Relevance of Minor Neuropsychological Deficits in Patients With Subjective Cognitive Decline

Objective Criteria for Subtle Cognitive Decline in Aging and Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although the Alzheimer's Association (AA) biomarker-only Alzheimer disease (AD) criteria and the International Working Group clinical-pathologic AD criteria differ, both approaches appreciate the need for early detection efforts. Within the AA approach, clinical stage 2 recognizes that someone can be cognitively unimpaired but still experience "subtle cognitive decline" (SCD) measured by subjective report or objective decline using neuropsychological measures. While significant attention has been given to subjective cognitive decline methods, there are no systematic examinations of the operational definition of SCD using objective neuropsychological measures. Therefore, the primary aim of this review was to identify and describe the approaches used to classify objective SCD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases for articles with dates ranging from the start of the database through November 1, 2023. Included studies were peer-reviewed, described a discrete objective SCD category, included participants aged 50+ without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, and focused on aging or AD. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Data were extracted by the 2 authors who then categorized and described the classification approaches.

RESULTS

Of the 1,361 publications initially identified, 70 case-control studies met criteria for inclusion. SCD definitions generally fell into 6 categories based on using similar methodology: (1) SCD based on a specified cutoff on a single cognitive test (n = 6); (2) SCD based on a cutoff (e.g., 10th percentile) on a cognitive composite score (n = 9); (3) objectively defined SCD (Obj-SCD) using cutoffs (e.g., -1 SD) on multiple individual neuropsychological measures (n = 24); (4) "Pre-MCI" criteria defined using a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5 but normal performance on neuropsychological testing (n = 12); (5) cutoff based on longitudinal rate of cognitive decline (e.g., over 1 year) (n = 13); and (6) data-driven/clustering approach to classification (n = 8). Two studies used multiple classification approaches.

DISCUSSION

Six promising classification approaches were identified in the existing literature, with the Obj-SCD and Pre-MCI approaches being the most commonly applied. Additional work is needed to compare SCD approaches head-to-head to identify the most prognostically useful, particularly within racially/ethnically diverse older adults.

Blood biomarkers confirm subjective cognitive decline (SCD) as a distinct molecular and clinical stage within the NIA-AA framework of Alzheimer´s disease

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is proposed as an indicator of transitional disease stage 2 in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. However, molecular and particularly longitudinal fluid biomarker data for this stage are still limited. This study aimed to determine whether blood-based biomarkers in amyloid-positive individuals with SCD (A + SCD) support the notion of stage 2 as a distinct stage between stages 1 and 3 of AD and to identify those at high risk for clinical progression. In a prospective multicenter study (DELCODE) involving 457 participants across the AD continuum, we analyzed plasma phospho-tau 181 (p181) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) and assessed their association with longitudinal cognition, hippocampal atrophy, and AD clinical stage transition. The results showed that baseline plasma p181 levels were elevated and increased more rapidly in A + SCD individuals compared to amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired (A + CU) individuals (stage 1). NfL levels rose across A + CU, A + SCD, and amyloid-positive mild cognitive impairment (A + MCI, stage 3). In A + SCD, but not in A + CU, higher p181 levels predicted cognitive decline (PACC5) and transition to MCI. In conclusion, plasma p181 provides molecular biomarker evidence supporting A + SCD as a pre-dementia AD stage (stage 2) distinct from A + CU (stage 1) and helps identify individuals at risk for cognitive decline early in the AD continuum.

Frequency, sociodemographic, and neuropsychological features of patients with subjective cognitive decline diagnosed using different neuropsychological criteria

BACKGROUND

Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is recognized as a risk stage for future cognitive impairment and dementia. The criteria for SCD include normal performance on neuropsychological testing; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding standard score cut-offs for neuropsychological tests to define cognitive impairment and to differentiate between SCD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). This study aimed to assess the frequency of SCD diagnosis using various neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality and to characterize the sociodemographic and neuropsychological features of SCD patients diagnosed under these criteria.

METHODS

The Cognitive Complaints Cohort (CCC) participants were diagnosed following Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) criteria. Normal cognitive performance was defined by the absence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to the five sets of MCI neuropsychologically based criteria defined by Jak and Bondi. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data. A bootstrap methodology was employed to estimate the mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for specific parameters of interest, namely the SMC scale (subjective memory complaints scale), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Blessed Dementia Rating Scale - first part (BDRS first part), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).

