Outliers as a Cause of False Cardiac Troponin Results: Investigating the Robustness of 4 Contemporary Assays

Cardiac troponin

Cardiac troponin (cTn) testing plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which includes acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, conventional immunoassays may be subject to interference from autoantibodies, cross-reactivity, and biotin-related effects, compromising diagnostic accuracy. A thorough investigation of these interference mechanisms is necessary to improve assay methodologies, ensuring greater reliability and precision. In recent years, significant advancements in mass spectrometry (MS) technology have sparked increased interest in its application for cTn testing. For instance, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) employs multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to accurately quantify cardiac troponin I (cTnI)-specific tryptic peptides along with their fragment ions. This technique effectively reduces immunoassay interference while improving analytical specificity. Compared to traditional immunoassays, MS-based approaches alleviate matrix effects and analytical interferences while achieving superior specificity. Nonetheless, clinical adoption remains constrained by technical complexity; thus clinicians can obtain more reliable diagnostic insights. This review summarizes the current landscape of cTn detection technologies by examining the prevalence of false-positive results across various methods. It further explores both the practical applications and challenges associated with MS-based techniques in cTn testing. Ultimately, this review aims to improve cTn testing reliability, enhance cardiovascular disease diagnosis, and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Individual and Joint Associations of High-Sensitivity Troponin I and High-Sensitivity Troponin T with Cardiac Phenotypes and Outcomes in the General Population: An Analysis From the Dallas Heart Study

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) and T (hs-cTnT) provide complementary information regarding cardiovascular disease risk. The explanation for their distinct risk profiles is incompletely understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were measured in Dallas Heart Study participants. Associations of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT with demographics and phenotypes were assessed using linear regression. Associations with incident heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, global cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox models. Among 3276 participants (56% women, 50% Black persons, median age 43 years), the correlation between hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT was modest (Spearman rho=0.35). Variables associated with hs-cTnI but not hs-cTnT included hypertension, higher body mass index and total cholesterol, and lower high-density lipoprotein and cholesterol efflux capacity. Older age, male sex, and diabetes were positively associated, and smoking was negatively associated, with hs-cTnT but not hs-cTnI. Hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were associated with heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] per SD log hs-cTnI 1.53 [95% CI, 1.30-1.81] and HR per SD log hs-cTnT 1.65 [95% CI, 1.40-1.95]), global cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.10-1.34] and HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.15-1.32]), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25], and HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06-1.29]). After adjustment for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and the alternative troponin, both remained associated with heart failure (HR per SD log hs-cTnI 1.32 [95% CI, 1.1-1.58] and HR per log hs-cTnT 1.27 [95% CI, 1.06-1.51]).

CONCLUSIONS

Hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT are modestly correlated, demonstrate differential associations with cardiac and metabolic phenotypes, and provide complementary information regarding heart failure risk.

Generation of Rapid and High-Quality Serum by Recombinant Prothrombin Activator Ecarin (RAPClot™)

We recently reported the potential application of recombinant prothrombin activator ecarin (RAPClot™) in blood diagnostics. In a new study, we describe RAPClot™ as an additive to develop a novel blood collection prototype tube that produces the highest quality serum for accurate biochemical analyte determination. The drying process of the RAPClot™ tube generated minimal effect on the enzymatic activity of the prothrombin activator. According to the bioassays of thrombin activity and plasma clotting, γ-radiation (>25 kGy) resulted in a 30-40% loss of the enzymatic activity of the RAPClot™ tubes. However, a visual blood clotting assay revealed that the γ-radiation-sterilized RAPClot™ tubes showed a high capacity for clotting high-dose heparinized blood (8 U/mL) within 5 min. This was confirmed using Thrombelastography (TEG), indicating full clotting efficiency under anticoagulant conditions. The storage of the RAPClot™ tubes at room temperature (RT) for greater than 12 months resulted in the retention of efficient and effective clotting activity for heparinized blood in 342 s. Furthermore, the enzymatic activity of the RAPClot™ tubes sterilized with an electron-beam (EB) was significantly greater than that with γ-radiation. The EB-sterilized RAPClot™ tubes stored at RT for 251 days retained over 70% enzyme activity and clotted the heparinized blood in 340 s after 682 days. Preliminary clinical studies revealed in the two trials that 5 common analytes (K, Glu, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), Fe, and Phos) or 33 analytes determined in the second study in the γ-sterilized RAPClot™ tubes were similar to those in commercial tubes. In conclusion, the findings indicate that the novel RAPClot™ blood collection prototype tube has a significant advantage over current serum or lithium heparin plasma tubes for routine use in measuring biochemical analytes, confirming a promising application of RAPClot™ in clinical medicine.

Four high sensitivity troponin assays and mortality in US adults with cardiovascular disease: The national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2004

Objective

High sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) may be useful to monitor residual risk in secondary prevention. Our objective was to study the correlations and comparative associations with mortality of four hs-cTn assays in US adults with known cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods

We studied 1,211 adults with a history of CVD who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004. Using stored samples, we measured hs-cTnT (Roche) and three hs-cTnI assays (Abbott, Siemens, and Ortho). Outcomes were all-cause and CVD mortality, with follow-up through December 31, 2019.

Results

Mean age was 64 years, 48 % were female, and 80 % identified as non-Hispanic White. Pearson's correlation coefficients between hs-cTn assays ranged from 0.67 to 0.85. There were 848 deaths (365 from CVD). Among adults with a history of prior non-fatal CVD, each hs-cTn assay (log-transformed, per 1-SD) was independently associated with CVD death (HRs ranging from 1.55 to 2.16 per 1-SD, all p-values <0.05) and with all-cause death (HRs ranging from 1.31 to 1.62 per 1-SD, all p-values <0.05). Associations of hs-cTnT and all-cause and CVD death remained significant after adjusting for hs-cTnI (and vice versa). Associations between hs-cTnI and CVD death remained significant after mutually adjusting for other individual hs-cTnI assays: e.g., HR 2.21 (95 % CI 1.60, 3.05) for Ortho (hs-cTnI) after adjustment for Siemens (hs-cTnI) and HR 1.81 (95 % CI 1.35, 2.43) for Ortho (hs-cTnI) after adjustment for Abbott (hs-cTnI).

