GPER-mediated proliferation and estradiol production in breast cancer-associated fibroblasts

From physiology to pathology: Emerging roles of GPER in cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are among the leading causes of death globally and pose a significant threat to public health. Factors such as prolonged high cholesterol levels, diabetes, smoking, unhealthy diet, and genetic predisposition could contribute to the occurrence and development of CVDs. Common CVDs include hypertension (HTN), atherosclerosis (AS), myocardial infarction (MI), myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI), heart failure (HF) and arrhythmia. Estrogen is recognized for its cardiovascular protective effects, resulting in lower incidence and mortality rates of CVDs in premenopausal women compared to men. The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), a G protein-coupled receptor with a seven-transmembrane structure, exhibits unique structural characteristics and widespread tissue distribution. GPER activates intracellular signaling pathways through its interaction with G proteins, mediating estrogen's biological effects and participating in the regulation of cardiovascular function, metabolic balance, and nervous system. Although recent research has highlighted the significant role of GPER in the cardiovascular system, its specific mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, this review summarizes the latest research on GPER in CVDs, including its fundamental characteristics, physiological functions in the cardiovascular system, and its roles and potential therapeutic applications in common CVDs such as HTN, AS, MI, MIRI, HF and arrhythmia. Exploring GPER's positive effects on cardiovascular health will provide new strategies and research directions for the treatment of CVDs.

Regulation of Stromal Cells by Sex Steroid Hormones in the Breast Cancer Microenvironment

Breast cancer is a prevalent hormone-dependent malignancy, and estrogens/estrogen receptor (ER) signaling are pivotal therapeutic targets in ER-positive breast cancers, where endocrine therapy has significantly improved treatment efficacy. However, the emergence of both de novo and acquired resistance to these therapies continues to pose challenges. Additionally, androgens are produced locally in breast carcinoma tissues by androgen-producing enzymes, and the androgen receptor (AR) is commonly expressed in breast cancer cells. Intratumoral androgens play a significant role in breast cancer progression and are closely linked to resistance to endocrine treatments. The tumor microenvironment, consisting of tumor cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, and blood vessels, is crucial for tumor progression. Stromal cells influence tumor progression through direct interactions with cancer cells, the secretion of soluble factors, and modulation of tumor immunity. Estrogen and androgen signaling in breast cancer cells affects the tumor microenvironment, and the expression of hormone receptors correlates with the diversity of the stromal cell profile. Notably, various stromal cells also express ER or AR, which impacts breast cancer development. This review describes how sex steroid hormones, particularly estrogens and androgens, affect stromal cells in the breast cancer microenvironment. We summarize recent findings focusing on the effects of ER/AR signaling in breast cancer cells on stromal cells, as well as the direct effects of ER/AR signaling in stromal cells.

The activation of the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor promotes the aggressiveness of MDA-MB231 cells by targeting the IRE1α/TXNIP pathway

Background and purpose

This study investigated modulating the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) on the IRElα/TXNIP pathway and its role in drug resistance in MDA-MB231 cells.

Experimental approach

To determine the optimal concentrations of G1 and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (TAM), GPER expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were analyzed using qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. Cells were treated with individual concentrations of G1 (1000 nM), G15 (1000 nM), and TAM (2000 nM), as well as combinations of these treatments (G1 + G15, TAM + G15, and G1 + TAM) for 24 and 48 h. The expression levels of GPER, IRE1α, miR-17-5p, TXNIP, ABCB1, and ABCC1 genes and TXNIP protein expression were evaluated. Finally, apoptosis and cell migration were examined using flow cytometry and the wound-healing assay, respectively.

Findings/Results

Activating GPER with its specific agonist G1 and TAM significantly increased IRE1α levels in MDA-MB231 cells. IRE1α through splicing XBP1 led to unfolded protein response. In addition, decreased TXNIP gene and protein expression reduced apoptosis, increased migration, and upregulated the genes associated with drug resistance.

Conclusion and implication

Our investigation revealed that blocking the GPER/IRE1α/TXNIP pathway in MDA-MB231 cells could enhance treatment efficacy and improve chemotherapy responsiveness. The distinct unfolded protein response observed in MDA-MB231 cells may stem from the unique characteristics of these cells, which lack receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and HER2/neu hormones, possessing only the GPER receptor (ER-/PR-/HER2-/GPER+). This study introduced a new pathway in TNBC cells, indicating that targeting GPER could be crucial in comprehensive therapeutic strategies in TNBC cells.

Cancer associated fibroblasts and metabolic reprogramming: unraveling the intricate crosstalk in tumor evolution

Metabolic reprogramming provides tumors with an energy source and biofuel to support their survival in the malignant microenvironment. Extensive research into the intrinsic oncogenic mechanisms of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has established that cancer-associated fibroblast (CAFs) and metabolic reprogramming regulates tumor progression through numerous biological activities, including tumor immunosuppression, chronic inflammation, and ecological niche remodeling. Specifically, immunosuppressive TME formation is promoted and mediators released via CAFs and multiple immune cells that collectively support chronic inflammation, thereby inducing pre-metastatic ecological niche formation, and ultimately driving a vicious cycle of tumor proliferation and metastasis. This review comprehensively explores the process of CAFs and metabolic regulation of the dynamic evolution of tumor-adapted TME, with particular focus on the mechanisms by which CAFs promote the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment and support metastasis. Existing findings confirm that multiple components of the TME act cooperatively to accelerate the progression of tumor events. The potential applications and challenges of targeted therapies based on CAFs in the clinical setting are further discussed in the context of advancing research related to CAFs.

Progesterone Receptor Signaling Promotes Cancer Associated Fibroblast Mediated Tumorigenicity in ER+ Breast Cancer

Breast cancer progression involves intricate interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). This study elucidates the critical role of progesterone receptor (PR) signaling in mediating the protumorigenic effects of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) on estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) luminal breast cancer cells. We demonstrate that CAFs produce physiologically relevant levels of estrogen and progesterone, which significantly contribute to breast cancer tumorigenicity. Specifically, CAF conditioned media (CM) promoted PR-dependent anchorage-independent growth, tumorsphere formation/stem cell expansion, and CD44 upregulation. CAF cells formed co-clusters more frequently with PR+ breast cancer cells relative to PR-null models. While both PR isoforms mediated these actions, PR-A was a dominant driver of tumorsphere formation/stemness, while PR-B induced robust CD44 expression and CAF/tumor cell co-cluster formation. CD44 knockdown impaired CAF/tumor cell co-clustering. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), also secreted by CAFs, phosphorylated PR (Ser294) in a MAPK-dependent manner and activated PR to enhance CD44 expression and breast cancer tumorigenicity. The FGF receptor (FGFR) inhibitor PD173074 diminished CAF- and FGF2-dependent PR activation, tumorsphere formation, and co-clustering. In summary, this study reveals a novel mechanism through which stromal CAFs orchestrate elevated PR signaling in ER+ luminal breast cancer via secretion of both progesterone and FGF2, a potent activator of ERK1/2. Understanding tumor cell/TME interactions provides insights into potential therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting PR- and/or FGF2/FGFR-dependent signaling pathways to prevent early metastasis in patients with ER+ breast cancer.

