1
|
Ro E, Schooler GR, Morin CE, Khanna G, Towbin AJ. Update on the imaging evaluation of pediatric liver tumors from the ACR Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:1171-1179. [PMID: 39292279 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04565-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Ro
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
| | - Gary R Schooler
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Cara E Morin
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Geetika Khanna
- Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, USA
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mostafa AG, Abramson Z, Ghbrial M, Biswas S, Chan S, Darji H, Gartrell J, Karol SE, Li Y, Mulrooney DA, Patni T, Zaghloul TM, McCarville MB. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of liver lesions in patients treated for childhood malignancies. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:115. [PMID: 39210481 PMCID: PMC11360734 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00750-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated for cancer have a higher incidence of focal liver lesions than the general population and there is often concern for a malignant etiology. This can result in patient, caregiver and physician anxiety and is managed by a "wait and watch" approach, or immediate additional imaging, or biopsy, depending on the degree of clinical concern. Because it is a low-cost, easily accessible, radiation and sedation free modality, we investigated the value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to accurately distinguish benign from malignant liver lesions in patients treated for childhood malignancies. METHODS We performed an IRB approved retrospective study of 68 subjects who were newly diagnosed, on treatment or off treatment for a pediatric malignancy and had liver lesions discovered on CT, MRI or non-contrast ultrasound and subsequently underwent CEUS between September 2013 and September 2021. Two experienced pediatric radiologists and a radiology trainee, blinded to the etiology of the liver lesions, independently reviewed the CEUS examinations and categorized lesions as benign, indeterminate, or malignant. The reference standard was biopsy for 19 lesions and clinical follow-up for 49. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of CEUS were calculated using only the benign and malignant CEUS classifications. Inter-reviewer agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS There were 26 males and 42 females, mean age, 14.9 years (range, 1-52 years). Fifty subjects were off therapy, twelve receiving treatment, and six with newly diagnosed cancer. By the reference standard, 59 (87%) lesions were benign and 9 (13%) were malignant. Sensitivities of CEUS for the three reviewers ranged from 83 to 100% (95% CI, 35.9-100%), specificities from 93.1 to 96.0% (95% CI, 83.5-99.6%), PPV 60.0-71.4% (95% CI, 29.0-96.3%), NPV 98.0-100% (95% CI, 89.2-100%) and accuracy from 93.8 to 94.6% (95% CI, 85.1-99.7%). The kappa statistic for agreement between the two experienced radiologists was moderate at 0.58. CONCLUSIONS CEUS is highly accurate in distinguishing benign from malignant etiologies of liver lesions in patients treated for pediatric malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayatullah G Mostafa
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Zachary Abramson
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
| | - Mina Ghbrial
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Som Biswas
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
- Pediatric Radiology Department, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Sherwin Chan
- Department of Radiology, Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
| | - Himani Darji
- Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Jessica Gartrell
- Department of Oncology, MS 260, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Seth E Karol
- Department of Oncology, MS 260, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics , St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Daniel A Mulrooney
- Department of Oncology, MS 260, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Tushar Patni
- Department of Biostatistics , St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Tarek M Zaghloul
- Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - M Beth McCarville
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang F, Peng W, Chen S, Wan L, Zhao R, Liu X, Ye F, Zhang H. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia during follow-up of patients after cyclophosphamide- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: differentiation from liver metastasis. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:215. [PMID: 39186145 PMCID: PMC11347512 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01793-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Newly detected hepatic nodules during follow-up of cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy may pose a diagnostic dilemma. We investigated a series of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) diagnosed by either typical MRI features and follow-up or pathology in cancer survivors. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 38 patients with tumours who developed new hepatic FNH after cyclophosphamide-based (n = 19) and oxaliplatin-based (n = 19) chemotherapies. The main tumour types were breast cancer (n = 18) and colorectal cancer (n = 17). MRI findings, clinical features, and temporal evolution of all target hepatic lesions (n = 63) were reported. In addition, the two chemotherapy drug groups were compared. RESULTS The median interval between chemotherapy completion and FNH detection was 30.4 months (12.9, 49.4). Six patients underwent biopsy or surgery, while the remaining patients were diagnosed based on typical MRI features and long-term follow-up. Among the patients, 60.5% (23/38) presented with multiple nodules and 63 target lesions were detected. The median size of target lesions was 11.5 mm (8.4, 15.1). The median follow-up time was 32.5 months (21.2, 48.6), and 15 patients experienced changes in their lesions during the follow-up period (11 increased and 4 decreased). The cyclophosphamide-based treatment group had a younger population, a greater proportion of females, and a shorter time to discovery than the oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy group (all p ≤ 0.016). CONCLUSIONS FNH may occur in cancer survivors after cyclophosphamide- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Considering a patient's treatment history and typical MRI findings can help avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary invasive treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT When cancer survivors develop new hepatic nodules during follow-up, clinicians should think of the possibility of focal nodular hyperplasia in addition to liver metastasis, especially if the cancer survivors were previously treated with cyclophosphamide or oxaliplatin. KEY POINTS Cancer survivors, after chemotherapy, can develop hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Cyclophosphamide and oxaliplatin are two chemotherapeutic agents that predispose to focal nodular hyperplasia development. Focal nodular hyperplasia occurs at shorter intervals in patients treated with cyclophosphamide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjing Peng
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Chen
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Wan
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Zhao
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangchun Liu