Conclusion

In US adults with a history of CVD, we found modest correlations between 4 hs-cTn assays. All assays were associated with all-cause and CVD mortality. The hs-cTnT assay was associated with mortality independent of the hs-cTnI assays. Hs-cTnI assays also appeared to be independent of each other. Thus, hs-cTn assays may provide distinct information for residual risk in secondary prevention adults.

An Alternating Current Electroosmotic Flow-Based Ultrasensitive Electrochemiluminescence Microfluidic System for Ultrafast Monitoring, Detection of Proteins/miRNAs in Unprocessed Samples

Early diagnosis of acute diseases is restricted by the sensitivity and complex process of sample treatment. Here, an ultrasensitive, rapid, and portable electrochemiluminescence-microfluidic (ECL-M) system is described via sandwich-type immunoassay and surface plasmonic resonance (SPR) assay. Using a sandwich immunoreaction approach, the ECL-M system employs cardiac troponin-I antigen (cTnI) as a detection model with a Ru@SiO2 NPs labeled antibody as the signal probe. For miR-499-5p detection, gold nanoparticles generate SPR effects to enhance Ru(bpy)3 2+ ECL signals. The system based on alternating current (AC) electroosmotic flow achieves an LOD of 2 fg mL-1 for cTnI in 5 min and 10 aM for miRNAs in 10 min at room temperature. The point-of-care testing (POCT) device demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity for cTnI detection in 123 clinical serum samples. For miR-499-5p, it exhibited 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity in 55 clinical serum samples. Continuous monitoring of these biomarkers in rats' saliva, urine, and interstitial fluid samples for 48 hours revealed observations rarely documented in biotic fluids. The ECL-M POCT device stands as a top-performing system for ECL analysis, offering immense potential for ultrasensitive, rapid, highly accurate, and facile detection and monitoring of acute diseases in POC settings.

Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the key biomarker for diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We performed a complete assessment of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) (CLIA) assay on the analytical performance and clinical diagnostic performance, which was compared with Abbott ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay.

METHODS

Sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) were determined from a healthy population of 424 males and 408 females. High-sensitivity performance was assessed by examining the imprecision at sex-specific URLs and the detectable results above LoD in a cohort of healthy population. The diagnostic performance of the hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay was validated in a population of 934 patients with suspected ACS.

RESULTS

The 99th percentile URLs were 15.3 ng/L for female, 31.3 ng/L for male and 24.2 ng/L for overall population. The total imprecision near the sex-specific 99th percentile URLs were <5 %. 76.74 % of females, 97.12 % of males and 86.69 % of overall population had cTnI values exceeding the LoD, which met the criteria of high-sensitivity troponin assay. No cross-reactivity or interference was identified. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay were 97.97 , 90.70, 79.02, 99.21 % and 0.9885, respectively, which were comparable to ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay.

CONCLUSIONS

hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay is a high-sensitivity troponin I method with high precision, sensitivity and specificity. The clinical diagnostic performance of hs-cTnI (CLIA) is comparable to the established ARCHITECT hs-cTnI assay. Mindray's hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay is an attractive alternative for diagnosis of myocardial infarction with a high level of accuracy and safety.

Investigating outlier rates of cardiac troponin I and troponin T assays: A systematic review

Objectives

This review aimed to harmoniously summarize and compare outlier rates for various cardiac troponin (cTn) assays, including high-sensitivity-cTn (hs-cTn) assays and contemporary cTn (generation of assays prior to hs-cTn ones) assays, from the published studies.

Methods

The PRISMA guidelines were utilized to perform this systematic review. Five databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched using specific keywords up to June 30th, 2023. Studies reporting specifically calculated outlier rates for cTn assays when conducting in-vitro diagnosis in human samples were included. Selected studies were then further assessed using the GRADE tool.

Results

Thirteen studies were included. The data from the studies were summarized statistically in this review. The results showed substantial evidence of improved analytical robustness or reduced respective mean rates of outliers, critical outliers, and analytical outliers for hs-cTn assays (0.14 %, 0.18 %, and 0.18 %) compared to contemporary cTn assays (0.63 %, 0.71 %, and 0.50 %).

Conclusion

The findings offer promisingly provide a comprehensive reference for laboratory scientists and clinical staff in choosing the most suitable cTn assay for patient care regrading outlier rates. Besides, this review reveals the advancements of hs-cTn assays with lower outlier rates than contemporary cTn assays. The emerging challenges for continuously improving analytical robustness of cTn assays are also elaborated.

High-sensitivity troponins and mortality in the general population

AIMS

Cardiac troponin T and I can be measured using a number of high-sensitivity (hs) assays. This study aimed to characterize correlations between four such assays and test their comparative associations with mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among adults without cardiovascular disease in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, hs-troponin T was measured using one assay (Roche) and hs-troponin I using three assays (Abbott, Siemens, and Ortho). Cox regression was used to estimate associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing concentrations from each assay ranged from 0.53 to 0.77. There were 2188 deaths (488 cardiovascular) among 9810 participants. Each hs-troponin assay [log-transformed, per 1 standard deviation (SD)] was independently associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratio (HR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.28] for Abbott hs-troponin I; HR 1.10 (95% CI 1.02-1.18) for Siemens hs-troponin I; HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.14-1.33) for Ortho hs-troponin I; and HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.21-1.42) for Roche hs-troponin T. Each hs-troponin assay was also independently associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.44 to 1.65 per 1 SD). Associations of hs-troponin T and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remained significant after adjusting for hs-troponin I. Furthermore, associations of hs-troponin I remained significant after mutually adjusting for hs-troponin I from the other individual assays: e.g. cardiovascular mortality HR 1.46 (95% CI 1.19-1.79) for Abbott after adjustment for the Siemens assay and HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09-1.53) for Abbott after adjustment for the Ortho assay.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates only modest correlations between hs-troponin T and three hs-troponin I assays and that hs-troponin I assays can provide distinct risk information for mortality in the general population.

