Cyclo19,31[D-Cys19]-uPA19-31 is a potent competitive antagonist of the interaction of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with its receptor (CD87)

Piptide Chemotypes for Perturbation of the Interaction of Urokinase with Its Receptor

Only a few small molecules that disrupt the uPA and uPA receptor (uPAR) interaction have been discovered despite decades of research in the area, and none have been approved in clinical trials. Research reported here features two new ways of considering the problem of discovering small molecules to disrupt uPA•uPAR, specifically in terms of chemotype design and method of evaluation. Chemotypes used in this work are piptides (Arancillo . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 6653-6659) with side chains corresponding to the uPA loop that binds uPAR. Further, hybrids of 1 and another uPAR ligand developed in these labs (2), i.e., 3 and 4, were also designed and tested. All the piptide chemotypes bound uPAR at concentrations of 50 μM or less. Members of this series had K_i values <3 μM and showed favorable responses in cellular assays; these data are comparable with the best small molecule uPA•uPAR disruptors in the literature (from conventional screening).

Modulation of Cellular Function by the Urokinase Receptor Signalling: A Mechanistic View

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR or CD87) is a glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol anchored (GPI) membrane protein. The uPAR primary ligand is the serine protease urokinase (uPA), converting plasminogen into plasmin, a broad spectrum protease, active on most extracellular matrix components. Besides uPA, the uPAR binds specifically also to the matrix protein vitronectin and, therefore, is regarded also as an adhesion receptor. Complex formation of the uPAR with diverse transmembrane proteins, including integrins, formyl peptide receptors, G protein-coupled receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor results in intracellular signalling. Thus, the uPAR is a multifunctional receptor coordinating surface-associated pericellular proteolysis and signal transduction, thereby affecting physiological and pathological mechanisms. The uPAR-initiated signalling leads to remarkable cellular effects, that include increased cell migration, adhesion, survival, proliferation and invasion. Although this is beyond the scope of this review, the uPA/uPAR system is of great interest to cancer research, as it is associated to aggressive cancers and poor patient survival. Increasing evidence links the uPA/uPAR axis to epithelial to mesenchymal transition, a highly dynamic process, by which epithelial cells can convert into a mesenchymal phenotype. Furthermore, many reports indicate that the uPAR is involved in the maintenance of the stem-like phenotype and in the differentiation process of different cell types. Moreover, the levels of anchor-less, soluble form of uPAR, respond to a variety of inflammatory stimuli, including tumorigenesis and viral infections. Finally, the role of uPAR in virus infection has received increasing attention, in view of the Covid-19 pandemics and new information is becoming available. In this review, we provide a mechanistic perspective, via the detailed examination of consolidated and recent studies on the cellular responses to the multiple uPAR activities.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) as a therapeutic target in cancer

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is an attractive target for the treatment of cancer, because it is expressed at low levels in healthy tissues but at high levels in malignant tumours. uPAR is closely related to the invasion and metastasis of malignant tumours, plays important roles in the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM), tumour angiogenesis, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and is associated with the multidrug resistance (MDR) of tumour cells, which has important guiding significance for the judgement of tumor malignancy and prognosis. Several uPAR-targeted antitumour therapeutic agents have been developed to suppress tumour growth, metastatic processes and drug resistance. Here, we review the recent advances in the development of uPAR-targeted antitumor therapeutic strategies, including nanoplatforms carrying therapeutic agents, photodynamic therapy (PDT)/photothermal therapy (PTT) platforms, oncolytic virotherapy, gene therapy technologies, monoclonal antibody therapy and tumour immunotherapy, to promote the translation of these therapeutic agents to clinical applications.