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang SM, Yoo SY, Jeong WK, Lee MW, Jeon TY, Kim JH. Superb Microvascular Imaging in Pediatric Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2024; 46:e233-e240. [PMID: 38408130 PMCID: PMC10956684 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate superb microvascular imaging (SMI), a novel Doppler ultrasound technique that can visualize low-velocity microvascular flow, for assessing pediatric focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). PATIENTS AND METHODS Nine FNH lesions in 6 patients were enrolled. On SMI and color Doppler imaging (CDI), intralesional vascularity was assessed visually and categorized as typical spoke-wheel pattern (central vessel radiating from the center to the periphery), multifocal spoke-wheel pattern, and nonspecific pattern. We compared the vascular features of the lesions between SMI and CDI and evaluated vascular patterns according to lesion size. RESULTS In terms of vascularity pattern, the typical spoke-wheel pattern of FNH was noted more frequently on SMI (67%) than on CDI (11%; P < 0.05). In addition, a multifocal spoke-wheel pattern was noted in all remaining lesions (33%) on SMI. On the contrary, a nonspecific vascular pattern was detected in the majority (78%) of CDI. Regarding the lesion size and vascularity on SMI, the typical spoke-wheel pattern was seen more frequently in the small FNH group than in the large FNH group. The intralesional vascular signal was detected more frequently on SMI (100%) than on CDI (89%). CONCLUSION SMI is feasible in evaluating FNH in children and has a greater ability to demonstrate the spoke-wheel pattern than CDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sook Min Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University
| | - So-Young Yoo
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Kyoung Jeong
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Woo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Yeon Jeon
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morin CE, Kolbe AB, Alazraki A, Chavhan GB, Gill A, Infante J, Khanna G, Nguyen HN, O'Neill AF, Rees MA, Sharma A, Squires JE, Squires JH, Syed AB, Tang ER, Towbin AJ, Schooler GR. Cancer Therapy-related Hepatic Injury in Children: Imaging Review from the Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230007. [PMID: 37616168 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
The liver is the primary organ for the metabolism of many chemotherapeutic agents. Treatment-induced liver injury is common in children undergoing cancer therapy. Hepatic injury occurs due to various mechanisms, including biochemical cytotoxicity, hepatic vascular injury, radiation-induced cytotoxicity, and direct hepatic injury through minimally invasive and invasive surgical treatments. Treatment-induced liver injury can be seen contemporaneous with therapy and months to years after therapy is complete. Patients can develop a combination of hepatic injuries manifesting during and after treatment. Acute toxic effects of cancer therapy in children include hepatitis, steatosis, steatohepatitis, cholestasis, hemosiderosis, and vascular injury. Longer-term effects of cancer therapy include hepatic fibrosis, chronic liver failure, and development of focal liver lesions. Quantitative imaging techniques can provide useful metrics for disease diagnosis and monitoring, especially in treatment-related diffuse liver injury such as hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis, hepatic iron deposition, and hepatic fibrosis. Focal liver lesions, including those developing as a result of treatment-related vascular injury such as focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions and hepatic perfusion anomalies, as well as hepatic infections occurring as a consequence of immune suppression, can be anxiety provoking and confused with recurrent malignancy or hepatic metastases, although there often are imaging features that help elucidate the correct diagnosis. Radiologic evaluation, in conjunction with clinical and biochemical screening, is integral to diagnosing and monitoring hepatic complications of cancer therapy in pediatric patients during therapy and after therapy completion for long-term surveillance. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material See the invited commentary by Ferraciolli and Gee in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara E Morin
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Amy B Kolbe
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Adina Alazraki
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Govind B Chavhan
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Annie Gill
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Juan Infante
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Geetika Khanna
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - HaiThuy N Nguyen
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Allison F O'Neill
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Mitchell A Rees
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Akshay Sharma
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - James E Squires
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Judy H Squires
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Ali B Syed
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Elizabeth R Tang
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| | - Gary R Schooler
- From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 (C.E.M., A.J.T.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.B.K.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Ga (A.A., A.G., G.K.); Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.B.C.); Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla (J.I.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (H.N.N.); Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass (A.F.O.); Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (M.A.R.); Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn (A.S.); Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (J.E.S.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.S.), UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (A.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (E.R.T.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Snyder EJ, Sarma A, Krishnasarma R, Pruthi S. Complications of Cancer Therapy in Children: A Comprehensive Review of Body Imaging Findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023; 47:833-843. [PMID: 37707415 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Complications of cancer therapy in children can result in a spectrum of toxicities that can affect any organ system and result in a range of morbidity. Complications may occur at the initiation of therapy or years following treatment. Although childhood cancer remains rare, increasing survival rates means more children are living longer following their treatment. Radiologists often play an important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of these complications, and thus, awareness of their imaging findings is essential to guide management and avoid misdiagnosis. This second part of a 2-part review aims to illustrate the typical body imaging findings of cancer therapy-related toxicities, including both early and late treatment effects. The article also discusses the differential diagnosis of imaging findings, highlighting pearls and pitfalls in making the appropriate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Snyder
- From the Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cekuolis A, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Augustinienė R, Taut H, Squires J, Chaves EL, Dong Y, Dietrich CF. Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2360. [PMID: 37190288 PMCID: PMC10137002 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrius Cekuolis
- Ultrasound Section, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Centre, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Rasa Augustinienė
- Ultrasound Section, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Centre, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Heike Taut
- Children’s Hospital, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Judy Squires
- Department of Radiology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Edda L. Chaves
- Radiology Department, Hospital Regional Nicolas Solano, La Chorrera 1007, Panama
