Basiliximab

Cardiac Allograft Rejection: Strategies for Success in the Face of Immune Challenges

Heart transplantation for patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to medical therapy has remained definitive treatment with significant advances in posttransplant care. Despite improvement in postoperative morbidity and mortality, acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remain substantial challenges that can lead to allograft failure and patient mortality. Immunosuppressive agents have been the mainstay of both prevention and treatment for ACR and AMR; however, many challenges exist with traditional therapies. There are a multitude of molecular pathways involved in mediating the humoral and cellular response to rejection, offering various targets for treatment. This review summarizes therapies used in the management of ACR and AMR as extrapolated from use in induction therapy and treatment of other solid-organ transplant rejection. Future studies focused on cardiac transplant recipients are needed to expand therapeutic options.

SYNBIP 2.0: epitopes mapping, sequence expansion and scaffolds discovery for synthetic binding protein innovation

Synthetic binding proteins (SBPs) represent a pivotal class of artificially engineered proteins, meticulously crafted to exhibit targeted binding properties and specific functions. Here, the SYNBIP database, a comprehensive resource for SBPs, has been significantly updated. These enhancements include (i) featuring 3D structures of 899 SBP-target complexes to illustrate the binding epitopes of SBPs, (ii) using the structures of SBPs in the monomer or complex forms with target proteins, their sequence space has been expanded five times to 12 025 by integrating a structure-based protein generation framework and a protein property prediction tool, (iii) offering detailed information on 78 473 newly identified SBP-like scaffolds from the RCSB Protein Data Bank, and an additional 16 401 555 ones from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database, and (iv) the database is regularly updated, incorporating 153 new SBPs. Furthermore, the structural models of all SBPs have been enhanced through the application of the AlphaFold2, with their clinical statuses concurrently refreshed. Additionally, the design methods employed for each SBP are now prominently featured in the database. In sum, SYNBIP 2.0 is designed to provide researchers with essential SBP data, facilitating their innovation in research, diagnosis and therapy. SYNBIP 2.0 is now freely accessible at https://idrblab.org/synbip/.

QuantiFERON-CMV as a Predictor of CMV Events During Preemptive Therapy in CMV-seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation is costly and burdensome.

METHODS

Given its promising utility in risk stratification, we evaluated the use of QuantiFERON-CMV (QFCMV) and additional clinical variables in this prospective cohort study to predict the first clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMV, ranging from asymptomatic viremia requiring treatment to CMV disease) in the first posttransplant year. A cost-effectiveness analysis for guided prevention was done.

RESULTS

One hundred adult kidney transplant recipients, CMV IgG + , were given basiliximab induction and maintained on steroid/mycophenolate/tacrolimus with weekly CMV monitoring. Thirty-nine patients developed CS-CMV infection (viral syndrome, n = 1; end-organ disease, n = 9; and asymptomatic viremia, n = 29). A nonreactive or indeterminate QFCMV result using the standard threshold around day 30 (but not before transplant) was associated with CS-CMV rates of 50% and 75%, respectively. A higher QFCMV threshold for reactivity (>1.0 IU interferon-γ/mL) outperformed the manufacturer's standard (>0.2 IU interferon-γ/mL) in predicting protection but still allowed a 16% incidence of CS-CMV. The combination of recipient age and type of donor, along with posttransplant QFCMV resulted in a prediction model that increased the negative predictive value from 84% (QFCMV alone) to 93%. QFCMV-guided preemptive therapy was of lower cost than preemptive therapy alone ( P  < 0.001, probabilistic sensitivity analysis) and was cost-effective (incremental net monetary benefit of 210 USD) assuming willingness-to-pay of 2000 USD to avoid 1 CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided CMV prevention by the prediction model with QFCMV is cost-effective and would spare from CMV surveillance in 42% of patients with low risk for CS-CMV.

Non-IL-2-blocking anti-CD25 antibody inhibits tumor growth by depleting Tregs and has synergistic effects with anti-CTLA-4 therapy

CD25, also known as the interleukin-2 receptor α chain (IL-2Rα), is highly expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs), but relatively lower on effector T cells (Teffs). This makes it a potential target for Treg depletion, which can be used in tumor immunotherapy. However, marketed anti-CD25 antibodies (Basiliximab and Daclizumab) were originally developed as immunosuppressive drugs to prevent graft rejection, because these antibodies can block IL-2 binding to CD25 on Teffs, which in turn destroys the function of Teffs. Recent studies have shown that non-IL-2-blocking anti-CD25 antibodies have displayed exciting antitumor effects. Here, we screened out a non-IL-2-blocking anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7B7 by hybridoma technology, and confirmed its antitumor activity via depleting Tregs in a CD25 humanized mouse model. Subsequently, we verified that the humanized 7B7, named as h7B7-15S, has comparable activities to 7B7, and that its Treg depletion is further increased when combined with anti-CTLA-4, leading to enhanced remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Moreover, our findings reveal that the Fab form of h7B7-15S has the ability to deplete Tregs, independent of the Fc region. Taken together, our studies expand the application of anti-CD25 in tumor immunotherapy and provide insight into the underlying mechanism.

