure, Success, and Future Direction of Alzheimer Drugs Targeting Amyloid-β Cascade: Pros and Cons of Chemical and Biological Modalities

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent cause of dementia and has become a health concern worldwide urging for an effective therapeutic. The amyloid hypothesis, currently the most pursued basis of AD drug discovery, points the cause of AD to abnormal production and ineffective removal of pathogenic aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ). AD therapeutic research has been focused on targeting different species of Aβ in the amyloidogenic process to control Aβ content and recover cognitive decline. Among the different processes targeted, the clearance mechanism has been found to be the most effective, supported by the recent clinical approval of an Aβ-targeting immunotherapeutic drug which significantly slowed cognitive decline. Although the current AD drug discovery field is extensively researching immunotherapeutic drugs, there are numerous properties of immunotherapy in need of improvements that could be overcome by an equally performing chemical drug. Here, we review chemical and immunotherapy drug candidates, based on their mechanism of modulating the amyloid cascade, selected from the AlzForum database. Through this review, we aim to summarize and evaluate the prospect of Aβ-targeting chemical drugs.

Antibody-Mediated Clearance of Brain Amyloid-β: Mechanisms of Action, Effects of Natural and Monoclonal Anti-Aβ Antibodies, and Downstream Effects

Immunotherapeutic efforts to slow the clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by lowering brain amyloid-β (Aβ) have included Aβ vaccination, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products, and anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies. Neither Aβ vaccination nor IVIG slowed disease progression. Despite conflicting phase III results, the monoclonal antibody Aducanumab received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of AD in June 2021. The only treatments unequivocally demonstrated to slow AD progression to date are the monoclonal antibodies Lecanemab and Donanemab. Lecanemab received FDA approval in January 2023 based on phase II results showing lowering of PET-detectable Aβ; phase III results released at that time indicated slowing of disease progression. Topline results released in May 2023 for Donanemab's phase III trial revealed that primary and secondary end points had been met. Antibody binding to Aβ facilitates its clearance from the brain via multiple mechanisms including promoting its microglial phagocytosis, activating complement, dissolving fibrillar Aβ, and binding of antibody-Aβ complexes to blood-brain barrier receptors. Antibody binding to Aβ in peripheral blood may also promote cerebral efflux of Aβ by a peripheral sink mechanism. According to the amyloid hypothesis, for Aβ targeting to slow AD progression, it must decrease downstream neuropathological processes including tau aggregation and phosphorylation and (possibly) inflammation and oxidative stress. This review discusses antibody-mediated mechanisms of Aβ clearance, findings in AD trials involving Aβ vaccination, IVIG, and anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, downstream effects reported in those trials, and approaches which might improve the Aβ-clearing ability of monoclonal antibodies.

Anti-Amyloid Immunotherapies for Alzheimer's Disease: A 2023 Clinical Update

The amyloid cascade hypothesis is a useful framework for therapeutic development in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Amyloid b1-42 (Aβ) has been the main target of experimental therapies, based on evidence of the neurotoxic effects of Aβ, and of the potential adverse effects of brain Aβ burden detected in humans in vivo by positron emission tomography (PET). Progress on passive anti-amyloid immunotherapy research includes identification of antibodies that facilitate microglial activation, catalytical disaggregation, and increased flow of Aβ from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to plasma, thus decreasing the neurotoxic effects of Aβ. Recently completed phase 2 and 3 trials of 3rd generation anti-amyloid immunotherapies are supportive of their clinical efficacy in reducing brain Aβ burden and preventing cognitive decline. Data from recent trials implicate these agents as the first effective disease-modifying therapies against AD and has led to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recent approval of aducanumab and lecanemab, under an accelerated approval pathway. The clinical effects of these agents are modest, however, and associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Testing the effects of anti-Aβ immunotherapies in pre-symptomatic populations and identification of more potent and safer agents is the scope of ongoing and future research. Innovations in clinical trial design will be the key for the efficient and equitable development of novel anti-Aβ immunotherapies. The progress in the field of AD therapeutics will bring new clinical, logistical, and ethical challenges, which pose to revolutionize the practice of neurology, dementia care, and preventive cognitive healthcare.

Modeling Alzheimer's disease progression utilizing clinical trial and ADNI data to predict longitudinal trajectory of CDR-SB

There is strong interest in developing predictive models to better understand individual heterogeneity and disease progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We have built upon previous longitudinal AD progression models, using a nonlinear, mixed-effect modeling approach to predict Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) progression. Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (observational study) and placebo arms from four interventional trials (N = 1093) were used for model building. The placebo arms from two additional interventional trials (N = 805) were used for external model validation. In this modeling framework, CDR-SB progression over the disease trajectory timescale was obtained for each participant by estimating disease onset time (DOT). Disease progression following DOT was described by both global progression rate (RATE) and individual progression rate (α). Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination and CDR-SB scores described the interindividual variabilities in DOT and α well. This model successfully predicted outcomes in the external validation datasets, supporting its suitability for prospective prediction and use in design of future trials. By predicting individual participants' disease progression trajectories using baseline characteristics and comparing these against the observed responses to new agents, the model can help assess treatment effects and support decision making for future trials.

Effects of three kinds of anti-amyloid-β drugs on clinical, biomarker, neuroimaging outcomes and safety indexes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II/III clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the three kinds of anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) drugs on cognitive and other functions, fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers, and safety on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and rank the three kinds of anti-Aβ drugs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and AlzForum from inception to January 21, 2023 to include randomized controlled clinical trials. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one clinical trials (20929 participants, 9167 male) were included. Anti-Aβ drugs had significant but relatively low efficacy in preventing cognitive decline (ADAS-Cog SMD -0.07, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.03, p < 0.001; CDR-SOB -0.05, -0.09 to -0.01, p = 0.017). Instrumental variable meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis confirmed the reliability of the pooled estimation. Beneficial effects were also observed by assessing other cognitive and activity of daily living scales and biomarkers, with acceptable safety of anti-Aβ drugs. Meta-regression demonstrated significant association between higher baseline mini-mental statement examination scores (MMSE) and better cognitive protective effects on cognitive function (ADAS-Cog β: -0.02, -0.05 to 0.00, p = 0.017) and clearance of pathological productions of anti-Aβ drugs. Network meta-analysis ranked the passive immunotherapy drugs to have the best cognitive efficacy, followed by active immunotherapy and small molecule drugs.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Aβ drugs have relatively low efficacy in preventing cognitive decline, and they reduce pathological productions with acceptable safety. Patients with higher baseline MMSE scores benefit more from anti-Aβ drugs. Passive immunotherapy anti-Aβ drugs show relatively better efficacy than active immunotherapy and small molecule anti-Aβ drugs.