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Christoph F. Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence, 3013 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berklite L, Shenoy A, Hollowell M, Fung B, Ranganathan S. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia-Like Lesions With Glypican-3 Positivity in Infancy. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2023; 26:30-38. [PMID: 36546616 DOI: 10.1177/10935266221122934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND CONTEXT Glypican-3 is often used to discriminate between neoplastic and nonneoplastic liver. In focal lesions, positivity may be considered suggestive of a malignancy such as hepatoblastoma. However, glypican-3 is also normally expressed in the immature liver. We present a series of 5 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions arising in very young patients with glypican-3 expression and highlight the challenges these lesions present in the differential diagnosis of hepatoblastoma. METHODS Cases were obtained from the files of 3 tertiary pediatric hospitals. Clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record and histopathologic material including immunohistochemical stains were reviewed. KEY RESULTS Patients were aged 2 weeks to 6 months with peak AFP levels ranging from 88.6 to 204,696 ng/mL. Microscopically, all were variably demarcated hepatocellular lesions with cords of hepatocytes, marked sinusoidal dilatation, and occasional fibrous bands and areas reminiscent of central scar with bile ducts. No significant cytologic atypia or increased mitotic activity were present. All showed glypican-3 expression and were negative for nuclear beta-catenin with intact reticulin framework. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights the pitfalls of evaluating focal liver lesions in infants when high AFP levels and glypican-3 expression may reflect immaturity rather than neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Berklite
- Division of Pathology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Archana Shenoy
- Department of Pathology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Monica Hollowell
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bonita Fung
- Department of Pathology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chavhan GB, Schooler GR, Tang ER, Squires JH, Rees MA, Nguyen HN, Morin CE, Kolbe AB, Khanna G, Infante JC, Alazraki AL, Towbin AJ. Optimizing Imaging of Pediatric Liver Lesions: Guidelines from the Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group. Radiographics 2022; 43:e220043. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.220043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Focal nodular hyperplasia after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: A diagnostic challenge. Radiol Case Rep 2022; 17:1858-1865. [PMID: 35401910 PMCID: PMC8990178 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy could induce benign liver alterations presenting as diffuse or focal lesions mimicking metastases. Oxaliplatin-induced vascular liver injury is described in literature, but the association with FNH-like lesions has been reported in a limited number of cases. We herewith describe the case of a 67-year-old male, who had laparoscopic right-sided hemicolectomy, 8 years ago, because of colonic adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0) and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine + oxaliplatin), who referred to the ultrasound service of our Radiology Unit because of abdominal pain. Five-years follow-up was negative for metastases. Ultrasound examination showed 2 small hypoechoic hepatic nodules, in segment VIII and VII, confirmed at CT, suspected for metastases. FDG-PET was negative, and blood tumor markers were within normal ranges. For further evaluation we performed gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI that showed hyperintensity of the nodules in the hepatobiliary phase with central small hypointensity due to a central scar. Considering the previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy the findings were compatible with FNHlike lesions and the diagnostic suspicion was confirmed at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Knowledge of the possible occurrence of FNH-like lesions in oncologic setting, along with the detection of typical MRI appearance, is important for appropriate management and may avoid unnecessary biopsy or surgery and reduce patients’ anxiety.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fleming AM, Duffy C, Gartrell J, McCarville MB, Langham MR, Ruiz RE, Santiago T, Murphy AJ. Giant focal nodular hyperplasia with a background of hepatic steatosis in a 14-year-old boy. J Surg Case Rep 2022; 2022:rjac238. [PMID: 35665385 PMCID: PMC9155174 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Giant focal nodular hyperplasia (GFNH) is rarely seen in children, presenting complex diagnostic and management considerations. Pathognomonic radiographic findings can be absent in this population, and the nuances of pathologic examination are critical. We present a child with a GFNH involving the right side of the liver arising in the background of hepatic steatosis. The details of the diagnosis and therapeutic decisions involved in his treatment are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Fleming
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Caitlyn Duffy
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jessica Gartrell
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - M Beth McCarville
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Max R Langham
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Robert E Ruiz
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Teresa Santiago
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew J Murphy
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bardi E, Mulder RL, van Dalen EC, Bhatt NS, Ruble KA, Burgis J, Castellino SM, Constine LS, den Hoed CM, Green DM, Koot BGP, Levitt G, Szonyi L, Wallace WH, Skinner R, Hudson MM, Kremer LCM, Effinger KE, Bresters D. Late hepatic toxicity surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer: Recommendations from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102296. [PMID: 34571378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer may develop treatment-induced chronic liver disease. Surveillance guidelines can improve survivors' health outcomes. However, current recommendations vary, leading to uncertainty about optimal screening. The International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has developed recommendations for the surveillance of late hepatotoxicity after CAYA cancer. METHODS Evidence-based methods based on the GRADE framework were used in guideline development. A multidisciplinary guideline panel performed systematic literature reviews, developed evidence summaries, appraised the evidence, and formulated recommendations on the basis of evidence, clinical judgement, and consideration of benefits versus the harms of the surveillance while allowing for flexibility in implementation across different health care systems. RESULTS The guideline strongly recommends a physical examination and measurement of serum liver enzyme concentrations (ALT, AST, gGT, ALP) once at entry into long-term follow-up for survivors treated with radiotherapy potentially exposing the liver (moderate- to high-quality evidence). For survivors treated with busulfan, thioguanine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, dactinomycin, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), or hepatic surgery, or with a history of chronic viral hepatitis or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, similar surveillance for late hepatotoxicity once at entry into LTFU is reasonable (low-quality evidence/expert opinion, moderate recommendation). For survivors who have undergone HSCT and/or received multiple red blood cell transfusions, surveillance for iron overload with serum ferritin is strongly recommended once at long-term follow-up entry. CONCLUSIONS These evidence-based, internationally-harmonized recommendations for the surveillance of late hepatic toxicity in cancer survivors can inform clinical care and guide future research of health outcomes for CAYA cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edit Bardi
- St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
| | - Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Neel S Bhatt
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathy A Ruble
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Burgis