Myocardial Injury Thresholds for 4 High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays in a Population-Based Sample of US Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury is an important pediatric diagnosis. Establishing normative data from a representative pediatric sample is vital to provide accurate upper reference limits (URLs) for defining myocardial injury using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.

METHODS

Among participants 1 to 18 years of age in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we measured high-sensitivity troponin T using one assay (Roche) and high-sensitivity troponin I using 3 assays (Abbott, Siemens, and Ortho). In a strictly defined healthy subgroup, we estimated 97.5th and 99th percentile URLs for each assay using the recommended nonparametric method.

RESULTS

Of 5695 pediatric participants, 4029 met criteria for the healthy subgroup (50% males; mean age 12.6 years). Our 99th percentile URL estimates for all 4 high-sensitivity troponin assays among children and adolescents were lower than the manufacturer-reported URLs (derived from adults). The 99th percentile URLs (95% CI) were 15 ng/L (95% CI, 12-17) for high-sensitivity troponin T, 16 ng/L (95% CI, 12-19) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Abbott assay, 38 ng/L (95% CI, 25-46) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Siemens assay, and 7 ng/L (95% CI, 5, 12) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Ortho assay. The 95% CIs for age-, sex-, and race and ethnicity-specific 99th percentile URLs overlapped. However, the 97.5th percentile URL for each assay was measured with superior statistical precision (ie, tighter 95% CIs) and demonstrated differences by sex. For male compared with female children and adolescents, 97.5th percentile URLs were 11 ng/L (95% CI, 10-12) versus 6 ng/L (95% CI, 6-7) for high-sensitivity troponin T, 9 ng/L (95% CI, 7-10) versus 5 ng/L (95% CI, 4-6) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Abbott assay, 21 ng/L (95% CI, 18-25) versus 11 ng/L (95% CI, 9-13) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Siemens assay, and 4 ng/L (95% CI, 3-5) versus 2 ng/L (95% CI, 1-3) for high-sensitivity troponin I with the Ortho assay. In contrast to the 99th percentiles, the point estimates of 97.5th percentile pediatric URLs for high-sensitivity troponin were also much more stable to differences in the analytic approaches taken to estimate URLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Because myocardial infarction is rare in children and adolescents, the use of statistically more precise and reliable sex-specific 97.5th percentile high-sensitivity troponin URLs might be considered to define pediatric myocardial injury.

Myocardial Injury Thresholds for 4 High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays in U.S. Adults

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury is currently defined as a cardiac troponin above the sex-specific 99th percentile of a healthy reference population (upper reference limit [URL]).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to estimate high-sensitivity (hs) troponin URLs in a representative sample of the U.S. adult population; overall and by sex, race/ethnicity, and age group.

METHODS

Among adults participating in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we measured hs-troponin T using 1 assay (Roche) and hs-troponin I using 3 assays (Abbott, Siemens, and Ortho). In a strictly defined healthy reference subgroup, we estimated 99th percentile URLs for each assay using the recommended nonparametric method.

RESULTS

Of 12,545 participants, 2,746 met criteria for the healthy subgroup (mean age 37 years, 50% men). The NHANES 99th percentile URL for hs-troponin T (19 ng/L) matched the manufacturer-reported URL (19 ng/L). NHANES URLs were 13 ng/L (95% CI: 10-15 ng/L) for Abbott hs-troponin I (manufacturer: 28 ng/L), 5 ng/L (95% CI: 4-7 ng/L) for Ortho hs-troponin I (manufacturer: 11 ng/L), and 37 ng/L (95% CI: 27-66 ng/L) for Siemens hs-troponin I (manufacturer: 46.5 ng/L). There were significant differences in URLs by sex, but none by race/ethnicity. Furthermore, the 99th percentile URLs for all 4 hs-troponin assays were statistically significantly lower in healthy adults aged <40 years compared with healthy adults ≥60 years (all P < 0.001 by rank sum testing).

CONCLUSIONS

We found URLs for hs-troponin I assays that were substantially lower than currently listed 99th percentile URLs. There were significant differences in hs-troponin T and I URLs by sex and by age group in healthy U.S. adults but none by race/ethnicity.

Retrospective analysis of intra-patient laboratory variation demonstrates that the BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ blood collection tube reduces troponin variation

OBJECTIVE

The BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ plasma blood collection tube uses a mechanical separator during centrifugation to separate plasma from the cellular elements of blood. Compared to use of plasma separator tubes (PST™) with gel, Barricor™ produces a cleaner sample with less residual cellular content. We sought to determine if Barricor™ reduces pre-analytical error compared to PST™.

DESIGN & METHODS

We used a model previously published that utilizes serial differences between intra-patient measurements transformed into a Taylor series of variation vs time with the y-intercept equal to the sum of short-term analytic variation, preanalytic variation and biologic variation. The intra-patient variation of chloride, sodium, potassium, and troponin-T (hs-TnT) obtained from the Emergency Department of a large tertiary care center sampled with PST™ (May 2015-April 2018, n = 59,762 specimens) or Barricor™ (May 2018-May 2021, n = 61,512 specimens) was evaluated. All specimens were analyzed on either Roche Modular or Cobas® instruments. For each analyte, pairs of intra-patient results were tabulated and separated by 1 h intervals. The average between-pair variations were then regressed against time. We also determined the number of intra-patient outliers using the reference change value for each analyte.

RESULTS

The Barricor™ hs-TnT y-intercept (-0.0132) was significantly lower than the PST™ intercept (0.9109; p = 0.022). This was also true for chloride (y-intercept = 1.0067 in Barricor™ and 1.3431 in PST™, p = 0.037). The percentage of hs-TnT outliers was significantly lower in Barricor™ (8.32 %) vs PST™ (12.2 %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The analytical and biological variations are assumed to be steady over the study periods; we ascribe the difference in the y-intercept to the preanalytical effect of the Barricor™ tube reducing platelets and other cellular debris.

