Long-term persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein-specific and neutralizing antibodies in recovered COVID-19 patients

Nucleocapsid-directed antibody testing is unsuitable to estimate hybrid immunity against SARS-CoV-2, a longitudinal cross-border study in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion

INTRODUCTION

Understanding immunity from previous natural SARS-CoV-2 infection is important for booster vaccination strategies. A longitudinal study conducted in 2021 within the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion, bordering the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany, aimed to assess seroprevalence of spike-directed (anti-S) and nucleocapsid-directed (anti-N) antibodies to demonstrate immunity as a result of both vaccination and natural infection (hybrid immunity), and to evaluate the dynamics of the anti-N response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Questionnaires and self-finger-prick blood samples from 3110 participants were collected at two time points: weeks 22-29 (June-July, round 1) and weeks 40-45 (October-November, round 2) of 2021. Individuals with anti-S antibodies were additionally tested for anti-N antibodies.

RESULTS

In total, 4366 samples tested positive for anti-S; n = 1291 for round 1 and n = 3075 for round 2. Of these, 10.1 % of Dutch (32/316), 3.1 % of Belgian (9/294), and 2.8 % of German participants (13/466) were anti-N positive in round 1 (p < 0.001). In round 2, this was 4.6 % (69/1510), 3.3 % (20/607), and 1.5 % (14/912), respectively (p < 0.001). In 45.1 % (23/51) of anti-N positive participants in round 1, the result reversed to negative in round 2. In 42.1 % (16/38) of anti-N positive participants with a self-reported positive PCR result, anti-N reversed to negative in round 2.

CONCLUSION

Variations in anti-N seroprevalence across EMR countries may reflect differences in vaccination campaign enrollment. Over 40 % of participants experienced seroreversion of anti-N within six months, indicating anti-N testing is unsuitable for diagnosing past infection or estimating hybrid immunity within a population. However, anti-N testing may be used as a proxy for increased circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in a population.

A multicentre study comparing post-mortem SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in Cape Town mortuaries

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was recognised as a global pandemic in 2019, yet the exact number of infections is still unclear. In addition, there is limited research on post-mortem antibody testing.

Objectives

This study sought to evaluate the use of the SureScreen COVID-19 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM Rapid Test Cassette in deceased individuals by comparing it to the gold-standard antibody tests in South Africa, and to identify the most appropriate antibody testing method for post-mortem samples.

Method

Between May 2021 and February 2023, fifty cases, with suspected COVID-19 infection during their lifetime, were recruited from Tygerberg Mortuary and Salt River Mortuary, after obtaining informed consent from their next-of-kin. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was confirmed through antemortem positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (PCP) tests in 39 participants. Blood samples were collected during autopsies in serum separator tubes, which yielded better separation when centrifuged immediately after collection. The SureScreen test was performed alongside Roche Diagnostics Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays.

Results

Among the confirmed PCP cases, Elecsys demonstrated the highest sensitivity (97.1%) followed by SureScreen IgG (82.1%). In a logistic regression analysis, PCP confirmation was significantly associated with the SureScreen IgG results (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, Roche's Elecsys had the highest yield of positive results on our cohort of post-mortem serum samples, followed by SureScreen, and finally, Abbott's Architect assay.

Contribution

These results suggest that the SureScreen test has potential as a screening tool in mortuary settings, with Roche's Elecsys assay recommended for diagnostic confirmation.

Determinants and dynamics of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Poland

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to assess the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in population and in convalescents 6 months after infection with COVID-19.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 2 groups, i.e. group I: 232 post-COVID-19 patients, and group II: 544 patients from a population cohort. Detection of anti-N antibodies was performed with Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and anti-S antibodies with LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG tests.

