Histone H1 and transcription: still an enigma?

Basis of the H2AK119 specificity of the Polycomb repressive deubiquitinase

Repression of gene expression by protein complexes of the Polycomb group is a fundamental mechanism that governs embryonic development and cell-type specification1-3. The Polycomb repressive deubiquitinase (PR-DUB) complex removes the ubiquitin moiety from monoubiquitinated histone H2A K119 (H2AK119ub1) on the nucleosome4, counteracting the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1)5 to facilitate the correct silencing of genes by Polycomb proteins and safeguard active genes from inadvertent silencing by PRC1 (refs. 6-9). The intricate biological function of PR-DUB requires accurate targeting of H2AK119ub1, but PR-DUB can deubiquitinate monoubiquitinated free histones and peptide substrates indiscriminately; the basis for its exquisite nucleosome-dependent substrate specificity therefore remains unclear. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structure of human PR-DUB, composed of BAP1 and ASXL1, in complex with the chromatosome. We find that ASXL1 directs the binding of the positively charged C-terminal extension of BAP1 to nucleosomal DNA and histones H3-H4 near the dyad, an addition to its role in forming the ubiquitin-binding cleft. Furthermore, a conserved loop segment of the catalytic domain of BAP1 is situated near the H2A-H2B acidic patch. This distinct nucleosome-binding mode displaces the C-terminal tail of H2A from the nucleosome surface, and endows PR-DUB with the specificity for H2AK119ub1.

Interphase H1 phosphorylation: Regulation and functions in chromatin

Many metazoan cell types differentially express multiple non-allelic amino acid sequence variants of histone H1. Although early work revealed that H1 variants, collectively, are phosphorylated during interphase and mitosis, differences between individual H1 variants in the sites they possess for mitotic and interphase phosphorylation have been elucidated only relatively recently. Here, we review current knowledge on the regulation and function of interphase H1 phosphorylation, with a particular emphasis on how differences in interphase phosphorylation among the H1 variants of mammalian cells may enable them to have differential effects on transcription and other chromatin processes.

HMGB1 in health and disease

Complex genetic and physiological variations as well as environmental factors that drive emergence of chromosomal instability, development of unscheduled cell death, skewed differentiation, and altered metabolism are central to the pathogenesis of human diseases and disorders. Understanding the molecular bases for these processes is important for the development of new diagnostic biomarkers, and for identifying new therapeutic targets. In 1973, a group of non-histone nuclear proteins with high electrophoretic mobility was discovered and termed high-mobility group (HMG) proteins. The HMG proteins include three superfamilies termed HMGB, HMGN, and HMGA. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), the most abundant and well-studied HMG protein, senses and coordinates the cellular stress response and plays a critical role not only inside of the cell as a DNA chaperone, chromosome guardian, autophagy sustainer, and protector from apoptotic cell death, but also outside the cell as the prototypic damage associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP). This DAMP, in conjunction with other factors, thus has cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor activity, orchestrating the inflammatory and immune response. All of these characteristics make HMGB1 a critical molecular target in multiple human diseases including infectious diseases, ischemia, immune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer. Indeed, a number of emergent strategies have been used to inhibit HMGB1 expression, release, and activity in vitro and in vivo. These include antibodies, peptide inhibitors, RNAi, anti-coagulants, endogenous hormones, various chemical compounds, HMGB1-receptor and signaling pathway inhibition, artificial DNAs, physical strategies including vagus nerve stimulation and other surgical approaches. Future work further investigating the details of HMGB1 localization, structure, post-translational modification, and identification of additional partners will undoubtedly uncover additional secrets regarding HMGB1's multiple functions.

Core histone hyperacetylation impacts cooperative behavior and high-affinity binding of histone H1 to chromatin

Linker histones stabilize higher order chromatin structures and limit access to proteins involved in DNA-dependent processes. Core histone acetylation is thought to modulate H1 binding. In the current study, we employed kinetic modeling of H1 recovery curves obtained during fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments to determine the impact of core histone acetylation on the different variants of H1. Following brief treatments with histone deacetylase inhibitor, most variants showed no change in H1 dynamics. A change in mobility was detected only when longer treatments were used to induce high levels of histone acetylation. This hyperacetylation imparted marked changes in the dynamics of low-affinity H1 population, while conferring variant-specific changes in the mobility of H1 molecules that were strongly bound. Both the C-terminal domain (CTD) and globular domain were responsible for this differential response to TSA. Furthermore, we found that neither the CTD nor the globular domain, by themselves, undergoes a change in kinetics following hyperacetylation. This led us to conclude that hyperacetylation of core histones affects the cooperative nature of low-affinity H1 binding, with some variants undergoing a predicted decrease of almost 2 orders of magnitude.

Chromatin ultrastructural abnormalities in leukocytes, as peripheral markers of bipolar patients

This study investigated the ultrastructural conformation changes of the chromatin in blood leukocytes of bipolar patients, versus normal controls, by using the phosphotungstic acid-hematoxylin (PTAH) block-staining method, modified for electron microscopy, and the immunohistochemical localization of the histone H1, by the immunogold method. These two methods are basically complementary. If histone H1 immunolabeling is used, it shows that the immunogold labeling on chromatin is different in the three phases of the illness, i.e., high in normothymia and low in depression as well as in mania. However, in this particular tissue fixation (4% paraformaldehyde-1% glutaraldehyde in 0,1 M phosphate buffer), the heterochromatin in the nuclei remains identical in the three phases of the illness. On the other hand, the PTAH method shows exactly the area of electron-lucent condensed chromatin, separate from the area of electron-dense, decondensed, chromatin. The present data confirmed that both the clinical state of depression as well as that of mania display activated lymphocytes and neutrophils with their characteristic relaxed de-condensed chromatin. On the contrary, the state of normothymia shows a reversion to the condensed state of the chromatin, as it is observed in the leukocytes of the normal controls. The ultrastructural conformations of the chromatin, revealed by the PTAH method, in combination with the histone H1 immunogold labeling, applied in blood leukocytes, supports the use of these two methods, as screening methods of choice in investigating blood biological markers in mental illness.