Not T too! False elevations in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) following specimen transport

Though false elevations attributed to preanalytical specimen handling have been widely reported for Troponin I (TnI), Troponin T (TnT) has appeared more robust to falsely elevated Tn. We describe reproducible false elevations in high sensitivity TnT (hs-TnT) in specimens after courier transport in plasma separator tubes (PST) off-site for testing. Hs-TnT was measured under 5 different conditions: 1) at collection location (N=24); 2) after transport upright in racks (N=66); 3) after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=69); 4) on transported aliquots (N=84); or 5) immediately after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=16), followed by keeping the specimen upright and re-measuring at 1hr, 2hr, 4hr, and 20-24hrs (N=6). To assess the degree of discrepancy, plasma from the original PST was aliquotted, re-centrifuged, potential debris removed, and hs-TnT re-measured. 43% of PST specimens collected offsite and transported with no control over tube agitation had clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT which subsequently decreased following aliquotting and re-centrifugation (median decrease =9.9ng/L). Onsite testing or transported aliquots demonstrated no discrepancy. After being kept upright, discrepant specimens were not different from re-centrifuged aliquots by 4hrs (p=0.6141, repeated measures ANOVA with Dunn's multiple comparisons). Clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT occurred in approximately 40% of separated PSTs that were transported in containers where specimens are transported with no control over tube agitation. This interference does not occur if plasma is aliquoted or if hs-TnT is tested at the collection site. In order to prevent these false elevations, and their potential patient impact on the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, specimens for hs-TnT measurement should be aliquoted at the collection location prior to transport.

Analytical and clinical performance evaluation of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay

OBJECTIVES

To validate the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay on the automated light-initiated chemiluminescent assay (LiCA^®) platform.

METHODS

Comprehensive analytical validations were performed, and the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) from apparently healthy individuals were established. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the assay for NSTEMI.

RESULTS

The limit of quantitation (LoQ) were 1.9 ng/L (20% CV) and 5.1 ng/L (10% CV). The sex-specific 99th percentile URLs were 17.6 ng/L (4.2% CV) for men (age 20-79y) and 14.2 ng/L (4.9% CV) for women (age 19-89y) in serum, 14.4 ng/L (4.9% CV) for men (age 19-88y) and 12.9 ng/L (5.2% CV) for women (age 19-87y) in plasma, respectively. Detection rates in healthy individuals were from 98.7 to 99.1%. The correlation coefficient and median bias between LiCA and Architect were 0.985 and 0.1% (-2.0-2.9%) in full analytical range of serum specimens. In lower range (<100 ng/L), LiCA had an overall positive bias 6.7% (-1.6-13.3%), R=0.949. At the specific medical decision levels (15.2, 26.2 and 64.0 ng/L), assay difference was estimated to be <10%. No significant differences on AUC, sensitivity and specificity, NPV and PPV were found between LiCA and Architect for the diagnosis of NSTEMI.

CONCLUSIONS

LiCA hs-cTnI is a precise, highly sensitive and specific assay that meets the requirement of a 3rd generation (level 4) high-sensitivity method. The diagnostic accuracy of LiCA assay for NSTEMI is comparable to the established Architect hs-cTnI assay.

Analytical and Clinical Considerations in Implementing the Roche Elecsys Troponin T Gen 5 STAT Assay

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of the fifth-generation troponin T reagent.

METHODS

Troponin T was measured in 2,332 paired serum and plasma samples from emergency department and hospital patients using the fourth- and fifth-generation reagents. Testing was repeated after recentrifugation to determine the frequency of analytical outliers and percentage of patients with elevated values for each assay. We conducted separate experiments to determine the effects of biotin and hemolysis interference, as well as measure interinstrument variability, for fifth-generation troponin T.

RESULTS

Analytic outliers occurred more frequently using the fifth-generation reagent (3.4%) compared with the fourth-generation reagent (1.0%). The frequency of elevated troponin T above the 99th percentile upper reference limit was 26% for the fourth-generation reagent and 52% for the fifth-generation reagent. Clinically significant assay interference by biotin was observed at 20 ng/mL, but hemolysis interference was not observed until an H index of 150. Instrument-to-instrument variability between e411 and e601/602 instrument platforms is predicted to confound clinical interpretation of troponin changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Analytical outliers and instrument-to-instrument variability are the two analytical variables most likely to confound interpretation of changes in fifth-generation troponin T results over time.

The underestimated issue of non-reproducible cardiac troponin I and T results: case series and systematic review of the literature

Cardiac troponins (cTn) are the preferred biomarkers for the evaluation of myocardial injury and play a key role in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Pre-analytical or analytical issues and interferences affecting troponin T and I assays are therefore of major concern given the risk of misdiagnosis. False positive troponin results have been related to various interferences including anti-troponin antibodies, heterophilic antibodies, or elevated alkaline phosphatase level. On the other hand, false negative results have been reported in the case of a large biotin intake. These interferences are characterized with erroneous but reproducible troponin results. Of interest, non-reproducible results have also been reported in the literature. In other words, if the sample is reanalyzed a second time, a significant difference in troponin results will be observed. These interferences have been named "fliers" or "outliers". Compared to the biotin interference that received major attention in the literature, troponin outliers are also able to induce harmful clinical consequences for the patient. Moreover, the prevalence of outliers in recent studies was found to be higher (0.28-0.57%) compared to the biotin interference. The aim of this systematic review is to warn clinicians about these non-reproducible results that may alter their clinical judgment. Four case reports that occurred in the Clinique of Saint-Luc Bouge are presented to attest this point. Moreover, we aimed at identifying the nature of these non-reproducible troponin results, determining their occurrence, and describing the best way for their identification.

