1
|
Abdin E, Seet V, Jeyagurunathan A, Tan SC, Mohmad Khalid MIS, Mok YM, Verma S, Subramaniam M. Mapping the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with mental disorders. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:1009-1015. [PMID: 38967393 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2376100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study aims to develop an algorithm for mapping the WHODAS 2.0 to the EQ-5D-5 L for patients with mental disorders. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Institute of Mental Health and Community Wellness Clinics in Singapore between June 2019 and November 2022. We included four regression methods including the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression, the Tobit regression model (Tobit), the robust regression with MM estimator (MM), and the adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (ALDVMM) to map EQ-5D-5 L utility scores from the WHODAS 2.0. RESULTS A total of 797 participants were included. The mean EQ-5D-5 L utility and WHODAS 2.0 total scores were 0.615 (SD = 0.342) and 11.957 (SD = 8.969), respectively. We found that the EQ-5D-5 L utility score was best predicted by the robust regression model with the MM estimator. Our findings suggest that the WHODAS 2.0 total scores were significantly and inversely associated with the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores. CONCLUSION This study provides a mapping algorithm for converting the WHODAS 2.0 scores into EQ-5D-5 L utility scores which can be implemented using a simple online calculator in the following web application: https://eastats.shinyapps.io/whodas_eq5d/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edimansyah Abdin
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vanessa Seet
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Sing Chik Tan
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yee Ming Mok
- Department of Mood and Anxiety, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swapna Verma
- Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mythily Subramaniam
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bray G, Moncrieff J, Priebe S, Marston L, Lewis G, Haynes N, Pinfold V, Johnson S, Hunter RM. Cost-Utility Analysis of Antipsychotic Reduction and Discontinuation in Patients With Long-Term Schizophrenia and Psychosis in English Mental Health Trusts: The RADAR Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02800-6. [PMID: 39127250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current recommended treatment for patients with recurrent episodes of schizophrenia and related conditions is antipsychotic medication. However, many antipsychotic users remain functionally impaired and experience serious physical and mental side effects. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy compared with maintenance treatment over 24 months from mental health services, health and social care, and societal perspectives. METHODS Nineteen mental health trusts recruited patients to the Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction (RADAR) randomized controlled trial. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from patient-reported EQ-5D-5L, with years of full capability calculated from the patient-reported ICECAP-A. Mental health services use and medication was collected from medical records. Other resource use and productivity loss was collected using self-completed questionnaires. Costs were calculated from published sources. RESULTS A total of 253 participants were randomized: 126 assigned to antipsychotic dose reduction and 127 to maintenance. There were no significant differences between arms in total costs for any perspectives. There were no significant difference in quality-adjusted life-years (-0.035; 95% CI: -0.123 to 0.052), whereas years of full capability were significantly lower in the reduction arm compared with the maintenance arm (baseline-adjusted difference: -0.103; 95% CI: -0.192 to -0.014). The reduction strategy was dominated by maintenance for all analyses and was not likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS It is unlikely that gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy is cost-effective compared with maintenance over 2-years for patients with schizophrenia and other recurrent psychotic disorders who are on long-term antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Bray
- Office of Health Economics, London, England, UK
| | - Joanna Moncrieff
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Stefan Priebe
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Nadia Haynes
- Research and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | | | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamaguchi S, Ojio Y, Koike J, Matsunaga A, Ogawa M, Kikuchi A, Kawashima T, Tachimori H, Bernick P, Kimura H, Inagaki A, Watanabe H, Kishi Y, Yoshida K, Hirooka T, Oishi S, Matsuda Y, Fujii C. Associations between readmission and patient-reported measures in acute psychiatric inpatients: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2024:10.1007/s00127-024-02710-5. [PMID: 39102067 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02710-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined whether patient-reported measures (PRMs) addressing quality of life, personal agency, functional impairment, and treatment satisfaction at hospital discharge were associated with future readmission during a 12-month follow-up period. The study also examined whether readmission influenced changes in the same measures. METHODS A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at 21 psychiatric hospitals in Japan. Participants completed the EuroQol-five-dimensions-five-level (EQ-5D), the Five-item Subjective Personal Agency Scale, and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at the time of index admission (T1), discharge from index admission (T2), and 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after discharge. Inpatient treatment satisfaction was assessed at T2. Readmission and variables potentially associated with hospitalization and PRMs were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models and mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS A total of 491 participants were followed for 12 months (attrition rate: 19.4%), and 480 were included in the EQ-5D analysis. The most common diagnoses were schizophrenia (59%), depression (14%), and bipolar disorder (13%). No patient-reported measures were significantly associated with readmission over the follow-up period. Interaction of readmission and time did not significantly affect changes in EQ-5D. Readmission did significantly influence SDS score changes between T2 and T3 (B = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.30-3.25, p = 0.018) and between T3 and T4 (B = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.14-2.72, p = 0.029). The same influence of readmission on SDS score changes was not observed in the model which adjusted for all potential covariates. CONCLUSION Readmission was potentially associated with changes in self-reported functional impairment. Findings highlight the potential role of intensive post-discharge services in preventing readmission, rather than relying on time-of-discharge PRMs in order to predict readmission risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000034220).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sosei Yamaguchi
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan.
| | - Yasutaka Ojio
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Junko Koike
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Asami Matsunaga
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
- Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Ogawa
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Akiko Kikuchi
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Musashino University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kawashima
- Department of Information Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisateru Tachimori
- Department of Information Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan
- Endowed Course for Health System Innovation, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Bernick
- Student Accessibility Office, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kimura
- Department of Psychiatry, Gakuji-Kai Kimura Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chaba, Japan
| | - Ataru Inagaki
- College of Education, Psychology and Human Studies, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Watanabe
- Department of Psychiatry, Gakuji-Kai Kimura Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Division of Medical Treatment and Rehabilitation, Center of Forensic Mental Health, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Kishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koji Yoshida
- Department of Human Care and Support, Toyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Hirooka
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Satoru Oishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsuda
- Osaka Psychiatric Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Nara, Japan
| | - Chiyo Fujii
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tessier P, Wolff FC. On the ability of the SF-6D to capture the consequences of chronic illnesses on subjective well-being: Evidence from France. Soc Sci Med 2024; 354:117086. [PMID: 38981399 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Using cross-sectional data from a representative sample of the French population (the 2008 Disability Health survey), this paper examines whether the SF-6D, a widely used preference-based measure of health-related quality of life in economic evaluations, fully captures the variation in subjective well-being (SWB) due to chronic illnesses. We conduct a mediation analysis to disentangle the direct and indirect, through the SF-6D, effects of various chronic conditions on SWB (happiness). Our results show that the SF-6D reflects changes in happiness due to most illnesses except mental illness. Changes in SWB mediated by the SF-6D account for 74% of the total effect. The variation unexplained by the SF-6D is significant and increases substantially in the presence of multimorbidity when a chronic illness is combined with anxiety or depression. Overall, our results suggest that the SF-6D incompletely captures the subjective experience of chronically ill patients, especially those with comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Tessier
- SPHERE, Nantes Université, Univ Tours, INSERM, Methods in Patients-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, IRS2 22 Boulevard Benoni Goullin, 44000, Nantes, France.
| | - François-Charles Wolff
- LEMNA, Nantes Université and TEPP, BP 52231 Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, 44322, Nantes Cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Touré M, Poder TG. Confirmatory analysis of the 13-MD and ranking of its meta-dimensions and items. HEALTH CARE SCIENCE 2024; 3:249-263. [PMID: 39220430 PMCID: PMC11362658 DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Background The 13-MD is a new generic instrument developed to measure general health-related quality of life (GHRQoL). This instrument considers all aspects of health (i.e., physical, mental, and social) in a balanced way. A previous study led to minor changes in the original version of the 13-MD. The objective of this study was to confirm the validity of the modified 13-MD. Methods Validity was assessed with recent data from the general population of Quebec, Canada. The meta-dimensions and items composing the 13-MD were also subjected to a ranking procedure, which allowed to determine the most important aspects for respondents. Results A total of 1337 French-speaking participants were recruited with 1099 completing the 13-MD for validation purposes and 1084 completing the ranking procedure. The 13-MD showed very satisfactory results and confirmed to be a valid instrument. The ranking of the meta-dimensions revealed that "Well-being" received the most points, followed by "Sleep and energy" and "Body functioning." Conclusion These results will be very useful in the continuous improvement of the 13-MD, ultimately leading to the valuation stage (i.e., development of a value set).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moustapha Touré
- École de gestionUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeQuebecCanada
- Centre de recherche de l'IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'île de MontréalMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Thomas G. Poder
- Centre de recherche de l'IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'île de MontréalMontrealQuebecCanada
- École de santé publiqueUniversité de MontréalMontrealQuebecCanada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boko MF, Khanna AK, D'Aragon F, Spence J, Conen D, Patel A, Ayad S, Wijeysundera DN, Choinière M, Sessler DI, Carrier FM, Harlock J, Koopman JSHA, Durand M, Bhojani N, Turan A, Pagé G, Devereaux PJ, Duceppe E. Incidence and Risk Factors of Chronic Postoperative Pain in Same-day Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 141:286-299. [PMID: 38669010 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The amount of same-day surgery has increased markedly worldwide in recent decades, but there remains limited evidence on chronic postsurgical pain in this setting. METHODS This study assessed pain 90 days after ambulatory surgery in an international, multicenter prospective cohort study of patients at least 45 yr old with comorbidities or at least 65 yr old. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Chronic postsurgical pain was defined as a change of more than 1 point in self-rated average pain at the surgical site between baseline and 90 days, and moderate to severe chronic postsurgical pain was defined as a score greater than 4 in self-rated average pain at the surgical site at 90 days. Risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Between November 2021 and January 2023, a total of 2,054 participants were included, and chronic postsurgical pain occurred in 12% of participants, of whom 93.1% had new chronic pain at the surgical site (i.e., participants without pain before surgery). Moderate to severe chronic postsurgical pain occurred in 9% of overall participants. Factors associated with chronic postsurgical pain were active smoking (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.76), orthopedic surgery (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.24 to 9.7), plastic surgery (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.97 to 9.2), breast surgery (odds ratio, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.29 to 5.8), vascular surgery (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.09 to 6.7), and ethnicity (i.e., for Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, odds ratio, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.68 to 6.9 and for First Nations/native persons, odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.05 to 15.4). CONCLUSIONS Persistent postsurgical pain after same-day surgery is common, is usually moderate to severe in nature, and occurs mostly in patients without chronic pain before surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melodie Fanay Boko
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ashish K Khanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio; Perioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Frederick D'Aragon
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jessica Spence
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Conen
- Department of Medecine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ameen Patel
- Department of Medecine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sabry Ayad
- Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic-Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Duminda N Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesia, Unity Health Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manon Choinière
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel I Sessler
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Francois Martin Carrier
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - John Harlock
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Madeleine Durand
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alparslan Turan
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gabrielle Pagé
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - P J Devereaux
- Department of Medecine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Duceppe
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ul Husnain MI, Hajizadeh M, Ahmad H, Khanam R. The Hidden Toll of Psychological Distress in Australian Adults and Its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Health State Utilities. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:583-598. [PMID: 38530626 PMCID: PMC11178635 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00879-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological distress (PD) is a major health problem that affects all aspects of health-related quality of life including physical, mental and social health, leading to a substantial human and economic burden. Studies have revealed a concerning rise in the prevalence of PD and various mental health conditions among Australians, particularly in female individuals. There is a scarcity of studies that estimate health state utilities (HSUs), which reflect the overall health-related quality of life in individuals with PD. No such studies have been conducted in Australia thus far. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the age-specific, sex-specific and PD category-specific HSUs (disutilities) in Australian adults with PD to inform healthcare decision making in the management of PD. METHODS Data on age, sex, SF-36/SF6D responses, Kessler psychological distress (K10) scale scores and other characteristics of N = 15,139 participants (n = 8149 female individuals) aged >15 years were derived from the latest wave (21) of the nationally representative Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia survey. Participants were grouped into the severity categories of no (K10 score: 10-19), mild (K10: 20-24), moderate (K10: 25-29) and severe PD (K10: 30-50). Both crude and adjusted HSUs were calculated from participants' SF-36 profiles, considering potential confounders such as smoking, marital status, remoteness, education and income levels. The calculations were based on the SF-6D algorithm and aligned with Australian population norms. Additionally, the HSUs were stratified by age, sex and PD categories. Disutilities of PD, representing the mean difference between HSUs of people with PD and those without, were also calculated for each group. RESULTS The average age of individuals was 46.130 years (46% male), and 31% experienced PD in the last 4 weeks. Overall, individuals with PD had significantly lower mean HSUs than those likely to be no PD, 0.637 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.636, 0.640) vs 0.776 (95% CI 0.775, 0.777) i.e. disutility: -0.139 [95% CI -0.139, -0.138]). Mean disutilities of -0.108 (95% CI -0.110, -0.104), -0.140 (95% CI -0.142, -0.138), and -0.188 (95% CI -0.190, -0.187) were observed for mild PD, moderate PD and severe PD, respectively. Disutilities of PD also differed by age and sex groups. For instance, female individuals had up to 0.049 points lower mean HSUs than male individuals across the three classifications of PD. There was a clear decline in health-related quality of life with increasing age, demonstrated by lower mean HSUs in older population age groups, that ranged from 0.818 (95% CI 0.817, 0.818) for the 15-24 years age group with no PD to 0.496 (95% CI 0.491, 0.500) for the 65+ years age group with severe PD). Across all ages and genders, respondents were more likely to report issues in certain dimensions, notably vitality, and these responses did not uniformly align with ageing. CONCLUSIONS The burden of PD in Australia is substantial, with a significant impact on female individuals and older individuals. Implementing age-specific and sex-specific healthcare interventions to address PD among Australian adults may greatly alleviate this burden. The PD state-specific HSUs calculated in our study can serve as valuable inputs for future health economic evaluations of PD in Australia and similar populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rasheda Khanam
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowomba, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rencz F, Janssen MF. Testing the Psychometric Properties of 9 Bolt-Ons for the EQ-5D-5L in a General Population Sample. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:943-954. [PMID: 38599517 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.2195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess the psychometric performance and added value of 9 existing bolt-ons (breathing problems, cognition, hearing, self-confidence, skin irritation, sleep, social relationships, tiredness, and vision) for the EQ-5D-5L in a general population sample. METHODS The EQ-5D-5L, 9 bolt-ons, SF-6Dv1, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29+2, PROMIS Global Health, and Satisfaction with Life Scale were completed in an online cross-sectional survey among a general adult population sample in Hungary (n = 1587). The following psychometric properties were tested for the EQ-5D-5L + bolt-on(s): ceiling, divergent and convergent validity, structural validity, known-group validity, and explanatory power. RESULTS Adding sleep (30%), tiredness (24%), or vision (21%) substantially reduced the ceiling of the EQ-5D-5L (41%). Cognition, sleep, social relationships, and tiredness correlated with corresponding PROMIS and SF-6D items (rs = ǀ0.32ǀ - ǀ0.73ǀ). All bolt-ons, except cognition and self-confidence, loaded on a different factor from the EQ-5D-5L dimensions. Breathing, hearing, skin irritation, and vision significantly improved known-group validity in relevant health condition groups. The sleep bolt-on improved known-group validity in 9 of 13 chronic health conditions. Tiredness had the largest impact on explaining EQ VAS score variance in 8 of 13 conditions. Hearing and vision improved the ability of the EQ-5D-5L to capture declining health with age, whereas self-confidence and social relationships were valuable for mental health assessment. CONCLUSIONS This study established the validity of multiple bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L and highlights the usefulness of including relevant bolt-ons in population-based and patient surveys. Our findings inform the further development of these bolt-ons and the bolt-on item selection for clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary, Budapest.
| | - Mathieu F Janssen
- Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands, Rotterdam
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuharić M, Pickard AS, Mukuria C, Finch AP. The Measurement Properties of the EQ-HWB and the EQ-HWB-S in Italian Population: A Comparative Study With EQ-5D-5L. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:955-966. [PMID: 38490471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ Health and Well-being, EQ-HWB (25-item) and the EQ-HWB-S (9-item), are new generic measures of health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S measures in relation to the EQ-5D-5L among the Italian general population. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 2020 to February 2021, followed by secondary analysis of collected data from Italian adults. This analysis included response pattern distributions, correlation strength, and known-group comparison. Known-group comparison was assessed using effect sizes (ES) across health conditions, caregiver status, and social care usage. The EQ-HWB-S index-based score was based on the UK pilot value set, whereas the Italian value set was used for scoring the EQ-5D-5L index. RESULTS Out of the 1182 participants, 461 reported having a chronic condition, 185 identified as caregivers, and 42 were social care users. EQ-HWB items (7.5%) showed fewer ceiling effects than EQ-5D-5L items (34.7%). Strong correlations (rs > 0.5) were found between overlapping EQ-HWB and EQ-5D-5L items. EQ-HWB-S and EQ-5D-5L index scores demonstrated similar discrimination based on symptomatic chronic conditions (ES d = 0.68 vs d = 0.71), but EQ-HWB-S had slightly higher ES for social care users (ES d = 0.84 vs d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS Initial evidence supports the validity of EQ-HWB/EQ-HWB-S because outcome measures in the Italian population. EQ-HWB-S performed comparably to EQ-5D-5L among patients and was better in differentiating social care users. A slight decrease in discriminative properties for caregivers was observed when transitioning from EQ-HWB to EQ-HWB-S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Kuharić
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Maths in Health BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bauer A, Gregoire A, Tinelli M, Knapp M. Costs and benefits of scaling psychosocial interventions during the perinatal period in England: A simulation modelling study. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 154:104733. [PMID: 38493516 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, guidance recommends the integration of mental health into maternal and child healthcare to address common maternal mental health problems during the perinatal period. However, implementing this in the real-world requires substantial resource allocations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to estimate the likely costs and consequences linked to scaling the delivery of treatment (in the form of psychosocial interventions) during the perinatal period. DESIGN Simulation modelling. SETTING(S) England. METHODS Costs and consequences were modelled for three scenarios of assumed provision of services, whereby one referred to the projected provision under current government plans, with no additional scaling up of treatment. The other two scenarios referred to additional scaling of treatment: in one scenario, this referred to the provision of treatment by midwives and health visitors trained in the routine enquiry about mental health and delivery of psychosocial interventions; in the other scenario this referred to an expanded provision by primary mental health services. For each scenario and in yearly intervals (covering a ten-year period, 2015 to 2024), unit cots and outcomes were assigned to the activities women were assumed to receive (routine enquiry, assessment, treatment, care coordination). All costs were in 2020 pounds sterling. Data sources for the modelling included: published findings from randomised controlled trials; national unit cost source; national statistics; and expert consultation. RESULTS If the projected treatment gap was to be addressed, an estimated additional 111,154 (50,031) women would be accessing treatment in 2015 (2024). Estimated total costs (including cost offsets) in the scenario of projected provision under current government plans would be £73.5 million in 2015 and £95.2 million in 2024, whilst quality-adjusted life years gained would be 901 and 928 respectively. Addressing the treatment gap through provision by trained midwives and health visitors could mean additional costs of £7.3 million in 2015 but lower costs of £18.4 million in 2024. The additional quality-adjusted life years gained are estimated at 2096 in 2015 and 1418 in 2024. A scenario in which the treatment gap would be met by primary mental health services was likely to be more costly and delivered less health gains. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this modelling study suggest that scaling the integration of mental health care into routinely delivered care for women during the perinatal period might be economically viable. REGISTRATION N/A. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Integrating mental health into maternal and child healthcare might generate economic benefits new study by @a_annettemaria and @knappem @CPEC_LSE finds #increasing access to treatment for women with perinatal mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Bauer
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Michela Tinelli
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom. https://twitter.com/CPEC_LSE
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom. https://twitter.com/knappem
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Loughlin R, Jones R, Chen G, Mulhern B, Hiscock H, Devlin N, Dalziel K. Comparing the Psychometric Performance of Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments in Children and Adolescents with ADHD, Anxiety and/or Depression. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:57-77. [PMID: 38329689 PMCID: PMC11168999 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01354-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of common generic paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments in children and adolescents with mental health challenges. METHODS Participants were a subset of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) study and comprised 1013 children aged 4-18 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 533), or anxiety and/or depression (n = 480). Participants completed an online survey including a range of generic paediatric HRQoL instruments (PedsQL, EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L, CHU9D) and mental health symptom measures (SDQ, SWAN, RCADS-25). A subset of participants also completed the HUI3 and AQoL-6D. The psychometric performance of each HRQoL instrument was assessed regarding acceptability/feasibility; floor/ceiling effects; convergent validity; known-group validity; responsiveness and test-retest reliability. RESULTS The PedsQL, CHU9D, EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L showed similarly good performance for acceptability/feasibility, known-group validity and convergent validity. The CHU9D and PedsQL showed no floor or ceiling effects and fair-good test-retest reliability. Test-retest reliability was lower for the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. The EQ-5D-Y-3L showed the highest ceiling effects, but was the top performing instrument alongside the CHU9D on responsiveness to improvements in health status, followed by the PedsQL. The AQoL-6D and HUI3 showed good acceptability/feasibility, no floor or ceiling effects, and good convergent validity, yet poorer performance on known-group validity. Responsiveness and test-retest reliability were not able to be assessed for these two instruments. In subgroup analyses, performance was similar for all instruments for acceptability/feasibility, known-group and convergent validity, however, relative strengths and weaknesses for each instrument were noted for ceiling effects, responsiveness and test-retest reliability. In sensitivity analyses using utility scores, performance regarding known-group and convergent validity worsened slightly for the EQ-5D-Y-3L and CHU9D, though improved slightly for the HUI3 and AQoL-6D. CONCLUSIONS While each instrument showed strong performance in some areas, careful consideration of the choice of instrument is advised, as this may differ dependent on the intended use of the instrument, and the age, gender and type of mental health condition of the population in which the instrument is being used. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR-ACTRN12621000657820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel O'Loughlin
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
- Health Services Research Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Renee Jones
