1
|
Shareef F, Bharti B, Garcia-Bigley F, Hernandez M, Nodora J, Liu J, Ramers C, Nery JD, Marquez J, Moyano K, Rojas S, Arredondo E, Gupta S. Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Test Follow-Up: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241242571. [PMID: 38554066 PMCID: PMC10981848 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241242571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Colonoscopy completion rates after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are suboptimal, resulting in missed opportunities for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. Patient navigation and structured follow-up may improve colonoscopy completion, but implementation of these strategies is not widespread. METHODS We conducted a quality improvement study using a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to increase colonoscopy completion after abnormal FIT in a large federally qualified health center serving a diverse and low-income population. Intervention components included patient navigation, and a checklist to promote completion of key steps required for abnormal FIT follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving colonoscopy completion within 6 months of abnormal FIT, assessed at baseline for 156 patients pre-intervention, and compared to 208 patients during the intervention period from April 2017 to December 2019. Drop offs at each step in the follow-up process were assessed. RESULTS Colonoscopy completion improved from 21% among 156 patients with abnormal FIT pre-intervention, to 38% among 208 patients with abnormal FIT during the intervention (P < .001; absolute increase: 17%, 95% CI: 6.9%-25.2%). Among the 130 non-completers during the intervention period, lack of completion was attributable to absence of colonoscopy referral for 7.7%; inability to schedule a pre-colonoscopy specialist visit for 71.5%; failure to complete a pre-colonoscopy visit for 2.3%; the absence of colonoscopy scheduling for 9.2%; failure to show for a scheduled colonoscopy for 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS Patient navigation and structured follow-up appear to improve colonoscopy completion after abnormal FIT. Additional strategies are needed to achieve optimal rates of completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faizah Shareef
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Balambal Bharti
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jesse Nodora
- University of California San Diego (Radiation Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jie Liu
- Shang Consulting LLC, San Diego CA, USA
| | - Christian Ramers
- Family Health Centers of San Diego (Graduate Medical Education), San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Karina Moyano
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Samir Gupta
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effect of Chronic Comorbidities on Follow-up Colonoscopy After Positive Colorectal Cancer Screening Results: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1137-1145. [PMID: 35333781 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are colorectal cancer screening tests used to identify individuals requiring further investigation with colonoscopy. Delayed colonoscopy after positive FOBT (FOBT+) is associated with poorer cancer outcomes. We assessed the effect of comorbidity on colonoscopy receipt within 12 months after FOBT+. METHODS Population-based healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, were linked to assemble a cohort of 50-74-year-old individuals with FOBT+ results between 2008 and 2017. The associations between comorbidities and colonoscopy receipt within 12 months after FOBT+ were examined using multivariable cause-specific hazard regression models. RESULTS Of 168,701 individuals with FOBT+, 80.5% received colonoscopy within 12 months. In multivariable models, renal failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.82), heart failure (HR 0.77, CI 0.75-0.80), and serious mental illness (HR 0.88, CI 0.85-0.92) were associated with the lowest colonoscopy rates, compared with not having each condition. The number of medical conditions was inversely associated with colonoscopy uptake (≥4 vs 0: HR 0.64, CI 0.58-0.69; 3 vs 0: HR 0.75, CI 0.72-0.78; and 2 vs 0: HR 0.87, CI 0.85-0.89). Having both medical and mental health conditions was associated with a lower colonoscopy uptake relative to no comorbidity (HR 0.88, CI 0.87-0.90). DISCUSSION Persons with medical and mental health conditions had lower colonoscopy rates after FOBT+ than those without these conditions. Better strategies are needed to optimize colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in individuals with comorbidities.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. 2021 US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines and available evidence support routine screening from ages 45 to 75, and individualized consideration of screening ages 76 to 85. USPSTF guidelines recommend annual guaiac fecal occult blood testing, annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), annual to every 3-year multitarget stool DNA-FIT, every 5-year sigmoidoscopy, every 10-year sigmoidoscopy with annual FIT, every 5-year computed tomographic colonography, and every 10-year colonoscopy as options for screening. The "best test is the one that gets done."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Gupta
- GI Section, VA San Diego Healthcare System, Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, MC 111D, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cusumano VT, Myint A, Corona E, Yang L, Bocek J, Lopez AG, Huang MZ, Raja N, Dermenchyan A, Roh L, Han M, Croymans D, May FP. Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3760-3768. [PMID: 33609211 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06866-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a common colorectal cancer screening modality in the USA but often is not followed by diagnostic colonoscopy. AIMS We investigated the efficacy of patient navigation to increase diagnostic colonoscopy after positive FIT results and determined persistent barriers to follow-up despite navigation in a large, academic healthcare system. METHODS The study cohort included all health system outpatients with an assigned primary care provider, a positive FIT result between 12/01/2016 and 06/01/2019, and no documentation of colonoscopy after positive FIT. Two non-clinical patient navigators engaged patients and providers to encourage follow-up, offer solutions to barriers, and assist with colonoscopy scheduling. The primary intervention endpoint was completion of colonoscopy within 6 months of navigation. We documented reasons for persistent barriers to colonoscopy despite navigation and determined predictors of successful follow-up after navigation. RESULTS There were 119 patients who received intervention. Of these, 37 (31.1%) patients completed colonoscopy at 6 months. In 41/119 (34.5%) cases, the PCP did not recommend colonoscopy, most commonly due to a normal colonoscopy prior to the positive FIT (19, 46.3%). There were 41/119 patients (34.5%) that declined colonoscopy despite the patient navigator and the PCP order. Male sex and younger age were significant predictors of follow-up (aOR = 2.91, 95%CI, 1.18-7.13; aOR = 0.92, 95%CI, 0.87-0.99). CONCLUSIONS After implementation of patient navigation, diagnostic colonoscopy was completed for 31.1% of patients with a positive FIT result. However, navigation also highlighted persistent multilevel barriers to follow-up. Future work will develop targeted solutions for these barriers to further increase FIT follow-up rates in our health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivy T Cusumano
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Myint
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Edgar Corona
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Bocek
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Faculty Practice Group and Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antonio G Lopez
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA
| | - Marcela Zhou Huang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA
| | - Naveen Raja
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Faculty Practice Group and Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna Dermenchyan
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Quality Program, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lily Roh
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Faculty Practice Group and Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maria Han
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Quality Program, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Croymans
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.,Quality Program, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA. .,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Cancer Prevention Control Research, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoeck S, De Schutter H, Van Hal G. Why do participants in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening program not undergo a diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test? Acta Clin Belg 2021; 77:760-766. [PMID: 34530695 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1980675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hoeck
- Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium
| | | | - Guido Van Hal
- Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Redwood DG, Dinh TA, Kisiel JB, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Provost EM, Sacco FD, Tiesinga JJ, Ahlquist DA. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:1203-1217. [PMID: 33840520 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of multitarget stool DNA testing (MT-sDNA) compared with colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for Alaska Native adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS A Markov model was used to evaluate the 3 screening test effects over 40 years. Outcomes included colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The study incorporated updated evidence on screening test performance and adherence and was conducted from December 15, 2016, through November 6, 2019. RESULTS With perfect adherence, CRC incidence was reduced by 52% (95% CI, 46% to 56%) using colonoscopy, 61% (95% CI, 57% to 64%) using annual FIT, and 66% (95% CI, 63% to 68%) using MT-sDNA. Compared with no screening, perfect adherence screening extends life by 0.15, 0.17, and 0.19 QALYs per person with colonoscopy, FIT, and MT-sDNA, respectively. Colonoscopy is the most expensive strategy: approximately $110 million more than MT-sDNA and $127 million more than FIT. With imperfect adherence (best case), MT-sDNA resulted in 0.12 QALYs per person vs 0.05 and 0.06 QALYs per person by FIT and colonoscopy, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses supported the base-case analysis. Under varied adherence scenarios, MT-sDNA either dominates or is cost-effective (ICERs, $1740-$75,868 per QALY saved) compared with FIT and colonoscopy. CONCLUSION Each strategy reduced costs and increased QALYs compared with no screening. Screening by MT-sDNA results in the largest QALY savings. In Markov model analysis, screening by MT-sDNA in the Alaska Native population was cost-effective compared with screening by colonoscopy and FIT for a wide range of adherence scenarios.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertels L, Lucassen P, van Asselt K, Dekker E, van Weert H, Knottnerus B. Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2020; 38:487-498. [PMID: 33185121 PMCID: PMC7781896 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
SETTING Participants with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) have a high risk for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. They are therefore recommended follow-up by colonoscopy. However, more than ten percent of positively screened persons do not adhere to this advice. OBJECTIVE To investigate FIT-positive individuals' motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice in the Dutch CRC screening program. SUBJECTS Non-adherent FIT-positive participants of the Dutch CRC screening program. DESIGN We conducted semi structured in-depth interviews with 17 persons who did not undergo colonoscopy within 6 months after a positive FIT. Interviews were undertaken face-to-face and data were analysed thematically with open coding and constant comparison. RESULTS All participants had multifactorial motives for non-adherence. A preference for more personalised care was described with the following themes: aversion against the design of the screening program, expectations of personalised care, emotions associated with experiences of impersonal care and a desire for counselling where options other than colonoscopy could be discussed. Furthermore, intrinsic motives were: having a perception of low risk for CRC (described by all participants), aversion and fear of colonoscopy, distrust, reluctant attitude to the treatment of cancer and cancer fatalism. Extrinsic motives were: having other health issues or priorities, practical barriers, advice from a general practitioner (GP) and financial reasons. CONCLUSION Personalised screening counselling might have helped to improve the interviewees' experiences with the screening program as well as their knowledge on CRC and CRC screening. Future studies should explore whether personalised screening counselling also has potential to increase adherence rates. Key points Participants with a positive FIT in two-step colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are at high risk for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Non-adherence after an unfavourable screening result happens in all CRC programs worldwide with the consequence that many of the participants do not undergo colonoscopy for the definitive assessment of the presence of colorectal cancer. Little qualitative research has been done to study the reasons why individuals participate in the first step of the screening but not in the second step. We found a preference for more personalised care, which was not reported in previous literature on this subject. Furthermore, intrinsic factors, such as a low risk perception and distrust, and extrinsic factors, such as the presence of other health issues and GP advice, may also play a role in non-adherence. A person-centred approach in the form of a screening counselling session may be beneficial for this group of CRC screening participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Bertels
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- CONTACT Lucinda Bertels , .Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam
| | - Peter Lucassen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel van Asselt
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van Weert
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Knottnerus
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paltiel O, Keidar Tirosh A, Paz Stostky O, Calderon-Margalit R, Cohen AD, Elran E, Valinsky L, Matz E, Krieger M, Yehuda AB, Jaffe DH, Manor O. Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Israel: Comprehensive multi-year assessment based on electronic medical records. J Med Screen 2020; 28:25-33. [PMID: 32356670 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320919152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess time trends in colorectal cancer screening uptake, time-to-colonoscopy completion following a positive fecal occult blood test and associated patient factors, and the extent and predictors of longitudinal screening adherence in Israel. SETTING Nation-wide population-based study using data collected from four health maintenance organizations for the Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program. METHODS Screening uptake for the eligible population (aged 50-74) was recorded 2003-2018 using aggregate data. For a subcohort (2008-2012, N = 1,342,617), time-to-colonoscopy following a positive fecal occult blood test and longitudinal adherence to screening guidelines were measured using individual-level data, and associated factors assessed in multivariate models. RESULTS The annual proportion screened rose for both sexes from 11 to 65%, increasing five-fold for age group 60-74 and >six-fold for 50-59 year olds, respectively. From 2008 to 2012, 67,314 adults had a positive fecal occult blood test, of whom 71% eventually performed a colonoscopy after a median interval of 122 (95% confidence interval 110.2-113.7) days. Factors associated with time-to-colonoscopy included age, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Only 25.5% of the population demonstrated full longitudinal screening adherence, mainly attributable to colonoscopy in the past 10 years rather than annual fecal occult blood test performance (83% versus 17%, respectively). Smoking, diabetes, lower socioeconomic status, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension were associated with decreased adherence. Performance of other cancer screening tests and frequent primary care visits were strongly associated with adherence. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial improvement in colorectal cancer screening uptake on a population level, individual-level data uncovered gaps in colonoscopy completion after a positive fecal occult blood test and in longitudinal adherence to screening, which should be addressed using focused interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ora Paltiel
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Aravah Keidar Tirosh
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Orit Paz Stostky
- Pharmacy Department, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Ronit Calderon-Margalit
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Arnon D Cohen
- Department of Quality Measurements and Research, Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Elran
- Quality Management Department, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Liora Valinsky
- Quality Department, Meuhedet Health Care, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Matz
- Community Health Services, Leumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michal Krieger
- Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Arye Ben Yehuda
- Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel.,Department of Internal Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dena H Jaffe
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Orly Manor
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cusumano VT, Corona E, Partida D, Yang L, Yu C, May FP. Patients without colonoscopic follow-up after abnormal fecal immunochemical tests are often unaware of the abnormal result and report several barriers to colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:115. [PMID: 32306919 PMCID: PMC7168865 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01262-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the second most commonly used colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modality in the United States; yet, follow-up of abnormal FIT results with diagnostic colonoscopy is underutilized. Our objective was to determine patient-reported barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy following abnormal FIT in an academic healthcare setting. Methods We included patients age 50–75 with an abnormal FIT result between 1/1/2015 and 10/31/2017 and no documented follow-up diagnostic colonoscopy. We abstracted demographic data from the electronic health record (EHR). Study personnel conducted telephone surveys with patients to confirm colonoscopy completion and elicit data on notification of FIT results and barriers to colonoscopy. We also provided brief verbal education about diagnostic colonoscopy. We calculated frequencies of demographic data and survey responses and compared survey responses by interest in colonoscopy after education. Results We surveyed 67 patients. Fifty-one were aware of the abnormal FIT result, and a majority learned of the abnormal FIT result by direct communication with providers (19, 37.3%) or EHR messaging (11, 21.6%). Overall, fifty-three patients (79.1%) confirmed lack of colonoscopy, citing provider-related (19, 35.8%), patient-related (16, 30.2%), system-related (1, 1.9%), or multifactorial (17, 32.1%) reasons. Lack of knowledge of FIT result (14, 26.4%) was most common. After brief education, 20 (37.7%) patients requested colonoscopy. Conclusion Patients with an abnormal FIT reported various multi-level barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal FIT, including knowledge of FIT results. When provided with brief education, participants expressed interest in diagnostic colonoscopy. Future efforts will evaluate interventions to improve colonoscopy follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivy T Cusumano
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Edgar Corona
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Diana Partida
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christine Yu
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. .,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. .,UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. .,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme? Eur J Cancer Prev 2019; 29:119-126. [PMID: 31724969 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was started in 2013, coordinated by the Centre for Cancer Detection (CCD) in cooperation with the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR). The CCD offers a biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to Flemish citizens aged 56-74 years and recommends a colonoscopy when screened positive by FIT. The study objective is to investigate sociodemographic differences in follow-up colonoscopy adherence after a positive FIT. METHODS Characteristics of the study population were derived by linkage of data from the CCD and BCR, linked with data of the Intermutualistic Agency and the Crossroads Bank for Social Security, resulting in aggregated tables to ensure anonymity. A total of 37 834 men and women aged 56-74 years with a positive FIT in 2013-2014 were included. Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy was calculated for age, sex, work intensity at household level, preferential reimbursement status, and first and current nationality. Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS Nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy was associated with increasing age, and was significantly higher in men [odds ratio (OR), 1.08], participants with a preferential reimbursement status (OR, 1.34), very low work intensity (OR, 1.41), no payed work (OR, 1.38) and other than Belgian nationality by birth (OR, 1.6-4.66). CONCLUSION Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FIT differs according to sociodemographic variables. Additional research is needed to explore reasons for nonadherence to colonoscopy and tackle barriers by exploring interventions to increase colonoscopy follow-up adherence after a positive FIT in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nadel MR, Royalty J, Joseph D, Rockwell T, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Gray SC, Shapiro JA. Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured. Prev Chronic Dis 2019; 16:E67. [PMID: 31146803 PMCID: PMC6549419 DOI: 10.5888/pcd16.180452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Screening can decrease colorectal cancer incidence and mortality and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Poor quality of colorectal cancer screening can negate the benefit of screening. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of screening services provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program from July 2009 through June 2015. Methods We collected data from the program’s 29 grantees, funded to provide colorectal cancer screening and diagnostic services to asymptomatic, low-income, and underinsured or uninsured adults aged 50 to 64. We collected data on the dates and results of all screening and diagnostic tests and, for colonoscopies, on whether the cecum was reached, whether bowel preparation was adequate, and endoscopists’ recommendations for the next test. Results Overall, 82.9% (range among grantees, 50.0%–97.2%) of positive FOBTs/FITs were followed up by colonoscopy; 95.2% of colonoscopies occurred within 180 days of the positive stool test. Cecal intubation rates ranged among grantees from 94.2% to 100%. Adenoma detection rates met recommended threshold levels for almost all grantees. Recommendations for rescreening and surveillance intervals deviated from guidelines in both directions. Of clients with normal colonoscopies, 85.3% (range, 37.7%–99.7%) were told to return in 10 years, as recommended in national guidelines. Of clients with advanced adenomas, 55.2% (range, 20.0%–84.6%) were told to return in 3 years as recommended, 25.4% (range, 3.8%–56.6%) in 5 or more years, and 18.6% (range, 0%–47.2%) in less than 3 years. Conclusion Although overall screening quality was good, it varied considerably. Ongoing monitoring to identify performance problems is essential for all colorectal cancer screening activities, so that efforts designed to improve performance can be targeted to individual clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion R Nadel
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mailstop S107-4, Chamblee, GA 30341.
| | - Janet Royalty
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Djenaba Joseph
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - William Helsel
- Information Management Services Inc, Calverton, Maryland
| | | | - Simone C Gray
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jean A Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context. BJGP Open 2019; 3:bjgpopen18X101631. [PMID: 31049411 PMCID: PMC6480863 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme, individuals receive a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to do at home. After a positive FIT result, a follow-up colonoscopy is recommended to identify CRC or advanced adenomas (AA). GPs may influence their patients’ decisions on adherence to follow-up by colonoscopy. Aim To explore GPs’ perspectives on the CRC screening programme and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients to follow up with the recommended colonoscopy. Design & setting Semi-structured interviews among GPs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Method GPs were approached using purposive sampling. Analysis was performed on 11 interviews using open coding and constant comparison. Results All interviewed GPs would recommend FIT-positive patients without obvious contraindications to adhere to a follow-up colonoscopy. If patients were likely to be distressed by a positive FIT result, most GPs described using reassurance strategies emphasising a low cancer probability. Most GPs stressed the probability of false-positive FIT results. Some described taking a positive screening result in CRC screening less seriously than one in breast cancer screening. Most GPs underestimated CRC and AA probabilities after a positive FIT result. When told the actual probabilities, some stated that this knowledge might change the way they would inform patients. Conclusion These results imply that some of the interviewed GPs have too low a perception of the risk associated with a positive FIT result, which might influence their patients’ decision-making. Simply informing GPs about the actual rates of CRC and AA found in the screening programme might improve this risk perception.