RESULTS

After the Omicron wave, gradual increase in the prevalence of the analyzed antibodies was observed in the general population - up to 92.5 ​% of anti-S and 69.7 ​% of anti-N antibodies. In the COVID-19 convalescents, 6 months after infection, 4.3 ​% and 3.7 ​% did not generate significant titers of anti-S and anti-N antibodies, respectively. Among patients, who were vaccinated, 1 ​% did not generate anti-S antibodies. The median age of non-responders was higher than that of responders. Sex did not influence the results. Comparison of anti-N and anti-S antibodies 6 months after infection in the whole group showed higher anti-N titer in patients who suffered from the disease than in the general population. In the general population, 17.4 ​% of participants had anti-N antibodies, and 9 ​% had anti-S antibodies, despite no prior vaccination or history of COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

High prevalence of anti-N antibodies in patients reporting no history of COVID-19 during last wave, even after official end of the pandemic suggests high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and frequent asymptomatic or unspecific COVID-19, what is of high importance from the public health perspective.

Dynamic modeling of antibody repertoire reshaping in response to viral infections

For decades, research has largely focused on the generation of high-affinity, antigen-specific antibodies during viral infections. This emphasis has made it challenging for immunologists to systematically evaluate the mechanisms initiating humoral immunity in specific immune responses. In this study, we employ ordinary differential equations (ODE) to investigate the dynamic reshaping of the entire antibody repertoire in response to viral infections. Our findings demonstrate that the host's antibody atlas undergoes significant restructuring during these infections by the selective expansion of antibody pools with strong binding activity. The simulation results indicate that the ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) outcomes do not directly reflect the levels of specific neutralizing antibodies, but rather represent a quantitative response of the reshaped antibody repertoire following infection. Our model transcends traditional theories of immune memory, providing an explanation for the sustained presence of specific antibodies in the human body in long term. Additionally, our model extends to explore the mechanistic basis of the original antigenic sin, providing practical applications of our framework. One important application of this model is that it indicates that antibodies with a faster forward binding rate are more effective in preventing and treating associated viral infections compared to those with higher binding affinity.

Binding Antibodies Responses to SARS-COV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients and Vaccinated Subjects: A Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study

Background

Prevalence of seropositivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection is vital in evaluating herd immunity. However, depending on illness severity, it remains unclear whether the breadth and magnitude of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is for short or long term.

Objective

To test the persistence of humoral antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 exposure in patients with different illness severity and among volunteers who had been vaccinated.

Methods

This study was conducted in two Saudi Arabian tertiary hospitals. Participants were categorized as critically ill COVID-19 patients, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or vaccinated volunteers. We collected demographic data, COVID-19 exposure history, symptoms, vaccination details, and serum samples to analyze antibody persistence. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations in COVID-19 patients with varying disease severity and age groups, as well as in BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals, focusing on IgG levels against the S.FL and S1 domains of the spike protein.

Results

The study included 172 adults: 92 unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 80 vaccinated volunteers. All vaccinated subjects demonstrated seropositivity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, with nearly 80% having a median antibody titer of 13,500 AU/mL. Notably, vaccinated subjects exhibited significantly higher IgG levels than naturally infected patients (P < 0.001), including higher S.FL and S1 titers, regardless of severity. Age, comorbidities, and previous infections influenced S-specific antibody levels. Among hospitalized patients, 58% required intensive care, with 28- and 90-day mortality rates of 23% and 43%, respectively.

Conclusion

These findings shed light on the immune response dynamics following SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to vaccinated individuals, where the latter showed significantly higher level of antibodies response, providing crucial insights for evaluating short-term herd immunity and the effectiveness of natural infection-induced immunity.

