Impact of disease heterogeneity on treatment efficacy of immunotherapy in Type 1 diabetes: different shades of gray

Prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: in search of the ideal combination therapy targeting multiple immunometabolic pathways

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) represents an autoimmune disease caused by the gradual immune-mediated destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells within the pancreatic islets of Langerhans, resulting in the lifelong need for exogenous insulin therapy. According to recent estimates, T1D currently affects about 8.4 million individuals worldwide. Since a definitive biological cure for this disease is not available yet, there is a great need for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at safely and effectively altering the natural history of the disease during its sequential stages. Ideal therapeutic goals in T1D include the prevention of autoimmune beta-cell destruction, the preservation of residual beta-cell mass and endogenous insulin secretion, the replacement and/or regeneration of beta cells, as well as automated insulin delivery through advanced closed-loop artificial pancreas systems. With this regard, an important research area focused on the identification of a definitive biological cure for T1D is represented by the investigation of immunotherapeutic and beta-cell-protective agents used as disease-modifying therapies to forestall or eliminate insulin dependence. In this commentary, we discuss the reasons why the use of combination therapies targeting the multiple immunometabolic dysfunctions associated with T1D (other than beta-cell autoimmunity) is likely to be more effective in preserving beta cell function in individuals at different stages of T1D, as compared to the use of single therapeutic agents.

The opportunities and challenges of the disease-modifying immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There are multiple disease-modifying immunotherapies showing the potential of preventing or delaying the progression of type 1 diabetes (T1D). We designed and performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to gain an overview of what a role immunotherapy plays in the treatment of T1D. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to December 2023. We included clinical trials of immunotherapy conducted in patients with T1D that reported the incidence of hypoglycemia or changes from baseline in at least one of following outcomes: 2 h and 4 h mixed-meal-stimulated C-peptide area under the curve (AUC), fasting C-peptide, daily insulin dosage, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). The results were computed as the weighted mean differences (WMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in random-effect model. In all, 34 clinical trials were included. When compared with control groups, 2 h C-peptide AUC was marginally higher in patient treated with nonantigen-based immunotherapies (WMD, 0.04nmol/L, 95% CI, 0.00-0.09 nmol/L, P=0.05), which was mainly driven by the effects of T cell-targeted therapy. A greater preservation in 4 h C-peptide AUC was observed in patients with nonantigen-based immunotherapies (WMD, 0.10nmol/L, 95% CI, 0.04-0.16 nmol/L, P=0.0007), which was mainly driven by the effects of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitor and T cell-targeted therapy. After excluding small-sample trials, less daily insulin dosage was observed in patient treated with nonantigen-based immunotherapies when compared with control groups (WMD, -0.07units/kg/day, 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03units/kg/day, P=0.0004). The use of antigen-based immunotherapies was also associated with a lower daily insulin dosage versus control groups (WMD, -0.11units/kg/day, 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.00units/kg/day, P=0.05). However, changes of HbA1c or FPG were comparable between nonantigen-based immunotherapies or antigen-based immunotherapies and control groups. The risk of hypoglycemia was not increased in patients treated with nonantigen-based immunotherapies or patients treated with antigen-based immunotherapies when compared with control groups. In conclusion, nonantigen-based immunotherapies were associated with a preservation of 2 h and 4 h C-peptide AUC in patients with T1D when compared with the controls, which was mainly driven by the effects of TNF-a inhibitor and T cell-targeted therapy. Both nonantigen-based immunotherapies and antigen-based immunotherapies tended to reduce the daily insulin dosage in patients with T1D when compared with the controls. However, they did not contribute to a substantial improvement in HbA1c or FPG. Both nonantigen-based immunotherapies and antigen-based immunotherapies were well tolerated with not increased risk of hypoglycemia in patients with T1D.

The need and benefit of immune monitoring to define patient and disease heterogeneity, mechanisms of therapeutic action and efficacy of intervention therapy for precision medicine in type 1 diabetes

The current standard of care for type 1 diabetes patients is limited to treatment of the symptoms of the disease, insulin insufficiency and its complications, not its cause. Given the autoimmune nature of type 1 diabetes, immunology is critical to understand the mechanism of disease progression, patient and disease heterogeneity and therapeutic action. Immune monitoring offers the key to all this essential knowledge and is therefore indispensable, despite the challenges and costs associated. In this perspective, I attempt to make this case by providing evidence from the past to create a perspective for future trials and patient selection.