Collapse
|
13
|
Barriers to Follow-up Colonoscopies for Patients With Positive Results From Fecal Immunochemical Tests During Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:469-476. [PMID: 29857147 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Colorectal cancer is common yet largely preventable. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a highly recommended screening method, but patients with positive results must receive a follow-up colonoscopy to determine if they have precancerous or cancerous lesions. We characterized colonoscopic follow-up evaluations and reasons for lack of follow-up in a Veterans Affairs (VA) cohort. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients 50 to 75 years old with a positive FIT result from January 1, 2014, through May 31, 2016, in a network of 12 VAs sites in southern California. We determined the proportion of patients who received a follow-up colonoscopy, median time to colonoscopy, and colonoscopy findings. For patients who did not undergo colonoscopy, we determined the documented reason for lack of colonoscopy and factors associated with declining the colonoscopy examination. RESULTS Of the 10,635 FITs performed, 916 (8.6%) produced positive results; 569 of these (62.1%) were followed by colonoscopy. The median time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result was 83 days (interquartile range, 54-145 d), which did not vary between veterans who received a colonoscopy at a VA facility (81 d; interquartile range, 52-143 d) vs a non-VA site (87 d; interquartile range, 60-154 d) (P = .2). For the 347 veterans (37.9%) who did not undergo follow-up colonoscopy, the reasons were patient-related (49.3%), provider-related (16.4%), system-related (12.1%), or multifactorial (22.2%). Overall, patient decline of colonoscopy (35.2%) was the most common reason. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of veterans with positive results from FITs during CRC screening, reasons for lack of follow-up colonoscopy varied and included patient, provider, and system factors. These findings can be used to reduce barriers to follow-up colonoscopy and to address system-level challenges in scheduling and attrition for colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gandilhon C, Soler-Michel P, Vecchiato L, Chaunier C, Fay I, Walter T, Rivory J, Saurin JC, Ponchon T, Pioche M. A motivational phone call improves participation to screening colonoscopy for those with a positive FIT in a national screening programme (NCT 03276091). Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:1309-1314. [PMID: 30197186 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of individuals with a positive faecal immunologic test (FIT) will never undergo the recommended colonoscopy despite a full sequence of reminders. AIMS This prospective study aimed to recruit refractory individuals by a motivational personalised phone call given by a screening physician. METHODS We evaluated the impact of a motivational phone call given by a physician of the screening organisation in order to convince patients with positive FIT to undergo a colonoscopy. RESULTS 115 individuals with a positive FIT were targeted. After GP phone call, it was ascertained that 15 had had a colonoscopy, one died, one moved outside the region, and the GP refused the study phone call for 13. Finally, we attempted to call 85 individuals; 24 could not be reached, 5 colonoscopies had been performed, and thus 56 individuals were included. The main reason for colonoscopy refusal (33.9%) was wrong advice from the GP or the gastroenterologist. Among those included, 33.9% (19/56) underwent the colonoscopy within 22.7 months after FIT; 1 invasive cancer, 18 adenomas and 9 serrated sessile lesions were found. CONCLUSION Motivational phone call performed by a physician from the screening organisation is effective to recruit a third of refractory individuals. Education for GPs and gastroenterologists is necessary to increase participation to colonoscopy and to avoid the performance of an inappropriate secondary FIT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT 03276091.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémentine Gandilhon
- Lyon 1 University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France; Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; Departmental Screening Management Association Rhône, Lyon, France.
| | | | - Léa Vecchiato
- Departmental Screening Management Association Rhône, Lyon, France
| | - Claude Chaunier
- Departmental Screening Management Association Rhône, Lyon, France
| | | | - Thomas Walter
- Oncology Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Lyon 1 University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France; Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Lyon 1 University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France; Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; Inserm U1032, LabTau, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Lyon 1 University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France; Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; Inserm U1032, LabTau, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Llovet D, Serenity M, Conn LG, Bravo CA, McCurdy BR, Dubé C, Baxter NN, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Peters A, Tinmouth J. Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1872-1880. [PMID: 30361625 PMCID: PMC6768592 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0381-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Follow-up colonoscopy rates among persons with positive fecal occult blood test results (FOBT + ) remain suboptimal in many jurisdictions. In Ontario, Canada, primary care providers (PCPs) are responsible for arranging follow-up colonoscopies. The objectives were to understand the reasons for a lack of follow-up colonoscopy and any action plans to address follow-up. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 FOBT+ persons and 30 PCPs in Ontario. Eligible FOBT+ persons were identified through administrative databases and included those aged 50-74, with a 6-12 month old FOBT+, no follow-up colonoscopy, and no prior colorectal cancer diagnosis or colectomy. Eligible PCPs had ≥1 rostered FOBT+ person without follow-up colonoscopy. Transcripts were analyzed inductively using Nvivo 11 (QSR International Pty Ltd., 2015). RESULTS Reasons for lack of follow-up colonoscopy were: person and/or provider believed the FOBT + was a false positive; person was afraid of colonoscopy; person had other health issues; and breakdown in communication of FOBT+ results or colonoscopy appointments. PCPs who initially recommended follow-up colonoscopy did not change the minds of the persons who dismissed the FOBT+ as a false positive and/or who were afraid of the procedure. These FOBT+ persons negotiated an alternative follow-up action plan including repeating the FOBT or not following-up. CONCLUSIONS PCPs may not adequately counsel FOBT+ persons who believe the FOBT+ is a false positive and/or fear colonoscopy. PCPs may lack fail-safe systems to communicate FOBT+ results and colonoscopy appointments. Using navigators may help address these barriers and increase follow-up rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Llovet
- 1Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.,2Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Lesley Gotlib Conn
- 2Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,3Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Catherine Dubé
- 1Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.,4Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- 5Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,6Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- 2Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,7Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- 1Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.,8Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Jill Tinmouth
- 1Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.,8Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Multi-Level Fit-Based Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Managed Care Population. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018; 9:177. [PMID: 30177700 PMCID: PMC6120887 DOI: 10.1038/s41424-018-0046-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common but largely preventable disease with suboptimal screening rates despite national guidelines to screen individuals age 50–75. Single-component interventions aimed to improve screening uptake only modestly improve rates; data suggest that multi-modal approaches may be more effective. Methods We designed, implemented, and evaluated the impact of a multi-modal intervention on CRC screening uptake among unscreened patients in a large managed care population. Patient-level components included a mailed letter with education about screening options and pre-colonoscopy telephone counseling. For providers, we facilitated communication of screening test results and work-flow for abnormal results. System-level modifications included establishment of a patient navigator, expedited work-up for abnormal results, and stream-lined colonoscopy scheduling. We measured the rate of screening uptake overall, screening uptake by modality, change in the proportion of the population screened, and positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) follow-up rates in the 1-year study period. Results There were 5093 patients in the intervention cohort. Of these, 33.2% participated in FIT or colonoscopy screening within 1 year of the mailing. A total of 1078 (21.2%) participants completed a FIT and 611 (12.0%) completed a screening colonoscopy. The screening rate in the managed care population increased from 65.1 to 76.6%. Fifty-nine patients (5.5%) had a positive FIT, of which 30 (50.8%) completed a diagnostic colonoscopy. Conclusion Multi-modal interventions can result in substantial improvement in CRC screening uptake in large and diverse managed care populations. Translational Impact Health systems should shift their focus from single-level to multi-level interventions when addressing barriers to CRC screening.