The protective effect of serum antibodies in preventing SARS-CoV-2 virus entry into cardiac muscle

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with significant cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infection and pulmonary embolism. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the myocardium of the left ventricle and the levels of IgG and IgM antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in deceased COVID-19 patients. We conducted a post-mortem examination on 91 individuals who succumbed to COVID-19-related complications. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the myocardium of the left ventricle was analyzed reverse transcription real time PCR (RT-qPCR) (EliGene® COVID19 UKV/SAV RT kit, Elisabeth Pharmacon), and antibody levels in serum were analyzed by serological assays (VIDAS SARS-COV-2 IgM and VIDAS SARS-COV-2 IgG II tests, BioMérieux). Of the heart tissue samples, 44 % tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Our findings indicate that any detectable level of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 reduces the risk of viral penetration into the myocardium by more than fourfold. Specifically, individuals with detectable levels of IgG and IgM antibodies exhibited a significantly reduced presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in cardiac tissues (p<0.0001 for IgG and p<0.001 for IgM). Notably, all patients who died from pulmonary embolism had elevated levels of IgG antibodies. The study underscores the protective role of IgG and IgM antibodies in preventing SARS-CoV-2 penetration into cardiac tissues. However, high antibody titers were associated with fatal outcomes such as pulmonary embolism, pointing to the intricate balance of immune response in COVID-19 pathology. Key words SARS-CoV-2, Antibody, IgG, IgM, Cardiac damage, qPCR, Pneumonia, Pulmonary embolism, Heart failure.

Comparison of anti-HCV combined with HCVcAg (Elecsys HCV Duo immunoassay) and anti-HCV rapid test followed by HCV RNA analysis using qRT-PCR to identify active infection for treatment

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can cause acute and chronic hepatitis, leading to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The World Health Organization aims to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 through extensive screening and treatment. To achieve this goal, comprehensive and widespread screening is essential for diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Elecsys® HCV Duo immunoassay (Duo-assay), which simultaneously detects anti-HCV antibodies (Duo/anti-HCV) and HCV core antigen (Duo/HCVcAg) in a single sample, compared with initially antibody testing followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Additionally, this study aimed to evaluate a relationship between Duo/HCVcAg and qRT-PCR assay in different genotypes. A total of 769 plasma samples were tested using the Duo-assay to further evaluate the test's performance and conduct Duo/HCVcAg correlation analysis using qRT-PCR for each genotype. Among the active infection group (anti-HCV+/RNA+; n = 473), the Duo-assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting Duo/anti-HCV and 70.6% for Duo/HCVcAg. In the resolved infection group (anti-HCV+/RNA-; n = 176), the assay showed 100% sensitivity for Duo/anti-HCV and 100% specificity for Duo/HCVcAg. In the non-infected group (anti-HCV-/RNA-; n = 120), the assay showed 100% specificity for both Duo/anti-HCV and Duo/HCVcAg. Moreover, no correlation was observed between the Duo/HCVcAg and HCV RNA tests, irrespective of genotype. These findings indicate that the Duo-assay is highly sensitive for detecting anti-HCV and specifically identifies patients with active infection. Nevertheless, cases with anti-HCV+/HCVcAg-results should undergo additional confirmation with western blot/immunoblot and qRT-PCR to ensure diagnostic accuracy, especially in Blood donation facilities.

Associations between clinical data, vaccination status, antibody responses, and post-COVID-19 symptoms in Thais infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants: a 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), led to a global pandemic from 2020. In Thailand, five waves of outbreaks were recorded, with the fourth and fifth waves driven by the Delta and Omicron variants, resulting in over 20,000 new confirmed cases daily at their peaks.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study investigated the associations between clinical symptoms, vaccination status, antibody responses, and post-COVID-19 sequelae in COVID-19 patients. Plasma samples and clinical data were collected from participants admitted to hospitals in Thailand between July 2021 and August 2022, with follow-ups conducted for one year. The study included 110 participants infected with either the Delta (n = 46) or Omicron (n = 64) variants. Virus genotypes were confirmed by RT-PCR of nasal swab RNA and partial nucleotide sequencing of the S gene. IgG and IgA antibody levels against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants were measured in plasma samples using ELISA.

