Reproducible image handling and analysis

OrgaMeas: A pipeline that integrates all the processes of organelle image analysis

Although image analysis has emerged as a key technology in the study of organelle dynamics, the commonly used image-processing methods, such as threshold-based segmentation and manual setting of regions of interests (ROIs), are error-prone and laborious. Here, we present a highly accurate high-throughput image analysis pipeline called OrgaMeas for measuring the morphology and dynamics of organelles. This pipeline mainly consists of two deep learning-based tools: OrgaSegNet and DIC2Cells. OrgaSegNet quantifies many aspects of different organelles by precisely segmenting them. To further process the segmented data at a single-cell level, DIC2Cells automates ROI settings through accurate segmentation of individual cells in differential interference contrast (DIC) images. This pipeline was designed to be low cost and require less coding, to provide an easy-to-use platform. Thus, we believe that OrgaMeas has potential to be readily applied to basic biomedical research, and hopefully to other practical uses such as drug discovery.

Bridging imaging-based in vitro methods from biomedical research to regulatory toxicology

Imaging technologies are being increasingly used in biomedical research and experimental toxicology to gather morphological and functional information from cellular models. There is a concrete opportunity of incorporating imaging-based in vitro methods in international guidelines to respond to regulatory requirements with human relevant data. To translate these methods from R&D to international regulatory acceptance, the community needs to implement test methods under quality management systems, assess inter-laboratory transferability, and demonstrate data reliability and robustness. This article summarises current challenges associated with image acquisition, image analysis, including artificial intelligence, and data management of imaging-based methods, with examples from the developmental neurotoxicity in vitro battery and phenotypic profiling assays. The article includes considerations on specific needs and potential solutions to design and implement future validation and transferability studies.

Simple quantitation and spatial characterization of label free cellular images

Label-free imaging is routinely used during cell culture because of its minimal interference with intracellular biology and capability of observing cells over time. However, label-free image analysis is challenging due to the low contrast between foreground signals and background. So far various deep learning tools have been developed for label-free image analysis and their performance depends on the quality of training data. In this study, we developed a simple computational pipeline that requires no training data and is suited to run on images generated using high-content microscopy equipment. By combining classical image processing functions, Voronoi segmentation, Gaussian mixture modeling and automatic parameter optimization, our pipeline can be used for cell number quantification and spatial distribution characterization based on a single label-free image. We demonstrated the applicability of our pipeline in four morphologically distinct cell types with various cell densities. Our pipeline is implemented in R and does not require excessive computational power, providing novel opportunities for automated label-free image analysis for large-scale or repeated cell culture experiments.

CellProfiler plugins - An easy image analysis platform integration for containers and Python tools

CellProfiler is a widely used software for creating reproducible, reusable image analysis workflows without needing to code. In addition to the >90 modules that make up the main CellProfiler program, CellProfiler has a plugins system that allows for the creation of new modules which integrate with other Python tools or tools that are packaged in software containers. The CellProfiler-plugins repository contains a number of these CellProfiler modules, especially modules that are experimental and/or dependency-heavy. Here, we present an upgraded CellProfiler-plugins repository, an example of accessing containerised tools, improved documentation and added citation/reference tools to facilitate the use and contribution of the community.

ModularImageAnalysis (MIA): Assembly of modularised image and object analysis workflows in ImageJ

ModularImageAnalysis (MIA) is an ImageJ plugin providing a code-free graphical environment in which complex automated analysis workflows can be constructed and distributed. The broad range of included modules cover all stages of a typical analysis workflow, from image loading through image processing, object detection, extraction of measurements, measurement-based filtering, visualisation and data exporting. MIA provides out-of-the-box compatibility with many advanced image processing plugins for ImageJ including Bio-Formats, DeepImageJ, MorphoLibJ and TrackMate, allowing these tools and their outputs to be directly incorporated into analysis workflows. By default, modules support spatially calibrated 5D images, meaning measurements can be acquired in both pixel and calibrated units. A hierarchical object relationship model allows for both parent-child (one-to-many) and partner (many-to-many) relationships to be established. These relationships underpin MIA's ability to track objects through time, represent complex spatial relationships (e.g. topological skeletons) and measure object distributions (e.g. count puncta per cell). MIA features dual graphical interfaces: the 'editing view' offers access to the full list of modules and parameters in the workflow, while the simplified 'processing view' can be configured to display only a focused subset of controls. All workflows are batch-enabled by default, with image files within a specified folder being processed automatically and exported to a single spreadsheet. Beyond the included modules, functionality can be extended both internally, through integration with the ImageJ scripting interface, and externally, by developing third-party Java modules that extend the core MIA framework. Here we describe the design and functionality of MIA in the context of a series of real-world example analyses.