Fast 0/1-h algorithm for detection of NSTEMI: are current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays fit for purpose? An EQA-based evaluation

Background High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T/I (hs-cTnT/I) assays have improved analytical sensitivity for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI). To gain clinical specificity and sensitivity, interpretation of changes in cTn concentrations over time is crucial. The 2015 ESC NSTEMI guideline defines absolute delta values as additional rule-in and rule-out criteria for MI. A critical assumption for application of this rule is that total analytical imprecision within the delta period, including inter-instrument bias, is comparable to analytical imprecision in the validation studies. Methods Data from the Dutch External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) were used to calculate inter-instrument bias and estimate imprecision for the measuring range where the proposed delta values are relevant: for Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT, 5-52 and 5-12 ng/L; for Abbott Architect hs-cTnI, 2-52 and 2-5 ng/L for rule-in and rule-out, respectively. Results For Elecsys, the median inter-instrument bias is 0.3 ng/L (n = 33 laboratories), resulting in reference change values (RCVs) of 3.0 and 1.7 ng/L, respectively, for rule-in and rule-out with imprecision as claimed by the manufacturer. With RCVs smaller than the guideline's delta thresholds, 100% of the laboratories have adequate specifications. RCVs for rule-in/rule-out increased to 4.6 ng/L/2.5 ng/L, respectively, with individual imprecisions as estimated from EQA data, resulting in 64% and 82% of laboratories with adequate specifications. For Architect, 40% of instruments (n = 10) might falsely qualify the result as clinically relevant; hence, inter-instrument bias could not be determined. Conclusions We advise laboratories that use the fast 0/1-h algorithm to introduce stringent internal quality procedures at the relevant/low concentration level, especially when multiple analyzers are randomly used.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a potential follow-up biomarker of mandibular advancement device efficacy on cardiac function in obstructive sleep apnea

Interrelationships between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular diseases are now recognized, but some underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain controversial. Circulating cardiac biomarkers are diagnostic tools that can help understand them, in particular the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), a marker of myocardial stretch, and a potential indicator of subclinical cardiac stress in OSA. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the first-line treatment of moderate to severe OSA, may be considered as uncomfortable, resulting in poor adherence, and reduced effectiveness. In this case, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are an effective alternative therapy, more comfortable, and generally well accepted, with higher compliance. To date, few studies have compared the cardiovascular effects of CPAP and MAD. From recent literature reviews, it emerges that both therapies are effective in blood pressure reduction. However, the effects of MAD on other cardiovascular outcomes are conflicting, in particular as regards to its impact on circulating cardiac biomarkers. In a recent ancillary study from a randomized controlled trial, Recoquillon et al concluded that two months of MAD treatment had no effect on NT-proBNP plasma levels in patients with severe OSA. The present discussion analyses this result from a biological, statistical, and analytical standpoint, in light of results from other studies evaluating natriuretic peptides in MAD-treated OSA, with the aim to support further longitudinal studies designed with a high methodological quality.

Performance characteristics of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 800 TSH (3rd IS) assay

INTRODUCTION

Beckman Coulter recently reformulated their commercial TSH assay with primary calibration to the World Health Organization 3rd TSH international standard. An extensive evaluation of the performance characteristics for this assay was completed.

METHODS

Intra-day and inter-day precision was evaluated using 3 concentrations of commercial quality control material. Linearity, reportable range, stability, sensitivity and susceptibility to common inferences were determined using pooled patient specimens. Inter-assay variability was assessed across 5 different platforms (n=47 patient specimens).

RESULTS

Intra-day and inter-day CVs were <10% at all concentrations evaluated. The LOQ, LOD and LOB were 0.0047μIU/ml (10% CV), 0.0012μIU/ml and 0.0005μIU/ml, respectively. Variable bias was observed for the TSH3 assay when evaluated against the previous generation assay and other platforms, but overall TSH3 gave comparable results.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSH3 assay for UniCel DxI 800, is precise, highly sensitive and comparable to the previous generation assay. The assay is acceptable for clinical testing.

Cardiac troponins: 25 years on the stage and still improving their clinical value

Twenty-five years ago, non-isotopic immunoassays for measuring the cardiac specific isoforms of troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) were developed. Both biomarkers radically changed the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy indication of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and, particularly, of myocardial infarction (MI). However, cardiac troponins (cTn) rapidly demonstrated their usefulness in other cardiac and non-cardiac conditions, a part of the ischemic coronary diseases. Consequently, the number of patients to be tested for cTn and the number of tests requested to clinical laboratories sharply increased. Though the manufacturers continuously improved the analytical characteristics of the first cTn assays and produced different cTn assay "generations", the universal definition of myocardial infarction required less-than-available analytical imprecision at the cTn concentration used to assess MI (i.e. the 99th reference percentile). To address the clinical requirements, manufacturers developed the high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays that allow to measure the 99th reference percentile with adequate precision, to detect cTn in many healthy subjects and, hence, to calculate the hs-cTn biological variation and especially to observe in very short time intervals serial differences in hs-cTn attributable to cardiac ischemia. Since the number of patients attending the emergency departments (ED) for a suspected ACS or MI is increasing, the improved properties of hs-cTn assays, allowing faster and safer patient assessment, will help to alleviate the sometimes overcrowded EDs. However, there are many biological, analytical, and clinical factors that can influence the true hs-cTn values of a patient. Clinicians and laboratory professionals should know about them for the best interpretation of the otherwise largely useful hs-cTn measurements. In conclusion, 25 years after their introduction for clinical use, "cTn are still on the stage and improving their clinical value".

Analytical robustness of nine common assays: frequency of outliers and extreme differences identified by a large number of duplicate measurements

INTRODUCTION

Duplicate measurements can be used to describe the performance and analytical robustness of assays and to identify outliers. We performed about 235,000 duplicate measurements of nine routinely measured quantities and evaluated the observed differences between the replicates to develop new markers for analytical performance and robustness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Catalytic activity concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and concentrations of calcium, cholesterol, creatinine, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate, triglycerides and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in 237,261 patient plasma samples were measured in replicates using routine methods. The performance of duplicate measurements was evaluated in scatterplots with a variable and symmetrical zone of acceptance (A-zone) around the equal line. Two quality markers were established: 1) AZ95: the width of an A-zone at which 95% of all duplicate measurements were within this zone; and 2) OPM (outliers per mille): the relative number of outliers if an A-zone width of 5% was applied.