Current progress and prospects for G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease. The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) plays a crucial role in mediating the effect of estrogen and estrogen-like compounds in TNBC cells. Compared with other subtypes, GPER has a higher expression in TNBC. The GPER mechanisms have been thoroughly characterized and analyzed in estrogen receptor α (ERα) positive breast cancer, but not in TNBC. Our previous work revealed that a higher expression of GPER mRNA indicates a better prognosis for ERα-positive breast cancer; however, its effects in TNBC differ. Whether GPER could serve as a predictive prognostic marker or therapeutic target for TNBC remains unclear. In this review, we provide a detailed introduction to the subcellular localization of GPER, the different effects of various ligands, and the interactions between GPER and closely associated factors in TNBC. We focused on the internal molecular mechanisms specific to TNBC and thoroughly explored the role of GPER in promoting tumor development. We also discussed the interaction of GPER with specific cytokines and chemokines, and the relationship between GPER and immune evasion. Additionally, we discussed the feasibility of using GPER as a therapeutic target in the context of existing studies. This comprehensive review highlights the effects of GPER on TNBC, providing a framework and directions for future research.

The importance of cancer-associated fibroblasts in targeted therapies and drug resistance in breast cancer

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a substantial role in the tumor microenvironment, exhibiting a strong association with the advancement of various types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. CAFs represent the most abundant mesenchymal cell population in breast cancer. Through diverse mechanisms, including the release of cytokines and exosomes, CAFs contribute to the progression of breast cancer by influencing tumor energy metabolism, promoting angiogenesis, impairing immune cell function, and remodeling the extracellular matrix. Moreover, CAFs considerably impact the response to treatment in breast cancer. Consequently, the development of interventions targeting CAFs has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in the management of breast cancer. This article provides an analysis of the role of CAFs in breast cancer, specifically in relation to diagnosis, treatment, drug resistance, and prognosis. The paper succinctly outlines the diverse mechanisms through which CAFs contribute to the malignant behavior of breast cancer cells, including proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the potential of CAFs as valuable tools for early diagnosis, targeted therapy, treatment resistance, and prognosis assessment in breast cancer, thereby offering novel approaches for targeted therapy and overcoming treatment resistance in this disease.

The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Triple-Positive Breast Cancer Progression and Therapeutic Resistance

Breast cancer (BRCA) is a highly heterogeneous systemic disease. It is ranked first globally in the incidence of new cancer cases and has emerged as the primary cause of cancer-related death among females. Among the distinct subtypes of BRCA, triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) has been associated with increased metastasis and invasiveness, exhibiting greater resistance to endocrine therapy involving trastuzumab. It is now understood that invasion, metastasis, and treatment resistance associated with BRCA progression are not exclusively due to breast tumor cells but are from the intricate interplay between BRCA and its tumor microenvironment (TME). Accordingly, understanding the pathogenesis and evolution of the TPBC microenvironment demands a comprehensive approach. Moreover, addressing BRCA treatment necessitates a holistic consideration of the TME, bearing significant implications for identifying novel targets for anticancer interventions. This review expounds on the relationship between critical cellular components and factors in the TPBC microenvironment and the inception, advancement, and therapeutic resistance of breast cancer to provide perspectives on the latest research on TPBC.

Crosstalk and plasticity driving between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor microenvironment: significance of breast cancer metastasis

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the most abundant stromal cell population in breast tumors. A functionally diverse population of CAFs increases the dynamic complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The intertwined network of the TME facilitates the interaction between activated CAFs and breast cancer cells, which can lead to the proliferation and invasion of breast cells. Considering the special transmission function of CAFs, the aim of this review is to summarize and highlight the crosstalk between CAFs and breast cancer cells in the TME as well as the relationship between CAFs and extracellular matrix (ECM), soluble cytokines, and other stromal cells in the metastatic state. The crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor microenvironment also provides a plastic therapeutic target for breast cancer metastasis. In the course of the study, the inhibitory effects of different natural compounds on targeting CAFs and the advantages of different drug combinations were summarized. CAFs are also widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The cumulative research on this phenomenon supports the establishment of a targeted immune microenvironment as a possible breakthrough in the prevention of invasive metastasis of breast cancer.

Selective Modulation of the Keratoconic Stromal Microenvironment by FSH and LH

Keratoconus (KC) affects the corneal structure, with thinning and bulging outward into a conelike shape. Irregular astigmatism and decreased visual acuity appear during puberty and progress into the mid-30s, with unpredictable disease severity. The cause of KC is recognized as multifactorial, but remains poorly understood. Hormone imbalances are a significant modulator of the onset of KC. This study sought to investigate the role of gonadotropins, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) in KC, using a three-dimensional, self-assembled matrix in vitro model. Healthy corneal fibroblasts and human KC cells in the corneal stroma were isolated, cultured, and stimulated with stable vitamin C to promote extracellular matrix assembly. Cultures were further stimulated with 2.5 or 10 mIU/mL FSH and 5 or 35 mIU/mL LH. Samples were evaluated for cell proliferation and morphology via BrdU assay and imaging; protein expression was assessed via Western blot analysis. Proliferation was significantly greater in human KC cells compared to healthy corneal fibroblasts with LH stimulation, but no changes were found with FSH stimulation. Additionally, in sex hormone receptors, fibrotic markers, proteoglycans, and members of the gonadotropin signaling pathway were significantly changed, largely driven by exogenous LH. The impact of exogenous FSH/LH in the KC stromal microenvironment was demonstrated. These results highlight the need to further examine the role of FSH/LH in KC and in human corneal homeostasis.

Oestrogen receptor-independent actions of oestrogen in cancer

Oestrogen, the primary female sex hormone, plays a significant role in tumourigenesis. The major pathway for oestrogen is via binding to its receptor [oestrogen receptor (ERα or β)], followed by nuclear translocation and transcriptional regulation of target genes. Almost 70% of breast tumours are ER + , and endocrine therapies with selective ER modulators (tamoxifen) have been successfully applied. As many as 25% of tamoxifen-treated patients experience disease relapse within 5 years upon completion of chemotherapy. In such cases, the ER-independent oestrogen actions provide a plausible explanation for the resistance, as well as expands the existing horizon of available drug targets. ER-independent oestrogen signalling occurs via one of the following pathways: signalling through membrane receptors, oxidative catabolism giving rise to genotoxic metabolites, effects on mitochondria and redox balance, and induction of inflammatory cytokines. The current review focuses on the non-classical oestrogen signalling, its role in cancer, and its clinical significance.

Characterization of Breast Cancer Aggressiveness by Cell Mechanics

In healthy tissues, cells are in mechanical homeostasis. During cancer progression, this equilibrium is disrupted. Cancer cells alter their mechanical phenotype to a softer and more fluid-like one than that of healthy cells. This is connected to cytoskeletal remodeling, changed adhesion properties, faster cell proliferation and increased cell motility. In this work, we investigated the mechanical properties of breast cancer cells representative of different breast cancer subtypes, using MCF-7, tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7, MCF10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. We derived viscoelastic properties from atomic force microscopy force spectroscopy measurements and showed that the mechanical properties of the cells are associated with cancer cell malignancy. MCF10A are the stiffest and least fluid-like cells, while tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 cells are the softest ones. MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 show an intermediate mechanical phenotype. Confocal fluorescence microscopy on cytoskeletal elements shows differences in actin network organization, as well as changes in focal adhesion localization. These findings provide further evidence of distinct changes in the mechanical properties of cancer cells compared to healthy cells and add to the present understanding of the complex alterations involved in tumorigenesis.