The crucial role of bioimage analysts in scientific research and publication

Bioimage analysis (BIA), a crucial discipline in biological research, overcomes the limitations of subjective analysis in microscopy through the creation and application of quantitative and reproducible methods. The establishment of dedicated BIA support within academic institutions is vital to improving research quality and efficiency and can significantly advance scientific discovery. However, a lack of training resources, limited career paths and insufficient recognition of the contributions made by bioimage analysts prevent the full realization of this potential. This Perspective - the result of the recent The Company of Biologists Workshop 'Effectively Communicating Bioimage Analysis', which aimed to summarize the global BIA landscape, categorize obstacles and offer possible solutions - proposes strategies to bring about a cultural shift towards recognizing the value of BIA by standardizing tools, improving training and encouraging formal credit for contributions. We also advocate for increased funding, standardized practices and enhanced collaboration, and we conclude with a call to action for all stakeholders to join efforts in advancing BIA.

OrgaMapper: a robust and easy-to-use workflow for analyzing organelle positioning

BACKGROUND

Eukaryotic cells are highly compartmentalized by a variety of organelles that carry out specific cellular processes. The position of these organelles within the cell is elaborately regulated and vital for their function. For instance, the position of lysosomes relative to the nucleus controls their degradative capacity and is altered in pathophysiological conditions. The molecular components orchestrating the precise localization of organelles remain incompletely understood. A confounding factor in these studies is the fact that organelle positioning is surprisingly non-trivial to address e.g., perturbations that affect the localization of organelles often lead to secondary phenotypes such as changes in cell or organelle size. These phenotypes could potentially mask effects or lead to the identification of false positive hits. To uncover and test potential molecular components at scale, accurate and easy-to-use analysis tools are required that allow robust measurements of organelle positioning.

RESULTS

Here, we present an analysis workflow for the faithful, robust, and quantitative analysis of organelle positioning phenotypes. Our workflow consists of an easy-to-use Fiji plugin and an R Shiny App. These tools enable users without background in image or data analysis to (1) segment single cells and nuclei and to detect organelles, (2) to measure cell size and the distance between detected organelles and the nucleus, (3) to measure intensities in the organelle channel plus one additional channel, (4) to measure radial intensity profiles of organellar markers, and (5) to plot the results in informative graphs. Using simulated data and immunofluorescent images of cells in which the function of known factors for lysosome positioning has been perturbed, we show that the workflow is robust against common problems for the accurate assessment of organelle positioning such as changes of cell shape and size, organelle size and background.

CONCLUSIONS

OrgaMapper is a versatile, robust, and easy-to-use automated image analysis workflow that can be utilized in microscopy-based hypothesis testing and screens. It effectively allows for the mapping of the intracellular space and enables the discovery of novel regulators of organelle positioning.

Exposing image splicing traces in scientific publications via uncertainty-guided refinement

Recently, a surge in image manipulations in scientific publications has led to numerous retractions, highlighting the importance of image integrity. Although forensic detectors for image duplication and synthesis have been researched, the detection of image splicing in scientific publications remains largely unexplored. Splicing detection is more challenging than duplication detection due to the lack of reference images and more difficult than synthesis detection because of the presence of smaller tampered-with areas. Moreover, disruptive factors in scientific images, such as artifacts, abnormal patterns, and noise, present misleading features like splicing traces, rendering this task difficult. In addition, the scarcity of high-quality datasets of spliced scientific images has limited advancements. Therefore, we propose the uncertainty-guided refinement network (URN) to mitigate these disruptive factors. We also construct a dataset for image splicing detection (SciSp) with 1,290 spliced images by collecting and manually splicing. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the URN's superior splicing detection performance.