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Health Services Research Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Caulfield East, VIC, Australia
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Health Services Research Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsui TCO, Torres SC, Bielecki JM, Mitsakakis N, Trudeau ME, Bremner KE, Davis AM, Krahn MD. A scoping review to create a framework for the steps in developing condition-specific preference-based instruments de novo or from an existing non-preference-based instrument: use of item response theory or Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:38. [PMID: 38745165 PMCID: PMC11094879 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02253-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no widely accepted framework to guide the development of condition-specific preference-based instruments (CSPBIs) that includes both de novo and from existing non-preference-based instruments. The purpose of this study was to address this gap by reviewing the published literature on CSPBIs, with particular attention to the application of item response theory (IRT) and Rasch analysis in their development. METHODS A scoping review of the literature covering the concepts of all phases of CSPBI development and evaluation was performed from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to December 30, 2022. RESULTS The titles and abstracts of 1,967 unique references were reviewed. After retrieving and reviewing 154 full-text articles, data were extracted from 109 articles, representing 41 CSPBIs covering 21 diseases or conditions. The development of CSPBIs was conceptualized as a 15-step framework, covering four phases: 1) develop initial questionnaire items (when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists), 2) establish the dimensional structure, 3) reduce items per dimension, 4) value and model health state utilities. Thirty-nine instruments used a type of Rasch model and two instruments used IRT models in phase 3. CONCLUSION We present an expanded framework that outlines the development of CSPBIs, both from existing non-preference-based instruments and de novo when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists, using IRT and Rasch analysis. For items that fit the Rasch model, developers selected one item per dimension and explored item response level reduction. This framework will guide researchers who are developing or assessing CSPBIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa C O Tsui
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Child Health and Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Sofia C Torres
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Joanna M Bielecki
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Mitsakakis
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen E Trudeau
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aileen M Davis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nikl A, Janssen MF, Jenei B, Brodszky V, Rencz F. Population Norms for the EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D in Hungary. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:583-603. [PMID: 38416366 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01360-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop population norms for three preference-accompanied measures [EQ-5D-5L, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-preference scoring system (PROPr) and Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D)] in Hungary. METHODS In November 2020, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted among a representative sample of the Hungarian adult general population (n = 1631). Respondents completed the Hungarian versions of the EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-29+2 version 2.1 and 36-item Short Form Survey version 1 (SF-36v1). The association of utilities with sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of respondents was analysed using multivariate regressions. RESULTS The proportion of respondents reporting problems ranged from 8 to 44% (self-care to pain/discomfort) on the EQ-5D-5L, 39-94% (physical function to sleep) on PROPr and 38-87% (role limitations to vitality) on the SF-6D. Problems related to physical function, self-care, usual activities/role limitations and pain increased with age, while mental health problems decreased in all three measures. In almost all corresponding domains, respondents indicated the fewest problems on the EQ-5D-5L and the most problems on the SF-6D. The mean EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D utilities were 0.900, 0.535 and 0.755, respectively. Female gender (PROPr, SF-6D), a lower level of education (EQ-5D-5L, PROPr), being unemployed or a disability pensioner (EQ-5D-5L), being underweight or obese (SF-6D), lack of physical exercise (all) and polypharmacy (all) were associated with significantly lower utilities. PROPr yielded the lowest and EQ-5D-5L the highest mean utilities in 28 of 30 chronic health conditions. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the first set of Hungarian population norms for the EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D. Our findings can serve as reference values in clinical trials and observational studies and contribute to the monitoring of population health and the assessment of disease burden in Hungary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Nikl
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University Doctoral School, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mathieu F Janssen
- Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Balázs Jenei
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Valentin Brodszky
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
- Semmelweis University Doctoral School, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mao Z, Crèvecoeur J, Pepermans K, Kind P, Neyens T, Beutels P. A Comparison of Items and Constructs of Standardized Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Well-Being Measures. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:478-489. [PMID: 38296048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the internal constructs of the concepts being measured by EQ-5D-5L (a health-related quality of life measure that can produce preference-based utility values) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12, a mental well-being measure) and to understand to what extent the items of EQ-5D-5L and GHQ-12 associate with each other. METHODS We used data from 12 701 respondents participating in a Belgian survey in 2022. Correlation coefficients between GHQ-12 and EQ-5D-5L were calculated at both the aggregate and item levels. Multidimensional scaling, exploratory factor analysis, and regression models were performed to investigate the underlying constructs that are associated with the items. RESULTS Despite a moderate correlation (0.39) between the EQ-5D-5L and GHQ-12 total scores, only a trivial or weak correlation (<0.3) was observed between the first 4 EQ-5D-5L items and any GHQ-12 item. Multidimensional scaling and exploratory factor analysis showed the first 4 EQ-5D-5L dimensions were clustered together with EuroQol visual analog scale and positively phrased GHQ-12 items were close to each other, whereas EQ-anxiety/depression and negatively phrased GHQ-12 items were grouped with overall life satisfaction. In the regression models, not all GHQ-12 items had a significant coefficient to predict EQ-5D-5L responses. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, we present the first comparison of items and underlying constructs of GHQ-12 and EQ-5D-5L. The results showed that GHQ-12 can only partially predict the responses of EQ-5D-5L and the 2 instruments measure different constructs. Researchers should carefully consider conceptual legitimacy while applying the mapping technique and consider sensitivity analyses for the mapping estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuxin Mao
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Jonas Crèvecoeur
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Lueven, Belgium
| | - Koen Pepermans
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul Kind
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Thomas Neyens
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Lueven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Beutels
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oxley SG, Wei X, Sideris M, Blyuss O, Kalra A, Sia JJY, Ganesan S, Fierheller CT, Sun L, Sadique Z, Jin H, Manchanda R, Legood R. Utility Scores for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Mapping to EQ-5D. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1358. [PMID: 38611036 PMCID: PMC11010846 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) are the most effective breast and ovarian cancer preventive interventions. EQ-5D is the recommended tool to assess the quality of life and determine health-related utility scores (HRUSs), yet there are no published EQ-5D HRUSs after these procedures. These are essential for clinicians counselling patients and for health-economic evaluations. METHODS We used aggregate data from our published systematic review and converted SF-36/SF-12 summary scores to EQ-5D HRUSs using a published mapping algorithm. Study control arm or age-matched country-specific reference values provided comparison. Random-effects meta-analysis provided adjusted disutilities and utility scores. Subgroup analyses included long-term vs. short-term follow-up. RESULTS Four studies (209 patients) reported RRM outcomes using SF-36, and five studies (742 patients) reported RRSO outcomes using SF-12/SF-36. RRM is associated with a long-term (>2 years) disutility of -0.08 (95% CI -0.11, -0.04) (I2 31.4%) and a utility of 0.92 (95% CI 0.88, 0.95) (I2 31.4%). RRSO is associated with a long-term (>1 year) disutility of -0.03 (95% CI -0.05, 0.00) (I2 17.2%) and a utility of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94, 0.99) (I2 34.0%). CONCLUSIONS We present the first HRUSs sourced from patients following RRM and RRSO. There is a need for high-quality prospective studies to characterise quality of life at different timepoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G. Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Xia Wei
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (L.S.); (Z.S.)
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child´s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Sechenov University, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Jacqueline J. Y. Sia
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Subhasheenee Ganesan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
| | - Li Sun
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (L.S.); (Z.S.)
| | - Zia Sadique
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (L.S.); (Z.S.)
| | - Haomiao Jin
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7YH, UK;
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (L.S.); (Z.S.)
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Rosa Legood
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (S.G.O.); (X.W.); (M.S.); (O.B.); (A.K.); (J.J.Y.S.); (S.G.); (C.T.F.)
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK; (L.S.); (Z.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lathe J, Silverwood RJ, Hughes AD, Patalay P. Examining how well economic evaluations capture the value of mental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:221-230. [PMID: 38281493 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00436-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Health economics evidence informs health-care decision making, but the field has historically paid insufficient attention to mental health. Economic evaluations in health should define an appropriate scope for benefits and costs and how to value them. This Health Policy provides an overview of these processes and considers to what extent they capture the value of mental health. We suggest that although current practices are both transparent and justifiable, they have distinct limitations from the perspective of mental health. Most social value judgements, such as the exclusion of interindividual outcomes and intersectoral costs, diminish the value of improving mental health, and this reduction in value might be disproportionate compared with other types of health. Economic analyses might have disadvantaged interventions that improve mental health compared with physical health, but research is required to test the size of such differential effects and any subsequent effect on decision-making systems such as health technology assessment systems. Collaboration between health economics and the mental health sciences is crucial for achieving mental-physical health parity in evaluative frameworks and, ultimately, improving population mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lathe
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Richard J Silverwood
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alun D Hughes
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aragón MJ, Gravelle H, Castelli A, Goddard M, Gutacker N, Mason A, Rowen D, Mannion R, Jacobs R. Measuring the overall performance of mental healthcare providers. Soc Sci Med 2024; 344:116582. [PMID: 38394864 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
To date there have been no attempts to construct composite measures of healthcare provider performance which reflect preferences for health and non-health benefits, as well as costs. Health and non-health benefits matter to patients, healthcare providers and the general public. We develop a novel provider performance measurement framework that combines health gain, non-health benefit, and cost and illustrate it with an application to 54 English mental health providers. We apply estimates from a discrete choice experiment eliciting the UK general population's valuation of non-health benefits relative to health gains, to administrative and patient survey data for years 2013-2015 to calculate equivalent health benefit (eHB) for providers. We measure costs as forgone health and quantify the relative performance of providers in terms of equivalent net health benefit (eNHB): the value of the health and non-health benefits minus the forgone benefit equivalent of cost. We compare rankings of providers by eHB, eNHB, and by the rankings produced by the hospital sector regulator. We find that taking account of the non-health benefits in the eNHB measure makes a substantial difference to the evaluation of provider performance. Our study demonstrates that the provider performance evaluation space can be extended beyond measures of health gain and cost, and that this matters for comparison of providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José Aragón
- HCD Economics, Daresbury Innovation Centre, Keckwick Lane, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4FS, UK
| | - Hugh Gravelle
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Adriana Castelli
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Maria Goddard
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Anne Mason
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, Park House, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | - Rowena Jacobs