Decreasing the steroid rapidly may help to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with intestinal steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease receiving basiliximab treatment

Intestinal steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) is the major cause of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify the relationship between different steroid decreasing velocity and therapeutic response in patients with intestinal SR-aGVHD receiving basiliximab treatment, and also aimed to propose a reasonable steroid decreasing regimen for these patients. The median time for steroid dose decreasing to the 50% of initial dose and decreasing to the low-dose steroid for patients achieving ORR was 5 days and 12 days, respectively, which was both shorter than patients without achieving ORR. The ORR, NRM and survival in rapid and medium steroid decreasing group were all better than slow group. The cumulative incidence of ORR at any time was 90.4%, 78.1% and 62.3%, respectively, in rapid, medium, and slow group. The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year after basiliximab treatment was 18.7% (95% CI 11.3%-26.1%), 22.8% (95% CI 14.2%-31.4%) and 32.8% (95% CI 24.1%-41.5%), respectively, in rapid, medium, and slow group. The probability of OS at 1 year after basiliximab treatment was 76.9% (95% CI 68.9%-84.9%), 72.7% (95% CI 63.7%-81.7%), and 62.3% (95% CI 53.5%-71.1%), respectively, in rapid, medium, and slow group. Hence, it was helpful to decrease steroid to the 50% of initial dose ≤ 5 days and to the low-dose steroid ≤ 12 days after basiliximab treatment for intestinal SR-aGVHD patients, which may also be the reasonable steroid decrease protocol for these patients.

Analysis of death avoidance by concomitant use of prednisone in patients with renal transplant using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal transplant are frequently administered immunosuppressants to prevent transplant-related adverse events. There are mainly nine immunosuppressants on the market, and multiple immunosuppressants are frequently administered for patients with renal transplant. Identifying which immunosuppressant was responsible when efficacy or safety was observed in patients taking multiple immunosuppressants is difficult. This study aimed to identify the immunosuppressant that was effective in reducing death in patients with renal transplant. A very large sample size was required to conduct prospective clinical trials of immunosuppressant combinations, which is impractical. We investigated cases wherein death occurred despite immunosuppressant administration in patients with renal transplant using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We used FAERS data reported between January 2004 and December 2022 in patients with renal transplant who received one or more immunosuppressants. Groups were defined for each combination of immunosuppressants. Comparison between two identical groups except for the presence or absence of prednisone was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for differences in patient background.

RESULTS

When the group without prednisone was set as the reference, the aROR for death was significantly <1.000 in several cases in the group to which prednisone was added.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of prednisone in the immunosuppressant combinations was suggested to be effective in reducing death. We provided the sample code of software R that can reproduce the results.

Therapeutic Antibodies in Medicine

Antibody engineering has developed into a wide-reaching field, impacting a multitude of industries, most notably healthcare and diagnostics. The seminal work on developing the first monoclonal antibody four decades ago has witnessed exponential growth in the last 10-15 years, where regulators have approved monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics and for several diagnostic applications, including the remarkable attention it garnered during the pandemic. In recent years, antibodies have become the fastest-growing class of biological drugs approved for the treatment of a wide range of diseases, from cancer to autoimmune conditions. This review discusses the field of therapeutic antibodies as it stands today. It summarizes and outlines the clinical relevance and application of therapeutic antibodies in treating a landscape of diseases in different disciplines of medicine. It discusses the nomenclature, various approaches to antibody therapies, and the evolution of antibody therapeutics. It also discusses the risk profile and adverse immune reactions associated with the antibodies and sheds light on future applications and perspectives in antibody drug discovery.

Immune-based Therapies-What the Emergency Physician Needs to Know

Immunotherapy is a treatment modality that has a broad and rapidly growing range of applications to treat both chronic and acute diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, cancer, and COVID-19. Emergency physicians must be aware of the breadth of applications and be able to consider the effects of immunotherapies when patients on these treatments present to the hospital. This article provides a review of the mechanisms of action, indications for use, and potential complications of immunotherapy treatments that are relevant in the emergency care setting.

Therapy in the Course of Kidney Graft Rejection-Implications for the Cardiovascular System-A Systematic Review

Kidney graft failure is not a homogenous disease and the Banff classification distinguishes several types of graft rejection. The maintenance of a transplant and the treatment of its failure require specific medications and differ due to the underlying molecular mechanism. As a consequence, patients suffering from different rejection types will experience distinct side-effects upon therapy. The review is focused on comparing treatment regimens as well as presenting the latest insights into innovative therapeutic approaches in patients with an ongoing active ABMR, chronic active ABMR, chronic ABMR, acute TCMR, chronic active TCMR, borderline and mixed rejection. Furthermore, the profile of cardiovascular adverse effects in relation to the applied therapy was subjected to scrutiny. Lastly, a detailed assessment and comparison of different approaches were conducted in order to identify those that are the most and least detrimental for patients suffering from kidney graft failure.

CD25: A potential tumor therapeutic target

CD25 is the alpha-chain of the heterotrimer IL-2 receptor. CD25 is expressed on the surface of both immune and non-immune cells with different frequencies. For cancers, CD25 is expressed at high levels in many types of hematological malignancies, but at low levels in most solid tumors. CD25 is also highly expressed in activated circulating immune cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Infiltration of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment can lead to an imbalanced ratio of effector T cells (Teffs) and Tregs, which is associated with the progression of cancers. A rescued Teff/Treg cell ratio indicates an efficient anti-tumor response to immunotherapy. CD25 as a potential target for the depletion of Tregs is critical in developing new immunotherapeutic strategies. Few articles have summarized the relationships between CD25 and tumors, or the recent progress of drugs targeting CD25. In this paper, we will discuss the structures of IL-2 and IL-2R, the biological function of CD25 and its important role in tumor therapy. In addition, the latest research on drugs targeting CD25 has been summarized, providing guidance for future drug development.