Molecular dynamics of histone H1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.

Global gene expression analysis reveals specific and redundant roles for H1 variants, H1c and H1(0), in gene expression regulation

In mammals, the functional significance of the presence of evolutionarily conserved, multiple non-allelic H1 variants remains unclear. We used a unique overproduction approach coupled with cell cycle synchronization and early time point assays to assess differential effects of H1 variants, H1c and H1(0), on global gene expression in the absence of compensatory events that may mask variant-specific effects. We found that H1c and H1(0) act primarily as specific rather than global regulators of gene expression. Many of the genes affected were uniquely targeted by either H1c or H1(0), affirming that H1 variants have some unique roles. We also identified genes that were affected by both variants, in which cases the expression of these genes was, for the most part, affected similarly by both the variants. This observation suggests that as well as having specific functions, the H1 variants share common roles in the organization of chromatin. We further noted that H1(0) repressed more genes than did H1c, which may underlie the prevailing notion that H1(0) is a stronger repressor of transcription.

Histone H1e interacts with small hepatitis delta antigen and affects hepatitis delta virus replication

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) encodes two isoforms of delta antigens (HDAgs). The small form of HDAg (SHDAg) is required for HDV RNA replication, while the large form of HDAg (LHDAg) is required for viral assembly. Using tandem affinity purification method combined with mass spectrometry, we found that linker histone H1e bound to SHDAg. The binding domain of SHDAg to histone H1e was mapped to the N-terminal 67 amino acids. Oligomerization of SHDAg was required for its interaction with histone H1e. LHDAg barely bound to histone H1e and was masked at N-terminus. The binding domain of histone H1e to SHDAg was mapped to its central globular domain. HDV replication was inhibited by N- or C-terminal deletion mutants of histone H1e and was rescued by wild-type histone H1e. We conclude that histone H1e plays a significant role in HDV replication through forming protein complex with SHDAg.

Differential affinity of mammalian histone H1 somatic subtypes for DNA and chromatin

Background

Histone H1 is involved in the formation and maintenance of chromatin higher order structure. H1 has multiple isoforms; the subtypes differ in timing of expression, extent of phosphorylation and turnover rate. In vertebrates, the amino acid substitution rates differ among subtypes by almost one order of magnitude, suggesting that each subtype might have acquired a unique function. We have devised a competitive assay to estimate the relative binding affinities of histone H1 mammalian somatic subtypes H1a-e and H1° for long chromatin fragments (30–35 nucleosomes) in physiological salt (0.14 M NaCl) at constant stoichiometry.

Results

The H1 complement of native chromatin was perturbed by adding an additional amount of one of the subtypes. A certain amount of SAR (scaffold-associated region) DNA was present in the mixture to avoid precipitation of chromatin by excess H1. SAR DNA also provided a set of reference relative affinities, which were needed to estimate the relative affinities of the subtypes for chromatin from the distribution of the subtypes between the SAR and the chromatin. The amounts of chromatin, SAR and additional H1 were adjusted so as to keep the stoichiometry of perturbed chromatin similar to that of native chromatin. H1 molecules freely exchanged between the chromatin and SAR binding sites. In conditions of free exchange, H1a was the subtype of lowest affinity, H1b and H1c had intermediate affinities and H1d, H1e and H1° the highest affinities. Subtype affinities for chromatin differed by up to 19-fold. The relative affinities of the subtypes for chromatin were equivalent to those estimated for a SAR DNA fragment and a pUC19 fragment of similar length. Avian H5 had an affinity ~12-fold higher than H1e for both DNA and chromatin.

Conclusion

H1 subtypes freely exchange in vitro between chromatin binding sites in physiological salt (0.14 M NaCl). The large differences in relative affinity of the H1 subtypes for chromatin suggest that differential affinity could be functionally relevant and thus contribute to the functional differentiation of the subtypes. The conservation of the relative affinities for SAR and non-SAR DNA, in spite of a strong preference for SAR sequences, indicates that differential affinity alone cannot be responsible for the heterogeneous distribution of some subtypes in cell nuclei.

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry profiling of histones

Here we describe the use of reverse-phase liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS) to simultaneously characterize variants and post-translationally modified isoforms for each histone. The analysis of intact proteins significantly reduces the time of sample preparation and simplifies data interpretation. LC-MS analysis and peptide mass mapping have previously been applied to identify histone proteins and to characterize their post-translational modifications. However, these studies provided limited characterization of both linker histones and core histones. The current LC-MS analysis allows for the simultaneous observation of all histone PTMs and variants (both replacement and bulk histones) without further enrichment, which will be valuable in comparative studies. Protein identities were verified by the analysis of histone H2A species using RPLC fractionation, AU-PAGE separation and nano-LC-MS/MS.

Drosophila ribosomal proteins are associated with linker histone H1 and suppress gene transcription

The dynamics and function of ribosomal proteins in the cell nucleus remain enigmatic. Here we provide evidence that specific components of Drosophila melanogaster ribosomes copurify with linker histone H1. Using various experimental approaches, we demonstrate that this association of nuclear ribosomal proteins with histone H1 is specific, and that colocalization occurs on condensed chromatin in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed that specific ribosomal proteins are associated with chromatin in a histone H1-dependent manner. Overexpression of either histone H1 or ribosomal protein L22 in Drosophila cells resulted in global suppression of the same set of genes, while depletion of H1 and L22 caused up-regulation of tested genes, suggesting that H1 and ribosomal proteins are essential for transcriptional gene repression. Overall, this study provides evidence for a previously undefined link between ribosomal proteins and chromatin, and suggests a role for this association in transcriptional regulation in higher eukaryotes.

Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation

Linker histone H1 plays an important role in chromatin folding in vitro. To study the role of H1 in vivo, mouse embryonic stem cells null for three H1 genes were derived and were found to have 50% of the normal level of H1. H1 depletion caused dramatic chromatin structure changes, including decreased global nucleosome spacing, reduced local chromatin compaction, and decreases in certain core histone modifications. Surprisingly, however, microarray analysis revealed that expression of only a small number of genes is affected. Many of the affected genes are imprinted or are on the X chromosome and are therefore normally regulated by DNA methylation. Although global DNA methylation is not changed, methylation of specific CpGs within the regulatory regions of some of the H1 regulated genes is reduced. These results indicate that linker histones can participate in epigenetic regulation of gene expression by contributing to the maintenance or establishment of specific DNA methylation patterns.

DNA-induced secondary structure of the carboxyl-terminal domain of histone H1

We have studied the secondary structure of the carboxyl-terminal domains of linker histone H1 subtypes H1(0) (C-H1(0)) and H1t (C-H1t), free in solution and bound to DNA, by IR spectroscopy. The carboxyl-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution but becomes extensively folded upon interaction with DNA. The secondary structure elements present in the bound carboxyl-terminal domain include the alpha-helix, beta-structure, turns, and open loops. The structure of the bound domain shows a significant dependence on salt concentration. In low salt (10 mm NaCl), there is a residual amount of random coil, 7% in C-H1(0) and 12% in C-H1t. In physiological salt concentrations (140 mm NaCl), the carboxyl termini become fully structured. Under these conditions, C-H1(0) contained 24% alpha-helix, 25% beta-structure, 17% open loops, and 33% turns. The latter component could include a substantial proportion of the 3(10) helix. Despite their low sequence identity (approximately 30%), the representation of the different structural motifs in C-H1t was similar to that in C-H1(0). Examination of the changes in the amide I components in the 20-80 degrees C temperature interval showed that the secondary structure of the DNA-bound C-H1t is for the most part extremely stable. The H1 carboxyl-terminal domain appears to belong to the so-called disordered proteins, undergoing coupled binding and folding.

The H1 phosphorylation state regulates expression of CDC2 and other genes in response to starvation in Tetrahymena thermophila

In Tetrahymena thermophila, highly phosphorylated histone H1 of growing cells becomes partially dephosphorylated when cells are starved in preparation for conjugation. To determine the effects of H1 phosphorylation on gene expression, PCR-based subtractive hybridization was used to clone cDNAs that were differentially expressed during starvation in two otherwise-isogenic strains differing only in their H1s. H1 in A5 mutant cells lacked phosphorylation, and H1 in E5 cells mimicked constitutive H1 phosphorylation. Sequences enriched in A5 cells included genes encoding proteases. Sequences enriched in E5 cells included genes encoding cdc2 kinase and a Ser/Thr kinase. These results indicate that H1 phosphorylation plays an important role in regulating the pattern of gene expression during the starvation response and that its role in transcription regulation can be either positive or negative. Treatment of starved cells with a phosphatase inhibitor caused CDC2 gene overexpression. Expression of the E5 version of H1 in starved cells containing endogenous, wild-type H1 caused the wild-type H1 to remain highly phosphorylated. These results argue that Cdc2p is the kinase that phosphorylates Tetrahymena H1, establish a positive feedback mechanism between H1 phosphorylation and CDC2 expression, and indicate that CDC2 gene expression is regulated by an H1 phosphatase.

Histone H2A Ubiquitination Does Not Preclude Histone H1 Binding, but It Facilitates Its Association with the Nucleosome

Histone H2A ubiquitination is a bulky posttranslational modification that occurs at the vicinity of the binding site for linker histones in the nucleosome. Therefore, we took several experimental approaches to investigate the role of ubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) in the binding of linker histones. Our results showed that uH2A was present in situ in histone H1-containing nucleosomes. Notably in vitro experiments using nucleosomes reconstituted onto 167-bp random sequence and 208-bp (5 S rRNA gene) DNA fragments showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not prevent binding of histone H1 but it rather enhanced the binding of this histone to the nucleosome. We also showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not affect the positioning of the histone octamer in the nucleosome in either the absence or the presence of linker histones.

Methylation of histones in myeloid leukemias as a potential marker of granulocyte abnormalities

We show that common heterochromatin antigenic protein markers [HP1alpha, -beta, -gamma and mono-, di-, and trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9)], although present in human blood progenitor CD34+ cells, differentiated lymphocytes, and monocytes, are absent in neutrophil granulocytes and to large extent, in eosinophils. Monomethylated and in particular, dimethylated H3K9 are present to variable degrees in the granulocytes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, without being accompanied by HP1 proteins. In patients with an acute phase of CML and in acute myeloid leukemia patients, strong methylation of H3K9 and all isoforms of HP1 are detected. In chronic forms of CML, no strong correlations among the level of histone methylation, disease progression, and modality of treatment were observed. Histone methylation was found even in "cured" patients without Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) resulting from +(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR/ABL translocation, suggesting an incomplete process of developmentally regulated chromatin remodeling in the granulocytes of these patients. Similarly, reprogramming of leukemia HL-60 cells to terminal differentiation by retinoic acid does not eliminate H3K9 methylation and the presence of HP1 isoforms from differentiated granulocytes. Thus, our study shows for the first time that histone H3 methylation may be changed dramatically during normal cell differentiation. The residual histone H3 methylation in myeloid leukemia cells suggests an incomplete chromatin condensation that may be linked to the leukemia cell proliferation and may be important for the prognosis of disease treatment and relapse.