Collapse
|
17
|
Partin MR, Gravely AA, Burgess JF, Haggstrom DA, Lillie SE, Nelson DB, Nugent SM, Shaukat A, Sultan S, Walter LC, Burgess DJ. Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results. Cancer 2017; 123:3502-3512. [PMID: 28493543 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Revised: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening. METHODS In total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS Roughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening). CONCLUSIONS In the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa R Partin
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amy A Gravely
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - James F Burgess
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Haggstrom
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sarah E Lillie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David B Nelson
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Sean M Nugent
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gupta S, Nodora J. Optimizing the Quality of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Continuum: A Call to Action. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:2740721. [PMID: 28376229 PMCID: PMC5441292 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Gupta
- Affiliations of authors: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA (SG); UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA (SG, JN); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA (SG); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA (JN)
| | - Jesse Nodora
- Affiliations of authors: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA (SG); UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA (SG, JN); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA (SG); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA (JN)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Plumb AA, Ghanouni A, Rainbow S, Djedovic N, Marshall S, Stein J, Taylor SA, Halligan S, Lyratzopoulos G, von Wagner C. Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test. J Med Screen 2017; 24:12-19. [PMID: 27216771 DOI: 10.1177/0969141316645629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Screening participants with abnormal faecal occult blood test results who do not attend further testing are at high risk of colorectal cancer, yet little is known about their reasons for non-attendance. Methods We conducted a medical record review of 170 patients from two English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme centres who had abnormal guaiac faecal occult blood test screening tests between November 2011 and April 2013 but did not undergo colonoscopy. Using information from patient records, we coded and categorized reasons for non-attendance. Results Of the 170 patients, 82 were eligible for review, of whom 66 had at least one recorded reason for lack of colonoscopy follow-up. Reasons fell into seven main categories: (i) other commitments, (ii) unwillingness to have the test, (iii) a feeling that the faecal occult blood test result was a false positive, (iv) another health issue taking priority, (v) failing to complete bowel preparation, (vi) practical barriers (e.g. lack of transport), and (vii) having had or planning colonoscopy elsewhere. The most common single reasons were unwillingness to have a colonoscopy and being away. Conclusions We identify a range of apparent reasons for colonoscopy non-attendance after a positive faecal occult blood test screening. Education regarding the interpretation of guaiac faecal occult blood test findings, offer of alternative confirmatory test options, and flexibility in the timing or location of subsequent testing might decrease non-attendance of diagnostic testing following positive faecal occult blood test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Plumb
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Ghanouni
- 2 Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandra Rainbow
- 3 London Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Natasha Djedovic
- 3 London Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Sarah Marshall
- 4 St Marks Screening Centre, St Marks Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Judith Stein
- 5 University College Screening Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dalton ARH. Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 40:e46-e58. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
21
|
Abstract
In recent years, the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders, including screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), has been recognized as very important. The available data indicate that PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines because a number of factors have been identified as significant barriers to the proper application of CRC screening guidelines. These factors include lack of time, patient reluctance, and challenges related to scheduling colonoscopy. Further positive engagement of PCPs with CRC screening is required to overcome these barriers and reach acceptable levels in screening rates. To meet the expectations of modern medicine, PCPs should not only be able to recommend occult blood testing or colonoscopy but also, under certain conditions, able to perform colonoscopy. In this review, the authors aim to provide the current knowledge of the role of PCPs in increasing the rate and successfully implementing a screening program for CRC by applying the relevant international guidelines.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chubak J, Garcia MP, Burnett-Hartman AN, Zheng Y, Corley DA, Halm EA, Singal AG, Klabunde CN, Doubeni CA, Kamineni A, Levin TR, Schottinger JE, Green BB, Quinn VP, Rutter CM. Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25:344-50. [PMID: 26843520 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce colorectal cancer mortality, positive fecal blood tests must be followed by colonoscopy. METHODS We identified 62,384 individuals ages 50 to 89 years with a positive fecal blood test between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 in four health care systems within the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium. We estimated the probability of follow-up colonoscopy and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall differences in cumulative incidence of follow-up across health care systems were assessed with the log-rank test. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Most patients who received a colonoscopy did so within 6 months of their positive fecal blood test, although follow-up rates varied across health care systems (P <0.001). Median days to colonoscopy ranged from 41 (95% CI, 40-41) to 174 (95% CI, 123-343); percent followed-up by 12 months ranged from 58.1% (95% CI, 51.6%-63.7%) to 83.8% (95% CI, 83.4%-84.3%) and differences across health care systems were also observed at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. Increasing age and comorbidity score were associated with lower follow-up rates. CONCLUSION Individual characteristics and health care system were associated with colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests. Patterns were consistent across health care systems, but proportions of patients receiving follow-up varied. These findings suggest that there is room to improve follow-up of positive colorectal cancer screening tests. IMPACT Understanding the timing of colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests and characteristics associated with lack of follow-up may inform future efforts to improve follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea N Burnett-Hartman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Ethan A Halm
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA, Skinner CS, McCallister K, Sanders JM, Bishop WP, Agrawal D, Mayorga CA, Ahn C, Loewen AC, Santini NO, Halm EA. Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer 2015; 122:456-63. [PMID: 26535565 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Revised: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is limited by underuse, particularly among underserved populations. Among a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged cohort of patients, the authors compared the effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and colonoscopy outreach to increase screening participation rates, compared with usual visit-based care. METHODS Patients aged 50 to 64 years who were not up-to-date with CRC screening but used primary care services in a large safety-net health system were randomly assigned to mailed FIT outreach (2400 patients), mailed colonoscopy outreach (2400 patients), or usual care with opportunistic visit-based screening (1199 patients). Patients who did not respond to outreach invitations within 2 weeks received follow-up telephone reminders. The primary outcome was CRC screening completion within 12 months after randomization. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics across the 3 groups were similar. Using intention-to-screen analysis, screening participation rates were higher for FIT outreach (58.8%) and colonoscopy outreach (42.4%) than usual care (29.6%) (P <.001 for both). Screening participation with FIT outreach was higher than that for colonoscopy outreach (P <.001). Among responders, FIT outreach had a higher percentage of patients who responded before reminders (59.0% vs 29.7%; P <.001). Nearly one-half of patients in the colonoscopy outreach group crossed over to complete FIT via usual care, whereas <5% of patients in the FIT outreach group underwent usual-care colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Mailed outreach invitations appear to significantly increase CRC screening rates among underserved populations. In the current study, FIT-based outreach was found to be more effective than colonoscopy-based outreach to increase 1-time screening participation. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to compare the effectiveness of outreach strategies for promoting completion of the entire screening process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Samir Gupta