New Perspectives on Sex Steroid Hormones Signaling in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The importance of sex hormones, especially estrogen, in the pathogenesis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has attracted attention due to its high incidence among young adults and nonsmokers, especially those who are female. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) reside in the cancer stroma and influence cancer growth, invasion, metastasis, and acquisition of drug resistance through interactions with cancer cells and other microenvironmental components. Hormone-mediated cell-cell interactions are classic cell-cell interactions and well-known phenomena in breast cancer and prostate cancer CAFs. In cancers of other organs, including NSCLC, the effects of CAFs on hormone-receptor expression and hormone production in cancer tissues have been reported; however, there are few such studies. Many more studies have been performed on breast and prostate cancers. Recent advances in technology, particularly single-cell analysis techniques, have led to significant advances in the classification and function of CAFs. However, the importance of sex hormones in cell-cell interactions of CAFs in NSCLC remains unclear. This review summarizes reports on CAFs in NSCLC and sex hormones in cancer and immune cells surrounding CAFs. Furthermore, we discuss the prospects of sex-hormone research involving CAFs in NSCLC.

The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, a gene co-expressed with ERα in breast tumors, is regulated by estrogen-ERα signalling in ERα positive breast cancer cells

GPER is a seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor that mediates rapid estrogen actions. Large volumes of data have revealed its association with clinicopathological variables in breast tumors, role in epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like effects of estrogen, potential as a therapeutic target or a prognostic marker, and involvement in endocrine resistance in the face of tamoxifen agonism. GPER cross-talks with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in cell culture models implicating its role the physiology of normal or transformed mammary epithelial cells. However, discrepancies in the literature have obfuscated the nature of their relationship, its significance, and the underlying mechanism. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between GPER, and ERα in breast tumors, to understand the mechanistic basis, and to gauge its clinical significance. We mined The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-BRCA data to examine the relationship between GPER and ERα expression. GPER mRNA, and protein expression were analyzed in ERα-positive or -negative breast tumors from two independent cohorts using immunohistochemistry, western blotting, or RT-qPCR. The Kaplan-Meier Plotter (KM) was employed for survival analysis. The influence of estrogen in vivo was studied by examining GPER expression levels in estrus or diestrus mouse mammary tissues, and the impact of 17β-estradiol (E2) administration in juvenile or adult mice. The effect of E2, or propylpyrazoletriol (PPT, an ERα agonist) stimulation on GPER expression was studied in MCF-7 and T47D cells, with or without tamoxifen or ERα knockdown. ERα-binding to the GPER locus was explored by analysing ChIP-seq data (ERP000380), in silico prediction of estrogen response elements, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Clinical data revealed significant positive association between GPER and ERα expression in breast tumors. The median GPER expression in ERα-positive tumors was significantly higher than ERα-negative tumors. High GPER expression was significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) of patients with ERα-positive tumors. In vivo experiments showed a positive effect of E2 on GPER expression. E2 induced GPER expression in MCF-7 and T47D cells; an effect mimicked by PPT. Tamoxifen or ERα-knockdown blocked the induction of GPER. Estrogen-mediated induction was associated with increased ERα occupancy in the upstream region of GPER. Furthermore, treatment with 17β-estradiol or PPT significantly reduced the IC₅₀ of the GPER agonist (G1)-mediated loss of MCF-7 or T47D cell viability. In conclusion, GPER is positively associated with ERα in breast tumors, and induced by estrogen-ERα signalling axis. Estrogen-mediated induction of GPER makes the cells more responsive to GPER ligands. More in-depth studies are warranted to establish the significance of GPER-ERα co-expression, and their interplay in breast tumor development, progression, and treatment.

The G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update

Oestrogens and their receptors contribute broadly to physiology and diseases. In premenopausal women, endogenous oestrogens protect against cardiovascular, metabolic and neurological diseases and are involved in hormone-sensitive cancers such as breast cancer. Oestrogens and oestrogen mimetics mediate their effects via the cytosolic and nuclear receptors oestrogen receptor-α (ERα) and oestrogen receptor-β (ERβ) and membrane subpopulations as well as the 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER). GPER, which dates back more than 450 million years in evolution, mediates both rapid signalling and transcriptional regulation. Oestrogen mimetics (such as phytooestrogens and xenooestrogens including endocrine disruptors) and licensed drugs such as selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and downregulators (SERDs) also modulate oestrogen receptor activity in both health and disease. Following up on our previous Review of 2011, we herein summarize the progress made in the field of GPER research over the past decade. We will review molecular, cellular and pharmacological aspects of GPER signalling and function, its contribution to physiology, health and disease, and the potential of GPER to serve as a therapeutic target and prognostic indicator of numerous diseases. We also discuss the first clinical trial evaluating a GPER-selective drug and the opportunity of repurposing licensed drugs for the targeting of GPER in clinical medicine.

Autophagy and Breast Cancer: Connected in Growth, Progression, and Therapy

Despite an increase in the incidence of breast cancer worldwide, overall prognosis has been consistently improving owing to the development of multiple targeted therapies and novel combination regimens including endocrine therapies, aromatase inhibitors, Her2-targeted therapies, and cdk4/6 inhibitors. Immunotherapy is also being actively examined for some breast cancer subtypes. This overall positive outlook is marred by the development of resistance or reduced efficacy of the drug combinations, but the underlying mechanisms are somewhat unclear. It is interesting to note that cancer cells quickly adapt and evade most therapies by activating autophagy, a catabolic process designed to recycle damaged cellular components and provide energy. In this review, we discuss the role of autophagy and autophagy-associated proteins in breast cancer growth, drug sensitivity, tumor dormancy, stemness, and recurrence. We further explore how autophagy intersects and reduces the efficacy of endocrine therapies, targeted therapies, radiotherapy, chemotherapies as well as immunotherapy via modulating various intermediate proteins, miRs, and lncRNAs. Lastly, the potential application of autophagy inhibitors and bioactive molecules to improve the anticancer effects of drugs by circumventing the cytoprotective autophagy is discussed.

Beyond antibody fucosylation: α-(1,6)-fucosyltransferase (Fut8) as a potential new therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy

Aberrant post-translational glycosylation is a well-established hallmark of cancer. Altered core fucosylation mediated by α-(1,6)-fucosyltransferase (Fut8) is one of the key changes in tumor glycan patterns that contributes to neoplastic transformation, tumor metastasis, and immune evasion. Increased Fut8 expression and activity are associated with many types of human cancers, including lung, breast, melanoma, liver, colorectal, ovarian, prostate, thyroid, and pancreatic cancer. In animal models, inhibition of Fut8 activity by gene knockout, RNA interference, and small analogue inhibitors led to reduced tumor growth/metastasis, downregulation of immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1/2, and B7-H3, and reversal of the suppressive state of tumor microenvironment. Although the biologics field has long benefited tremendously from using FUT8 -/- Chinese hamster ovary cells to manufacture IgGs with greatly enhanced effector function of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity for therapy, it is only in recent years that the roles of Fut8 itself in cancer biology have been studied. Here, we summarize the pro-oncogenic mechanisms involved in cancer development that are regulated by Fut8-mediated core fucosylation, and call for more research in this area where modifying the activity of this sole enzyme responsible for core fucosylation could potentially bring rewarding surprises in fighting cancer, infections, and other immune-related diseases.

G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor GPER: Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutic Applications

The actions of estrogens and related estrogenic molecules are complex and multifaceted in both sexes. A wide array of natural, synthetic, and therapeutic molecules target pathways that produce and respond to estrogens. Multiple receptors promulgate these responses, including the classical estrogen receptors of the nuclear hormone receptor family (estrogen receptors α and β), which function largely as ligand-activated transcription factors, and the 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, which activates a diverse array of signaling pathways. The pharmacology and functional roles of GPER in physiology and disease reveal important roles in responses to both natural and synthetic estrogenic compounds in numerous physiological systems. These functions have implications in the treatment of myriad disease states, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders. This review focuses on the complex pharmacology of GPER and summarizes major physiological functions of GPER and the therapeutic implications and ongoing applications of GPER-targeted compounds.