MSX1 cooperates with histone H1b for inhibition of transcription and myogenesis

During embryogenesis, differentiation of skeletal muscle is regulated by transcription factors that include members of the Msx homeoprotein family. By investigating Msx1 function in repression of myogenic gene expression, we identified a physical interaction between Msx1 and H1b, a specific isoform of mouse histone H1. We found that Msx1 and H1b bind to a key regulatory element of MyoD, a central regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation, where they induce repressed chromatin. Moreover, Msx1 and H1b cooperate to inhibit muscle differentiation in cell culture and in Xenopus animal caps. Our findings define a previously unknown function for "linker" histones in gene-specific transcriptional regulation.

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions

BACKGROUND

Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact.

METHODS

A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.

Role of the M-loop and reactive center loop domains in the folding and bridging of nucleosome arrays by MENT

MENT is a developmentally regulated heterochromatin-associated protein that condenses chromatin in terminally differentiated avian blood cells. Its homology to the serpin protein family suggests that the conserved serpin reactive center loop (RCL) and the unique M-loop are important for its function. To examine the role of these domains, we studied the interaction of wild-type and mutant MENT with naked DNA and biochemically defined nucleosome arrays reconstituted from 12-mer repeats containing nucleosome positioning sequences. Wild-type MENT folded the naked DNA duplexes into closely juxtaposed parallel structures ("tramlines"). Deletion of the M-loop, but not inactivation of the RCL, prevented tramline formation and the cooperative interaction of MENT with DNA. Reconstitution of wild-type MENT with nucleosome arrays caused their tight folding and self-association. M-loop deletion inhibited nucleosome array folding, whereas the inactive RCL mutant was competent to fold the nucleosome arrays, but had a significantly impaired ability to cause their self-association. Bifunctional chemical cross-linking of MENT revealed oligomerization of wild-type MENT in the presence of chromatin and DNA. This oligomerization was severely reduced in the RCL mutant. We propose that the mechanism of MENT-induced heterochromatin formation involves two independent events: bringing together nucleosome linkers within a chromatin fiber and formation of protein bridges between chromatin fibers. Ordered binding of MENT to linker DNA via its unique M-loop domain promotes the folding of chromatin, whereas bridging of chromatin fibers is facilitated by MENT oligomerization mediated by the RCL.

Structure-function relationships in nucleosomal arrays containing linker histone H5

To study the structural and functional changes accompanying the integration of histone H5 into the nucleosome structure, linear DNA species have been employed with a terminal promoter for bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase followed by tandem repeats of a 207-bp nucleosome positioning sequence. The oligonucleosomes assembled from 12-repeat DNA and saturating amounts of core histone octamer plus histone H5 are compacted, in the presence of 1 mM free magnesium ions, to the level of the 30-nm fiber. Under these ionic conditions the efficiency in RNA synthesis and the size distribution of RNA chains obtained with this template are the same as those corresponding to the template without H5, indicating that the 30-nm fiber stabilized by H5 does not impair RNA elongation. Therefore, under our experimental conditions, incorporation of one molecule of histone H5 per nucleosome does not affect elongation of RNA even when a folded structure is produced. However, elongation is inhibited by binding of an excess of H5.

Linker histone subtype composition and affinity for chromatin in situ in nucleated mature erythrocytes

The replacement linker histones H1(0) and H5 are present in frog and chicken erythrocytes, respectively, and their accumulation coincides with cessation of proliferation and compaction of chromatin. These cells have been analyzed for the affinity of linker histones for chromatin with cytochemical and biochemical methods. Our results show a stronger association between linker histones and chromatin in chicken erythrocyte nuclei than in frog erythrocyte nuclei. Analyses of linker histones from chicken erythrocytes using capillary electrophoresis showed H5 to be the subtype strongest associated with chromatin. The corresponding analyses of frog erythrocyte linker histones using reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography showed that H1(0) dissociated from chromatin at somewhat higher ionic strength than the three additional subtypes present in frog blood but at lower ionic strength than chicken H5. Which of the two H1(0) variants in frog is expressed in erythrocytes has thus far been unknown. Amino acid sequencing showed that H1(0)-2 is the only H1(0) subtype present in frog erythrocytes and that it is 100% acetylated at its N termini. In conclusion, our results show differences between frog and chicken linker histone affinity for chromatin probably caused by the specific subtype composition present in each cell type. Our data also indicate a lack of correlation between linker histone affinity and chromatin condensation.

Phosphorylation and an ATP-dependent process increase the dynamic exchange of H1 in chromatin

In Tetrahymena cells, phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates transcription of specific genes. Phosphorylation acts by creating a localized negative charge patch and phenocopies the loss of H1 from chromatin, suggesting that it affects transcription by regulating the dissociation of H1 from chromatin. To test this hypothesis, we used FRAP of GFP-tagged H1 to analyze the effects of mutations that either eliminate or mimic phosphorylation on the binding of H1 to chromatin both in vivo and in vitro. We demonstrate that phosphorylation can increase the rate of dissociation of H1 from chromatin, providing a mechanism by which it can affect H1 function in vivo. We also demonstrate a previously undescribed ATP-dependent process that has a global effect on the dynamic binding of linker histone to chromatin.