Immune Reconstitution of Patients Who Recovered From Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Basiliximab Treatment

We aimed to identify the characteristics of immune reconstitution (IR) in patients who recovered from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after basiliximab treatment. A total of 179, 124, 80, and 92 patients were included in the analysis for IR at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). We observed that IR was fastest for monocytes and CD8⁺ T cells, followed by lymphocytes, CD3⁺ T cells, and CD19⁺ B cells and slowest for CD4⁺ T cells. Almost all immune cell subsets recovered comparably between patients receiving <5 doses and ≥5 doses of basiliximab. Most immune cell subsets recovered comparably between SR-aGVHD patients who recovered after basiliximab treatment and event-free HID HSCT recipients. Patients who recovered from SR-aGVHD after basiliximab treatment experienced satisfactory IR, which suggested that basiliximab may not have prolonged the negative impact on IR in these patients.

124I Radiolabeled Basiliximab for CD25-Targeted Immuno-PET Imaging of Activated T Cells

Activated T cells played critical roles in immunotherapy and adoptive T cell therapy, and a non-invasive imaging strategy can provide us useful information concerning the transportation, accumulation, and homing of T cells in vivo. In this paper, by utilizing the long half-life radionuclide iodine-124 (¹²⁴I) and CD25 specific monoclonal antibody Basiliximab, we have fabricated a novel probe, namely, ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab, which was highly promising in the immuno-PET imaging of T cells. In vitro, ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab had superior affinity to CD25 protein (Kd = 5.31 nM) and exhibited much higher accumulation in CD25 high-expression lymphoma cell line Karpas299 than that in CD25-negative cell line Daudi. In vivo, ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab was excreted slowly from the body of mice, rendering it a relatively high effective dose (0.393 mSv/MBq) when applied in the immuno-PET imaging. In Karpas299 tumor xenograft, ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab probe was observed to accumulate in the tumor quickly after tracer administration, with the optimal image acquired at 24 h post-injection. More importantly, PHA-activated hPBMC had much higher uptake of ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab, indicating the potential utility of ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab to discriminate activated hPBMC from its non-activated status. In summary, ¹²⁴I-Basiliximab was fabricated for the first time, which can be applied in CD25-targeted immuno-PET imaging of activated T cells in vivo.

Basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A real-world analysis

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the leading causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the efficacy, safety, prognostic factors, and optimal therapeutic protocol for SR-aGVHD patients treated with basiliximab in a real-world setting. Nine hundred and forty SR-aGVHD patients were recruited from 36 hospitals in China, and 3683 doses of basiliximab were administered. Basiliximab was used as monotherapy (n = 642) or in combination with other second-line treatments (n = 298). The cumulative incidence of overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 after basiliximab treatment was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.5%-82.3%). The probabilities of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival at 3 years after basiliximab treatment were 26.8% (95% CI 24.0%-29.6%) and 64.3% (95% CI 61.2%-67.4%), respectively. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between the monotherapy and combined therapy groups. Combined therapy did not increase the ORR; conversely, it increased the infection rates compared with monotherapy. The multivariate analysis showed that combined therapy, grade III-IV aGVHD, and high-risk refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score before basiliximab treatment were independently associated with the therapeutic response. Hence, we created a prognostic scoring system that could predict the risk of having a decreased likelihood of response after basiliximab treatment. Machine learning was used to develop a protocol that maximized the efficacy of basiliximab while maintaining acceptable levels of infection risk. Thus, real-world data suggest that basiliximab is safe and effective for treating SR-aGVHD.

Immune-based Therapies-What the Emergency Physician Needs to Know

Immunotherapy is a treatment modality that has a broad and rapidly growing range of applications to treat both chronic and acute diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, cancer, and COVID-19. Emergency physicians must be aware of the breadth of applications and be able to consider the effects of immunotherapies when patients on these treatments present to the hospital. This article provides a review of the mechanisms of action, indications for use, and potential complications of immunotherapy treatments that are relevant in the emergency care setting.

Current and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), develops in approximately 50% of patients. The primary treatment is high-dose systemic steroids, but treatment failure is common, and steroid-refractory (SR) GVHD is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality after allogeneic HCT. Ruxolitinib became the first treatment for SR GVHD to obtain US Food and Drug Administration approval, and other new treatments are actively being studied. We searched the literature using the PubMed database and clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov to identify the most promising new treatments for GVHD. In this review, we categorize potential new treatments for GVHD by their mechanism of action (e.g., antibodies that deplete T cells or prevent their trafficking to target tissues, proteasome inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and other agents) and summarize the results from clinical trials.

Case Report: Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis With Disseminated Infection in Chronic Granulomatous Disease-A Serious Cause of Mortality

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a primary immune deficiency due to defects in phagocyte respiratory burst leading to severe and life-threatening infections. Patients with CGD also suffer from disorders of inflammation and immune dysregulation including colitis and granulomatous lung disease, among others. Additionally, patients with CGD may be at increased risk of systemic inflammatory disorders such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). The presentation of HLH often overlaps with symptoms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and therefore can be difficult to identify, especially in patients with a primary immune deficiency in which incidence of infection is increased. Thorough evaluation and empiric treatment for bacterial and fungal infections is necessary as HLH in CGD is almost always secondary to infection. Simultaneous treatment of infection with anti-microbials and inflammation with immunosuppression may be needed to blunt the hyperinflammatory response in secondary HLH. Herein, we present a series of X-linked CGD patients who developed HLH secondary to or with concurrent disseminated CGD-related infection. In two patients, CGD was a known diagnosis prior to development of HLH and in the other two CGD was diagnosed as part of the evaluation for HLH. Concurrent infection and HLH were fatal in three; one case was successfully treated, ultimately receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The current literature on presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of HLH in CGD is reviewed.