RESULTS

Among the 1268 subjects included, the prevalence of SCD diagnosis exhibited substantial variation across SCD-I criteria using different neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality (ranging from 16.4 to 81.3%). When using the most conservative criteria to define cognitive impairment (2 tests within a cognitive domain > 1.5 SD below age-adjusted means), the resulting Conservative SCD group had poorer global cognitive function (MMSE: mean 27.15, 95% CI 27.00-27.31), whereas when using the most liberal criteria to define cognitive impairment (only one test > 1 SD below age-adjusted means) the resulting Liberal SCD group had superior performance in daily-life functioning (BDRS first part: mean 0.30, 95% CI 0.23-0.38). However, subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms did not significantly differ among SCD diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of diagnostic criteria using distinct neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality significantly impacts the frequency of SCD diagnosis and characterizes different patient populations. Consequently, it is essential to specify the criterion when diagnosing a SCD patient and to understand the risks and benefits of using different criteria to define cognitive impairment.

Association of Neurogranin and BACE1 With Clinical Cognitive Decline in Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CSF biomarkers have immense diagnostic and prognostic potential for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, AD is still diagnosed relatively late in the disease process, sometimes even years after the initial manifestation of cognitive symptoms. Thus, further identification of biomarkers is required to detect related pathology in the preclinical stage and predict cognitive decline. Our study aimed to assess the association of neurogranin and β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) with cognitive decline in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).

METHODS

We enrolled participants with available neurogranin and BACE1 measurements in CSF from the DELCODE (DZNE-Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, Germany) cohort. The longitudinal change of Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite score was assessed as the primary outcome in participants with SCD and controls. The secondary outcome was defined as conversion of SCD to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) during follow-up. Levels of neurogranin, BACE1, and neurogranin/BACE1 ratio across groups were compared by analysis of covariance after adjustment for demographics. The linear mixed-effects model and Cox regression analysis were applied to evaluate their association with cognitive decline and progression of SCD to MCI, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 530 participants (mean age: 70.76 ± 6.01 years, 48.7% female) were analyzed in the study. The rate of cognitive decline was faster in individuals with SCD with higher neurogranin and neurogranin/BACE1 ratio (β = -0.138, SE = 0.065, p = 0.037, and β = -0.293, SE = 0.115, p = 0.013). Higher baseline neurogranin and neurogranin/BACE1 ratio were associated with an increased rate of conversion from SCD to MCI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35 per SD, 95% CI 1.03-1.77, p = 0.028, and HR 1.53 per SD, 95% CI 1.13-2.07, p = 0.007). In addition, the impact of higher neurogranin levels on accelerating the rate of cognitive decline was more pronounced in the SCD group than in cognitively unimpaired controls (β = -0.077, SE = 0.033, p = 0.020).

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that CSF neurogranin and BACE1 begin to change in the preclinical stage of AD and they are associated with clinical progression in individuals with SCD.

Subjective cognitive decline: Memory complaints, cognitive awareness, and metacognition

Cognitive complaints are common in elderly subjects and are a frequent reason for referral to memory clinics. If the complaints are not associated with objective cognitive impairment, the condition is labelled subjective cognitive decline (SCD). SCD is often considered as a stage antedating objective impairment, and an at-risk condition for subsequent dementia. Recent large-scale studies indicate that a significantly increased risk of clinical progression in subjects with SCD is associated with positivity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, a finding supporting the notion that SCD can be due to different mechanisms not associated with neurodegeneration, including functional cognitive disorders. In this paper we present a selective review of research on the relations among SCD, cognitive awareness, and metacognitive abilities. We propose that longitudinal studies of metacognitive efficiency in SCD may provide useful cues about the risk of progression to dementia and the possible presence of a functional cognitive disorder, with different implications for the management of this prevalent aging-related condition. HIGHLIGHTS: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), a common cause of referral to memory clinics, can be due to multiple conditions. The predictive value of SCD for progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is high in association with AD biomarker positivity. The awareness of cognitive decline is the mechanism responsible for the emergence of SCD and metacognition is the underlying neuropsychological function. The awareness of cognitive decline in clinical patients is usually assessed comparing an informant rating to the patient self-assessment, a method that can be affected by informant bias. While there is strong evidence that awareness starts to decline with the onset of objective cognitive impairment, progressively leading to the anosognosia of AD, the status of metacognitive efficiency in SCD needs to be further investigated. Quantitative, performance-based indexes of metacognitive efficiency may contribute both to the assessment of progression risk and to the management of subjects with functional cognitive disorders.

Amyloid and SCD jointly predict cognitive decline across Chinese and German cohorts

INTRODUCTION

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in amyloid-positive (Aβ+) individuals was proposed as a clinical indicator of Stage 2 in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum, but this requires further validation across cultures, measures, and recruitment strategies.