An inducible helix-Gly-Gly-helix motif in the N-terminal domain of histone H1e: a CD and NMR study

Knowledge of the structural properties of linker histones is important to the understanding of their role in higher-order chromatin structure and gene regulation. Here we study the conformational properties of the peptide Ac-EKTPVKKKARKAAGGAKRKTSG-NH(2) (NE-1) by circular dichroism and (1)H-NMR. This peptide corresponds to the positively charged region of the N-terminal domain, adjacent to the globular domain, of mouse histone H1e (residues 15-36). This is the most abundant H1 subtype in many kinds of mammalian somatic cells. NE-1 is mainly unstructured in aqueous solution, but in the presence of the secondary-structure stabilizer trifluoroethanol (TFE) it acquires an alpha-helical structure. In 90% TFE solution the alpha-helical population is approximately 40%. In these conditions, NE-1 is structured in two alpha-helices that comprise almost all the peptide, namely, from Thr17 to Ala27 and from Gly29 to Thr34. Both helical regions are highly amphipathic, with the basic residues on one face of the helix and the apolar ones on the other. The two helical elements are separated by a Gly-Gly motif. Gly-Gly motifs at equivalent positions are found in many vertebrate H1 subtypes. Structure calculations show that the Gly-Gly motif behaves as a flexible linker between the helical regions. The wide range of relative orientations of the helical axes allowed by the Gly-Gly motif may facilitate the tracking of the phosphate backbone by the helical elements or the simultaneous binding of two nonconsecutive DNA segments in chromatin.

DNA-induced alpha-helical structure in the NH2-terminal domain of histone H1

It is important to establish the structural properties of linker histones to understand the role they play in chromatin higher order structure and gene regulation. Here, we use CD, NMR, and IR spectroscopy to study the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees, free in solution and bound to the DNA. The NH(2)-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution, but it acquires a substantial amount of alpha-helical structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE). As in other H1 subtypes, the basic residues of the NH(2)-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees are clustered in its COOH-terminal half. According to the NMR results, the helical region comprises the basic cluster (Lys(11)-Lys(20)) and extends until Asp(23). The fractional helicity of this region in 90% TFE is about 50%. His(24) together with Pro(25) constitute the joint between the NH(2)-terminal helix and helix I of the globular domain. Infrared spectroscopy shows that interaction with the DNA induces an amount of alpha-helical structure equivalent to that observed in TFE. As coulombic interactions are involved in complex formation, it is highly likely in the complexes with DNA that the minimal region with alpha-helical structure is that containing the basic cluster. In chromatin, the high positive charge density of the inducible NH(2)-terminal helical element may contribute to the binding stability of the globular domain.

Induction of secondary structure in a COOH-terminal peptide of histone H1 by interaction with the DNA: an infrared spectroscopy study

We have studied the conformation of the peptide Ac-EPKRSVAFKKTKKEVKKVATPKK (CH-1), free in solution and bound to the DNA, by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The peptide belongs to the COOH-terminal domain of histone H1(0) (residues 99-121) and is adjacent to the central globular domain of the protein. In aqueous (D(2)O) solution the amide I' is dominated by component bands at 1643 cm(-1) and 1662 cm(-1), which have been assigned to random coil conformations and turns, respectively. In accordance with previous NMR results, the latter component has been interpreted as arising in turn-like conformations in rapid equilibrium with unfolded states. The peptide becomes fully structured either in 90% trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution or upon interaction with the DNA. In these conditions, the contributions of turn (1662 cm(-1)) and random coil components virtually disappear. In TFE, the spectrum is dominated by the alpha-helical component (1654 cm(-1)). The band at 1662 cm(-1) shifts to 1670 cm(-1), and has been assigned to the COOH-terminal TPKK motif in a more stable turn conformation. A band at 1637 cm(-1), also present in TFE, has been assigned to 3(10) helical structure. The amide I' band of the complexes with the DNA retains the components that were attributed to 3(10) helix and the TPKK turn. In the complexes with the DNA, the alpha-helical component observed in TFE splits into two components at 1657 cm(-1) and 1647 cm(-1). Both components are inside the spectral region of alpha-helical structures. Our results support the presence of inducible helical and turn elements, both sharing the character of DNA-binding motifs.

Core histone acetylation is regulated by linker histone stoichiometry in vivo

We investigated the relationship between linker histone stoichiometry and the acetylation of core histones in vivo. Exponentially growing cell lines induced to overproduce either of two H1 variants, H1(0) or H1c, displayed significantly reduced rates of incorporation of [(3)H]acetate into all four core histones. Pulse-chase experiments indicated that the rates of histone deacetylation were similar in all cell lines. These effects were also observed in nuclei isolated from these cells upon labeling with [(3)H]acetyl-CoA. Nuclear extracts prepared from control and H1-overexpressing cell lines displayed similar levels of histone acetylation activity on chromatin templates prepared from control cells. In contrast, extracts prepared from control cells were significantly less active on chromatin templates prepared from H1-overexpressing cells than on templates prepared from control cells. Reduced levels of acetylation in H1-overproducing cell lines do not appear to depend on higher order chromatin structure, because it persists even after digestion of the chromatin with micrococcal nuclease. The results suggest that alterations in chromatin structure, resulting from changes in linker histone stoichiometry may modulate the levels or rates of core histone acetylation in vivo.

Rapid exchange of histone H1.1 on chromatin in living human cells

The considerable length of DNA in eukaryotic genomes requires packaging into chromatin to fit inside the small dimensions of the cell nucleus. Histone H1 functions in the compaction of chromatin into higher order structures derived from the repeating 'beads on a string' nucleosome polymer. Modulation of H1 binding activity is thought to be an important step in the potentiation/depotentiation of chromatin structure for transcription. It is generally accepted that H1 binds less tightly than other histones to DNA in chromatin and can readily exchange in living cells. Fusion proteins of Histone H1 and green fluorescent protein (GFP) have been shown to associate with chromatin in an apparently identical fashion to native histone H1. This provides a means by which to study histone H1-chromatin interactions in living cells. Here we have used human cells with a stably integrated H1.1-GFP fusion protein to monitor histone H1 movement directly by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in living cells. We find that exchange is rapid in both condensed and decondensed chromatin, occurs throughout the cell cycle, and does not require fibre-fibre interactions. Treatment with drugs that alter protein phosphorylation significantly reduces exchange rates. Our results show that histone H1 exchange in vivo is rapid, occurs through a soluble intermediate, and is modulated by the phosphorylation of a protein or proteins as yet to be determined.

Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by creating a charge patch

In Tetrahymena, histone H1 phosphorylation can regulate transcription and mimics loss of H1 from chromatin. We investigated the mechanism by which H1 phosphorylation affects transcription. Tetrahymena strains were created containing mutations in H1 that mimicked the charge of the phosphorylated region without mimicking the structure or increased hydrophilicity of the phosphorylated residues. Whenever the charge resembled that of the phosphorylated state, the induced expression of the CyP1 gene was greatly inhibited. Whenever the charge was similar to that of the dephosphorylated state, the CyP1 gene was induced normally. These results argue strongly that phosphorylation of H1 acts by changing the overall charge of a small domain, not by phosphate recognition or by creating a site-specific charge.

Resolution of allelic and non-allelic variants of histone H1 by cation-exchange-hydrophilic-interaction chromatography

A mixed-mode high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method that resolves the six known non-allelic variants of chicken erythrocyte histone H1 is described. Common, but previously unknown, allelic variants of H1 that comigrate in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis are also resolved. The resolution of H1 variants achieved by this method should be useful in determining the functional significance of H1 sequence heterogeneity and in analyses of post-translational modification of H1. Furthermore, the principles behind the separation should be applicable to analyses of polymorphism in other proteins.

A helix-turn motif in the C-terminal domain of histone H1

The structural study of peptides belonging to the terminal domains of histone H1 can be considered as a step toward the understanding of the function of H1 in chromatin. The conformational properties of the peptide Ac-EPKRSVAFKKTKKEVKKVATPKK (CH-1), which belongs to the C-terminal domain of histone H1(o) (residues 99-121) and is adjacent to the central globular domain of the protein, were examined by means of 1H-NMR and circular dichroism. In aqueous solution, CH-1 behaved as a mainly unstructured peptide, although turn-like conformations in rapid equilibrium with the unfolded state could be present. Addition of trifluoroethanol resulted in a substantial increase of the helical content. The helical limits, as indicated by (i,i + 3) nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) cross correlations and significant up-field conformational shifts of the C(alpha) protons, span from Pro100 to Val116, with Glu99 and Ala117 as N- and C-caps. A structure calculation performed on the basis of distance constraints derived from NOE cross peaks in 90% trifluoroethanol confirmed the helical structure of this region. The helical region has a marked amphipathic character, due to the location of all positively charged residues on one face of the helix and all the hydrophobic residues on the opposite face. The peptide has a TPKK motif at the C-terminus, following the alpha-helical region. The observed NOE connectivities suggest that the TPKK sequence adopts a type (I) beta-turn conformation, a sigma-turn conformation or a combination of both, in fast equilibrium with unfolded states. Sequences of the kind (S/T)P(K/R)(K/R) have been proposed as DNA binding motifs. The CH-1 peptide, thus, combines a positively charged amphipathic helix and a turn as potential DNA-binding motifs.

Effects of H1 histone variant overexpression on chromatin structure

The importance of histone H1 heterogeneity and total H1 stoichiometry in chromatin has been enigmatic. Here we report a detailed characterization of the chromatin structure of cells overexpressing either H1(0) or H1c. Nucleosome spacing was found to change during cell cycle progression, and overexpression of either variant in exponentially growing cells results in a 15-base pair increase in nucleosome repeat length. H1 histones can also assemble on chromatin and influence nucleosome spacing in the absence of DNA replication. Overexpression of H1(0) and, to a lesser extent, H1c results in a decreased rate of digestion of chromatin by micrococcal nuclease. Using green fluorescent protein-tagged H1 variants, we show that micrococcal nuclease-resistant chromatin is specifically enriched in the H1(0) variant. Overexpression of H1(0) results in the appearance of a unique mononucleosome species of higher mobility on nucleoprotein gels. Domain switch mutagenesis revealed that either the N-terminal tail or the central globular domain of the H1(0) protein could independently give rise to this unique mononucleosome species. These results in part explain the differential effects of H1(0) and H1c in regulating chromatin structure and function.

The N-terminally acetylated form of mammalian histone H1(o), but not that of avian histone H5, increases with age

We report here on the HPCE separation of two chicken H5 histones, which do not show the heterogeneity (Gln/Arg) at residue 15 first found by Greenaway and Murray [Greenaway and Murray (1971) Nat. New Biol. 229, 233-238]. The two subfractions obtained were identified using reversed-phase HPLC, hydrophilic interaction HPLC, Edman degradation, and MALDI-MS analysis. We found that the two H5 subcomponents differ only by an acetylated (designated H5a) and an unacetylated N-terminus (H5b). In contrast to the N-terminally acetylated form of rat kidney histone H1(o), which increased by about 40% with aging of the animal, the corresponding form of chicken H5 did not: the ratio N-terminally acetylated: unacetylated remained constant (30:70) when histone H5 was extracted from erythrocytes of newly hatched chickens and from adult chickens, respectively. The HPCE technique used in this investigation represents a quick and convenient method for analyzing N-terminally acetylated proteins in the presence of unacetylated forms.

Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by mimicking H1 removal

Two Tetrahymena strains were created by gene replacement. One contained H1 with all phosphorylation sites mutated to alanine, preventing phosphorylation. The other had these sites changed to glutamic acid, mimicking the fully phosphorylated state. Global gene expression was not detectably changed in either strain. Instead, H1 phosphorylation activated or repressed specific genes in a manner that was remarkably similar to the effects of knocking out the gene encoding H1. These studies demonstrate a role for H1 phosphorylation in the regulation of transcription in vivo and suggest that it acts by mimicking the partial removal of H1.