A versatile insertion point on albumin to accommodate peptides and maintain their activities

Genetic fusion of human serum albumin to peptides is an important strategy to enhance the plasma half-life of the peptide. An inherent challenge of such method is the reduction of specific activity of the cargo peptides upon connecting at N- or C-termini of albumin. Here, we report a finding that residue 363-364 of albumin can be inserted with a peptide while maintaining the peptide activities. We insert a peptide inhibitor into this site, and at the N-terminus of albumin, for comparison. The chimeric protein displays potent inhibition (IC₅₀ value of 30 nM) to its target (uPAR), but not the N-terminally fused construct. We also study the chimera of HSA with a cyclic peptide inhibitor of murine urokinase-type plasminogen activator grafted at either the internal site or the N-terminus. The internally peptide-grafted protein possesses a much more potent inhibition compared to the N-terminally located fusion (IC₅₀ value of 32 nM vs 19 μM). We further demonstrate that such internal fusion does not affect albumin expression, secondary structure, and inherent drug binding activity. Thus, this work identifies a versatile insertion point inside albumin for maintaining fusion peptide activity, and opens a new avenue to expand the applications of albumin fusion technology.

Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Urokinase and Its Receptor in Cancer

Several studies have ascertained that uPA and uPAR do participate in tumor progression and metastasis and are involved in cell adhesion, migration, invasion and survival, as well as angiogenesis. Increased levels of uPA and uPAR in tumor tissues, stroma and biological fluids correlate with adverse clinic-pathologic features and poor patient outcomes. After binding to uPAR, uPA activates plasminogen to plasmin, a broad-spectrum matrix- and fibrin-degrading enzyme able to facilitate tumor cell invasion and dissemination to distant sites. Moreover, uPAR activated by uPA regulates most cancer cell activities by interacting with a broad range of cell membrane receptors. These findings make uPA and uPAR not only promising diagnostic and prognostic markers but also attractive targets for developing anticancer therapies. In this review, we debate the uPA/uPAR structure-function relationship as well as give an update on the molecules that interfere with or inhibit uPA/uPAR functions. Additionally, the possible clinical development of these compounds is discussed.

The urokinase plasminogen activator binding to its receptor: a quantum biochemistry description within an in/homogeneous dielectric function framework with application to uPA–uPAR peptide inhibitors

DFT calculations using the MFCC fragment-based model considering a spatial-dependent dielectric function based on the Poisson–Boltzmann approximation were performed to describe the uPA–uPAR interactions.

Designing tracers for PET imaging of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor from a cyclic uPA-derived peptide: first in vitro evaluations

The treatment of cancer remains a major challenge, especially after tumour cell dissemination and metastases formation. Expression of the urokinase-type plasminogen activation system including urokinase (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) has been associated with the complex process of cell migration, a tumour's invasive potential as well as a reduced overall and disease-free survival of patients with solid cancers and haematological disorders. A cyclic peptide cyclo[21,29][d-Cys²¹ ,Cys²⁹ ]-uPA_21-30 was designed from the growth factor-like domain (GFD) of urokinase whose binding to uPAR was found to inhibit tumour growth and spread of human ovarian cancer cells in mice. With the aim of visualising uPAR expression using PET imaging to attempt an estimate on the tumour's aggressiveness, the cyclic peptide was modified with an either C- or N-terminally attached variable spacer and chelator. The free ligands were evaluated for their binding affinities to the isolated human uPAR and labelled with ⁶⁸ Ga and ¹⁷⁷ Lu to assess their lipophilicities and stabilities in human serum. Although retaining the full binding potential displayed by cyclo[21,29][d-Cys²¹ ,Cys²⁹ ]-uPA_21-30 to its target was found to be a challenging task upon both C- and N-terminal modification, chelator-bearing ligands were identified that can serve as promising starting points in the development of uPAR-addressing PET tracers.