Restoring glutamate receptor signaling in pancreatic alpha cells rescues glucagon responses in type 1 diabetes

Glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha cells is crucial to prevent hypoglycemia. People with type 1 diabetes lose this glucoregulatory mechanism and are susceptible to dangerous hypoglycemia for reasons still unclear. Here we determine that alpha cells in living pancreas slices from donors with type 1 diabetes do not mount an adequate glucagon response and cannot activate the positive autocrine feedback mediated by AMPA/kainate glutamate receptors. This feedback is required to elicit full glucagon responses in the healthy state. Reactivating residual AMPA/kainate receptor function with positive allosteric modulators restores glucagon secretion in human slices from donors with type 1 diabetes as well as glucose counterregulation in non-obese diabetic mice. Our study thus identifies a defect in autocrine signaling that contributes to alpha cell failure. The use of positive allosteric modulators of AMPA/kainate receptors overcomes this deficiency and prevents hypoglycemia, an effect that could be used to improve the management of diabetes.

From Disease and Patient Heterogeneity to Precision Medicine in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains a devastating disease that requires much effort to control. Life-long daily insulin injections or an insulin pump are required to avoid severe complications. With many factors contributing to disease onset, T1D is a complex disease to cure. In this review, the risk factors, pathophysiology and defect pathways are discussed. Results from (pre)clinical studies are highlighted that explore restoration of insulin production and reduction of autoimmunity. It has become clear that treatment responsiveness depends on certain pathophysiological or genetic characteristics that differ between patients. For instance, age at disease manifestation associated with efficacy of immune intervention therapies, such as depleting islet-specific effector T cells or memory B cells and increasing immune regulation. The new challenge is to determine in whom to apply which intervention strategy. Within patients with high rates of insulitis in early T1D onset, therapy depleting T cells or targeting B lymphocytes may have a benefit, whereas slow progressing T1D in adults may be better served with more sophisticated, precise and specific disease modifying therapies. Genetic barcoding and immune profiling may help determining from which new T1D endotypes patients suffer. Furthermore, progressed T1D needs replenishment of insulin production besides autoimmunity reversal, as too many beta cells are already lost or defect. Recurrent islet autoimmunity and allograft rejection or necrosis seem to be the most challenging obstacles. Since beta cells are highly immunogenic under stress, treatment might be more effective with stress reducing agents such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. Moreover, genetic editing by CRISPR-Cas9 allows to create hypoimmunogenic beta cells with modified human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression that secrete immune regulating molecules. Given the differences in T1D between patients, stratification of endotypes in clinical trials seems essential for precision medicines and clinical decision making.

Improvement of Lipoplexes With a Sialic Acid Mimetic to Target the C1858T PTPN22 Variant for Immunotherapy in Endocrine Autoimmunity

The C1858T variant of the protein tyrosine phosphatase N22 (PTPN22) gene is associated with pathophysiological phenotypes in several autoimmune conditions, namely, Type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroiditis. The R620W variant protein, encoded by C1858T, leads to a gain of function mutation with paradoxical reduced T cell activation. We previously exploited a novel personalized immunotherapeutic approach based on siRNA delivered by liposomes (lipoplexes, LiposiRNA) that selectively inhibit variant allele expression. In this manuscript, we functionalize lipoplexes carrying siRNA for variant C1858T with a high affinity ligand of Siglec-10 (Sig10L) coupled to lipids resulting in lipoplexes (LiposiRNA-Sig10L) that enhance delivery to Siglec-10 expressing immunocytes. LiposiRNA-Sig10L lipoplexes more efficiently downregulated variant C1858T PTPN22 mRNA in PBMC of heterozygous patients than LiposiRNA without Sig10L. Following TCR engagement, LiposiRNA-Sig10L more significantly restored IL-2 secretion, known to be paradoxically reduced than in wild type patients, than unfunctionalized LiposiRNA in PBMC of heterozygous T1D patients.

Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of RITUXfab-Decorated Lipoplexes to Improve Delivery of siRNA Targeting C1858T PTPN22 Variant in B Lymphocytes

Autoimmune endocrine disorders, such as type 1 diabetes (T1D) and thyroiditis, at present are treated with only hormone replacement therapy. This emphasizes the need to identify personalized effective immunotherapeutic strategies targeting T and B lymphocytes. Among the genetic variants associated with several autoimmune disorders, the C1858T polymorphism of the protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) gene, encoding for Lyp variant R620W, affects the innate and adaptive immunity. We previously exploited a novel personalized immunotherapeutic approach based on siRNA delivered by liposomes (lipoplexes) that selectively inhibit variant allele expression. In this manuscript, we improved lipoplexes carrying siRNA for variant C1858T by functionalizing them with Fab of Rituximab antibody (RituxFab-Lipoplex) to specifically target B lymphocytes in autoimmune conditions, such as T1D. RituxFab-Lipoplexes specifically bind to B lymphocytes of the human Raji cell line and of human PBMC of healthy donors. RituxFab-Lipoplexes have impact on the function of B lymphocytes of T1D patients upon CpG stimulation showing a higher inhibitory effect on total cell proliferation and IgM+ plasma cell differentiation than the not functionalized ones. These results might open new pathways of applicability of RituxFab-Lipoplexes, such as personalized immunotherapy, to other autoimmune disorders, where B lymphocytes are the prevalent pathogenic immunocytes.

Breaking and restoring immune tolerance to pancreatic beta-cells in type 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the loss of immune tolerance to pancreatic beta-cells leading to their destruction. Immune intervention therapies tested in T1D so far delayed progression but failed to restore tolerance, which partly explains their lack of durable clinical efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of beta-cells and islets themselves in dialogue with their micro- and macro-environment including the immune system and the intestinal microbiome is increasingly evident. Indeed, islets can both maintain and break immune tolerance. Some recent immune therapies in cancer that block immune regulation also break tolerance. Induction of immune tolerance requires activating immune activation too, whereas immune suppression precludes this process. Immunotherapy alone my not suffice without engaging islets to restore tolerance and preserve beta-cell function.

SUMMARY

New insight into the role of islet tissue and its interaction with its environment in preserving or breaking tolerance has contributed to understand the development of islet autoimmunity and T1D. Knowing which factors in islets and the immune system contribute to maintaining, breaking, and restoring the balance in the immune system is critical to prevent initiation and reverse disease progression, and guides the design of novel tolerogenic strategies for durable therapeutic intervention and remission that target both the immune system and distressed islets.

Combination of vitamin D and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (VIDPP-4i) as an immunomodulation therapy for autoimmune diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) represent the most common types of autoimmune diabetes and are characterized by different age of onset, degrees of immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells and rates of disease progression towards insulin dependence. Several immunotherapies aimed to counteract autoimmune responses against beta cells and preserve beta-cell function are currently being investigated, particularly in T1D. Preliminary findings suggest a potential role of combination therapy with vitamin D and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (VIDPP-4i) in preserving beta-cell function in autoimmune diabetes. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the immunomodulatory properties of vitamin D and DPP-4 inhibitors, as well as the rationale for investigation of their combined use as an immunomodulation therapy for autoimmune diabetes.

Progression of Diabetic Complications in Subgroups of People with Long Term Diabetes Type 1 According to Clinical Course

AIMS

Prevention and prediction of microvascular complications are important aims of medical care in people with type 1 diabetes. Since the course of the disease is heterogenous, we tried to identify subgroups with specific risk profiles for microvascular complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 285 people (22637 consultations) with >10 years of type 1 diabetes. Persons were grouped into slow (<15 years), fast (>15 years) and non progressors according to the average onset of microvascular complications. Generalized estimating equations for binary outcomes were applied and pseudo coefficients of determination were calculated.

RESULTS

Progression to microvascular disease was associated with age (OR: 1.034 [1.001-1.068]; p=0.04), diabetes duration (OR: 1.057 [1.021-1.094]; p=0.002), HbA_1c (OR: 1.035 [1.011-1.060]; p=0.005), BMI (OR: 0.928 [0.866-0.994]; p=0.034) and the social strata index (OR: 0.910 [0.830-0.998]; p=0.046). Generalized estimating equations predicted 31.02% and exclusion of HbA_1c marginally reduced the value to 28.88%. The proportion of patients with LADA was higher in fast than slow progressors [13 (26.5%) vs. 14 (11.9%); p=0.019]. A generalized estimating equation comparing slow to fast progressors revealed no significant markers.

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, we were able to confirm known risk factors for microvascular disease in people with type 1 diabetes. Overall, prediction of individual risk was difficult, the effect of individual markers minor and we could not find differences regarding slow or fast progression. We therefore emphasis the need for additional markers to predict individual risk for microvascular disease.