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bajgain KT, Mendoza J, Naqvi F, Aghajafari F, Tang K, Zwicker J, Santana MJ. Prioritizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to use in the clinical care of youth living with mental health concerns: a nominal group technique study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:20. [PMID: 38381258 PMCID: PMC10881912 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00694-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past few decades, particularly in the mental health setting, there has been growing interest in using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to assess the efficacy of the treatments in healthcare systems. Despite recent initiatives for global harmonization, there remains a lack of consensus on which PROMs are best practice and appropriate. Engagement of the service users, such as patients and family members/caregivers, is vital at this stage to ensure the selected PROMs are feasible, relevant, and acceptable to them. This study aimed to prioritize PROMs by youth and family/caregiver based on feasibility, relevance, and overall importance to be used in the clinical care of youth living with anxiety and/or depression. METHODS Ten validated and widely used PROMs were presented to the patients and family/caregivers. Nominal group techniques were employed to prioritize the PROMs based on feasibility, relevance, and overall importance. RESULTS For patients and families/caregivers, the PROMs, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCAD 25), and The Young Person's Core (YP-CORE) were the highest priorities. Both felt that RCAD 25 was comprehensive, short, easy, and quick to complete, whereas regarding YP-CORE, patients and family/caregivers thought it was also short and relevant. Due to some specific concerns, the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire and Child Health Questionnaire were the lowest prioritized by patients and family/caregivers. CONCLUSION It is of utmost importance that patient's and family/caregivers' voices or opinions are considered while selecting and implementing PROMs in mental health settings. Our study provides practical recommendations around measures best suited to achieve this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalpana Thapa Bajgain
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Justino Mendoza
- General Psychology, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Farwa Naqvi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fariba Aghajafari
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen Tang
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer Zwicker
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maria-Jose Santana
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Alberta Children's Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones G, Bailey L, Beeken RJ, Brady S, Cooper C, Copeland RJ, Crosland S, Dawson S, Faires M, Gilbody S, Haynes H, Hill A, Hillison E, Horspool M, Lee E, Li J, Machaczek KK, Parrott S, Quirk H, Stubbs B, Tew GA, Traviss-Turner G, Turton E, Walker L, Walters S, Weich S, Wildbore E, Peckham E. Supporting physical activity through co-production in people with severe mental ill health (SPACES): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:32. [PMID: 38368380 PMCID: PMC10873949 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental ill health (SMI) includes schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder and is associated with premature deaths when compared to people without SMI. Over 70% of those deaths are attributed to preventable health conditions, which have the potential to be positively affected by the adoption of healthy behaviours, such as physical activity. People with SMI are generally less active than those without and face unique barriers to being physically active. Physical activity interventions for those with SMI demonstrate promise, however, there are important questions remaining about the potential feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity intervention embedded within existing NHS pathways. METHOD This is a two-arm multi-site randomised controlled feasibility trial, assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a co-produced physical activity intervention for a full-scale trial across geographically dispersed NHS mental health trusts in England. Participants will be randomly allocated via block, 1:1 randomisation, into either the intervention arm or the usual care arm. The usual care arm will continue to receive usual care throughout the trial, whilst the intervention arm will receive usual care plus the offer of a weekly, 18-week, physical activity intervention comprising walking and indoor activity sessions and community taster sessions. Another main component of the intervention includes one-to-one support. The primary outcome is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and to scale it up to a full-scale trial, using a short proforma provided to all intervention participants at follow-up, qualitative interviews with approximately 15 intervention participants and 5 interventions delivery staff, and data on intervention uptake, attendance, and attrition. Usual care data will also include recruitment and follow-up retention. Secondary outcome measures include physical activity and sedentary behaviours, body mass index, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, healthcare resource use, and adverse events. Outcome measures will be taken at baseline, three, and six-months post randomisation. DISCUSSION This study will determine if the physical activity intervention is feasible and acceptable to both participants receiving the intervention and NHS staff who deliver it. Results will inform the design of a larger randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: ISRCTN83877229. Registered on 09.09.2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Jones
- Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Health and Wellbeing Department, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Laura Bailey
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | - Samantha Brady
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Cindy Cooper
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Robert J Copeland
- Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sam Dawson
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Distington House, Atlas Way, Sheffield, S4 7QQ, UK
| | - Matthew Faires
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Holly Haynes
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Andrew Hill
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Emily Hillison
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Distington House, Atlas Way, Sheffield, S4 7QQ, UK
| | - Michelle Horspool
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Distington House, Atlas Way, Sheffield, S4 7QQ, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Katarzyna K Machaczek
- Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Helen Quirk
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Garry A Tew
- Institute for Health and Care Improvement, York St John University, York, YO31 7EX, UK
| | | | - Emily Turton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Lauren Walker
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Stephen Walters
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Scott Weich
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Ellie Wildbore
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Distington House, Atlas Way, Sheffield, S4 7QQ, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2DG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Jonge M, Blankers M, Bockting CLH, van Dijk MK, Kikkert MJ, Dekker JJM. Economic evaluation of preventive cognitive therapy versus care as usual in cognitive behavioral therapy responders. Front Psychiatry 2024; 14:1134071. [PMID: 38268558 PMCID: PMC10806131 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1134071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The highly recurrent nature of Major Depressive Disorder is a major contributor to disability and health care costs. Several studies indicate that recurrence may be prevented with Preventive Cognitive Therapy (PCT). This study is the first to perform an economic evaluation of PCT in comparison with care as usual for recurrently depressed patients who experienced two or more depressive episodes and remitted after receiving Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Methods An economic evaluation from the societal perspective was performed alongside a randomized trial (N = 214). Health-related quality of life (QALYs), depression-free days, health care utilization, and productivity losses were measured between randomization and 15 months follow-up. The costs were indexed to the reference year 2014. Results QALY gains did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.69). Depression-free days were higher after PCT (p = 0.02). Societal costs of PCT were 10,417 euro and for care as usual 9,545 euro per person. We found a 47% likelihood that PCT led to additional QALYs at higher costs, and there was a 26% likelihood that PCT led to fewer QALYs at higher costs. When depression-free days was used as an outcome, we found PCT had a 72% likelihood of leading to more depression-free days at higher costs than care as usual and a 27% likelihood of leading to more depression-free days at lower societal costs. Limitations The 15-month follow-up might be too short to draw long-term conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of the PCT. The data collected for this study is part of an RCT to examine the effectiveness of adding PCT to care as usual. Therefore, the study was powered primarily to detect an effect in time to relapse/recurrences. Conclusion The economic evaluation is slightly in favour of the PCT condition when depression-free days is used as an outcome. PCT is not cost-effective given the high costs per additional QALYs from the societal perspective when QALYs are the effect measure. Clinical trial registration https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en, identifier NL2482.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo de Jonge
- Department of Research, Arkin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Novarum, Amstelveen, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Blankers
- Department of Research, Arkin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Trimbos, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jack J. M. Dekker
- Department of Research, Arkin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McCaffrey N, Ratcliffe J, Currow D, Engel L, Hutchinson C. What Aspects of Quality of Life are Important from Palliative Care Patients' Perspectives? A Framework Analysis to Inform Preference-Based Measures for Palliative and End-of-Life Settings. THE PATIENT 2024; 17:39-52. [PMID: 37975965 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00651-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Preference-based outcome measures are commonly applied in economic analyses to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions. Few preference-based outcome measures have been specifically developed for palliative and end-of-life settings. This study aimed to identify which quality-of-life domains are most important to Australians receiving specialised palliative care services to help determine if the development of a new condition-specific preference-based outcome measure is warranted. METHODS In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with 18 participants recruited from palliative care services in South Australia. Data were analysed using a framework analysis drawing on findings from a systematic review of international qualitative studies investigating the quality-of-life preferences of patients receiving palliation (domains identified included cognitive, emotional, healthcare, personal autonomy, physical, preparatory, social, spiritual). Participants identified missing or irrelevant domains in the EQ-5D and QLU-C10D questionnaires and ranked the importance of domains. RESULTS A priori domains were refined into cognitive, environmental, financial, independence, physical, psychological, social and spiritual. The confirmation of the eight important quality-of-life domains across multiple international studies suggests there is a relatively high degree of convergence on the perspectives of patients in different countries. Four domains derived from the interviews are not covered by the EQ-5D and QLU-C10D (cognitive, environmental, financial, spiritual), including one of the most important (spiritual). CONCLUSIONS Existing, popular, preference-based outcome measures such as the EQ-5D do not incorporate the most important, patient-valued, quality-of-life domains in the palliative and end-of-life settings. Development of a new, more relevant and comprehensive preference-based outcome measure could improve the allocation of resources to patient-valued services and have wide applicability internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki McCaffrey
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin Health Economics, SHSD, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claire Hutchinson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thai TTH, Engel L, Perez JK, Tan EJ, Eades S, Sanci L, Mihalopoulos C. A systematic review of health state utility values and psychometric performance of generic preference-based instruments for children and adolescents with mental health problems. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3005-3026. [PMID: 37237136 PMCID: PMC10522744 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03441-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This paper aims to systematically identify reported health state utility values (HSUVs) in children and adolescents with mental health problems (MHPs) aged less than 25 years; to summarise the techniques used to elicit HSUVs; and to examine the psychometric performance of the identified multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) used in this space. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English, reporting HSUVs for children and adolescents with MHPs using direct or indirect valuation methods were searched in six databases. RESULTS We found 38 studies reporting HSUVs for 12 types of MHPs across 12 countries between 2005 and October 2021. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression are the most explored MHPs. Disruptive Behaviour Disorder was associated with the lowest reported HSUVs of 0.06 while cannabis use disorder was associated with the highest HSUVs of 0.88. Indirect valuation method through the use of MAUIs (95% of included studies) was the most frequently used approach, while direct valuation methods (Standard Gamble, Time Trade-Off) were only used to derive HSUVs in ADHD. This review found limited evidence of the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. CONCLUSION This review provides an overview of HSUVs of various MHPs, the current practice to generate HSUVs, and the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. It highlights the need for more rigorous and extensive psychometric assessments to produce evidence on the suitability of MAUIs used in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thao T H Thai
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Joahna Kevin Perez
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Eng Joo Tan
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Sandra Eades
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Lena Sanci