Comparative G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) Systems in Diabetic and Cancer Conditions: A Review

For many patients, diabetes Mellitus and Malignancy are frequently encountered comorbidities. Diabetes affects approximately 10.5% of the global population, while malignancy accounts for 29.4 million cases each year. These troubling statistics indicate that current treatment approaches for these diseases are insufficient. Alternative therapeutic strategies that consider unique signaling pathways in diabetic and malignancy patients could provide improved therapeutic outcomes. The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is receiving attention for its role in disease pathogenesis and treatment outcomes. This review aims to critically examine GPER' s comparative role in diabetes mellitus and malignancy, identify research gaps that need to be filled, and highlight GPER's potential as a therapeutic target for diabetes and malignancy management. There is a scarcity of data on GPER expression patterns in diabetic models; however, for diabetes mellitus, altered expression of transport and signaling proteins has been linked to GPER signaling. In contrast, GPER expression in various malignancy types appears to be complex and debatable at the moment. Current data show inconclusive patterns of GPER expression in various malignancies, with some indicating upregulation and others demonstrating downregulation. Further research should be conducted to investigate GPER expression patterns and their relationship with signaling pathways in diabetes mellitus and various malignancies. We conclude that GPER has therapeutic potential for chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and malignancy.

Dual Role of Fibroblasts Educated by Tumour in Cancer Behavior and Therapeutic Perspectives

Tumours are complex systems with dynamic interactions between tumour cells, non-tumour cells, and extracellular components that comprise the tumour microenvironment (TME). The majority of TME's cells are cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which are crucial in extracellular matrix (ECM) construction, tumour metabolism, immunology, adaptive chemoresistance, and tumour cell motility. CAF subtypes have been identified based on the expression of protein markers. CAFs may act as promoters or suppressors in tumour cells depending on a variety of factors, including cancer stage. Indeed, CAFs have been shown to promote tumour growth, survival and spread, and secretome changes, but they can also slow tumourigenesis at an early stage through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Stromal-cancer interactions are governed by a variety of soluble factors that determine the outcome of the tumourigenic process. Cancer cells release factors that enhance the ability of fibroblasts to secrete multiple tumour-promoting chemokines, acting on malignant cells to promote proliferation, migration, and invasion. This crosstalk between CAFs and tumour cells has given new prominence to the stromal cells, from being considered as mere physical support to becoming key players in the tumour process. Here, we focus on the concept of cancer as a non-healing wound and the relevance of chronic inflammation to tumour initiation. In addition, we review CAFs heterogeneous origins and markers together with the potential therapeutic implications of CAFs "re-education" and/or targeting tumour progression inhibition.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived lncRNA signature as a putative biomarker in breast cancer

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play a key role in regulating tumor microenvironment and immunity. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are abundant in many tumors. However, the functional and clinical significance of lncRNAs specifically expressed in CAFs has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we identified a list of 95 CAF-specific lncRNAs (FibLnc), including HHLA3, TP53TG1, ST7-AS1, LINC00536, ZNF503-AS1, MIR22HG, and MAPT-AS1, based on immune cell transcriptome expression profiling data. Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets, we found that the FibLnc score predicted differences in overall patient survival and performed well in multiple datasets. FibLnc score was associated with the clinical stage of patients with breast cancer but did not significantly correlate with the PAM50 classification. Functional analysis showed that FibLnc was positively correlated with signaling pathways associated with malignant tumor progression. In addition, FibLnc was positively correlated with tumor mutational load and could predict immunotherapy response in patients with breast cancer receiving anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy. Our proposed FibLnc score was able to reflect the status of the immune environment and immunotherapeutic response in breast cancer, which could help explore potential therapeutic decisions and regulatory mechanisms of CAF-specific lncRNAs.

Correlation of functional and radioligand binding characteristics of GPER ligands confirming aldosterone as a GPER agonist

Aldosterone exerts some of its effects not by binding to mineralocorticoid receptors, but rather by acting via G protein-coupled estrogen receptors (GPER). To determine if aldosterone binds directly to GPER, we studied the ability of aldosterone to compete for the binding of [3 H] 2-methoxyestradiol ([3 H] 2-ME), a high potency GPER-selective agonist. We used GPER gene transfer to engineer Sf9-cultured insect cells to express GPER. We chose insect cells to avoid interactions with any intrinsic mammalian receptors for aldosterone. [3 H] 2-ME binding was saturable and reversible to a high-affinity population of receptors with Kd  = 3.7 nM and Bmax  = 2.2 pmol/mg. Consistent with agonist binding to G Protein-coupled receptors, [3 H] 2-ME high-affinity state binding was reduced in the presence of the hydrolysis-resistant GTP analog, GppNHp. [3 H] 2-ME binding was competed for by the GPER agonist G1, the GPER antagonist G15, estradiol (E2), as well as aldosterone (Aldo). The order of potency for competing for [3 H] 2-ME binding, namely 2ME > Aldo > E2 ≥ G1, paralleled the orders of potency for inhibition of cell proliferation and inhibition of ERK phosphorylation by ligands acting at GPER. These data confirm the ability of aldosterone to interact with the GPER, consistent with the interpretation that aldosterone likely mediates its GPER-dependent effects by direct binding to the GPER. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite the growing evidence for aldosterone's actions via G protein-coupled estrogen receptors (GPER), there remains significant skepticism that aldosterone can directly interact with GPER. The current studies are the first to demonstrate directly that aldosterone indeed is capable of binding to the GPER and thus likely mediates its GPER-dependent effects by direct binding to the receptor.

The G-Protein–Coupled Estrogen Receptor Agonist G-1 Inhibits Proliferation and Causes Apoptosis in Leukemia Cell Lines of T Lineage

The G-protein–coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) mediates non-genomic action of estrogen. Due to its differential expression in some tumors as compared to the original healthy tissues, the GPER has been proposed as a therapeutic target. Accordingly, the non-steroidal GPER agonist G-1, which has often demonstrated marked cytotoxicity in experimental models, has been suggested as a novel anticancer agent for several sensitive tumors. We recently revealed that cell lines derived from acute T-cell (query) lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) express the GPER. Here, we address the question whether G-1 is cytotoxic to T-ALL. We have shown that G-1 causes an early rise of intracellular Ca²⁺, arrests the cell cycle in G2/M, reduces viability, and provokes apoptosis in T-ALL cell lines. Importantly, G-1 caused destabilization and depolymerization of microtubules. We assume that it is a disturbance of the cytoskeleton that causes G-1 cytotoxic and cytostatic effects in our model. The observed cytotoxic effects, apparently, were not triggered by the interaction of G-1 with the GPER as pre-incubation with the highly selective GPER antagonist G-36 was ineffective in preventing the cytotoxicity of G-1. However, G-36 prevented the intracellular Ca²⁺ rise provoked by G-1. Finally, G-1 showed only a moderate negative effect on the activation of non-leukemic CD4⁺ lymphocytes. We suggest G-1 as a potential antileukemic drug.

An Emerging Role for Calcium Signaling in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

Tumors exist in a complex milieu where interaction with their associated microenvironment significantly contributes to disease progression. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the primary component of the tumor microenvironment and participate in complex bidirectional communication with tumor cells. CAFs support the development of various hallmarks of cancer through diverse processes, including direct cell-cell contact, paracrine signaling, and remodeling and deposition of the extracellular matrix. Calcium signaling is a key second messenger in intra- and inter-cellular signaling pathways that contributes to cancer progression; however, the links between calcium signaling and CAFs are less well-explored. In this review, we put into context the role of calcium signaling in interactions between cancer cells and CAFs, with a focus on migration, proliferation, chemoresistance, and genetic instability.