Combined vitamin D, ibuprofen and glutamic acid decarboxylase-alum treatment in recent onset Type I diabetes: lessons from the DIABGAD randomized pilot trial

Aim

Double-blind placebo-controlled intervention using glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-alum, vitamin D and Ibuprofen in recent onset Type I diabetes (T1D).

Methods

64 patients (T1D since <4 months, age 10-17.99, fasting sC-peptide ≥0.12 nmol/l, GADA-positive) were randomized into Day(D) 1-90 400 mg/day Ibuprofen, D1-450 vitamin D 2000 IU/day, D15, 45 sc. 20 μg GAD-alum; as A but placebo instead of Ibuprofen; as B but 40 μg GAD-alum D15, 45; placebo.

Results

Treatment was safe and tolerable. No C-peptide preservation was observed. We observed a linear correlation of baseline C-peptide, HbA1c and insulin/per kilogram/24 h with change in C-peptide AUC at 15 months (r = -0.776, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Ibuprofen, vitamin D + GAD-alum did not preserve C-peptide. Treatment efficacy was influenced by baseline clinical and immunological factors and vitamin D concentration. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01785108 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Combined vitamin D, ibuprofen and glutamic acid decarboxylase-alum treatment in recent onset Type I diabetes: lessons from the DIABGAD randomized pilot trial

Aim:

Double-blind placebo-controlled intervention using glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-alum, vitamin D and Ibuprofen in recent onset Type I diabetes (T1D).

Methods

64 patients (T1D since <4 months, age 10–17.99, fasting sC-peptide ≥0.12 nmol/l, GADA-positive) were randomized into Day(D) 1–90 400 mg/day Ibuprofen, D1–450 vitamin D 2000 IU/day, D15, 45 sc. 20 μg GAD-alum; as A but placebo instead of Ibuprofen; as B but 40 μg GAD-alum D15, 45; placebo.

Results:

Treatment was safe and tolerable. No C-peptide preservation was observed. We observed a linear correlation of baseline C-peptide, HbA1c and insulin/per kilogram/24 h with change in C-peptide AUC at 15 months (r = -0.776, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Ibuprofen, vitamin D + GAD-alum did not preserve C-peptide. Treatment efficacy was influenced by baseline clinical and immunological factors and vitamin D concentration. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01785108 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

In many countries, Type I diabetes with insufficient own insulin secretion is a common life-threatening disease in children and adults. There is no prevention and no cure. In spite of very intense treatment, the disease leads to serious complications. There is no efficaceous method to save own insulin secretion without serious risks and adverse events, but autoantigen treatment with glutamic acid decarboxylase has shown some efficacy. We have tried a combination therapy with vitamin D and anti-inflammatory treatment (ibuprofen). Vitamin D in combination with glutamic acid decarboxylase-alum seems to have beneficial effects, but not Ibuprofen. The effect is influenced by basal clinical and immunological status.

Interindividual Heterogeneity of SGLT2 Expression and Function in Human Pancreatic Islets

Studies implicating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in glucagon secretion by pancreatic α-cells reported controversial results. We hypothesized that interindividual heterogeneity in SGLT2 expression and regulation may affect glucagon secretion by human α-cells in response to SGLT2 inhibitors. An unbiased RNA-sequencing analysis of 207 donors revealed an unprecedented level of heterogeneity of SLC5A2 expression. To determine heterogeneity of SGLT2 expression at the protein level, the anti-SGLT2 antibody was first rigorously evaluated for specificity, followed by Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis on islets from 10 and 12 donors, respectively. The results revealed a high interdonor variability of SGLT2 protein expression. Quantitative analysis of 665 human islets showed a significant SGLT2 protein colocalization with glucagon but not with insulin or somatostatin. Moreover, glucagon secretion by islets from 31 donors at low glucose (1 mmol/L) was also heterogeneous and correlated with dapagliflozin-induced glucagon secretion at 6 mmol/L glucose. Intriguingly, islets from three donors did not secrete glucagon in response to either 1 mmol/L glucose or dapagliflozin, indicating a functional impairment of the islets of these donors to glucose sensing and SGLT2 inhibition. Collectively, these data suggest that heterogeneous expression of SGLT2 protein and variability in glucagon secretory responses contribute to interindividual differences in response to SGLT2 inhibitors.