RESULTS

Pneumonia was found to be associated with Delta variant infections, while sore throat, congestion or runny nose, and headache were linked to Omicron infections. Vaccination with fewer than two doses and diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with higher disease severity. Specific IgG and IgA antibodies against the RBD of the Delta variant generally rose by day 14 and were maintained for up to two months, whereas the pattern of antibody response to the Omicron variant was less clear. Antibody risings were found to be positively associated with pneumonia, certain underlying conditions (obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus), and age ≥ 60 years. Delta variant infections were associated with forgetfulness, hair loss, and headache during the 1-year post-infection period. Females were more likely to experience hair loss, forgetfulness, and joint pain, while older age was associated with joint pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhances our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Thais, particularly concerning the Delta and Omicron variants. The findings can inform public health planning and response strategies for future outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 or other emerging viral diseases.

Hybrid Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Narrative Review of the Literature

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 led to a global health crisis and the burden of the disease continues to persist. The rapid development and emergency authorization of various vaccines, including mRNA-based vaccines, played a pivotal role in mitigating severe illness and mortality. However, rapid viral mutations, leading to several variants of concern, challenged vaccine effectiveness, particularly concerning immune evasion. Research on immunity, both from natural infection and vaccination, revealed that while neutralizing antibodies provide protection against infection, their effect is short-lived. The primary defense against severe COVID-19 is derived from the cellular immune response. Hybrid immunity, developed from a combination of natural infection and vaccination, offers enhanced protection, with convalescent vaccinated individuals showing significantly higher levels of neutralizing antibodies. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, understanding the durability and breadth of hybrid immunity becomes crucial. This narrative review examines the latest data on humoral and cellular immunity from both natural infection and vaccination, discussing how hybrid immunity could inform and optimize future vaccination strategies in the ongoing battle against COVID-19 and in fear of a new pandemic.

Humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 response in patients with different long COVID phenotypes

Long COVID (LC) is characterized by persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, with various mechanisms offered to explain its pathogenesis. This study explored whether adaptive humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 responses differ in LC. Unvaccinated COVID-19 convalescents (n = 200) were enrolled, with 21.5% (n = 43) presenting LC three months post-infection. LC diagnosis was based on persistent symptom(s) and alterations in biochemical/clinical markers; three phenotypes were distinguished: cardiological, pulmonary, and psychiatric LC. All three phenotypes were characterized by significantly decreased seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against nucleocapsid (anti-NP). LC was associated with decreased odds of testing positive for anti-NP (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.16-0.78, p = 0.001). Seropositive LC patients had lower anti-S1 and anti-S2 levels than individuals without LC, and those with pulmonary and psychological phenotypes also revealed decreased anti-RBD concentrations. The results indicate that LC can be characterized by diminished humoral response to SARS-CoV-2. The potential implication of this phenomenon in post-acute viral sequelae is discussed.

Deciphering the Longevity and Levels of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Children: A Year-Long Study Highlighting Clinical Phenotypes and Age-Related Variations

BACKGROUND

Identifying potential factors correlated with the sustained presence of antibodies in plasma may facilitate improved retrospective diagnoses and aid in the appraisal of pertinent vaccination strategies for various demographic groups. The main objective was to describe the persistence of anti-spike IgG one year after diagnosis in children and analyse its levels in relation to epidemiological and clinical variables.

METHODS

A prospective, longitudinal, observational study was conducted in a university reference hospital in the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona (Spain) (March 2020-May 2021). This study included patients under 18 years of age with SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive PCR or antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2). Clinical and serological follow-up one year after infection was performed.

RESULTS

We included 102 patients with a median age of 8.8 years. Anti-spike IgG was positive in 98/102 (96%) 12 months after the infection. There were higher anti-spike IgG levels were noted in patients younger than 2 years (p = 0.034) and those with pneumonia (p < 0.001). A positive and significant correlation was observed between C-reactive protein at diagnosis and anti-spike IgG titre one-year after diagnosis (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected in almost all paediatric patients one year after infection. We also observed a positive correlation between virus-specific IgG antibody titres with SARS-CoV-2 clinical phenotype (pneumonia) and age (under 2 years old).