Harmonizing the Generation and Pre-publication Stewardship of FAIR bioimage data

Together with the molecular knowledge of genes and proteins, biological images promise to significantly enhance the scientific understanding of complex cellular systems and to advance predictive and personalized therapeutic products for human health. For this potential to be realized, quality-assured bioimage data must be shared among labs at a global scale to be compared, pooled, and reanalyzed, thus unleashing untold potential beyond the original purpose for which the data was generated. There are two broad sets of requirements to enable bioimage data sharing in the life sciences. One set of requirements is articulated in the companion White Paper entitled "Enabling Global Image Data Sharing in the Life Sciences," which is published in parallel and addresses the need to build the cyberinfrastructure for sharing bioimage data (arXiv:2401.13023 [q-bio.OT], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.13023). Here, we detail a broad set of requirements, which involves collecting, managing, presenting, and propagating contextual information essential to assess the quality, understand the content, interpret the scientific implications, and reuse bioimage data in the context of the experimental details. We start by providing an overview of the main lessons learned to date through international community activities, which have recently made generating community standard practices for imaging Quality Control (QC) and metadata (Faklaris et al., 2022; Hammer et al., 2021; Huisman et al., 2021; Microscopy Australia, 2016; Montero Llopis et al., 2021; Rigano et al., 2021; Sarkans et al., 2021). We then provide a clear set of recommendations for amplifying this work. The driving goal is to address remaining challenges and democratize access to common practices and tools for a spectrum of biomedical researchers, regardless of their expertise, access to resources, and geographical location.

Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: Common challenges and common solutions

As microscopy diversifies and becomes ever more complex, the problem of quantification of microscopy images has emerged as a major roadblock for many researchers. All researchers must face certain challenges in turning microscopy images into answers, independent of their scientific question and the images they have generated. Challenges may arise at many stages throughout the analysis process, including handling of the image files, image pre-processing, object finding, or measurement, and statistical analysis. While the exact solution required for each obstacle will be problem-specific, by keeping analysis in mind, optimizing data quality, understanding tools and tradeoffs, breaking workflows and data sets into chunks, talking to experts, and thoroughly documenting what has been done, analysts at any experience level can learn to overcome these challenges and create better and easier image analyses.

Challenges and opportunities for bioimage analysis core-facilities

Recent advances in microscopy imaging and image analysis motivate more and more institutes worldwide to establish dedicated core-facilities for bioimage analysis. To maximise the benefits research groups at these institutes gain from their core-facilities, they should be established to fit well into their respective environment. In this article, we introduce common collaborator requests and corresponding potential services core-facilities can offer. We also discuss potential competing interests between the targeted missions and implementations of services to guide decision makers and core-facility founders to circumvent common pitfalls.

A practical guide to bioimaging research data management in core facilities

Bioimage data are generated in diverse research fields throughout the life and biomedical sciences. Its potential for advancing scientific progress via modern, data-driven discovery approaches reaches beyond disciplinary borders. To fully exploit this potential, it is necessary to make bioimaging data, in general, multidimensional microscopy images and image series, FAIR, that is, findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. These FAIR principles for research data management are now widely accepted in the scientific community and have been adopted by funding agencies, policymakers and publishers. To remain competitive and at the forefront of research, implementing the FAIR principles into daily routines is an essential but challenging task for researchers and research infrastructures. Imaging core facilities, well-established providers of access to imaging equipment and expertise, are in an excellent position to lead this transformation in bioimaging research data management. They are positioned at the intersection of research groups, IT infrastructure providers, the institution´s administration, and microscope vendors. In the frame of German BioImaging - Society for Microscopy and Image Analysis (GerBI-GMB), cross-institutional working groups and third-party funded projects were initiated in recent years to advance the bioimaging community's capability and capacity for FAIR bioimage data management. Here, we provide an imaging-core-facility-centric perspective outlining the experience and current strategies in Germany to facilitate the practical adoption of the FAIR principles closely aligned with the international bioimaging community. We highlight which tools and services are ready to be implemented and what the future directions for FAIR bioimage data have to offer.

Noninvasive Assessment of Diabetic Kidney Disease With MRI: Hype or Hope?

Owing to the increasing prevalence of diabetic mellitus, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is presently the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease worldwide. Early identification and disease interception is of paramount clinical importance for DKD management. However, current diagnostic, disease monitoring and prognostic tools are not satisfactory, due to their low sensitivity, low specificity, or invasiveness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is noninvasive and offers a host of contrast mechanisms that are sensitive to pathophysiological changes and risk factors associated with DKD. MRI tissue characterization involves structural and functional information including renal morphology (kidney volume (TKV) and parenchyma thickness using T1- or T2-weighted MRI), renal microstructure (diffusion weighted imaging, DWI), renal tissue oxygenation (blood oxygenation level dependent MRI, BOLD), renal hemodynamics (arterial spin labeling and phase contrast MRI), fibrosis (DWI) and abdominal or perirenal fat fraction (Dixon MRI). Recent (pre)clinical studies demonstrated the feasibility and potential value of DKD evaluation with MRI. Recognizing this opportunity, this review outlines key concepts and current trends in renal MRI technology for furthering our understanding of the mechanisms underlying DKD and for supplementing clinical decision-making in DKD. Progress in preclinical MRI of DKD is surveyed, and challenges for clinical translation of renal MRI are discussed. Future directions of DKD assessment and renal tissue characterization with (multi)parametric MRI are explored. Opportunities for discovery and clinical break-through are discussed including biological validation of the MRI findings, large-scale population studies, standardization of DKD protocols, the synergistic connection with data science to advance comprehensive texture analysis, and the development of smart and automatic data analysis and data visualization tools to further the concepts of virtual biopsy and personalized DKD precision medicine. We hope that this review will convey this vision and inspire the reader to become pioneers in noninvasive assessment and management of DKD with MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: common challenges and common solutions