RESULTS

The AZ95 ranges from 3.2% for calcium to 11.5% for CRP and the OPM from 5 (calcium) to 250 (creatinine). Calcium, TSH and cholesterol have an AZ95 of less than 5% and an OPM of less than 50.

CONCLUSIONS

Duplicate measurements of a large number of patient samples identify even low frequencies of extreme differences and thereof defined outliers. We suggest two additional quality markers, AZ95 and OPM, to complement description of assay performance and robustness. This approach can aid the selection process of measurement procedures in view of clinical needs.

Variability and Error in Cardiac Troponin Testing: An ACLPS Critical Review

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive overview of the complexities associated with cardiac troponin (cTn) testing. An emphasis is placed on the sources of error, organized into the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical phases of the testing pathway. Controversial areas are also explored.

METHODS

A case scenario and review of the relevant literature describing laboratory considerations involving cTn testing are described.

RESULTS

Advanced comprehension of the specific assay used in a given laboratory is necessary for optimal reporting, utilization, and quality monitoring of cTn.

CONCLUSIONS

cTn assays are reliable diagnostic tests for acute myocardial infarction, but understanding their limitations is required for appropriate result interpretation.

The BD Barricor blood collection tube is an acceptable and robust alternative to the PST for use with the Beckman AccuTnI+3 assay

OBJECTIVES

BD Canada recently released a blood collection tube with a novel mechanical separator called the Barricor. We evaluated this tube as an alternate sample type for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) testing using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay.

DESIGN AND METHODS

3014 paired patient specimens (Barricor, plasma separator tube or PST) were obtained from the emergency departments and cardiac care units of nine hospitals in and around Edmonton, Alberta. After centrifugation, each plasma sample was analyzed for cTnI using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay. In addition, selected samples were analyzed multiple times within a single run or over 4-5days to generate imprecision data for the assay.

RESULTS

Repeatability and within-laboratory studies revealed an imprecision of <10% at concentrations above 0.025μg/L for the Barricor as well as BD's traditional PST. Paired patient sample comparisons over the full range of the assay yielded linear regression slopes ranging from 0.956 to 1.011 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.993 to 0.999. At a lower range of results closer to the manufacturer's 99th percentile cutoffs correlation was slightly worse, but still acceptable, with linear regression slopes ranging from 0.967 to 1.211 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.983 to 0.987. Notably, at these lower concentrations the agreement between individual PST and Barricor results worsened with decreasing cTnI concentration. Differences between pairs of results became particularly large (-50 to +400%) at PST cTnI concentrations ≤0.015μg/L. Closer inspection of the data around the 0.02 and 0.04μg/L 99th percentile cutoffs revealed a number of discordances between PST and Barricor results, with at least some of these attributable to false elevations in the PST results.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, our results suggest that the Barricor blood collection tube is good alternative to the traditional PST for cTnI testing using the AccuTnI+3 assay. The Barricor appears to minimize spurious, nonreproducible, and false elevations in cTnI results for a subset of patients but additional studies are needed to determine if it reduces overall false elevations. cTnI results below 0.04μg/L may still be of questionable accuracy even with the use of this new tube.

What to do when you question cardiac troponin values

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable cardiac troponin measurement with a high degree of analytical sensitivity and a low level of analytical imprecision at the low measuring range. One of the most important advantages of these new assays is that they allow novel, more rapid approaches for ruling in or ruling out acute myocardial infarctions. The increase in the early diagnostic sensitivity of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays comes at the cost of a reduced acute myocardial infarction specificity of the biomarker, because more patients with other causes of acute or chronic myocardial injury without overt myocardial ischaemia are detected than with previous cardiac troponin assays. Increased troponin concentrations that do not fit with the clinical presentation are seen in the daily routine, mainly as a result of a variety of pathologies, and if tested in the same sample, even discrepancies between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and troponin T test results may sometimes be found as well. In addition, analytically false-positive test results occasionally may occur since no assay is perfect. In this review, we summarise the biochemical, pathophysiological and analytical background of the work-up for such a clinical setting.

Recovery of spiked troponin I in four routine assays

Introduction

This study aimed to examine the recovery of spiked human cardiac troponin I (cTnI) results measured by four routine assays, and investigate possible interference from microclots.

Materials and methods

457 consecutive samples with cTnI concentration below limit of quantitation (12 ng/L), declared by the Vitros TnI ES assay (reference assay), were measured on Beckman Coulter Accu TnI+3, Siemens TnI-Ultra and Roche TnI STAT assays. These samples were enriched with native full-length cTnI to a concentration of 100 ng/L and retested. A post-spiking result that exceeded the critical difference at a predefined probability of 0.0005 of the target concentration (the median post-spiking result for each individual assay) was considered as outlier. To determine whether microclots were a significant cause of critically discrepant outlier results, a separate 50 samples were centrifuged twice between two post-spiking measurements using the Vitros TnI ES assay.

Results

The median recovery of the enriched cTnI was highest with the Roche assay (271 ng/L) and lowest with the Vitros assay (29 ng/L). The Vitros assay had the highest percentage of results that exceeded the critical difference (49%), followed by the Siemens (38%), Roche (18%) and Beckman Coulter (7%) assays. None of the 50 additional samples produced a critically lower cTnI result after re-centrifugation.

Conclusions

Our findings underscored the variability of cTnI assays in measuring native cTnI. The lack of cTnI results that became significantly lower after re-centrifugation suggested that microclots are unlikely to be a major cause of the outlier results.