COVID-19 antibody responses in individuals with natural immunity and with vaccination-induced immunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a large mortality and morbidity burden globally. For individuals, a strong immune response is the most effective means to block SARS-CoV-2 infection. To inform clinical case management of COVID-19, development of improved vaccines, and public health policy, a better understanding of antibody response dynamics and duration following SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination is imperatively needed.

METHODS

We systematically analyzed antibody response rates in naturally infected COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals. Specifically, we searched all published and pre-published literature between 1 December 2019 and 31 July 2023 using MeSH terms and "all field" terms comprising "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2," and "antibody response" or "immunity response" or "humoral immune." We included experimental and observational studies that provided antibody positivity rates following natural COVID-19 infection or vaccination. A total of 44 studies reporting antibody positivity rate changes over time were included.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that within the first week after COVID-19 symptom onset/diagnosis or vaccination, antibody response rates in vaccinated individuals were lower than those in infected patients (p < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed from the second week to the sixth month. IgG, IgA, and IgM positivity rates increased during the first 3 weeks; thereafter, IgG positivity rates were maintained at a relatively high level, while the IgM seroconversion rate dropped.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibody production following vaccination might not occur as quickly or strongly as after natural infection, and the IgM antibody response was less persistent than the IgG response.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing: Role and Indications

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, over 769 million confirmed COVID-19 cases, including close to 7 million COVID-19-related deaths, have been reported. Although mortality rates have dropped notably compared to the first months of the pandemic, spikes in reported cases and mortality rates continue to be registered. Both recent spikes in case numbers and the continued emergence of new variants suggest that vulnerable patient groups, including older adults, immunocompromised patients, and patients with severe comorbidities, are going to continue to be affected by COVID-19. In order to curb the pandemic, relieve the pressure on primary care facilities, and reduce mortality rates, global vaccination programs have been established by the WHO, with over 13.5 billion vaccine doses having been administered globally. In most immunocompetent individuals, vaccination against COVID-19 results in the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies. However, certain patient subsets have inadequate or reduced immune responses, and immune responses are known to decrease with age. General recommendations on the timing of booster vaccinations may therefore be insufficient to protect vulnerable patients. This review aims to evaluate the clinical role of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, focusing on measurement indications, prognostic value, and potential as a correlate of protection to guide future booster vaccination strategies.

Clinical Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Serological Testing and Defining a Correlate of Protection

Herein, we review established clinical use cases for SARS-CoV-2 antibody measures, which include diagnosis of recent prior infection, isolating high titer convalescent plasma, diagnosing multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and booster dosing in the immunosuppressed and other populations. We then address whether an antibody correlate of protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 has been successfully defined with the following considerations: Antibody responses in the immunocompetent, vaccine type, variants, use of binding antibody tests vs. neutralization tests, and endpoint measures. In the transition from the COVID-19 pandemic to endemic, there has been much interest in defining an antibody CoP. Due to the high mutability of respiratory viruses and our current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 variants defining a CoP for prevention of infection is unrealistic. However, a CoP may be defined for prevention of severe disease requiring hospitalization and/or death. Most SARS-CoV-2 CoP research has focused on neutralization measurements. However, there can be significant differences in neutralization test methods, and disparate responses to new variants depending on format. Furthermore, neutralization assays are often impractical for high throughput applications (e.g., assessing humoral immune response in populations or large cohorts). Nevertheless, CoP studies using neutralization measures are reviewed to determine where there is consensus. Alternatively, binding antibody tests could be used to define a CoP. Binding antibody assays tend to be highly automatable, high throughput, and therefore practical for large population applications. Again, we review studies for consensus on binding antibody responses to vaccines, focusing on standardized results. Binding antibodies directed against the S1 receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of the viral spike protein can provide a practical, indirect measure of neutralization. Initially, a response for S1-RBD antibodies may be selected that reflects the peak response in immunocompetent populations and may serve as a target for booster dosing in the immunocompromised. From existing studies reporting peak S1-RBD responses in standardized units, an approximate range of 1372-2744 BAU/mL for mRNA and recombinant protein vaccines was extracted that could serve as an initial CoP target. This target would need to be confirmed and potentially adjusted for updated vaccines, and almost certainly for other vaccine formats (i.e., viral vector). Alternatively, a threshold or response could be defined based on outcomes over time (i.e., prevention of severe disease). We also discuss the precedent for clinical measurement of antibodies for vaccine-preventable diseases (e.g., hepatitis B). Lastly, cellular immunity is briefly addressed for its importance in the nature and durability of protection.