METHODS

Eight hundred twenty-one participants from SILCODE and DELCODE cohorts, including normal controls (NC) and individuals with SCD recruited from the community or from memory clinics, underwent neuropsychological assessments over up to 6 years. Amyloid positivity was derived from positron emission tomography or plasma biomarkers. Global cognitive change was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

In the combined and stratified cohorts, Aβ+ participants with SCD showed steeper cognitive decline or diminished practice effects compared with NC or Aβ- participants with SCD. These findings were confirmed using different operationalizations of SCD and amyloid positivity, and across different SCD recruitment settings.

DISCUSSION

Aβ+ individuals with SCD in German and Chinese populations showed greater global cognitive decline and could be targeted for interventional trials.

HIGHLIGHTS

SCD in amyloid-positive (Aβ+) participants predicts a steeper cognitive decline. This finding does not rely on specific SCD or amyloid operationalization. This finding is not specific to SCD patients recruited from memory clinics. This finding is valid in both German and Chinese populations. Aβ+ older adults with SCD could be a target population for interventional trials.

A generalizable data-driven model of atrophy heterogeneity and progression in memory clinic settings

Memory clinic patients are a heterogeneous population representing various aetiologies of pathological ageing. It is not known whether divergent spatiotemporal progression patterns of brain atrophy, as previously described in Alzheimer's disease patients, are prevalent and clinically meaningful in this group of older adults. To uncover distinct atrophy subtypes, we applied the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) algorithm to baseline structural MRI data from 813 participants enrolled in the DELCODE cohort (mean ± standard deviation, age = 70.67 ± 6.07 years, 52% females). Participants were cognitively unimpaired (n = 285) or fulfilled diagnostic criteria for subjective cognitive decline (n = 342), mild cognitive impairment (n = 118) or dementia of the Alzheimer's type (n = 68). Atrophy subtypes were compared in baseline demographics, fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarker levels, the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC-5) as well as episodic memory and executive functioning. PACC-5 trajectories over up to 240 weeks were examined. To test whether baseline atrophy subtype and stage predicted clinical trajectories before manifest cognitive impairment, we analysed PACC-5 trajectories and mild cognitive impairment conversion rates of cognitively unimpaired participants and those with subjective cognitive decline. Limbic-predominant and hippocampal-sparing atrophy subtypes were identified. Limbic-predominant atrophy initially affected the medial temporal lobes, followed by further temporal regions and, finally, the remaining cortical regions. At baseline, this subtype was related to older age, more pathological Alzheimer's disease biomarker levels, APOE ε4 carriership and an amnestic cognitive impairment. Hippocampal-sparing atrophy initially occurred outside the temporal lobe, with the medial temporal lobe spared up to advanced atrophy stages. This atrophy pattern also affected individuals with positive Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and was associated with more generalized cognitive impairment. Limbic-predominant atrophy, in all participants and in only unimpaired participants, was linked to more negative longitudinal PACC-5 slopes than observed in participants without or with hippocampal-sparing atrophy and increased the risk of mild cognitive impairment conversion. SuStaIn modelling was repeated in a sample from the Swedish BioFINDER-2 cohort. Highly similar atrophy progression patterns and associated cognitive profiles were identified. Cross-cohort model generalizability, at both the subject and the group level, was excellent, indicating reliable performance in previously unseen data. The proposed model is a promising tool for capturing heterogeneity among older adults at early at-risk states for Alzheimer's disease in applied settings. The implementation of atrophy subtype- and stage-specific end points might increase the statistical power of pharmacological trials targeting early Alzheimer's disease.

The criteria used to rule out mild cognitive impairment impact dementia incidence rates in subjective cognitive decline

BACKGROUND

The research criteria for subjective cognitive decline (SCD) exclude mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but do not stipulate the use of specific MCI criteria. This study compared different approaches to defining (i.e., excluding) MCI during the ascertainment of SCD, focusing on the impact on dementia incidence rates in SCD.

METHODS

This cohort study utilized routine healthcare data collected in the Essex Memory Clinic from 1999 to 2023. Two different operationalizations of the SCD criteria were used to categorize the cohort into two SCD patient samples. One sample was based on local clinical practice - MCI was excluded according to the Winblad criteria (this sample was termed SCDWinblad). The other sample was created via the retrospective application of the Jak/Bondi criteria for the exclusion of MCI (termed SCDJak/Bondi). Only patients aged ≥ 55 years at baseline with ≥ 12 months follow-up were considered for inclusion. The initial clinical/demographic characteristics of the samples were compared. Rates of incident dementia were calculated for each sample, and unadjusted and Mantel-Haenszel-adjusted incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare dementia incidence between the SCD samples.