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Department of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine, and Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Caroline M den Hoed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel M Green
- Departments of Oncology and Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Bart G P Koot
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gill Levitt
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - László Szonyi
- Semmelweis University, I. Pediatric Department, Budapest, Hungary
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital and Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Departments of Oncology and Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Karen E Effinger
- Department of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine, and Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Özcan HN, Karçaaltıncaba M, Seber T, Yalçın B, Oğuz B, Akyüz C, Haliloğlu M. Hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI findings of focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in the liver following chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:370-376. [PMID: 32490830 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the MRI findings and follow-up of multiple focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)- like lesions in pediatric cancer patients diagnosed by imaging findings. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and MRI examinations of 16 pediatric patients, who had been scanned using gadoxetate disodium (n=13) and gadobenate dimeglumine (n=3). Hepatic nodules were reviewed according to their number, size, contour, T1- and T2-weighted signal intensities, arterial, portal, delayed and hepatobiliary phase enhancement patterns. Follow-up images were evaluated for nodule size, number, and appearance. RESULTS All 16 patients received chemotherapy in due course. Time interval between the initial diagnosis of cancer and detection of the hepatic nodule was 2-14 years. Three patients had a single lesion, 13 patients had multiple nodules. The median size of the largest nodules was 19.5 mm (range, 8-41 mm). Among 16 patients that received hepatocyte-specific agents, FNH-like nodules appeared hyperintense in 11 and isointense in 5 on the hepatobiliary phase. During follow-up, increased number and size of the nodules were seen in 4 patients. The nodules showed growth between 6-15 mm. CONCLUSION Liver MRI using hepatocyte-specific agents is a significant imaging method for the diagnosis of FNH-like lesions, which can occur in a variety of diseases. Lesions can increase in size and number in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Nursun Özcan
- Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Turgut Seber
- Department of Radiology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Bilgehan Yalçın
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oğuz
- Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Canan Akyüz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mithat Haliloğlu
- Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fang C, Anupindi SA, Back SJ, Franke D, Green TG, Harkanyi Z, Jüngert J, Kwon JK, Paltiel HJ, Squires JH, Zefov VN, McCarville MB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of benign and malignant liver lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:2181-2197. [PMID: 33978801 PMCID: PMC8566652 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-04976-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used in children. One of the most common referrals for CEUS performance is characterization of indeterminate focal liver lesions and follow-up of known liver lesions. In this setting, CEUS is performed with intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). When injected into a vein, UCA microbubbles remain confined within the vascular network until they dissipate. Therefore, visualization of UCA within the tissues and lesions corresponds to true blood flow. CEUS enables continuous, real-time observation of the enhancement pattern of a focal liver lesion, allowing in most cases for a definite diagnosis and obviating the need for further cross-sectional imaging or other interventional procedures. The recent approval of Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe Township, NJ) for pediatric liver CEUS applications has spurred the widespread use of CEUS. In this review article we describe the role of CEUS in pediatric liver applications, focusing on the examination technique and interpretation of main imaging findings of the most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. We also compare the diagnostic performance of CEUS with other imaging modalities for accurate characterization of focal liver lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Fang
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
| | - Sudha A. Anupindi
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Susan J. Back
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Doris Franke
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Zoltan Harkanyi
- Department of Radiology, Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jörg Jüngert
- Department of Pediatrics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jeannie K. Kwon
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
| | - Harriet J. Paltiel
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Judy H. Squires
- Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Vassil N. Zefov
- Department of Radiology, Dubai Health Authority, Latifa Women and Children Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - M. Beth McCarville
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gu K, Jeon TY, Yoo SY, Kim JH. Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:283-291. [PMID: 32797310 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07157-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the hepatobiliary enhancement patterns of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI and the temporal evolution of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors. METHODS We retrospectively included pediatric cancer survivors who had new liver lesions detected during surveillance imaging and who were diagnosed with FNH-like lesions by Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI without the aid of a hepatobiliary phase. The hepatobiliary enhancement patterns of FNH-like lesions were categorized as homogeneous hyperintense/isointense, heterogeneous hyperintense, and ring-like enhancement. Temporal changes in the FNH-like lesions were evaluated by follow-up Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance and Spearman's rank correlation test. RESULTS A total of 132 radiologically diagnosed FNH-like lesions in 18 patients showed the three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns: homogeneous hyperintense/isointense (n = 65, 49%), heterogeneous hyperintense (n = 24, 18%), and ring-like enhancement (n = 43, 33%). A weak positive correlation was found between the lesion size and the hepatobiliary enhancement pattern (p = 0.015). Follow-up MRI showed alterations in the size and number of 55 FNHs in 8 patients, including stable size (n = 15, 27%), increased size (n = 17, 31%), decreased size (n = 11, 20%), disappearance (n = 12, 22%), and 74 new lesions (5 patients, 63%). CONCLUSIONS FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors showed three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns and various temporal changes. Recognition of the radiological characteristics of FNH-like lesions may avoid unnecessary invasive procedures and reduce patients/parents' anxiety. KEY POINTS • FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors showed three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns. The most common was homogeneous hyperintense/isointense, followed by heterogeneous hyperintense, and ring-like enhancement. • FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors can show various temporal changes during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyowon Gu
- Regional Office of Military Manpower Administration, 13 Yeouidaebang-ro 43-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07360, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Yeon Jeon
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06531, Republic of Korea.