Clinical and genetic correlates of islet-autoimmune signatures in juvenile-onset type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Heterogeneity in individuals with type 1 diabetes has become more generally appreciated, but has not yet been extensively and systematically characterised. Here, we aimed to characterise type 1 diabetes heterogeneity by creating immunological, genetic and clinical profiles for individuals with juvenile-onset type 1 diabetes in a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Participants were HLA-genotyped to determine HLA-DR-DQ risk, and SNP-genotyped to generate a non-HLA genetic risk score (GRS) based on 93 type 1 diabetes-associated SNP variants outside the MHC region. Islet autoimmunity was assessed as T cell proliferation upon stimulation with the beta cell antigens GAD65, islet antigen-2 (IA-2), preproinsulin (PPI) and defective ribosomal product of the insulin gene (INS-DRIP). Clinical parameters were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 80 individuals, 67 had proliferation responses to one or more islet antigens, with vast differences in the extent of proliferation. Based on the multitude and amplitude of the proliferation responses, individuals were clustered into non-, intermediate and high responders. High responders could not be characterised entirely by enrichment for the highest risk HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 genotype. However, high responders did have a significantly higher non-HLA GRS. Clinically, high T cell responses to beta cell antigens did not reflect in worsened glycaemic control, increased complications, development of associated autoimmunity or younger age at disease onset. The number of beta cell antigens that an individual responded to increased with disease duration, pointing to chronic islet autoimmunity and epitope spreading.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Collectively, these data provide new insights into type 1 diabetes disease heterogeneity and highlight the importance of stratifying patients on the basis of their genetic and autoimmune signatures for immunotherapy and personalised disease management.

Effect of p53 activation through targeting MDM2/MDM4 heterodimer on T regulatory and effector cells in the peripheral blood of Type 1 diabetes patients

Various immunotherapies for the treatment of type 1 diabetes are currently under investigation. Some of these aim to rescue the remaining beta cells from autoimmune attack caused by the disease. Among the strategies employed, p53 has been envisaged as a possible target for immunomodulation. We studied the possible effect of p53 activation on Treg subsets and Treg/Teff balance in type 1 diabetes patients' PBMC. Upon p53 activation, we observed an increase in CD8+ Treg and activated CD8+ Teff whilst CD8+ Teff cells significantly decreased in healthy PBMC when stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28. No effect was detected on percentages of CD4+ Treg, while a reduction was seen in CD4+ Teff cells and an increase in activated CD4+ Teff cells. In patients' PBMC, upon p53 activation followed by 6 days of anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, CD8+ Treg and activated CD8+ Teff were increased while CD8+ Teff were decreased. No differences were detected in the CD4+ counterparts. CD8+ Teff PD1+, CD8+ Teff PD1low were increased upon p53 activation in type 1 diabetics compared to controls while CD8+ Teff PD1high were increased in both groups. The same increased percentages were detected for CD4+ counterparts. CD4+ Treg PD1high cells were decreased in diabetics upon p53 activation at day 6 of anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation. In conclusion, a Teff dysregulation is observed upon p53 activation suggesting that molecules promoting p53 cannot be used for therapy in type 1 diabetics.

Introducing the Endotype Concept to Address the Challenge of Disease Heterogeneity in Type 1 Diabetes

The clinical diagnosis of new-onset type 1 diabetes has, for many years, been considered relatively straightforward. Recently, however, there is increasing awareness that within this single clinical phenotype exists considerable heterogeneity: disease onset spans the complete age range; genetic susceptibility is complex; rates of progression differ markedly, as does insulin secretory capacity; and complication rates, glycemic control, and therapeutic intervention efficacy vary widely. Mechanistic and immunopathological studies typically show considerable patchiness across subjects, undermining conclusions regarding disease pathways. Without better understanding, type 1 diabetes heterogeneity represents a major barrier both to deciphering pathogenesis and to the translational effort of designing, conducting, and interpreting clinical trials of disease-modifying agents. This realization comes during a period of unprecedented change in clinical medicine, with increasing emphasis on greater individualization and precision. For complex disorders such as type 1 diabetes, the option of maintaining the "single disease" approach appears untenable, as does the notion of individualizing each single patient's care, obliging us to conceptualize type 1 diabetes less in terms of phenotypes (observable characteristics) and more in terms of disease endotypes (underlying biological mechanisms). Here, we provide our view on an approach to dissect heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Using lessons from other diseases and the data gathered to date, we aim to delineate a roadmap through which the field can incorporate the endotype concept into laboratory and clinical practice. We predict that such an effort will accelerate the implementation of precision medicine and has the potential for impact on our approach to translational research, trial design, and clinical management.