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and associated factors among household contacts of COVID-19 confirmed cases in Bangkok, Thailand

Background

High COVID-19 transmission among household (HH) contacts of infected cases were reported with seroprevalence varying from 5.5% to 57.2% worldwide. Data on seroprevalence among HH contacts and factors associated with seropositivity in Thailand are limited.

Objectives

To determine the seroprevalence and factors associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among HH contacts of COVID-19 confirmed cases.

Materials and methods

Data on confirmed COVID-19 cases (primary cases) in Bangkok from March 2020-July 2021 were retrieved from Institute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention. Primary cases were contacted within 14 days of testing positive for permission to contact their HH contacts via telephone. HH contacts were then recruited to complete questionnaires about demographics, and risk factors and blood was collected and tested for total immunoglobulin antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein. Factors associated with seropositivity were analysed by logistic regression.

Results

Eligible participants of 452 HH contacts of infected cases in Bangkok were contacted. Seroprevalence was 20.5% among HH contacts. Factors associated with seropositivity after multivariate analysis were relationship to index case (being other relatives to index case (other than close relatives/spouse) [aOR 4.04, 95% CI; 1.15, 14.14, p.029] and being a co-worker to index cases [aOR 0.16, 95% CI; 0.045, 0.60, p.006]), always staying in the same room with index case [aOR 5.64, 95% CI; 1.95, 16.34, p.001], sharing utensil [aOR 0.25, 95% CI; 0.074, 0.82, p.023], and participation in leisure activities together with index case [aOR 4.77, 95% CI; 1.47, 15.51, p.009].

Conclusion

Serological investigation can be used in detecting COVID-19 infection in conjunction with other molecular techniques. It is a useful tool for studies on seroprevalence in a population as well as seroconversion after a vaccination campaign. Sharing living environments are associated with seropositivity in HH contacts. Nevertheless, individual practices can be affected by awareness, cultural differences, and control measures implemented by each country.

An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.

Long-term systemic and mucosal SARS-CoV-2 IgA response and its association with persistent smell and taste disorders

Introduction

Current approved COVID-19 vaccines, notably mRNA and adenoviral vectored technologies, still fail to fully protect against infection and transmission of various SARS-CoV-2 variants. The mucosal immunity at the upper respiratory tract represents the first line of defense against respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and is thus critical to develop vaccine blocking human-to-human transmission.

Methods

We measured systemic and mucosal Immunoglobulin A (IgA) response in serum and saliva from 133 healthcare workers from Percy teaching military hospital following a mild infection (SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain, n=58) or not infected (n=75), and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Vaxzevria®/Astrazeneca and/or Comirnaty®/Pfizer).

Results

While serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgA response lasted up to 16 months post-infection, IgA response in saliva had mostly fallen to baseline level at 6 months post-infection. Vaccination could reactivate the mucosal response generated by prior infection, but failed to induce a significant mucosal IgA response by itself. Early post-COVID-19 serum anti-Spike-NTD IgA titer correlated with seroneutralization titers. Interestingly, its saliva counterpart positively correlated with persistent smell and taste disorders more than one year after mild COVID-19.

Discussion

As breakthrough infections have been correlated with IgA levels, other vaccine platforms inducing a better mucosal immunity are needed to control COVID-19 infection in the future. Our results encourage further studies to explore the prognosis potential of anti-Spike-NTD IgA in saliva at predicting persistent smell and taste disorders.