| | - So-Young Yoo
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06531, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hye Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06531, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hepatobiliary MRI Contrast Agents: Pattern Recognition Approach to Pediatric Focal Hepatic Lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214:976-986. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
17
|
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49:1422-1432. [PMID: 31620843 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04361-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Initial pediatric imaging of the liver heavily relies on ultrasonography (US) because it is free of ionizing radiation, easily portable and readily available. Although conventional US (gray-scale and color Doppler) is often an excellent screening tool, its relative low specificity compared to CT/MRI limits liver lesion characterization. The United States Food and Drug Administration's recent approval of an intravenous US contrast agent for pediatric liver lesion characterization (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) and its excellent safety profile have spurred increased interest in contrast-enhanced US for definitive diagnosis of pediatric liver lesions. This review focuses on the safety of contrast-enhanced US, role of contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of focal liver lesions, basic contrast-enhanced US technique for liver imaging, and interpretation principles. The authors review common focal liver lesions, with special attention to the role of contrast-enhanced US in the pediatric oncology population.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ayyala RS, Anupindi SA, Gee MS, Trout AT, Callahan MJ. Intravenous gadolinium-based hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs) for contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: what the radiologist should know. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49:1256-1268. [PMID: 31350632 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04476-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs) are a group of intravenous gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents that can be used to characterize hepatobiliary pathology. The mechanism by which these agents are taken up by hepatocytes and partially excreted into the biliary tree improves characterization of hepatic lesions and biliary abnormalities relative to conventional extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). This manuscript presents an overview of HSCA use in pediatric patients with the intent to provide radiologists a guide for clinical use. We review available HSCAs and discuss dosing and age specifications for use in children. We also review various hepatic and biliary indications for HSCA use in children, with emphasis on the imaging characteristics distinct to HSCAs, as well as discussion of pitfalls one can encounter when imaging with HSCAs. Given the growing concern regarding gadolinium deposition in soft tissues and brain, we also discuss safety of HSCA use in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rama S Ayyala
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital - Hasbro Children's Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St., Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - Sudha A Anupindi
- Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael S Gee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T Trout
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mulder RL, Bresters D, Van den Hof M, Koot BGP, Castellino SM, Loke YKK, Post PN, Postma A, Szőnyi LP, Levitt GA, Bardi E, Skinner R, van Dalen EC. Hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD008205. [PMID: 30985922 PMCID: PMC6463806 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008205.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival rates have greatly improved as a result of more effective treatments for childhood cancer. Unfortunately, the improved prognosis has been accompanied by the occurrence of late, treatment-related complications. Liver complications are common during and soon after treatment for childhood cancer. However, among long-term childhood cancer survivors, the risk of hepatic late adverse effects is largely unknown. To make informed decisions about future cancer treatment and follow-up policies, it is important to know the risk of, and associated risk factors for, hepatic late adverse effects. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES To evaluate all the existing evidence on the association between antineoplastic treatment (that is, chemotherapy, radiotherapy involving the liver, surgery involving the liver and BMT) for childhood cancer and hepatic late adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2018, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2018) and Embase (1980 to January 2018). In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and scanned the conference proceedings of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) (from 2005 to 2017) and American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) (from 2013 to 2018) electronically. SELECTION CRITERIA All studies, except case reports, case series, and studies including fewer than 10 patients that examined the association between antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer (aged 18 years or less at diagnosis) and hepatic late adverse effects (one year or more after the end of treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed the study selection and 'risk of bias' assessment. The 'risk of bias' assessment was based on earlier checklists for observational studies. For the original version of the review, two review authors independently performed data extraction. For the update of the review, the data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by another reviewer. MAIN RESULTS Thirteen new studies were identified for the update of this review. In total, we included 33 cohort studies including 7876 participants investigating hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment (especially chemotherapy and radiotherapy) for different types of childhood cancer, both haematological and solid malignancies. All studies had methodological limitations. The prevalence of hepatic late adverse effects, all defined in a biochemical way, varied widely, between 0% and 84.2%. Selecting studies where the outcome of hepatic late adverse effects was well-defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) above the upper limit of normal, indicating cellular liver injury, resulted in eight studies. In this subgroup, the prevalence of hepatic late adverse effects ranged from 5.8% to 52.8%, with median follow-up durations varying from three to 23 years since cancer diagnosis in studies that reported the median follow-up duration. A more stringent selection process using the outcome definition of ALT as above twice the upper limit of normal, resulted in five studies, with a prevalence ranging from 0.9% to 44.8%. One study investigated biliary tract injury, defined as gamma-glutamyltransferase (γGT) above the upper limit of normal and above twice the upper limit of normal and reported a prevalence of 5.3% and 0.9%, respectively. Three studies investigated disturbance in biliary function, defined as bilirubin above the upper limit of normal and reported prevalences ranging from 0% to 8.7%. Two studies showed that treatment with radiotherapy involving the liver (especially after a high percentage of the liver irradiated), higher BMI, and longer follow-up time or older age at evaluation increased the risk of cellular liver injury in multivariable analyses. In addition, there was some suggestion that busulfan, thioguanine, hepatic surgery, chronic viral hepatitis C, metabolic syndrome, use of statins, non-Hispanic white ethnicity, and higher alcohol intake (> 14 units per week) increase the risk of cellular liver injury in multivariable analyses. Chronic viral hepatitis was shown to increase the risk of cellular liver injury in six univariable analyses as well. Moreover, one study showed that treatment with radiotherapy involving the liver, higher BMI, higher alcohol intake (> 14 units per week), longer follow-up time, and older age at cancer diagnosis increased the risk of biliary tract injury in a multivariable analysis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of hepatic late adverse effects among studies with an adequate outcome definition varied considerably from 1% to 53%. Evidence suggests that radiotherapy involving the liver, higher BMI, chronic viral hepatitis and longer follow-up time or older age at follow-up increase the risk of hepatic late adverse effects. In addition, there may be a suggestion that busulfan, thioguanine, hepatic surgery, higher alcohol intake (>14 units per week), metabolic syndrome, use of statins, non-Hispanic white ethnicity, and older age at cancer diagnosis increase the risk of hepatic late adverse effects. High-quality studies are needed to evaluate the effects of different therapy doses, time trends, and associated risk factors after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyHeidelberglaan 25UtrechtNetherlands3584 CS