'Fat's chances': Loci for phenotypic dispersion in plasma leptin in mouse models of diabetes mellitus

Background

Leptin, a critical mediator of feeding, metabolism and diabetes, is expressed on an incidental basis according to satiety. The genetic regulation of leptin should similarly be episodic.

Methodology

Data from three mouse cohorts hosted by the Jackson Laboratory– 402 (174F, 228M) F₂ Dilute Brown non-Agouti (DBA/2)×DU6i intercrosses, 142 Non Obese Diabetic (NOD/ShiLtJ×(NOD/ShiLtJ×129S1/SvImJ.H2^g7) N₂ backcross females, and 204 male Nonobese Nondiabetic (NON)×New Zealand Obese (NZO/HlLtJ) reciprocal backcrosses–were used to test for loci associated with absolute residuals in plasma leptin and arcsin-transformed percent fat (‘phenotypic dispersion’; PD_pLep and PD_AFP). Individual data from 1,780 mice from 43 inbred strains was also used to estimate genetic variances and covariances for dispersion in each trait.

Principal findings

Several loci for PD_pLep were detected, including possibly syntenic Chr 17 loci, but there was only a single position on Chr 6 for PD_AFP. Coding SNP in genes linked to the consensus Chr 17 PD_pLep locus occurred in immunological and cancer genes, genes linked to diabetes and energy regulation, post-transcriptional processors and vomeronasal variants. There was evidence of intersexual differences in the genetic architecture of PD_pLep. PD_pLep had moderate heritability (hs2=0.29) and PD_AFP low heritability (hs2=0.12); dispersion in these traits was highly genetically correlated r = 0.8).

Conclusions

Greater genetic variance for dispersion in plasma leptin, a physiological trait, may reflect its more ephemeral nature compared to body fat, an accrued progressive character. Genetic effects on incidental phenotypes such as leptin might be effectively characterized with randomization-detection methodologies in addition to classical approaches, helping identify incipient or borderline cases or providing new therapeutic targets.

Exploiting novel tailored immunotherapies of type 1 diabetes: Short interfering RNA delivered by cationic liposomes enables efficient down-regulation of variant PTPN22 gene in T lymphocytes

In autoimmune diseases as Type 1 diabetes, the actual treatment that provides the missing hormones is not able, however, to interrupt the underlining immunological mechanism. Importantly, novel immunotherapies are exploited to protect and rescue the remaining hormone producing cells. Among probable targets of immunotherapy, the C1858T mutation in the PTPN22 gene, which encodes for the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase (Lyp) variant R620W, reveals an autoimmunity related pathophysiological role. Our scope was to establish new C1858T PTPN22 siRNA duplexes delivered by liposomal carriers (lipoplexes) to patients' PBMC. Following lipoplexes treatment, CD3+ and CD3- immunotypes were efficiently transfected; cell integrity and viability were preserved. Specific target mRNA down-modulation was observed. After T cell receptor stimulation, in lipoplexes-treated PBMC Lyp function was restored by increased release of IL-2 in cultures. Results set-up the stage for ultimate trials in the treatment of autoimmunity based on the specific inhibitory targeting of C1858T PTPN22 by lipoplexes.

Persistent elevations in circulating INS DNA among subjects with longstanding type 1 diabetes

AIM

To evaluate whether β cells continue to undergo death in the later stages of type 1 diabetes (T1D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fasting banked sera from a cross-section of 90 participants in the T1D Exchange Registry with longstanding T1D (median duration of 9 years) were analysed. Subjects were determined to be C-peptide (-) or (+) based on mixed-meal tolerance testing. Results were compared with 54 adult non-diabetic controls. Stimulated samples were assayed in a subset of subjects. Levels of unmethylated and methylated preproinsulin (INS) DNA were analysed using digital droplet PCR.

RESULTS

Fasting and stimulated circulating unmethylated INS DNA levels were increased among both C-peptide (-) and C-peptide (+) subjects with longstanding T1D compared with non-diabetic controls (P < 0.01). Consistent with prior reports, unmethylated INS DNA values correlated with methylated INS DNA values, which were also elevated among T1D subjects (P < 0.001). There was wide variation in the effects of mixed-meal stimulation on DNA levels, with fasting values in the highest quartiles decreasing with stimulation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results could reflect ongoing β cell death in individuals with longstanding T1D, even in the absence of detectable C-peptide production, suggesting that therapies targeting β cell survival could be beneficial among individuals with longstanding T1D.