RESULTS

The Essex Memory Clinic database included 2,233 patients in total. The SCD and study eligibility criteria were used to select SCDWinblad (n = 86) and SCDJak/Bondi (n = 185) samples from the database. Median follow-up (3 years) did not differ between the two samples. The SCDJak/Bondi sample was significantly older than the SCDWinblad at first assessment (median age: 74 versus 70 years) and had poorer scores on tests of global cognition, immediate and delayed verbal recall, and category fluency. Following adjustment for age, the dementia incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval] was 3.7 [1.5 to 9.3], indicating a significantly greater rate of progression to dementia in SCDJak/Bondi.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that the approach used to ascertain SCD has important implications for both SCD phenotypes and prognosis. This underscores the importance of how MCI is operationalized within SCD studies. More broadly, the findings add to a growing body of work indicating that objective cognition should not be overlooked in SCD, and offer a potential explanation for the heterogeneity across the SCD prognostic literature.

A remote digital memory composite to detect cognitive impairment in memory clinic samples in unsupervised settings using mobile devices

Remote monitoring of cognition holds the promise to facilitate case-finding in clinical care and the individual detection of cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. In the context of Alzheimer's disease, this is particularly relevant for patients who seek medical advice due to memory problems. Here, we develop a remote digital memory composite (RDMC) score from an unsupervised remote cognitive assessment battery focused on episodic memory and long-term recall and assess its construct validity, retest reliability, and diagnostic accuracy when predicting MCI-grade impairment in a memory clinic sample and healthy controls. A total of 199 participants were recruited from three cohorts and included as healthy controls (n = 97), individuals with subjective cognitive decline (n = 59), or patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 43). Participants performed cognitive assessments in a fully remote and unsupervised setting via a smartphone app. The derived RDMC score is significantly correlated with the PACC5 score across participants and demonstrates good retest reliability. Diagnostic accuracy for discriminating memory impairment from no impairment is high (cross-validated AUC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.66, 0.99]) with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.72. Thus, unsupervised remote cognitive assessments implemented in the neotiv digital platform show good discrimination between cognitively impaired and unimpaired individuals, further demonstrating that it is feasible to complement the neuropsychological assessment of episodic memory with unsupervised and remote assessments on mobile devices. This contributes to recent efforts to implement remote assessment of episodic memory for case-finding and monitoring in large research studies and clinical care.

Brain Health and Cognition in Older Adults: Roadmap and Milestones towards the Implementation of Preventive Strategies

In this narrative review, we delve into the evolving concept of brain health, as recognized by the WHO, focusing on its intersection with cognitive decline. We emphasize the imperative need for preventive strategies, particularly in older adults. We describe the target population that might benefit the most from risk-based approaches-namely, people with subjective cognitive decline. Additionally, we consider universal prevention in cognitively unimpaired middle-aged and older adults. Delving into multidomain personalized preventive strategies, we report on empirical evidence surrounding modifiable risk factors and interventions crucial in mitigating cognitive decline. Next, we highlight the emergence of brain health services (BHS). We explain their proposed role in risk assessment, risk communication, and tailored interventions to reduce the risk of dementia. Commenting on ongoing BHS pilot experiences, we present the inception and framework of our own BHS in Monza, Italy, outlining its operational structure and care pathways. We emphasize the need for global collaboration and intensified research efforts to address the intricate determinants of brain health and their potential impact on healthcare systems worldwide.

Symptomatic Clusters Related to Amyloid Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals

Background

The NIA-AA Research Framework on Alzheimer's disease (AD) proposes a transitional stage (stage 2) characterized by subtle cognitive decline, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild neurobehavioral symptoms (NPS).

Objective

To identify participant clusters based on stage 2 features and assess their association with amyloid positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals.

Methods

We included baseline data of N = 338 cognitively unimpaired participants from the DELCODE cohort with data on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for AD. Classification into the AD continuum (i.e., amyloid positivity, A+) was based on Aβ42/40 status. Neuropsychological test data were used to assess subtle objective cognitive dysfunction (OBJ), the subjective cognitive decline interview (SCD-I) was used to detect SCD, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) was used to assess NPS. A two-step cluster analysis was carried out and differences in AD biomarkers between clusters were analyzed.

Results

We identified three distinct participant clusters based on presented symptoms. The highest rate of A+ participants (47.6%) was found in a cluster characterized by both OBJ and SCD. A cluster of participants that presented with SCD and NPS (A+:26.6%) and a cluster of participants with overall few symptoms (A+:19.7%) showed amyloid positivity in a range that was not higher than the expected A+ rate for the age group. Across the full sample, participants with a combination of SCD and OBJ in the memory domain showed a lower Aβ42/ptau181 ratio compared to those with neither SCD nor OBJ.

Conclusions

The cluster characterized by participants with OBJ and concomitant SCD was enriched for amyloid pathology.