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, California.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Katharine McCallister
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Joanne M Sanders
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wendy Pechero Bishop
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Christian A Mayorga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Adam C Loewen
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Correia A, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN, Paszat LF, Sutradhar R, Yun L, Tinmouth J. Lack of follow-up colonoscopy after positive FOBT in an organized colorectal cancer screening program is associated with modifiable health care practices. Prev Med 2015; 76:115-22. [PMID: 25895843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Revised: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/21/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ColonCancerCheck (CCC), Ontario's organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, uses guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT). To reduce CRC-related mortality, persons with a positive gFOBT must have colonoscopy. We identified factors associated with failure to have colonoscopy within 6months of a positive gFOBT. METHODS Population-based, retrospective cohort analysis of CCC participants with positive gFOBT (April 2008 to December 2009) using health administrative data. Patient, physician and health care utilization factors associated with a lack of follow-up colonoscopy were identified using descriptive and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There were 21,839 participants with a positive gFOBT; 14,091 (64%) had colonoscopy within 6months. The strongest factors associated with failure to follow-up were recent colonoscopy (in 2years prior vs. >10years or never, OR: 4.31, 95% C.I.: 3.82, 4.86), as well as repeat gFOBT (OR: 6.08, 95% C.I.: 5.46, 6.78) and hospital admission (OR: 4.35, 95% C.I.: 3.57, 5.26) in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION In the first 18months of the CCC Program, 1/3 of those with a positive gFOBT did not have colonoscopy within 6months. Identification of potentially modifiable factors associated with failure to follow up lay the groundwork for interventions to address this critical quality gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Correia
- Credit Valley Hospital, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lawrence F Paszat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Lingsong Yun
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lotan Y, Svatek RS, Krabbe LM, Xylinas E, Klatte T, Shariat SF. Prospective External Validation of a Bladder Cancer Detection Model. J Urol 2014; 192:1343-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert S. Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zai AH, Kim S, Kamis A, Hung K, Ronquillo JG, Chueh HC, Atlas SJ. Applying operations research to optimize a novel population management system for cancer screening. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21:e129-35. [PMID: 24043318 PMCID: PMC3957383 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Revised: 08/22/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To optimize a new visit-independent, population-based cancer screening system (TopCare) by using operations research techniques to simulate changes in patient outreach staffing levels (delegates, navigators), modifications to user workflow within the information technology (IT) system, and changes in cancer screening recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS TopCare was modeled as a multiserver, multiphase queueing system. Simulation experiments implemented the queueing network model following a next-event time-advance mechanism, in which systematic adjustments were made to staffing levels, IT workflow settings, and cancer screening frequency in order to assess their impact on overdue screenings per patient. RESULTS TopCare reduced the average number of overdue screenings per patient from 1.17 at inception to 0.86 during simulation to 0.23 at steady state. Increases in the workforce improved the effectiveness of TopCare. In particular, increasing the delegate or navigator staff level by one person improved screening completion rates by 1.3% or 12.2%, respectively. In contrast, changes in the amount of time a patient entry stays on delegate and navigator lists had little impact on overdue screenings. Finally, lengthening the screening interval increased efficiency within TopCare by decreasing overdue screenings at the patient level, resulting in a smaller number of overdue patients needing delegates for screening and a higher fraction of screenings completed by delegates. CONCLUSIONS Simulating the impact of changes in staffing, system parameters, and clinical inputs on the effectiveness and efficiency of care can inform the allocation of limited resources in population management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian H Zai
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seokjin Kim
- Information Systems and Operations Management, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arnold Kamis
- Information Systems and Operations Management, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ken Hung
- Information Systems and Operations Management, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeremiah G Ronquillo
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Henry C Chueh
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven J Atlas
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ishikawa Y, Zheng YF, Nishiuchi H, Suda T, Hasumi T, Saito H. Classification tree analysis to enhance targeting for follow-up exam of colorectal cancer screening. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:470. [PMID: 24112563 PMCID: PMC3852589 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up rate after a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is low worldwide. In order to increase the follow-up rate, segmentation of the target population has been proposed as a promising strategy, because an intervention can then be tailored toward specific subgroups of the population rather than using one type of intervention for all groups. The aim of this study is to identify subgroups that share the same patterns of characteristics related to follow-up exams after FOBT. METHODS The study sample consisted of 143 patients aged 50-69 years who were requested to undergo follow-up exams after FOBT. A classification tree analysis was performed, using the follow-up rate as a dependent variable and sociodemographic variables, psychological variables, past FOBT and follow-up exam, family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), and history of bowel disease as predictive variables. RESULTS The follow-up rate in 143 participants was 74.1% (n = 106). A classification tree analysis identified four subgroups as follows; (1) subgroup with a high degree of fear of CRC, unemployed and with a history of bowel disease (n = 24, 100.0% follow-up rate), (2) subgroup with a high degree of fear of CRC, unemployed and with no history of bowel disease (n = 17, 82.4% follow-up rate), (3) subgroup with a high degree of fear of CRC and employed (n = 24, 66.7% follow-up rate), and (4) subgroup with a low degree of fear of CRC (n = 78, 66.7% follow-up rate). CONCLUSION The identification of four subgroups with a diverse range of follow-up rates for CRC screening indicates the direction to take in future development of an effective tailored intervention strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiki Ishikawa
- Screening Assessment & Management Division, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Colorectal cancer screening: factors associated with colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood test. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:1437-44. [PMID: 23989948 PMCID: PMC3776987 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/25/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contextual socio-economic factors, health-care access, and general practitioner (GP) involvement may influence colonoscopy uptake and its timing after positive faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Our objectives were to identify predictors of delayed or no colonoscopy and to assess the role for GPs in colonoscopy uptake. METHODS We included all residents of a French district with positive FOBTs (n = 2369) during one of the two screening rounds (2007-2010). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify individual and area-level predictors of delayed colonoscopy, no colonoscopy, and no information on colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 998 (45.2%) individuals underwent early, 989 (44.8%) delayed, and 102 (4.6%) no colonoscopy; no information was available for 119 (5.4%) individuals. Delayed colonoscopy was independently associated with first FOBT (odds ratio, (OR)), 1.61; 95% confidence interval ((95% CI), 1.16-2.25); and no colonoscopy and no information with first FOBT (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02-3.97), FOBT kit not received from the GP (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.67-3.14), and socio-economically deprived area (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.98-5.08). Colonoscopy uptake varied significantly across GPs (P=0.01). CONCLUSION Socio-economic factors, GP-related factors, and history of previous FOBT influenced colonoscopy uptake after a positive FOBT. Interventions should target GPs and individuals performing their first screening FOBT and/or living in socio-economically deprived areas.