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stefanidou T, Ambler G, Bartl G, Barber N, Billings J, Bogatsu T, Carroll R, Chipp B, Conneely M, Downey AM, Evlat G, Hunter R, Le Novere M, Lewis G, Mackay T, Marwaha S, Matin Z, Naughton G, Nekitsing C, O'Sullivan M, Pinfold V, Pan S, Sobers A, Thompson KJ, Vasikaran J, Webber M, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Randomised controlled trial of the Community Navigator programme to reduce loneliness and depression for adults with treatment-resistant depression in secondary community mental health services: trial protocol. Trials 2023; 24:652. [PMID: 37803385 PMCID: PMC10559405 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07684-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New treatments are needed for people with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), who do not benefit from anti-depressants and many of whom do not recover fully with psychological treatments. The Community Navigator programme was co-produced with service users and practitioners. It is a novel social intervention which aims to reduce loneliness and thus improve health outcomes for people with TRD. Participants receive up to 10 individual meetings with a Community Navigator, who helps them to map their social world and set and enact goals to enhance their social connections and reduce loneliness. Participants may also access group meet-ups with others in the programme every 2 months, and may be offered modest financial support to enable activities to support social connections. METHODS A researcher-blind, multi-site, 1:1 randomised controlled trial with N = 306 participants will test the effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme for people with TRD in secondary community mental health teams (CMHTs). Our primary hypothesis is that people who are offered the Community Navigator programme as an addition to usual CMHT care will be less depressed, assessed using the PHQ-9 self-report measure, at 8-month, end-of-treatment follow-up, compared to a control group receiving usual CMHT care and a booklet with information about local social groups and activities. We will follow participants up at end-of-treatment and at 14 months, 6 months after end-of-treatment follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the following: loneliness, anxiety, personal recovery, self-efficacy, social network, social identities. We will collect data about health-related quality of life and service use to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme. DISCUSSION This trial will provide definitive evidence about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme and whether it can be recommended for use in practice. The trial is due to finish in August 2025. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered on 8th July 2022 at: ISRCTN13205972.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Stefanidou
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gergely Bartl
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Nick Barber
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
| | - Jo Billings
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Tumelo Bogatsu
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Beverley Chipp
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
| | - Maev Conneely
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | - Gamze Evlat
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Marwaha
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zubair Matin
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | | | - Millie O'Sullivan
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Shengning Pan
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angela Sobers
- Barnet, Enfield and Haringey, NHS Mental Health Trust, London, UK
| | - Keith J Thompson
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valley, NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - Jerusaa Vasikaran
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Martin Webber
- School for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Franklin M, Hernández Alava M. Enabling QALY estimation in mental health trials and care settings: mapping from the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 to the ReQoL-UI or EQ-5D-5L using mixture models. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2763-2778. [PMID: 37314661 PMCID: PMC10474206 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03443-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly collected in trials and some care settings, but preference-based PROMs required for economic evaluation are often missing. For these situations, mapping models are needed to predict preference-based (aka utility) scores. Our objective is to develop a series of mapping models to predict preference-based scores from two mental health PROMs: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; depression) and Generalised Anxiety Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7; anxiety). We focus on preference-based scores for the more physical-health-focussed EQ-5D (five-level England and US value set, and three-level UK cross-walk) and more mental-health-focussed Recovering Quality-of-Life Utility Index (ReQoL-UI). METHODS We used trial data from the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) mental health services (now called NHS Talking Therapies), England, with a focus on people with depression and/or anxiety caseness. We estimated adjusted limited dependent variable or beta mixture models (ALDVMMs or Betamix, respectively) using GAD-7, PHQ-9, age, and sex as covariates. We followed ISPOR mapping guidance, including assessing model fit using statistical and graphical techniques. RESULTS Over six data collection time-points between baseline and 12-months, 1340 observed values (N ≤ 353) were available for analysis. The best fitting ALDVMMs had 4-components with covariates of PHQ-9, GAD-7, sex, and age; age was not a probability variable for the final ReQoL-UI mapping model. Betamix had practical benefits over ALDVMMs only when mapping to the US value set. CONCLUSION Our mapping functions can predict EQ-5D-5L or ReQoL-UI related utility scores for QALY estimation as a function of variables routinely collected within mental health services or trials, such as the PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Monica Hernández Alava
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Y, Rekhi G, Ang MS, Lee J. Impact of negative symptoms on health-related quality of life in schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1252354. [PMID: 37744001 PMCID: PMC10512711 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1252354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence regarding the association of Negative Symptoms (NS) dimensions with Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is limited and no prior study has looked into contributions of NS domains on HRQoL. This study bridges the gap by examining the associations of NS, its two dimensions (Motivation and Pleasure, and Emotional Expressivity) and five domains (Anhedonia, Avolition, Asociality, Blunted affect and Alogia) with HRQoL in schizophrenia. 274 individuals with schizophrenia were assessed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). PANSS scores were mapped to EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores using an algorithm previously validated in Singapore, and the resulting EQ-5D-5L scores were used as a measure of HRQoL. Multiple linear regression analyses of the two NS dimensions and five NS domains against EQ-5D-5L showed that a lower severity of NS, specifically that of the Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) dimension and asociality domain was associated with higher HRQoL. Our findings highlight the importance of targeting NS, particularly MAP and asociality, in improving HRQoL in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhui Li
- East Region, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gurpreet Rekhi
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mei San Ang
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jimmy Lee
- North Region and Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Seow LSE, Lau JH, Abdin E, Verma SK, Tan KB, Subramaniam M. Mapping the schizophrenia quality of life scale to EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D utility scores in patients with schizophrenia. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:813-821. [PMID: 37216213 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2215430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to map the disease-specific Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS) onto the three- and five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L), Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and Short Form six-dimensional (SF-6D) preference-based instruments to inform future cost-utility analyses for treatment of patients with schizophrenia. METHODS Data from 251 outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders was included for analysis. Ordinary least square (OLS), Tobit and beta regression mixture models were employed to estimate the utility scores. Three regression models with a total of 66 specifications were determined by goodness of fit and predictive indices. Distribution of the original data to the distributions of the data generated using the preferred estimated models were then compared. RESULTS EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L were best predicted by the OLS model, including SQLS domain scores, domain-squared scores, age, and gender as explanatory predictors. The models produced the best performance index and resembled most closely with the observed EQ-5D data. HUI3 and SF-6D were best predicted by the OLS and Tobit model respectively. CONCLUSION The current study developed mapping models for converting SQLS scores into generic utility scores, which can be used for economic evaluation among patients with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jue Hua Lau
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | - Swapna K Verma
- Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jönsson L, Regnier SA, Kymes S, Awad SF, Talon B, Lee XY, Goadsby PJ. Estimating treatment effects on health utility scores for patients living with migraine: a post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:797-803. [PMID: 37256558 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2219898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This post hoc analysis aimed to estimate eptinezumab's therapeutic effect on health utilities and determined to which extent monthly migraine days (MMDs) explain changes in health utilities. RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS DELIVER, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b trial (NCT04418765), investigated eptinezumab efficacy and safety in patients with 2-4 prior migraine treatment failures. Regression analysis explored the relationship between utility scores and MMDs, with eptinezumab treatment as a covariate along with MMDs to identify any MMD-independent effect on utilities. Path analysis quantified eptinezumab's impact as mediated through MMD reduction. RESULTS The base case model showed that each reduction in MMD was associated with a mean utility score increase (0.0189; 95% CI: 0.0180, 0.0198; P < 0.001). Mean utility score was generally higher for eptinezumab versus placebo, justifying addition of treatment effect to the base case model. Patients administered eptinezumab had on average 0.0562 (95% CI: 0.0382, 0.0742; P < 0.001) higher utility versus placebo when controlling for number of MMDs. From path analysis, MMD reduction resulting from eptinezumab treatment accounted for 53% additional utility gain observed in patients. CONCLUSIONS Changes in MMDs alone inadequately captured migraine's impact on patient utility, as there was also a positive eptinezumab-driven, treatment-specific impact on utility score. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04418765).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linus Jönsson
- Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility at King's, and Headache Group, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grochtdreis T, König HH, Keetharuth AD, Gallinat J, Konnopka A, Schulz H, Lambert M, Karow A, Dams J. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures in patients with affective disorders. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:499-512. [PMID: 35776388 PMCID: PMC10175471 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01489-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The generic self-reported Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures were developed for measuring recovery-focused health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in persons with mental health conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the ReQoL measures in patients with affective disorders in Germany. METHODS Data from a patient sub-sample in a randomized controlled trial have been used (N = 393). The internal consistency and the test-retest reliability of the ReQoL measures were assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The concurrent validity and the known-group validity of the ReQoL measures were assessed using Pearson's Correlation coefficient and Cohen's d. The responsiveness was assessed using Glass' Δ and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS The reliability among the items of the ReQoL-20 was overall excellent. The ICC of the ReQoL-20 was r = 0.70, indicating moderate test-retest reliability. The concurrent validity of the ReQoL-20 with the clinical measure PHQ-9 was strong with a correlation coefficient of r = - 0.76. The known-group validity of the ReQoL-20 using PHQ-9 cut-off points was large with an effect size of d = 1.63. The ReQoL measures were sensitive to treatment response and remission of symptoms measured by the PHQ-9 with large effect sizes/SRM. DISCUSSION The psychometric properties of the ReQoL measures for the assessment of patients with affective disorders were overall good. With the ReQoL, valid and reliable measures for the assessment of recovery-focused HrQoL for persons with affective disorders are available in German language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grochtdreis
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Gallinat
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Lambert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Karow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Dams
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sandin K, Shields G, Gjengedal RGH, Osnes K, Bjørndal MT, Reme SE, Hjemdal O. Responsiveness to change in health status of the EQ-5D in patients treated for depression and anxiety. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:35. [PMID: 37061712 PMCID: PMC10105922 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02116-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D is a commonly used generic measure of health but evidence on its responsiveness to change in mental health is limited. This study aimed to explore the responsiveness of the five-level version of the instrument, the EQ-5D-5 L, in patients receiving treatment for depression and anxiety. METHODS Patient data (N = 416) were collected at baseline and at end of treatment in an observational study in a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were adults of working age (18-69 years) and received protocol-based metacognitive or cognitive therapy for depression or anxiety according to diagnosis. Responsiveness in the EQ-5D was compared to change in the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Effect sizes (Cohen's d), Standardised response mean (SRM), and Pearson's correlation were calculated. Patients were classified as "Recovered", "Improved", or "Unchanged" during treatment using the BDI-II and the BAI. ROC analyses determined whether the EQ-5D could correctly classify patient outcomes. RESULTS Effect sizes were large for the BAI, the BDI-II, the EQ-5D value and the EQ VAS, ranging from d = 1.07 to d = 1.84. SRM were also large (0.93-1.67). Pearson's correlation showed strong agreement between change scores of the EQ-5D value and the BDI-II (rs -0.54) and moderate between the EQ-5D value and the BAI (rs -0.43). The EQ-5D consistently identified "Recovered" patients versus "Improved" or "Unchanged" in the ROC analyses with AUROC ranging from 0.72 to 0.84. CONCLUSION The EQ-5D showed good agreement with self-reported symptom change in depression and anxiety, and correctly identified recovered patients. These findings indicate that the EQ-5D may be appropriately responsive to change in patients with depression and anxiety disorders, although replication in other clinical samples is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Sandin
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway.