Persistent humoral and CD4+ TH cell immunity after mild SARS-COV-2 infection-The CoNAN long-term study

Understanding persistent cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 will be of major importance to terminate the ongoing pandemic. Here, we assessed long-term immunity in individuals with mild COVID-19 up to 1 year after a localized SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. CoNAN was a longitudinal population-based cohort study performed 1.5 months, 6 months, and 12 months after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a rural German community. We performed a time series of five different IgG immunoassays assessing SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses on serum samples from individuals that had been tested positive after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and in control individuals who had a negative PCR result. These analyses were complemented with the determination of spike-antigen specific TH cell responses in the same individuals. All infected participants were presented as asymptomatic or mild cases. Participants initially tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection either with PCR, antibody testing, or both had a rapid initial decline in the serum antibody levels in all serological tests but showed a persisting T_H cell immunity as assessed by the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specificity of T_H cells for up to 1 year after infection. Our data support the notion of a persistent T-cell immunity in mild and asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 up to 1 year after infection. We show that antibody titers decline over 1 year, but considering several test results, complete seroreversion is rare.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00022416.

Design and performance characteristics of the Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay

Background

Automated, high throughput assays are required to quantify the immune response after infection with or vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study on the Roche Elecsys^® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (ACOV2S) assay provides insights on the assay design and performance.

Methods

The ACOV2S assay quantifies antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The assigned units and the underlying standardization were compared to the international reference standard in BAU/mL. Assay specificity was assessed in samples (n=5981) collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and in samples from patients with non-COVID-19 respiratory infections (n=697) or other infectious diseases (n=771). Sensitivity was measured in 1313 samples from patients with mild COVID-19 and 297 samples from patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Comparison of results was performed to a comparator semi-quantitative anti-S1 assay of indirect detection format as well as a commercially available and an in-house version of a surrogate neutralization assay (ACE2-RBD).

Results

The originally assigned units for the ACOV2S assay were shown to be congruent to the units of the First International WHO Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins. Overall specificity was 99.98% with no geographical differences noted and no loss of specificity in samples containing potentially cross-reacting antibodies. High sensitivity was observed, with 98.8% of samples reported to be reactive >14 days after infection and sustained detection of antibodies over time. For all samples, ACOV2S titers and neutralization capacities developed with comparable dynamics. Robust standardization and assay setup enable excellent reproducibility of results, independent of lot or analyzer used.

Conclusion

The results from this study confirmed that ACOV2S is a highly sensitive and specific assay and correlates well with surrogate neutralization assays. The units established for ACOV2S are also interchangeable with the units of the First International WHO Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins. Worldwide availability of the assay and analyzers render ACOV2S a highly practical tool for population-wide assessment and monitoring of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.

The risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 antibody level differences in healthcare workers post vaccination in Siloam hospitals: A nationwide multicenter study

Background

Several vaccines have been approved against COVID-19, and 5 have been used in Indonesia. Due to the decrease in antibody levels 3 to 6 months after the second dose of CoronaVac, healthcare workers received the third booster of mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273) to increase the antibody level. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of anti-S-RBD IgG levels differences in healthcare workers.

Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study of 576 healthcare workers without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who received 2 doses of CoronaVac and the third dose of mRNA-1273 6 months after the second dose. Blood samples were obtained 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th weeks after the second dose of CoronaVac vaccine administration, with mRNA-1273 booster on week 20. Quantitative measurements of IgG antibodies were performed with Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay. We identify the baseline factors predicting post-vaccination antibody titers using univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results

This study comprised 576 participants aged 32 years old, 72.05% female, and 45.84% from high-risk occupation subgroups. The median antibodies titer level on the 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th weeks after the second vaccine dose administration were 40.99 u/mL, 42.01 u/mL, 54.78 u/mL, and 23,225 u/mL. Antibody levels trended highest in female and younger age group (20-29 years old).