Antigen-based immune modulation therapy for type 1 diabetes: the era of precision medicine

Precision medicine has emerged as a mantra for therapeutic approaches to complex diseases. The defining concept relies on a detailed insight into disease pathogenesis and therapeutic mechanism. Although the type 1 diabetes field has gained new insights into disease endotypes and indications of efficacy for several therapies, none of these is yet licensed, partly because of immune suppressive side-effects beyond control of islet autoimmunity. New strategies designed to regulate the immune system continue to emerge as basic science discoveries are made, including the use of antigen-based immunotherapies. A single agent or approach seems unlikely to halt disease progression in all people with or at risk of type 1 diabetes; as such, tailored methods relying on patient subgroups and knowledge of disease endotypes are gaining attention. Recent insights into disease mechanisms and emerging trial data are being translated into opportunities for tissue-specific prevention of progressive loss of β-cell function and survival. Results so far point to feasibility, safety, and tolerability of administration of islet autoantigens and peptides thereof into recipients with or at risk of type 1 diabetes. Findings from mechanistic studies suggest favourable changes in islet autoimmunity, with signs of immune regulation. Major challenges remain, including those related to dose and dosing frequency, route of administration, and use of adjuvants. However, the first steps towards tissue-specific and personalised medicine in type 1 diabetes have been made, which will guide future studies into induction of immune tolerance to intervene in the initiation and progression of islet autoimmunity and disease.

The challenge of modulating β-cell autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes

With the conceptual advance about four decades ago that type 1 diabetes represents an autoimmune disease, hope arose that immune-based therapies would soon emerge to prevent and reverse the disorder. However, despite dozens of clinical trials seeking to achieve these goals, the promise remains unfulfilled, at least in a pragmatic form. With the benefit of hindsight, several important reasons are likely to account for this disappointing outcome, including failure to appreciate disease heterogeneity, inappropriate use of rodent models of disease, inadequacies in addressing the immunological and metabolic contributions to the disease, suboptimal trial designs, and lack of a clear understanding of the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. In this Series paper, we convey how recent knowledge gains in these areas, combined with efforts related to disease staging and emerging mechanistic data from clinical trials, provide cautious optimism that immune-based approaches to prevent the loss of β cells in type 1 diabetes will emerge into clinical practice.

Immune Checkpoint Molecules, Personalized Immunotherapy, and Autoimmune Diabetes

Although significant progress has been made in understanding autoimmunity, no immunotherapy to effectively halt immune-mediated destruction of β cells in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is currently available. For successful immunotherapy it will be necessary to identify novel drug targets as well as robust immunologic biomarkers to predict disease heterogeneity and patient responsiveness. Inhibition of immune checkpoint mechanisms represents a novel and effective strategy in tumor immunotherapy. Because they are fundamental to rewiring immune circuits, the underlying mechanisms could be therapeutically enhanced and used as biomarkers in T1D. We examine here current knowledge of immune checkpoint molecules in T1D. One specific immune checkpoint mechanism, namely tryptophan metabolism, may meet the need for a valid drug target and robust biomarker in the quest for effective and personalized immunotherapy in T1D.

Differential transcriptome of tolerogenic versus inflammatory dendritic cells points to modulated T1D genetic risk and enriched immune regulation

Tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDCs) are assessed as immunomodulatory adjuvants to regulate autoimmunity. The underlying gene expression endorsing their regulatory features remains ill-defined. Using deep mRNA sequencing, we compared transcriptomes of 1,25-dihydroxyvitaminD₃/dexametasone-modulated tolDCs with that of non-modulated mature inflammatory DCs (mDCs). Differentially expressed genes controlled cellular interactions, metabolic pathways and endorse tolDCs with the capacity to regulate cell activation through nutrient and signal deprivation, collectively gearing tolDCs into tolerogenic immune regulators. Gene expression differences correlated with protein expression, designating low CD86 and high CD52 on the cell surface as superior discriminators between tolDCs and mDCs. Of 37 candidate genes conferring risk to developing type 1 diabetes (T1D), 11 genes differentially expressed in tolDCs and mDCs regulated immune response and antigen-presenting activity. Differential-expressed transcripts of candidate risk loci for T1D suggest a role of these 'risk genes' in immune regulation, which targeting may modulate the genetic contribution to autoimmunity.