Discordance with 3 Cardiac Troponin I and T Assays: Implications for the 99th Percentile Cutoff

BACKGROUND

We compared the 99th percentile reference intervals with 3 modern cardiac troponin assays in a single cohort and tested the hypothesis that the same individuals will be identified as above the cutoff and that differences will be explained by analytical imprecision.

METHODS

Blood was collected from 2005 apparently healthy blood donors. Cardiac troponin was measured with Abbott Architect STAT high sensitive troponin I, Beckman Coulter Access AccuTnI+3, and Roche Elecsys troponin T highly sensitive assays.

RESULTS

The 99th percentile cutoff limits were as follows: Abbott cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 28.9 ng/L; Beckman Coulter cTnI 31.3 ng/L; and Roche cardiac troponin T (cTnT) 15.9 ng/L. Correlation among the assays was poor: Abbott cTnI vs Beckman Coulter cTnI, R2 = 0.18; Abbott cTnI vs Roche cTnT, R2 = 0.04; and Beckman Coulter cTnI vs Roche cTnT R2 = 0.01. Of the results above the cutoff 50% to 70% were unique to individual assays, with only 4 out of 20 individuals above the cutoff for all 3 assays. The observed differences among assays were larger than predicted from analytical imprecision.

CONCLUSIONS

The 99th percentile cutoff values were in agreement with those reported elsewhere. The poor correlation and concordance amongst the assays were notable. The differences found could not be explained by analytical imprecision and indicate the presence of inaccuracy (bias) that is unique to sample and assay combinations. Based on these findings we recommend less emphasis on the cutoff value and greater emphasis on δ values in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Transitioning high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) into routine diagnostic use: More than just a sensitivity issue

OBJECTIVES

High sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I (hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI) assays show analytical, diagnostic and prognostic improvement over contemporary sensitive cTn assays. However, given the importance of troponin in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, implementing this test requires rigorous analytical and clinical verification across the total testing pathway. This was the aim of this study.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Analytical verification included assessment of critical outlier frequency, for hs-cTnI and cTnI assays. Concordance for paired cTnI and hs-cTnI measurements (n=1096) was verified using 99th percentiles for both genders (cTnI: 30 ng/L, hs-cTnI: 25 ng/L) and for men and women separately (hs-cTnI: M: 34;F: 16 ng/L). Discordant data was correlated with clinical and laboratory information. Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) or Non-ACS was adjudicated by two cardiologists independently.

RESULTS

The hs-cTnI assay showed a lower (10-fold) critical outlier rate (0.091%) and more detectable results above the limit of detection (LOD) (23.4%) and 99th percentile (2.4%), compared to cTnI. Analytical concordance between the two assays was high (94.5%) but decreased (91.7%) when gender-specific hs-cTnI cut-offs were used. The hs-cTnI assay gave fewer false negatives (up to 1.0%) but disproportionately more false positives (up to 6.7%) overall, which improved (3.9%) for serial measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratories should analytically and clinically verify hs-cTn assays before use, with attention to performance and the clinical and diagnostic algorithms that support appropriate testing and result interpretation. Work in the pre- and post-analytical phases is necessary to augment the analytical improvement in the new era of troponin testing.

Cardiac Troponin I carryover by very high patient samples still causes false-positive results on the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI + 3

Background

False-positive cardiac troponin I results as a result of carryover have previously been reported on the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI assay. We sought to determine if the carryover problem had been resolved with the new AccuTnI + 3 assay.

Methods

Carryover experiments were performed in parallel on the Beckman Coulter Access2 analyser using the legacy AccuTnI and new AccuTnI + 3 assays. The same negative patient pool sample was analysed before and after a single analysis of an extremely elevated patient sample.

Results

Analysis of a single extremely high sample caused elevations above the 99th percentile cut-off, and thus false-positive cardiac troponin I results on both assays. Both assays demonstrated carryover and subsequent further elevations in negative pool results the following day.

Conclusions

Our study replicates our previously published findings of carryover and reagent pack contamination on the AccuTnI assay. Despite improvements on the new AccuTnI + 3 assay, carryover and reagent pack contamination are still present.

Comparison of cardiac TnI outliers using a contemporary and a high-sensitivity assay on the Abbott Architect platform

BACKGROUND

Assays for cardiac troponin (cTn) have undergone improvements in sensitivity and precision in recent years. Increased rates of outliers, however, have been reported on various cTn platforms, typically giving irreproducible, falsely higher results. We aimed to evaluate the outlier rate occurring in patients with elevated cTnI using a contemporary and high-sensitivity assay.

METHODS

All patients with elevated cTnI (up to 300 ng/L) performed over a 21-month period were assayed in duplicate. A contemporary assay (Abbott STAT Troponin-I) was used for the first part of the study and subsequently a high-sensitivity assay (Abbott STAT High-Sensitive Troponin-I) was used. Outliers exceeded a calculated critical difference (CD) (CD = z × √2 × SDAnalytical) where z = 3.5 (for probability of 0.0005) and critical outliers also were on a different side of the decision level.

RESULTS

The respective outlier and critical outlier rates were 0.22% and 0.10% for the contemporary assay (n = 4009) and 0.18% and 0.13% for the high-sensitivity assay (n = 3878). There was no significant reduction in outlier rate between the two assays (χ(2) = 0.034, P = 0.854). Fifty-six percent of outliers occurred in samples where cTn was an 'add-on' test (and was stored and refrigerated prior to assay).

CONCLUSION

Despite recent improvements in cTn methods, outliers (including critical outliers) still occur at a low rate in both a contemporary and high-sensitivity cTnI assay. Laboratory and clinical staff should be aware of this potential analytical error, particularly in samples with suboptimal sample handling such as add-on tests.