Improving the expression of anti-IL-2Rα monoclonal antibody in the CHO cells through optimization of the expression vector and translation efficiency

The growing need for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) necessitates the development of novel and efficient production approaches. Regulatory elements like ubiquitous chromatin-opening elements (UCOEs) have been employed for improvement of the mAb expression in the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. SINEUPs are a class of long non-coding RNAs, which can improve the translation of partly overlapping mRNAs. A combination of these two elements might lead to higher production of mAbs. Therefore, the current study was conducted to investigate the effects of SINEUPs and A2UCOE on the expression of an IgG1 in the CHO-K1 cells. Hence, after constructing the mAb, mAb-SINEUP, and mAb-UCOE vectors, four stable cell pools were generated through combining the above vectors. According to the expression analysis, antibody yields were higher in the mAb-SINEUP and mAb-UCOE cell pools compared to the mAb cells. In addition, the cells possessing both SINEUP and UCOE elements provided the best expression. Persistent mAb expression was observed for over 2 months in these cells, whilst the expression was decreased in the mAb pool. SINEUP and UCOE positively influenced the stable mAb expression. It can be concluded that the SINEUP and UCOE enhance the antibody stability and expression level separately and their combination improves the mAb production in the CHO cells.

Direct T-cell Inhibition and Agents Targeting T-cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Lymphocyte depletion and blockade of T-cell activation and trafficking serve as therapeutic strategies for an enlarging number of immune-mediated diseases and malignancies. This review summarizes the infection risks associated to monoclonal antibodies that bind to the α chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, the cell surface glycoprotein CD52, and members of α4- and β2-integrin families acting as cell-adhesion molecules. An outline of the mechanisms of action, approved indications and off-label uses, expected impact on the host immune response, and available clinical evidence is provided for each of these agents.

New Strategies Using Antibody Combinations to Increase Cancer Treatment Effectiveness

Antibodies have proven their high value in antitumor therapy over the last two decades. They are currently being used as the first-choice to treat some of the most frequent metastatic cancers, like HER2⁺ breast cancers or colorectal cancers, currently treated with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and bevacizumab (Avastin), respectively. The impressive therapeutic success of antibodies inhibiting immune checkpoints has extended the use of therapeutic antibodies to previously unanticipated tumor types. These anti-immune checkpoint antibodies allowed the cure of patients devoid of other therapeutic options, through the recovery of the patient’s own immune response against the tumor. In this review, we describe how the antibody-based therapies will evolve, including the use of antibodies in combinations, their main characteristics, advantages, and how they could contribute to significantly increase the chances of success in cancer therapy. Indeed, novel combinations will consist of mixtures of antibodies against either different epitopes of the same molecule or different targets on the same tumor cell; bispecific or multispecific antibodies able of simultaneously binding tumor cells, immune cells or extracellular molecules; immunomodulatory antibodies; antibody-based molecules, including fusion proteins between a ligand or a receptor domain and the IgG Fab or Fc fragments; autologous or heterologous cells; and different formats of vaccines. Through complementary mechanisms of action, these combinations could contribute to elude the current limitations of a single antibody which recognizes only one particular epitope. These combinations may allow the simultaneous attack of the cancer cells by using the help of the own immune cells and exerting wider therapeutic effects, based on a more specific, fast, and robust response, trying to mimic the action of the immune system.

Basiliximab application on liver recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The benefits of the application of basiliximab induction therapy in liver transplantation are not clear. The present meta-analysis was to evaluate the pros and cons of basiliximab use in liver transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the associated publications in English from July 1998 to December 2015 in the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Basiliximab significantly decreased the incidence of de novo diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation (RR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.34-0.91; P=0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that basiliximab in combination with steroids-free immunosuppressant significantly decreased the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.97; P=0.04) and new-onset hypertension (RR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.93; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab may be effective in reducing de novo diabetes mellitus. What is more, basiliximab in combination with steroids-free immunosuppressant shows statistical benefit to reduce biopsy-proven acute rejection and de novo hypertension.

Use of Basiliximab and Daclizumab in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation represents a major medical victory in patients with whom dialysis and medical therapy have failed. To increase survival rates and optimize the use of limited organs, both patient care and immunosuppression therapy must be improved. Reduction in rejection episodes or severity of rejection may ultimately improve long-term allograft survival. Traditional engineered monoclonal antibodies have been associated with severe cytokine release reactions and an increased risk of opportunistic infections. Basiliximab and daclizumab are chimeric and humanized monoclonal antibodies that inhibit thymus-dependent lymphocyte proliferation. Interleukin 2 also affects the proliferation of natural killer cells, macrophages and monocytes, bursa-equivalent lymphocytes, epidermal dendritic cells, and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of opportunistic infections or malignancy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the overall effect of these agents on long-term patient and allograft survival.

Optimization of immunosuppressive medication upon liver transplantation against HCC recurrence

The introduction of liver transplant listing criteria for hepatocellular cancer (HCC) has significantly improved oncological outcomes and survival. But despite this HCC recurrence is still problematic. There is emerging evidence that the choice of immunosuppression (IS) after transplant for HCC can influence oncological survival and HCC recurrence. The following is a short summary of what has been published on HCC recurrence with the different classes of immunosuppressive agents in present use, concluding with the possible rationalization of the use of these immunosuppressive agents in the post-transplant patient at high risk of recurrence.