Sex-Based Differences in the Tumor Microenvironment

Cancers are heterogeneous multifactorial diseases consisting of a major public health issue worldwide. Sex disparities are evidenced in cancer incidence, mortality, expression of prognosis factor, response to treatment, and survival. For both sexes, an interplay of intrinsic and environmental factors influences cancer cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) components. The TME cumulates both supportive and communicative functions, contributing to cancer development, progression, and metastasis dissemination. The frontline topics of this chapter are focused on the contribution of sex, via steroid hormones, such as estrogens and androgens, on the following components of the TME: cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), extracellular matrix (ECM), blood and lymphatic endothelial cells, and immunity/inflammatory system.

Breast cancer fibroblasts and cross-talk

The breast tumor microenvironment is one of the crucial elements supporting breast cancer tumor progression and metastasis. The fibroblasts are the chief cellular component of the stromal microenvironment and are pathologically activated and differentiated into breast cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). The catabolic phenotype of breast CAFs arises due to metabolic reprogramming of these fibroblasts under pseudo-hypoxic conditions. The metabolic intermediates and ATP produced by the breast CAFs are exploited by the neighboring cancer cells for energy generation. The growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines secreted by the CAFs help fuel tumor growth, invasion, and dissemination. Moreover, the interplay between breast CAFs and cancer cells, mediated by the growth factors, ROS, metabolic intermediates, exosomes, and catabolite transporters, aids in building a favorable microenvironment that promotes cancer cell proliferation, tumor progression, and metastasis. Therefore, identifying effective means to target the reprogrammed metabolism of the breast CAFs and the cross-communication between CAFs and cancer cells serve as promising strategies to develop anti-cancer therapeutics. Henceforth, the scope of the present review ranges from discussing the underlying characteristics of breast CAFs, mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming in breast CAFs, and the nature of interactions between breast CAFs and cancer cells to studying the intricacies of reprogrammed metabolism targeted cancer therapy.

GPR30-mediated HMGB1 upregulation in CAFs induces autophagy and tamoxifen resistance in ERα-positive breast cancer cells

Tamoxifen (TAM) resistance constitutes a challenge in managing estrogen receptor (ER)α+ breast cancer patients. G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPR30/GPER), which reportedly initiates TAM resistance in ERα+/ GPR30+ breast cancers, is detected in the breast cancer microenvironment, especially cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Herein, considering that GPR30 mediates transcriptional regulation in different cell backgrounds, a microarray strategy was applied in immortalized CAFs derived from primary breast cancer samples, resulting in the identification of 165 GPR30 target genes, among which HMGB1 was confirmed to be upregulated by 17-β estradiol(E2)- and TAM-triggered GPR30 activation in CAFs. Activated GPR30 increased extracellular HMGB1 secretion by CAFs, which was reduced by blocking PI3K/AKT signaling using G15 or LY294002. GPR30-induced HMGB1 upregulation triggered MEK/ERK signaling, leading to increased autophagic behavior to protect cancer cells from TAM-induced apoptosis, mimicking the recombinant HMGB1-mediated increase in cancer cell resistance potential to TAM. MEK/ERK signaling blockage by U0126 decreased the autophagic behavior and resistance ability of cancer cells to TAM. CAF-expressed GPR30 induced TAM resistance via HMGB1 in vivo. Overall, TAM upregulated HMGB1 expression and secretion in CAFs via GPR30/PI3K/AKT signaling, and the secreted HMGB1 induced autophagy to enhance TAM resistance in MCF-7 cells in an ERK-dependent manner. Thus, targeting GPR30 and downstream cascades may be an effective strategy to attenuate the resistance of ERα-positive breast tumors to endocrine therapy.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Breast Cancer Treatment Response and Metastasis

Breast cancer (BrCa) is the leading cause of death among women worldwide, with about one million new cases diagnosed each year. In spite of the improvements in diagnosis, early detection and treatment, there is still a high incidence of mortality and failure to respond to current therapies. With the use of several well-established biomarkers, such as hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), as well as genetic analysis, BrCa patients can be categorized into multiple subgroups: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and Basal-like, with specific treatment strategies. Although chemotherapy and targeted therapies have greatly improved the survival of patients with BrCa, there is still a large number of patients who relapse or who fail to respond. The role of the tumor microenvironment in BrCa progression is becoming increasingly understood. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the principal population of stromal cells in breast tumors. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of CAFs' role in altering the tumor response to therapeutic agents as well as in fostering metastasis in BrCa. In addition, we also review the available CAFs-directed molecular therapies and their potential implications for BrCa management.

Signaling pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts and targeted therapy for cancer

To flourish, cancers greatly depend on their surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in TME are critical for cancer occurrence and progression because of their versatile roles in extracellular matrix remodeling, maintenance of stemness, blood vessel formation, modulation of tumor metabolism, immune response, and promotion of cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and therapeutic resistance. CAFs are highly heterogeneous stromal cells and their crosstalk with cancer cells is mediated by a complex and intricate signaling network consisting of transforming growth factor-beta, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin, mitogen-activated protein kinase, Wnt, Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription, epidermal growth factor receptor, Hippo, and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, etc., signaling pathways. These signals in CAFs exhibit their own special characteristics during the cancer progression and have the potential to be targeted for anticancer therapy. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of these signaling cascades in interactions between cancer cells and CAFs is necessary to fully realize the pivotal roles of CAFs in cancers. Herein, in this review, we will summarize the enormous amounts of findings on the signals mediating crosstalk of CAFs with cancer cells and its related targets or trials. Further, we hypothesize three potential targeting strategies, including, namely, epithelial-mesenchymal common targets, sequential target perturbation, and crosstalk-directed signaling targets, paving the way for CAF-directed or host cell-directed antitumor therapy.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts in non-small cell lung cancer: Recent advances and future perspectives

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes the majority of lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Nearly 70% of NSCLC patients were diagnosed at advanced stage with only 15% of five-year survival rate. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the major component of tumor microenvironment and account for almost 70% of the cells in tumor tissues. By the crosstalk with cancer cells, CAFs reprogrammed cancer cell metabolism, remodeled extracellular matrix (ECM) and created a supportive niche for cancer stem cells. CAFs lead collective invasion of tumor cells and shape tumor immune microenvironment, promoting tumor metastasis and immune escape. In this review, we have summarized the progress of studies regarding CAFs influences on NSCLC in recent five years from the aspects of cell growth, metabolism, therapy resistance, invasion and metastasis and immune suppression. We have discussed the involved mechanisms and implications for the development of anti-NSCLC therapies. The current strategies of CAFs targeting and elimination have also been generalized. Only better understanding of the molecular biology of CAFs may contribute to the development of novel anti-NSCLC strategies.