Collapse
|
29
|
Singal AG, Tiro JA, Gupta S. Improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applying lessons from colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11. [PMID: 23200983 PMCID: PMC3610769 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening is a complex process, with failure at any step in the process contributing to a gap between its efficacy and effectiveness. Important lessons can be learned from colorectal cancer (CRC) screening studies to improve the HCC screening process in clinical practice. Lack of provider recommendations is a barrier for both CRC and HCC screening; however, under-recognition of at-risk individuals appears to be unique to HCC. Future HCC screening interventions should help providers identify at-risk patients as well as promote ordering of HCC screening among those with cirrhosis. Patient adherence, a well-recognized barrier to CRC screening, does not appear to be a major issue in HCC screening. Poor patient adherence may become an important factor in the future when upstream provider-level factors are addressed. Other steps in the screening process, including radiology capacity and timely follow-up, have been demonstrated as barriers for CRC screening but have yet to be assessed for HCC screening. Overall, many lessons learned from challenges to CRC screening can be applied to rapidly optimize HCC screening delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-8887, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ashing-Giwa K, Rosales M. Evaluation of therapeutic care delay among Latina- and European-American cervical cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 128:160-5. [PMID: 23168174 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2012] [Revised: 11/08/2012] [Accepted: 11/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cervical cancer (CCA) ranks among the deadliest of cancers. Globally CCA claims 275,000 lives yearly. Severe delays, in cancer diagnostic or therapeutic care, that approach ≥ 60 days negatively affect survival and survivorship outcomes. This study investigated socioeconomic and healthcare system factors influencing therapeutic care delays among cervical cancer survivors (CCS). METHODS 291 CCS (132 European-, 50 English-proficient (EP) Latina- and 109 limited English-proficient (LEP) Latina-Americans) were recruited from cancer registries. CCS retrospectively noted the days of delay in obtaining therapeutic care and reasons for delays. RESULTS CCS who were LEP Latina-Americans, had lower income and education reported severe therapeutic delays (≥ 60 days). LEP Latina-Americans experienced delays due to financial issues, doctor's delay, and healthcare system issues (p < 0.001). Doctor and healthcare system delays significantly influenced therapeutic care delay in the logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare system delays are primary contributors to ethnic differences in access to appropriately-timed care observed in this study. Healthcare professionals need to develop a fuller appreciation of the multilevel factors that contribute to healthcare barriers to better inform effective interventions to increase access to life saving care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimlin Ashing-Giwa
- Center of Community Alliance for Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010-3000, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bringing an organizational perspective to the optimal number of colorectal cancer screening options debate. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:376-80. [PMID: 21915765 PMCID: PMC3286551 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1870-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2011] [Revised: 08/03/2011] [Accepted: 08/29/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Improving colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates represents a challenge for primary care providers. Some have argued that offering a choice of CRC screening modes to patients will improve the currently low adherence rates. Others have raised concerns that offering numerous CRC screening options in practice could overwhelm patients and thus dampen enthusiasm for screening. In this article we assemble evidence to critically evaluate the relative merit of these opposing views. We find little evidence to support the hypothesis that the number of options offered will affect adherence (either positively or negatively), or that expanding the modalities offered beyond FOBT and colonoscopy will improve patient satisfaction. Therefore, we assert future decisions about the number of CRC screening modes to offer would more productively be focused on considerations such as what benefit the health-care organization would derive from offering additional modes, and how this change would affect other critical components of a successful screening program such as timely diagnosis. In light of these organizational level considerations, we agree with the assertion made by others that a screening program limited to FOBT and colonoscopy is likely to be ideal in most settings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Menon U, Belue R, Wahab S, Rugen K, Kinney AY, Maramaldi P, Wujcik D, Szalacha LA. A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Ann Behav Med 2011; 42:294-303. [PMID: 21826576 PMCID: PMC3232176 DOI: 10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with high survival rates; screening prevalence, however, remains suboptimal. PURPOSE This study seeks to test the hypothesis that participants receiving telephone-based tailored education or motivational interviewing had higher colorectal cancer screening completion rates compared to usual care. METHODS Primary care patients not adherent with colorectal cancer screening and with no personal or family history of cancer (n = 515) were assigned by block randomization to control (n = 169), tailored education (n = 168), or motivational interview (n = 178). The response rate was 70%; attrition was 24%. RESULTS Highest screening occurred in the tailored education group (23.8%, p < .02); participants had 2.2 times the odds of completing a post-intervention colorectal cancer screening than did the control group (AOR = 2.2, CI = 1.2-4.0). Motivational interviewing was not associated with significant increase in post-intervention screening. CONCLUSIONS Tailored education showed promise as a feasible strategy to increase colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Menon
- College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University
| | | | | | | | - Anita Y. Kinney
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah
| | - Peter Maramaldi
- Simmons College School of Social Work, Harvard Medical School
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nielsen HJ, Jakobsen KV, Christensen IJ, Brünner N. Screening for colorectal cancer: possible improvements by risk assessment evaluation? Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46:1283-94. [PMID: 21854094 PMCID: PMC3205805 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.610002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2011] [Revised: 06/24/2011] [Accepted: 07/07/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Emerging results indicate that screening improves survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Therefore, screening programs are already implemented or are being considered for implementation in Asia, Europe and North America. At present, a great variety of screening methods are available including colono- and sigmoidoscopy, CT- and MR-colonography, capsule endoscopy, DNA and occult blood in feces, and so on. The pros and cons of the various tests, including economic issues, are debated. Although a plethora of evaluated and validated tests even with high specificities and reasonable sensitivities are available, an international consensus on screening procedures is still not established. The rather limited compliance in present screening procedures is a significant drawback. Furthermore, some of the procedures are costly and, therefore, selection methods for these procedures are needed. Current research into improvements of screening for colorectal cancer includes blood-based biological markers, such as proteins, DNA and RNA in combination with various demographically and clinically parameters into a "risk assessment evaluation" (RAE) test. It is assumed that such a test may lead to higher acceptance among the screening populations, and thereby improve the compliances. Furthermore, the involvement of the media, including social media, may add even more individuals to the screening programs. Implementation of validated RAE and progressively improved screening methods may reform the cost/benefit of screening procedures for colorectal cancer. Therefore, results of present research, validating RAE tests, are awaited with interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans J Nielsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kistler CE, Kirby KA, Lee D, Casadei MA, Walter LC. Long-term outcomes following positive fecal occult blood test results in older adults: benefits and burdens. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 171:1344-51. [PMID: 21555655 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, older adults have low rates of follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) result. The long-term outcomes of these real world practices and their associated benefits and burdens are unknown. METHODS Longitudinal cohort study of 212 patients 70 years or older with a positive FOBT result at 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities in 2001 and followed up through 2008. We determined the frequency of downstream outcomes during the 7 years of follow-up, including procedures, colonoscopic findings, outcomes of treatment, complications, and mortality based on chart review and national VA and Medicare data. Net burden or benefit from screening and follow-up was determined according to each patient's life expectancy. Life expectancy was classified into 3 categories: best (age, 70-79 years and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index [CCI], 0), average, and worst (age, 70-84 years and CCI, ≥4 or age, ≥85 years and CCI, ≥1). RESULTS Fifty-six percent of patients received follow-up colonoscopy (118 of 212), which found 34 significant adenomas and 6 cancers. Ten percent experienced complications from colonoscopy or cancer treatment (12 of 118). Forty-six percent of those without follow-up colonoscopy died of other causes within 5 years of FOBT (43 of 94), while 3 died of colorectal cancer within 5 years. Eighty-seven percent of patients with worst life expectancy experienced a net burden from screening (26 of 30) as did 70% with average life expectancy (92 of 131) and 65% with best life expectancy (35 of 51) (P = .048 for trend). CONCLUSIONS Over a 7-year period, older adults with best life expectancy were less likely to experience a net burden from current screening and follow-up practices than are those with worst life expectancy. The net burden could be decreased by better targeting FOBT screening and follow-up to healthy older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Kistler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7595, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carlson CM, Kirby KA, Casadei MA, Partin MR, Kistler CE, Walter LC. Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 171:249-56. [PMID: 20937917 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether lack of follow-up after screening fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in older adults is due to screening patients whose comorbidity or preferences do not permit follow-up vs failure to complete follow-up in healthy patients. METHODS A prospective cohort study of 2410 patients 70 years or older screened with FOBT was conducted at 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) medical centers from January 1 to December 31, 2001. The main outcome measure was receipt of follow-up within 1 year of FOBT based on national VA and Medicare data. For patients with positive FOBT results, age and Charlson comorbidity scores were evaluated as potential predictors of receiving a complete colon evaluation (colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema), and medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for lack of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 212 patients (9%) had positive FOBT results; 42% received a complete colon evaluation within 1 year. Age and comorbidity were not associated with receipt of a complete follow-up, which was similar among patients 70 to 74 years old with a Charlson score of 0 compared with patients 80 years or older with a Charlson score of 1 or higher (48% vs 41%; P=.28). The VA site, number of positive FOBT cards, and number of VA outpatient visits were predictors. Of 122 patients who did not receive a complete follow-up within 1 year, 38% had documentation that comorbidity or preferences did not permit follow-up, and over the next 5 years 76% never received a complete follow-up. CONCLUSIONS While follow-up after positive FOBT results was low regardless of age or comorbidity, screening patients in whom complete evaluation would not be pursued substantially contributes to lack of follow-up. Efforts to improve follow-up should address the full chain of decision making, including decisions to screen and decisions to follow up.