Challenging immunosuppression treatment in lung transplant recipients with kidney failure

Kidney failure after lung transplantation is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitors are immunosuppressants which play a major role in terms of postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. We report our preliminary experience with the anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody Basiliximab utilized as a "calcineurin inhibitor-free window" in the setting of early postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. Between 2012 and 2015 nine lung transplant patients who developed kidney failure for more than 14 days were included. Basiliximab was administrated in three doses (Day 0, 4, and 20) whilst Tacrolimus was discontinued or reduced to maintain a serum level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. Baseline glomerular filtration rate pre transplant was normal for all patients. Seven patients completely recovered from kidney failure (67%, mean eGFR pre and post Basiliximab: 42.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 69 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and were switched back on Tacrolimus. Only one of these patients still needs ongoing renal replacement therapy. Two patients showed no recovery from kidney failure and did not survive. Basiliximab might be a safe and feasible therapeutical option in patients which are affected by calcineurin inhibitor-related kidney failure in the early post lung transplant period. Further studies are necessary to confirm our preliminary results.

Reduced progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy with routine use of induction therapy with basiliximab

Background

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major limitation for long-term survival of patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT). Some immunosuppressants can reduce the risk of CAV.

Objectives

The primary objective was to evaluate the variation in the volumetric growth of the intimal layer measured by intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) after 1 year in patients who received basiliximab compared with that in a control group.

Methods

Thirteen patients treated at a single center between 2007 and 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Evaluations were performed with IVUS, measuring the volume of a coronary segment within the first 30 days and 1 year after HT. Vasculopathy was characterized by the volume of the intima of the vessel.

Results

Thirteen patients included (7 in the basiliximab group and 6 in the control group). On IVUS assessment, the control group was found to have greater vessel volume (120–185.43 mm³ vs. 127.77–131.32 mm3; p = 0.051). Intimal layer growth (i.e., CAV) was also higher in the control group (27.30–49.15 mm³ [∆80%] vs. 20.23–26.69 mm³ [∆33%]; p = 0.015). Univariate regression analysis revealed that plaque volume and prior atherosclerosis of the donor were not related to intima growth (r = 0.15, p = 0.96), whereas positive remodeling was directly proportional to the volumetric growth of the intima (r = 0.85, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Routine induction therapy with basiliximab was associated with reduced growth of the intima of the vessel during the first year after HT.

Impact of immunosuppressant therapy on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The most commonly used immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation (LT) is a combination of tacrolimus and steroid. Basiliximab induction has recently been introduced; however, the most appropriate immunosuppression for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after LT is still debated.

METHODS

Ninety-three LT recipients with HCC who took tacrolimus and steroids as major immunosuppressants were included. Induction with basiliximab was implemented in 43 patients (46.2%). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to reduce the tacrolimus dosage (n=28, 30.1%). The 1-year tacrolimus exposure level was 7.2 ± 1.3 ng/mL (mean ± SD).

RESULTS

The 1- and 3-year recurrence rates of HCC were 12.9% and 19.4%, respectively. Tacrolimus exposure, cumulative steroid dosages, and MMF dosages had no impact on HCC recurrence. Induction therapy with basiliximab, high alpha fetoprotein (AFP; >400 ng/mL) and protein induced by vitamin K absence/antagonist-II (PIVKA-II; >100 mAU/mL) levels, and microvascular invasion were significant risk factors for 1-year recurrence (P<0.05). High AFP and PIVKA-II levels, and positive (18)fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography findings were significantly associated with 3-year recurrence (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with basiliximab, a strong immunosuppressant, may have a negative impact with respect to early HCC recurrence (i.e., within 1 year) in high-risk patients.

Construction and characterization of a novel chimeric antibody c3C7 specific for the integrin αIIbβ3 complex

A murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) 3C7 against integrin αIIbβ3 was previously obtained as a potential antithrombotic agent in our laboratory. The epitope of 3C7 is a specific conformation of the αIIbβ3 complex, but not either of the two subunits, which makes it different from abciximab, a supplementary antibody drug used in percutaneous coronary intervention which has a cross-reaction with other integrins sharing the β3 subunit. To reduce the human anti-mouse antibody reactions of 3C7, the variable regions of this antibody were cloned and fused with the constant counterparts of human IgG1. Two vectors of light and heavy chains were constructed and co-transfected into CHO-dhfr(-) cells. The chimeric antibody c3C7 was purified and the properties of c3C7 were compared with 3C7. Identical to its parent antibody 3C7, c3C7 binds to the αIIbβ3 complex, but not to either of the subunits. The K(d) value of c3C7 was in the same order of magnitude as 3C7 (1.570 ± 0.326 vs 0.780 ± 0.182 nmol/L). Human platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate was effectively inhibited by c3C7 in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, after the modification, c3C7 retained the properties of its parent mAb with no loss of its biological activity. Therefore, c3C7 has the potential to become a novel agent for the treatment of thrombosis.

In vitro steroid resistance correlates with outcome in severe alcoholic hepatitis

Steroids improve the outcome in alcoholic hepatitis (AH), but up to 40% of patients fail to respond adequately. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) exacerbates steroid resistance in vitro. We performed a prospective study to determine if intrinsic steroid sensitivity correlates with response to steroids in individuals with severe AH and if IL-2 receptor blockade can reverse this. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from 20 patients with AH and a Maddrey's score >32. Patients were treated with oral prednisolone plus full supportive measures. Clinical resistance to oral steroid treatment was defined as a drop in serum bilirubin of <25% within 7 days or death within 6 months. In vitro steroid resistance was measured in PBMC using the dexamethasone suppression of lymphocyte proliferation assay and repeated after the addition of the anti-IL-2 receptor (anti-CD25) monoclonal antibody, basiliximab. Suppression of lymphocyte proliferation <60% was considered to indicate steroid resistance. In all, 82% (9/11) of in vitro steroid-resistant patients were dead at 6 months as compared to 21% (2/9) of steroid-sensitive patients (P = 0.03). Similarly, 91% (10/11) of in vitro steroid-resistant patients failed to show a significant fall in bilirubin at day 7 as compared to 44% (4/9) of steroid-sensitive patients (P < 0.05). Basiliximab improved the maximal proliferation count in 91% (10/11) of in vitro steroid-resistant patients (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcome of steroid therapy in this patient cohort correlated with in vitro steroid resistance. IL-2 blockade improved in vitro steroid sensitivity. This suggests that intrinsic lack of steroid sensitivity may contribute to poor clinical response to steroids in severe AH. IL-2 receptor blockade represents a possible mechanism to overcome this.