Overproduction of histone H1 variants in vivo increases basal and induced activity of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

BALB/c 3T3 cell lines containing integrated copies of the MMTV promoter driving a reporter gene were constructed. Expression vectors in which either of two H1 variants, H10 or H1c, were under control of an inducible promoter were introduced into these lines. Surprisingly, overproduction of either variant resulted in a dramatic increase in basal and hormone-induced expression from the MMTV promoter. H1 overproduction also slowed the loss of MMTV promoter activity associated with prolonged hormone treatment. Transiently transfected MMTV reporter genes, which do not adopt a phased nucleosomal arrangement, do not display increased activity upon H1 overproduction. Thus the effects observed for stable constructs most likely represents a direct effect of H1 on a chromatin-mediated process specific to the nucleosomal structure of the integrated constructs. Induction of increased levels of acetylated core histones by treatment with trichostatin A also potentiated MMTV activity and this effect was additive to that caused by H1 overproduction. However, the effects of TSA treatment, in control or H1-overproducing cells, were eliminated by inhibiting protein synthesis. TSA treatment does not necessarily potentiate MMTV promoter activity by increasing core histone acetylation within the MMTV promoter but perhaps by altering the synthesis of an unlinked transcriptional regulator.

The non-histone chromatin protein HMG1 protects linker DNA on the side opposite to that protected by linker histones

Linker histones and HMG1/2 constitute the two major proteins that bind to linker DNA in chromatin. While the location of linker histones on the nucleosome has attracted considerable research effort, only a few studies have addressed the location of HMG1 in the particles. In this study, we use a procedure based on micrococcal nuclease digestion of reconstituted nucleosomal particles to which HMG1 has been bound, followed by analysis of the protected DNA by restriction nuclease digestion, to locate the HMG1 binding site. Nucleosomal particles were reconstituted on a 235-base pair DNA fragment, which is known to be a strong nucleosome positioning sequence. The results unequivocally show that HMG1 protects linker DNA on one side of the core particle. Importantly, and possibly of physiological relevance, the linker DNA site protected by HMG1 was located on the side opposite to that already shown to be protected by linker histone binding.

Poly(ADP-ribose) binding properties of histone H1 variants

Using a poly(ADP-ribose) binding assay on protein blots we examined the ability of rat testis histone H1 variants to establish non-covalent interactions with the polymer. All the H1 variants bound ADP-ribose polymers; the binding was salt resistant and highly specific, occurring even in the presence of a large excess of competitor DNA. A comparison among the H1 variants showed that H1t has the highest affinity for poly(ADP-ribose). Long and branched poly(ADP-ribose) molecules were found to be preferentially involved in the interaction with the histone variants. The results further corroborate the concept that non-covalent interactions of poly(ADP-ribose) with target proteins may constitute an important mechanism to modulate chromatin structure.

Linker histones versus HMG1/2: a struggle for dominance?

The linker histones (H1, H1 zero, H5, etc.) and a group of abundant non-histone chromosomal proteins (HMG1/2) bind to linker DNA in chromatin and exhibit both generalized and specific effects on gene transcription. The two classes of proteins share many features of DNA binding behaviour, although they are structurally unrelated. While the linker histones and HMG1/2 exhibit direct competition in binding to such structures as four-way junction DNA, whether they compete for binding to the nucleosome has not been investigated. The possibility for either opposite or synergistic effects on gene regulation must be considered at this point.

The unmethylated state of CpG islands in mouse fibroblasts depends on the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation process

In vivo and in vitro experiments carried out on L929 mouse fibroblasts suggested that the poly(ADP-ribosyl) ation process acts somehow as a protecting agent against full methylation of CpG dinucleotides in genomic DNA. Since CpG islands, which are found almost exclusively at the 5'-end of housekeeping genes, are rich in CpG dinucleotides, which are the target of mammalian DNA methyltransferase, we examined the possibility that the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reaction is involved in maintaining the unmethylated state of these DNA sequences. Experiments were conducted by two different strategies, using either methylation-dependent restriction enzymes on purified genomic DNA or a sequence-dependent restriction enzyme on an aliquot of the same DNA, previously modified by a bisulfite reaction. With the methylation-dependent restriction enzymes, it was observed that the "HpaII tiny fragments" greatly decreased when the cells were preincubated with 3-aminobenzamide, a well known inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. The other experimental approach allowed us to prove that, as a consequence of the inhibition of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation process, an anomalous methylation pattern could be evidenced in the CpG island of the promoter fragment of the Htf9 gene, amplified from DNA obtained from fibroblasts preincubated with 3-aminobenzamide. These data confirm the hypothesis that, at least for the Htf9 promoter region, an active poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation protects the unmethylated state of the CpG island.

Histone H1 binding does not inhibit transcription of nucleosomal Xenopus laevis somatic 5S rRNA templates

It has long been proposed that selective binding of histone H1 is, in part, responsible for the differential developmental regulation of the oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in Xenopus laevis. In this study we show that histone H1 binds both oocyte and somatic genes equally after reconstitution into mononucleosomes or oligonucleosome arrays. Furthermore, we show that the binding of histone H1 selectively represses only oocyte gene transcription and that an RNA polymerase III transcription complex is able to initiate transcription of nucleosomal somatic templates regardless of whether histone H1 is present. These results support a model in which the differential regulation of the 5S rRNA genes is not simply due to the prevention of histone H1 binding by transcription complexes on the somatic genes, but rather to a difference in the histone H1 interaction with the somatic and oocyte genes.