| | - Gemma Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Ragne G H Gjengedal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| | - Kåre Osnes
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
| | - Marianne T Bjørndal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| | - Silje E Reme
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Odin Hjemdal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Tahir N, Doherty A, Clegg A. Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2023; 36:230-240. [PMID: 36448370 PMCID: PMC10099878 DOI: 10.1111/jar.13056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. METHOD We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi-database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference-based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Benedetto
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Luís Filipe
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK.,Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Naheed Tahir
- Public Advisers' Forum, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Alison Doherty
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Vocht AMR, Witteman CLM, de Vocht F, Spijker J. Second Opinions for Patients With a Persistent Depressive Disorder: Effects on Severity of Depression and Quality of Life. J Psychiatr Pract 2023; 29:104-112. [PMID: 36928197 DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A persistent depressive disorder has a major impact on both patients and health care systems. Despite the advice in guidelines to seek a second opinion if there is insufficient evidence of recovery after treatment, and the great number of second opinions in psychiatric care for patients with persistent depression, only a few studies have been published about their effects. METHODS Multilevel analyses were conducted to compare the mean test scores of a group of patients with a persistent depressive disorder who received the intervention of a second opinion with scores from a matched control group, at 3 time points: baseline, intervention, and follow-up. RESULTS A significant decrease in the severity of depression 3 months after the second opinion was found. No effects on quality of life or treatment satisfaction were found. LIMITATIONS The study sample was a convenience sample without randomization, and many values were missing in the data. In addition, a 3-month follow-up may have been too short to expect effects of the recommendations from the second opinion. The instructions concerning how to rate treatment satisfaction were also ambiguous. CONCLUSIONS A second opinion can be of value for persistent depression. Further research should address the question of whether the effect that was found is caused by the second opinion itself or is the result of subsequent changes in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke M R de Vocht
- DE VOCHT AMR: Depression Expertise Center, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; WITTEMAN: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; DE VOCHT F: Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol. Bristol, United Kingdom, and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West); SPIJKER: Depression Expertise Center, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, and Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Menting J, van Schelven F, Aussems C, Heijmans M, Boeije H. Routine healthcare disruptions: a longitudinal study on changes in self-management behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:196. [PMID: 36829185 PMCID: PMC9951824 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09119-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outbreak of COVID-19 had a significant impact on routines and continuity of professional care. As frequent users of this professional care, especially for people with chronic diseases this had consequences. Due to barriers in access to healthcare, an even greater appeal was made on the self-management behaviors of this group. In the present study, we aim to investigate the extent to which self-management changed during the recent pandemic, and which factors contributed to these changes. METHODS The Dutch 'National Panel of people with Chronic Illness or Disability' was used to collect self-reported data of people with at least one chronic disease. Self-management was assessed with the Partners in Health questionnaire at two time points: before the crisis in 2018 and during the second wave of crisis in Autumn 2020. Paired t-tests were used to analyze changes in self-management. Potential associating factors on three levels - patient, organization and environment - were assessed in 2020 and their impact on self-management changes was tested with multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Data from 345 panel members was available at two time points. In the majority of people, self-management behaviors were stable (70.7%). About one in seven experienced improved self-management (15.1%), and a similar proportion experienced deteriorated self-management (14.2%). Sex, physical disability, mental health and daily stressors due to COVID-19 (patient level), changes in healthcare access (organization level), and social support (environment level) were significantly associated with experienced changes in self-management. CONCLUSIONS People with chronic diseases experienced different trajectories of self-management changes during COVID-19. We need to be aware of people who seem to be more vulnerable to a healthcare crisis and report less stable self-management, such as those who experience mental health problems or daily stressors. Continuity of care and social support can buffer the impact of a healthcare crisis on self-management routines of people with chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Menting
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Femke van Schelven
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Claire Aussems
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Heijmans
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hennie Boeije
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hannah LA, Walsh CM, Jopling L, Perez J, Cardinal RN, Cameron RA. Economic evaluation of interventions for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1056210. [PMID: 36873195 PMCID: PMC9979220 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1056210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The extraordinarily high prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), coupled with its high economic burden to both healthcare systems and society, underscore how critical it is that resources are managed optimally to address the significant challenge it presents. Objective To review the literature on economic evaluation in TRD systematically, with the aim of informing future studies by identifying key challenges specific to the area, and highlighting good practices. Methods A systematic literature search across seven electronic databases was conducted to identify both within-trial and model-based economic evaluations in TRD. Quality of reporting and study design was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC). A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results We identified 31 evaluations, including 11 conducted alongside a clinical trial and 20 model-based evaluations. There was considerable heterogeneity in the definition of treatment-resistant depression, although with a trend for more recent studies to use a definition of inadequate response to two or more antidepressive treatments. A broad range of interventions were considered, including non-pharmacological neuromodulation, pharmacological, psychological, and service-level interventions. Study quality as assessed by CHEC was generally high. Frequently poorly reported items related to discussion of ethical and distributional issues, and model validation. Most evaluations considered comparable core clinical outcomes - encompassing remission, response, and relapse. There was good agreement on the definitions and thresholds for these outcomes, and a relatively small pool of outcome measures were used. Resource criteria used to inform the estimation of direct costs, were reasonably uniform. Predominantly, however, there was a high level of heterogeneity in terms of evaluation design and sophistication, quality of evidence used (particularly health state utility data), time horizon, population considered, and cost perspective. Conclusion Economic evidence for interventions in TRD is underdeveloped, particularly so for service-level interventions. Where evidence does exist, it is hampered by inconsistency in study design, methodological quality, and availability of high quality long-term outcomes evidence. This review identifies a number of key considerations and challenges for the design of future economic evaluations. Recommendations for research and suggestions for good practice are made. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=259848&VersionID=1542096, identifier CRD42021259848.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Hannah
- Applied Research Collaboration East of England, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy M. Walsh
- Applied Research Collaboration East of England, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Jopling
- Eastern Academic Health Science Network, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jesus Perez
- Applied Research Collaboration East of England, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Rudolf N. Cardinal
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rory A. Cameron
- Applied Research Collaboration East of England, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chapdelaine A, Vasiliadis HM, Provencher MD, Norton PJ, Roberge P. Cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic group cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders v. treatment as usual: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial over an 8-month time horizon using self-reported data. Psychol Med 2023; 53:1-13. [PMID: 36695038 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This economic evaluation supplements a pragmatic randomized controlled trial conducted in community care settings, which showed superior improvement in the symptoms of adults with anxiety disorders who received 12 sessions of transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural group therapy in addition to treatment as usual (tCBT + TAU) compared to TAU alone. METHODS This study evaluates the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU over an 8-month time horizon. For the reference case, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) obtained using the EQ-5D-5L, and the health system perspective were chosen. Alternatively, anxiety-free days (AFDs), derived from the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the limited societal perspective were considered. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness/utility ratios were calculated. Net-benefit regressions were done for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds range to build cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). Sensitivity analyses were included. RESULTS Compared to TAU (n = 114), tCBT + TAU (n = 117) generated additional QALYs, AFDs, and higher mental health care costs from the health system perspective. From the health system and the limited societal perspectives, at a WTP of Can$ 50 000/QALY, the CEACs showed that the probability of tCBT + TAU v. TAU being cost-effective was 97 and 89%. Promising cost-effectiveness results using AFDs are also presented. The participation of therapists from the public health sector could increase cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS From the limited societal and health system perspectives, this first economic evaluation of tCBT shows favourable cost-effectiveness results at a WTP threshold of Can$ 50 000/QALY. Future research is needed to replicate findings in longer follow-up studies and different health system contexts to better inform decision-makers for a full-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Chapdelaine
- PRIMUS Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
- Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de Longueuil, Charles-Le Moyne Research Center, 150 Place Charles Lemoyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Martin D Provencher
- École de psychologie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Peter J Norton
- The Cairnmillar Institute, 391-393 Tooronga Rd, Hawthorn East, Victoria 3123, Australia
| | - Pasquale Roberge
- Department of family medicine and emergency medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gottschalk S, König HH, Nejad M, Dams J. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:307-329. [PMID: 35915354 PMCID: PMC9911506 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03185-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Healthcare interventions for middle-old and oldest-old individuals are often (economically) evaluated using the EQ-5D to measure health-related quality of life (HrQoL). This requires sufficient measurement properties of the EQ-5D. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review studies assessing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D in this population. METHODS The databases PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, and EconLit were searched for studies providing empirical evidence of reliability, validity, and/or responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in samples with a mean age ≥ 75 years. Studies were selected by two independent reviewers, and the methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Results were rated against updated criteria for good measurement properties (sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, indeterminate). The evidence was summarized, and the quality of evidence was graded using a modified GRADE approach. RESULTS For both EQ-5D versions, high-quality evidence for sufficient convergent validity was found. Known-groups validity was sufficient for the EQ-5D-5L (high-quality evidence), whereas the results were inconsistent for the EQ-5D-3L. Results regarding the reliability were inconsistent (EQ-5D-3L) or entirely lacking (EQ-5D-5L). Responsiveness based on correlations of change scores with instruments measuring related/similar constructs was insufficient for the EQ-5D-3L (high-quality evidence). For the EQ-5D-5L, the available evidence on responsiveness to change in (Hr)QoL instruments was limited. CONCLUSION Since the responsiveness of the EQ-5D in a population of middle-old and oldest-old individuals was questionable, either using additional instruments or considering the use of an alternative, more comprehensive instrument of (Hr)QoL might be advisable, especially for economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Gottschalk
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mona Nejad
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Dams
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grochtdreis T, König HH, Gallinat J, Konnopka A, Schulz H, Lambert M, Karow A, Dams J. Validation of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) questionnaires for patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, somatoform and personality disorders in Germany. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 157:202-211. [PMID: 36495602 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and the recovery process of persons with mental health conditions can be assessed with the Recovering Quality of Life questionnaires (ReQoL-20 and ReQoL-10). The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, and somatoform disorders and in patients with disorders of adult personality and behavior. This study was based on a sub-sample of patients that were included in a randomized controlled trial evaluating an evidence-based, stepped and coordinated care service model for mental disorders (RECOVER). The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and the test-retest reliability was assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was assessed by Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and the known-group validity was assessed using the Cohen's d. The internal consistency of the ReQoL-20 and ReQoL-10 was excellent and good with Cronbach's alpha of α = 0.91 and α = 0.83 for all items. The test-retest reliability of the ReQoL measures was moderate with ICC of r = 0.72 to 0.74. The concurrent validity of the ReQoL measures with the Global Severity Index was overall high with a correlation coefficient of r = -0.70. In conclusion, for patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, somatoform and personality disorders, the German version of the ReQoL measures is valid and reliable for the assessment of HrQoL and the recovery process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grochtdreis
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gallinat
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Lambert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Karow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Dams
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Finch AP, Mulhern B. Where do measures of health, social care and wellbeing fit within a wider measurement framework? Implications for the measurement of quality of life and the identification of bolt-ons. Soc Sci Med 2022; 313:115370. [PMID: 36240533 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is variability across studies in the dimensionality i.e., set of latent variables to which health, social care and wellbeing measures relate. This variability may impact the development of new measures and the identification of bolt-on dimensions. We examine the dimensionality of commonly used measures and identify a set of potential bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS We used the OMS dataset, an online survey of health, social care and wellbeing measures in patients and members of the general public. A content analysis provided a theoretical framework for results interpretation. Quantitative analyses were based on a pool of 79 items from 7 measures. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess health, social care and wellbeing measures dimensionality and their contribution to quality of life. The relationship between EQ-5D-5L items and the identified factors was used for bolt-ons identification. RESULTS The dimensionality comprised of seven factors, namely physical functioning, psychological symptoms, energy/sleep, physical pain, social functioning, needs and satisfaction. Health measures covered five of the seven factors identified, wellbeing measures three and the social care measure one. A list of candidate bolt-on items for the EQ-5D-5L was presented e.g., cognition, energy, dignity. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence on the dimensionality of health, social care and wellbeing measures and presents a list of candidate bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- EuroQol Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Health Values Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Simon J, Kiss N, Korrelboom K, Kingdon D, Wykes T, Phiri P, van der Gaag M, Baksh MF, Steel C. Cost-Effectiveness of Positive Memory Training (PoMeT) for the Treatment of Depression in Schizophrenia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11985. [PMID: 36231292 PMCID: PMC9565889 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The Positive Memory Training (PoMeT) trial demonstrated reduced depression symptoms at 3 months for schizophrenia, but its longer-term outcome and cost impacts remain unknown. This study is a within-trial cost-utility analysis with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome based on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement and secondary outcome analyses of capability well-being. The incremental cost-effectiveness of PoMeT was compared to Treatment As Usual only (TAU) over 9 months from the 'health and social' care and 'societal' perspectives. Uncertainty was explored using bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses for cost outliers and outcome methods. HRQoL improvement was observed for both PoMeT and TAU at 3 months, but reached statistical significance and was sustained only for TAU. There was no change in capability well-being and no significant group difference in QALYs gained over 9 months. Mean intervention cost was GBP 823. Compared to TAU, PoMeT had significantly higher mental health care costs (+GBP 1251, 95% CI GBP 185 to GBP 2316) during the trial, but 'health and social care' and 'societal' cost differences were non-significant. Compared to the before-trial period, psychiatric medication costs increased significantly in both groups. The probability of PoMeT being cost-effective in the given format over 9 months was <30% and decreased further in sensitivity analyses.. Generalizability remains limited since the before-after cost analysis revealed additional treatment effects also in the TAU group that likely diminished the incremental impacts and cost-effectiveness of PoMeT. It is not clear whether an active post-intervention follow-up could result in sustained longer-term effects and improved cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Wien, Austria
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Noemi Kiss
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Wien, Austria
| | - Kees Korrelboom
- Department of Anxiety Disorders, PsyQ Parnassia Group, Psychiatric Center, Lijnbaan 4, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - David Kingdon
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London SE5 8AF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
- Research & Innovation Department, Tom Rudd Unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust Moorgreen Hospital, Botley Rd, West End, Southampton SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Mark van der Gaag