Biological agents for ulcerative colitis: hypes and hopes

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronic inflammatory disease of the colonic mucosa. Over the last decade, the increasing knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying intestinal inflammation has led to the development of a number of biological agents, mainly addressed to molecules and/or pathways demonstrated to have a pathogenic role in UC. In UC, clinical course and therapeutic decisions mainly depend on disease activity and extent. While therapeutic approach to mild-to-moderate UC by using aminosalicylates and corticosteroids has been well established, treatment of severe UC is far from being satisfactory. A severe attack of UC remains a challenge to be managed jointly by gastroenterology, surgery, and intensive care units. However, the recent introduction of biological therapies has led to promising changes in the management of UC patients. Aim of this paper is to review the recent advances and future perspectives for the use of biological agents in UC.

Basiliximab induction therapy for live donor kidney transplantation: a long-term follow-up of prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The effect of basiliximab induction therapy on long-term patient and graft survival is not yet clear. We aimed to evaluate if there is any advantage of routine basiliximab induction on the long-term outcome of living related donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine (CsA) micro-emulsion and azathioprine) and were followed up thoroughly for 7 years.

RESULTS

Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50), and in 7 years (28/50) when compared to (37/50) in controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the whole study period was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable among the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patient or graft survival; 7 years patient and graft survival were 92, 76% for basiliximab and 92, 80% for the control group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Routine basiliximab induction significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection without any noticeble beneficial effect on the long-term renal transplantation outcome.

Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal graft recipients

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.

Effective Immunoprophylaxis With Basiliximab Plus Triple Therapy in Renal Transplantation: Five-Year Single-Center Experience

We studied prospectively the efficacy and safety of basiliximab combined with triple immunosuppression in adult recipients of > or = 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. All studied patients received equal immunosuppressive drugs: 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 and on day 4, cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, safety of this therapy, renal graft function, and patient and graft survivals. One hundred seventy-two patients were studied. The HLA-antigen mismatches were 2.9 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD), and the cold ischemia time was 22.0 +/- 7.5 hours. Fifty-three (31.5%) patients experienced delayed graft function. At 12 months, 5 (3.0%) patients experienced acute rejection. Six renal grafts were lost, but not from rejection. Two patients died. Sixty-six infections required treatment in the hospital. One carcinoma of cervix (in situ) and two basal cell carcinomas of skin were detected. Hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine-release syndrome were not observed. At 12 months, serum creatinine was significantly higher (119 +/- 46 micromol/L; P < .001) in patients with delayed graft function than in patients with immediate graft function (99 +/- 26 micromol/L). Patient and graft survivals were 98.8% and 97.1%, respectively. Basiliximab combined with this triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with very low incidence of acute rejections, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high short-term survival rates in adult recipients of deceased donor renal transplant.

Basiliximab for the treatment of steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: further experience in moderate and severe disease

BACKGROUND

Preliminary data have suggested that interleukin-2 receptor blockade with basiliximab may increase steroid sensitivity. We have previously reported a small case series demonstrating the potential of basiliximab as a novel agent for the treatment of steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis.

AIM

To report further experience of the efficacy and safety of treatment with the interleukin-2 receptor blocking monoclonal antibody basiliximab, in addition to steroids, for the treatment of severe and moderate steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Twenty patients were enrolled - 13 patients with moderate steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis (Ulcerative Colitis Symptom Score: >or=6) and seven patients with severe steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis. All were given a single dose of 40 mg basiliximab plus standard steroid therapy in an open-label, uncontrolled trial. Primary end point was clinical remission within 8 weeks (Ulcerative Colitis Symptom Score: <or=2).

RESULTS

Within 8 weeks, 10 of 20 (50%) patients achieved clinical remission (seven of 13 moderate, and three of seven severe). At 24 weeks, 13 of 20 (65%) patients were in clinical remission. Five patients required colectomy (four severe, one moderate ulcerative colitis) and one required rescue ciclosporin (moderate ulcerative colitis). Two patients developed herpes zoster, but treatment was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab appears to promote prolonged remission after a single treatment. Taken in combination with previously reported data, basiliximab shows particular promise in moderate steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis.

Therapy for severe refractory acute graft-versus-host disease with basiliximab, a selective interleukin-2 receptor antagonist

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of IL-2R on activated cytotoxic T-cells, inhibiting lymphocyte proliferation. We report 34 patients with refractory acute GVHD (grade III-IV) who received basiliximab from December 1998 to October 2003. Adults received 40 mg weekly (2-3 doses) and children received half of this dose. Median age was 13 years. Twenty-five donors were unrelated. The stem cell source was bone marrow in 30 and cord blood in four. Complete responses were seen in 27/32 patients (84%) with skin, 12/25 (48%) with gut and 6/23 (26%) with liver GVHD. Median duration of response was 38 days (5-1103). Overall survival at 5 years was 20%. Eleven patients (32%) are alive. The main causes of death were CMV (n=4), fungus (n=6), sepsis (n=8), hemorrhage (n=2), and relapse (n=2). Graft-versus-host disease flares were observed in 14 patients (41%), half being rescued by other therapies. In conclusion, basiliximab was able to induce complete responses in patients with refractory acute GVHD. Prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the optimal treatment schedule.

Basiliximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Low-Dose Cyclosporine and Methylprednisolone Effectively Prevent Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The aim of the study was to analyze whether immunosuppressive treatment with basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), allowed a reduction in methylprednisolone and cyclosporine dosages without increasing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, reducing 1-year graft and patient survivals, or increasing the rates of infections and malignancy in the first year. The two groups were group A (n = 72), treated with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine and in the first 2 weeks with azathioprine; group B (n = 72), treated with basiliximab, MMF, and low-dose cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. The patients were followed for 1 year. The incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first year was significantly lower in group B (2.8%) than group A (12.5%; P < .05). The cumulative methylprednisolone dose, the daily dose, and the average cyclosporine trough blood level were significantly lower in group B (P < .001). One-year serum creatinine was significantly lower in group B (112 +/- 45 micromol/L) than group A (138 +/- 51 micromol/L; P < .01). One-year graft survival was 91.7% in group A and 98.6% in group B. One-year patient survival was 98.6% in group A and 100% in group B. The groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. Immunosuppression with basiliximab and MMF allowed a reduction in cyclosporine and methylprednisolone dosages and was associated with significantly lower incidences of acute rejections episodes with better graft function in the first year as opposed to immunosuppression with higher doses of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone alone. Both immunosuppressive regimens showed the same infection rates and did not differ significantly in the occurrence of malignant diseases within the first year.

The Pathologic Impact of Tacrolimus on Protocol Biopsy in Renal Transplant Patients With Basiliximab-Based Immunosuppression

Forty-two ESRD patients underwent renal transplantation using basiliximab (mean age: 30.6 +/- 18.6 years at transplantation; male: 50%; ESRD duration: 51.6 +/- 13.0 months) between February, 2000 and July, 2003. All patients had a protocol biopsy on the day of transplant, on discharge from the hospital (35.5 +/- 13.2 days), and at 1 year after transplant. The immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and methylprednisolone. While 16 patients used tacrolimus (FK group: 29.4 +/- 16.6 years old), 26 patients used cyclosporine (CsA group: 31.4 +/- 20.1 years old). Protocol biopsies were graded according to the Banff 97 classification. The incidence of acute rejection episodes within 1 year was greater in the CsA (15%) than the FK group (6%). Serum creatinine at hospital discharge was similar (CsA: 1.01 +/- 0.59 mg/dL, FK: 0.97 +/- 0.49, p = .18); however creatinine at 1 year differed significantly (CyA: 1.22 +/- 0.88 mg/dL, FK: 0.92 +/- 0.39, P = .03). There was a trend toward an increase in the score of interstitial inflammations in the CsA group, while it remained constant in the FK cohort (P = .05 at 1 year between the two groups). Other pathologic scores (t, ci, ct, cv, ah) did not differ between the groups at 1 year. Although there were no differences in the demographics between the two groups, there were several trends toward better renal function in the FK group.

Long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy in live donor kidney transplantation: a five-year prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy has not been addressed yet. We aim to evaluate its long-term effects in living related donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

100 adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups--one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine) and were closely followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50) and in 5 years (27/50) when compared to (36/50) the controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the study was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable between the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 100 and 86% for basiliximab, and 96 and 88% for the control group respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although routine basiliximab induction significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, its beneficial long-term effects on graft function and patient and graft survival are not yet evident.

Airway cellular response to two different immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients

A number of new immunosuppressive drugs have become available in transplant medicine. We investigated the effects of two different immunosuppressive protocols on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cellular characteristics in 34 lung transplant recipients who were treated with anti-thymocyte globulin induction therapy, cyclosporine, azathioprine (AZA), and prednisolone (regimen I), compared with 17 recipients receiving basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, AZA, and prednisolone (regimen II). We performed bronchoalveolar lavages between 15 and 40 d post-transplantation, in stable clinical condition and no acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, and/or respiratory tract infection. The regimen II treatment was associated with a significantly lower percentage lavage fluid lymphocytes than with regimen I. The CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher with regimen II than with regimen I: 1.56 (range 0.41-2.16) and 0.33 (0.04-0.95) respectively; p < 0.001, mainly because of a lower percentage CD8(+) cells with regimen II: 25% (12-51) vs. regimen I: 60% (34-77); p < 0.001. The percentage CD4(+) CD25(+) cells appeared lower with regimen II: 21% (10-88) vs. regimen I: 50% (0-87); p = 0.04. Overall survival was similar between the groups, whereas a beneficial trend in freedom of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was observed with regimen II. Airway lymphocyte subtypes are affected by the immunosuppressive protocol used. This observation should be taken into account when studying transplant recipients, and may contribute to our understanding of alloreactive airway disease.

Double-Blind Comparison of Hepatitis C Histological Recurrence Rate in HCV+ Liver Transplant Recipients Given Basiliximab+Steroids or Basiliximab+Placebo, in addition to Cyclosporine and Azathioprine

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in HCV+ liver transplant recipients is almost inevitable and may be promoted by immunosuppression. We compared the amount of liver damage with regard to usage of steroids and basiliximab.

METHODS

A total of 140 HCV+ adult liver transplant recipients were randomly allocated to basiliximab + steroids or basiliximab + placebo (plus cyclosporine and azathioprine). Primary endpoint: hepatitis C histological recurrence (liver damage as for Ishak grading score >or=8 by biopsy at 12 months); secondary endpoints: treatment failure (death, graft loss, patient withdrawal), biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), treated acute rejection (tAR), allograft and patient survival rates at 12 months.