Structural investigations of recombinant urokinase growth factor-like domain

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease that converts the plasminogen zymogen into the enzymatically active plasmin. uPA is synthesized and secreted as the single-chain molecule (scuPA) composed of an N-terminal domain (GFD) and kringle (KD) and C-terminal proteolytic (PD) domains. Earlier, the structure of ATF (which consists of GFD and KD) was solved by NMR (A. P. Hansen et al. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 4847-4864) and by X-ray crystallography alone and in a complex with the soluble form of the urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) lacking GPI (C. Barinka et al. (2006) J. Mol. Biol., 363, 482-495). According to these data, GFD contains two β-sheet regions oriented perpendicularly to each other. The area in the GFD responsible for binding to uPAR is localized in the flexible Ω-loop, which consists of seven amino acid residues connecting two strings of antiparallel β-sheet. It was shown by site-directed mutagenesis that shortening of the Ω-loop length by one amino acid residue leads to the inability of GFD to bind to uPAR (V. Magdolen et al. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem., 237, 743-751). Here we show that, in contrast to the above-mentioned studies, we found no sign of the β-sheet regions in GFD in our uPA preparations either free or in a complex with uPAR. The GFD seems to be a rather flexible and unstructured domain, demonstrating in spite of its apparent flexibility highly specific interaction with uPAR both in vitro and in cell culture experiments. Circular dichroism, tryptophan fluorescence during thermal denaturation of the protein, and heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy of ¹⁵N/¹³C-labeled ATF both free and in complex with urokinase receptor were used to judge the secondary structure of GFD of uPA.

Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) targeted nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein. Besides regulating proteolysis, uPAR could also activate many intracellular signaling pathways that promote cell motility, invasion, proliferation, and survival through cooperating with transmembrane receptors. uPAR is overexpressed across a variety of tumors and is associated with cancer invasion and metastasis. In order to meet the demand for a rapid development and potential clinical application of anti-cancer therapy based on uPA/uPAR system, it is desirable to develop non-invasive imaging methods to visualize and quantify uPAR expression in vivo. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in the development of uPAR-targeted nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy agents. The successful development of molecular imaging probes to visualize uPAR expression in vivo would not only assist preclinical researches on uPAR function, but also eventually impact patient management.

Conformational regulation of urokinase receptor function: impact of receptor occupancy and epitope-mapped monoclonal antibodies on lamellipodia induction

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a glycolipid-anchored membrane protein with an established role in focalizing uPA-mediated plasminogen activation on cell surfaces. Distinct from this function, uPAR also modulates cell adhesion and migration on vitronectin-rich matrices. Although uPA and vitronectin engage structurally distinct binding sites on uPAR, they nonetheless cooperate functionally, as uPA binding potentiates uPAR-dependent induction of lamellipodia on vitronectin matrices. We now present data advancing the possibility that it is the burial of the β-hairpin in uPA per se into the hydrophobic ligand binding cavity of uPAR that modulates the function of this receptor. Based on these data, we now propose a model in which the inherent interdomain mobility in uPAR plays a major role in modulating its function. Particularly one uPAR conformation, which is stabilized by engagement of the β-hairpin in uPA, favors the proper assembly of an active, compact receptor structure that stimulates lamellipodia induction on vitronectin. This molecular model has wide implications for drug development targeting uPAR function.

Radiometallated peptides targeting guanylate cyclase C and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor

Research is currently underway worldwide into the development of receptor-specific radiopharmaceuticals for the imaging and treatment of cancer. The successful clinical development of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for imaging and treatment of cancers overexpressing somatostatin receptors has catalyzed further preclinical investigation of other radiolabeled peptides for molecular imaging and peptide-receptor radiotherapy, including such well-studied peptide vectors as cholecystokinin, neurotensin, bombesin and RGD peptides. Within this larger context, this article will focus on the current status of two more recent additions to the list of molecular imaging targets – guanylate cyclase C, a specific marker for colorectal cancer, and the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, a cell-surface receptor overexpressed in diverse cancer types.

Modulators of the urokinase-type plasminogen activation system for cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor uPAR as well as two specific inhibitors, the plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) and type-2 (PAI-2), are involved in the control of extracellular matrix turnover and tumor growth. Data accumulating over the past 20 years have made increasingly clear that the uPA system has a multifunctional role in neoplastic evolution, affecting cancer cell proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, adhesion and migration.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Several therapeutic strategies inhibiting the uPA system have been or are currently being developed for suppression of tumor growth. This review examines the role of the uPA system in tumor progression and assesses the various therapeutic strategies developed to selectively exploit this system.