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University and Amsterdam Public Mental Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Zoutkeetsingel 40, 2512 HN The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M. Fazil Baksh
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AL, UK
| | - Craig Steel
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AL, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gao L, Nguyen D, Lee P. A systematic review of economic evaluations for the pharmaceutical treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev Hematol 2022; 15:833-847. [DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2125376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Gao
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University
| | - Dieu Nguyen
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University
| | - Peter Lee
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nicklas L, Albiston M, Dunbar M, Gillies A, Hislop J, Moffat H, Thomson J. A systematic review of economic analyses of psychological interventions and therapies in health-related settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1131. [PMID: 36071425 PMCID: PMC9450839 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08158-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This review aims to synthesise evidence on the economic impact of psychological interventions and therapies when applied to a broad range of physical health conditions. Methods The following bibliographic databases were searched for relevant articles: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO (Ebsco). As this review was intended to update an earlier review, the date range for the search was restricted to between January 2012 and September 2018. Reference lists from the review articles were also searched for relevant articles. Study quality was evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Network Guidelines (SIGN) appraisal checklists for both economic studies and Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). When the economic analyses did not provide sufficient detail for quality evaluation, the original RCT papers were sought and these were also evaluated. Half of the papers were quality rated by a second author. Initial agreement was high and all disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results This yielded 1408 unique articles, reduced to 134 following screening of the title and abstract. The full texts of the remaining articles were reviewed by at least one team member and all exclusions were discussed and agreed by the team. This left 46 original research articles, alongside five systematic reviews. Fifty-seven per cent of the articles were deemed to be of high quality, with the remainder of acceptable quality. Fifteen different medical conditions were covered, with chronic pain (10 articles) and cancer (9 articles) being the two most investigated health conditions. Three quarters of the papers reviewed showed evidence for the cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions in physical health, with the clearest evidence being in the field of chronic pain and cancer. Conclusions This paper provides a comprehensive integration of the research on the cost-effectiveness of psychological therapies in physical health. Whilst the evidence for cost-effectiveness in chronic pain and cancer is encouraging, some health conditions require further study. Clearly, as the primary research is international, and was therefore conducted across varying health care systems, caution must be exercised when applying the results to counties outside of those covered. Despite this, the results are of potential relevance to service providers and funders. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08158-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leeanne Nicklas
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
| | - Mairi Albiston
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Martin Dunbar
- Stobhill Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Alan Gillies
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Helen Moffat
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Judy Thomson
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nakamura CA, Mitchell PM, Peters TJ, Moreno-Agostino D, Araya R, Scazufca M, Hollingworth W. A Validation Study of the EQ-5D-5L and ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People Among Older Individuals With Depressive Symptoms in Brazil. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 30:91-99. [PMID: 35325703 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the known-groups validity of the EQ-5D-5L and the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O), 2 outcome measures used in economic evaluation, among older adults with depressive symptoms in socioeconomically deprived areas of Brazil. We also explored the role of education and income on responses to these measures. METHODS This cross-sectional study used baseline data from PROACTIVE, a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate a psychosocial intervention for late-life depression among older adults. Participants aged ≥60 years with a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥10 were recruited from 20 primary healthcare clinics. Ordered logistic regression models assessed the association between depressive symptoms severity, income, and education and dimension-level responses on the EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O. Multivariable regression models investigated the ability of EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O scores to discriminate between depressive symptoms severity levels and other characteristics, including education level and household income. RESULTS A total of 715 participants were included in the study. Depressive symptoms severity was associated with all EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O dimensions, except the ICECAP-O enjoyment attribute. In contrast, household income was only associated with the ICECAP-O security attribute. Higher severity of depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores) was also strongly associated with lower (ie, worse) scores on both measures in all models. Education level and household income showed no association with either EQ-5D-5L or ICECAP-O scores. CONCLUSIONS To best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the validity of these 2 measures among older adults in Brazil. Both EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O showed evidence of validity in differentiating depressive symptom severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina A Nakamura
- Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Paul M Mitchell
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| | - Darío Moreno-Agostino
- Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Marcia Scazufca
- Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - William Hollingworth
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Murphy O, Looney K, McNulty M, O’Reilly G. Exploring the factors that predict quality of life, and the relationship between recovery orientation and quality of life in adults with severe mental health difficulties. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03296-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIntegration of intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental factors has been proposed to enhance understanding of psychological quality of life (QOL) in adults with severe and enduring mental illness (SMI). This study examined the contribution of factors such as self-stigma, coping style and personal recovery orientation to psychological QOL in SMI; compared QOL outcomes to norms from the general population; and examined the association between personal recovery orientation and overall QOL. 70 participants with SMI completed measures of QOL (including psychological QOL), personal recovery orientation, coping, perceived stigma, psychological distress and demographic variables. Regression analysis found that only adaptive coping and psychological distress contributed significantly to psychological QOL. Personal recovery orientation was significantly associated with overall subjective QOL. Participants had lower QOL in the psychological and social relationships domains compared to the general population. Findings support the positive contribution of adaptive coping to psychological QOL, and the positive association between personal recovery orientation and overall QOL.
Collapse
|
43
|
Franklin M, Hunter RM, Enrique A, Palacios J, Richards D. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1018-1029. [PMID: 35667775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and subsequent cost-effectiveness estimates based on the more physical health-focused EQ-5D 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L) value set for England or cross-walked EQ-5D 3-level version UK value set scores or more mental health recovery-focused Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index (ReQoL-UI), when using alternative within-trial statistical methods. We describe possible reasons for the different QALY estimates based on the interaction between item scores, health state profiles, preference-based scores, and mathematical and statistical methods chosen. METHODS QALYs are calculated over 8 weeks from a case study 2:1 (intervention:control) randomized controlled trial in patients with anxiety or depression. Complete case and with missing cases imputed using multiple-imputation analyses are conducted, using unadjusted and regression baseline-adjusted QALYs. Cost-effectiveness is judged using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and acceptability curves. We use previously established psychometric results to reflect on estimated QALYs. RESULTS A total of 361 people (241:120) were randomized. EQ-5D-5L crosswalk produced higher incremental QALYs than the value set for England or ReQoL-UI, which produced similar unadjusted QALYs, but contrasting baseline-adjusted QALYs. Probability of cost-effectiveness <£30 000 per QALY ranged from 6% (complete case ReQoL-UI baseline-adjusted QALYs) to 64.3% (multiple-imputation EQ-5D-5L crosswalk unadjusted QALYs). The control arm improved more on average than the intervention arm on the ReQoL-UI, a result not mirrored on the EQ-5D-5L nor condition-specific (Patient-Health Questionnaire-9, depression; Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, anxiety) measures. CONCLUSIONS ReQoL-UI produced contradictory cost-effectiveness results relative to the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L's better responsiveness and "anxiety/depression" and "usual activities" items drove the incremental QALY results. The ReQoL-UI's single physical health item and "personal recovery" construct may have influenced its lower 8-week incremental QALY estimates in this patient sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Medical School, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Angel Enrique
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge Palacios
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Derek Richards
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gumley AI, Bradstreet S, Ainsworth J, Allan S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Birchwood M, Briggs A, Bucci S, Cotton S, Engel L, French P, Lederman R, Lewis S, Machin M, MacLennan G, McLeod H, McMeekin N, Mihalopoulos C, Morton E, Norrie J, Reilly F, Schwannauer M, Singh SP, Sundram S, Thompson A, Williams C, Yung A, Aucott L, Farhall J, Gleeson J. Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-174. [PMID: 35639493 DOI: 10.3310/hlze0479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relapse is a major determinant of outcome for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Early warning signs frequently precede relapse. A recent Cochrane Review found low-quality evidence to suggest a positive effect of early warning signs interventions on hospitalisation and relapse. OBJECTIVE How feasible is a study to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital intervention to recognise and promptly manage early warning signs of relapse in schizophrenia with the aim of preventing relapse? DESIGN A multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group cluster randomised controlled trial involving eight community mental health services, with 12-month follow-up. SETTINGS Glasgow, UK, and Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Service users were aged > 16 years and had a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with evidence of a relapse within the previous 2 years. Carers were eligible for inclusion if they were nominated by an eligible service user. INTERVENTIONS The Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Wellbeing, Engagement, and Recovery (EMPOWER) intervention was designed to enable participants to monitor changes in their well-being daily using a mobile phone, blended with peer support. Clinical triage of changes in well-being that were suggestive of early signs of relapse was enabled through an algorithm that triggered a check-in prompt that informed a relapse prevention pathway, if warranted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcomes were feasibility of the trial and feasibility, acceptability and usability of the intervention, as well as safety and performance. Candidate co-primary outcomes were relapse and fear of relapse. RESULTS We recruited 86 service users, of whom 73 were randomised (42 to EMPOWER and 31 to treatment as usual). Primary outcome data were collected for 84% of participants at 12 months. Feasibility data for people using the smartphone application (app) suggested that the app was easy to use and had a positive impact on motivations and intentions in relation to mental health. Actual app usage was high, with 91% of users who completed the baseline period meeting our a priori criterion of acceptable engagement (> 33%). The median time to discontinuation of > 33% app usage was 32 weeks (95% confidence interval 14 weeks to ∞). There were 8 out of 33 (24%) relapses in the EMPOWER arm and 13 out of 28 (46%) in the treatment-as-usual arm. Fewer participants in the EMPOWER arm had a relapse (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.98), and time to first relapse (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.74) was longer in the EMPOWER arm than in the treatment-as-usual group. At 12 months, EMPOWER participants were less fearful of having a relapse than those in the treatment-as-usual arm (mean difference -4.29, 95% confidence interval -7.29 to -1.28). EMPOWER was more costly and more effective, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3041. This incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be considered cost-effective when using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. LIMITATIONS This was a feasibility study and the outcomes detected cannot be taken as evidence of efficacy or effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS A trial of digital technology to monitor early warning signs that blended with peer support and clinical triage to detect and prevent relapse is feasible. FUTURE WORK A main trial with a sample size of 500 (assuming 90% power and 20% dropout) would detect a clinically meaningful reduction in relapse (relative risk 0.7) and improvement in other variables (effect sizes 0.3-0.4). TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN99559262. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 27. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding in Australia was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1095879).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew I Gumley
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Simon Bradstreet
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephanie Allan
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maximillian Birchwood
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul French
- Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Reeva Lederman
- School of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shôn Lewis
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Machin
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Hamish McLeod
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola McMeekin
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cathy Mihalopoulos
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma Morton
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Swaran P Singh
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Suresh Sundram
- Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Thompson
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Chris Williams
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alison Yung
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Farhall
- Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,NorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Gleeson
- Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Peters E, Hardy A, Dudley R, Varese F, Greenwood K, Steel C, Emsley R, Keen N, Bowe S, Swan S, Underwood R, Longden E, Byford S, Potts L, Heslin M, Grey N, Turkington D, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Morrison A. Multisite randomised controlled trial of trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis to reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms in people with co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder and psychosis, compared to treatment as usual: study protocol for the STAR (Study of Trauma And Recovery) trial. Trials 2022; 23:429. [PMID: 35606886 PMCID: PMC9125351 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06215-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with psychosis have high rates of trauma, with a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence rate of approximately 15%, which exacerbates psychotic symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations. Pilot studies have shown that trauma-focused (TF) psychological therapies can be safe and effective in such individuals. This trial, the largest to date, will evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a TF therapy integrated with cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (TF-CBTp) on post-traumatic stress symptoms in people with psychosis. The secondary aims are to compare groups on cost-effectiveness; ascertain whether TF-CBTp impacts on a range of other meaningful outcomes; determine whether therapy effects endure; and determine acceptability of the therapy in participants and therapists. Methods Rater-blind, parallel arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing TF-CBTp + treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU only. Adults (N = 300) with distressing post-traumatic stress and psychosis symptoms from five mental health Trusts (60 per site) will be randomised to the two groups. Therapy will be manualised, lasting 9 months (m) with trained therapists. We will assess PTSD symptom severity (primary outcome); percentage who show loss of PTSD diagnosis and clinically significant change; psychosis symptoms; emotional well-being; substance use; suicidal ideation; psychological recovery; social functioning; health-related quality of life; service use, a total of four times: before randomisation; 4 m (mid-therapy); 9 m (end of therapy; primary end point); 24 m (15 m after end of therapy) post-randomisation. Four 3-monthly phone calls will be made between 9 m and 24 m assessment points, to collect service use over the previous 3 months. Therapy acceptability will be assessed through qualitative interviews with participants (N = 35) and therapists (N = 5–10). An internal pilot will ensure integrity of trial recruitment and outcome data, as well as therapy protocol safety and adherence. Data will be analysed following intention-to-treat principles using generalised linear mixed models and reported according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Social and Psychological Interventions Statement. Discussion The proposed intervention has the potential to provide significant patient benefit in terms of reductions in distressing symptoms of post-traumatic stress, psychosis, and emotional problems; enable clinicians to implement trauma-focused therapy confidently in this population; and be cost-effective compared to TAU through reduced service use. Trial registration ISRCTN93382525 (03/08/20) Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06215-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Peters
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amy Hardy
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. .,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle University, London, UK
| | - Filippo Varese
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathryn Greenwood
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Craig Steel
- Oxford Centre for Psychological Health, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nadine Keen
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Swan
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raphael Underwood
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Longden
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Potts
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Margaret Heslin
- Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Grey
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Doug Turkington
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle University, London, UK
| | - David Fowler
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Purpose ‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors. Methods Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined. Results Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators. Conclusion The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.