Collapse
|
36
|
Nadel MR, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde CN, Smith RA, Coughlin SS, White MC. Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25:833-9. [PMID: 20383599 PMCID: PMC2896587 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1328-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2009] [Revised: 02/08/2010] [Accepted: 02/15/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up. OBJECTIVE To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests. DESIGN Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians. PARTICIPANTS Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening. MAIN MEASURES Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results. RESULTS Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0% and 8.9%, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9% of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9% report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8%) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6%). Only 44.3% of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return. CONCLUSIONS Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion R Nadel
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Elias K, Svatek RS, Gupta S, Ho R, Lotan Y. High-risk patients with hematuria are not evaluated according to guideline recommendations. Cancer 2010; 116:2954-9. [PMID: 20564400 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine whether high-risk patients with hematuria receive evaluation according to guideline recommendations. METHODS We recently performed a screening study for bladder cancer using a urine-based tumor marker in 1502 subjects at high risk based on aged > or = 50 years, > or = 10-year smoking history, and/or a 15-year or more environmental exposure. We evaluated use of urinalysis (UA) within 3 years preceding the screening study. Chart review was performed to determine if this subset with microhematuria received any additional evaluation. RESULTS Of 1502 study participants, routine urinalysis was performed in 73.2% and 164 (14.9%) subjects had documented hematuria (>3 red blood cells / high-power field) before inclusion. Of these, 42.1% had no further evaluation. Additional testing included repeat urinalysis (36%), urine culture (15.2%), cytology (10.4%), imaging (22.6% overall: 15.9% computed tomography, 4.3% intravenous pyelography; 2.4% magnetic resonance imaging), and cystoscopy (12.8%). Three subjects with microscopic hematuria (2%) were subsequently found to have bladder cancer during the screening study but were not referred for evaluation based on their hematuria. The source of hematuria was unknown in 65%, infection in 22%, benign prostatic enlargement in 10%, and renal stone disease in 4%, but these results are based on incomplete evaluation since only 12.8% underwent cystoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Subjects at high risk for bladder cancer based on > or = 10 years of smoking or environmental exposure with microscopic hematuria are rarely evaluated thoroughly and only 12.8% were referred for urologic evaluation. Further studies are needed to evaluate both the utilization and effectiveness of guidelines for hematuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Elias
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zapka J, Taplin SH, Price RA, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010; 2010:58-71. [PMID: 20386054 PMCID: PMC3731434 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
To achieve the benefit of cancer screening, appropriate follow-up of abnormal screening test results must occur. Such follow-up requires traversing the transition between screening detection and diagnosis, including several steps and interfaces in care. This article reviews factors and interventions associated with follow-up of abnormal tests for cervical, breast and colorectal cancers. We synthesized 12 reviews of descriptive and intervention studies published between 1980 and 2008. There was wide variability in definition of follow-up, setting, study population, and reported prevalence rates. Correlates of follow-up included patient characteristics (eg, knowledge and age), social support, provider characteristics, practice (eg, having reminders systems), community and professional norms (eg, quality measures), and policy (eg, federal programs). Effective interventions included patient education and support; delivery systems design changes, such as navigation; and information system changes, most notably patient tracking and physician reminders. Few studies focused explicitly on interfaces and steps of care, such as communication between primary care and specialists, or simultaneously targeted the multilevel factors that affect care. Future practice and research priorities should include development of clear operational definitions of the steps and interfaces related to patients, providers, and organizations; reflect evolving guidelines and new technologies; determine priorities for intervention testing; and improve measures and apply appropriate study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Zapka
- Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Singh H, Wilson L, Petersen LA, Sawhney MK, Reis B, Espadas D, Sittig DF. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009; 9:49. [PMID: 20003236 PMCID: PMC2797509 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2009] [Accepted: 12/09/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early detection of colorectal cancer through timely follow-up of positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBTs) remains a challenge. In our previous work, we found 40% of positive FOBT results eligible for colonoscopy had no documented response by a treating clinician at two weeks despite procedures for electronic result notification. We determined if technical and/or workflow-related aspects of automated communication in the electronic health record could lead to the lack of response. Methods Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, we evaluated positive FOBT communication in the electronic health record of a large, urban facility between May 2008 and March 2009. We identified the source of test result communication breakdown, and developed an intervention to fix the problem. Explicit medical record reviews measured timely follow-up (defined as response within 30 days of positive FOBT) pre- and post-intervention. Results Data from 11 interviews and tracking information from 490 FOBT alerts revealed that the software intended to alert primary care practitioners (PCPs) of positive FOBT results was not configured correctly and over a third of positive FOBTs were not transmitted to PCPs. Upon correction of the technical problem, lack of timely follow-up decreased immediately from 29.9% to 5.4% (p < 0.01) and was sustained at month 4 following the intervention. Conclusion Electronic communication of positive FOBT results should be monitored to avoid limiting colorectal cancer screening benefits. Robust quality assurance and oversight systems are needed to achieve this. Our methods may be useful for others seeking to improve follow-up of FOBTs in their systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- The Center of Inquiry to Improve Outpatient Safety Through Effective Electronic Communication, VA Medical Center (152) 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
|
42
|
|