Identifying and reducing potentially wrong immunoassay results even when plausible and "not-unreasonable"

The primary role of the clinical laboratory is to report accurate results for diagnosis of disease and management of illnesses. This goal has, to a large extent been achieved for routine biochemical tests, but not for immunoassays which remained susceptible to interference from endogenous immunoglobulin antibodies, causing false, and clinically misleading results. Clinicians regard all abnormal results including false ones as "pathological" necessitating further investigations, or concluding iniquitous diagnosis. Even more seriously, "false-negative" results may wrongly exclude pathology, thus denying patients' necessary treatment. Analytical error rate in immunoassays is relatively high, ranging from 0.4% to 4.0%. Because analytical interference from endogenous antibodies is confined to individuals' sera, it can be inconspicuous, pernicious, sporadic, and insidious because it cannot be detected by internal or external quality assessment procedures. An approach based on Bayesian reasoning can enhance the robustness of clinical validation in highlighting potentially erroneous immunoassay results. When this rational clinical/statistical approach is followed by analytical affirmative follow-up tests, it can help identifying inaccurate and clinically misleading immunoassay data even when they appear plausible and "not-unreasonable." This chapter is largely based on peer reviewed articles associated with and related to this approach. The first section underlines (without mathematical equations) the dominance and misuse of conventional statistics and the underuse of Bayesian paradigm and shows that laboratorians are intuitively (albeit unwittingly) practicing Bayesians. Secondly, because interference from endogenous antibodies is method's dependent (with numerous formats and different reagents), it is almost impossible to accurately assess its incidence in all differently formulated immunoassays and for each analytes/biomarkers. However, reiterating the basic concepts underpinning interference from endogenous antibodies can highlight why interference will remain analytically pernicious, sporadic, and an inveterate problem. The following section discuses various stratagems to reduce this source of inaccuracy in current immunoassay results including the role of Bayesian reasoning. Finally, the role of three commonly used follow-up affirmative tests and their interpretation in confirming analytical interference is discussed.

Outliers affecting cardiac troponin I measurement: comparison of a new high sensitivity assay with a contemporary assay on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyser

Background

False-positive cardiac troponin (Tn) results caused by outliers have been reported on various analytical platforms. We have compared the precision profile and outlier rate of the Abbott Diagnostics contemporary troponin I (TnI) assay with their high sensitivity (hs) TnI assay.

Methods

Three studies were conducted over a 10-month period using routine patients’ samples. TnI was measured in duplicate using the contemporary TnI assay in Study 1 and Study 2 ( n = 7011 and 7089) and the hs–TnI assay in Study 3 ( n = 1522). Critical outliers were defined as duplicate results whose absolute difference exceeded a critical difference (CD =  z x √2 x SDAnalytical) at a probability level of 0.0005, with one of the results on the opposite side of the decision limit to its partner.

Results

The TnI concentration at 10% imprecision (coefficient of variation) for the contemporary TnI assay was 0.034 µg/L (Study 1) and 0.042 µg/L (Study 2), and 0.006 µg/L (6 ng/L) for the hs–TnI assay. The critical outlier rates for the contemporary TnI assay were 0.51% (Study 1) and 0.37% (Study 2) using a cut-off of 0.04 µg/L, and 0% for the hs–TnI assay using gender-specific cut-offs.

Conclusion

The significant number of critical outliers detected using the contemporary TnI assay may pose a risk for misclassification of patients. By contrast, no critical outliers were detected using the hs–TnI assay. However, the total outlier rates for both assays were significantly higher than the expected variability of either assay. The cause of these outliers remains unclear.

Probing indiscretions: contamination of cardiac troponin reagent by very high patient samples causes false-positive results

Background

Cardiac troponin (cTn) has become the standard biomarker for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. False-positive cTnI results have previously been reported on the Beckman Coulter analysers, which were shown to be random, not reproducible and occurred more commonly than expected. Our investigation ensued after a patient sample with an inordinately elevated cTnI was analysed, followed by a series of false-positive results being reported. The implications of falsely elevated cTnI results on patient care could be considerable.

Methods

Multiple experiments with patient sample pools with concentrations below the 99th percentile to extremely high (0.025, 15, 175 and 884 μg/L) were conducted in varying sequences of high and low samples on the Beckman Coulter Access2, UniCel DxI600 and UniCel DxI800 analysers.

Results

Our results demonstrate a significant increase in cTnI concentrations in the negative pool after analysis of high pool samples in various sequences. This increase is sufficient to cause elevations above the 99th percentile cut-off and false-positive cTnI results. These findings were reproducible on all three analysers.

Conclusions

Our study is highly suggestive of carryover and cTnI reagent pack contamination by the pipettors on the Access2, DxI600 and DxI800 analysers when patient samples with extremely high cTnI concentrations are analysed, leading to potential false-positive cTnI results on subsequent samples.

Concordance, Variance, and Outliers in 4 Contemporary Cardiac Troponin Assays: Implications for Harmonization

BACKGROUND

Data to standardize and harmonize the differences between cardiac troponin assays are needed to support their universal status in diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We characterized the variation between methods, the comparability of the 99th-percentile cutoff thresholds, and the occurrence of outliers in 4 cardiac troponin assays.

METHODS

Cardiac troponin was measured in duplicate in 2358 patient samples on 4 platforms: Abbott Architect i2000SR, Beckman Coulter Access2, Roche Cobas e601, and Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP.

RESULTS

The observed total variances between the 3 cardiac troponin I (cTnI) methods and between the cTnI and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) methods were larger than expected from the analytical imprecision (3.0%–3.7%). The between-method variations of 26% between cTnI assays and 127% between cTnI and cTnT assays were the dominant contributors to total variances. The misclassification of results according to the 99th percentile was 3%–4% between cTnI assays and 15%–17% between cTnI and cTnT. The Roche cTnT assay identified 49% more samples as positive than the Abbott cTnI. Outliers between methods were detected in 1 patient (0.06%) with Abbott, 8 (0.45%) with Beckman Coulter, 10 (0.56%) with Roche, and 3 (0.17%) with Siemens.

CONCLUSIONS

The universal definition of myocardial infarction should not depend on the choice of analyte or analyzer, and the between- and within-method differences described here need to be considered in the application of cardiac troponin in this respect. The variation between methods that cannot be explained by analytical imprecision and the discordant classification of results according to the respective 99th percentiles should be addressed.