Activation of GPER by E2 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration of breast cancer cells by regulating the miR-124/CD151 pathway

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and is responsible for a high mortality rate. However, the underlying pathological mechanism of breast cancer remains unclear. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) play critical roles in the progression of breast cancer. Recent studies have reported that miR-124/CD151 participates in the development of breast cancer. However, the exact molecular mechanism of miR-124/CD151 action in 17β-estradiol (E2)-treated breast cancer cells remains unknown. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate miR-124 and CD151 expression levels in MCF-7 cells treated with E2 via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blot analyses. Bioinformatic analysis was performed to predict and identify whether CD151 is a potential target of miR-124. The Cell Counting Kit-8 and colony formation assays were performed to detect proliferation of MCF-7 cells. In addition, the invasive and migratory abilities of MCF-7 cells were assessed via the Transwell and wound healing assays, respectively. The results demonstrated that E2 downregulated miR-124 expression, while upregulating G protein -coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) expression in MCF-7 cells. Following treatment with the GPER antagonist, G15, miR-124 expression was significantly enhanced and E2-induced proliferation, invasion and migration of MCF-7 cells were notably inhibited. In addition, CD151 was confirmed as a direct target of miR-124. CD151 silencing remarkably suppressed the proliferation, invasion and migration of E2-induced MCF-7 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that upregulation of GPER expression induced by E2 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration of breast cancer cells by regulating the miR-124/CD151 pathway. Thus, the results of the present study provide a potential novel method for the treatment and prognosis of breast cancer.

G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor in Cancer and Stromal Cells: Functions and Novel Therapeutic Perspectives

Estrogen is involved in numerous physiological and pathophysiological systems. Its role in driving estrogen receptor-expressing breast cancers is well established, but it also has important roles in a number of other cancers, acting both on tumor cells directly as well as in the function of multiple cells of the tumor microenvironment, including fibroblasts, immune cells, and adipocytes, which can greatly impact carcinogenesis. One of its receptors, the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), has gained much interest over the last decade in both health and disease. Increasing evidence shows that GPER contributes to clinically observed endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer while also playing a complex role in a number of other cancers. Recent discoveries regarding the targeting of GPER in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition, particularly in melanoma, have led to the initiation of the first Phase I clinical trial for the GPER-selective agonist G-1. Furthermore, its functions in metabolism and corresponding pathophysiological states, such as obesity and diabetes, are becoming more evident and suggest additional therapeutic value in targeting GPER for both cancer and other diseases. Here, we highlight the roles of GPER in several cancers, as well as in metabolism and immune regulation, and discuss the therapeutic value of targeting this estrogen receptor as a potential treatment for cancer as well as contributing metabolic and inflammatory diseases and conditions.

Regulation of aromatase in cancer

The regulation of aromatase, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of estrogen in normal and cancer cells, has been associated with growth factor signaling and immune response modulation. The tissue-specific regulatory roles of these factors are of particular importance as local aromatase expression is strongly linked to cancer development/progression and disease outcomes in patients. Therefore, aromatase has become a chemotherapeutic target and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used in the clinic for treating hormone-dependent cancers. Although AIs have shown promising results in the treatment of cancers, the emerging increase in AI-resistance necessitates the development of new and improved targeted therapies. This review discusses the role of tumor and stromal-derived growth factors and immune cell modulators in regulating aromatase. Current single-agent and combination therapies with or without AIs targeting growth factors and immune checkpoints are also discussed. This review highlights recent studies that show new connections between growth factors, mediators of immune response, and aromatase regulation.

Microenvironmental Determinants of Breast Cancer Metastasis: Focus on the Crucial Interplay Between Estrogen and Insulin/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling

The development and progression of the great majority of breast cancers (BCs) are mainly dependent on the biological action elicited by estrogens through the classical estrogen receptor (ER), as well as the alternate receptor named G-protein–coupled estrogen receptor (GPER). In addition to estrogens, other hormones and growth factors, including the insulin and insulin-like growth factor system (IIGFs), play a role in BC. IIGFs cooperates with estrogen signaling to generate a multilevel cross-communication that ultimately facilitates the transition toward aggressive and life-threatening BC phenotypes. In this regard, the majority of BC deaths are correlated with the formation of metastatic lesions at distant sites. A thorough scrutiny of the biological and biochemical events orchestrating metastasis formation and dissemination has shown that virtually all cell types within the tumor microenvironment work closely with BC cells to seed cancerous units at distant sites. By establishing an intricate scheme of paracrine interactions that lead to the expression of genes involved in metastasis initiation, progression, and virulence, the cross-talk between BC cells and the surrounding microenvironmental components does dictate tumor fate and patients’ prognosis. Following (i) a description of the main microenvironmental events prompting BC metastases and (ii) a concise overview of estrogen and the IIGFs signaling and their major regulatory functions in BC, here we provide a comprehensive analysis of the most recent findings on the role of these transduction pathways toward metastatic dissemination. In particular, we focused our attention on the main microenvironmental targets of the estrogen-IIGFs interplay, and we recapitulated relevant molecular nodes that orientate shared biological responses fostering the metastatic program. On the basis of available studies, we propose that a functional cross-talk between estrogens and IIGFs, by affecting the BC microenvironment, may contribute to the metastatic process and may be regarded as a novel target for combination therapies aimed at preventing the metastatic evolution.

Therapeutic Perspectives on the Modulation of G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor, GPER, Function

Estrogens exert their physiological and pathophysiological effects via cellular receptors, named ERα, ERβ, and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER). Estrogen-regulated physiology is tightly controlled by factors that regulate estrogen bioavailability and receptor sensitivity, while disruption of these control mechanisms can result in loss of reproductive function, cancer, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease, obesity, insulin resistance, endometriosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Restoration of estrogen physiology by modulating estrogen bioavailability or receptor activity is an effective approach for treating these pathological conditions. Therapeutic interventions that block estrogen action are employed effectively for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer as well as for precocious puberty and anovulatory infertility. Theoretically, treatments that block estrogen biosynthesis should prevent estrogen action at ERs and GPER, although drug resistance and ligand-independent receptor activation may still occur. In addition, blockade of estrogen biosynthesis does not prevent activation of estrogen receptors by naturally occurring or man-made exogenous estrogens. A more complicated scenario is provided by anti-estrogen drugs that antagonize ERs since these drugs function as GPER agonists. Based upon its association with metabolic dysregulation and advanced cancer, GPER represents a therapeutic target with promise for the treatment of several critical health concerns facing Western society. Selective ligands that specifically target GPER have been developed and may soon serve as pharmacological agents for treating human disease. Here, we review current forms of estrogen therapy and the implications that GPER holds for these therapies. We also discuss existing GPER targeted drugs, additional approaches towards developing GPER-targeted therapies and how these therapies may complement existing modalities of estrogen-targeted therapy.

G-protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor Expression in Growth Hormone Secreting and Non-Functioning Adenomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the expression of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1), aromatase, estrogen receptor α (ERα), estrogen receptor β (ERβ), pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG), and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) in GH-secreting and non-functioning adenomas (NFA).

METHODS

Thirty patients with acromegaly and 27 patients with NFA were included. Gene expression was determined via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR). Protein expression was determined via immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

There was no difference, in terms of gene expression of aromatase, ERα, PTTG, and FGF2 between the two groups (p>0.05 for all). ERβ gene expression was higher and GPER1 gene expression was lower in GH-secreting adenomas than NFAs (p<0.05 for all). Aromatase and ERβ protein expression was higher in GH-secreting adenomas than NFAs (p=0.01). None of the tumors expressed ERα. GPER1 expression was detected in 62.2% of the GH-secreting adenomas and 45% of NFAs. There was no difference in terms of GPER1, PTTG, FGF2 H scores between the two groups (p>0.05 for all). GPER1 gene expression was positively correlated to ERα, ERβ, PTTG, and FGF2 gene expression (p<0.05 for all). There was a positive correlation between aromatase and GPER1 protein expression (r=0.31; p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

GPER1 is expressed at both gene and protein level in a substantial portion of GH-secreting adenomas and NFAs. The finding of a positive correlation between GPER1 and ERα, ERβ, PTTG, and FGF2 gene expression and aromatase and GPER1 protein expression suggests GPER1 along with aromatase and classical ERs might mediate the effects of estrogen through upregulation of PTTG and FGF2.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Epigenetic Regulation and Therapeutic Intervention in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are a heterogeneous population of cells in the solid tumour microenvironment. These cells are positively linked to breast cancer progression. Breast CAFs can be categorised into distinct subtypes according to their roles in breast carcinogenesis. Epigenetic modifications change gene expression patterns as a consequence of altered chromatin configuration and DNA accessibility to transcriptional machinery, without affecting the primary structure of DNA. Epigenetic dysregulation in breast CAFs may enhance breast cancer cell survival and ultimately lead to therapeutic resistance. A growing body of evidence has described epigenetic modulators that target histones, DNA, and miRNA as a promising approach to treat cancer. This review aims to summarise the current findings on the mechanisms involved in the epigenetic regulation in breast CAFs and discusses the potential therapeutic strategies via targeting these factors.