WHAT WILL THE READER GAIN

We focus on the therapeutic developments of the last 15 years. In addition to antibodies and recombinant uPA- or uPAR-derived proteins, various antagonistic peptides as well as small molecules have been designed and synthesized that inhibit the uPA system, leading to reduced tumor progression.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The multifunctional potential of the uPA system in cancer has rendered this system an attractive novel target for anticancer therapy. A few novel tumor biology-based therapeutic strategies reported here, opening new ways for patient-optimized and individualized cancer therapy. It may be the right time to evaluate the hypothesis that the uPA system plays a pivotal role in cancer progression and that targeting this system will lead to clinical benefit in cancer patients.

Development and evaluation of peptidic ligands targeting tumour-associated urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) for use in alpha-emitter therapy for disseminated ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Among gynecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality due to rapid peritoneal dissemination. Treatment failure particularly arises from failure to eliminate disseminated cells. Our aim was to develop peptidic radioligands targeting tumour cell-associated urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) for alpha-emitter therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

DOTA-conjugated, uPAR-directed ligands were synthesised on solid-phase. Binding of peptides to human cells expressing uPAR was assayed by flow cytofluorometry or, in case of (213)Bi-labelled peptides, by measuring cell-bound radioactivity. Bio-distribution of the (213)Bi-labelled peptide P-P4D was analysed in nude mice 28 days after intraperitoneal inoculation of OV-MZ-6 ovarian cancer cells in the absence or presence of the plasma expander gelofusine.

RESULTS

uPAR-selective ligands were developed based on published high-affinity uPAR-binding peptides. For preparation of N-terminally cross-linked divalent ligands, a novel solid-phase procedure was developed. Specific binding of (213)Bi-labelled peptides to monocytoid U937 and OV-MZ-6 cells was demonstrated using the natural ligand of uPAR, pro-uPA, or a soluble form of uPAR, suPAR, as competitors. The pseudo-symmetrical covalent dimer (213)Bi-P-P4D displayed superior binding to OV-MZ-6 cells in vitro. Accumulation of (213)Bi-P-P4D in tumour tissue was demonstrated by bio-distribution analysis in nude mice bearing intraperitoneal OV-MZ-6-derived tumours. Gelofusine reduced kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D by half.

CONCLUSION

Ovarian cancer cells overexpressing uPAR were specifically targeted in vitro and in vivo by (213)Bi-P-P4D. Kidney uptake of (213)Bi-P-P4D was distinctly reduced using gelofusine. Thus, this radiopeptide may represent a promising option for therapy for disseminated ovarian cancer.

Systemic administration of anti-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor monoclonal antibodies induces hepatic fibrin deposition in tissue-type plasminogen activator deficient mice

BACKGROUND

Degradation of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibrin, is pivotal to tumor invasion. Inhibition of the interaction between urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA) and its receptor (u-PAR), and hence pro-u-PA activation, is an attractive approach to anti-invasive cancer therapy. A number of inhibitors exist for the human system, but because of species specificity none of these are efficient in mice. We have recently generated an inhibitory monoclonal antibody (mAb) against mouse u-PAR (mR1) by immunization of u-PAR-deficient mice.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of mR1 in vivo in a physiological setting sensitive to deregulated fibrinolysis, we have administered mR1 systemically and quantitated the effect on liver fibrin accumulation.

METHODS

Wild-type and tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) deficient mice were administered with mR1, or control antibody, during 6 weeks. Thereafter, the livers were retrieved and the amount of liver fibrin measured by unbiased morphometrical analysis of immunofluorescence signal.

RESULTS

Systemic administration of mR1 caused significantly increased fibrin signal in anti-u-PAR treated t-PA-deficient mice compared to mock-treated, which mimics the phenotype of u-PAR;t-PA double-deficient mice. Fibrin and fibronectin accumulated within the sinusoidal space and was infiltrated by inflammatory cells. Analysis of small and rare hepatic fibrin plaques observed in t-PA-deficient mice showed infiltrating macrophages that, contrary to surrounding Kuppfer cells, expressed u-PAR.

CONCLUSION

We show that u-PAR-expressing macrophages are involved in cell-mediated fibrinolysis of liver fibrin deposits, and that the antimouse-u-PAR mAb is effective in vivo and thus suited for studies of the effect of targeting the u-PA/u-PAR interaction in mouse cancer models.