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Paediatric OncologyP.O. Box 22660AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DD
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyHeidelberglaan 25UtrechtNetherlands3584 CS
- Leiden University Medical CenterWillem Alexander Children's HospitalPO Box 9600LeidenNetherlands2300 RC
| | - Malon Van den Hof
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Paediatric OncologyP.O. Box 22660AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DD
| | - Bart GP Koot
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionP.O. Box 22660AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DD
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Emory School of MedicineDepartment of Pediatrics, Division Hematology/OncologyAtlanta, GAUSA
| | | | - Piet N Post
- Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBOPO Box 20064UtrechtNetherlands3502 LB
| | - Aleida Postma
- University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's HospitalDepartment of Paediatric OncologyPostbus 30.000GroningenNetherlands9700 RB
| | - László P Szőnyi
- King Feisal Specialist HospitalOrgan Transplant CentreRiyadhSaudi Arabia11211
| | - Gill A Levitt
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustOncologyGt Ormond StLondonUK
| | - Edit Bardi
- Kepler UniversitätsklinikumMed Campus IV26‐30 KrankenhausstraßeLinzAustria4020
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Great North Children’s HospitalDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology / OncologyQueen Victoria RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE1 4LP
| | - Elvira C van Dalen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyHeidelberglaan 25UtrechtNetherlands3584 CS
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Paediatric OncologyP.O. Box 22660AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DD
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ünal E, Karaosmanoğlu AD, Ozmen MN, Akata D, Karcaaltincaba M. Hepatobiliary phase liver MR imaging findings after Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in cancer patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:2321-2328. [PMID: 29427046 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1482-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging findings in colon and rectal cancer patients who received Oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION Spectrum of hepatobiliary phase imaging findings include diffuse heterogeneous dysfunction, macronodular and micronodular FNH-like lesions, and coexistence of periportal increased liver function with FNH-like lesions. Differentiation of these benign lesions from metastasis is crucial to avoid biopsy in patients with colorectal cancers and may allow better understanding of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome pathophysiology and regenerative response of liver.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ntoulia A, Anupindi SA, Darge K, Back SJ. Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the pediatric abdomen. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:948-959. [PMID: 28980061 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1315-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a radiation-free, safe, and in specific clinical settings, highly sensitive imaging modality. Over the recent decades, there is cumulating experience and a large volume of published safety and efficacy data on pediatric CEUS applications. Many of these applications have been directly translated from adults, while others are unique to the pediatric population. The most frequently reported intravenous abdominal applications of CEUS in children are the characterization of focal liver lesions, monitoring of solid abdominal tumor response to treatment, and the evaluation of intra-abdominal parenchymal injuries in selected cases of blunt abdominal trauma. The intravesical CEUS application, namely contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS), is a well-established, pediatric-specific imaging technique entailing the intravesical administration of ultrasound contrast agents for detection and grading of vesicoureteral reflux. In Europe, all pediatric CEUS applications remain off-label. In 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the most commonly used worldwide second-generation ultrasound contrast SonoVue®/Lumason® for pediatric liver and intravesical applications, giving new impetus to pediatric CEUS worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Ntoulia
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Sudha A Anupindi
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Kassa Darge
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Susan J Back
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kaur H, Hindman NM, Al-Refaie WB, Arif-Tiwari H, Cash BD, Chernyak V, Farrell J, Grajo JR, Horowitz JM, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Qayyum A, Lalani T, Kamel IR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Suspected Liver Metastases. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 14:S314-S325. [PMID: 28473088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Liver metastases are the most common malignant liver tumors. The accurate and early detection and characterization of liver lesions is the key to successful treatment strategies. Increasingly, surgical resection in combination with chemotherapy is effective in significantly improving survival if all metastases are successfully resected. MRI and multiphase CT are the primary imaging modalities in the assessment of liver metastasis, with the relative preference toward multiphase CT or MRI depending upon the clinical setting (ie, surveillance or presurgical planning). The optimization of imaging parameters is a vital factor in the success of either modality. PET/CT, intraoperative ultrasound are used to supplement CT and MRI. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harmeet Kaur
- Principal Author, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Nicole M Hindman
- Co-author, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Waddah B Al-Refaie
- Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia; American College of Surgeons
| | - Hina Arif-Tiwari
- University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - James Farrell
- Interventional Endoscopy and Pancreatic Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Joseph R Grajo
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | - Richard B Noto
- Brown University Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Aliya Qayyum
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tasneem Lalani
- Specialty Chair, Inland Imaging Associates and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Panel Chair, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ayyala RS, Anupindi SA, Callahan MJ. Practical use and pitfalls of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs) for pediatric hepatic and biliary magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:502-520. [PMID: 27680015 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0916-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used to evaluate for hepatic and biliary pathology in the pediatric population. Recently, there has been increased use of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs), such as Gadoxetate disodium in children. Traditionally, HSCAs have been used to characterize focal liver lesions. However, these agents can also be used to problem solve specific hepatic or biliary diagnostic dilemmas. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the practical uses of HSCA in children with both hepatic and biliary indications, and review the corresponding imaging findings. We will highlight the diagnostic uses of HSCA in children, as well as pitfalls encountered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rama S Ayyala
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, 3959 Broadway, CHONY 3 N, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Sudha A Anupindi
- Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Michael J Callahan