Use of short interfering RNA delivered by cationic liposomes to enable efficient down-regulation of PTPN22 gene in human T lymphocytes

Type 1 diabetes and thyroid disease are T cell-dependent autoimmune endocrinopathies. The standard substitutive administration of the deficient hormones does not halt the autoimmune process; therefore, development of immunotherapies aiming to preserve the residual hormonal cells, is of crucial importance. PTPN22 C1858T mutation encoding for the R620W lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase variant, plays a potential pathophysiological role in autoimmunity. The PTPN22 encoded protein Lyp is a negative regulator of T cell antigen receptor signaling; R620W variant, leading to a gain of function with paradoxical reduced T cell activation, may represent a valid therapeutic target. We aimed to develop novel wild type PTPN22 short interfering RNA duplexes (siRNA) and optimize their delivery into Jurkat T cells and PBMC by using liposomal carriers. Conformational stability, size and polydispersion of siRNA in lipoplexes was measured by CD spectroscopy and DLS. Lipoplexes internalization and toxicity evaluation was assessed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis. Their effect on Lyp expression was evaluated by means of Western Blot and confocal microscopy. Functional assays through engagement of TCR signaling were established to evaluate biological consequences of down-modulation. Both Jurkat T cells and PBMC were efficiently transfected by stable custom lipoplexes. Jurkat T cell morphology and proliferation was not affected. Lipoplexes incorporation was visualized in CD3+ but also in CD3- peripheral blood immunotypes without signs of toxicity, damage or apoptosis. Efficacy in affecting Lyp protein expression was demonstrated in both transfected Jurkat T cells and PBMC. Moreover, impairment of Lyp inhibitory activity was revealed by increase of IL-2 secretion in culture supernatants of PBMC following anti-CD3/CD28 T cell receptor-driven stimulation. The results of our study open the pathway to future trials for the treatment of autoimmune diseases based on the selective inhibition of variant PTPN22 allele using lipoplexes of siRNA antisense oligomers.

Role of humoral beta-cell autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes

Islet cell antibodies (ICA) were found for the first time more than 40 yr ago in patients with autoimmune endocrine deficiencies, including type 1 diabetes (T1D). ICA detected by indirect immunofluorescence represent a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies targeting a series of biochemical autoantigens, such as the protein tyrosine phosphatase related islet antigen 2 (IA-2), the 65 kD isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GA65), and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) as well as currently unidentified autoantigens. The general view is that the diabetes-associated autoantibodies are not directly involved in beta-cell destruction but function as biomarkers of an ongoing destructive process. The diabetes-associated autoantibodies remain the strongest predictive marker for future development of T1D. Positivity for multiple (≥2) autoantibodies is highly predictive of clinical disease both among first-degree relatives and in the general population. Autoantibody titers are highly variable during the preclinical phase, but in many cases the titers tend to decrease before diagnosis. The first signs of beta-cell autoimmunity may appear early during the first months of life. The majority of those individuals diagnosed with T1D before puberty seroconvert to autoantibody positivity before the age of 3 yr. The natural course and duration of preclinical diabetes vary substantially from one individual to another. The characteristics of the isotype-specific response during preclinical diabetes appear to be antigen-specific. Diabetes-associated autoantibodies may be useful surrogate markers of the subsequent development of T1D in primary prevention trials. T1D may occur, albeit rarely, in the absence of any signs of humoral autoimmunity at diagnosis.

Where, How, and When: Positioning Posttranslational Modification Within Type 1 Diabetes Pathogenesis

Autoreactive T cells specific for islet autoantigens develop in type 1 diabetes (T1D) by escaping central as well as peripheral tolerance. The current paradigm for development of islet autoimmunity is just beginning to include the contribution of posttranslationally modified (PTM) islet autoantigens, for which the immune system may be ignorant rather than tolerant. As a result, PTM is the latest promising lead in the quest to understand how the break in peripheral tolerance occurs in T1D. However, it is not completely clear how, where, or when these modifications take place. Currently, only a few PTM antigens have been well-thought-out or identified in T1D, and methods for identifying and characterizing new PTM antigens are rapidly improving. This review will address both reported and potential new sources of modified islet autoantigens and discuss how islet neo-autoantigen generation may contribute to the development and progression of T1D.