Folding of chromatin in the presence of heterogeneous histone H1 binding to nucleosomes

We have reconstituted oligonucleosome complexes containing histone H1 starting from a synthetic DNA template, consisting of 12 tandemly arranged 208-base pair fragments of the 5 S rRNA gene, purified HeLa histone octamers, and histone H1. A ratio of histone H1 per histone octamer used in the reconstitution (0.8-0.9 mol of histone H1/mol of histone octamer) similar to that observed in vivo was used. The reconstituted chromatin complexes exhibit a salt-dependent folding, which is almost indistinguishable from that exhibited by chromatin fragments obtained from nuclease digestion of native chromatin. The folding of this reconstituted chromatin complex seems to be rather independent of the symmetrical or asymmetrical position occupied by H1 in the individual nucleosomes. Binding of histone H1 to the oligonucleosome complexes, under the stoichiometric binding conditions used, had no inhibitory effect on the transcriptional potential of these complexes.

Chromatin fiber structure: morphology, molecular determinants, structural transitions

Despite more than 20 years of research, the structure of the chromatin fiber and its molecular determinants remain enigmatic. Recent developments in high-resolution microscopic techniques, as well as the application of mathematical modeling to chromatin fiber structure, have allowed the acquisition of some new insights into the structure and its determinants. Here we present some of the newest data on the structure of the chromatin fiber in both its extended and compacted states, and bring together this new knowledge with older data in an attempt to provide a unified view of how chromatin components interact with each other to form its various conformations. The structural transitions that are believed to take place during transcriptional activation and its cessation are also discussed. It becomes obvious that despite some progress in our understanding of the fiber structure and its dynamics, huge gaps continue to exist. Bridging these gaps will require further improvements in already available techniques and the introduction of completely new approaches.

Chromatin structure in granulocytes. A link between tight compaction and accumulation of a heterochromatin-associated protein (MENT)

To study the mechanism of heterochromatin formation in vertebrate cells, we isolated nuclei from chicken polymorphonuclear granulocytes and examined the chromatin organization. We found granulocyte chromatin to remain insoluble after nuclease digestion and to be resistant to swelling in low salt/high pH media. Both insolubility and resistance to swelling were lost after washing with 0.3 M NaCl, a procedure that released two abundant tissue-specific proteins from granulocyte nuclei. One of them (42 kDa) is identified as MENT, a protein previously shown to be associated with repressed chromatin from mature chicken erythrocytes. We show that MENT is immunolocalized in granulocyte heterochromatin, where it is one of the most abundant chromatin proteins ( approximately 2 molecules/200 base pairs of DNA). MENT is the first nuclear protein structurally related to the serine protease inhibitor family. The other abundant protein is similar to or identical with mim-1, a myeloid-specific protein that is known to be stored in cell granules and to associate with isolated nuclei. MENT (but not mim-1) binds chromatin and free DNA, and, at its physiological protein/DNA ratio, enhances compaction and the reversible Mg2+-dependent self-association of nucleosome arrays. MENT appears to promote the formation of heterochromatin by acting as a "glue" within and between chains of nucleosomes.

Nucleosome structural transition during chromatin unfolding is caused by conformational changes in nucleosomal DNA

We have recently reported that certain core histone-DNA contacts are altered in nucleosomes during chromatin unfolding (Usachenko, S. I., Gavin I. M., and Bavykin, S. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3831-3836). In this work, we demonstrate that these alterations are caused by a conformational change in the nucleosomal DNA. Using zero-length protein-DNA cross-linking, we have mapped histone-DNA contacts in isolated core particles at ionic conditions affecting DNA stiffness, which may change the nucleosomal DNA conformation. We found that the alterations in histone-DNA contacts induced by an increase in DNA stiffness in isolated core particles are identical to those observed in nucleosomes during chromatin unfolding. The change in the pattern of micrococcal nuclease digestion of linker histone-depleted chromatin at ionic conditions affecting chromatin compaction also suggests that the stretching of the linker DNA may alter the nucleosomal DNA conformation, resulting in a structural transition in the nucleosome which may play a role in rendering the nucleosome competent for transcription and/or replication.

The major chromatin protein histone H1 binds preferentially to cis-platinum-damaged DNA

Both cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin or cis-DDP) and trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) form covalent adducts with DNA. However, only the cis isomer is a potent anticancer agent. It has been postulated that the selective action of cis-DDP occurs through specific binding of nuclear proteins to cis-DDP-damaged DNA sites and that binding blocks DNA repair. We find that a very abundant nuclear protein, the linker histone H1, binds much more strongly to cis-platinated DNA than to trans-platinated or unmodified DNA. In competition experiments, H1 is shown to bind much more strongly than HMG1, which had been previously considered a major candidate for such binding in vivo.

The role of chromatin in transcriptional regulation

Transcriptional activation is mediated by the facilitated binding of the basal transcription complex to the transcription start site of a promoter. The activation procedure involves protein-protein interactions between specific transcription factors and members of the basal transcription complex. However, since eukaryotic DNA is packaged with histones into nucleosomes the accessibility of the transcription factors is limited. In order to activate transcription, some of the specific transcription factors must have the capacity to bind to their binding sites when organized into nucleosomes. As a next step, the chromatin structure of the promoter needs to be decondensed in order to facilitate the binding of the basal transcription machinery. Recent data have addressed these issues and both binding of transcription factors to their chromatin binding site as well as transcription factor-induced chromatin remodelling have been demonstrated. In addition, factors that are candidates to mediate the chromatin remodelling have recently been identified and characterized. The ability of a transcription factor to recognize its cognate element in a nucleosome is an inheret property that differs among different transcription factors. The implications of the rotational and translational positioning of the DNA within a nucleosome on the accessibility of a transcription factor is described in this review. In addition, nucleosome rearrangement and juxtaposing in the context of transcriptional activation is also discussed.