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER-1) and agonist G-1 inhibit growth of ovarian cancer cells by activation of anti-tumoral transcriptome responses: impact of GPER-1 mRNA on survival

PURPOSE

The present study intended to further elucidate the role of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER-1) in ovarian cancer by comparing the effects of a GPER-1 knockdown and treatment with its agonist G-1 on cell growth, apoptosis, and the transcriptome of two ovarian cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the role of GPER-1 in ovarian cancer survival was examined.

METHODS

GPER-1 expression in OVCAR-3 and OAW-42 ovarian cancer cells was knocked down by RNAi. The effects on cell growth were measured by means of the fluorimetric cell titer blue assay and on the transcriptome by Affymetrix GeneChip analysis. The effect of GPER-1 on patient's survival was examined using open source mRNA and clinical data of 1657 ovarian cancer patients.

RESULTS

GPER-1 knockdown resulted in a significant growth stimulation of both cell lines, whereas treatment with agonist G-1 decreased growth of both cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptome analyses revealed a set of 18 genes being conversely regulated after GPER-1 knockdown and G-1 treatment. Generally, treatment with G-1 led to a transcriptome response associated with growth inhibition. In contrast, knockdown of GPER-1 exerted opposite effects, stimulating pathways activating mitosis, but inhibiting pathways associated with apoptosis or interferon signaling. Further analyses using open-access mRNA and clinical data by bioinformatical online tools revealed a longer OS (HR = 0.86, p = 0.057) and PFS (HR = 0.81, p = 0.0035) of ovarian cancer patients with high GPER-1 mRNA expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study clearly support the hypothesis that GPER-1 acts as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer.

GPER mediates decreased chemosensitivity via regulation of ABCG2 expression and localization in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells

Rescue chemotherapy is usually the preferred treatment for patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer with endocrinotherapy resistance. However, these patients often simultaneously show a poor response to cytotoxic drugs, and thus the detailed mechanism of this resistance needs to be further investigated. Our previous research indicated that the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is a novel mediator of the development of multidrug resistance, including resistance to both endocrinotherapy and chemotherapy, and ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) has been identified as an engine that confers cancer cells with chemoresistance by expelling xenobiotics and chemotherapeutics. Here, we are the first to show that the expression levels of GPER and ABCG2 are markedly increased in tamoxifen-resistant ER + metastases compared to the corresponding primary tumors. A plasma membrane expression pattern of GPER and ABCG2 was observed in patients with metastases. Furthermore, both ER modulator tamoxifen, GPER-specific agonist G1 and pure ER antagonist ICI 182,780 significantly enhanced ABCG2 expression in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells (MCF-7R) but not in tamoxifen-sensitive cells (MCF-7). The activated downstream GPER/EGFR/ERK and GPER/EGFR/AKT signaling pathways were responsible for regulating the expression and cell membrane localization of ABCG2, respectively, in MCF-7R cells. Interestingly, the above phenomenon could be alleviated by inhibitors of both the indicated signaling pathways and by knockdown of GPER in MCF-7R cells. More importantly, the tamoxifen-induced GPER/ABCG2 signaling axis was shown to play a pivotal role in the development of chemotherapy (doxorubicin) resistance both in vitro and in vivo. The clinical data further revealed that tamoxifen-resistant patients with high GPER/ABCG2 signaling activation had poor progression-free survival (PFS) when given rescue anthracycline chemotherapy. Therefore, our data provide novel insights into GPER-mediated chemoresistance and provide a rationale for the GPER/ABCG2 signaling axis being a promising target for reversing chemoresistance in patients with advanced ER + tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.

Loss of Estrogen Receptors is Associated with Increased Tumor Aggression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) responds to 17β-estradiol via estrogen-receptor (ER, transcribed from ESR1) dependent mechanisms, but is not recognized as a hormonally responsive cancer. 17β-estradiol production by LSCC cell lines UM-SCC-11A and UM-SCC-12 was examined. Wild type (WT) and ESR1-silenced LSCC cultures and xenografts were examined for 17β-estradiol responsiveness in vivo. 14 LSCC and surrounding epithelial samples at various pathological stages were obtained from patients; ERα and ERβ expression were verified using data from the total cancer genome atlas. UM-SCC-11A and UM-SCC-12 both produce 17β-estradiol, but only UM-SCC-12, not UM-SCC-11A, xenograft tumors grow larger in vivo in response to systemic 17β-estradiol treatments. ERα66 and ERα36 expression inversely correlated with clinical cancer stage and tumor burden. LSCC ERα66 expression was higher compared to surrounding epithelia in indolent samples but lower in aggressive LSCC. ERβ expression was highly variable. High ESR1 expression correlated with improved survival in LSCC. Loss of ERα66 expression inversely correlated with prognosis in LSCC. ERα66 may be a histopathological marker of aggression in LSCC.

α1,6-Fucosyltransferase (FUT8) regulates the cancer-promoting capacity of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) by modifying EGFR core fucosylation (CF) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the main cancer-promoting component in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). α1,6-Fucosyltransferase (FUT8), the key enzyme catalyzing core α1,6-fucosylation (CF), plays a promoting role in multiple malignancies. In the current study, we investigated the function of FUT8 in CAFs and elucidated the mechanism through which FUT8 regulates the cancer-promoting capacity of CAFs in NSCLC. A bioinformatics analysis was performed to reveal the relationship between FUT8 and CAFs. Resected specimens from NSCLC patients were analyzed to assess the expression of FUT8 in CAFs. Primary CAFs and normal lung fibroblasts (NLFs) were extracted from NSCLC patient specimens and were co-cultured with NSCLC cell lines in a novel 3D-printed non-contact co-culture device. An In vivo CAF/NSCLC co-injection tumorigenesis assay was performed using nude mice to study the function of FUT8/CF in TME formation. The current study revealed that FUT8-mediated CF in CAFs plays a positive role in the cancer-promoting capacity of these cells. FUT8 overexpression was observed in CAFs isolated from some lung adenocarcinoma cases. Further investigation showed that FUT8/CF in CAFs promoted the formation of an invasive and malignant TME in vivo and in vitro, and the resulting NSCLC cells exhibited faster proliferation and increased invasiveness. EGFR signaling exerts a catalytic effect on the cancer-promoting capacity of CAFs and is regulated by the CF modification of the EGFR protein.