Collapse
|
47
|
Dawoud D, Lamb A, Moore A, Bregman C, Rupniewska E, Paling T, Wolfram V, Lovett RES, Dent R. Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2167-2173. [PMID: 35247152 PMCID: PMC9188493 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In July 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initiated a major review of its health technology evaluation methods to update its methods guide. This update has recently concluded with the publication of its health technology evaluation manual in January 2022. This paper reports the methods and findings of the review in relation to the recommended approach to use for the measurement and valuation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in submissions to NICE. Issues related to (i) the methods to use when NICE’s preferred measure (EQ-5D) is not appropriate or not available; (ii) adjusting health state utility values over time to account for age; (iii) measuring and valuing HRQoL in children and young people; and (iv) including carers’ QoL in economic evaluations were included in this review. This commentary summarises the methods used to undertake the review, its findings, and the changes to NICE methods that were proposed based on these findings. It also outlines topics where further research is needed before definitive methods guidance can be issued. The broad proposals described here were subject to a public consultation in 2020 and a further consultation on the updated methods guidance was completed in October 2021 before the publication of the manual in January 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia Dawoud
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.
| | - Alan Lamb
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Alan Moore
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Bregman
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Ewa Rupniewska
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas Paling
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Verena Wolfram
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ross Dent
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wallace K, Stewart EA, Wise LA, Nicholson WK, Parry JP, Zhang S, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Jacoby V, Anchan RM, Diamond MP, Venable S, Shiflett A, Wegienka GR, Maxwell GL, Wojdyla D, Myers ER, Marsh E. Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life After Procedural Intervention for Uterine Fibroids. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2022; 31:415-424. [PMID: 34101502 PMCID: PMC8972021 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Quality of life (QOL) and psychological health has been reported to be decreased among women with gynecological conditions such as uterine fibroids (UFs). Materials and Methods: Women enrolled in the Comparing Options for Management: PAtient-centered REsults for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) registry, receiving procedural therapy for symptomatic UFs, were eligible for this analysis if they completed a series of health-related QOL surveys administered at three time points (baseline, 6-12 weeks postprocedure, and 1 year postprocedure; n = 1486). Ethical approval for this study was obtained at each recruiting site and the coordinating center (NCT02260752, clinicaltrials.gov). Results: More than 26% (n = 393) of women reported moderate anxiety/depression on the baseline anxiety/depression domain of the Euro-QOL 5-dimension instrument. At both the 6-12 weeks and 1-year postprocedural follow-up, there was significant improvement in the UF QOL symptom severity score (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), the total UF symptom QOL score (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), and the Euro-QOL 5-dimension visual analog scale (p < 0.001, p = 0.004) compared with the preprocedural baseline scores. The reporting of anxiety/depression decreased by 66.4% among women who were at baseline, whereas 5.6% of women previously reporting no anxiety/depression reported anxiety/depression at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: UF symptoms were more severe among women reporting anxiety/depression at baseline. At the 1-year follow-up, health-related QOL scores improved among all women and the prevalence of anxiety/depression decreased in most, but not all women, whereas severity of anxiety/depression worsened in a small percentage of women (5.6%). Overall, these results suggest that UF treatment improves symptoms of anxiety/depression associated with symptomatic UFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kedra Wallace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.,Address correspondence to: Kedra Wallace, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | | | - Lauren A. Wise
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wanda Kay Nicholson
- Center for Women's Health Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - John Preston Parry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Shuaiqi Zhang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Vanessa Jacoby
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Raymond M. Anchan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael P. Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Amber Shiflett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Ganesa R. Wegienka
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - George Larry Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evan R. Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erica Marsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Xu RH, Keetharuth AD, Wang LL, Cheung AWL, Wong ELY. Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:165-176. [PMID: 34338898 PMCID: PMC8327050 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01359-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of three generic preference-based measures and compare their performance in a sample of Hong Kong general population. METHODS Data used for this analysis were obtained from a cross-sectional telephone-based survey in July 2020. Participants were asked to complete several measures, including The EuroQol five-dimensional five levels (EQ-5D-5L), Recovering Quality of Life-Utility Index (ReQoL-UI) and ICEpop CAPability measure for adults (ICECAP-A). Acceptability, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of three measures were assessed as well as the agreement between these instruments. RESULTS Based on data from 500 participants to the survey, a lower mean score of the ICECAP-A (mean = 0.85) was observed compared to the other two measures (meanReQoL-UI = 0.92; meanEQ-5D-5L = 0.92). All three measures showed an acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74, 0.82 and 0.77, respectively) as well as good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.74, 0.82 and 0.77, respectively). Correlation analyses confirmed satisfactory convergent validity and the ability of the measures to differentiate between participants with different health or from socioeconomic status groups. The Bland-Altman plot revealed poor agreement between the three measures. CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed that EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A were psychometrically robust to measure HRQoL in the general HK population. The EQ-5D-5L was more suitable for assessing physical HRQoL, whereas the ICECAP-A and ReQoL-UI were more appropriate for measuring interventions aimed at improving people's well-being and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Huan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | | | - Ling-Ling Wang
- Department of Blood Transfusion, School of Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Annie Wai-Ling Cheung
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dura-Perez E, Goodman-Casanova JM, Vega-Nuñez A, Guerrero-Pertiñez G, Varela-Moreno E, Garolera M, Quintana M, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Barnestein-Fonseca P, Gómez Sánchez-Lafuente C, Mayoral-Cleries F, Guzman-Parra J. The Impact of COVID-19 Confinement on Cognition and Mental Health and Technology Use Among Socially Vulnerable Older People: Retrospective Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e30598. [PMID: 35049505 PMCID: PMC8865547 DOI: 10.2196/30598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 forced the implementation of restrictive measures in Spain, such as lockdown, home confinement, social distancing, and isolation. It is necessary to study whether limited access to basic services and decreased family and social support could have deleterious effects on cognition, quality of life, and mental health in vulnerable older people. Objective This study aims to explore the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia as the main outcome and the quality of life, perceived health status, and depression as secondary outcomes and to analyze the association of living alone and a change in living arrangements with those outcomes and other variables related with the use of technology and health services. Likewise, this study aims to analyze the association of high and low technophilia with those variables, to explore the access and use of health care and social support services, and, finally, to explore the informative-, cognitive-, entertainment-, and socialization-related uses of information and communications technologies (ICTs) during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods This cohort study was conducted in Málaga (Spain). In total, 151 participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, from the SMART4MD (n=75, 49.7%) and TV-AssistDem (n=76, 50.3%) randomized clinical trials, were interviewed by telephone between May 11 and June 26, 2020. All participants had undergone 1-3 assessments (in 6-month intervals) on cognition, quality of life, and mood prior to the COVID-19 breakout. Results The outbreak did not significantly impact the cognition, quality of life, and mood of our study population when making comparisons with baseline assessments prior to the outbreak. Perceived stress was reported as moderate during the outbreak. After correction for multiple comparisons, living alone, a change in living arrangements, and technophilia were not associated with negative mental health outcomes. However, being alone was nominally associated with self-perceived fear and depression, and higher technophilia with better quality of life, less boredom, perceived stress and depression, and also less calmness. Overall, health care and social support service access and utilization were high. The most used ICTs during the COVID-19 outbreak were the television for informative, cognitive, and entertainment-related uses and the smartphone for socialization. Conclusions Our findings show that the first months of the outbreak did not significantly impact the cognition, quality of life, perceived health status, and depression of our study population when making comparisons with baseline assessments prior to the outbreak. Living alone and low technophilia require further research to establish whether they are risk factors of mental health problems during lockdowns in vulnerable populations. Moreover, although ICTs have proven to be useful for informative-, cognitive-, entertainment-, and socialization-related uses during the pandemic, more evidence is needed to support these interventions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04385797; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04385797 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/26431
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Dura-Perez
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.,Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Amanda Vega-Nuñez
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Gloria Guerrero-Pertiñez
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Esperanza Varela-Moreno
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Maite Garolera
- Brain, Cognition and Behavior: Clinical Research, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrasa, Spain
| | - Maria Quintana
- Brain, Cognition and Behavior: Clinical Research, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrasa, Spain
| | - Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Carlos Gómez Sánchez-Lafuente
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Jose Guzman-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|