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shelmerdine SC, Roebuck DJ, Towbin AJ, McHugh K. MRI of paediatric liver tumours: How we review and report. Cancer Imaging 2016; 16:21. [PMID: 27526937 PMCID: PMC4986178 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-016-0083-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver tumours are fortunately rare in children. Benign tumours such as haemangiomas and cystic mesenchymal hamartomas are typically seen in infancy, often before 6 months of age. After that age, malignant hepatic tumours increase in frequency. The differentiation of a malignant from benign lesion on imaging can often negate the need for biopsy. Ultrasound is currently the main screening tool for suspected liver pathology, and is ideally suited for evaluation of hepatic lesions in children due to their generally small size. With increasing research, public awareness and parental anxiety regarding radiation dosage from CT imaging, MRI is now unquestionably the modality of choice for further characterisation of hepatic mass lesions. Nevertheless the cost, length of imaging time and perceived complexity of a paediatric liver MR study can be intimidating to the general radiologist and referring clinician. This article outlines standard MR sequences utilised, reasons for their utilisation, types of mixed hepatocyte specific/extracellular contrast agents employed and imaging features that aid the interpretation of paediatric liver lesions. The two commonest paediatric liver malignancies, namely hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma are described. Differentiation of primary hepatic malignancies with metastatic disease and mimickers of malignancy such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenomas are also featured in this review.. Imaging should aim to clarify the presence of a lesion, the likelihood of malignancy and potential for complete surgical resection. Reviewing and reporting the studies should address these issues in a systematic fashion whilst also commenting upon background liver parenchymal appearances. Clinical information and adequate patient preparation prior to MR imaging studies help enhance the diagnostic yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan C Shelmerdine
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Derek J Roebuck
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kieran McHugh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smith EA, Dillman JR. Current role of body MRI in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46:873-80. [PMID: 27229504 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3560-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Revised: 12/06/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the imaging of children with non-central nervous system malignancies, and it is increasingly replacing or complementing CT in many cases. MRI has several advantages over CT, including superior contrast resolution as well as superior tissue characterization with the use of novel pulse sequences and functional or organ-specific contrast agents. In addition, the lack of ionizing radiation - an important consideration in children - allows for multiphase dynamic post-contrast imaging, which can be useful for lesion detection and characterization. Several challenges remain in the performance of MRI in pediatric oncology patients, including the frequent need for sedation or anesthesia in young children because of long imaging times, as well as the suboptimal imaging of the lungs in the evaluation for pulmonary metastatic disease. However, despite these challenges, with continued improvements in MRI image quality and the development of novel sequences, contrast agents and quantitative imaging techniques, MRI is expected to play an ever increasing role in the imaging of pediatric oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan A Smith
- Department of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, 1540 E. Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-4252, USA.
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Almotairi M, Oudjhane K, Chavhan GB. Pediatric multifocal liver lesions evaluated by MRI. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015; 25:296-302. [PMID: 26288526 PMCID: PMC4531456 DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.161466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to present our experience with MRI evaluation of multifocal liver lesions in children and describe the MRI characteristics of these lesions. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive MRI exams performed for the evaluation of multiple liver lesions between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2012 was done to note the number of lesions, the size of the largest lesion, MR signal characteristics, and background liver. Final diagnosis was assigned to each case based on pathology in the available cases and a combination of clinical features, imaging features, and follow-up in the remaining cases. Results: A total of 48 children (22 boys, 26 girls; age between 3 months and 18 years with average age 10.58 years and median age 11 years) were included in the study. Totally 51 lesion diagnoses were seen in 48 children that included 17 focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), 8 hemangiomas, 7 metastases, 6 regenerative nodules, 3 adenomas, 3 abscesses, and one each of angiomyolipoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, focal fatty infiltration, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic infarction, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and hepatic cyst. Background liver was normal in 33, cirrhotic in 10, fatty in 3, and siderotic in 2 children. Most FNH, hemangiomas, and regenerative nodules showed characteristic MRI features, while metastases were variable in signal pattern. Conclusion: Many commonly seen multifocal liver lesions in children have characteristic MRI features. MRI can help to arrive at reasonable differential diagnoses for multifocal liver lesions in children and guide further investigation and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed Almotairi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kamaldine Oudjhane
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Govind B Chavhan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The impact of hepatocyte phase imaging from infancy to young adulthood in patients with a known or suspected liver lesion. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45:354-65. [PMID: 25246096 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3160-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Revised: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 08/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hepatocyte-specific contrast agents are used to help characterize liver lesions. However, there are no studies evaluating the utility of these agents in detecting or diagnosing pediatric liver lesions. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the hepatocyte phase of imaging on lesion detection, tumor staging and diagnostic confidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients undergoing an MRI between September 2010 and August 2012 using gadoxetate disodium as the contrast agent were included in this study. Each exam was duplicated so that one copy contained all sequences, including the hepatocyte phase of imaging, and the other copy contained all sequences except the hepatocyte phase of imaging. One reviewer evaluated all exams in a blinded, random fashion. Data tracked included imaging diagnosis, confidence in diagnosis, number of lesions and PRETEXT grade. The imaging diagnosis was compared to histopathology, when available. Data were analyzed for the study population as well as the subset of patients diagnosed with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). RESULTS There were 112 patients (56 male; mean age: 9.25 years) included in this study. A total of 33 patients had a malignant tumor and the remainder had either a benign lesion or no lesion. The addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging significantly improved the diagnostic confidence for all patients (P < 0.0001) as well as specifically for patients diagnosed with FNH (P = 0.003). In nearly a quarter of patients, the hepatocyte phase of imaging allowed the reviewer to detect additional lesions (P = 0.005). In the patients with a malignant tumor, the addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging changed the PRETEXT grade in 7/30 patients although the results were not significant (P = 0.161). CONCLUSION The addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging helps to improve lesion detection and increase the diagnostic confidence for all liver tumors, as well as for FNH in particular.