As microscopy diversifies and becomes ever-more complex, the problem of quantification of microscopy images has emerged as a major roadblock for many researchers. All researchers must face certainchallenges in turning microscopy images into answers, independent of their scientific question and the images they've generated. Challenges may arise at many stages throughout the analysis process, including handling of the image files, image pre-processing, object finding, or measurement, and statistical analysis. While the exact solution required for each obstacle will be problem-specific, by understanding tools and tradeoffs, optimizing data quality, breaking workflows and data sets into chunks, talking to experts, and thoroughly documenting what has been done, analysts at any experience level can learn to overcome these challenges and create better and easier image analyses.

Automated analysis of gray matter damage in aged mice reveals impaired remyelination in the cuprizone model

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by myelin loss, axonal damage, and glial scar formation. Still, the underlying processes remain unclear, as numerous pathways and factors have been found to be involved in the development and progression of the disease. Therefore, it is of great importance to find suitable animal models as well as reliable methods for their precise and reproducible analysis. Here, we describe the impact of demyelination on clinically relevant gray matter regions of the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, using the previously established cuprizone model for aged mice. We could show that bioinformatic image analysis methods are not only suitable for quantification of cell populations, but also for the assessment of de- and remyelination processes, as numerous objective parameters can be considered for reproducible measurements. After cuprizone-induced demyelination, subsequent remyelination proceeded slowly and remained incomplete in all gray matter areas studied. There were regional differences in the number of mature oligodendrocytes during remyelination suggesting region-specific differences in the factors accounting for remyelination failure, as, even in the presence of oligodendrocytes, remyelination in the cortex was found to be impaired. Upon cuprizone administration, synaptic density and dendritic volume in the gray matter of aged mice decreased. The intensity of synaptophysin staining gradually restored during the subsequent remyelination phase, however the expression of MAP2 did not fully recover. Microgliosis persisted in the gray matter of aged animals throughout the remyelination period, whereas extensive astrogliosis was of short duration as compared to white matter structures. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the application of the cuprizone model in aged mice mimics the impaired regeneration ability seen in human pathogenesis more accurately than commonly used protocols with young mice and therefore provides an urgently needed animal model for the investigation of remyelination failure and remyelination-enhancing therapies.

Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses

Images document scientific discoveries and are prevalent in modern biomedical research. Microscopy imaging in particular is currently undergoing rapid technological advancements. However, for scientists wishing to publish obtained images and image-analysis results, there are currently no unified guidelines for best practices. Consequently, microscopy images and image data in publications may be unclear or difficult to interpret. Here, we present community-developed checklists for preparing light microscopy images and describing image analyses for publications. These checklists offer authors, readers and publishers key recommendations for image formatting and annotation, color selection, data availability and reporting image-analysis workflows. The goal of our guidelines is to increase the clarity and reproducibility of image figures and thereby to heighten the quality and explanatory power of microscopy data.

A community-driven approach to enhancing the quality and interpretability of microscopy images

Scientific publications in the life sciences regularly include image data to display and communicate revelations about cellular structure and function. In 2016, a set of guiding principles known as the 'FAIR Data Principles' were put forward to ensure that research data are findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible. However, challenges still persist regarding the quality, accessibility and interpretability of image data, and how to effectively communicate microscopy data in figures. This Perspective article details a community-driven initiative that aims to promote the accurate and understandable depiction of light microscopy data in publications. The initiative underscores the crucial role of global and diverse scientific communities in advancing the standards in the field of biological images. Additionally, the perspective delves into the historical context of scientific images, in the hope that this look into our past can help ongoing community efforts move forward.

Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses

Images document scientific discoveries and are prevalent in modern biomedical research. Microscopy imaging in particular is currently undergoing rapid technological advancements. However for scientists wishing to publish the obtained images and image analyses results, there are to date no unified guidelines. Consequently, microscopy images and image data in publications may be unclear or difficult to interpret. Here we present community-developed checklists for preparing light microscopy images and image analysis for publications. These checklists offer authors, readers, and publishers key recommendations for image formatting and annotation, color selection, data availability, and for reporting image analysis workflows. The goal of our guidelines is to increase the clarity and reproducibility of image figures and thereby heighten the quality and explanatory power of microscopy data is in publications.

Building a FAIR image data ecosystem for microscopy communities

Bioimaging has now entered the era of big data with faster-than-ever development of complex microscopy technologies leading to increasingly complex datasets. This enormous increase in data size and informational complexity within those datasets has brought with it several difficulties in terms of common and harmonized data handling, analysis, and management practices, which are currently hampering the full potential of image data being realized. Here, we outline a wide range of efforts and solutions currently being developed by the microscopy community to address these challenges on the path towards FAIR bioimaging data. We also highlight how different actors in the microscopy ecosystem are working together, creating synergies that develop new approaches, and how research infrastructures, such as Euro-BioImaging, are fostering these interactions to shape the field.

The analysis of protein recruitment to laser microirradiation-induced DNA damage in live cells: Best practices for data analysis

Laser microirradiation coupled with live-cell fluorescence microscopy is a powerful technique that has been used widely in studying the recruitment and retention of proteins at sites of DNA damage. Results obtained from this technique can be found in published works by both seasoned and infrequent users of microscopy. However, like many other microscopy-based techniques, the presentation of data from laser microirradiation experiments is inconsistent; papers report a wide assortment of analytic techniques, not all of which result in accurate and/or appropriate representation of the data. In addition to the varied methods of analysis, experimental and analytical details are commonly under-reported. Consequently, publications reporting data from laser microirradiation coupled with fluorescence microscopy experiments need to be carefully and critically assessed by readers. Here, we undertake a systematic investigation of commonly reported corrections used in the analysis of laser microirradiation data. We validate the critical need to correct data for photobleaching and we identify key experimental parameters that must be accounted for when presenting data from laser microirradiation experiments. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward, four-step analytical protocol that can readily be applied across platforms and that aims to improve the quality of data reporting in the DNA damage field.

CellProfiler plugins -- an easy image analysis platform integration for containers and Python tools

CellProfiler is a widely used software for creating reproducible, reusable image analysis workflows without needing to code. In addition to the >90 modules that make up the main CellProfiler program, CellProfiler has a plugins system that allows for the creation of new modules which integrate with other Python tools or tools that are packaged in software containers. The CellProfiler-plugins repository contains a number of these CellProfiler modules, especially modules that are experimental and/or dependency-heavy. Here, we present an upgraded CellProfiler-plugins repository, an example of accessing containerized tools, improved documentation, and added citation/reference tools to facilitate the use and contribution of the community.

Prevalence and practices of immunofluorescent cell image processing: a systematic review

Background

We performed a systematic review that identified at least 9,000 scientific papers on PubMed that include immunofluorescent images of cells from the central nervous system (CNS). These CNS papers contain tens of thousands of immunofluorescent neural images supporting the findings of over 50,000 associated researchers. While many existing reviews discuss different aspects of immunofluorescent microscopy, such as image acquisition and staining protocols, few papers discuss immunofluorescent imaging from an image-processing perspective. We analyzed the literature to determine the image processing methods that were commonly published alongside the associated CNS cell, microscopy technique, and animal model, and highlight gaps in image processing documentation and reporting in the CNS research field.

Methods

We completed a comprehensive search of PubMed publications using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and other general search terms for CNS cells and common fluorescent microscopy techniques. Publications were found on PubMed using a combination of column description terms and row description terms. We manually tagged the comma-separated values file (CSV) metadata of each publication with the following categories: animal or cell model, quantified features, threshold techniques, segmentation techniques, and image processing software.

Results

Of the almost 9,000 immunofluorescent imaging papers identified in our search, only 856 explicitly include image processing information. Moreover, hundreds of the 856 papers are missing thresholding, segmentation, and morphological feature details necessary for explainable, unbiased, and reproducible results. In our assessment of the literature, we visualized current image processing practices, compiled the image processing options from the top twelve software programs, and designed a road map to enhance image processing. We determined that thresholding and segmentation methods were often left out of publications and underreported or underutilized for quantifying CNS cell research.