RESULTS

Any significant difference has been observed in the 12-month hepatitis C histological recurrence rate (41.2% basiliximab + steroids, 37.5% basiliximab + placebo, P = 0.354). The treatment failure rate was significantly higher in basiliximab + steroids (28.8%) than in basiliximab + placebo (15.6%), P = 0.03; the combination test for the evaluation of the joint hypothesis resulted in a borderline nonsignificant overall result (P = 0.059). BPAR rate was significantly lower in the group treated with steroids (24.3% basiliximab + steroids, 39.4% basiliximab + placebo, P = 0.04), while the tAR rate was similar (29.7% basiliximab + steroids and 37.9% basiliximab + placebo). Any significant differences in 1-year graft and patient survival rates have been observed (72.9% and 84.8% basiliximab+steroids; 81.5% and 89.0% basiliximab + placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that steroid-free therapy is associated with a significantly lower treatment failure rate, although histological recurrence rate of hepatitis C is similar in the two groups. This benefit is not offset by an evident increase in graft rejection rate requiring treatment.

Meta-analysis of basiliximab for immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Basiliximab is a high-affinity chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor. Individual studies have shown that it is highly effective in preventing acute rejection and causes no measurable incremental toxicity. However, incorporation of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis into routine practice depends upon the demonstration of benefit across treatment regimens and quantitation of the treatment effect.

METHODS

This study employed a meta-analysis to examine the clinical benefit of basiliximab. Parameter estimates were derived from four randomised prospective double-blind studies conducted in 93 renal transplant centres in 18 countries. A total of 1185 adult primary allograft recipients were randomised within the centres to receive either basiliximab 20mg intravenously on days 0 and 4 or placebo, in addition to double or triple immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporin-microemulsion (Neoral((R))The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.), corticosteroids, and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Key clinical events included patient and graft survival, graft rejection and complications. Analysis was performed using a variable model; odds ratios and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to benefit or to harm one patient were calculated for each principal outcome at 6 or 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

Basiliximab reduced the relative risk (RR) and absolute risk (AR) of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection across all treatment regimens. The overall RR of clinical acute graft rejection was decreased by 35% in patients receiving basiliximab. AR was reduced by 15.6% (pooled incidence: 28.8% vs 44.4%, p < 0.0001), and the NNT for efficacy was six. The reduction in RR of biopsy-proven rejection was similar (32%) with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 11.7% (pooled incidence: 25.1% vs 36.8%, p < 0.0001) and NNT of nine over 6 months. There was a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14). The RR of graft loss was reduced by 26% with an AR reduction of 2.3% (pooled incidence: 6.4% vs 8.7%) and an NNT of 42 over 6 months. The risk of death was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab produces a significant reduction in the RR and AR of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection with a trend towards a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss. The magnitude of protection provided by basiliximab, the fact that it is observed across treatment regimens and the safety of this therapy are arguments for its routine use in renal transplantation.

Basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids in caucasian cadaveric renal transplanted patients: significant decrease in early acute rejection rate and hospitalization time

Safety and tolerability of basiliximab in renal transplantation have been proven in different immunosuppressive regimens. Few informations are available about the association of basiliximab with tacrolimus and steroids. We present a retrospective analysis performed in Caucasian cadaveric renal transplant recipients, comparing a basiliximab, tacrolimus and steroids induction protocol (GrA: 51 patients) with a tacrolimus and steroids protocol (GrB: 46 patients). A significant decrease in acute rejection rate in the first 3 months (2.0% vs. 17.4%; p < 0.01) was noted. Interestingly, the recipients in GrA were at major immunologic risk for the younger age of recipients, the greater number of mismatches and the higher rate of second transplants. The hospitalization times resulted reduced of 5.3 d in GrA vs. GrB (20.8 d vs. 26.1 d; p < 0.05). The adverse events patterns and profiles were similar in the two treatments groups. One patient in each group had a post-transplant lymphoprolipherative disorder. No significant difference was found in patient and graft survival. According to the results of this study, in a Caucasian adult population, basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids is a safe and efficacious tool for acute rejection prevention and it is cost saving by reducing the hospitalization times.

Basiliximab plus low-dose cyclosporin vs. OKT3 for induction immunosuppression following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Current immunosuppressive therapies are very effective in preventing acute rejection (AR) and graft loss following renal transplantation. Newer agents now make it possible to develop equally efficacious but better tolerated and less toxic strategies. This is especially relevant for our ageing recipients. We now compare the efficacy of basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin therapy to standard OKT3 induction therapy.

METHODS

In this single-centre study, 100 consecutive recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants from November 1998 to August 2000 were treated with basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin, reduced steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Clinical outcomes at 100 d and 1 yr were compared with a group of 26 patients transplanted from March 1995 to November 1998 who received OKT3, delayed full-dose cyclosporin, high-dose steroids and MMF. Amongst basiliximab treated patients, we compared clinical outcomes in those older and younger than 60 yr.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar except for a shorter cold ischaemic time in the basiliximab group. Length of stay, number of readmissions, total hospitalization days and cytomegalovirus infections were lower in the basiliximab group. Despite a 40% reduction in steroids, basiliximab-treated patients had fewer biopsy-proven episodes of AR (basiliximab 14% vs. OKT3 35%) and required less antilymphocyte antibody therapy. Clinical outcomes including patient and graft survival were no different between groups. Long-term graft survival for patients over 60 yr was limited primarily by mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OKT3 induction therapy, the combination of early low-dose cyclosporin and basiliximab is steroid sparing, effective, well tolerated and relatively safe.