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pillon M, Carucci NS, Mainardi C, Carraro E, Zuliani M, Chemello L, Calore E, Tumino M, Varotto S, Toffolutti T, Destro R, Gazzola MV, Alaggio R, Basso G, Messina C. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: an emerging complication of hematopoietic SCT in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50:414-9. [PMID: 25581411 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Revised: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a nonmalignant condition rarely affecting children previously treated for cancer, especially those who received hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Some aspects of its pathogenesis still remain unclear and a strong association with specific risk factors has not yet been identified. We report here a single institution's case series of 17 patients who underwent HSCT and were diagnosed with FNH, analyzing retrospectively their clinical features and the radiological appearance of their hepatic lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore the role of transient elastography (FibroScan) to evaluate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in FNH patients. Our analysis showed an association of FNH with age at transplant ⩽12 years (hazard ratio (HR) 9.10); chronic GVHD (HR 2.99); hormone-replacement therapy (HR 4.02) and abdominal radiotherapy (HR 4.37). MRI proved to be a more accurate diagnostic tool compared with US. Nine out of 12 patients who underwent FibroScan showed hepatic fibrosis. Our study points out that FNH is an emerging complication of HSCT, which requires a lifelong surveillance to follow its course in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pillon
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - N S Carucci
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - C Mainardi
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - E Carraro
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - M Zuliani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - L Chemello
- Medicine Department-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - E Calore
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - M Tumino
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - S Varotto
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - T Toffolutti
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - R Destro
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - M V Gazzola
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - R Alaggio
- Pathology University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - G Basso
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - C Messina
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Towbin AJ. Pediatric tumours: liver tumours. Cancer Imaging 2014. [PMCID: PMC4242751 DOI: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-s1-o16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
30
|
Cha DI, Yoo SY, Kim JH, Jeon TY, Eo H. Clinical and imaging features of focal nodular hyperplasia in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202:960-965. [PMID: 24758647 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to review the clinical and imaging features of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) developed in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS At a single institution, pediatric patients who underwent imaging studies and who had pathologically proven FNH were studied. Clinical characteristics, including presenting symptoms and signs and the presence of underlying disease, were reviewed from the medical records. Imaging features of FNHs, including the number, size, ultrasound echogenicity and vascularity, CT attenuation, MRI signal intensity and enhancement pattern, and the presence of a central scar, were evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (11 boys and 14 girls; median age, 8.6 years) were found to have a solitary (n = 23) or multiple (n = 2) FNH lesions with a mean size of 4.9 cm (range, 1-10 cm). Multiple lesions were associated with small size of the lesions and history of malignancy treated by chemotherapy. Most patients were asymptomatic (n = 22). Biliary atresia was the most common underlying disease (n = 5). On ultrasound, FNHs most commonly appeared to be isoechoic and hypervascular. On dynamic CT and MRI, strong enhancement on the arterial phase and becoming isoattenuated or of isointense signal intensity on the portal or delayed phase was common. A central scar was usually noted in large lesions in about half the cases. CONCLUSION Pediatric FNH is uncommon and usually is found incidentally in otherwise healthy children. However, it may occur in children who have underlying diseases, including biliary atresia. In addition, it can be encountered during surveillance of childhood cancer survivors with less common imaging features, including lack of a central scar and multiplicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ik Cha
- 1 All authors: Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yoo SY, Kim JH, Eo H, Jeon TY, Sung KW, Kim HS. Dynamic MRI findings and clinical features of benign hypervascular hepatic nodules in childhood-cancer survivors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:178-184. [PMID: 23789673 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.9734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to investigate the dynamic MRI findings and clinical features of benign hypervascular hepatic nodules in childhood-cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed dynamic MRI findings and clinical features in 15 patients who had been treated for childhood malignant solid tumors and in whom hypervascular hepatic nodules were later found on surveillance imaging by either CT or ultrasound (or both). The benign nature of the lesion was based on histologic examination or clinical and radiologic follow-up (or both). RESULTS Time between initial diagnosis of malignancy and detection of the hepatic nodule ranged from 4.5 to 13.5 years with the majority of the malignancies being neuroblastoma treated by high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 43 nodules were detected, often multiple and small. Most of the lesions were isointense or slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging and isointense or slightly hypointense on T1-weighted imaging. All nodules had intense enhancement on the arterial phase and were isointense or slightly hyperintense on the delayed phase. A central scar was seen in four. Additionally, hepatic hemosiderosis was noted in four patients, in whom all the lesions were hyperintense on both T1- and T2-weighted imaging. CONCLUSION Benign hypervascular hepatic nodules in survivors of childhood malignancy occur years after high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Dynamic MRI findings including intense arterial enhancement and absence of washout in the delayed phase are of great value in the differential diagnosis of these hepatic nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So-Young Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Benign hepatocellular tumors in children: focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma. Int J Hepatol 2013; 2013:215064. [PMID: 23555058 PMCID: PMC3608344 DOI: 10.1155/2013/215064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Accepted: 02/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Benign liver tumors are very rare in children. Most focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) remain sporadic, but predisposing factors exist, as follows: long-term cancer survivor (with an increasing incidence), portal deprivation in congenital or surgical portosystemic shunt. The aspect is atypical on imaging in two-thirds of cases. Biopsy of the tumor and the nontumoral liver is then required. Surgical resection will be discussed in the case of large tumors with or without symptoms. In the case of associated vascular disorder with portal deprivation, restoration of the portal flow will be discussed in the hope of seeing the involution of FNH. HepatoCellular Adenoma (HCA) is frequently associated with predisposing factors such as GSD type I and III, Fanconi anemia especially if androgen therapy is administered, CPSS, and SPSS. Adenomatosis has been reported in germline mutation of HNF1- α . Management will depend on the presence of a predisposing factor and may include metabolic control, androgen therapy withdrawn, or closure of the shunt when appropriate. Surgery is usually performed on large lesions. In the case of adenomatosis or multiple lesions, surgery will be adapted. Close followup is required in all cases.
Collapse
|