The urokinase receptor (uPAR) and the uPAR-associated protein (uPARAP/Endo180): membrane proteins engaged in matrix turnover during tissue remodeling

The breakdown of the barriers formed by extracellular matrix proteins is a pre-requisite for all processes of tissue remodeling. Matrix degradation reactions take part in specific physiological events in the healthy organism but also represent a crucial step in cancer invasion. These degradation processes involve a highly organized interplay between proteases and their cellular binding sites as well as specific substrates and internalization receptors. This review article is focused on two components, the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and the uPAR-associated protein (uPARAP, also designated Endo180), that are considered crucially engaged in matrix degradation. uPAR and uPARAP have highly diverse functions, but on certain cell types they interact with each other in a process that is still incompletely understood. uPAR is a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein on the surface of various cell types that serves to bind the urokinase plasminogen activator and localize the activation reactions in the proteolytic cascade system of plasminogen activation. uPARAP is an integral membrane protein with a pronounced role in the internalization of collagen for intracellular degradation. Both receptors have additional functions that are currently being unraveled. The present discussion of uPAR and uPARAP is centered on their protein structure and molecular and cellular function.

The kringle stabilizes urokinase binding to the urokinase receptor

The structural basis of the interaction between single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scuPA) and its receptor (uPAR) is incompletely defined. Several observations indicated the kringle facilitates the binding of uPA to uPAR. A scuPA variant lacking the kringle (Delta K-scuPA) bound to soluble uPAR (suPAR) with the similar "on-rate" but with a faster "off-rate" than wild-type (WT)-scuPA. Binding of Delta K-scuPA, but not WT-scuPA, to suPAR was comparably inhibited by its growth factor domain (GFD) and amino-terminal fragment (ATF). ATF and WT-scuPA, but not GFD, scuPA lacking the GFD (Delta GFD-scuPA), or Delta K-scuPA reconstituted the isolated domains of uPAR. ATF completely inhibited the enzymatic activity of WT-scuPA-suPAR unlike comparable concentrations of GFD. Variants containing mutations that alter the charge, length, or flexibility of linker sequence (residues 43-49) between the GFD and the kringle displayed a lower affinity for uPAR, were unable to reconstitute uPAR domains, and their binding to uPAR was inhibited by GFD in the same manner as Delta K-scuPA. A scuPA variant in which the charged amino acids in the heparin binding site (HBS) in the kringle domain were mutated to alanines behaved like Delta K-scuPA, indicating that that the structure of the kringle as well as its interaction with the GFD govern receptor binding. These data demonstrate an important role for the kringle in stabilizing the binding of scuPA to uPAR.

Inhibition of the tumor-associated urokinase-type plasminogen activation system: effects of high-level synthesis of soluble urokinase receptor in ovarian and breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Tumor cell invasion and metastasis depend on the coordinated and temporal expression of proteolytic enzymes to degrade the surrounding extracellular matrix and of adhesion molecules to remodel cell-cell and/or cell-matrix attachments. The tumor cell-associated urokinase-type plasminogen activator system, consisting of the serine protease uPA, its substrate plasminogen, its membrane-bound receptor uPAR, as well as its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2, plays an important role in these pericellular processes. Especially, association of the proteolytic activity of uPA with the cell surface via interaction with uPAR significantly increases the invasive capacity of tumor cells. Consequently, various approaches have been pursued to interfere with the expression or activity of uPA and/or uPAR, including antisense strategies and the development of active-site inhibitors of uPA or inhibitors of uPA/uPAR interaction. In this review, we focus on the results obtained in vitro and in vivo with tumor cells producing high levels of a recombinant soluble form of uPAR, which efficiently inhibits uPA binding to cell surface-associated uPAR and, by this, acts as a scavenger for uPA.

The urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) as a target for tumor therapy: uPA-silica particles (SP-uPA) as a new tool for assessing synthetic peptides to interfere with uPA/uPA-receptor interaction

Many different processes in the physiology and pathophysiology of human beings are regulated protein/protein interactions such as receptor/ligand interactions. A more detailed knowledge of the nature of receptor/ligand binding sites and mechanisms of interaction is necessary as well in order to understand the process of cancer spread and metastasis. For instance, the cell surface receptor uPAR (CD87) and its ligand, the serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), facilitate tumor invasion and metastasis in solid malignant tumors. Besides its proteolytic function in activating the zymogen plasminogen into the serine protease plasmin, binding of uPA to tumor cell-associated uPAR initiates various cell responses such as tumor cell migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Hence, the tumor-associated uPA/uPAR system is considered a potential target for cancer therapy. Here we briefly describe a new technology using micro-silica particles coated with uPA (yields SP-uPA) and reaction of SP-uPA with recombinant soluble uPAR (suPAR) to test the competitive antagonistic potential of synthetic uPA peptides by flow cytofluorometry (FACS). We discuss the data obtained with the SP-uPA system from two different points of view: (1) The enhanced potential of improved uPA-derived synthetic peptides compared to previously described peptides, and (2) comparison of the new technique to other test systems currently used to identify uPA/uPAR or other protein/protein interactions.

Inhibition of intraperitoneal tumor growth of human ovarian cancer cells by bi- and trifunctional inhibitors of tumor-associated proteolytic systems

Several proteolytic systems are involved in (anti)adhesive, migratory, and proteolytic processes, necessary for tumor progression and metastasis. We analyzed whether multifunctional inhibitors of different tumor-associated proteolytic systems reduce tumor growth and spread of human ovarian cancer cells in vivo. Bifunctional inhibitors are composed of the N-terminal domain of either the human matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors TIMP-1 or TIMP-3 and the cysteine protease inhibitor chicken cystatin (chCysWT); trifunctional inhibitors are composed of N-TIMP-1 or -3 and a chicken cystatin variant harboring the uPAR binding site of uPA, chCys-uPA19-31, which in addition to its inhibitory activity toward cysteine proteases interferes with the interaction of the serine protease uPA with its receptor. OV-MZ-6#8 cancer cells, stably transfected with plasmids expressing the multifunctional inhibitors, displayed similar proliferative and adhesive features as the vector-transfected control, but showed significant reduction in their invasive behavior in vitro. The cell lines expressing the multifunctional inhibitors were inoculated into the peritoneum of nude mice. Expression of three of the four inhibitor variants (N-hTIMP-1-chCysWT, N-hTIMP-1-chCys-uPA19-31, and N-hTIMP-3-chCysWT) resulted in a significant reduction of tumor burden compared to the vector-control cell line. These compact and small inhibitors may represent promising agents for gene therapy of solid malignant tumors.

Engaged urokinase receptors enhance tumor breast cell migration and invasion by upregulating alpha(v)beta5 vitronectin receptor cell surface expression

We have previously shown that urokinase receptor physically and functionally interacts with alpha(v)beta5 vitronectin receptor, leading to tumor breast cell migration and invasion. Here, the link between these 2 receptors was further investigated by analyzing the expression levels of urokinase receptor and alpha(v)beta5 integrin in 35 human breast carcinomas and 5 benign breast lesions. The occurrence of a positive correlation between urokinase receptor and alpha(v)beta5 protein levels in benign and malignant tumor specimens prompted us to investigate whether engaged urokinase receptors might modulate alpha(v)beta5 expression. Here, we report the receptor-dependent ability of catalytically inactive urokinase to upregulate the alpha(v) and beta5 chains in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast carcinoma cell lines in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. This effect is dependent on protein kinase C activity and requires new protein synthesis. Accordingly, the availability of assembled alpha(v)beta5 receptors on the cell surface increases upon urokinase treatment, as shown by immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemical analyses. Exposure to urokinase leads to enhanced tumor cell migration and invasion, which is prevented by the "phosphorylation-like" urokinase receptor antagonist His-uPA(138E/303E), the DNA-binding drug mithramycin, the protein kinase C inhibitor calphostin C and anti-alpha(v)beta5 antibodies. Finally, urokinase enables benign breast MCF-10A cells to cross Matrigel in a alpha(v)beta5- and urokinase receptor-dependent manner, indicating that urokinase controls a regulatory circuitry crucial to breast tumor progression.