Conclusions

The third dose of vaccine increased the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titers and eliminated differences in antibodies titer by gender.

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels after a Third Heterologous and Homologous BNT162b2 Booster Dose

This study aimed to determine the anti-S (receptor binding protein) RBD IgG antibody titers formed against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) and the neutralizing antibody inhibition percentages (nAb IH%) in blood samples taken after two doses of inactive or mRNA-based vaccine and a booster dose. Volunteers with two doses of inactivated CoronaVac (heterologous group; n = 75) and BioNTech (BNT)162b2 mRNA vaccine (homologous group; n = 75) were included in this study. All participants preferred the BNT162b2 vaccine as a booster dose. First, peripheral blood samples were taken 3 months after the second vaccine dose. Second, peripheral blood samples were taken 1 month after the booster dose. Anti-S-RBD IgG titers were determined by CMIA (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant). Neutralizing antibodies were detected by a surrogate neutralization assay (SARS-CoV-2 NeutraLISA, Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). The median age of the volunteers was 40 (IQR 29-47) years old. After the heterologous booster dose, anti-S-RBD IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies increased approximately 50-fold and 9-fold, respectively. Anti-S-RBD IgG titers increased by 9 and 57 times, respectively, while nAb IH% increased by 1.5 and 16 times, respectively, among those with heterologous reminder doses and those with and without a prior history of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This study showed that after the administration of a heterologous booster dose with BNT162b2 to those whose primary vaccination was with inactivated CoronaVac, the binding and neutralizing antibody levels were similar to those who received a homologous BNT162b2 booster dose. It was observed that the administration of heterologous and homologous booster doses resulted in the development of similar levels of neutralizing antibodies, independently from a prior history of COVID-19.

The Post-Vaccination Quantitative Total Immunoglobulin Levels against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers: A Multi-Centric Cohort Study in India

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in India received the AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines from January 2021 onwards. The objective of this study was to compare the immune response (seropositivity rate and geometric mean titer (GMT), and 95% confidence interval (CI)] against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in HCWs who received these vaccines, after the first and second doses. Therefore, the total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels specific to SARS-CoV-2 were measured using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The study population of 133 HCWs consisted of two groups in which the immune response was measured for the AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines. Data collection was performed from 6 February to 20 August 2021. Four weeks after the first and second dose, the odds ratio of seroconversion for AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccine was 10.3 times (95% CI: 4.5–23.7) and 15.9 times (95% CI: 6.3–39.9), respectively. The GMT was 6392.93 and 6398.82 U/mL for AZD1222 and 1480.47 and 990.38 U/mL for BBV152 after the first and second doses, respectively. Both vaccines elicited an immune response, but the seroconversion rate and GMT after each dose were significantly higher for AZD1222 than those for the BBV152 vaccine in this study.

Longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific antibody responses in Lower Austria

The Lower Austrian Wachau region was an early COVID-19 hotspot of infection. As previously reported, in June 2020, after the first peak of infections, we determined that 8.5% and 9.0% of the participants in Weißenkirchen and surrounding communities in the Wachau region were positive for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. Here, we present novel data obtained eight months later (February 2021) from Weißenkirchen, after the second peak of infection, with 25.0% (138/552) and 23.6% (130/552) of participants that are positive for IgG and IgA, respectively. In participants with previous IgG/IgA positivity (June 2020), we observed a 24% reduction in IgG levels, whereas the IgA levels remained stable in February 2021. This subgroup was further analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 induced T cell activities. Although 76% (34/45) and 76% (34/45) of IgG positive and IgA positive participants, respectively, showed specific T cell activities (upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-derived peptides), those were not significantly correlated with the levels of IgG or IgA. Thus, the analyses of antibodies cannot surrogate the measurement of T cell activities. For a comprehensive view on SARS-CoV-2-triggered immune responses, the measurement of different classes of antibodies should be complemented with the determination of T cell activities.