Discussion

Less than 10% of papers with immunofluorescent images include image processing in their methods. A few authors are implementing advanced methods in image analysis to quantify over 40 different CNS cell features, which can provide quantitative insights in CNS cell features that will advance CNS research. However, our review puts forward that image analysis methods will remain limited in rigor and reproducibility without more rigorous and detailed reporting of image processing methods.

Conclusion

Image processing is a critical part of CNS research that must be improved to increase scientific insight, explainability, reproducibility, and rigor.

In situ cell division and mortality rates of SAR11, SAR86, Bacteroidetes, and Aurantivirga during phytoplankton blooms reveal differences in population controls

Net growth of microbial populations, that is, changes in abundances over time, can be studied using 16S rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, this approach does not differentiate between mortality and cell division rates. We used FISH-based image cytometry in combination with dilution culture experiments to study net growth, cell division, and mortality rates of four bacterial taxa over two distinct phytoplankton blooms: the oligotrophs SAR11 and SAR86, and the copiotrophic phylum Bacteroidetes, and its genus Aurantivirga. Cell volumes, ribosome content, and frequency of dividing cells (FDC) co-varied over time. Among the three, FDC was the most suitable predictor to calculate cell division rates for the selected taxa. The FDC-derived cell division rates for SAR86 of up to 0.8/day and Aurantivirga of up to 1.9/day differed, as expected for oligotrophs and copiotrophs. Surprisingly, SAR11 also reached high cell division rates of up to 1.9/day, even before the onset of phytoplankton blooms. For all four taxonomic groups, the abundance-derived net growth (-0.6 to 0.5/day) was about an order of magnitude lower than the cell division rates. Consequently, mortality rates were comparably high to cell division rates, indicating that about 90% of bacterial production is recycled without apparent time lag within 1 day. Our study shows that determining taxon-specific cell division rates complements omics-based tools and provides unprecedented clues on individual bacterial growth strategies including bottom-up and top-down controls. IMPORTANCE The growth of a microbial population is often calculated from their numerical abundance over time. However, this does not take cell division and mortality rates into account, which are important for deriving ecological processes like bottom-up and top-down control. In this study, we determined growth by numerical abundance and calibrated microscopy-based methods to determine the frequency of dividing cells and subsequently calculate taxon-specific cell division rates in situ. The cell division and mortality rates of two oligotrophic (SAR11 and SAR86) and two copiotrophic (Bacteroidetes and Aurantivirga) taxa during two spring phytoplankton blooms showed a tight coupling for all four taxa throughout the blooms without any temporal offset. Unexpectedly, SAR11 showed high cell division rates days before the bloom while cell abundances remained constant, which is indicative of strong top-down control. Microscopy remains the method of choice to understand ecological processes like top-down and bottom-up control on a cellular level.

A biologist's guide to planning and performing quantitative bioimaging experiments

Technological advancements in biology and microscopy have empowered a transition from bioimaging as an observational method to a quantitative one. However, as biologists are adopting quantitative bioimaging and these experiments become more complex, researchers need additional expertise to carry out this work in a rigorous and reproducible manner. This Essay provides a navigational guide for experimental biologists to aid understanding of quantitative bioimaging from sample preparation through to image acquisition, image analysis, and data interpretation. We discuss the interconnectedness of these steps, and for each, we provide general recommendations, key questions to consider, and links to high-quality open-access resources for further learning. This synthesis of information will empower biologists to plan and execute rigorous quantitative bioimaging experiments efficiently.

In Vitro High-Throughput Genotoxicity Testing Using γH2AX Biomarker, Microscopy and Reproducible Automatic Image Analysis in ImageJ—A Pilot Study with Valinomycin

(1) Background: The detection of DNA double-strand breaks in vitro using the phosphorylated histone biomarker (γH2AX) is an increasingly popular method of measuring in vitro genotoxicity, as it is sensitive, specific and suitable for high-throughput analysis. The γH2AX response is either detected by flow cytometry or microscopy, the latter being more accessible. However, authors sparsely publish details, data, and workflows from overall fluorescence intensity quantification, which hinders the reproducibility. (2) Methods: We used valinomycin as a model genotoxin, two cell lines (HeLa and CHO-K1) and a commercial kit for γH2AX immunofluorescence detection. Bioimage analysis was performed using the open-source software ImageJ. Mean fluorescent values were measured using segmented nuclei from the DAPI channel and the results were expressed as the area-scaled relative fold change in γH2AX fluorescence over the control. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the relative area of the nuclei. We present the workflows, data, and scripts on GitHub. (3) Results: The outputs obtained by an introduced method are in accordance with expected results, i.e., valinomycin was genotoxic and cytotoxic to both cell lines used after 24 h of incubation. (4) Conclusions: The overall fluorescence intensity of γH2AX obtained from bioimage analysis appears to be a promising alternative to flow cytometry. Workflow, data, and script sharing are crucial for further improvement of the bioimage analysis methods.