Synthesis, solution structure, and biological evaluation of urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA)-derived receptor binding domain mimetics

Tumor cell migration and metastasis in cancer are facilitated by interaction of the serine protease urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) with its receptor uPAR (CD 87). Overexpression of uPA and uPAR in cancer tissues is associated with a high incidence of disease recurrence and early death. In agreement with these findings, disruption of the protein-protein interaction between uPAR present on tumor cells and its ligand uPA evolved as an attractive intervention strategy to impair tumor growth and metastasis. For this, the uPAR antagonist cyclo[19,31][D-Cys(19)]-uPA(19)(-)(31) was optimized to efficiently interrupt binding of uPA to cellular uPAR. First, the disulfide bridge of this lead compound was shifted and then the modified peptide was shortened from the amino and carboxy terminus to generate cyclo[21,29][Cys(21,29)]-uPA(21)(-)(30). Next, cyclo[21,29][D-Cys(21)Cys(29)]-uPA(21)(-)(30) was yielded by changing the chirality of Cys(21) to D-Cys(21). For analysis of uPAR binding activity, we employed competitive flow cytofluorometric receptor binding assays, using FITC-uPA as the ligand and U937 promyeloid leukemia cells as the cellular source of uPAR. As demonstrated for cyclo[21,29][D-Cys(21)Cys(29)]-uPA(21)(-)(30), the achieved peptide modifications maintained receptor binding activity (IC(50) = 0.04 microM), which is close in order to that of the parent protein ligand, uPA (IC(50) = 0.01 microM). A detailed NMR analysis with restrained and free molecular dynamics calculations in explicit H(2)O exhibits a well-defined structure with characteristic features such as an omega-loop with two betaI-turns about Lys(3), Tyr(4), Ser(6), and Asn(7). Hydrophobic clustering of the side chains of Tyr(4), Phe(5), Ile(8), and Trp(10) is observed. Side chain mobility is analyzed with time-dependent distance restraints. The NMR structure of cyclo[21,29][D-Cys(21)Cys(29)]-uPA(21)(-)(30) is very similar to the previously reported structure of the amino terminal fragment of uPA. Systematic point mutations led to cyclo[21,29][D-Cys(21)Nle(23)Cys(29)]-uPA(21)(-)(30), which still binds to uPAR but is resistant to proteolytic cleavage, e.g., by the tumor-associated serine proteases uPA and plasmin, and is stable in blood serum or plasma. In conclusion, small cyclic peptides were created, which mimic the structure and activity of the binding epitope of uPA to uPAR and which may serve as novel therapeutic agents in cancer metastasis.

High-affinity urokinase-derived cyclic peptides inhibiting urokinase/urokinase receptor-interaction: effects on tumor growth and spread

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) binds with high affinity to its specific cell surface receptor (uPAR) (CD87) via a well-defined sequence within the N-terminal region of uPA (uPA(19-31)). Since this uPA/uPAR-interaction plays a significant role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis, it has become an attractive therapeutic target. Two small peptidic cyclic competitive antagonists of uPA/uPAR-interaction have been developed, based on the uPAR binding site in uPA: WX-360 (cyclo(21,29)[D-Cys21]-uPA(21-30)[S21C;H29C]) and its norleucine (Nle) derivative WX-360-Nle (cyclo(21,29)[D-Cys21]-uPA(21-30)[S21C;K23Nle;H29C]). These peptides display an only five to 10-fold lower affinity to uPAR as compared to the naturally occurring uPAR-ligand uPA. In this study, WX-360 and WX-360-Nle were tested in nude mice for their potency to inhibit tumor growth and intraperitoneal spread of lacZ-tagged human ovarian cancer cells. Intraperitoneal administration of either cyclic peptide (20 mg peptide/kg; 1x daily for 37 days) into the tumor-bearing nude mice resulted in a significant reduction of tumor weight and spread within the peritoneum as compared to the untreated control group. This is the first report demonstrating effective reduction of tumor growth and spread of human ovarian cancer cells in vivo by small synthetic uPA-derived cyclic peptides competitively interfering with uPA/uPAR-interaction. Thus, both WX-360 and WX-360-Nle are promising novel compounds to reduce dissemination of human ovarian carcinoma.