Estrogen signaling and estrogen receptors as prognostic indicators in laryngeal cancer

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) has been shown to respond to 17β-estradiol. However, the presence and characterization of estrogen receptors (ER) and other sex hormone receptors in LSCC are still being determined. Sex hormone receptors and the way sex hormones impact LSCC tumors are important for understanding which patients would benefit from hormone therapies, such as anti-estrogen therapies. This information also has prognostic value, as there may be a correlation between ER profiles and LSCC aggression. Recent work by our team and others has shown that the canonical ER, estrogen receptor α (ERα), and its splice variant ERα36, are important modulators of estrogen signaling in LSCC. This review describes some common 17β-estradiol signaling pathways, and explains how these signaling pathways might control LSCC tumor growth. We also show that loss of ERα, but not ERα36, imbues LSCC with enhanced aggression, a pattern which has previously only been observed in breast cancer. We make a case for using ERα as a tumorigenic modulator and pathogenic marker in LSCC on par with the use of ERα as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.

G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER)-Specific Agonist G1 Induces ER Stress Leading to Cell Death in MCF-7 Cells

The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) mediates rapid non-genomic effects of estrogen. Although GPER is able to induce proliferation, it is down-regulated in breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer. During cancer progression, high expression levels of GPER are favorable for patients’ survival. The GPER-specific agonist G1 leads to an inhibition of cell proliferation and an elevated level of intracellular calcium (Ca²⁺). The purpose of this study is to elucidate the mechanism of G1-induced cell death by focusing on the connection between G1-induced Ca²⁺ depletion and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cell line MCF-7. We found that G1-induced ER Ca²⁺ efflux led to the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), indicated by the phosphorylation of IRE1α and PERK and the cleavage of ATF6. The pro-survival UPR signaling was activated via up-regulation of the ER chaperon protein GRP78 and translational attenuation indicated by eIF2-α phosphorylation. However, the accompanying pro-death UPR signaling is profoundly activated and responsible for ER stress-induced cell death. Mechanistically, PERK-phosphorylation-induced JNK-phosphorylation and IRE1α-phosphorylation, which further triggered CAMKII-phosphorylation, are both implicated in G1-induced cell death. Our study indicates that loss of ER Ca²⁺ is responsible for G1-induced cell death via the pro-death UPR signaling.

Tamoxifen induces toxicity, causes autophagy, and partially reverses dexamethasone resistance in Jurkat T cells

Estrogens demonstrate biological activity in numerous organ systems, including the immune system, and exert their effects through estrogen receptors (ER) of two types: intracellular ERα and ERβ that activate transcriptional factors and membrane G protein-coupled ER GPER. The latter is capable to mediate fast activation of cytosolic signaling pathways, influencing transcriptional events in response to estrogens. Tamoxifen (TAM), widely used in chemotherapy of ERα-positive breast cancer, is considered as an ERα antagonist and GPER agonist. TAM was shown to possess "off-target" cytotoxicity, not related to ER in various tumor types. The present work was designed to study biological effects of TAM on the glucocorticoid (GC)-resistant cell line Jurkat, derived from acute lymphoblastic leukemia of T lineage (T-ALL). We have shown that T-ALL cell lines, in contrast to healthy T cells, express only GPER, but not ERα or ERβ. TAM compromised mitochondrial function and reduced the viability and proliferation of Jurkat cells. Additionally, TAM induced autophagy in a GPER-dependent manner. Gene expression profiling revealed the up-regulation of autophagy-related gene ATG5. Interestingly, TAM sensitized Jurkat cells to dexamethasone (DEX) treatment, which may be related to its capacity to cause autophagy. We suggest that TAM-based adjuvant therapy may represent a novel strategy in T-ALL patients handling.

G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer

The G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), an alternate estrogen receptor (ER) with a structure distinct from the two canonical ERs, being ERα, and ERβ, is expressed in 50% to 60% of breast cancer tissues and has been presumed to be associated with the development of tamoxifen resistance in ERα positive breast cancer. On the other hand, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes 15% to 20% of breast cancers and frequently displays a more aggressive behavior. GPER is prevalent and involved in TNBC and can be a therapeutic target. However, contradictory results exist regarding the function of GPER in breast cancer, proliferative or pro-apoptotic. A better understanding of the GPER, its role in breast cancer, and the interactions with the ER and epidermal growth factor receptor will be beneficial for the disease management and prevention in the future.

Establishment and characterization of a carcinoma-associated fibroblast cell line derived from a human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma

Salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) is one of the most common malignancies in the oral and maxillofacial region. Carcinoma-associated fibroblast (CAF) is an important component in the tumor microenvironment and participates in SACC progression. In this study, we established a CAF cell line derived from a human SACC and named it CAF-SA. It was identified that CAF-SA expressed typical CAF biomarkers. Then, we studied the cellular communications between CAF-SA, tumor cells and endothelial cells. It was found that CAF-SA promoted the migration, invasion, and proliferation of SACC tumor cells in vitro. In addition, tube formation by endothelial cells was enhanced by CAF-SA. In vivo experiment showed that SACC cells formed larger xenografts in nude mice when they were transplanted with CAF-SA. Overall, we demonstrated that CAF-SA exhibited the most important defining feature of CAF by promoting cancer progression.

Metabolic Reprogramming of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts: The Slavery of Stromal Fibroblasts

Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the main stromal cell type of solid tumour microenvironment and undergo an activation process associated with secretion of growth factors, cytokines, and paracrine interactions. One of the important features of solid tumours is the metabolic reprogramming that leads to changes of bioenergetics and biosynthesis in both tumour cells and CAFs. In particular, CAFs follow the evolution of tumour disease and acquire a catabolic phenotype: in tumour tissues, cancer cells and tumour microenvironment form a network where the crosstalk between cancer cells and CAFs is associated with cell metabolic reprogramming that contributes to CAFs activation, cancer growth, and progression and evasion from cancer therapies. In this regard, the study of CAFs metabolic reprogramming could contribute to better understand their activation process, the interaction between stroma, and cancer cells and could offer innovative tools for the development of new therapeutic strategies able to eradicate the protumorigenic activity of CAFs. Therefore, this review focuses on CAFs metabolic reprogramming associated with both differentiation process and cancer and stromal cells crosstalk. Finally, therapeutic responses and potential anticancer strategies targeting CAFs metabolic reprogramming are reviewed.

A genetic polymorphism repurposes the G-protein coupled and membrane-associated estrogen receptor GPER to a transcription factor-like molecule promoting paracrine signaling between stroma and breast carcinoma cells

GPER is a membrane-associated estrogen receptor of the family of G-protein coupled receptors. For breast cancer, the contribution of GPER to promoting the proliferation and migration of both carcinoma cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in response to estrogen and other agonists has extensively been investigated. Intriguingly, GPER was previously found to be localized to the nucleus in one isolate of breast CAFs. Moreover, this nuclear GPER was shown to bind regulatory sequences of cancer-relevant target genes and to induce their expression. We decided to find out what induces the nuclear localization of GPER, how general this phenomenon is, and what its functional significance is. We discovered that interfering with N-linked glycosylation of GPER, either by mutation of the predicted glycosylation sites or pharmacologically with tunicamycin, drives GPER into the nucleus. Surveying a small set of CAFs from breast cancer biopsies, we found that a relatively common single nucleotide polymorphism, which results in the expression of a GPER variant with the amino acid substitution P16L, is associated with the nuclear localization of GPER. GPER with P16L fails to be glycosylated, presumably because of a conformational effect on the nearby glycosylation sites. GPER P16L is defective for membrane-associated signaling, but instead acts like an estrogen-stimulated transcription factor. In CAFs, it induces the secretion of paracrine factors that promote the migration of carcinoma cells. This raises the possibility that the GPER P16L polymorphism could be a risk factor for breast cancer.