Can Image Data Facilitate Reproducibility of Graphics and Visualizations? Toward a Trusted Scientific Practice

Reproducibility is a cornerstone of good scientific practice; however, the ongoing "reproducibility crisis" shows that we still need to improve the way we are doing research currently. Reproducibility is crucial because it enables both the comparison to existing techniques as well as the composition and improvement of existing approaches. It can also increase trust in the respective results, which is paramount for adoption in further research and applications. While there are already many initiatives and approaches with different complexity aimed at enabling reproducible research in the context of visualization, we argue for an alternative, lightweight approach that documents the most relevant parameters with minimal overhead. It still complements complex approaches well, and integration with any existing tool or system is simple. Our approach uses the images produced by visualizations and seamlessly piggy-backs everyday communication and research collaborations, publication authoring, public outreach, and internal note-taking. We exemplify how our approach supports day-to-day work and discuss limitations and how they can be countered.

A Hitchhiker's Guide through the Bio-image Analysis Software Universe

Modern research in the life sciences is unthinkable without computational methods for extracting, quantifying and visualizing information derived from microscopy imaging data of biological samples. In the past decade, we observed a dramatic increase in available software packages for these purposes. As it is increasingly difficult to keep track of the number of available image analysis platforms, tool collections, components and emerging technologies, we provide a conservative overview of software that we use in daily routine and give insights into emerging new tools. We give guidance on which aspects to consider when choosing the platform that best suits the user's needs, including aspects such as image data type, skills of the team, infrastructure and community at the institute and availability of time and budget.

3D imaging for driving cancer discovery

Our understanding of the cellular composition and architecture of cancer has primarily advanced using 2D models and thin slice samples. This has granted spatial information on fundamental cancer biology and treatment response. However, tissues contain a variety of interconnected cells with different functional states and shapes, and this complex organization is impossible to capture in a single plane. Furthermore, tumours have been shown to be highly heterogenous, requiring large-scale spatial analysis to reliably profile their cellular and structural composition. Volumetric imaging permits the visualization of intact biological samples, thereby revealing the spatio-phenotypic and dynamic traits of cancer. This review focuses on new insights into cancer biology uniquely brought to light by 3D imaging and concomitant progress in cancer modelling and quantitative analysis. 3D imaging has the potential to generate broad knowledge advance from major mechanisms of tumour progression to new strategies for cancer treatment and patient diagnosis. We discuss the expected future contributions of the newest imaging trends towards these goals and the challenges faced for reaching their full application in cancer research.

IRimage: open source software for processing images from infrared thermal cameras

IRimage aims at increasing throughput, accuracy and reproducibility of results obtained from thermal images, especially those produced with affordable, consumer-oriented cameras. IRimage processes thermal images, extracting raw data and calculating temperature values with an open and fully documented algorithm, making this data available for further processing using image analysis software. It also allows the making of reproducible measurements of the temperature of objects in a series of images, and produce visual outputs (images and videos) suitable for scientific reporting. IRimage is implemented in a scripting language of the scientific image analysis software ImageJ, allowing its use through a graphical user interface and also allowing for an easy modification or expansion of its functionality. IRimage's results were consistent with those of standard software for 15 camera models of the most widely used brand. An example use case is also presented, in which IRimage was used to efficiently process hundreds of thermal images to reveal subtle differences in the daily pattern of leaf temperature of plants subjected to different soil water contents. IRimage's functionalities make it better suited for research purposes than many currently available alternatives, and could contribute to making affordable consumer-grade thermal cameras useful for reproducible research.

Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods

Although fluorescence microscopy is ubiquitous in biomedical research, microscopy methods reporting is inconsistent and perhaps undervalued. We emphasize the importance of appropriate microscopy methods reporting and seek to educate researchers about how microscopy metadata impact data interpretation. We provide comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. We aim to improve microscopy reporting, thus improving the quality, rigor and reproducibility of image-based science.

Towards community-driven metadata standards for light microscopy: tiered specifications extending the OME model

Rigorous record-keeping and quality control are required to ensure the quality, reproducibility and value of imaging data. The 4DN Initiative and BINA here propose light Microscopy Metadata specifications that extend the OME data model, scale with experimental intent and complexity, and make it possible for scientists to create comprehensive records of imaging experiments.

An Open-Source Framework for Automated High-Throughput Cell Biology Experiments

Modern data analysis methods, such as optimization algorithms or deep learning have been successfully applied to a number of biotechnological and medical questions. For these methods to be efficient, a large number of high-quality and reproducible experiments needs to be conducted, requiring a high degree of automation. Here, we present an open-source hardware and low-cost framework that allows for automatic high-throughput generation of large amounts of cell biology data. Our design consists of an epifluorescent microscope with automated XY stage for moving a multiwell plate containing cells and a perfusion manifold allowing programmed application of up to eight different solutions. Our system is very flexible and can be adapted easily for individual experimental needs. To demonstrate the utility of the system, we have used it to perform high-throughput Ca2+ imaging and large-scale fluorescent labeling experiments.

Bioimage analysis workflows: community resources to navigate through a complex ecosystem

Workflows are the keystone of bioimage analysis, and the NEUBIAS (Network of European BioImage AnalystS) community is trying to gather the actors of this field and organize the information around them.  One of its most recent outputs is the opening of the F1000Research NEUBIAS gateway, whose main objective is to offer a channel of publication for bioimage analysis workflows and associated resources. In this paper we want to express some personal opinions and recommendations related to finding, handling and developing bioimage analysis workflows.  The emergence of "big data" in bioimaging and resource-intensive analysis algorithms make local data storage and computing solutions a limiting factor. At the same time, the need for data sharing with collaborators and a general shift towards remote work, have created new challenges and avenues for the execution and sharing of bioimage analysis workflows. These challenges are to reproducibly run workflows in remote environments, in particular when their components come from different software packages, but also to document them and link their parameters and results by following the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) to foster open and reproducible science. In this opinion paper, we focus on giving some directions to the reader to tackle these challenges and navigate through this complex ecosystem, in order to find and use workflows, and to compare workflows addressing the same problem. We also discuss tools to run workflows in the cloud and on High Performance Computing resources, and suggest ways to make these workflows FAIR.

Reproducible image handling and analysis

Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to address this problem. A new norm for reporting reproducible image analyses will diminish mishandling, as it will alert co-authors, referees, and journals to aberrant image data processing or, if published nonetheless, it will document it to the reader. To promote this norm, we discuss the effectiveness of this approach and give some step-by-step instructions for publishing reproducible image data processing and analysis workflows.

Effective image visualization for publications - a workflow using open access tools and concepts

Today, 25% of figures in biomedical publications contain images of various types, e.g. photos, light or electron microscopy images, x-rays, or even sketches or drawings. Despite being widely used, published images may be ineffective or illegible since details are not visible, information is missing or they have been inappropriately processed. The vast majority of such imperfect images can be attributed to the lack of experience of the authors as undergraduate and graduate curricula lack courses on image acquisition, ethical processing, and visualization.  Here we present a step-by-step image processing workflow for effective and ethical image presentation. The workflow is aimed to allow novice users with little or no prior experience in image processing to implement the essential steps towards publishing images. The workflow is based on the open source software Fiji, but its principles can be applied with other software packages. All image processing steps discussed here, and complementary suggestions for image presentation, are shown in an accessible "cheat sheet"-style format, enabling wide distribution, use, and adoption to more specific needs.

Effective image visualization for publications - a workflow using open access tools and concepts

Today, 25% of figures in biomedical publications contain images of various types, e.g. photos, light or electron microscopy images, x-rays, or even sketches or drawings. Despite being widely used, published images may be ineffective or illegible since details are not visible, information is missing or they have been inappropriately processed. The vast majority of such imperfect images can be attributed to the lack of experience of the authors as undergraduate and graduate curricula lack courses on image acquisition, ethical processing, and visualization.  Here we present a step-by-step image processing workflow for effective and ethical image presentation. The workflow is aimed to allow novice users with little or no prior experience in image processing to implement the essential steps towards publishing images. The workflow is based on the open source software Fiji, but its principles can be applied with other software packages. All image processing steps discussed here, and complementary suggestions for image presentation, are shown in an accessible "cheat sheet"-style format, enabling wide distribution, use, and adoption to more specific needs.